#🧠|serious-chat
1 messages · Page 174 of 1
师傅/大师
Like I said, I don't know any grammar, damn it!
That’s weird
It was a parody of Shifu's name
You say that as you put commas everywhere
Lol a clerical error
That’s not 😂 no one’s name is master
😂😂😂 no one is master when he borns
Correctly so. Just because I'm unfamiliar with English grammar doesn't mean that I can't construct grammatically correct sentences.
Im not sure if that makes any sense at all but sure
It was a parody of Shifu's name, a character in the hit movie Kung Fu Panda
Okay bro I understand
I guess
It does
Nice parody
Tell this to the organizations that removed homosexuality from the list of mental illnesses just because of the protests + there are actually places that treat these things search youself
Or does it? Michael here.
"Search yourself" this isn't how a discussion works my guy, that's why no one takes you seriously here
Does anything you say really make sense, or is it just you affirming your stance?
And people would rather joke than engage in a discussion with you
I know. Nice propoganda too!
Do I ever take myself seriously is the question
Maybe
If there is China in US government file does it indicate that US is spreading propaganda about China ?🤔
Yes
Yes this is why China is the best and the yankees are big poo poo

Western propoganda! Eastern propoganda is what the real ones consume
I only consume Antarctic propaganda
Provided to me by the United Albatross Commission
are you from china ma'e
You say this, but the science that you believe in says that homosexuality exists in some organisms, so without it they would not reproduce, so it is natural for them, but some organisms that exhibit homosexual behavior are due to a defect in the olfactory receptors cuz of pollution
Homosexuality is something natural to some beings, but humans are not among these beings
For most visitors, the PRC remains a very safe country. Traffic accidents are the most common safety concern for U.S. citizens. Training, capability, and responsiveness of PRC authorities vary by region and even by city. The U.S. Embassy and Consulates General have no law enforcement authority and may not represent U.S. citizens in either criminal or civil legal matters.
To ensure your safety and security in the PRC, you should:
Take routine safety precautions.
Pay attention to surroundings.
Report any concerns to the local police.
Call “110,” the local equivalent to “911”. English services are often available, but you should not expect English services in remote parts of the PRC.
Violent crime is not common in the PRC, however:
While sanctioned demonstrations must be approved by PRC authorities, they can turn violent.
Domestic unrest and terrorism can occur.
Business disputes between U.S. citizens and PRC-national business partners can sometimes result in physical confrontation, detainment, or coercion. Go straight to the police if you feel threatened or relocate to a public place.
Imagine if West Korea existed, and tankies still said "Western propoganda!"
Propaganda

I still see criticism, but all I see are children making fun of my writing error
Most birds outside scavenging birds of prey don't require olfactory clues, their sense of smell is quite poor in fact. So it doesn't explain why homosexuality is documented in penguins
Most birds have a sense of smell poorer than that of humans, it's pathetic
Okay bro calm down . I see you changed your photo
yup and if you search in quran you ofc you wont found elephent you want me to bring the verve from quran?
@obtuse perch I thought it's another one 😂
This is like saying humans need to sense the electrical signals of other humans to be attracted to them, as if we had the same senses sharks have
If you are driving a tank and you are permitted to kill people (not innocent, most of them are terrorists or terrorist supporters) what will you do ?
"Search yourself" i mean that he is must search for a psychiatrist himself to treat his girlfriend. Would he like me to go to his country and find him a psychiatrist who treats homeopathy? do you even understand what im typing lmao
A very safe country if you shut up and don't criticize the government, and don't do anything that might set off their suspicion meter
For me, I will not only kill them by knocking but using cannons to fire against them
I don't think you did even get that he was joking
Kill the terrorist students!
A tank in Finland would be quite damaging and wouldn't last for long I believe
It would get stuck in the mud
Not gonna lie you can criticize government but you can’t spread anti-Chinese propaganda.
Ask the Soviets 
I even criticize Xi jinping multiple times
Not all animals rely on smell to distinguish between males and females But my question, which I am still searching for a convincing answer to, is whether homosexuality is natural in humans. If so, why?
Too damn cold
Winter is coming!
Presenting forth a sentiment or opinion critical and/or disagreeing with the CCP heavily isn't anti-Chinese propoganda, it's simpl
Do it in public, in the centre of Beijing, and make sure you disagree with the authority thing
You can disagree with CCP, actually after covid times a lot of people disagreed with CCp even they say take down Xi jinping in some places
But government didn’t arrest them or do anything special
I wonder what happened to them
What's the point of mentioning other animals if you have to set the comparison aside when it suits you? Besides, many things in humans weren't a thing 1000 years ago. Were they using phones in China? Did we have supersonic jets in Finland? Did Arabs have 8K screen monitors? Why do we like those? Irrelevant
Yes, definitely did not do anything at all
Then you will receive a tank
That’s prohibited
Free tanks? Great!
a joke or not this is serious chat ill take everything srious and he said IM NOT CAPPING If I ignore him, he will use this against me because I ignore him and have no answer
Yeah free tanks, maybe it’s the tank that to free you
Because it's considered public unrest, while all it really is is an opinion
Yeah that’s public unrest true but you can still criticize with your friend or with anyone you like
No, free tanks from the PLA is what all students want!
People always having emotions with authority that’s normal
hlelo gyus
That's not public unrest. Protests are not public unrest, they are a movement for reform, and the CCP does seem so keen for them
Indeed it is public unrest
We have a famous sentence that called 防民之口甚于防川 which means it’s just like stopping flood if you want to make people shut up.
Seems like the CCP is having a big emotional breakdown at the slightest sight of liberty
That sentence almost every Chinese learn from education
Not really, different cultures different traditions
I don't think it's a cultural thing, more of a political one
In china, preserving order is the priority of the CCP
I have no clue of you'te talking about
At the cost of many liberties
It is cultural
The Chinese never lived under democracy
How so? Was authority in China always high?
Justifying human actions through animals actions is an illogical thing. hualn has a mind and animals depend on instincts. These instincts can be tampered with in various ways, and animals also perform many brutal acts. Is it possible for humans to perform these acts only because they exist in nature, but they do not exist? In his nature
Yes, the people never got to make their decisions
But it still doesn't negate the more political aspect of it. This is just authority against liberty
@feral river if i am permitted to inquire, how are you able to access discord in china💀 , VPN?
What about that one republic?
You know that laughing in a discussion means that you have no answer
Are you seriously going to talk about that. 💀
Yeah you're right, justifying human actions with animal actions isn't right. That's why homosexuality in animals shouldn't be compared to that in humans like you just did earlier
The phrase “防民之口、甚于防川” translates to “It is more sinister and ominous to stop civilians from speaking than to block the river flows.” This idiom comes from the classical Chinese text “Guoyu,” which dates back to the 4th century BCE. The full context of the quote is: “防民之口,甚于防川。川壅而溃,伤人必多,民亦如之。” In English, this can be interpreted as: “To guard against the people’s speech is more difficult than to guard against river floods. When a river is blocked and breaks its banks, it will injure many people, and the same is true when people are silenced.” This proverb emphasizes the importance of allowing free speech and the dangers of suppressing it123.
Yes, we're going to talk about that republic with the strange flag
Can't even take a joke
From Microsoft copilot
Oml we legit cannot talk when there’s a trillion paragraphs @cedar oar
Fine. How about Taiwan? They're Chinese, aren't they? I know they're a very recent creation, but I'm trying to argue
Tbh the Republic of China had like a single election and after political instability, the elections stopped altogether
Chinese logograms are funny because they save so much space compared to other alphabets, you draw a bunch of things and they make long sentences
It was an unproductive, corrupt and disorganized state
It had a single election before it broke into several pieces*
Technically it's older, since it was formed by the older government no?
You you're accepting that homosexuality is natural in some beings, like it exists in nature, right?
Taiwan was a dictatorship just before transitioning to a democracy in the 80s
It’s a new thing for them too
Is that my government you're talking about?
💀
Earlier he admitted that it's only an issue on men
Yes, I know, but it still very faintly counts
Either way, mainlanders never lived under a so called “western” democracy
What about Hong Kong and Macau? Actually, forget them
if i am right how do you explain homosexual behavior in a person as something natural and not a mental illness? you support and I want to help them, so what is the meadow that you rely on to support them?
and I am not the one who compared animal behavior to human behavior
And I don’t think they will anytime soon
Hong Kong and Macau were both colonies
Technically Taiwan is the Republic of China as well
Real question: how do you explain it as a mental illness when most scientists agreed to remove it from the list? I think it's their choice, just like how it's my choice to play Fallout 4 or watch giraffes on TV
one study found that hophobic men are more likely to become aused when exposed to homoe**tic imagery
Sorry some words were banned
It's the only one, the other has a different name
For a long time they were managed by a colonial government appointed by their respective governments
I know, that's why I said forget them. Those British imperialist pigs will pay one day
I think they also transitioned to democracy in the 60s-70s
So not long ago either
The authors investigated the role of homosexual arousal in exclusively heterosexual men who admitted negative affect toward homosexual individuals. Participants consisted of a group of homophobic men (n = 35) and a group of nonhomophobic men (n = 29); they were assigned to groups on the basis of the …
Well, so much so for a people's republic
@manic juniper check this bad boy out
Don't search why they arrested an homophobic Hungarian politician and why he was at a party with cocaine and over 20 other men
Personally I don’t think we will see a Democratic mainland China in our lifetime
Me neither, it's just like Russia
Nothing happened here on 5:20 AM Pacific time
They just missed out on that train and they don't seem to care that much about it
Those that do eventually find a way to immigrate
The Chinese are fine with living like this
Oh, God damn it. It's still more of a political thing though
反攻大陆!retake the mainland!
When asked are you free in China, they all say yes
In china, the concept of being free is totally different from Western free
sry im srious rn I don't like being a serious, do most of the time I speak freely, ask Aladdin, but this is a place to talk seriously, so I take any word seriously simply because I respect this place and its rules
It would be great though. China would be a really great place if it had all of those liberties we have here, and none of the censorship
Not politically free but rather economically and being able to travel anywhere you want etc.
yes
Not going to happen
I can confirm he's one of the most chill guys of English hub, he's a god lad
That would be dangerous if there is no censorship and cameras the crime and corruption would be crazy
What are you talking about?
We need those stuff to prevent crime and corruption

Different concept of being “free”
They can spend their money however they wish and they can travel and move around
Exactly
I was talking about censorship, protests, really. Freedom of speech
And they are fine with that
This is the same kind of "freedom" that was granted to most of eastern Europe after the decline of socialism
I was talking about we have different values on freedom, democracy thing
It's enough for me
Finally we're on a common point
I'll keep supporting homosexuality and in 2028 I'll provide some more solid evidence ||my friend is researching on it||
Until then you can live with your believes
Some were ok with it, others weren't, others slowly adapted
Honestly they just want to live life and don’t want to cause social and political disorder
China is East Taiwan
West?
Well, I guess the debate always boils down to this. Still, though, there are pre-determined values for what freedom is depending on the ideology
Because there are actually people who recovered before it was removed from the list of diseases, and it was not removed because they proved that homosexuality is not a disease, but rather they removed it due to the pressure of agendas and protests.
Everybodys saying the Chinese are oppressed and why aren’t fighting for their freedom
Taiwan is in west of china, so I did the maths
They are perfectly content with the status quo
Didn't they cause the death of Alan Turing through one of those supposed "therapies" to fix his homosexuality?
Take me with you
?awesome bot
awesome Aladdin died due to questionable activities, he'll resurrect on 13 may
||Awesome bot||

https://williamsinstitute.law.ucla.edu/press/lgb-suicide-ct-press-release/
Unless you consider suicide to be a solution, I don't see how it works
Brb in 2 years
Brb to the Finno-Korean hyperspace war
and till that time, remember that the science you trust says today that there is no gay gene
and that science can be falsified, and even if tomorrow a scientific paper comes out that says that homosexuality is natural, remember that after years it may be proven that the research was falsified.
now you know that your support depends only on your feelings and there is no evidence. I respect your honesty, my friend
As for me, I will not support an idea if I am not sure of its authenticity, 100% but you are free to do what you want.
反攻大陆!
RETAKE THE MAINLAND!
I’m glad to be a citizen of Republic of China! 🇹🇼 🇹🇼 🇹🇼 🇨🇳
Do you believe that pedophilia and crime love can be treated?
Pedophilia can possibly be treated, but I don't see how this is relevant to a discussion about two consenting adults
I don't know what's crime love lol
at this time I always ask: what's wrong with pedophilia ? 🤔 💀
Most children are pedophiles, aren't they?
they are 🤣
when I was a kid I like my friend even I said I love her 💀
pedo committed 💀💀💀
You had your priorities at the times
Why did you love her
I was on a fight and she helped me, she gifted me a chocolate
do you know how important is 10 bucks of chocolate for a kid??!
Was it physical?
yeah physical.
Who was the bully? Or who started it?
hummm... me 💀
This is due to many reasons, the most important of which is stopping treatment at a certain stage because the patient does not see that he is being treated, so he decides with himself to stop treatment, and this is the biggest mistake any patient can make. Stopping treatment without medical advice is the most dangerous thing that could happen at all, and if we rely on Therefore, depressed patients who receive treatment are more likely to commit suicide than those who do not receive treatment. When treatment is stopped, complications may occur that make the disease more serious than it was. Should we stop treating people with depression?
Also, what is your solution for homosexuals? Do we have to support them so that they do not commit suicide? In my opinion, this is wrong because it is against human nature, but it seemed that why do not we help them and show society that if you have homosexual tendencies, this is not a bad thing, but rather just a normal disease like any other disease, and it can be treated. This patient receives treatment and support from society, unlike what we see today. Homosexuals are exposed to bullying and hatred, all because of the people who supported them and did not want to help them.
宁教我负天下人, 休教天下人负我
"I will hurt everyone just for everyone not to hurt me" - Cao cao
Source?
Unless you just wrote that based off personal interpretations and feelings
"Vierevä kivi ei jäkälly"
A rolling stone gathers no moss
- Some random Karelian
same meaning 🤣
but Caocao is different
No lmao it means that an unsettled person does not prosper
it's discriminating racists! no discrimination 💀 (kidding)
lol
we can offend in "serious chat" right?
to each other
like saying that there are only 2 genders
or no
you can say that
I think there are only 2 genders, but too many characteristics
🤰 man can be pregnant then
jokes aside some men really pretend to be pregnant
Who have an ielts , pls help me
I am not able to share any media files?
Can anyone enlighten me why that is?
I face such a problem in various servers.
I have some biscuits u want one?
u don’t have pic perms?
Why is that?
What I desire at the moment is the correct approach towards me being able to having the permission of sending media files.
It would be truly a kind (abstract) gesture of kindness towards ich.
Yes, why not?
I can help you but its 50$
No
Very well. 100$ for you, incase you change your mind in near future.
I will think about this
Is there a discord bot that has like points system? Example: a specific role can give people points and people can check how many points they have with a certain command
Its more like an xp system
Pay me 50$, I will tell you.
No thanks i already got the answer from chatgpt
ask the owner of this server idk
to get pic perms u need to talk on here
This is interesting
Why you say it.
I think he means to ask why you asked it if you were going to ask gpt anyway
I was asking when I didn’t have the answer. Simple.
For me, using chatgpt to find information like that, is like hammering a nail with a microscope.
Why?
Who want to be serious with me
Today you use such a tool, tomorrow you wonder why humanity has degenerated. They cannot search for even the simplest information on their own.
Long story short you use chat gpt you are dump.
Soon they will create an AI tool that can to distinguish human speech by humming, and than people forgot how to speak. generation of degenerates.
Why speak if you can make a sound and ai understand it and send a message
when I see how they start using AI, I get really scared, and not because AI will take over us
AI is dumb
If u pay attention closely
The saddest thing is that this has already happened and it’s too late.
I don’t think I’m qualified to help you cuz I only got band 6😂
How abou speaking?
easy, but you got to practice a lot, i got only 6.5 in speaking because i didn't practiced enough
As I see your listening was high
i got 8 in listening
6
listening is the easiest part
Listening 5.5 speaking 6 reading 6.5 writing 6
Hardest for Chinese
Writing is the most difficult part
my native language is arabic, but i used to listen a lot
it's not difficult but you have to practice developing ideas and writing fast
i only wrote like 3 essay's before my exam, and that was wrong
Its advice on how to improve listening
yeah, u can try listening to podcasts, they help alot to be honest
my best way for learning english is playing games watching videos and debate with some stupid son of b.
Hope you learned your lesson not to argue with delusional NPCs who are fed with talking points.
Incest is a fair point to show if they are consistent with their worldview. It's between consenting adults, and isn't necessarily heterosexual incest. There are atheists who agree and are consistent actually, although they are few, we need to applaud them.
Ewwwwwwww
*applauds for their intellectual consistency, not for their pro-incest take
Same arguments used to defend vanilla homosexuality can be used to defend homosexual incest with ease,
- natural cause animals do them cuh
- consenting adults
- do whatever that doesn't harm others (utilitarianism)
- it's all fun and pleasure maxxing
...etc.,
Any atheists have a single argument against homosexual incest lmk
Sure, but I'll still be against the ways of the CCP
Well thats your personal opinion
You live in a free state where free speech is accepted and its perfectly fine
Personal opinion of what, the CCP? I believe it is perfectly apparent of what I think of the CCP
Indeed it is
X
The situation in Palestine
I want to talk about this situation
But I'm pretty sure they will ban me, or maybe cut my microphone
You will be the first person who might report me...
Why would I? I want to talk about it too
btw I have no idea about CCP, I just think some of CCP's policies are actually working properly and it was amazing.
something like assimilation, immigration policies, and political structures.
I don't have many opinions in it but I like seeing people talking about it ofc
it's the most advance and efficient political entity in the world, in my opinion, they do other countries can't do, it worked and they take a poor country to the second most powerful country.
ofc it has prices like you said freedom of speeches, suppressing minorities, cheap labor etc. no any country rise without costs, what about the British ? slavary, colonizes, Soviets ? annexation, USA ? interventionism.
I don't really care the measure they do that becoming a superpower, but I really care who is the superpower, I rather study and admire a strong not a loser, even I have some personal opinion about adolf, Hirohito, studying something to be a loser is stupid.
today's main stream idea is still based on global power, what the USA promotes, freedom, democracy, human rights, and more even in their history when they are not a superpower they don't give any f to those stuff.
then why would I give a f to those stuff ? I rather have my freedom of eating and survival of the fittest not be a minion of the US, that's the true freedom.
China >>
bro conversion Therapy refers to a set of practices aimed at attempting to change a person's sexual orientation or gender identity. These practices may include psychological therapy, sex therapy, hormone therapy, and other methods that could contribute to altering an individual's sexual orientation or gender identity. and i am completely against it
The treatment that I talked about is psychological treatment only, without the introduction of medications, hormone injections, changing gander
the APA President himsels say "that Homosexuals can Change" he is the same one who led the process of removing homosexuality from the list of mental illnesses but after 40yrs admit that homosexuality can be treated
here is the article if you want to know more
https://thenewamerican.com/us/culture/former-apa-president-says-homosexuals-can-change/
But why the media doesn't want people to know? weird fr but i think also have the answer
Because most people don't think it's an illness that needs to be changed, it's just the opinion of a fringe group
no need to read all his if you only looking for source
I||n fact, you do not need sources to prove this because I saw it with my own eyes
As an Internet user, I also follow people on social media. There were three of the channels that I follow the most on YouTube, but the owners of this channels suddenly no longer published anything for seven months. It turned out that two of thses youtubers committed suicide. They were not sharing this in the videos. They were not announcing that they were sick with depression, they were afraid or embarrassed about that. After the investigation, it became clear that they were undergoing psychological treatment, but suddenly they began to feel that this treatment was not benefiting them, so they decided to stop taking the medication and go to the psychiatrist. This was the biggest mistake they made, as psychological treatment does not have direct effects, but rather takes time a long time and many sessions, they thought that this medicine was not helping them, so they stopped using it. Then what happened happened. I wanted to share their channels with you, but their families deleted them, unfortunately. As for the third YouTuber, he is Moroccan. He stopped posting videos for about two months. This was strange, but after that he came up with a shocking video. he talked about how he tried to commit suicide by taking excessive doses of the medicine, but fortunately he was saved, and in the video he explains exactly what happened to him and that the main reason was to stop using the medicine. If you would like me to share the video with you, but it is in the arabic , you can use the translation of YouTube, but it's not entirely accurate||
but if you dont trust here his some sources
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19758520/
https://my.clevelandclinic.org/health/diseases/25218-antidepressant-discontinuation-syndrome
Just search for the side effects of stopping psychotherapy and you will find things that may be better than my sources
Substantial confounding exists in examining the link between antidepressant use and suicide attempt, specifically regarding those factors associated with characteristics of depression. Antidepressant discontinuation showed a significant risk for suicide attempt, as did the period of an abbreviated t …
"I saw it with my own eyes" 🤣
Peak comedy
I asked for a source about most of them stopping their treatments, this isn't what I asked for. It's a generic article
But it turns out that it is something that can be treated, so why not treat it and make them normal people in society, unlike what is happening with them today
Plus a YouTuber? Seriously?
If you start by thinking it's not normal, can I say the same about any person I think isn't normal?
my eng is not that good
This is just an example id saw Isn't the YouTuber a human?
Science doesn't work with anecdotes
ofc no normal or not normal when a being does something outside of its nature, this is not normal
A transvestite will carry the Olympic flame through the streets of Paris on the opening day of the Summer Olympics, - France 24
But you already demonstrated that what you consider part of nature or not is subjective
you did something outstanding and received such an honor? or you could be a transvestite
I told you these are just things I saw and wanted to share with you, and they match exactly what the sources says isn't it?
Your sources don't say that lol you even confirmed it earlier, they aren't what I asked for
I said that homosexuality is necessary for some animals, meaning that it is natural for them, but I did not say that homosexuality is natural for humans
Keyword "I said"=your opinion
This isn't the first time you say "I think" "I said" if you're not even sure of it then don't talk
If you read what I said, I said in brief:
Homosexuality is a mental illness, and stopping treatment may lead to complications, and my sources prove that
They don't prove anything, one guy that claims a thing isn't proving anything
There are scientists that think birds evolved from drepanosaurs, no one takes them seriously
A couple has been arguing for days. Has anyone cared to ask if they agreed on a single thing? This is not OKAY.
I'm losing faith in humanity 💔
Hello
You definitely do have an idea about the CCP. It's the political party that rules your country
Lol
I don't like them in the slightest
Hear ye hear ye, the most advanced political party
What's funny 🤔
My life
OKAY
I think he meant opinion, but I still will make a whole deal about it
The giant circus that politicians and their chambers are
funny honey gas ⛽
The term "I think" means i believe that there is no absolute truth, and it is very difficult for the human mind to find absolute truth for me everything is subject to criticism and debate so I don't say the scientist said or the following source says... simply because I don't consider sources themselves absolute truth but at any moment someone can convince me of their point of view they just have to provide strong evidence to support their argument. the term "i think" to me doesn't mean I'm saying things on my own but it means that the things I believe in and the ideas I hold are subject to change just convince me of your point of view and give me evidence to prove that I am wrong, and I will thank you because you helped me develop myself and abandon ideas that are less plausible than yours.
I think that this is the goal of discussion: to recognize and analyze the opinions and ideas of others, and if they are contrary to your ideas and more convincing, then your ideas are simply wrong and you must change them.
the one who speaks while he is 100% confident in what he says is a person with whom it is not appropriate to discuss. He is not at all willing to change his convictions even if it is proven that his ideas are wrong and that there are more perfect and practical ideas.
and this is consistent with what is in the Quran
"The eyes are not blind, but it is the hearts that become blind."
there are people who, even if they see the truth before their eyes, will not turn it around and will give ridiculous justifications for it
Politics is a too complex system for us human beings, we must return to anarchy
I'm happy that anyone can be a great debater with Chatgpt
No, no, it's not complex at all. To put it simply, populists get elected every time, and drag down our countries through mud
Why do we always have to create arguments here? In the end we are all human beings, peace and love guys
Wellckp ackhually, you don't belong to the superior Aryan race, so I propose we exclude you from life
What?
Only one here truly belongs to the Caucasian race
I'm not understanding
I was mocking far-right racists
I didn't claim I didn't say anything but the sources who saidbut if you dont trust here his some sources
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19758520/
https://my.clevelandclinic.org/health/diseases/25218-antidepressant-discontinuation-syndrome
Substantial confounding exists in examining the link between antidepressant use and suicide attempt, specifically regarding those factors associated with characteristics of depression. Antidepressant discontinuation showed a significant risk for suicide attempt, as did the period of an abbreviated t …
Yeah!
When the arguments hit diminishing returns, the parties don't value time much. They're just talking past each other.
Boring
Th- the lizard biologist said boring to a scientific article?!1?
im happy that you think i am using ai i think it proves that I know how to argue
It's boring because it's the second time I see that out of context
You were making fun of my uncle then 🤣🤣
But I think scientific articles are generally boring, especially if it's medicine or psychology
Sure man, I don't have a problem. It's quick and saves time.
While the other person is scrambling to address your arguments and wasting time
I think the picture that comes with the link has gotten mundane. Please change it, people love to link that article as a source for some reason
You're a smart fellow 😉 @obtuse perch
Let's not speak further of this. Anyway, now what?
That's why biology articles are more entertaining, the picture is a cross-section or a live pic
What
However I found the video of the Finnish person trying to speak English
I suppose my message wasn't clear enough. I was basically telling you, and myself to change the topic to something that doesn't include mocking others
Is it the one about gay marriage?
i feel i lil bit sad because of that you think i'm using ai but yeah buddy
but dw I understand you you think everyone is lazy like you
does chatgpt give sources?
You must've learned biology just for the pictures. Props to you. But actually, I think it's something else. The lizard gods probably must've sent you a message to become their first prophet and establish a new religion
what is your evidence
Nothing is clear enough to me, my brain does not work anymore, anyway, I got it
No, that's the second reason. I did it for the cute animals, I think that's the case for everyone
Nah, it's a sh!tpost
Why do you think it's a problem? I didn't say it is good or bad. A lot of people are using AI, showing how smart they are.
PS: why did you guys stop, continue LMAO @obtuse perch @manic juniper
I've watched it at least 100 times
If thy mind does not suffice enough to grasp the purport of a message, thou shalt try the common procedures for the problem.
Is it the one of the Twitch streamer dressed like a femboy?
Eww, no, can I send it?
There is a funny hypothesis about Germanic languages in linguistic
Yes
What do you mean by "that's the second reason"? Cute animals? I see you have passion for biology
This video is absolute brainrot
Some linguists think that the German languages are a pidgin languages are just broken Indo-European created by Finnic speakers
It's accurate but why can he pronounce W, we don't have that
Must be a Finland Swede smh
You are speaking in a form that "I am sure you are using ai" without any prove why you didnt say i think tou are using ai , and I do not depend on aa in my studies and in my daily life. I still want my mind to get tired and work a little.
Okay I retract my word. Can you please continue with the debate?
Sorry that I came along and sounded the alarm, then y'all paused ⏸️
My bad
Did anyone win the debate?
i won
Cause it has been literally a week now 💯
However, something really bad happened today at school
She did not answer what I said, perhaps there is no answer, or perhaps she found that what I said was logical, or perhaps she began to doubt her own ideas, or perhaps she is like others who think they are always right, or perhaps because I am slow in responding, and perhaps she thinks that I am using ai...etc. I don't and I can't know my friend.
Maybe
Go ahead, tell us all about the unfortunate event which has befallen upon this day
I'm sorry to hear that. It sucks.
Maybe if y'all debate a little bit longer, miracles can happen. There can be agreements. Listen, don't lose hope!
Perhaps that means you have to debate till the heat death of the universe
Are you ready to go all in??
Today we had to have a minute of silence for a boy who lost his life in our school, but my idiot classmates started making noises and opened clash royal
How foolish are people to still play that game?
maybe she is busy
Maybe she will answer when available
No problem, my friend. don't blame yourself. You didn't do anything wrong, but don't speak i without being sure. this is rude tbh. and its totally fine dw
What's your argument? I missed it probably
After this I was sad all day, how can you (my classmates) be so disrespectful?
tf are talking about
which is better , banana or watermelon
watermelon for me
Read again. I'm saying don't give up. You can still win.
same , that's how i won it 💪🏻
I thought you were referring to me for a second. Though to be honest, your classmates are probably much better than mine, so at least there's that
I'm sorry..sorry. Please continue with the debate.
💪😎👍💯
They were very disrespectful, the boy lost his life at school for a very bad reason
I do not wish to know the reason at the current time. Though disrespectful they were indeed
win what? Debate, for me, is not a loss or a win, but rather it is about changing the wrong ideas in a person’s head about why a person is more effective.
give me your idea and ill give you mine and we gonna see wich idea is more ligical and correct
if you canvice me ill be thankful and ill chnage the my idea too be better
But what was the debate?
Did they ever try to throw a guy out of the window?
What wrong ideas have you changed so far?
A bunch of nonsense
🫥
I believe it was started by somebody denouncing homosexuality
My classmates did
huh? how do i can continue the debate when there is no response to what I said?
Did they succeed?
They were interrupted by my professor, he just came back from the bathroom
@manic juniper don't run.
Finish the freaking debate.
Why must you have had the urge to ask what happened?
No, they ended up dropping him to the ground
They lifted this guy and he initially was having fun because he didn't get what their intentions were
But what did the boy do to deserve this?
Isfrun VII of Lizard 'The Coward'
Nothing, just being unlucky
Isfrun XVII the Bored
I'd rather be the Bored than the Repetitive
Is homosexuality a natural thing in humans, and should we accept and support homosexuals or help them?
the first question is alrd done but the 2nd no
I didn't realize that you were talking about your class until a bit before you sent this message
I think homosexuality can be accepted
i was gonna join the conversation but this seems too controversial to be a part of
We should accept homosexuality
Isfrun XVII 'Protector of Science', 'Wrath of all Lizards'
and here we go again
They made me ambassador through an unilateral vote
Most here do, though I'm not sure about the other guy
What's wrong?
And I would really like to understand why
It must feel quite great to be a Finnish ambassador denouncing Russia every 5 days on Twitter
@obtuse perch Please spend your precious time explaining your way of seeing things to me
I'm pretty sure he started the debate
No, just the human ambassador of the reptiles, they have a rodent one too in southeast Asia
Sorry man @manic juniper blocked you. Their escape hatch.
Find someone else.
It must feel quite great to be the ambassador of the superior Aryan species and denounce humans every 5 days
We wuz aryan n shiett
Brb
(not serious)
Yeah !!! 😌
But the boy will have to be quick, I have to revise for my English test
Back
Might be because he is using sophisticated systems
Time to translate this
Aryan means slave in Finnish
It's simple to understand
Orja=slave
Orja used to mean Aryan
The superior Suomenusko species then
So much for the superior race if some reindeer herders used to call them slaves
I thought it was German
But why this? There were particular dominations or wars to obtain this meaning?
Maybe, but our written history only starts around the year 1100, when we lost our freedom
The Russians, Swedes, and every other entity that occupied the Finnish territories?
Reminds me a lot of this obscure country in the middle of nowhere, called "Armenia"
I usually speak German when I don't want to be understood, but this is not the case
Swedes are called Russians and Russians are just Slavs
It makes sense if you go back in time and realise why the Swedes took that name from us
Well, too bad Mr. Moderator will use a translator to find out what secrets you said in your German text. The case it may not be, but I truly have no idea of what it's saying, other than maybe a few words
The same Swedes that created Kyivan Rus' are the first Swedes we met, and Russia took its name from Rus'
Took what name from you?
Then I'll start einen Blitzkrieg on the moderators phone
It sounds more similar to Russia because the name comes from the Rus' people
It was all an elaborate plan from the very beginning to subjugate the Finnish tribes there
Did Armenia start writing so late as well?
@dapper laurel homosexuality is a disease that can be treated you can read what I said previously
For me, the most reasonable opinion is that we help people who have homosexual tendencies to become normal people, and as we see today, homosexuals are exposed to bullying and violence... and the most society does not accept them. We should also not forget the diseases that are common among homosexuals, whether psychological or physical, and also the people who regret their decisio to be gay and they wish there were people to stop them, even by force + Homosexuality is not something in human nature, so it goes against how he was created and goes against his nature
What did Armenians do the many centuries before that time? If I'm not mistaken they're one of the few people whose current name is still the same as the one that was being used in the past
Created? Lol
Humans weren't created
You must be a troll, it's the only answer
Unfortunately he isn't
Armenia started writing earlier, I believe. It unfortunately got the Poland treatment throughout history though
block= run=you dont have an answer=you indirectly admit that you are wrong
That's not an argument smhh
Another escape hatch?
They did what any other ancient kingdom was doing
So... The same thing as us which is... I have no idea
There would be a counter-answer, but I'm too tired
Being gay isn't a choice. Sexuality isn't something you can chose like you're choosing your character in games
The Poland treatment, as I call it.
I think he knows that, but he's still advocating for a cure lol
In fact, now I will start writing an essay to respond to the thesis of @obtuse perch
No matter how you think we came to this life, homosexuality is not a natural thing for humans
This sounds like trolling?
Yeah sure, coming from a creationist it must be true
Well, Genesis proves you wrong. Take that, scientists!
if im trolling it would be easy to show me im wrong right?
Yes, ENOMÖL's space duck created us
Heresy! We were created by onniscent lizards. I don't know who or what enomol is
give me a prove that being gay isn't a choice
yeah sexuality isn't something you can chose like you're choosing your character in games because you born a boy or a gurl thats it
Define natural, pls
So that's who Enomol is
@lavish moon come beat me
I think you're deaf to criticism, I already said it multiple times so I eventually got tired of it. But I honestly don't think you know what a scientific article looks like, or can distinguish them from a newspaper article, or a single statement from an ex president of an association. Plain and simple
You don't know the differences between sexuality and gender apparently
Is Enomol some duck who is treated as a god in Uralic culture?
After a while it gets boring because one has to repeat the same thing over and over, or it feels like arguing with someone that can't keep up or has good faith
islamophobic or not idc if they wanna talk about islam i can too
No, ENOMÖL is the Entity that created the duck, the duck was tasked with creating the universe and keep an eye on it
I know you're a strong individual 💪
I'm not in mood to fight
They got really creative with the genesis of humanity, didn't they? This level of creativity puts Greek mythology to shame
there is a creator makes more sense to me than an impossible chain of coincidences
Real men are not tired 😫
Idc if there is a creator or not, humans weren't created for sure lol
The space duck is the creator
Listen, not everyone in this world know 100% who they are, we find out a lot of things about ourselves, so when a person finds out their sexuality, they're just learning more about themselves
The world/universe is supposed to be the space duck's egg
Also, where are these pictures from? The duck is drawn fabulously
I think it's random Finnish, Swedish or Russian artists that did these pieces
This puts even Egyptian mthology to shame. Ben Ben is nothing compared to this
The one represented there isn't the duck from ENOMÖL's myth, but the diver myth is present in native American religions too, it's quite common
It is natural, for example, for a child to be born like this, and there are genes responsible for that, or for it to be necessary for him to perform a certain behavior in order to survive.
And the signature myth of Uralic people
OK gloves or no gloves
So it isn't natural to use Discord, since children aren't born with the need to use Discord
Well, if you ever find the source of the sacred piece of art that the duck is illustrated in, tell me
Shouldn't take long, I'll try rn
Bare hand bruh
Pull up!!
Humans consuming artificially created blue light on screens put close to their eyes is quite unnatural to be honest
#Abolishbluelight
Boy and girl are genders, gay is sexuality. These are different things
We must spread the message of the blue light filters
Let's start with the assumption that you are only speaking from personal experience, homosexuals are not discriminated against in most civilized countries. Furthermore, this vision that you are exposing is heavily influenced by your religious beliefs, you have probably never spoken to a homosexual, you don't know them, you only have a stereotyped image in your mind of homosexuals. Do you think they are mentally ill? I don't think it's a coherent thought after all. I assume you are a religious person, but isn't it a duty of religious people (at least in Christianity as far as I know) to accept everyone? What does your faith say about this, shouldn't they be accepted? At this moment you are denying the real existence of homosexuality, you only think that it is a mental illness, but in reality this trait occurs in all forms of life equipped with a complex intelligence. So why say this? Furthermore, homosexuality has always existed throughout history and has never led to any harm. Furthermore, I think you are also a coward, because if you found yourself in front of a homosexual you wouldn't say things like that if you have a minimum of sensitivity. Trying to apply useless measures, like trying to cure gays, is not useful to society, there would only be more problems, society would be unstable, there would be more taxes to pay for maintenance of certain infrastructure.
Imagine if everybody used Chatgpt.
💀
https://commons.m.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Jumo_den_Jyn_04.jpg#mw-jump-to-license
Some Russian did it
You can check my text on internet, it's not ChatGPT
Why do you have so little faith in mankind?
They are Kugu Jumo and Kijamat, the earth-diver myth often features two birds (one good, one evil)
Of course some Russian did it. That must mean that the Rus are a part of the Uralic Resistance Movement against the tyrannical lizards
I should write some lore one day about this whole combined universe of gods and prophets everywhere
Some Russians are nerds about their own minorities
I can understand them because I'm also interested in Sámi culture
Nothing wrong, chill
I think everyone should be using it as it levels the ground
As in a fully egalitarian society
AI will solve the intelligence disparity
The one who said that was the same one who removed homosexuality from the list of mental illnesses, and that was after 40 years. That is, after forty years, his human conscience was awakened and he decided to tell the truth to the people, and that 20% of those who were receiving treatment had already been treated. If you choose to be stupid, it is not my problem. My question is, is it proven that homosexuality is not a mental illness before removing homosexuality from the list of mental illnesses?
Ah, yes, the Far-Eastern, Southern Part of the Yolga river, Mixed Chinese (Manchu dialect) with Ukrainian speaking people called the Ostropharis
You said that the scientists did that, now you proceed to say ONE psychologist did... Interesting
I don't need it, I find it rather degrading to be replaced by an AI in these cases
In which part does this Sami culture lie in Scandinivia?
The only sexual activity that I know that nature created us for is between a man and a woman
Then you're a patriarchist
Northern Fennoscandia and Kola peninsula in Russia
Nature isn't an entity that creates animals, that's absurd
I'm afraid I don't recognize these places. Perhaps you could loosely point it out?
Maybe it could be, who knows 👽
Northern Finland, northern Norway, northern Sweden, the peninsula in northwestern Russia with the borehole
we alrd talked abt that yesterday car glasses remember?
if you dont ill remind you In short,
the things created by humans, humans are the ones who control its laws
Finnmark, the Paradox games make me recall
Do you play Hoi4?
I believe it's close to Finnmark actually
nature created us to look for the ohter gander anything against this its against the nature
I used to, but don't anymore, because the game turned my laptop into an egg fryer. Also, I'm trying to quit gaming, and my 200+ hours on EU4, or the ones on CK2, or literally any other game are not helping
This afternoon, on the other hand, I conquered the world with Germany
That is an easy task in HOI4, as Germany gets a copious amounts of buffs, because the AI is too stupid to play intelligently
I now wish to forget gaming, as I'm trying to quit it, and surprisingly, any mention of it does not help my endeavour
You're young, enjoy some fun
It is Finnmark, it's named after them
Finnar is a pejorative that referred to them and Finns
That's stupid, then you also think sexualities like furrysexual are valid?
https://gender.fandom.com/wiki/Apegender
Just say that you support this
1rst of all its not "personal experience" it is research
2nd even in civilized countries, they are exposed to bad things, but to a lesser extent, because there are laws that protect them. However, they are exposed to racism bully..ect Also, the gay man decided to go outside his country, as his destinations are limited because the most countries in the world are conservative countries and do not accept these behaviors. and you can imagine the things they might be exposed to
3rd I did not mention religion at any point when talking about homosexuals. I am talking to you an atheist.
4th I talked to a lot of gay people, some of them blocked me, some of them did not accept what I said. We no longer talk, some of them are on my friends list, and we still talk till this day yes, they are truly wonderful people, but I feel pity for them and want to help them, and this not bothers them , we even play valorant together and we also discuss this topic.
4thYou said that homosexuality has been around since ancient times, and this is true. Now, do you want to know how they punished the homosexual in that time?
5th my religion position in this: I accept every person who is his nature (You are the one who mentions religion now, not me)
6thJustifying actions by saying it was in the past is ridiculous. murdering was also in the past. So, if I killed someone, would that be my justification?
7th 20% of the people who were receiving treatment have already been treated. did you even read what I mentioned to you?
8th You did not criticize any of the words I said, you are just now criticizing my personality and thinking without giving evidence come on you are better than that
the scientists did that but only one but only one person said that, and he is the old president of APA after 40 yrs
You changed your affirmation once more, now what am I supposed to believe?
I ignored you when you said that it is not necessary to have a creator and that the space duck is the creator, but now I ask you to explain your point of view to me
Do you think there is a creator?
Or did we come from space (nature)
I already stated that (in my opinion) the space duck is the creator
Did we create animals? LMAO
Yes, I guess you aren't familiar with dogs, housecats, cows, domestic pigeons, domestic hamsters, lab rats
I am seeking support from individuals located in the US, UK, Argentina, Mexico, Puerto Rico, Australia, and New Zealand.
This task will take approximately 20 minutes, and I am willing to pay $30 for it.
This is not a technical task.
If our collaboration proves successful, I can offer additional work opportunities that could provide a stable monthly income.
Brother, maybe they can be discriminated against primarily because they are a minority, nom because they are homosexuals, that would be the point. Furthermore, in many ancient societies, as I have explained to you, homosexuality was tolerated, just take the Roman-Hellenic society as an example.Saying that homosexuals must be helped is in itself a ridiculous statement, in fact an efficient society would tolerate them, without making unnecessary fuss. Then the example you gave: "killing also happened in the past" or something like that, is not very fitting, you can't compare homosexuality to a crime. Plus I mentioned religion because I bet you are a religious person, and so I wanted to make you think about the values of religion itself. Last of all, could you mention the research you were alluding to?
I didn't change anything. I just explained to you what happened. If you don't understand, do you think that the only one who works in APA is the president???? and ofc not all of them can talk if one talks thats enough
Why does this guy reply two or three messages late
If Internet Explorer was a person
Maybe it's the time zone
🤣
So I'm the problem, I'm messaging from the future
Or is he the one messaging from the past?
If you're reading this, you will die in a hour. Avoid the yellow light if you want to stay alive
did we create "dogs, housecats, cows, domestic pigeons, domestic hamsters, lab rats" NO im talking about the things Which did not exist and we created it, such as the Internet, for example. Is it nature that will set the laws for using the Internet? or humans?
.
Lol as if housecats, dogs and others existed in nature
Do you believe that there was an hairless cat in the wild?
ok the duck space is the creator any prove pls?
My ancestors said this, that's the proof
Guns don't exist in nature, so (according to you) I can make laws on how to use my Glock 19X
It's dog space though
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
That's not sexual activity dude, you're talking about biological genders here. Please, go study the differences
Ayoo
Yes, this is the result of human selection
Biological genders are a spectrum though
1960: Sex and Gender means the same, and there are two.
2000: Sex is two, gender is a spectrum.
2024: Sex, and gender are a spectrum
Get updated oldies
😎
?
blud really said " ? "
¿
⸮
What the-
I identify as hollow/purple
Ikik jaw dropping
I'm just following the science 💅✨
The definitions have changed
Ok how do I explain this without being called homophobic
Yep !!
In science they obviously have different definitions
But on something as constructive as gender, do you not think that "following the science" is leaning on scientism? idk
I will use the correct usage of gender when necessary, but to me (and to many other ppl) it is still synonymous with the other word
Well if you believe it stops at two, then that is narrow mindedness and bigotry
This topic is one of the few that i agree
I have a very narrow mind in
But regardless you should respect everyone no matter who they are
Basically, Ill use the definitions correctly; however, i disagree with them
I feel like bc of how sensitive this topic is it's hard to express any form of negation or disagreement without being called homphobic 😭 (any form of opposition or questioning of this movement)
This is so sad. Literally means being stuck in the 1960s, and following the science and norms of that time.
I believe open dialogue is important for something like this and ppl who may be opposed to this or policy implementations bc off this movement (not homophobic per se), should be important
The fact is that science evolves through rigorous research and new data.
that's true
ok
Consider other movements
E.g. Black Lives Matter, Pro-Palestinian/Israeli, etc.
There are critics and ppl who may disagree with parts of these movements, or like if they want open dialogue, it's much easier
Than say questioning the LGBTQ+ movement
In school we were discussing important civic issues and it was stated multiple times that "oh you can have whatever political view"
What's your position currently, victorian monarchism?
Im trying to be serious yk
You're epitomising what Im basically saying. Trying to have open, peaceful dialogue (im rlly not trying to be mean and im srry if i was),
yeah listening !!
Rather than saying dumb things
But for the LGBTQ+ it wasn't quite so; you had to accept it and whatever policies that came through it
Whereas we analysed other movements: blm, israel-hamas, etc. and looked at them thoroughly
I like this is so cool. The instructor wants the students to be flexible.
There was no such thing for the LGBTQ+ movement (even if it's scientifically supported, it's still a big social part that shakes the world whether for good or bad, and its bigger than either of those)
Yes!! He did try, but on few things, like the LGBTQ+, we couldnt
Bc if you had any sort of opposition ("oh, maybe we should rethink this LGBTQ policy?") you'd get in trouble
Opposition (not hate) is important, and without this open dialogue, you aren't going to get as good policies
And ofc there's homophobic ppl who are completely opposed to it and that I think is wrong but for the many ppl who instead just think that "yk, some parts of this movement has its flaws" or "this policy is stupid and could be changed"
This dialogue doesn't exist in school and it is most unfortunate
But like im not a political scientist or anything this is just my opinion and experience from school atm
It seems like you have an issue with dogma, in this case, questioning diverse genders, and the policies enacted to protect their well being
exactly
indoctrinating dogmatism concerning LGBTQ+
Alr
regardless
the lgbtq+ area is one of the few that i'm pretty right on
Everything else im either centre or centre-left
Are you the person from Canada? Maybe we talked before
Yes!!
Ty for understanding that im not trying to be mean or anything
Just my views and you can be opposed to them ofc
What happened to Angela Merkel??
Had her for too long 😭
You think I'm gay?
idk
Yeah, I'm gay, and quite offended rn
I see
I am sorry if it offended you but that wasnt my intention
Jk bro
Bruhh 😭
I identify as a space alien cause I don't belong to this world 👽
What's up hate speech laws in Canada
Trudeau will monitor your talks online
Idk
they need to change the constitution
LoL
Trudeau is above the constitution
Be careful and don't talk bad about him cause I don't want to see you in prison
u can talk bad about him
ive literally seen f trudeau signs
And ive heard ppl say it too
I am concerned about your future
DONT
I already haveee
💀
He only won bc he appealed to young ppl and certain groups (lgbtq, Indigenous, some middle-aged, etc.) & he was the son of a fmr. prime minister
Actually his father was the one who repatriated the constitution from the uk and established the constitution act, 1982 & made the charter of rights and freedoms
There's no limit for winning. He's on a marathon. Looking like a dictator to me.
He's slowly catching up to Putin and Xi
Your pfp is his mom or what
😭 WHAT-
It is!! 💃
Is a dictator has a bad definition? because those leaders, who you consider dictators, I do not consider them bad.
Oh muh goshhh!
Trudeau must be seething.
Only he be the role model for you!!
Dictators are bad
They get things done much faster but they are in the end, bad
Good. They are good in what way?
Speed
Good in being leader
queen elizabeth ii is but trudeau um what
A dictator isnt a leader they're a dictator
So they aren't a dictator
As a man, look up to Trudeau
Who
As a girl, look up to elizabeth ii!!
She's dead so !!
Trudeau is a girl for some people rigghhtt
then look down
okie
Mhm..?
yooooo
I mean, some folks on the conservative side genuinely think that, like an effeminate person
But the rules he makes are authoritarian big protective mother
She's apparently a role model for some people
Yes she is
Wdym apparently 😭
her photogenicness is facts though
Who knows
i like queen elizabeth ii but there's not like any 1 person that i always look up to
thats disrespectful
ou eu ?
you*
Canada!!
nah all cool 🙂
how deeps the snow dude
Hate the system, not the player
Hate discord
big j
How did you end up conservative?
biden my role model true
nah dude trump
he's kind, compassionate, full of empathy
my role model hit ler
same
el bidens like a chimpanzee trumps a lion
go off
u say this for the mustache loser
the only reason too hate him is
no fed posting !!
that he removed juices from country
I’m not conservative
I’m a centrist/central left
LGBTQ and furries/stuff like that is the only thing I can think of that I’m right-wing on
well the left would categorize u in that box bc of your deeply questioning attitute
with regards to diverse genders
They would if they only heard of my lgbtq opinion
Questioning is important regardless of where you fit in the spectrum
remember there is no nuance in the political world, its pure tribalism
black and white scenario
not really
ur constitution suck tbh
You’re trolling me rn 😭
why does it suck?
contrast with the american one
not asking that, I’m asking y does it sick
2a for example, right to bear arms
Is a good constitution an American one and therefore ours doesn’t epitomise it it’s bad?
With glowing hearts we see thee rise
So because it doesn’t have this it’s bad?
The True North strong and free
no, it can easily fall under dictatorship imo
From far and wide
From far and wide, O Canada we stand in guard for thee
💀 explain
God keep our land, glorious and free
O Canada, we stand on guard for thee
O Canada, we stand on guard for thee
u cant own guns in canada right, they are even banning knive LoL slippery slopes all around

You can own guns and stuff but there’s restrictions (most countries around the world have gun restrictions too)
all dictatorships unarm the people before they do ridulous genocidal events
name me one who hasnt
You focus on this one point but how exactly would that make it susceptible to a dictatorship
before they do ridiculous genocidal events, that doesn’t mention how a dictatorship came to be
Hate capitalism
I have to shower so I probably shouldn’t be debating rn
ur uisng a capitalist app
The us and Canadian constitution have a lot of parallels btw
an app made by a worker
Where’s the French 💅🏻
i dont need to xplain, ask hitler, stalin, mao, etc.,
based
Not explaining weakens ur argument
oh my goshhh so privileged
jkjk
And you didn’t get the point of it
Ô Canada!
Terre de nos aïeux,
Ton front est ceint de fleurons glorieux!
Car ton bras sait porter l'épée,
Il sait porter la croix!
Ton histoire est une épopée
Des plus brillants exploits.
Et ta valeur, de foi trempée,
Protégera nos foyers et nos droits.
Protégera nos foyers et nos droits.
And the bilingual version 💅🏻💅🏻
Oops
O Canada! Our home and native land!
True patriot love in all of us command,
Car ton bras sait porter l'épée,
Il sait porter la croix!
Ton histoire est une épopée
Des plus brillants exploits,
God keep our land glorious and free!
O Canada, we stand on guard for thee.
O Canada, we stand on guard for thee.
It is better to shower than to debate 💃
- Anonymous
allah im doing ur hw
consequences for being stuck in the 1960s
As of May 1, 2020, the Canadian government has banned over 1,500 models of assault-style firearms, including the upper receivers of M16, AR-10, AR-15, and M4 patterns. In May 2022, Prime Minister Justin Trudeau announced new legislation that would ban the ownership of "military-style assault weapons" and restrict the sale, purchase, importation, or transfer of handguns
there is no 2a he can do whatever the sheet he wants
attack on free speech and fundamental liberties by a bad actor, then it leads to a dictatorship gadually
Those are restrictions which I said and i feel like the numbers kind of inflate them "1500 models of assault-style firearms" (yk, the ones that shoot a billion bullets)
Oh ofc, it's very sad. canada is lucky to be a sovereign of human rights and liberties
trudeau is emboldened cause he is phasing out arms slowly, at the same time he introducing hate speech laws to stop criticising him and his cabinet's agenda
you are all doomed LoL
all this is possible bc there is no specific constitutional protection for gun ownership or the right to bear arms in Canada
May I ask how "all this is possible bc there is no specific constitutional protection for gun ownership or the right to bear arms in Canada", how specifically would guns create this slippery slope phenemenon? it is not visible
Online Harms Bill C-63, which will give police the power to retroactively search the Internet for 'hate speech' violations and arrest offenders, even if the offence occurred before the law existed,"
fact check me on this !!
Hate speech laws existed long before trudeau & also you exemplify what a healthy democracy is,
that is,
For trudeau, the person who was one respected in 2015, to be greatly criticised and hated (and for government information to come out so fast) wouldn't happen in a dictatorship or a country turning into a dicatorship
let alone, when his opposition (who openly criticises him is and is more popular to the canadian public) is more likely to win the next election
would u be satisfied if Putin decides what hate speech? who decides this hate speech
where is that from btw
it's subjective and arbitrary
Honestly I’m just waiting for the next election
At this point, I’m done with Trudeau
hate speech is subjective, but the criminal code i believe has definitions
in one case of antisemitism the supreme court also defined hate speech (i can find it for u if u want) when the man argued that it was his liberty to freely express themselves
Your hate for trudeau--the canadian public's hate for trudeau--epitomises what a good democracy is
The People are the ones who decide
before you talk about sujectivity and arbitrariness (we have the supreme court for laws like that, and ours is a judicial titan compared to the united states' ones, imo), where is ur source
okay u changed ur tone bc it seems ull go to prison
I'm noticing lmao !!
ok now you're trying to attack me rather than my arguments
That bill does nothing 😂
Let's focus on the debate
I’ve been reported a lot for just saying “I hate you” online
Government Bill (House of Commons) C-63 (44-1) - First Reading - An Act to enact the Online Harms Act, to amend the Criminal Code, the Canadian Human Rights Act and An Act respecting the mandatory reporting of Internet child pornography by persons who provide an Internet service and to make consequential and related amendments to other Acts - Pa...
I even had the police come to my house over it
But they did nothing
They laughed it off 😂
Where does it say "Online Harms Bill C-63, which will give police the power to retroactively search the Internet for 'hate speech' violations and arrest offenders, even if the offence occurred before the law existed," (this itself is literally an interpretation of the bill rather than the bill itself)
where in here does it say "Online Harms Bill C-63, which will give police the power to retroactively search the Internet for 'hate speech' violations and arrest offenders, even if the offence occurred before the law existed," and where can u interpret it from
Loll
that ain't the whole bill. screenshot the 1% and claim it's the bill
i sent the link to it
And btw that's the parliamentary summary of the bill
But answer this please: find where it says what u said (or where you get that interpretation from) and the source to your original comment
Lol also this part is completely wrong i believe
"even if the offence occurred before the law existed,"" clear violation of the charter of rights and freedoms or the criminal code:
cap
u pissed in ur pants, and fell unconscious
true story
https://www.justice.gc.ca/eng/csj-sjc/rfc-dlc/ccrf-ccdl/check/art11g.html, here the supreme court writes: "Any person charged with an offence has the right:
not to be found guilty on account of any act or omission unless, at the time of the act or omission, it constituted an offence under Canadian or international law or was criminal according to the general principles of law recognized by the community of nations
I swear bro 😂
Particularly, "not to be found guilty on account of any act or omission unless, at the time of the act or omission, it constituted an offence under Canadian or international law"
Why would I lie about something that ridiculous?
So the latter part of your claim was completely wrong
Astaghfiruallah
Other examples, including in ur own country, exists similarly these protections
Article 9 of the American Convention on Human Rights; article 7(1) of the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms; and article 1, sections 9 and 10 of the Constitution of the United States of America
SCHTRANER
You're the university student omg, am i not right?
irritated
Yes
can u verify this
My wife wrote to all Canadian MP's about our opposition to the Online Harms Bill C-63. MP Rachael Thomas of Lethbridge is the only one who wrote back ... It is the best written summary of issues I have seen yet. Long, but here it is...
"Thank you for writing to me regarding…
can you asnwer my questions first
y r u using twitter as ur source bruh 😭
yeah Twitter is where the government officials are on
straight from the horses mouth
Can you answer my questions please
^ these
Yea but r u gonna use an MP (a conservative one at that, already bias) to interpret BILL C-63
Who probably wants to push their political agenda (and the person posting it), or someone more credible and impartial
The bill hasn't even passed it's second reading too
it has 7 more steps to go through: Second reading
Consideration in committee
Report stage
Third reading
Senate (first reading, second reading, third reading)
sis slow down
we are not in a hurry !!
But I am
This is the great thing about democracy, yk,
Even if BILL C-63 restricts freedom of expression [speech] (which if it does,s constitutes a violation of the constitution and the supreme court would overrule it, as it has done before in the past), the polls show that pierre poilievre (the opposition) is in the lead
So in the next election he could just reverse it!!
Much slower than a dictatorship, ofc, but much better long-term
I will agree w/ you in one sense though: bill c-63 is too broad,
It's not even law too and i bet the election is gonna happen before it's ratified (and he probably wont win the next one) and then ofc again, there's the supreme court
And the house of commons itself is a check of power
so you're telling me you read the 1000+ pages length bill in a few minutes?
no
i just read the top bits
u dont need to read the whole thing to figure out what i said anyways
yeah yeahh
But I am still waiting for my answers
they'll sneak in their BS in pages 1092
find it
but let's judge the book by it's cover
there's a summary at the top
legal bills are not like books btw
ok just making the analogy to understand
poor use of an analogy
ok let's not have a "meta conversation "
Please answer my questions omg
okay so
this is where I found that wording
Tesla CEO Elon Musk weighed in on a debate over Canada's proposed hate speech law, the Online Harms Bill. Musk expressed concern over the legislation's implications, prompting a fact-check request. The bill, aimed at curbing hate speech online, introduces a digital safety regulator and penalties for offenders, eliciting criticism for potential c...
^ and the source to ur original comment
it's in the article bro check it out
nobody gets hurt
Lol this is funny
ikik we the people do the fact checking
so far nothing wrong has been said
huh?
it hasn't been fact checked as false !!
and the other way around too
okay it's neutral then??
nobody wins
I'm okay with that final verdict
I'm not a Canadian anyways
Omg this is so funny
Ok honestly it shouldnt be about whether we win or not
We both learnt something
fun funn funny funny
we learnt what exactly!??
yeah don't mess with big daddy trudeau
I actually didnt originally know that the constitution prevented retroactive law punishment
Or that there are many other examples (like here!)
Or the broadness of Bill C-63
he's going to lose the next election
would u like be a law student? u seem that type
in ur dreams
The polls seem to be in his favour, and the canadian public just has that attitude
he's gonna win, big y'all haters cry a river
I dislike trudeau i dont hate him
But yea he's not winning
which poll !!
ironically, if you use statistics similarly in the U.S., it looks like trump is winning
but biden will probably win
poll can be wrong sometimes
you know this right !!
biden already won
he's exploding in the polls
Oh oops let me find it
yes, they're a lot more hectic but trudeau still seems much more unlikely
oh u actually did good work digging
ive cited before & now when u asked
okokok
importance of looking at data and statistics before coming to a hypothesis and digging for conclusions after fr
what is this poll? is this recognize, not a fringe one?
global news (a news organisation, and it's just reporting statistics) and abacusdata which is like a think tank
and btw just search up "polls trudeau vs polievere"
jagdeep singh ❤️
oh the ndp person
Do you have think Trudeau could win this year?
I'll grant this is valid, would u want polievere to win
he's a threat to democracy right more than trudeau
he's like a controlled opposition
idc
im not even old enough to vote
I see
I'm asking you
No he's not winning the next election
Good since Canada does need change tbh
kkkkkkk
that sucks

