#🧠|serious-chat
1 messages · Page 391 of 1
Basic frameworks which were provided by the source of morality, it can be religion or parents or anything will prevent you from doing atrocities, saying we don't do bad things because we're afraid of laws is oversimplification of our humane behaviour 💀
I'm just a bad person then
It isn't what I said, just that some individuals are ready to drop everything and do bad once the first opportunity arises
I'm familiar with the word beastiality too. theriophillia is the first time reading it
anyone IELTS on 13th February? wanna practice speaking? lemme know
How many wives do you beat weekly
I don't think that behaving politely should be taught as a good deed in order to get a reward in the future, it must come from yourself
Yeah exceptions are everywhere in the natural world, some people with the source of natural morality can also commit atrocities
It's not absolute
Socio structure creates unspoken laws too
💯
Non as of now, How many have you got?
how do u know its good or no ? without anyone telling u
Yes, which is why I think it's better. If it comes from themselves and a combination of various sources instead of few identifiable factors then it's less likely to create a culture around toxicity and falsehoods
How many should one* get ?
Harmscales
Zero tbh, get a husband instead
I don't, I just do what I think is good and what my life taught me
I changed the question, try again
You wrecked my joke ffs
I would better* die imaginary-lesbian then
I met a rude person, but they had no idea they were rude at all. we need standard
Here we go, continue
If someone behaves badly because they have been mistreated or abused, rather than, let's say, a militaristic fascist culture, that's much better
You need a catalyst at the initial stage to go forward in the right direction, otherwise what will you do if urge to commit atrocities comes from inside
It's like bribing for good/natural deed.
I won't beat my little sister if parents give me stuff
I won't hurt you if I get rewarded with heaven
That's where politeness comes into play, your parents and community must do a good job, it shouldn't have a weak basis or source
If you grew up in a toxic environment, chances of you becoming a toxic person is unfathomably higher
It reminds me of people that have to read a book in order to take care of their house
I won't attack/plot against my neighbouring country if they let me steal their land/natural resources
Which is why those are more dangerous than anything else
So yeah religion can be that community to provide basic frameworks
I get what you're saying
Only if it teaches you that behaving well makes everyone happier and get along better, not if it's a threat to your life (or what comes next)
What happens once you remove the source itself, religion?
Religion provided me basic frameworks for morality, I'm not religious anymore
If you remove the community it's fine, you will find another similar one of your liking. But if the source of your goodness is almost completely external then you risk dropping it at any moment
I'm still a good human
Religion is too dogmatic, I don't like it.
Plus 1
Because you went through personal growth and made those teachings personal, compare this to the many people that leave it and become junkies, alcohol addicted idiots or worse
Heck plenty of religious people are junkies or alcohol addicts because they don't think their religion truly affects their lives to that extent
He can’t have another term
22nd amendment
So he has upgraded to a kryptonite now heh!
Mecha-Trump
Baron trump ?
Yet
I get what you're saying
It's better to be a good person without some religious reward system.
My point is good is good
He'll change it, inshallah
Yes, or any threat for that matter
It's why I like rehabilitation most of the times

We define good through reason, not revelation.
He doesn’t qualify
He can’t you need 2/3rds if the states to agree more than half don’t
stop it
Since I don't believe in free will i think we need a framework to define good through reason
I like komodo dragon though 🥺
It's one of them
Doesn't sound badass
Ocean dragon 🤔
Oh sure but will it survive
Still no
the king of the lizards, in Indonesia
Add D R A G O N 
It used to
Now that there are plenty of invasive animals in Australia it will be even easier to survive
They will destroy goats, pigs and others
One of my favourite videos I've seen has a Komodo dragon that rips open the womb of a deer to swallow the almost fully formed fetus whole
Isn't australian fauna a bit scattered ?
Given komodo dragon's speed will it work?
It would be amazing if they get new land to prosper
Is this the kind of abortion that Trump claims democrats practice?
There's a page on Instagram, they break legs of the goat and put it in front of komodo dragons
They need to ambush them just as they ambush the water buffalos, they are much faster and stronger than the monitor lizard. However getting poisoned is a death sentence for anyone
I like how his green hat
I saw an evil video of someone chaining a monkey in front of one
I once saw a pelican video. It gulped down a whole full grown hare 💀 those bigger ones in the wild
free will is paradox, If it exists, then God does not exist but we not sure there is no god , if free will does not exist, then God exists—but we cannot prove that God exists. - determinism

I wonder how Komodo dragons would fare against the Australian feral camels
I'd pay to watch Komodo vs baboon
Most likely it doesn't exist, best argument for it's existence is at atomic level
Because quantum physics doesn't make sense yet
They're good hunter for sure no wonder they've survived so far. The venom and bacteria do the rest of the job.
How many invasive species been introduced in australia btw?
Was it hares that breeded extensively or wild boar

Happens a lot I bet
🏳️🌈
What
Too many to count, pretty much every species of farm animal, foxes, stoats, black rats and brown rats, various insects
God knows better akhii
And camels as well
The cane toad is one of the most notable ones
Dogs and cats too if you don't count them as farm animals
I have a cat
Nice
which god ?
thanks
My goodness. I wonder how many went extinct or due extinction because of all these invasive species
I'd love to get Asian arowana
i‘m back, do you like my new profile picture? it symbolizes peace towards the armenian folk ☮️
Technically they introduced Tasmanian devils as invasive species, but they used to live on the Australian mainland few thousands of years ago, same as Komodo dragons. This is why I want them to be reintroduced as well
that fish, why ?
silly hat but otherwise good
thank you shawty
A lot but not as many as one would expect, most of the damage was done by Europeans after they interrupted firestick farming by the natives, and if you go back in time a lot of damage was done by the natives themselves through firestick farming
That's not my name
The chemistry ⚗️
They look majestic some of them are quite rare
The modern Australian fauna seems to be at least partially dependent on firestick farming for survival, either a recent adaptation or the extinct megafauna used to have similar effects to it that limited the damage of wildfires
Tsmanian tiger are extinct no?
Nowadays it's invasive species that cause most of the damage
whats your name then
Dr. Shawty
I gotta check first what's fire stick farming.
Is it where they burn remaining plantation after harvesting ?
It's like causing a controlled wildfire to free farmland
It's different from industrial farming or even just farming as practiced in most of Europe and Asia
It's sad. I feel sad whenever I learn about how much* destructive humans can be/really are
Psychological Exoticism – You find things that don’t exist in your place interesting, while people there see them as ordinary.
It's the quickest way apparently
I bet many asian countries still practice it
you don't need the much
It's typical of Australia, at most some Oceanian people do as well because they are related just as the dingo is related to the Papuan singing dog
Do I need many ?
no
where‘s your practice, need to visit you i have severe pain in a certain area
just delete
I'm not that kind of doctor
I'm the useless kind
its cute
send that to a random person with the caption "I am inside your house"
To my knowledge it's Central Asia that had a different farming from the rest of Asia
But even there the practice stopped outside of Mongolia
u will be useful for me i guess
Wtf 💀
Didn't expect this in a serious chat 😂
New delhi's AQI shoots up because of farm burning in those months.
From pakistan
And several indian states
Yes but that's different, happens even in Canada or Spain, firestick farming is environmental engineering and controlled
hello sis
Hi
she wants me bro
It's that sick moustache
You should have grown it earlier
ew
i know u like me
Here we're back to square one pffft!
You're a female and breathing I think that's enough for him
Why did you say the same thing twice
Forgive me father for I have tautologised
i dont see anything
This is sad story 👀
it went from really busy to really quiet
no i‘m not aggressive lil girl
lmao
"Kurds and armenians deserved that"
i‘m not talking to you
khojaly massacre —— read something about that first
you also joked about turks who got raped so you r not a polite guy either , maybe even a racist
I said "metaphorically"
Do you know what it means?
No 
you should defend me Dr. Shawty
Go and hump someone else's leg
a question, you get to understand that: chaves packed you stuffand he went through
Godzilla had a stroke trying to read this and died
if he live for a thousand year we will have a chance to unify the entire planet
At that time there’s only one country in this planet
Then unify currencies, standards, languages everything
Do as what Qingshihuang have done to China
Threatening
In reality Humans never achieve the world peace
By force if necessary
absolutely, Humans do only understand that language . we shall speak it if necessary.
Bring peace by force
Because that always goes so well
You are a thug and nothing more
If you try to bring me peace you will encounter a good dose of peace coming at your boy parts in the form of a harpoon
well , we use force against Transgressors and deserved ones , bcz Justice and Goodness imply that ..
who?
Everyone
we do use force only against fighters and transgressors .
we shall not bear innocents what they dont deserve
Principles without force and protection are weak and under collapse anytime
Transgressors being . . . ?
Hy guys
lol
I want to learn poetry in English, do you have any recommendations?
go ask the people in the chat where most of the minors are
we talk about +18 stuff here
No you don't

Shakespeare
read his work
Not lame poetry
read the "Prophet" of khalil jabran very good peace of art
What is a “Transgressor”
I like some Korean movies. But those actors playing so extra

I don't like movies
Hey recommend something, it might be classic but not Shekspier
Why?
Because
I find it too passive
You are just sitting there and letting something happen to you
It does not feel like an activity
And I find that extremely boring
+18 theme
What
Sounds super boring
So watch a movie
I playing Mario
chess is the best
I prefer go
Chess also boring, I understand it smart game but it just not interesting
if u try it u ll like it
zelda is the best game amongst switch games
I like Triangle Strategy
Switch have a lot Zelda's, but you mean new ones I guess. Yea good game. Best open world IMO.
yea tears of the kingdom is pretty good but nothing can surpass the feeling when I played zelda for the first time
felt magical somehow
zelda breath of the wild
'Fight in the cause of Allah against those who fight against you, but do not transgress. Surely Allah loves not the transgressors' (2:191).
the Quran justifies wars for self-defense to protect Islamic communities against internal or external aggression by non-Islamic populations, and wars waged against those who 'violate their oaths' by breaking a treaty
So only for defensive purposes, against the violent?
Yes I can only agree, I just can add those two last Zelda's they kinda similar in good way, the same setting. Because old Zelda's feels way different, but they are super cool too. Just in different way
yea
but in the past the arabs forced other people to change their religion
that‘s why islam is one of the major religions today
So not for adulterers, apostates, disrespecters of the prophet (pbuh), etc.?
also articulated justifications for what could be considered offensive jihad. war could be waged against those who:
Obstruct the propagation of Islam.
Oppress Muslims or prevent them from practicing their faith freely.
Violate treaties or agreements.
Ibn Taymiyyah (a well known islamic scolar) stressed the importance of righteous intentions in warfare. He argued that jihad should be waged for the sake of God, not for worldly gain or personal ambition. He also emphasized the need to consider the context of war, including the potential consequences and the balance of power.
which time ? it s matter of rice now not islam?
I would say the recent one has much more details but idk about the graphics, maybe it‘s kinda the same but slightly better
What about the examples I gave?
And I'm not just talking about jihad here. Just violence in general.
we have laws against them but under islamic law and in an islamic country ,not in a foreign country
And do you support that?
during the arab conquest of iran
absolutely. where is the problem?
Right, so my comment stands
which one?
not all sorts violence are bad
I agree. Violence has an important role in repelling thugs.
Just not in promoting virtue.
if ur just hearing dont claim such thing.. u have to know that if they did that its condemned ,and islam doesn't allow compulsion in religion.
respectfully, if u have a rational objection for making such laws against those groups enlighten us.
i know it that the arabs forced other people brother, i didn‘t witness it because i wasn‘t born at that time were these things occured but I have read it on a lot of history pages
i am also a muslim chill
Respectfully, I am not sure that I do. If you were to resort to violence in order to promote virtue, then the state would punish you for it. The state exists by maintaining a monopoly on force. You and I get punished by the state for acting in ways that the state itself acts. So I rather think that it is for you to account for why the state should have the privilege of using force in ways that it denies the rest of us.
go shorty goo
ur generalizing it to everyone. not everyone commit adultery ,not everyone rape others, those laws are made to deter these types of ppl and they are done under very specific and restricted way. its applicated by the State and not individuals...
there's no monopoly of power or justice system, in Islam whoever leader didn't govern with Allah commands shall be taken from power .. in addition Islamic government should be based on -الشورى- or Shura "Asking for the opinion of someone who is qualified for it, or it is a survey of the opinion of the nation or of its representative in public matters related to it. In this context, it can then be defined as a collective intellectual effort that aims to adopt a common position regarding a political, social, economic or other issue that has not been addressed explicitly or implicitly in the Holy Qur’an. Accordingly, it has been taken"
so it s not like dictatorship political system u may perceive.
u have to show us evidence.. and who is gonna give validation to ur history book
Law through revelation is absolute, oh we need amendment 
I don't think you understood what I was saying. I never claimed that everyone commits adultery, and I am not sure where you got that.
The state is just a composite of individual persons. It's not a macro-organism which acts of its own impetus. It is composed of individual politicians, individual police officers, individual judges . . . There is nothing emergent here. If you really don't think that the state holds a monopoly on force, then you should try levying your own taxes, raising your own army, enforcing your own laws, etc. You cannot do these things, but the agents of the state can. Monopoly is not just a feature of dictatorships; it is a feature of all political states.
Appealing to a 'common position' is just a good old 'No True Scotsman' fallacy. You can't appeal to shared values as a justification for punishing people who (for example) burn the Quran, since these are obviously not their values. So you must treat them as though they don't count.
I don't think you understood what I was saying. I never claimed that everyone commits adultery, and I am not sure where you got that.
I have said that as i perceive that u thought that these laws are oppressing all of social composition, while it meant for establishing justice and deter of those types of individuals.
The state is just a composite of individual persons. It's not a macro-organism which acts of its own impetus. It is composed of individual politicians, individual police officers, individual judges . . . There is nothing emergent here. If you really don't think that the state holds a monopoly on force, then you should try levying your own taxes, raising your own army, enforcing your own laws, etc. You cannot do these things, but the agents of the state can. Monopoly is not just a feature of dictatorships; it is a feature of all political states.
U didnt get wht i meant by "laws are applicated by the state" : what i meant is that those laws are not done arbitrary ,anarchic and lawlessness way .but in a Just ,restricted and well proofed way.
and lastly I'm not against the state being the carrier and applicator of laws and order , its necessary and consequently.
Appealing to a 'common position' is just a good old 'No True Scotsman' fallacy. You can't appeal to shared values as a justification for punishing people who (for example) burn the Quran, since these are obviously not their values. So you must treat them as though they don't count.
I dont have to appeal to anything , since these things comes from objective source, but for the sake of argument what the problem in making laws against those certain indvs? .u made an exception for it which someone burn the Quraan , well here we cant applicate same laws against that but I would say its Hate Crime: If the act of burning the flag is combined with other actions or words that are deemed to be hateful or discriminatory towards a particular group of people, it could be investigated as a hate crime. If the act of burning the flag is done in a way that is threatening, abusive, or likely to cause harassment, alarm, or distress to others, it could be a public order offense. This means that if the police believe your actions are likely to incite violence or disorder, they could intervene. so why not ?
There is nothing violent about burning a Quran.
If you think that such activities should be met with violence, then you are the thug
i wouldn't say violence Acts but some restrictions and sanctions, im not brutal
tho
You really have not addressed my challenge. You have simply asserted that the state uses force in ways that 'objective' and 'just'. But the fact remains: the state reserves for itself the prerogative to use force which it denies to you and me. You have not presented any justification for this.
Restrictions backed by force
That is how the state works
It's what a state is
Let's not pussyfoot about it
force if Necessary not from the beginning
this is how things work
why is that problematic , would u like to erase something called state , and everyone does what he wills
ur calling disorder and chaos ,u should be aware of that
im just saying
but what s ur solution for that
then?
seems impossible, more of a dream where everything is pink and everyone is smiling and dancing right?
hahah
nice discussion with you
I simply do not grant your assumption
I don't agree that political order stands or falls with a small subset of the populace holding a compulsory monopoly on force
Why do you connect religion and the state? Not all religions are exclusively tied to governance. Religion cannot enforce punishments on its own, it must go through the state.
me either i just told u about Shura and the importance of collective intellectual efforts, society works collectively and with corporations.

That is just what we are talking about. It is @restive zodiac who brought us onto the subject of Islamic law.
But that has nothing to do with the state.
u r saying :small subset of the populace holding a compulsory monopoly on force.
im respoding to this
By definition, this 'collective' does not share values if you are talking about punishing members of the collective who evidently do not share those values.
If someone in the collective is a critic of Islam and chooses to burn a Quran, then clearly she does not share your values. So in what sense are they values of the collective?
u r making exceptions as the rules , than why we should punish killers , they dont share same values of us?
Because the killers are the violent ones
You cannot have political order of any kind if we are free to go around killing whimsically
and what the one promoting hate speech and triggering social disorder
read this one
I have read everything you have said
it doesn't change the fact that speech is not violence
(not that burning a Quran is either)
are u sure?
Positive 👍
are they not offending others in any way
so why not facing offensive act with offensive laws
huh
Because the offensive act is not violent, whereas the law that punishes them is
Which is why it is thuggery
It's really not so complex
we dont punish them with death u know that?
if they are in an islamic country
they may face same punishement as someone faces when offend others vocally
لكل مقام مقال
jails ,sanctions , repayments
restrictions
That means nothing. It's just an arbitrary landmass. All of this presupposes the legitimacy of the state, which has yet to be demonstrated.
ur jumping to another subject .. legitimacy of the state comes by necessity of the nature of humans
It's not another subject at all. There is nothing about being in an 'Islamic country' as opposed to anywhere else that excuses the thuggery of using violence against peaceful individuals.
omg r yall still talking about the same stuff
which peaceful indvds that are offending and triggering disorder and promoting hate speech ur talking about? ur being biased here... and which force is being used against those specfic group such as someone burn the Quraan for the previous reasons that i mentioned?.
ur calling for a social concept where everyone does what he wills. without facing punishment for his actions .
Religious law has no meaning if the state is secular, such as laws that are not enforced, if individuals or groups take the law into their own hands, it is considered a crime by the state.
for last line : that to enforce order and justice
imagine society everyone enforce law the way he wills
I have been asking you about your position: about whether you endorse the use of force against activities which you find hateful, offensive and distasteful but which are, nonetheless, peaceful. You keep finding new ways to repackage it but it just seems like the answer is yes.
what is peaceful about these offensive action ?
i dont find them peaceful
i dont find someone offending my mom a peaceful person
It's not causing physical harm
It's not destroying anyone's property (except one's own)
do u know about other nature of harms?
or i cite some
There is this really curious meeting of the minds between Muslim thugs and Western progressives
very limited def of harm
It's baffling
Yes, I do not count your feelings when I speak of harm
If you want to include hurt feelings, then it is quite a can of worms
harasment is not a crime then?
That's too vague
blackmailing is not a crime
ur position is fragile
Hi there I am new here
u know that
are u sure of that , maybe need more examples
I'm not sure what you think you're doing
If you're banking on the fact that I have not dwelled systematically on the full logical consequences of my position, then you will encounter difficulties
which are?
shawty dont care about this guy just slide into my dm‘s we‘ll have better conversations
Well, pick a subject. You offered blackmail as an apparent counter-example to my thesis that violence should not be used as a punishment for non-violent acts, and I bit the bullet and accepted that blackmail should be legal. This is something I have argued for years. If you think you have other examples that pose a problem, I'll gladly hear them.
Burning the Quran can be categorized as blasphemy i think
I'm sure it is, as is burning the Bible for a Christian
That doesn't make it violent
accepting it doesn't mean u justified it + u are agreeing on something that against an ethical concept of society which u agree with . ur just welcoming the devil to ur home and pretending ur OK
hate speech , triggering social disorder, offending a specfic group.
a list of things u can add
I don't accept the assumption that the law of the land should be used to promote virtue. I suspect that you and I are closer on ethics than you think. I am extremely culturally conservative, especially when it comes to matters of sexual ethics. But we disagree on the effectiveness of violence in promoting virtue.
I do not personally condone hate, or its expression, or the causing of offence for its own sake.
but I also do not think that violence is a good antidote
Maybe this is just where Muslims and Christians differ
Okay, in this context, we are talking about state law, not religious law. It is indeed not violence, but it is categorized as blasphemy, and Muslims usually get very angry.
That much I can see
I see ,then u do accept that ur previous thesis is fragile...
If by 'fragile' you mean false, then of course not
Otherwise I would not take the position I do
violence is that case of burning the Quraan is not capital penalty or something
it as u havent respond to my objection yet
What is the objection?
here
ur theses has many fragile points
Right. I understood you to be raising blackmail as a counter-example to my position that violence should not be used against peaceful oeople.
My response was to accept that blackmail should not be a crime.
re read then
there is my respond
Just tell me what your argument is
ur accepting it without justifying it to be OK as u perceive .. and if u accept it ur then contradicting ur ethical social concept(self contradiction)
saying its not problematic for u is not an enough rational justification
i would also accept facing those crimes with violence and pretend that is not problematic, and then case is closed.
not to mention ur limitation of harm to only physical-material damage
I don't need a special justification for believing that blackmail should be legal. It simply follows from my general position about how violence should and should not be used. I have used 'thuggery' to describe the use of violence against people who are not themselves violent. My belief that blackmail should be legal simply follows from my opposition to thuggery. I understood that to be the reason you raised the example of blackmail in first place, since you correctly perceived that it follows from my position.
Yes, I do not consider hurt feelings to be harm in the relevant sense. If you want to include hurt feelings, then you open up the possibility that someone might be offended by the Quran.
But I'm guessing that wouldn't count
based on exception of the rule , limited def, "shifting the goalposts" fallacy
-
Violence should not be used against non-violent people.
-
Blackmailers (qua blackmailers) are non-violent people.
Therefore,
- Violence should not be used against blackmailers.
There is nothing fallacious about it.
u didnt justified that blackmailing is good
then why it s allowed
Because it's not violent
ur argument is flawed bcz it rely on limited definition
Definition of?
You keep telling me what I have to do
im not a kid
LOL what
ur logic is flawed
No one called you a kid
hear me out
There's no need to make things personal
vocal offense is harm therfore its violence
It is not
sorry I didn't catch your perspective here, are you progressive miss?
What you are talking about is hurt feelings
No, I'm not
again ur premises are wrong : rely on limited definition of violence that exclude vocal violence and other types.
So you say
Nevertheless, the fact remains that you are talking using force to deal with your hurt feelings instead of processing them like a grown man
any system of Justice will classify Vocal violence to be crime : like harassment and blackmailing
Look, I am a Christian. If my neighbour burned a Bible to antagonise me I would be offended. But I would deal with it, because that is part of being an adult in a world of adults, even when other people act less adult than you. It's really not that hard to do.
thats not matter of individual with other individual , it someone triggering and promoting hate speech against a mass population
very different
Speech still isn't violence
Even if it expresses hatred
Look, hateful people are already miserable. You and I don't need to do anything else to them.
contradiction
There's nothing contradictory about it
No, you're just thin-skinned
contradiction
hhhh
they are triggering social disorder and causing violence activities..
we should both protect him and others
deterring them by such laws is very effective
everyone respect others
or spend some time in jail
I really think that this is a point on which Christian ethics is just stronger and fundamentally more adult. You see, we are commanded to love our enemies and pray for those who persecute us. We are told to turn the other cheek when someone slaps us. Now, doing all of this is extremely difficult. It's probably the hardest thing you can do. It's a very high standard, and most Christians don't meet it. But the fact is that a Christian ethic is an ethic of meekness. The Islamic ethic just seems to be an ethic of fragility and thuggery, at least as you have presented it.
What is not violent people hide terrorist
I'm stepping into the shower now
Ahh, if only everyone were like you. But unfortunately, reality is not like that. There are parts of religious communities that are very rigid and sensitive, and they will take legal action, either under blasphemy laws or hate speech laws.
There is a movie about it when they have to torture relatives of terrorist so he can say where is the bomb
But you don't like movies
So you out of this dilema
thats why u see ppl mocking Jesus on the street , we Muslims and dont accept that . the Christian consept of morality is not factual or realistic , it more of a dream and an ideal concept. if someone violate my rights should be prepared for Justice. but let me slap ur cheek and turn me the other one OK.
valuation of our symbols and rights is not something we demand its something should everyone respect ..
if ppl do really respect others do not offend others
altho those laws are applicable in Islamic country
🤤🤤
10:34, where Jesus says, "Do not think that I have come to bring peace to the earth. I did not come to bring peace, but a sword." This verse is often
are u really Muslim ?
Christians behave like thugs sometimes
bro you shouldn‘t question my belief in my religion it‘s also haram
ur behavior and action are haram brother. im not doing takfir to u or something but an advice
i mean everyone makes mistakes in life and no muslim should judge another muslim
yea i know brother i am grateful for that ❤️
Someone told me islam is mostly based on humanist. Is it true?
idk what a humanist is lmao
this is not a mistake , it was intentioned.
Humanism"
ye i know but as I said, nobody is perfect, even if it was intentioned it‘s at the end of the day my problem
I mean I cant limit my life even though I was only joking and don‘t care about girls
Just an advice my brother ,no body is perfect but we make effort to seek it .
im a muslim alhamdullilah but I also have bad habits in life which I need to change, but that‘s why we are here right? we make mistakes and learn from it
u can say so if u mean valuation of life and reason , human dignity, social justice, and goodness
depend on ur definition
Kk
A fundamental difference is the source of authority. Humanism, in its secular form, often places human reason and experience as the ultimate authority. Islam, on the other hand, derives its primary authority from divine revelation (the Quran) and the teachings of the Prophet Muhammad (the Sunnah)
Most forms of humanism are secular and do not believe in a personal God. Islam is fundamentally theistic, centered on the belief in one God (Allah). This difference has profound implications for ethics, morality, and the meaning of life.
Is that from chatgpt?
This is really revealing. You see, we just look at this completely differently. Apart from the fact that a 'right not to be offended' is highly questionable (not to mention absolutely impossible to universalise), I don't see someone who is blaspheming God as violating my rights. God isn't a blushing maiden. He doesn't need you or me to protect his honour.
Now, you look at this person and see him as someone in need of punishment. He has trespassed on your dignity, and now he's cruising for a bruising. I see him as someone in need of mercy, and that is how Christians are called to regard him. It's not intuitive, and it's not meant to be. But we get what you can't ever have: peace. That's the reward of virtue. I can live with myself and never have to resort to crude thuggery.
You say that it's not realistic, and yet my own life gives the lie to that. If it weren't realistic, then I couldn't possibly live it out. But I do.
Um... Amen. 🙂
if u don't have the spirit to value ur religion sanctities .or even the right to not being violated or promoted to be hated .-this just individual perspective, what would be the case if it was against a whole mass population- what else will be disrespected?. words and certain action have deep sociological impact .
respecting others is not something ppl find it hard to do. -respect to be respected-
Im not wo is gonna establish the law , so im not going to attack whomever violate me vocally, there are laws that are not usually fundamentally violence , we may put sanctions or restrictions or prisoning of a period of time.. and not necessarily death. even using violence i such as beating is not allowed..
If ur really not a hypocrite , tell me what would u do if someone hypothetically harassed u?
very fine I think?
Give me a specific example
ironic
aleyküm selam , have a good night
imagine loving bitch ass enver in 2025
enver is not a big leader
we do not have to share the same opinion
i noticed
i admire him idc what other people say
but u r right the turks had a lot of idolic leaders
admiring his fascist tendencies?
proof?
how old are you?
i will get banned if the moderators find out 😢
predictable
a non turk tries to convince me about stories the westeners made up — probably something about the „genocide“ right?
so you're telling me not a single armenian got harmed?
did I say so?
then you accept murdering of armenians
azerbaijanis got also killed, what about their lives? or don‘t you consider them as human beings because they follow a different religion as armenians
khojaly massacre - get knowledge about that first
i know about it
that doesn't make anything else right
Azerbaijani village getting raided
it‘s pretty common that a country or an empire acts in a harmful way when a minority wants to separate the country and forms resistance organizations
still, doesn't make it right to genocide.
bro wtf do you want
there were also genocides on azerbaijanis go and find some armenians
I'll say the same thing to them when i find an armenian
and talk to them about the genocides they committed
but now you're here
yall r so annoying ngl
i didnt even say anything yet
it‘s the same with the kurds nowadays
i know where this is going
they also created a terrorist organisation and expect that we give them turkish cities without harming them
they kidnapped and killed innocent turkish citizens
it's pkk
„resistance groups“ hell nah yall are terrorists who want to separate a country and it‘s people
not all kurds
yea i meant the pkk
Im in Istanbul dawg i got nothing to do with them
r u a turk
sadly
then u r not a turk
yaay
u r funny af bro 👊🏼
predictable
what about u
okayyy
predictable
u know that when atatürk would be alive he would definitely be ashamed of the recent chp
at least im not idealising a murderer
idc you are weird af, you feel sad about being a turk
you do racist shit to kurds then complain about it when they rise up against you
i have the feeling that u r only joking
what did you expect? They gonna stay quiet and suck it up?
they have equal rights in türkiye dont make up stories lil bro
"lil bro"
you cant even say your age
im 21
yeah im sure
lmaoo
yeah?
just forgot about the great turkish history
your soldiers got burned alive, what did your government do? Your people died under rubbles just 2 years ago, where was your government?
no real turk is ashamed of being a turk, not even an american neither north koreans
because you grow up in a specific country and adapt to their culture
Just a few days ago a lawyer exed himself
you cant even protect your woman and children
these are common things which happen in most countries around the globe
is this the mighty Turkish nation?
türk müsün lan türkce konus bakiyim bi
puahahahaha
götden uydurmaaq
sakin ol dostum
nasil türksün la sen
depremde twitteri kim kapatti?
kürd feln misin anlamadim ag
askerlerin basina cuval gecirilince kim gotune kuyrugunu kistirdi
bahsettiğim irkcilik tam olarak bu
biri bir şey söyleyince hemen kurt olduğunu varsayiyorsunuz
turkum dostum, bayburtluyum. Allahin bayburtunda Kürt mu var
alakasi yok knk
pkkli gibi konusuyon
kürtler ülkede adam gibi yasa sikinti olmaz
elektrik kacakcilik var
cinayet var
adamin dilini yasakla, ırkçılık yap, zulum et
sonra adam gibi neden yaşamıyor
kac milyon kurt var ulkede
dilleri yasak degil bal gibi konusuyorlar
konusmayi yasaklayamazsin zaten canim dostum
dogu turkistanda bile uygurca yasak degil
nasil yasaklayacan
eeee daha ne olsun kürtce dil dersi mi versinler okuldaamk
devlet dairelerinde geçiyor mu?
dersi var mi?
versinler
ulkede kac kurt var birader
niye versinler peki? almanyada da bir sürü türk var? okullarda türkce egitim dersi mi veriyorlar
almanyada ayni
değil
niye degilmis cok bilgili kardesim anlat bakiyim
Türkiye'deki Kürt orani almanyadan kat kat daha büyük
milliyetçilik bu ulkeye zarar veriyor
kabullenemeyecek kadar körsunuz
neyi anladin
kürdistan degil, kürtcü olmak istiyorlarsa irak a gitsinler orda kürdistan var
kurdistan diyen olmadi
bros switched it to some real Turkish talking
ülke degil sadece bölge, bir sürü kürt var orda
kurdistan kelimesi cikmadi nerden cikardin
ülkeyi begenmeyen gidebilir her ülke icin gecerli bu
ben baska ülkede yasasam, begenmesem, neden zornan orda kaliyimaq?
ulke ona gore şekillenecek
devlet kutsal bir şey degil
kutsal olan halk
halk olmadan devlet neye yarar
yok canim, bizim atalarimiz kac bin sene savasdi lan sen ne diyon
türkler yeter, türkiye halkin cogunlugu türk ismide „türkiye“ hatirlatiyim 😉
azicik mantik kur
English please !! 
dostum anlamamakta neden israr ediyorsun
bolmek istiyorum demiyorum
o da devletin vatandasi
ona da yaşam hakki sunacak
yeterince haklari yokmu sence kürtlerin?
yok
türkiye türklerindir türklere göre sekillenecek
istesende istemesende
milyonlarca kurt var
onlari yok sayamazsin
iki tarafa gore şekillenecek
diyelim kürtlere daha cok hak veriyo devlet
bu devlete bu ülkeye savas baslatan, gelecekde ne yapar knk sence?
dostum, sen onlara iyi bir yaşam sunarsan isyan etmeye sebepleri kalmaz
isyan edenlerede destek olmazlar
kalir ama, cünkü adamlar kendi devletlerini istiyorlar
problem o
anladin mi türk kardesim
pkk ile butun kurtleri bir tutuyorsun
kac tane kurt kendi devletini istiyor
hepsi istese zaten kocaman isyan cikar
var mi oyle bir sey? yok.
pkk istiyor kurt devleti
pkk kuruldugu dönemde türkiye bunlara daha cok hak verseydi, irkcilik yapmasaydi, belki olurdu ama simdi gec kaldilar adamlar kendi ülkelerini istiyorlar
hepsi uyandi
HEPSI MI ISTIYOR
dostum mantılı düşün
madem kurtlerin hepsi istiyor
bu adamlarin milyonlarca nufusu var
istemeyenler zaten memnun yeterince haklari var ülkede
neden isyan etmiyorlar coktan?
az once hepsi uyandı dedin
kendinle celisiyorsun
kürtlere karsi irkcilik yok, pkkli-kürtlere karsi var/// bunlarin ikisini bi ayir
pkklilardan bahsediyorum
iki laf edince hemen kurtsun dedin bana
kurtsun deyince pkkli anlamiyor kimse
Kürt anliyor
fazla politika isleriynen ugrasma , türk oldugundan bile utaniyorsjn düsdügün hallere bak vallah
gulum sen gercek yasini soylesene
atalarimiz bosuna savasmadi
gercek yasimi söyledim inanmak zorunda degilsin zaten, sadece seninle ayni fikirde olmadigimdan dolayi mal mal konusmana gerek yok
eeee ben öyle bisey demedim
21 yani, hangi üniversiteye gidiyorsun
sana neden söyleyim knk
tanimiyorum seni

ictim knk annem isitmis iyi geldi
bal ile iç
i can read it yall saying
never mind i am out
ama kendi atana küfür etme bir daha cok saygisizlik yapiyorsun
enver pasha olmasa ermeni kökenliydin sen suan
enver ve arkadaşları faşist serefsizlerdi
senin kac baya kücük herhalde 🤣🤣🤣
tek gayesi kendi çıkarlarıydi
yas
19 dostum
hepsi türk devleti icin savasdi
begenmiyorsan türklügünü reddet ve ülkeden defol
onlarda baya irkci hatirlatiyim
buyudugunde beni hatirla
hallederiz knk raad kal
abinle agir konusma cüce
haaa yok türk devletini irkci olduklari icin sevmediginden dedim
baya ironik
baska irkci ülkeye gidecek pasam büyüdügünde
turk devleti kendi vatandaşini koruyamiyor
sen hala onu savunuyorsun
6 Şubat'ta kac insan öldü
chp zamaninda o binalar yapildi hatirlatiyim
gara da kac insan öldü?
imar iznini belediye mi veriyor
güzel dostum
askerleri yakilmadi mi bu ulkenin onları koruyamadi
baslarina cuval gecirilmedi mi
ruslar bombalamadi mi
hic birine sesi cikti mi
stratejik politika
PUAHAHAHAHA
politika budur maalesef
„ülken“
kadinini koruyamiyor
What language it's ?
ermeni kökenli misin dogruyu söyle, bi dna testi yaptir
C'mon speak english
delirecegim
tmm bi kac seneye hatirla beni oglum
Guys it's english server u should've talk in english
tmm hadi iyi geceler
real
shut yo bitch ass up and go jerk off to anime or something
it's okay to say a few words but not having a full conversation
yea we knot it and i don‘t care tbh because it‘s non of ur business
why u have to be rude
sorry i felt bad
non turkish people are not allowed to engage in the conversation
literally took five seconds to understand he's racist
thank you
u r not slightly better
we were actually arguing about that
:<
at least im not racist
admit it, but u r racist towards ur own people, I even question ur origin
ok cool
im not racist, i hate the government
not the same
not the same
tmm uyu rezil etme bizi bunlara
Calm down man why do you have to be so rude ? It's english server dude
sorry mate that was just a moment
didn't mean to burst at you like that
it's oka it seems like the problem is someone else
lol
whatever
there is no „problem“ it was just a discussion so u should definitely keep quiet german boy
It's okay man ....


I see
almanin ülke batiyor daha konusuyoamk
they both are signs of some controversial issues in Turkish society and politics
turkiye batmiyor mu lol
did he said smth about my people
But funniest thing someone said to me jerk off to anime ? Even that i hate that kind of shit cartoon 
alman cocuk karismasin
he said your country is at the brink of collapse
what a snitch
I don't even live in germany
this cant be a turk he is backstabbing another turk
would have taken him five seconds to translate
real was about to
ambusher
even tho that's a bit true loll
accept it or not babe, im just as turk as you
What's mean that ?

yuh
Ohh but I'm talking about u aren't u from ?
I'm not turkish
you should thank god for that
ur muslim?
I don't thank god
me neither
bro he is weird dont talk to him ngl
💀
i have became weird just because i dont share the same opinion as you
lmao
Turkish society people
nah not only because of this
Why turk had its own legacies about Turkish history....
he has some truth in his position
hm..
a turkish guy saying stuff like that lmao - he wants to be „different“
I want it to change
why cant everyone just be friends
so everybody has to be the same ?
I agree ma boi
atheist?
Gosh I hate this cooldown to type
why do you have to discriminate people just because they are not from your race
ja
it‘s in humans nature to harm other people regardless of the nationality
same 
you can be better than that
you dont have to bash people's head with rocks
?
"yes"
yea tell this to the politicians around the world
maybe the world will change lmao
hope so
must
or we all die
just be a good person
real
We die but our soul's remain alive
what does that mean in this context
nukes dont leave anything behind
politicians are not dumb enough to nuke earth lmao

when somebody says "government wouldn't do that"
Like heroshima Nagasaki
oh baby trust me, they would

"why would the government lie to us"

get some sleep buddy it‘s 4AM

where
U guy's know what was the main reason of Oppenheimer to putting bomb on Nagasaki?
Although he is an atheist he acknowledges Equity and dislike discrimination and racism .and oppose Fascisme and radical nationalism. U should think about it Emre..
we all Humans , and what make us near more than what makes us far, especially we share commonalities : Religion and history and close cultures
No
defending my country doesn‘t mean I am a racist
if no one would care about races/nationalities there would be no countries brother
well it’s fairly deep
once he understood it was being dropped on japanese cities instead of military bases he objected to it
it‘s in the humans nature to form various groups and embrace a culture
Better
civil war
.
There can be no civil war without a country you dummy
Especially if no one cares about nationalities and races
but humans tend to feel more connected to a certain group
Galactic Civil War, the empire isn’t a country!
😈
But did government know about that ? I have think Oppenheimer just was a weapon to end ww2 and destruction of heroshima
a race would feel neglected and would declare war
the government changed their minds and didn’t really care
i’m getting my info from the movie but it’s an accurate movie
truman decided to bomb the cities and when they told oppenheimer he hated it
Nope movie is just garbage not any specific information get from it
or resistance
this is false
but u can separate them based on their skin color
it’s dramatized but accurate
or appearence
Or their moustaches
It's literally arbitrary
Let's oppress people with distinct earlobes

That's how they used to find out about jews in nazi era
It's why mammals will never progress on a moral level
They will always seek a way to oppress one another
they didn’t find out….
It's why mammals are inherently inferior
they chose people with big noses
and glasses
and had a CHANCE of finding a jewish person
And attached earlobes
detached earlobes for the win
What in the fuck
Ye is movin wild on twitter
Explain buddy 
Captain Rex on top
cuz they didn't got that in the first place
you should guess why there's no nuclear attacks at moscow in cold war
because they got nukes, bigger than everyone
Ateist thinking about how christianity began .
and it wasn't like that ? 
@upper peak hello
I can't read hindi
This 4yo was raped and killed day before
Translate please
Tht ain't hindi sir
Idk TF tht is
But yh
She was sexually assaulted and killed by a 45yo man
Guess what the comments under this post were doing
Might be marathi
Yeah it's always about hindu muslim
We're going backwards
Real
Bro wtf is this country
Tht guy hasn't been caught yet
And instead of doing something everyone is busy in Hindu muslim
They just want to feel proud about not belonging to the criminals religion
Smh
Wt about tht poor girl
In reality it's a regional problem, we have similar DNA
Real
Country is doomed.......
She won't get justice just like other 1000s of victims
I wanna run away from this shit hole fr
When you tell people about the problems they call u antinationalist
As expected

