#🧠|serious-chat
1 messages · Page 308 of 1
the state not the ethnicity??
there are places called west bank and Gaza u know them???
yeah part of Israel I know
there's only one sovereign state throughout this region
State of Israel
there occupied by isreal accourding the court of justice, UN ,humans right , any fucking org and more than 120 countries
ofc some part was occupied because Hamas started against Israel
they kicked their ass perfectly
they were before hamas attacked ur ignorant u dont know what re u talkin about
That's the opposite point of view of the point of view that we have. However, you reply hatefully rather than normally with the view to having a debate so, like I avoided your hateful comments before.. I also expect you to keep out of a conversation that's not with you like Flare also said
no idea you can post something to proof they were occupied before this date
btw that's not occupation that's part of their territory
They also deny Al nakba
there's only one sovereign state in this region
You know, you still can't justify such war crimes even with such denials
that's what he said something like hateful comments you stated for me or other people
it's not me started with this bullshit
u just show me that u know nothing about palestine or isreal situation go educate urself pls i cant waste my time show u evidences u cant relate to
Prove that this is part of their territory.
I mean if you are incapable to proof the occupation status before the Oct 7th even it's controversial you better study some basic history
@void arch he or she always trying to spread the lies and hate in this channel so just better avoid because they enjoy lying and insulting
they are occupied by evidence
why would I proof that ? they are in charge not you guys
it's you guys need to proof it
🤣
His approach to this debate is based on denials and denials
ok i noticed that early maybe she is psyco[ath
I know.
my approach to this debate is just truth.
hard truth you can't deny
The ICC have done their investigation on the case made by south Africa about an ongoing genocide in Palestine and you probably haven't watched the hearing of the court
what denying the opposite claims without refuting it ,, and claiming points without proving it ... is that what u mean by ur approach????
That's all. Denials will not make us move from our position.
A debate cannot go on with constant denials from opposition.
You made an assertion and did not substantiate it. This is called the burden of proof, which lies upon you since you've made an extraordinary claim.
You need to learn some basic logic.
Everything we say is false and everything he says is the truth.
Every investigation we did is rigged.
That's his way of debate. Good luck
Wats the first thing that comes into ur head when i say:
Mao zedong
You forgot one. Every proof we provide is a propaganda. 😂
Sarcasm 101 session 2
this is your ICC recognized status
There's more in the list tho
would you like to check it by yourself ?
idk if you can find a bunch of muslim state or state that support Palestinians
and... US, Russia China those superpowers doesn't give a shit
what else your ICC could do now ?
Wats that, china's food supply map?
The states parties to the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court are those sovereign states that have ratified, or have otherwise become party to, the Rome Statute. The Rome Statute is the treaty that established the International Criminal Court, an international court that has jurisdiction over certain international crimes, including ...
U expect us to decide who supports who from a map
Oh The ICJ
ICC cannot do anything by itself. The fact that they're incapable of doing anything and despite enough proof, the superpowers don't give a sh*t is what we are protesting against. Big protests are being held all around Europe
I don't see you mentioned anything besides this ICC stuff
and I give you the source of how ICC being recognized
I don't think I really need further comment about this
they ruled for plausibility of genocide, they will take 20 years to deliver a verdict any way.
But plausible is a big deal
well yeah I guess you get it
I agree with you
Your approach to this topic is yet again denial to accept an investigation by icc
wym ? I just give you the source of how they were being recognized
and you see it on the map pretty clear
Haven't changed a bit.
God
if North Korea says the entire world is their's are you gonna say 'your approach to this topic is yet again denial to accept their claim ?'
it doesn't even make sense
This is not a debate, just a waste of time when you deny everything. Thus I will end it here.
Your text makes no sense
why the heck they have to accept your claim ?
The fact is, it's not a claim
@feral river are u aware on how the Israeli state was created ?
Prior to 1948?
Cuz ur missing a lot.
Forget 7 octobre, and the icj and gaza
Talk about the real deal
The main prblm
It's an investigation. Even USA couldn't call it rigged or false
That is zionists ideology
Ask him about Al nakba
He will deny it happened
He doesn't know a bugger for sure
they dont know nothing just arguing
Attack on tents.
July 2024 attack.
oh really ? let me ask you this way, you said 'your approach to this topic is yet again denial to accept an investigation by icc' I give you the source of recognition status of ICC which is global power don't even give a shit, and you are saying that I'm denying it on this conversion, what I'm saying is why the heck I will not deny this invaild shit that nobody gives a shit ?
why the heck I would accept that dude
Helloo mine
I asked u a question
https://www.dohainstitute.org/en/Lists/ACRPS-PDFDocumentLibrary/Arab-Opinion-Index-2019-2020-Inbreef-English-Version.pdf
https://www.dohainstitute.org/en/Lists/ACRPS-PDFDocumentLibrary/arab-opinion-war-on-gaza-press-release-en.pdf
The overwhelming majority of Arabs, not only Egyptians as I've previously stated, reject the recognition of Israel. Statistical analyses have been conducted on this issue by the ACRPS.
So, your claim is completely unfounded for someone claiming to hold the truth.
Oh he is checking ggl maybe
so they are lying dispite enough proof??
You will not deny it because it's an investigational proof. Not a claim. I think human beings will understand this
what ?
oh you started with your think of human beings will understand this
I started with my think of human beings will not give this shit because of this map
what a crap
Every one ignores me.

Insecurities ✅️
Anger ✅️
Imma do like mao-zedong now
Oh oh , stalin is better
this map perfectly shows how is the ICC is a crap
hhhhh
Not even his English skills. Lol.
His grammar is just as awful since the first message he posted in this server.
I would laugh out fr when I'm looking this list
I would give you this one
to this *
Any debate where one party gives evidence and another party denies it is not any serious debate.
This is a joke where you keep denying everything that includes claims, facts, investigations and court hearings.
We should stop this debate here because from our side we are working to prove a point and from his side he's just denying everything.
As of June 2024, the State of Israel is recognized as a sovereign state by 164 of the 192 member states of the United Nations. The State of Israel was formally established by the Israeli Declaration of Independence on 14 May 1948, and was admitted to the United Nations (UN) as a full member state on 11 May 1949. It also maintains bilateral ties ...
@thorny steeple see ?
your egypt
appears to green bro
remember the battle of Sinai in the old days
the arab countries agreed on the condition of the recognition of palestine .. under the border of 1976
I wouldn't judge him for his English lvl
But the ideas
Nah uh
So messed up
Big deal messed up
Check Al Nakba.
Also, UN ordered Israelis to get out of the Palestinian territories some days ago as more than 88% of the west bank is now taken over by Them
it's not really me posting bunch of crap like ICC over here and you literally accused me on how I denied your claim based on the ICC actually that's your only argument with me
and I give you the source of how ICC being recognized you didn't argue
and what you are talking right now ?
accusations /
yes arab league agreed on 1976 border given by the UN
you can bring the resolution link over here
or you can't find one ? idk
Anyway. We will move on from this topic if you will deny the verdict by icc, Al nakba, Jenin Jenin etc.
If you want to deny any verdict of icc, you will have to point out the reason or any lack of information for which you are denying their investigation. Otherwise, your denials is valueless and we will not debate with you with constant denials from your side
anyway you didn't really argue with anything but keep accusing me about how I denied some stuff which you didn't even argue
so I would consider that's pure accusation
You can also find it.. check below. You could find it but I found it for your
you claim there was and you let me to find it ?
lol
Completely irrelevant. If the government makes a decision, it doesn't entail the population agrees with it. It's just like saying if the government decided to murder its population, then the population agrees with it.
See. Your argument is laughable, even you couldn't hold yourself.
what are you guys talkin about exactly ?
sometimes I just can't hold my myself with you guys especially you I do consider you are a terrorist sympathizer so I'm not so surprised with the shit
dude finally awake
Fair enough, although he is using an English learning server.
remember that's what the narrative you are using
next time I will use the same thing to talk back to you with this screenshot
now ur personalizing .. stop attacking the person and go for the proof
I didn't attack anyone I'm stating my opinion and facts
don't make any accusations against me lol
I don't give any of this shit never
New topic: Hamas.
I believe Hamas has all the rights to attack any unlawful presence of Israel within Palestine.
wym ?
we do know West Bank and Gaza are considered occupied territories even to Israel, nothing new here
Denials denials
your claim is invaild I guess
are there two ?
Deny un deny icc deny
Vc skills still below average. Should take some feedback more importantly
So, you do make personal assessments. Contrary to a statement you've made before.
for me I don't like to make personal assessment [#🧠|serious-chat message]
All States and international organizations, including the United Nations, have obligations under international law to bring to an end Israel’s unlawful presence in the Occupied Palestinian Territory, according to a new legal position paper released Friday by a top independent human rights panel.
there are 2 states, one of them is recognized the other isn't
When you deny every proof. This is not a debate anymore. This is just joke
only one sovereign state
sovereign state only one
that ain't deny my claim
sure, that doesn't mean there isn't a conflict where there is a territory from which an unrecognized state is trying to emerge
your proof is invaild why you think I would not to deny it
you are providing invaild proof not me
what I'm saying is hard truth that you can't deny it
have you ever try ? I don't see it
similar situation to Serbia-Kosovo, Morocco-Western Sahara, etc...
what you are doing is just bring some irrelevant stuff or other sources of information based on bias
and even based on their narrative, that ain't deny my claim
hold on, how is what i said bias ?
yeah I'm not going to deny there was a conflict, actually there is, between 2 groups of people
there is occupation everything is under the isreali control .. imagine if u want to do some paper work about identity or somthing u have the approval from isreal ... food water anything is under isreali control ... no life no degnity
but in one state
I'm not saying you dude
that s not... isreal wasent before they come from other countries and settled and use power to dominant by the aid of major power
there's no such thing called occupation that only one sovereign state in this region
there's only one sovereign state throughout this region
Ad hominem is largely his way of argumentation. He is bigoted and lacking in intellectual merit.
can anyone deny this truth ?
you guys are wasting energy on the wrong thing, occupation of West Bank and Gaza was there since 1967.
the goal shouldn't be to end the occupation because that takes us nowhere and would probably never happen as long as a two or one state solution isn't happening
dont talk to me again i said that u understand ???
well that was not an occupation
there's only one sovereign state throughout this region
West Bank isn't sovereign state, hence you can't say occupation
how many times I need to repeat this shit ?
it is very much the same, people using their right of self determination.
is it that hard to understand?
correct dude you got my point
thats right thanks for ur corsprency
there's only one sovereign state throughout this region
Minecraft, if from Israel's perspective, West Bank and Gaza are considered occupied and thus under military court, why are you trying to prove otherwise
no bro it is very deff from a ppl lived in the same land and wanted self determination... and a foreign state funded by major power settled to over dominant the region by over use of power
I didn't try to proof it what I'm saying is there's only one sovereign state throughout this region
you can literally use any court, civil court military court to justice anything in the region under your administration
that's your issue
u lose the arg since isreal is against u ... they approves the occupation of these territories
the presence of or rather the lack of an alleged foreign state makes no fundamental changes about his conflict from it being one about right of self determination, variables can change, the core of the struggle remains the same.
unless you want to explain to me how right of self determination is irrelevant to palestinians
I don't know what you are arguing about
I'm saying that there's only one sovereign state in this region and both group of people fighting there
isreal approves its occupation of gaza strip and west bank we dont need ur oppinion
what you guy saying is they are not part of Israel, they are part of a non-existing state all the time
what a crap dude
That's outright false and completely ridiculous claim. What is your definition of "sovereign state" anyway? You seem to abuse the term everywhere.
when a foreign power go to ur country by the aid of another countries and say to u our book said this land is ours so u have to give ur house what would u call that self determination ????
A sovereign state is a state that has the supreme sovereignty or ultimate authority over a territory. It is commonly understood that a sovereign state is independent. When referring to a specific polity, the term "country" may also refer to a constituent country, or a dependent territory.
A sovereign state is usually required to have a permanent...
there is a recognized sovereign state there, sure, I'm not debating against this
educate yourself
@thorny steeple
don't thank me about it
that's what I should do to all human being
I know I'm like a professor on something idk I don't give a shit I'm not an ashole academic crazyer mental illness talking about some stupid term all the time but it's really hard to explain it
u wanted from her the deff and she gave u a link from wiki hahah
he asked about ur understanding of the deff
dumb
So, what are you referring to as the "region"? The Middle East?
how divine of my love to all humanity by education
no, if you don't understand what a region is
Middle East can be a region
A. very accurate and non misleading brief about the historical perspective.
B. the occupying force being foreign or from the region doesn't change the fact that the said group is struggling for self determination.
There is absolutely nothing in my statement that even hints that I don't understand what the word "region" means. My question is crystal clear, what are YOU referring to as the "region"?
@feral river
Are you referring to the territory in which Israel occupies?
ur twisting and misusing the term of self determination... they are literary representing imperialism
the region that includes Israeli conflict between Palestinian people, Israel mainland, Gaza, West Bank
well Lebanon is a sovereign state that was not included
?
do u condemn Israeli attack on civilians against Lebaneses
??
goood
you're being regarded, how about this, since you seem to care, if you were make a case for Palestine in the framework of international law about their core struggle, not just for escalatory events, so as if you were 1950s.
good luck finding anything about imperialism or colonialism that fits this
then we can consider isreal a war crime state ??
well ICC is not vaild, so there was no war crime state
do you think right of self determination doesn't broadly cover states that were under imperialism ? that it didn't give colonized state the right to seek independence
that's well-documented
jeez
bro i understand what u mean very much .... i agree we can't go back to the past .... isreal is alr recognized... there is only one solution is the two state solution .... but i dont want to regard the fact that was imperialism and occupation since the beginning
imperialism or not, it doesn't render them no longer under the right of self determination, it's a core fundamental international law, creation of a Palestinian state is sought after based on this law
its a inevitable situation and i alr say i m with the two sate solution
So, you're basically saying "Israel has the authority over Israel". Pretty much a tautological claim and meaningless in essence. Ironically, these types of tautological statements are used in rhetorical speech, further proves my point that your claims are largely rhetorical.
This claim does not address the point of Israel's illegal occupation. Might does not make right.
no ? I said there's only one sovereign state in this region and I give you the explaination of what is this region which included West Bank, Gaza and Israeli mainland
yes ..but it still a fact a cristal clear fact and history is still recognize that
u cant change it
but we can find solution
can save the dignity and the life of Palestinians and Israelis
and live in peace and harmony as it was in the old days
when all the ppl of the monotheistic blief lived together
in that land
under British rule ? isn't that colonialism and imperialism lmao
that's the real colonialism and imperialism
before that go read history
what's needed is pragmatism and realpolitik, according to which the historical context are irrelevant, what matters is the situation as it is right now.
in short : both Hamas and Israel don't want two state solution, so there would be no progress towards this goal for the short future.
the ppl were exploited by the colonizers that not dignity or peace
Let's say Gaza and the West Bank are controlled by Israel, and - according to you, therefore they are part of Israel. Explain to me how is your statement meaningful when saying that Israel has "supreme authority" over Israel.
Additionally, that still didn't address the point of Israel's illegal occupation. Just because Israel has "control" and "power" doesn't mean we are ought to support it or justify its actions.
hammas agreed on that several times ... only some Israelis in the top of them natenuaho didnt approve it .. he didnt want it
wooooow
did i say something new
thats a fact brother
sectarian zionists dont want 2 states solution
buddy, the two states solution talks were halted because of Hamas since 2008 where the last actual talks happened and PA left last moment.
Hamas' 'doctrine' is eradicating Israel and opposing two state solution, that's why directly after getting power they kicked the PA out of Gaza, Israel liked this since as long as Hamas is in power the two state solution talks would stop and use them as an excuse for the latter.
do u know whay was oct 7 bcz Israel dont want to go the table and negotiate about that
Hamas never agreed to 2 state solution
i swear that they do
yes, some new divine wisdom you got
yes, some new divine wisdom
wait ill send u something prove my words
show me an instance of talks between both sides about 2 state solution where Hamas agreed

ok
u are right
u have to know whether they want or not from both sides.. it doesn't mean that 2 state solution is not a solution can be presented to the table
if you didn't get it yet, this is a trick question, because it never happened lel
The Palestine Liberation Organization has accepted the concept of a two-state solution since the 1982 Arab Summit. In 2017, Hamas announced their revised charter, which claims to accept the idea of a Palestinian state within the 1967 borders, but without recognising the statehood of Israel.
u see
it's one of the 3 possible solutions, but it's unlikely to happen now, we've got to wait and see the outcome in Gaza, if somehow the US can force Israel to allow the PA to go back to Gaza that's a big win, but would probably not happen since Israel doesn't want it
yes .. but thats pure evil from isreal
The two-state solution is a proposed approach to resolving the Israeli–Palestinian conflict, by creating two states on the territory of the former Mandatory Palestine. It is often contrasted with the one-state solution, which is the establishment a single state in former Mandatory Palestine with equal rights for all its inhabitants. The two-stat...
the whole thing about 2 state solution
its not Devine wisdom i say what im clearly convinced with
in 2017 hamas agreed on that but they put a condition , Israel didnt like it
so basically no solution
we hope peace for all humanity
everyone goanna die in the end and left behind this earth that were fighting for it
Pure evil of Israel... when in fact who started this war was the other side. Bizarre.
i really love windows and how they force update restart
war has limitation u cant bomb civilians and commit mass killing of kids that s reached over 18k
PA agreed to two state solution while ago, Hamas though even though they hinted at accepting 2 state solutions in 2017, not only that they emphasized on never recognizing israel, but they also would launch attacks to disturb normalization acts from Israel
they are war crimes so pure evil is completely fairness to describe that
Who started the war? Who uses children and hospitals as human shields? You know the answer.
there is no human shield
there is too much to load in one go but i'll say that there are only 3 possible solutions, a two state solution, which i hope by now we clearly understand it's not going to happen any time soon
Oh c'mon.. they built much of their sites under hospitals and schools is a coincidence? No. Really.
go watch the ved of battles of hamas with isrealdid u see human shield ??? ... but rather there are documented senarios from the UN shows us how Isreal use Palestinian as human shield .. do u condemn that too ???
give me proof ???? hurry up pls
apartheid state, on which greater israel become one (green line israel + west bank + gaza), but it would have to turn into apartheid since they would fail to maintain the jewish demographic supremacy but they will be able to keep the political one
At no time did I support Israel. But who started the war? It is simple. It is not difficult. I would like Hamas to stop being selfish and really support the creation of two states. But they don’t want that.
third is ethnic cleansing, similar to what happened in 1948 and 1967, so they'd annex West bank and Gaza and also be able to maintain the demographic supremacy.
the likeliness of this happening without a large war into play is low
even tho that dont give u the right to bomb a hospitals contain civiliance or kids .... would ur government do that if a bunch of terrorists are in ur house would they bomb it and kill u and ur family or they will find another appropriate way
how is this relevant to going forward ?
wait untill read urs simon
if you don't know what green line israel that i've mentioned it's in the image of this link
this is happening in west bank ... they live without dignity or freedom ... complete oppression
No, it doesn’t. But this wouldn’t be happening if hamas hadn’t started. Both sides are suffering. And the initial blame is not of Israel. The fault is of hamas to use defenseless people to achieve their evil goal.
There are multiple reports and claims that Hamas has used schools, hospitals, and other civilian infrastructure as shields for military operations. According to the IDF, the group has established command centers and stored weapons in facilities like Al-Shifa Hospital in Gaza. Israel asserts that Hamas uses tunnels beneath hospitals and operates near schools to make military targets harder to strike without risking civilian casualties.
Sry
Ur way too naive
As was i
im talking about a homogenous apartheid state, that is when Israel annexes both.
the current situation in West Bank is a product of continuous occupation and being subject to military court as do almost all occupied areas globally
To beleive in the two states solution
the starting or not ... thats not an excuse for Israel to commit this genocide and mass killing of civilians
No. I just don’t think like the bubble.
In this case you are justifying the death that hamas committed at the beginning. As if the lives of people they took away in the beginning also had no importance. Bizarre.
who s goanna trust the idf.... again thats not an excuse to bomb place where civilians exist ...
Yes u do
im completly against that
They bombed a party. With people. Who were there just wanting to have fun. Killed for fun. Laughed. They mocked the deaths of thousands.
and againt Isreal genocide too
i said
somthing
isn't
No. I don’t care if you think so. 
This is inaccurate. Yeah, sure Hamas is the one launched the attack in Oct. 7th, but that doesn't mean it started the whole war.
In fact, the operation of Oct. 7th has been labelled Al-Aqsa Flood. Al-Aqsa is an Islamic mosque in Jerusalem. According to the Jewish Talmod, this is the place in which they need to rebuild Solomon's Temple (this means, they'll need to demolish Al-Aqsa mosque), which is why Israel has committed many attrocities there, most recently 2023 Al-Aqsa clashes, where they've forcefully expelled Palestinian Muslims from the mosque, which is one of Islam's holiest sites, and have let Jewish settlers get in and perform their worshiping traditions in an Islamic mosque. Furthermore, this conflict is over 72 years old. So, saying Hamas started this war is very inaccurate, Hamas was founded about 39 years, which is during the first Palestinian intifada against the Israeli occupation, after the coercive establishment of Israel as a Jewish state.
there no excuse for killing civiliance especialy kids even in wars
Oh i know.
Naivety is often accompanied with ignorance and arrogance.
But a small tip. U gotta stop treating hamas as the problem,
And recognize them as the symptom of the main problem.
That is colonialism
Yes. What about children who were killed by them? They massacred the cities. They killed animals, people, women and children too. For evil.
still no proof on that
U all should not be fixating on 7th of October.
The bigger picture is worth more
Attention
thats not accurate all that was from the media and proved to be bullshit
are you talking about what hamas did in 7th of october ?
u didnt see the reportes of refuting this fake claims
There are videos on the internet of his own hamas showing this, just look for you. I saw. A lot.
show me
beside the fact that the conflict didn't start in 7th of october, Hamas did some messed up shit
You wouldn’t dare search and see again. Search yourself.
i totally against that if it was ,but are u againt Israeli genocide be consistent ???
u have the burden to provide me with things support ur claims
not me
answer my question are u aginst Israeli atrocities and mass graves
funny that on my part you have none of this. But, words can convey things that are not truths. Even more so when they are only written.
beside the kidnapping and killing of civilians at gun point
no I wont
If you are not able to search yourself.. I will not search and show you. I have seen what I needed. I read and studied what was necessary. And end.
when i condemn hamas for their atrocities u cant condemn isreali for same thing
ur just closed minded
this is whataboutism
this.. 😭
i alr said i condemn anything has relation of killing innocent people
im verry consistent in that point
she cant condemn them they have the right to do so
since they are the white or somthing
or maybe the chosen ppl
It’s no use. It seems that those who question them are always the wrong ones. Let them..
That's also inaccurate, there hasn't been any reliable accounts of Hamas massacring children. While there is a widespread video showing Israeli indiscriminate airstrikes during Oct. 7th, killing both Hamas militants and Israeli civilians. Israel does have a policy for this called Hannibal Directive, which is a policy used to prevent soldiers' abduction by all measures, even if it results in killing Israeli citizens.
lorena do u condemn this
or not??
More than 100 bodies were discovered in one Kibbutz alone, according to the NGO Zaka.
Subscribe to our channel: https://www.youtube.com/c/euronews?sub_confirmation=1
Watch our LIVE here: https://www.youtube.com/c...
ofc. People died bro
so u condemn isreal ?
ur making me laughing do u think this is a proof
some narrations we dont have any proof to be true or just a propaganda
At some point I said I was supporting them? I didn’t. I just said they didn’t shoot first.
it s irrelevant wether first or last ... u dont have the right to commit a genocide of thosand of women and kids to satisfy ur anger
that s illogical
A newspaper interviewing people who were on the spot and saw: It is not evidence.
A newspaper condemning Israel: it is proof.
ok, sir logical.
did they show us a ved like the guy has sent .. show us members of hamas doing what u claim and the narration claim
nice discussion have a great day
are you indirectly asking for gore vids ?
no
im just saying narrations are not necessary true or can be taken as a proof
they can be faked twisted
u too.
الخلاف في الرأي..لا يُفسد للوّد قضية!
It’s obvious there’s a ongoing solution which is full annexation of Gaza and West Bank
That was a nice solution to end this conflict forever
what s that bro
yea you're right, that's why they have been building settlements in West Bank
Yeah pretty nice and worked properly
Agree. I do not think like you, but not for that I will not take into account what you think or respect. These discussions add knowledge even if both parties do not agree.
an individual enjoying his right to his autonomy, with a cigarette, at least it's not a vape
gotta grind them calories
I’m 55 kg
?????
im against smoking tho but nice feeling
lol
agreed
if smoking is bad, then why is solid snake smoking ? checkmate liberals
you need to start grinding food then
solid snake smoking exists?
i didn't know he is a game character
lol yeah
I even wonder I’m lacking of testosterone
I can speak like a girl
wth
I mean I can
you what ?
If you give a fake hair with dresses you won’t realize im a guy
ummmmm
i have friends who can fake girl voice, yet they look very masculine
interesting talent
And I pursue peace & love, pretty feminine right ?
as far as i know, you're the opposite someone who is pursuing peace
Nah I just hold some fundamental truths about how peace works
And to establish the real peace
That war will never happen again
Right ?
a unified globe under CPC ?
what makes u sure that u hold the truth
Interesting question let’s take an example
If the opposite doesn’t exist anymore
Will there be peace or war ?
what u define as opposite ?
Your enemy
The target you are fighting to
If they doesn’t exist anymore, peace achieved
And this has been proven by history
u hold evil values bro if u gonna be the next leader of china trust me u will eliminate human race
Well well well it’s you switched the topic
You didn’t really question my truth
thats the center of ur evil ideology thats what ll bring out
lol
@dense agate what do u think
ur encouraging the elimination of the opposite side just bcz they adopt deff view... it's an evil ideology
I’m just stating a truth nothing else
at a fundamental level from a realist perspective, it is in state's interests if an adversary is gone, but that doesn't mean it's possible or that the end would justify the means to do so
Minecraft why u love seek arg despite the fact u know exactly that are not logical ...are u suffering from schizophrenia
it's like saying if it's good for USSR's interests if the USA could be destroyed, well yes, but regardless if they had the capability to do so, there would be consequences that wouldn't make it worth it
are all the Chinese think like this ??/
similar things is applied to Israel, the enemy is not Hamas by itself, but rather the possibility of the Jewish state to cease from existence, they can attempt to do a large ethnic cleansing but there would be consequences
there are no objective values
from a mere interests perspective that is true
It's difficult to calculate all the pros and cons.
yes so he cant hold autority on someone disagree with him
lol
guys im done have a great day
🗿
that's why i like realism, values, ideologies hold no meaning, just pure pragmatism and interests
agreed
hhh
it can be hard but not impossible, Russia knew sanctions were going to happen if they invade Ukraine, but the end justified the means for them so they did it
regime born from guns - Mao Zedong
dictatorships
i talked to minecraft a lot, i don't think all he says is nonsense, he's also very pragmatic
Sanctions are also very difficult to calculate in advance.
power is everything in a global anarchic system
ur favorite symbol
They couldn’t understand our view that make sense
You from US I’m from China we all global powers
That’s just our political games
For them it’s their only way to survive on this planet
the healthy mind cant accept what are ur promoting
but they knew large amounts of sanctions were coming, hence why they economically prepared for it
they prepared so good that left 300 billion dollars in Europe
mincraft i think hetler will agree with u
Europe will use the proceeds from this money, amounting to about 30 billion, to support Ukraine
All make sense if you can’t understand
so a damaged mind will understand?
and this happened because we believed in the law and private property
ur athiest right
wym I didn't even talked about it
I'm stating the truth
Were we ready, maybe, but not always, and many decisions are good improvisation
that's one of the shortcomings they did, they probably thought it would be unlikely for EU to make an extreme turn on them due to their energy dependency on Russia
The video seems to ask random people in the street. I'm not trying to say their testimonial is unreliable though, but I'd be skeptical given contradictory citations. For example, Israel itself admits their tanks have shot many of its civilians during Oct. 7th.
Another one made by Nir Hasson in Haaretz, which is an Israeli newspaper of record, admitted Israeli forces murdering Israeli citizens and hostages. Another one is made by Yasmin Porat describing Hamas militants treatment as "humanely" and later admitting Israeli forces did kill Israelis when she was held hostage by Hamas.
Furthermore, I've detailed about Israeli former hostages testifying that Hamas did treat them nicely.
#🧠|serious-chat message
#🧠|serious-chat message
So, it seems unlikely that they want to be nice and also want to kill children in my opinion. I'm not trying to say Hamas is cute though, just saying there is no sufficient evidence backing up the allegation of intentional killing of children and babies. Noteworthy, Israel did claim Hamas beheaded babies, but this claim has long be debunked too, as well as other fake news propagated by ZAKA org.
I would say that's because their national interest to fight against Russia not because Russia is not a democratic or something
personally, this is a regarded move for them to take frozen assets and give it to Ukraine
that was all pretext used for justify a campaign to fight against Russia
they don't give any shit to what Russia will be but how to deal with Russia
dude they are terrorists there's no need to explain anything and there's only one sovereign state in this region which is state of Israel
i don't think EU wants to fight Russia but at the same time they don't want it to cause instability in the area.
a Russia that seeks to expand it's sphere of influence is a threat to EU
what state of Israel is doing to accommodate the war on terror by their own ways to deal with terrorists
long live for war on terror
that's my personal opinion
put it in that place
well yeah but things are not so complex than you think, EU has its own considerations but mostly the pressure is coming from the Ukraine and the US not Russia
They don't understand that. when we fight Chechen US say they just freedom fighters.
it's the US pressuring EU to supply Ukraine and start militarization process to lease the burden of the US's defense duty
who the hell gives a shit to what they says ? Chechen is always part of Russia
chechen are free anyway that works
Ukraine is part of Russia according to you guys well if you can do that
After 9/11 they change their mind, a bit
that's why Biden just shipped their weapons to Israel
very good job for counter terrorism
that's our common mission
terrorism will be eliminated completely
keep ranting on
If you go to land, occupy it, kill children, suffer the people and creat a chaos then you shouldnt talk about why people fighting against you
idk man, the way i see it, the war on terror was a failed mission with a +8 trillion dollar price tag
This news has also been criticized. Especially, given that it has also been propagated by ZAKA org, a government-funded organization in Israeli, which is known for its propaganda of the 40 beheaded babies. In my opinion, it would also be a very extraordinary claim that Hamas committed systematic rape and sexual violence against Israelis. The notion of rape and sexual violence itself clashes sharply with Hamas's doctrine.
are u paragmatic too?
no idea you gather fighters and carrying out a bunch of terrorist attacks against a regional power while talking some shit and blame on your enemy
you are done bro they will be eliminated very soon
i try to remain consistent with realism
and they don't want to be responsible with their actions ? no problem Israel will enforce it
to let you know what will happen if you did something like that
Who is terrorist? Taliban? Im not supporter of neither Afgans nor Taliban but since exiting America from Afganistan people are more better than before
Hamas
Hamas, Hezbollah all terrorists
realism do not require pragmatism
Especially when he keeps talking about taking responsibility of one's actions.
At least they die with honor
Not like who shitting in their pants
realism is just the theory, it's application (realpolitik) does require pragmatism
especially till now you know what's going on and that's your bill
pay it
pragmatism in which sense?
lol I see the guy shitting in their pants just shipped some billions of dollars worth weapons to bomb the shit out of these terrorists
America every year losing power and becoming less powerful
our job is send those not-afraid of death bastards to the hell - MacArthur
see those terrorists honor in the hell
And still cant defeat a bunch of terrorist who have only a Ak
Ex-fucking-cuse me?
according to who??
I see if they will or not
some F-22 you know pretty beautiful when it's on the sky
Bro Israel has f35 and f15 and still cant defeat those territories
Skill issue
stop taking Mincraft bullshit seriously
Those are air combat vehicles…..
idk if they want to delay the war anyway
used to bomb civilians
I remember if there's a type used for drop bombs for F-22
or maybe I'm wrong ?
As I've previously proved, Israel is disliked by most Arabs in the Middle East. So, why don't I see you talking about how Israel should take responsibility of the hostility it caused in the region? Their safety is far-fetched with their criminality, even if they kill every single Palestinian, there would still be millions of Arabs to get rid of, and 2 billion Muslim who wants to free Al-Aqsa mosque. Why doesn't Israel taking responsibility for that? You seem to have very apparent double-standards.
F15e is air-land fighter jet
a state is considered to be a rational entity, and when we say they pragmatically pursue their interests -like when it comes to survival and keeping sovereignty- we mean that decisions should be made based on what will maximize power and/or security, rather than ethical or ideological reasons.
so it also helps us avoid idealism, since there would be compromises that reflect the realities of power politics.
Ha ha yes im sure they want to keep fighting yes
Someones were saying Puting can defeat Ukrain now but he doesnt want

Israel is of course doing atrocious shit, but I can’t go 24 hours without someone popping up in P&R and saying they should murder Israeli civies as justice.
Let’s not pretend the sympathy for either side isn’t motivated by ethnic violence, usually religious in nature.
dont u think that lead to the idea of the end justify the mean ...
what are you talking about ?
they have the ultimate authority over their territory
No its just assumed that states are rational actors
yes, it can lead to this
thats horrible in moral sense
they can dismantle any mosque they want lol it's none out your business
So is advocating for killing people for buying a house from the gov and living in it
yes it can be, that's why morals and politics don't mix well
Bro no body has issues with jewish
Muslims has problmes with zionists wich who want to kill Palestinian people and occupy their land
At this point, we're going in circles. This response is neither relevent, nor is it even meaningful as I've previously detailed.
#🧠|serious-chat message
#🧠|serious-chat message
and that's a good thing to some extent
@void arch ah brother
there's only one sovereign state in this region
Cyprus
keep ranting on
🇨🇾
well yeah true
You should come listen to the vile shit I hear people say about making civilians fear for their children’s lives, how they will kill them in righteous justice.
North
there's only one sovereign state in Cyprus
Recognised by one country
very good and accurate
thats lead to many controversial topics about corruption, morality, religion and a lot ... as a result its not harmonic theory .. it opens the door for unwanted idoelogies
And these one country is enouph to silence whole Europe
There is no country there, it's just colonised territory
You can just doing embargoes
It's funny how you dislike Israel but proceed to defend colonised territory just because it's Turkish
And it’s doesnt matter Turkey can do his own war planes
Not even the native Cypriot Turks like the settlers sent by Turkey to occupy empty houses in Cyprus
Yes I know there is only one country
that's why pragmatism is king, and adopting certain values or sets of morals as foreign policy would very likely backfire, like how US liberalism caused harm in Iraq and Afghanistan even though the intentions were good
🇨🇾
The difference Turkey dont kill children and women as what Israel doing and Greece has done
wym by harm that's counter terrorism
Lmfaooo they invented the word "genocide" because of Turkey
dude that's part of war on terror well-documented
cough cough armenia
remove saddam from power and fight against talibans
here is a good solution
not so good as you think lmao
Show it to me
Erdogan said to Armenia and Greece to showing this “document” and they didnt accept
what ?
Prove it
it's against the current policy that they will annex the Gaza and West Bank completely
https://www.tccb.gov.tr/haberler/410/31964/biz-arsivlerimizi-acmaya-haziriz-ermenistan-da-acsin
read with translate, this official page
they cant believe that there are ppl adopt such values like prohibition of killing innocent people during wars
A document from the Turkish government, surely it won't be biased
They thinking we are like them
that s why it s dangerous theory
He is denying multiple genocides
yes brother
May i ask to what's the current topic so I may throw my hat into the ring
are you actually asking for resources about that genocide ?
realism ? lel
go bring us an alternative disprove it
yes
wait wait, are you saying armenian genocide didn't happen
well... ?
Then show a document from your country
As you red, Erdogan called a 100 president and vice president
24 Nisan Türkiye’ye gelen 100’e yakın devlet başkanı, başbakan, bakanlar, büyükelçiler orada ne yapıldığını gayet iyi görecekler
it's the most practical one, idealism doesn't work
Then how you will prove it? You will say something you heard from your grandma?
100% israel and 100% Palestine, like the hypostasis
i assume this isn't the first time you hear someone mention Armenian genocide, do you have any idea why people believe such thing happened ?
its not when u disregard many fundamental traits of the human rice like mortality... idealism can work bcz there no objective way to do that ... all of them end up in horrible way
three in one
kağıt yok döküman yok arşiv yok mezar yok ceset yok bunu kanıtlayan tek bir şey yok.
You just want to create a great Armenia thats why you keep talking about it
Why I wrote it in Turkish?
I don't speak Turkish
Wtf
My problem just one second
idealism doesn't work, it's like you look at the Israel-palestine conflict from Palestine's perspective, the ideal solution would be that Israel ceases from existence, basing a foreign policy on that would take them nowhere
Most people don't deny the Armenian genocide, the alternative would be denial which is very common from Turkey
Report of the ICTJ on the Armenian genocide
yes, i was paid by the PKK to promote the idea of Greater Armenian state
appeling to autority is logical fallacy u know that ??
There is no paper, no document, no archive, no grave, no body, there is nothing to prove it @manic juniper
I literally sent the report
Literally just sent the report
No you just one who believe in everything government said
These people are insufferable
i didn't hear this from the government
let me read
which consiperacy source is next on your script ?
There was no grave for the Jews killed in the Holocaust either, why would the Nazis give them graves? They didn't like Jews
From where from a tiktok account?
That's simply stupid
again wrong
Ummmmm…

What kind of genocider gives a grave to the people they murdered?
I think some lands in present day Türkiye are historically Armenian and Armenians have every right to claim them, as Kurds and Greeks could do
Yeah, it was called Western Armenia, unfortunately nothing is left of it today and it's a dead nation
Mass grave? They dont have to do graves by using marble
They cant burn the dead bodies by acid
Some Turks present in those areas retain some Armenian DNA, they are simply a stateless people
They must do a mass grave
Armenia was shrunk in size because of the genocide and ethnic cleansing.
Kurds are still there but any promotion of their independence is suppressed
summary pls
if we lived in an ideal world, this should be modern anatolia
You can hide your mass graves in Turkey, too bad you genocided them in Syria as well
it satisfies all the parties
Maybe you shouldn't have if you wished to hide it
The Armenian genocide happened
Turks came, implemented the “settlement policy”, took the Turks and settled them in Armenia and Greece, so there is Turkish DNA in the Greeks and Armenians
I tried to explain it clear as I can
Read about “iskan politikasi”
The Turks think that the Kurds rebelled because the Americans supported them and that before that everything was rosy. Turks don't understand that if they oppress foreign peoples, the result will always be riots or very high crime rates because the people of those lands don't trust the state
Lel, you have their DNA lil bro
DNA can't be replaced, you just changed their language and culture, but they're Greeks and Armenians by blood, you can't change that
that's true. Kurds are a sensitive topic in the middle east, since other countries have minorities of kurds (syria, iran, iraq), so they're all teaming up against suppressing any of creating a kurdish state, since none of them want to cease territory to them
I want to ask you
If there is no Turk dna in Anatolia, who was fucking “they” for 1000 years? 
Read about Iskan Politikasi
I never said that there is no Turkish DNA in Türkiye, but that it simply mixed with Greek, Armenian and Arabic DNA
mam can you give me the debate summary ?
trigger incoming
Yes, the Armenian Genocide is widely recognized by historians and scholars as a historical fact. During World War I, the Ottoman Empire, led by the Young Turk government, systematically targeted its Armenian population through massacres, forced deportations, and starvation, resulting in the deaths of over one million Armenians12.
Primary sources, including eyewitness accounts, diaries, and contemporary newspaper reports, provide substantial evidence of these atrocities13. For instance, The New York Times extensively covered the events in 1915, describing them as a "campaign of race extermination"1. Additionally, the term “genocide” itself was coined by Raphael Lemkin, inspired in part by the atrocities committed against the Armenians2.
Despite this, the Turkish government has historically denied that these events constituted a genocide12. However, the overwhelming consensus among historians and numerous countries’ official recognitions affirm the occurrence of the Armenian Genocide12.
If you have any more questions or need further details, feel free to ask!
AI
And, believe it or not, Arabs had a huge genetic impact on your land
So what? Also in their dna there is Turkic dnas
Doesnt matter
In some cities
And it doesnt matter
If he work for Turkey and love his country isnt a problem
The good thing is that the genetic impact of foreign peoples on your country is also reflected in your culture
bro forget about the past and focus on reality
bro's adopting realism
Someone said there was no genocide on Armenians and other people, so I sent a document that provided an analysis
So what do you want? Also to kill them or what?
i think the relation between turkey and Armenia is quite improving
???
buddy look at the last war between armenia and Azerbaijan
Lmfaooo
The documents you brought from news sites funded by Germany are unimportant. Why didn't they come when Erdogan called on Armenia to open the archives?
I want you to free them and go back to central Asia
After this war*
Joke
no bro
And not improving, just stabilising
No
What archives? Do you think their government is hiding it?
I cant leave ISTANBUUUUL
The term Genocide was coined by Polish-Jewish lawyer Raphael Lemkin in 1944, whose family was one of the victims of the Jewish Holocaust. By defining this term, Prof. Lemkin sought to describe Nazi politics of systematic murder, violence and cruelty and atrocities committed against the Armenians in the Ottoman Empire in 1915 as well.
On December...
You cant hid something doesnt exist
the claims of the historians and news paper report... cant be taken seriously ... when u know the fact who wins write history
Polish-jewish…
Yes, so?
🇹🇷🇹🇷🇹🇷 Istanbul or Constantinople 🇬🇷🇬🇷🇬🇷?
Even in that case they dont have any archive
There were plenty of Jews in Poland until 1945
Kurdastinople
Nothing just funny
holy crap
The true ending
Istanbul since 1453
another non-existing state appeared
I can't believe you said that. Do you think this is a Jewish conspiracy theory?
this guy is a troll le l
they came by ships to isreal
Just like the Turks in Cyprus then
not when they got Atakurd on their side
"Nooo we don't do that, we are moral, we don't kill women and children"
They are welcome to Palestine we dont have any problem with them
We just want dont kill the muslim babies
maybe
I prefer Italitanbulnople
still true untill u find out the opposite
Constantinople under the Latin Empire
who's Trukey bombing in Syria ?
I literally showed proof of the genocide
The funny part is that, after years of separation, Northern Cyprus is still an underdeveloped "country"
yes
isis maybe
You know, yes we did I LOT OF GENOCIDES
Thats way you must leave Cyprus to Turkey then we dont kill you
Naaah, we created Constantinople, so the name remains the same
And most of the Turks in Northern Cyprus are settlers that the native Cypriot Turks don't like either
yes buddy, you're completely and utterly clueless
Turkey is a paper tiger, they would fold if they tried to invade us
enlight us
Bro I have a looot of Syrian friends in Turkey and till now I didnt anybody saying Turkey bombed Syria. Against of it, Turkey supoorting people and öso in Syria against Bashar Assad
Naaaaaah, you're not just bombing them, you've also invaded a portion of their territory to the north 👍🏻
We entered Syria and Iraq, we took Cyprus and defeated Armenia and also finished pkk in Turkic lands
Alhdamulillah we keep doing well in defense industry
Yes we took to dont America creat a terrorist state in North
And we didnt bomb them
If you want watch on internet what happening there
governments do whatever they desire and we are here trying to hold accountability over them
You can only do well against countries without a government or a military, what's even the point of bragging
look up Turkey's safe zone alongside the the syrian border and put it in relation to the syrian-kurdish armed militias (who are btw figthing ISIS)
That's like Israel bragging about defeating Palestine when they don't even have a functional military
Or a centralised government
Year by year… Turkey become stronger
The inflation is devouring your country alive 🤣
you not hearing about the bombings from the syrians you know = it didn't happen
You'll have to pay half of your monthly salary just for a piece of bread in some years
Bro the problem Israel cant defeat this little army of Palestine, they just bombing children
You need to bomb them, you need immigrants and a cheap workforce to sustain your declining economy
there is a reason why the US has military bases inside the areas controlled by Krudish fighters in Syria
Thats way we stopped buying from America, we making our own weapons
The Turkish economy is ran by someone with an high school diploma on economics
There is no way you can run a country that badly otherwise
I dont thin Turkey need 15m immigrants to work
We are just a country has honor not like someones who bombing children
The gdp is rising
stop attcking ppl ur just ruining the discussion
not u bro
I dont know
what u dont know?
So is Ireland's, increasing GDP doesn't mean much when it sucks per capita
Im very anxious
Turkey every year buying a lot of tons gold
I hope Turkey dont get into any war
they're already involved in conflicts
They have no future as an alliance
I know people a little bit suffering
Because of wests embargoes
But now we dont need anymore to your product
We making our weapons
türkiye will enter into any war sooner or later
And also we sell to you
I hope no
+1
narrations
They are just a collection of underdeveloped states that have few common interests, in a maximum of twenty years there will no longer be any bloc opposed to the United States
Is that why Turkey is still in NATO and trading with the EU? So much for self sufficiency
we ll see mate
Their only common interest is not using the US dollar, that's pretty much it. It's a team of countries that hate someone rather than loving each other
Unlike the EU where we mostly like each other
And we don't hate the UK for leaving either
We need time bro
Isnt easy to make a 5th waplane bu yourself
America and his allies couldnt do f35 for years
there is no love when a country dominant the world especially when u have many advantages
I love my European brothers, I hope that one day there will be a European confederation
like making the dollar as the a unified currency
Dont you realise america is becoming powerless?
It's just a myth
did u know how America stole coutries s gold
Americans have worse living standards because of unregulated capitalism but the country isn't getting weaker, that's just wishful thinking
Other countries are facing much worse right now
A myth?
America isnt stronger like 20 year ago
Now think about after 20 years
From declining birth rates to rampant inflation and corruption
Most other countries aren't either
Their population is growing as is their economy, they have one of the strongest militaries in the world and strong allies with developed economies. There will be a clash between the blocks of power and here we know very well who will win
Turkey before 20 years was a state who cant defeat the terrorist in his lands
They're still incapable of that after 20 years
Maybe in 20 years these "terrorists" will have an independent state within Turkey's borders
Yes its the number one for now, and for many years
But its getting worse
Now there is no pkk in Turkey
Turkey now focusing on Iraq and Syria to finish pkk completely
they can't do anything to them while US bases are still in kurdish territories, or are you suggesting Turkey fighting the US ?
Fighting pkk, read about Pençe Kilit operasyonu
Us is losing power in middle east. They were stronger and by years America will not a problem to Turkey and other countries in middle east
Did you watch what Trump said?
why did the first sentence seem sus to me? has Türkiye ever been purged of pkk
US is intentionally moving from the middle east to focus on China, yet their military bases remain next to the Kurds in Syria, and turkey keeps complaining about it
Yes Turkey did
Now Turkey just fighting with pkk in Iraq
PKK and Kurdish militias are still there
not just in turkey
Ülkede terörist kalmadı zaten.
Bütün pkk temizlendi ve şu an kökten bitirmek için sınır ötesi harekat düzenliyorlar @weary belfry
As I said, by years
الله يجزيك خير حبيبي مع السلامة
you're free to speculate all you want
hmmm,i have a feeling that there will always be PKK in türkiye. i dont think we have gotten rid of them (im talkin abt PKK within the borders of Türkiye)
Thanks

But these are facts. Look at gulf war. From these years to now, how much power america did lose?
لا تأخذ المناقشة على محمل الجد فهي لا تستحق... وداعا حبيبي أراك لاحقا
there are no facts here, only interpretations
In Turkey pkk will still as politicans not as soldiers
i can tell you the US wants to move on from the middle east to focus on curbing China their actual adversary, you'll read that as them giving up
ولا يهمك حبيبي مع السلام نلقاق على خير
YES BRO AMERICA WILL BE GREAT AGAIN YES
cringe
I know
And we came and destroy all of it 
no we didnt bro
hahahah
Yes, you destroyed the Middle East and the Balkans, not something I'd be proud of
they should thank us god commanded us not to destroy building or place of worship during wars
We brought something better
I will not explain the civilisation of Ottomans
Where are you from?
hmmm, okay, got this. diff perspective
السلام عليكم ورحمة الله وبركاته
Allah ﷻ says in the Quran:
”فَسْـَٔلُوٓا۟ أَهْلَ ٱلذِّكْرِ إِن كُنتُمْ لَا تَعْلَمُون“
”So ask the people of knowledge, if you do not know”
-# (Surah An-Nahl, Ayah 43)
Not as they did in Balkan wasr…
oh sorry wrong server
or trees
Nusayr brother welcome
Finland
We are not brownnnnn 😠😠😠
They were turned into mosques, that's why
bro who wins write history
May Allah enrich you out of his bounty
Bro you didnt have a chance to destroy anything, “historyless”??
Just because we were occupied and destroyed by others doesn't mean we have no history
Amin inshallah wa iyyakum
I'm not a stupid nationalist so I don't really care about the past
People that have no future only care about the past, that's how it is
Hahshhahahaha thats exactly mean it
we can do so but we cant exaggerate to the point where no churches ... the fact there still churches prove my point.... so where is the oldest church???
Their countries have no future so they would rather cry about the long gone past
WE Muslims during war aren't allowed to do 8 things
There are no churches in Saudi Arabia
Yahya related to me from Malik from Nafi from Ibn Umar that the Messenger of Allah, may Allah bless him and grant him peace, saw the corpse of a woman who had been slain in one of the raids, and he disapproved of it and forbade the killing of women and children.
Globalism will only benifit the elites
Yes you are completely true
We are only muslims not much
Alhamdulillah
Those without a future only care about the past
how many christians in saudi?????? Saudi had many churches but tehy died out even tho muslims allowed it (to remain)
Isn't it prohibited to build churches in Saudi Arabia? Lol
it s an aspect of pragmatism
I want to see what will happen in eu because of Russia and east blok
Eu trying create a new armies and America doesnt look like will help Europe
saying you're anti nationalism instantly means you're pro globalism, thank you
No, just in Kaaba you cant build churches and Madina
hahahahhahahahha
Lol
thats the thing, there is no sizeable christian community that would, if that was the case you could build
lol
nationalism will benefit the folks ?
Lmao my bad
2 millions out of 30 aren't sizeable I guess
lmao
buddy, don't act regarded, be nice and go back to what realism and pragmatism means.
a small hint, something related to ideologies
Don't they have a right to a place of worship? 2 millions are a lot of people
'Do not embezzle the wealth of spoils and do not deceive a people'
'Do not mutilate the enemy dead'
'Do not kill women and children, nor religious recluses. ...
'Create peace in the land and treat the people with benevolence'
'Do not harm that which they consider to be sacred'
'Do not cut down a fruitful tree'
copy pasta
Are Hindus allowed to have a temple?
nationalism requires some aspects of pragmatism
In a country you only have to compete with other poors
In globalistic system you would have to compete with all the poors
what was that shit ?
I like Chinese approach here, lil isolation is needed for survivor
oh yeah depends on what global system you are referring to
You see, those 2 millions aren't citizens or ppl living there. They are from other countries like hindus. In medina it was allowed to build churches and synagogues. But those people have either moved or converted. Any local people being chroistian would be allowed
@feral river why tf every new person here thinks you're a gal lmao
I've lurked some crazy messages
why tf I would give a shit to that ?
are you my fucking taxpayer ?
wait
you mean gal ? or girl ?
Girl female xx isfrun
I thought it was a freaking sexy stuff u know
If two millions are living in your country even temporarily you build houses for them
And it goes the same for churches and temples
Besides it was announced by the former minister of justice Muhammad Issa
It isn't a matter of people living there permanently or not, it's just illegal
Saudia arabia isn't secular country tho
maybe they will think better and realize im a transgender and they have no idea
You think they dont have rooms?
Yes, at least they're consistent. I have a problem with people denying it
Vatican City too prohibits building other places of worship as well

I was making an example, you don't just build houses for them
you're saying ideals/ideology requires some aspects of pragmatism, by definition that's not true, since you'll have to make decisions according to thsoe ideals and not pragmatism which is based in practical reality.
but there are many nationalistic states that won't follow their set of values all the time and act according to pragmatism, especially in foreign policy
Yeah atleast they're consistent, eventually they'll build churches
To attract tourists
True
Hopefully they will have churches of Satan too
that what i meant
I don't see there's any state is practicing some pure ideological imagine on their own utopia
I bet that Minecraft agrees with all the core tenets of Satanism
There are no official exceptions to the rule prohibiting the construction of churches in Saudi Arabia. The country enforces a strict interpretation of Islamic law, which only allows the public practice of Islam. This means that non-Muslim religious buildings, including churches, cannot be constructed or openly operated anywhere in Saudi Arabia.
However, non-Muslims are allowed to practice their religion privately within their homes or in private gatherings. While this private practice is tolerated, it must be done discreetly and without attracting public attention.
AI
even North Korea is doing a good job to improve its economy and prevent famine
However, non-Muslims are allowed to practice their religion privately within their homes or in private gatherings. While this private practice is tolerated, it must be done discreetly and without attracting public attention.
if you'd convince him satan has nukes, he's worshiping
lol it's the first time i ever heard this
what is Satanism btw
Why the last part?
there are ppl believe in this shit ... and cant relate to other beliefs
Minecraft can't be it
Look at the first point lmao
Maybe not with 1, 7 or 10 but he would agree with the others
meaning they can practice their religion .... its a national law of the country ... if u didnt like the country dont go to work in it
I'm asking why can't they attract public attention?
Do you apply that to France too and its restrictions on wearing hijab?
what ??? ask france ??
I'm talking about Saudi Arabia there
religion practices has nothing to do with the style of wearing
It's a religious practice
💀
the law say u can wear anything ... except bieng nude
i can wear a pikini whats the prblm
i can wear Spiderman suit too
u can disprove it
You didn't tell me why attracting public attention is not allowed
mf
She's saying if you do not question the Saudia arabia for not allowing to built churches, you don't have the right to question France on banning hijab
Why is it illegal?
Stop unfriending me you toothpaste eater
I can say that in France's case they have no basis for prohibiting religious attire as long as it doesn't make identification impossible
it is not me who determines laws of a country ... meaning u have to accept it
I'm asking for an opinion, do you think it's the same as France banning hijabs on the workplace?
What's your views on it?
Ban @thorny steeple he's haram
2 separated things
In my opinion as long as it's not the beekeeper-like attires (that could be used akin to masks for criminal operations) there are no reasons to ban any, like hijabs, veils, turbans...
Na both of em are suppressing freedom of expression
it s completly deff u can wear anything except being nude
I guess you have no opinions on it
Habibi come to France
Or you don't like to have an opinion
Sounds responsible to me
go check law
Some people are spineless
Yeah it was passed in 2011
It's about USA
i proved my point that u can wear anything u want
I'm not going to teach you how to google lol
Tell this to french Olympic team
You have no point, because I asked for an opinion and you only pointed to "These are the laws"
It's legit spineless behaviour
I gave my opinion on the subject twice
sure but u have to know i have disproven ur claim about seeing hijab as baning churches from SA , bcz the law of wearing is clearly againt it , since it approves wearing anything
7 out of 11 disagreed
I didn't talk about churches though, I asked about "attracting public attention" what's that?
they can do what they want idc
What about point 9?
are hijab and baning churches separated things ???
ill answer u
🤦🏼♀️ I asked about public attention... Nevermind
answer mine
i alr tell u its a national law
When you have two millions Christians then yes, they are almost on the same level
i cant change it
I didn't ask you to change it
are hijab and baning churches separated things ???
Is it right or wrong in your opinion??
🤦🏼♀️
Or you support the national law only
I wonder if his teachers had to repeat the same thing four times as well
428 members
in my opinion it's misinterpretation and misusing of power ... everyone has the right of expression and practice his religion freely within limits of respect ,tolerance, and safety of others...