#š§ ļ½serious-chat
1 messages Ā· Page 397 of 1
this is the internet, why would i be lying
are you also muslim
No
Is Islam hard and conservative?
whats your religion?
neither god or religion redefine objectivity, nothing stopping us from projecting it on them at a fundamental level, unless we have biases or other things to stop us from doing so
All religions was like that but nowadays everyone do whatever they want
I dont have one
theistice to athiestic?
The second one
A religion can be many things based on interpretations, but many of the Muslim societies are conservative
I dont think so
culturally not by religion
What was your family religion?
you don't think there is constant influence between these 2 ?
Islam
Why
I have many Christian friends and I feel like their religion is not less conservative than Islam
You arent conservative, culture are conservative, rleigion itself is beautiful
Ayoub the muslim typing
Pls
Im not ready to read paragraph
the answer is in ur last part ,we will never be able to do so as we are actually limited in knowledge and we have many biases and different opinions..
Only culture brings conservativism, not religion
why did you left it?
orthodoxy was never in any religion
not even any
Kalam?
no just simple logic
then you can never make a claim with 100% certainty, yet you were pretty convinced God's morality is objective
DM me your aqeedah
Mmm firstly I don't think I've ever called myself a Muslim and so I can't say that I've "left" Islam because I was never even there I was just raised that way by my parents because they are muslim
And Idont like to talk to people about my views on religion
where the problem if we get objective morality from the only source that can determine it in absolute accuracy?
Iām mean they use this word like itās a bad sign where the religion is all about rules and we should stick to it
How would you know that ?
you're saying you can't know anything for certain, yet you're saying that
The size of the Thigh is proportional to Mortality.
the source is not me, could u undersatnd ?
are rules fixed?
God is the necessary existence.
You're certain the source has absolute accuracy
we are given guidance we need to implement it, you derived mrality
How can you be fully certain of this, if we can't be certain of anything ?
@void arch what juridispiction you follow?
@dense agate you too what school of thought you gfollow
all i could say is do ur own research on islam . Islam has many evidences to prove his truthfulness .
Mostly yes
How?
as i said there are accessible evidences .
Saimon is not a muslim
is he athiest?
maybe
Did u delete ur message?
yes
what is your aqeedah and school of thought?
I doubted you confirmed
Wht is aqedah
why you want to know
Wow
set of beliefs or faith similar to it
Ok like there are cardinals itās fixed,
Inheritance rules are fixed, and other rules
I think there is no something changeable in the rules but with the differences in situations between the past and today there is some situations that require fatwa ( an opinion from an Islamic scholar) and its based on the fixed rules but it requires someone who is specialized in religious science u get me?
sociality, social justice system
How about it?
Anyone interested in music?
Why will we be?
No
Ok Iām interested š
Okay cool, just wanna start a conversation yk don't wanna cause any trouble š„²
why cant you do something to rules, why cant you do changes to the system
No and stop talking about music here pls
Aight cool
cant you derive from the guidance of God? @void arch
Because this is the point of religion itās from god not us
Iām busy now I will be back I 30mins
Drce chill wtf
Chill out Zehra
I cant stand this type of people
I don't even read his messages 
ŠŠ¾Ń ŃŠ°Šŗ
ok
What do u want to get to?
Like tell us the issue u wanna change and then we will discuss
My point is with the social systems, and Ijtihad
I hope you get the point
I read aqeedahs Kalam now I m confused
Get me out of this well, of doubts
faith increase and decrease with actions of the mouth, hearth and senses or limbs. and -Allah guide whom he wills- , meaning that God knows who deserves guidance and who deserves misguidance based on the faith and intentions of ppl.
Now do you know about what debates I read, or talking about do you have idea
Social systems? Like Islamic jurisprudence and schools of it?
Ijtihad is done with foro3 or something new . and not with Usoul
sure, but you've said before that humans have a limited capacity to absorb knowledge plus our biases, so how come you can be certain of this evidence but not every other one.
you should stay consistent, if we can't be fully certain of anything, then that applies to anything
yes
i just answer this one
Principles are eternal, but we can make systems from it
I am correct or wrong?
Ok where are u from? Iām from Egypt okey? Have u heard about Al azhar ?
alazhar university?
Yes
The only one that doesnāt āsupportā it in large quantities is Islam mostly. Other faiths are content to leave them be. This is partially due to the lack of more Islam in large numbers in western countries. Typically as societies develop religions become more accepting even if not condoning
that's not true ,me not being able to know something doesn't imply i cant know what is my name for example. we can't know everything objectively but we have the capacity of knowledge and reasoning that can allow us to investigate those evidences
But as I stated earlier. We need to give a minimum level of respect and decency to other human beings. Especially on multicultural platforms.
Sure we can utilize our reasoning and capacity to think, but we can never be fully certain of any conclusion.
we cannot rationally conclude beyond doubt that rationality is infallible.
im referring to what religion says , not individuals.. i think what remain from Christianity in the west is just the name , most ppl are liberal and cultural Christian and if u find someone have read the bible u may tell u find a treasure.
nobody will disagree with u ,but this is what our religion says we can't sugar coat it for some social changing.
Is there any sugar in Islam?
ur now still coming with an atheistic view in investigating those evidences which is a very biased and prejudice way to do so , as the result of ur pre view will deny what u ve reached of evidence as ur Brain is a result of a merely random natural reactions.
@dapper laurel accurate?
Hey is anyone of you interested in accounting major or is like working in that profile? Would like to connect!
acknowledging the limitations of human understanding (which you did too) is not only biased but an atheistic view ??
why are you arbitrarily labeling things now ?
look to what u ve said : -we cannot rationally conclude beyond doubt that rationality is infallible-
ur not hyper doubting conclusions ?
Do you deny the Gods guidance and truth?
You can reason, find solutions from the Quran, Hadith, Fiqh then scholarly interpetations
Yes, can you at any point claim you know anything that could be known ? so that you can have a final ultimate conclusion ? No.
this isn' about doubt.
If somethings arent permissible they are due to their ultimate loss, destructive to humanity
Here you're just talking about Islam, im talking about this on a fundamental level.
if i end in a fair conclusion based on reasonable thinking that those evidences are true im not gonna doubt it .
Fundamentally failure, logic, reasoning, again build it do it and conclude and go on
ur denying conclusions with no basis or justification except ur pre view on rationalaly as it is a result of randomness therefore not reliable?
just absurdity
You can have a conclusion that you're confident of based on your current knowledge, but that doesn't mean you're certain of it beyond doubt, but if you are that would be a leap of faith, since it goes against rationality
Not denying them, I was pointing out your inconsistency when it comes to acknowledging humans' limitations when it comes to knowledge, for you it can apply to anything except god and religion
that is the absurdity
what ull reach of conclusions is this regard is not limited to knowledge cuz ull ve only one absolute conclusion .
bcz any basic knowledge will make u reach same conclusion after investigating those evidences.
it not something that is relative when it comes to those conclusion.
Not true, there are many conclusions when it comes to god, ofc you would believe yours is the only true one.
What are you guys talking about
@thorny steeple Iāve studied at an Azhar school . At elementary school we had a subject of jurisprudence , it was two schools of jurisprudence it was an elective subject ,I chose one and my friend Chose the other. The two were not different from each other except very few rules and it wasnāt about the principle itself it was about the processes of its implementation ,the period of it ,and that all is for the facilitation . āDifference is compassion ā u take what is easier for u thatās it . I hope I make my point clear cause Iām not that good at English š«
damn finally some sense has entered the chat
what are these conclusions ?
lets break them down
all the other god concepts, but they're all fundamentally irrational, just like yours
I've a grip knowledg on Islam then other around me in school, now I've things more than that, scholarly debate or issues
you can say that, I want to ask about it and want to clear them
so u say they re not rational yet still putting them as alternatives .
very biased
U are not muslim?
I'm Muslim, very paracticing also completing obligations
I did mistake by reading all
possible conclusions someone who leaves rationaltiy behind could make, you're a prime example.
i think we were talking in term of rational thinking .
then supernatural deity is out of the room, you cannot rationally prove it.
God is the only explanation for the existence
matter cant come from nothing
so it has to come from something
Ok good for u
and we can't go to infinity of material causes we ll ve to end up in immaterial cause
Did you read the 3 creeds and wahdatul wujood?
that s a flawed concept
No I googled it and found itās like shirk or something
U explain to me š
yes it is
it s the say that allah is one with the creation
What the hell ?
its kufr
what about others
see you are lagging here
others is what the text affirm and most of scholars and Salaf agree on , just read some of ibn taimya
are you takfiring Ibn Arabi?
What about Imam Ashari? the ashari creed
Hi guys, yous are okay?
did you read it?
I donāt know even who is he š
imam ashari repented did u know that ?
the person who wrote Wahdatul Wujood
before that not after that
and Matruidi
before that its obv bidaa ,so why would he repent ?
In opinion you, whats the best form to learn english?
he repented before
Where are u from bro?
U are following sunnah or other things ?
I follow Quran, Hadith and Seerah,
bro follow aguedah of salaf and stay away from these things .
I'm asking you
Ok thatās the right thing by the way
No Shiāa?
No shiaism and biased prespective
im not specialized to do takfiir brother
I'm questionion your thoughts and want to know them so I can clear everything
Ok thatās right but u have some confusing perspectives though
Are you salafi just want to know?
im follower of Salaf
I also follow Salaf?
Whats wrong with 2 creeds and wahdatul wujood
Yes of Caurse Azhar u knowš
read what most authentic scholars said about it .
who are some authenthic scholars? I read some cant conclude then saying 3 are right with some differences
According to Ibn Taymiyyah, surely u know him, waḄdat al-wujūd is the equating of God with nature. In modern terms synonymous with pantheism. Ibn Taymiyyah said those who adhere to waḄdat al-wujūd say that existence is one, and wajib al-wujūd what God has is the same as possible waḄdat al-wujūd that a creature has.
he critiqued ibn arabi
read all of it
Ibn Taymiyya, rejected the idea of "wahdatu wujud." He argued that the concept of the unity of existence is incorrect because it leads to the belief that God is in all things, which he considered to be a form of pantheism.
Instead, Ibn Taymiyya maintained that God is separate from His creation and that the world is only a manifestation of God's will and power. He believed that the Sufi interpretation of "wahdatu wujud" undermines the concept of tawḄīd, the Islamic principle of divine unity, and therefore should be rejected.
Regarding the MuŹætazila creed, Ibn Taymiyya disagreed with their understanding of the existence of God. He opposed their use of logical reasoning as the primary means to prove God's existence, as he believed it to be insufficient and limited to the world of logic without addressing the actual existence of God.
In relation to the Ashʿari school of thought, Ibn Taymiyya had reservations about their interpretation of God's attributes and the concept of divine unity (tawḄīd). He considered their views to be closer to anthropomorphism, attributing human-like qualities to God, which he considered to be incorrect.
Do you hate Sufi?
why i ve to?
Mostly Salfai I met hate them
i see that their creed is flawed but there no reason for me to hate them
there nothing wrong with them, infact I dont know whats the problem with and fighting on that.
Why dont you take them right and move on?
would u believe in flawed consept of God and move on ? same with these things u have to believe in the right consept of God , u cant believe that God is everywhere and pretend its right in fact this what paganists believe.
they derive it from Quran and Hadiths
according to them What will you say about it?
Salahuddin was Ashari
No No
Ottamans were also were they all kaffir?
appealing to authority ll not make it true
salaf oppose it would u agree with them ?
I'm not appealling to authority my point is were 600 years ottamans then turks
and salaf were before them
were they all wrong which fullfilled Prophet S.A.W
would u follow them?
I directly follow Quran, Hadith and Seerah
U are using kaffir so much they might be wrong but we shouldnāt be used to use this word
so u should follow salaf
and leave those beliefs
I didntt said it a person I met said that, i can send screenshot too if you want
I'm taking all the things again what did I say, I need more knowledge, Icant decide that right now. No one is answering properly
I believe you
brother those beliefs are flawed ,most earlier scholars agree on it.
Like he said if you follow Quran,Hadith you should follow salaf
I follow Quran as it is. Are there use of metaphors or something like that?
Sufi doesnāt focus on seerah (prophet Mohammedās one)
I think so they follow seerah
I made a mistake
It wasnāt a question it was a statement
Believe me the one which really adheres to Quran is salaf
Have you read any of itās jurisprudence books?
his problem is with Aqueda not feqh
I read Imam Abu Hanifa, some of it, then Imam Tahmiyya then Imam Ahmed bin Hanbal some quotations, then some of Sheikh Jillani, Jalalludin Rumi Poetry
And what did you find?
Imam Tahmiyyah affirmed Allah above the throne, Hanafi Juridisipiction mostly are the other 2 creeds, Imam Ahmed also Affirmed Allah above the throne but the point is the people like Salahuddin fathi Quds, and ottamans who lead Islam
How can they be deviated? How can they be wrong?
Did Allah gic the leadership to the deviated muslim?
Why will Deviated Muslim lead? just like Shia never lead Ummah or any of the other group then they might be right there may be possibilities
God cant be confined by space time limit
This is why I started not giving a shit about modern European pseudo-liberal thinking, whatever I do is wrong, even going to the gym is considered extremist. The economy is getting fucked, the united states are abandoning us and Russia is conquering territory in Ukraine every day, nothing could get worse.
I am writing this message while I am returning home, I just hope I don't get stabbed by an illegal immigrant for no reason, because of the failed policies of the EU
I donāt see what you mean clearly but I assume u say that tahmiyyah affirmed that Allah above the throne is not making sense?
Like cause god cannot be confined by space, time, and limit?
yes
also Salahuddin fathi Quds, and ottamans who lead Islam
How can they be deviated? How can they be wrong?
Did Allah gic the leadership to the deviated muslim?
Ok first, Do u know what the throne looks like?
Add more to life. Be pike a fart
I dont knwo how it looks like
Allah doesnt need throne
Like itās literally one from occultism if Iām saying it right
Itās not a place we detect or can detect itās one of Allahās secrets
So, it has nothing to do with our definition of place and time u get me?
I got you, now Is Allah above the arsh?
Yes
Itās in Quran
He told us so
But we donāt know what the throne is
Like do u know how long is the day of Qiyaama
50,000 Years
No no after that it says that we canāt count it
In the same aya
We donāt know how long it takes with our definitions like Iāve said before
now here is humble question to youu, can it be metaphorically said or not its straight?
Itās secrets we donāt know it and we will not until it happens thatās it
Do you go the gym? How is it extremist in any sense?
Redpill culture I guess
Itās more about can we count it ?No
For example Allah said
āŁŁŲµŲ§ŁŁ ŁŁ Ų¹Ų§Ł
ŁŁŁ"
That means the baby takes 2 years to stop getting milk from mother right?
Allah made it clear with our parameters of measurement, but In Alqiyaamah he didnāt he said that we cant count it it behind our perception
Not that I've ever met anyone who thinks going to the gym is extremist, if anything I think too many people go to the gym for... Reasons
But this is non-sequitur isn't it? It's like saying that praising Bolivar is fascism because Mussolini erected a statue for him
Yes it is a non-sequitur but there are people who think like that, on online spaces
This is true, I've seen self-declared fascist who said that your opinion in far-right environment only counts if your arm girth is high
Either gyms are used to date people or it's the newest popular activity
Like... Reddit?
fr
to date people
No, those people don't know what a gym is
But I've seen reposts from Twitter about that
Then again I never stepped on Twitter so I have no idea about what's popular and what isn't
I understand it, but can Allah be everywhere with knowledge? not with essence
do you guys think the qu'ran is just a continuation of the bible
No
why not
Why don't Redditors know about gym
It's forbidden knowledge, just like showers
Of caurse thatās the point
but isnt it the same area? and isnt the qu'ran set after jesus died? so would that almost be like a continuation
Hm not exactly, if what's reported in the Quran is true they were in contested/neutral region, the books in the Bible were more popular throughout Rome
Even then the Quran doesn't include the books in the Bible, the Bible has the Old Testament (but they proposed a version with just the New Testament at some point)
I recommend u to read tawheed book the one we were studying at my school has replied to many of your questions I can find it and send it to u.
Are you Arabian?
Im not arabian
that would be awesome thank you
I wasnāt talking to uš¶
you can send me english version
bruh you sent it to the whole chat and replied to yourself lmao
@thorny steeple i was talking to him
Itās fine I was trying to clear the mud understanding
If u want it I will send it to u
I donāt have a problem
oh okay dw
Itās not available but Iāll look for it
Itās a continuation.
sure
@thorny steeple brother we don't do Taawil to them , we accept them as it is in the text without interpretation or twisting the text, but we surely know that Allah is unlike the creation nor anything u could imagine is like allah.
can u send it here to me if u dont mind
Are you Arabian?
yes
Ok guys, why u all have a problem with taawil?
Itās necessary most of the time even when Iām Speaking Arabic
Which country?
when it comes to sifat allah we cant use our mind to encompass them
Yeah of course
Morocco
But other than that itās a necessity,like him he couldnāt differ between metaphorical and genuine expressions in Quran
I will not understand u even if u talk Thenšš
ŁŲ°ŁŁ ŁŲ«ŲØŲ« ŲµŁŲ§ŲŖ Ų§ŁŁŁ ŲØŲÆŁŁ ŲŖŲ§ŁŁŁ ŲŲŲŖŁ ŁŲ§ ŁŲŗŁŲ± Ų§ŁŁ Ų¹ŁŁ Ų§Ł ŁŲØŲ·Ł Ų§ŁŲµŁŲ§ŲŖ.
its bcz the media and especially cinema ,i can understand other dialects easily bcz i was exposed to it through media and cinema. almost all arabs can understand Egyptian bcz its is famous by it s powerful cinema industry . if u were exposed to Darija same way u would probably be able to understand it
Are you asking Muslims?
People talk about Darija as if it's some alien language from a different planet 
in regards to the subject which is Sifat allah he shouldn't do taawil.
well ,we are fast at speaking
I'll like to read more about them
Is that racist?
@thorny steeple and for that I forgot to reply to it
Sallah Eldein and other leaders are justGodās āpeopleā I donāt even know if he was like that or not and Iāve never cared cause your aqeeda relys on your god and prophet not his followers not other leaders and he is not a prophet to say that Allah put him in leadership u got me?
It's a too vast demonym, I see people supporting hormonal treatment for "trans kids", while on r/Portugueses they are making excuses for Salazar and Franco
do u have that book
sure, Ottamans were Sufi do you know that
When I was a child I used to watch Moroccan cooking shows after like four months I was still canāt understand their talking š„ø
But their cooking with fascinating thoš
Itās about him it doesnāt make Sufi is the right one
I still respect them but they have nothing to do with your aqeeda
šš ill not deny that darija is a little hardš¶
Little yeahššš
majority of citizens were Suni , some leaders favoring Sufism is not an excuse to follow Sufism especially when they are not scholars, it s more of appealing to authority for me , if that works for u why favoring them on the earlier Salaf and sahaba when was no Sufism, no maturdi not ashary?
it may seen im being harsh or something, its just my English personality 
Ottamans are pillar in Islamic world, they really matters the one who fullfilled Prophecies they are great leaders they have very big achievements
How pillar?
Islam doesnāt need anyone, Islam is salaf that follows the prophet and the seerah
He is a great leader yeah but it doesnāt do any thing with Islam itself he is not a prophet.
Ottoman Empire conversation?
The prophecies, itās also like the the throne example, itās not specific we donāt actually know which one is the prophecy , as Muslims we shouldnāt pay our focus on people and what happens in dunia u should focus on the prophet seerah and rules and what we should do to get closer to Allah, until now u were asking questions that we donāt pay attention to it in fact !
And seeking knowledge
No I think that itās a disrespect for absentees and godās secrets
Those ones
nah they're sufi so no great in that try to search about sufism magic
What is Siri's chat about
idk
Actively a large language model or generative ai Siri
Nice to meet you
So what are you guys talking about here
What are you escaping
I follow quran and hadith directly
Oh no religion**** no
it's a serious thing so yes
A serious thing probably great by most of the humans on Earth actually
I mean I'm not against religion but that's not the thing that I want to discuss because it leads nowhere it's serious for sure like death as well but I'm not I'm not 80 i'm I'm on my 20s right so why would I discuss religion And still young and not going to die any time soon
yeb that what is called salfi or Sunnah or whatever u call it
no if u don't like the current conversation just wait until other start
I mean I can start a conversation debating against talking about religion
isn't that serious I think it's not for snowflakes
yeah start idc, we should follow some laws in this life to make it better, as an example in most religions being gay is forbidden so we should follow laws to make our life better u understand?
I think religion especially nowadays is more like a social media influence trend
I'm not gay by any means right so that doesn't relate to me at any point
no in reality a lot of people fight for their religion
as any movement
we want to unite I understand that I unite with my fellow disk golf players
yeah yeah politics man
or like student communities They want to basically unite as students and then because they all students they can unite
Okey good for u tho
But that's responsibilities you have to carry out like talking about these topics because you can influence other peoples by your sights and you don't want to do that
Imagine that you do not believe in religions and you killed someone. Forget the laws of countries, most of them are originally religious. Will you be held accountable if there is no religion or religion did not exist at all? On the other hand, killing in religions is forbidden.
that's nonsense
I never kill anyone I at least don't remember so but that's the thing right whatever you will have done in life you can forget it in 5 to 10 years like this really a fact that humanic may Maybe once you older but let's say you kill someone when you wear 5 you won't remember that because you didn't intend to but when you 20 And you also have a grown brain and bioterrorist right you will remember what you did on you late 20s so by when you 50 you remember what you did on your light 30s right
wake up bro ur religion is everything in ur life
I don't meant u bro
Sunnah so
I believe in science logics and data and humans right I believe in humans ask to some degree like many different things to do in this planet
nonsense
That's not nonsense that's basic what I feel like
So u r Atheist
Itās a very small knowledge tho
I mean I know my knowledge isn't high because I haven't lived in this earth for 60 years right i'm on my early 20s so I haven't been in this world for long enough to have a upper knowledge right compared to my father facts Abu so On these late 50s on my Granddad
but if u believe in religion u will forget If you repent cuz god forgive everyone
At the end of the day what is knowledge right it's it's that you understand facts you cannot have knowledge that is not fact and how do you prove something like that there's no way to prove it
so u wanna tell me that u don't believe in religions or god cuz it's not knowledge?
u got mind?
But they were not you will still forgot I have I have been religion religious in my life right II believe because I read some of the Bible stories and there's multiple very variants of what has happened in the history In their written but I cannot remember them any more I don't remember what happened stand us logically you will forget
Religions and their stories are deeply connected to history, the history of early humans, and the beginning of creation.
I mean by believing in something I don't think it can be knowledge right I have believed in many things II thought that this is how the world works in a way of acts before but now I realized that it's actually different that humans are more dynamic we're not static creatures that being said believing is not knowledge I can't believe in anything right probably I do I will probably believe I don't know just predictions right Predicting that I will start believing at one point and that's what life forced me to do right
wanna learn more about religions or u will just argue with nonsense context
Thatās the point Islam comes from tasleem ŲŖŲ³ŁŁŁ it means that you surrender to your god and given yourself up to Allah
Yeah but I never I never surrendered II never been to that point I always fight II never surrender for anything and that's how I have lived past 20 years of my life
yeb
You are so young bro never surrender what?
what does serious mean to you what is the definition of series can we even say that series is talking about religion because serious I think has something to do with facts
ok bro I'm 17 so I lived less than u, so wanna learn with an open mindset or what
He is kicking us out now šš
anything in life is serious
Yeah like is there even point of talk about religion is channel no that's not true because what is the definition right I don't think you know it either Let me Google
Are we being like we cannot laugh about it and we have to be serious about anything we want to say here
bro forget the chat forget English and forget anything let's talk religion
Maybe
come dms if u want
I mean I know I don't think you should pick things that seriously think life is like a playground to some degree as well you can play around you you don't have to take everything seriously
What are you seeking to discuss ?
Sarah I agree with you maybe
don't argue if u don't like don't speak, it's a freedom u want everyone to talk like what u want
Me?
Itās my pleasure š
Can Andy CS be serious
What is it?
Yeh I googled it
it's pretty serious to me it really reminds me of my childhood
I donāt know it unfortunately
Do u know chase atlantic?
Itās a band
But Iām referring to thatās not actually a serious chat š
he was thinking religion is not serious but music is very serious
what do u mean directly? with ur own understanding? .. the ones who deliver and protect what u believe after Allah are Salaf and Sahaba . u should understand them as they did, as the prophet peace and blessing upon him command us . if u didn't do so u may fall astray Akhi. @thorny steeple
.
This picture is taken by my iPhone 15 pro
Really ?wow
Yeah is that right i think nowadays most of phones can capture moon
Imagine that our descendants will live on the moon and mars one-day, like interstellar civilizations, what a amazing
I donāt find it lovely I like earth the most so far
my problem not yours
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zGwOXNBIZeM
Almost 98% of people can turn off their brains and just vibe. But the elite 2.1% of overthinkers? Theyāve unlocked the secret level of constant frustration, existential dread, and knowing way too much about things that will never be useful in real life. In this video, we break down why being smart actually sucks.
š Don't forget to SUBSCRIBE! š
...
You're lying to yourself, you speak vaguely and avoid debates
lmao
Imagine being this pretentious
People used to think wisdom was divine and now the dumbest people will watch a AI scripted video about how being aware of basic stuff makes them suffer and become content with stupidity
Can't you simply dye your hair and become dumb
I haven't watched that but personally I do think being average is better just considering that what will be expected of you is also the average
Thatās an interesting point, but I still disagree. Everyone suffers from external pressure
I still donāt understand why people think that knowledge expands sadness
Maybe the pressure explains, but not entirely
And after all, wisdom is constructed communally, if you put your self worth in hierarchy of course youāre going to feel pressured because you already feel like a fraud, always in on the verge of being caught
That isn't quite how I experience it but my intelligence comes with autism so I still think average is at better, I'm sure that it isn't the best, still better than one sided intelligence that doesn't really help you do better in school and in life
Iām also autistic and have hyper fixations. Still hold onto what I said
But of course, different people feel different
No need to have the same view : )
I just think itās a fallacy that knowledge expands sadness and all
Hmm yeah knowledge doesn't
Not fundamentally, at least
Ways of thinking do
For sure
Hello hello
Beliefs, you mean?
Hi
How are you?
Fine. You?
I am good
In this chat we discuss topics, you have something in mind?
What's The secret for a happy life?
I believe thereās no formula, but to me is to find some deep meaning in your life and live according to it
What about you?
Different for everybody
be happy
I agree with you Just know yourself and do what you like to do.
But do you think people could be in a ilusion happiness?
Well, I think happiness is a feeling. It doesnāt make you any difference I guess
Sure, just trigger the happiness things in the brain artificially
I donāt mean it at all, actually. I think we should create ourselves, rather than know. And I think we should do what it is right, not what we would like, necessarily
Still can't quite decide if that is a good life though, logically it should be as, you know, you're happy. So why still does it not sit right with me that that is a good way of living your life
They say that power corrupts, but absolute power corrupts absolutely. Realising that public anger at corruption was threatening the legitimacy of the Communist Party, President Xi Jingping launched a wave of corruption investigations when he came to power in 2012. āEconomic crimesā still carry the death penalty and in the past two years, over 30...
I don't see communism there, alot corruption 
Conquer the world mehh..
Joka, next time please wait for the other discussion to finish before starting another topic
You mean using drugs to be happy?
I am busy now sorry for that
To feel happy, instantly
No just wire the brain to constantly receive happiness signals or something like that
I think happiness is more abroad than that
We think of it as stimulation only, but intuitively, I disagree
When Iām being entertained the whole day, I donāt feel happy even though empirically I am
Happiness to me is something spiritual, in the sense that requires surrender
Intuitively yes, but how is living like that worse, I cant think of any rational train
Yeah but logically it should just be brain stuff that can be triggered forcefully
Then weāre simply understanding our brain wrongly
We donāt work like that
Ethics, that is, how to live your life, is from the beginning a philosophy
And it is from a reason
What kind of life would make you happy?
That isn't what I mean but I gtg now
So I can't try to explain better what I mean, sorry
I understand you. And it is easy to say that brain science is limited, that weāre more than our brain and signals. But I donāt think thatās correct? I mean, weāre material. Maybe itās our science, our definitions and methods that is limited, not itās object of study
No you don't understand me but its fine, bye!
How to seek true happiness?
It depends on what you truly want
I can only answer for me
You have to make your own answers
You canāt get that from the world
But i want a scientific answear.
And whoever claims to have a universal answer is going to attract desperate people. Donāt trust self help gurus
Lmao
Again, ethics is a philosophical topic
Itās not science
Whatever so called answer is going to be shallow and insufficient
Because itās not their job to provide it
But I would say that extroversion seems to be linked with positive feelings
True happiness never exist
Elaborate
Do you think weāre eternally dissatisfied?
It often feels like certainty is out of reach. The realities we face seem to be reflections of the challenges we've endured together. Yet, these experiences shape our resilience and deepen our connections, enriching our journey despite the doubts we encounter.
Kinda
To be or not to be
Happiness is a spectrum, to me. I canāt imagine a happy life without suffering and mistakes, because those gives us wisdom. I think Socrates said something about an unexamined life is not worthy of being lived
I find my happiness in a sharp morality and curiosity for the world
And kindness : (
š
Good corruption
craziest thing ever heard in 2025
@thorny steepleI like your pfp and banner
This is Qur'an in a nutshell:
Inaccurate and incorrect attempts to describe natural phenomena, talks about old myths, legends, and characters from them that existed before Islam without going into details, stories that have no points for them other than "be blindly loyal to god (in other words; Muhammad)", epistemologically invalid arguments, enticement attempts for Muslims with a heaven that have fresh and clean water, fruits, and such things that people in the Arabian desert found it hard to get at the time of Muhammad, along with enticement for Muslim men with virgin women in heaven, and threats for those who don't blindly believe in Islam to be tortured so badly forever.
There are verses that contradict each other, but that's another story.
It surely goes into some basic ethical stuff. But it doesn't go deep. It's surprisingly shallow.
Like, it doesn't talk much or with any level of depth about family relationships, friendships, love and life partners, leadership, compassion and emotions, and such things.
it's ridiculous they will believe that as a truth at the moment they find 0 evidence of the existence of entire thing
it's ridiculous they would believe the thing it asserts
it's more ridiculous they will follow it with absolutely no question
it's stupidly ridiculous it exists in 2025
but it's making sense because those are coming from the middle east
Hi
The middle east was the birth place for the three religions. It makes sense honestly considering how stupid people here are.
Why does this chat room always end up discussing religion?
Welcome to serious chat were religion is always the main topic
It seems like everyone is on the same page and there arenāt any other topics to discuss!
Yeah like history or politics is just all religions nothing else
Discuss about how web series are increasingly shaping the lives of Gen Z!
Web series? In what way?
Yessss šÆ
Anugya do you read web series?
Nooo
Me too
Never read also..
Web series are a great way for escapism from reality
Then you don't read anything? Or just watch YouTube
Yeah video games too
Yess nowadays..š
Watch YouTube or listen to podcasts..
Why read books when there are new alternatives š
š.
Yeah lolol
Fact: in Vietnam you can starve to death if you run a red light in traffic and the traffic police catch you.
I shifted from tiktok to YouTube/shorts YT and reddit nowadays
Ebooks in general
Nicee š
That's a terrible law
Yeah the only part I'm being lazy is trying to learn video editing on Android
hm?
On android ??
You don't use laptop ???
Pov: when you won't realise new AI editing toold
Use capcut maybe š
Yeaa
It's school laptop so the one's I have are either old or too slow š¦„
Wow here is nice place
Capcut for me is like after affect
Huh , so you're in school ??
A school boy...
This is probably my country's desperate policy to reduce the number of deaths due to traffic accidents
Maybe I used canva for making my YouTube shorts now stoped I'm thinking using capcut for replacing canva
For me after effect š
In one sense it's good....but it's still a terrible punishment
Well lady I haven't graduated yet so I can't just say Thank God
How old are you ??
Lol but last update on capcut was powerful , I mean after affect is good Bec u can do ur affects by yourself but many features are the same in both apps
So in basic mathematics 10 + 8 be like
Ooh okay...
18??
Actually, this comes from the fact that people in my country are largely too unconscious when participating in traffic and turn the traffic in our country into extremely chaos.
That's a dumb way of guessing
Yeah doesn't take a rocket scientist š„¼ that much
ye
Yess yess š
But still I do !
Ok
where are u from bro?
India
Namaste bro
ye
Namaste and Greetings
Indeed
Your country's traffic is probably quite chaotic like my country, right?
Wow, the traffic here feels like a never-ending loop!
Yes
Yeah that's crazy y'know
Hey there! Just checking inādo we remember? š
Yea š
What's web series?
š
Lol...you don't know
Remember what? Each other ? Yes. You were pretty engaged last time i was here for a couple of hours. How you doin
Yea... doing well
I don't know
No problem at all! Web series are just like your favorite TV shows, but you can catch them on online platforms instead!
If you ever need any web series suggestions, feel free to ask! I'm here to help!
I donāt think they are genetically stupid but waste their intelligence on some stuff makes them so damn fucking poor and underdeveloped
In this world everyoneās on the ground, you start to blame ? You are the fucking loser
And the loser deserves nothing
Survival for the fittest
I don't think so as well, the luck isn't on our side. We got hit by three waves of stupidity and that's why.
literally go back to centuries ago
they really believed that they could use that outdated religion with few protests and revolutions to establish a new islamic empire again
what we have done is just bankrupt their day dream
How to have access to the selfie section in the server?
I guess it requires to be active. @whole beacon
Level five
You can know your level in #šļ½bot-commands
Islam will win in the end


I go to the gym and some and have often received mixed opinions about this habit. There are also articles that support this theory
I think information spreads quickly and worsely in Europe. This is nowhere near to be implemented in Brazil, though redpill culture is harshly repressed and scorned in here.
But keep going to the gym, I'm six years older than you and wish I hadn't left the gym so many times
It's just freedom of speech, everyone can say what they want here, even if it's bullshit, in the end it's a human right to be able to express oneself
Yesterday I had leg day, now I walk like a cripple, that's why I'll never stop going
Cripple walk, taken rest?
I walked to school, same thing when I have to go back. No pain no gain
Yeah I wish I could lmao
Do you have a broken leg? What happened?
Can't say it's just something y'know, how's your day going
Why am I so obsessed with a word, even the words I have encountered with formerly or pretty sure I know them, THE OBSESSION IS KILLING ME, even with the easiest words like "food", I go through what collocation is used with "food" word, ohh this is primary reason tackle me to not study, how do you deal with it
Pretty good, we're not doing anything at school, that's why I'm writing, how are you?
It's well no school today but Tomorrow regular schedule
Not having school Monday is something fantastic
Crazy
Are people free to support the austrian šØ š¼ļø in Italy?
I got this from chatgpt, Idk if it's true or not.
I thought the Islamic states didn't have the apostasy death penalty for the time of the Islamic Golden age.
You're correct in noting that during the Islamic Golden Age (roughly the 8th to 14th centuries), there was a significant emphasis on intellectual inquiry, religious tolerance, and philosophical debates. While Islamic law (Sharia) traditionally considered apostasy a serious offense, in practice, its enforcement varied widely. Many rulers and scholars during this period prioritized persuasion, debate, and diplomacy over execution.
Apostasy Laws in the Islamic Golden Age
While classical Islamic jurisprudence (fiqh) generally held that apostasy was punishable by death, actual enforcement in many Islamic statesāespecially during the Abbasid Caliphate (750ā1258)āwas often selective and lenient, particularly in intellectual and urban centers.
Scholars, philosophers, and rulers often engaged in rationalist discourse rather than harsh punishments for religious dissenters.
Mu'tazilite thought, which dominated in the early Abbasid period, encouraged free will and rationalism, making rigid apostasy laws less of a focus.
Conclusion
During the Islamic Golden Age, many rulers and scholars took a more lenient and intellectual approach toward apostasy. Theoretical discussions on apostasy laws existed, but actual executions were relatively rare compared to later rigid interpretations. This period was marked by scholarly openness, religious diversity, and debate, which often replaced punitive measures with persuasion and discussion.
Hell yeah
Most men I know in here despise leg day, leg isn't the focus for them, as long as they have muscles in the arms and chest it's ok
@brisk scroll
Remember the bro code they say lmao
I would say yes here in South Tyrol
It's the same here too, but my bro says that if we don't train our legs too, we won't pull baddies
Interesting š§
But it's still a small minority
Lying isnāt a right.
I mean, it's their ancestor
Your speech may be free but you are not free of consequences
Good keep it that way hopefully that fades with time
Ofc
And even free speech hates reasonable limitations and restrictions
"Baddies" don't matter, do it for your health and aesthetics
We are doing it for health
Amen!
It's like Americans being free judicially-wise to march on the streets using KKK hats but the media doxxing them all and making them lose all their prestige
In fact I think they will disappear in the next few years
The social consequences are always worse than the law
Sweet
Here it is more the social consequences than the law itself that harms you. In our pseudo-liberal society the state is getting smaller and smaller and individuals have more and more freedom, not that this is necessarily a bad thing, but, you know how it works, people are usually stupid
https://youtu.be/VT8TdVAhw34?si=7yIC7aBeyJOg23fk
This woman lost her job and was doxxed all over the internet. Luckily she's pretty otherwise she would be screwed for life
Polemiche e indignazione in Germania per un video, diventato virale, in cui un gruppo di giovani 'vip' tedeschi intona cori contro gli stranieri e accenna saluti romani e imitazioni di Hitler in un rinomato locale dell'esclusiva isola di Sylt nel Mare del Nord. Nellāelegante cittadina di Kampen, il gruppo si ĆØ filmato nel bar delle celebritĆ 'Po...
She isn't pretty at all
5/10 she is eh
Kinda
She's 6.5/10 at the very least, at that range any woman is passable nowadays
I could play ping pong on her forehead
Maybe
Same
Well no. Hate speech isnāt protected if you ask me because the intention is to direct harm to the most vulnerable members of society by use of systematic language
And these stupid people have the right to gather their peers and launch a social sanction at you for saying some truth about immigration
Welcome to democracy where everyone is equal
Turns out when you run campaigns on hate it doesnāt work out for anyone
If you don't threat these groups directly, you are protected by the law
Funny thing law can be
Regardless of what you think about it. Not that I favour this attitude, I think being a nazi should be a crime as it is everywhere else
Here you could be sued for hanging nazi flags in your room, in America you would get exposed by the media but the officers wouldn't hand over their handcuffs and arrest you
Remember the American government runs on outdated concepts not adapted to the 21st century
Isn't this slippery slope argument?
John Oliver discusses the first four weeks of Donald Trumpās second term as president, the strategy behind some of the choices his administration has made and why it is indeed fuck time. You heard us: Itās fuck time.
Connect with Last Week Tonight online...
Subscribe to the Last Week Tonight YouTube channel for more almost news as it almost h...
Tottaly
A pastor in Brazil was sentenced for hate crimes against Jews, he will be in prison for his next 17 years, that is the most a person has ever gotten for this
Seems reasonable no?
No. Not necessarily. Slippery slope occurs when someone argues that a specific action or idea will inevitably lead to certain negative consequences without sufficient evidence. The passage is probably showing the progression of how spreading hatred, stereotypes and prejudice led to a concentration camp.
Lol no, he should have gotten fined or slapped on the face at most, 17 years is too much, rapists and murderers don't get jailed for such a time
Well damn now seems more reasonable
Better than let him walk free y'know
I think the problem comes from where you draw the line. I believe true hate speech that would lead to a concentration camp is something that's so extreme and so obvious, like calling a group of people "subhuman" or calling for their annihilation and suppression.
Why does it seem more reasonable to you after I provided that rapists and murderers don't get this jail time?
Well be back doing the same stuff without penalty y'know
Well, I agree. However, true hate speech can gradually develop over time. Any extreme idea can gradually develop over time.
The craziest thing in his argument is he getting wrong the law of his own country because his personal judgement says the opposite
The thing is that these speeches were publicly acceptable back in the early XX century, nowadays a politician can lose his charge if he goes beyond like that
there's no end, and you will continue to lose.
Aladdin being Floridaman for one day be like
Weren't you in Florida last year?
Nah bro I haven't traveled outside of Pennsylvania since the beginning of the pandemic
š
Ayoo don't act like a teenage girlfriend š
Lmao bro got a Chinese GF or bf
Sometimes I feel like Iām a girl
They want them to go back to Poland yet they can't tell them apart from Palestinians smh
Perhaps we should send both Israelis and Palestinians to Poland
And make Poland great again
When it was great it called different
I don't wanna see if they will be smashed by germans with soviets together and being smash again by the next is germans then soviets
Indeed the PlC!
They almost conquer us once
Indeed but failed
not a chance against the flood of tanks
they set up three strategic target: Leningrad, Stalingrad, Moscow, they failed to take any one of it
Leningrad is a easy one because they cut off the supply but Finnish didn't want to cooperate with them
Hi
they are frozen in the front of Moscow
Those war was before tanks, it was 16 century I believe
and hitler feel confident about the battle of Stalingrad, once he controls it, he can control your oil field in baku to gain an advantage to maintain a long-term war against everyone, but he didn't expect that you still have that crazy amount of tanks to surround them
What are u guys talking about?
ah really ?
Ding! I believe 15th or 16th century
You can check our war at those time
Lol I not sure if googl translation is correct, but it happens after this
Russia was weak and they took an advantage
Correct šÆ
What is your mother language?
This word not translated like time of troubles, it more like time of uncertain. But google translated it like this. My version is shadowy times
Rusky
In English it's the times of troubles
Gosh I wish I could read Arabic lmao
Yes, but Russian meaning different. But it close enough, it the same like Ivan terrible in Russian it a bit different meaning almost untranslatable different
Indeed when Russia looked like being torn apart after unity since the kievan rus days
It just a name it have never existed. And we were devided back then, on several Principality
Yeah
Oooh this is so risky

"we all need to spend money, for Egypt"
What does ŁŲ“Ų®ŁŁ mean?
The sound of coins when they hit each other.
It means give money in our dialect.
Alright thanks
Oh I see
Bro is a fucking begger š
Lmao in 2025
We had a politician that was like āyou guys need to stop buying chips and cookies, stop spending unnecessarilyā
El Sisi once told people that if they want prices not go up, they should stop buying things that become expensive 
Genius economist
Lmao
Smartest Egyptian economist
We have good economists actually, but they are in the prison.
Yeah that sucks
āSomething something prosperity is when leaders grovel to expert, and ruin is when experts grovel to leadersā
Where are y'all from dwellers of #š§ ļ½serious-chat?
Sleeping or working
Where are those on the map? 
That I wouldn't know information is lacking
An empty text that does not hold any true cognitive value. It is full of fallacies and false allegations without evidence.
probably It was written merely to attract attention and spread lies.
And the funny thing is that whoever wrote this text makes talking about some things a criterion for the authenticity of the Qurāan. In this way, you see the extent of the writerās mental immaturity and childishness. I would not be surprised if some people believe such superficial and misleading texts.
Immature? How do you make this judgement exactly lol
Anyway, it's just true, and if you disagree you can provide the reason why you disagree with it rather than throwing accusations of childishness and immaturity.
It's ironic because you are the one acting childishly and immaturely here.
I guess it really upsets you how you are unable to silence someone like me just like how you guys do in your great countries.
very obv from what your text displays, That "Anyway, it's just true," u should give us proof since u made an extraordinary claims, the burden of proof is on u shoulders and that's what makes ur previous text immature and childish.
My claim is a judgement on the Quran which is a book that everyone can access and read, if you disagree with this judgement you can bring verses to my attention that disprove what I said..
Honestly, unbeatable is right.
The burden of proof is on you. You've made claims such as "epistemologically invalid arguments".
Even if you're claiming the negative, you'd have to back it up.
why i would silence a liar when i can easily Expose his dishonesty.
What dishonesty?
I'm dishonest for just saying my opinion on the Quran?
You guys are really aren't used to oppostion and it shows.
im not gonna repeat myself ,im not in a habit of that.
that's not true, you stated things as facts, now we want proof.
The proof I need to present here is an analysis of the entire Quran.
if that u opinions don't share it as a fact when u have no evidence on it
That would need a book or an article to explain
then do it, or just don't talk
we dont stand liars like u
I just said my opinion folk. If you believe it's wrong you can point out verses with depth.
No. You don't need to. You can present one example of "There are verses that contradict each other", or any of the other claims you've asserted there.
i respect everyone's opinion, but in this case, you stated something as if it were a fact rather than sharing your perspective.
I mean, naturally my prespective is a fact for me.
the burden of proof is on u , although ur text from the beginning assert that is a fact and not an opinion
our perspectives often feel like facts to us. notwithstanding, there's a difference between personal truth and objective reality.
ur just displaying ur dishonesty and prejudices .
"epistemologically invalid arguments" and "There are verses that contradict each other" are not expressions of one's opinion. They are active claims that require substantiation.
you're just misleading people
this is their main job day and night
Objective reality is something that exists, but the thing is everyone views it in a different way. Some of these views are wrong, some are right.
How?
can you read the text behind this cat ?
sure i cant
What does it say?
now run away kid
Run away from what exactly? You refuse to try to disprove my point that your book is so shallow. Maybe it's because I'm right.
I'd call it misleading when one is evading substantiating their assertions by saying "It's an opinion".
u r the one who is claiming that ,first substantiate it with evidence
"they live there for a really long time"
"very skillful to master the skill of escape cars"
"and very cautious"
"they are likely to stay here for eating"
"they will ? (obscured)"
"and unwilling to (obscured)"
"most of them are (obscured)"
"these cats I (obscured)"
ur claim is not a fact kid
it's Chinese I can read it lol
probably some cats are waiting for adoption in some center
what is going on here?
if you claim your perspective is a fact just because you believe it, that would mean no one can ever be wrong and that clearly isnāt the case.
someone seaking attention š
Sup bro! Assalamualikum.
How is it going, my friend? š¤
It's not a fact because I believe it, it's that I believe it because I think it's a fact.
Long time no see.
someone throwing a misleading text as fact without any evidence, and demanding us to refute his magic
waalaykum assalam brother, very good alhamduliallah what about u
ohh see
most immature thing u displayed so far
Glad to hear that. š¤
I'm doing okay, alhamdulillah.
Take this as an example of a fallacious argument. It's shifting the burden of proof, instead of presenting a proof it asks doubters to present a proof themselves.
And if you are in doubt about what We have revealed to Our servant,1 then produce a sƻrah like it and call your helpers other than Allah, if what you say is true.
https://quran.com/2/23
alhamduliallah
I don't even have to drop into this, it's all enough to use just some simple philosophy to defeat religion
or a little bit history ?
First of all u are not aware of the context of this ayah, as Kufar Quraich first claim that this book is man made book and easy to imitate , so the quraan respond to that with that challenge .
Logic, histroy, and science, all go against our friends' beliefs.
and they are defeated already besides some terrorist organization taking over some area and declaring how great they are
Who says they want them to go back to Poland?
this is just my humble respond ,and i dont claim its the truth
who cares, they are done already
Which country is best
I'm pretty sure it's not in mena.
best in what
To travel
idk I didn't travel all of the countries but for my experience would be Japan, China, Singapore
and Dubai also nice
but who knows what's going on in the rest of the UAE
Hey where are you from
PRC šØš³
prepare urself for "Ų§ŁŲ¬ŁŲÆ"
Not the ROC
ROC is awesome
btw I think most places in East Asia, North America, Western Europe, Oceania are nice because they are prosperous
rest of the world was like another world
Yeah
And you say I'm the immature one 
How's life in prc
What are you talking about?
nice
Two convos. One about whether the Quran is shallow or not, the other is about China apparently.
Cool
im not immature in my arguments as u , and im just joking there unlike u putting empty opinions in the plate of a fact, show how dishonest u are
but prepare urself for "Ų§ŁŲ¬ŁŲÆ" 
Alright that's great but I am a beginner š
It's ok. You'll improve with practice.
It is not the prose of a poet ˹as you claim˺, ˹yet˺ you hardly have any faith. [Qur'an 69:41]
Now, the pagans are astonished that a warner has come to them from among themselves.1 And the disbelievers say, āThis is a magician, a total liar! [Qur'an 38:4]
And those who disbelieve say, 'This is nothing but a falsehood he invented, and another people assisted him in it.' But they have committed an injustice and a lie. And And those who disbelieve say, "This [QurāÄn] is not except a falsehood he invented, and another people assisted him in it." But they have committed an injustice and a lie. (4) And they say, ā˹These revelations are onlyĖŗ ancient fables which he has had written down, and they are rehearsed to him morning and evening.ā [Qur'an 25:4-5]
It's funny how you've asserted the same claim as they did about the Prophet re-narrating ancient fables and legends. Lol. Reminds me of when Allah said "The same was said by those who came before. Their hearts are all alike." (Qur'an 2:118).
Anyhow, the Qur'an challenges those in the previous Ayat who claimed it's "ancient fables", "magic", and "poetry" as they had magicians, poets, and groups who were knowledgeable about ancient legends. It's an open challenge, though. Produce something like it if you wish.
So, it's not a shift in the burden of proof, it's obligating the opponents to substantiate their assertions. They obviously couldn't.
Thanks. But how ? Can you give me a method
"Ų§ŁŲ¬ŁŲÆ" has came
It's still shifting the burden of proof.
it's not a shift in the burden of proof, it's obligating the opponents to substantiate their assertions.
This is basically an attempt to make shifting the burden of proof seem like something logical.
Go to this channel for good advices #šļ½english-questions
Idk some antisemitic people
How come?
some Europeans are anti immigrants too
Yes, pretty much everywhere in the world
The verse speaks to the doubters, telling them that if they doubt the Quran they should bring something like it. It shifts the burdan of proof from Mohamed who is claiming that the Quran is divine, to the people who are naturally doubtful of that.
is that good ? .and if it s fine , why making others antisemitic if they just oppose immigration like others?
u shifted the context , bcz this Aya is respond to the claims of kufar that Quraan is a work of a man
Because they are not immigrants if they are born and lived their entire lives there, that's like saying third generation descendants of refugees with a citizenship are still immigrants
so the challenge rise the problem in their reasoning as they dont have any evidence, and since they can't establish that challenge
???
so its bad since they are not anymore immigrants, that s fine. unfortunately they re ppl that label them as immigrants
Why is it bad
it s bad to be against them
There could be good reasons
There are good reasons to be against other citizens as well, but calling for deportation and statelessness is against their rights
what are these examples? i think they are just normal citizens like others as u affirm
so should be treated equally like other citizens.
Your comment seemed a little bit confusing them, "they" refers to antimetic people but the person who shot is a jew himself
So why would a Jew be antisemite?
The challenge is not "It's divine unless you prove otherwise", it's "If you claim this is just human speech, then produce something comparable".
It's not that they were skeptical whether it's true or not, it's that they've claimed it's not, as per the previous Ayat. As I stated previously, the burden of proof is on you even if you're claiming the negative. Unless you adopt an agnostic position, you're required to substantiate your claim. It's perfectly logical to present a counter-challenge to refute the opponent's argument.
The Qur'an essentially recognizes the burden of proof (e.g., 46:4, 21:24, 27:64).
you can guess why
ŁŁŲÆ ŲŖŁ Ų¬ŁŲÆŁ
nobody want a random guy who is speaking another different lanaguge wear some stupid stuff walking around in their community and say a bunch of stupid piece of shit nobody gives a fucking shit
"It's divine unless you prove otherwise" = "If you claim this is just human speech, then produce something comparable"
Those are basically the same. If I don't believe that your claim is right I'd naturally consider it wrong, it's silly to ask me for proof that you are wrong instead of presenting a proof that you are right, and it's sillier to not consider it shifting the burden of proof fallacy. The verses you mentioned at the end use the same tactic shamelessly.
ŲØŲ§ŁŲµŲŲ© Ł Ų§ŁŲ¹Ų§ŁŁŲ©
I even doubt why they would allow immigrants and grant them some power, let me get straight to this, this is fucking invasion
and nobody wanted to be invaded
and Guess what .idc about ur opinion .
you can not to care, but you will care because this is happening that, you will get less and less immigration in this world
that's why Chinese are everywhere, soft invasion?
you will see what will happen
if we can, we do it
He's the Islamic terrorist who killed a 14-year-old boy in Austria and injured four others with a knife. He laughs after taking the life of a young boy who was guilty of being considered an "infidel". The raised finger is a symbol of jihadist fighters, those who consider Allah as the only God. He is a terrorist in all respects.
Europe has failed to keep order on the streets because of these alien immigrants. While we export graduates abroad, we import this scum. It's time for all this to end
we do for ourselves and we prevent other guy coming in
ever see we take even one refuggee from outside of the world ?
immigration is a natural phenomenon but it doesn't regard the fact that should be regulated
And now china is literally blessed
so if a christian did the same ill label all Christians to be terrorists ?
that's the case if there's no border and there's no state
you aren't live in an anarchy society neither I'm
Wtf, did you at least see what I wrote?
i dont oppose it obv , but i dont it is a bad thing if it was regulated
immigration flow is now a crisis, it's not few years ago some people promoting immigration for their pocket because they can exploit them, they are cheap and they are taxable
and even some groups, especially from the middle east, started to participating in some politicial movement against the interest of their nation
when u add a muslim to a criminal ur labeling a while nation to be so, why we dont do the same when it s a Christian rapist and we suffice to say a murderer?
and people wanted to stop that, 2024 presidential election proved everything
Lol, I repeat, did you read carefully what I wrote?
maybe Trump isn't perfect, he's a felon, he's a racist, he's a transphobic assh, but for american nation, he's the man we needed
Make America Great Again šŗšø
Make china great again
aint u like chinese
#shorts #short #shortvideo #shortsvideo #Ų“ŁŲ±ŲŖ #shortsyoutube #shortsfeed
You literally avoided the question
Every religious person is the criminal at the end , so sad !
How can you empathize with a criminal?
Unexpected lmao
Moral : do not binded by any religion..
After he killed a 14 year old boy, how dare you?
Death penalty ASAP lmao
not all immigrants are criminals.
i dont , i do disagree with u labeling it to a whole nation to promote hate , thats why watch that ved
Because every time I see , one religion's perspective waits for another to point towards another act..
That's true
In truth y'know
It's worse this way. They want me to be killed for their "holy war" so they can get in the heaven a big prize (72 virgins or something š)
Lmao now that's crazy š¤£
I don't promote hate, your actions promote hate. I'm just exposing some actions
see u r promoting misconceptions
not all muslims or immigrants do that action
u just affirm my claim
ur literally labeling it to whole nation
So? They still do that
just leave him be, in my country we say "c'est l'extrĆŖme-droite dans toute sa splendeur"
they re extremists in any ideology or religion ,ur just making an exception to be the rule
oui c'est vrai
Coincidentally, an exception, it's a shame it's not the only one
Last year another one of those freaks stabbed and killed a policeman
In Germany
I'm atheist 
most extremists are not muslim, in fact Mulims do suffer from those ppl more than others do
well in my country a christian man stabbed children in the name of God. did we say all christians are terrorists ? no, because this man does not represent christianity.
Ooh , nice !
U also š§
Best thing
Yeah š
And u
u just heard of them bcz ur media is Merely a propaagnda ,u heard word muslim just with 'muslim killers' , but when it s from other background is no more from it!
in all religions there are crazy people, doesn't mean everyone is crazy.
Han !
here, it's a policeman who stabbed a kid
Nice š

because he was north african
I never said all Muslims are terrorists, I just called that damned guy a terrorist after he killed a 14 year old. Is there anything wrong with that?
like this things don't happen usual ?
Here the message
But why u are vegan šæ
Hi bro š
i agree with you, but you also said that the problem is immigrants
which isn't true
Literally in your country in 2015 hell happened because of Islamic terrorists
Most crimes are committed by migrants, or at least in proportion to their population
i know, does that mean i need to hate on all immigrants because they could be islamic terrorists ?
i need numbers.
do u know the impact of saying that ? imagine i say the Christian terrorist !,it s merly a terrorist and religion has nothing to do with it , bcz his religion forbids killing innocent people to begin with !
he also forgot that there were immigrants, muslims, jews, black people who died during this tragedy.
No it's not.
Stating "unicorns are real unless you prove otherwise" is not equivalent to "If you assert unicorns don't exist, prove it". The former is shifting the burden of proof, while the latter holds the claimer accountable for their assertion.
The default position is "I don't know". Meaning that I neither know if unicorns exist or not.
Similarly, you can't claim "it's man-made" unless there is a proof. The Qur'an challenges the "men" to produce a man-made Surah that resembles it.
I'd highly recommend learning more about logical fallacies so as to not mislabel arguments with such.
Regarding the Ayat I've mentioned, the first demands proof for their belief in other Gods (idols); The second is the same as the first, but not necessarily idols; The third is demanding a proof that their Gods create and resurrect etc...
If I don't believe that your claim is right I'd naturally consider it wrong
No. If you don't believe someone's claim, it doesn't necessarily mean you consider it wrong. It just means you haven't been introduced to sufficient evidence to believe it.
If you do believe your opponent is wrong, you must have a reason, some sort of proof or evidence that they are not right; therefore, claiming that I'm wrong puts the burden of proof upon you.
For instance, if someone claims unicorns exist, they bear the burden of proof to provide sufficient warrant for their claim. On the other hand, if you assert that unicorns do not exist, you are responsible for providing reasons, evidence, or justification to support that claim. Simply because the default position is "I don't know". Either positive or negative claims require substantiation.
I hope you finally get the point. This is probably the farthest I can explain the burden of proof principle.
flare is slugish at typing
Proofreading. š
?def proofreading
:x: That word could not be found in the dictionary.
well understandable
Related crimes in Germany per 100,000 by nationality
North Africa and the Middle East lead the way
Fantastisch
did you really use something from twitter ?
and from 2016 ??
can you translate what's written ?
Alright so checking if it has mistakes and fixing them to publish it without them
Apparently, Hitler invaded Poland on Sept 1, 1939.
Yeah
Countries and regions: crimes without asylum violations, foreign suspects per 100,000 inhabitants
The situation can only get worse with the increased migratory flow
do you know what "suspects" means ?
please give me a more recent version
and not from twitter but from the government
šš»
The data refers to "auslƤndischer TatverdƤchtiger" (foreign suspects). which means suspect is not necessarily a convicted criminal. This data reflects suspected individuals, not convictions.
exactly.
thank you.
also the data specifically refers to foreign suspects. and It only includes individuals who are not German citizens.

abu umnia u u ve been ultimately Ų¬ŁŲÆŁ 
Fron the UK
Between 2022 and 2023
So this is likelihood to be arrested, which says more about implicit bias than implicit behavior
Recomend this
Not really
there is not factual context , and i can easily label it to racism that those black ppl face and neglection of their rights
Or systemic inequality
very much
and also, where are the arabs that you were pointing at earlier ?
Many non citizens face that issue worldwide
Why do you always try to empathize with criminals?
Half the studies only cite arrests not convictions
