#🧠|serious-chat
1 messages · Page 535 of 1
Anyone from Kolkata?

sup yall, which country has better uni education russia or turkiye?
Hello, I'm a college student, a fitness trainer, a boxer, and I want a girl so that we can become real friends, take care of each other, talk about everything, and learn English together.
i think turkey is better more good universities and more students from other countries russia is ok but turkey is growing fast
Turkey since they're not a cancer in Europe
Russia has some excellent universities, the only flaw is that research facilities are less interconnected with the rest of Europe, unlike Turkey
@feral river Israel will occupy Gaza 🇮🇱
Another victory for the West
It seems like the countries hated by Allah continue to expand, unlike others lol
@bold forum i keepppppp havin a ban from the another english chat for no reason the shrifty girl got me ban for no reason is that a racist???
Hello
Where are you from
@bold forum hey gimme a reason that's not fair i didn't do anything?!!
You're in the English Hub server, not the right place to discuss other servers
okay i see but just why i got mute while another person said sum bad to me?
ban*
Again, I'm not gonna carry drama over here, this is the English Hub server.
carry drama!! kol khraa then
Yes
He was get banned
But came back
I only speak English and French 
He/she told you "Eat shit" in Arabic
I know because my gf says that to me daily
hahah u gotta k what does it mean, ALSO remember u have no admin feature here 

exactly i meant that but when it is in arabic kol khara its more elegent
???
Ok?
then kol khraaa
Hi writers! I’m Otis Kenny, a web designer who helps authors build polished websites that bring your books to life.
Whether you're launching a book, building a portfolio, or creating an author platform, I build deploy-ready sites (WordPress / Webflow) with elegant design, responsive layouts, and mobile-first SEO.
If you’d like a free mini-audit or mockup—share your homepage link or book cover, and I’ll send you a branded concept sample to envision your site before committing.
Looking to connect with long-term collaborators who want to elevate their author's brand and book marketing.
Happy to chat, answer questions, or walk through how it works.
just keep learning and when you give up try it again until you get fluent
I mean , when I give up in my life , I just quit every useful habit in my entire life
And start drinking
I do the same and i start playing videogames until i burn out
Yo
Yeah , also video games
Do you know that's normal?
I mean, when people is going through something
usually they go to something bad
I think it's normal when happens not often and secondly not too long
like ''vices''
Yeah
No , we need to overcome that shit before it destroy you
I mean , vices are too harmful
Like we have prime time of our life , right and sometimes bad times , so wtf person just quit learning English in bad time . And it happens every time
look at people who consumed that new drog called (i dont remember)
Yes
I quit learning when i get depression
bad feelings makes you to leave things , and it's a like an emotional fight you need to defeat
@thorny steeple how often you get depressed
once a week or more often
Wow
Yeah
And how long it takes you
eight years maybe
So you think about suicide?
though it is not like 24/7 , it's more like you have a thought coming in your mind and you defeat it or it defeats you , if it defeats you , you will spend that day like a shit
and when you give up strugglin with that thought , may be guiltiness or complains about the life you might have...
whatsoever, not at all
Well
İt's hard action actually
Gotta be hard
I keep fighting , i keep learning english despite i had left learning i started and i'm doing great, also i keep studying highschool and finishing
so
Great job
How old are you
For sure
especially men
You re almost 5 years here @sonic lion did you already learn eng btw?
Being driven is a personality trait not a gender one
Nope I was just a lonely child/teenager who learned it by being consuming a lot of media
its not about being driven idk
nvm
specifically men need to accomplish targets in their life because they naturally need to be dominators
it's in our blood
we need to overcome in our job, in our life, in our home
Pop evolutionary psychology crap that's debunked by every serious research but nevermind
to rule is our second name
If that makes your life meaningful keep believing it or whatever
are you male or female
Lmao self help ahh quote
Yes chatting on discord makes us Alexander
LOL
I'm a woman
women always wanted to be rebel to men
What.
What's the meme in Alexander?
Wanting rights makes you a rebel only in a society that benefits from women's oppression, just proved the feminist point
Nothing, it was just an observation
you don't understand anything
Okie dokie I'm just chilling here
A girl doesn't want a nice boy , a efeminated man , she needs a dominator , she needs a leader , she needs a man

that's not occupation, that's liberation
Seems like you're the one wanting a man buddy
and Israeli Gaza was part of the territory of the State of Israel, the sovereignty of the territory has current no nation which is already claiming
maybe a girl would like a nice and stupid manipulable boy to rule over that guy but that's not the mayority
it's just not their 'core' territory which is a province or territory but it could be
Seems like you're molding your life to fit in to some girl's dream boyfriend
Nothing against that but seems shallow
Not at all , you don't understand men's need
Ok
I know what you're talking about
Gender roles is nothing new
I just don't agree with it
And I think it's more liberating to see a human being outside of norms
do you agree with an homosexual woman married to another woman growing a child?
As if I would care what people do with their lives
In their freedom
I couldn't care less who a person chooses to marry or procreate
do you agree or not
Yes
there you are
Got me bruh
have a nice night
And btw what's a feminine men?
man*
efemniate
is someone who apropiates femenine characters as well as posture, doblegated, submissive to a girl, and of course the sexual part where he may like to be f
Got it
As soon there's a girl in the room my male friends all become submissive lol
Being submissive is unattractive for both genders btw
In my opinion
it depends on the context , you can be hospitalary with a new visit }
and serving stuff
Yeah but that's being polite
be girl or not
Basic human decency
I just don't agree that is unattractive specifically for men
Women who are submissive are unattractive too
i gotta go , have a nice day aftern.. or night bye , it was a amusing chatting
Okay bye
of course they are
not in the way you are thinking of but well..
bye see you tomorrow or some day xd
No
Then we need another misogynist to continue the convo
Submissive women are manipulative
I am kinda libertarian
I think they're the ones being manipulated
Or they just have a kink in being submissive
So you support capitalism with minimal state interference?
What yall talking about
We were discussing gender roles

They're good when they're not forced or misogynistic
i think these things are about culture
Gender roles are cultural
True, in some cultures women are seen as less than, and it's normalised
Yeah I guess
i mean for both gender
I heard that in Sweden women are seeing very differently, is that true?
I saw in a Ted Talk so yk suspicious info
Yep
We treat them as humans here
No but fr idk what you mean 💀
I saw a supermodel saying that she lived in Sweden and there women chose the men and not the opposite
so like minarchism
She said she felt more free
If you're talking gender roles then it isn't forced, for example my lil sis is 7 and in school she isn't forced to behave a certain way or play a certain way
That's very nice
I'd say it's pretty even, most women here have access to everything men have so it creates an equality where they can pick and choose who they want instead of settling for someone more successful or educated than them
That's very nice about nordic countries but there's also a paradox that I don't know how to explain
Like even tho nordic countries have more equality in gender roles it still presents higher domesic violence then expected
Ummm
It's not as big as they try to portray it
For sure
I thought you meant the gender equality paradox but yeah, we still have domestic violence here, idk if it's more common than in other countries though
I never heard of gender equality sounds pretty bullshit but I ever heard of the gender struggle
In Iceland they had massive protests over this and it's the only country that did actual progresses over this matter
like the class struggle, survival struggle
are gender struggle a class struggle ?
sounds pretty like bunch of leftists use gender as a stage to create such struggle out of thin air
Still with the incoherent ramblings
and they call it 'gender equality'
and it doesn't have anything to do with the equality
I don't even bother anymore
I think when they shut the fuck up and we don't have that problem
Me when I try to be edgy
Never seen this guy make sense 😭
You can't even argue with him, you don't know what point he tries to make
cuz my point is straightforward as fuck you can't even deny the shit I'm pointing
lmfao it's just that easy
Wo shi ba ba, ni shi bao bao
He's probably just young saying nonsense to feel bold yk
Bro.... He's pushing 30 💀
No waaay
I thought it was a young girl lmfao I didn't even know it was a dude
With that anime ahh profile pic
Minecraft is a Chinese man whose morals doesn't extend beyond what earns him $200
I know him
depends on which level of moral you are mentioning, some aren't even worth 5 USD
LAW/RULE WITHOUT ENFORCEMENT IS TOILET PAPER
only it become matters when we recruit personnels, enforce it under the guns
without it, it's nothing as always
Bro is online 24/7 at age 30
what do you think about sydney sweeneys ad
I thought it was cringe af
No
me too
She's that blonde chick with huge boobs from euphoria
I just searched that name in gifs, yall some gooners
Why is she wearing two jeans
Jeans of course are a reference to "genes"
idk lol
They're basically doing eugenic propaganda for attention
yea sadly
it's super rare to see a girl wearing jeans on the ad
they usually wear skirts exposing skin that attract eyeballs
Its because of her genetics, blonde hair and blue eyes, #totally not a Nazi eugenics ad
Lmao
Her voice annoys me so much I couldn't even watch the ad
Worse thing is that it works 😭
Yup, we’re in full Nazi society rn 😭
Now everyone knows the brand
Where is mysogynist
What's up
I would believe her shit if this was the case
Bro please get medicated 😭😭😭
oh my gosh quite success this one
Why do her arms look emaciated there smh
Why didn't you edit in a desert eagle
you are genius
I remembered another celebrity gossip
nah we gonna delay 3 months then we will report it to WHO
Lmao
I'm so unemployed
before that day if anyone questions, just be like there's nothing have existed
I wish I knew all these names but I'm culturally illiterate
Sjsjsjsj
I watched the harry potter series and the lord of the ring movies last year 💀
I still haven't touched star wars and god knows what else
Oh god
Well, that's not shameful at all
But just out of curiosity, you don't watch movies?
why would I spend some shit at cinema if I can see it in my home with my 4K screen and full adoby audio with fxsound
Asking this because I'm genz and basically grow up watching those
I don't mean cinema as a place, I mean cinema as the seventh art
I only go to cinema with a girl that I'm going to sex with her
and pretend that was a date
I didn't really watch movies or tv shows, I just recently started to catch up
Sure....... we believe that....
PLEASE BRO PLEASE PLEASE DONT PROCREATE
Honestly that's very cool
I imagine you as a child playing chess and reading books
I don't know if I have kids because my developed 'seed' had already spread enough among few people
I was sniffing glue and playing hockey💀
Lmfao
you could imagine a lot of kids holding AK-47 doing salute to their supreme leader, me
Playing hockey what a scandinavian thing to do 🙄
maybe, who knows
Are you pol pot
How can someone make political propaganda their entire personality
And he wants us to believe he's getting laid
it's all about obsession of power ofc I have wanted full totalitarian dictatorship but that didn't happen
Terrible thought
and I'm still happy to live in an authoritarian state
Have you read Foucault
He was a post modern theorist
if you would like to talk about marxism-leninism I'm quite into this field
His views on power are pretty cool
I like it too
but I'm anti-communist
me too
my idea was very based on the marxism theory of development, but I would prefer lassiez-faire development model and adopt totalitarian dictatorship to the society
theory nice but..
it's like... humm all together yeah it was a mixed idea
but generally it's pro-right
yeah I think currently it's most reality based explaination of how society and economy evolves
Proudest serf
one thing we have learned is people shouldn't be applicable to demand stuff at all, they don't know what's the best situation and interest for the whole nation neither they will boost efficiency to help the nation develop faster, it's all based on development
what social structure develops faster and exhaustive is the advanced one - Karl Marx
in modern day social economy it was all based on the only authority entity of what we call the country, also the nation I would say, and in that case it's not very hard to establish a totalitarian dictatorship like what Stalin have done under the idea of socialism in one country
there was never lack of ideas to unify the people who are into this field to make them fight against another group with different political view
and you don't need that if it's under absolute authority
Hi
therefore the powerful authority that you could do anything you want without question and opposition, when it was full focused on the development of the nation, and it was the most advanced structure ever to be exist
Correct
also it's very necessary to place only one intelligent leader to avoid internal turmoils, regulate power struggle, and hold everyone only on himself that ensures the system efficient
the only way to develop ourselves was to follow the nature and rule of development which should not be questioned and infringed by political ideas - Mao Zedong
Communism 🤒
Yes let’s follow mao’s development plans of killing the sparrows
What could go wrong
he's super intelligent but maybe some mistakes were carried out
anyways that's still nothing to his struggle for the whole nation
He’s an excellent writer but when you see how it was carried into practice it’s clearly propaganda
The Four Pests campaign (Chinese: 除四害; pinyin: Chú Sì Hài) was one of the first campaigns of the Great Leap Forward in Maoist China from 1958 to 1962. Authorities targeted four "pests" for elimination: rats, flies, mosquitoes, and sparrows. The extermination of sparrows – also known as the smash sparrows campaign (Chinese: 打麻雀...
Yeah that’s one of the worst decisions in terms of human life in the second half of the 20th century
well not really but that doesn't come out with expected result
Wdym not really? In terms of a single event it may very well be first
Like when you kill the things which eat the pests of course you get more pests
That’s expected
well yes but that wasn't under the expectation so that's skill issue
at that time there wasn't some ecological scientists in our country
The eradication of the four pests together was first mentioned in Mao Zedong's 17-Point Agriculture Policy, in 1955,[note 2][11]: 136 as a way to reduce infectious diseases and grain loss caused by pests.[11]: 137 In January 1956, the 17-point policy was expanded into the draft of National Programme for Agricultural Development (1956–1967), which mentioned that "starting from 1956, we should work to eradicate rats, sparrows, flies, and mosquitoes in all areas possible across the country within five, seven or twelve years".[11]: 137 The draft was adopted by the Central Committee in 1957, with the timeline revised to twelve years.[11]: 140
and some policy do have bad outcome that wasn't surprising
that happens everywhere in reality
There weren’t many but there were some, whether it’s expected or not doesn’t change the result. They tried to play god and it blew up in their faces.
“Millions of sparrows were killed.[25] By April 1960, Chinese communist leaders changed their opinion in part due to the influence of ornithologist Tso-hsin Cheng[26] who pointed out that sparrows ate a large number of insects, as well as grains” like they apparently never heard this before or something?
The better question is why these leaders with obviously limited knowledge were so certain of their policy of playing god
Seems like a clear flaw in the leadership structure if they’re able to do so much without every consulting an expert
well everyone do have limited knowledge but instead they have full execution power without opposition which is a huge advantage in terms of efficiency
Yeah that goes in both directions, they were efficient at completely destroying millions of lives all while working against their goals of increased agricultural output. They had the ego to either not realize their limited knowledge, or the ego to think they knew enough about agriculture to make decisions without consulting relevant experts (which did exist). Either way that shows a systemic issue in the leadership structure
they actually do care about the people and what's the best for the nation
I sort of doubt that, but I never claimed they didn’t
btw you are accusing them because there was an issue that was going on for almost a decade which you mentioned a famine
that famine was very complex and it's very hard to say they caused this famine by killing sparrows
but killing sparrows do worsen the situation
okay im gonna show you do you know what impact the most to the famine ?
that actually has nothing to do with Mao zedong he wasn't in charge at that time
The 1938 Yellow River flood (simplified Chinese: 花园口决堤事件; traditional Chinese: 花園口決堤事件; pinyin: Huāyuánkǒu Juédī Shìjiàn; lit. 'Huayuankou Dam Burst Incident') was a man-made flood from June 1938 to January 1947 created by the intentional destruction of levees on the Yellow River in Huayuankou, Henan, by the Na...
There was food shortages and there had been famines in China for centuries but it’s widely acknowledged at this point that killing the sparrows and forced collectivization caused it. It’s one of if not the worst famines ever.
check this out
that actually has nothing to do with Mao zedong he wasn't in charge at that time
you are talking a famine that was ongoing for almost a decade
Where are you getting this history lmao, that didn’t cause the 59-61 famine lmao
and that was caused, I mean directly by the former leadership
it affected greatly even we recovered that shit at 2006
why the heck you think that has nothing to do with the famine itself ?
It was 20 years later
At that point it’s on agricultural policies
yeah 20 years later they destroyed every source of obtaining food and blame a famine that was caused because of IT
what the fuck is that logic, a famine is caused by lacking of food sources
what will cause lack of food sources
you are talking like he want to starve people
There wasn’t nearly the same amount of death compared to that famine. And there was plenty of time to plan and fix this, what are we even talking about.
that was totally bullshit dude
I never said that I just think he’s an incompetent moron.
well skill issue as I said
I ain't denying it doesn't have bad outcome it did
Skill issue = systemic problem with Chinese governance
well nah it's not a systemic problem, neither it has very great impact to the result
and totalitarian dictatorship do rely on leader's intelligence yeah hard to deny that point
but it still was the most efficient ever to be existed
Yeah that’s the whole point, the totalitarian model can easily suffer massive disaster due to the failures of a single key figure
Other models may safeguard against this
that does not say hard to achieve in democratic states
"meritocratically elected leader" in 2025 🥀
Think of it this way, you got a 1/2 chance of getting a ‘bad’ leader by default.
lol if that's by inheritance
That’s a prior confidence value.
Nale
but we have modern system to elect the Supreme Leader in the party by in-party selection and power struggle to elect intelligent leader
Before taking into account any other variables you start at a horrendously bad likelihood of getting a ‘good’ leader
hummmm till now it's 50/50 in general
even some good leader became bad when they are old
well that case happened a lot of times
but they still made significant achievement if you compare with some prime ministers or presidents
and most of them do have agenda and goal to shape the whole nation and some benefit the people
Okay. Basic math time
so even it's a bad leadership, they do something, and they do something better off the situation
With a singular ruler authority. The chance of getting an ‘all bad’ leadership is 50% at default.
With two leaders it’s 25%
with four it’s 12.5%
and so on and suchforth
It’s harder to get 1000 bad people than it is to get one bad person if you’re picking at random
25%
My math might be off but the point remains
hi
that's why you are electing a leader by process even in totalitarian states that could be the case but not by people's votes
and you can't got a qualified leader by inheritance
in-party selection based on past achievement was quite reliable actually
even everything is on only one person he also need a team to make the administration more efficient and centralized
Mathematically you want a plural executive
there's no such case which a single person would be able to care all of the issues
Or at least a diminished executive
well no ? if the guy was intelligent enough to execute everything on his own, why not
we just ensure how he could be intelligent by this way
but he still needs a team
a team that only cares about what he focus on, absolute loyal and dedication
how do you ensure it
elect them by past achievement and experience was quite reliable
how a Supreme Leader could be qualified as a Supreme Leader if he don't know anything about running a country
democracy has democratic way to elect a President
authoritarian has authoritarian way to elect a Supreme Leader
same thing different logic
how does an authoritarian governnent elect their leader
Democratically, they hold elections
Except it's one choice
what
just finished reading the discussion
you guys are too engraved in your own sentiments to acknowledge certain merits and demerits without over-inflating them
Amen
Bro made the mistake of reading Mein Krafts messages 💔💔💔
you still got a lot ways to elect a leader
most typical one was through election among the officials, to be simple may official and chairman in certain fields or other positions like mayor, provincial governer come up to one stage then elect the leader by vote
that basically ensures the elected leader has the most link with other officials which he could form his own ruling team and do have enough intelligence to run the country by knowledges
it's also election but was not elected by people
again I'm not a fascist
pro-authoritarian doesn't equal to be fascist
How's that supposed to work
Daily messages about suppression of dissidents
"again I'm not a fascist"
it's not only fascism suppress dissidents
0 coherence 0 consistency
100% truth
There's something in Chinese water, no other explanation
we export water to EU
no other explaination
i genuinely thought he was a maoist at first
You don't moron
I do loser
He has no consistency, he'll argue for something then go against it within 10 messages
EU is very famous for its shortage of water, there's so little water here that we import it from China, not Russia or anything closer, China
Minecraft which diagnoses do you have
No💀
I promise you that it isn't, his brain is just mush and he genuinely believes that his incoherent thoughts make sense
You're new here
He's to this channel what dwarves used to be in royal palaces in medieval times
you don't have to make sense with a guy that doesn't make sense
First time I thought it was AI💀
eh not really no
Isis times were crazy online
what makes you think he make sense by accusing other's doesn't make any sense
btw you are not making any sense right now
he has the consistency of an outspoken chinese nationalist who thinks China has mastered the art of solving contradictions when they simply overcompensated with having mundane managerial capitalism
He's not a Chinese nationalist 💀 He supports whomever is winning even if it means China is losing
"btw you are not making any sense right now"
he vouched for Xi Jinping when it comes to making capitalism efficient, he's made a case about how great Deng was in revolutionizing China's transition to the market economy. the only time he sullied his position was whenever he regretted China's low modern military intervention compared to the US
there wasn't very much about how you gonna solve contradictions by Chinese way, it was just depends how you view it and what you gonna do with it
a fervent chinese supporter who laments that China is losing in the grander field of the arm's race because it kept sticking to trade pragmatism when rival nations are looking to agitate thru military means is as common as a stray cat.
that's just your average warhawk in a Bilibili forum
novascuteass has been timed out 

Reason: Posting NSFW Websites
I don't know why people obsessed about China with me actually I even do praise US and Israel more
that exists everywhere
liberals in the west also as common as a stray cat
that's just your average lefthawk in the west
That says everything we need to know about your takes lmao
who brought up liberals
you just added to my point with this
now before anyone says "why is the china guy a Zionist" China currently ranks 2nd among Israel's most prolific trading partner and is Israel's foremost EV supplier
well nah I support Israel because they fight against terrorism that stays irrelevant to China
I'm not a Chinese nationalist
against terrorism that what
Wym terrorism
they fight against terrorism around the region and islamic influences
i mean, yes beyond breaking the west's leg and extending its economic interest in Palestine's reconstruction China has no moral motive in boarding negotiations between Freedom Fighters and willing Israel delegates let alone supporting Hamas
oh so you're just an islamophobe got it
there's no Palestine
Palestine was a name of a region
i'll let u be with your convictions gang
there's only one state around that region which is the State of Israel
sure sure
that was the total truth, not my claim btw
sir yessir
remember most debatebro regulars in this chat are too driven
what a pretentious dude lmao
girl you don't wanna know
He just enjoys the sound of his own voice
He spent months after months and day after day reforcing his ideas to whoever pays a little attention
I bet he j*rks off of shocking people
I feel nice about how you would anticipate what I'm thinking by your way even it's negative towards me
I don't mind that, a lot of people do have negative evaluations towards me
nothing really surprise me about
I do enjoy my own voice ? good question I would say 50/50
You must enjoy because the only thing you talk about is your interest in totalitarianism
who the fuck else you could enjoy if you don't enjoy your own
You even manipulate topics to fit into your interest
Idk you could just... be interested in the world around you?
not only I used to talk about a lot of stuff
last time I was talking about how I'm appreciating the idea of the discrimination based on gender, race should not be carried
I was interested in the world around me
you can't find another person in this chat who knows more about what's happening in the world than me
bet
We definitely can't find a person more delusional than you
what do you mean discrimination based on gender? in what ways?
a guy who don't even have an idea would say I'm delusional
make sense
I mean people shouldn't be discriminated by race, gender etc.
That's just common sense
some people do have their common sense based on leftism propaganda
Idk my ideas are definitely not original, you have a point
not very surprising
I'm not on manifesto competition tho
but in a very pragmatic way, this does have benefit under the perspective of the development of the whole nation
Well
I meant more in a way that everything I thought has been thought before me
Like none of my ideas are my own really
They're constructed socially
are you still there
if you hold the gun to say that was your idea, then it's yours
lol
is race a social construct?
you have an idea or not based on your power projection
you don't have power projection ofc your idea doesn't matter
it matters when it was enforced under the guns
Ok that scalated pretty quickly
Why so beligerant man
Yes and no
society was a survival struggle
Ideas around race are
lmao
Was?
yeah it is
I just got here kinda
only losers would use some leftism logics to beg people to have common sense to be sympathy about their situation which was caused by their failure and useless

survival for the fittest
survival of the fittest isn't necessarily true throughout history and nature
there's a book called survival of the sickest. depending on the environment, certain extremes/spectrums (ex. being more average or worse) can actually be more beneficial to survival and reproduction
i don't knwo , but what i do know is that i'm eating a delicious beef stew with vegetables
it's not a food for poor people btw
You say this because you mustn't have any idea what poverty is like
who says the opossite will must die
I know what is natural selection and how it works
btw, you're forgetting sexual selection. there are actually many selections and different effects, not necessarily the best will survive
I don't belive you anything with that name
How rational you are
Be less emotional bud
my emotional levels are well
oh yeah i forgot this chat is unapologetically right wing
Yeah it's such a simplistic interpretation, he is just instrumentalizing it to support his ideology
That's why I always left if with a headache
haha get it always left
stop taking personally everything bud
the truth lies somewhere in between
depends on the circumstances
i don't entertain debates for gratuitous sakes unless i'm hella bored so i wouldn't know
Politics isn't fantasy bro it has real effect in the world
pansy
I would just prefer to have an honest conversation but people are hard sometimes
Centrist spot
I'm being honest
personally, i'd lean towards the right in the modern landscape though
there we go
honesty is good
anyways
You're too attached to your persona of the gym bro who is dominant and so on
who wants to talk about world war two
sure, what you want to talk about?
the gass chambers and concetration fields
Why the germans did that against the jews
what happened in that moment
i know world war two is so extensive to talk about , so I just wanna know what was happening
if you know something about the SS
etc
antisemitism has been around for centuries
how many extermination fields there were
they were an easy scapegoat for him to use
Yeah but he had no economical reason to do it it was pretty much an obsession
okay go ahead girls i won't write so i don't interrput you while you are telling me the stuff
it is a great way to motivate the people of the time
antisemitism was widespread back then, economy was poor before he gained power, by correlating the economic improvement of a war economy and with the jewish people, it made it easier for propaganda to support him
furthermore, any mistakes he made, he could easily blame the jewish people
But no one really knew what he was doing in the concentration camps
The brutality of it was an obsession
To exterminate and so on
well for some part, yes. but also, their research conducted was actually highly detailed and advanced. to the point some modern day medical textbooks still use diagrams from their camps
it is hilarious, the soviets also heavily persecuted the jewish people, yet no one mentions that
Even the officers had to work drunk
I had no idea too
did you know the soviets 🍇 almost 2 million german women after ww2?
The soviets get away with a lot of things
I herd somewhere that extermine camps were a myth , an old woman advocating about that happen.
Oh my god, that's so awful
an old ''german'' woman
i know right, im so disappointed in how schools teach history
in america, our society barely acknowledges the war crimes and atrocities of the soviet union
i would argue the soviet union was as bad as germany during ww2
This is literally the most documented event on history with millions of victims telling their experience but sure, one woman is debunking it
Don't believe sensationalist crap
My communists friends treat the USSR as a paradise sometimes, like they did nothing wrong and everything is propaganda
It makes me so pissed
💔
I'm learning a lot about their atrocities now
have your communist friends known any people that actually experienced communism?
Probably not since we're not slavic
so , I'm more convinced from the USA telling than what that old german woman was spreading in her final years of life.
She was nuts probably
its sad, but some people don't listen to enough sides of story
what do you mean by that
I know the Sionists are doing a bad paper doing what they do in palestine
Yeah
oh my god, can you stop with the antisemitism
almost all the politicians are J
Dude
its genuinely so edgy and gives off 14 year old "save europe" reels type of energy
You're falling into conspiracy again
Lol
I'm not being antisemtisim I'm talking about Sionism
wait, what country are you from? im american
I'm brazilian
ah brazil, unfortunately, i only know about your culture from rio (the movie)😭
Yeah Latam sucks
LMAO
Unfortunately I don't live in Rio de Janeiro
it is not a paradise but they did a good job under Lenin and Stalin's leadership
In my region people are pretty conservative and white
Stalin was j
Brazil is very diverse
they committed a whole genocide under stalin
Lenin I agree, he did great stuff
But Stalin?
Stalin was J
Oh god
did you guys know that
stalin persecuted the jews too buddy
Of course
Stalin rapidly transformed a backward state to a global superpower by implement centralized planned economy and winning against Nazi Germany, restoring Russian dominance over the East Europe
actually Stalin did more what Lenin has contributed to the Soviet Union
without lenin, there would be no stalin.
Did more in terms of what?
but he's also a betrayal to the communist agenda but more focused on his own idea of socialism in one country
but still a great controversial legendary leader
and yeah he caused the Ukraine great famine that was one of his biggest mistake
And Lenin was the one leading the revolution
you can praise its accomplishments, but to call it a "good job" under a dictatorship is fairly misleading
You can't possible not admire the man
it is a good job and great achievement under dictatorship
At last it depends on what book you have read from , the winners tells their own storie
well nobody's gonna deny that ?
stalin caused the 🍇 of almost 2 million german women, ranging from the children to the elderly.
they killed all the husbands and sons, looted the homes, and violated the mothers and daughters
does that contradict to the achievements of the Soviet Union ?
gRape being a way of dominance in nations just proves that women are facing an even greater war
is Stalin, a german ?
Gosh that makes me so sick
I don't think so
Bro
i never said they didn't have achievements. i stated that 🍇 makes stalin's method clearly not good.
based on your idea okay but that doesn't contradicting to what I'm saying
he is clearly morally bankrupt. this prevents him from doing a "good job" when he could've done a less rapid but more morally acceptable approach
Stalin is not a german
How can you be this cold man
doesn't contradict*
he's not cold, he's just edgy. he'd change up tunes if it was his own mother/sister
is not contradicting*
Stalin's dead.
neither he represent the interest of the german nation
Yeah for sure
Looks like it's time for another Soviet joke, haha
if you would say he caused Ukraine famine which is in his territory and hurt his own people it's a failure and mistake I would say yes
completely agreed
I remember a lot of Soviet jokes.
but what he have done to German soldiers or civilians obviously has nothing to do with his own nation's achievements
dude, it was a genocide. he purposely killed those people in ukraine.
neither it contradicting to how he's gonna achieve it
There's a communist narrative that it was a n@zi propaganda
purposely killed was a little bit over it's actually caused by a mistaken policy that collected more grains off the people than what they have ancitipated
and that caused famine
by the way, if we're talking about territories, stalin purposely divided many ethnicities and states such as kazakhstan and uzbekistan
he literally caused border disputes that are still fought to this day
that's in one country called the Soviet Union, he's for the Soviet Union
Kazakhstan and Uzbekistan was part of the Soviet territory at that day
not his issue dude
that's what have been decided after the establishment of the Soviet Union
stalin himself literally decided to separate them
or united them for his own benefit
👀
well okay so nothing really bad happened under his rule ?
why does that matter
mass deportations into foreign countries, which many people froze or starved to death
aren't those his people?
The Soviet Union hasn't done anything bad for more than 30 years. Why do you still hate it so much?
why i'm not seeing any phrasal verb sence so much time ? e.e something is happening
I mean what mass deportation exactly happened ?
can you provide some sources or examples
latvians, chechens, poles
way more ethnicities than i can list
he was literally ethnically cleansing them
using leftism logic in 21 century to evaluate Stalin was totally off the table
and that doesn't cause any issues to the Soviet Union
obviously irrelevant
eventually, the mass deportations led them to break off from the soviet union 💀
also stalin promoted alcohol to the people
hummm hard to say if that's because of Stalin actually more because of his sucessor
russia still has a deadly alcohol addiction to this day
that's fine actually
Don't worry about it, this is a unique Chinese way of teaching Soviet people to love the Soviet Union, haha
their own problem to live in such cold place that they need drink alcohol to generate heat against it
that's just natural condition limitations
the alcohol literally killed their people off
from 1990-2001, alcohol consumption caused 3 million deaths in russia 💀
btw, lenin hated alcohol,
called it the "weapon of bourgeoisie"
speaking of russia killing their people off
but they have to consume it to maintain the national economy
still beneficial to the state
nobody talking about stalin's USSR here knows what a NEP is
jst slide it in gng 💔
I'll be gentle
Classic Lenin saying “time to do state capitalism cause the revolution can only happen in Germany”
im tired of people caring some stupid shit
في حدا عربي
👀
this is a bit dismissive. Lenin bet all his chips on the Spartacist Revolution when his economic plan was already in the works, except it was intended to develop the material transition to communism's infancy which he hoped would've been pioneered by the event. when it failed, the NEP took a pragmatic turn into consolidating the interests of the peasantry and small businesses to centralize wealth to recoup war losses.
Bukharin oriented the NEP to establish a market system before Stalin tampered with him
i half expected the Zionist to recognize the deportations as a kind of ethnic-purifying valor the way they praise Nakba for booting out arabs but i'll settle with denial
law/rule without enforcement is toilet paper
everyone is saying ethnic-purifying but they barely knows how it does impact to the society and the state
they don't want to talk about it
survival for the fittest
I think this is very optimistic about Lenin’s intent tbh.
The Russians never needed the spartacist uprising to succeed, though it would’ve helped.
The more likely explanation is played out both through all of Lenin’s actions and everyone who claims to be a Leninist or offshoot of Leninist (I.e. Marxist Leninist) and their actions.
It always ends with a system of governance where a party elite consolidates power for themselves and replaced the pre existing hierarchy with the proletariat subjugated to the party and state instead of capitalists. Considering he stamped out workers councils and jailed anarchists and communists in opposition to him, it’s considerably more likely his writings to be propaganda.
Marx’s main reason for stating capitalism as a necessary development was because of his belief that the contradictions would inevitably lead to revolution. But the revolution (which was more Trotsky than Lenin on the ground) had been completed, but instead of letting workers guide themselves through the necessary developments or even straight to socialism with focus on building heavy industry, they subjugated workers.
what's up guys, I'm a CS major at cmu, I know how tough it is to grind long hours. so I decided to make an app to help students power through long study sessions without crashing 🧠
https://lock-in.ai is an AI study coach for deep focus and zero burnout. Use student discount code I8KWRGCX for 20% off this week—let me know how it goes!
I also like to keep in mind that mainstream leftists at the time were wary of Lenin due to his beliefs, and he faced frequent criticism from communists. The bolsheviks themselves were the result of a party split caused by Lenin’s dogmatic beliefs that others viewed as wrong
well Marx's idea has nothing to do with heavy industries, if you would say heavy industries that was the idea of Stalin and he's thinking how to transform a backward state to a industrialized global power, he predicted the next war and made 5-years plan which only focus on heavy industry by sacrifice farmer's interest to be industrialized
I never said Marx’s idea included heavy industries, that was a hypothetical I threw out
also in general marxism the class definition of the farmers was little bourgeoisie
most of them own lands in europe which is the means of production
True but this isn’t really relevant to the topic at hand
whoah seems I am lost xdd
Ionly referred to his writings about the Revolution, he obviously operated under Russia's own circumstances but the success would've bolstered his ideas more on state abolition and, somehow, the innovated militant body of the proletariat to ensure the compliance of institutions protecting class antagonism. sadly, Luxemburg wasn't this bold
the Bolsheviks' main priorities were recollecting assets and socioeconomic stability after the Civil War, and they needed to encourage market activities with a mixed economy plan. i'm not trying to absolve Lenin of his degrading Vanguardist integrity here, many of left SRs and anarchists were rightfully critical of the collectivization policies and Lenin himself was limp during a good remainder of his supervising role nearing the end of his life. but he was optimistic until he chose Bukharin to take the wheel and Trotsky to deal with rebelling anarchists e.g Kronstadt.
Yeah, I guess my issue is I just don’t trust a thing his public facing writings say. I view it as personal PR. Whatever he may personally believe, he certainly acted antithetical to his stated belief in socialism, whether by incompetence or malice doesn’t concern me too much
ehhh it was still on track with his idea of realizing Marx's lower phase. The "Leninism" in Marxist-Leninism is often credited as the ideology's practice school. reminder that Socialism in One Country was Stalin's idea, Lenin only contrived a restorative state capitalist policy with the hopes that everyone would cooperate
the many compromises blurred the line between ideological advancement and post-war revitalization, but his later writings still contained brimming socialist zeal towards his programs
I don’t think he even worked towards socialism well tbh, I understand how it could’ve been conceived of as a state capitalist policy being necessary for socialism, but it doesn’t explain his anti-socialist policies. And yeah, while Lenin didn’t come up with socialism in one state it certainly seems like the logical conclusion of his policy.
Whatever Lenin fancied himself or fantasized about in his writings may be good, but it just contrasts with the on the ground realities
I ain't reading aladat
there was no true socialist policy that didn't involve tailoring Capitalism to be progressive for a long while. he was equally valiant through many self-determination and indigeneity diversification programs like the Korenizatsiya as he was viceful with snuffing out oppositions to the Bolsheviks.
the aftermath of the civil war was him tidying up scraps.
Well yeah, my point is that when you see his actions as a whole it doesn’t appear to be socialist oriented, and when his writings are put in the context of his actions and positions in society, they hold different meanings.
For every program like the Korenizatsiia there is also something like the invasion of Ukraine after its independence. To me that would suggest programs to indigenous communities to be less about being self determination based and more about the practicality of offering autonomy as pacification to prevent indigenous communities from revolting from the extremely fragile state
most self-liberation policies had that tendency. and other than the fact the native-affirmation policies took place after the civil war, the invasions of Ukraine during Lenin's active years were prominently carried to quell Nazi-aligned white movements, thus the program inevitably had to be arranged to molify even said movements. the one time Bolsheviks were frothing for Ukraine seemingly out of absorbed importance was the 1919 invasion.
isfrun isfrun, may i ask some experts say that birds are the descendants of dinosaurs recently, is that for real @manic juniper
I’m not sure how that contradicts anything I said or changes anything
Birds are dinosaurs
oh i wasn't refuting, just clearing up some historic justifications to relieve bad faith interpretations.
Yes, many consider them to be dinosaurs
hey friends , can we solve a DSA question together on Discord for job preparation in start-up and also MNC , so if you are interested then Dm Me !!! , i am serious for job
REMEMBER WHO YOU AREEEEEE
BOK 🗣️🗣️🗣️
Whats MNC
Yoo wassup
WHHHAAAT
Multinational Corporation ,Some well-known MNCs include Apple, Toyota, Nestle, and Coca-Cola.
Nah. Dinosaurs are the descendants of birds, they just devolved back because they realized it's immoral to be predators.
They are all fucking dead because they can’t survive under that natural condition lmfao
Your animal moral theory my ass
Sounds like they feel immoral so they killed themselves
🤣
Actually, they didn't die according to evolutionists. Modern day birds are Dinosaurs.
Funny as always flare
Total displeasure that you like my jokes. Thank you. Lol.

who got a sever i will join
Minecraft is back
Do you ask or telling us
Did u make a server?
Ruined my week
Guys, you know that there is a flat earth voice channel in this server. Me and my friend want to prove that the flat earth theory is false. Me and my friend want to prove that to the Earth is round. We intend to start it at 1300 o’clock GMT +0 of a 24 hour clock today. If you want to join us please Direct message me. I will provide information debunking flat earth in a PDF file. Please help us win. We could really use some good debaters, and just join if you can and help the cause. Who’s with me? We shall conquer! Down with flat earth!
You failed before starting, if you talk with flat believers it mean you talk with stupid, if you talk with stupid you can't prove him anything.
But good luck
gimme some serious info
Dm me
well said brother 👍. totally agree with you.
How serious are we talking
You do not need to prove that the earth is flat. Science has already proved this. Trying to argue with people who believe in it, is in vain. You will only waste time.
For what?
Chaos is necessary
No chaos 😔
Looks tasty
The less chaos the bigger peace 🕊️ (wtf is this!)
Pookie 💔◀️👤🪦
Muslims would go on and on about how ISIS is a Mossad and CIA conspiracy when it doesn't make any sense.
Sure, ISIS can never be an organic part of the Muslim world. Decades of tolerating hate speech against other religious and non-religious groups and militarized religious texts from Quran and Sunnah people read and memorize all the time certainly aren't what gave rise to radical groups, it's the evil organizations with members in black hoodies working in the shadows.
very serious!
Wow. You've leveled up. I'm proud of you.
Also, It's just weird how ISIS never spoken against the Israeli occupation.. Instead, they had no problem openly loathing any Palestinian resistance group. They've for long killed all types of Muslims and attacked many Muslim majority countries, never in my life have I heard they've even accidentally attacked the Israeli occupation. It should be point of focus for them if they claim to be 'devout' Muslims since Al-Aqsa is right there.
I'm not saying they are Mossad agents, but I'm considering the possibility of them being allies with the occupation. It's of the occupation's interest to spread terror and corruption in middle eastern countries.
How do you know they never spoken against Israel? Are you following their channels or what?
Anyway, you are wrong. They often encouraged Palestinians to stab Israeli settlers. Wilayat Sina'a also attacked Israel borders in 2012 when a group of them killed Egyptian soldiers, took Egyptian armored vehicles and one of got into Israeli borders. That was before they allied with ISIS, but even after that they did try to attack Israel with rockets multiple times from Egypt and Israel cooperated with Egypt to air strike their positions.
Most of ISIS victims are Muslims because they think their ends justify the means, and innocent Muslims they kill in the way would go to heaven anyway. They operate in Muslim countries and their focus is to control those countries first then they would start attack others, and that makes sense from their point of view and even from an Islamic point of view generally, make Sharia rule first then spread it.
And despite that, they continue to attack non-Muslim countries and people despite how it's not strategic at all for them.
Is this true?
The idea that Israel behind them is so silly. Why would Israel plant a group that hates it in an unstable region? Are they stupid enough to not consider that it could get out of control and the new leadership for countries around them would be a group like ISIS that wants war? You don't remember how big regions of Iraq and Syria fell in the hands of ISIS rapidly and how many people at first celebrated them?
I don't think Israelis are this stupid, and Arab countries have always been weak anyway so they never posed a real threat on Israel's existence even at its worst moments. Even in the 1973 war, the Egyptian army would never had succeeded in taking Israel. In fact, Israel would've occupied Cairo if the war continued for so long. Israeli forces penetrated Egyptian lines before the peace deal.
Can’t blame all the baddies together
Actually, ISIS's attacks on Muslims are largely based on their Takfir ideology.
From their point of view, it would still make more sense to attack the occupation first. They have never formally declared any attack on the occupation, though. Also, the occupation may play it in a way that clear them of suspicions.
Anyways, it was just a thought process. Maybe they are not. I don't know.
Didn't say they are one group. Just allies due to aligning interests.
Blocked?
Sure
No. It’s unblock day.
No
And their Takfir ideology stems from how large chunks of Muslim populations don't adhere to true traditional Islam. As I said, it's not strategic for them to split their focus across multiple targets, they already have enough on their plate and yet their allies in Saina still continued to try and attack Israel and they encouraged Palestinians to stab Israeli settlers through their media outlets.
Nah. They excommunicate anyone who doesn't adhere to their own ideologies. Not that Muslims are not adhering to true traditional Islam.
You don't miss any opportunity to stab Islam, don't you.
Brother even mainstream Muslim yap about how Muslims don't adhere to "true Islam" anymore.
Haven't you ever heard Muslims complaining about Hudud not implemented and how mosques aren't crowded anymore?
When ISIS ruled they cut off the hands of thieves, stoned adulterers, executed murderers, implemented jizyah and Dhimmi laws on non-Muslims, forced women to wear hijab, made men stop having haram haircuts, etc...
Are you challenging bloody Muslims brothe
I do miss lol
You guys kill and imprison whoever criticize your belief, so I have no outlet to share my thoughts other than online.
It really baffles me how you hold this idea that your religion is under attack when you suppress its criticism everywhere, whether with violence and legal action in the Muslim world or with accusations of Islamophobia and victimhood card in free societies.
Nope. Never heard one Sheikh complains about 'Huded not being implemented'. It's not even 'implementing huded', it's upholding Sharia.
A lot people not going to mosques is indeed a problem that is spoken about a lot, that doesn't mean they do not adhere to true traditional Islam or that they have left the religion.
Even implementing Hudud is something people and Sheikhs complain about all the time. I grew up hearing them fantasizing about cutting off the hands of thieves.
هل عدم تطبيق الحدود في الدولة الإسلامية يعد معصية لله؟الشيخ مصطفى العدوي
ISIS is organic. Its rise is no surpirse to me.
I'm sure you'll find a lot of material in Jewish and Christian bible to criticize too.
Maybe:
2 If a man or woman living among you in one of the towns the Lord gives you is found doing evil in the eyes of the Lord your God in violation of his covenant, 3 and contrary to my command has worshiped other gods, bowing down to them or to the sun or the moon or the stars in the sky, 4 and this has been brought to your attention, then you must investigate it thoroughly. If it is true and it has been proved that this detestable thing has been done in Israel, 5 take the man or woman who has done this evil deed to your city gate and stone that person to death.
[Deuteronomy 17:2-5]
There are many non-Islamic terrorist groups as well to criticize. You don't have to cling so tightly to propaganda and Islamophobia together.
<2>" If there is found among you, within any of your towns which the Lord your God gives you, a man or woman who does what is evil in the sight of the Lord your God, in transgressing his covenant, <3> and has gone and served other gods and worshiped them, or the sun or the moon or any of the host of heaven, which I have forbidden, <4> and it is told you and you hear of it; then you shall inquire diligently, and if it is true and certain that such an abominable thing has been done in Israel, <5> then you shall bring forth to your gates that man or woman who has done this evil thing, and you shall stone that man or woman to death with stones.
1- This is obviously not relevant to me.
2- Islamic terrorism is more common and Islamic fanaticism is more common and intense than its counterparts.
Porpaganda and Islamophobia lol
Also, from what I know Jews adhere to rabincal traditions not to the bible, no?
They're also not competent enough, no wonder why more than 80% victims of islamic terrorism are muslims
/s
Can anyone talk to me

I addressed that many times before read the conversation 🤦
I ain't reading aladat
Then don't give your opinion on a conversation you haven't read
It's a public server, I'll shove my opinions wherever I want 
Ok bro, whatever makes you comfortable.
If you don't mind asking, are you a Muslim?
No, I'm not a Muslim
Then why are you defending it? 
I'm not defending it, I don't like the idea of generalizing it
Wow should I be a victim to defend a victim I find it is a strange principle
I never claimed all Muslims are fanatical and terrorist, I'm saying that they have these problems in their societies and they should focus on solving them and stop spreading nonsensical conspiracy theories.
When you see something wrong it is not strange or awkward to defend it
'Fantasizing', the amount of prejudice is unmatched. And you seem to like theft as well. Lol.
Also, I did invite you to debate a person who knows far more than you do on Islam, The Muslim Lantern. Why haven't you accepted the challenge? Scared?
He'd give you a platform to criticize Islam to a wider audience. A genuine critic wouldn't dislike this idea, especially Islamophobes.
It strange and awkward when it's obviously bad and yet you hop in to defend it when you aren't even a part of it.
I want to know about these nonsensical conspiracy theories
Then is it okay if I am muslim
- Any religion with violent passages should be relevant you. You're an atheist, aren't you? Otherwise, you're just another Islamophobe, maybe not even an atheist, who knows.
- Lol. Okay. I'll just lay this peer-reviewed study here:
https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/07418825.2018.1524507
Pretty much.
Nope. They follow both. In fact, the main foundational source of Judaism is the Torah.
It appears to be generalizing the whole community lol, And I do agree that there are serious issues in their societies that need fixing. Most people in Muslim countries just want a peaceful life, but they often end up victims of terrorism
And you seem to like theft as well.
Because I don't want those who commit theft to get their hands cut off, great thought process. It's just that medieval solutions to societal problems aren't good, that's why I criticize them, doesn't mean at all I defend the action. Go and tell anyone who get weirded about this genius solution outside the Muslim world that they like theft lol
Why haven't you accepted the challenge? Scared?
Sure, the only logical answer is that I'm scared. Certainly not because my level in English would make VC difficult for me or maybe I don't like to talk in front of a big number of people live. But I guess I'm at fault here, I need to stop expecting Muslim fundamentalists to approach conversations in good faith.
Prejudice you say, could you stop using terms coined by the filthy infidels of the west? Why do you use such language that was made to combat bigotry when you don't mind it as a concept? Try to use more Islamic terminology around these topics instead of trying to appear as a victim in front of westerners?
Books from abrahimic religion are more entertaining than Harry Potter ngl
It isn't about terrorism here. It's about the suppression of dissent which is real and very common in Muslim countries, and I don't think Flare oppose it given our previous conversations. Muslim countries are the only countries that punish apostasy with death, and punishment for blasphemy is more common and more severe in them.
That's why I only criticize Islam online
Any religion with violent passages should be relevant you. You're an atheist, aren't you? Otherwise, you're just another Islamophobe, maybe not even an atheist, who knows.
Are you really convinced by this or pretending? I live in a Muslim country, why would I care about something that I don't see in my sphere more than the religion and community that suppress me?
I'll see about your peer-reviewed study later.
Like how they say Mossad, CIA, and the freemasons created ISIS for example.
Not all thiefs get their hands cut off There are a lot of conditions and considerations like when hunger happens and when someone steals they won't cut their hand
It's not good under any circumanstance, that's assuming you are right about what you say.
It's bold to demand 'good faith' when all you do is dehumanizing Islam and Muslims.
Also, WHAT ON GOD'S EARTH IS THAT. LMFAO!! So, just because I'm a Muslim I shouldn't use anything that isn't 'Islamic'. Honestly, you have a more extreme ideology than any extreme group I know. xD
What about you why do you think you are right about what you have said
you have a more extreme ideology than any extreme group I know
I'm more extreme than ISIS for example because I criticize Islam and Muslim societies online. Ok.
تمام جداً
hello hello
وه بتتكلم عربي
Hey
Yeah I'm Egyptian
So i have a question about this sentence i stumbled upon
Go ahead
it caries a deep meaning i can't quite understand
a small fish swims to the older fish and says "i'm trying to find this thing called the ocean",
the ocean? says the older fish,that's where you are right now,"this?" says the young fish "this is water what i want is the ocean"
That's strange I thought you don't know anything about Islam
I know a lot. Not a scholar but certainly better than some Muslims in some areas.
Haven't you just said people are not following the true traditional Islam. LMAO.
So you just have some sort of trauma from your community. Good, I agree. 🤝
Thanks for coming. Having a goodnight.
Is that the Oblivion lockpicking minigame
You really don't have to. Being informed is not your thing.
Yes it is
Nice
indeed
Probably it means how some people don't appreciate the great things they have, and don't see how good they are.
Like the child of a loving parent not realizing that they are blessed.
I don't think so because first you are not the one that defines that you know a lot about Islam second your problem with cut off hands shows that you didn't read even a book about it
How?
I respect what Islam says about hyraxes but it's bad that it negatively depicts geckos
That's completely immoral to me
Did you study in Alazher or you read some articles
Why can't it say positive things about them as well
Especially when geckos are more charismatic and serve the world better than hyraxes
As I said, I'm not a scholar. But I read a lot and listened to many dawah people and Shiekhs.
Tell me names
That was my first thought until i read some comments agreeing with the young fish
its like escaping the routine life where everyone is like a robot
You know that conditions differ from scholar to scholar, right? And regardless, even if a thief is only punished with that when they aren't in need, that isn't wise. There are mental health conditions that may drive someone to do such thing, we should treat that rather than cut of the person's hand.
I think my view is more accurate because the fish isn't trying to leave the ocean for another place more adventurous, but it is in the ocean and not recognizing that.
thought it was that the young fish seeing something else old fish can't recognize
But I heard that geckos can carry salmonella germs
I think this interpretations would require more justifications for how exchange goes.
Oh man! This is getting even more fun. Lol.
Did you know that, weirdly enough, Islam prohibits punishing the ill? These terrorist Muslims put incredibly strict requirements for the most severe punishments. This hurdle obstructs us from properly dehumanizing them. 
@rugged adder where are you from btw if you don't mind asking?
You are right it is differ from scholar to another but it should lead to the same destination anyway if you think about the mental health about the thief what about the mental health about the one who gets stolen tell me what about this side of story
I am Egyptian too
Islam doesn't recognize the concept of mental illness outside of severe cases too. That explains why many Muslim scholars and Sheikhs don't recognize stuff like depression and anxiety as real medical problems not some sort of demonic influence.
Who said that
Wow. I'm an Egyptian too.
We're invading the server. Or should I say, waging an Islamic conquest on the server. Lol.
I really want to know the name of these sheikhs and scholars
Well, in a good country the damaged side would get their stuff back after the thief is captured. The thief goes through rehab.
Now you have two functioning members of society instead of ending up with a person with one hand less.
You guys seem to live in Egypt not masr 
I'll try to find some and send you their videos.
بَاب الطَّلَاقِ فِي الْإِغْلَاقِ وَالْكُرْهِ وَالسَّكْرَانِ وَالْمَجْنُونِ وَأَمْرِهِمَا وَالْغَلَطِ وَالنِّسْيَانِ فِي الطَّلَاقِ وَالشِّرْكِ وَغَيْرِهِ لِقَوْلِ النَّبِيِّ صَلَّى اللَّهُ عَلَيْهِ وَسَلَّمَ الْأَعْمَالُ بِالنِّيَّةِ وَلِكُلِّ امْرِئٍ مَا نَوَى وَتَلَا الشَّعْبِيُّ لَا تُؤَاخِذْنَا إِنْ نَسِينَا أَوْ أَخْطَأْنَا وَمَا لَا يَجُوزُ مِنْ إِقْرَارِ الْمُوَسْوِسِ وَقَالَ النَّبِيُّ صَلَّى اللَّهُ عَلَيْهِ وَسَلَّمَ لِلَّذِي أَقَرَّ عَلَى نَفْسِهِ أَبِكَ جُنُونٌ وَقَالَ عُقْبَةُ بْنُ عَامِرٍ لَا يَجُوزُ طَلَاقُ الْمُوَسْوِسِ
Chapter: Divorce under compulsion, dislike, drunkenness, madness and related matters; (divorce) issued in error or forgetfulness; during shirk (polytheism) and otherwise — based on the Prophet’s ﷺ saying: “Actions are judged by intentions and each person will have only what he intended.” And Al-Shaʿbi recited: “Our Lord, do not take us to task if we forget or make a mistake.” And (regarding) what is not valid from the confession of a person afflicted with obsessive whisperings (waswasa). The Prophet ﷺ said to the man who confessed against himself: “Are you insane?” And ʿUqbah ibn ʿĀmir said: “The divorce of a person suffering from waswasa is not valid.
[Sahih Bukhari]
لَّيْسَ عَلَى ٱلْأَعْمَىٰ حَرَجٌۭ وَلَا عَلَى ٱلْأَعْرَجِ حَرَجٌۭ وَلَا عَلَى ٱلْمَرِيضِ حَرَجٌۭ ۗ
There is not upon the blind any guilt or upon the lame any guilt or upon the ill any guilt [for remaining behind]....
[Qur'an 48:17]
Even contemporary scholars acknowledge depression and don't recognize Kufir when someone is in a severe state:
https://islamqa.info/ar/answers/169574/هل-يحاسب-المريض-بالاكتىاب-على-اقواله
And mentally ill people:
https://www.islamweb.net/ar/fatwa/131295/هل-يؤاخذ-المريض-النفسي-بتصرفاته
What don't generalize what come from uneducated people
Bro, have a nice and respectful conversation with the Muslim Lantern. He'll probably help you overcome whatever you've been through, InShaAllah.
He's far better than me in Islamic studies.
You are really lazy enough to search about what prophet Muhammad said
There are a lot of haddis about people who have mental illnesses
Even if we live on Mars Islam is Islam it doesn't change. You don't know that it is okay fine go and learn but speaking like you know everything that is a huge mistake
No, who told you that is what is happening most cases don't get their stuff back
I never spoke like I know everything.
Islam doesn't change, but it seems like views on it change given the social context and the amount of knowledge the person reading its texts possesses. It's almost as if it's not as timeless as many Muslims claim.
Do you know what the conditions are to cut off the hand of the thief
As I said, those matters differ from scholar to scholar. But yes I read the opinion that says it should only be applied in times of stability and they cite the story of how Umar ibn al-Khatab stopped implementing it at some point for that reason, but my point still stands, cutting off someone's hand for theft is extreme and unreasonable.
Yeah we eat Croissant and Milk Tea on breakfast. We don't eat Foul and Kushari, that's yucky. xD
Just kidding. I don't even like Milk Tea.
You really have a strange mindset you said the views change and Islam doesn't change and at the end you say it is not timeless
I like eating fools, but I don't like talking to them 
No
The claim that its timeless is about how it can work in any context. I'm pointing out that it needs to change because it can't.
Being timeless and rigid are two different things.
Eh, you eat them!? LMFAO. No wonder your arguments are absurd.
Who are you to change it
You already have a misconception
What?
And change your point each second
Point out when I changed my point
Where did I do that?
You said Islam should change and I want to know who you are to change it you even didn't study it
You told us no one cares about mental illness in islm
Timeless means it works in all times, it doesn't mean it fits with all standards.
Why should people always make embarrassing mistakes that I have to correct. Why! 
You didn't reply to me about the conditions you told me that it differs really I want specific answer give me an answer that convinces you from the sheikhs that you were listening to
