P2: u misused my permesis to come to wrong conclusion that a biased from u ... the universe depending on its parts in a way they form ,shape and show its nature and its image as a whole and dependency never meant to be used the way u did by saying:~~ " implying the universe depends on it's part => the universe is a emergent phenomenon => the universe can be reduced to it's component"~~.. also the universe depending on laws meaning => depending on his limited nature and mechanizme to be the way it s now .
ik it could be exist in another way if laws are deff ,but it still show restriction on it .
ur making a claim i never claimed and starting attacking it , my claim is deff and simple the universe depending on his laws and and composes or parts to determine his nature and existence not in causation way but in a relation way ,bcz causations is deff from dependency , i can cause something to exist but it ll still able to exist if i stopped to exist . but something depending on me ll never exist if i disappear so it implies continued existence.
if variables changes the nature of the universe changes. that a form of dependency, or u want to treat the universe as consciece being ?,and say the universe behave and act that way deliberately and thats none-sense and unproven scientifically from a cosmological perspective so far, bcz ur assuming that the universe is behaving that way not bcz its restricted but bcz its his nature ,but the unanswered question still there : what determined its nature ?. since must be a determinator , makes certainty that the universe is restricted and depending .
therfore it cannot exist a world where depending things depend on depending things to infinity , must be a necessary existence that is independent and self-sufficient .