#🧠|serious-chat
1 messages · Page 362 of 1
You're essentially either wrong or wrong
He could; and that's the object of metaphysics to discuss. We've got a variety of tools to demonstrate; neoplatonism relies on participation; everything partakes of space, for instance, to be in space, everything made of an object, partake of its object and vis-a-vis. So anything that's unity partakes of unity; goodness partakes of goodness etc.,
im proving that nothingness, is still something which u said that darkness is a concept and that means it doesnt exist outside of us but it does exist independently of us a priori, i dont need science to prove this
Absolute idealism notes the distinction is presupposed in every objects; so if everything is a product of difference, removing difference collides being into a non-spatial being.
u need to take a break and think for a moment
instead of being a complete textual machine that doesnt think at all
You're not proving anything by making self-contradictory assessments. Science is by definition observation, that's known as empiricism, the basis of your argument is empiricism, so if empiricism is wrong, you can't prove anything by your own admission. Either you can prove something by observation, i.e., science, hence, you're wrong, or we can't, hence, you can't prove your claim and you're wrong.
the basis of my argument isnt empricism
So essentially god is also a concept?
so ur wrong again
darkness is somthing, blackness is something too. try to think of nothing... did u think of void? yeah thats something too
This is an empirical claim.
If you can't prove it empirically, you can't prove it at all - You've no basis for it.
no it is not, i just thought of it i dont need to see it or observe it
again, my argument is a apriori argument
Yes - The source however is to demonstrate whether he's exlusively conceptual, or actually pervades things. That's the object of metaphysics.
theres a difference between that and a posteriori argument
@elder seal @willow fulcrum well just shut up and enjoy life, I will shut up as well

lol
This means nothing. Your position is "you can just envision a void," yet, this is a one-sided dogma, the basis of 'envisioning a void' is the object which is use referentially to it. That's by vritue empirical.
this guy just likes disagreeing for nothing
Void's only conceptual in reference to something, hence why it doesn't actually exist
Okay, nice having argue with you
After all, we all are just learning from each other
You too mate - Though, I'd not say it was an argument but a discussion; though, I'd say that it's important to distinguish conceptualization from the objective. We can conceptualize an unicorn, yet that wouldn't "exist" as an object outside of thought for instance - Concepts grasp the world, that's why we can conceptualize it; but it can develop past it. A tree is a concept, for instance, when grasped merely as 'tree.'
Oh well, you too man 😭
I think you are describing Plato's Theory of Forms. Plato describes "Forms" or "Ideas" same way you describe "concepts."
Just as an fyi - Reason I don't care about "apriori" is there's no such thing as a pure apriori statement. Apriori is prior to observation; yet no statement exist prior to observation. Apriori statements when arguing about something like first-principles and broad metaphysical inquiry are essentially meaningless; we can only make apriori statements prior to the observation of something, but the matter discussed cannot be dealt with apriori by virtue of our existence
Not really here, no. But they can be associated with the forms as universals. I discussed the forms later up though - Just to expand: I'd love discussing the forms, I'd generally say is nominally agree with them, as I've also dealt with a variety of objections to them before such as the third man argument which i find to be unsatisfactory
Also why nothingness isn't something, because if you make it something as you just did, you've made it not-nothing, and you can't say it's nothing.
Either nothing is nothing conceptually real, but then it's something, and hence not nothing, or it's nothing as absence of something, in which case it's only privation of something
I don't think I understand Third Man Argument fully. Could you briefly elaborate?
It was introduced by Plato in Parmenides. Basically, the theory of form states that everything alike assumes a likeness by which they partake. So all trees are 'trees' and therefor partake of the form of the tree.
The third man argument essentially says that the form of the tree also partakes of the tree, because it is a tree, so that assumes another tree before it, which also does so, and so into infinity. I.e., infinite regress
As later authors like Gregory Vlaados noted, this is an unwarranted introduction. To demonstrate it notationally, where T1 and T2 are two different trees, and TFa is the form of the tree:
[T1, T2] = TF1,
TF1 => TF2
Yet, TF1 = TF1, hence, TF2 is not needed in the sequence. Essentailly, the form of the tree is just the form of the tree, it's only identical to itself as that, and we don't need a third man
Another example is with the form of the Good, where authors like Wittgenstein objected to the third man argument.
Essentially, if we say all that's good partake of Goodness, then the good must also be good, hence, there must be a good after it. The problem here, says Wittgenstein, is it conflates adjective with identity. "To be Good" is just to be good, while to be "the good" is to be the identification of goodness. It conflates identity with adjective, and gets trapped in its own rhetoric
A good reductio ad absurdum I've read about this is, let's say that I'm making a bunch of dolls in my likeness, they're all alike, as all things alike to me bear my likeness, but why would that warrant an infinite regress of me's?
So, Third Man Argument is flawed. I was thinking about it in another context some time ago. If one planet exists where intelligent life developed (here) doesn't that mean that there should be many others in the universe?
I mean, not really the same as the third man argument - Those would be different argumentations. The theory of form is also important to remember also takes reference to a higher universal force, and not necessarily the mediacy of them
My understanding of Third Man Argument was incomplete. I was thinking about it outside of the Forms.
That's fair. The problem i have with that objection above is that any particular object, so let's say, a 'tree' that looks crooked, is not itself a metaphysical form, but is itself its own particular form. This is one of Aristotle's objections to the forms i found to be unsatisfactory
I am me, Nils, writing this, so aritstotle says, "what is the form of Nils?" well - I am the form of Nils. I'm my own form, yet I partake of the form of man, whiteness etc.,
I havent touched anything Greek in a long time, but I remember someone (in a podcast) saying Theory of Forms does not cover all cases. They mentioned Aristotele's Universals and Neo-Platonism. I find Universals as easiest way to distinguish and identify objects by their properties rather than reference to the Form. Though, Forms are much more interesting to think about.
Yes. Aristotle's substance is in a way a critique and a development upon the forms; though neoplatonists reapproach the forms through an aristotlean critique. Specifically, the forms are substance, and persist as 'authentic beings,' but are a product of identity and difference (as aristotle would say)
the universal substance, the one or the good, which is prior, is being deprived of diffearence
You have a lot of knowledge about philosophy. I tried it as a hobby and could barely scape the surface. Was wondering, if I am not crossing a line, how you acquired such understanding of theories?
Discussion on line + reading. I'd say I dislike reading Aristotle, so I mostly just read summaries of his works
Nicaragua has what you're looking for, but Costa Rica and Panama and perhaps El Salvador are the safest places to go right now
El Salvador very safe ✅
100%
The ones to accept Bitcoin
Isn't it in Mexico?? The chicxulub crater
Definitely safe now - Well, safer
Yeah. Is impressive how changed..
Indeed you should visit there lory
With the chaos that is my country currently, only leave the country who is rich. 
Truly Lory the explorer
I prefer tacos
by chances yes but till now we didn't discover another planet that contains alien lives
and about religion or god my point was, the narrative they uses itself is all based on assertion that requires belief in the first place to establish logical relevance
and the usage of religion throughout the history of humanity is undeniably most political, but using other factors as the source that creates the fundamentals which were all "after recognized" by the people who believes it
for instance, they uses a lot of narrative to establish the legitimacy of the god and how it was existed, but only uses some first assertion narrative and philosophy to question why it didn't exist.
and they do serve as a political tool to unite people, as an odd ideology that uses a set of religious practice, common sense, political recognition and social status
simplify it, it was a good tool for authority to "scam" people with a bunch of story to serve certain entity and create a social environmental link within the society
if I'm the leader and I have an option that just tell people this story and they will follow me, why not ?
and they do
I dont think those two statements contradict itself. For instance, climate change is (most likely) a real problem society faces today, but that doesnt mean big corporations are not using it as means of financial gain.
The fact that rulers used religion to control huge mases of people doesnt mean god doesn't exist.
And about that, I like a quote by Paulo Coelho: "Everything that happens once can never happen again. But everything that happens twice will surely happen a third time."
the problem is, they have a problem on both as you said they are not contradicting but they did have some term of relevance based on the stuff they are relating to.
Are you a believer?
they did have a problem to let people believe it in the first place, and they did have a problem to relate everything with god that even if that's the case it still has logical errors with different narratives within themselves.
Exactly
I don't believe in something.
Do you believe God exists?
I do question everything in the first place and I do adopt some sort of narratives and ideologies that benefit me in real life
depends where I live in if I was live in the middle east yes, or somewhere in america in a christian family of course, now I live in China so nope.
So you don't
that was just a social contract for me I don't really believe them but I use them obviously
evolution
that was confirmed by science no space for you to create something around it
Huh you believe that
I do not
why the fuck you guys assume other people believes in something ?
that's fucking stupid
Many of the scientists believe that God exists
science is not the fucking belief
can't give more shit
I don't believe in science dude
But you will
Everything got a purpose, what do you think is the purpose of your life
There is an interesting theory between god and evolution. A day for god is like a billion years. And god created humans on day six. It can be said that god created humans using evolution over billions of years. So, two theories do not contradict each other.
We believe in only one thing --->🇮🇱
dude you made an assertion first in your question, "everything got a purpose"
how do you know that ? why you are so fucking certain about it ?
and don't question me with that stupid affirmive stuff in the first place
You should read some scriptures first
I don't believe that shit
You will get to know a lot
You are not welcomed
exactly the case what I'm saying, made an assertion in the first place
You should keep the conversation healthy
woah things got heated
dude try to proof something without assertion
Go read Bible, torah and the quran
there was a lot of narratives you can choose besides as stupid as just get rid of it
and I don't pay a little attention to that piece of shit
You piece of shit
say that again and I will report
You don't know how to talk
I say what I do.
Woah woah woah, keep it civil at least
that's absolutely personal insult
hey hey can you chill out
Go learn something first and then give your opinion afterwards
you can argue but do it respectfully
Who was the one starting
What's your view on veganism
i know but chill out
See @dusty kite
i dont care about vegans i am not vegan
@feral river can you also chill
you can both argue but respect each others please
@dusty kitedo you belive in god
yes
Fair point
well i am not really religous myself
Nah
last time i went to a church was 2 years ago
can you explain sir
💀
Isn't this a contradiction?
Since when do I worship three gods?
Where please let me know
Indeed since when
However, they are not three gods, there is a concept called Trinity
some says 1 god and others says 3
Explain trinity
jesus is god but son of god in the same time i dont really understand that
The holy Trinity
Exactly 💯
how
hmm
jesus is the son of himself
Indeed
We believe that Jesus Christ was a messenger of God not god himself
Yeah, muzlimz do that
that what muslims belive
Correct 💯
that's what I've been taught in school as well
The Trinity (Latin: Trinitas, lit. 'triad', from Latin: trinus 'threefold') is the Christian doctrine concerning the nature of God, which defines one God existing in three, coeternal, consubstantial divine persons: God the Father, God the Son (Jesus Christ) and God the Holy Spirit, three distinct persons (hypostases) sharing one essence/substanc...
Hypostatic union (from the Greek: ὑπόστασις hypóstasis, 'person, subsistence') is a technical term in Christian theology employed in mainstream Christology to describe the union of Christ's humanity and divinity in one hypostasis, or individual personhood.
In the most basic terms, the concept of hypostatic union states that Jesus Christ is both ...
I got it @dapper laurel
Useless or useful in the eorld
Just to be sure
huh?
Actually I have learnt every abrahamic religion
*world
so you mean that x=1 and y=1 but x do not equal y
what do u mean
which one of them is correct
How much is applicable in usefulness
what is applicable?
I believe Bible and torah is not in it's actual state. Those are changed
Religious teachings
People made changes according to their comfort
what about quran
It is exactly the same as 1400 years ago
It would be more like a system of equations
how can you be certian
I do chill dude
trust me bro
Because people have learnt it by heart, look at muslims
not convincing argument
You can make changes in a book but you can't change what's inside the heart
Check it do your own research
that not an prove
that's youre opinion
If you don't believe me do your own research please
how are you so sure that the bible was tampered with but not the Quran
During world war the Bible was destroyed
There are different versions of the Bible
Written by a different person
Who do you think is the author of the Qur'an?
I'd say it depends on the approach, if you think of religion as a philosophy or path of life, I'd say it's pretty much applicable.
@thorny steeple
You should think about it
Chills ran down John's spine when Capt called
Very open minded
well to be fair in the muslims book you can't find a contradiction
The people the Prophet asked to write down?
for example the god is son of himself
Correct 💯
Prophet was the messenger same as Jesus Christ was
yeah like if you wanna use religion as a tool for your self-interests, it then loses its practicality
Indeed
See religion is to unite people not to divide
well it wasn't him who wrote it down anw?
Correct
so why don't you question its legitimacy
it wasn't written by God's messiah
but rather simpler human beings
Hope you guys will find the truth
While it was being written he was present
so how do you know someone didn't tamper with it after his death?
He asked his companion to write whatever was being revealed to him by God
You can search for the oldest Qur'an, and we learn it by heart exactly the same
so there's various versions of the Quran too?
Nope
learning it by heart doesn't prove its legitimacy tho
I think there were before Muhammad's death? Maybe I could be wrong y'know
Sure do your own research
why are you avoiding answering my question tho
I'm asking you a very simple question
God himself has said in the Qur'an that it will be unchanged till the day of resurrection
if you burn every quran and Bible books no one will remember the Bible. but for Quran, it's not the same because muslim kids on 9 and 6 memorize it
So that means God themself checks that the Quran is never tampered with?
Because you are not believing me
Not exactly what I meant
There is a verse in the holy Quran you can check it
it's because you're unable yo give me a convincing answer
Because you don't want to convince yourself
why not quote it here'
Sure give me a moment
I can convince myself if you can provide a logical answer
The verse in the Quran where Allah takes responsibility for the Quran is Al-Hijr: 9, which says, “We revealed the Reminder and We are its Protector "
Hello who studied oroonoko prose restoration by appraisal Ben and paradise lost could explain to me some extracts?
is 'We' God themself?
What do you Indians think about China?
John isn't Indian tho
Oh
See Arabic language have different meanings for the same word in different contexts
I understand that
god use we to shows his greatness i think
Hola
I'm Indian tho
heyyy
How are you?
good n u?
Same
hi guys
this is not true
If you kill every primates, octopus will find
Fnet = mā
So where you from again
John serious before 2025
Boredguyfr single fr
I am since Dec 1
Okay
Basically Mike without a partner lmao
is John single tbh
So who is your partner?
You are always in chat btw 😜
Lore drop lmao
No one Omega lul
Isn't it in Mexico? On the Yucatán peninsula
I want to have a spiritual revelation from the Chicxulub impactor
Spiritual awakening lmao
What is this about?
64 million years ago
66
K-PG extinction event
After I meant after it impacted
Can you explain more
@manic juniper
Chicxulub means "the devil's flea" in Maya language. This was clearly revealed to them as an allegory from the atomised reptiles
Wait a minute wdym atomic reptile?
Atomised reptiles?
When the impactor hit the planet's surface many living beings were instantly atomised by the nuclear explosion
This infused their souls with high energy that persisted there to this day, driving the Mayans to insanity
That's interesting I thought vaporizered y'know
But also granting them immense knowledge
This is why they worshipped Kukulkan, their interpretation of a dinosaur (a feathered snake)
Or archosaurs in general
Indeed
I mean Nicarágua still has the pyramids that were built by the natives, if you want to know about their culture

Costa Rica is basically a resort for white tourists
It was said to be the Latin American Switzerland, but the small cities in the country are flooded with criminals, Panama has surpassed them in HDI due to that
Honduras and Nicaragua aren't good places to live in nowadays, the three inhabitable ones are Costa Rica, Panama and maybe El salvador, but Nicaragua is very attractive when it comes to tourism
Pardon me?
the new leader of El Salvador is kinda on 🔥 and lighting the country up
he's absolutely ruthless and doesn't spare even the youth criminals
complete disregard of juvenile laws or any sort of protection for criminals
you commit a crime, you get your ass thrown in jail
maybe we'll have a very habitable and beautiful El Salvador in a few years?
Why do you guys like Mussolini so much @dapper laurel
His granddaughter was the most voted councilor in Rome and her sister is a deputy
However, he deserves Serie A
Most people in Italy think that Mussolini did good things
pardon my weak history, but wasn't Mussolini one of the worst leaders in Italy's history with extreme gang connections and extravagant lifestyle funded by public money?
He was loaned to Pescara and then they loaned him again to Juve Stabia. He's a defender, scored his first goal recently.
No
Imagine if he had scored against Lazio, even the laziales would celebrate
Giolitti was worse
The "SS" Lazio 🤨
Società Sportiva Lazio
They had this as an acronym since its foundation, much before Hitler's rise to power
I know, it's just funny to think about it
His grandaughter (Rome's councilor) left Fratelli D'Italia for a center-rightist party because it was "too extremist" for her 💀
Rachele Mussolini
His mother, Alessandra mussolini, was a member of the European parliament
Yup she even appeared naked in an old movie, this family gotta be the weirdest in the world
Yup but his country is too small, the City of Mexico alone has more inhabitants than it
But he could have done in the other countries from Central America
I’m looking for native french speakers to practice with. I am 100% native english and spanish speaker. Feel free to DM me 🙂
Sure
hi
@marble elk ok sir come dms
Sure
Oke check dms :D

I need a spiritual journey
I could visit Nicaragua afterwards as well
99% of Lazio hooligans are fascists
Yes, most of the good things he did simply are past projects that were supposed to be completed by someone else, since he was a dictator he got all the merits (that happens when you are 20+ years in power), most were started under Giolitti
But that was juve stabia
And this name is not even written correctly in Latin
It should be Juventus Stabiae
Imagine that, hypothetically, Joe Biden singlehandedly completes the Wall™ that Trump wanted to create. Would you give all the credits to Biden or to the person that started the project?
Their supporters in general should be, a few months ago, a guy wrote "88" and "Hitlerson" on the back of his shirt, they write Mussolini's name in banners when they go protesting quite often, support Palestine because they oppose Jews
Romano Floriani Mussolini is a Lazio player, he's just loaned to Stabia
But that was juve stabia
Or, to put it better, Juventus Stabiae
Oficially he's a Lazio player, they can loan players to other clubs
Gioventù di Stabia
Yeah that was Stabia, he was loaned to Pescara before
well it is . there is a lot of bibles with a lot of changes but 1 quran
It's a real shame that he plays in Serie B
Aren't there 7
It should come on a permanent basis to SouthTyrol
He wants people to call him Mussolini
7 what
He will be good here
The ten recitations or ten readings are ten Qira'ats and recitations of the Quran approved by scholars in their research to determine the frequent recitations.
Neither Romano nor Floriani
I feel it's his place
They're ten actually
Are you cheering for a Mussolini relative Andos, why?
He is proud of his surname
His mother is a pretty one
As long as he's not Mussolini, I don't see what the problem is
Sussolini
Nah, bleh, she seems transgender
Mussolini and his wife were ugly but they did have some pretty offspring except for the men, I wonder why
Ok, maybe it was rude
just search and you will understand its ten recitations not 10 books
The Bible is the same, it's the same books but translated to other languages
No. It’s not. There are many people who would know what the bible says if they were all burned. Don’t judge something you don’t know.
He had also been an impostor, he tried to escape to Germany disguised as a German soldier
He was sus asf
Maybe if he didn't look that iconic he could've gotten away with it
There are a lot of translations, and the Catholic bible has seven more books than the Prostestant bible does, but the book would be pretty much the same in the end
If he had been less fat, maybe they would have mistaken him for a real soldier
There are Bibles with different books but most of them are shared by all Christians faiths
The most different ones are the Syriac, Ethiopian and Coptic Bibles
There are even some gospels that the Catholic church doesn't recognize
@thorny steeple My philosophy teacher called me a control freak because I pointed out to her that she can't be Catholic and not follow Catholic dogma at the same time
hahahahah lol u are right 
There are Turkish, Albanian and Bosnian Qur'ans anyway
She was like "I can't psychoanalyze you, but I think you're a control freak" 💀
Catholics changed quite a lot after the Second Vatican council, they can straight up say some heretical stuff and still call themselves Catholic in the end
Instead of a real argument
Can you recite them in these languages?
ahhahahah lol
Not in mainstream Islam but these are some of the most popular non-English translations
If you are Catholic, you don't have to deny the Pope, you cannot go against Catholic dogmas or have a different interpretation of the Bible.
This is why I am a proud Protestant
The Persian one should be the most famous, is it?
She must have been so perplexed by the comment that she said it to try to come out on top 
Or you can become sedevacantist
Maybe 🤔 I don't know Iran's recent history that much, Atatürk pushed to have it translated to Turkish, the others were translated by order of socialist governments
Or maybe those in Urdu
She's just delusional, but I somehow like her
Bengali, whatever
I've never met any South Asian that doesn't read them in Arabic, they often learn how to read them without knowing the meanings
that's good.
I had also entered a Mormon phase, but then people started making jokes about soaking and I decided to rage quit
I guess it's one of the biggest selling points, they recite it in the same way but they don't necessarily know the meaning
That's not a good choice 
For example kamu said that shit several times
You love this girl Andos
No
Don't lie to us
But I'm busy with other people rn
Long distance relationships aren't worth
guys i respect your answers but i have a video Could any one of you watch it until end and explain to me
I mean, in real life, I'm busy with other people, I'm not interested in discord relationships
its a youtube video
I had to repeat this several times to an Indian boy today
@thorny steeple@manic juniper@sonic hazel
oh, ok, if I can help. Go ahead
Hlo
thank you watch it until end even if you disagree with him
The video is not in English and the subtitles that are generated are not synchronized correctly.. 




I will watch
but at the beggining hahhahahh lol wait
ok
But he's talking about random events in the Bible
Hey
Why are you so demanding
How can I make an assertive analysis if the video is not in English? 
I have no way of guessing. But as the rest of the video is in English, I will try. It’s not a requirement.. It’s just talking about what he asked for.
Disclaimer: it doesn't seem very informative
oh... really??? 
Yeah he isn't talking about versions of the Bible or the Qur'an, just about random things
Oh..
I’ll try to watch........ Not now, because I’m working. Hope don’t waste time.....
Hi everyone
Do you have some channels in English on YouTube to recommend, about science or any kind of interesting subject?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zR3Igc3Rhfg
I don’t know if this is what you are looking for, but a friend once recommended me this video. Through it, I believe you can find others as good as him.
On a dry lakebed in Nevada, a group of friends build the first scale model of the solar system with complete planetary orbits: a true illustration of our place in the universe.
We're making a series! Check the project out at www.ToScaleSeries.com
Consider becoming a Patreon to support more films like this: patreon.com/toscale
A film by Wylie O...
do you mean that the events in the bible is something random we shouldn't read it or understand it
It isn't very related to what we were talking about
well not problem
can you explain to me how jesus is god and the son of god at the sametime
Thanks, I will watch it for sure ! I'm just trying to learn new things in English and about life in general
Wow.... I really try to understand why you think you are right, just because you do not have the answer you want in the religion of others. It is for those who believe.
yw!! 😁 This video is pretty good!
The channel looks interesting too
I'm not Christian, I read the Bible and I didn't get the impression that he is besides the gospel of John. But why wouldn't it be possible
Zeus was the son of god (Kronos)
And he himself was a god
Now in Christianity it's presumed that Jesus and his father are the same God
the god must be the most powerful one . so how the god have a god
As for how it's possible for a God to have a son that is himself, is that truly difficult? An omnipotent being could potentially create paradoxes in a whim without issues
yeah.. sometimes just a caos... hashahshash
A God could create solid air, or a smart human without a brain
well thank you for your answers but is that make any sence to you
the god is the son of himself
No but that's the point, if you believe in an omnipotent being then you must believe that it is capable of impossible, sometimes paradoxical feats
Even if you take gods that weren't omnipotent in the Greek tradition like Zeus they still were able to accomplish impossible feats, he could handle lightnings built by supernatural beings, throw them, fight against a giant monster and trap it under a volcano
Bear in mind that this monster could drag down the stars themselves and he made all the Olympians besides Zeus cower in fear before him
i think god must make his religon very clear
because if we use your argument
we cant belive anything any more
But no religion is
It's why I don't believe, how am I supposed to choose
Because the standard has become imagination, not logic.
Isn't that why it's called faith
nope
🤔
faith is to be certian that there is a god create me of a purpse
and i have to belive in that
Yeah, if someone has no faith then why would they believe
but you have to find the religion of god the right one
Believing despite the lack of ultimate evidence
Why not the right ones
Maybe there are more than one
if there is more than one you need to prove that opinion
If there is only one you need to prove that opinion
because if we use "maybe " in anything in life we will find it a lie
Most people throughout history used to believe in more than one god, there still are people that do this
yea that a very good question
and that the path to find the truth
i will explain
if there is more than one i have to study all religions
What is the topic of the discussion?
and when you do that by using the logic you will figred out that all of them exept one is lies
whats the right religion
Wow
Audacious topic
This is a rather biased question, it depends on the belief of the person answering
The Flying Spaghetti Monster (FSM) is the deity of the Church of the Flying Spaghetti Monster, or Pastafarianism, a parodic new religious movement that promotes a light-hearted view of religion. It originated in opposition to the teaching of intelligent design in public schools in the United States. According to adherents, Pastafarianism (a port...
That's not what people used to believe though
If you asked the Romans or the Greeks about the "right" religion they wouldn't understand your question
so whats yours
First because there was no concept of religion in ancient Greece, and also because they thought that all deities were the same just with different names or that the extra deities simply were spirits or lesser known deities
Agnosticism, I don't like making statements
Do you like your boyfriends?
Have u ever noticed that where does diety supernatural god's belongs ? Which religion?
It would be a shame to have a boyfriend without loving him

mine takes a long time to respond and I get really mad about it but I love him so much what to do I already told him but it seems like he doesn't understand I have to talk face to face or if it's not incommunicado with him what to do
do you belive in god
Love is miserable and mythical
Also because modern religions are based on concepts relating to morality and the Greek and Roman pagan cults were not very moral, so they would also have different evaluation parameters
Before the Norse converted to Christianity they integrated Jesus as another god in their pantheon, he was considered to be the son of their god Odin, and he was the brother of another god (Thor)
Exclusively online relationship?
As an half Roman, I would think in that way
Relationship
It's because you haven't experienced it yet
ohhhh
I believe that this stems from their later interpretations, before converting to Christianity the Greeks were starting to reinterpret some of their myths (especially the more questionable ones like Zeus brainwashing a woman into loving a bull) to fit the narrative that deities had to be all good
Set him up on an irl date to discuss about it
you mean odin and fray frya or something like that
They started to interpret them in a more metaphorical key
There's slight differences between love and care ....
Ok tanks
Yeah, when Christians explained that Jesus was the son of the god in the sky the Norse thought that they were talking about Odin
Of course, a difficult difference to make if you haven't experienced it first
Since Thor is Odin's son, that made him Jesus's brother
Good luck with your bf
In my opinion this is due to the evolution of Greek philosophy, which became increasingly moral and needed to quantify good and evil, and to distinguish them for reasons
They thought that Jesus was the king of Jerusalem, another kingdom within the Yggdrasil, so it was linked to the land of the giants, Asgard... All that stuff
It's a bit fraudulent
I don't have to experience theses thing's bcoz i have know what does reality look likes of loving each other....
@manic juniperand the storm means thor is angry and there is something called ragnarock were the gods died
And what does it look like?
I told you before man
Yeah, Fimbulvinter
That storm wasn't caused by Thor but by a prophecy
The death of Baldr would cause the season unending
What's difference between odin , thor and Jesus, and what's relationship between them ?
There is some truth to the Norse myths
If you read them in contrast with the Balto-Finnic myths you get the bigger picture, it's a story about colonialism and war against the Finns and the Sámi
In the bible there's mentioned about thor and odin , " NOT" that mean they haven't exist in reality
Odin and his brothers slaughter Ymir the first giant to form our world, Kalevi was the father of the ancient Finns
They're just mythical god's
It's clearly a story about wars between our ancestors over the control of Fennoscandia
From Vikings germanicc
It's quite delusional, the idea you have of an experience without having lived it and often different from reality you know
But they were mentioned by independent sources in the Widsith, at least one of those deities was a real life figure
Kalevi existed for real
So why wouldn't I believe it, they were at war and they fought one another more than once
"Attila ruled over the Huns, Eormanric the Goths,
Becca the Baningas, Gifica the Burgundians.
Caesar ruled the Greeks and Celic the Finns,
Hagena the Holmrigs and Heoden the Glomms."
https://oldenglishpoetry.camden.rutgers.edu/widsith/
Celic was the Latinised form of Kalevi, Kalevi was a giant that was said to be the progenitor of the Baltic Finns
Widsith is just poem composerd by kemp melone, who wrote about dieties, but it has to do NTG with odin and thor ,
It was a poem about real life rulers, not about deities, and the author isn't even known
💴 Welcome to Positive.Manhood - Inspiring videos about Motivation, Mindset and Money
🔔 Subscribe now to stay up-to-date with the best advices!
Dominik Tarczynski
.
.
.
.
.
.
The content in this post is not owned by Positive.Manhood; it has been edited and shared solely for the purpose of raising awareness. If the content owner (visual/audio)...
He’s the real supreme leader
What's definiation of reality ?
Salute to this man and appreciate if they can follow him forever
Have u read ? It ?
In context, this means empirical experience, as opposed to more or less rational thought.
Yes, did you? You skimmed through the Wikipedia page and mentioned a medievalist mentioned there instead of the author being unknown
The author of the Widsith isn't known
Unknown? Really? And there's one thing that' i haven't visit Wikipedia,,... I have know about that that's why I mentioned theses thing's and if I have to gather data and knowledge about somthing so i have to use anything I want it has to do NTG with this non evidence argument
Show me evidence? About that then ?
Bro you literally mentioned some random scholar that studied the poem as its author, that's pathetic as fuck. Mashing random words here won't save your face
An widsith was written by mistral and scope of the heroic age , after that 10th century it reviewed by melone camp ,
Congrats, you can read a Wikipedia page
" Ætla weold Hunum, Eormanric Gotum,
Becca Baningum, Burgendum Gifica.
20
Casere weold Creacum ond Celic Finnum,
Hagena Holmrygum ond Heoden Glommum."
The original
U have half of evidence which haven't proof ur point lol ... So what about side author? And Romans?
Is anglo-saxon mythology the same as Norse mythology @manic juniper it seems to have some differences
And how does u measure something or something reality?
Hello friends
are you able to match thy freak
Let's see
@weary belfry HELP HES TRYING TO ASSAULT ME!
Can you say something that makes sense for once?
Dude..
Hi
hes jd alchoholic
dont disrespect him!
mb bbg im sorry
Demm
It's similar, the stories could be different since those are more subject to changes by the oral narrators than the names of the deities themselves, but the deities were almost the same, same names and qualities, they share them with the Norse and the northern Germanic tribes, the mythical creatures too are very similar or identical (elves, giants, sprites, gnomes...)
oral?
doesnt that mean uh
like teeth and stuff
Why should they?
Through voice, as opposed to written accounts
ohhhhhhhhhh
In relation to sensory perception
so whats an oral prostate exam
Heyyy
heyyyyy

Sup bruh
fat pig
whats your opinion on king von
Have no idea who are you talking about
alr buddy
Who is the king
Make sense? just rephrase ur msg and afterwards u can that to me , the poem was about real ruler ? Wtf ? It's fictional and often times read as by novels? Poem has obviously fictional account and consider
king von my goat
Iam gonna search about it
real asf rolex1537
Attila, my favourite fictional ruler lmfaooo, please go home
Bro i hate rappers it's not ma fav type
it's actually rolex09513
hes the king of oblock
Go and research about difference between fictional and non fiction and I'm already in home lol
24 bodies to his name
real asf rolex 3159
deep as usual
Change it to seamaster300
fr
Maybe I should have to remove that name
it looks just like rolex5349
make it alcoholic5349
finna pull all the baddies
doesn't look like a sub tbf
like isfrun
Was Attila fictional? Yes or no?
Wouldn't seem cool i think
are you a baddie?
ok Nonchelant Nonchalant Hive Drone
its intentional
i know
Hungarian ?
No
hey gang is isfrun a baddie?
Alright I guess it's useless to discuss with someone that doesn't even know who Attila is
should I change mine to nonchelant seal?
May Iku-Turso devour your progeny
isnt she that woman who has the last name hunt
Why would you
don't wanna be iseal
What about pococurante seal
wtf is that word
use words i can understand
smarty pants
yea
no
oh
yeah
Ok ok i appreciate that so ? Who was the poeter of attila ? Then
Cringe English word from French
hey isfrun are you a baddie? jd alcoholic wanted me to ask you
*rolex53 something whatever
I don't think so but he's/ she's somthing odd like iykyk
how about this one?
ahhh
i think it's classier
alr
but not as beautiful as omega
Is this real life or a representation
The lighting is trippy
? @manic juniper i haven't know about what is attila so u can tell me ? What it's ?
How can you wear one of those metallic watches on your bare skin
idk I wear a rubber strap
Costly as fck
nah it's good
people dont comment on it?
i have an omega watch
wish we were like rolex5416
yeah
i wanna be iseal Seamaster Diver 300m Chronometer 42mm Blue Dial Watch
Watch is watch .. they show time anyway
yeah wear timex
Sealmaster
this thingy
Stop bro it's Just username 😭
ok username
stop rolex53 something
oh
sorry it's username
sorry username
Sure I have to change' it tooo ....
stop username
rolexalcoholicsomething53
can you change it to cherry pie 69
🤣
Oh wait a minute
or like delusionalrolex53
Which one I should have ?
This one
Or this ?
This user name seems so cool
yeah
But that is too long, haven't fit as an username
do rolexalcoholic53
Hii
So MAGA-land is exploding rn
Trump’s base
Basically the economic republicans and the nazis are fighting each other
@thorny steeple you didn't reply to the previous topic
Can we not with the trolling in here
This is not the channel for that, all the others are already used for trolling
He's definitely going on date
Recitations?
There is only one Qur'an
You are not smart enough
Hi
Hi
why were u fighting @manic juniper about smth?
We are not fighting it is a healthy relationship between us
It happens in relationship don't worry
Why people here keep tagging me
ok....?
I have to turn off everything
k
Because people think you are smart but you are not actually
Ooh trust me she's one of the smartest person I've ever met on internet
💀
Blud just said she ain't smart enough, that's hilarious
I thought it too first but lack of research makes her ignorant
That's a very low bar
She said there are different versions of the holy Quran lol
And that's correct 
Brother are you out of your mind
Lmao fair enough, because mythical lmknot might be on my list
/.s
Lemme give you an example, do you think quran is completely same as it was 1400 years ago, no one even added a point?
Yes it is indeed
We have discussed about it yesterday as well check it out above
Uthman ibn Affan: am i joke to you
He was a believer and companion of the prophet
He is no joke
Aren't there these too?
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Codex_of_Ibn_Mas'ud
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Codex_of_Ubayy_ibn_Ka'b
Although functionally extinct
The codex of Ibn Mas'ud is a purported mushaf of the Quran that differs from the established mushaf of Uthman and is attributed to Abd Allah ibn Mas'ud, a companion of Muhammed.
This variant has not been definitively found in any existing early Quranic manuscript, but details about it are mentioned in literary references and historical accounts...
The codex of Ubayy ibn Ka'b is a mushaf of the Quran that differs from the Uthmanic codex and is attributed to Ubayy ibn Ka'b, a companion of Muhammad. The codices of Ubayy and Uthman differ on point of several textual variants between the two, but more importantly, Ubayy's codex possesses a total of 116 surahs, whereas the codex of Uthman posse...
You guys are actually being ignorant because of lack of knowledge
Back then there was no fathah, kasrah, and dammah he added em lol
These aren't even different recitations but different codexes
Akin to the Syriac and Coptic Bibles
I thought you knew about it like every other good Muslim
Atleast read something about your own religion lol
Yeah that's correct
Different sects don't mean different Qur'an
Bro I know my religion well and other abrahamic religions as well
fathah, kasrah, and dammah are different sectors

That's what ignorant people says
You're surely south asian
Do you know about zeer zabar pesh, we call em fathah, kasrah, and dammah in Arabic
It's not sector lmao
Lmao that doesn't mean there are different versions of the holy Quran
Qur'an is the same
Adding fathah, kasrah and dammah doesn't change it lol
Brother get some knowledge
Now you're accepting they added fathah, kasrah, and dammah
Can you ping me that message where I said it
Sure
Check it out @formal pilot
Yeah before Zayd ibn Thabit there was some other scripts also, he unified it
On Technicality thers are diff version
With with dots
One without dots
Atleast
Lmao
You said they even added a dot
The translations too
Different translations doesn't mean different Qur'an
It is for the non-Arabic speakers, who can't read it properly. To make it readable for the majority it was done. That doesn't make different versions of the holy Quran as The Bible
There is only one Holy Qur'an and it will remain the same till this world lasts
You agreed on the fact that they even added a point
Now it's standardized, even in Arabic speaking countries you'll find same quran as in your local mosque
You can't take it na
This they won't accept, even after having archeological evidence
Bible gets translated: different versions
Qur'an gets translated: nothing to see here
I already said Arabic language have different meanings for the same word
Yeah that's they point
The Bible tried to avoid translations in the past, those that pushed the most for it were the Protestants at first with the Reformation, then the Catholics did the Counter-Reformation to copy their success
Are you out of your mind? Bible is changed throughout time
It's ridiculous how Romanians have masses in Old Church Slavonic, their language isn't even Slavic
Is quran in same form as it used to be and they didn't even added a point?
Yes it is indeed. Adding fathah kasrah doesn't make the authenticity questionable
I've translated quran with actual meaning, it's in 7 volumes every volume is as thick as standard Qur'an
I have already said that there are different translations by scholars but that too have the same meaning
Na i ain't cooking, I'd rather discuss these topics with flare
Atleast he makes sense

Wasn't the Arabic language still not standardised until the 8th century too? That's after the Qur'an was narrated
I wonder if they changed the interpretations according to that
Not at all
Imagine how fucked is it especially since it's an abjad
Should've been revealed to Finnish people since our language is very conservative
If only we could write... ✍🏻
You missed when he called me a gorilla, then proceeded to say atheists consider women to be as dumb as gorillas
It is translated in finnish as well you can cross check different translations to believe in it's authenticity
Now you are playing a Woman Card
That's fkd up, gorillas aren't dumb
I bet they've better photographic memory than humans
True, I don't even get why it's supposed to be an insult to be compared to apes
I only dislike chimps because they can be cruel but none of them are dumb, not even gibbons
Keep being ignorant, we will always be there to explain
Yeah I've seen chimps hunting down monkeys, they're cruel af
Or do your own research from authentic sources
They treat their food better than how they treat other apes
@stoic cedar what are you studying btw? Just asking in general
Random infanticide just because they have to
I am an IT engineer
What about you?
Understandable, ig you're in 20s
I am 24 years old
There's a really great chimp research center in japan
I keep reading about their articles, apparently chimps are really smart
So random infanticide might be justifiable from their pov
The only bird line that survived K-T be like
It is, crows and ravens do the same, it's better to get rid of your future enemy in the past
Chimps would've stopped Hitler unlike us
How old are you @formal pilot ?
Just studying and brain and emotions
The baby Hitler dilemma would be instantly solved
Soon 24
I see you use dead emote a lot
You don't act like one 
I was going to say the same. Grow up kid
Do they kill their own offsprings?
There's no fun in growing up tbh
I don't know if they do, but they kill pretty much any potential rival species
Paying taxes and bills are too much for me
True that
I've seen crows and ravens having skirmishes between one another but they seem like mostly harmless skirmishes
Light wrestling
They'd be corvid supremacists but wouldn't destroy themselves unlike chimps and us
I don't think they kill offsprings, that would be stupid for evolution
Carrying testosterone is even harder 💪🏻
It would make sense if it's intraspecific competition
Have some balls, it would be easier
There is also brood reduction but I don't think crows do that
Balls are becoming balloons and I don't want them to explode

Nvm magpies do that and they're basically crows
We call it hernia, visit a doctor
Wth is magpies, lemme Google
No we call it The Great Manlyhood
That thing I used to have
Yeah I've seen magpie robin performing crazy dance moves
Where are you from @formal pilot ?
Why is it great
You won't get it kiddo
Explain me or I'll think even you don't know about it
Huh it's okay I don't want to show my IQ to make myself great in others eyes. Do you know there is a concept of evil eyes 👁️?
If you don't want to show off why are you preaching about great manlyhood and pretending to be superior, isn't it contradictory
What's evil eyes
Men 🍵
I just gave you the answer brother to your hernia comment
You should not comment on those things if you can't take your insult
I was respectful all these times
There is also a concept of self-respect and dignity
Which was derived from your comment about testosterone, and your comment can be translated to pretending to be superior and showing off
And you just contradicted it by saying concept of evil eye
What's wrong with that?
Women often wants to be with a guy who is superior
Your inability to explain what the great manlyhood is
Yes something wrong with that?
In what terms??
If you are manly enough you should know about that
And if you know it you'll be able to explain it
I don't know that's why I need your explanation
Pardon me but I am not in a mood to explain it right now
I will explain to you once you grow up
I already said i am not in the mood
That's so disrespectful to the Sigma community
There's even a community?
Huh let it be brother
I am not in a mood Right now
We will talk later, Take care
I never meant to offend anyone

No one is offended here, we all have thick skin
Pardon me if anyone got offended
We aren't religious, it's hard to offend us 
🤣
Lmao
See you guys later
Enough of this shit
That whole geographical region is high, that's why I try to maintain anonymity
Me too
I definitely have blubber
Your eyes tho 😂
It's an achievement
I have cranial pachyostosis
The bones are thicker than normal
Pachy means thick or wide in Greek, ostosis indicates bones
I have this
Gotcha, I've met folks with thick skull, it's so thick that there's hardly enough space for brain
that's exactly how I am, it appears as normal on the outside but on the inside there is barely any space for it
It's optimised and good for bashing
No sir, i don't know anything about her
I'm sure level 1 helmet is enough for you
Anyway I'm out
I'll enjoy working from home
Who is gen aphla troll?
I'll enjoy being unemployed
i hope u find a sugar mama for your unemployed ass cuz u aint surviving a day with no money.
Wait until you need money 💰
Is your IQ so high that it’s giving you a constant altitude sickness, or is that just what happens when you’re too far from reality?
dont trust in, trust it god
?
Reality is often not what you consume daily
Reality is often not what you consume daily—sometimes it’s just the bitter taste left behind after swallowing your own hype.
alslam aliykom brothers
if you're looking for someone SAUCYYY 💅 (@sosy), i'm available af. 😂 Sorry had to crack that joke.
Wa alaikum assalam
Should've waited till it got dark. you would've disappeared anyway except your teeth of course.
Wanna swallow my hype?
nope. you have your mouth, don't you? just bend a little and stretch you neck a little and voila you'll find success. good job bro.
Nah I don't make self love, I like to share with you poor people take it 💦💦💦
You should think twice before saying anything
Do not start this shit @thorny steeple you won't be able to digest it
Speaking of gen alpha did you know today is the last day in history to be able to be born as a gen alpha
i am guessing gen beta is next?
Yes
I wonder whats coming next
The Future awaits!
Footbolista Fiat
Didn’t regret I supported him
Let’s see what will happen in January
He’s gonna led his people to eliminate every single terrorist on that shit ground I believe
Any one pls DM me to be friends!
Which terrorist organisation Israeli or Palestinian ?
Without forgetting the homosexuality also ultimately...
i agree with you the palestinian must get back their land
Could you stop tagging her
What's he talking about
New year’s congratulation word to people
Xi dies then what happens next
Chinese new year when
Whose cat are you
Hello 👋
check dm
Do you want to be my friend
Ok
Nah just for the regular new year
Tomorrow’s 2025 and he said something to the people
please rise for our national leader
Hellu, wassup?
Lmao
Check that dude's message history
Lmao, Background ☠️
I was also wondering who he was looking for, let's help him 
Chills ran down my spine
Oh, why? Does this have anything to do with that user?
Too many things on shelf/table
help him to find his way out the server, how plesent
Na lmao just something random lmao
Oh.. sorry.. I can't help him anymore rn, I tried to help him as much as I could...
