#🧠|serious-chat
1 messages · Page 409 of 1
It's important to really understand the context here - The specific fear among some Arabs were that the Jews were planning on building the temple as a way to reinforce their ideals; reality was, nobody had anyt plans here, this massacre serviced as the catalyst to the kibbutz uprising and Jewish zionism
Specifically, the Haganah was a direct reaction to this
https://www.hudson.org/foreign-policy/the-hebron-riots-of-1929-consequences-and-lesson you can read the consequences of this attack here:
The 1929 riots destroyed the Jewish community in Hebron. They persuaded Labor Zionist leader David Ben-Gurion that socialist fraternity among Jewish and Arab workers and peasants would not ensure peace. They impelled Palestine’s Jews to bolster the Haganah, their underground self-defense group. And they vindicated Zionist warnings against relying on foreigners for security.
In 1929, Arab clerics and politicians provoked riots across Palestine by accusing Jews of plotting to take control of Jerusalem’s al-Aqsa Mosque. This month marks the 90th anniversary of those riots — but they are not a bygone. Palestinian Authority and Hamas leaders incite violence today using similar falsehoods and ideology.
Also, the past does not matter to the subsect; the fact is, you're in the present. A state is justified on its own basis; there's as much justification for one as opposed to the other. You're in the present now, noT 1920s or 1930s.
ur committing bothsidesism Fallacy and erasing Historical events that lead to what it is today ,only to adopt an unjustifiable state.
Nothing here is a "fallacy" - We're in 2025, the historical events can only be used as a framing towards how things are now. There's no attempt at "balance" here, what's said is that the past is not a meaningful justification for anything, because I can take reference to any specific point in the past as a justification for anything
you're essentially building an arbitrary argument. It doesn't matter how things were 100 years ago, we're in 2025. Not 1900. If you want to argue on that basis - I'd note that arabs did infact initiate this conflict, not the Jews
they didn't live "peacefully together," as you claim, the specific reaction, and all the violence, started there specifically - You can blame the British for giving justification for the violence, sure. But that's not a meaningful defence when Arab leaders spread lies about some Jewish plot that induced this violence
it seems to me as it is a natural counter effect to the going on plans to establish Jewish state -despite I don't justify killing innocent ppl as it is against the Islamic doctrine - but looking at the Historical context of that reaction, just now observing what Isreal reached today approve that their worries were right, but actions may be wrong.
But how that justify expulsion of Palestinians from their villages ,thousands of villages have been totally erased ? .
There was no such attempt - And if there was, that was always specifically done with Arab and Jews in mind. You can see that by merely noting how Zionist leaders related to Arabs; David Ben-Gurion wanted peaceful coexistence of Jews and Arabs. Things like the Haganah, while existing, was not particularly militant nor was it aggressive in its posturing. The violence specifically occurred over accusation of Jews wanting to take over al-Aqsa Mosque; problem? It had no proof. It was a baseless accusation. So zionism did not have as strong an appeal prior to these attacks - It was exactly because of these attacks that the Jewish community concluded that peaceful coexistence was impossible.
The Haganah became increasingly militant, only bolstered by arab violence and riots from 1931-1936, serving as further justification for the Haganah. The 1948 expulsion and killings by the Haganah are the eventual outcome of this.
Now, you're asking for a Justification for this - I don't think there is one; but neither was there a justification for the attacks in 1921, 1928, 1936, 1939 etc., the specific expulsion was a Reaction to these things; if violence is the only thing you've known from a group of people, do you want to live peacefully with those? If your neighbour constantly attacks you, do you think you can live with him peacefully? It's important to understanding this in context to grasp the full breath - This is an outcome of these attacks which serviced as ideological justification for radical zionism
they don't give a shit to your islamic stuff
Nobody's appealing to Islam, MC.
can't agree more
The point he's making is that we shouldn't have had Jews moving to Israel - And I'd be inclined to agree. In a 'perfect world,' the Jews wouldn't have gone there - In part due to balfour declaration; in part due to the Germans mass expulsion of Jews in 1930s
and btw whatever you think it's unjust to let those jewish people into that piece of land or something else fucked based on some toilet paper, the reality is that land is part of the British Empire, British rules, not any of you guys
I don't see even one arab in British cabinet
and they decided to let people come in, establish their state, whatever who the fuck gives a shit to you, you are not ruling the land
british rules
and nobody gives a shit to some loser's excuse
well those all excuses for some morality explaination, I would say things happened with real cause which mostly not based on those excuses
the truth is, let more jewish into that place would help British to control their territory in the middle east
It's important to understand that the specific dialogue is due to 'moral discourse' - That's how @void arch started the specific conversation. There wasn't any specific justification to religion; there wasn't any specific discussion about "Erhm, who had power!?" as you're attempting to shoehorn into it. That's irrelevant to the subject-matter
remember their old for all strategy of divide and rule ? separating groups of people, make people rival together in one territory so the cost would be very little for british to rule the place
I don't think I need to follow his subject-matter to respond some bullshit
neither you should do
I'm merely contextualizing the subject 🤷🏻♂️
gj I see very nice
opps sorry wrong gif
my mice double clicks by itself
Just to expand on this, by the way, @void arch David Ben-Gurion was the first prime minister of Israel. His opinion on Arabs had changed a lot after the attacks - before that, he followed a very typical Arab-Israeli reconciliation framework on the basis of "working class and victims of imperialism should unite" type of reasoning
ur erasing the Historical context that lead to the establishment of isreal ,and equating between a colonizer and a colonized an occupier and an occupied ,its just dishonest to do so.
I didn't mention that past is justifying anything today ,at least u. ur justifying Isreal state legitimacy based on an suffering that caused by western states for centuries, and the actions against their plans to establish Isreal from Palestinians ,like Jewish people were living under brutal occupation and suffering in palestine ,for intance u have many Jewish ppl mentioning how peaceful and harmony their life among Muslims was.
not to mention that period ur mentioning those acts against Jews is when tensions were at the top between two sides ,and that erase the historical context ,as Muslim were afraid of today observable consequence of establishing isreal .when they are wittinising mass immigration of europian Jewish ,and political support for establishing Zionist state. what would be ur reaction if u know immigrants are planning to take control ur country and kick ur off out if it with support of other major powers?
indeed ur argument is flawed ,just bcz Jewish ppl -for the sake of argument- suffer from brutality and violence ,doesn't justify establishing an apartheid state based on ethnic cleansing against another group and expulsion of them.
I'm giving you the context, actually - That's the specific context itself; the cause of much of it can be traced to violence that occurred through this period.
I'm not actually justifying anything. I'm demonstrating why the specific events occurred and what caused them. If you accept that the attacks of 1921 and 1928 were provoked on unsound reasoning; you must also accept that these specific attacks that occurred later through the civil war has reasoning. You're talking about 'peaceful and harmonious life,' but I don't see that when I look it up. Already in the 19th century 18-19 hundreds, arabs were beginning to make attacks on Jews throughout the arab world. A masscre of jews in 1828 Bagdad; punitive taxation in Libya; in 1867, 1870 and 1897 arabs ransacked and destroyed several synagogues in Tripolitania. We can go on - While none of these were specifically in Palestine, we saw similar sentiment arise: attempts at expulsion and violence too. So this would be a fantasy.
That's ignoring that the establishment was a reaction to violence - Again, I've already gone through this with you. You can say the immigration 'was bad,' but to then talk about violence which occurred against throughout the arab world, even in areas without immigration; in areas before the balfour declaration, what peaceful coexistence are we specifically talking about?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1834_looting_of_Safed not to forget this
The 1834 looting of Safed (Hebrew: ביזת צפת בשנת תקצ"ד (or the 1834 Safed pogrom), 5594 AM) was a month-long attack on the Jewish community of Safed in the Sidon Eyalet of the Ottoman Empire during the Peasants' revolt in Palestine. It began on Sunday, June 15 (7 Sivan), the day after the Jewish holiday of Shavuot, and lasted for 33 days. It has...
If you want - I can go through more pogroms in Ottomn Palestine
ur again erasing the context ,like Muslim wake up and start attacking Jewish ppl , cinema!
Jewish ppl were mass immigrating and establishing settlement with the aid of terrorists paramilitary of isreal , it s consequential there ll be resistance and clash between sides but its important to highlight the dangerous movement seen by native citizens .
are u colonizing me and expecting peace are u sure of what you are saying ?
"Wake up"? From what? The minority in the 19th century prior to zionism? What did they wake up to - These attacks had no justification, yet they were committed with impunity. To quote:
The Arabs are violently hostile to the Jews, and persecute the children of Israel in the streets of the city. If a notable or even lower-class citizen lays their hands on a Jew, we have no right to reciprocate, whether Arabs or Turks, for they are of the same religion. If a Jew is hit, he must adopt a supplicant attitude and not retaliate with unkind words, lest he receive even more blows, for, in their eyes, we are people of nothing. Sephardim behave like this because they’re already used to it.
You talk about peaceful coexistence, but I don't see any here - These were prior to immigration, this was before the specific claims you're making. Much of this was unprovoked
This isn't even a meaningful framework: Is a Palestinian who return to Palestine while living 50 years in Europe a colonizer?
taking someone land and expecting to accept 50 50 share , its unfair to begin with
Important to remember that these specifically were often done in areas where Jews were already the majority - The initial split in 1948 occurred around the coastline where Jews were a majority population. You can say it's because of "immigration," sure, legal immigration for that matter - Do you think that Europeans are justified in attacking and discriminating against arabs in europe?
If not - Why do you think they are in this case?
And even then - Many of the areas of Palestine were initially primarily inhabited by Jews. To quote Franciscus Quaresmius on Safed, it was: "Inhabited mainly by Hebrews, where they have their synagogues and schools." Yet, by the time of the 1920s, it was generally inhabitated by Arabs. Would this not constitute colonization? Or are we skipping around the bush here?
As I've stated - The more you look back, the less favorable to your position history becomes.
Nowhere I ever claimed you did
Americans always feeling as if they're at the centre of everyone's attention 
I dont support brutal treatment of any side ,I do recognize the right for both ppl to live there, but I oppose mass immigration and world political movement at that time that lead to establishing a state based on ethnic cleansing and expulsion of another native citizen.
i also do not see it to be logical to make such narratives a legitimate reason to establish an apartheid state.
false equivalence, Europeans Jews weren't immigrants in europe they were citizens for centuries in europe, not like other Jews that lived originally in palestine.
See - That argument falls on his head for a variety of reasons. At least initially, we're both in agreement; and while expulsions can be argued to be 'negative,' you must admit that those are a reaction to specific history of violence itself. Neither being justified. But the problem remains that even with expulsions, when peace occurred, Israel wanted the state of Palestine to look like this: This deal was demographic, if we take a look at populations during this period, we'll see the overlap. Arab majority areas went to Arabs, Jewish majority areas went to Israel with some exceptions. Now, you'd be right in saying that nakba was unjustified - I've already agreed, but we've also got to contextualize plenty of these things in a historical context.
You're relying on an arbitrary dividing line. They've been there "in a century," okay, why would it matter if it's 2 or 10 generations? They're still citizens of a foreign country when they 'return.' See, your reasoning is inconsistent here. At least if we look at European jews, Ashkenazi Jews, they're geneticallty similar to even local Jews in ottoman Palestine (Mizrahi), and even have a 30~50 % genetic overlap with local arab Palestinians
also, the largest Jewish population of Israel are arab jews - Mizrahi Jews, so even then, this position wouldn't actually work out.
Jewish migration and acquisition of land was done legally and authorities intervened to settle any issues ( this is back at Ottoman times).
very ironic how you talk about erasing context and you just ignore fully fledged facts.
are u comparing an immigrant with an occupier that actively willing to occupie and establish a state in ur country?
You are comparing many of the Jews who moved to Palestine to occupiers, when in fact they were refugees from a genocide
You did conveniently forget that several areas were originally Jewish dominated. So if we go far enough back in history, this argument can be turned around against you.
https://www.fondapol.org/en/study/pogroms-in-palestine-before-the-creation-of-the-state-of-israel-1830-1948/ I think this article goes into depth with this
what Palestinian state was there prior to Israel lel
You're thinking in terms of state and country, not in terms of population and members - He's talking membership and population, not statehood
I think that example is especially poor lol weren't they establishing a state with the permission of the owner of said country?
I just followed his statement where he mentioned occupying a country, and it's not like Jews are alien to that part of land.
As I've argued earlier - @void arch, if you want a justification for your position, it's better to look from 1970s and after; that's where the most stringent offences from Israeli side occurred.
and it's especially in 1990 - 2014 that the specific framing is best applied.
after the oslo accord
They're addressing Ashkenazi Jews who came from Europe to Palestine during these periods; though I did point out the flaw in this argument in that Mizrahi Jews are the largest and fastest growing group in Israel currently
and ironically, it's ashkenazi jews that want peaceful coexistence, while it's the local mizrahi Jews that are often nationalists and genocidal
I dont see genetics has any basis for this, the fact is Isreal established by mass immigration, nobody could say it illegal bcz it was done under BK on paper, but its actual illegal immigration for me.
Well, "for you" would be the arbitrary framework. That's the issue. However, I think I did argue above that it's useless to even argue this case as lot of Jews, the largest proportion, are Arab Jews from the area itself. Mizrahi jews make up 45% of all Jews in Israel - Ashkenazi are 32%
what are u comparing , the fact is u ve mass immigration and systemic occupation by those immigrants.
I don't have valid reasons to call it illegal but i'll do so anyways lel
that s what makes it illegal
I mean, you need to be more specific - If we're talking about the colonilization effort around the early 2000s, I'd be in agreement with you here. Those are also against the UN declaration, so these are by definition international crimes
the same leap of faith arguments you make for supernatural deities... apples don't fall far away from the tree.
Also, to add, 8% are of mixed background
so has some root to the area itself in some way or another in a more immediate sense.
how all of that justify isreal legitmacy ?
I don't know if that's a useful framing - Israel has, through its settlement policy, illegally occupied land since the 1970s. Some, like the Golan height, can be justified on foreign policy pretexts, but putting israeli settlers throughout the west bank has 0 justification; not only that, but has harvested and destroyed the economy of the west bank itself
same reason are applied for Palestinians
Well, I've stated that both are justifiable - That's why I don't argue on basis of historical justification
becausei t will just go down to subjective value judgement
Israel is an illegtimate child
bcz reasons for its establishment are not valid or legitimate
The West Bank settlements are illegal, but here we are discussing Israel's right to exist as a state, which he firmly disagrees with.
Our founder said that Israel is an illegtimate child of imperial powers
Well - He can disagree with it; but as he admitted to, it eventually collapses into subjective value judgement at that point. And as subjective value judgement, it's trivial. One could argue, as minecraft does, that a state justifies itself through its monopoly on violence
legitimacy at the end of the day really isn't a strong framework
If Zionist want that land then give spain to arabs and balkan land to turkiye
It belongs to them they were there from thousand of years
return their lands, we need our land back
Imperfect framework - Arabs were not originally in Spain; Jews were originally in Palestine. Arab pressence in Palestine itself is due to the same conquest done in Spain.
Turks still live in the Balkans though
Not only their country is partially in the Balkans but there are Turkic people in the rest of the Balkans
Wrong, Jews werent also there, they migrated their.
Specifically - Conquest of Spain occurred through the 9th century due to a visigothic civil war. Same period wherein Arabs gained the Palestinian area, which was previously known as 'Judea' prior to Hadrian.
The Kingdom of Judah was an Israelite kingdom of the Southern Levant during the Iron Age. Centered in the highlands to the west of the Dead Sea, the kingdom's capital was Jerusalem. It was ruled by the Davidic line for four centuries. Jews are named after Judah, and primarily descend from people who lived in the region.
The Hebrew Bible depicts ...
The idea of them coming from Egypt is also problematic - Jews themselves has very clear genetic lineage to local cananites
you are taking information from wikepedia amazing
good luck to your research
They've got historical sources 🤷🏻♂️
Palestinian are also te origin ppl of that land
Israel
😳 
so you are another Zionist here
You're correct - But that returns to my statement that genetics would not be a justification. The university of Tel Aviv did a significant genetic research on these population: the jewish population, lebanese and Palestinians are all of cananite background
its a war against soul of arabs and muslim
Not when Israel attacks Syria unprovoked
Its a war against soul of Islam
Syria is dangerous to them
it s occupation not equal war

Syria gave Israel several concessions, Vivek. Israel has the golan height which is a buffer zone for this exact reason - The current government permitted Israel to keep it
True that
@elder seal canada talks about the atom bomb
They need it to protect themselves from trump
atleast this is wat they said
Why are you changing the subject to trump 😭
also I've done my trolling part
☠️
noticed
natives of a place is really just a matter of timeline.
I noticed that ur contradicting urself here as from the beginning posing many historical reasons for the validation of isreal existence while ur acknowledging that they are irrelevant and subjective ,so basically as Isreal existence based on those Historical justification ,is no longer legitimate. and if we should abide to the present day ,nobody should blame Hama** for their actions.
so immigrant Jews shouldn't establish isreal?
You're not exactly noticing a contradiction. My point is that justification one way or another would be arbitrary and subjective; it's essentially that if we are to take a hard historical line, we'll either claim none or both has a right to exist. That's the point I've made in the discussion I had with flare as well. That there's very little sound reasoning outside of value judgement
They can, migration is part of human history.
but do u think immigration and colonialism is the best way to establish right to exist ?
Unironically yes
ok ,nobody should blame immigrants if take over ur country one day
Most countries are either people who managed to gain independence or the original people were mostly replaced by someone else
I think this is committing a 'begging the question' fallacy. The right to exist justification for Israel is found in its past; and that's its reasoning for existence and service as an ideological justification - To Israelies, Israel as a 'reclaimation' of their state from foreign colonizers, in this case Arabs. In a way, the argument you're using is used against Palestine too
do u think this is a consistent coherent justification ? bcz when others start reclaiming their lost lands, the door for double standards should be closed .
My point is that both could argue this position and in a way the only justification would be by adding additions unto it. It doesn't matter what I think. From a purely logical perspective, all these justifications can and are used as a source of legitimacy. I've already stated prior that that's why they fail rhetorically. Because once confronted by a firm believer in the opposite, the other fails.
Yoo hi How are you..
i think it is stupid to use the statement ''I used to live here'' as justification for establishing right of state existence or self determination.
and i think it leads to chaos
Well - Doesn't this argument also go against you now? Because your current justification for removing Israel for Palestine is "they used to live here"?
I mean - I'd agree, and it did lead to chaos. But that's generally outside of our lifetime, so it's not like I can form an opinion on a historic event outside of hindsight
no its bcz isreal is not legitimate to begin with
as we establish it
before
Well - The justification you used for why they're legitimate was that they had no right to establish themselves because "we usedto live here" isn't a justification, but then we can apply the same reasoning to Palestine? Don't see why it'd follow
I'd also note that Israel itself is predominatenly composede of local Jewish population; Mizrahi Jews. So if being a local population isn't justification for something, then that goes to the other groups too
Palestinians were there and still ,while large portion of isreal are immigrants, if we were going to call for state establishment at that time ill not disagree if they both find way to establish their state , but Zionists make a huge problem when initiated policy of settlements and apartheid system ,they just aggravated things more than before.
now isreal do not want to agree even on two states solution and recognizing palestine
makes sense when u say its colonialism
and total erase of a nation
First statement is a bit more nuanced - Majority are either Arab or Mizrahi Jews, neither of which are really immigrants but are from the area specifically. That's 54% of the population collectively. Not accounting the Druze population who are also native to the place itself.
And you're entirely fair in opposing settlement policy. I've already noted that it's specifically are against UN law. However, opposition to settlement policy is different from opposition to the state itself - What I've noted here however is that it's the European immigrant population; Ashkenazi Jews, who oppose settlement policy - Historically as well. The irony is that the settlement policy was pursued by Likud, which is predominanty supported by Mizrahi population
im referring to the past
Sure - Though, most of the current issues are specifically worsened through the 90s to today. From 2000-2015 there was a very real opportunity for peaceful settlement, which however was opposed by the Israeli powerbase in spite of 60% of the population supporting peaceful relationship with Palestinians, and Palestinians also having an equally high % doing the same
For instance, in 2002, 72% of both Israelis and Palestinians supported returning to 1967 borders
with peaceful cooperation being a clause as part of that agreement
that's a far cry from the 14% today on both sides
but new administration of isreal didnt want to
Exactly - Likud is the party of Mizrahis as well, those were the one who often time support a more hardline foreign policy and has for a long time
If you look at the specific voting split - Mizrahi and Sephardi Jews vote right, and Ashkenazi jews vote left. That's the specific composition on ethnic lines
both sides are equal to me ,left side is just that boy ashamed of his father actions but can't do anything .
pretending to have mercy on kids ,but they will grow up and be terrorists , so better kill him
as many of them say
I think you're overthinking that - The specific goal is not about the past, but about the present and future. Whether you like it or not, both parties found* it preferable to have a peaceful settlement that does not involve further bloodshed. That it hasn't gone that way is a historic outcome 🤷🏻♂️
peaceful settlement where?
what i said is the true mindset of the majority
more than 60% dont oppose total ethnic cleansing of Palestinians
I said that was the 'desire.' There was attempts: Oslo accord, Madrid conference, 1996-99 agreement, Camp david summit, The arab peace initative of 2002-03, Annapolis conference
Nope
I can go on
ok, i think i have to go. nice discussion with you .Salam🤝
peace need justice first
There was attempts at that - In 2000, Israel promised several reparations and return policies, alongside returning 91-95 % of the occupied west bank to Palestinian authorities. Arafat rejected the proposal and came with no settlement or proposal in return
There's been many attempts like this
Even if Arafat didn't agree with it - What's typically done is you come with a counter proposal that's more favorable to your side. Arafat basically came with no demand
regarding the reasons for this rejection. Some sources state that the proposal did not meet core Palestinian demands, particularly concerning the status of Jerusalem and the right of return for refugees. so that attempt didn't address fundamental issues
there is debate on this
Sure - But what you typically do is come with a counter proposal. All initial proposals are negotiable, they just set the starting poind. If Israel was willing to give broad concessions like that, it's easily argued own - The entire proposal however would collapse in 2001 when Likud came to power
This is what I am reading:
Arafat rejected this offer and did not propose a counter-offer.[38][39][40] No tenable solution was crafted which would satisfy both Israeli and Palestinian demands, even under intense U.S. pressure.[38] Clinton blamed Arafat for the failure of the Camp David Summit.[38][40]
that's the problem
Well, not proposing a counter offer is always a problem in negotiations. If a car salesman wants to sell you a car for 110k, you should try and argue him down to 80 by starting from 60
much the same occurs in diplomacy
what do u think it s trivial for u is very fundamental for Palestinians.
(statue of Jerusalem, return of refugees..ect)
Again - Israel started at 110k, Arafat refused to argue it down to 80k. The outcome is that Israel keept the car - That's a metaphor, but one that essentially is my point. You say these are 'fundamental,' yet he didn't come with a counter-offer. If they're fundamental to Palestinians, why'd he not do it?
altho ,Palestinian positions and alternative ideas were conveyed during the negotiations.
There are also sources that indicate that some counter proposals where given, but that they where not deemed acceptable.
you can argue arafat is foolish for not doing it - and that'd be fine, but saying that 'there's nothing to negoatiate' when Israel has the car is arrogant
I've yet tosee any of those - I'm going by what's available 🤷🏻♂️
its up to them ,i cant decide anything.
Well, it's up to no one now. It's about 23 years ago
Context?
He thought we were spending millions on “Trans Mice.”
Who's "He"? Elon? Trump?
In that instance both
That's funny
They are functionally retarded
think in this instance "ignorant" would qualify - Don't think the average person, even academic, knows what transgenic is unless they work in genetics or biology
or at least have an interest. Though, assuming it's "transgender" is actually stupid
When you want to cut funding to a program you should at least know what the program is
They saw the letters t r a n s and mice and their peanut brains took over
9m for promoting lgbt in Lesotho, in a country nobody knows! ah moment
Where the fuck is Lesotho and why does it sound like the name of a Lesbian resort
Agreed - Granted, some of the cases I've heard does justify cut-funding. Like a program for serbia to advance diversity and inclusion
it s in South Africa
The State Department’s Office of the Under Secretary for Public Diplomacy and Public Affairs also offered around 70k USD to finance "a live musical event to promote the U.S. and Irish shared values of diversity, equity, inclusion, and accessibility"
They might as well say the N-Word in place of “DEI” cause thats what they mean
Like, I'm sorry - But some of these projects are just outright waste of public finances
DEI to these people just means The N-Word
when they fire them for dei its always minorities
Then they put unqualified white men in their place
DEI just raises inequality on class basis anyways - Not exactly sure why you're fixation so much on it
Even if it mitigates racial inequality
Good for business though - So I guess that's an argument in favor of it.
Reminds me of a study looking at groups composed of people of diverse backgrounds; politically (right and elft) gender (man and woman) and race. Often-time it improves group performance because it increases focus on what's shared (the job) instead of on things trivial to the work
Specifically - Affirmative action programs in university is my primary thought here. The book "no longer separate, not yet equal" goes into this. The book is one of those books that does that thing where it proves a point that's not "culturally accepted" but still proves a position. Specifically, it actually proves the mismatch hypothesis and then goes on to ignore it as if it didn't just make that conclusion - which is weird
At least you get it unlike some racist shits I run into ☺️
I'm very objective minded 😭 I've no problem necessarily with DEI, though I don't think you should apply it universally. Some times it results in counterintuitive results. Some research on diversity hiring in police office shows that it raises discrimination agaisnt african americans; ironically, black and hispanic cops are more likely to pull over african americans than white ones are. Likely due to reduced threat or accountability from abuse of power
In case of teachers, where there's more women teachers, earlier soruces were afraid that it'd result in discrimination against male students hence worse performance; though there's no evidence that male students do better under male professors vs. female, as was assumed early on in the research
So, DEI initiatives shouldn't be applied universally; inclusive bureaucracies work in some situations, not all.
Tbf you have other issues among police
Bigger ones like higher rates of spousal and child abuse and pedophilia.
Domestic abuse is largely down to workplace stress and lack of proper care. Emotional regulation breaks down when you're fearful of getting shot on the daily - I'd say the lack of accountability plays a role here too, police unions for instance
Also, ages ago i read about this - sadly i can't find any of the sources. There was also a specific book i had in mind
forgot its name - think it was 'inclusive bureaucracy' but unsure
Argh - Representative bureaucracy was the name
Here's the study i read ages ago:
Scholars have recently begun to look at other types of agencies such as law enforcement. Meier and Nicholson-Crotty (2006) examine the relationship between the gender of police officers and sexual assault reports and arrests. The study finds that police forces with larger numbers of female officers file more sexual assault reports and make more sexual assault arrests. Wilkins and Williams (2008) examine the relationship between passive and active representation using race and racial profiling in police departments. Their study finds that increasing Black police officers increases racial disparity in vehicle stops. They argue socialization within police departments may hinder the translation of passive into active representation. The authors call for more qualitative data in this area to better understand these findings.
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/0095399712459724
Interesting, i did find a follow up, that this effect is inverted if the proportion is large enough https://www.jstor.org/stable/26648231?seq=1
You son of a
Wiat
You are not talking about me lmao
My bad
You know the USAID spend billions on promoting DEI stuff right ?
DEI means Diversity, Equality, Inclusive
They spend billions on leftism values
So what’s the reason of trump or elon should not cut it all
Since this does not apply with the interest for majority of american people and national interest
And it also includes some weird stuff like, spend a random billion to somewhere like Africa to promote democracy and equality ?
That’s pure wasting taxpayers money
And with no actual benefit in return to the US
I’m not saying these stuff are bad something, but it is none of you guys’ business
And it is bad, for Trump administration.
The most important reason I believe
You know it saves us billions more in the long run right?
What should I do to change my life just wants to be financially free and someone who can take care of me
f*ck off pal
You guys are the threat to the whole world. What are you even proud of? What superpower are you talking about?
Is there anyone who can help me
marry a rich man and all your problems will be solved
Bro I'm a boy
I want to stand on my own legs
Show me road map
than marrying a rich woman or accepting this compromise
I can't help you anymore
Work? Study?
Rich woman no i can't where I'm gonna find
Trim it down what an exact plan to find financial freedom
You should do that first cuz it’s broad af
What should I say now
Millions problem one solution money
so then you first move to find that place and move there
@steel void pls don’t advertise
You little evil aschole, you made a mistake, and don't even have the courage to apologize!
and now you're sitting there, hiding in your mini-world, pretending you don't hear anything, you make me sick
shut up Neyro
Blocked
@faint wasp where?
@unique light unblocked 
what ? From where ?
Not you, cuz you live in a puppet state of a superpower
I live in Ireland
in a neutral country
Okay, be neutral, and we will see if other guys would be neutral on you
We are neutral
Okay good good
Can’t believe this crap you think you are neutral so we can’t do anything on you
And you have no power on the global stage
We have yet to receive an F 16 from America or something so you'd better be scared. We are a feckin' military superpower. Up the Irish!
Okay, pay the bill of US military bases
Maybe double the price, in the future
We ain't got enough money to pay for anything
But China isn't an ally of the U.S...
Bro
It’s you think you are ally of the US
You are a puppet of the US
A puppet under military direct intervention
Do you have some kind of 'small dick' syndrome? Why are you screaming about being a superpower every single time? No wonder people like you would vote for Trump if they were American
I guess I am not
Why tf a random minor state would claim he would afford everything for stay alive with a superpower and be proud of it ?
I guess I am not a neutral citizen
How does that make sense
But what I am saying is we are neutral
and the U.S. is an ally of Ireland
Who tf cares
Why you are not saying universe is an ally of Ireland
US is your master nation, you call them allies
Why are you screaming about being a superpower every single time?
Lmao
Cuz ur nothing with little power
That’s the truth
Yo
Most Americans have Irish ancestry... They are sons and daughters of the Irish who came there hundreds of years ago during the famine
They do give a shit ?
Biden has ancestors from Co. Mayo
Say it by yourself, do you think they give a shit ?
What the fuck you are even talking about
Apparently they do, considering how many Americans tell the Irish that they are digging down to their roots and that they are 4% Irish, meaning they went back home to Ireland
By that logic, we have millions of people in california, so can they be part of us ?
Lmao
Well I guess those don't like China
Americans love Ireland trust me
THIS WAS SO FUCKED
They don’t give a shit to you guys
That’s it
Okay
🎤✨ Welcome to "Voice Got Latent" Singing VC! 🎶💫
Step in, vibe out, and let your voice shine! 🌟 Whether you're here to sing your heart out 🎵, vibe to the melodies 🎼, or just chill and enjoy the talent 🔥, you're in the right place!
🎧 What to do here?
🎙️ Sing & showcase your talent
👏 Hype up and support others
💬 Chat & vibe with the community
🎶 Enjoy the music and have fun!
Let the vocals flow and the music take over! 🎤🎶💜
https://discord.com/channels/801609515391778826/1347272199794462800
No
DEI is just a buzz word so the magats don’t have to say slurs, it has no meaning anymore
mandation is unruly, true DEI means accessibility
its false that the majority don’t support it, 74-82% of americans favor LGBTQ protection laws, which is what true DEI is
people like to pretend virtues than to be virtuous
Hi how are you ?
No one
What is wrong with that
It is difficult to predict improvements in lies
my English is too rusty to elaborate
Hello, may i have a serious conversation with any of these people here.
About?
Are you from ireland?
O
Anti homeless architecture in the USA, what would you say about it? It even affects everyone, imagine there are no benches at the station
This shows that power must be separated from religion and even morality.
I am very serious.
Haha JazakAllahu khairan it made me smile
FREE PALESTINE 🇵🇸
how serious,tell you a fun fact that in history ,If Japan didn’t invade China, Chinese communist party could have never developed and eventually taken political power,It is due to Japan’s help that Chinese communist party are able to meet there in Beijing
One more thing we can blame anime for
is this real chat?
"we're fighting to reveal his message" wtf
bro sounds like the obsessive ex of somebody
it's just critical when it comes to elon musk
lmao
the worst thing is he has more "pages" dedicating to attack trump's government
i'm not against freedom speech but this overpass it
it seems like an attack more than other thing
LMAOOOO, where did you get that conclusion? sycophant lmao
i'm just saying my point of view
it seems somebody cannot stant id

that question look a little backhanded
i do, but i was not talking about it
i just say that "periodic" seems a little unbalanced
i not agree with most of the trump's action
i'm mexican dude
i invited you to search about him, most of the reports that he makes are against trump
lmao, now i know why you're acting in that way
i'm not defending him
Lmao, can you say he is worst than biden?
idk i'm not E.UU citizen, but something is clear, he is doing better than biden
from my perspective and that's my opinion
lmao
there are more feelings
come on
i'm not saying he is the greatest president, but you seem having a certain inclination lol
as i said before idk, i'm not euu citizen
i'm not focusing on that shit couse i dont fucking care
lmao somebody don't know to read
it seems you too
this is from 2024 and it seems not getting down LOl
as i said mtf i dont fucking know, i just said a fucking opinion, what of that cannot you understand?
conflict managment maybe?
are you mad now? lmao chill out dude, this chat it's to argue, not to insult
LMAO when did i say that I'm trump's cheerleader?
XDDD
can you affirm biden's government was better than the actual?
Idiot?! Serious?
getting into two wars that not belongs to you sounds worst to be honest lmao
don't reflect yourself pls
can we debate without offending?
You sound like ben shapiro
I don’t watch him and I agree with you
It just reminds me of his famous line or some sht
However I watch people I disagree
I think I’m addict to stress
how much money had biden's government spend in Ukrania war? or did you forget the thousand of dollars he has already burned out in the Palestinian war? dude i'm not saying as i said in repetitive occasion that i agree with trump, but on MY perspective he is doing better than other ones
another attack
Exactly
He’s being aggressive for no reason
He just need smile
Calling people idiots will not change their mind
the hate invaded your soul dude
Just be honest and learn to talk like a human being
Exactly
that war didn't belong to euu, i'm not agree with wars in general lmao
Finally, hope for this world
also, please don't say stupid things. trump wants to flatten gaza and the Palestinian people and turn the area into a giant casino.
but you probably didn't know that, did you?
this was posted by donald trump's official instagram account while he is a sitting president.
it seems biden burned out his money like you with your brain
Same to you man 🤝
lmao, how many times do i have to say that i'm not interested in what happends to euu or its actions. lmao
“I’m smarter than you”
“Look how intelligent I am”
“You’re not as bright as I am”
Not in the USA though affected too by the anti-homeless architecture. Just another manifestation of reprehension/oppression and late capitalism.
no, i didn't and im not interested in wasting my time with you, it will be more enjoyable if you were kind and respectful but you seems you're not
brainwashed
keep enjoying your mental illness while you can
can you show me where i said that?
shittalker
well i'm learning right now lmfao, isn't it supposed this server is about?
yes i'm aware, did i say i agree with that? lmfao
what are you trying to get? lmfao obviously no
Shame dude... As a latin american you were not supposed to support any form of imperialism
And you are stupid
btw you never answered my question about who's better, if trump or biden, but nevermind, you're not interested in that
and i'm not
Against drugs cartels? Yes
no, that's not against drugs cartels, it's an invasion, something that i disagree with
keep smiling while you are burning out your last neuron @lethal sparrow
surveys says other thing 😳
nah, you burned it since you started to insult lmao
Oh god
Is there any link between schizophrenia and narcissism personalty?
I don’t even know what @tulip zenith’s point is, all he does is respond to insults. You’re not even letting the guy make his arguments properly by constantly attacking him
this cannot be called as an "argue"
@sonic lion you didnt see the firsts messages lmao
What made you think that?
it's not speculation. you're just uninformed. trump's already signed executive actions moving these pieces into place.
https://www.sfchronicle.com/opinion/openforum/article/insurrection-act-president-trump-20201819.php
I don’t even see you constructing points
why do i need a point if i'm not defending some one?
the only thing i did was giving an opinion, opinion that you can see
If you don’t even have a point why are you arguing?
he started insulting and attacking
I know man
Becoz there's no empirical particular evidence to prove that true that's why ....
lmao, i was defending myself
he started attacking me
is it wrong to defend myself?
Basically a coup
That’s an interesting point. Do you mean neurological evidence?
i don't need to translate it, but as i said i'm not gonna waste my time on something that i'm not interested shit-talker
comprehension skills -1000
The only good thing about Trump is making the European left look good again, perhaps the far right wave will stop soon
how can i lose if i never defended any point? lmfao
lmfao
He’s could be a stephen king character ngl
Both psychologcal and neurological but .... They're unrelated with each other.... becoz narcissism is egoistic personality disorder and schizophrenia is psychotic disorder a genetic compund... So it has to do NTG with npd ?
what a mess
if you're not able to keep a natural conversation whitout insulting, what did i expect?
Honestly I have no idea lol I’ll have to research about it
I don't think so. Europe fascism is rapidly increasing :/
thanks in part because of elon musk and JD Vance (trump's vice-president)
b-but muh biden!
By going after Musk the UK reform is looking worse
Idk Tesla is losing badly because of Musk's involvement in politics, I hope he gets involved more with those parties so they become irrelevant together
He seems to put his self worth into hierarchy, not realizing how knowledge is constructed socially.
When you view your own intellect as a value, you’ll essentially feel like a fraud, always on the verge of being caught out, like dfw said
So assuming everyone as stupid seems like an easy way out
Yeah it's okay but some illiterate people were trying to prove me wrong.....with that assertion they said Ur not psychologist? I mean that doesn't make sense even ...
Dude your ideology is an insult in itself... It hurts and kills people
what ideology lmao
Your not?
You don’t need to be one to think about how knowledge is constructed, we’re all just talking here
where did you get i have an "ideology", where is that so-called ideology?
dont wanna sound pretentious, its awful
Even there's a name blueberry she was trying to encounter my grammar mistakes instead of getting into what I want to say ....
In the marxist sense, it’s the narrative that institutions construct and reproduce in order for the system to continue being perpetuated
I don’t know if I explained properly
who's talked about marx? lmfao
I recommend reading Althusser
Are u sadless?
Well, Marx studied the capitalist system, so it’s part of his theory
is that my "ideology"? cous i didn't talk about it
but he's referring to my so-called ideology
nobody talked about him before he started
yh
i'm not inclined to anything ideology
So you are
lmao
Even if you say you’re not, you’re acting in favor of one
Same
I really think some people should learn more about history before trying to learn an other language
idk
read a comprehension book before talk :p
You can’t really learn a language without learning about it’s culture. It’s a halfway work
nobody talked about marx
Wtf?
Being said that, don't feed the troll
I just said Ideology in the marxist sense bc you look in the dictionary it’s a very abroad term
But the marxist sense of ideology is more specific
And marxist doesn’t refer strictly to Marx’s work
It’s sort of a tradition of thinking that starts with him, but doesn’t end w him
hahaha 
rich people too selfish for communism
Anyone likes to watch bojack horseman ?
No hope for this world
I’m a pessimistic when it comes to a revolution, honestly
But somehow I have some hope for people idk
reminder that this was posted by donald trump's official instagram account as commander-in-chief
but go ahead and let's talk about how bad biden was instead 
People fight for nothing
Biden cheerleader
somebody didn't read this
It’s not that you’re wrong bro it’s just the way you communicate your ideas repels ppl
They fight for who they love tho
Politics?
I’m talking in general
It's dark future
Yea but it’s not a total waste
Do you care about palestinians?
i care about everyone
You don't care about Israel civil?
Really? It seems not
i invite you to search in my message history, you'll not find something about that
why does it seem not?
and he deleted the mesage LMFAOOOO
That’s turning into a court instead of a debate
NAH DUDe
Serious chat vs Awesome
lmfao
For sure. Though it is not israelis diying without food nor water
keep delating msg come on
Which side shelled schools? Uni? Hospitals?
just for terrorism
Is it a competition
this guy would be singing "trump gaza, shining bright, golden future, a brand new light" and dancing on the graves of the Palestinian people lmao
btw most of your msg were deleted, why?
@last yoke why choice how live or die
keep making nonsense ideas in your head, at least that the only thing you can
@last yoke war it is not game
you deleted most of your msg, even when you were sure you wasn't wrong
Enough discord for the week
Yep
Of course not***! It is a massacre! Palestine was never a real threat to Israel.
You might be lagging,dumbass
who
It seems he is more concerned about the imperialism against Mexico
I mean i shouldn't have expected you to understand who.
*"b-but biden was worse...." 😢 *
It is not a war man, it is a massacre
get a comprehension book pls
Civil massacre
there are many ppl
@last yoke but you don't care
Trump is literally dreaming about turning Gaza into a giant hotel
defense against terrorism attack
Hamas it's no good massagem for world
Defense? Do you really call that "defense"?
Only dust remaing in Gaza
What's your plan?
the worst thing is he treats everyone in that way, I'm not able to imagine how you treat your own family, I cannot even imagine how your own family can stand someone like you, a narcissist that cannot even hold a fucking conversation without attacking and insulting other's opinion, keep thinking you're good while you're cool while you can.
My plan is to not destroy an entire state
My plan don't make terrorism
Hamas no is good for Palestinian massage
Though you and other psychopath will - for sure - stand with the idea of destruction of Gaza
blocking opinions that are against your lack of logic, keep doing these things and you'll get close, you're mere existence is an insult to human evolution, it's supposed that we are able to resonate, now i'm able to see that evolution skipped somebody, and there must be a good reason for it.
fear make people stay away your cause
@last yoke get out bubble
Just make nothing no is solution
No just good and bad
Anyone could do a google and see how harmful is the racist policy of Israel... They want the fear, not me...
Good idea attack civil
Ok man you win
I never insult anyone
@lethal sparrow you hate Trump but people like u make he win
I'm just an observer here but bro, you're so cringe xD
dude just chill down, Keep on track, no need for personal insults, just provide a counter argument.
youre both lmao
Bro would open a glass door to see what's on the other side 
easy now !! were not fight to death here
wtf
tf
Waste money and spreading leftism propaganda make people more radical over time and that’s not true
And most important one, America’s supreme leader Trump doesn’t like it
And it will be totally down under Trump
Content warning: The following scene may include dehumanizing rhetoric, calls for discrimination or violence, misinformation, or other harmful language. Right Wing Watch condemns bigotry and other threats to democratic values.
We expose this content to help Americans understand and respond to antidemocratic forces. Right Wing Watch is a proj...
Yeah you are right those terrorists are massacring Israelis
Joe Rogan can communicate with gods
All
Why so serious
Guyzooo
According to chatgpt Tokyo is the best city in the entire world following by NYC , Paris , and london
Hey everyone
our egg, oil, and other necessities prices still remain the same ?
I can't tell a difference of the price tags on these necessities between the past and now in here lol
and we got the most tariffs
LMAOO
For Government,Police, Politicians, Kattar Hindu's, Latent disscssion in more important than this big issue..
Jail samay
Self Claimed Kattar Hindu: Samay aur Ranveer ko jaan se mardo..
Aur inko koi nahi marega.
lifetime jail
Ignore that
@trim veldt don't post those things
Just important ones
Are tujhe dikhane send kiya.m
Okay English tho
That wasn't important
Let's talk about Ranvir and samay

Let's boycott Ranveer show
Samay is Anti national
Spreading shits in the name of hinduism
definitely
Man making the daily bread
Yess point ! 😂 💯
@upper peak do you guys use upi?
Yeah we can.. but not me yet.
What's the exchange rate of nepali rupay vs rupee
1 Nepalese Rupee is
0.62 Indian Rupee.
1 Indian Rupee is
0.62 Nepalese Rupee.
Hello yall , someone wanna chat? just chill friends
Yo
Good friends, so happy
Sup
Hey
How you doing bro
What is this meeting for
No idea, new plan how to get a lot of weapon or something. I mean piece plan
Ic ic
✨🔮 Welcome to the Fortune Teller VC! 🔮✨
Step into the mystical realm where destiny unfolds. 🌙✨ Our astrologer will reveal insights into your past, present, and future. 🔭✨ Ask about love ❤️, career 💼, or anything that’s on your mind. 🌟 Will fate be in your favor? 🔥 Join us and find out! 🔮💫
https://discord.com/channels/801609515391778826/1347491424538595410
Subscribe to our YouTube channel for free here:
https://sc.mp/subscribe-youtube
Read more on this: https://sc.mp/f365a2
A SpaceX spacecraft experienced “a rapid unscheduled disassembly” in the second consecutive Starship failure in 2025. The 123-metre (403-foot) rocket blasted off from Texas on March 6, 2025, but lost contact less than 10 min...
lmao musk fanboys

Ooh , what the heck is this again iit Baba??🙄🙄
Don't do this kind of nonsensical!!!😑😑😑
There is a saying that once dhongii is always a dhongii 👏👏😂😂🤣
Anugya
Haan yesss
@upper peak that's a beautiful sounding name. What does it mean?
tell me who are the peiople who hates you
Nobody hates me
Fake news!! I don't hate you.
why you hate chinese people
I see that’s good news
Only Chinese nationalist
I no hate chinese. China is cool in its own way
I am curious,How much do you know about Chinese people and politics stuff @thorny steeple
I have chinese friends ik from them. my first partner was chinese
its like I spend most time with chinese, idk much about internal matters or politics in china
really
yes i have long friendship with chines epeople only not with any other
It's a Sanskrit driven name , meaning 'authority' or 'priority'.
What do think about Chinese government

Can I think none
@thorny steeple would you consider living in mainland china

are you a Chinese or not
next is the Europe
Make America Great Again, now it's Make Canada Great Again
then dissolve the EU, Make Germany Great Again, then France, Italy, etc.
Every country can't be great at the same time. America isn't great, those times is over. But America gonna be different.
@thorny steeple why are you Muslim?

What's the point of dissolving the EU
china has blocked western media,it is more benefit than cons? What would Chinese people think about this case? They’re fine with it 
They’re okay the fucking low interest while using a vpn 
What is bro saying?
You are chinese?
They unitedly anty Russia, so I prefer it being dissolve. Why he wanna dissolve, I have no idea. The same I don't understand, why he support Trump.
They are just fine, if they hate Islam and Muslims then we arent good to go with govt, but as much as I know they like our ocuntry alot
@feral river the Great Firewall of China has both pros and cons,but on ther other hands it would be more beneficial to chinese people? if china set up free vpn in some major cities? which can boost Economic benefits? access more information and Chinese Companies with Global Operations ,Hinders innovation, instead of stuck to the low internet while using a vpn, i think Nowdays most of Chinese people do know what a Vpn is usually among yonger generations. 
because do you like this minecraft guy?
i am not gay thanks
this dude may change china i guess
do you like opinions
then I will be turned away from china
In china are most guys like him?
i do not know
you live in china you must know it'
know what?
i do not have powers
i can tell you about my country peopleliving here
why cant you tell me about your people
what are you talking about
do people in china are same like this guy or this is the only one?
what is wrong with Mimecrcraft guy?
he hate islam, he hates muslim, he hates eeryone except chinese
nah all chinese are same dude, there is no guarantee with nationality
we are unique like everyone else
if everychinese become like him then no one iwll friends with chinese
biologically speaking,All humans share 99.9% of their DNA, The 0.1% difference is what makes each person unique
no doubt, i doubt he must be alien then
then there are good people and bad epople
I am not a dhongi check my bio
humans can be an evil and angel at the same time,regardless of whatever shit ethnicity and race
absolutely correct
True dude
I (16M) am unsure about my feelings for her. Sometimes I think it is simply natural attraction, but I do not view her in an objectifying manner as I do when feeling lustful. There is something different about her, yet I am quite convinced that she does not want me in her life. I aim to move on, but whenever I see her, my thoughts falter, and my heart feels heavy. This leads me to act awkwardly, often embarrassing myself in front of her. Reflecting on these moments makes me feel regretful.
Our interactions have been limited. The most extensive conversation was when she visited my house, and we exchanged greetings. Otherwise, she typically ignores me. Despite this, there were instances where she seemed interested. For example, she asked my sister to show her my childhood photos and commented on them positively. She also inquired through my sister if I needed help with exam preparations.
Despite these moments, she began to distance herself and ignored me even more. During another brief interaction at my home, she avoided eye contact and appeared uncomfortable, which made me feel guilty. As a result, I decided to keep my distance to prevent causing her any discomfort.
Later, I sent her a friend request on Instagram, which she initially accepted but then blocked me a day later. This confirmed my belief that she did not want me in her life, so I resolved to move on. Over time, I became less preoccupied with her and adopted a negative view of our past interactions, ultimately feeling relieved to be free from the emotional burden.
However, an incident at the park reignited my feelings for her. After a year of moving on, playing football with her unexpectedly brought back those emotions. Although I recognize that she has consistently shown disinterest, my feelings remain conflicted. One part of me desires her appreciation, while another part is content with not being in a relationship due to the effort it would require.

How're you
What's on your bio ?
Good sir ,
How about you?
Check my discord profile bio
10/10 pfp lol
Okay then ?
What about those you mentioned earlier is already irrelevant or manipulative towards people...
Thank you ! Lol
Open the link
Yeah no problem my friend
Nahi ,
I have already read you , no thanks 🙏
I dm you proofs that i m not dhongi
Okay not dhongii , but misrepresenting !
Sorry for taking wrong word , lol !
Watch the proofs
Then talk about it
Inappropriate @tough ether
@upper peak what happened?
Areeh , Nahi ho aap , achhe ho aap !
Thik haii ? 😀😀🙌✨
homosexuality is not leftist radical propaganda
What's your problem with LGBTQ people? Has anyone ever asked you to become gay? Were you asked to kiss a guy? Or what? I genuinely don't understand people who hate gays just because they're gay, without having actual reasons.
From my experience, the less educated someone is, the more they tend to hate groups like LGBTQ people, left wing, immigrants, etc. You're one of those people.
You're also one of those people who says that Russia, China, and the U.S. are the world's superpowers, but the U.S. isn't an ally of yours, and neither is Russia, even though you think they are. But what do you mean by 'superpower'? Do you mean the ability to destroy you and others instantly?
china is a great power not superpower
china would not never be a superpower near these centuries
You support Trump, the guy who is revoking the legal status of 240,000 Ukrainian refugees and deporting them. Does he really think they don't contribute to the country? There's no welfare in the U.S. and they can't milk the system by sitting on benefits? These people had jobs and were building new lives in the U.S., only to be deported. Do you really support this? These people were not illegal they actually had legal status in the U.S. They didn't cross the border from Mexico, they came from Europe
Whatever this guy is doing, it's always bad for America
It's bad for everyone
It's bad for other countries, other people and all Americans
the main function and the goal for its existence is for protecting our internet industry
that is bullshit
you are bullshit
lmaooo
well if you say so, but they are
Trump did not stop these guys from being an LGBTQ member
Is this your problem with LGBTQ?
protecting the fucking internet industry intresting, the biggest lie i have ever heard

Trump just did halt the progress for those so-called LGBTQ member who are actually leftists promoting their shit value all over the country
What do you mean by saying "shit value?"
literal means
understandable if you know nothing about economy
70% individuals chinese people do use a vpn to access goddamn western shit dude
understandable, domestic economy shit
who told you 70% ? lmao, and 90% of individuals use wechat instead of skype, facebook, instagram
70% bro you are so fucked with that number
don't you guys have snapchat?
we have our version of snapchat, we don't need an unnecessary american apps in our domestic market
and they promote their fucking shit influence our people
okay pal
that's a national security issue
okay
that means anyone who promotes anything which will likely and tend to violate the law of the PRC, would be prosecuted under the national/social security law
Being queer isn’t a choice
he just cut off some unnecessary medicine supplies to these guys didn't he ?
i mean they use western platforms to gain some goddamn information and outside of wall, nah just your goddamn wall dude
like what we have done in the mainland
It was needed medication dumbass
oh you mean 70% of Chinese, bypassing the wall to access western medias ?
do you know how many people we have it here ?
if that's the case we already dominated every western app 🤣
Are you gonna do a interview in Chinese street
this was stupid
you sure these are not drugs ?
in this case 90% do not fucking use a vpn?
not even 5%
All meds are drugs
lmao can't even guarantee there was 3% or even 1% of people bypassing that shit
Everyone knows that a vpn shit, or brainwashed!
people who bypassing that almost all university students or some outside related individual
I can't even figure out if that count even 1% of our total population
Its not about how many its about the principle
unnecessary to do, you can find everything in here and even better than western one
I mean like heroin, cocaine or some other stuff
weed like these
When local market is saturated by local stuff, there's no need to look into foreign cultures
Sales managers, logistics, customs, banking system workers etc
These are medically needed drugs not those
Students, people who know English and understand weechat is not used commonly abroad
You literally get weechat only to talk t the Chinese
what if, they don't have it
The drugs im talking about are medical
that is invovled in terms of politically shit, is that good so many chinese people use a vpn, why are you still here
in east Asian countries yes no one look into foreign cultures, what a joke
is not good to facilitate international business and innovation?, for some professional and international purposes in terms of ways?
What did you do
Did you mention a fictional event that allegedly took place in 1989 Tiananmen Square?
you told about political shit maybe
Naaah I have no idea tbh I downloaded this app just to message my Chinese friend and suddenly they blocked me
And a misogynist one
👺
Probably searched if taiwan has a visa requirement for chinese people 👀

Chill girl
No, just a doctor
Korean doctor 💊
Dream job
Hello how are you guyz?
Oba, give me some
She selling it, it not like you sit there and eat it 
I would eat
Me too
Give me cheapest one
Did u make crepes for russian crepes day
What
I don't understand expensive chocolate, it feels like they try to deceive me, all chocolate is makes from cocoa beans
Maslenitsa
I have something about it, wait a sec, saw it recently.
@verbal torrent watch timing 4:50 she is talking about maslenica
Mikey Madison finally gets to see the Anora Menorah from Sarah Sherman's cut Saturday Night Live sketch in person before talking about her expectations of Anora going into filming and the director asking her to send her tears out of a different eye.
Late Night with Seth Meyers. Stream now on Peacock: https://bit.ly/3erP2gX
Subscribe to Late Ni...
Yep yep i saw it before
Zehra why, did you watch the movie?
Did you think it was fair that she won?
I don't watch the movie
Can't say if it good, but my opinion, movie is lame even though I don't watch it
Maybe I change my opinion, but don't wanna watchnit
I think either Demi or Fernanda should have won, not her
On my list
That dude she is talking about, he is big here, big actor
in mine too
Biiiig
Que isso tão me ignorando mermo 😭👍
agree
Whoo
Omg I thought that was italian
lol is portuguesse:)
Italian? 🤣
Yupp but they seem similar idk why
I've seen people confuse Portuguese with Spanish, but Italian lol
Zehrw stlye😼
same bro haha
but how they confuse russian with portuguesse? it's not even the same alphabet
oh ok, so i will see soon:)
There is no way a person can confuse Greek with Italian
They are two completely different sounding languages
wut
wut
wut
Bro got reprimanded
Imagine if bro is eloquent and the moment you hop into vc, he would unleash his proficient terminology upon you.

Bro invented English. When he makes a mistake it becomes a new grammatical rule.
Ye my brotha, wut a ye talking about
I'm sorry bro
Damn, that's crazy bro

Bro speaks English
I just noticed we both made our accounts the same day
It's impossible
check it out
What are the chances lol
We should get married, that's what universe wants
Does your country allow gay marriages?
Astagfirullah
not yet
just a matter of time tho
I agree
I think so
let's not care and just do it 
Sounds good
🙏🏻
It's a good business idea, using marriages as a legally migrating factory
I see
lol fr
lmao
Bro is goated
“There’s nowhere you can get close to me.” or “You’re nowhere near my level.”
Eh
Are u guys kidding at serious chat ? That's not the right place to do it and kidding
here is slowmode too
Thats always the case here hun
@thorny steeple il se passe quoi dans 6 heures ? Ajoute moi en ami si t’as un problème on parle tranquille en dm
You good?
If u wanna message go to bot-commands it still works
Hii
Things should start settling down now
Me
FUCK YOU BOT!!!! I HATE YOU!!!
Understandable have a good day sir!!!!!!
RAMA
I've found plenty
I see
Ehe
It's ok
YA!!!
We will survive
We're deap fried....😭
I will make my own vc
At least this one is good...
😭
I can be whatever I want, that’s my fucking freedom and none of your fucking business
The server is raided and you wanna talk about this?
Speaking as a typical Chinese: “why you think we would be interested with some barbarians culture or something”
In mindset of a typical Chinese, all of you guys are nothing, except Chinese and China
And that’s the truth, and that’s not me
simples
