#đ§ ď˝serious-chat
1 messages ¡ Page 371 of 1
Not really, the difference of opinion is just an excuse, the goal since time immemorial has been to steal resources, expand territories and impose force
Chinese people generally don't believe in any religions
Doesn't mean they cannot, they used to after all
What if a new mandate of heaven comes
That wouldn't happen. Though I don't even believe in a new religion logically, there'll be more conflict happening. Let's just take an example that is happening around us: the religion that has already existed for a long time. Those followers of each religion are debating with one another about which religion is the most correct. So, a new religion would just create a new conflict.
It could be a new religion that unites those people with disagreements, even if temporarily
You can easily trick them through technology
Fair reason. Those invaders are mostly targeting the opponent's resources; for example, in the Middle East, the war between the us and its allies against Saddam Hussein. All they want is the massive resources that they have.
Religion means having a strong belief. So, if you use the word "trick," then you can't even call it a religion. Though many people tried to make a new religion, in the end, the government targeted them.
Many people tried making a new religion and succeeded, tricking others into believing in it always was part of it. Think of all the oracles or prophets that claimed to be speaking for their deities
Just one face of the greed of wars ..
I never knew about that information, but thanks for letting me know. In my neighborhood countries, many tried to make that new religion but in the end, they were just being targeted and got ended. Also, many people have strong beliefs in their religion. Those who leave their original religion into the "new religion" you called are mostly non-strong believers. Sorry, this is the end of talking topic about religion because I'm afraid I will say something wrong that might make me sin.
That's how the world work sadly, we can't change anything much.
Hi what u talking about
Many people that join newer religious movements are fervent believers that think it's a new message
I give you a trip, learn some Mandarin before you go to china, yeah most of Chinese apps there is no English subtitles or change to English language,also most of people donât speak really well English, okay but good luck
There you go
Change it ? What do u mean ? We the humans who do this, how can we change something that we do it ourselves? Existence is bound to continue like this unless at least an exception is made
Most of people don't speak English?
most of them knows some basic English language i think but you can find English speakers usually in big cities, among The younger generation and professionals are more likely to be fluent
No need to dominate anything�
It is helpful to know some basic mandarin anyway
thats what i want to say,too
Reptile hegemony is just
You were just saying that nah include the Uyghurs and Tibetan people generally
Basically most people do practice religion mostly like in rural areas
Yes, because the church will give eggs. If you are a believer
Sorry if I am confusing you, but what I meant is that human nature behavior is greedy. Even if you manage to make a difference, there'll be always a greedy person who'll be against that thing.
Indeed. The poor want to be rich while the rich want to stay rich. They don't want to be as equal
The first part of what you said is correct. Comparing the environment in which you lived to the principles of humanity in general is wrong. In reality, the majority are the ones who constitute greed, while the minority are the ones who desire to fight it (without making any moves on the ground, except for those whom God has mercy on)
Rich wanna be more rich
Nah we need to dominate everything for our interest
At least everything we can
Every country is trying to do so no exception
You guys are the dominant power ofc you donât want to be challenged
Same logic for us if we are the country which controls almost everything around the world
National interest above all
And our government is struggling to be beneficial to us
Only.
And we are determined to get what we wanted on the world for us
Survival for the fittest
Lol now I guess Donald Trump himself is above the law
You guys can convict him but canât arrest him
He is a person who committed felonies, but judges canât do anything to him @shy summit
Trump got sentenced to âno sentenceâ
Heâll get his eventually
He is a criminal, he committed felony
But judges canât do anything on him
He can be a dictator if he want I think
A guy who committed felony could be the president of the United States
That was irony
No we have guardrails
Without personal feelings to Donald Trump, I wanna say your system has broken
Thereâs no anything could justify a person who committed felony can be sentenced to none while leading the country
why is selling drugs illegal but selling porn is not
Idk
Sex is our biological need?
porn isnt sex
it s about profet and money
Bro's having sex through his pc
If that was true, then drugs would also be legal
drugs are legal ..like alcohol segarets
Can be said about any social activity
Sure - And marijuana isn't, neither is cocaine etc.,
yes
But you're getting ar0u$ed and 0rga$m
Being a simulacrum isn't the same as the deal itself - And you get stimuli from drugs
they avoid making their society instable so they ll kill their citizens .. they want a way where they can make money without causing a lot of damage that leads to death in a small period
Again - This is irrelevant. Your argument is that porn is legal and drugs isn't because of profit and money; this is nonsensical because all illicit drugs are a billion dollar industry
i said why bcz the damage of some type of drugs is very dangerous to the society and economy ... add that the ppl see porn safer than those type of drugs
Who would watch porn if they could get to have s3x with anybody? Desire n pleasure
Great - So then your first argument was wrong. #đ§ ď˝serious-chat message
i just didnt put it in a the right form
im eating
I don't see why that's relevant to anything that's been said so far. Your argument is a naturalistic fallacy - Sex is as natural as lack of sex
lol
So without taking external substance you're playing with your body and imagination n tricking yo brain into pleasure
Yes. This doesn't mean much. The reasoning for why 'sex is a biological need,' but many drugs and substances trigger similar biological needs; dopamine is pretty much essential for very basic human functions
Masturbation is
So the argument - "Porn is legal due to biological need" goes for drugs too
porn is addiction is a more dangerous than heroine and coca** in case of damaging the brain ,]..read book "brain under
Dopamine is there to motivate n reward you to survive n reproduce
Exactly. A biological need. It also interacts with mood, movement and memory
Wow interesting topic
cause of adhd is a lack of dopamine, or fried dopamine responders
book :your brain under the influence of porn by gary wilson
Nobody is arguing for or against porn
just a benificial book recommendation
Sure - but the subject is also highly contentious
Due to difficulty establishing causation
That doesn't make any sense, you don't directly need drugs they're not biological need, you're 'abusing' your body with it
Neither is masturbating or sex. So again, your argument is either wrong, or it's wrong.
What's common similarities between sex nd masturbation
I could go my entire life without sex
Sexual arousal and stimuli
Lol no, heroin and cocaine are hard drugs that can directly cause damage in certain regions of the brain and fundamentally alters the brainâs rewards pathway, you absolutely can not compare any sort of sexual activity to it
its due to power of this industry that make ppl rethink before judging them by facts and scientific evidences
Your body is wired to survive and reproduce
That's an assumption without any substantiation on your part. It also doesn't make it wrong.
Same as my body is wired towards acquiring dopamine - I.e., drugs
So your argument really doesn't make any sense
there is a study by a scientist shows that the damage of the brain caused by pron is higher and dangerous than those type of drugs just look up at google
So that we can say objectively we could survive without sex in our whole life ?
Not through drugs, dopamine is a reward that encourages you to do things such as eating the better food, sleeping, gaining information, reproducing etc
We can. And many do. And many die without ever having it
No, thatâs just plain wrong. Drugs physically change our bodies in ways that are often immediate and life threatening, porn does not. End of story.
This doesn't mean anything. Your argument is that it's a natural impulse. If acquiring dopamine is a natural impulse, it's as natural to get dopamine through drugs as it is through porn; both are a simulacrum.
Doesn't matter if i have dopamine to acquire food - Sure, i also have sexual lust to get sex, doesn't justify your view of porn. If anything, it justify the view against it by making it a parralel to drugs
Acquiring dopamine is not your goal
Neither is 'sex' under this assumption.
I'm not saying porn is good either
Because reason why people want sex is because it gives pleasure; same way doing drugs is. Dopamine is a mechanism towards food, same way arousal is towards sex. So the parralel is 1-1 between porn and drugs
So why does ppl need it to survive with biological need ?
Doesn't matter - There's a clear parralel between both
Notice how the language throughout the article doesnât directly address that itâs as bad as hardcore drugs, it only mentions that compulsive porn watchers might have similar psychological issues to those found by drug users, but thatâs the keyword, compulsive. This is nothing a normal person has to fear compared to anyone who consumes even the tiniest amount of a hardcore drug like cocaine.
So, this is where my inner scientist comes out - How do they show this. It's one thing they claim to show something, the problem is how they do it.
Itâs all nothing but sensationalist fearmongering, the average person has nothing to fear as long as they follow the golden rule of moderation and not allowing something to control their life
biological need can be fulfilled by marriage or a real relationship.. not by porn it lead to addiction of ur brain to these things can affect ur brain specially ur cortex that is responsible for crucial activities in daily life
That's the thing exactly to notice. Correlation is used as a stand-in for causation. That's why articles like this should be read with a pair of critical glasses
here about drugs
.
The pleasure aspect can be
I have a few questions about these studies, how did they control people, who were in the "didn't watch porn" group?
Drug is different machenism to get relex body and pleasure but sex is far different from that ? Sex has to ntg with drug ? And dopamine is fuel of our body
There are three factors to sexual activities and only one need be met at a time for minimal efficacy
The parralel is that we meet certain bodily desires through a substitute to what those desires often mediate.
Pleasure, pair-bonding, reproduction
Even then - Is what they find a matter of reverse causation. For instance, is it porn that makes people impulsive, or impulsive people that watch porn?
The latter
Itâs the chasing of dopamine
porn addictives defending porn
I'm not going to take a side in this. Because there's general argument in favor of either case. And there's reason to contemplate both arguments.
Thus why ADHD people are more prone to addictive behavior
Even if someone's addicted to porn, doesn't mean the defence of it is wrong
everthing is presented by evidence u all just arguing on waste
Thatâs a big reach to say people here are porn addicts
Read the first line of the article please, it directly says that this should not be taken as porn being as addictive as drugs lol
im not generalizing
'Presented by evidence,' the evidence you've supplied offers nothing conclusive. It offers statistical correlations, not causality
Our brain produces the neurotransmitters which are essential for mood regulation, pain tolerance n memory etc but Drugs mimic it and activate the same receptor excessively
Same way that porn and masturbation simulate sexual gratification and the sexual act, yes.
I haven't saying that porn is good for our Brain and whatever but drug ? U guys really think that drug and sex has same machenism to get body relax and give pleasure?
addicting porn is not like having real intercource
Why do you keep pulling articles that literally say the same stuff when we already established that compulsive != average people lol?
So I know this article. This article's study doesn't prove the claim it presents, rather, it shows that people who are chronic porn watchers show similar symptoms to drug addicts. In statistics, we learn to read these type of articles critically; confounder variables are often to be considered.
" The new study, published in the journal PLOS ONE shows that sex addiction, scientifically known as compulsive sexual behavior, may actually be similar to drug addiction in the brain."
look
Studies are not true simply because they're studies.
Thatâs like saying water is dangerous because you can die if you drink a certain amount of it, while forgetting to mention that the amount is so ridiculously high that most people have nothing to fear, itâs just fearmongering.
Although compulsive sexual behaviour (CSB) has been conceptualized as a âbehaviouralâ addiction and common or overlapping neural circuits may govern the processing of natural and drug rewards, little is known regarding the responses to sexually explicit materials in individuals with and without CSB. Here, the processing of cues of varying sexual...
Or that cancer causes life because it happens in living organisms
idc if u dont believe in the evidence
I don't "believe" the "evidence" because what you've presented isn't actual evidence for the claim you've made. That's the point. What you've supplied are correlations that fail to prove causality
this research compare the brain of an addict to porn to another addict to drugs
Its not nearly the same
That's why I'm asking you how they acquire those results
I donât know what to tell you, a study doesnât mean itâs magically true. You really need to research more on how Academia works lol, trust me itâs not as honest as it seems.
the one of the addict to porn is worse
If you can specifically explain why this should be a concern Iâll switch to your side
That's true, but unlike the case of water, when you're getting pleasure your body can't easily stop it, you're overstimulated
Blind trust of science is a fool's game - 71% of all scientific publishing is factually incorrect, that's sufficient reason enough to doubt something
The issue is that drug addiction is simply far worse because its not only worse in severity but also because of the added side effects
I mean, Iâd argue that you canât easily stop drinking water either lol
This âMastrubation is Worseâ narrative has been pioneered since the 80âs
I mean, it took 50 years to demonstrate the smoking was bad for you. Before that, there was no clear evidence that it was a negative; even today we find evidence for the so-called 'smoker's paradox' that shows how smoking can help expand your lifespan.
it damages ur brain it snot natural for a human to be exposed to such material in this huge scale .. its will damage ur sexual activity in real life and make u all the time thinking of porn and when u can watch it again
we see it with the obesity paradox too; which is a statistical outcome due to a collider stratification bias, a statistical bias where we fail to control for a variable - In this case smoking - which makes obesity seem like it's health improving
it just a suicide
Great, so what is the âscaleâ you refer to? Because I assume you must know the specifics and all since you seem so sure
those research are done by well know universities and institutes .. ll be amazed if was saying porn is good for ur health
Give link to science research, it time journal.
We had a similar claim with alcohol
Although compulsive sexual behaviour (CSB) has been conceptualized as a âbehaviouralâ addiction and common or overlapping neural circuits may govern the processing of natural and drug rewards, little is known regarding the responses to sexually explicit materials in individuals with and without CSB. Here, the processing of cues of varying sexual...
Exactly. And a lot of it wasn't even conspiracy theory stuff. It's all due to the fact that statistics don't lie, people lie with statistics; or rather, people often time interpret statistics due to cognitive biases
Indeed
and we have an entire book industry around interpreting results in a sensationalist way, as you said above
You still donât get it, I never once said that itâs âgood for youâ, I said that you are fearmongering. In order for any of the risks of what you mention to come through, one must have an addiction, something that can literally be said for anything else one can get addicted to. A normal person has nothing to fear
Why I ask for 'method and data' and not 'results'
Bulshit. Nothing to discuss.
The title literally says correlates lol. Correlation isnât causation.
bro u dont start addictive from the beginning like alcoholics they dont start as addicted they just start with small amount and then their tolerance get higher and higher until addiction .. it says "prevention better than cure "..
Again. You say this, but you've not described how these studies comes to their results
It bulshit not studies.
Most studies are bullshit, so it's both
Just forget about links that he send
These researchs has not proof yet ... they're just neurologist article who claims about that
No, it depends where it was posted
That's not remotely true.
His links is nothing
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Replication_crisis Most peer reviewed papersa re generally and factually incorrect
The replication crisis is an ongoing methodological crisis in which the results of many scientific studies are difficult or impossible to reproduce. Because the reproducibility of empirical results is an essential part of the scientific method, such failures undermine the credibility of theories building on them and potentially call into questio...
Maybe some but not all ....
This study is riddled with flaws that make its conclusions shaky at best. First, it relies on a heavily biased sample, comparing an extreme, self-selected group against a control group cherry-picked for its lack of any issues. Second, the diagnostic criteria are subjective and controversial, relying on self-reports rather than objective measures. Third, it fails to fully account for confounding factors like depression, anxiety, and impulsivityâfactors that could easily explain the findings. The sample size is too small to be statistically robust, and the lack of diversity makes it impossible to generalize the results. Lastly, the neuroimaging data is overhypedâbrain activity alone doesnât prove causation, and the study leaps to conclusions it canât support. This isnât evidence; itâs a house of cards dressed up as science.
im not forcing u to accept their result im just showing what those researcher so far find of some encouraging evidences that addiction of porn is harmful for brain and likely can be dangerous as drugs
Most means majority - It also depends on fields; but if you watch Sabine Hossenfelder, we see a widespread practice of terrible science in theoretical physics, sociology, medicine, economics, political science, even in biology
Again. To reiterate the point stated above. Their 'evidence' isn't evidence, that's the point we've made so far. Having results and claiming what those results say are two different things; a study from Denmark showed citizenship reduced immigrant crime - Is that because citizenship lowers crime, or because people with a lower propensity to do crime are more likely to seek and get citizenship?
But porn addiction has not claim yet that it's real addictive mental health problem
Most research say that tooo
I'll explain to you how all respected scientific journals work. They receive a study with a request to publish it. They create an independent group of scientists in a related specialty, they check the data, and only then publish the information. Or don't publish. Those news that getting into news most often don't go through fact checking and never published.
This doesn't meaningfully prove your argument.
i don't have to convince anyone from u .. do whatever u want
And you're just saying things I know. Peer-review is an imperfect mechanism to acquire truth; riddled with biases and often time what we call publication bias
We also have nationality bias; truth biases etc., in peer review. Scientists are less likely to review or give thumbs up to an article that disagrees with their pre-established views, even if it's made in a better manner with stronger conclusive evidence for its proposition
The most common bias is of course publication bias.
if that didnt convince u try this one https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3050060/
there is no subject for discussion here if a person sends as evidence a link not to a study but to an article in the news. I wrote how it is published in the news
So no, it doesn't depend on where it's posted @prisma cipher - This argument is firstly, what we in logic call a genetic fallacy. I.e., it's a logical fallacy; an article that isn't peer reviewed can be as true, if not more true, than one that is. Secondly, peer review is not even establishment for certainty of proof, but my reflect deeper systematic biases
if u read just this one u ll find why addiction of porn is dangerous
Articles refers to studies. This is pretty much most of them.
https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0102419 this a study not a news
Although compulsive sexual behaviour (CSB) has been conceptualized as a âbehaviouralâ addiction and common or overlapping neural circuits may govern the processing of natural and drug rewards, little is known regarding the responses to sexually explicit materials in individuals with and without CSB. Here, the processing of cues of varying sexual...
And secondly, @prisma cipher this is a scientific paper.
Letâs narrow this down, do you mean porn or mastrubation
Same story, different package. The study leans on borrowed data, cherry-picks comparisons, and draws sweeping conclusions without solid, original research to back them up. Itâs all speculation, no substanceâanother house of cards waiting to collapse under scrutiny.
Yea. The case you're giving is a scientific article from a scientific journla
I wanna narrow down specifically what you mean Ayoub.
Por no graphy is not addictive machenism in term of disorder called csbd
https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0102419 it even gives you its DOI @prisma cipher
Although compulsive sexual behaviour (CSB) has been conceptualized as a âbehaviouralâ addiction and common or overlapping neural circuits may govern the processing of natural and drug rewards, little is known regarding the responses to sexually explicit materials in individuals with and without CSB. Here, the processing of cues of varying sexual...
To an extent I would agree but for more sociological reasons
CSB subjects were recruited via Internet-based advertisements and from referrals from therapists. Healthy volunteers were recruited from community-based advertisements in the East Anglia area. For the CSB group, screening was conducted using the Internet Sex Screening Test (ISST) [32] and an extensive investigator-designed questionnaire on details including age of onset, frequency, duration, attempts to control use, abstinence, patterns of use, treatment and negative consequences. CSB subjects underwent a face-to-face interview with a psychiatrist to confirm they fulfilled diagnostic criteria for CSB [6], [33], [34] (Table S1 in File S1) focusing on compulsive use of online sexually explicit material. All participants met proposed diagnostic criteria for Hypersexual Disorder [6], [33] and criteria for sexual addiction [34] (Table S1 in File S1).
This is its methodology. This is a questionable method
It also only has a dataset of 38
so the methodology is already questionable alongside its data-set being too small to say anything
Study has a questionable methodology + it has too small a data-set to say anything conclusive
i would agree on that but thats not enough to reject it
I would argue it presents an unhealthy objectification of relationships due to capitalism.
Bruhh it has been claimed that porn is not addictive machenism it's disorder....
Actually, it is enough to reject it. Its method doesn't support any conclusion, because it can be explained by a series of counterfactual cases, like you know, picking participants from a therapist?
This is why philosophy is better. You don't need to fuss with silly old experimental methods. You can just uncover the immutable laws of reality in the shower.
u have to prove that !
It's written in the paper
Philosophy is addictive too but
The current study has multiple limitations. First, the study involved only heterosexual male subjects, and future studies should examine individuals of various sexual orientations and females, particularly as girls with mental health concerns may exhibit high rates of CSB [67]. Second, although CSB subjects in the study met the provisional diagnostic criteria and demonstrated functional impairment relating to sex using multiple validated scales, there currently exist no formal diagnostic criteria for CSB and thus this represents a limitation for understanding the findings and placing them within the larger literature. Third, given the cross-sectional nature of the study, inferences about causality cannot be made.
Like, literally, the author acknowledges his study can't prove anything
philosophy dont lead to any truth if it was based on hyper-doubting
I have a question for you, do you play videogames?
And:
Thus, the small sample and lack of a whole brain corrected approach is a limitation.
I agree, but not all philosophers are Descartes
Why I moved away from science tbh - Too many poorly made studies within my field and too many idiots believing them
And even Descartes thought that he could establish a lot (whether or not he actually did is another matter)
Ah, so you play video games? Careful nowâdid you know gaming can be addictive? By your logic, the fact you play at all must mean youâre one step away from losing your job, skipping meals, and shouting âone more levelâ as your life crumbles around you. Sounds ridiculous, right? Thatâs because engaging in a behavior doesnât automatically make it a harmful addiction. Context, control, and individual circumstances matterâotherwise, weâd all be addicts just for enjoying things. See how that argument falls apart?
My speciality was within stigmatization and discrimination;did a project where we essentially questioned common place assumptions and I later did a few works on civil society and elections - Most of the area is pseud-garbage
I'd recommend Oswald Spengler's decline of the west - Love my meta-history
Under your arguments you used for porn, it doesnât really matter if you are a casual gamer or a hardcore gamer, both are at risk of âaddictionâ, see why claiming absolutes is never a good idea and a slippery slope?
playing games is not like as porn addiction where ur health is in serious danger .u r doing false comparison
Oh, I seeâso now playing games is fine because you do it, but suddenly, itâs different when itâs something you donât like? Letâs not pretend that gaming canât have its own health risksâphysical inactivity, eye strain, even mental health issues like aggression or escapism when overdone. But hereâs the thing: moderation matters. Just playing a game doesnât mean youâre on the path to addiction, the same way watching something online doesnât automatically destroy your health. False comparisons? No, itâs exposing how cherry-picking arguments to fit your narrative doesnât hold up under scrutiny.
Iâll stop now, but hopefully you realize the point im trying to make
the thing is not ur in risk of addiction it about the time u watch porn ur addictive it s like drugs u cant stop from the first try .. but gaming is more controlled behavior than porn or drugs
Actually the effect is similar on the brain
In fact anything that rewards dopamine can be similarly addictive
Descartes was modernity philosopher + french scientist too ,
yes but sport is not as like watching porn
its false comparison
Its not neurologically
The only difference might be the long term lung and muscle usage
but behaviorally
Yes but as I said, anything that rewards dopamine has similar risk
u have a good point but ur making a false comparison
you are basically talking nonsense, and therefore all arguments based on this are nonsense. You waste of time. You literally make me waste 10 minutes of mi time on reading this research because journal is legit. But information is remotely close with what you say.
Its not a false comparison Ayoub its actually regarded in a similar capacity by the field in question
Youâre right that gaming and other behaviors arenât exactly the same, but the point isnât about making a direct comparisonâitâs about showing how labeling something an âaddictionâ without considering context or moderation is overly simplistic. If weâre going to call something harmful just because it activates the brainâs reward system, then a lot of everyday behaviors, like gaming, social media, or even enjoying coffee , could fall into the same category. Itâs not about false comparisons; itâs about consistency in how we evaluate these things. Wouldnât you agree?
I think you may be attaching a moral value here
the thing is the tolerance of ur brain is equilibred when u do sport over time .. but in porn ur brain is exposed to a dangerous amount of dopamine and ur brain essentially cant handle it so the tolerance get higher and higher and that is what seriously damages ur brain .
not to mention the physical changes that porn can cause .. that damages ur brain and essentially ur mental and social health
Its not, what youâre thinking of is the other benefits
u just didnt get the context of why porn is deff .. and those studies essentially show u how it s deff
the article says that some brain reactions are similar to reactions from drugs. what does a person with strange logic do. he thinks that drugs harm the brain, and therefore sex harms the brain. there is nothing to discuss here
But if you stupid you can keep going
sex is not watching porn
Ur neurologist?
are u addicted 
no

It has the same effect,
The only difference is the social expectation created
no its not its very deff..
Dude, I know
There is nothing about porn.
Researcher, scientist?
u can say medical student
Mbbs ? Or phd
If you talking about porn, this article is twice bulshit. Because they don't research porn influence
PhD
have u read it
Y didn't get my point he's also scientist so he's philosophy doesn't rely on believing or something about truth
Bruhh stop that shit
It's over
he is addicted 

I think youâd be better off arguing social issues of negative image @void arch
Why do you guys asserting on this topic repeatedly when u haven't a single logically factor about that ?
im just kidding with him
Did you read it?
I have no idea what that means but it sounds like it's probably wrong
well philosophically will not offer us any beneficial fact about it .. we need to observe scientifically and experience the scientific data for this subject
yes
Doubt it.
About what?
about phonography addiction
You simply have no arguments if you refer to this article.
But journal is legit it was my mistake
Descartes doesn't say anything about pronography addiction (although he did have a sexual fixation with girls with a lazy eye)
it s just a matter of investigating and searching
I think I unblock Minecraft, and block you, best decision of the day
Truths rely on the knowledge and belief not doubting
Nice
hhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh
Of course

But doubtful maybe false but that truth is undoubted

The research is inconclusive about the neurological effects on viewers but the data is a bit more ominous on itâs social impact
Bruhh stop stop plz

https://endsexualexploitation.org/articles/pornography-changes-the-brain/ read this one but the bad thing is that the study has been done on smaal number of ppl
the article says that people with compulsive sexual disorder react to sex scenes similar to getting drugs, the brain signals are similar. this guy concludes from this that this means that it harms the brain. and not research, that's why he is i blocked. Like person who my wasted time. Nothing personal
the most important is the health impact and physical impact which is been likely demonstrated to be existing in porn addiction
Itâs still inconclusive, and so far its shown to be no worse than any other behavioral addiction
if he came up with it himself, he's a genius of course, but I think he's quoting someone, someone evil but smart, who likes to implant idiotic ideas into people's heads
bro u didnt read anything: results
1-the brain circuitry between the prefrontal cortex (the decision-making part of the brain) and the reward system was reduced.
2-the heavier users had less grey matter .
My concerns lie more in the objectification of women and portrayal of unhealthy relationships which lead to unrealistic expectations.
it changes the brain and it s not dangerous as drugs.. that also physically change the brain ?!!
yes thats also some bad consequences .. but ppl would argue that its not bad as long as it doesnt affect ur brain or physical health
Depends what drug in question youâre referring to and the severity of the case
I actually think that itâs worse. Leading to unhealthy expectations in heterosexual men,
i dont have any knowledge about that
And the glorification of fornication
yes its worse but ppl would argue the opposite ..so u have to prove them wrong scientifically
Well obviously not all drugs are similarly dangerous. Canabis derivatives are much less dangerous than alcohol for a number of reasons
In the same way, the bodyâs natural responses canât rival modern synthetics
Neyro dont know what grey matter and the prefrontal cortex means to the health of his brain
True but while the userâs brain is only affected neurologically, everyone they interact with is affected socially
that's consequently true
i learn a lot have a good day all
Black Chinese matter
maybe so let's make more profit
sell it to the people
and tax them
Russia's war machine is somehow relying on alcohol lol
American's supremacy is relying on the soldiers who stationed in the middle east
Bruhh grey matters is referred from American english, and most of medical course book's written in Britisian mathod,I'm medical student too ...but I haven't even know what does it mean ..
Medicine is yucky
What is difference between yucky and Lucky?
Unblocked
Lucky is fortunate. Yucky is gross.
Yucky is informal adjective and Lucky is formal....
Grey matter contains most of the brain's neuronal cell bodies.it includes regions of the brain involved in muscle control, and sensory perception such as seeing and hearing, memory, emotions, speech, decision-making, and self-control. so less Grey matter is literally bad mental health
*Literally
its beautiful
Lucky is pretty informal too . . .
Hm like fortune...
my favorite subjects are anatomy and biochemistry
My fav pharma and patho ....
But we have limitations
which year are u in?
i think patho begins from third yr
3 rd but haven't find a way to research on them
u have to
Sorry for digressing from the topic but may I please know which field is your phD in @mystic bay ? I could really use some professional guidance
Philosophy
Bruh i have a problem with my profession
Oh wow. That's amazing. Thank you. You have a follower â¨
Lucky can be informal too. Besides from that, differs a lot from yucky
But luckey synonyms "fortune" is formal.....so yes... Lucky can be informal but not as adjective then
But now you're talking about "fortune", the formal way of lucky... then that's different
But both are same adjective so wheather it could be formal and informal....
But the fact they are synonyms doesn't mean they have to be the same always, "formal/informal"
But as a adjective they does
Well, you can investigate and wise up yourself
This isn't interesting
Perhaps. But it was quite serious...
is that supposed to be a pun?
Do you listen to Richard Wagner, bro @dapper laurel
Do you have a PhD title?
Hello
heyyyâŚď¸âŚď¸âŚď¸âŚď¸âŚď¸
Do someone know the thema for exam?
@delicate totem sorry sir but im lost
Came in response to the call, your majesty
Brođđ
Hi
Hey
Sry, i was taking my driving class
Here is my suggestion, if you want to know whether a Chinese person's political opinion based or not, tell them you love Taiwan's democracy and support Taiwan.
If they agree with you, fine, at least they support democracy and human rights. If they disagree, DON'T ARUGE, we respect their opinion too(tho we don't agree),so just let them alone. hope you can have good mood in every debates your majesty
Tbh racist nowadays generally becomes a word you can use everywhere as long as someone doesn't agree with you.
I believe most of us don't even bother to be rasict, what's the point of it, can't gain anything from it
i see, i hope you pass ur driving test later and dont brother yourself i know his answer already đ I'll try to be peaceful like you and stop arguing
yeah the word lost its meaning
Do you realize that it is provocative for you to say such things in front of the Chinese?
How about the next time I say I love Israel and America in front of Muslims?
Some people don't realize how rude they are, many Muslims in particular.
Seriously, if you don't want people to dislike you, at least behave appropriately.
I love Mongolia
Most people only use it when its warranted
Lmao my propaganda worked finally
Thanks for reminding, you're partially right
But
The key point is that most Americans and Israelis genuinely love their countries, and they take pride in being part of the United States and Israel. Regrettably, the United States and Israel are indeed recognized as democratic nations, where their citizens, at the very least, enjoy a certain level of human rights and freedoms.
In contrast, take Taiwan as an example. I have several Taiwanese friends, including a close one, and none of them like China, they despise the idea of becoming part of it.(plz don't argue that, that's a fact)
What Iâve stated above is not from a national or political standpoint but from the perspective of human rights and freedom. Therefore, your argument does not hold to me
I wish Estonia annexed Finland

Sir, no one is talking to you about democracy and freedom, but you, as an outsider, are deliberately making provocative remarks in front of Chinese people, which is very disrespectful, and your intelligence is not good enough for you to think of that?
Btw
Look at the number of gold medals your race has won in the Olympics and then talk to me about racism, you're the one being looked down upon, don't get it backwards.
I'm not outsider, I'm actually a Chinese
I hope our country can be as freedom as Taiwan one day

Ha! Chinese? Do you speak Chinese?
The only thing I can say in Chinese is çąä˝ çŠĺĺš´
For sure ||ä˝ ĺčżäşĺ||
Type it out. I don't click suspicious black things.
i hope you enjoy your meal ĺ¸ćä˝ äşŤĺä˝ çéĽéĽ
Click on the channel above and top â on the first post, it'll help underprivileged grasshoppers suffering from malnourishment
i blocked it because it's English server
Some Southeast Asians like to pretend to be Chinese, it's disgusting.
For some respect, I don't directly type Chinese out
Maybe he is Chinese but not from China
Chinese are Chinese citizens, no one see them as Chinese in China
Southeast Asians are Southeast Asians
For me, no problem
You see, lots of ppl here hate Japanese or Koreans (south btw)
But no one single Japanese or Koreans did one bad thing to me
So what's the point of hatred
Unfortunately, I'm from China
I mean an ethnic Chinese, or Han
Interesting
You'd kill me for that
If you know the situation here
Lol, end of conversation, you are not Chinese
We can't disagree with the political correction here, or we disappear
and I'm going to block you
I'm sry you think that way
But do as you wish
Your name is similar to the genocide Sayfo

Fake news
It's not
You are either a traitor to China or someone from another country trying to smear China. A frog in the well has no right to speak recklessly here.@midnight abyss
You are?
I'm not speaking recklessly boy
Asking any Taiwanesee if they like to be a part of China
Hey,
Whom does chinese love?
And I'm still not a traitor, that's not always focused on the shinning part of China, what underneath it, is 6000mils ppl have income below 300 dollars per month
What underneath it, is lots of ppl got locked down and burned to die in the covid
What underneath it, 30% unemployment rate of young ppl
I'm a Chinese, I love China from bottom of my heart
Taiwan has been a part of China since ancient times. The people in Taiwan speak Chinese and have Chinese faces. It was only because the Kuomintang and the Communist Party of China fought and lost in the 1990s that they fled to Taiwan. How the Taiwan issue is resolved is a matter for the Chinese people. Who do you think you are? It's none of your business.
So let's face the problems
Why deny every problems while speaking on your own?
girl wth why would he lie?? He's Chinese and i mentioned him btw
Here we go again
Hahaha
Does the macro narrative provide 600 mil people with an income of more than 300 dollars?

It's fine
I don't really care lol
=sword
ik you're just too kind đ
At a glance, you are clearly a fake Chinese person, slandering and defaming China from behind a screen. Our per capita GDP is 150,000 RMB. Our purchasing power parity is the highest in the world, and our economy is the second largest globally. You have no idea where you're from, some remote and impoverished place, and after listening to your backward media, you come here to smear China. Honestly, you are not worthy. You are just a bug in a dark corner of a gutter.
Your income is only 300 dollars, so poor? You don't even understand our income, yet you speak nonsense. You are not worthy.
Chill out bro
What are you pretending to be?
Don't insult others too hard
I bet you're so much angry now
I'm being very calm right now, it's just that the dog is barking, and I need to hit it with a stick.
So you're ĺ°ç˛çş˘
Then, our conversation is over
Like we said, never argue with ĺ°ç˛çş˘
I don't get upset with animals, haha.
ĺŚćä˝ äťŹćŻä¸ĺ˝äşşďźčݎĺć˘ă

bro, you see I never insulted you despite you insulted me with every sentences
That's the difference
I didn't insult you. I was talking about animals, dogs. Did I say anything about you?
So if you think Taiwan is a part of China
I respect you, let's stop it lol
ä˝ äťŹćĽĺ°ć䝏çĺ˝ĺŽśďźć 夺ć䝏çčľćşďźć䝼诡ä¸čŚĺćĽčżéă @midnight abyss

why would he lie about his nationality ya zaki just stop this bs, he can have different views not all your fingers are the same
That's really funny. Which country are you from?
I'm from Pakistan
We aren't going to give you Golden resources of Pakistan
Chill out bro that can be considered as insult
If you want to disguise it, that's fine
You're smol pink anyways
You are strategic partners and friend You are pushing us that you will be become same like US
Your military equipment was provided by us, and your ports were built by us. You, ungrateful wolf, are saying that we plundered your resources? That's really funny.
we are also fighting against India, didnt acept Tawan
But the resources in Bal are ours
we dont want chinese to take over there
We have alot of pressure becuse of it
You don't need to argue with him too hard
He's nonsense because of Chinese political propaganda
Unfortunately
You admit you're not Chinese, a traitor who eats from both sides.
Dont come out gwadar
It will be like
Speaking one bad thing about China, especially ccp, you will be my enemies, even if you're right
do like ccp
Without a strong motherland supporting you, you're just a second-class citizen wherever you go. You are a failure.
an honest review
Oh yes
You're right
So plz stop it
btw, you don't decide if I'm a failure or not
That's another insult
I donât support any political party, but right now, we Chinese people are living happily, with money and strength. We are proud. Are you, a rat hiding in a dark gutter, envious? Thatâs why youâre jumping out to smear us.
Jealousy has distorted your appearance.
I don't really like to talk with you guys
But since I have time, i don't bother
You can't trigger me anyways
So what's your point
And what's your purpose
Prosperous Humanity should be a goal
The other person just insulted you, and you still havenât learned your lesson? Youâre just a clown, stop trying to get attention.
Don't fight on other people's life effort talk only of your own personal
China is not limited to Shanghai and Beijing
I support your point of view.
China or pakistan both are not born before Bharat , so keep quiet and do work
Bro why he was insulted me already??
Damn bro
Im sry, you're too fkinf nonsense, I can't
Are your eyes not working, or is it your brain? The video I sent you shows at least ten cities in China. Do you think China only has Beijing and Shanghai as developed cities?
How many provinces China has?
Muhammad Bin Qasim was the first Pakistani
By chatting here in a group nothing is going to change in the world , so go and learn some skills, take care of your family, live life long along with the world
Pakistan isn't a nation state
Sry, bro
I really can't
You don't have a point, you don't have a common sense, all you say is ''China number 1 if you don't agree, you're a shxt''
So I quit
Everything you said is right
It's okay, travel abroad more to see the world. Oh, right, you're poor, so you can only look at our country online and spread rumors and smear China.
No debate prize đ for barking on who comes first , dinosaurs were long before us
I only said that China has the highest purchasing power parity, not that China is number one. Don't try to confuse the issue here. I wasn't wrong when I said your brain isn't working.
Look at you, so poor youâve never seen the world.
Why am i poor to you
Or any Chinese who want to support the poor in China
They're automatically poor to you?
then stop it about India
I don't know any other things too much
But I know two
One: there're 600mil poor ppl here
Two: Taiwanesee don't like China
Argue that with your evidence stupid pink
First of all, I didnât mention others, I was talking about you. Youâre poor, not just materially, but also in your thinking. All you know is how to slander and defame other countries, instead of thinking about how to make your own country prosperous and strong. Thatâs why you deserve to be poor, a failure in life.
Stupid pink? Lmao I'm gonna use that, new vocabulary
Stop india, pakistan, china
dont interfere in serious debate
if you have yapping only
Sry if our conversation bothered others
do you guys love Pakistan?
First go to school , you donkey national @balmy folio
Or see it as a partner only
Living on us & china money and still trolling them online, don't forget india is your father
I love you guys
I don't represent Chinese ppl
But me personally respect Pakistan
Says who
discussions like these should be about constructive dialogue, not insults or name-calling. I know your hate
@static pivot
Yes , but trolling pakistani is always funny and enjoying
We also like you guys, but due to certain things we got confronted from china
your arrogance is only overshadowed by your lack of respect. If you can't engage in a serious discussion without resorting to insults, maybe you're the one who needs a lesson in basic decency and maturity.
Alright
India is a broken peace only from years you lived under muslims
Political stuffs is political stuff
We just want to live our lives
So dw if you need to, you do your things to live better lives, i understand
Discussion of shit isn't a serious discussion man , have economical talks , improving english and earning money đ¤đ°
China and Pakistan are allies, and you are our "Iron Brother" friends, with a strong relationship. As for some of the other things you've heard, they might have been spread by hostile countries, so don't take them seriously.Be cautious and avoid being deceived.
At the end all human rats run for money, don't forget

China is not like the United States; it does not interfere in the internal affairs of other countries.
Yeah, our concern is about trade with India and Uygurs
đ§
thats why we are close to yu
Yes , I can see peace in pakistan along with terrorism only , this nation is a sorry state of Pakistan, what progress did you achieve in the last 70 years
Yes, we are strategic allies and brotherly allies. Don't be deceived by those with ulterior motives.
Only thing that confront are Uyghurs
Some of the insurgents in Pakistan are supported by the United States and , as they donât want Pakistan to become strong.
US left weapons in Afghanistan we are facing all the terrorism in our country because of it
Pakistan is the only ally of dollars đ°, there army officer takes dollars and goes into Europe and us , but poor Pakistanis live there life in blunder, can't imagine governance like this
This is exactly false statement its a logical fallacy
Who raised taliban along with us and dollars
To USSR, we were the next target
We have to do everything to protect us
They are our allys
Men should accept its reality, then only he can improve in his life đ§Ź
im curious where are you from?
Our Army is best they interfere in politics for country else politicans would have destroyed us, also our Army fought against you guys they are best people
I see , your ally is killing your National by bombings and all , don't lie man everyone knows truth , #TTP,#Talibam
We are talking about Afghan Taliban
If I start tlaking about India you will be left with no hideout
Mass Killings of Muslims
i see indian
Mass Systematically rape
The nuclear info you beg from usa , đ
USA sanctioned us after nuclear I see your ignorance
Our accounts got freezed
You see , I can't
You are exposing your ignorance
Before that event India built nuclear energy by its own technology đ
We have second strike capability before India
Every country has its own difficult history, but the one thing that cannot be stopped is our desire for a better life in our respective countries. Therefore, we donât need to smear other countries; we should focus on developing and strengthening ourselves.
Then why did you do such work that freezes your accounts đ
We stopped you in 65 war where US sanctioned but you were begging USSr for help
You begging your father in Kargil so that Pak Army can withdraw
I can understand chinese history and I respect it , but not pakistan's cause there is no such nation đ¤đ¤
Whatever we do its our choice we build nuclear after all by our seld not by USSR help
All of your progress is because of USSR and now USA not for yourownself
I see who begged 50 million in 47
my brain crashed trying to comprehend how dumb this reply is
It is said that Pakistan has now imported fifth-generation fighter jets, which shows that Pakistan is becoming very powerful.
Pakistan is a nation state, hahaha its an ideological nation
At the end Pakistan forms on the basis of inhuman demand for religious beliefs, which helps india to become a nice country
yes you stole our money, You got all the infrsutructure and becam USSR baby
Systematically Rapes f Muslims, Declaring them Second class citizen destroying mosques make India great
OR ally of USA fake propaganda
If someone is asking about existence , on the basis of killing innocent people by getting help of islamic talks , this is not going to work man , everyone sees where is pakistan and where is india and where is china
Don't think more or else another strike will be there đđđ
We developed everythhin on our own, we didnt used USA or USSR for development
Do you have anything else than trolling lol, why cannot you speak with facts
There is something called common sense
Ohh I see who burnt trains by giving fatawa to kill everyone who is not Muslim ,
Assert proof for it
There was nothing like that
Again fake propaganda
Do you have anything other than pakistan đŤ
We have our religion, Paksitan is based on relgion, so everything is our
Why do we need anything else than that
Go and read world history after WW1
thats a dumb thing to say
but India is a hindutva state that belongs to hindu, sikh, christiansd muslims are systenmatically killed and raped
thats make india great
I have never seen such a dumb nation ever
There is some moral grounds where is your morality
Then why there are Muslims in India , cause they know Pakistan is not islamic nation it is just a terrorist country đ¤Łđ¤ŁđŞ
Because they were unable to mgrate from there, aslo
Voice came from Parliament do India want pertitition again Muslims in your Parliament said that
Muslims in India want to come to Paksitan its internation media says that
Everywhere in the world pakistan is the safest country, happy man , enjoy your time my grandson â¤ď¸ #Donkeypakistan
Again Hindutva troller
see you got no hideout
Hello there
Good morrow
@flat hemlock @balmy folio I've read all your comments and they are not nice.
Kindly maintain the server decorum and respect towards all nations.
And their people.
You both don't agree on something that's alright, you guys don't have to get personal and start insulting each other...
That won't lead anywhere but mute đ¤đ
Can you mention a personal insult by Pakisani
i didn't expect it 
My emphasize is complete on fact
By you I suppose?
yes

Here
Here
Here
I admit this but the abov, I speak with facts
kashmir and destruction of mosques
Your way of speaking is wrong
and it's insulting
You could have said that in a very different and neutral way
he was contantly indulting
And so did you tho.
@flat hemlock You have 2 hours to edit your messages. Any insult towards Pakistan should be removed or else the consequences shall be grave.
In not saying he's right and you're wrong or something
I'm simply telling you both to not make it personal and stop insulting
Hope this makes sense
This^^
Dyamm saying the whole nation is stupid is really absurd, you guys should comment on government, policies and regime
đ well well well
I didnt started I alwasy said speak with facts then I started it
exactly
Serious chat is fun when we discuss Mexican lesbian lizards while avoiding ad hominem
I wanna talk about the gay penguins that shook the world
Didn't one of the Penguins pass away recently?
It caused such an uproar on social media
Apparently it's not that hard to find homosexual penguins, there's a really famous homo penguin couple in zoo

Yeah that's what I am talking about
There's no way, lemme Google
That's really unfortunate, one of em died
Yeah
It was quite a big news
There was even a video where the zookeepers took the other penguin to see the dead body of its partner for the last time
Everyone was crying

I haven't read anything about emotions in animals, seems like a really fascinating thing to learn
Unfortunately my bus is here, I've to go now
Halo
Halo
You like me name?
hi
Sup
Yes
It's was certainly new for me knowing that dolphins commit grape too. Sometimes it's gang####
If you own multiple pets you'll certainly know that they mourn deaths of their fellows. Their behavioural pattern changes.
We used to pet a couple of chicks. Their stories will amaze you
Yes, one of my favourites
By everyone I meant all the zoo keepers
Sup whereâs u from
Ok
I was looking it up on Chinese website and itâs so funny to see that it says,Our great lead forward was actually learned from Soviet Union

You look like this dude @spice bobcat
Ok karen
You're the female
Who said that
I never proved it tho
He does
How bruv how
Just look at him
Anyway he is handsome idk why you are getting angry
Bruh
Because I'm me bruv đ
Ok đđť
Bro said thumbs up
Honestly The great lead forward drew some lessons and inspiration from the Soviet Union's but there were significant ideological ,goal models and practical differences 
Fatima do you wear glasses?
Nope , why ? đĽ˛
Scarface , are you gay ?
Very
Ok go now
But where
Hell
Threatening me with a good time, I like it
Isnât this serious chat?
We starting a coup
You guys why donât go to chill chat
Bye
Fatima, you changed??? Who hurt you?
Hi again
Do you know great lead forward in china history
As close as I am to china, unfortunately no.
We haven't worked it out yet
I lean more towards science
History ain't my thing
As in giving respect? Yeah
Okay do you wanna hear
Nah I want to be tho
I'll be honored
Who is that idk
The Great Leap Forward was a economic campaign under leadership by our former leader, and it caused the massive famine
During the great leap forward
We were feely to kill birds and rats and flies stuff
People collected body birds and received some bucks 
Like 10 body birds they gave you 1 cent probably
I gave up my Chinese citizenship
Rather not be Chinese
Doesn't make you Less Chinese
Alright
But interesting tho
Alright
Was your former leader a communist?
I'm thinking about him
Like don't come at me
đ
Hiii
More like a capitalist, but anyway
Ohhh well ty for explaining it to me
Hahaha , in china he is considered the national hero tho
People hang his portrait on the wall
Another fact I just learnt, tytytyty
Usually like in rural areas, like peasants respect him
That's sweet
What about now? Is china mostly communist or nah. Because I keep seeing things about chinese communism

Bro you gotta be subtle at least 
Ummm like
it is more like capitalistic, they just call themselves communists , you mean government?
Yes yes
I understand you ty for being patient bruv đ see you soon I gtg
china just rules by communist people
More like an authoritarian regime
Okay
so
In fact, they call it socialism with Chinese characteristics.
Yeah For orthodox Marxists, socialism is the lower stage of communism
So like
Do you know anything about socialism with Chinese characteristics? This is definitely not true socialism.
I am not living in mainland china anymore
I don't think so, because China has implemented a market economy since the reform and opening up.
Yes
But in grass-roots society, there will be similar agricultural production cooperatives, which are similar to socialism, but only in rural areas.
Yep The term common usage during the era of Deng tho , he makes china more capitalist
adopting elements of market economics, that was how , called it socialism with Chinese characteristics
The gap between rich and poor is too wide, especially now.
The Bangladesh genocide (Bengali: ŕŚŕŚŕŚžŕŚ¤ŕ§ŕŚ¤ŕŚ°ŕ§ŕڰ ŕŚŕŚŁŕŚšŕŚ¤ŕ§ŕŚŻŕŚž, romanized: ÄkÄtturÄr GĂ´ášĂ´hĂ´tyÄ, lit.â'71's genocide', Bengali: বাŕŚŕŚžŕŚ˛ŕŚż ŕŚŕŚŁŕŚšŕŚ¤ŕ§ŕŚŻŕŚž, romanized: BÄáš Äli GĂ´ášĂ´hĂ´tyÄ, lit.â'Bengali genocide') was the ethnic cleansing of Bengalis, especially Bengali Hindus, residing in East Pakistan (now Bangladesh) during the Bangladesh Liberation War, perpetrated by ...
Most of people arenât rich tho in china, most of them come to big cities like shang hai, shenzhen like
To earn those low salaries
Chinese people are very tired now, especially young people, middle school students, or college graduates, a large part of them do not have two days off, you know 996.
@manic juniper hello
I knew it
996 it means like work 6 days a week 9 hours per day
?
"996" is a Chinese internet slang term that refers to a work schedule of 9am to 9pm, 6 days a week. It became a symbol of the intense work culture in China's tech industry, particularly at major companies like Alibaba and Tencent.
This schedule is often associated with overwork, burnout, and a lack of work-life balance. While some employees may embrace the challenge and potential rewards of such a demanding schedule, many criticize it for its negative impact on employee well-being and mental health.
I see
@native smelt how did know those things where u from
Wasn't that mostly abolished
No idea gonna ask Minecraft dude
I think most of companies do adopt those 996 working schedule, but itâs also very depending on the what kinda jobs and work you do
okay
You play Minecraft?
What part of china
I used to play a lot but now i donât play
A city in the southwest. I don't really want to say it.
I see i see
Nobody is free until Palestine is freeđľđ¸
đŽđąđŽđąđŽđą
Palestine is a terrorist "state"
You mean Israel
it is NOT a war
attacking innocents is NOT a war
Is there a war where people don't die?
Okay free palestine
October 7th?
1 day vs YEARS
Yes, and there will be an increasing need for it in the future
it didn't begin during October 7th
Because resources are needed, and many countries don't have them
It all started when the coalition of Arab countries attacked the newly formed state of Israel
Arabs are the classic people who throw stones and hide their hand
I love how china still keeps Russia legacy alive tho, when i came to china i still saw communist flag, or communist symbol on the road or street đđš@native smelt
Anyway i love Communism
???
I think that the countries of the world will start to collaborate when a common problem is found for all, and I hope there will be, otherwise we will continue to fight each other for wealth and resources, as we always did
what
Need the communist revolution?
why do you like communism
You can ask xi and numbers of ccp
Ready to fail again
I just want your point of view
But in china was succeeded
The Chinese one is not true communism, perhaps true communism has never been applied
but why do YOU like communism
This guy is into everything.
are you chinese ?
Life
Do you guys know Jean Marie Le Pen ?
sorry i was just kidding
What's the most significant problem you've faced within your education?
This qs is for a research -- from the pov of students of the struggles in school/others ...
Feel free to answer
Not this dude again
Such a great musician. But my favorite one is Antonio Vivaldi
Tutorial pls
Learn how to squeeze a lemon with this guide from wikiHow: https://www.wikihow.com/Squeeze-a-Lemon
Follow our social media channels to find more interesting, easy, and helpful guides!
Pinterest: https://www.pinterest.com/wikihow/
Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/wikihow/
TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@wikihow
Facebook: https://www.faceboo...
Thanks , it was super helpful , you owe my respect
Four Israeli soldiers were killed in north Gaza's Beit Hanoun during combat operations on Saturday, according to a statement released by the Israel Defense Forces.
The four fallen soldiers were identified as Sgt. Maj. (res.) Alexander Fedorenko, 37, from Bat Yam; Staff Sgt. Danila Diakov, 21, from Ma'aleh Adumim; Sgt. Yahav Maayan, 19, from Modi'in; and Sgt. Eliav Astuker, 19, from Ashdod.
Okay? How were they killed
Gunfire? Explosions? Buildings fall on them? Maybe White Phosphorus? Submunitions?
Mm, i kinda like him, but i respect your opinion. đ
You realize heâs a human sex trafficker⌠rightâŚ?
Testify your statement, buddy.
You wanna defend thisâŚ.?
Still hasnât been cleared btw
Mate, he is innocent, you cant even prove he has done sex trafficking.
He wouldnât have been charged if there wasnât a substantial threshold of evidence.
He tried to flee the country⌠twice⌠to avoid the trialâŚ
I donât know mate, I donât know entire history, maybe im wrong. But, i donât know, i love him.
If i was charged, i would do too.
I am not a feminist btw , i just dislike some of his opinions
He knows his ass is grass
Yep, i donât agree with all of his opinions. Only a fool with agree to someoneâs all opinions. But, i lokey like some of the things he says.
Mine ?
ye
You must really suck as a criminal to get arrested in Romania
The things he says about women, they are kinda trash. Rest is good.
Who
He kinda disrespects us
Yep, he surely does.
People are complex, and no one is 100% right all the time. But I think Andrew Tate says some things that make sense to me, like focusing on self-improvement, working hard, and building confidence. How men should walk, and talk.
Everyone is different, buddy
Guy's how to be millionaire ?
shame on u ..u defend a genocide ..where 10k kids dead by airstrikes and mostly in residential areas that should be safe zones
I'm not defending a genocide, I'm defending the West, that's it
the same thing
good when u approve that
Muslims mostly hate us, so I support western allies
who hates ?
why do you think muslims hate you
that not a moral nor a logical thing that can encourage someone to defend a killer
or u say u hate islam
judging ppl by others in not quite good when innocents dies
specially kids
Why must you side against a majority, for the insults of a few.
I am not defending a genocide, or a specific country or anything else, I am defending the West, and the values it professes, especially if a Western ally is attacked immediately after its creation
If this is true, its the craziest video i have seen.
If you talk about that war, everyone is guilty
You defend them just because they are Muslims, you don't care how immoral a war can be, otherwise you would have defended the other side too, but no, and the reason is evident
Emotions overcomes the logic sometimes, mate. đĽ˛
guys i have a research
can u answer some questtion for me on google docs
it would me alot to me
You need Aristotle 
read Iqbal
What do you recommend?
Do you believe in any religion??
A personal question
I am a Christian
Elevate yourself to such heights that before fate is written, God asks His servant, 'What do you desire?
ur erasing the context bro .. the Zionist state werent established with candy and chocolate , but by a series ethnic cleansing and destroying thousands of Palestinian village and establishing illegal settlements.. not to mention the Genocidal acts against Palestinian ... the state of isreal its establishment is not legal nor moral ...
being attack after its creation ...its not just a accident its a respond to its brutal and unjustified actions they commit against the Palestinian..
Christianity gave the message of love to the world, but the essence of that love has been lost.
the one who invade and commit a genocide i think is who responsible for all of that .. i ll be amazed if i took ur home and killed ur family to be treated like a friend after .
I agree
None of the above mentioned things took place before the creation of the state of Israel, on the contrary, with the immigration of Jews to Palestine the Arabs began to attack them (an example would be the massacre of Hebron), so, no, Jews deserved that land and but Arabs didn't understand it
And when the United Nations proposed a treaty to allow both sides to coexist, the Arabs refused. As I said before, the Arabs throw the stone and hide their hand, as always
If you are angry because Jews have settled in part of your lands, then what should we Europeans say about Muslim immigration to Europe?
how they deserved that land what the evidence ..with that logic we lived in spain for 800 year do i have right to invade them?!
As I said, you are biased
Why should the Jews be a stateless people?
âThe support given to the Zionist movement by imperialist powers is a betrayal of the Arab people and an affront to justice.â
u would refuse too if i moroccan immigrated to ur country and after that the UN propse a solution to split italy between us is that Good
why Palestinians should be massacred and abandoned as like they have no homeland
**âThe imposition of a Jewish state on the Arabs is a blatant act of imperialism. The Arabs have every right to oppose it.â
**
It's different, the Italians only have Italy, the Palestinians are Arabs, they have the whole Arab world, Israel is just a spit of land in the middle of the Arab world
they are Europeans
Not arab Jews
They chose it, they threw the stone and hid their hands
No lol
đŁđŁđŁđŁđŁđŁđŁđŁđŁ
If you are referring to Jews, they are not Europeans
speak facts
Mizraihs are Asians
they chose it 𤥠... its inevitably respond to such brutal invasion and action agiants humanity ..they have no land no rights no existence ... the UN didnt find any solution for them .. the world is silent .. absolutely u ll have resistance.. where in history where wasent resistance to such thing ..
âMuslim nations, from the Middle East to South Asia, must stand together as brothers. Our strength lies in our unity and faith.â
they cames by ship from all around the world its a documented fact by the Un itself
The United Nations Partition Plan for Palestine was a proposal by the United Nations to partition Mandatory Palestine at the end of the British Mandate. Drafted by the U.N. Special Committee on Palestine (UNSCOP) on 3 September 1947, the Plan was adopted by the UN General Assembly on 29 November 1947 as Resolution 181 (II). The resolution recomm...
âThe bonds of faith and brotherhood between Pakistan and Saudi Arabia are unshakable. We look forward to working together for the benefit of the entire Muslim world.â
what is the next step of the operation?
Mate, i appricate it. But its too much, and philosophy is boring. At least thats what i think.
This doesn't prove that they are European
that much less land to people who were living from years
sprove it that they are arabs
isreal dont accept that , they dont even recognize the existence to the so called palestine .. the major leaders of isreal calling for apartheid system or literally the erasing of all palestinians
No, it wouldn't make sense, Jews are neither European nor Arab
thats your fallacy
they do so much
who are they asians?
Israel accepted the first resolution, the Palestinians did not
so why should i give them land?
Which is from my ancestors?
You don't know the history or genetics to say that
they lived in europe from thousand of years now they became somthing unknown
good night everyone
It doesn't work like that, they still have the genetic heritage of those lands, many of them didn't even mix with the locals
we stick with the facts bro and coming from all around the world is a fact end of discussion ,if ur interested in genetics propose that the zionist government
Oh really? You think that? Lol
I've heard there are 7 people with resemblance in this world(nothing serious just a movie dialogue)
In parts of the world where keeping a beard is quite common, guys do be look similar to others at first glance đ it's fine, understandable đ¤đ¤
I need to know
thats not true Jewish ppl are very often married to women from other communities
they will not allowed ..they think their DNA .. is Holy ..superior from the gentiles
they are the chosen ppl of God bro
they don't have to be legal or moral, the best proof is they can be exist as a regional power with a prosperous society for jewish people
they don't work for you guys
china stands against this stance
So your statement isn't representative of ccp
Who cares
