#š§ ļ½serious-chat
1 messages Ā· Page 459 of 1
We want sex because we have such mechanics
Itās your world view
We have dopamine that instigate your desire to have a sex
What about those who don't š³
But our conscience stops us from always listening to our animalistic impulses
At least for some
You are not out of the human body right ?
Lmao
Everyone has evil desires
remove morality
what will happen?
everyone would hurt each other
humans live in societies
and societies live in order
Muscular men
Your conscience, was based on your brain
I'm a muscular man
If I shut down your brain you will have nothing but a dead body
Again we would have to dive into the source of our respective moral centers
You brain contains everything that a conscience would exist, the memory, the processing, and response system, they were connected in between through electricity
You speak about the physical processes, but our brains are like cd players- you have one cd playing in yours, āMachiavelliāa Greatest Hits Collectionā
And I have another in mine
Thatās electricity working in your brain but very low
We are dancing to different songs
You are just a very advanced computer
If what you are doing can even be called a dance
More like a dangerous flailing of limbs
Even your processing unit was just like a computer dude
Computers run programs
That we possess computers is not in question and is actually irrelevant
The question is why your computer is running the programs it is
If you write a Manifesto PDF I will read it. Do It
Well you are, and thatās it
And this likewise applies to myself
If I shut it down then you are dead, and your conscience will also dead
Irrelevant
Conscience is not something that is out of the brain
Time?
You arenāt talking to our topic anymore
Good we have brains, if our brains die, we die
Okay and
I think what you are actually trying to say is what I already identified about you
You are an atheist, and you have followed this world view to its brutalist natural logical conclusion
And this is why you think the way you do
Yes i already know minecraft
Thatās the belief, science is not about you are believing it
No need to repeat what we established at the beginning
They proving it
They are proving, that is part of the brain
This was very clear right ?
The relevancy of your points is lost to me
So you win, mainly so i can depart
Interactive accounts talking to each other on a screen 
If you think god actually exist, everything makes sense now
But science didnāt prove it
Welcome to the starting line
You finally arrived
I was waiting for you, but now i am going
We can talk another time God permitting
GOD TOPIC FOR THE 1726TH TIME THIS DAY
we dont know yet
You could not

But this server is full of people who delight in argument over nerd topics
Ah yeah make sense but try to prove it
Did science prove how the universe was created
What do you expect
Just go on let me see how you gonna prove they exist
While i have been talking to i have been getting ready to leave house
We will talk again Lord willing
Not yet, but they have a reliable conclusion
And we are still observing the universe
They have conclusion by observation, not imagination
time for another argument stalemate
Imagination was also part of your brain, comes from the energy you consume from your food that assigned by your brain
If you consumed some drugs, there will be some crazy image you will see so thatās almost irrelevant to reality
What makes you think it is over
And that could be forged
It is on pause
Minecraft took the long way around to get to the beginning
But now that we are here, we can move on to the next part
Just go on
Give the conclusion dont come up with words
Here we go
That makes no sense and I give you that https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Big_Bang?wprov=sfti1#
Your word makes no sense till now
Just remind you
Tell me wut u know I thought u r a scientist
Btw what it was before the big bang
U still using words šš
Thereās rule of law and morality almost does not participate in politics
Politics is where the interest exchanges
And the rule of law is based on force
What are you guys even talking about?
Without force your law and your moral and everything is nothing
LAW/RULE WITHOUT ENFORCEMENT IS TOILET PAPER
Planck epoch
Nothing, it was just the first era
No
So there was a starting point??
Are you LGBT
Iām gay, yes
Possibly, the initial singularity
We donāt know
I see, happy pride month
Yesss
Well who started the point
Well there is a conclusion... A creator aka god
I decided I am going to put off my trip lol
BREAKING NEWS MINECRAFT_652 IS A 4'8 FEMBOY
If I leave I donāt know when we will continue
Take me with ya
The initial singularity, that's why it's called initial
How do you want to continue
Or muscular 6'4 we don't know either
Saying it was god is just jumping to conclusions without basing it off any credible model
Very true
The word dinosaur was invented in 1842- before that they were called dragons
Call it singularity or call it God
No
We need not be specific
Dinosaurs were called birds
At this stage of the argument it is not necessary to establish which God or Singularity we are referring to
Before non-avian dinosaurs were discovered there likely weren't any fossils of dinosaurs that were mistaken for dragons, it rather was mammoth and other Pleistocene mammal bones
I think the key difference is whether or not the Singularity was rooted in nature or existed apart from it
Or at least one of them
Nothing points at it being supernatural
I think that from everything we can observe in nature, we can conclude that it was
The initial singularity isn't the most supported model either, only if you limit yourself to general relativity
Describe the peculiar qualities of the Singularity
Self existent, possessing no source
The first push- without any pusher
Eternal and preexistent
This is getting very philosophical lmao
There is nothing in nature that possesses all of these qualities
It is already above nature in that respect
It's not eternal, it's in the name: initial, means in the beginning
But from where
Unfortunately
I would rather have them read slowly what's being said or not inventing stuff
In nature it is not observed to have a push without a pusher, an effect without cause
This is not natural
It either created itself
Well i mean thatās all there is
Well, weāre also talking about a point in the universe that we donāt fully understand
You presume it had a starting point because you assume it follows the laws of naturw
Could've been a collectivity of deities, why did it need to be one or to have a quantity
But for some reason you only assume this and ignore the other problems
This would be the logical next step
No, they presume it has a starting point because it's based off general relativity. Once you add quantum mechanics it's very different, it can very well be a loop or cycle
I said we need not pick a specific deity at this point
Or even which pantheon or collection
I'm being consistent, I'm not assuming stuff beyond for no good reason
Ya actin like The initial singularity was proved to be true
Well the thing we learned that there is a starter for the action u cant just say yee it was nuthin then it happened
Merely that the Initiator is already superseding almost every observable natural law merely by existing
And because of this, it is arbitrary for you to assume that it would not be eternal
I'm not, which is why I said it's not the most accepted model so far... Again, you could read everything I said or at least pay attention šš»
It bucks every other known natural convention
Why would you assume it would conform to natural law solely on this point
It is the Singularity in every way you can think of it
"Natural law" is pointless terminology here
Here it means, based on what precedent can be reasonably observed and by which logical conclusions can be made
The Singularity is distinct in its inherent logical qualities form nearly everything else
So it's pointless, since our observations are very limited by our recent existence
And yet for some reason you presume it is not eternal
You don't use a Chinese man's experience in 2025 to determine how ancient Egyptians lived in 4500 BC
But all I have established is that in not conforming to what is known of nature in nearly every observable and testable instance, it is therefore in some sense āSuper naturalā
And this is an even more absurd matter, it goes back billions if not even to infinity (assuming the Big Bounce model is real)
Its singular and unique set of qualities makes it so
what i said that humans live in societies and societies need order so they will create laws anyway
that is my point
No, we know many things which existed back in time before we had any way to record them and I'm sure we don't consider most of them to be supernatural
Supernatural here meaning that it rises above the norms and repeatable processes we can expect to find at nearly every instance of natural observation
It doesn't seem to be unique, the model is based off phenomena we described
But we do not assume any of them fail to conform to the natural trends and processes that the Singularity by logical necessity is exempt from in order for everything else to be
Because it would abnormal to assume it
Nature does not indicate this ever happens
Argue with me about the qualities of this Singularity, is it intelligent or not, if so, who or what is it
A turtle perhaps
But it is inherently supernatural already
It does, based off general relativity...
is serious chat contemplating about god's existence again
Some are, I didn't really mention it
Hello, you are the one who joins and rolls his eyes to demonstrate the clear gap in his intelligence between yourself and everyone else
Do your song and dance so we can get it out of the way
God doesn't exist becuz I wasn't paying attention
u cant put an argument pushing an idea over other idea becuz u didn't likes it or sumth everything has a cause to happen or to exist the Big bang has a cause its so stupid that all these rules breaks down when we are arguing abt it
And continue
I'm describing in a very crude manner how the universe may have started moving or progress
i know you wouldn't, you dont have as much seething ideological/moral drivel to be mad about it as most guys here
not really. i just prefer more concrete topics š
Okay well thank you slito
It was a pleasant interlude, thank you for that commercial break
I don't really care about god's existence or not, I would rather have it be real so it's more similar to how I would imagine it (the Vision Serpent). Simply describing a process isn't denying something else completely unrelated
Thanks! And it's weird because I'm supposed to be that kind of person, I'm a reptile propagandist, ecoterrorist and ideological extremist
I think believing in your snake god would be more logical than atheism
And more in conformity to observation of the natural world
I didnt say it was logical, merely more logical- more in its general direction
It makes more sense than most fictional stories I've heard for sure
Like atheism
It would perfectly explain why there is so much reptilian imagery in all myths
It might
Yes, having a model based off observable and tested results in a controlled environment usually is somewhat reliable compared to hallucinations and suggestions
the head bites the tail in death we are born
Ouroboros
And idc abt u believing in him or not just don't push a theory over other I thought u the HUMAN OF SCIENCE while u syin that a thing created itself from another thing that created itself
Btw u write God of War stories are more accurate tbh
I think acknowledging the supernatural quality of the Singularity, its transcendent nature above anything else that currently exists, would not make you a theist or even a deist but I think it would at least remove you from atheism
You don't care yet you brought it up as if it's the case? Your argument needs to be consistent, this is just bait and switch
It does not need to assume the Singularity possesses intent or sentience
I didn't even say that it was self-creation anywhere lmfao, I hate when people don't read for whatever reason
Holy fucking shit
I am not interested in having you debate two people
It's no mystery that mammals are responsible for all that is evil on this world, they would rather create an enemy out of nothing than face reality when it doesn't suit them
Nothing suggests it's supernatural, otherwise it wouldn't be described following general relativity
idg why you'd be averse to the idea of a transcendent focal point in the universe. what's the harm in believing it other than to spite when you don't?
"holly fkin shi" Ye you being subjective right now thats really third world behaviors
I cant push anymore
"third world behavior" when you speak english like that š
here i thought the arguments would be worthwhile
Are ad hominems all that you have?
They never are
He is trying his best
There used to be once upon a time, around the time I joined and a little later
You are doing your song and dance again
Where you say nothing of import or contribution
English is clearly not his first language
Cheap shot to focus on that
Yee I never see someone I never see someone swearing in the middle of argument
Swearing is normal, the ancients did it all the times
It's especially normal when the other side changes argument or ignores their own previous statements, or they don't listen or understand what their adversary is saying
Isfrun is intelligent and usually level headed but she gets frustrated like anyone else, donāt get hung up on this like Slito gets hung up on your grammatical errors
Well why u didn't bring the point I missed or u just sticking with YOU CHANGING THE TOPIC cuz now u changed it to me
Donāt harp on this
I can excuse not having a full comprehension because I'm not that great at the language either, I just can't stand annoying assumptions or willful ignorance
Hello
I already did
You didn't change your course
Ngl I enjoyed arguing with her I took a lot of points that it really deserve a look but switching from argument to how to calling wut u say bait and switch is a subjectivity
Unfortunate it fell apart
We will assume the best of both parties and chalk it up to the challenges of communicating in languages that are non native to either of you
Also it is just frustrating to not be understood
You really didn't, if you really paid attention to the whole argument I didn't say anywhere that any model disproves god, in fact it wasn't really part of my original statement. I simply said what was there before the Big Bang according to some models
Well in the first one I just reminded ya to not over pushing and theory over another
None of which prove or disprove god, or are in any way related to god's existence in the first place
Perhaps you could disengage
š¤¦š¼āāļø
Well ig there is no point anyway
Theory of general relativity establishes universe has a beginning and helps establish when it might have been begun but it does nothing towards altering the supernatural qualities of the source of such a beginning
It doesn't establish a creation, there is no point in it where it does
Wrong word choice
It establishes a beginning of time which is different from creation
Yes yes, i changed it
I saw what you would focus on i know
We will not use such loaded language when i can catch it
There is nothing supernatural about general relativity unless I missed it
If there is I'd like to know
A beginning is natural
Beginning from nothing is not
?
Although, i say this for rhetorical purposes
It's not loaded language, it's just inaccurate
In reality, i do not like the word supernatural
Nowhere it implies ex nihilo
You need to address only what's being said, I cannot argue points that I didn't make
To clarify your position
I believe that you are stating that nature itself need not come from a source
It did not come from nothing
My position isn't even this, I was just describing one of the main models
I see
I don't have enough knowledge on general relativity or quantum mechanics to have an opinion on it and I don't find it particularly interesting
You are once again serving as a clinical dispensary of knowledge and data, which is a useful service I suppose
Thank you
Vitun hyvin
Anyway, I feel that anything God does, and I recognize I am skipping to the end, is entirely natural, as anything He would be responsible for would of course be natural- He is the originator of natural processes
Nature wasnāt natural till He made it to begin with
If there was no nature then what's the point of even giving it features when it doesn't exist as a concept
?
You love to say things in other languages or runes or whatever and decline to ever translate them so it behooves my mischievous nature to interpret whatever you said in any way I wish
Runes? What
I donāt know what they are
Orientalism, got it
We all of us do our best with the limited vocabulary we each possess to describe what is in front of us
You should assume good faith
People find dinosaur bones, assume they are dragons- well how could they call them dinosaurs before the word was invented
Except they didn't
We will allow that they did the best job they could describing what they did not with what words they had to use
As an aside, where do you think the idea of dragon comes from
Just as a matter of casual curiosity on my part
Not rhetorical, sincere
Nowhere, what's called a dragon in a language is called azhdar in another and they aren't 1:1 equivalents
And the word, dragon?
Dragons specifically come from the ancient Proto-Indo-European myth of the rain god fighting against a primordial serpent
Again i am asking for wikifrun
I'm not an etymologist, look it up
Hmm
I know what it means in my language, which already doesn't directly translate into dragon
It translates into salmon snake
Cool
I noticed that the word salmon shows up a bit more often in finnish than i accustomed to
At least as i recall the rainbow trout conversation
It doesn't
Because you only saw it twice and ran with it
In english you we basically use the word to describe one type of fish, at least, colloquially
Then i find that you call rainbow trout salmon
As well as some sort of dragon type creature
In addition it would seem to what we would also call salmon
It's not. It's the second time I said this
Lol well itās interesting to me
You assume too much of other people as always
@dapper laurel Italians after the recent football performance?
Well pleasant afternoon or whatever time it is for you
When
The sheer irony of saying that is lost on me
Yes I know, I am prone to doing this as well
Can you tell me when I did that?
I am curious now
Well in this conversation- i say it is interesting- a statement that reflects my thoughts- and then you counter it by saying it isnāt- a statement that centers it back on yourself
I say that your use of salmon is more than i am accustomed to
And then once again counter my own assertion of my perspective with your own
Well, perhaps it isnt interesting to you
And perhaps it is not more than you are accustomed to
But why would you presume i share these thoughts
Who says it was referring to you
I suppose that is fair
Hii
One good assumption for once
You donāt like to lose
Wsp
No, I enjoy losing if I have a shot at winning
@rose lion imm good, and u?
I love this line lol
Or if it brings improvements
Ran out of assumptions?
Trying to find a Term to use instead of "her laughter echoing louder than any royal decree"

No you merely won the debate
Why continue to run a race that has reached its conclusion
Now i will go relax lol, enjoy the reward
There was no debate
I didn't see arguments from the other guy and neither from my own
Indeed, it was more an intellectual massacre
For a novel?
People who defend other people's ideas instead of their own aren't good at debates
I was the victim ofc isfrun, lol ofc
Story
Which is exactly what I did
I mean not morally
Short story
I mean i was the loser lol dont worry
Cool
And ofc i am sure you arent worried
Just an expression, and i dont assume either way
You are isfrun, and that is all, you said what you said and all is said and done
Wish there was a place to find terms to describe actions when out of ideas
Chatgpt perhaps lol
Did you try the Cambridge online dictionary? It's pretty good
Look up the synonyms on a page, or even on Wiktionary
What action do you wish to describe
@wild sapphire this
pretty much
Are there any words you are okay to keep?
Maybe laughter
hi
What is the context here?
what you talking about
Like the context is meant that she is young girl and being like any kid, running and being careless
Oooh lol
And I just don't know how to describe it
This was important because the way you worded it made it sound like she was an evil queen to me
Let me see
The unburdened innocence of youth and her exuberant vitality bubbled forth from her lips in an eruption of joyous laughter
How does that sound
You can replace the last part with "more deafening than an air raid's siren"
It sounds fancy 
Do you want it less fancy?
No! It's alright, thank you
Back to writing now 
Hope it goes well
That was fun, thank you
the girl who will replace hawk tuah š¤
Undecided yet aka unknown
JPEG and JPG only
wait what's PNG short for here
oh new guinea š
I don't like lossy format
JPEGs are, JPGs have smoother qualities
anyway i'm not well-versed in PNG's affairs since most highlighted conflicts are brewing in the indonesian occupied side. despite the criticisms i have to lay out about the freedom fighters, the government contributes to a bigger fault at not totalizing their support through administrative and infrastructural clearance
I asked because I saw the red and black flag on your profile, it's similar to PNG's flag šµš¬ I was wondering if it was a reference to the freedom fighters
Or to another resistance group in their favour
oooh. no it's just my politics, or at least the general strands of it haha
Is it anarchism then
I recognise the Palestine flag but not the red and black
with the black flag yeah
The only thing below me is my womb
Anarcho-communism? Idk
ehhh i didnt mean to fuse them when i included the flags. my beliefs fall on the spectrum, but not combined
Anarcho Capitalism/communism
i engage with them as separate ideologies, left anarchism and socialism/(mild) social democracy
Social democracy on top!
we looove nordic welfare š£ļø
We love The SDP!
Lmao
Understood
I love this thing and still dont grasp what it is
Some kind of chaotic force of nature ensconced in the small form of a woodland animal
those fancy words apply to usagi alone.
Is that the little white one
I have finally found someone knowledgable about this creature
no it's the yellow force of the gluttony in the video i sent
Who is the little white one
chiikawa is the white one, the titular character
hachiware is the blue one, their closest friend and the only creature in the trio to speak the common tongue
He speaks human language?
they act as the translator to both chiikawa and usagi
everyone does except chiikawa and usagi. chiikawa's too burdened by their anxiety so they can only communicate in childlike grunts and whines. usagi can't verbalize their thoughts at all but they make it up with direct action
Innnnteresting
You love this show
It looks adorable
it has 250 episodes each in a minute's length.
WOW
i caught up through an ig account š
nevermind i missed one guy
Who is this interesting soda loving fellow
thats a lemon sprinkled beer they're drinking and their name is kurimanju
It's similar to Kurmanji
whats so serious
I am running company kind of software engineering
All I need is a computer ship address
You will receive my computer and turn on and earn money for that
1k per month
$
usd
yes zinx
was the gecko controlled by satan. why did it become its own story to religiously permit gecko killing
it reminds me of the hadith where Muhammad advised his followers that if a fly landed in their drink, it was recommended to fully submerge the fly into the drink because one wing of the fly carried disease, while the other wing carried the cure to that disease
the hadist itself wasnt even the dumbest part. many scientists fought tooth and nail to prove this right and their scientific ramifications were solely hung on the chemicals in the wings seeping into drink

i'm welcome to the idea that religious passages told concepts that preceded modern time researches. even if skeptics presumed most came from simple intuition and weren't entirely novel ideas, they're still prescient and they did build the intellectual spark for people at the time to learn.
but some prophet recounts are straight up questionable
i am familiar with several of the hadiths
i was raised muslim, and my dad once bought me a book on the bits of sciences expressed vaguely in the qur'an and hadiths. its been years since i opened it but the majority of ideas were scientifically viable. they had huge merits as insights of daily life conducts i.e navigation, food components, health and eating habits through a worshipped book, but the attempts at proving disbelievers wrong on the more abstract topics in the end got a bit unchallenging
the arguments on the islamic behalf is too "presupposed". it's almost just pushing subjectivities down the other person's throat.
Exactly ā„ļø
are you Muslim?
Yes

do you have anything say or...
You are a muslim?
only on my citizen's id and to the knowledge of my close connections. i generally dont profess to it that much
Whys that?cause it's presupposed?
incompatibility thats all
What do you think you want it to be as compatible as science....like equal
i dont wanna get into this..
i think there is a language barrier here
can a guy just not believe
š
this made me look at that guy's question and youre right he only plucked off what i said
i am not even sure what it means exactly, no offense to you, atif
"What do you think? Do you want it to be compatible with science? Equal to science?"
I think that is an approximation of what he was saying
but how to answer such a question
ok well...that's one way to read it
no i didnt mean to relate both statement to each other
all I wanted to say was that you want it to be like what science had done or is doing
when i said its incompatible its a sum of what i felt throughout the years. it had nothing to do with the previous talk
he is saying it isn't compatible with himself
Ohh
no it involves more than science and im not here to clear my point to anyone š

What are you guys debating on?

Youuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuu
You'll get the capital punishment
Mf
one of my coworkers is a chronic weeb becaude why is your nick on the office gc not your real name
like, who's "poetic narrator" and why do you have a solo leveling pfp
Lmao
Non comprehensible
is he a programmer? 
I'm currently reading this book
It's the most stupid shit I read in my life up until now.
are you an atheist?
thank you
damn
very very controversial stuff going on
It's truly mind boggling beyond belief, unbelievable. You kill, imprison, and harass people over something you deeply believe in yet have no objective standards to prove it with. All your "evidence" is basically your personal preference in literature, and you call that "scientifically and methodologically" proven.
Schools, mosques, hospital stuff probably didn't notice how under their buildings located tunnels which comparable to the second largest metropolitan in the world
Interesting
whats the difference
Agnostic
atheist == non-religious
are you agnostic
Nope
whats that
no, an english teacher
Don't believe in god but not sure if he exists
atheist means without belief in any higher power, non-religious can suggest some form of spirituality but home-brewed, without a preestablished religious system
It's only controversial because of emotions. Muslim Arabic speakers are emotionally drawn to the Quran and they think it's because it has any value on its own. But non-Muslim Arabic speakers know that it's bullshit.
i have heard this argument
There are gnostic atheists, agnostic atheists, agnostic theists, gnostic theists
fk, once theres a religious topic,you guys show up
i'm Christian, lol
walked to the metro drenched af #fml
this is a little generalizing dont you think
But I think Christians are pretty normal, just like atheists
Do you have any principles that you must follow
Not spiritual though. I think I'm more of an apatheist, meaning I don't care about the whole matter of the creator or creation. But when I think about how the universe came to existence, I tend to think that there are some sort of natural laws that brought it, that seems to make more sense.
Someone told me this is an atheistic view though.
love God, and love your neighbor, and love your enemies
How so?
'love your enemies'
mhm
Jesus said that we need to emulate our Father
and God shows kindness to those who hate Him, He provides for their needs as He does for others
It was your request
so Jesus said we must do good to those who hate us, bless those who curse us, and pray for those who spitefully use us and persecute us
He did it best
It truly scratches my mind how they state the weakest arguments with iron confidence. As if they saw and talked to their god before.
They even say "I bear witness that there's no god but Allah" although they witnessed no shit.
Ų“ŁŲ§ŲÆŲ© Ų²ŁŲ± as we say in Arabic.
Probably my most hated aspect about it
quran verses have been lauded as evocative literary arts even by non muslim arabs, it's preached as the glossary of fundamental inspiration in arabic poems. i have no stakes in the discussion this is just a little smth from me. i think the conclusion you came to was a bit narrow minded
however, your rhetoric matters here- we aren't discussing it in such a way as to reason with it
we are just sort calling it stupid
Killing reptiles is where I draw a really hard line and this causes me to hate it to no end now
im not buy it at all, if i robbed your money, do you gonna beat my ass
It's pure barbarism
I am not allowed
Jesus said if you rob me, I should give you more
It's almost as if they distilled pure mammalian ideology
but,if that happened
they can clothe empirically wrong statements with flowery language but they're flowers nonetheless
Idk but seems like other animals were helping Ibrahim, which means the gecko had free will to act in favour or against
What do you mean exactly?
Fancy words aside, you are wrong.
fancy words????
Idk bro I'm intermediate in English š
big words helps you say more with less
he is not being pretentious
Or help you look right when you are wrong.
It seems that sticking with only one dictionary (if there is no rare situation), one grammar book is much better so to not waste any time.
only if the audience can't make heads or tails of what they are reading, I guess
insane, i will get rich, because im going out on the streat and find christians
ofc it is important to tailor your language to your audience when it is feasible to do so
communication is hard
then christians will shoot me
USA moment
That's what happened. The message directed at me, someone who is intermediate.
do you really want to do this?
Christians are not supposed to shoot you, that's all I can say
Jesus said if someone asks us for something, we should give it and expect nothing in return
hahahaha
mkay lemme tone it down a little. i dont think non muslim arabs will be stunned by most quran verses when they are grammatically and metaphorically proper. you'll have to bag a certain hate towards them to even say they sound stupid
i understand
again, communication is so hard, especially when most of the participants are all speaking in a language that is not their native, and in which they all vary in degrees of comprehension
you guys should be gracious
probably need to ask a lot of questions to make sure there is no misunderstanding
wow everyone is here
I had this attitude toward it even as a Muslim.
It was like oh what the fuck idc what happens, god no.1 and fuck you if you donāt believe in god
were you a Muslim at some point?
It's over
Born and raised as one even.
i see
people raised in a given religion tend to be the most openly hostile when they apostasize
I was already enough about some backward ideology that drives people into cycle of underdeveloped and radical
omg i like christians , if that is true, i will never be hated by a christian
Like Islam is a typical one
why are you reading the book?
Jesus said hatred in the heart is seen by the Lord as murder
I guess so. No one likes getting something they aren't convinced with pushed down their throats.
Maoism as opposed to Dengism?
I am wondering though, in a world full of enemies and people who wish to harm you, why would you go out of your way to take advantage of people who are committed to taking care of you because God loves you

omg ................................ christians are nice?
Well they are quite so different, in some cases I would say Maoism is more advanced
it is not advisable to paint any group with such a broad brush
For example to deal with corruption, and for ideological struggle
I am speaking to what we are called to, not to how every Christian behaves
many don't even know that they are supposed to do these things
and many who do know capitulate to human weakness
Is Dengism more focused on money?
But Dengism was a more like how to make the pie bigger
Someone recommended it for me after I asked for the objective standards they judge the Quran with, and up until this point I don't see any.
I was a bit dumb honestly, thought I'd see that for a moment.
i am merely saying, this is what we are supposed to do
Thatās what he said
i appreciate your intellectual honesty
whats so serious
I feel that you summarized the argument and its inherent flaw quite succinctly however
Maoism isnāt that bad, it was eliminated the corruption, and cracked down on reactionary forces
got it, but i will still like your religion groups
you mean because you will see Christians as easy pickings
And it establish the basis of our nation which will not be easily overthrow
you shouldn't shoot your friends when you will have so many enemies in life
Still no though, I will after reading the book.
Good and bad individuals exist within every religion, no faith is exempt from this reality. To claim that any group is inherently good would be an oversimplification
You can imagine that even the most terrible cases of great leap forward and cultural revolution happened for decades and our political structure and power stays fine
Thatās super weird because if some state even have 10 days or 20 days of cultural revolution they might have a upcoming real revolution very soon
But for us, these lasts for decades, and people still praise Mao till now
True, even saurians get carried away by their inner mammal instead of following the reptile path all the way through
have you guys seen the martian btw?
no sir, without any purpose, all people like kind people
you need to evaluate each Christian the same way you do anyone else
Not if the kindness is just a faƧade
i am sorry to say that the Christian moniker doesn't mean much
unless it is backed up by fidelity
by Christ's seal of authenticity
The pope, how many troops he have ? - Joseph Stalin
i am not Catholic, so I can offer no insight
yeah Of course !
Canāt believe in 21 century there was a bunch of people who try to use the way that happened few centuries ago to grow their power and they totally failed before it
Their place remain divided into chaos, war, and poverty while stay shouting for the godās sake
who??
He had many once
the catholics waged some of the most disgusting wars in history, both against others, and against Biblical Christianity
He was in charge of the most powerful country in Italy and one of the most fearsome in all of Europe
i think this is good english practice
It had little power projection compared to colonial power which is why they stayed behind
you are talking about very complex issues, this is bound to improve your vocabulary
Thatās the fucking truth
Idc about the english thing tbh I say whatever the fuck is truth
i also love how you add the f word at unusual moments, you come across as very passionate and exciteable, which is probably true
out of your mind hahahahah
you do need to have an adequate understanding of a given language in order to communicate truth in said language, however
Heās been getting crazier and crazier lately
life is hard
I understand what you are saying and you donāt understand what Iām saying as the other knows ?
Who seems to be the real problem here
to be honest
No he's limiting his power level
i am no longer engaging with your statements as arguments anymore
We almost lost Minecraft lad more than once
you recycle the same ideas over and over, and to no one in particular, which tells me you just want company, and you are sharing what you are passionate for- these are not bad things
and I have addressed the points as much as I care to
This is his most acceptable form, it doesn't violate any rule be it outlined or hidden
this one was true regardless of your status
so now I view your statements through the lens of someone who tutors English
what really, i like the crazy guy
Yes we all do
awesome I never said my english was perfect, but for convey the meanings I believe that's all enough
no one's english is perfect
Only the enemies of serious chat don't like him
not even mine, don't worry
yeah !!
good movie
go straight militarism
get money then get guns then take lands then get money then get guns and go infinite cycle
that fail everything in peace times
how are you, sir
that killed himself ?
me, im good sir
He lost them all to united Italy
history told us you need enough power to hold the power
some general's power even above you
He was powerful enough against individual Italian states but not against most of Italy
appreciate every second that Mussolini didn't hand over the military to the pope
likewise
He gave him more power tho
Post-fascist Italy has been way tougher on the Pope than Mussolini was
i cant follow it....
it reads like dueling wikipedia articles
but i nerd out about star wars in the same way
how do they continue the conversation, who are they talking about
to say something fucked
whats so serious
and start an arugument
you guys don't really have that many arguments
then they fight back by shouting ass
i should keep practicing reading
well, it doesn't seem so
just seems like you guys share historical facts and opinions about politics
not now because these are my people
oh lol, i see
there's the clique of Minecraft_652
ahh, the minecraft_652 club
they all my friends ofc we don't start arguments like dropping the pit
well my english came from street asshs who would expect that lol
anyway just have fun
your english isn't bad
you are able to communicate fairly complex ideas in a reasonably understandable way
We still had some in the past, now we know each other's opinions
english me is good, me english good is
thanks
Except Zinx, he doesn't express many opinions
yeah quite a lot
And Zinx isn't an OG yet but he's achieving apoOGsis
i know nothing, im nervous now
this chat needs more zinxs
Knowing isn't needed
This server*
he is a good chap
zinx is drunk
u fell in love man
i like this kind of content
Please rate these claim sentences about star wars: The forceās believe-in-yourself-nature may arguably be the most appealing aspect towards Star Wars; a Hillbilly farm kid becoming a hero among an oppressive tyranny through believing in himself reflects the viewerās inner wants.
And yet, George Lucasās addition of midichlorians placing an almost pure emphasis on the need of genetics undermines the appealing , majestical spirituality of the force: ānow anyone can become somebody if they are a one-in-a-quadrillion eliteā.
Ultimately, George Lucasās almost surreal blindness to the true nature of the forceāspirituality and beliefāreveals his true being as a pulp-fiction director that struck gold.
no..........
i love people in general and don't mind calling out virtue where i see it
I am quite bad at English, but I hope to improve.
i think those things should be celebrated since there is so little to celebrate
everything and everyone have a cause to exist here
While this isn't perfect for an essay, its main purpose was made to make people, to some degree, disagree; these style promotes interest in literature
i would be fine
It's true, to an extent the prequels feel a bit like a completely different team did the entire trilogy
without the enemy what's the point of the guns in my hand
I was more or less referencing to the brilliant stravato that my claims aim to captivate.
what is that, BUT that girl is cute very very, thats not even in english
Collecting idk
hahaha
She was recorded by a stranger for a Tik Tok video
Without her consent and without her knowing it
i am pretty sure even in new hope, luke's force sensitivity is alluded to being due in part to his father's own force aptitude
i didn't find any issue with the midichlorians
Why not?
the spiritual and the material are often instrinsically intertwined in my mind
i think they work together in tandem to affect goals and processes
the idea is native to my own way of thinking as a Christian
so the midichlorians do not detract from the more spiritual components of the Force, to me
to me it just served to emphasize Anakin was something exceptional even amongst the Jedi
It creates power behind thte hands of one-in-a-trillion elites, and these sentiments transverse further than the literature itself ever hoped to b
how is this different from the original trilogy
Anakin wasn't exceptional, alas he was born lucky.
Note how the original triology appears more spiritual, although force uses are painted as hunted thus rare
it's a hero's journey narrative
ofc the hero is going to be exceptional- this narrative has its own intrinsic virtue
just because it is not the message you want it to be doesn't mean it is a bad message
heroes are exceptional- they act when others will not
do you feel this way about super hero movies
They could make the hero exceptional in other ways. If you need to add an overpowered mystical power than only elites can access, and place him at the top by far, then you lack bad writing skills
they gave him powers because it is cool
i mean, he is surrounded by every day heroes as well, lando, han, leia, all exceptional individuals
Depends on the super hero movies, but they are mostly made for stuff; I disagree on ones which promote the negative idea thereof
anakin is a flawed person anyway
but u like zinx more
Those are well written characters, but them having the ability to use the force, like everyone else, to some degree after learning would propel the story
you don't know me very well
but i know u fell in love with zinx
also, in general, for you to claim that star wars promotes the message you are indicating reveals a lack of media literacy
How so?
is that what star wars is saying when anakin is shown to be a deeply flawed person whose inner demons destroy the jedi order, and ruins everything
his exceptional powers do not end up helping him save the galaxy
in the end, it is a selfless act of love for his son that does it
and this in response to Luke's own sacrifice
it is not force powers, or lightsabers, that wins the day here
whatever potential anakin might have possessed is squandered when he falls to his own temptations and demons
Just because it has other motifs, doesn't mean it overtakes the flawed ones. Star wars was ameant to be itself a pure entertainment form of literature, and its going about your mentioned actions of him is done poorly if it wasn't for star wars initial hype
the motif you are framing it as, putting all your hope in the hands of elites, isn't in star wars
in the prequels, the elites are the jedi
and they ruin everything due to their hubris and pride
their most elite member, anakin, is blinded by his own arrogance due to his elite nature and destroys everything he loves most including himself
power blinds them all and they set the galaxy on fire due to their failure
in the original trilogy, it is a motley crew of friends that save the galaxy working together
and ultimately it is their love for each other, and luke's love for an irredeemable monster, that redeems vader back to the light, and sets things right
My motif was mainly that Star Wars purest form of being itself consisting of the spiritual force was decimated
because of midichlorians?
Their love for each other, belief in themself, etc., not aligned with genetics
i think you have this perspective due to last jedi, when its advocates tried to support rian johnson's hackneyed writing as being good for star wars
genetics and spirituality do not have to be separated from each other
i mean, this is not even how
bro, even in the og trilogy, the force is manifested through the bodies of its users
there is a synergy between the flesh and the spirit that is expressed in use of the force
Implying that, to which I disagree is a good idea, a such brute sided scale is not needed
not sure what you mean
anyway, go ahead and write your paper lol, i just like talking about star wars
The force manifested mainly from their belief, as it appeared from the viewer's persepcttive
i never saw the og trilogy that way at all
and i watched it a million times before the prequels came out
it was never about how much faith you had, luke clearly was exceptional
Don't you get tired of spreading reptilian propaganda 
i mean, you couldn't just will yourself to have the force
I would need
It was mostly about faith. Your view on Luke was exceptional likely stems from your belief of success on luck
it never was lol
Not luck, but predetermined luck
i mean, yes, there are themes there- but luke's sensitivity to the force is clearly tied to his lineage in the og trilogy
there are already hints to the force's roots in genetic inheritance
the midichlorians only gave a name to what the original trilogy alluded to
In the realm of contemporary discourse, the significance of eloquence and articulate expression cannot be overstated. The ability to convey thoughts with precision and sophistication is a hallmark of intellectual prowess. This essay endeavors to elucidate the paramount importance of cultivating a rich vocabulary and employing complex linguistic structures in both written and spoken communication.
Language serves as the bedrock of human interaction, facilitating the exchange of ideas, emotions, and cultural nuances. A robust vocabulary empowers individuals to articulate their thoughts with clarity and depth, transcending the limitations of simplistic expression. The lexicon one possesses is not merely a collection of words; it is a reflection of oneās cognitive engagement with the world. The more extensive oneās vocabulary, the more adept one becomes at navigating the intricacies of discourse, whether in academic, professional, or social contexts.
Moreover, the utilization of complex vocabulary can significantly enhance the persuasiveness of an argument. In the realm of rhetoric, the strategic deployment of sophisticated terminology can captivate an audience, engendering a sense of authority and credibility. For instance, employing terms such as "ubiquitous" instead of "common" or "ameliorate" in place of "improve" can elevate the discourse, prompting listeners or readers to engage more critically with the content presented. This elevation of language not only enriches the communicative experience but also fosters a deeper intellectual engagement with the subject matter.
this is why obi-wan hides luke and leia- because they are the children of anakin skywalker
Furthermore, the mastery of complex vocabulary is intrinsically linked to the cultivation of critical thinking skills. Engaging with advanced linguistic constructs necessitates a nuanced understanding of context, connotation, and the multifaceted nature of meaning. This cognitive exercise encourages individuals to analyze and synthesize information more effectively, fostering a mindset that values depth over superficiality. In an age characterized by the rapid dissemination of information, the ability to discern and articulate complex ideas is an invaluable asset.
In addition to enhancing personal expression and critical thinking, a sophisticated vocabulary can also serve as a bridge to diverse cultural and intellectual traditions. Language is a vessel of culture, and the words we choose to employ often carry with them the weight of historical and philosophical significance. By embracing a more complex lexicon, individuals can access a broader spectrum of literature, philosophy, and art, enriching their understanding of the human experience. This cultural literacy not only broadens oneās horizons but also fosters empathy and appreciation for the myriad perspectives that exist within the global tapestry of human thought.
However, it is imperative to approach the use of complex vocabulary with discernment. The indiscriminate application of sophisticated terms can lead to obfuscation rather than clarity. Effective communication hinges on the ability to tailor oneās language to the audience and context. Thus, while the pursuit of an expansive vocabulary is commendable, it must be balanced with the principles of clarity and accessibility. The ultimate goal of communication should be to foster understanding, not to alienate or confuse.
yeah, exactly, see, this guy agrees with me
In conclusion, the cultivation of a complex vocabulary is a multifaceted endeavor that enriches personal expression, enhances critical thinking, and fosters cultural literacy. As individuals navigate the complexities of modern discourse, the ability to articulate thoughts with sophistication and precision will remain an invaluable asset. By embracing the nuances of language, we not only elevate our own communicative capabilities but also contribute to a more thoughtful and engaged society. The journey toward linguistic mastery is one that promises both personal and collective enrichment, underscoring the enduring power of words in shaping our world.
Serious information for serious chat
bingo
It is how the viewer sees it, not how George sees it
obi-wan tells luke in return that due to their ancestry, luke and leia were hidden
everyone knew that anakin's kids would be prodigiously powerful
that already sets up the idea of the force being passed down through bloodlines
midichlorians were already there in the og trilogy
Appeals to the auidience that they're hidden because they were, I don't know, sons of a sith lord
george just gave it a name
My original claim was this: The forceās believe-in-yourself-nature may arguably be the most appealing aspect towards Star Wars; a Hillbilly farm kid becoming a hero among an oppressive tyranny through believing in himself reflects the viewerās inner wants.
And yet, George Lucasās addition of midichlorians placing an almost pure emphasis on the need of genetics undermines the appealing , majestical spirituality of the force: ānow anyone can become somebody if they are a one-in-a-quadrillion eliteā.
Ultimately, George Lucasās almost surreal blindness to the true nature of the forceāspirituality and beliefāreveals his true being as a pulp-fiction director that struck gold.
It focuses mainly on how star wars changed in the eyes of the viewers for something negative
there is no force believe in yourself nature imo
Death star?
there is trust in the force
allow this higher power, this spiritual presence, to guide your actions
Their trust n the force is also their trust in themself
not believe in yourself and it will happen
ehhhhhh
do or do not, there is no try, etc.
i didn't take luke's failure here to be a lack of confidence in himself
i took it to be that luke failed to see the world through a spiritual lens, focused as he was on the material world in front of him
he didn't realize the true power and reality that the force represents
Lack of confidence, etc.
no
yoda is there to highlight the moral of that encounter
luke looks at yoda, and sees a tiny little guy, underestimates him
and then yoda lifts the giant x-wing out of the swamp- luke realizes in this moment that the world is more than the material realm, more than appearances
he was wrong to focus on the size of the ship, on the size of yoda- the force is greater than all of this
not luke himself
Our claims can both be taken out of the movie, but I am writing it from the view of how most people will see it. You're viewing it through the lens of a religious person
i don't exactly see how your claim can be taken
i have talked to a lot of star wars nerds in my time
and i don't know anyone who saw star wars and felt it contained themes of the need for self-confidence
and i have heard george talk a lot about star wars
and i have never heard him say this either
There is a difference between star wars nerds and the general populace.
i guessss
but let me give you my blessing
star wars, like most things, allows audiences to read it the way they want
so take your perspective and run with it
it should be an entertaining read anyway
I'll read these soon, uwu
ok
did you write this?
no
you wanted to share?
you certainly did lol
its not mine
Although none of his works have survived, his opinions had been preserved through his critics and the surviving books that answered him.
Ibn al-Rawandi is considered an early example of what modern scholarship terms individual atheism or isolated intellectual dissent. Despite his polemical and critical approach, his thought did not give rise to a distinct school or following. Van Ess further noted that Ibn al-Rawandi "remained on the margins of Islamic theological discourse, and his ideas left no significant legacy."
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ibn_al-Rawandi
Abu al-Hasan Ahmad ibn Yahya ibn Ishaq al-Rawandi (Arabic: Ų£ŲØŁ Ų§ŁŲŲ³Ł Ų£ŲŁ ŲÆ ŲØŁ ŁŲŁŁ ŲØŁ Ų„Ų³ŲŲ§Ł Ų§ŁŲ±Ų§ŁŁŲÆŁ), commonly known as Ibn al-Rawandi (Arabic: Ų§ŲØŁ Ų§ŁŲ±Ų§ŁŁŲÆŁ;ā 827ā911 CE), was a scholar and theologian. In his early days, he was a Mu'tazilite scholar, but then rejected the Mu'tazilite doctrine. Afte...
I can't express how much I dislike this religion.
mutazilism
imagine being anime islam enjoyer
Some reports considered him an atheist
what reports
You're just copy-pasting online wikipedia
His books of course, weren't preserved.
whats so serious
Well, prove it wrong then.
I'm just saying, You are just reading what independent editors from around the world wrote about him here. Most things related to islam dont have proper references in wikipedia at all
gtg
islam is the most peaceful religion
ninty percent of the terrorist organisations:
wassup G
john fallout
no
i was hoping to see you again because i am still waiting to find a reason to get you banned
islam will kill ur brain
Likewise sweetheart
lol
except i dont wanna get u banned, i just wanna chat
about what, mr. fallout
life
yes
oooo okay thats fun
lol who
Muslims claim it
they are biased
no they arent
are you muslim, blade?
yes
so you believe it is the most peaceful religion
yes they are, theyre also wrong i can tell ya, anyone who claims islam is a peaceful religion is in denial
it is a religion of righteousness, which brings peace and justice!
i see lol
whatever you need to tell yourself sweetie
Lmao
if I lie then catch me
who tf even said that it is the most peaceful
what how can i catch you idk where u live
blade
while on the contrary
muslims, but they are biased
blade doesn't attempt to argue that it is the most peaceful, present tense
his argument is that islam contains the most potential for bringing his idea of peace
they are based
are you muslim?
in afgan they literally only study quaran in schools
atheist
guys, islam does not exactly have a great track record when it comes to peace these days
Some moderate Muslims Ig.
Muslim are following their desires, not Islam!
ah i see
Its not a religion i look up to. Literally says in the quran that the prophet muhammed married a 6 year old and had intercourse at 9. This isnt a joke by the way, search it up if you like.
I believe the desire to oppress and kill others is very Islamic.
it is not Islamic, it is out of Islam
in saudi arabia very likely you will be executed as non muslim
basically the same as mauritania but rich
yeah cause muslims are extremists
anyone can be extremist given the right pressures
tolerated terrorists
Take the apostasy death penalty for example. The Hadith that commanded it is very clear, Mohamed said "kill whoever changes his faith".
okay
OOFN is sleeping
it is claim, i can show you strong proof where the age is 21, 18 and other, so you dont lie and pick and choose, if you do that then you are defaming whole Muslims nation and a religion,
i can't get on board with this because the expression of islam through individuals varies wildly
yeah how can people follow such religion, its truly horrible how people justify that stuff
blade for example, is disavowing the violence other muslims commit
i think the ideas of islam can be safely criticized because they are written down and unchanging, at least as pertains to the quran, although the hadiths are a different matter
no what i said is true, dont you come here and try to lie
and sure even criticize the hadiths
in Hanafi Juridispiction there is not things like that, Are you forced to be Muslim, punishment of Blasphemy is death!!!!
huh
If I prove you wrong, then dont come here and assert lies, and acept you picked and choose
Prove to me that islam isnt a extremist religion, prove that you guys are not the scum of the earth. Be my guest.
So what county express Islam the most

