#🧠|serious-chat
1 messages · Page 160 of 1
I just dropped a bomb 🔥
Say the corrections after reading everything, please
I have read everything else, you called those dialects lol
They are not dialects for sure
I humbly apologize, in my language the word dialect also means language, it was my mistake
You think Italy is more diverse than Russia?
No I don't think so, even if you just include European Russia they might be more or less on par by then
But if you include all of Russia there are just too many people that don't even share language families or continent
Indo-European, Uralic, Turkic, Mongolic, Tungusic
And Caucasians
(I'd never think that tho)
Who would ever think that
Some stupid person
I spoke to people that do in fact think that
Were they Russian?
Italian
I'm new to this kind of discussion tho, I got into this one year ago
Papuans too have at least two different origins, one is much older than the other so idk
Italy may be different, but there are Russians who resemble Chinese. Russia is much more diverse than Italy
I don't know if it's possible to calculate that reliably, it's possible that many people changed a lot culturally but very little generically. Like Spaniards and Portuguese, they have Celtic origins but their languages obviously aren't
Portuguese have changed quite a lot during the Arab conquest, they also absorbed aspects and words from African languages, although Ancient Portuguese are of Celtic ancestry.
The Spanish Language have 4000 words with Arab origins
If you are referring to after the fall of the Roman Empire, I think the language remained close to Latin only because the Visigoths used a different code of laws and they gradually integrated after years. They never tried to assimilate the Spanish I think
I mean Portuguese as people.
But the language too
I thought the Mozarabians were very few and just in positions of power
This certainly also influenced their genetics, Andalusia is very different from the Basque countries for example
No I'm not saying that, just that their languages changed unlike their genetics, they'd be closer to Italians if they did consistently
And Romanians too
They are various Balkan and Central European but the language is romance
Portuguese people are even called Moortuguese by some people, we Brazilians have that DNA. The Arab influencia in Iberian Peninsula lasted for more than 600 years until they got completely expelled
Lol moortuguese
This made me laugh
Does this man look more Arab or European?
I mean we also had Swedes for 600 years, yet we are not similar besides few of us
He looks Berber
They were few and only in positions of power, the only Swedes that left a footprint in the genome lived in Uusimaa and coastal Ostrobothnia
Or "mourugues" in our language.
Northern Spain remained German as the Visigoths kept their rule on that place
Right he has that DNA
But where does he come from?
Or hair colour
I saw that some Sweds live in Estonia and that makes that a bit Nordic, do you agree? Also Estonia were part of the Viking Kingdom
Nordic is just a socioeconomic thing, any country could be Nordic
He is called Abel Ferreira, a football coach. Now he is in Brazil,
Our country is Nordic but isn't closely related in language and culture to the other 4
Yeah, Estonia isn't Nordic due to various reasons, one of them is USSR, it lasted too long for them to be indepedent
Estonia was under Danish occupation similarly to us under Sweden
they were similarly rich to us once, and had more potential
Ancient Finnish are rather Asians,,
It depends on whether you mean Nordic as a geographical term or as an ethnic term
There isn't an ethnic Nordic
However, there are Germanic populations typical of the northern regions
Those are North Germanic or Norse, not Nordic
Nordic is just a term for our welfare and economic system
Poland could become Nordic tomorrow
Why do you mean Nordic as a socioeconomic term, isn't that just a stereotype?
Because that's what Nordic is
Tell me what's Nordic about the myth of the duck sent by the sky god to create the universe after laying an egg
I found this
Yes, those people are part of the system, someone with citizenship is also Nordic even if their parents are from Africa
But it's not an ethnicity, it's just tied to your nationality and to politics
I have 0 things in common with someone from Greenland or a guy from Reykjavik
Scandinavia is more of a Geographic term, isn't it
I wouldn't include Estonia, I would include Greenland because it's part of the kingdom of Denmark
Both are, but one is historical and the other is just political
@manic juniper are u graduating on history or antropology by any chance?
What are u graduated in?
The same thing but I only have a master
Nice to hear
Hello any English fluent individuals in here?
Yes!!
✅
Yes
Well that’s just a piece of land which fulfilled by ice
But why didn’t Denmark sell this land to the United States ?
or they just capture it
Why would they sell it
Why didn’t they using force to occupy it I heard a lot of times that US wanted this land
or just buy it during the WW2 just like the destroyer trade with the British Empire
If they do that then the entire EU would oppose it and not be an ally anymore
Denmark is one of the most respected countries in the EU even if small
Well yes if now they claim it but why didn’t they claim it in before ?
In the year that everything can change, like WW2
if such a thing were to happen canada would be expected to take it
and this would further increase tensions with the soviets at the time
Canada and the British Empire were on the way
its like the issue of ukraine's joining to nato right now
it doesnt seem like its gonna happen
According to Russia, that would be a nuclear war if Ukraine joins nato
yea
He's only 17 and won the candidates in other words he's the challanger for world championship
Yes, I am
Woah
Let's see if he's got the balls to back up all the hype
Has he ever touched grass?
The equevelant of grass for him are Chess pieces
Wow
@quick plover hello
howdy.
Hi
How about no trolling
hi
Afghan Jalebi mashooq farebi
Ghayal hai tera deewana

Nehi nehi Im not down
I saw this guy here yesterday
@fast sleet basically St. Louis is controlled by democrats but the state is not
Oh, I see
I can't say that I know how it is yo be like that
But I can say that I know what is to have a robber as you country president @mortal junco
Vargas take this gun off your hand
Shesh, I forgot to lock my room
yes ma'am
DONALD TRUMP!
TRUMP WILL BE BACK AND SAVE AMERICA
this is why first-past-the-post is silly
Hmm are you sure?
Anyone here is software engineer?
We all love the mother of god 
Which god?
Jesus Christ
The only God
His mother's name was maria?
Heard it for the first time
Idk about all this, i just like the name
Maria ❤️❤️
In English it's Mary
In Spanish and Portuguese it's Maria
That happens because we must translate royal / religious names
That's one of the most common names in Latin America
I really need a female friend with this name
Cause i love this name
Wbu
Where are you from
"friend" we won't judge you bru
Start learning any Latin language and go on those servers
I ain't interested in learning languages
I can only speak 3 languages hindi, english and, punjabi
You said you wanted to talk to me
Citation needed [Wikipedia]
Heey guys
Truths don't need citations
Yes they do need them. In science, everything has a citation, at least everything that isn't theoretical
Science is gay
the best argument I see in all my life
No, it's not. Perhaps you lack evidence to prove against it, and that's why all you could mutter was an absolutely untrue statement. @formal pilot, add this guy to The List.
You could have decided to reply with a reasonable message, but it seems as if you don't have one, and therefore can only send images depicting yourself.
I wish
same
Aristotle once said that everything that moves gets its energy from anything. A car needs a creator and a driver to set it up and move.
Plato says that for every creation needs a perfect form to be serve as model (and that form can never be reached). Think of a table. It needs a craftsman to make it and set it up. In the ideal world, this table has an image in which the craftsman had to use as a model. But that table doesn't depict the table that the craftsman thought of. And so does humanity; God is the perfect form, everything was creted as an attempt to depict what is perfect, but it was never reached; God is the perfect form; we are so small to understand him thoroughly
That first sentence of yours seems to be incorrectly formed, though that matters not. There is no concrete evidence of God's existance.
It was, I'm on a hurry so I could not properly write that.
What was? The sentence? It wasn't, you edited it to be so just recently, that however does not address my other statement.
Yes the sentence, I corrected that.
Define "concrete"
You did. I'm not really gonna define it, but say more so that there is no actual way of telling that God exists, as he himself is super natural (if he exists), is he not?
Anyway, I must go now
I will use Plato again: we live in the sensitive world. That world that we can feel and understand is too little to God's world. God's nature is not our nature.
It's impossible to tell that God exists only by using our senses; God is too big to be understood on our nature. The only way to understand God is by elevating our souls to God's and studying him. We are too ignorant to even think of how God really are
Back once again, but not for long.
That still does not give me evidence of God's existance.
Who's Muslim here?
Me 😶👋🏻
At your service. 👋
Consider referring to the argument from necessity that I've presented once: #🧠|serious-chat message
Alhamdulillah. We as Muslims are very consistent in our belief, and we have evidence for our claims that are sufficient for any truth seeker.
I'm tired and It is 23:05 for me currently, so I may misunderstand this. While I have thought about that arguement myself, all of the things that apply to what you said also apply to God as he too would need a cause to exist. But that, even if true, I am not quite sure if I can consider it sufficient enough to prove his existance.
Would you become a theist if I prove God's existence?
I remember you asking that to somebody else as well, but, that shall remain a topic for tomorrow as it is currently too late for me to make any arguements that are solid enough.
Yes, I asked @ Kohelet before responding to his misconceptions. Since you saw it then you know it would be pointless to prove his existence if the other party is not actually listening or is not open-minded.
Anyways (this is a slang for "anyway", because I remember you commenting on that 😆), have some rest my friend. We can definitely discuss it tomorrow or any time you want.
Well, if the evidence was concrete enough, others could believe it, or it could make for an interesting debate. Anyway, I shall indeed have some rest, as I did not sleep well yesterday at all which makes the current situation at hand even more fatiguing. Cya, until tomorrow.
I respect your point of view, bro. I'm not here to convince you, this debate is too complex and a conclusion can't be reached
Guys
I wanna talk about ISIS
Anyone interested?
Nice topic. I
I will lurk, I haven't studies that tho
Let's talk today over vc
I meant tomorrow
Will talk about it in depth
I'm not defending anyone but
Why would it be needing to 'start' falling? Maybe there is no 'start' of falling, but a continuous thing.
Because each domino piece is dependent on the one preceding it.
This is called the causal chain of events, or causality for short.
Casual chain of events, doesn't require a starting point
you are describing random processes
in this category this possibility is allowed
Why does the domino fall? Because it is pulled by gravity
What happens when the gravity dissappears?
The Universe could just be a constant motion
Sometimes, it makes no sense to think there would be any starting point
@static pivot sup. I saw your statements, could you substantiate them?
This is a serious chat, right?
Where is the starting point?
What statement
denial of the existence of accomplished.
Which statement is that
Why is the possibility of their existence not allowed?
Kindly show me
ok
.
I will not prove this from a religious point of view.
Let's try a different method
. But what is your maxim based on?
What are you guys talking about
sup. of course
🎭
😂😂.
🫠🫠
@craggy sphinx I'll respond in private mate. This server is becoming increasingly annoying.
as you wish
send 2 separate messages
Maybe that would work
Casual chain of events, doesn't require a starting point
The domino piece representing the creation of our known universe require the one preceding it to fall in order for it to fall. Regress back to infinity and you'll discover that none of them would ever fall. So a chain of dependent events requiring a non-dependent cause to initiate it.
you are describing random processes
I believe you're confused. There is nothing in my statement imply or indicating any random processes.
in this category this possibility is allowed
I'm not sure I follow here.
Why does the domino fall? Because it is pulled by gravity
This is called hypothetical. Basically the usage of known examples to illustrate an idea or a concept.
The Universe could just be a constant motion
Ah, Zeno's paradoxes again. 😆
Sometimes, it makes no sense to think there would be any starting point
I agree. Not in our case though.
Indeed worked.
😏
@craggy sphinx
Then how do they began. Even if things seem to just keep happening without a clear beginning, like dominoes falling because of gravity, there are often other reasons or events that set everything in motion. For example, even in a constantly moving universe, there might have been a specific event, like the Big Bang, that started it all. So, even when it feels like there's no starting point, there usually is one if we look closely enough.
quite similar
Why prophet married a 9 yo
And why he had sexual intercourse with her
@lyric karma @thorny steeple
What is the right age for marriage?
wtf, what kind of answer is this, disgusting
I can assure you 9 isn't
It's clearly a question. I'm not sure where do you get that idea that it's an answer.
Right age is when she's an adult
That's not the answer to my question.
I already did
I'm asking for a number.
9? 🤔
i meant "response"
No, according to Islam 9 is not the age for marriage. 😂
We have a completely different criteria.
But you prophet marriage when she was 9
And had sexual intercourse with her
Hadith says she used to wash semen from prophets clothes
What else do you need man
Prophet offered nawaj in clothes covered with semen
Well okay
Slimani is the greatest of all times
Because there is no specific age for marriage in Islam. It doesn't make any sense given that different cultures had different specifications for the age of marriage. It has not been so long when the age of consent in Britain was about 13 years old.
Our criteria would be the age of puberty in a nutshell. Once an individual is pubescent, and is mentally and physically (sometimes also financially) capable for marriage, he/she can marry.
Talk about your Religion
So islam says have sex with 9 year olds?
This sounds like pedophilia to me
And if islam says there's no marriage age,islam is wrong.
And you shouldn't blindly follow it
No it doesn't. Islam provides a different criteria than "The age of consent" which you're forcibly attempting to impose on Muslims.
Your prophet had sex with 9 yo
I'm not saying anything , Quran is saying everything
I posted Hadith proof
most of the hadiths are nonsense, but the discussion should not have turned to the age of consent, if the claim is false, falsification should have been made, thats all
Muhammad offered prayers in clothes covered in semen
So hadiths are fake?
hadiths are not quran tho
That's your claim.?
This statement might be regarded as an insult for over 2 billion Muslims. Insinuating that we are following a pedophile prophet is not a good way to discuss with a Muslim.
Okay again Quran says prophet married and had sex with her when she was 9
Shut up
I'm just saying what Quran said
What??
You don't have answers so I'm insulting you lol
Ffs
Just one question
Was prophet right to have sex with a 9 yo girl?
Just yes or no, answer me this.
kinda foolish
My question for everyone
Have a look at the rules of the server mate. If you're unable to maintain an intellectual discussion before becoming overly emotional, triggered or disrespectful, don't initiate one.
What the fish are y'all on about
shouldn’t be hard to follow
How many times will y'all debate this 💀
as long as it exists
Dang
I know
Let's talk about something more serious
Who's that?
yeh the chaos
For humanity's sake
Love it
This is called the loaded question fallacy. It's carried out with the presumption that marrying as a "9 year old" individual is objectively wrong. Which would be completely false. So I don't have to answer this question which is aimed to portray me or my religion in a bad image.
Why did father do that??
I am not a Christian but go on lol
CHAT WHAT'S THE BEST FLAVOR OF ICE CREAM?
vanilla
MilkShake
My g
Marrying a 9 yo is wrong.
it’s not a flavour
THAT'S NOT A FLAVOR
I'M IN THE RIGHT PLACE
IT'S A SERIOUS QUESTION
Myy G
Ayo waddafak
~topic
What story you’ve heard has stayed with you and always disturbs you every time you think about it?
NO MY ICE CREAM
🤓🤓🤓
Read then u ll get it, don’t listen to your islamphobic friends
Qoran
Stop marrying 9 year olds
And we'll talk.
TALK ABOUT THAT LATER WHAT'S THE BEST FLAVOR OF ICE CREAAAM
Coffe flavor
lemon
somethings wrong with the grammar hare
Chocolate
I swear it exists in Burger King
Ew wtf
I'M GENUINELY CONCERNED, HUMANITY'S EXISTENCE IS AT STAKE HERE
he just asked a yes or no question, should'nt be that hard i guess
NUH UH, VANILLA
Dang y'all got no seriousness 😔
im joking, i think its almond, honey, vanilla and chocolate
Ugh u suck at this
give him the verse where's that topic being explained then
@ justareallyboredguy#0000 last chance
VANILLA IS AVAILABLE BY EVERY MAJOR ICE CREAM COMPANIES
don't insult anyone's beliefs bro
That's a controversial photo dawg. You can delete or the mods will take care of it
Chill out y'all like dang
I mean she was 9
Should we bring master po here?
true
But ok
Or no
THAT SUS
I mean we already discussed this shi
Just scroll up
Prophet was right to marry a 9 yo, yes or no.
YOUR EXISTENCE IS SUS. TELL ME ONE, ONE REASON FOR VANILLA NOT BEING THE BEST
I won’t answer that question, read then come back
Hahahah
I'm feeling funny
Exposed!
Srry
BECAUSE IT'S A SERIOUS TOPIC
SHUT THE HELL UP!
THE VANILLA'S FLAVOR I HATE
Wow say debunked innit?
HELL YEAH I'M BLOODY SERIOUS NOW
Tastes bad
@sonic terrace fk u
WHAT?!
You can't answer a simple question
Sorry herclokk😭
YOU GOT NO TASTE BUD
can you people move to more casual talk like #💭|general
If you can't answer a simple question about your Religion then stop typing pls
I'M GENUINELY CONCERNED
Blud
YES
i was jooking
It ain't bad tho-
U HAVE A BAD TASTE
Nah that s the worst Combination of milk
true, otherwise I wouldn't have befriended you-
Google is crazy
💀
Fr fr
i actually like icecream with almond particles and chocolate, honey, vanilla
Same
Remove me rn
vanilla > chocolate
almond honey and vanilla is the best combination
Remove me from ur friends
When u turn 16 u ll understand that
chocolate is good in itself tho
Nuh uh
Fr fr
All kids are into vanilla
anime pfps arent allowed to talk here
Yea
🤫 🧏🏻♂️
Y have anime pfp yourself
I AGREE
get glasses bud
I swear I see anime
is it virgil
😭am I cooked
Naww @sonic terrace pull up on this dude
totally
blud had to ping andrew tate
MasterPo spawns
Games PFPs aren't any better
Both NPC hobbies
andrew tez shut it
blud be getting motivated by andrew tate 🗣️ 🔥
u be attacking real quick bud
Don't take that serious tho
Andrewwha
Motivation is like an adrenaline boost
Not permeant
real
New pfp
That's my husband (according to the family tree)
Actually ykw
Don't even think about it, that pfp is the new masterpo not herlock
same character
i take the racoon or whatever it is
No worries. Now show me why is it wrong? If you're referring to the present-day standards, you would be committing the presentism fallacy. The age of consent is highly variable, relative, and might even be subjective. Different countries have different ages generally considered to be the right age for marriage.
- It was culturally acceptable in the era of the prophet to marry at young ages such as 6, 7, 8, or even 9 years old. A proof is that even before the prophet peace be upon him marries Aisha, she was already engaged to Jubayr ibn Muṭʽim. Another proof is that Khawlah bint Hakim was the one to recommend him to marry Aisha. Yet another proof is that, even though the disbelievers at the time of the prophet peace be upon him used anything at their disposal to discredit and harm him, we've never heard them talking about his marriage to Aisha. So it was very familiar at that time to marry at such young ages.
- Many Hadiths narrated the following statements made by Aisha RA:
- "...How can it be (that a woman like me) should not feel jealous in regard to a husband like you..." [Sahih Muslim 2815].
- "The Prophet (ﷺ) died in my house on the day of my turn while he was leaning on my chest closer to my neck, and Allah made my saliva mix with his Saliva." Aisha added, "AbdurRahman came with a Siwak and the Prophet (ﷺ) was too weak to use it so I took it, chewed it and then (gave it to him and he) cleaned his teeth with it" [Sahih Bukhari 3100].
- "...Yes (you are right), but by Allah, O Allah's Messenger (ﷺ), I leave nothing but your name..." [Sahih Bukhari 5228]
Your unreasonable irrational complaint about the marriage of the prophet is not even valid. A woman who says I can leave nothing but your name, feels jealous about him, or be glad to use the Miswak before him so that her saliva mix with his doesn't sound like a woman who is either harmed, mistreated, or even unprepared for marriage. You'll have to find another doubt to discredit Islam unfortunately.
HOLY SHI
THAT'S A LONG ESSAY
He was testing me. I had to respond.
Bro cooked
I wouldn't allow anyone to speak one single negative word against my beloved prophet upon him be peace and blessings simply for hearing some online prejudice-based complaints. Additionally, he was highly disrespectful and preconceived in his ideology, which caused me to be more triggered and less empathetic towards him during the discussion.
@thorny steeple
Your opinion seemed very aligned with his, so here is my response. I challenge you to refute this argument.
You haven't answered his question
Yes or no one
congratulations, you have a religion that cannot keep up with today's conditions. they accused your guide of marrying a 9-year-old and you just agreed
Just answer that
I don't have to as I've previously mentioned: #🧠|serious-chat message
Meh
So you said marrying with 9 yo is ok
Man
Anyway
I'm out
Btw that guy is my jail for inappropriate meme.
what 'is my jail' mean
The standard in which 9 years old marriage is a taboo or frowned upon is a very subjective and relative one. Islam doesn't teach a specific age for marriage. It states that no harm should be inflicted to either parties and each must be physically and mentally (sometimes financially) capable for marriage. This is a religion that perfectly fits each and every era, society, circumstances, conditions, and standards.
I can marry nowadays at 30, that doesn't go against Islam in any way, shape, or form. In the future societies might determine that marrying at 25 as the case for the majority of present-day age of marriage is bad, Islam would fit that era easily as well.
So your statement is inherently flawed.
That's a very good comeback. Lol. 😂
there's an ongoing VC debate btw if u are interested
I have to pray Isha.
I'll see if I can join.
My time zone is -3 GMT
You can schedule
Anything that reminds me of chocolate or strawberry
Also cheese and banana have a nice taste
I just saw this
You're enforcing him to answer a Yes/No question while he wrote a whole essay explaining , argue his points one by one
(i asked)
Cool response, heard the same one on kindergarten
(i asked)²
Lmao
I'm only being nice saying that i asked
I'm saving you from embarrassment sister
Why would I be embarrassed for expressing an opinion
Because opinions are the "i refuse to use my brain and I'll stick to that statement" card
Not talking about you
But in general
So instead of saying "My opinion" use logical discussing
Okay, elaborate on that
But it is dangerous to ignore the existence of the irrational. The more cultivated a person is, the more intelligent, the more repressed
Someone says "sky is green" and i scientifically prove him wrong, but he says "well i respect what you said but in my opinion i think that sky is green"
For example, you said "Bad taste" directly without intros
You missed the point, yet called that dumb
Yeah, taste is subjective. To me is bad
Your opinion about that person specifically might be formed depending on what you've seen
@formal scaffold
Bro, with all due respect, that was the worst discussion I ever engage in. 😆
People kept talking over each other, shouting, mislabeling each other's reasoning, and committing all types of fallacies.
And i asked
Bro stop chatting in this zoo ffs
People here have the iq of a germ
😆
Waste of time
I believe the organizer of the discussion was very unqualified. He couldn't hold himself from interrupting and committing fallacies all around. Although it felt a bit frustrating, I had some fun observing how being biased is a result of you being triggered and having your ideas being challenged. xD
The only way to do this properly is inviting him to VC
💯
Otherwise his ego will grow bigger and bigger behind the screen thinking he's destroying his opponent
I've wasted over 2 hours. I was kind of afraid that people would think I'm running away if I said I have to leave in the middle of it.
nah lol just leave
I'll follow your advise if there is a next time. 🤝
Well obviously, how could it be another way?
It doesn’t matter dude, I don’t need your interrogation to express a opinion
And it's preferred to be a locked vc so no clowns can interrupt
You're embarrassing yourself.
Imagine going to a random street, stop a random dude, telling him you don't like his clothes, he'll be like "uh, ok?"
🫵😂
Too bad
Cuz like
That pic
is staying there
Of course, I’m not demanding you to take it off
I super care
I care about that too Mrs mature
the most insigihful thing that i can advice someone it's learn english takes time, a lot of itme
it's like we born again
there's someone to interact?
Well it takes time to learn anything new, it’s not only limited to learning english.
Dude you're lucky, you know why?
You were literally reading from chatgpt
we born again every time learn,
You were the one who got the most time to speak
And you had no idea wat were you even reading
😂
You're lucky they didn't mute you
You really mentioned a religious content to proof a thing is correct 😂
I would say, different places with different law and order, if you live in a place that allowed marry with a child, you are literally not required to justify it
who the hell cares, but if even you are living in a society that doesn’t care your religious content even more they may call someone Islamic fundamentalism to justify them as terrorists, who the hell will care and being convinced in here then
That’s why sometimes I always replying back to your comment or statement because that’s totally spreading influence.
And I don’t give a f to that
No place allows you to marry a child
You know that right?
And if your place or religion allows you to marry a child, you're wrong, your religion is wrong
don't spread toxicity/misinformation here
Different places with different rule and law and you must follow the law which made by your local government with no reason otherwise you got punished.
Screw different rules
Yeah I don’t think any places have the law that allows you to marry with a children but different places with different law
You literally said that above
I said if it’s possible, if there is they are entitled to do that of course
That’s the right that local government give you
I repeated this logic all the time
And I don’t think you are literally understanding the point
But I don’t care
isn't making any sense
It make sense 100%
Nope
Different places with different law, totally 100%
Done
You fools are ruining the sport of arguing online
Yeah be nice
Stop throwing insults like a child
is he muted
You’re too sensitive
He is
I'm not, and if you want to be here, be respectful
Dwag tryna misuse his powers
Nothing to cry about when you yourself is too sensitive
cheers crybaby
You are, and it’s totally your problem. I would never offend someone by calling them a fool, it was a very innocent way of approaching a convo
Do what you want
you don't even what people are talking about
You're just jumping in calling them fools
I was talking about the chat gbt thing
Get over it
I was saying that using AI ruined arguing, whats so offensive about that?
Chill, please
You have not said that
"You fools are ruining the sport of arguing online"
This is what you said
AFTER YOU SAID THE CHAT GBT THING
Now you know more about me about what I was trying to say?
Didn’t know you could read minds
You could be less defensive
I agree with you.
hello
Where are you from
About what?
Why Tesla is doing so bad
Why
In 2021 it's valuation was close to $1T
Now it's just $468B
Dude they fired 14,000 employees recently
And giving discount on cars 💀
hello, do u remember something?!
Lmao hell yeah
Let's start from the start
ok
I'll try to be as non biased as possible
😔
I really feel like a few #🧠|serious-chat convos (not this update, of course) have been severely degraded, particularly, at times, when wheels (no, not literal wheels) are involved
@keen wraith first let's understand the anatomy behind the building Israel
Atrocities against Jews begins thousands years ago
When Jesus was crucified, Christans belived that all the Jews are responsible for that, and when crusades started (1000 years ago) Christians killed the Jews in large numbers
i believe Judaism is the most hated religion of last 1000 years.
after 1800s hate towards them increased, they used to seem as different ethnicity. Jewish around the globe began feeling that no country accept them and they need to create their own country.
There was a Hungarian journalist, Herzrl, he started new political movement Zionism .
Keep in mind this concept was here before, herzrl just gave it a name, Zionism
This is the story behind Zionism
hm , ok.
@sonic lion
sure.
@jolly agate
yes sir
Welcome
Welcome back
@feral river welcome
anything
you want to say to us
😂😂😂
I'm back
welcome back.
there’s literally nothing I can say now
anyway all good just be careful next time
1881 is the year when first large scale migration of Jewish took place, they built permanent settlements in Palestine
Why Palestine cuz it's holiest place for them.
Palestine at that time was in Ottoman Empire, communal tension was negligible that time
Now fast-forward to 1951 during WW1, British french and arab revolutionaries fighting the Ottoman Empire
And British created 3 contradictory policies, which i think is the one of the root cause
Are you new join here?
huh? You mean like join the conversation
Hey you’re billaden?
I was then I stopped
Ah ok

hii ppl
@keen wraith McMahon agreement
British said to arab revolutionaries help us to defeat Ottoman Empire and Palestine will be yours
[Arab revolutionary were fighting to create a unified Arab country]
Balfour Declaration
British promised the same thing to Jewish
that they'll let em create a Jewish nation near Palestine.
At the same time they did a secret deal with France

I'm doing good sir, why aren't you online nowadays?
Sykes picot agreement
France and Britain will divide the middle East in themselves

\
British took control of the Palestine and during WW2 when Hitler was smoking the Jews, they started migrating to Palestine.
And started a Israeli nationalist movement.
Then Palestinian also started movement and demanding their own country.
At the end British left the country in blood bath and everyone knows what's happening since
After that it's just blood bath, I don't want to discuss it rn cuz I haven't read the details/terms and conditions of Oslo agreement

mhm, okay.
I'll digest it until then.
Lmao
Nice
the region of Palestine is part of the United Kingdom in that time, and their choice is to divide this region.
and now, it's literally the region of Israel, and gaza ruled by Hamas, West Bank ruled by Israel and PNA.
I think if we gonna talk about the history, we can claim that whole asia and even europe because Genghis Khan declared himself as emperor of China 😂
the claim literally worth nothing, but occupation by power and force is the real thing.
I'm not getting your point
She asked me about the whole Israel Palestine conflict from the start
my point is to decide the region belongs to which country by claim is ridiculous.
yeah I didn't argue with that I'm just stating this point.
Hell yeah
Like china is doing to Taiwan
yeah that's part of claim, but the real thing that decides who is owner, is force.
like Tibet and Xinjiang 😂
but the interesting thing is someone has force to occupy it and they won't do it because it's costly.
someone use force to occupy it and becomes to a stalemate even launched a rebellion internally in before.
so be smart to took over a region, it's not ancient days that you can do whatever you want because you are powerful in this region
but in the other places, the much more powerful one is seeing anyone who is powerful as threat to their supremacy.
My account was suspended lol
Lmao why?
Discord thinks I’m underage
You might jokingly said it
Yeah
Discord policies are kinda wild rn
Discord is crap atm ngl
Well, that's the best they can do to keep kids away from pedos
When did you come to this conclusion, in your dreams? 😆
I fell asleep at late night
That's 10x worse. 😆
Lol.
The guy can be conscious during sleep, and also sees through screens and observes what people do. 😆
almost Devine attributes
Real thing
Come to #🫂|beginner-chat it's serious chat at 4k ngl
@thorny steeple, I have returned. I wish for a short debate, and if the evidence of God is concrete enough for me, then why wouldn't become a theist?
Anyway, we shall continue here: #🧠|serious-chat message
A worthy opponent has risen
I don't think I'd call myself worthy
Chill out, play the role of a hero right now
delete your prior message
or edit it
Worsty opponent*
Sire, there is no need to tell me to chill as I already am so. Hero, uh, I'll consider myself one when I create my own Wikipedia article.
Stop using my username for puns
he being sarcastic about your username
you don’t get it
never mind
I know, but he's doing it too much at this point
Because we're in #🧠|serious-chat, and I'm trying to keep it so
not serious
I barely can formulate one sentence sometimes xD
that's too easy, religion is unfalsifiable and science is falsifiable.
that's the ultimate difference.
you can't proof god exist and doesn't exist, neither you can't proof I'm not the god.
so after all of the sorts, you will find one thing which is you are believing a thing that you are likely to believe, no matter it's truth or not.
that's why I only believe truth, and I'm not a god damn atheist or religious person at the same time.
and your believe, doesn't need to proof, mine's too. that's the stupid nature of humanity.
@feral river am i allowed to use GPT against a GPT user?? During an argument
of course.
Well well well
Someone here is using it
This is want their explanation looks like
wtf are you serious right now ?
This is what my explanation looks like
It beats the point of discussion, I can also use the gpt to counter your point
And i got the paid one, it's more powerful 
ofc you can beat me by it and It's pretty interesting and challenaging
I'm not accusing you dude
cuz that's tesla 💀
From $1T to $460M in few years
Because Twitter was bought
For half a billion?
what is twitter ? I never heard about it
I ONLY KNOW X
For populists
The coming generations will forget the blue bird
Sounds like a W
And they will only know the edgy X as being Twitter
#🧊|chill-chat is serious chat rn
We all miss general-2
Do not include me
I know, but the true spirrit is lost
We all miss it, except for excessive pun makers
state your arguments
(I don't miss it)
beat the cause and effect theory
Then you can talk to flare about god
No, I can do whatever I want without you telling me what I can do
but you cant beat the cause and effect theory, thats the same one he will present
Since you want to have a debate with him shouldn’t you be the one to propose an argument first rather then him
he can say god exist
Now you have to say something
What is it??
I'm not saying God exists or doesn't, I simply said that there is no concrete evidence for his existance. Also, he has to prove God as I'm asking for it, not the other way around
So you simply don’t know if god exists or not and you want him to prove god is does exist. So you are a “seeker” who hope to get enlightenment via someone more knowledgeable than yourself.
A seeker of knowledge
Indeed splendid
I'm not a "seeker", I simply want evidence to God's claim if people claim he exists
thats is seeking
you want to find the answer of the unknown
If it isn’t that what it is
That is agnosticism
can explain the word “seeker” for me
I think we have a language barrier
It has a few definitions for it, search them up. I'm currently talking to somebody else
you are clueless right??
He's curious
The word seeker is a simple word, I know its meaning, but am asking you to search for it as I'm currently talking to somebody else. Also, no we don't have a language barrier
if it’s simple you should’ve wrote that rather this long as paragraph
it exist and THAT’S KIM JONG UN
It indeed is, and if it were so to you as well, then you would not have asked for it in the first place
you can learn if not prepared to learn
How do you define a seeker?
Hell yeah so everyone is a seeker
yes
But he wasn’t able to comprehend such simple words
He was trying to be more specific
Everyone is a seeker asking it doesn't make sense
Dude. I was simply asking for the evidence of God's existance, stop making this overly philosophical
I described his situation
You described situation on enite human race
Agnosticism, in and of itself, is all about seeking
how so
Everything is about seeking
its not philosophical its simple English
Everyone is a seeker
Doesn't seem true for a staunch believer who worships a particular doctrine
It is simple English, but that's not my point. My point is simply that I asked for evidence for God's existance, and tou made a whole shabang of it
the point is you didn’t get it in the first place
He defined seeking as looking for someone/something, finding unknown
read that again
In some way yes
But doesn’t mean I was referring to everyone
I was specifically talking to him
He's asking for evidence of god's existence
It seems like neither did you
I wrote that in more poetry way
there's no proof of god's existance
there are signes tho
There you go, that's all I asked for
where is your proof that there is no proof
there you go
where's your proof that my proof isn't proof?
We stuck again at the same plsce
see we can keep doing this forever
just with you
we are back to square one
with non open minded people I can find common grounds for discussion
I never claimed to know I have any proof to begin with, your assumptions was wrong
I'm always wrong
the evidence is the lack of evidence xD
Yeah, I already said that that was what I was looking for
but lack doesn’t imply it doesn’t exist, there is simply not enough proof for its existence.
it could exist
Its why its belief
you know i can make everything goes in circles about any topic, I just have to play dumb enough for that to happen
what is nothing? 🤡
nonexistent
do you have a proof of that?
see we all can play that game
it's not smart it's rather dumb if u ask me

Proof it doesn’t exist
Cha rah ychkal 3lik hada
The the whole characteristic of nothing-that it doesn’t exist
I just interefered in his discussion since it didn't seem to end xD
Its a circle discussion
Wat is the true nothing than.
sounds like you are describing a zero shape, zero results xd
Another circle to play with
exactly what that discussion was
also lack of evidence doesn’t imply something doesn’t exist.
To break it down for you, there's no clear proof of god's existance or his non existance, therefore people discuss the signes of his existance or the counter arguments to that to build an idea on doubt that's where it won't be a circle discussion since the 2 sides might not be familiar with few arguments esp newbies who are part of an english learning server
As an agnostic i agree with skuggi
Should’ve said that in first place
I did
you missed it anyways it don't matter
thats the matter of perspective,
signs can be seen as proof
anyway
Call me god
Lack of evidence doesn’t imply something doesn’t exist
I’m the supreme leader of the universe and the god which created everything
come Democratic People’s Republic of Korea and you will experience the sun is shining 24/7
Am I only the only one with an European map sticked on the wardrobe
#🔗|bot-commands
Neymar Land
because there is no proof against you being god doesn’t mean it’s automatically true, what is your evidence to back it up
I’m the creator who created you
we are in a loop now
I have a roman map.
From what era?
The pax romana era.
40 AD
Ave Augustus!
Harry Styles makes bad songs. (Argue with the wall)
Now you're expecting evidence? That's a double standard
Those theological discussions on this server always end up with logical discussions
Ye I agree with u
I listen metal,some rap music or balkans pop
I reached what I'd consider as a basic fluency in English, yet I feel like the more I get exposed to the language, the more I realize I don't know much, there are always new expressions and words to learn
Does anyone else relate
Which metal subgenres
I was about to ask if it was Mastodon
Usually that's what comes to mind when it's early 00s
Who listening this rock,everyone know these
I'm a bit ignorant when it comes to mainstream bands
Me too
I think the most mainstream I listen to is Scar Symmetry and it's not mainstream enough
Ye I dont know its
Same here brother
People have bad stereotypes about Scandinavian Metal in Brazil
For them it's all Burzum
I only have bad stereotypes about Norwegian black metal
Damn thats not good
So sometimes I surprised cuz scandinavians the best in the some topics
Cs,some song categories,education ,...
Huh
It's all about Norwegians
My idea is same with norweigans btw :D cuz cs song really the best
Also, some people don't like Scandinavians in general because they promote loads of eugenic programs in the early 20th century
It'a bit uncovered and forgotten but they did
?def eugenic
Definition (null): pertaining to or causing improvement in the offspring produced
"Eugenics (/juːˈdʒɛnɪks/ yoo-JEN-iks; from Ancient Greek εύ̃ (eû) 'good, well', and -γενής (genḗs) 'come into being, growing')[1] is a set of beliefs and practices that aim to improve the genetic quality of a human population.[2][3][4] Historically, eugenicists have attempted to alter human gene pools by excluding people and groups judged to be inferior or promoting those judged to be superior."
This definition seems accurate
Basically loads of women were sterelized because they wanted to get rid of what they called "bad genes".
There was a trend going on Europe. It all "stopped" after WWII.
you mean that the era of war usual breaking out used to implement what is called eugenic?
To be honest I dont care cuz only germany,bulgaria and turkey important for me
They targeted minorities rather than women with actual issues
Like Greenlandic, Sámi women
Dude isn't there is theory that we evolved from reptiles
It's outdated
@thorny steeple
It's from past taxonomy, like when we used to use paraphyletic definitions (like birds not being reptiles)
Today if you go by cladistics we never had reptile ancestors
Gotcha
yes they looked similar to early reptiles, but they also looked similar to salamanders
So according to cladistics birds are reptiles?
Some shapes, like crab, lizard and crocodile are recycled throughout history
Yes, unequivocally
If you look at phytosaurs and archegosaurs they both looked like crocodiles, even the mammal Ambulocetus did
Yeah they're the ogs, just like horseshoe crabs
Even the head shape of dinosaur predators was recycled from some distant relatives, not direct ancestors
I'm zoned out I can't digest birds are reptiles
Most dinosaur predators weren't even that closely related, they just kept evolving the same body plan and head shape
They've feathers
Once you watch enough modern reconstructions you'll start to see why
So did other dinosaurs
You know that pterosaurs aren't dinosaurs, right?
Well, recently they have discovered that it's likely pterosaurs had feathers too, and that feathers were inherited from the ancestors of both dinosaurs and pterosaurs
They look like bat bird thing to me
Pterossaurs were flying reptiles
They were a mix in features, the wings were muscular instead of being thin like those of bats
They also had air sacs in the wings themselves, birds don't have air sacs there, they're more limited
If you think bird morphology is absurd, you need to look into pterosaur adaptations
They make birds look normal in comparison
Cool thing about velociraptors is the ability they had to use their feathers and tail to attack from higher ground
No wonder pterosaurs had a much higher size restriction compared to birds
On my viva exam, examiner asked me
What's the difference between birds and reptiles
And i scored 100%
That's why I can't digest they're reptiles
Unfortunately that outdated definition is still the most popular especially at lower education levels
Have you guys watched that dinossaur tv show from apple tv?
Once you start to see that the majority of dinosaurs already were covered in feathers you'll see why birds are just another branch of dinosaurs and reptiles, and proof that reptile diversity is immense
@thorny steeple what's in your syllabus, birds and reptiles are different or same?
Prehistoric Planet? Absurdly good, nothing compares
Anyone that likes dinosaurs or prehistoric life should give it a try
I'm Android enjoyer sir
I watched both seasons
Jaw dropping series. I loved that scene with the t-rex swimming
No agag scroll up a bit
F our education system