#🧠|serious-chat
1 messages · Page 375 of 1
I guess Thor ain't sleepin soon
I really wonder.
Why aren't you questioning your own standards as well? There is a good reason to question them, called the fallacy of presentism.
Who said im not
If the problem were only the dolls... Marrying a 6yo bro and being intimate when she's 9y
Flare is justifying child grooming
Sure, a finally tuned universe popped into existence out of absolutely nothing.
Fallacy
nothing should be a reason to do that
*Trying to, there's no justification to this
Prove it came from nothing, prove its finely tuned
You don't believe the prophet Muhammad peace and blessings be upon him existed?
I don't believe either
bruh , don't u know what an atheist mean
Helou, these discussions don't happen often on here. Sorry for the bad representation
Even Hitler married women that were not 18 yet
I think quran is a book full of mythologies taken from various other religions
Flare has nothing but a claim, barely an assumption, no proof, no evidence, just blind faith
The way I see it he likely existed but he was nowhere near as described, it's just a cult of personality or mythically exaggerated. It's common for the least historically documented kings, think of the first Chinese rulers that likely weren't real
The Muhammed character in the book didnt exist.. the person it might have been based on is irrelevant
Romulus too, perhaps there was someone named Romulus after the city of Rome (since it's a diminutive)
But he didn't found Rome nor destroyed Alba Longa and stuff
He's only doing the thing that almost all the religious people do, trying to "prove" their religion with faith and no proof (and a book wrote hundreds of years ago)
Wasn't Muhammad's biography written centuries after he died
And the hadiths too, we should believe that they kept existing in oral form for over 100 years, sometimes over 200 years before they wrote them down
Same with the first Roman kings, their time of rule isn't compatible with the amount of kings that existed
Understandable.. I see an "atheist" in their name which auto translate to "im confused i need validation for my thoughts" its a common occurence on the internet 🥜
It is said that Numa instituted the first census within the empire but we don't know whether he really existed or not
Muhammed changed a gospel because he didnt like it 600 years after it happened, why would I trust him over the original? xD
I like to laugh at people
Again, what is the appropriate age of marriage (objectively)? If you say not 9, then what is it? 18? 15? 100? These ages vary from one state to another on the same land (America), how do you expect it to be fixed historically and culturally?
I've already cited a passage about the varying age of consent in the US here: #🧠|serious-chat message
Yes, the first proof of a title of "king" (written as "regi", preceding the classical Latin "rex") may have been a sacerdotal title and not a political one. It also was found much later, not in the 7th century BC as they say in the later Roman stories
.....
And here we go again
Why not 2 flare? Why not 80, like i said, mental and physical health. A 9 year old child isnt ready for marriage under ANY circumstances
Im losing braincells, im heading to bed... please fix your view on children flare. Leave peoples young daughters alone
Can't be fr 💀
Even one of the first consuls that founded the Republic may have been mythical
@thorny steeple You will never be able to express yourself clearly enough for those who want to misunderstand you -J. Warren Welch-
There is nothing to misunderstand
Another one? They are multiplying
a
true, it has been stated clearly
So why throw out a random quote?
Simple. Human's are known for rationality. Why would you post two random Hadiths that coincidentally happen to insinuate a stereotype of children in modern-day in a discussion about Aisha's marriage and whether she was ready for it or not?
I remember when you used to call me out for allegedly circling around, while it seems you're the one who does so all the time, with all due respect.
nice quote at a wrong situation
What do i circoe around with?
Circle*
because you're throwing out a random reply? Flare was clearly just giving the statistics and you started assuming
Humans aren't well known for their rationality, especially when they justify things like these but at least some do feel called out
"Statistics"
Both the first stories you mentioned and the last ones (the rape of Lucrecia) were fabrications. Romulus could have been raised by a prostitute as the term "lupa" designates both prostitutes and wolves
Yea quote a word, thats how you start misinterpreting things
Objectively, the consumption of a marriage only occurs if the woman has a developed body to have birth (that's more true if there's no contraceptive methods), so I want to see the scientific article that say that a 9yo "woman" is ready to give birth because a 9yo can be sufficient mature to marry according to your arguments, can you send me the articles?
Last time I simply answered that anywhere from 18 to 25 is an ideal age to allow most people to marry, unless they have heavy mental disabilities
Wow, you guys need to wait in a line or something, I can't respond to all massages simultaneously.
These ages are indicative simply to avoid grooming or abuse since there is no mature 10 years old for sure, and if they mature at 17 (something I still find hard to believe) it doesn't hurt if she waits one more year before taking a life-changing decision
So who is advocating marrying a 9yo in the present? is there a case of it happening?
Marriages were mostly arranged when the age of consent was that low, so they didn't even have to take any decisions
People who use Muhammed as a rolemodel
And where are those people that are supposedly "marrying 9 yo girls" ?
Muslim families
That is so disrespectful
hey guys
Why don't you be patient with me and like, you know, actually argue for your point?
I'm willing to go against the mainstream belief about marriage, why don't you at least respond with actual logically sound arguments? I've refuted your "common sense" claim and proved, historically, people didn't share you "common sense". I've proved that the age of consent has never been fixed and it's pretty much arbitrary based on cultural norms.
I don't know what is there left for your argument to act as if you're right about it.
That's called hatespeech
Yes Muhammed didnt respect aisha boundaries
Do your research
I told you to open a scientific book and read it yourself
I have, that's why im disgusted
"And here we go again" is not an argument, it's hardly even an objection.
that is the wrong resources
Read Quran
Where do you think I found out what Muhammed did
The Qur'an is the only true and final guide for Muslims. It was sent by Allah to Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him) to teach us how to live. Speaking badly about the Prophet (peace be upon him) is wrong and hurtful. He showed kindness, mercy, and fairness to everyone and lived by the teachings of the Qur'an. We should respect others and share peace while staying strong in our faith.
Quran is a claim, bot evidence or proof
It's clear that the common ground between me and you guys is not the age of marriage. I'm trying to invite you to a common ground where we can reach a conclusion based it so that we don't simply exchange comments such as yours.
I've expressed my argument for why the modern-day common sense of marriage is not binding and judging people historically based on present-day standards is an argument from presentism (a logical fallacy) here:
#🧠|serious-chat message
#🧠|serious-chat message
#🧠|serious-chat message
I refuse your common child grooming ground
That is crazy, and it seems valid
Where did you get that information? Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him) never did anything wrong or inappropriate. He was known for his honesty, kindness, and excellent character. He treated everyone with respect, fairness, and compassion, regardless of their background. Many people admired him for his integrity and humility, and even his enemies testified to his good character. He was a role model for justice and goodness, and his life is a perfect example of how to live with dignity and honor.
Except for having sex with a child
he never did that!!
tbf I've never liked these so called "religious law"
That claim is false and based on misinformation. Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him) was known for his wisdom, kindness, and high moral character. His marriage to Aisha (may Allah be pleased with her) was in line with the cultural practices of the time and was based on mutual respect and care. It's important to remember that historical events must be understood in their proper context. Spreading false accusations only causes harm and misunderstanding. I encourage you to research from authentic Islamic sources to understand the truth about his life and teachings.
Trying my best to show them the flaw in their complaint. It's not even an argument because there absolutely no objectivity or logicality about it.
I don't need to convince anybody of anything, they're free to choose whatever they wanna believe or disbelieve. I only deliver the message and argue for the sake of it.
Basically, making it clear, and letting them choose whatever they want to believe.
Its in your hadiths....
This is the bottom line for this chat, I've never witnessed anyone openly justifying paedophilia. And they can't be banished because it would be islamophobia
Are you serious? Ive said it 5 times now, a 9 year old CANT be physically or mentally fit for marriage
I need lemon overdose
Did I ever say you're circling around? Review the message, I'm replying to Isfrun.
I'm not aiming to justify anything. Whether you like it or not, it's what it is.
Justification means there is an actual problem, when the only problem is your idea about the topic.
There is a problem
Wtf is wrong with you
Please stay away from young girls. Ive had enough of this
To me it seems the case, other people here can testify as well. What are you going to say? Ad populum fallacy?
I mean, I get that there are people out there advocating child marriage but you're just accusing Flare of supporting it here. Flare themselves never said they agreed with it. they were just saying its not a religious thing it historically happens in various cultures
Flare has said multiple times he objectively = across time thinks its ok
that'd be f'd up
Not subjectively
He just said that there is nothing wrong with it
And call me the problem for wanting to protect and not wanting to deflower young girls
"I don't think that slavery should be practiced but there is nothing wrong with it"
Thats either active support or passive at worst
Negative
I cant disprove god, but i reject the claim
Stop trying to justify it
Its against discord TOS
And all the stories about aisha was written by her masters... not her herself so they are irrelevant
I don't care about the quran, i don't care about Muhammed or aisha. I just want you to stop promoting this
Lets keep it at 18 just so everyone is not at risk and leave it there. There is NO reason for why that shouldnt be the case
End of discussion
Okay, why don't you cite some?
Im done with you
Neither do I stand on any child grooming ground. I'm simply inviting you to the common ground of logic and rationality.
I've pointed out the flaws in your reasoning. Your responses so far have been baseless assertions, factual errors, and unnecessary comments. I don't see where is the intellectual discussion in that.
Im saying wait until the body is ready, there is no flaw in that logic
Quran is an assumption and a factual error, dont try to lecture me with "facts"
Having the menarcha doesn't mean being able to carry a child in their uterus, unfortunately even girls who aren't sufficient developed yet can get pregnant, however it's extremely harmful to girls at that age to carry a child and giving birth, some of them actually die because of this, and that's the reason that some countries legalized the abortion to girls at that age. There's not a justification to a disgusting act like this nor any argument
damn still here
It is indeed ad populum fallacy, because it relies on the majority's held belief rather than logical argumentation.
The most widespread religion is Islam, does that mean Islam is true to you?
Im sorry for you
No
I like how Flare once said that morality is objective but is doing moral relativism here
isn't that an agnostic perhaps
Agnostic atheist
It's not even the most widespread
Now this is indeed a fallacy, false equivalence
I'm not justifying anything. You're free to accept my responses or not. I merely respond to the flawed responses you guys are making.
Believe what you want
yeah got it , that's what I am 
True shi
And it's preposterous to say that a 6yo child is sufficient mature to marry a man, it's the biology of the development of our brains, we cannot be mature enough to marry a 6y in normal circumstances. A girl in that age "can only be mature enough" if she is taught to say that or she's forced to do so
Saying my logic is flawed doesnt make it true
I've made it clear I don't encourage child marriage. I'm showing the flaw in the reasoning of judging past eras' cultural standards with today's cultural standards. I've also proved that Aisha's marriage did not cause any harm to her, and that Islam explicitly prohibits a marriage that causes harm to either party.
You havent made that clear at all
No kind of belief should shield you from the fact that a child marrying and reproducing is a cruel and vile act.
Imagine claiming to have the moral superiority while blessing a child groomer
are you say that the girls in the desert and before more than 1400 are same with girls now?
They developed slower than today, so its even worse
Biology 101
The common sense change as the years pass by, however a girl body doesn't, a 9yo will be a 9yo nowadays, will be a 9yo in the future and was a 9yo in the past
fr , what kind of argument was that
the girls before is more power and strong and s then girls now
Prove it
Thats a claim
bro do you think before talking
They dont
They spew talking points
They had worse food then, less nutrition and conditions = worse development
The girls from the ancient times were still girls, they weren't a different specie
even if that wasn't the case... 9 is still wild
Its 1500 years, not 1.5 million
it's not like we're talking about 20 yo then vs now , literally kids in this case
Muhammed was 52? Aisha was 9? How can any sane person think "that makes sense"
does the ppl now can fight old ppl like romans and ..etc now with same weapons ?
Damn you guys are still here
I think everything is correct as long as it's from them , maybe that's the reasoning
Do people train like they did? No
brother.... 9 years old , tf are u talking about
Anyone that trained in a modern military would know that modern soldiers are much tougher
hahah
lol yeah
Depends on the DEI hire military
Medieval plate armour weighed something like 14 kg meanwhile a soldier has to carry 40-60 kg or more on his back
"Oh no, the marriage didn't made any harm to her"
According to Muhammed
when u put it like that 😭
Muhammed had 14 women, was a real baller
With all due respect, you're oblivious about the nature of Hadiths and their transmission.
Hadiths are not written text, they are orally transmitted actions and sayings of the prophet upon him be peace and blessings. They've been written, sure, but that doesn't mean that's how they are authentic.
Each narrator narrated the Hadith on the other until it reached to us, this is called the chain of narration.
There is a whole Islamic science called ʻilm al-ḥadīth (science of Hadith) used to study the authenticity of Hadiths and their narrators.
We literally have hundreds of books about ʿilm ar-rijāl (Science of Narrators) which is a discipline of the science of Hadith in which scholars examine the biography of each and every narrator in any Hadith to validate their credibility. If only one non-credible narrator is found in the chain of narration of one Hadith, it's instantly rejected and graded "Da'ief" (Weak), even if the whole chain of narration consists of other credible narrators.
Hadith scholars have examined and rejected coutnless Hadiths' that actually could've supported Islam, but because there is a systematic examination for that, they don't accept or reject Hadiths based on their own whims.
I highly recommend reading about this subject rather than speaking out of ignorance, with no offense of course.
you see how the circumastances are diiffernt and poverty and the weather like orgin arab
And the book that him and his friends wrote with their visions of the situation
Sure buddy
I guess all the people that defend it , would like their daughters to marry at such a short age
They simply cant say "the prophet did wrong"
Isnt early puberty in and on itself a problem? like a sign of poor diet and things like that
bro 💀
Comparing the development of a 9yo throughout the history with the development of weapons and war, a great argument indeed
Great!! And I couldn't agree more.
We also hold the same principle as Muslims, but we assert that Aisha consummated her marriage in an age where she was ready physically and mentally.
wow wow wow
Thats what happens when people dont get educations
You think being ready is before 9 when its literally and figuratively impossible on all fronts
My messiah didn't marry, I don't have to go through that
Of course, a 9yo is ready to give birth, serious?
Mary got pregnant at 12...
I don't mean to offend you, but your condescending tone is enough of a proof for how close-minded you are. What do you mean "don't lecture me about facts"? Is it just because I'm Muslim means I'm not as intellectually capable as you are? Lol. That would be the stupidest claim you've made so far if that's what you mean.
Thats 1/4 older than aisha
But she didn't have intercourse
Brother , I've talked with muslims before and they don't argue shit like u do
You're taking your facts from an assumption....
1/3
12 is 1/4 more than 9?
Math ain't mathing
Haha
What does that have to do with Aisha?
She didn't suffer from any of these problems. I've already made it clear that these things you're talking about are highly relative.
It's ⅓ more, 3/9
relative 
How would you know? Were you there to know what really happened?
wut both are the same
Depends on how you look at it
Yes, that's the point
oh got it
Thats how faith work, no one knows 🥜
Aisha was 9, so Mary was 1/3 older than her
Its 2:37am i dont know math
well I mean , even 16 and 25 are bad , imagine 9 and 40ish
You're right invictus
There is also the brain damage from the current conversation
We noticed , now rest
I dropped 40 points in IQ
Good night
cheers
xD
It's not only aisha bro it's all the children that has to marry and be intimate with a 20+yo man at a young age like 9
so Mary had 33,333% more of aisha's age
💀
That happens to everyone, chills
Goodnight
whatever , goodnight y'all 
Source: trust me bro. Lol.
Jokes aside, prove it.
bro you can't "xD" this is #🧠|serious-chat xD
33,333...%
If Aisha's marriage is debated because cultural norms of 7th-century Arabia differed significantly from modern values. What was customary then may not align with today’s understanding of childhood and consent
Historical actions should not be viewed by todays lens
💀
it is presentism fallacy
Moral relativism but only when it is in my favour
not celebrated either
anyways bye
@latent minnow
This article says puberty can be reached in girls from ages such as 8 all the way to 13: https://kidshealth.org/en/parents/understanding-puberty.html
So, on what basis are you claiming all girls are subject to your rule?

you arent forced to do anything stop committing fallacies
oh my
Technically when they reach menarch, but this is just the beginning, still weird
Even if she had reached puberty yet that would be weird
The minority of girls reach menarch at such an early age, and this isn't a standard
Having the menarcha doesn't mean being able to have sex
If you really think about it to say this means that you agree that those people who are doing what is normalized in the present days has done an oopsie because they were ignorant, not saying its entirely their fault since studies won't be as advanced as they are nowadays but they were still ignorant people according to present standard 🥜
Ofc but that's not what he's defending
labeling them as "ignorant" oversimplifies complex culture and the norms
it exposes your ignorancy
You think he isn't trying to justify this?
Just scroll up
Not in all places, no.
In this study, which ironically was cited by Isfrun in the past to support the claim that Aisha wasn't ready, they've noticed girls are reached puberty earlier than during the 9th century. Of course this is only taking into account Western girls. However, one of their speculations for the cause of this phenomenon is non-western migrants miarrages with western girls. So, it's very likely that humans physiology has gone through a lot of changes throughout history, and that non-Western girls were actually menstruating earlier than western girls as the study seems to suggest. Environmental factors are actually important in such issue.
So, this claim is also unfounded.
I mean, these culture and norms are based on the knowledge of that time, no? 🤔
if only they knew better
is what im sayin
It legit says that people with better nutrition from hunter gatherer times reached puberty earlier than humans in agrarian societies, that's 40k years ago
It also says this, but leaving it out is convenient I guess
"These findings may be understood in terms of neurological development. Some domains of neurodevelopment, largely related to affect (romantic motivation, sexual interest, emotional intensity, changes in sleep/arousal, appetite, risk of affective disorders in females, increase in risk taking, novelty seeking, sensation seeking), are puberty specific, whereas most aspects of cognitive development (reasoning, logic and capacities for self-regulation of emotions and drives) mature in a more age-related fashion, continuing to develop slowly long after puberty is over."
We are only recently catching up with hunter gatherers
we die faster cuz food was scarce and now we die faster cuz food is readily available
Lol. Speaking of education, you're completely oblivious about history.
I genuinely hope you would give it more attention because it seems you're only holding tightly to whatever you've been taught by your culture and society, you even think it's binding to all cultures, civilizations, and eras, which as I've repeatedly said is the presentism fallacy.
Have a look at my response to @ Tecno here: #🧠|serious-chat message
It's in the article
Seriously this is peak idiocy
The pot calling the kettle black
The normal age of menarch can vary depending of different factors, but having the menarch doesn't mean being able to have sex and get pregnant, if a girl who is married become intimate with her husband so for the logic she's able to carry a child without problems (because the reason that cannot be changed to a intercourse, is getting children, and this is more true in a time where contraceptive methods aren't used), however, it's impossible to a 9yo carry a child without getting harmed in the process, their bodies aren't sufficient developed to this, wherever the part of the world.
I never said a girl at 9 years old can give birth.
I only said it doesn't follow that just because it cannot give birth it's also incapable of marriage, especially in the context of their culture, era, and environment.
Furthermore, Aisha haven't suffered any health issues due to her marriage as one reviews all the Hadiths reported regarding Aisha and her life.
We only have Hadiths of her expressing how greatly it appreciates her marriage with the prophet as I've briefly presented here: #🧠|serious-chat message
So, even if there are risks involved, that doesn't mean they apply to Aisha specifically. I've also mentioned how culturally familiar was that in their environment and era.
Interestingly, marrying at young ages persisted for such an incredibly long time, even in the US the age of consent was between 8 to 13 in some states recently, not to mention other countries. One state has actually had its age of consent at 7 years old, legally!
So, it wasn't a while back when your grandparents have married perhaps at 13 or 15 years old, which is nowadays would be considered child marriage.
Watch your tongue, please.
I cited sources. How am I "taking my facts from an assumption"?

From the same source you rely on to say Aisha was 9 years old when consummated, Hadiths. Lol.
Are you going to cherry-pick certain Hadiths and leave others because they don't fit with your narrative?
I understand, but the way you generalize is problematic.
Let me say it again, I do not encourage child marriage. I'm only proving that judging Aisha's marriage specifically and the cultural difference between now and their time is logically problematic and doesn't constitute anything objective.
I wouldn't marry at 12 or even 15 years personally, neither would I encourage my children to marry at these ages, because culturally, I don't want that, but I won't go and judge the historic age of marriage. I'd be fascinated that they were marry so young, but I wouldn't simply say "Oh, they were stupid because they didn't adhere to our modern-day standards". I hope you finally got my point.
💀
Intercourse could be driven by the desire from people who have a sufficient developed body to want it. Children don't have a developed body to want this nor want these kind of things unless someone said to them to "want it" or force them to it
It doesn't seem like it. Aisha has expressed her loved in multiple occasions as many Hadiths reported: #🧠|serious-chat message
Furthermore, prophet Muhammad upon him be peace and blessings has never coerced anyone of anything in his home. Aisha herself said that: "She said God's messenger never struck anyone with his hand, neither a woman nor a servant, unless he was striving in God's path; and nothing was ever done to him for which he took revenge on the perpetrator unless things God had forbidden were transgressed, in which event he took revenge for God's sake. " [Mishkat al-Masabih 5818]
It makes it ok because he had an older wife
Completely out of context. Reread.
Wtf bro, why a child will have sexual desire?
Is it?
Do you really know what you're writing?
yeah, children shouldnt even know what that is.
I'm not a thief, I never stole before. I only stole once at the bank. I could've stolen from my friends and family members, I had plenty of opportunities to
Blud literally said why would he marry khadija aa his first wife 💀
Wasn't she the biggest businesswoman of the region
Luckily it's difficult to die on an hill
Apparently being high isn't dangerous
It is.
I've already mentioned countless times, I don't encourage it. I wouldn't let my children marry at such young ages. My argument revolves around judging based on presentism.
Aside from that, scholars contend that the prophet married Aisha primarily for teaching her the religion from her early ages so she grows to teach other Muslims after his death, which ultimately happened.
sigh
That was a long argument.
Leave it
Don't bring that on, now. Lol. Weren't you the one who abstained from engaging in a philosophical discussion before about morality?
To respond though, whether morality is subjective or objective is a subject of meta-ethics, while the age of marriage, abortion and similar topics are subject of normative ethics. So, the age of marriage and whether it's relative has nothing to do with whether morality is objective or not.
Watch this instead
https://youtu.be/dEXGHYDWye8
Bandicoot Month is still June. It's June 33rd. Here are some Crash Bandicoot Bootlegs. Thanks to Epic Games for sponsoring - Fall Guys is now free! Download here: https://pixly.go2cloud.org/SH3I4 #FallGuys ▼ MORE BELOW ▼
Special thanks to https://twitter.com/JetpackBraggin for the incredible thumbnail art!
Also, special thanks to https://www...
Just straight up hypocrisy, I'm simply pointing it out. Presentism bad but moral absolutism is true
You're the one who replied, I was just responding. Lol.
Lol. I've never in my life argued for moral absolutism. It was moral realism that I argued for. That's first.
Second, there is no hypocrisy about it, because normative ethics =/= meta-ethics.
Meta-ethics deals with what is and the source. Normative ethics aims to give us a framework for ethics and how we ought to live.
We can debate normative ethics without touching meta-ethics. It's true that they are related, but they are still different disciplines in the philosophy of ethics.
We could both argue for and against a topic such as marriage while still believing morality is objective, because the age of marriage deals with numbers and aligining them, somehow, with what is moral (i.e., no harm should be caused). I argued that we can definitely put numbers for what ages are able to get married (legally), but that doesn't mean it's objective, it's building on an objective principle which is to not cause harm, what I objected was judging other numbers that have been put in the past by today's numbers. That's if I put the whole argument in an oversimplified format.
You've been going all around about a completely irrelevant topics. If you won't accept Hadiths and Islam for the sake of the argument, then you shouldn't have stated "he married a 6 year old", because that fact is primarily extracted from Hadiths.
Additionally, I've been formulating logical arguments and supporting my claims with sources and evidence if necessary. You are the one who kept asserting with absolutely no argument or evidence to back any of your claims.
Lol. It's honestly hilarious that you'd have to resort to such non-argument comments in order to portray yourself as being correct and any other opposing argument is just wrong.
What is left? -583759474?
Next time, work harder for your argumentation rather than resorting to insults and unnecessary comments.
Finally, a logical statement out of this chaos.
You're basically lying here.
False equivalence.
The appropriate age for marriage has always been variable as I've proved countless times. It still is until today.
Equating slavery with marriage is like saying "planes are faster because trains are taller".
Nonsense.
You could argue that, historically, slavery was endorsed, similar to the young age of marriages. However, the problem with that notion would be that slavery was endorsed due to factual error, people used to believe they are of superior races and therefore are entitled to having inferior races as slaves.
The age of marriage, specifically Aisha's, was not based on any factual error because marriages at these eras didn't simply mean intercourse, even if they married at a young age, they still only engaged in intercourse later when they were ready.
They meant long-term relationships at the time.
Defending what we now consider and define to be child predation without condemnation seems a new low :/
We should still condemn it as we now know better.
The fact no one criticized it despite the amount of enemies the prophet until the 19th century doesn't seem indicative of that.
Have a look at this message: #🧠|serious-chat message
You do realize the fourth stage is beyond 12 years correct?
The point is that we don't know better now.
The age of consent or marriage is based on cultural norms.
Unless a harm was inflicted by marriage, the age of marriage can vary between cultures, civilizations, eras, countries, or even individuals.
We do however understand that children aren’t capable of such choices alone and should never be placed into such circumstances.
That much is obvious
This is as obvious as don’t beat your children. Don’t make them distrust you.
Don’t sexually exploit children
3 stage "concrete operational".
It means a person is now aware of the environment.
It starts at the age of 7, while Aisha's marriage consummation was at the age of 9. 2 years after.
My brother in mother fucking Adonalsium you are not defending this.
You cannot be post hoc reasoning that it was okay KNOWING what we now know
Do I even have to say why defending it by today’s standards isn’t okay…?
Like do I actually have to explain that to you?
Agreed. If she ever rejected this marriage after growing up, the marriage would be invalid.
"a virgin must not be married till her permission is asked" [Mishkat al-Masabih 3126]
This theory is likely: #🧠|serious-chat message
Bro… what did I just say. 😭 They never listen.
That's the fourth stage.
Have a look at the 3rd.
Called "concrete operational stage", at this stage, a person becomes aware of his/her environment and are able to make informed decisions.
According to her own words years later after her marriage, she is completely satisfied and happy with her marriage. That's first.
Second, she was perfectly healthy and mentally capable, the majority of Hadiths are narrated by her, which indicates a perfect memory, along with the content of Hadiths about her life where she makes informed decisions, so she was perfectly healthy. She died at the age of 63. She lived perfectly healthy and okay.
Ohmigod he’s stillgoing.
How could someone talk about his 9 years old events in detail if he wasn't mentally aware at that age??
You know what.
I'm disengaging. Had enough of stone heads.
The fact that you’re only just now realizing that…
I told you to stop this hours ago flare
People: oh poor Aisha, we are so sorry.
Aisha: for what??
People: for marrying at a young age.
Aisha: but I'm okay with that.
People: you must've hated your husband so much.
Aisha: I absolutely love him!
People: shut up! You don't.
Lol.
I got it
I was merely responding to your claims.
Again.. the quran is a claim
Of what
Thor pls
xD
Wrong room for that

It is in my B.Ed. syllabus
N e w T o p i c
Hinduism says that light and darkness are twins. The absence of light is darkness, the absence of darkness is light. By establishing this, the Vedas talk about the existence of matter and anti matter and the break in their equilibrium which resulted in the creation of the universe. Comment in your own words.
woww
Whenever the equilibrium of a system is disrupted there is either an absorbance or a release of energy
n how is the equilibrium disrupted
The Vedas say that the universe started getting created after a massive release of energy
This massive release of energy in modern science is called the Bing Bang theory
Matter and anti matter didn't cancel each other out and thus got separated
This separation caused a massive release of energy
ohh n thus we got life as we are part of matter
hii gyss
Hii
However the Rig Veda does say:
ko addhā veda ka iha pravuḍcatkuta ājātā kuta iyaṁ visṛṣṭiḥ |
arvāg devā asya visarjanenāthā ko veda yata ābabhūva ||
Translation:
“Who really knows? Who will here proclaim it? Whence was it produced? Whence is this creation? The Gods came afterwards, with the creation of this universe. Who then knows whence it has arisen?”
It is believed that the Vedas say that there will always be ambiguity regarding how and when the universe was created as human knowledge is limited @lost hawk
helloo
woaa that does sound interesting indeed 😮
if we humans don't know then who may mnow
We're mere human beings and some things go beyond our capabilities
maybe the answer to the universe is within us, stored in our dna!
The Vedas says ‘no one’
Maybe!!
The universe is a vast space
God knows when human beings will even reach its end
yea
Who knows if there r aliens
And that is why Hinduism says that God is the ultimate truth, something that is beyond human capability
It is very wrong to say Hinduism is a polytheistic religion
In its fundamentals, it is monotheistic
That's just on the outside
Most of these ‘Gods’ come from the Puranas. Many Hindus today consider the Puranas as folktales
Mahabharata and Ramayana are epics
They're stories with a moral, with something to teach
Yours doesn't fight for its rights
My what?
Your ass
...
I know it needs help now
comparing hamas with ass lol
It makes sense
fr
I think most people know that Hamas only want mansions in Tehran.
Like the Palestinian authority that only wants to sell all the aid they receive for weapons
Not to mention the zionists pressuring the Israeli government to push for land at the cost of civilians.
Meanwhile the palestinians and israelis pay for all this selfishness
wake up
flare is muted
today's a good day
hey
waz gud
Not funny, that’s not how the serious thinkers debate
That’s the best situation to annex Gaza and West Bank for Israeli national interest and security
I don’t blame some people of being atheist almost every Heavenly religions have a kind of distinction
The palestinians would not want that, and a lot of israelis would oppose it
Where we can create a debate room?
You can’t have what you all wanted don’t you ?
If you really want something from the world, bring the forces in
And I promise, when you take over all of these things, nobody would dare to bother you again
Or being fucked all over the place
Survival for the fittest dude
Nobody will care your interest, only yourself
This is the world we live in
yeaa there is one god with many forms
i do believe in aliens
mee too. I was a fan of these things n mysteries. Keep researching stuff ppl found regarding them n other supernatural stuff. Ghosts n all
Hello everyone
I believe there is the another earth which it’s located in the other galaxy
sure man^^
I didn't compare it with marriage, just with child marriage
mee too
Yeah
😵💫
This seems to be very expensive.
Seems like a fruit cake in my opinion
Yeah
Just imagine the cost of that!
Btw it is insane that most tiktoker move to rednote
But a lot of people call it “rednot” 🤣
chinese ?
Yeah and Duolingo Chinese section of learning is booming
As a Chinese i never use that app
Yeah they should pronounce it xiaohongshu
That figures, it's funny the gun videos and testing the limits of the app
I think America will ban all of Chinese apps
Since they has banned wechat, tiktok, etc
With how slow congress gets I'm sure they might use an umbrella ban for anything Chinese
is this a cake??
WeChat user?
Yeah
Fruit cake
In my culture a 50 yr old man that wants to marry a 10 year old girl
Would be castrated immediately
My culture is Spain in the 1400s
If a girl rather marry that old man?
What would happen if?
She would be sent to a mental institution

Gerontophilia is greatly disordered
What if a girl(18 years old) marry a guy who is 28 years old , it would be considered unethical?
An 18 year old is an adult
They may marry who they want
It used to be that 14 and 16 year olds could marry their peers and even those slightly older
But this proved to be bad as teens still have underdeveloped frontal lobes and therefore make very hormonal decisions as opposed to logical and long lasting ones
We need to raise the age to marry up to the mid 20s then. Might be wise tbh.
18 year olds are still developing frontal lobes as well
Agreed 18 is the minimum
I think if people wait till they're 23 or 24 or even 25 for some of the later bloomers
If they do that the divorce rate would tank
Finally a logical statement
After the discussion with flare 💀
I think we stop interfering at the age of 18 because generally, we accept that once you reach that age, you are legally responsible for your own actions. You should be responsible enough to take care of your own needs. But this doesn't explain why other age limits are set to 21. Like for drinking and for smoking tobacco.
Let's just raise the age of majority to 21
It would be for the best
Weapons of Mass Diabetes
yet ,there are the reason for many ppl accepting Islam when they start seriously searching if what they have heard of is 100% accurate or just lies .
"يُرِيدُونَ أَن يُطْفِئُوا نُورَ اللَّهِ بِأَفْوَاهِهِمْ وَيَأْبَى اللَّهُ إِلَّا أَن يُتِمَّ نُورَهُ وَلَوْ كَرِهَ الْكَافِرُونَ" سورة التوبة آية:٣٢
@azure brook ummm
watch how they support each other in a positive feedback circlejerking loop 
If only it could be exploited to generate endless energy
dealt 
I prefer Roman Republic
insha'Allah
hello
Hi
what are you talking about here
when are people grown up
depends some never others has to as early as possible
how is your day going
Is there any native English speaker that I can talk on vc?
Republican you're
Me
I'm for a great Roman Republic, those times were goated
Indeed I'm just fascinated with the time of Roman Kingdom y'know
Then you should read about Enea, and the myth of the birth of Rome, it's beautiful
Noted, how's narew
I don't know, I hope he's fine
Yeah, me too
@thorny steeple hello golden John 🌞
nowadays girls get pregnant at 9-10 years at western countries! difference is-Aisha married in a civilized way and today girls do behind the bushes 🤧
Aisha, before the Prophet proposed to her, was being pursued by Jubair ibn Mut`am, indicates that she was mature enough for marriage, according to the prevailing tradition at that time, if not, the Quraish people, who would never waste any chance to insult the Prophet, peace and blessings be upon him, would have found this marriage as a golden opportunity to pour on him rain of insults. Rather they found nothing wrong in this engagement, and they received the news of the Prophet’s proposal for Aisha as something usual, and even, expected.
Aisha was not the first case, for everyone was married at her same age that time.
Narrated Aisha: I had seen my parents following Islam since I attained the age of puberty. Not a day passed but the Prophet visited us, both in the mornings and evenings.
Sahih Bukhari, Volume 1, Book 8, Hadith 465
This is a hadith reported by her (RA), in which she clearly styears agothat she had already reached puberty when she was with her parents,long before she was married.
Though that is more than enough, here’s another:
Narrated Aisha: "When the girl becomes 9 years old, she has become a woman."
Jami at-Tirmidhi 1109.
This one Hadith single handedly refutes entire thing in a whole.
Now here is the another evidence -Aisha narrated “My mother intended to make me gain weight for me to (consummate the marriage with the Prophet) and send me to the (house of) the Messenger of Allah (saw). But nothing which she desired benefited me till she gave me cucumber with fresh dates to eat. Then I gained like the best kind of plump.”
Sunan Abi Dawud 3903, Ibn Majah Hadith 3324
So this is even more interesting evidence. Here we see Aisha herself was getting ready for the consummation. And her mother was even helping her. Which means that she had no problem and was mature in every way for the consummation.
Insights into their relationship, such as the fact they liked to drink out of the same cup or race one another, are indicative of a deep connection which belies any misrepresentation of their relationship.
To paint Aisha as a victim is completely at odds with her persona.
From her own perspective-There is no doubt that mother of believers Hazrat Aisha (RA) was very lucky to have the best creation of ALLAH SWT as her husband.
Aisha (ra) was the one who narrated the details of this love through numerous accounts in which the intensity of deep love between the two is quite evident. She used to describe the tenderness of Prophet Muhammad to her and the sense of care that he showed her. Here are some of the narrations:
Aisha (ra) would often seek reassurance from The Prophet (saw) that he loved her.
“How is your love for me?” she once asked.
“Like the rope’s knot,” he replied, meaning that it was strong and secure, and as the rope is pulled the knot gets stronger.
She was very pleased with his love, and many times after that she would ask, “How is the knot?” and he would reply: “Ala haaliha” meaning “The same as ever!”
Aisha RA once said,
“the women of Egypt cut their hands upon seeing Prophet Yousuf (AS), but had the seen the messenger of Allah (SAW) they would have cut their hearts out.” (shamail trimidhi)
Now imagine 1500 years ago and how different the women matured at that time! Back then, there was no school or education. A boy pretty much became a man when he was able to hunt animals and bring food home everyday and a girl pretty much became a woman when she could take care of the house. The fact of the matter is that it is well-known that people in the past would generally live a shorter life, therefore, back then, they matured quicker biologically as well, both physically and mentally. The average life expectancy at the time of the Prophet Muhammad PBUH, which is the 6th century, was 30-35, but as of 2020, its 77 years old! A 9 year old today is not ready for marriage, but back then, they were more than ready.
the application of modern standards to the past is more of an illogical fallacy called presentism
This is how mother of the believers Aisha bint Abi Bakr (ra) viewed her marriage with the Prophet Muhammad (saw) i.e. that of love, sweetness, gentleness and companionship.this is how mother of the believers Aisha (ra) felt about her marriage to the Prophet (saw). She did not feel oppressed or subdued, rather she was very happy and content; and what matters is how she felt not how some people 1440 years after that are feeling. As we say: “If husband and wife are happy and agree with each other, Priest can do nothing.”
Narrated 'Abdullah bin Mulaika: 'aisha said that the Jews came to the Prophet and said, "As- Samu 'Alaikum" (death be on you). 'aisha said (to them), "(Death) be on you, and may Allah curse you and shower His wrath upon you!" The Prophet said, "Be calm, O 'aisha ! You should be kind and lenient, and beware of harshness and Fuhsh (i.e. bad words)." She said (to the Prophet), "Haven't you heard what they (Jews) have said?" He said, "Haven't you heard what I have said (to them)? I said the same to them, and my invocation against them will be accepted while theirs against me will be rejected (by Allah). " (Book #73, Hadith #57)
If Aisha (ra) would be alive today she would curse you heavily
@latent minnow @rancid grotto
Bro what does it mean nowadays and or in religion text ... It's a different , religious text tried to teach about life and humane societies isn't it as per you ? And even it's the ultimate truth bla bla...
You still don't have concise, and preach about religions bla bla..
who is talking about religion here ?!
You
where?
Of course.
Qur'an verse , and comparing sayings nowadays bla bla..
do u know what that reply is for ?
I read the first line of this shit and I have to ask you: what kind of weed did you smoke?
Whatever the reply , why have to compare today's this that with Qur'an verse...you be a human being first,that's enough..
Not him , but what he read since childhood and been brainwashed probably..
That could be.
if u dont know the subject of the discussion ,dont rush urself and respond from ignorance
Can we all have some good serious conversation?
This is the result when you talk to Muslims, you shouldn't think you are dealing with reasonable people
Your Qur'an doesn't talk about climate change , AI revolution, human populations, consciousness, etc why ??@void arch
True and let's leave it
look at this
@thorny steeple
You cant prove god = cant use him as a reason to justify anything.
I don't want to waste my time reading or talking about quran or some bullshit
"Santaclause said I could do this"
Lol, this is the main argument in this chat
Why does it has to be?
I hate it so ,
Do not impose what you have in belief in others , please , just be singular like we all are humans that's it and try to dispute or discuss the keys aspects
Because this chat has recently been invaded by Muslims and they are all quite fanatical
ur making a claim that the only supporter is the hadith in the case of Aisha age ,if u dont stick with it dont make the claim.
Not so hard to ignore right?
First tell him to not bring here Qur'an verse
And then only we can have serious chat or discussion
Here everything is Islam-centric, so it's hard to talk about anything else
where did i do that?!.. my reply was about the Aisha RA age ,since they use our Hadith to establish their claim,they should be ready to accept the counter argument from the same source
hopefully u understand
Mam we can't control what others say, it's best to ignore
Let's try to do so, do you have something to talk about?
What ever they did , why do we have to discuss the same topic over and over ,
So you mean you can't think of anything on your mind yourself????
Even marrying 9 year old girls
not only 1 but 4 9 years old girls
they are the ones who bring it ... before 100yr ppl never talked about it from many atheistic or non islamic background bcz it was common and the norm , but those ppl born last day they sleep and wake up on "Aisha married at 9" 🤡
This is probably what Allah wishes
please mind ur business ..i didnt reply to u ,nor i called u ..
First we have to control them , it's everywhere like every time and it's so disgusting...if someone spoke to be rational then they will say islamphobic 😭😭🤮🤮
indiaa n u?
Garbage 🗑️😔
"we have to control them" what this sentence tend to mean ?!!!!!!!!!!!!
can i join
Talk in a normal conclusion, be a conceptual not religion...
and still migrantes yo Europe
who are u to impose ur subjective ideals on me?!
yet claiming i impose my thoughts on ppl
said Anguya
very funny
What they eat I Never get this , this is not going to get rid off , like never
"I hate the western world"- Written from an apartment in the suburbs of Berlin
@dapper laurel do something
Lmao aren't you pretending to be Muslim on another server
Go make another earth , go to Mars sir , please
I have to pull some baddies
Talk about islam there a lot 😁✨ happy happy happy ..
Yes, that's why I'm totally crazy
Hell yeah, continue the chad Augustus blood
Muslim larper in other servers
Western defender in the English hub
Europe is goated
All my homies hate merican politics
And don't be so worried about death , first make life better , think about the next generation too what we are leaving for them.
@void arch
Place or countries have been displaced and scattered because of having belief or faith in one particular'' holy stone '' like wars in Gaza and Israel..
This is halal
People had enough food , shelter to live but still because of some faith or belief they have been in trouble and lost their lives!!!
Isn't this because of stories, a fictional story..rather than research and countering in real issues
??
im not worried about death . im preparing for death.
This sounds mad out of context, you can say I'm preparing for akhra
Lol bro is neither serious, just don't get .
He's a good lad, always being consistent
Most of the time against my personal beliefs
Well why are people afraid of dying like shit just joined the army
China
u have to judge the scripture not ppl ,having faith in God is not a necessary a reason for wars , 95% of most wars are not religious... and for the war on gaza its not as u want to see .. Judaism condemns the occupation of that land bcz they should not do it before the coming of the Masih .. not to mention that Zionism is an atheistic originated movement that claims some sort of God promised them a land when they reject his existence .
Yo lil
Maybe , he could be , only possible if he could think out of his scriptures holy quran.
likewise
Hello stray cat
I think you forgot why caliphate or crusader were created
Everyone is free to do whatever they want unless they're hurting someone, I'm strong supporter of freedom of expression
i love life ,but im not afraid of the idea of death .
Then join army 🪖

Ni hao ma ?
I am good thanks
Aah nice
secret
Like your life
u have to read history and compare between the two ... just Salh dine al ayouby can give a great idea of the rules and laws of war in islam, crusaders they kill and erase any city or village they come across, while the muslims they fight in most historical cases they kill they fighter opponents.
Whatever
You didn't learn to cooperate ,
You are opposing, also it is visible..
So religion ,having faith or belief brought any peace ??
So then why still not considered
You're that closed book when people are trying to read u just don't open
i dont need to.
Well both were the same they did invade the lands and killed people so they can spread the message of their prophet and God also protect people from false gods
It's hurting already , they are blind faith..
Always in the same talk and had arguments..
This is not freedom
This is suppression and imposing others to be the same.
Why then ??
Why did Persian flee from Iran when conquest from caliphate started in Persia
They join police
I thought ur Chinese as well
Yatjung yuhyihn wihngyuhn batagu
They never talk about anything productive , like what's going on , what we need to do , for example climate to technology revolution and it's cause effect
Etc etc
Do you believe in god?
January is religious talk season
Why believe in god who likes to be praise all the time
True, I don't even believe in myself
Yeah we should eliminate all people who doesn't talk about technology and science etc, this way we'll get rid of 80% of the population in the world
yes having faith brought peace in harmony in the world in spain and palestine where the 3 major religions lived in peace in harmony for more than 1000 yrs and still in other places..
just look at what islam realy teaches and ull be fascinated ..
and opposing ur faith or ideals or ur morality doesn't mean i have to kill u or u have to do the same .. i respect u as well u do the same in accordance with no harm dealt to anyone.
They have the right to be whatever the want
If god exists he won't have a problem if I pray or not
Most of the important part of life is to live in fullest while walking on Right path
Humanity is God for me.
History is my favourite subject..
History means the future , how it would be in the upcoming generation of humans , civilization, morals and values , ethics etc
From the birth to end u have u only so at least believe in yourself
Interesting, I'd like hear how history means the future from your perspective
Just say f..k and take chances even if you're afraid nobody is gonna remember u after 50 years
CCP should rule the world
Or Singaporean
Only once in a lifetime maybe , lol
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Martyrs_of_Córdoba
Very peaceful
The Martyrs of Córdoba were forty-eight Christian martyrs who were executed under the rule of Muslim administration in Al-Andalus (name of the Iberian Peninsula under the Islamic rule). The hagiographical treatise written by the Iberian Christian and Latinist scholar Eulogius of Córdoba describes in detail the executions of the martyrs for capit...
🔥🔥
It's not even true
Abrahamic faith never lived in harmony until they reached their golden age and fell into the dark ages
Lol if it's funny how the god of islam gets angry n gives you hell if you don't praise/acknowledge him
Like you have to learn homo sapiens, nexus , of ynh !
I love his vision and concerns..🙌✨
Sams for Jesus lol
To pretend that any of them ever were tolerant is ridiculous, maybe better than the alternative but peaceful? That's ridiculous. Not even most pagans and Buddhists were
I'm descendent of Neanderthals
Yeah I had to check as if it is convincing or not 😁🤣
It wasn't even peaceful in Palestine, the Ottomans silenced Muslims, Christians and Jews alike
By the end of their empire the situation was completely out of control
These three religions are Chaos lol
Well they created the history with wars
I think most wars
Whole region was chaotic, they wouldn't survive without fighting
Eh idk there is ancient history, with many wars that we don't know of
True
Some of them were driven by religion as well to an extent, some priest or oracle that pretended having visions of conflicts
It was all about power, they had wars within their religion
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/1917_Jaffa_deportation
There is this as well, so much for peaceful Palestine
Tel Aviv and Jaffa deportation was the expulsion on April 6, 1917, of 10,000 people from Jaffa, including Tel Aviv, by the authorities of the Ottoman Empire in Palestine. The evicted civilians were not allowed to carry off their belongings, and the deportation was accompanied by severe violence, starvation, theft, persecution and abuse. It is th...
2k Christians+Muslims
8k Jews
Well it was chaotic but it became more when christian empire and the Islamic empire wanted to rule all over it why they were so peaceful during the golden age why suddenly they became hungry for war during dark ages
Who still take the info from Wikipedia?
what that has to do with the discussion ... there is no documented historical evidence says a genocide was committed against other ppl .. this article state the excutionof some ppl under the islamic law "The Mālikī jurist al-Qayrawānī (d. 996 AD) distinguished between two kinds of insult: an outright attack against Islam, made by ill intent and therefore punishable by death according to the Islamic death penalty, and a simple declaration of one's own religion. In this last case, the Christian could not be held accountable for this offense. If one insulted Islam beyond the needs of his religion, he or she would have to be executed.[5] "
You can simply look it up
https://orientxxi.info/l-orient-dans-la-guerre-1914-1918/the-expulsion-of-the-jews-from-tel-aviv-jaffa-to-the-lower-galilee-1917-1918,1456
And what they spread is like they can't have others faith or belief or they can't participate in others ideology, like that is sin or they are haram lol logic.
Where did I say a genocide took place? Lol
They should pay me to not insult some of you
what the point of u bringing a judicial operation ?
Yeah i knew that guy you don't have to tell me
Iam arab and also My name is Jamal 
So iam the one who knows those people
These People always cry for Palestinians but nobody thinks about western sahar which is facing the same thing because the country invading is Morocco
Because persecutions and executions took place perhaps? Saying it was peaceful is either naive or completely dishonest
True 🇪🇭
morocco be doing the same thing yet no tears about it kek
@void arch why don't you go cry a river over your country's genocide ?
do you guys know about 2012 ?, Many people speculated that this date would bring about apocalyptic events in 2012, Mayan civilization's prediction was that ,the world would end in 2012 based on Mayan calendar
I think they may have been correct
im not saying all thing were perfect .. but im talking generally .
That's about the time that the world started to crumble
Nobody gives a shit about african country because they aren't arab or white
Yes I watched in 2012 movie lol
Generally it was not…
💀 i wonder that so many people was believing that shit
The issue at hand is that certain types of ideology are more prone to radicalization than others. Religion being chief-most among them.
Well they said something like the end of the world but it was their end of civilization
Everything will be fine if people correct their religious dogmatism part
so true
How old are you
The issue is the focus on anti-empiricism and anti-out-group sentiment these ideologies are prone to.
50
most all conflicts have been started worsened or perpetuated because of these attributes
first of all treating western Sahara like palestine situation is completely illogical and unrealistic .
before colonialism morocco has clear and strong evidences about his merit of sovereignty on that land ..
in western sahara there are a lot of Saharan ppl live under the Moroccan government.
the Moroccan government deals with the subject with diplomacy . and it extends to give them autonomous government under the Moroccan sovereignty .
Imperialism moment
^^
kinda just proved a few principle issues of ideological radicalization
Same reason why religion and nationalism tend to go hand in hand
"we deserve that land even pre-colonization"
"they are under our rule"
"muuh diplomacy so it's okay"
these same arguments can be used for israel yk that right ?
Imperialism is fine, you just need to have the piece of paper that says so
but somehow it's different
You're reminding me about a japanese grandpa I met
Well it's pretty much the same for that land for which all three religions are crying
if Israel got the siege wall around Gaza, then Morocco has the sandwall and landmines around what's left of Western Sahara
Good morning
Ayoub. Please… take the L and move on
Hi
Good evening
Hi
I’m okay and you ?
Here is the list of countries where it's easier to die on an hill
I'm also good
What language do you speak
More like tryna scam
I’m from the United States
Where is faroe
Sunken
Hello
Ohh which state?
welcome to the server trina
🇹🇷 🇹🇷 💪 🇹🇷 🇹🇷 💪 🇹🇷 🇹🇷 💪 🇹🇷 🇹🇷 💪 🇹🇷 🇹🇷 💪 🇹🇷 🇹🇷 💪 🇹🇷 🇹🇷 💪 🇹🇷 🇹🇷 💪
another classic Turkish W
😭
And the Balkan region is the highest on average, makes perfect sense
Ohh nice
And you ?
Baltics be having it lower yet they usually score the highest in su*cide, that's quite the dedication
Never copy this gif's media link and paste in the chat, you're most likely to get muted 💀
Wdym that's a Korean word
Good morning, how are you, how old are you, do you work, study, hobby
hahahahaha i keep forgetting it has that name
There's no way koreans speak Spanish
On a better note i love sweden, few days ago I was chatting about it with my homies
I just met a spanish person who speaks korean
it's a nice place to visit, and a great one to get introduced to Arab culture as well
니가
that land was Moroccan ,Morrocans lived their under spanish colonialism..
its not about they are under rule its about some Sahrawines accept living under Moroccan sovereignty . and Morocco has clear and strong historical evidences prove his merit of that land. while isreal has nothing except "God promised us that land"
Morocco use diplomacy when they offer realistic offers to solve the problem peacefully under the international law. like autonomy proposal and extend to call for a vote to chose between morocco or Polisario government but this solution is unclear due to the difficulty to establish the needed ppl who should vote .
while isreal never existed as a state until by power and invasion of Palestine with the political and economical aid of the west, they commit a genocide several times .they dont care about international laws. and have only one rule "this land is only ours" .
the isreal invasion is a colonial imperialistic problem while the western Sahara conflict is a self-determination and and a post colonization problem .
(・o・)
Do we really need Minecraft here to explain how a country is born?
Dayamm that's a new kind
And that law without enforcement is the same as toilet paper?
So proud of my country
Well I met a girl who speaks 14 language
That's my mum
Is she greek?
Unfortunately no, she isn't
Oh you're finnish
well thanks for making it easy to reply to.
Morocco didn't control Western Sahara in 19th century (which is when colonizers like Spain came)
the rest of your points are slippery slope, since Morocco doesn't have right to that land, just an ex-imperial force crying about the new big imperial powers that made a twink out of it
Dayammmm i barely speak my native
Is she a teacher or something
No, but she lived in many countries and enjoyed language learning
Does Neapolitan count as a language?
Yes
I can say that I speak 4 languages on my resume
Calabrian is the one that isn't an actual language because it's divided in two varieties, one closer to Neapolitan/Campanian and the other to Sicilian
Dyamm that's really great
Nabboletano
Guys would you rather have a big house or travel around the world?
😳 honestly neither, a big house is horrible because it takes a lot of resources to clean it all or to fill it with stuff
Have a big camper so I can do both
Please…
No…
Alright i won't say anything racist

https://youtu.be/OWtQ7bmr1SE?si=T6HKfu3X-73J2K1T Paolo sizzi speaks a good lombardian @dense agate
Introdüssiù in lèngua oròbega del canàl del “Tübo”, gestìt del Lombardista, ol Pól Séss. Cültüra, identidà e tradissiù, ‘n del nòm di Lombardée. Mia tat polìtega ma pötòst la natüra de la mé tèra e del mé pòpül. Per chèi che i mastèga mia bergamàsch e lombàrd ve rimande al filmàt de presentassiù de l’öltima ólta.
P.S.: qui adopero, scrivendo, i...
i dont see any logical objection in ur respond ..it seems u have accepted that ur claim is fragile right ?..
ur claims that Morocco doesn't have right to that land is unrealistic ,bcz Morocco has a strong and historical documented evidences .. although Morocco still calls for diplomacy and searching for a realistic solution as i mention .
Today you had a long discussion with him, did you guys come to agreement?
But do people of western Sahara say, it's like israeli and Palestinians both telling their historical rights
isreal has no historical right make them eradicate the Palestinians and expelled them from their land .. isreal Palestine issue is an invasion and imperialistic movement.
while western Sahara issue is a self determination and post colonialism issue between same ppl they all speak same language ,same religion and same history. but with deff political views . Morocco dont want to lose his land while some Saharawin want self determination
Well both sides says same shit
Hard to believe who is right
it s not the same obv
reading history is a clear proof
REGIME BORN FROM GUNS - Mao Zedong
SURVIVAL FOR THE FITTEST
LAW/RULE WITHOUT ENFORCEMENT IS TOILET PAPER
those are my fav statements
pure truth
this sentence was a reason for many radical Ideologies that cause most of recent wars
Mincraft if was a leader would be a great dictator
should study politics
I don't see how recent war is relating to this rule of nature
ww1 ww2
if you don't like wars, just higher the price tag
i like wars only in games
if there was, then there must be still little pricy than other stuff
c'mon that's how market works
why you think people or regimes have to start a war if they have to pay a lot from it ?
but what if they are already paying that much to start a war, and they did it, why you think the price of war is above the price of peace ?
this is a business thing bro
im talking about how like statements that hold no objective nor logical scale encouraged ppl to such brutal actions during the past
countries doesn't give any shit to that ideology
war is easy but establishing peace is hard
well I mean superpowers, not some puppets caring that shit under their master nation
superpowers would just do what they want in a cheaper price
then if it's pricy to have a war, why not peace ?
if it's pricy to have peace, why not war ?
simple logics
Ooh now you realise ?? 🤩🤣
did i call for war ?
So bringing Qur'an Verse either doesn't bring peace
puppet would only do what superpowers allowed them to do lol otherwise they pay a price
ofc if they want to get independent from those superpowers, they got a lot to pay
Then why did you brought 🤣
which verses do u mean?
who do u think the puppets are?
Every time allah wallah you keep mentioned
A puppet state, puppet régime, puppet government or dummy government is a state that is de jure independent but de facto completely dependent upon an outside power and subject to its orders. Puppet states have nominal sovereignty, except that a foreign power effectively exercises control through economic or military support. By leaving a local g...
Why
are u mad at that ? without knowing what those verses state .. u just blindly hating things u dont understand
even if they gained independence in modern era, they can still be considered as puppets in many factors
formally got independence means nothing
ik what puppet state means but what country can be seen as puppet?
it means everything when they acted against those factors
i told u why just reread my replies
hummm hard to define, I can tell my own definition
Yes of course , if you imposed some one and says only source of truth then of course I have the right to speak 😎
yes about 11 Africans countries still being colonized indirectly by france as France control their currency >> economy >> Political
when did i say that .
lets bring back gulags and concentration camps.
Why ??
for example Japan got their golden era almost 2-3 decades ago, but that was ended by an agreement almost forced by the United States
and that directly caused economic collapse
to bring the world into control
lets bring back the good ol nazi soviet days
I guess bro has a short memory loss 🤣
send me the agreement. i didnt knwo that , but ik that japan is more of a puppet to the US like the Philippines..
No
I hope the world itself destroys and heals again
lol
And next era not human , better other creatures
no i dont ,as far as i remember i do not impose the Quran on someone while i establish why the Quraan is the truth ,then its up to u to accpet
reading quran is haram
Evolve .
haram
your roblox name is that of an old historian am i right?
yes it s a well known traveler, he is the first one to visit almost the known world
from Tangier
i see
bro got muted
maybe for this
some Japanese didnt like u bro hhah
@void arch okay tell me what are halas , like a few activities..
For me for example I don't find killing some creature is halal to sophisticate one's own life so what can you say like it's a peaceful, really???
Like for pleasure anything....
well ,killing for pleasure to any creature even for food is foribidden in Islam.
but how u could define slaughtering of a sheep fo survival is immoral?
Ah now here is a different story..
or why animals eat each others ?
from an atheistic background u cant say this is immoral!
@void arch
Are you an animal , do every animal eat other animals ???
Does chicken eat meat or cow eat meat ??
Why do you eat animals for then? To suffer or to get pleasure?
Well chicken does lol
i eat them for survival ,bcz im designed to be capable of benefiting from that kind of food
What is meant by conscious and ethical human beings then ?? A rational human being. . .
Bru like you can't survive without meat
No actually they are fed soya beans
And other seeds
according to that nothing is subjective not everyone see things the same
But bro vegetrian also survive without these
Well chickens eats other chickens apparently
R u atheist bro?
Lol
Better say you have greed , nothing like a peace mind .
You have plenty of food to eat but you choose violence wow and says most peaceful religion bla bla..
A human being.
Nice
Lol
Bro decided that from one random video , chicken eats chicken..
You can try it yourself lol
i could do but why i have to be imposed not eat meat ?! , add that altho scientific studies shows that a short vegan date is healthy but also for a long term studies see that has a bad consequences like deficiencies of some crucial vitamins and minerals not to mention that structural damage of bones and muscles .
Well source please I'd like learn it aswell?
do u know calling ppl to a date based on only vegan is not realistic it s problematic ..what are u calling for is chaos and hunger.
I just got a conservation in that mute channel with nale
nothing more I was not being muted for that
@upper peak just asking Are you Indian?
Who the vegan faced the problematic or didn't find realistic , show me ?? Source or Articles ..
our produced amount will not be enough for all the world , the prices will increase .. and ppl will not be able to afford buying avocados and crucial vegetables that is needed to replace the amount of crucial materials needed to maintain a healthy body
thats why relying on just plants is problematic
Have you ever studied that even because of adulteration in cultivation and over breeding of animals causing global issues , like first the human population and next is animal farming and industry..
No , near India but not from india..
Nepali ig
A lack of vitamin D (deficiency) can affect your bones and overall health. Learn who is at risk, how much vitamin D you need, and how to get enough.
Health authorities increasingly recommend a more plant-based diet, rich in fruits, vegetables, pulses, whole grains and nuts, low in red meat and moderate in dairy, eggs, poultry and fish which will be beneficial for both health and the environment. ...
Recently, vegetarian diets have experienced an increase in popularity. A vegetarian diet is associated with many health benefits because of its higher content of fiber, folic acid, vitamins C and E, potassium, magnesium, and many phytochemicals and a fat content that is more unsaturated. Compared wi …
Okay cool
Clam down man dont be so proud
Yes but bro these type of research is for meat eaters also
I was being ironic
Damnn good humour😭
Mashallah to my humour
i agree that industry is problematic but do u agree that calling for global strict vegan diet is also problematic..
and here is ur argument : "ppl should avoid eating meat completely bcz the industry is bad "
u didnt solve the problem nor u give a reasonable logical solution.
@void arch whatever deficiency is mentioned , it's neither in meat as well , that's because you kind of people don't want to learn global warming etc but after producing more and talks about Allah wallah beliefs only..lol
Wrong server
yes bcz both a strict vegan or strict meat diet is unhealthy ..i defend the normal balanced diet based on both meat and plants
Definitely wrong server
Come together in the ground and let's solve the issues then it could be , 95% animal cruelty we can save , can you ???
Are you a vegan?
why bring religion ?!.
i m against meat strict diet also.
I might become one in the future
I would like to finish puberty first
Yeah that should be the way
In other event the SCOTUS is upholding the TikTok ban
Because the body needs as much variety of foods as possible to grow fully, and I would like to surpass my father in height this year
Event?
hi
I support TIKToK's ban
Im also so happy i never installed tiktok in my life
This is one of my biggest achivments as well as twitter and snapchat
I like TikTok, really no issue tbh.
Goat achivement
Because religion talks about peace and meat comes from violence..
Of course, no animals come to you to serve on your dinner plate.
You and we trapped them ,
How much they get frightened or tried to espace from thier life murdering..
I'm proud of you. Do the same with all social media
Yeah good nourishment is really really important, forcing veganism to young people is absurd
I limit my social media intake, doomscrolling doesn’t help.
Yes, but I will probably become vegan because it makes you live longer
Tiktok ban seems to be a PR move in my opinion
If you want to collect data you can literally buy it
It absolutely is a PR move
Wth I'd love to live a long healthy life, i won't be a hard core vegan tho
ur objection is based on emotional reaction ..
u have first to establish why eating meat for survival reason is immoral objectively ?
And it's a good one for sure
Because it's not moral to kill other lives
The only animal I will eat when I become vegan will be my cat, when it is about to die, I will eat it, I love it too much and I want it to be part of me
Isn't morality subjective
And how Islam is so perfect and the ultimate truth..
Agree that islam or any religion is neither peaceful nor it about moral values and disciplines etc
plants arent alive?
They don't have nervous system, blood n brain
That's wild, stop hanging out with Minecraft
No, not subjective
We should start eating Sponges, f SpongeBob
Do they sense , do they bleed or are they mammals , do they have offspring..lol
they are alive right ?! , then ur objection of killing animals for food isn't a logical objection nether they experience pain or not ...
Fun fact plant experience pain differently
I don't watch that dumb cartoon
they experience pain definitely in different methods
they are a living creatures and that is enough to reject ur claim
Bro turned into Jeffrey dahmer
Not creatures
oooo
Who are you bro
I like cats tho
Catnibal
Saimon is cooking something
Either I'll eat it or I'll display his skull in my room as a memento
Thanks mr ross
what are they ?..stones .
a living creature by definition is a creatures that breath, reproduce, grows, and has a nutritional system.. A living organism can therefore be defined as anything that has life, consisting of cells as its basic unit of organization
yup
Nah definitely Jeffrey fan
I don't know him
Good for you
Imagine comparing plants to animals
This means even if your nail grows and hair grows , if you cut them does they feel pain???
What kind of logic lol
I feel pain when i cut my hair
You think veganism is morally correct
I think you can eat whatever you want
Doesn't this discussion prove that morality is subjective
And my hair told me that it feels pain too
Good point, Our hair n nails grow and is also not dead in his logic
"logical objection"
that whether they take the diplomatic approach or not, it's irrelevant to the fact they are an occupier force, they don't rightfully belong there.
ICJ ruled so, even Morocco didn't hold control of it the century before it got colonized.
they are like any imperial occupying force and Israel, refuse to acknowledge their right of self determination, and having referendums.
you can throw all historical arguments you want they would serve nothing, right to self determination is king.
all other arguments are copy paste of the same stuff you criticize israel for, if double standard could kill, you'd be dead long ago
imagine u differentiating between things that living creature and preferring to eat some and abolish others
Your hair is a plant, it doesn't have sense
Yeah okay..
You do without hurting or less hurt by yourself..
But see how the other living creatures have been exploited
Well you can't decide what's moral lol
It took you this long to type this
i was afk :(
How can you decide it then?
and gotta always be bringing the milk
You're definitely white
I mean his decision is cursed
Long live Great Imperial Morocco
whats white - black bro we all are human 
Lombard larper
Then why does girls prefer bbc
I was legit planning to dive into a deep philosophical discussion about morality, after reading this statement, I won't waste my time 
We all bleed red
Red salute
Enlighten me mr. Wise
now you're commie ??
ur comparing a part of a body to a whole living creature..it s a false equivalence
Yeah until I'm rich, this seems to be the way
I definitely appreciate a mixed economy
Extreme side is always problematic
with all it's infinite variants

