#š§ ļ½serious-chat
1 messages Ā· Page 463 of 1
Do you see how the idea of Nazis are weaponized now by people who actually wish to behave by Nazis
True, my president is called a nazi
Nazis are almost the universal code word for āmonsterā or ābad guyā
tbh there are rightful critiques to confront the state and non state parties involved in the conflict, but the russo-ukrainian war is the first conscious analysis of an unveiling war to most people and they adopted a campist approach when settling for a side to support.
He is Adolf Hitler Uunona
Painting your enemy as a Nazi is one of the easiest ways to morally justify treating your enemy as a dog to be put down
I would argue that what Putin is doing is Nazi in spirit
More important than being Nazi in name
Putin is just doing putin stuff
The Nazis are always trying to come back, but they donāt always go by Nazis
True, say that both sides are bad is ambiguous, anyway we can say one is stronger (which is Russian and I don't know why didn't win yet)
Is crazy to be called a nazi by a State that invaded Georgia, Chechenya and (idk but one more is surely)
russia's, or rather putin's conquest, was tsarist expansionism. ukraine, amidst the wake of the war, does high strung vilification of their socialist heroes while green lighting historically nazi-backed actors to cope with their uncoordinated aggression and poor stand. NATO's promises to restore democracy in ukraine's attacked regions are shady at best
hell, you can't even discount Russia from the Fascist Problem⢠when there are literal Neo Nazis roaming in small but uninterrupted parades
Iād take natoās hand over a guy who pushes comatose patients out of windows any day tbh
i'm a partisan through and through
Sorry to deviate, but you have a very good English, where are you from?
indonesia, born and raised.
wdym
Gud english
they're like, the least awful group to depend on in this situation
oooh. thanks
What, Ukraine validating the nazi figures? I didn't know, I mean in the azov regiment is known to be nazi
But if the government is doing that it can't be not used for saying that they are not nazi
they kicked down statues of USSR-affiliated ukranian heroes who were very integral in national construction efforts and decorated nazi insurgents in their place. they were scouring for anti-soviet representations due to the stress of the war
it's definitely a glaring problem among the people who run the state, though
the international protelariat
I mean is understandable but it was better if they let the people let do it instead of the state
They are Communist or Nazi, there is not more Nestor Majno
Sad
wheres my favourite minecraft girl
Must be sleeping
shes still here tho and active?
Tag her you'll know
nope, she probably doesnt even remember me lol 
That's sad
Declare the war @feral river
Declare all the war
Even the minor skirmishes and battles
Wagner group's founder is a Nazi, complete with tattoos
They also didn't just play the part but did war crimes in Africa if that wasn't enough
And Syria
It's the least antisemitic country in Europe, and their president is a Jew... That goes against the whole point of being a Nazi
Ilona?
nope, her name is minecraft china mainland something
He is here everyday
Just wait, it's somewhat early here
Declare the war
Itās like catnip

not the boykisser...
lol
I always see them around, probably just wait till its daytime there
@feral river you have a fan waiting eagerly for your attention here or something lol
They are probably busy laying waste to their enemies and salting the land on roblox
serius chat is the least serius chat
change my mind
Itās seriously unserious
see?
Still counts
i'm very serius when talking in this channel
What would you like to talk about
want to see my level of serious...ness?
hmmm
What serious matter weighs on your mind so heavily that you would drag it kicking and screaming to this channel
i think that men should get pregnant too, women think that they are better just cuz they can get pregnant 8 months then feel how a baby just kicks their belly
it's unfair, men should feel that 2, women just get happier but men just get sadder cuz when talking with the wife she'll say "nah i've got pregnant fr you're a skibidi toilet", no one likes brainrot
Declare the war
I hope this helps
i'm sorry i'll need to go soon, let's talk a bit
Bon voyage
what do u wanna talk abt
?topic
Whatās the dumbest thing someone has argued with you about?
my friends tought that aliens were real and i proven to them that it wasn't
there's isn't enough phosphorus to make life, barely we have born
They could be. To say they are, without evidence, is stupid, but to say the could be is pretty reasonable, in my opinion
even if a planet has phosphorus wich is the chance that those planet with phosphorus will be habitable?
even suposing that space is infinite it'll expand and will expand faster while you get even further so it is a no sense not to see any kind of life ouside earth then expecting those hypotetical lifes will come to us or viceversa
and top of that wich is the chance that those "aliens" will develop enough to make complex life like some-kind of cow
even worse if we'll talk about smart ones
@merry ore it is enough for you?, now you see that life outside earth couldn't be pretty reasonable
i think he/she's offline
I never said they had to be smart or highly developed, though. I only said they could exist on another planet somewhere in this universe. An alient, to me, is just a living organism from space, not something highly developed, smart, or whatever else movies show :p
you can only expect some kind of bacteria there š„ŗ
That's still life though ;p
What's up?
even with that the amount of phosphorus is pretty low, you should search it
pray, do tell
a person from this server gave me friend req
at first we were doing good i thought friends
next thing he wanted my account and pc
is that a scammer?
Yes
what did your toughts made to you š
Im sorry bud
Yes. Block them
report, block then close
What the
Okaay well
ask him for forgive, then block and report
Many people on discord just want to scam you lol. It's very obvious, normally
Just move on
can i mention that fella?
btw: never download anything from discord
We can't do much lol
maybe their account got stolen
wdym with ss?
their account got stolen
do not feel bad about breaking that relationship
if you're lucky maybe your friend can re-send the friend req
š¤·
i still bealieve that there's no aliens, the chances of that is the same that a bacteria evoles into a super giant dinosaur with super laser eyes and super strenght (absolute no sense)
alien mitochondria when
does it exists?
how would i know
even if it exist it shouldn't be considered as life at all
would have to travel light speed or worm whole
why not?
add "close to" before "light speed"
it'll only produce energy with complex molecules it wouldn't able to even reproduce
what if parallel universe exists? could that be consider aliens right?
that's impossible š„ŗ
i think that it depends on wich planet will be considered some kind of paralel-earth
sed š aight i want alien tardigrades
i want alien tragedies š
still parallel humans would be not us
then those can be considered alieans
with electrons circling in the wrong way
too much science fiction
i do not think pararel universes would work like that š , at least not by steven hawking teory (that i barely understand)
š
What I know to be alien is something that comes from a different planet, so would a parallel earth still be earth? Sounds like a Ship of Theseus situation
as far i know diferent unniverse -> diferent (physics) rules
so it'll be even harder to make life
Yes true, but the premise of parallel universe is that you have at least one change, like in a parallel universe I might be a girl, or have brown eyes. But in this universe I am a boy and blue eyes.
I wouldnāt say different universes have different physics rules; imagine free energyā¼ļø
Maybe the correct term here would be alternate universe, instead of coexisting with our current universe, itās a complete different universe @clever ocean
Hi! Iām a software engineer, and Iām looking for a native speaker who can help me improve my communication skills while working together on exciting projects.
Which emerging technology are you most excited about?
im a caveman i hit rocks with my big wood bat
my bat is bigger
i win
Whatās the worst movie trope?
dry quips
wait no its when a movie's entire premise is the rejection of famous tropes by only doing the opposite with no coherent plot. it can get underhanded and smug, you'll have to be very impressionable to find it worth praising
They give us a single hot mom but then kill her off.
another one is characters from minority backgrounds who chose to conform and the movie paints it as a moral conclusion to their arc, or when fighting sides in a nuanced social issue casts their rooted hatreds aside in a fingersnap to fight the Big Bad threatening their One Society.
its lazy
what movie even does this
are you talking about the tom holland spiderman movies because ive never watched any of them
i dont watch capeflicks in general
Ye
suddenly thought of this since its pride month; caricatures in movies promoted as queer with outright queer main charas. not only does it immediately show they're going to have the most rehashed and sanitized dynamics, the production as a whole is detached from authentic queer experiences

Hello sir
How you doing my fella from another bella
Brother from another mother
not true in the eastern world
Holy moly
in here we have very significant amount of people supporting nazism
hello dude
Stupidity is a universal trait
they are not stupid, they just have their own mind on seeing so much things
also in here the universal value we see is an ideology coming from the west
which we say the western universal values
most people support Russia in Ukraine war
Brainwashed people do
Lots of them around
Stupidity is when your mind generates or accepts a stupid idea
We all do it
Weakness of the flesh
Declare the war
Supporting nazis is big stupid
Unless the asian version is less about killing Jews and handicapped and homosexuals and everyone and more about military fashion or something
well no ? stupidity is when your mind is incapable to think very much stuff but blindnessly following others
your definition was based on a very subjective view
Blindly following nazis is stupidity, yes
We are on the same page
stupidity is objective, at least it can be
Call off the war
Blindly following communist is also stupidity
Yes
Blindly following anyone tends to be a dangerous and foolhardy proposition
total subjective

sorry what is bella
This was a good debate, it was a pleasure having you agree with me
hahahahaha where do you get the picture
āFella from another bellaā is a variation of ābrother from another motherā
Bella here means beauty, and fella means man
Bella means beauty in a few languages
i see
Yep also in Italian and Spanish
Do you still play minecraft
User named after Minecraft, do you play Minecraft
Donāt tell me you stopped
Donāt tell me you declared the war on the mining of crafts
What do y'all think about Islam?
It depends. Some people defend it.
Those individuals tend to be outliers to the regular group in this channel I think
At least to my cursory perspective
I wonder often, what really makes it different than other faiths? Why Muslims tend to be more fanatical than other theists?
Is it Muslims or people that live in war torn countries and violently harsh living conditions
Even in the west
Their rhetoric can be quite aggressive yes
Some new white converts take their attitude.
But in the west, an adjusted and acclimated Muslim is not likely to be so interested in embarking on jihad when they have a football game to watch with friends
The new white converts are probably disillusioned with western society
Happens all the time
They donāt always flee to Islam
Maybe they become ardent communists
I mean fanaticism in a more broader sense, not only terrorism. The type that would make you convinced that apostates should be executed and shit like that.
That happens when everyone around you also believe apostates should be executed
Even if you didnāt feel that way, only the bravest will admit it
I am a Christian
@thorny steeple shoot
and yet a shocking percentage of western muslims support violent and illiberal practices in regards to apostasy, or blasphemy if you poll them
For the reason I just outlined
Itās called peer pressure
They all know their book says it, and they all know that their community affirms it
What are they supposed to say
But what will they actually do when they meet an apostate
Will they overturn their lives for the sake of following Quran
God forbid
Iām not defending Islam
I know, because the hardcore ones also exist
I think
The answer to this question is
The degree to which the average Muslim adheres to the teachings of their religion
Or the manner in which they choose to express them
Depends on their cultural acclimation and adaptation in a given society
And their living circumstances
To me, it seems like context doesn't matter much.
It doesnāt matter when looking at their book
It matters when talking about them as a whole
I think many Muslims understand their religion to be a peaceful one
And they probably live peaceful lives
The principles I outlined above are true of any religion however
Or any movement
Religious zeal tends to dull when you find your place in a secular society
Mmm
Mmm
I think Islam is a religion of anger and hate
I think the best weapon therefore is love
What lol
islam people wont admit it
So what
i was kidding sorry sir
Zinx
if i were a islam people, i will verbal attack you
You are one of the nicest people i know so far
You dont need to apologize for anything
I will assume the best of you
what.....you dont know me at all
Not personally, but i think generally people say more about themselves than they ever mean to say
Everything, even the most casual actions, have roots
Nothing happens in a vaccuum
So far, you strike me as a civil, polite person
I donāt assume you would ever offend me on purpose
Not unless I pushed you
The Islam original intention was good, and in the beginning, it brought great benefits to people
However, over time, those in power gradually caused some parts to become extreme and violent
i read slowly
thank you !!
Lol do u even know wt the word Islam means ? It's peace .
I dont care what people say they are
I care about what they actually are
Names mean nothing, substance is everything
here we go , i bring the chair and sunflower seeds
Basmala is polite
And wt they actually are
Did they made WW1 or 2 did they made ethnic cleansing for counties
Did they occupied countries ?
Nope to world war 1 and world war 2
Is this relevant
Oh but occupy countries yes
Islam has a very militaristic history
They do not shy away from violence as a means to an end
In many circumstances it is divinely mandated
Ethnic cleansing, mmmmm
An argument can be made
Nope it wasn't occupied
It's conquest
And the difference is very high
They didn't kill innocents neither wanna destroy the country before they enter any country they ask the rules to be Muslims and if they refused they battle them army to army still if the whole people refused to be Muslims they won't force any one tho
How you wanna them make people know about Islam by internet ?
Oh i see
You are hoping to win this argument through semantic technicality
If muslims invaded a country and took it over by armed conquest
It follows that the inhabitants were innocent except that they possessed the land the Muslims wanted
There is no difference
They went in, killed, and conquered
Nope It happened only once by ottomans and no one agrees on that shit no Muslim would say it's true and it's a barbarian thing out of Islam
āDid they do ethnic cleansing?ā
āWell-ā
āFine yes, but only once!ā

I should note, that peace is a euphemism for the word submission in Islam.
or surrender
Wt ? They pay for that as anyone the only change happens to the policy
Bytheway all those Islamic countries u see now came from conquest don't u still see other religions? Of there's no difference between it and occupation will they still be Muslims after weakness of the Muslims empires ? Idk when this claim comes from the occupation is the same as conquest
Why donāt you tell me how occupation differs from conquest
And how this difference somehow erases the overwhelming campaigns of non-peaceful violence Islam took against its enemies
Remember that the position you are arguing for is that Islam is a religion of peace
You win when you can prove this stance
It's not Islamic should I tell u all the wars Christians did u r responsible for it js because they were Christians?! Or Christianity is the problem ?
But so far you are not denying its mountain of violence
You are just attempting to justify it using word games
I don't wanna win anything. I'm just clarifying what's false
You are not even arguing that these violent conquests were against the core tenants of Islam
Yes but what you are clarifying is that your assertion that Islam is a religion of peace is false
Your argument so far is as follows:
Zinxo
- islam is a religion of peace
- Islam conquered many countries through armed invasion
- ???
- Peace
hello, im still watching
In what respect are Islamās many military campaigns peaceful
Peaceful warfare???
fr lmao
They didn't make world wars because Islamic countries were too weak and poor to do that, so this argument doesn't make much sense.
Stay in context
Wtf it's named Islam from day 1 before even the prophet Mumhamed there were Islam
And also i am not interested in overwhelming someone
If two people argue with one it isnt fair or courteous
It cannot be expected they would answer both of us
@thorny steeple and what you did by jumping in is allow basmala to pick the weaker of the two arguments to flee to
You allowed basmala to get off the track i set him on to go back to the beginning which is his appeal to Islamās etymology
Which means zero
If you called a religion the Happy Big Fun Party Time Club
And this religion went around conquering tons of people and killing scads more
The name clearly means nothing
I didn't say it wasn't named Islam.
Do u understand it was the only way to make Islam be known do u get that ? They first send for the ruler to make him now and inform his people they all disagree and call for war so ? They would if it's the only way to make some enter Islam otherwise they didn't force anyone to do so
No he wanted to go there and you let him out
Christianity got it to be known through spreading the message through charity and reasoning- it wasnt until it became a state religion that the teachings of Jesus became grossly warped and violent thanks to the crusades
And the catholics and all that- but where i can say that those events contradicted the teachings of my Founder
You cannot do that- because Muhammad did believe in armed warfare
Wt ? And why they became Muslim from the first place where do u guys get the claim that anyone forced them to enter Islam ? And were they independent lol they were under Persian or Romanian Empire .
Ofc people are going to convert when the option is convert or die
Telling people to convert or be fired upon is literally forcing them
This is ridiculous, this is the literal definition of coercion
Dont act like this was a cordial debate
the teachings of Jesus almost certainly had been grossly warped by the bible itself.
Yes yes
Okay well when you provide me with His authentic teachings we will talk more
Thank you pro for wildly flailing around
Basmala you havent proven that Islam lived up to its name at all
I think you had better concede and move on
You have been cordial and polite
Fuck who did that ?
If there was a war between two armes and when they already entered they told people if they wanna enter Islam or still in their Religion whatever it was where's the force here
The force when the rulers refused to tell them abt Islam when they ask him from the beginning with no war
They always kindly asking the ruler before to inform his people abt Islam they refused
Islam started its own wars
They always ask kindly lol
Before kindly returning with swords if they didnt listen
That's the truth believe it or not
Basmala you are not being sensible
Basmala
Let me show you how you sound okay
Imagine a married couple
Jack and Bethany
Jack says that he loves his wife and asks her one day to do something she will be very uncomfortable with
Well, some of Jesus' authentic teachings are there in the bible, but many were distorted or invented by later authors. This is a widely accepted view among scholars.
Jack asks her very kindly and calls her loving names
And then when Bethany refuses, Jacks whips out his baseball bat and beats her to death
What a kind, peaceful man, Jack is
He did ask kindly, didnt he
Bethany shouldnt have said no, oh well
Did you know smoking is actually good for the lungs, this is according to researchers sponsored by big tobacco
Please āsome scholarsā as if somehow this means anything
Plenty of scholars come to conflicting conclusions all the time
āSome scholarsā indeed
Did you know some Islamic scholars believe Jesus was a Muslim, itās true
U know why ?!
Since the emporer himself converted ? That's what Muslims want from the beginning but he refused not js that he refused to inform his people so
The emperor converted due to a dream and then he proceeded to be one of the worst enemies to Christ I have ever seen
So
You keep justifying the violence
But by justifying it you are acknowledging it
And violence is the opposite of peace
Every single one of your arguments is bolstering my point
You keep kicking balls into your own goal
Well, not just 'some scholars', but a strong scholarly majority among historical and critical scholars of the New Testament
You are playing for my team
Oooooh
Not just some, but a LOT of some
So what are we talking here, you have a number
Basmala God bless you
You havent gotten anywhere, let me let you off the hook
Here is the argument you should make, it would be easier for you to defend
āIslam is not a peaceful religion because peace is not possible until the world submits to the will of Allahā
āWhen all the world is Muslim, then we shall have peaceā
āUntil then, violence is justifiedā
Say this
I am helping you basmala
You should copy my homework
whats so serious

The prophet freed all people in Mekkah after they killed his uncle , companies when he entered didn't kill them which is gonna be fare but he forgive them and as always didn't force anyone to be Muslim
He did with jews. They broke it after .
And for always he didn't force anyone to enter Islam neither his companions some Christians did bytheway even tho they were under Islamic control they will still be in whatever religion they want with no injustice u can read any historical book on this period no one would blame Muslims on conquest neither their treatments with other religions even the extrem hated historian
Thats good
Still not peace
Anyway
Im glad we cleared that up
Well, I don't have a specific number, but around 70-80% of university bible scholars would agree that the bible has later theological additions that don't accurately reflect what historical Jesus have said. Even a majority of those who are Christians themselves don't discount it.
Aha
Well that is a big number wow
Which source did you get this from
And a majority of christians holy moly
I wonder who polled them
Lol u should when u grap smth know the context first
You are still wrong
Maybe for u
You have done nothing but share with us the many reasons for Islamās violence
Thatās all you did the entire time
How do you even define peace?
Does peace mean violence with justification?
I want you to tell me what peace is
This would help us understand what the other person is saying
It's avoiding injustice and leaving with balance
Living *
Sir, I think you're talking about Christianity.
1 Samuel 15:3 NIV
Now go, attack the Amalekites and totally destroy all that belongs to them. Do not spare them; put to death men and women, children and infants, cattle and sheep, camels and donkeys.
So peace means avoiding injustice and living with balance
zinx is drunk
Yes and i think you are talking about judaism
this debate is not over yet, smh
It is good to know what you are talking about before cherrypicking
Always a good debate strat i find
Where did you get this definition from?
can i join in ur discussions
If everyone gets tangled up in here i will stop engaging
I wont let this become a bar room brawl
What cherrypicking? š
Aren't those the words of god too?
no, let them finish
oaky
Cherrypicking means choosing a particular point, removing it from its context, and then presenting it as the whole picture
Which is what you did, because you are largely ignorant of how Christianity works except for the parts you like to use in debate
Goodbye
You literally are the one who's doing that lol
@hollow cave and your definition- where is it from
I have read the bible every day for years
Run away lil kid
but which bible ur talking about is it the true one
?
Im not leaving, i am saying your argument is so poorly contrived as to be beneath my notice or effort
I am talking to basmala primarily
U do the same with Islam, and when i do it with Christianity you get mad and running away š
Answering you is a favor, but you have nothing to offer
It's agian not violence
It's violence when they force people they came I told u already they sent messengers to the ruler if js one of them did as the Romain empreopr there won't be any conquest from the beginning It's the bottom line
Christianity knowned as the emprore entered
And the only way in that time to make people know as unfortunately there wasn't internet is conquest even they did and didn't force anyone to enter Islam after if the whole people's country didn't enter It's not a problem they now know what Islam is
So our micro debate is over until you try something else
So what's the problem?
And thatās why we generally donāt rely on the views of 'some Islamic scholars.' Instead, we rely on a broad scholarly consensus among experts from diverse backgrounds to avoid motivated reasoning and other forms of bias.
Islam itself
Because I read the context first
And you're willing to discount it to preserve your fundamentalist view
So basically you're not able to refute it, so you had to run away?
In short- divinely mandated violence is not singular to Islam- it does exist in Judaism as well- where the difference lies is in Christ- Christ abolishes this mandate and instead mandates love and the forgiveness of sins
Muhammad does not
Muhammad passes along the mandate for violence into perpetuity
You would know the difference if you werent cherrypicking
but quran is never ever changed in contrary to the bible
It depends on what you mean by changed
And now you get no more time from me
Basmala wrote me a book to read
It is probably more justifications for violence
Before you criticize others' religion, look at your own religion first.
Let me check
Dude don't read
More justifications for violence
like the way it is sent to muhammad came to our day without getting changed by people and there is some proofs like museums
It doesn't take a genius to criticize Islam btw
Basmala, when Muslims conquered a country through armed invasion, did they exert physical force intended to hurt, damage or kill
Andos, are you agreeing with their position
How bad faith are you
but i think islam is stronger than christianity in every aspects
All religions are ambiguous in some ways, but Islam is virtually indefensible
like logic
Islam is the most illogical of the Abrahamic faiths
Do you mean there is no something like that in the New testament?
I'm not
It is not predicated on logic
what's your evidence when saying that
That's true it's a valid point actually as I don't know how I would believe in smth I'm not sure who wrote it and what exactly has been changed from the original book like Bible
But here I mean by context reading the whole surah to know what's is talking abt and this talk for who
In the New Testament, the disciples attempt to invoke divine judgement on people who reject Jesus and Jesus scolds them for failing to understand His purpose
The history of your religion proves it, even what you do today is a clear example
There is a final apocalyptic battle between satan and God but this does not constitute a divine mandate for violence
Christians are called to preach redemption of sins and to love our enemies
what do i do today
Muslims are allowed to use physical violence to spread their message
islam is not responsible for what im doing
It doesn't take a child who can read to refute the whole Bible without using any other sources
A child who could read would make better arguments than you
In many Muslim countries Christians are persecuted and civil rights are only optional
no there's a surah in quran against that like la ikrahe fiddin
u can read it
The quran existed in several variations until Caliphate Uthman gathered them all and burned them before canonizing the copy you have today
Uthman decided what the definitive quran is
have u heard wt I said a thousand time it's first not invasion it's conquest and again they did as it was the only way to get the Islam known at that time
The preservation of so many biblical manuscripts actually allows us to verify the authenticity of what we do have
there's no forcing in the religion before u accept it
As opposed to uthmanāa book burning
Wt ? It was the same Quran it wasn't js written that's the whole thing
No uthman burned them because of the confusion that began to emerge over which version was correct
He wanted to clear that issue so he did
By burning the variations and choosing the one he felt was most correct
there's no much difference like in the bible
Anyway
bible is compeletely changed hundreds of times
I dont mind this but the essential topic of debate was whether or not Islam is a religion of peace
it is
Wt that fuck ? It's one version then and now and always
They were typing some surah in to study so he basically gathered them all to one book but there's no difference it's the same thing
As Basmala failed to make even a singular argument that denied or even concealed the existence of Islamās mandates of violence or even its history of violence
And as Basmala is not making any new arguments
Basmalaās point is lost
Islam is not a religion of peace
I excuse myself now
According to u
u need to get that into ur mind that islam does not support violence
i mean the true islam
Jesus, two sides pushing hilariously bad-faith readings of history and arguments in defense of their own religion, to make their side look better.
Emmet, it does- the best Basmala was able to do was to justify it, they never denied it happened, only that there were reasons
because there are false groups in islam that are exteremist
Let them call Islam a religion of righteousness
Or a religion of goodness
But it is not a religion of peace by any metric at all
I don't think they will ever understand
don't need to learn islam from basmala learn it from its source and trusted sources
After failing even a single time to insert yourself into this discussion in any meaningful capacity you finally decide to spit the tongue at both parties and leave to nurse your ego
yes there are some exteremist groups in islam that emerged in the modern age but it's a false version of islam that they are trayna spread
@hollow cave thank you for your time
Thank you for your hopeless idealism
but it does not mean islam supports violence
what do u mean i did not get it
@flint anchor im sorry you dont like going to church
But that's not what i found in the New testament.
God says I had to be killed without Mercy if I reject the law of Moses.
Hebrews 10:28 NIV
Anyone who rejected the law of Moses died without mercy on the testimony of two or three witnesses.
Lol no
Since it is just us now i will field this last error from you
The book of hebrews is designed to juxtapose the teachings of the old testament with the new
Here is the whole passage
but do u accept that quran is actually stronger in terms of evidence when compared to the bible
When your religion becomes too uncomfortable you deny it, unfortunately Islam is a religion stuck in the Middle Ages and you have to learn to deal with this
In the first half of the chapter, Paul contrasts the imperfect use of animal sacrifices with the perfect sacrifice of Christ
Hi chat
He then compares the imperfect priesthood of the OT with the perfect priesthood of Christ
what can i do when it's the false version that they blieve in
islam is no such a religion like that where u kill people
And then he says
If, in the Old Testament, if under Mosesās law, the punishment for presumptuous sin was this severe
But in your history you have always done it, and even brutally, was that also false Islam?
I didn't even say anything lol, just brought up a verse from your book and you started panicking.
Im not panicking i am dealing with you as with a petulant child
I am just taking the time to do your homework
You did a google search and didnt even bother to read the chapter leastways the book
no we have never killed innocent and harmless people in history
You are copy and pasting indiscriminately and with zero understanding then smirking at your display of stupidity
I don't understand why they are so obsessed with Christianity when Christian theologians have already debunked them extensively
Let them
He probably comes from a christian family and hates it who knows
Anyway there can be valid reasons
I used to hate God myself
The Ottomans and the Umayyads don't mean anything to you?
Well, I don't have to pick a side. If youāre willing to bend history or science to fit your narrative, thereās no common ground. You canāt land a single argument because both sides keep shapeshifting whenever it suits them. It's the perfect example of what we mean by bad faith. Both sides are biased and it's so obvious to an observer.
yes they have never killed innocent poeple
You made up a bunch of random facts then sank into quiet funk when i pressed you on any specifics
You throw around big words like science and āmajorityā and scholars and then provide nothing of substance
they just spread islam
yes there can be some flaws of them
Instead they did, first of all they conducted wars of conquest against often defenseless and harmless peoples just to spread their religion
no they did not
Anyway rhetoros
The passage you quoted me is Paul juxtaposing Judaism with Christianity
That is why he is quoting the law of Moses
He is not saying that is how Christianity works, he is comparing it to Christianity
The entire book of Hebrews does this
It is the point of the book
the conclusion that i came to is that u christians knows nothing about the correct islam that quran and the prophet talks about in his hadiths
We judge by what we see of you, not by what you claim to be
i say it is not the true islam that quran includes right?
islam is actually a religion of peace and love
You and I can debate another time, you tried anyway
Next time though let me finish my first debate
More courteous
even the word islam itself comes from the root s l m which means peace
Peace and love you say
Religion of Peace 2: Electric Boogaloo
Revenge of the Peace
The Peace Strikes Back
and this ayat "And We have not sent you, [O Muhammad], except as a mercy to the worlds."
u need to learn islam from the quran and hadits not from empires u need to learn it from its own source
Attack of the Peace
It's just empty rhetoric if you don't put it into action
timur was an exterimist commander who was not a decent muslim
but that's not islam's fault itself its the fault of false groups that claim themselves to be muslims
Today is a world environment day but we don't have enough drinking water š but please here defending thier religion.. they saying thier religion is best , all stupid, all vain , come to the topic and discuss..
You are right
Where should i send my water
Doubtless you only stopped by to remind us of the need to help those in need before leaving to do so yourself
This is righteous and good of you
Hur hur
I pretty sure it's not. Traditional scholars would never call it that.
Basmala and I just finished
This is a remaster
A remake
Good show
Bad zuko
If your religion isn't able to be understood by a large section of you, then the Quran is not as holy and perfect as they want you to believe
Historically Muslims have been violent, there is little to add
I dont understand
Is he saying the fire nation is israel
but that is the fault of an empire not the quran and islam
And even in the modern era they have continued with their atrocities, they will never change
u need to learn the real islam not the false one
from quran or the prophet muhammad's various hadiths
It can't always be a coincidence, people behave in a way because your religion has made them understand to behave that way
no
So you're telling me that true Islam, a bit like communism, has never really been applied?
just an analogy, its sarcasm ig
Can you talk to rhetoros about the last airbender
He is bored and wants to debate
But he doesnt know what he is talking about and basically i have to do my part and his part and its painfully tedious
I don't give a fuck about whether it encourages to kill people or something else because it was all based on some shit rules which was made by the leader of islamic empire in the past
Power power power
now it's 21 century
Declare the war, minecraft
if you wanna enforce that on us, then we go to war
Why does it have to juxtapose? Isn't both god's words? Or God issues contradictory teachings?
Declare the war
And you also continued throughout the history, how is it possible that you never understood? @ornate lance
You took a long time to admit you had no idea what you were quoting when you quoted it
If you were sincere i would bother to answer you
unnecessary, just DECLARE THE WAR
Isn't the ot also the words of god? How can it be imperfect?
But since this merely another attempt to troll, and this amounts to a concession from you, i release you
The Crusades existed for a reason š¤
at least it is like that in islam
they are nothing but a bunch of useless electricity in your brain
that god is flawless
Now I was justifying war goal
This conversation is really special
which disrupt your ability to know what's the fucking truth
why prove it
Ahhh yeah sure
Im sure my son
I dont have time to argue pal, the only thing im on discord is fun and chill vibes 
I said talk not argue
I see we have a serious chat going on
Last airbender is a great show
the guy would believe in nothing ask me to prove why there's nothing
what the fuck bro
but i think it's not as simple as that
so ur an atheist
it is, there's no fucking shit called that
Declare the war
if you think some invincible being that created everything is god which you can't observe
why can't it be my ass ?
I was reading interpretations of the verse and no one said what you said
Just say you can't
I summarized the purpose of the book and the point of that passage
The reasons for his contrasting examples vary
yes because ur ass is something that is born
how ? did you observe it ?
or you go into it when I was sleeping
and god is not born by someone
how did you know that
God exists in eternity, but we exist in linear time, and His plan unfolds in chronological sequence
even if u can observe it it's something that is gonna die and be nothing and disappear
The plan is perfect, but the part that is over makes way for the part that needs to happen now
It is not that complicated
You are just being ridiculous
how you can say something you didn't directly observe, exist ?
it's like saying aliens exist all around the earth even you don't have any evidence
that was totally fucked bro
because we know from the things that he sent to us such us quran and the prophets like muhammad and jesus
If i gave you a ten step plan, and moved on to step 4, would you attempt to argue that the plan is a bad one because i didnt stop at step 1 or 2
dont be so pedantic
we have a lot of evidence
yeah some fake book made by your leader and he's a human too to rule all of you guys under his regime
whether it's based on logic or somethign like that
No one said what you said, so you interpret the text according to your opinion so you can answer me
and his regime is done, totally done
Okay specifically what are you talking about
yes he was a human but he was a prophet
it's like praise the 13th century Kim Jong Un
The purpose of hebrews? The point of that specific verse? What?
under a political ideology book of Quran
agree,
The film has a lot of philosophy in each story. The journey of the protagonist group brings a deep impression in character development. Especially Zuko, he who was initially a villain develops into a character who wants to be a better person.
sometimes I feel, we are all zuko. A bad person who try to be better
LMFAO
Send me what you found so i know what you want me to address or clarify
Who interpreted it for you and what did they say
Send me
if u search about it u can see it's not just a book written by a human it's sent by god
because the verses prove it
how do you know what you searched is not faked by somebody else
how do you know that definitely is because you see other's saying it
I know they didnt interpret it the way you did because you have zero idea about anything @flint anchor
bacause there are considerable evidences
And you're just saying nonsense and every time I ask you a question you start panicking and crying without giving an answer lol
like in the museums
you didn't answer any of these questions but believeing some shit which doesn't have any evidence to proof its existence
and things like tha
I have answered you every time
say it
wait let me dm u about it
what considerable evidences ? did you directly observe it ?
You keep hoping that the next time will be the time you get me- you are just being a clown and i keep fielding your misinterpretations and juvenile attempts at argument in long suffering patience
Send me what new thing you found now
No, but that's different from what we're talking about.
As you trawl the internet for new arguments
The old testament is step 1, new testament is step 2
the last guy came out and claiming that he's the cousin of the Jesus for a revolution: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hong_Xiuquan
Because what you're asking for an absurdly specific numberālike 193,195 out of 213,124ānot because it's crucial to prove my point, but to play gotcha and move the goalposts. You know full well no one can provide that kind of precision, and more importantly, itās not necessary. I could give you respected Christian scholarsāyou'd call them biased. I could point to polls or historical Jesus seminarsāyou'd question at the methodology or dismiss the source. Let's be honest: you don't play this game of hyper skepticism to any other historical claim or fact in science. You also see through it when muslims play similar game in regards to their own religion, and rightly call them out on it.
Of course, If I ask you to Google it or ask Wikipedia or ChatGPT, you'd also dismisa s them as biased.
Hebrews 10:28 explanation
Moses law is step 1, but christians are living in step 2
there are tons of it u can search them by yourself too but let me send u soem
a total outdated ideology
whats so serious
If you make an absurd claim come prepared with absurd numbers
āThe Romans have been defeated in a nearby land. But after their defeat, they will overcome [their enemies] within a few years...ā
Thatās how it works pal
and there are scientific miracles liek
"We created man from an extract of clay⦠then We made him into a clinging clot (alaqah)ā¦ā
I can say it too does that make me the god ?
u know these thing right now
LMFAO
Okay i told you what hebrews is doing with that passage and i will tell you what hebrews is saying with that passage specifically
Just type 'Hebrews 10:28 explanation' on Google and read
but it is said thaosands of years ago
sounds like if I would mention some science shit that everybody knows then I would be the scientist
what the fuck is that stupid logic
no can u know that thing thaosand years ago
You're too delusional lol
so how do you know that fuck about that
and how could you dare to say that's the truth
how it's being proven, by what
by something doesn't exist ?
so science prove there's something happened in before, and you claim it's what the god says so everybody believe the fucking god even we don't know what is that shit
Okay so verses 19-39 contrast the warning of Mosaic law with the warning of falling away from the Christian faith. Paul knows or suspects that some Christians may be thinking of leaving the faith, and he contrasts the Christian faith with the law of Moses. As is a recurring theme of Hebrews, he emphasizes the material reality of the Old Testament Law with the Spiritual realities of the New Testament law. He says to them, āif the punishment for breaking Mosesās law under such conditions was death, then we can extrapolate that if we choose to willfully abandon the faith after we have received ample knowledge of the truth, there can be no salvation for us- donāt give up your faith, hold on to the end
Would you do me an honour and ask any AI or google this question, and then report me with what you've found? "How many bible scholars believe that the bible accurately reflects what the historical Jesus had said?"
why didn't the god did not prove that shit in before when science didn't come to make you know the truth
You really have no idea how silly you sound to me because your arguments all sound like google copy pastes
But i keep reasoning with you as a favor to you
no hear me out it was proven thasounds of years ago by quran and now the science says the exact same thign
Would you mind doing your own research before making up baloney
dude I'm being honest with you, there's so many fucking questions and even I can pick a random one these stuff could not stand against it
Same to you rhetoros
Kids trying to debate with zero idea of what they are debating
Their egos are on the line so they cant escape
They just keep digging the hole
what's good lads
One must imagine Sisyphus happy
looks like everyone's riled up
just declare the war
war would solve everything
I DECLARE THE WAR
Thanks for confirming my suspicions, so I can finally let go of trying to push this rock.
oh you guys were arguing over interpretations nvm
I don't, stop being delusional lil bro.
It all started when you accused Islam of using violence, so I brought you a verse from your book that incites violence and killing, then you started crying to deny it and say that it is not perfect. Assuming this is true, it does not justify the violence at that time.
It took you an hour to finally give me the answer of āask chat gptā
You didnt even try to push the rock
You sat on your couch and asked someone else to move it for you
Lazy and dishonest individual that you are
hey isn that right bumperfish
No you cherrypicked, i slapped you down, and then you cherrypicked again, and i slapped you down again
oh it got racist š
And we keep doing that over and over
no hear me out it was proven thasounds of years ago by quran and now the science says the exact same thign
What is the racism
What did?
just a few while i was scrolling up, theyre not from the guys arguing rn
Well hypothetically if
oh simply "racist states"
Oh oof
how old are u
are you serious
oh the person asking for your age
no u
yes tbh im bored
Not you emmet
Emmet, basmala, they debate what they know
They have a working knowledge of their topic of debate
Rhetoros is ignorant
But he cant admit this
Each time i reveal this to him, he goes back to google and tries to find a new angle
Or chatgpt
Idk
so what about u ur the smartest of us?
Im not the smartest
Im complimenting you and basmala
i know
Yea as i said too delusional. You answer my questions and your answer interprets the texts according to your opinion to delude yourself into victory and then flatter yourself.
Itās weird when you talk about yourself in the second person
haha
it was funny
Literally a kid lol, good luck mate until u find answers to my questions
but i think islam is not what u all think it is
you need to gain more knowledge about it
i finally got to bumper's basic arguments. his points are singlehandedly strengthened by the fact that Muhammad was a renowned war general š
I have answered every single one of your questions, which is a disservice because you should have known the things i told you before presenting your piss poor arguments
Impossible to argue otherwise
Rhetoros is locked in mortal combat
With his own fat ego
That is not constructive debating Bumper, even if its true. Personal insults won't get you anywhere
Fair fair
I'm not saying it is or isn't true, I haven't read the conversation
Rhetoros is struggling to overcome the personal challenge of admitting that he should have come better prepared before making false assertions about other peopleās beliefs
Thatās a more balanced way of putting it
Your answer: the ot (which is god's words too) is bad and the nt is good.
I give you a verse from the nt, your answer: you don't understand and start interpreting the text according to your opinion to delude yourself into winning.
Keep going champ, Christianity needs more kids like you.
This is not what i said
Classic
Thank you for your time
Sure lol
Where did i say ot is bad and nt is good
Reread the thread
This isnt even cherry picking, it is just outright lying
I dont need to reread what i said, because i know i wouldnt say that, since it isnt good contextually informed theology
If i said it, it is there, and you should be able to quote me
wait whybdid that reply bumper's msg
He told people that if they wouldn't convert their cities would be destroyed
He also insulted pagans more often than not
He literally can't stay more than 5 minutes without insulting pagans. Not only this, he once gave a point by instakilling a tree. Just why
This is ridiculous, you can give a point without killing
@manic juniper By the way, is it just me or did you move your proficiency tag up not too long ago?
I always set it to fluent because it's blue
Lol you are talking about Jesus
Yes
Not to put too fine a point on it, but if Jesus is right then pagans are wrong
those were preached when he was directly ordained by God to spread the good word, as did the other abrahamic prophets according to the islamic canon. he didn't light the fuse to some other wars in equal measure.
He also transferred demons into pigs' bodies and made them kill themselves
Oh odd, I don't know why I remember different
Also He doesnāt insult pagans, He usually criticizes the Jewish orthodoxy
That's not the point, he is racist towards them
His entire ministry was basically to the Jews
I don't care about pagans being good or bad, he always shittalks them
islam in general demonizes pagans
He barely talks to any non Jews and whenever He does they are held up as role models except Pilate
You deny the Old Testament to get out of the question and interpret the New Testament according to your opinion for the same reason and you think that this way you have won and you start to flatter yourself. This was the summary of the discussion. You are probably a child under 16.
Christianity does too, not to the same extent tho. It depicts them as backwards or less dogmatic, which is ironically a good trait according to Jesus
Ah noooo i didnt
Can you quote me saying this either
What? You don't need to talk to non-Jews to be racist. Why are you changing the argument
one of the many commonly taught passages to islamic grade schoolers was about axing pagan statues š
Black people were ghettoed in the United States, most people didn't talk to them. Are you telling me they were less racist than today because they interacted with black people to a lesser extent? This is ridiculous
Isfrun, your assertion is that Jesus insults pagans
- jesusās entire ministry takes place to Jews
- He almost never ministers to non Jews
- Whenever a non Jew shows up, they are held up as examples of faith
- Except pilate
- So what are you talking about exactly
Jesus shittalks pagans and gentiles to his disciples all the times, you don't need an exegesis to realise it. Simply read the gospel
Where???
Oh he does mention the way pagans pray
Reread the thread, don't have the time to quote u
Why are you changing argument again? I said that you don't need to talk directly to a person to insult or be racist towards them
Yes, he says dont pray as the gentiles do, repeating things, since God hears you the first time
before and after, actually
Isfrun, i told you i would believe the best of you
wait i thought we're talking about muhammad? jesus had a much more hospital view of pagans
And to be truthful, you categorically dont deserve this from me at all, but in the interest of keeping my word
I will assume this is language barrier and misunderstanding and nothing else
The initial argument you made was that he couldbt go five minutes without insulting pagans
You shifted the goal posts
Okay so in that case, how does Jesus be racist without saying it out loud
I didn't lmao
Lol, even a Christian like you realized how foolish he is
I said that he's racist and you shifted it to him talking to non-Jews more?
Isfrun, how does he insult pagans every five minutes
I'm not a Christian
Read the gospel of Matthews
Whatever you are
I am speaking to the fact that His rhetoric, His criticism, is all levied at the Jews themselves
And whenever He does interact with a gentile, and this is rare
He always praises them for being righteous and faithful
I don't care about his interactions with gentiles
What do you mean by pagans?
As I said it's like basing racism off interactions between people. That's not how racist works, you can be racist towards people you never met
Jewish practitioners?
Gentiles are all pagans
We are talking about the first century
Nooooā¦.. thatās not how that is handled in the gospels
He meets gentiles who believe in Him
And they almost always demonstrate more faith than their Jewish counteparts
Jesus always highlights this
The Bible I've read used gentile and pagan, it surely refers to most people alive during that time
I wouldnt mind an example so i can at least understand your pov
They are few
And he called them dogs
He surely didn't refer to them because if I generalise an entire group I'm talking about the average
Maybe its a finnish thing idk
None of my bibles substitute pagans for gentiles
If I say "the height of Chinese people" I'm not referring to the Chinese people I've met, I'm referring to the average height of a Chinese guy
Also I like how you didn't deny that he instakilled an innocent tree just to prove a point
Isfrun, our sense of
Mmm, scale,
Not only this but he killed pigs by making them run off a cliff, he transferred demons into their bodies
Is a little bit different
Couldn't he transfer those demons in a bacteria's body? They'd die shortly after of old age
NO NEED TO THROW THEM OFF A CLIFF
Rhetoros, Isfrun is infinitely better at debate than you
Couldn't he transfer them into his own cells? Lol
Matthew 15:24-27 NIV
He answered, āI was sent only to the lost sheep of Israel.ā The woman came and knelt before him. āLord, help me!ā she said. He replied, āIt is not right to take the childrenās bread and toss it to the dogs.ā āYes it is, Lord,ā she said. āEven the dogs eat the crumbs that fall from their masterās table.ā
You are not winning any points here
Yeah, we can call these token gentiles
You are on her side in terms of ideology and goals, but you are a dishonest person and ill prepared
Yea that's why you didn't answer every question i asked š
By the time he dies he doesn't seem to have changed his mind on gentiles as a whole, perhaps he may have a slightly improved opinion
How? Isn't he a Muslim, I'm not on anyone's side
I answered every question and as you demonstrated when you attempted to summarize my points you lack reading comprehension
No he is salty and wants you to get me for his sake
And he isnt muslim
At least as i am aware
Keep being delusional bro
Okay for a moment
Assume a premise for me
Yea sure, lol
Letās talk about Jesus as a mythological character, denying His reality for a moment
I imagine you are already there anyway
If we talk about Jesus as a fictional character, then it becomes easier to acknowledge the more miraculous elements. You are doing this already when you refer to the pigs and the trees
And how do you treat a pagan, out of curiosity?
You were owl 10 hours ago
I treat everyone the same
Well no, let me rephrase that
No, I'm asking a rhetorical question on that passage
Mmmm not sure what you mean
He says to treat them differently, that's strange. And he even compares them to tax collectors
Isfrun, it sounds like your translation uses the word pagan a lot
Again even one example would help make your meaning more clear
Oh okay
Well do you know how Jesus treats publicans and heathens
He is talking to His Jewish disciples
The Jewish people hated publicans and heathens
For their sake, He uses an example that conveys His meaning in a way they understand
But Jesus Himself does not treat publican and heathens this way
This is one of the reasons given for why the Pharisees hate him
Because He spent time with the publicans and helped the people the Jews considered to be the scum
They complain about Him for this all the time
And then, as part of this narrative, by the time He has risen from the dead
He appears to Peter who refuses to eat with non jews


⦠š