#🧠|serious-chat
1 messages · Page 323 of 1
The sun on the sky is damn damn red eh
The sun in the heart is Donald Trump eh
He leads people ban abortion eh
Really takeover be the owner!
Iya iziyoyaeryaziyo a
Really takeover be the owner!
🇵🇸🇵🇸🇵🇸
🇮🇱 🇮🇱 🇮🇱
Italiano
Unfortunately they do
😘
Yeah, friendly and manly kiss, not gay kiss
Exactly, we Chad , Italiano
Genocide supporter
Cringe
@manic juniper so you basically comparing slaves to a poor person in capitalist society?
Like that
The socialist fraternal kiss was a special form of greeting between socialist state leaders. The act demonstrated the special connection that exists between Communist countries, consisting of an embrace, along with a series of three kisses on alternate cheeks. In rare cases, when the two leaders considered themselves exceptionally close, the kis...
Sort of, some of them were better off with their rights
I'm not pro-slavery because we have alternatives that are better (to me)
But I don't understand how slavery being normal for most of its existence is proof of objective morality
I had something cooking about slavery and you just dropped slavery in Roman Empire, and i hate you for killing my chain of thoughts
Why
If I'm not mistaken they also were some of the first to abolish it, I don't recall there being slavery in it in the middle ages for example
It wasn't as bad as chattel slavery
In the Italian States and in the eastern Roman empire
Apparently there was still slavery but it was very reduced
Everything comes down to
if a slave owner treats his slaves well, does that make it moral then? I know it's in the minority of cases, but within these small cases, does it make their act of committing slavery moral just because they treated their slaves well?
loser supporter
It used to be better than the alternative, being homeless and not feeding your family
And if you were a slave of a wealthy person chances are you hit jackpot
DID I JUST HEARD ROMAN EMPIRE?
However, slavery was never actually abolished here
Alhamdulillah, it was the greatest empire according to my white writers and i believe em
I was a slave until 2017
Dayamm that's crazy
We learn new things every single day, Today I'm going to bed learning slavery can be justifiable 💀
How did it end?
I believe that Alex O'Connor did a video on this too or at least it was in a video about philosophical hot takes
You should believe that the Roman Empire is one of the greatest in history just because I say so 😡😡😡
I married my owner's daughter
I mean if we look at the size, we surely had bigger empires
I'll make sure to watch it
Is she related 💀
The importance of an empire is not only measured by its size, but also by its innovations and cultural influence
So I wuz romanz, I wuz kang, emperorz n such
British mongol and Russian empires are way ahead in the game
If we look at cultural impact
Middle eastern folks did a really great job
I mean look at the population of muslims and Christians
Maybe only the British empire
The rest is nothing
Persian? Ottoman 
Nothing
The Ottoman Empire claimed to be the successor to the Roman Empire, as did Russia, this speaks volumes
Which Persian one
They had at least four or five
The Romans technically had 2 or 3 of them
That means they use it as a form of punishment, not that it's not morally wrong to enslave someone from their group. That proves humans are not morally perfect at best, it does not prove they've seen slavery as morally right altogether.
I've already addressed this point that people did have varying exceptions in which certain actions that are considered immoral can be justified. This is applied ethics, not normative or meta ethics, so it's irrelevant.
Becoming a slave voluntarily because you're poor is not a form of punishment
It's a lack of social services
Guys is here anyone who speaks espagnole ?
It's not. I've already explained how moral values are normative and known by intuition. Why should I doubt my intuition?
Just because it's possible to you that morality is subjective doesn't mean it is. Possibility is not a probability. I could be a butterfly moving around thinking that I'm a human, but I intuitively believe I am not, as long as I don't have a reason to believe otherwise, holding such a belief would be unjustified. So, it would seem that your position is the one that requires justification, not mine since it's normative.
Additionally, the same reasoning can be applied to epistemic facts as I've previously mentioned. There is a similarity between moral claims (what we ought to do from the perspective of morality), and epistemic claims (what we ought to do from the perspective of knowledge and evidence). They are both normative, both tell us one course of action is the correct one, therefore, arguments attacking morality might as well undermine themselves as they are attacking normativity in general.
No, statistics are not necessarily used to form hypothesis or assumptions. They can be used to infer causal relationships. It seems to me like you're abusing the principle of correlation and causation. Apart from being a normative epistemic principle, at this point you could argue that if one puts a paper on fire and it gets burned, one is not justified to believe he caused the paper to burn, only that they correlate. It would be a travesty. The correlation causation fallacy is committed only when a causal relationship is assumed without a proof.
Putin congrats Trump 
You said people were enslaved in certain societies for debt. That seems like a punishment rather than a normative or meta ethical belief. However, this example is still applied ethics, so it's irrelevant. This doesn't mean they did perceive slavery as moral on its own.
I made many examples, and no I don't think they even thought about slavery as moral or immoral just like working is not a moral matter
When something is normalised it's not seen through a moral lens, to me homosexuality is simply amoral because it has nothing to do with morals
There you go. So your examples are irrelevant. Whether morality is objective or subjective is a meta-ethical topic, it has nothing to do with applied ethics.
A lot of leaders did, netanyahu, mbs, jordan's king, indian pm, etc...
He has good relations with other countries leaders unlike biden
Yes
For any Americans in Red States there are resources for you if you need to flee.
The sequel
Season 2 is coming!!
Stay tuned
putin is good
What serious conversation did i miss
First one, The Achaemenid Empire
Justification for slavery
The Russian empire stratched from Ukraine to Northern Asia and lasted for centuries 
It was only their serfdom system and the West preventing them from developing
Very much like the Ottomans
Black women look very good to me and I'm a light pardo
I envy adolescents because I wish I would be one of them again tho my adolescence was shit
8 e c 99 Oct
putin is my president 
wdym?
people flee from San Francisco, Los Angeles 
Zombie apocalypse everyday until our general secretary Xi Jinping comes to that city and Newson clean it up 🤣
Don’t pick a fight with me tonight mine, you’re already on the hook for this morning,
Our*
Dude this is just wild
What just happened ? You appears to be abnormal than before
Anyway good for you
That does not relevant to my statement of how statistics help you to make assumptions, not conclude objective facts.
And the example of casual relationships still in a civil degree of definition doesn’t really matter that much.
The point is, how you gonna explain morality is objective, while I can counter with this definition in another morality you disagree with.
I don’t think it’s possible, that’s why my conclusion was objective morality doesn’t exist.
And you neither could observe nor provide legit proof.
The fact itself of some people follow a similar moral principle is based on statistics and hypotheses.
minecraft morning 
Here’s afternoon but morning!
how could i miss this, yesterday was the day of the October Revolution
Grazhdanskaya Oborona - And the battle is going on again
Русский прорыв в Москве 27 мая 1994 г., УДС "Крылья Советов"
Russian breakthrough in Moscow May 27, 1994, stadium "Wings of the Soviets"
The overlay on the top left in the video means "In Memoriam Yegor Letov".
Концерт инфо (ру): https://bit.ly/2OCh6nU
ГрОб/GrOb - инфо/info (ру/en/de): htt...
The battle is going on again
The heart is worrying in the chest
And Lenin is young once again
And the young October is ahead! 🫡
That was in October, right ?
By the old style calendar it was October 25, the calendar was changed, so it was November 7
That's why we celebrate Christmas on January 7th. Because old calendar was different
How can one practice being humble?
Lenin's speech on the soviet propaganda film "Lenin in October", performed by the actor Boris Shchukin.
Lenin was so damn cool ngl.
Until he handover the power that caused a competition between Stalin, Trosky
Stalin is not a communist revolutionary but a guy who works for communist party for came to power
And trosky’s permanent revolution and anarchist communism contradicts with Lenin’s centralized political system that manually develop and towards a communist society
Communist Soviet Union is dead after Lenin is dead.
What it being replaced, is a new red empire.
Check this, red army choir https://youtu.be/0UXQPwt0ejE?si=8ZqsN25cjuUluLDv 🫡
TRUMP TRUMP
Donald Trump
Donald Trump
this Trumpsters gathering only lacks the sieg heil salute
I salute the day that he was elected.
America, first.
I just love him when he asked ROC for money
I bet Xi can't be more happier in that day
we all laughing all the time such a clown DPP in ROC
lurks in serious chat
@feral river my cousin is going to Beijing next month, he has a question for you
Is it safe to tell a Chinese man that I'm from Taiwan, just as a joke
ofc I have friends from Taiwan
and one of them live in mainland they are okay
Taiwan is part of China, not only Chinese nation but culturally, linguistically part of China.
It was like a North Korean person come to South Korea.
politically, Taiwan's official name is Republic of China, the mainland was People's Republic of China.
it was not some pro-Chinese dilemma it was just a simple truth.
New invention by media
it's absolutely relevant. What are you talking about? It addresses the problematic point in your statement that says "not conclude objective facts".
Correlation can imply causation, when there is a causal relationship that can be inferred. Let me elaborate using an example:
- Studies show that daily coffee consumption is correlated with higher level of heart health. Assuming that coffee consumption and heart health have a casual relationship would be unjustified, because other factors such as physical activities, diet, or lifestyle habits could influence both the consumption of coffee and heart health. Therefore, that would be an example of correlation doesn't imply causation.
- Studies on a new medication show that controlled trial of tests produced data of significant decrease in blood pressure. The nature of experimental design and controlled variables in this example does imply a causal relationship. Therefore, that would be an example of correlation implying causation.
If you disagree with any of the above statements you might as well have to assume you shouldn't take any medication if you get sick, because correlation always doesn't imply causation and therefore, medication is not really responsible for curing you.
If you agree, then you'll have to agree that objective facts do exist and that our subjective experiences are adaptive and reflective of them, such that, our five senses use an experimental method in a context of controlled variables similar to how medication can be proved casual with curing certain diseases.
Keyboard Warriors
re-li-gion.
The phrase "correlation does not imply causation" refers to the inability to legitimately deduce a cause-and-effect relationship between two events or variables solely on the basis of an observed association or correlation between them. The idea that "correlation implies causation" is an example of a questionable-cause logical fallacy, in which...
What!? First, you didn't even given yourself the chance to read what wrote. Second, you're using a term that you don't even fully understand.
You could at least learn the implication of your ignorance if you don't want to bother learning the basics of statistics or philosophy and meta-ethics: https://youtu.be/HUti6vGctQM?si=s0Ga2L8EGBGNlSEl
Have fun improving your math & physics skills! Head to https://brilliant.org/minutephysics/
Footnote video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iMbcMMe0D_Y
This video is about how causal models (which use causal networks) allow us to infer causation from correlation, proving the common refrain not entirely accurate: statistics CAN be used to prove...
still give you the same result: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Correlation_does_not_imply_causation
The phrase "correlation does not imply causation" refers to the inability to legitimately deduce a cause-and-effect relationship between two events or variables solely on the basis of an observed association or correlation between them. The idea that "correlation implies causation" is an example of a questionable-cause logical fallacy, in which...
I don't think it's debatable.
it was just how a truth were established, if you can against this natural rule of establishing truth, you can forge anything.
Did you even read that Wikipedia article?
I did a lot of times.
Then explain to me, what do you understand of correlation doesn't imply causation?
Don't cite the article. If you can't explain it simply, you don't understand it.
The very statement of "correlation doesn't imply causation" and its implication already proves how ignorant you are about it.
It says that correlation does not imply causation, not that it deny or disproves causation. It just refers to exactly what the Wikipedia article you fail to comprehend says "refers to the inability to legitimately deduce a cause-and-effect relationship between two events or variables solely on the basis of an observed association or correlation between them.", So, if one can "deduce" (quoting from the article) the causal relationship, it then implies a casual relationship. It's simple that a 5 year old would understand it with ease.
one moment, I'm on match right now
Studies on a new medication show that controlled trial of tests produced data of significant decrease in blood pressure. The nature of experimental design and controlled variables in this example does imply a causal relationship. Therefore, that would be an example of correlation implying causation.
Let me explain this: you made a conclusion based on statistics that controlled variables as you claimed but how could you conclude a casual relationship based on what you believed a correlation that can not be observed ?
The casual relationship is inferred. The correlation of two events can be observed.
can anyone read my english assignment? Its a analyzing text about the first chapter in the story "Gravel" by Alice Munro
the relationship is what you can't observe, you can observe I drink water, also you can observe I play LOL, can you conclude because I drink water so I play LOL ?
That's a trivial example. Of course this example would demonstrate a correlation that doesn't imply causation. Applying experimental method of trial and error in a context of controlled variables would reveal they are not casually related.
You're beating around the bush. I've already explained the difference and gave examples. It's very clear.
I questioned your example and you responded nothing about it.
and this is not a trivial example
and it's you beating around the bush
you realized that you given out a bunch of abstractive statements which basically out of nowhere that could proof nothing but beating around the bush, you quickly switched away from it.
what I'm really doing is using your way to counter your example.
I did respond. (#🧠|serious-chat message)
Your understanding of correlation doesn't imply causation is inherently wrong. You're taking it to an absolute, implying that no casual relationship can be drawn from anything. Because there are always correlations in a casual relationship.
The casual relationship is inferred. The correlation of two events can be observed. this is your response to " you made a conclusion based on statistics that controlled variables as you claimed but how could you conclude a casual relationship based on what you believed a correlation that can not be observed ? "
It is trivial because it constitutes no challenge to my statements whatsoever. Pretty much a false dilemma.
I don't think if you can think I'm stupid or can I infer you are stupid ? I assume you are not.
and I give you another not trivial, but a hard example that you can't deny
If you believe I misunderstood what you wrote, feel free to rephrase or expound on your statement further.
and you did not deny it, surprisingly
if you think you can't understand what I'm saying, feel free to use a tool that was called google translate to help you understand english language.
I don't think you can use anything to fool around of me and I clearly don't give a shit
also it's you trying to interpret my response in a ridiculous way not me so I don't give that shit too, trivial lmao.
I never denied it to begin with!! There is nothing in my statements that denies correlation doesn't imply causation. My statements pretty much align perfectly with this notion and explain it further.
Casual relationships must be inferred, if it cannot be inferred, then this principle applies. But if one takes any situation in which there is correlation and says "Oh, correlation doesn't imply causation, therefore, it has no causal relationship", then pretty much any casual relationship is denied, because all casual events are essentially correlated! So, the implication of your understand of this principle is the erroneous one.
Not even Google Translate can decipher your poorly written English, sorry. That's a problem for you not for me. Lol.
You've previously used an expression "in a civil degree of definition" that pretty much doesn't exist in English and is simply meaningless. I've spent some time trying to find any clue about what it means, but to no avail. So, I dropped it completely and tried to understand the rest of the sentence. So you live in a glass house while throwing rocks!
then use chatgpt instead.
Used it too. Lol.. Wanna see how he responded?
don't care bro I'm not here to say I'm right you are wrong, I just don't think you are stupid but you keep saying my statement was an error while it's you give a lot of examples with your abstractive statements literally means nothing.
and your examples, you can try to read it again or post here
you will find out how ridiculous it is.
or you can try to pull out a list of my examples.
or I will do that ?
Man online debates are just two randos throwing loads of research articles on each other
I don't do that shit
That's my experience
People just throw links on links
That's just arrogance
It's not that my statements mean nothing, they are all taken from popular philosophers and meta-ethical experts. It's you who don't seem to understand them properly.
That response I gave for your problematic statement about the correlation-causation principle, you didn't even take a minute to read it before responding "re-li-gion". How do you expect a fruitful and understandable discussion with such behavior?
Debate through texting, ewww
I think flare is wasting their time
It's obvious china mainland isn't seriously taking this convo
how about we do a list of each other's examples ?
just by copy paste
or you wanna continue this I can do both
Why do I need to do that? They are already there, you can review the discussion history and see them in a chronological order. It would be exactly the same as listing them again.
make an easy comparison on it
I will do that and you will find out how ridiculous it is.
Flare:
- coffee consumption is correlated with higher level of heart health Unconcluded
- new medication show that controlled trial of tests produced data of significant decrease in blood pressure (an example of correlation implying causation)
Minecraft_652:
- you can observe I drink water, also you can observe I play LOL, you can't conclude because I drink water so I play LOL. Concluded, Did not reject.
Let me rephrase it:
Through the observation of I'm drinking water show that controlled trial of tests produced data of significant increase of chances in playing League of Legends.
🤷♂️
Can this be more clear than it ? @thorny steeple
you are the person who's making this complicated as much as you can but I will just pick points that couldn't be more clear than ever before.
or make it more easier
Through the observation of I'm drinking water shows a increase of chances in playing LOL
That's a desperate way of twisting clear statements.
Your example falls under correlation doesn't imply causation. Because no casual relationship can be inferred. You can still play LOL without drinking water. Drinking water does not cause you to play LOL.
I have gave two different examples, the first one resembles yours, the second one explains how casual relationships can be inferred. So, just because there is a correlation doesn't mean there is no causation. If a casual relationship can be inferred, then both correlation and causation are true.
you didn't give a counter part in this message.
I said through the observation of I'm drinking water shows a increase of chances in playing LOL but what you are saying is I can still play LOL without drinking water ?
that statement against the premise of my statement which is invalid.
Yes, sure. I'm the one throwing Wikipedia articles without comprehending them instead of explaining simple concepts. I've been trying to make tons of information as simple as possible as to eliminate any misconception or disagreement. I also have got a lot on my plate to do, so I absolutely want to finish the discussion with fewer and simpler explanation of any concept involved. How am I making the discussion complicated?
or let's make it simple:
Through the observation + drinking water shows + an increase chance of playing LOL
Yours:
You can still play LOL + without drinking water ???? as a counter part.
well well well...
dude this is not debate.
It isn't a counter argument. There is nothing I'm required to counter. Your statement constitutes no real challenge in the first place!
got debunked, so let's combine it.
It just gives an example of one situation with two correlated events that are not casual. It does not constitute any challenge for my second example, it's not even similar.
Flare claims:
new medication show that controlled trial of tests produced data of significant decrease in blood pressure (an example of correlation implying causation)
Minecraft_652 gives counter part:
you can observe I drink water, also you can observe I play LOL, you can't conclude because I drink water so I play LOL. Concluded, Flare did not reject.
Therefore:
Through the observation of I'm drinking water shows an increase of chances in playing LOL (based on the logic of correlation implying causation by Flare)
Flare says, this is twisting clear statements! counter part:
You can still play LOL without drinking water.
Minecraft_652:
??? LMAO
So, you can decrease blood pressure without medicine!
Wha
You know what. Diazonium Ion is right. I have to disengage.
?def modest
Definition 1 (adjective): not large but sufficient in size or amount
Definition 2 (adjective): relatively moderate, limited, or small
Definition 3 (adjective): low or inferior in station or quality
Other definitions can be found here

i dont agree
Wht u guys think will change when Trump comes in power?
?def sou
Definition (noun): a former French coin of low denomination; often used of any small amount of money
https://immpolicytracking.org/media/documents/ACLU_Fact_Sheet_on_Denaturalization.pdf
Any of those who recently obtained legal status in the US should be compelled to come to a sanctuary city.
You’ll be safe in places like CA
can I be one of them ?
If you are in places like FL you need to run now while you have two months to shortsell assets or whatever you need to do.
wait you said legal nvm.
maybe you are right bro
latest deportation and family separation movement led by Trump is just crazy
It was disgusting
Those parents never saw their kids again and those kids never got home,
He’s now stripping citizenship from people
and no clue and no benefit to do that
Legal citizens he’s taking citizenship from
My advice still stands
Go to California or New York
idk if that is happening... if he's canceling people's citizenship by religion, race, political leanings
that's Kim Jong Un 2.0
Doesn't he want to remove the ius soli?
Trump I mean, I guess you're talking about him
I don't really know if he would do that much and btw do you have reliable source of he's doing it ?
Students are even more screwed if he cancels FAFSA
Yes
It makes little sense for a country like USA
denaturalization ?
if I know that US citizenship can not be withdrawn
and it was consititutional ?
The law doesn’t matter to trump
We knew that much when he raped women, never blew the whistle on Epstein
When he falsified records and tried to remain in power illegally
Yes, but again the law doesn’t matter to trump. He’ll try to cancel all charges against himself
that was called, presidential exemption from being prosecuted
he actually have the right to avoid being prosecuted as a president right ?
@JackPosobiec Yes. We started a new denaturalization project under Trump. In 2025, expect it to be turbocharged. https://t.co/tUKejwHwY8
What the fuck
He does not have exemption
oh what the heck it was unnecessary to scare the people
25 project ongoing...
does he is gonna completely take over the US by controlling everyone's fate ?
that sick if he's just for popularity to separate families and deport legal citizens
I still doubt if he's gonna do that, now he's saying it idk what will happen next
Joe will die in a few years
Yes
He will
Already claimed by his entourage
As Trump, on the other hand
I was going to say it
If he starts playing with the FBI
Which communist party?
He will die by old age
idk lol
I invoke the right to wait for his next move.
It could be a loss because he is a great president
I don't know why when people try to defend their country, they get the worst accusations
20%
maybe he will be mercy with those innocent people who is living good with their families and pay taxes to the government.
maybe he's just saying it for votes
it was hyping right ? just hyping
I don't think so
What? deportation of immigrants?
deportation with denaturalization against legal immigrants.
this is what I can't accept, you can't just cancel their citizenship because they are democrats or they are muslim or they are communists

this is not the USA
they worked hard and paid taxes for american while you are going to cancel their citizenship by your freaking votes ?
Well, I don't understand why Americans are worried, it's a problem for immigrants, not for regular Americans
that won't happen Trump's not a psycho or stupid dude
well.... I would be scared if that happened on immigrants
because this is targeted on immigrants by his allegations who will be sure about the next move isn't target on you ?
it was like my neighbor got shot and I will be scared and move to another neighborhood
He would never harm his own electorate
and United States of America, is a country were built on immigrants, let more legal immigrants come into their country to contribute american economy only will have more benefits.
nvm with Nigeria I guess
America was built by European settlers, who are very different from today's illegal immigrants
Nigerians still got Turkey, they're fine
I don't think this example able to represent most countries in the world.
how about India or China
China would be easier to get into the US than India I believe.
Well
I have seen other countries
our economy situation is obviously better than India
not just settlers, Immigrants kept on coming through the entirety of US history, i don't see why you'd exclude them
Because America was born as an Anglo-Saxon state, I don't care about all the other immigrants who came for profit
According to his 25 p
He didn't specify the countries but as IMMIGRANTS in general
how can you even differentiate between them post-US-independence ?
he won't do that I believe... I didn't made a terrible decision to support him he has excellent policies to support US economy and national development.
Hence, idc about Italians, germans, Swedes and such, they are just immigrants who are alien to the concept of the Anglo-American state
Yeah great business man
He can do that without immigrants
he may piss some people off but I don't think he will just generalize a group which is a huge group within the US that contributed US a lot
Well waiting for January
millions from Ireland fled to the states mainly because of the famine, and that was decades after the independence, they were discriminated against by both Europe and Americans, yet they are pretty successful within the US
The men who built America are the fathers of the constitution, those who fought for their independence, not people who want profit
I guess... everything will be better under his next administration
there was a reason that people vote for him all we can do is trust him
I don't think so
and follow him maybe if he asks people for loyalty to his personality which he did it before
but I believe he's a leader like Putin and Xi, everything will be okay.
Nevermind all that, can we switch to something that it isn't I think this you think that and neither of us will change our views regardless?
why do you even assume the US reached a point of being fully built ?
A nation is born when it has a people to compose it, a constitution, laws, immigrants haven't built America in this sense
^
if such thing as "Anglo-American" existed, it probably died just after they got independence, so unless someone was part of the UK and was willing to settle there, they wouldn't have been able to
The statement "immigrants built America" only supports the erratic melting pot theory
This term was preserved and took on the WASP nomenclature
stay loyal to him I think all will be okay.
in this sense countries are built on day one, which is a hollow way of observing states.
and what you're saying even goes against American principles on which it was built of individuality, capitalism...
I don't understand why everyone is obsessed with defending immigrants in America, they literally betrayed their home country, I'm angry with my relatives who live in America for this reason
it's not erratic by any means
america is built on immigrants and american dream is the dream for every immigrant that wanted to achieve a better life
In fact, American society is so uniform and united that even when people participate in national and unitary events (such as voting) they are categorized by race/origin/religion
The American dream never existed, immigrants worked hard to enrich the ruling class, that's it, the American dream exists only for the ruling class
well... let's talk about some real stuff
if you live in my city, Jinan city, the capital of Shandong province as a service worker
you probably will only earn 500-700 USD per month which is not a low income in China
don't confuse the melting pot with census data
you may enjoy the Chinese good which is the cheapest in the world only cost you 1 USD per meal
are you representing the Chinese dream ?
but in the US, somewhere in California, you can easily get a labor job with a salary of 18 USD per hour.
if you work for 8 hours per day, 22 days a month, you will get 3168 USD a month as an illegal.
and in China you probably will work more like 9-11 hours per day with 4 holidays instead of 8 for a month.
maybe a meal from Mcdonalds will cost you 10 USD or 15 USD leaving a tip or not up to you but this gap still can not be filled
Have I not explained and demonstrated otherwise?
My best friend’s wife may have to go into hiding dude
I was uncertain about it, I just hope it will be okay.
12-18 USD btw depends on what you get
Closing borders drilling drilling drilling
stay positive, don't worry about it you have sanctuary California
For now
and he's definitely not going to scare people like that
I hope everything works out in her favor 🙏🏻
come on he's just going to tell people loyal to him, not really take actions against people's will
that's not for some 'national interest' there's no freaking national interest from deportations
he's not a tyranny, he was president before dude
Not like that
The problem is not on him but his administration and their future decisions
He is just a business man
Solve everything with money
Bannon steve and the other dude
he is, everything comes to an interest to a business man
I'm a business man like him I understand him very well
I know he can just ignore people's will for his interest or national interest or state interest but there's no fucking interest from deportations
deport people will solve nothing but create more vacuum in labor market which most people don't work in, will create deficit, decline U.S. economy and will receive less taxes from deportation.
or if you wanna say he can benefit from this or he can ultimately be a dictator from this, which I don't believe that will happen, he still have to follow the consitution.
and for laws I must say he violated some but he's still a qualified leader.
Dictator
This is what he said in one of his interviews
he won't betray the people who loyal to him.
New laws maybe
Well
I wish peace and love around the world 🙏🏻
well me too but before we can achieve that, we got a lot of works to do.
and Donald Trump will solve it I believe.
why I feel like if you are an immigrant currently outside of the sanctuary area, you will likely be killed 🤣 don't be so stressful with it.
what a prelude of a mass prosecution against certain group of people in certain regions
don't be stressful for it, stay positive and loyal you will be okay.
and everyone will be okay
Loyalty isn’t a part of the equation
Because he is very unpopular, had more people voted over all he would have lost
that was true if you let undocument to vote
No this election just had a very low turnout
he's expelling some people in red states to blue states right ?
No
oh idk why some people saying it
Many people are fleeing red states because they are being persecuted
They can’t get various healthcare or they aren’t protected by the law from discrimination.
Why don't they move to Finland
am i welcomed in finland
How can i move to Finland
they need to preserve their confederate legacy
btw what does this flag mean
what's behind this flag that people waving it for trump
Don't know, I spawned there
If I'm not mistaken it's the flag of the southern states, the Confederacy
People that fought to preserve their old economic and class system based off slavery and plantations
Conservatives like it
Finances mostlyu
I like the flag, I don't like the ideology
I'm a capitalist, I endorse the ideology that benefits me or winner ideology
except that capitalism by itself is an ideology, what you're describing is being an opportunistic not a capitalist
basically you're WW1/WW2 Italy wannabe
Is it just me or does the statement "Everyone is unique" sounds a bit contradicting?
I mean, unique is supposed to be different from others
How can everyone be different from everyone
🤷♂️
you know Italy lose WW2 right ?
only Mussolini's Italy lost, you're aware they switched sides in WW2 as well, right ?
Meow
..
MEOW MEOW MEOW MEOW MEOW MEOW MEOW MEOW
Meowismmm
Or kesi chl rhi neet preparation ??
Do you know me?
Perhaps
Looks suspicious
So when are you going to kota
Reveal your Identity

they switched side doesn't making them a good example of winning, they lose their western italy and southern italy, they are under destruction by battle conducted by germans and allies in their homeland after surrender
An alt?
Nah
they win the war fight for the United States, but they lost the war fight for themselves.
What was ur name🤔

but they make a good example of an opportunistic entity, just like you, they were spineless
It starts from N right??


nope I always represent my own interest, not being a puppet of the United States or Greater German Reich
Im damn sure You're an alt of someone
Nah im not
.
What identity
you have no principles to stand on and adhere to, you'll go under any ideological umbrella if you perceive it as the winning side, which is literally being spineless
I have a very clear principle based on my own ideology to choose my side for my interest to deal with any circumstances, you can take an example of Spain not Italy.
and it was definitely not spineless
just because you call it an ideology or principle, doesn't make it make
wym
I agree to disagree
I have a very clear principle I told you
and I have my own ideology to benefit myself not fighting for the master nations
and spain was neutral
Spain was not so neutral as you think.
self explanatory
oh i must've missed the part when they joined a side in ww2
i don't want to argue semantics here, terms should be taken arbitrarily
Spain was under a fascist government after the Spainish civil war, after the war breaks out, Hitler asked Spain for joining the war, Spain declined the request but keep selling minerals and sending people as volunteer army to fight against Soviet Union, after the turning point of the WW2 were concluded, Spain opened its airspace, dock to U.S. and British armies, at the end they openly say they are anti-nazis
this is a good example of how they were benefiting themselves at the most in ww2
they don't join either side which seemingly will win, but sitting on the fence and benefit from the war that everyone needs them to stay neutral.
that's why I said they are literally not so neutral as you think
literlaly confirming what i've said, opportunistic, and completely spineless
lol
this is not a game, this is the life for everyone
nobody's playing a game of how to not to be spineless to win the game
but how to benefit from the realistic conditions
being opportunistic isn't an ideology, literally means you won't strict yourself to a single set of principles or ideology, that you'd be flexible
says the HOI4 scholar
you can go straight to death for not to be a spineless person in a war, while I can retreat from an aggressive move that may angry great powers that will end everything I have, then maximize my benefit.
sure every situation is different, but i'm just stating things as they are, if someone wants to be spineless and it suits them best, good for them, but they are what they are
I don't care
yet you were so defensive about being spineless
as I said before, you can go straight to death in a war for not being a spineless person, but I do not, I use my brain to think about it and maybe just run to anywhere I can hide.
Hi
the average person is not someone who's leading a state, waky waky from the illusion
好死不如赖活着
good death isn't better than living with a shame
We pray for him and his family 🌹
what a philosophy @dense agate
i assume you're gonna add context to this half aborted statement
My prayers 🙏🏻
just assume he died of old age
nope it was just a Chinese proverb
好死不如赖活着
good death isn't better than living with a shame
you're aware we're talking in a general sense, not everything is about a ruler and his decisions
It is painful to accept the reality but denying the truth won't solve anything
same logic in general sense
not really bud
let me give you an example
different game, different rules
Btw this happened like 2 days ago. It's a repost
hopefully Hamas gets what it deserves for causing this
you are a random solider who received the order from superior that tells you to conduct suicide attack (if you did that and you dead, then they will award you the highest appreciation in this country), if you don't do that you will be called a traitor and go straight to court and being executed, what you would do ?
Do you mean Hejbullah (idk if I spelled it right) because he's in Lebanon
irrelevant minecraft, but i'll go with the 72 virgins path
by Hamas i somewhat meant Hamas
come on you asked different situation I provided one and you said irrelevant ?
how about you give out an example ?
Hezbollah ain't going anywhere

i'm talking in general sense, problems faced and decisions made by a ruler are no analogous to the ones experienced by a citizen, you can try to find patterns but in general they are not similar
well example dude
I will never know what is your version of general sense
until you give me an example to show how it was
not talking about the whole conflict, just the recent escalation
I would say most cases I don't have to be spineless to maximize my beneift why not ?
Why do u choose to dismiss history ?
only few cases I have to compromise with it
i'm not going to prove a negative
what ?
it suits my current narrative
You can't ignore the past and blame Hamas for the recent activities. I think that's similar to changing history
what are you talking about since when I asked you to proof a negative
I didn't ask you to proof god exists
👍🏻
I gotta say
Ur the most honest pro israeli ever.
10 outta 10
you're asking me to prove how A and B aren't related, think about it
bro I asked you a simple example but you didn't give any of this
I just asked you for a simple example
nothing left
I already give you an example while you said irrelevant
im not pro either sides, but if it wasn't clear from my first reply to that guy, im joking
what does that shit which relevant with your statement ?
Paying taxes out of the blue ?
I don't understand at all you are circling around with your point
Well that was sarcasm. I like it.
what the heck I didn't ask you for proof anything
Taxes ??!!
This is not a war against any Hamas. This is a genocide.
sigh
what can I say
mine it's simple, asking me to prove A isn't related to B isn't done by giving a single example, its like asking to prove a negative, can't give every possible scenario so we know for sure they aren't related
what the fuck is A and B
Don't feel uncomfortable with my presence @feral river
Don't stop at my account
It wasn't me who banned u after all
Yess
I mean what lol
Meeh nvm
I didn't feel uncomfortable because you are here
that the kinds of decisions/problems within a leader's framework, aren't that similar or related to the ones in a civilian framework
well you are good bro
Wdym by that?
Gtk bro
My little baby
U sent to Israelis supporters here
okay based on this statement, can you give out an example ?
Idc who is here

and let me explain how to use this framework in a same way under different circumstances
actually not every leader was born as a leader
stating an example is useless for my point, because it would mean nothing, unless i can state all possible scenarios and show how they're not related
Good job 
do you see why it's like asking me to prove the negative
hitler was a painter, stalin was a musician, mao zedong was a scholar
only few leader that was born as a leader, like hirohito
you can just give one and I will explain how it can be frameworked in the same way under different circumstances
because it's you saying that can't be the same under the different framework
Ahem
but I can tell you I can, and I do
not everyone's mindset is same or similiar maybe you can realize that I was the one holding a unique mind between other people
even I was in between Chinese.
Wow amazing
I'm not saying I'm superior because I'm unique that was stupid
but maybe you can correlate with the power of mine is rapidly growing with my mindset is unique, which you can't really proof it but you can guess it
minecraft you're straying too far away, my point was, just because there is state can act opportunistically and be "spineless" or anything else, that doesn't mean an individual, a civilian adhere to similar behavior, why would you think you should act like states when you're not one
it's that simple
because this is the way you can maximize your benefit.
I can perceive the huge amount of self control that Minecraft is going through after all these mentions of the conflict in the Middle East
you can barely see individual know how to benefit themselves at most, that's why we only got 0.1% billionaries
or 0.0001% politicians
It's like me turning a rock in the Amazon forest and resisting the absurd urge to photograph the insects
genocide's too obvious yet not confirmed by the UN
those are the people who's holding the dominate power above other people's lives
I don't wanna be a loser like a random stranger on the street.
I will try to be one of the most powerful person in the world, at least I will try
to benefit would mean you should play according to the system you're in
sigh people do need to control themselves
for me I invented a new word fit for myself: personality dictatorship
that means I will be any type of person to act following my will
that's the best weapon and defense force ever for me
I would be different if you are the guy who recognizes me maybe you think I'm fascist
but someone thinks I'm a total communist, someone thinks I'm a liberal, someone thinks I'm a converative
that all depends how I'm gonna interact with them to influence their perspective, to scam them
this is called austism
lol
idk if this translation was correct but it doesn't relevant at all
Zi Bi leeel
it means what you've said you are, special
I'm an E type person not even an I
I once translated autism to different languages
I didn't expect Chinese, Korean and Japanese to have completely different terms for it
Putin
I didn't investigate much about Putin
He is like that
do you know what is autism in Chinese
No, what is it
that was used to describe a person that was extremely introvert that naturally cease relationship with other people.
or you can say that's a more depressed version of depression
weird
Taiwan will be free
WoW
free taiwan
free sahara

Free you
Rosie.
from rosie
Shush.
Free Taiwan from ROC
Free Taiwan from china
yeah Free Taiwan from Republic of China
No one can be free from me
you are right dude
I'm so right
nuh uh #freemike
Free him now
Except Taiwan is already free, no Commie managed to take it over
its not free
no it's under evil regime of ROC
Its under terror by china
we need to liberate it for Taiwan people
ROC's evil and not CCP, sure
what if I say I'm a member of CCP ?
Nooooo
Money
it would mean you'd still say same bullshit but you're wearing a suit this time
🤣 wearing a suit would be eaiser for me to counter a bullshit
I need money RIGHT NOOOOW
Good evening everyone, I have a question about studying in England, do you know how I can study in this country when I come from Europe?

Applying for scholarship
Vivek said he is broke
So u still in jail
u forgot that im a monkey
a what ?
Literally me
Try to look up in Google for scholarships in England depending on your budget
it's really unfortunate how the closure of google made it almost impossible to find info online
heyy!!!
Did they go bankrupt after paying the fine from Russia?
that's called being miserable not just depressed
you saw that lel, Russian courts be going crazy
you are an introvert ? I don't even think so
what's the first time we chat with each other ?
Yes, how many times did you see me in VC?
realy funny ! i just wanted to know this information from pepole who comme form the land
then I'm an introvert too I don't do vc that much also lol

I'm shy when it comes to talking 
Then you complain about getting muted
Especially in real life, I always shiver at the thought of approaching a stranger or even initiating conversation with someone I know
You're free to ask any questions whenever u want
You're promoting drinking
good luck, the server is around 60% British people
😭
Under my watch
Only 8%
it's sad lmao
Russia again
with strangers it's understandable, but with people you know it comes easy
Depends on who they are
go look up actual forums instead
Only if they are/were extremely close friends, otherwise it's difficult to talk first
that's literally traumatising for introverts to approach a stranger
Or even reply, I can't choose between the two. One is more difficult than the other
No one like to talk in real life
Sometimes you have to, because you have to ask for directions, or instructions on how to use a new device/program
i can't stop myself from being autistic when im around friends, with strangers/classmates however, i turn into vladislav roslyakov
Now that I don't live in my country anymore I have to ask all the times
wait you mean as in procrastinating from replying back ?
i'll search on internet rather than asking a stranger
No I mean when someone initiates a conversation, I'm caught by surprise in that very moment and I'm too stressed to think normally
fr fr 
Local people are superior at giving directions most of the times, or advices on where to find something
Or if you need a quick explanation on how to use scientific machinery, I don't think you can understand much from a manual online unless you read it thoroughly
isn't that country filled with anti-social folks, sounds like a nice place for an introvert
once i become friends with someone then i am kinda extrovert but only for them
What do you think about peach vodka?
No idea what is that
I never tried that at least
😭😭
is it sweet?
Finland or Japan? Both are
Yes
recently I just like to make coke bucket for me
Elders are great because you can't embarrass yourself in front of them
and share with my friends
i only know Sweden is like that from my cousin
coke bucket 1st
less alcohol volume? 
Funland is worse but not by much
It's vodka for those who don't like the taste of alcohol
Because they think you already stupid like everyone young people.
Estonia is Funland with more rude people
I think it's the same
that would've made it the perfect place for me if it wasn't painfully cold
around 40%?
We also have strawberry vodka
it's nice during summer, especially the south
Actually the South is nice for almost half a year, it's really not that bad
I don't even remember that night, imagine the alcohol volume of the vodka I drank
Lol Russian don't like taste of alcohol, they just drink it in two big gups
Wooooah
amazing vid
We never do, like sipping alcohol
I wouldn't feel the difference if it was above 40, it would be the same as normal one for me. haha
Aren't you Algerian? A pro-Israel Algerian?
YES
Unusual
the only good thing from Finland for me is their funny English accent
we got israeli edits now ?
why not
there should be one for the algerian civil war as well
Hey guys
it had good content
Yo you're here too
Yes why
What about the... Nevermind there really isn't that much
This server and the other one almost have the same people in it 
Yeah you are right
@feral river
did they actually show soccer kek
Why you are like a idiott
good question
Too old dude
We had one before
Mr Moroccan
hi
Is there a place to ask serious questions?
Sure. Also a place where you can discuss serious topics (religion, politics etc)
how educated are u on the subject of Israel and Palestine
not very well since i don't care
Yeah I figured
I'm not mad
u won't piss me off by "I don't care" lol
if you're looking to piss people off then switch to #💭|general
matter of fact dude
just change servers
u aren't slick
or cool
ok
Looks like it did
Huuh !! U from morroco
Hello everyone, my name is Nourhen. I'm 22 years old and I'm from Tunisia. I'm a programming student. I can speak English and a little bit of Spanish. I'm here to practice more and meet new friends. Nice to meet you all!
I come once a month to see how you are doing, then I disappear.
Yeah, I noticed that too
الهريسة 
Has there been any change in this time that has passed or is the world still the same?
It did not, he was using the channel for the wrong purpose
There is no interesting change when you think abt it. Diff ppl, same behaviors
I am your neighbour
Deep talk

Aaaaa ye3ni nty mn alger
Yeeeeeees
Damn girl
@raw cave marroci ?
Ofc
rak kin a bro
W h1dik damn girl 3laach ze3ma hhhhhhhhh

Lh y3ezz rijaaaal finma kanou 
Like wooow you got it gurl
When I see you, the first thing that comes to my mind is the old times btw
mfhemtch wlkyn hanya
Jps nty mn Oran

No no I am not Oranian
Yes I have beautiful memories with you
Iranian ?
Yes I am from Iran
nice
Oh daaaaaamn I thought you were from Algeria

I am Algeria wallah l3adim
I think we ve met before lferda
Face a face ??
No in chat cuz I remember only.one girl asked me if I am oranian
Hmmmm
Algerian + iranian
That's so .....
يعجز لساني عن التعبير
@raw cave are you a woman
This is weird. Everyone I talk to says it's like they've talked to me before. It's a weird feeling when people know you and you don't know them.
Hahahhahahah
How come you don't understand your language?
Alaaaa
I'm a maaaan
Hallelujah!
Kya bhai har jagah naach rhe hon? 
Koi taklif?
Morning stacy

In serious chat XD
😉🫰🏼
really ?
Our central bank, Bank of China and government monopoly telecom company, China telecom officially released their anime character(vtuber) to represent themselves 😭😭😭
Shiet
Dorud 
what app are you using
bilibili
哔哩哔哩(bilibili.com)是国内知名的视频弹幕网站,这里有及时的动漫新番,活跃的ACG氛围,有创意的Up主。大家可以在这里找到许多欢乐。
This is Chinese YouTube
A video of Chinese browser company’s anime character singing a Japanese song to attract anime lovers
This company lmao
Delusional
oh i thought blibli was a regular anime site
No it was Chinese YouTube now
Few years ago we have a lot of video websites and bilibili was founded on the basis of anime lovers
So it was an anime site before but it transformed to YouTube-like website because of an exponential explosive growth driving by content creators
And they beat other video platforms ass
mine, you just woke up ?
Nope I woke up 6 hours ago
Now I’m out for a stroll
good, it's saturday, we should get you and Ando in a VC
and have a talk in a VC for once
when is Ando available
looks like a noisy place
I got a German vs Soviet match in hoi4 with ando he didn’t let me finish 😠
It was like 2 weeks ago
he plays HOI4 ?
Busan, South Korea
He do we promised to have a solo I play as German he’s Soviet
But he left in between the match
Busan is Bussin
We didn’t finish that yet
why doesn't he play as Italy, so he can see how shit that country was back then
tactical retreat
I thought youku is chinese youtube
From 1-10 how much u give to Chinese YouTube?
Lmao
Dude you make me laugh in the center of the crossway
Well idk based on what certain criteria if you would say experience I will give 8
Youku is almost dead
Why?
excessive ads, poor user experience and management inefficiency inside the company
I play rise of nation roblox
you mean Israeli hamas war ?
win the war, problem solved
No i've thought of a better idea
we give isreal and palastine back to the british
that can't be let british come back to rule here
lmao
war on terror
bro forget October the 7th happend
It's not just one day
Oct 7 was just the beginning
look man the reason the war happend was because hamas attacked isreali citizens its not a genocide its a response to a terrorist attack
So did Hamas
Any Scandinavian people in here
i would show you images but it would likely get taken down
I don't believe your bs
Private chat i can show images
Ai generated dark web bullpoop
opium war : the sequel
except this time they get the Chinaman addicted to anime girls
Good luck fighting them when you're whole nation is filled with gooners
I'm addicated too 😭
where tf is Ando
@dapper laurel Rome is rising, waky waky
idk he's fucked in the toilet I guess
@white mulch tf! did i disrespect you or something ?
This is the worst way to make a point ever
Wooooah wooooah
I still have to go to the toilet for now
It doesn't need to rise, because it never fell
minecraft as japan naaahh
If everyone closed their eye, would there be no colours?
color depends on the wavelength of light reflected from the surface and entering our eye. if the light does not enter our eye, this does not mean that there will be no light wave
If you see color as variations of light, not seeing the light doesn’t make it disappear 
Colour in real life doesn't exist lol
Our brain transfer wavelengths to a specific colour
I just explained to you
Read my question again
It's about colours not wavelengths
It appears only in our brain
it appears only in our brain? can u explain more please
the colors we see depend on the wavelength of light
In this case your brain exists, doesn't it ?
But perhaps you want to say that color depends on the people who see it
White light is made up of different wavelengths
Every wavelength is associated with diff colours in our brajn
Wavelengths enter through our eyes and go to occipital lobe
playing as Brazil, has to be ironic
occipital lobe converts that wavelength to colour
ofc, Turkey is still standing strong
According to the philosophy of the ancient Greeks, color does not really exist. For Parmenides there was a sensible and false reality, and the true reality that can only be understood according to reasoning, so if we want to put it this way....
i agree
is the wavelength of same frequency seen as different colour by some animals and humans? in some unusual casases
can there be a purpose to life if there was no humans ? can it be sound if there wasn't an ear ?
That's really really really interesting question, yeah some animals can see diff colours
We humans can see only 7 colours and their combinations
Some squids can see 8 or even 9 colours and their combinations
I didn't talk about it in a philosophical way, but yes, that's also a point of view
hmmm if this is true then perhaps there is no objective colour associated to any specific wavelengths.
😭
If there’s no purpose of life then we can create one
It's all made up in our brain
But in this case this philosophical conception is related to reality
