#🧠|serious-chat
1 messages · Page 176 of 1

It was "/"not \
Maintenance in USA vs China...(Americans Shocked)
🧧 Become a Patron - https://www.patreon.com/livinginchina?ty=h
🏆 Subscribe - https://www.youtube.com/c/JasonLightfootLivinginChina?sub_confirmation=1
☕ Buy us a coffee - https://www.buymeacoffee.com/livinginchina
⭐ Tiktok - https://www.tiktok.com/@jasonlivinginchina
📷 Instagram - https...
This is wild 💀
Boikott Eurovision!!!
Banned Palestinian flag. Also lets Israel compete but denies Russia
(also eurovision has just kind of become lame in general)
That's not too much actually, here in Brazil we reached 32° 
I am a Turk and I hope Turkey will participate in Eurovision.
I WILL HOPE THAT WE WIN
(Loses)
What pedophile mean
we will win
Pedophile is an adult who likes kids, it's also used as an insult often
Is it vulgar?
Very
Can it be offensive if we use in common places
Very offensive, do not use this weird when not necessary
It's more inappropriate and very offensive
Why is it even necessary ig?
Never use it towards anyone
Ohkk
It is only necessary in VERY EXTREME situations
Ohh
I was about to say to someone 💀
Hopefully you didn't
Yeah like i hoped here to know the meaning
Before saying
Don't say anything bad towards anyone
No i was in server a girl said im 13 then a guy randomly came said ur pedo blah blah and i left for a while
Gingerbread cake
But how can you be a pedo if you're 13?
I mean you are a kid, just like her
More or less that, it can't really be translated tbh
Im not 13 that girl told a guy they were communicating i was watching them
Yea gotcha dw
I'm confused
But nevermind, just never use this word
Ig like that was heat up situation so i was curious to know
If they use it - ignore them
Hm
Hakim based ✅
Watched the video and I looked at the comments
What in the actual is happening
No way they are doing revisionism, rewriting history to suit their ideology/ideas
He legit starts the video by insulting people who believe real history
And says to use your brain and to not be controlled by the "pop culture"
I am speechless
That is legit a fallacy
Nobody believes this:
He legit has to get his head out of the sand
guys what is the word for someone who has nothing to do and does nothing but sits at his home all day
There's a noun for it, but it is censored by the server so I suggest you don't say it here.
I can tell you in a DM.
Kanako DM me
I did.
Lazy
does anyone know where El went?
i wanted to talk to him about the Quran, but I cant ping him?
Maybe banned or left the server I don't know tbh
He probably created another alt account, he'll be here soon enough
He sure will
ayoooo no way 💀 i thought i just cant ping him do u have his name so i can send a freind req
No mate
Sadly I don't have him tbh
Search his messages and click on the profile
Maybe search amongst your old pings
YOOO EL IF UR WATCHING ME FROM UR ALT ACC SEND A MESSAGE IN DM
oh its totally fine tnx for ur help
Ye
unfortunately i alrd have a lot of pings i cant found...
Search keywords on this channel
Damn I almost got bankrupted
u remeber smth that he used to say cuz i know him 2 days ago
im alrd
I don't see his messages, I've had him blocked for ages
Wait
I think RTG had a screenshot of one of his messages maybe?
The Zulus went in and I don't have enough catapults to being a assault to reclaim Berlin so now I'm stuck by waiting
his underage??
No lol I blocked him because he's a troll and he says nothing of value
Nein I deleted those
I found it @obtuse perch
#🧠|serious-chat message
Search those messages if you really need to
My mistake I thought I deleted from the chat
I thought you were referring to your gallery
Ye that's were I'm referring to
Ye
Hi, I read a book named 'Stop Reading the News,' which says that reading the news is a waste of time. What do you think about it?
Well tell me more about the book
This book says that news cannot help you better understand the world, but will give you the illusion of understanding the world and make people overconfident.
I remember a quote from this book If you really care about the fate of earthquake victims, war refugees or famine victims, give money. Not attention. Not work. Not prayers. Money.
This book has many points of view, I only remember a few
Be patient everything comes in its time
Tysm i sent a friend request 🥐
Well news is part of the process of learning
Sure but I sent in. War too early and got the English civilization destroyed
Damn i wish u fix it soon
Had to restart again
Two cities on the isle
A lot of work i can tell gl (;
Damn i knew its a video game hahahahahahah
Ye
Tbh i dont like strategy games its boring for me
Ye there's also age of history
AAAAAAAAAAA no i think we totally have deferent tastes i like action games
Like call of duty
Rainbow six
And others
I like skyrim and GTA
Nice
Yeah y can see but im a fun of games like souls games AAA games fighting... games that have a lot of movements yk
Interesting
Till now my fav game is gow i played all the serie except 1 GOW RAGNAROK
Have you played palworld or helldivers
No 
Okey
this shaked it is israeli girl she killld by terorist in 2003 she was only 7 moths
LIKE SHE WAS A LOT OF CHILDREN israeli THEAT KILLD BY TERORIST NOT ONLY \ FROM HAMAS
Okey?
@thorny steeple my brother
Sup
How's it going tbh
Everything's good
How's the PC setup
Nah
Normal one, I'm not a hardcore gamer
Ok
Have you played on console tbh
Nah
I'm a keyboard guy
All tankies are like that. Unfortunately they feel the urge to defend any "communist" regime to death, even if they were obviously wrong. Some even defend Pol Pot
Have you played WARZONE Mobile? It was fire bruv... like
I wished tbh
Hell no. That guy is probably the epitome of tabkieism and stupidity
Well isn't everyone biased
Goddam this cracked me
Are you serious? That's not an issue of bias, that's straight up stupidity and re-writing history
Well thanks to our modern system it seems more divided and united world tbh

🤔
What are you talking about?
What are you talking about, man?
The topic you replied to tbh
I mean you are saying that "even if they were obviously wrong. Some even defend Pol Pot" and who tf cares the wrong in your head ?
Any topic to bring to the table
I'm having difficulties understand what you're trying to say
I don't think you have difficulties to understand what did you say.
He was re-writing history, straight up lying, and there are even some allegations of him being a racist
Conspiracy that Most of the countries are puppets of some big companies
Interesting where's your sources
I definitely am. Re-word it and make it better if you want me to truly understand it
how is that re-writing history accusations come from ? from modern days cuz you guys are his enemies ?
Just watch the Hakim guy a bit, and go into the tankie sphere
Did you not see this message?
Ok
nah bro I'm saying about this message from you: #🧠|serious-chat message
what's wrong with them ?
The ones who defend Pol Pot? And the other tankies who will defend Stalin?
Obviously who in their right mind would defend pol pot
Tankies would, and they did. It is absolutely ridiculous
Brb
that's pretty weird you call someone defend Pol Pot or Stalin as wrong, or they are clear about what Pol Pot and Stalin's doing for their country and favor to some of their policy.
can I say you are wrong because you stand with freedom of speech ?
It sure seems likely it
No but defending someone who killed a lot of people is not something I would defend
yeah I won't do that too but the only side you see is a man who killed a lot of people, the other side I see is a great leader defeated Nazis, turned a country from a poor, underdeveloped to a superpower.
Back
How is it weird to call genocidiers wrong? Pol Pot killed 25% of his own population, with a stupid slogan. Stalin did pretty much the same thing, but with a much more amplified populace
That's not the point
Ye but Hitler still lead Germany to ruin he bite more than he could chew still not the point tbh
then what about liberation from moarchy and occupation by Pol Pot ? what about defeat Nazis by Stalin's policy ? what about their people who got ultimate freedom from Stalin ? what about that ?
you only say something they messed up but you didn't really realize what did they exactly do for it.
It isn't tbh
all they are doing is practice their way for their country and people.
just different than you guys.
Well pot killed 25% percent of the population, Stalin's policy is still felt across Russia, and it was more like under new management
Yea we don't work like that in the west
That first arguement completely ignores my point. Just because the British Empire abolished slavery doesn't mean that it didn't exploit them for 300 years. But sure, I'll play along. It wasn't really a liberation, but more of a replacement. Once again, completely ignores my point. Stalin was stupid enough to purge most of his army, and thus let the German's almost capture the 2 main cities of the USSR.
that's because you opinion is from the people's view, not Russian's, remember, Stalin is a leader of Soviet Union, not other countries, they don't really need to care you guys.
he's doing good for his own country
No, I say the truth of what happened. You seem dead set on defending their sentiment for some reason
no government work for other countries except this action can literally bring more interest for its own.
so British Empire exploit resources for who ?
tell me for who that's all enough.
What do you mean? I'm saying that they exploited slaves, and that's not all
remember, it's for British, British, British, British, British.
they exploit resources, for British.
What are you on about?
it's called British Empire not the freaking world empire
Same I want some of that
they work for british why would they care those slaves ?
No sheiße, what does that have to do with the exploitation?
what the hell are you talking about
Well it's been defunct since a lone time ago
they work for British not those slaves, those are just their tool to get more productivity.
that's called british empire
Are you out of your mind? I never said they have to care or cared. I said that they exploited them, which they did
yeah good job for that, exploit them for british
so ?
And benefited both of them depending on the case
You're now not even arguing anymore
it's you are not arguing anymore, because I clearly said every country work for their own people, their own country.
Stalin is, Pol Pot is, British Empire also is.
not the freaking victim
So, they were exploiting human beings for their own benefit, which is a horrible thing to do. Did I have to spell it out for you?
You said that to somebody else, and that again ignores my point. Stalin was a genocidal maniac, there is no way of getting over that
Ye but what's the blimey main point?
that was horrible if you think something like this. I think it's the greatest regime if they exploit those guys for me.
You truly a fascist
they did it for me. bro they did such those horrible thing for me, I can knee down to the king if they did that.
that was a greatest appreciation.
remember, they don't work for any of you guys, if you are not british, if you are not cambodian farmers, if you are not Soviets.
You ignored my points, brought up unrelated things, defended fascists, acted like them as well. I don't argue with fascists
I didn't ignore your point at all, but you really see only one side which whatever you want to see and it's clearly biasd.
unlike me, I will state their advantages, and disadvatages, at the same time.
which is more objective.
No, I don't see one side. It is you who are unable to see the other one. I am not biased for calling a genocidal maniac wrong
Unlike you, I will not try to ignore the massacres
you are clearly biased because you don't know they do those thing for which group of people.
the majority, cambodian farmers.
I never ignore massacres.
Just tell me how's his point biased tbh
What? Let's say they did it for the greater good. Nothing can justify the murder of an innocent person, especially when it's 25% of your population
Well, I think he explained it very well
I stated many times which I was basically saying that the only side you see is he killed a lot of people and you consider he's a bad guy or he's wrong to do but you forgot the goal he exactly do, which means he did it for the specific group of people which is cambodian farmer.
Because you are one of them, and are truly biased
Ye and I think correct if I'm wrong the intellectual were targeted
you only say he caused massacre, but you didn't say he improved lives on cambodian farmers, which is obviously biased.
It doesn't make sense saying that he is doing his video for his bias, he said that USSR made a lot of mistakes
There is no justification for it, and no goal can justify it
That doesn't matter when you killed 25% percent of your population does it
Nope, you don't need to be communist to understand his point in the video
that's what you think, which is not relevant.
We're not talking about that currently, but about the other thing
the truth is truth, truth won't change by your thought.
It's not the video we're talking about
Exactly, the truth is the truth, and you will unfortunately ignore it
It is tbh
May I ask what is the topic then?
It was about that message I sent, let me find it
that's what you think, nothing special
I don't think they are objective since they only say result and conclusion not goal, measure, result and conclusion 🤣
I think it was this one: #🧠|serious-chat message
Ye but when evidence shows it self it can't be ignored
ofc it can't be ignored he killed 25% of its population
That's not what just I think. That's what 80% of the population thinks. Murder isn't ok
So, it's your comment about Hakim's video, right?
that was a greatest mistake made by him
Sheesh that's not good
There is no justification for it
80% of your population thinks doesn't matter to me okay ?
Yes, which somehow devolved into this
how is that 80% population thinks 🤣
Yeah, because you're a fascist
we think it's okay if they did it for majority of people, very nice
nah i'm not.
Yea it devolved very fast
Go ask anyone right now seriously in #💭|general
you are not the one who benefiting from this movement.
but I see who is the benefiting from it.
and you are not see it.
Yes, you are. You have no sense of humanity, or care about the genociders
Well more like morality went out the window
how is that no sense of humanity accusations came out 🤣 ?
the greatest humanity.
There is no benefit from it, and if there even was, there was no justification for it
And I said that he explained it very well because he provided sources and he didn't ""glorify"" USSR, he mentioned its mistakes. But you got it in a very exaggerated way
You seem keen on exploiting others for your own good
no benefit ? 🤣 are you out of your mind
In none moment we say these countries don't make mistakes or they are perfect
say something to cambodian farmers, which the group supported Pol Pot to do something like this.
say something bro.
Again, that's not really the topic. It was supposed to be, but got devolved into me being incorrect to call Stalin and Pol Pot "wrong"
"the group benefited by Pol Pot"
Well by one person in general chat it can't be Good and not ok
USSR always have a lot of mistakes all the time but all they want to do is benefit their own people, their own great Soviet Union.
they work for themselves.
Obviously not every single movement is without a flaw
not some freaking losers and enemies
Ye
no one works for its enemies except stupid.
They supported them? Are you serious? You know what, man? You have completely surpassed for what is reasonable in this arguement. You would probably even defend Hitler. Goodbye
why you think I will defend a loser which ruined its great German Reich ?
@thorny steeple, I'll argue with you now. Present forth your arguements for Stalin and Pol Pot, please
the country that took over the western europe and even occupied Ukraine ?
they ruined their own country.
But about what?
the Greater German Reich
About the massacres they committed
Ok, so, name one of them
he's a socialist, internationalist nothing special, he only see the great leaders's mistakes and not see the side of their goal and greatest vision.
I really would not like to name every single one, but let's start with Pol Pot, shall we?
The Cambodian genocide was the systematic persecution and killing of Cambodian citizens by the Khmer Rouge under the leadership of Prime Minister of Democratic Kampuchea, Pol Pot. It resulted in the deaths of 1.5 to 2 million people from 1975 to 1979, nearly 25% of Cambodia's population in 1975 (c. 7.8 million).
Pol Pot and the Khmer Rouge had l...
Why did it stopped?
I know... It's kinda weird
Because Pol got killed
Well that doesn't matter when they are dead does it
I'm not a socialist, I don't think. I'm a social democrat, if you will
That's great. Who killed him tbh?
Pol Pot's regime, thus he has most of the blame
Interesting I thought he would have 100% control of it
ok then social democrat, I'm not a fascist, I'm a capitalist.
Well, he probably did have total control over Cambodia, much like Kim Jong Un
Yes, you are a fascist. You don't mind exploiting others, or the massacres, because they had a reason for it
How did then lost control of the nation?
Outside intervention, I believe
The war with Vietnam?
Yes
Thought Vietnam was crippled after the war with the US
Not crippled enough to not be able to invade another country very much crippled like them
didn't China also declare war in 79'
Oh hey politics
That doesn't matter, as Cambodia was crippled enough from the genocide by Pol Pot
Pol Pot was genuinely insane
Well that sure was a stupid mistake pot made
Ye
and yes the US did a lot of damage but there is more to it than that
Reminds me of Romania
But oh no, he did it for the greater good. How can we present any rebuttals now it's joever
Not only genuinly, but completely
During it's pre revolution and lost revolution
I really hate people who call them selves communists but really just end up being fascists but red
The Khmer rouge were much worse though
Ye worse than the Soviet Union
but Marxist Leninism is just that it's red fascism and Pol Pot was absolutely a Marxist Leninist
They are called "Tankies". And may you perhaps be one of the non-tankie leftists?
Right on the money hahaha
I am indeed a leftist, and a socialist, but not a tankie
I don't know about that though. Stalin had the quantity, and still the horror of Pol Pot's persecution methods
Hello there, comrade
What kind of leftist may you be? An anarchist perhaps?
Ye but luckily stalin didn't obliterated the population like pot until WW2 came
I am a socialist but my ideology is a bit of a mixed bag, socially I pull from some anarchism and some libertarianism (the originial libertarianism not what the term has become now)
Oh, boy. He still did a lot of damage. The reason for why the Germans pushed so far was because of his paranoia and incompetency
Yeah Stalin did a lot of damage
Ye but he also bricked Russia population with order 227
I see. I can closely call myself a libertarian (democratic) socialist
Not just Russia, he really loved spreading the equality of his terror everywhere! What a stand up man
The Nazi commanders literally didn't want to push that far into Russia but it was Hitler specifically commanding they do and ignoring his generals. I mean good he was a fuckwit and fascists generally are. They're great at getting into power but they are absolutely terrible at governing
He sure was!
You should watch me on YouTube 😛 I'm a new channel but I do live streams and also shorter video content
That sure is interesting, but doesn't scratch the point of Stalin being stupid
Well they were both stupid
That's the point, fascists don't know how to govern
Not really a fan of streams, but I may check them out
Ye
I cut my streams into shorter videos
Ok have you used shorts?
and my point is that fascists when they have the power make stupid decisions because they're incompetant
Good one. In West lied the fascists, in the East lied the fascists but with really cool uniforms and the colour red. The latter must've been good, right?
Not really I'm not a fan of short form video, I have a couple up on shorts reels and tiktok but my filming format isn't really suited for it
Well, then I may check it out
I'm more of a both long and short form tbh
I mean there's fascists everywhere now, europe is full of them, the US is full of genuine nazis we're just going back in time really
Oh, TikTok and Shorts, I loathe those beyond comprehension, and generally avoid channels with any of them
Nein mate
Please don’t defend Pol Pot he was a mass murdering fuckhead. - Sincerely Everyone
Fascists always make stupid decisions
Unfortunately are
I try to do short form as well but I work just by myself and don't have like an editor or anything so its a pain to make short form
Got to say it the bots right

The bot is indeed right
Ye
All praise the bot
That's thought I put them in raw no editing but in the future maybe
I wish we could say the F word as well, without getting censored

From Heaven thy Comes
yeah only just figured that out lmao
He also can't use the sheiße word
It's because I stream on youtube the format doesn't work well for landscape videos it cuts the majority of the content
Well fricked me
I'll try it with one of my most recent ones
I'm @visora on youtube too btw if you just search me up youll find it
Ye
Wait, you've got Twitter as well? Tell me, how many tankies have you met there?
Hahahahaha ye nice try
a bunch lmao Im realvisora on twitter
I've met a few "maga communists" lately
Save yourself some sanity and get off that site
which I find genuinely funny
“I will knee under the king if they do that for me” doesn’t mean I’m a fascist, but a capitalist.
I would but it's good advertising for my channel
I hate the rebranding tbh
Gotta get off the ground somehow
Well use TikTok or reddit
They can even massacre a group of people just for me, can’t believe that ?
Looks who's back tbh
Oh I'm on all of them
I will knee under the king/supreme leader/general secretary if they do that for me
but I get the most traction on twitter
Here: #🧠|serious-chat message
You truly think they are the greatest regime for exploiting people for your own benefit
Capitalists... 
Yes for me, I’m a capitalist no problem
I’m a capitalist
Are you wealthy?
Maximum the benefits for me
Like net worth over $1M including assets like a house
Not really but a middle class
Just not bad in here
Then capitalism isn't benefitting you as much as you think it is
That's not capitalism. Putting people in chains and forcing them to work as serfs is not capitalism, (well, it kind of is, but it's more like fascism) it's fascism
Fascism ( FASH-iz-əm) is a far-right, authoritarian, ultranationalist political ideology and movement, characterized by a dictatorial leader, centralized autocracy, militarism, forcible suppression of opposition, belief in a natural social hierarchy, subordination of individual interests for the perceived good of the nation and/or race, and stro...
And indentured servitude it feels like
Corporations exists literally only to make profit for themselves and their shareholders
Labor rights and protections have been under attack for decades
Exactly
and the middle class is ever shrinking because of it
That's what replaced Feudalism
Free Market Capitalism serves to benefit only the select few bourgeoise
We're basically living in neofeudalism now
Go to your wage cage, go to the home you can barely afford and eat the food you can barely afford
B- but what about those wretched share holders? They haven't gotten their 1 million yet! We must break more backs of our slaves workers, so we can pay our investors in time
Because it's hurting their profit of course
That's understandable but we need the profit yk
Fiscal Socialism is the best way forward, it benefits the common good rather than the select few executives
There's a difference between profit and what they do
The middle class will be exploited forever until it vanishes, just like the ozone layer, and the atmosphere
Capitalists are the exploiters, who own the means of production of private property, they don't depend on wage and labour to survive
Ye
Thanks for watching! Like and Subscribe to support the channel for more livestreams and videos.
Apologies for the bad audio, sound settings got messed up while recording.
Support the steam - https://streamlabs.com/sl_id_6fd78bb3-6f4f-3123-ab54-b6c9011ecbf9/tip
Instagram - https://www.instagram.com/realvisora/
Twitter - https://twitter.com/real...
In fact watch my most recent video lol
Well who knows maybe change might happen
Literally about this exact topic in relation to food
It won't change unless they're made to change
Never heard of it, but I think most forms of socialism are fine. As long as they're egalitarian, and have the common sentiment of working for the greater good of their people (without killing 25% of the population of course)
Well in a corrected way we don't wan another Soviet Union
In the US for example it's literally illegal for a corporation to make a decision that doesn't produce profit for the shareholders, they can be held liable
Now, look, you are a tankie, but I agree with what you said
Financially Socialist, Socially Libertarian
You forgot one important thing which made me not a fascist which is the potential risk on massacring people.
It’s not the maximum the benefits but the potential prices you have to pay
The suppression isn’t free.
anyone wanna hop in voice and continue this?
You still have to pay a lot of things, like camps, military for maintaining order
Most slaves were treated terribly, and even treating them "fine" does not remove the fact that it was slavery. Slavery.
And they are expensive
💯 🗣️ ‼️ WE'RE GOING TO SEPARATE THE LEFT WITH THIS ONE 🗣️ 💥 ‼️ || and end up with the capitalists mocking at our faces ||
What are you suggesting? Slavery?
Slavery is not really a nice institution for the master
But the integration is
Leftism try not to start a civil war challange (Impossible)
Seems like it
Well, I'm really lost, Idk what is the topic here
What are you talking about? They were taken from their homes and families and forced to work for aristocratic pieces of sheiße
It's whatever we feel like talking about
I mean the interest for master state not the puppet states
Who tf cares the puppies
I don't really chat in voice call, so I must deny this most kind invitation
Whatever topic tbh
That’s why I see a lot of puppet states of USA exist in this world 😂
I honestly can only partially understand what you're trying to say
You mentioned slavery I said slavery is not the best policy maintaining the order and generate profit in occupied territories
Half of the world...
The best would be an annexation
Ye the American empire
Why is it profit? Why is profit the only thing you can see? Slavery is not a good thing in any way shape or form
It's not the 18th century anymore
Not suppress them, it’s hell to pay if you suppress them and it’s a long term policy
Actually it’s failed
It’s totally messed up
I’m a capitalist
Ye its a bad thing tbh
Thaks for confirming the sentiment that capitalists are soulless people
Ye the cycle of capitalism
Yes, but how far can they go? It's ridiculous
At least IM not a fascist 😂
He's saying he's capitalist
Yes, you are one. Most capitalists are fascists
LMAO 😂
I know, but it's ridiculous how far some can go
I never think suppressing people is the best policy on maintaining order and strengthening the control
But an annexation and integration
And it’s successful
Capitalists defend capitalism, so I think the're all fascists, because fascism didn't come from isolated political figures
I mean, originally
That’s why I think it’s pretty weird when he said stalin is bad cuz Stalin is not a international fighter 😂
He’s a great controversial legendary leader
Do you own any means of production and you don't need to work? @feral river
Not much but i can generate some passive income
Stop twisting my words, I said that he massacred people
Wdym by "not much"? Owning the means of production is yes or no
Nah
That’s pretty hard to get
That's a simple answer tbh
Understandable
I think I will have a better mind after a systematic study on Marxism
Ye
Apple user
Ye
Ye
Ye
Dismiss your notifications
It looks ugly
also who tf has the Wikipedia app
Like who uses it as a source

let him cook
Intellectuals
They informed me to install one and I installed
Otherwise I got notifications every time when I’m using my safari to access Wikipedia
at least better than communism and socialism 
Even fascism are better than those international fighters

LMAO goodbye fascist
LMAO goodbye international fighter 
I’m not a fascist, I’m a capitalist
what do you think of the phrase "fascism is capitalism in decay."
Have a good day tbh
https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/ @gilded pond @clear gyro
bs
Btw they can’t understand this cuz they are not living in a great power or superpower
The world’s order is based on us, five global powers
They really think that international thing matter
Actually that’s just an excuse to maintain the order established by us 
We can establish it to defend our interests, we also can destroy it for our interests
And they are nothing cuz they are non-power or puppet states.
Just like the League of Nations
you mean the UN security council?
the permanent members iirc
Some international fighters really think they can use our tool to against us
That’s impossible 😂 this world is still based on strength and power
neo colonialism is alive and well after all
Ye
Still sole superpower till now
China is just a great power
I thought china was more influential economically tbh. USA more powerful militarily while CN more powerful economically
Nah US still dominating the economy
The US Dollar
US’s the most powerful weapon is not nukes, guns
It’s the US dollar, when your enemies need US dollar to buy guns and resources, it’s all over.
what about the whole BRICS thing?
also china's influence in africa
Not really cause any threat to the US
maybe in the future tho
Africa is unstable doesn’t really have a nice environment to develop economy
its bricks 🧱
Ye but doesn't china have considerable influence there? through the loans they give
🧱
That’s nothing compared to the pressure of resources depending on USD
China doesn’t really have enough natural resources
BRICS stands for Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa
is it like a union or smth?
nah its just an association of countries. Like the UN kinda
idk
😭 🙏
they do cooperation for economic/political issues. kinda
Its like touted as resistance to the global western order but not really
They do but they still can cooperate sometimes ig? idk. They still engage in economic cooperation and maintain ties with each other for what its worth
america also has considerable influence in the world's institutions too
This situation will continue, I believe the totalitarian system is gonna be established by those great powers due pressure from puppets.
And that will be our paradise
wait you wanna keep the system as it is?? 
nah I think the system is gonna be more suppressful.
and the more suppressful system we have, the benefit we maximize.
You're on that oppressors' grindset 
what if China is cast out of the world order tho
we are if you live in US, and I live in China
I'm the citizen of People's Republic of China
Would you rather a unipolar world or a multipolar world with China, Russia, etc as superpowers instead of just the US
that would be the end of the world.
I rather a multipolar world with China Russia and US, but not those freaking losers.
russia's image has been damaged significantly after that disastrous war in ukraine
yeah I guess, we need to send more aid to Russia
at least they need to maintain the front with Ukraine
hell yeah maintain the proxy war
yeah proxy war.
some minor power really get benefit from this proxy war
I think east and west need to unite again against losers
WHO ASSASSINATED JFK, WORST.
Oswald
establish a totalitarian system against them.
who are these losers
non-power
2nd Age of Imperialism 
It definitely wasn't the one that start with a C.
Ye Even the Soviet Union was like mate we got nothing to do with it
Yeah
Oswald was a commie after all
just like British conquered africa
those freaking losers really annoying and they pretend they are the real power
When will it start, mr minecraft
Vale, is this a question?
yes I need to know when africa is colonized again
Idk who knows, but that is the best way to expand our interests
Did imperialism really end? France still has some control over West Africa and stuff
When did Europe started reaching it's resources limit?
US ruined their fun honestly
Ye but before colonialism
Not end it’s never gonna be end
New imperial era is coming
We are so back
“War is inevitable if a sovereign state holding enough power” - Einstein
That’s so damn true
who knows
Ye
New colonial empire?!??!
God's gracious
is this really serious chat
europeans gonna make a comeback fr
it seems funny one
i have no drill you speak of
The greatest comeback ever !!!!!
who great europe very funny
comeback arc will come, europoors ‼️
study history bro
Since 1945
Richonesians vs Europoors
Who will win?
are you saying you want my drill worst
richonesians clearly
Rome is order, Rome is power
no one is power
Im not the guide tf
The latter
the only power is GOD ALMIGHTY
Rome is civilization
But colonialism was bad, joking aside
or am I?
Ye
Great european civilization
the whole world is in danger due to some leaders of some countries holding power
Since the Annals of history threaten in it's peak it's demise
we should avoid these stupid talks
God 👑
be human with heart thats it
God is king
No human can be God u are humiliating God
God is Gracious God is humbled
King of kings
Christos anesti
You're right
Only the Romans thought could be God once
The Romans are too pragmatic
Ye
Who knows what would have happened if Christianity had never spread throughout the empire
Ye or if Christianity was into different sects
I’m the god
The supreme leader of the universe
The general secretary of the god is me party
Here
@formal pilot A research showed also that the rate of AIDS among gays are 19 times higher.
Correlation does not equal causation
wait prove me this
u said no STDs between gays
Then were's your evidence 🧾

so should we allow it only for lesbians?
We allow all homosexuality
Where?
Correlation does not equal causation
bro u said no STDs between homosexuals
General chat
Just because there is a correlation between homosexuality and higher rates of STDs, it does not mean that homosexuality causes STDs
what does this even mean?
If 2 gay are having intercourse without any STDs
so what's the reason if you don't mind
They'll be perfect safe from STDs
Lemme explain
my favourite
so why is it 19 times higher to get infected by AIDS?
topic
sexual behavior, access to healthcare, and social and economic factors
Cuz they f like crazy
😂😂😂😂
Do you think gay couple can produce HIV?
so these what made sense to you and not the same-gender sex?
Well that's the hormones
I thought im having an adult debate
Homosexual can't create a disease
I think yk that
They can still be infected
Example Covid 19
some people say it's genetic
but it's just a hypostasis
and the person who claimed this hypostasisal statement was a homosexual himself 💀
Damn 😩
two uninfected same sex men can do homosexual acts with each other and not be infected because the STD is not present proves it isn't the homosexual act itself that causes higher STD rates in homosexuals. It is
unfair to say that a group is bad because of their higher health risks. Heterosexual Black people have the highest STD rates among all other heterosexual races, does that mean black on black heterosexual sex is immoral?
A woman gets on a bus with her baby. The bus driver says: “Ugh, that’s the ugliest baby I’ve ever seen!” The woman walks to the rear of the bus and sits down, fuming. She says to a man next to her: “The driver just insulted me!” The man says: “You go up there and tell him off. Go on, I’ll hold your monkey for you.”
(Joke in serious chat 💀)
Homosexuality causes also severe psychological disorders, according to a study conducted by a Dutch team in recent years.
hey lil bill
Supp man
💀
Yo!
@shell lily
Send me research, I'll give it a crack
How you doin
how do y'all k a lot about ' geh sex" r u in this too?💀
Good wbu?
Yeah I'm one of em
Police arrested two kids yesterday, one was drinking battery acid, the other was eating fireworks. They charged one – and let the other one off.
lmao
So again why is AIDS 19 times higher among homosexuals(give me valid proofs not the childish ones u sent earlier)
Yea by a infectious needle
We need sources
Stop the capping
Just because of unprotected and careless sex
And needle
They can't create HIV i think yk that right?? @shell lily
ugh
so this doesnt happen in the normal sex?
Well I wouldn't tbh
Learn the whole thing, basically because of unprotected sex
It happens
Obviously it happens
WBT Aids
AIDS one read it in a different language
lemme see the english version
If a uninfected man is going to have intercourse with uninfected man, will they get AIDS??
Answer this simple question
ugh, you just don't make any sense
do you know what you're talking about or you are just saying some stuff to satisfy urself?
Wanna know something ironic
wathch this if any legend know the man https://youtube.com/shorts/911rdkwxXbQ?si=uJEIwayCaUTqXrws
This is a logical fallacy
@shell lily
all of your conservation is not allowed here
#🛂|report-help open a ticket against us
Ok take it easy
I respond when you give me a logical reason of why homosexuals have 19 times higher AIDS infection rate
We are just talking
hello I am not doing this I know nothing happenns but i can ask you for some manners
In the 80s there's was a product called AIDS
can i know from where you are ill mannured are
i hope frome europe
According to your link
Just unprotected sex is responsible for this
@shell lily I'm waiting for your response
bro wtf this is family friendly server
Bodily fluids are the transfer
Who doesn't know that bro?
Not saliva obviously
waiting for the proof
But the one intense ones
And now to gay discussion and dieses
This guy
report

im dying frm the inside
Feel free to report
this is family friendly server report
Ok
did you bring proofs that respond to this?
You asked i gave you explantion
First you refused to give me the evidence that homosexuality doesn't occur in nature
Second you didn't gave me explanation about why uninfected men having intercourse can generate hiv
Well Aladdin were's sources
he thinks he came up with something nobody knows
Ye he's thinks he's Einstein
Ok 👌
You asked me why it's common in homosexual
I gave you explantion
It was in your own shared link
Ok make it more indepth
You can read again

again doesn't that happen in normal sex intercourses?
Well what's your thoughts on this
Blud is searching the whole internet to find something useful abt my questions yet he couldn't
he just yaps
You were asking why it's high, i have to response
This blimey topic
Someone is saying gay couple can generate HIV, wow
a333333333333333333333
Again normal sex also it is common to be without condom
what's ur resoponse to that again?
sciecne said it
not me
Ok explain tbh
Just take it easy
Skin around the anus is more thinner than skin around vagina, so small tears are more likely to occur
I am against homosexuality in general
how does one generate HIV without already having it in their bodies?
I'll punch my laptop on live stream
Ye
Ok 👌
Please give me the evidence that's homosexual can generate HIV
so...? what's the conclusion.
Yea that doesn't makes sense
Wear protection
welcome to the HIV Mark 5 suit
Damn
I sent im not sending again.
Dude he's saying homosexuals can generate HIV
They can't generate HIV, it's a virus
Which transfers from one to another
What about severe psychological disorders
Ye it can also lead to aids
wear protection?
wear protection against psychological disorders?
What do we've got in here?
What about bodily disorders?
First accept that they can't generate HIV and homosexuality occurs in nature
is this what people call the tinfoil hat?
Ye
This is because they engage in anal intercourse , in which the possibility of transmitting AIDS may be high
Use condoms then
That's what I'm saying, they can't generate HIV
what does HIV have to do with psychological disorders?
ah u mean generating
I mean it's proven that who don't have HIV will not have them after sex
My question was why the heck homosexuals have 19 times higher AIDS infection
He's bringing it up
Skin around the anus is more thinner than skin around vagina, so small tears are more likely to occur
You will lose your money, respect, family, trust from your love ones, etc
isn't this the reason?
Ok don't bring it up then
Ye
mister awesome is here to respond to that
He's refusing to read
He better do
Then tell him to read
"im embarrassed of talking about this but anyway"
Doesn't this go for straight sex also? like men and women?
Ye STDs
Absolutely
But gay perform anal more
That's the only way
wdym?
Wdym?
if what my high school biology taught me is to be believed, then biological men don't have a vagina
Correlation does not equal causation
That's absolutely correct
They don't tbh
The whole argument was about does homosexuality occur in nature now we're here lmao
Ye
"what did the author mean by 'yes' when answering this question?"
(2500 words)
Can you send the paper?
send something bro ur just talking the whole time
Ye
Now he'll pretend like he can't read it
I'm waiting for the paper where it says that homosexuality doesn't occur in nature
And uninfected homosexual couple can get HIV
Ah thanks
im gonna cook it tonight.
back to my question
why is normal sex doesnt have as much diseases and psychological disorders as the homosexual one
im waiting for the proof
he be like: Correlation does not equal causation
Told ya 5 times, you can read it
ah okay
ig it is useless
Now accept that homosexuality occur in nature
let homie be for his homies lol
@shell lily
everything happens in nature
they dont have a mind what are you talking about
make sure you kiss your homie goodnight when the debate ends
So you're accepting that it occurs in nature?
Absolutely
everything happens they are animals they eat each other kill each other they do everything
and we aren't animals somehow?
let him cook
Fair enough, i think we're on a common ground now
Apart from this i don't think we'll accept eachother's ideology
if you think you are you are free to, in some western countries (you can even be a potato)
Rn we're discussing homosexuality
I was talking about how lame it is to justify animals homosexuality in order to normalize it in society
that's called counter example
Argument was does it occur in nature or not
And morality is subjective
no it wasn't
You can scroll down in general chat
"The tissue of the anus is delicate and can tear easily. This can leave more openings for an infection to enter the body. The person who is getting anally penetrated, sometimes called the bottom, is more at risk for STIs than the person doing the penetrating, sometimes called the top"
save your bottom @formal pilot
Ok
Bro i was laughing about that conclusion
Some say it doesn't occur in nature, that's why I use the og homosexual lizards
To prove that i occurs
Is it morally bad or not, it depends on the individual
i believe it is rare because we are born with that instinct of getting attracted to the opposite sex
and i believe too that it has some down sides to those animals
Yeah being straight is more common in nature, evolution also favours it
I was recently chatting about evolutionary aspect of homosexuality with a well known biology professor of my state
Her words it might help in survival for weak individuals but we can't say for sure, the only thing that we know is that, it was always there
So do you agree that it causes more diseases and psychological disorders?
There might be a connection, cuz in general recessive traits are subjected to more challenges
Dang I just got here I didn’t know THAT kind of debates occurred here 😭
But we can't say for sure
There might be? ofc course there is
stats say there is
r u gay
STDs can be prevented by protection and careful intercourse, homosexual couples can't create disease out of nowhere, so it's irrelevant
I'm more interested in psychological aspects
I'm not familiar with it rn, so I can't say anything about it
I'll give a crack to the study you've sent
How can they prevent psychological disorders?
I think you haven't read my text
which one?
I'm not familiar with psychological aspects
So i can't say anything
ig u have to have a strong knowledge before advocating something
That's why I'm not saying anything about psychological aspects
hewwo
I've explantion for psychological challenges after HRT
But I'm not familiar with in general psychological challenges in homosexuality
Protesters are demanding the government reach a deal to bring the hostages back from Gaza, for new elections and the resignation of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. The demonstration took place as a delegation of the Palestinian militant group Hamas was in Cairo for cease-fire talks with Israel. (AP video by Shlomo Mor) #israelhamaswar...
Netanyahu really need to focus on internal affairs.
especially need martial law in some places to maintain the order.
We are a democratic country he canot really do siruous thing
Its not abt this studies indicate a high incidence of these diseases in homosexuals especially man thats it
The only thing he needs to do is resign
Only men*
What is it you mean by "monopolized conservative"
Most of the data about STI is about reports, so it doesn't necessarily reflects reality
It's only an indicator of who reports more
The chances of catching SIDA for instance is increased in 3x when practicing an4l s3x, that's one of the reasons it's so high
I might try to find it later 'cause my phone is running out of battery, but I got to clarify that I'm not anti-gay or stuff, I just saw that one time and found it believable
-
Syphilis Trends among Men Who Have Sex with Men in the United States and Western Europe: A Systematic Review of Trend Studies Published between 2004 and 2015
-
Sexually Transmitted Diseases in Men Who Have Sex With Men
These are two of the studies that show such disproportionate cases of HIV and similar disease between homosexuals in comparison non-homosexual people
What is it your way of accepting a study? these are official ones.
https://academic.oup.com/cid/article/53/suppl_3/S79/312189
@thorny steeple@manic juniper
Copyright © 2011, © The Author 2011. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Infectious Diseases Society of America. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.
Now sum up this article and back up your arguments with it, just unleashing it on the chat won't change anything

