#🧠|serious-chat
1 messages · Page 406 of 1
Just doing some work at the moment sadly
You up to much?
No chillin only and looking for new friends
Where r u from
Poland / Slovakia and you ?
I’m from of the border, Győr
Ok than
Oba dorud, jk I knew you Persian
Eh?
Khafe sho
Why
Because it all I knew in Persian
What's ur native language
Wdym they say?
If it's that so
اخرس
It's arabic alphabet
Hi
Azhdar=dragon
You wrote the zero in western Arabic numeral, clearly an Arab
Bemir
Arabic is my native language, English is my second.
I really wish I learn more languages one day. I think I should learn French since I may go to Canada in the future but I don't like how the language sounds 
I speak it and agree with you 😂
Canadian speak English
Ik, afaik some of them speak French.
Don't talk with those they are weird
Quebecers don’t really speak ‘French’ 😂
In Quebec, people speak French. But it's a particular kind of French, with a very strange accent.
If you are fluent with it I think you get more points in some immigration programs, and I may immigrate to there.
Imagine he wasted a years for learning language and then realize it was wrong one
I would do my research before making any move
That would be very funny, or not 😆
It depends, if he going crazy it will be sad
Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky’s visit to the White House on February 28 didn’t go well. He was there to discuss a minerals agreement and secure continued US support from Donald Trump for Ukraine’s fight against the Russian invasion.
Most of their nearly-hour long Oval Office meeting with reporters was polite. But about 40 minutes in, w...
“you will feel the effects”
donald trump and jd vance proceed to have a baby rage
Zelensky was playing in survival mode ngl
to be totally honest
i think the outcome was beneficial
trump showed his true colors and europe is going to shift away from the US’ cradle
It was, he wasn't going to win anyway but he didn't provide Trump and Vance with more fuel for the fire
in an ideal world i’d want a federalized europe but everyone hates everyone
at the very least i hope there’s a joint european military
There are the basis for it
the EU & its european allies combined has twice the manpower and tanks and also having thousands more armoured vehicles, planes and helicopters than the US
IF they unified then american domination would be over
if 😔
Ideally the armies from the smaller countries would unite for the sake of efficiency until only large armies are left
Coll
By then it's a matter of military spending, it'll be tough and time consuming but the European military will become a reality
i’ve completely given up the desire for sovereignty since every british government is incompetent
so i’ve staunchly changed to very pro EU
trump will make cause the end of the american century himself
This could be a good first step
It wouldn't surprise me if Sweden, Finland and the Baltics would merge theirs too
yeah
the main suspects are the UK and germany
france is already very supportive of it, the uk hates everything european and germany would be the ring leader (in terms of if they did it, then other countries would follow suit)
there is only one problem why i dont believe that european aid can make an impact on the battlefield. if europe had the ability to help ukraine so well without the us, why did you wait 3 years.
europe will not actively fight the war
they’ve provided 145 billion in aid
Why
European leadership is majority western European, they don't believe Russia is a threat
I understand it right not seriously, why.
If it was up to Eastern Europe it would be different
they definitely do it’s just they want to avoid escalation
They woke up after finding out that USA isn't on their side
they’re scared of escalation
That is why I don't believe
europe has provided 25 billion in aid more than the US, its definitely feasible to cope without them
but we will not fight unless russia attacks us, simply because we would escalate the war and involve our armed forces and people
And if you give the same amount weapon like USA do you will loose, you need to give more
i know
Yes we should give more
Long story short you loose before starting
i really wish we did more but fighting the war ourselves is something unreadable
Have fun
unfeasable*
With a lot of tanks
We will learn how to dish out drones from Ukrainians
any allegation of russia invading the EU and starting WW3 is NOT true
Moldova is next
the joint NATO european militaries DWARFS russias
If they ever get out of Ukraine anyway
a british comedy show explains this well
step 1. say nothing can be done to help
step 2. say something might be able to be done to help
step 3. say you’ll help
step 4. say it’s too late to help and back out
War 3 ?? I think today's army would rather not die a stupid death.
I want to become dictator of my country and remove the no nuclear restriction from the Constitution
Yess do it
i got it slightly wrong https://youtube.com/clip/UgkxKuL2jxzoiqiL3YMG0qjvaLb-g83h4lYy?si=4inpzr4uo3OAMI_b
15 seconds · Clipped by owen · Original video "Diplomacy is about surviving until the next century | Yes Prime Minister" by British Comedy
Soldiers in democratic countries will be more disloyal and nationalistic.
I'm sure of that
They join for money
Do they pay you to make nonsensical and disconnected statements
Soldiers are unloyal in countries where they make coups and establish dictatorships and juntas, like Myanmar and heck even your country Indonesia
My country has almost ⅕ of people with military background yet there are no such issues
I'm just stunned by this man. Zelensky said that he took a loan from Britain, and the money to pay off the loan will come from frozen Russian accounts. How good it is when you always know where to get money
Dude just chilling
I don't think it's negative, a lot of Russian money has been taken from frozen assets already
In fact I'm surprised we didn't use all of them yet, there are frozen bank accounts from oligarchs in Switzerland that are of no use still
With the influence of modernity I think those who are not loyal will leave the country. And prefer to live.
Why don't they leave then?
We will see in future, how it works, it not their money. I don't angry or something. it's just that, money has an owner and if you don't like the owner of the money, it doesn't mean that you can dispose of it. rules either exist or they don't, if they don't exist, you don't have the right to accuse Russia breaking it.
Conscription is mandatory in my country, and you face jail time if you don't conscript
Yet no one leaves to avoid conscription
I I mean if a country starts a stupid war
My life is ruined by it
True but in these trying times it's better to have some experience than none, finally it paid off. When was it established? Since our Constitution was made or after WW2?
Most of them are rich people, they can do fine without their money laundering in Switzerland
I don't see rule that say you can use it in case of war or something. So it really interesting, that is why all that time they try to make something with it without really doing.
My experience might be useless if I get C papers
I'll know on Tuesday
Yes, my big fat belly eats all harmful gases
It's not a war crime so they deem it legal
I'd want to serve to the end but if my heart is saying no then I'm more than fine to get out there
The solution is known but we aren't doing much towards it, hopefully we get to live long enough for a green revolution and are able to reverse the damage done
Learn Faroese and fake being a local, tending sheep herds and growing 4 vegetables a year
That sounds fun
The biggest contributor to the world carbon emissions, USA, isn't part of the Paris Climate Accords anymore, other countries aren't really meeting their climate goals in time
But that dude zelensky he literally say we take a loan, money Britain take from Russian money
he think he is superstar or something without doubt.
Sad he doesn't care about people either
Twice, they left it again this year I think
Actually they didn't but it's planned
||Trump||
Unfortunately it's impossible to avoid hurting common people with sanctions
No there were genuine intentions
Countries that invested in renewables are benefitting from them, they are more reliable and cheaper than nuclear
India, Pakistan and Romania benefitted for example
Now that the EU was forced to become more energy independent it will increase renewables too
And China is doing the same because they don't have a lot of oil and gas at their disposal
Not joking after 10 pack of sanctions don't listen what they are about. A lot of companies turning back
It might be for bad reasons, but they are doing the right thing in time
What do you mean
It really wasn't, everyone was invited to participate
While USA withdrew and Iran never agreed on it most other countries were on the same page, although they didn't fulfill their goals but that has nothing to do with being first or third world
Hi
There are multiple solutions and advancements being made but also parties working against it and the situation is worsening
We aren't at a point where the situation is getting better, not yet
someone wanna play chess with me?
Good new world
One thing is true old world has more stability
When it just USA in power it easier to control
But the new world will be objectively better since the EU will be less addicted to gas
I think other countries prioritize their economic stability rather than global climate, Like a country that still depends on natural resources for income. To get to that stage, we need the same awareness and ethics.
I like you but you have one problem, you have a prejudice against Russia. Europe is not becoming independent from energy Europe is becoming independent from Russian energy.
Green transition is speeding up, Russia sold cheap gas. USA and Norway give tough bills
Nowhere the message was about Russia selling gas itself, it was about the EU using it, since the industrial capacity is extremely high there
Green stuff is out IMO. Don't work in big scale.
There are no issues about selling gas, as long as it's not used
It's good if paired with nuclear as demonstrated by France and Finland
Nuclear as the bulk, renewables for cheap and fast conversion, oil and gas as emergency last resorts in nuclear plants
Don't happen IMO, but like a good dream ok
We have a problem when resources will be out. Don't believe even in one second in solar energy or wings energy, don't work
on a large scale, the maintenance of such mechanisms and the cost of services, I do not believe that even medium-sized countries will operate on wind energy
Welfare inequality forces them to do so. It is very difficult to change old habits, such as being promoted to become a vegetarian.
Like in one hand we have mechanical things a lot for make big energy one other pipe that give energy
reinforced social divisions by the destruction of intercity communities and the rise of antisocial behaviour from social media
Never believe it will be more productive even in far future
Interesting 🤔, When we run out of oil, there has to be something to replace it.
this big tower, it rotates, it needs to be checked and lubricated, diagnostics need to be carried out, thousands of such towers need to be built, or you can extend a pipe, just an iron pipe and all that needs to be checked once a year to see if it is leaking and put a patch
Do you have a suit. Zellinsky ??!
That was a proof
Early on "(late 1800s–early 1900s)", Jewish groups bought small amounts of land from Arab landowners, sometimes through middlemen. During the British Mandate (1920–1948), more land was bought, often from rich Arabs, and many Palestinian farmers who worked there lost their job that's why it caused a tension ( the beginning of it).
@shut hawk
The Mandate system was instituted by the League of Nations in the early 20th century to administer non-self-governing territories. The mandatory power, appointed by an international body, was to consider the mandated territory a temporary trust and to see to the well-being and advancement of its population.
On July 24, 1922, the League of Nations entrusted Great Britain with the Mandate for Palestine. Recognizing "the historical connection of the Jewish people with Palestine," Great Britain was called upon to facilitate the establishment of a Jewish national home in Palestine-Eretz Israel (Land of Israel). Shortly afterward, in September 1922, the League of Nations and Great Britain decided that the provisions for setting up a Jewish national home would not apply to the area east of the Jordan River, which constituted three-fourths of the territory included in the Mandate and which eventually became the Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan.
The British Mandate authorities granted the Jewish and Arab communities the right to run their internal affairs; thus the yishuv established the Elected Assembly and the National Council. The economy expanded, a Hebrew education network was organized, and cultural life flourished.
The Mandatory government did not succeed in maintaining the letter and spirit of the Mandate. Under Arab pressure, it withdrew from its commitment, especially with respect to immigration and land acquisition. The White Papers of 1930 and 1939 restricted immigration and the acquisition of land by Jews. Later, immigration was limited by the 1930 and 1939 White Papers, and land acquisition by Jews was severely restricted by the 1940 Land Transfer Regulations.
After the UN General Assembly adopted the resolution to partition Palestine on November 29, 1947, Britain announced the termination of its Mandate over Palestine, to take effect on May 15, 1948. On May 14, 1948, the State of Israel was proclaimed.
We will use everything together but the more in future we go the more energy we need.
Don't see any reason use nuke but don't use water wind or solar energy
nuclear but there is a reluctance to invest
everyone just needs to chill out
Yes but hi is fighting, he can't wear a suit, what if he fight with Trump at the meeting and rip his costume
Redemption of land in Eretz Israel, much of which had fallen into neglect under foreign rule, began in the mid-1850s with the first attempts to enable Jews to live productively in Ottoman Palestine without reliance on the “old Yishuv” model of overseas support. Sir Moses Montefiore (1784-1885) made the first known land purchase: 10 hectares (1 hectare = 2.5 acres) of orange groves in Jaffa (1855). Other private acquisitions followed, and by 1882, some 2,200 hectares had been purchased by Jews.
@shut hawk
I wonder how long it takes to charge an electric car before it can be used again? 1 hour 2 hours ??
Yeah Very logical I did not think about it .

Oil can be converted to energy in seconds, but transferring electricity to batteries can be very tedious.
Imagine charging a Tesla battery using a generator because it runs out of power in the middle of the desert.
I don't have Discord neither.
And again you're not coming up with your proofs you're just telling me what to do as before.
Kanka
A tip for you
Always get some proofs and sources and read about them before debating someone so you will be ready to answer them.
I just asked you like some minutes ago
I said instead of telling me this is false or not, give me reasons.
who speak french here ?
I do.
Proofs are Proofs, I wouldn't send what I don't believe, I read them and I send them after.
You were interested and I copy pasted what I have read so far.
You didn't say give me a source
Just check your message again.
Yes all you can do is cursing.
Like others.
And I can use my favorite word again-> you're being fanatic.
can U help me to learn better english pls ,
I can't write the whole for you.
You can read about Early Land Purchases (Late 1800s _ early 1900s)
Also you can read these books that all ara talking about my point
The iron cage
Righteous victims
One palestine, complete
I'm also a learner, so I don't think if I can help you much.
There are some teachers here, you can ask them.
Are you French?
Hello
But they're not real teachers and professional ones, they're some native people.
Yes
You didn't talk about your point tho, should I read all of them to get your point without knowing it?
Yes i'm french
Because you cursed me.
You'll be Ukranian in parallel universe
No Persian
😐
Ukrainian it like nothing really change, I wanna exotics
Are you french too ?
Wtf
No I'm not french
Not me
I just realized maybe fr he bad at English and don't understand what I answer.
I just asked Deepseek to give me a summary of each book and I got this from number 4
Historical Context (1878–1917):
- The book begins by exploring the late Ottoman period, when Jewish immigration to Palestine increased under the Zionist movement. It discusses how Jewish settlers purchased land from Arab landowners, often through intermediaries, and established agricultural communities.
Jewish Immigration and Land Purchases:
- The authors acknowledge that early Jewish land purchases were legal and conducted through voluntary transactions, often with wealthy Arab landowners. This supports the Israeli argument that Jewish settlement in Palestine was legitimate and based on lawful acquisitions.
Aren't those what I said like earlier? I mean you're just recommending me some books that are talking about the same as I said earlier. 😂
Why he got muted?
I was laughing so hard when I saw the summary of these books, I think you didn't check before sending me.
Don't know, but he was talking with Vivek in general last time I saw him
There's a small detail in it that might spark Andos' wrath
Ça va?
Salut
this was posted by trump's official instagram account. (@realdonaldtrump)
https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/1120818572797685811/1344813407848632350/Video_by_realdonaldtrump_DGhfpgHsOg6.mp4?ex=67c24695&is=67c0f515&hm=61d514551d1b2b29a656391275b9ad47c832d6f6c3aaad9f2be8bff7131dc830&
he is a great man god bless him 🙏
🫢
Sup
Sup bro, how is it going?
I'm doing well how's you and Invictus
starting a war with both Italians and Muslims in 1 pic
Yeah lmao
Graduation project committee just evaluated my thesis
is anyoone up to watch a film on custom room
Wait this is not general
I am in a serious chat.
How to be serious
FR I DONT KNOW MYSELF
Yes, who are you?? 😭😭
Are you serious.
Lmao 🤣
No way😭😭.
I don't have a brain 🧠
Indeed lol
SORRY FOR THE LOSS ILL PRAY.
If you pray for me.
Is it possible to get a brain.😭
Then pray two times i need two brain
IG I PRAYED AND I GOT IT!!
BIG HEAD
Yes head only.
Don't pray for my forehead.😭
OK OK
ONE BRAIN IS ENOUGH
Are you sure one brain is enough for me also.😭😭
THE SHOPKEEPER DIDNT GIVE THE WARRANTY CARD T-T
I WAS TALKING BOUT ME T-T
There is no warranty.
No way how can you survive 😭
Nooo😭😭
I can't live without a brain 😭😭😭
Best of luck 🍀
THANKUU
insha'Allah you can do better.
OMG JAZAKALLAH HU KHAIRAN!!!!!!
See you soon
CYA!
Hi ppl
@thorny steeple
?

Hi
Hitler was a hero or a villain?
He was a dictator
hero or villain
Jews call him a villain but some others a hero
So those who think he was a hero are fools because a true hero is someone who glorifies humanity promotes peace and works for the good of others
Hitler on the contrary was for violence hatred and destruction
Some see Hitler as a hero for killing Jews believing they deserved it because of what Jews did (and still do )to Palestinians
But one group’s suffering doesnt justify another’s and Holocaust was a genocide where millions including Jews romani people diisabled individuals and lgbtq+ people were murdered for their identity No political conflict can justify such mass killing
Quaid-i-Azam Muhammad Ali Jinnah gave open support to North African Arabs in their struggle to throw off the French yoke. He, therefore, provided all possible diplomatic assistance to the liberation movements in Indonesia, Malaya, Sudan, Libya, Tunisia, Morocco, Nigeria and Algeria.
He vehemently opposed the partition of Palestine and condemned the establishment of Israel as a dagger in the heart of the Arab world. He said: "I do still hope that partition plan will be rejected, otherwise there is bound to be the gravest disaster and
"...of what jews did to Palestinains." i'm sorry what Palestine and which Palestinains were there in and prior to WW2 
They were under British control weren't they
Was good until lgbtq part
Then teach us what country were there
I've seen a wild portrait of Hitler in a restaurant
You think they deserve to die?
Would it bother u?
🤔
My god does
True
Am i allowed to share a portrait of Hitler, he got breasts and it's a legit portrait
I’d avoid it
Alrighty
Oh yes, Palestinian nationals of a Palestinian state in WW2 era, yess completely factual here.
feel free to check the map-records and point me which national Palestinian state existed before '47
Obvious attempt to flare up discontent amid certain groups of people is obvious.
Can we load a new joke into the chamber pls?
Bro i asked you if you can till what state were there if it wasn't Palestine
A name will be good
He also had an embarrassing haircut
This could be used for most of the middle east before WWI
His low-fade was fine, this is the trend nowadays, what bothers me is the whisker
Had a classmate with the exact same haircut
Glad he is going bald
I can't even describe this because it's in the word blacklist of this server

After that mustache a haircut is excusable
Just for the record, it's not like they were anti jew, they got the portraits of all big names in history
Stalin was also there
Yeah it was really short and cartonized
1 week goal of not watching reels
Day 7
Challenge completed
Chill
There’s no Palestine, and there will be no Palestine in the future
You will either see an american gaza or Israeli gaza
And you have no right to decide which one you want
Because these guys, are nothing.
They are not americans, neither Israelis
@barren breach
But they can be Israelis at least
Crazy glaze
No they cant lol israel occupied them and didnt give them israeli citizenships or passports
Woah I was wondering u
Congrats
Theyll just be killed if they arent forced out
Israel should not still be a state after all of the perpetual war crimes
There’s no occupation they are not a state
They were a state
And if they dislike this place, just move to somewhere else
A state under the british mandate atleast
That’s their freedom
They were forced out their homes with no compensation
the truth is nah
Litterally
There’s no such state lmao
And they did go somewhere, they went to live on the streets
Israel isnt a state its a people group lol
Palestine has always meant that area of land
Israel is the renewed name of Jacob, israelis are his supposed heir
There’s only a terrorist organization, proclaiming there was a state under their terrorism administration, and nobody recognize it
Aka israel
Actually they are going to lost control of this piece of land
And it will be part of Israel
Wonder why
Or how this will be done
(Forcefully)
And they will be killed if they try to fight for their freedom
Yeah they gonna use force to eliminate every single terrorist in this region
Perfect
A terrorist isnt someone whos families have been living there their whole lives until they got evicted from their homes no insurance
nah
A terrorist is someone who repeatedly breaks the geneva convention
biased prespective
They fight against another regional power and they don’t want to pay for it ?
Lmao
I'm a terrorist but only in one country
Like israel
They are not fighting for their freedom, they are conducting terrorist attack, they are terrorists, and they will be eliminated totally
Lol which country
Uh ok, whats a terrorist attack then
Pay it
Don't dodge the quesrion
just like chinese give their bllod in 1963 then in civil war then wwwII
Answer so you dont make a fool of yourself any longer
You are clearly dodging the question
2 billion people will give hteir blood
Oh really 2 billion ?
Are you one of them ?
Stop commenting let this bitch answer
clearly chinese give their blood we are giving them before them
Why you are not on the ground but talking shit over here with me
A mouthpiece is needed at all times
J7 will be used there no need to be on ground
chinese blood needeed there and equipment
Israeli authority defines what is a terrorist
That’s truth lmao
Ok? How does it
If its in america then its not a terrorist attack its just limited to israel? Lol
There is a global definition for terrorist no?
Feel free to tell me how they define terrorism though
Isn't there a dictionary bot here
Terrorism is generally defined as the unlawful use of violence or threats to intimidate or coerce a population or government to achieve political, religious, or ideological goals.
?def terrorism
Definition (noun): the calculated use of violence (or the threat of violence) against civilians in order to attain goals that are political or religious or ideological in nature; this is done through intimidation or coercion or instilling fear
@barren breach
we can define groups and organizations such as Hamas according to this subject
This is a good definition, what has hamas done that was unlawful to intimidate/ coerce people into their ideas
Fyi there are about 8 countries which recognize israel as a perpetrator of state terrorism
(With good basis)
they attacked, kidnapped and kidnapped civilians just like a normal jihadist terorist organization
But i digress from that point for now
in my basis they have no diffrence with islamic state
Did israel not do the same?
we are talking about hamas not israel
Didn't they attack civilians in 2023
They attacked much fewer civillians but k
if you want to make a serious converstation first know how to make a converstation
did civilians die or not ?
Yes
yes they did so we got my point
That doesnt constitute terrorism
hahahahaha
Lol that's crazy
Terrorism is the deliberate killing of civillians in order to scare other civillians
.
hamas started killing israel citizines then they got big punch from israel then they went to be crybabie
they deserved it
Hamas wasnt doing anything to intimidate
Not the definition of terrorism
. i advise you to follow this
If they're not terrorists then it's simply a group of insane psychopaths
nah you dont even know how to make one you are just terorist sympatisian
I think you should use google translate in these conversations so you know what im sayinf
Yeah before oct 7 it was fairytale and a perfect society for everyone
Frfr
xd english my second language bro firstly i think u should do that
Please reread what ive said up until this point using google translate
Irs sarcasm
Palestine before October 7th
yeah i am gonna block him i dont want to see terorist supporters in the chat
send them chinese soldiers
chinese blood
hamas deserved what they got i hope israel hit them better
those terorists need to be killed
My country doesn't recognise Hamas as a terrorist organisation, what should I do
At what cost?
are u sheep ?
Yes I'm sheep
dont u have ur own mind
Every terrorist will be killed
amen 🙏
which country?
It's not a Muslim country lol
name it
i hope there wouldnt be any terorist in middle east thanks to USA, Israel and Kurds 🙏 god bless them
I won't
it is not turkish chat
Israel literally took over farms of my Palestine friend, she's in west bank
F those basterds
you are turk?
We will see how the supreme leader Trump & Netanyahu will eliminate all of the terrorists in the world
🇺🇸 🇮🇱
Make America Great Again
if you atack someone dont cry when they reattack you
nah god forbid 🙏
It's in west bank
amen 🙏 no terorist for next generations
You mean Israeli arab ?
I don't know the ancestry but I don't think they're majority Arabs
You mean israel is illegally taking it, just like they illegally took golan heights in syria for 0 reason lol
Palestine isnt the only area they want
Lmao China also doesn't consider hamas as terrorist organisation
What happens if USA takes over Gaza
Doesnt matter she saw some post on facebook vro that means they are
Will they accept these new borders? Or will they be ceded to Israel
They will, probably nothing
Innocent folks will die or become homeless lol
As they have been
Yes I mean that's for sure, also mass expulsion of all Palestinians as Trump claimed
Yeah that also
I dont think other countries will join in
According to him "some" would be able to come back, which won't be true, but assuming it will be it's a humanitarian disaster
they have to
Who doesn't like cheap labour
Imagine being exiled from your country, then you come back and you find random rich people chilling on the beach where you used to live
Cyberpunk 2025
And boom that's how america was born
But but trump said he will expel them to a better place
Nope he said to Jordan and Egypt
😭 🙏🏻 bros gonna send them to jordan or something
Lol with no compensation probably
Trump is going to create Palestinian Dubai
For
Without the Palestinians
Americans.
"Hi jordan can you please give this family of 8 a 1 room apartment"
Not Israeli arabs
Likely yes but seems to be for rich people in general
It will be a very diverse and welcoming country, as long as you have $$$
As compensation for the homes they used to have lmfao
Yeah 10 more hamases are gonna form ngl
Wonder why
"Ok guys get the fuck out of your own country and leave your belongings youre heading to jordan"
The kill all of them if there was more terrorists coming out
The biggest terrorist out of them all is israel
What warcrimes did hamas break name them lol
I cna do the same for israel, theres a reason netanyahu has an international arrest warrant
They dont give out that shit randomly you know
hay amina kodumun terorist sempatizani ya
Nobody recognize ICC only losers puppets
ICC is nothing
Frfr and they gave netanyahu an arrest warrant just because
For fun
I couldnt translate this well mb
Idk what youre trying to say but your point fell apart as soon as you resorted to emotional arguments instead of responding to my questions
Aren't there arrest warrants for Palestinian leadership as well
Theres probably shoot on sight warrants
With a former hamas commander aswell oh k
There were arrest warrants for other leaders but they have been killed
Netanyahus left
His own people will probably kill him, no one likes the guy anymore
U just said that u are not Turkish
The icc is internationally recognized. It merely has no enforcement power and relies on self policing
Man, I don’t need to repeat this
U know what I’m gonna say
Btw how is that international recognized ?
U mean UN recognize ICC ?
Hey how are you guys
I didn't talk to you

Chinese gaza
Israel didn't exist before that date either.
Kingdom of Israel
Hi
Hi
Hi
That was very long time ago. Do every people who had some sort of a state dozens of centuries ago should massacre people who are living in those places today out of them? Add to that, I read this in the Wikipedia article about the kingdom of Israel:
Whether the United Monarchy existed—and, if so, to what extent—is a matter of ongoing academic debate.
So basically, the justification for the occupation is something thats existence is debated.
There was no national state for the Palestinians before 47, but that doesn't mean they didn't exist. They have been there for a long time, it's their home. Today we have many Palestinian families passing down the keys and documents of their houses that they were forcefully expelled out of by occupiers from generation to the next. Those people have way stronger links to the land than the occupiers who are a mix of foreigners to the region.
true
@thorny steeple
https://youtu.be/GfqLcBwUT_E
Based Fox News for once I guess
Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy addresses heated Oval Office exchange with President Donald Trump and Vice President JD Vance, conditions for a peace agreement and more with Putin in exclusive 'Special Report' interview. #foxnews
Subscribe to Fox News! https://bit.ly/2vBUvAS
Watch more Fox News Video: http://video.foxnews.com
Watch Fox...
same for South Sudan, thanks for you irrelevant input.
Yes, that's because colonialism introduced mostof the foundational steps and institutions for modern state-building in MENA, which also helped nationalistic movements to spread.
i saw, but i didn't save 
Your argument still doesn't make sense, most modern states didn't exist prior to WWI
Haven't I referenced one before? (#🧠|serious-chat message)
Let's repeat it then. "Map of Palestine", created in 1799 by Pierre Jacotin, a French cartographer. This is, obviously, way older than "1947".
I know you'd argue: "This is not an independent nation, it's simply the name of the land at the time when it was part of the Ottoman empire". Yes, it wasn't an independent nation, but this is simply irrelevant.
The same people who lived at that land at the time are the modern-day Palestinians. They are the indigenous people to that land and the only ones who are entitled to decide how it should be governed. Arguing that it's justifiable to occupy a land and displace its inhabitants solely due to the lack of international recognition as an independent state or sovereign entity is no different than claiming the right to steal your coffee because you didn't take a receipt.
So, if that's your argument, it's very flawed.
My point is there was no national Palestinian state at that time, you're reply doesn't go against it.
I just went on and added the fact that MENA region was behind when it came to institutions, bureaucracy, modern concept of "state", whose introduction helped ignite many nationalist movements in that region
What do you mean by 'indigenous' - Arabs are historically a very recent resident of the land, specifically 8th century. If you're talking 'Indigoneous' as per genetics, Palestinians had little genetic dissimilarity between other Jewish groups, overlap of approximately 60%, so by this category, Israelis are also indigoneous.
Depending on study specification anywho - Can take a look https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3032072/
Besides Southern European groups, the closest genetic neighbors to most Jewish populations are the Palestinians, Bedouins, and Druze. The observed differentiation of these groups reflects their histories of within-group endogamy.39 Yet, their genetic proximity to one another and to European and Syrian Jews suggests a shared genetic history of related Middle Eastern and non-Semitic Mediterranean ancestors who chose different religious and tribal affiliations.
So really - I'm curious what standard we're using here.
Ashkenazi jews - So European Jews, had around 40% overlap with local middle easterners. This isn't even consider Sephardi and Mizrahi Jews (also known as arab jews), which are likely to have a substantially higher %
I'm fairly certain you can find more mentions of a geographical area known as "Palestine" in historical maps and records, but i fail to see how this equate having any Palestinian identity, let alone a state whether dependent or independent, based on this you'd totally be okay with Israel if they simply changed their name to Palestine.
and the people who lived in that area came of highly diverse backgrounds, and they all merit right of self determination.
talking about indigenous status here is really just a matter of which timeline you pick.
Why I pointed out it's important to define the term - Because so far I just see it being thrown around with no concrete definition. If it's genetic, then you must admit Jews are indigoneous too. If it's cultural, you fall into that rabbit hole you've got there; fact is, it's entirely arbitrary where you put that line
Only actual group you may challenge having a stay are Ethiopean jews. Though they're hardly a substantial part of Israel. If we look at Mizrahi + Arabs, we're talking majority of its population; largest people group in Israel being Mizrahi Jews. Second largest Ashkenazi.
Ohkay
Why isn't Zelensky portrayed as an wojak
The indigenous people of that land were initially the Canaanites (historically). If we're going to discuss genetics, then we'd find a deep ancestral link between Cannanites and modern-day Palestinians.
Now, of course, certain Jewish groups share similar ancestral link. Historically speaking, modern-day Palestinians are largely descendants of ancient Israelites and early Christians who later became Muslims following the Islamic expansion. In fact, there are Jewish Palestinians who used to live alongside Christian and Muslim Palestinians prior to the Israeli occupation.
While it's true that many Jewish diaspora populations have an ancestral link to Palestine and the broader Middle East, their integration with other cultures and societies, such as Europe (Ashkenazi Jews), Spain & Portugal (Sephardic Jews), China (Chinese Jews) etc... blurs their historical connection to the land of Southern Levant.
So, basically, even if their great grandparents used to live there, it doesn't give them the right to establish a colonial occupation, illegal settlement, and mass expulsion of the inhabitants there.
If both share a genetic resemblance, modern-day Palestinians would still be far more indigenous than Israelis. Even if modern-day Israelis have the right to live in Palestine, Palestinians have a greater claim to its sovereignty.
This argument then must also admit Jewish as being specifically indigoneous. Because both people-groups significant overlap. Even when we're discussing European Jews, we find between 30~50 % (averaging at 40%) DNA overlap with Palestinians. I also think it's important to remember here that the idea that 'israel' was originally separate from Caanan is likely historic legend, as opposed to historic fact. In this sense, early Israelis were Caananites.
I think to say they "blur" the line would be as meaningful as saying Palestinian relationship with Arab culture 'blur the line' as well. Their culture has changed in accordance with Arab settlers coming through the 8th century as well. My point here is that a premise on basis of Indigenous must either exclude both, or include both, and can't give us a meaningful framework of dialogue on this matter. A thought experiment we can use here is to merely ask if a cherokee who moves to Europe and lives in Europe, only intermingling and marrying other Cherokee, ceases being a cherokee on that basis. I think it'd be absurd to say it does.
This relies on a fairly arbitrary standard - An indogenous group is indigenous on basis of origin; both groups has an origin even if they're genetically dissimilar on some point. Palestinians got Arab dna from the arab penninsula, and Jews got European DNA from Europe (ashkenazi and Sephardi specifically).
when a person speaks turkish doesnt mean he is turkish and yes i can speak turkish fluently it is one of 4 languages i know
ig yall in some argument but its impressive man
idk why the arabs claims north africa and middle east to their land it doesnt belong them they got these lands by killing men and children raping the women for spreading their peacifull religion like a barbarian now when they get not even 10 percentage what they did they are crying like a baby
thank you bro
I'd probably not be that extreme in my terminology of this discussion - The point here is about what we categorize as 'indigenous.' I'm on the position that it's a trivial framework, because the outcome would be unethical regardless of who's in charge.
Israel's stance on Palestine since the 1970s had been unnecessarily ambigious - and in 2010 both populations supported peaceful co-existence, only stopped by Israeli settlement policy
Hamas attack in recent times being another such instance on the other side - It's a cycle. One that could've been stopped in 2010s, but wasn't because of historic grievances. Israel's recent attacks into Syria is another case of where Israel is overstepping its boundaries, given it's entirely unprovoked and unnecessary, appeasement had been pursued by Syria and Israel has its buffer
"fairly certain" is inadequate to establish a point.
but i fail to see how this equate having any Palestinian identity
Basically the connected descendants of the inhabitants of ancient Palestine make it a Palestinian entity.
let alone a state whether dependent or independent
It was surely a dependent state. First under the Ottoman Empire and later under British administration.
I'll attach some images of ancient drain covers having the name Palestine on them. Ironically, many of them still exist 'till today in the occupied territory.
based on this you'd totally be okay with Israel if they simply changed their name to Palestine
No it isn't. this is a non-sequitur. Changing the name of the state doesn't change the fact it's a colonial occupation, it would only make it confusing.
and the people who lived in that area came of highly diverse backgrounds, and they all merit right of self determination.
This statement is vague. If you're referring to Palestinians then I agree with the last part.
talking about indigenous status here is really just a matter of which timeline you pick.
Not really. Palestinians have a firmer historical connection to the land. It doesn't make sense that immigrants govern the land they migrated to (referring to Israelis).
I think it is because USA still doesnt trust the goverment of syria their only reliable ally at middle east Kurds and Israel. Kurds got what they promised (and last developments between PKK and Turkey enchanced it seems that they gonna end the war between them) and still obeys to USA on the other hand new Syrian dictator is still jihadist and USA doesnt trust muslims (and they are right) this is the reason why israel just occupied some lands in Syria they just want to scare the dictator like if you dont obey us there are gonna be this consiquences. i think in next years USA is gonna attack the Iran they just want to be sure the things in middle east goes well for them and it is obvious that it really goes well since Trump arranged with Putin too.
Don't know why the USA would be involved in this - You're right that Israel doesn't trust them, but the attack still is outside reason. Israel has a buffer-state, something the current government accepted and even acknowledged and reaffirmed to maintain peaceful co-existence. The current government is also not meaningfully a dictatorship; the leader has stated decision to move towards fair elections, and to call him a 'Jihadist' is an exaggeration; his ideas are hardly 'radical' or 'extreme,' his stated desire is to build Religion from the 'bottom up' as opposed to 'top down,' these aren't "Jihadist ideals." He's a former jihadist, but hardly anything under this umbrella term in any meaningful sense as of current
He's specifically a pragmatic man - And he can't be put into any specific camp. You can at "worst" call his policy a type of 'Islamic pragmatism,' though that's hardly extremism in any meaningful capacity - As extremist as calling christian democrats in Germany extremists
🤔🗿
Ah. I see.
Makes sense, to some extent. Indigeneity doesn't seem to have a widely accepted and objective definition.
However, regarding the Arabic culture. The culture is not the point, the land they inhabit is. The Jewish diaspora communities settled in many different regions across the globe, while Palestinians continued to inhabit Palestine. Palestinians are considered Arabs merely on the basis of language and culture, but their ancestry is predominantly Cannanite and Israelite.
They've adopted the Arabic language and culture following the Islamic expansion.
I'm merely arguing that Israelis who immigrated to the land in and after 1917 (following Balfour Declaration) are less relevant to the land compared to Palestinians, let alone forming its government and sovereignty.
Bro I am from middle east I know a lot of things what goes there and "** once you are jihadist you are always jihadist**" and yes they are still maintaining jihadist policies because they are still attacking to SDF(Kurdish Autonomous region in North Syria) just because they are not muslim and arab. As we can see that USA has still interest in middle east. btw mate dont see israel like independent nation they are still puppet of USA. USA wants to hit Iran and take lucrative Petrol fields from south east Iran actually i think USA wants to end radical islam in middle east along with their oil interests.
They're not merely on basis of language and culture; there's also genetic overlap. That's at least the latter point I'm making. However, in this sense you run into another challenge - If a Palestinian moved to Europe, do they cease to be Palestinian once they return? Are they no longer indigenous? My point is, it assumes an arbitrary category.
My problem here would be both groups would, genetically at least, be within the same exact group. They're only different the way way a Western Turk and Greek are different, in terms of religion and language (Don't tell the Turks or Greeks I said this)
Israel is an independent state - Israel if anything is puppetering the USA if you want to go that route - Look up the "Israeli lobby and US foreign policy" for an academic reference. Both states are independent, just mutually reliant; their relationship is also very recent, 1970s specifically, before that, Israel's relationship was primarily with France (50s onward).
Also, the attacks on Kurds isn't something I'd be aware of - My knowledge so-far indicate at least that there's a movement towards an increasingly free-market policy. This isn't exactly indicative of a dictatorial desire; typically such reforms are pursued prior to democratization with some exceptions (China, being the only one actually). I can see some caution in their education reform leaning more towards strict conservatism though
Syria's President Jawad destroyed the secular system left from the Assad administration. We can give examples of this, such as the abolition of co-education.@elder seal
Yes - Had to look into it. Educational reforms do seem concerning from a chiefly secular perspective. Though, I'd perhaps inquire whether that's indicator more of the bottom up approach as opposed to the strict top-down framework; seeming pursuit of freedom of the press; economic liberalization; a desire to change the imagery and beng open to foreign pressure would be indicative of a liberalizing route
Sure. But you haven't got my point yet.
If Palestinians immigrated to different regions, bred, adopted their cultures and norms, and formed even a short historical connection with those regions, they are only genetically Palestinians. However, they've already integrated into a different society and adopted different mindsets and behaviors. So, the connection of their descendants to those various regions is much stronger than it is to their ancestors native land.
For instance, children would be way more connected to America if they've been born there, even if their parents are immigrants. You get what I mean?
that was a nice converstation bro i can reply at morning because i need to sleep right know it is 1h39 pretty late for me (since idk where are u from ) anyway good night!
I get what you're trying to communicate. Though - It'd hardly make them cease to be those things; Jews specifically were often in ghettos and maintained a very strict internal homogeniety. I think the genetic evidence of European Jews (ashkenazi Jews) tells us that much. That Mizrahi Jews and Sephardi jews too share significant overlap, even those that remained in the region (mizrahi), tells us that their pressure to an external and domestic way of life was significantly limited.
Saying Jews aren't indigenous would be much the same as saying a Palestinian who maintains their way of life ceases to be indigenous*, even though they're in practical terms still speak the language, has the culture etc., of their forbearers, just because british made everyone there become culturally British and religiously Anglican. I hope you see the overlap on the 'everyone's indigenous' framework.
🙂↕️
Goodnight pal
Alright, given that, do you believe Israelis have a greater claim to the land's sovereignty?
Elon Musk (Mike Myers) interrupts a heated meeting with Donald Trump (James Austin Johnson), JD Vance (Bowen Yang), Marco Rubio (Marcello Hernández) and Ukraine President Zelensky (Mikey Day).
Saturday Night Live. Stream now on Peacock: https://pck.tv/3n1IyzK
Subscribe to SNL: https://goo.gl/tUsXwM
Stream Current Full Episodes: http://www.nbc....
I think my stance would entail an ambiguous to equal claim to the soil - or at least, a 'near equal,' which leaves us in the absence of anything except personal discretion. My problem so far is that the indigenous framework simply doesn't lend us towards one conclusion contra another - Meaning, logically, you must accept either neither or both as rightful claimants.*
If we are to ask me 'what i believe,' I believe it isn't my concern - Or said more exactly, I'd not work within a framework over 'claim' which i'd regard as largely trivial. If we consider 'ethical concerns,' then I'd say that's more multifaceted and I see no 'ethical solution.'
As I've stated above - Concern over who's "more ethical" are largely historical; changing and transient. The only recent viable source of peace was in the 2010s-14 period, where settle policy disrupted any meaningful motion towards peace. The other one was in the mid 1940s where arabs. Much of the incitement can be traced to conflict in the 1928s attacks which induced the reciprocal disdain between both groups
I was blocked by two people I've never interacted with in here
Smiles - blocked half of the people in here (if not more)
Poppi - I don't know who's this person
Smiles blocks everbody who looks slightly pro-Trump. As for the other person I can't say I know who they are
Smiles blocked me after I btfoed him in a vc debate. Was funny as hell
You should have recorded, pal
Should have - But the slow abandonment of his support-base leaving the chat as he lost ground to stand on was funny
But i don't record without people's consent either
If it's public you don't need consent. I remember when I had a woman banned in here. She was promoting her onlyfans by twerking half-naked on the camera
I recorded and sent to the mods
- It isn't about legality, it's a matter of personal principle,
- That's not the case in Europe,
The EU data-law is very strict with private information
But is a public VC deemed private?
My understanding is that it isn't - At least, the examples we were given as part of our education presented significant challenges. Two people were sued for 100k here because they recorded someone, basically, and lost the voice-note
Tbh even in Brazil you can't go recording people on the streets but that's not the case for Discord
I'm not lawyer anywho - but law isn't personal issue. I don't think you should record anyone in general, it's weird to do
Here? Where?
Don't care how stupid a person's position is in this regard. You could believe in something with 0 justification
Europe - This would be EU
I'm asking what's the country
Well - That's private, monsieur 😉 - Though, the principle cause would be the EU's laws
But I know there is a common legislation for EU members
Okay
Because it's the GDPR
I don't mind sharing where I live because there's over 200M people in here. But I'd worry if I were a Danne for instance
🤷🏻♂️ Even Denmark would be 7 million - That's a lot of people
Though, the point is within both instance of Europe in general
There are cities in the American continent with more than that
The City of Mexico and Sao Paulo
And many more in USA
I mean - Obviously, living in America would entail greater obscurity surrounding residency. That doesn't leave it obvious
Exactly. This is why I don't mind dozxing my location in here
Lmao - Think most people wouldn't care anyways, you're in Brazil. Who'd ever waste their time going to Brazil to get one guy?
South America is that one continent people forget exists
It's kind of just there, in a corner of the map, nobody really thinks about it, it just exists
This isn't the only risk. I have opinions which I can't display in public, but they are secure on this chat
It's in the same continent which France, Canada and USA take part on
Sure - I just generally don't express extreme opinions outside of voice chat. I prefer being largely descriptive on text - Services better for conducive discourse as well, for that matter. Given that I'm not here to 'be right,' but more so to expand my understanding of things 🤷🏻♂️
Uhm - South american isn't north america, sir 🙄
Also, are you religious? @thorny steeple
Well, I do. I just won't show my face that often and neither will I doxx my real name on the app
It depedends on where you are, in America they are trated separately whereas in South America there's only one "America"
Continents are a social-construct. Otherwise there would be continents called Afro-Euroasia
I'm a Catholic convert, but I spent most of my last years as a non-religious person
I'm aware 🙂↕️
Which tradition would you align with - Aquinas or Scotus?
I like Aquinas, I have some of his books downloaded. There are concepts I can grasp effortlessly, but... some of them are out of my current level
Are you an atheist?
That's typical scholastics. I'm planning on getting into Duns Scotus
I'd generally categorize myself within the Platonic tradition; generally, granted
You seem like an avid reader
Neo-Platonic? You would enjoy the Church Fathers
I'm aware - I've read Pseudo Dionysius, planning on getting into Justin Martyr and Augustine. As well as Philo of Alexandria. Do have some loose treads though - Specifically, reading Deleuze, need to get his ideas properly incorporated into my head, then get into the critique by Badiou and Zizek before getting to grant maxwell
Zizek is the only communist I can get on with. I just hope you won't end up jumping out of your windows like Deleuze
I'm reading Confessions
Really fun to read in English
Deleuze's ideas were something that attracted me due to his critique of Hegel - I am interested in how Zizek, as a Hegelian, would mediate the problems posed by Deleuze
Deleuze being a very strict Spinozist
So far I've only really gotten Deleuze concept of 'Difference' as something affirmative; that is, 'differences' are ontologically prior to identity - So that everything is 'different from each other' because of their differences, who's intensity determines their capacity to 'resonate' with each other.
This opposes Hegel's concept of negation; to Hegel an object is determinate in terms of its opposition to its other. So without any specific 'negation' it's merely a vague abstraction; the "internet" without the objects caused by its usage is merely an empty abstraction, it's only through the usage of the internet, its opposite, or non-internet, that the internet becomes determinable
Deleuze's texts are a bit more 'fragmentary,' so it's difficult to connect it coherently. Did appreciate certain insights into questions though; that all questions supposes their own answer - Though, gist of it, differences determine how we resonate; so the way we engage and interact and impact each other in creating new differences through memory and habit
Though, either way - Currently reading Spinoza 🙂↕️ He's fun
God forbid I saw you say you are not Turkish and Idk i wouldn’t want to learn the language of a nation I don't want to be
Maybe you had to learn?
Augustine is a w bro destroyed the anonymous gospels arguement first
syrians maybe afghans or african it could be you know
or teenage kurds
you don't have to

you guys was like, oh there's a piece of shit over here, actually there's nothing but when I step on it, you say oh fuck you you stepped on a shit
that's just the type of fallacy you guys have been talking about for all the time

it didn't exist as a country but some people identify themselves, Palestinian
was there a super-earth state of transgender if some people identify themselves, transtinian ?
no fuck, they live under other regimes in different region
Gaza and West Bank was like under some extent of autonomy which Israel has given to them, but they never have their sovereignty and they don't have a state
and they are going to lose this autonomy
Yea
The amount of ignorance here is too much
New ignore feature is really great
some people deserve ignorance
survival for the fittest
Yeah I know some people deserve ignorance
Click on profile, click on 3 dots, there's a legit ignore option 💀
I only block bots
I don't know why

I watched a video where one dude explains body language. I have no idea if he is good. But interesting https://youtu.be/U0AIFIK8yKM?si=FR1PbJYY9SoG9SMs
Join this channel to get access to perks:
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCOmjR-JVOshlZbUoQYOCxWg/join
Dr. G's Body Language Course:
https://www.drgexplains.com/offers/CEnNLKFa
In this video, Dr. G analyzes the body language and behavior of Donald Trump and Volodymyr Zelenskyy during their contentious Oval Office meeting on February 28, 2025....
Yeah that shouting match was unexpected
I'm waiting for an apology. Because I do literally nothing, I don't even mention Holocaust. But I got mute because Holocaust. I don't even know how pronounced that word.
Well the difference is that, afaik, the people of South Sudan were in South Sudan before the state got established, while on the other hand Israelis weren't in Palestine. They are a group of foreigners who came from all over the globe to a land their only connection with is that people of their ethnicity/have their religion were there thousands of years ago.
Israel didn't have a state as well
they have that, they have their regime, they have their military and jurisdiction stuff everything in that region and they are mostly recognized
it's not about where did they come from
they can come from mars so what ? they take over this region and they establish their regime, and they have their system then a country is born
regime born from guns - Mao zedong
Doesn't sound moral to me. So if Arab nations have the strength to dismantle their state one day and establish a Palestinian state, they have the right to do so?
moral has no enforcement, law/rule without enforcement is toilet paper
and your moral worth nothing in face of bullets
What a lovely principle to live with
what a simple truth
if they can
actually they can't
there are more powerful nations which protect and support Israel to eliminate remaining terrorists in Gaza
and the arab nations, you are talking about, they aren't "arab" nations, they are totally different nation in different region following different law under different regimes
they have conflicts all together based on the state
arab nations is not a nation
Israel itself, a nuclear power with robust military, also as the economic powerhouse in that region, I don't see any chance those terrorists would have a little chance to win against them
if you believe, ground is always open
and you see it.
They can't today, but who knows what will happen in the future. Who knew that the Jews would have one of the strongest states at some point a couple of hundreds years ago? This fucked up principle fuels endless conflict as power can't stay on one side forever.
Arab nations share a lot of cultural aspects and if you live in the mena you would realize how united they are and how they really dislike Israel. Israel is surrounded by enemies from every side and you can't guarantee those enemies would stay weak for that long.
then we will see what will happen in the future
I believe it's not so difficult to expect what will happen. Power always shift, it's not constant.
yeah but for bunch of terrorists with no organized powerful military, no
I'm not talking about only them
Yet to read him - can't talk about 🙂↕️
Hello
"Fairly certain" was as a tongue in cheek way to point out how many repeatedly use historical maps and records to argue that Palestine was a sovereign stat.
You're going for a historical argument based on the assumption that the name "Palestine" implies an independent Palestinian nation identity or state, but names alone don't determine political sovereignty or national identity. "Palestine" was geographic term used by many ruling powers but this never equates it being a distinct self governed nation-state.
Even drain images you've sent were never of a Palestinian state, and by that logic any colonial administrative term would justify a national claim, which isn't how statehood works, so stop being misleading.
You can also quit ignoring the reality that Jewish presence in the region is continuous and deeply rooted, and if we turn your standard to a rule concerning historical continuity as basis for legitimacy, then Israel as a nation-state has just as strong if not a stronger claim to statehood.
Also stop treating Jews as if their presence in that region only started couple decades before establishing Israel, fact of the matter is Jewish communities lived in the region for millennia, and that Zionism was a movement of RETURN, not a foreign colonization. and i'd like to see you apply this "immigrant" argument consistently, because then anyone whose ancestors moved under Ottoman or British rule would also be a settler lel :/
All in all, point is that national identities evolve over time and the modern Palestinian national movement only emerged in response to Zionism among other things, but this by no means retroactively create a historical Plaestinian state.
On the other hand, Israel exists as a sovereign nation today, recognized by the international community, and has just as much right to self-determination as any other nation 🇮🇱 .
you can pick the timeline that suits your narrative all you want, and completely ignore the fact Jews continuously existed in that region.
The reality however, tells a very different story.
Where did I say they didn't? That doesn't change that the vast majority of the Jews who came during the 20th and after are foreigners to Palestine.
They are invaders.
However, they have blood ties to those lands
You are referring to the Jews who ruled it thousands of years ago? It's honestly dumb that this has any value. And the "blood" tie is weak too since there were people who converted to Judaism and got mixed with the group.
It's weak if it's something that has any value in the first place.
The real invaders were the Arabs, who spread from the Arabian Peninsula and settled in the Levant and other areas of the Middle East, even reaching North Africa. "Palestine" is nothing but a geographical definition and the "Palestinians" are as much an abstraction as their "Palestine". They are Arabs, culturally and genetically and those lands don't belong to them. In modern times the Palestinians could coexist with the Jews, but this is not possible, so if one has to choose between the colonizing Arabs and the native people of that land, one will choose the latter. The Arabs in Palestine could simply return to where they came from or settle in other neighboring Arab countries, which are in fact their brothers in blood and culture
And it certainly isn't stronger than the ties the people who have been living there and still living there. As I said, Palestinians still pass documents and keys of houses and lands they were forced to move from to this day, it's tragic.
Their ancestors come from those lands anyway. European Jews retain strong genetic ties with their land of origin, with some sprinkles of Mitteleuropa admixture, they deserve that land
Assuming that what you are saying is real, it still doesn't have any value. If I had genes of someone who lived on your land at some point in history, does that justify forcing you out and living in your place? It's very flawed reasoning.
The only common point that I can recognize in both Jews and Palestinians is the Canaanite ancestry, which however in both groups turns out to be a minority
You are trying to convince me that genes, again assuming that you are right, matter more than the identity that's directly linked to the land? The culture, the memories, the legal ownership and all of that?
"invaders" kek, many jews migrated during 19th and 20th century during both Ottoman and British rule, but how does that make them invaders ?
You're applying a double standard to migration. If Jews moving to their historical homeland makes them "invaders", then what does that make Arabs who arrived under the same rule? migration has always been a part of history, so I'd love to see you apply this anti-migration stance to all countries and see how far you get.
Jews also legally purchased land, they didn’t invade it. Even the Ottomans dealt with Jewish land purchases and often sided with them in disputes with Arabs
You called the Jews colonizers, good. It is important for you to know that the Arabs are. Some Jews remained in the Holy Land, others gave birth to the diaspora keeping their culture and identity strong for centuries, now you want to talk to me about culture and memories ignoring all that?
It’s funny how his own narrative gets turned against him lel 
The discussion about ancestors starts precisely because the Arabs consider the Jews too European to be considered natives of Judea lol. That's kinda racist too
I'm getting pretty good at them, also because I've addressed the same topic with different people but they all said the same thing
Meanwhile Mizrahi and Sephardi jews that existed there and in Arab countries as well.
Yea pretty much copy paste the same talking points they find in their own echo-chambers.
The funny thing is that when they talk about Jews they only mean Ashkenazi jews
"you're too blond for this land bud"
Exactly 🤓☝🏼

yes i had to learn it
It's not anti-migration stance, it's simply that the natives didn't have a saying about migration policies and most Jews came to Palestine after 47, after Israel was established with a division of the lands that didn't make sense and was unfair. Most Jews came as Israel was ethnically cleansing Palestinians.
What memories are you referring to? Most Jews who arrived during 20th didn't have any memories with the land. And their cultures developed far away from it.
This is true and not racist. A huge percentage of Israelis are really European and from other parts that are far away from Palestine, sometimes far away from the entire middle east and north africa too.
You know, I'm not arguing on the basis which racial group deserves the land, I'm arguing on the basis who were already there, who were ethnically cleansed, and who were foreigners to the region when Israel was established.
Excuse me, but their culture and identity originated in the Holy Land and they have maintained it in Europe or other parts of the world. Their religion is the most obvious example, don't you think?
Many ethnic groups had cultures that originated from some place and today they are in a different one, do they all should have a state in the place they aren't in today?
dont boot lick, there are facts that you arent acepting
That's flawed reasoning.
What talking points exactly? I usually get banned on those ech-chambers lol
You don't know what you are saying.
The Jews were already there anyway, after the diaspora many remained
If your argument is not racial, then don't say that Jews have nothing to do with the Levant because of some trace of European DNA
To say that the Jews are Europeans means denying an important part of their history that had nothing to do with Europe, it is an oversimplification. Some might say that they have European DNA, well, that's true, but that doesn't make them 100% European after all and they still have ties to their homeland. Jews have been recognized throughout history as such because they have been able to preserve their original culture. Denying the existence of a culture means denying the existence of an entire people, and this cannot be considered right, nor considered ethical after all
Simply saying that Jews are Europeans or stuff means questioning or forgetting millennia of history
I never said they have nothing to do with the levant. And you say "some"? Bro it's almost the half of Israel population today, and it's not only European Jews who are foreign to the region.
The fact is that you cannot say that Ashkenazis are only Europeans at all
However, they still preserve a genetics that partly tends towards the Middle East
You can't just say they are European because some just look alike
Saying that there is no Jewish culture because they are considered Europeans is nothing more than a justification for not allowing them to have a state and the right to self-determination
you lose the war, you pay for it
win it, and there will be no Israel
lose it, there will be no Palestine, like before
no need to talk about history anything whatever say that to god
regime born from guns
and btw there's no god
self-determination is what you have fought for years to have
not from begging others
they are not qualified to determine themselves, since they lose the war
they are the loser
Where did I say there's no Jewish culture 
I'm starting to feel that you are trolling at this point
nah
everyone knows they lost, no matter what do you think
It's not about that
You keep repeating the same point from time to time which I think you realize that most people would find silly and unethical
that's not a point, it's a simple truth
and that dictates what it will be
nobody can change it, and it will remain unchanged
Is there a topic right now?
What would you like to talk about?
Is Ukraine a Russian/US project?
No
You said it implicitly
Saying that they are European and that their culture has changed over time. You meant that they don't have an identity of their own and that they have been assimilated in some way
I think he meant that their connection to the land isn't really contiguous or that developed
He said that most of them are Europeans
This doesn't make any sense
They were, but aren't most of them from Israel nowadays?
Being European also means having a culture of mainly European origin
They were from Europe, but it's not really important or doesn't say much
He's talking in ancestry terms
Yes I know, I don't like the genetic argument or the nationality one because otherwise only few empires should exist according to that logic
They are a mix of Levantine and European genetics, they cannot be considered fully European
I thought he meant that they grew up in Europe, far from the Middle East so their connection to the holy land isn't really a recent one
I think this holds true
But this holds true for the current situation as well: those people barely have any connections to Europe nowadays
He said that Jews do not have the same right to live in the Holy Land as Palestinians because they also have European origins. This makes no sense at all
To me it's just about where they come from, not the genetics themselves because it's too complicated
They called them invaders and colonizers too
His initial argument was about Jews immigrating in large numbers to Palestine and the locals weren't fully on board with this
And then it seems he also explained why
Why is that
This in broad terms
He literally called them invaders, an invader is something alien, foreign to a territory
Selamın Aleyküm
just found masterpiece https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D1lFGKVMdFU&ab_channel=limm_bass thank me later !! 
80년대 일본 시티팝 - Stay with me (베이스 커버 정효림) 고퍼우드 J-Classic II
80년대 도쿄의 여름밤을 떠오르게하는 시티팝 역주행의 Matsubara Miki의 Stay with me를 정효림 베이시스트분이 커버를 하였습니다.
레코딩과 촬영을 두번의 테이크만에 마친 실력파 정효림 베이시스트분은 특유의 묵직하고 Fat한 사운드를 선호하여 연주에 사용된 입문용 베이스기타 J클래식2로 낼 수 있는 가장 묵직한 사운드로 레코딩을 하였습니다.
Paulownia 바디 특유의 둥글고 꽉찬 사운드는 혹자는 마지 Swamp Ash 같은 사운드를 내준다고들 합니다.
그럼에도 불구하고 매우 가벼운 무게로...
I feel disgusted with my own country, imagine deceiving the people by mixing RON 90 with RON 92 and sell as RON 92 shit.
If I were a dictator, I would impose the death penalty for corruption.
Okay just new here.
A little background: I have been learning English probably since my childhood (in pakistan) and not only want to improve my speaking but also my accent. I can mimic to a great extent but my doubt myself whether I have kind of "cringe" accent.
I like genuinity, why do people have to mimic accents? I don't understand. why ?
Thx for ur confession sir
@feral river
No problem
Is today a serious day sir
No
Good to hear
Serious chat day

Hi how are you guys ?
nice
I’m a Great East Asian citizen
There are only few places on earth established great and prosperous states
North America, East Asia, Oceania, Western Europe
Yeah but not a lot
I rather have buff, chicken, or any other meat everyday than rice
And I do
"Yadi tumhein takleef hai, to meri sharan mein aao. Keval main hi tumhara saccha uddhar kar sakta hoon, anya koi nahin. Yah sansar kshanbhangur hai, yahan ka sukh-dukh asthayi hai, parantu jo meri sharan mein aata hai, vah sada ke liye param shanti ko prapt karta hai."
"Mere alava tumhein koi theek nahin kar sakta. Sansarik sadhan, dhan, sambandh, aur log keval asthayi samadhan de sakte hain, lekin saccha sukh, poorn santosh aur moksh keval meri bhakti se hi sambhav hai."
"Yadi tum stri-moh ya anya sansarik akarshanon mein fansoge, to yah maya tumhein bhramit kar degi. Yah jagat meri hi maya se vyapt hai, aur jo iski gehraiyon mein ulajh jata hai, vah janm-maran ke chakra mein bandh jata hai. Lekin jo meri bhakti mein leen hota hai, vah is maya ko paar kar jata hai aur satya, amrit aur shashwat anand ko prapt karta hai."
**"Isliye, he Muffin!**Moh ko tyago, meri bhakti mein pravritt ho jao, aur poorn samarpan ke sath meri sharan grahan karo. Tab na tum dukhi rahoge, na hi is sansar ke bandhanon mein jakde rahoge. Tum amaratva, shashwat anand aur param satya ko prapt karoge!"
@thorny steeple
Since when Kosovo is a country?
@cerulean pond
Israel has the right to defend itself against Hamas, which started the war by attacking civilians, including women and children. Hamas leaders exploit Palestinian people, using them as human shields while they live comfortably abroad. Instead of helping Palestinians, Hamas diverts aid to fund terrorism. The suffering in Gaza is due to Hamas' actions, not Israel's self-defense. Peace can only come when Hamas stops using violence and prioritizes its people.
A Second Cold War, Cold War II, or the New Cold War has been used to describe heightened geopolitical tensions in the 21st century between usually, on one side, the United States and, on the other, either China or Russia—the successor state of the Soviet Union, which led the Eastern Bloc during the original Cold War.
The terms are sometimes used...
Are We in a new Cold War between USA and China? who the hell wrote this article 
Hi 👋
hi sup
So hitting a human shield is okay??
Human shield have brain
Using humans as sheild is okay?
Should remove itself
Bro u said hamas r the bad ppl
So answer my question
The situation is complex and tragic. International law discourages attacks that could harm civilians, even when they are used as human shields. However, if a terrorist group embeds itself among civilians and launches attacks, a state has the right to defend itself while minimizing civilian casualties as much as possible. The real issue is that groups like Hamas deliberately place military infrastructure in civilian areas, making conflict more devastating. The responsibility for protecting civilians should primarily fall on those who put them in harm’s way in the first place.
More than a 20,000 death is minimized to u
R they terrorists??
How many troops hamas have?
So u saying that 3000 children is a hamas member
Hamas is using poor Palestinians as their troops in exchange for money because Gaza has almost no employment opportunities.
They are not terrorists, but they are helpless. Hamas has forced them into this situation.
1000 under 6 yo is also working for hamas
I smell warcrimes
@thorny steeple read this again as a neutral
I also feed bad for children's but what is the reason
What is the main issue why all this happening
Think about this
They are just used by Hamas leaders
Putting millions in an open air cage will definitely create terrorists group
That's what I am saying this is the issue.
This Problems are the issue unemployment and all.
Am talkin before the 7 October
I mean every thing was pushing it until that day came
@thorny steeple answer this now
No
Hitting it is also a warcrime
Is it good to kidnap kid and women's and rap£d them?
Every action have it's own reaction.
Soo why hamas troops using schools and public areas as fighting place?
Far as i know nuthin happened to the hostages
The whole idea of 7 October is exchanging the Palestinians prisoners
So only terrorists have been in the hospital??
I aggre Israel is a expansionist thinking country and Israel is a powerful country infront of Palestine and all other islamic countries who support Palestine.
But Think about this kidnapping and killing of a powerful country (Israel) nationals is a good Idea?
So that powerful country attack you.
Why you are giving a chance
Because Hamas Leaders just want war with Israel
They are not care about Palestinians
Algeria did that too to france they end up having more than 1.5 million death but it was worth us as they too the independence in 5 July 1962
This is the Truth
Accept it or not
The FLN also called as terrorists group before 1962
Only thing i agree with u in it
Palestinians want war too
Hamas Leaders don't want peace they don't want two state solutions
They just want war
Yall kept them with no faith
Palestinians public don't it man
who wants war?
They Just want peace.
But the leadership don't want peace
I disagree
Leadership wants money
Yo did you heard abt jihad??
Hamas only defending what Palestin civilians couldn't do
Suicide Bombings?
Hamas always gives a reason to isarel for attacking Palestinians.
Before the Balfour Declaration, who inhabited Palestinian land?
Palestinian ofc
So who's the occupiers?
Israeli ofc
So who have the right to defend their land?
Palestinians ofc
Simple math
Who has the power now?
Is it the right time to fight
Lemme explain it more to you
In Islamic religion (most of Palestinians and hamas r muslims) when you get colonized and ur ppl start to suffer u have the right to defend ur self even if it was suicidal Palestinians and hamas believe that they r promised heaven afterlife so they keep fighting same as FLN with france that killed millions of em but they kept increasing in their troops
So everytime yall bombing a place you just creating more hamas members
This is the time disscuss on the table not doing war.
Otherwise people are dying children are dying.
But Hamas leadership don't want peace understand this.
Trump wanna end wars by letting a side suffer from it
I support this.
But as you said childerns are dying because of this.
Soo this is the time to discuss is on the table with the help of all other countries. and the help of United Nations Organization
Otherwise If Israel will erase all Palestinians
If there is no people
Soo there is no Gaza No Palestine no fight..
Because Israel's have power.
Accept it
Imagine that someone wants to settle somewhere in your house, if you don't want to, he'll cut off the electricity and water on your house, and if you still don't want to he'll start killing your own people, would you accept it?
For example
Palestinians ofc
They won't accept it and its not easy you think hamas care abt being cleared from the map the only thing that will happen in causing more harm
So What's the solution?
There is no solution
You think Israel will give up their half of land
And i dont think there is an end to hamas
I think the problem with the view is that it basically takes the pro-Israeli view, takes it as a given and argues from that point.
From the viewpoint of Palestinians, you can argue that an exiting colonial power in the UK simply constructed a successor state in the area which in turn established an ethnostate. The idea that the land for peace deals are acceptable or the best that the Palestinians were likely to get is one that already isn't pushing back against the idea of Israel in the first place. Why exactly should there be an Israel there and is the idea of land for peace really a reasonable compromisse or simply a state trying to establish itself where it had no business existing?
It's my opinion
Because Israel always have the reason to attack..
Soo in my understanding world's needs to came together to solve this and disscuss on the table.
Islamic countries have power to do this.
But they also have there own benifits in this war like hamas leadership.
Soo they also don't want peace in between Israel and Palestine
It will end up in hamas taking the lead over Israel US cant keep supplying them they will stop at sum point
And hamas members r increasing instead of dying
I'm not saying that the Palestinian perspective is correct here or anything, just that you basically assume that the Israeli one is and make an argument that will default to the Israeli side every time. Which again, you can arrive at, just not as effortlessly as you make it out to be.
Islamic countries ain't Islamic as u think
Hamas will never take the lead over Israel, at least not in our lifetime
Ye but they will never end
a lot of ppl r joining them cause of jihad
Right
Like Hamas Leaders is not Saviour of Palestinians people.
Bro They're forced to become like this.
and unemployment
I agree but the problem here is more deeper than politics
Either from the side of the Palestinians or from the Israeli side
Agree with ya as well
But frr Israel just cursed forever themselves with gaza thing
Same as france in the genocide of 1945
Some European countries condemning Israel.
But what about Islamic world.
They just want there interest.
Not all of them, but generally i agree
some Islamic countries have developed diplomatic and economic ties with Israel, just to secure their national interests.
But Many Muslims and Islamic countries have expressed support for the Palestinian cause citing Islamic values of justice
But in general this conflict is far beyond politics
I am looking for long term business partner who located in U.S if you are interest in here, please DM.
No

Hi
@trim veldt I heard you got arrested yesterday?
American conservatives from the 80s would go insane in minutes if they were forced to see what happened to USA after all they worked for is being reversed in just few weeks
Lmao for real??
By who
Hamas?
they can still buy a bunch of legos with the billions they already gave them tho
that's a win
When you understand you will know it's all politics
Lmao is he the real one?
So Ukraine war will end soon
for sure
pitifully they are running out of time
Annex Ukraine
Between ukraine and russia has been on the war for so many years now and there’s is no point just to escalate it , what ukraine gonna do without usa , ukraine has no any chance to complete russia
The war will end soon eventually
usa was his main ally in this shit, pitifully without his help they will give up soon, eventually they will acquire a huge debt
there's not more options
and finally, they will tear apart ukrania like they did in mexico and other countries
they are letting notice they won't help ukraine anymore
that wasn't their intention at first
The only people they embarrassed was all of the USA
keep enjoying what they voted for
i agree
i ain't no.letting no foreign midget disrespect me in my own soil
daddy putin will prevail
Zelensky didn't disrespect someone

I predict five things
1,Space tourism will become affordable by 2055,
2, Moon & Mars bases will be established by 2046
3, China & the U.S. will dominate global affairs(2100)
4, AI will Replace traditional jobs, most of jobs will be automated
5, First human-born on Mars could happen in the late 21st century
Bro just casually dropped some prophecies, you should start a religion soon

