#🧠|serious-chat
1 messages · Page 185 of 1
Worst will still hound your ass from hell and back
who knows
at least better than don't know what's going on with religion
Hm are you an atheist/agnostic
I never define myself an atheist or religious but I can be religious and atheist for any cases I need.
in China, I'm a firm Marxism-Leninism revolutionary, a Chinese nationalist, a pro-CCP and authoritarian.
Blud is religiously fluid 💀
Hm how can you also be a capitalist then? Aint communism and capitalism polar opposites
in West, I'm a freedom fighter, a religious, a believer of american values
capitalist doesn't mean I must support capitalism but seek more benefit in current situation.
in a perfect communist society, there is no class, everyone is equal, in such a utopia it still needs leader, needs politician
and those guys tell people that they are "leader of the society not superior is bs" because corruption exist.
and actually the Soviet Union, China those country which pursues communist society, they still establish their order based on nationalism, and alleged Marxism-Leninism philosophy
and something you know like socialism with Chinese characteristics.
so it becomes to what you see is fighting our equality, but using bugs which establish by THEMSELVES to get benefit.
Ah so you dont support capitalism outright but just wanna get the most our of the current system (which happens to be capitalist)?
maybe, based on current situation, the supreme entity of both wing is as same as authoritarian.
If you go too far on either side, you'll still end up as authoritarian.
Horseshoe theory
so less to be authoritarian is more possible for a normal people to get higher on ranking of class.
that's why if I'm a higher class I supports more authoritarian, if I'm a lower class I supports more democratic.
all of its logic is seek more benefit and defend my interest, nothing strange.
that's the core of capitalist.
Maximize your personal benefits and defend your interests ig
yes.
that's how explained I don't really belongs to any religion or irreligious.
but I use any religion or irreligious philosophy to maximize my benefit.
Such a pragmatist you are 
maybe I shouldn't say I'm a capitalist but a pragmatist but I think someone don't really know what pragmatist mean.
that's why I said I'm a capitalist at least some left-wing crazyer know I'm their enemy 
Minecraft the defender of capitalism fr
from People's Republic of China
sometimes I feel like I'm not a Chinese
I already got used to the english environment
You will be deported from china 
Can I abstain?
unborn and cant be killed, neither cessation nor generation, neither birth nor death , thats who I AM
Vale, you better delete that message which is suffusing slander on my name soon! You know very well I quit that preposterous hobby (life). Now chop chop, prisoner #82848
Afterlife (if it exists) doesn't care whether you believe in it or not
You die, you die.
What if you get to do a new game+
Im not gonna book burn
Literally 1894
I thought for sure I could type it. Some days I can, some days I can't 
Depends on big bro's mood
who wanna make extra income, please ping me.
I am a web developer and I am looking for US or Canada guy who is over 25.
Let's collaborate!
I am 1 years old. Is this okay?
I am serious
Goo goo gaa gaa
You have a minions profile pic
A REAL man loves minions
Is there any relation between minion pic and serious?
No. But there's some relation between bad grammar and scammers
Maybe try Grindr
If you're not a scammer, prove it by giving me 10 dollars
me
"help this gentleman relieve himself" 
u guys are slacking off
u just wanted to use the new word which was shown in idiom of the day right
yes
caught it
just practicing so that I don't forget the idiom
yea great job
I learn and then usually forget in just some matter of days
due to lack of using the word
u should talk
using them
people near by talk in their native language. and usually don't talk in english
even in school
even tho its english medium
talking to myself on mirror and texts really help a lot
people are just not so enticed to talk in english.
great ideas
who to undestand and continue in conversation and ask if they didn't get something
a person in real life who doesn't speak english because it doesn't feel good way to be connected and when we both know the same native language. we ust not able to talk in english
That's not burning books, Vale. That is simply burning your slander
Religion is only for people, who don't want to think. In 99% cases you just believe in something you know nothing about.
The problems is that while traffic rules save your life, religion does the opposite: it takes your life, it takes control of your life so that you feel safe. There's a difference.
Depends on which rule. For example, rape is a heinous act which should NEVER be committed, so theres a rule against it
rape takes away control, so rules aim to forbid it;
religion often also takes away control, but rules don't often aim to forbid it 🤔
Wassup guys, what is the discussion about?
wassup! I just learned how to type ur name 🤣
Lol just click on username
Well, religion save people too, but here are the humans themselves who misuse it and commit crimes under the name of religion
To join a religion, you have to agree to conform to a set of values that the religion teaches. The religion's values are related to the teachings of the religion; for example, to become Christian, you just need to follow Christ. But to do that, you need to do what Christ teaches, and that is where the rules come in. That's what I think.
These teachings can guide the follower's behavior and actions, forming the basis of the moral code or rules within that religion.
That way, religion can be seen as restrictive. For some people, though, that is good; these guidelines provide a framework for living a meaningful and purposeful life that is in accordance with their (and the religion's) beliefs.
theres no way to satisfy atheists 🙌
How so?
they wont get what u say tho..u can try ..
Do you get what I'm saying?
Okay. I don't consider myself very religious, but I can see why people choose to follow religion.
yea sure
im not against buts thats a reality that Atheists often overlook the deeper meanings of religious practices and myths, treating them as mere intellectual errors. Additionally, some atheists exhibit a narrow focus on specific religious beliefs, failing to engage with the broader spectrum of religious thought..
Indeed. Some atheists do not bother to study religion and say ‘religion is false’ without knowing exactly how it is false.
so, could you spell it out more about this?
by "how it is false"
what prompted you to think so? any statistical data or just you judge it by your acquantances?
The second one lol
Guys, in Italy they are about to reinstate compulsory military service
War is near
For men only?
Yes, only for boys between 18 and 26 years old
In reality it can be either compulsory military service or civil service, it's up to you
But I'm going to do the military service
It's the same here but we had this for a long time now
In Sweden they only pick people with the best physical features of both sexes and they only select few of them
We also had it in the past, then they disabled it for a while, but now they want to put it back on
I wish they did the same here or that they made it mandatory for women as well
Italy
In Finland it was never removed
Most likely it will be the same with us
This means you could easily circumvent it
Because there isn't enough money to support such a large number of reservists
It's a huge waste of money, one of our economists proved that a volunteer force is cheaper and more efficient
But I don't want to, I will give my all to be part of the military service
That's because of misconception and misuse of the people from religion
In Sweden most people involuntarily avoid it because the chances of being selected are microscopic
We can't blame the religion for that
Indeed it is, but I think it's only temporary, here they are simply afraid of a war
What war does Italy risk even
In essence, that's agreeable.
In practice, oh boy, those are often abused to death!
It is not yet known how it will work here, the law still needs to be approved by Parliament
So is god that weak in ur believes?
A full-scale war with NATO against the pro-Chinese/Russian bloc
Atheism is better then
Given that Italy gave very little military support to Ukraine it would be strange to backtrack now and participate in a war against Russia directly
Nah, we have donated a lot to Ukraine, our government is just an opposition controlled by Europe. If there is a war between NATO and Russia, Italy will probably participate
Atheist can't deny God if God is existence itself 🧠
No offence but even Canada and Denmark donated more, Italy gave humanitarian aid (aka taking in refugees)
Well , Existence is
It's self proving
This is military support, but we have given a lot of economic support. However, it's not something I'm proud of
Very true
Maybe people just like to have fun. You should try it sometime
The greatest metaphysician the west has ever produced (Parmenides)
I agree with this statistic, here we are talking about military support, but we have given a lot of economic support
I think he is saying that the ammunition use different standards so it's a mess
But it must be said that Ukraine is holding up well to the invasion
Gtk
Well no they shouldn't be, they are required in the Parliament and to maintain stability
And they shouldn't interfere with those that actually studied and live to be soldiers and officers
Unfortunately that's how it is everywhere except Antarctica
Penguins are incorruptible
Ukraine is a really corrupted country and many people think their countries don't need to donate anything to Ukraine as they will eventually sell everything, grab the money and leave the country
I know some Ukrainian lads and none of them want to go back
They all want to live in Ireland
True
Really?
The Irish people support people of Ukraine, not their politics
We can't as we have housing crisis
Well, they get much more money than in any EU country
They are provided with accomodation
Our hotels are all full
We can't take more, we can't find a house to rent ourselves
The Irish people becoming second class citizens and no one even cares
Asylum seekers come to our country to live for free as they have a refugee status and you're not allowed to work if you're a refugee, they get 38 euro weekly and free accommodation with food
And Ukrainains have to find themselves a job, rent a room/house as now they are provided with free accommodation only for 3 months
It's ridiculous as most of them are hard working and no one wants to support them any longer, but illegals are welcome. How come?
Asylum seekers even ask for family reunification so they can bring their grandmas and relatives here to live for free
Some even get 213 euros a week
So it's more than 800 a month
Loads of money, considering their accomodation is free
Sounds like Ireland has a lot of money to spare
But no money for their own people
Always difficult when it comes to that 🤔 I wonder why
Because the Irish people are second class citizens in their own country, no one cares about the Irish, there always be a house for anyone, but not for the Irish
I was considering that because there are countries I like more than my own but I already have a job and I worked for years to get where I am
I don't know if I would get the same opportunity elsewhere, plus I'd have to sell my home and almost everything I have
Just imagine, 800 euros per month, no need to work, free accommodation
You won't be able to get a refugee status
No reason for that
Do you think a girl from Myanmar could get it?
The country has a civil war going on
I'm pretty sure you won't
Not me, asking for a friend
I don't think I pass as Burmese lmao
Plus 800€ are a lot if you do nothing, but I don't want to earn a lot less than what I get and be poorer overall
She could even fake being one of the persecuted minorities since I don't know how the Irish government would be able to check her background like that
Ukrainians get more money as they are not refugees, they are under international protection. Refugees typically get less, 38 euro per week (Ukrainians will be getting 38 a week soon as well)
Go home ya lads, if you don't want to work at all
All working Ukrainians and immigrants are welcome!
She could be recruited in the army in few months
Since they recently passed a law that will make them able to recruit women as well, for lack of manpower
They will definitely try
Yes but I find it difficult in general
She is from a country with over 50 major ethnicities
I don't think her documents even say which ethnicity she is
You can't work if you're a refugee (Refugee status, not international protection) as refugees typically have no docs, no passport or whatever, they get 38 euro a week, free accomodation
And no one would ever say they are welcome to waste taxpayers' money
I think she should give it a shot
Why did I tell ya about refugees? Come on
I'm dumb, I know
I should've never told ya
I think the worst is when she gets back to her country if that's the case
If she has no visa - she goes home if she won't have a reason to come to Ireland
If they find out that she tried to escape it will be bad, they restricted travel for men abroad and probably will do the same for women
I'd suggest you to try to come legally, this is a good country, the government will help you, but please, respect Ireland, it's full already and we don't need more asylum seekers here so they could get all of taxpayers' money and live for free
She wants to move legally and also leave forever and work elsewhere
Welcome
I wanted to help her leave but I don't know how any of that works at all, plus my country wouldn't be good since most people speak Finnish and Swedish, not English
Irish premier Simon Harris has said that Ireland won’t “provide a loophole for anybody else’s migration challenges”.
He was speaking after UK Prime Minister Rishi Sunak said claims that the UK’s Rwanda plan is causing an increase in migration to Ireland shows its deterrent effect is working.
The Irish Government has said there has been a shift...
She could learn Swedish but there is no way she will ever learn Finnish
Ireland-Rwanda migrant deal soon
Imagine being an Albanian caught on the same boat as some Rwandans
Rwanda is a great country though, people are paid some decent money and they live in a well-developed African country. That's a great deal
And the UK even pays them 3000 pounds when they come to Rwanda I presume
Is this a remigration policy?
least of all, I feel sorry for the Russians who abandoned everyone and ran away. Don't mention, they are dump.
Is there anyone who knows Nobisuke?
muted 💀
You
@balmy niche let’s debate and pretend to fight to cause drama and choas
but i can't fight against you 😭
instead let's bully sukuma po

Sure
Hii
Just say the keywords, religion, atheism, Islam idk what else
Communism capitalism the West reptiles deez nutz
Serious chat is the same place it used to be, but much worse now. Hello once again, everyone
got it
i have something in mind
Quite correct in that regard. Finnish is obviously the superior Reptilian Honorary Aryan language. She does not stand a chance
I’m wondering if I will get muted if I say this
Idk someone said the N word days ago and nothing happened lol
I got warning for neyro word
Good
What word?
Neyro
What was that?
What does it mean?
It mean black dude, their race name
I know you want to say that
Say it
It's boring conversation.
Alright
Why you send friend request, you aren't my friend.
Sorry... I didn't mean to hurt you big man
"Ran away" to save their lives*
People don't leave their country without any reason
The must have been a reason to leave it
Dumb or dump?

Dump sounds weird
But it's not offensive
Idk anything about it, I just know they send asylum seekers to Rwanda
Neither dumb sounds offensive bruv...
I think you won't understand. but tell anyway. It short true story. there is a man who ran away, and there is his old mother who now has no one, who can help. those, who ran away, I don’t feel sorry for them. they abandoned their family and friends. All of them. they simply have no sense of responsibility. If you feel pity for them, I'm not.
when I see videos of these people, I ask myself who you left behind. was it your dog, was it your boyfriend or girlfriend, was it your parents, who did you leave?
you didn’t just leave for another country to earn money, you left when it became difficult and dangerous to live in the country. and that changes everything
.......
Serious chat 
They'll make money and will provide a good farewell... maybe a cool retirement or something...
Leaving your parents behind isn't a cool thing. But if it's good for your folks future, and your future... don't hold back... your neighbors will take care, your friends will take care of your parents... your cousins and all
It was message for Liam, not for you. I forgot to put his name. You are good I'm not gonna say it to you
what's the daily stance ? 🤔
I decided to believe in god this day, and the left-wing socialism democratic.
freedom, democracy, no communism, no nationalism, for justice, for god, for human rights!
god is the only thing we believe 👐
💯
Believe in something was good as always..
I would rather live my life as if there is a God and die to find out there isn't, than live as if there isn't and to die to find out that there is.
Smart people will always live a country when it's dangerous and difficult to live in. They all made a good decision for themselves as now no one's going to send them to the frontline to kill innocent people.
It became difficult because you've decided to support the war in Ukraine
That's simple. You support killing, we support sanctions against you.
Enjoy!
I knew that you wouldn't understand, but I tried 
Good try, well done
Ignore, some of these people are known for 'debating' like this
I take it as an insult.
I guess most Russians have never seen how people live in Europe or in the US. People leave the country looking for a better place to live and better future for their kids.
I have no problem with that at all
I mean I report it to mod
I said no problem with that at all
I said the same thing and u didnt care either lil bro
Crying as always
Nevermind, I've never heard of "You support killing" curse word though, I guess my English is getting better now
These people debate, lose, and then moan
god said human is literally superior.
Did you talk to him?
nope but I find some words he said in Bible.
he didn't really directly say you can kill them but he said you can rule over them
which is superior, if I understand it correctly
"And God said, “Let us make man in our
image, after our likeness. They shall rule the fish of
the sea, the birds of the sky, the cattle, the whole earth,
and all the creeping things that creep on earth.”"
Yes because it was written by mammals for mammals
Mammals require constant propaganda to feel superior otherwise they will be depressed
now I just feel how I did destroyed a person who uses religious content in before by science or marxism-leninism philosophy and what is that guy actually thinking just like, WTF you don't believe god you ssob god curse you you gonna die or sth
100% empathize
but that's religion, I'm sorry and god would curse you if you are holding this mind.
you know the religion, religion, this is religion

It's like I'm sorry this is religion, I'm really sorry, I can't admit this is truth and deny the existence of god, this mind wtf, I just feel like this is crazy.
I would say I don't really believe something proved by unfalsifiable contents.
religious content is unfalsifiable one.
but I have to say that I believe in god sometimes, OMG this is so incredibly distortion
You cant falsify being/existence itself
existence is and ever will be with no change
because the idea of change means it will go from being itself to being something other than itself
if existence were to be changed , it will have to be changed something other than itself
which is non-existence
but, something cant go to non-existence . ex nihilo nihil fit
you also can't assume a thing that may exist with little evidence or literally no evidence/solid proof.
from nothing comes nothing
existence exists ( tautology )
you need to proof it.
existence itself must be timeless
you can say god exist, because existence exists, why can't I say the supreme leader of universe also exist because of this ?
this is pointless.
what proof ? its self-evident .. there is existence rather than non-existence .. the fact that we are chatting now is proof that existence is
self-evident only make you trust it, not other people.
God is existence itself . God is not some sky daddy above nor a being amonst other beings
based on this logic, I can say everything exist, so this is just a pointless statement
then why god ?
why not the supreme leader of the universe
you are superimposing abrahamic idea of a God
if you think, but I don't really care if you can't answer this simple question
because based on this logic, all of the assumptions can be justified as exist.
you can't say a thing exist so this is really exist.
again , forget about God .. You are so roused about the idea of the god ..Think abstractly about existence itself ..The isness of everything ..
you are misundertanding
forget about the god ...contemplate on existence itself
existence is easy
my freaking iPhone exists, my body, my brain, my DNA exists
we cant ever think about non-existence because if we think , we are thinking about something . To think about nothingness is not to think at all
non-existence is a bogus idea
then what is non-exist ?
for example, my third hand doesn't exist.
that's just so damn easy
yes , now youre getting it .. when you eat a food , does it go into non-existence ? or rather it was a mere transformation ? you cant ever destory the isness of something
something cant go into nothingness
Energy conservation law
that's what I learned when I was a kid
in a freaking Chinese school
energy and matter also has an origin .. its not something primary
that's basic science
the point is you can't proof the origin, but make a pointless abstraction which is god and I can even make it because you made it by assumption
when we are talking about the unconditioned reality , we are talking about the absolute primary thing
you are rejecting science
remember this is your assumption
this is an assumption, not a observation
this is an assumption
then tell me what the origin is ? have you see it ?
or have you created one ?
it's unobservable.
thats why we use inference and deduction
do you reject inference and deduction and logic?
inference and deduction based on observable evidence, not the assumptions
you can never use your assumption as your proof
we didnt see fire directly , but when we see a smoke arising , we can infer that there must be a fire/heat/combustion
because fire and smoke is invariable concomitance
this is bs because using smoke to infer a fire is obviously fake science.
you never can use your past experience as solid proof
how do you know it's a fire ? what if it's not a fire
big bang theory is based on observation
that doesn't really related to this
you can never use your assumption as your proof
and it clearly says time,space and matter has an origin
this sentence, only this sentence.
its related
you can never use your assumption as your proof.
this is science.
you can't make an assumption there is a fire because there is a smoke
lmao have you ever seen smoke without fire or heat ?
big bang clearly says space,time and matter has an origin
what if ?
dont cope
what if what ?
how do you know there is a smoke because there is a fire ?
how do you know that
how you can sure this is because of a fire ?
invariable concomitance .. these two things go together
one is observable, one is not observable
you are using an observable thing to assumpt another thing also exist which you can't observe.
its based on empirical evidence that smoke and fire always go together
how do you know that evidence works ? how to proof that
you need to proof which you need to observe both things
and you have a proof
if you can only observe the smoke, how do you know there is a fire ?
how is this rule exist if you can only observe smoke ?
its not an assumption that existence is ..its a tautoligcal statement ..
how is this rule exist if you can only observe smoke ?
because of what ?
god ?
whats the cause of smoke ?
what causes smoke ?
use your brain
how is this rule exist if you can only observe smoke ?
you are using this rule to explain the smoke exist along with the fire
then if you can only observe the smoke how do you know there is a fire ?
I think this logic is clear.
the very definition of what a smoke is that it is airborne particles caused by a combustion of matter
how is this rule exist if you can only observe smoke ?
you are using this rule to explain the smoke exist along with the fire
then if you can only observe the smoke how do you know there is a fire ?
directly answer the question
its called inference
b
its a way of deducting logical consequence based on empirical envidence
have you read my text ? the first sentence is "how is this rule exist if you can only observe smoke ?"
what does that even mean
if this rule doesn't exist, your inference also doesn't exist
because you are using this rule to infer a smoke exist with a fire
are you rejecting inference as proper epistemy ?
nope but you are trying to avoid my question
what ?
that sounds so dumb lmao
pokemon go opinions
what question ?
how is this rule exist if you can only observe smoke ?
you are using this rule to explain the smoke exist along with the fire
then if you can only observe the smoke how do you know there is a fire ?
because every smoke is caused by combustion, heat or burning , you dummmb*****
how is this rule exist if you can only observe smoke ?
you are using this rule to explain the smoke exist along with the fire
then if you can only observe the smoke how do you know there is a fire ?
I think you need to read what you have said
its the very definition of what a smoke is
answer the question
your definition of smoke is based on observation
Smoke is a suspension of airborne particulates and gases emitted when a material undergoes combustion or pyrolysis, together with the quantity of air that is entrained or otherwise mixed into the mass.
how is this rule exist if you can only observe smoke ?
you are using this rule to explain the smoke exist along with the fire
then if you can only observe the smoke how do you know there is a fire ?
I don't need to repeat it anymore but I think you are done with this
you can incapable to answer this question, which you don't wanna admit you have to observe the both things to get a conclusion
that's so damn clear I think everyone see this will understand
the very definition of smoke is that it is caused by combustion or fire or heat .. so yes, every smoke is caused by fire or heat ..
even a kid
your definition is based on observation
you are not even talking to me
repeating the definition doesn't really proof you are intelligent
yesssss, when did i deny that ?
oh so you agree with this ?
inference is based on observation ..
okay then, tell me, if you can't observe the fire but only the smoke, how to get that definition ?
do you know what empirical evidence means right ?
empirical evidence means sense observation
i have said that a long time ago that inference is based on observation
I didn't say this at all I just asked a simple, very simple question please answer it directly
what ?
if you can't observe the fire but only the smoke, how to get that definition ?
what does that even mean ?
you can observe: smoke, you can't observe: fire, how to get that definition ?
inference is based on observation that's what you said
inference is deducting based on what we normally experience ..
don't avoid the question
you can observe: smoke, you can't observe: fire, how to get that definition ?
what we experience at all times is that smoke and fire always go together .when we see smoke , we can infer that there is a fire
can you get a definition because you see there is a smoke and there is no fire because you never observe it
you can observe: smoke, you can't observe: fire, how to get that definition ?
I really said you can't observe it.
okay ?
are you talking about a hypothetical scenario where there is a smoke but there is no fire ?
your experience is also based on observation
no this is a simple question. you can observe: smoke, you can't observe: fire, how to get that definition ?
how to get that definition ?what ?
I think your english doesn't have any problem which you can't understand this question
thats a non sensical question
you can observe: smoke, you can't observe: fire, how to get that definition ? #🧠|serious-chat message
let me get this to you
ooga booga
thats what you are saying
yeah that's what I'm saying
and you are avoiding my question because you can't admit the smoke and the fire needed to be observed to get the rule, get the definition which will deny the existence of god 🤣
but the truth is you need to observe smoke and fire to know that there is a smoke, so there is a fire.
if you can only observe one you can't get that conclusion
Iam avoiding your non sensical question
i already said inference is based on empirical evidence
why are you repeating the same stuff again and again ?
why you are focusing on some stuff doesn't relating to this but the only thing, a simple thing
observation
I didn't see you talk something in that
because you can get a conclusion without observation ?
this is gonna be crazy
empirical evidence means observation
nope that doesn't mean observation
say observation
this is easy and clear
lol
do you know what empirical evidence means tho ?
I know but I don't have to know because it's 100% not relating to this 🤣
did you see any of my word or question related this ?
but you are the only one who is repeating this
why ? 🤣
empirical evidence is not related to observation ?
you can continue your autobiography which is more funny than now
but you can never shift away from my question by this
your r-worded question ?
"how is this rule exist if you can only observe smoke ?
you are using this rule to explain the smoke exist along with the fire
then if you can only observe the smoke how do you know there is a fire ?" - Minecraft_652
and you said: "because every smoke is caused by combustion, heat or burning , you dummmb*"
this is just ridiculous when I see this question and this answer.
based on prior observation ,plus, the very definition of smoke is that it is an air borne particles caused by combustion/HEAT or burning so obviously smoke and fire is an invariable concomitance .Its definitional .
okay based on prior observation, as you said based on prior observation, based on prior observation, then what if there is no prior observation and you only see a smoke ?
what if there is no prior observation and you only see a smoke ?
The very definition of what a smoke is that it is an predicated effect of burning/fire/combustion ...
"what if there is no prior observation and you only see a smoke ?", "The very definition of what a smoke is that it is an predicated effect of burning/fire/combustion ..."
so , no , you wont ever see smoke without any combustion
bro this is crazy
"what if there is no prior observation and you only see a smoke ?", "The very definition of what a smoke is that it is an predicated effect of burning/fire/combustion ..."
please read our conversations
and you may answer it again
"what if there is no prior observation and you only see a smoke ?" then , you cant make any predication from about anything, thats a useless hypothetical scenario
the very idea of inference is that it is a deduction based on obervations and prior rules/patterns
bro avoiding my question again
what if there is no prior observation and you only see a smoke ?
then , you cant predicate about from anything
do you read what i said ?
.
I was too tired to engage in this discussion and now I regret it
lol why
Hey everyone
omg it's always better not to get involved
Why not?
Fair
Uh yes. Technically smoke is defined as a visible suspension of carbon or other particles in air. So smog is smoke and so is liquid coming out of an aerospray
Neverthless, I feel your conversation with minecraft to be very pointless
What is the point of arguing when does smoke occur when there are many better things to do
It wasn't an argument .
I was stating a common sense of an inference that smoke and heat/combustion/fire always go together
He said matter ,space ,time ,etc having an origin is an assumption 🤣
When it's extrapolated
clearly based on observation and which the big bang model proposes (that it has an origin)
And ,the big theory is based on extrapolation/deduction(which is an inference ) based on current trend and observation( the fact that the universe is expanding exponentially) .
Inference is used in science .
He said inference is a fake science 😭😭🤡
He doesn't know what he's talking about
you can observe: smoke, you can't observe: fire, how to get that definition ?
inference is based on observation that's what you said
yeah true because he's incapable to answer my question but repeat his definition again
he's already done in this logic
I don't think he's capable to understand this logic or he just don't want to admit it, who cares ?
he's basically repeating an existence of smoke can inter the existence of fire, smoke is one you can observe and fire is one you can't observe.
so why I can't say because the existence of my d which can infer I'm the god ?
my d is observable, and god is not observable, a perfect example which proofed god exist 🤣
he's done with this logic, don't repeat it anymore.
and all I want to say is, you have that definition because you can observe a smoke exist along with a fire, smoke is observable, fire must be observable which you can conclude it.
this is the real science and philosophy
In quantum mechanics, Schrödinger's cat is a thought experiment, sometimes described as a paradox, of quantum superposition. In the thought experiment, a hypothetical cat may be considered simultaneously both alive and dead, while it is unobserved in a closed box, as a result of its fate being linked to a random subatomic event that may or may n...
it's quantum science nvm, we study it in our middle school maybe it's too hard for you.
Don't cope .
You said inference is fake science when science uses inference as a valid epistemological tool
yeah true because he's incapable to answer my question but repeat his definition again
he's already done in this logic
I don't think he's capable to understand this logic or he just don't want to admit it, who cares ?
he's basically repeating an existence of smoke can inter the existence of fire, smoke is one you can observe and fire is one you can't observe.
so why I can't say because the existence of my d which can infer I'm the god ?
my d is observable, and god is not observable, a perfect example which proofed god exist 🤣
he's done with this logic, don't repeat it anymore.
and all I want to say is, you have that definition because you can observe a smoke exist along with a fire, smoke is observable, fire must be observable which you can conclude it.
this is the real science and philosophy
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Schrödinger's_cat
In quantum mechanics, Schrödinger's cat is a thought experiment, sometimes described as a paradox, of quantum superposition. In the thought experiment, a hypothetical cat may be considered simultaneously both alive and dead, while it is unobserved in a closed box, as a result of its fate being linked to a random subatomic event that may or may n...
Don't spam
Even though we might not observe a fire immediately ,when we see smoke ,we can infer that it's caused by the fire
Don't make me repeat this
And we can infer because of our prior experience and observation
If we didn't have any prior observation
We cant infer anything
It's about recognising a trend and pattern
Also ,you're wrong that space ,time ,matter,etc having an origin is an assumption .
It's not assumption as it is based on observation and inference .
The Big Bang theory clearly says matter ,space and time has an origin if we extrapolate further back in time
You're coping so hard right now
Don't cope ,kid
Changing the subject doesn't work for me.
You only spam sh*t
so is that insult ?
I'm sorry but changing the subject doesn't work for me.
What topic ?
Iam getting back to the topic where you said inference is fake science
Big Bang theory itself is based on inference
google translation maybe it's a good tool
Kid have nothing but to spam
but I don't think my speech is really hard that you need google translation
you are done with this logic
you are already done bro
you are not even trying to get it out
stop personal insult or you will receive a mute or something
Then don't spam
I didn't really #🧠|serious-chat message
Say what you gonna say in precise manner
What you saying is incoherent
Rephrase in other words
Also ,you can't proof God based on inference
When did I ever say that ?
You live on strawmanning
okay then, answer me only yes or no: you can see there is a smoke, but you can't see there is a fire, you have no prior experience of it, can you say you can infer the fire exist ?
only yes or no
No
You are repeating the same thing again
okay then, very nice you get it out, then answer me yes or no: Can you infer a thing which is not observable, by a observable object ?
Inference is based on prior observation of having always seen fire and smoke together .
If you didn't have any prior experience of both of them causally related to each other ,you cant infer anything
yes or no
yes
Yes ,if we have established prior that two objects are causally related to each and Can be predicated as effect from that other object.
No,if we don't have any established prior observation of their causal relation
which one have solid proof ? the Yes or the No ?
Do you understand what I wrote ?
If we have established prior that one object is always caused by the other object,we can infer the cause when we see the effect ,even though we can't directly observe the cause
I'm saying which one have soild proof ? the Yes one or the No one.
This means you didn't understand .
It's a mutually exclusive condition .
It's either or (Exclusive or ).
We can't ask which one has "more" solid proof .
Either one can be true in certain circumstances .
For example , through observation,we have established the causal relationship between the fire and smoke ,so we can always infer fire/heat from the smoke from a far away places ,Even though we can only see the smoke
yes or no.
this question, only yes or no.

I can't believe you can say a thing has more proof in word than the thing you directly observed.
I think you are smart so answer this question directly only yes or no.
Yes ,we can infer it if we have established prior of their causal relationship
yes or no
That's the very definition of inference ,you idiot
I'm saying which one have soild proof ? the Yes one or the No one. this is the question
#🧠|serious-chat message based on this
The very definition of inference is that it is inferring something which is not directly observed by a thing which have been observed ( but have priorily established of their invariable concomitance )
I'm saying which one have soild proof ? the Yes one or the No one. this is the question
#🧠|serious-chat message based on this
The very category of my second answer is based on lack of prior causal relationship or lack of evidence of causal link.
So ,you are again asking a non-sensical question
You can't ask which one has more proof of a mutually exclusive category
repeating the question non-sensical doesn't proof ur intelligent bro
I'm saying which one have soild proof ? the Yes one or the No one. this is the question
#🧠|serious-chat message based on this
It's your intelligence not intelligent and yes ,you're asking a non-sensical question

everyone will curious why is this simple question can't be answered by you ?
||[]||
Yes ,if we have prior observation of their causal relationship
I have already answer it
You are too dense to figure it out
a cause , which is not immediately observed ,can be inferred from an observed effect if we have previously established of their causal link or invariable concomitance .
And ,if we don't have prior experience/observation of relationship bwteen two objects as a cause and an effect ,we cant infer anything
You can't ask which one has more proof here
So stop spamming the same thing again and again
Me : something is either red or not red
You: which one has more proof 🤡🤓
🍿
The more we suffer the more we grow I see something wrong here Uk the choices we make and the way we deal withtht pain decides of our ...... Growth?

Or is it smtg else and I'm the dumb one?
Game I played stopped updating 2 weeks ago, is there any way I can skip sophomore, junior, and senior years so I can graduate this year like I'm supposed to? I failed freshmen year 3 times, I'm in a risk of failing a 4th time, and I have a GPA of 0.14. Next week is my last week of school.
Cheat
Give up. And start looking into trade schools. Maybe uni/college is just not for you
Make cheat sheets on bras and skirts
But can I also skip sophomore, junior, and seniors years too? I want to skip them and graduate next week since I'm supposed to be a senior rn and graduate next week.
If the exam is not a written test, I don't know how to cheat
It's not written...
Man I really don't want a 5th high school year
It's already my 4th
And I'm freshmen
you should ask AI for suggestions, AI is always better than human
You are NOT making an academic comeback
Just like you
So wrong smh
Even if I have time to do school stuff at home now? The game stopped updating recently, but I have one week of school left.
And I'm supposed to be senior rn
I'm actually supposed to be graduating next week
But I'm freshmen
Dude you're not a super senior. You're something else 💀💀
Drop out at this point and hope for the best 🙏
Or how about skipping sophomore, junior, and senior years so I can at least graduate next year
Maybe not this year but next year
Isn't that reserved for the smart kids tho. If you're really talented, the teachers allow you to skip a few grades or smth
I didn't had time to do school stuff at home before
But now I do
I also got sent to alternative school
You better study as much as you can then. Maybe you'll get into one of those acceleration programs
On top of that
But yeah I'll definitely start studying next year since I'll have a lot more time
But definitely not doing 4 more years of high school
And having 8 years in total
I have to do something about it
Have you realized that you wasted four years more than you're supposed to man?
I hate whoever decided to make the school system this corrupt
Wait a sec, doesnt that mean you're in your early 20s by now
I'm 18
So around the average age of college freshmen then
Yeah
The only sensible option at this point. Not even joking
I was forced by my school board this year to go to alternative school
But still about to fail freshmen year a 4th time
Since I didn't had time to do school stuff at home
The punisher is getting punished 🙏

Israel might hire you

☝️
Eisan is my favorite friend
At least 36 I think
Obsessed?
Nope. Just full of love
Man what the heck. In my country 18 is a highschooler. 20 years old is a freshmen in university/college
nineteen is a highschooler too, twenty is like, on the verge between the highschooler and a uni freshman
Guys what is the topic
Topic is how to get people to scroll up and read instead of asking pointless questions
Do you have any ideas?
My idea is to use subtle sarcasm but it doesn't always work
Wow that was 1 minute of my life I would not get back
I'll take it as:
This chat is not for lazy people
Yes
Where you from?
In my country it is both XD
After 12th grade you finish highschool or you can continue school to 13 grade but most people don't do 13 grade.
You from russia/Ukraine?
Nah, am from a civilized country, not like russians. Am polish
Oh nice
On one hand Poland is good for not accepting immigrations on the other hand I dont like their new hollucust rule
what if some of the messages are repeat
there are no holocaust rules here idk what u talkin about
You're looking too deep into a joke
But you're right. Then I will say I have at least 1 favorite person
I meant the rule that says you can go to jail for saying Poland had part in the hollucust ( am not saying all of them were Nazis or helped them am just saying it is wrong to say Poland has no connection to that)
it is correct to say poland has no connection to that
polish national heroes, who fought for polish independence from nazis, were not against jews, in case of every victory jews were viewed as victims to be rescued
they saw jews similar to how they saw polish citizens, jailed and repressed, so they naturally thought jews should be let free
even now during the conflict in the middle east most polish media support israel, there is like literally not a single voice supporting the muslims
there is no jail punishment for saying this tho. I could say this to anybody here. I would not be imprisoned
I do believe some polish people did help the Nazis but like I said not all of them... Overall I love Poland
Polished*
be my friend. This is gold.
I came looking for copper and this is what I find
yes
oh
Danzig or war ?
German Soviet non-aggression pact
Polish people’s republic
War! The Allies will come to our aid . . . or maybe not.
case obout burning sun, everyone watching?
i know (:
Polish thinking that Poland is civilized country. LOL
Hi,I'm here to practice my IELTS exam and where can I practice my speaking?
If you guys have any method plz lemme know
In vc
what does vm stand for?
Hello guys
@fickle wadi one question why white?
it is a based country
I am more surprised by the use of the word civilized country in the context of his nationalist statement.
im serious
Yeah
Idk that... but, it's just the psychology of a hardworking man, or a person who wants to do something in his life... wants to do something for their loved ones...
Drink water...
Hello, everyone.
I hope everyone's help
Let's study help each other
If I make mistaks, I want your correction to me immediately
Okey
Help me find someone to rely on
Do you have a particular area that you feel in need of assistance?

That pfp is something
That’s a good thing
something what
Do we have to talk about something serious here?
no we wil screwed up
Something good
it’s scary
ik
Ca anyone give me explain
Not really.
I don’t know if she can break it unless she is a developer
That too a developer in a major company
@tough steppe if she's improving it, it means she changed something. So she have to break it
Just sabotage something
u need to watch black mirror
Lmao
Real life is not like black mirror you know @thorny steeple
That will probably take more than 100 years
We will be dead by then so I don’t really care
Cause no one can stop advancement in humanity
Otherwise we won’t be here right now
You can't, she can stop it
I disagree. Can you explain how can she stop it
Make it work wrong, I don't know what exactly that ai do to be more precise
Like she is improving algorithms, and make it work weird
ppl is crazy they can do everything maybe they are trying rn but we don’t know
for example they can get money using your voice
or pic
Improving or reducing the accuracy?
Yeah that is very easy compared to what you are trying to say
Yes or gives it wrong answers, wrong data
i didn’t say to do easy or hard i meant that’s not good
hi
Good
Heeeey yoooo brooo
hi
Heeeey yoooo brooo
@glacial lodge because as slong as we htink we aare the victims and we're born to suffer wewon't even have ethe hope to change our lives
we'll blame external factors and accept our so called fate.......as victims.......
yk someone told me a quote ........a lovely one too,
we either praise the sunshine
or blame the sunburn
Thank you for sharing your opinion.
But being born into certain circumstances or environments can subject us to various challenges and hardships beyond our control. Are the people who are born like that victims, then? I would like to hear what you think.
We inherit genetic traits from our parents, which can include illnesses. If a baby dies from this illness, is he a victim?
you are right
inequality reigns free in the world we live..........life in it self is unfair....... there's not much we can do but....... the least we can try is to be hopeful.... if we just tell a kid who has cancer tht he is going to die .then he would lose the hope to even live
Then, is he a victim? Wait, this is becoming nihilistic.
Diseases that are passed on from parents to children often result in death
Then, would you say that the child was a victim of being born?
I am not saying that the child was born sick, I am saying that the diseases that are passed on from the parents to the children may be the cause of death.
Because I heard some cases about this
I think in cases like this it's reasonable to feel a sense of victimization because these circumstances are often beyond one's control. However, sometimes labeling individuals as victims can sometimes oversimplify their experiences and resilience. While some may perceive themselves as victims, others might view their challenges as opportunities for growth and transformation. Perspective.
Some people in the society think that it is caused by God, but if seen, it is caused by the parents because their diseases are passed on to their next generations, which often leads to May cause death
hmm
By the way, if you look at it, there is no doubt about it, no one knows that he has to die, he has life and life, and no one knows about it, not even the doctors, because doctors only guess.
I know my English bad 😅
by the way who do you worship? ( if you never mind)
I'm Christian.
sameeee
glad to hear , sister
😁
where you from?
Pakistan
This chat is no laughing matter
first time i heard this country name (Maldives) and i searched on google it's Asian country ( nice country)
yeaa
you heard about Pakistan
yep
oh nice
please take me there. I wanna visit it. So much
i went there once
uhmm then u should come
life on easy mode :
sure. When I win the lottery
I just think why is it not belongs to India ?
Or the UK
It should be part of UK, France or other countries
Unlike the Vatican City which protected by master as a holy place for religion
Those micro nations doesn’t really have any power to defend any foreign influence
or it’s being protected by UK or the US ?
What
If you look at the United States, it is currently only supporting Israel and giving it bombs so that it throws more and more on Palestine. He supports people who are ready to attack Muslims and he does not want Muslim countries to remain in the world, he wants to eliminate them somehow.
So ?
Is it really special?
The existence of hamas is threatening the national security of Israel and the global order based on the United States
Of course they want eliminate it
And you should also know that whoever is martyred in Palestine, the Israeli army rips up his body, sells his internal organs at high prices, buys more bombs and destroys them back to Palestine, and the United States fully supports it.
If you know about Romans then you know that today is someone else tomorrow is someone else I mean someone wins today someone wins tomorrow
Everything happens with time. Anyway, if you look at it, everything changes with time. At the moment, America and England are powerful and Israel is powerful over Hamas. Next time, maybe Muslim countries will destroy them isael, england, america .
(Nice to meet you)
so ?
Are they citizen of Israel ? Nope
Are they citizen of United States ? Nope
where you from @feral river ?
Are they citizen of their enemy ? Yes, are they providing assistance to their enemy included not limited like money, taxes, fighter, shelter, guns?
Any words left ?
People’s Republic of China
bye
Next time maybe there is a historical term comes out which is Muslim
Good luck
Please struggle to avoid this
why must the US and China fight. why can't they kiss instead
It’s more complex than you think about the US-China relation
We share some common interests as being a global power and we also have conflicts
i'm aware, my friend, i was making a joke. but to be serious, the ordinary people of the US and China have more in common than they realize
🤣 I know that
but we don't really have that nice economy condition than US anyways
are you he/she @feral river ?
I'm a god
god doesn't have a gender 
i would say neither of us are particularly great at the moment, lol
well we have our problem and you guys have your problem
exactly
drugs, crimes, social unrest, unemployment, homeless, inflation, for the US
stagnation economy, authoritarianism, corruption, for China
we've got plenty of corruption here too lol, but yes we both have serious issues
yeah for sure, are you a US citizen ?
so proud of that 🤣 I'm proud to be a Chinese citizen but I have that interest to get a green card in US!
I hope both country will be okay
@feral river can you tell me who gave Israel a place to live in his country when Hitler made it illegal for Israel to live?
United Kingdom
ehh, proud as i am willing to be. i hope you can get a green card and pay us a visit! we do have many wonderful things here
are you sure?
yeah maybe 🤣 , I ever been a lot of countries like South Korea, Japan, Singapore etc.
maybe next is Austraila or Israel
then I will come to US
the ruler of the region of Palestine is United Kingdom at that time.
they decided to split the region, then you guys wanna eliminate them, but you defeated every time.
"you guys"? is flame an israeli?
But still the people of Palestine gave them a place to live and not America.
your people of Palestine is not the ruler of region of Palestine
the ruler of region of Palestine in that time is UK
they decide everything not you.
you are holding no power facing UK
well we could certainly ask
flame, where are you from? if you don't mind me asking
.
ah i see lol
Bro's stalking
LOL
all i'll say on the issue is that my heart goes out to the people of palestine, i hope there is a ceasefire soon
Everytime I enter the chat Minecraft_652 is here
Oh we're discussing Palestine vs Israel?
He's the king here
well I think Israel gonna annex the region but I'm not sure
it's not my business
I only invest some military industry of Israel and get some profit
~topic
If you had a HUD that showed three stats about any person you looked at, what three stats would you want it to show?
not gonna do moarchy but the supreme leader! 🇰🇵
@feral river
Palestine belonged to the Muslims and it will remain the land of the Muslims, so I will say this, people have a different opinion. All of America has stood up. If there is no America, then Israel will be completely removed from the land by now. It can't do anything without America.
hail the leader! @mint idol
I don't need it
King sounds cooler tho
oh really ? maybe you will awake the dream by the sound of guns, missiles, drones, coming from Israel.
5 global power, 4 has cooperation with Israel.
and Russian doesn't really give a s to that region
because they are all imperial powers. the imperial powers will support colonial projects like the annexation of palestine even if every other country on the earth is against it
US, China, Russia, UK, France, only Russia doesn't have cooperation but they are fighting with Ukrainian.
Palestine isn't a sovereignty
The People's Republic of China (PRC) and the State of Israel formally established diplomatic relations in 1992. While the Republic of China had de jure recognized Israeli sovereignty in 1949, it eventually lost the Chinese Civil War, bringing the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) to power across mainland China. In 1950, Israel became the first count...
LOL
but palestine is a place that people call home, even if some countries do not recognize it as a "sovereignty". it should not be destroyed, and the people that live there deserve a sense of peace and dignity just like everywhere else on the planet
live there deserve a sense of peace and dignity UNDER Israel
not Palestine
@feral river
Consider that if your country was attacked by another country and then the dead bodies of those who died in your country were taken out from the graves and their bodies were cut into pieces. If their body parts are removed from their bodies and sold in the market, then new weapons are bought with this money and then dropped again on your country, then how will you feel?
I feel nothing because our country won't be attacked by another country, if they want to taste the guns, missiles, drones, destoriers, and nukes they could try.
@feral river
A person who has a heart inside him, after seeing this, his whole body trembles if he sees it, have you not seen it in reality?
I will do that person who is killing them if it's for defending my country's interest and my interest.
you Palestinian threatening the national security of Israel
This is why people forget that what they think is something else.
who can tolerant that ?
you can't say you are pity when you are threatening other people's life
and who tf cares ?
We are Muslims, we have no fear of anyone, it doesn't matter if we become martyrs, we don't mind it, but everyone has to die.
okay then try it, let's see who has more power
i am not muslim, but i care. because they are human beings and do not deserve death simply for existing
"our mission is send those bastards who don't afraid of death to the hell." - MacArthur
"The pope, how many troops he have ?" - Stalin
you're quoting Stalin of all people?
How long can you live your life Maximum 100 years 120 years 80 years 30 years No one knows No one knows No doctor knows No other person knows Death is for everyone Do whatever you want
I remember that was said by MacArthur
i'm gonna look that up, i know multiple MacArthurs in US history
That quote is in the Hearts of Iron 4 loading screen, hahaha.
douglas macarthur
