#š§ ļ½serious-chat
1 messages Ā· Page 91 of 1
What about you?
Which means you trust them.
I didn't say otherwise.
To me the most important factor is humility
Being religious means being devoted to a higher power or spiritual practices. What are your religious affiliations?
The most important thing for me is interest, staying questioning and better know every aspect and different prospect.
Fair enough.
I will be invincible if I know how religious people think, and how irreligious people think
How?
KÅEMĆ, there is no worship involved so I don't know if I can define myself as religious
Be a world spy and never trust anything except myself.
I've heard that Charles Darwin was a Diest, do you know anything about that?
Idk you can talk about that
Not skeptic enough are you now
He was
What is this?
But I don't know how convinced he was of that, that's difficult to know without him being alive
Maybe, I agree with this
A minority religion from Russia
And what does this religion stand for?
Is it a polytheistic religion?
There are some values to follow, usually it encourages the pursuit of non-violent knowledge, avoiding unnecessary aggression, being a balanced person without vices, keeping a prosperous environment
This can be done without following a religion, can it not?
Yes and no, it's similar to Baltic polytheism where deities are considered aspects of a greater entity, but the number is neither one or many, it isn't specified
Do you have any rituals or any god that you worship?
Yes, like all things
I don't worship any because She doesn't require it, I follow traditions and rituals though, the last one was at the beginning of the year and there will be another in this month
Do you think an aggression is exactly unnecessary in any cases ?
Understandable.
"Unnecessary aggression" means there are cases where it's necessary
Make sense.
But hard to define which one is necessary
And which one is unnecessary
It's quite easy
According to Christianity what is the purpose of life, why did we come here?
If a snake bites you because it felt threatened you leave it alone
I've heard of the concept that suggests that we're here as a punishment, is that correct?
If a person with a knife jumps on you you are free to do anything you can to save your life
But what if a snake can be sold for billion dollars
What about that
I was giving an example because you say if a snake bites you because it felt threatened you leave it alone
The purpose of my Faith is to seek union with God and inherit His Kingdom, to have Eternal Life.
But what if itās profitable
Doing it for money could be considered a vice
Further explain
You can sell people's organs for money too, but most wouldn't do it
That'll be the afterlife right? What about this life?
Selling the snake could potentially jeopardise its life, it's better left where it lives unless it needs another kind of help
This life prepares us for the next, it's a "test".
Thatās because law exists, if you sell peopleās organ which you will be forcibly punished by law
Itās not worth it
But what if a snake ?
Even before laws existed most people weren't doing it
Ohh interesting, we Muslims also consider this to be a test
Most of Europe didn't have written laws before the Roman Republic conquered it and imposed them
That's actually pretty interesting
Yes, I am aware.
Indeed it is.
Their life is no less valuable
Well, but you are saying an exception arenāt you ?
Because I didnāt ask that question tho
No? Most people lived lawlessly
If they didn't do it without laws, why would they do it with laws? Laws are there to standardise punishments, otherwise people will seek personal justice, and that can go either way
There is no where doesnāt have a law
If there wasn't a law about stealing an apple, people would still do it. And people would still deal with apple thieves, however they'd do it however they wish, some may get enslaved, tortured, killed
Just for stealing an apple
Law is used for defining which is guilty and under forcibly punished and which is not guilty
Thatās why court exists
But if the law says you'll be in jail for a day then they will end in jail for a day
What is the point for stealing an apple ? Itās not worth it
What if you're starving
When I was starving, so yes I will steal an apple
Most criminals are such out of desperation
How do you guys view the trinity and monotheism.
I think there must be a reason they are desperate
I donāt think there is anyone wanting steal an apple and break their own reputation because itās not worth it
Good point so economy prosperity will reduce crimes thatās actually true
People steal food directly from the fields or the supermarkets
But another point, prosperity can reduce crime, and rule of power also can reduce crime
We believe that God is one in essence but exists in three personalities or hypostasis. God the Father, God the Son, God the Holy Spirit.
Violence can reduce crime too
Nah
Nah ?
Plenty of criminals stop being such in Nordic countries because they are taught life skills and may be hired in jobs before getting out of jail
If some nation made a law that says if you trust god you are under arrest by force
What do you think about this way ?
Actually itās effective
Punitive systems like the American one aren't very good for crime rates
It's restrictive for no good reason
It has good reason, and what if everyone supports this ?
Actually it happened in the past and now
It's impossible that everyone supports any idea, there will always be outliers and contrarians
What's the good reason also
Majority of people
For non-christians this concept is often incomprehensible or maybe confusing at times is it easy to understand among the Christians
*?
The good reason of cultural invasion, destabilizing society and creating division around people
It isn't always right to let the majority choose just because they're the majority
There are similar concepts in Hinduism and sorta in Romuva too
Yes but for some cases like this
Majority all think itās good for majority
And it indeed works, itās not just saying
We can see how they worked properly with this
I can comprehend that if you say itās inhumane, but in prospect of interest, that is absolutely good for majority of people and whole society
Yes, that's why we believe in it. Christians possess the Holy Spirit which is within us and that's why we can see clearly.
Idk about Romuva but in Hinduism they have this concept of multiple incarnations of one God, but in Christianity it's very different I think
Is it always present in a Christian? Or is there a process?
Always. From the moment you declare the Lord and become Christian until the end.
If you stay a Christian of course.
The Holy Spirit is also God right?
Is it as much the God as The father and Jesus or is there a difference?
They are comparable, maybe somewhat similar but not identical
But they're independent entities right?
There is something similar in my religion too, but they are more separated than in Christianity
Yes!
The are equal and co-eternal
The Father is often just called "God" but all three are
Yes
One more thing
Not all the times, if the majority votes for a war that will be detrimental then it isn't a good choice
Yes, God is the Father, the Son and the Holy Ghost
Distinct personalities, yes!
Jesus (A.S) is considered the begotten son of God right? Then how is he co-eternal?
As an entity the Christian God is one because the essence is shared
Three persons but one God
In Hinduism it's supposed to be similar about the essence part
@shadow kite do you have confession in orthodox churches? I've heard you do do communitary confessions in front of every one is that true?
Yeah but then if you take one out then the rest won't be fully God right? Cuz how can a part of whole be whole?
He is God in the flesh of the Son of God the Father. He existed with God the Father and God the Holy Spirit when the Heavens and the Earth were created. He was incarnated when the time was right in order to be Crucified and offer Salvation to the world.
It is paradoxical, but if the entity is omnipotent then it can be done. An omnipotent being would be able to make a square round
We do have confessions, but not in front of everyone.
Maybe it's a thing of oriental Orthodox
I am an Eastern Orthodox Christian.
Oh, so that might be oriental orthodox
Oriental Orthodox are very few
I think it was the russians who confessed that way, i don't remember
Probably not the russians so š§
They should be eastern too but Russians follow some other traditions
We actually confess in front off a priest, but i am seeing a lot of confessionaries available here now
@prime cloak Are you Catholic?
Catholics (Roman)
What if it comes to detrimental for enemy but it gets huge benefits to themselves ?
What do you think of secularism?
Yes indeed! But i do like Orthodox traditions
Agni parthene
It's amoral and oligarchic, most of the times only politicians and their families receive benefits
People basically prioritize their interest more than the others.
It is originated in desire for existence I guess
God bless you! Agni Parthene is one of my favorite chants
There is that one too called Kristos Anesti
Has anyone read Fyodor Dostoevsky?
I would say it has huge benefits for majority of people in some cases, politicians and higher class people gets more but other people still receive benefits
like
Both very good, there is a lady i've talked about before here called aleksandra spicberga, from latvia, she sings them like no one else
Yes! We listen to that on Easter!
First Sino-Japanese war
Not yet, but I'm planning on doing so once I finish my exams!! I'm very excited about it š
I've also been recommended Crime and Punishment
The benefits to the people being
Economy prosperity, opportunities etc.
But I'm not an avid reader I'm not sure if I should jump in with this one
What do you study?
Actually after that, just not a long time, Japan became the most powerful and prosperous nation in Asia
They even defeated Russian
First time for east defeated west
Thank you! I want to read White Nights too!
Physical education and sports science.
Are you doing a bachelor's degree?
Yes, it's my first year! What about you? Do you study?
@manic juniper are you russian?
I'm Finnish
My mum is Russian but not ethnic
Yes, I'm doing bachelor's in computer science
Beautiful!
Can you read russian?
Cyrillic? Yes
If you're aware of Fyodor Dostoevsky's work would you say that the translations do justice to the original work? I'm assuming he wrote in russian
You're studying physical education, do you plan on becoming a trainer of some sort? What are the professions in this field?
Some of that is lost in translation, although my Russian isn't the best it loses a lot of emphasis and emotional expression with them. If you really have to choose one go for English because it has the highest amount of them, and some are good
There some tgings that can only be expressed in russian language
I've studied russian for 4 years, and the liricity of the language is amazing
Arenāt Finland a puppet state during Soviet era ?
Do you have a suggestion?
*recommendation
It's like the word saudade, which is a substantive in portuguese that express the feeling of missing something or someone
That word would never be translated properly
I don't know if he translated other books of his, but there is Ignat Avsey's translation of The Karamazov Brothers that works well enough
How many languages do you know?
I speak portuguese
That book is top 3 of his so you can start with that as well, no issue
Alright thanks
No, it never was
There was the short lived Karelian Republic
I know english, russian (intermediate), spanish (learning right now) and a little bit of brazilian sign language
Yeah I've got it on my list
I gave up on russian to learn spanish, a flight to russia from brazil costs 2000 dollars or 3000 dollars which is a lot here
Brazilian sign language
A flight to argentina is like 200 dollars
But Finland invaded Soviet Union since they are part of Axis ?
Or less
To retake back Karelia, USSR invaded Finland first
How different are the different sign languages? Can they communicate?
And we kicked the nazis out of the country as well
They are very different
There are similar words but they are indeed very different
We were completely alone when the USSR invaded our country
You can even find "accents" in sign language
Yeah they screwed up
And there is regional variation
nazis saying that they can only took 2 hours to make you guys surrender
Then Italy gave us a decent amount of support against the USSR for the invasion, Germany did something as well, and in turn the USSR provided aerial support against the Axis
The EU is our first and only real ally, we had some deals with Estonia before WW2 but they were suspended
The Europeans fought quite a lot in the last century no?
Only in the last? Hahahaha
Make sense, your legendary leader is very clever
But I forgot his name
I think serbia was bombarded in 1990
Only in the beginning and the end
Or was it 2006?
In the beginning there was WW1 and WW2, then in the end Yugoslavia started to break up and they had one war after the other
It was in the 90s
That old general lead Finland stands up against Soviets and Nazis
Russia never stopped fighting, but fought internal wars and invaded georgia
NATO didn't react aggressively to Bosnia's invasion and they did with Kosovo, because some felt like they wanted to avoid another genocide
Me? Culturally it is for sure, geographically it may not be but it isn't very important imo
Cruel for a small country.
I consider Finland eastern European geographically
They should've done something for Bosnia as well, it was a diplomatic and humanitarian failure
You guys actually made a paradise for your people
Finland is awesome
Yes but we took like 800 years for that
God forbid we'll be repeating such statements in a few decades
Even the previous century wasn't 100% good, even if you exclude the Winter War
But, unlike us, there are too many differences between west and east
They have 3 presidents dont they?
It's weird because it's a demonstration of how arbitrary borders are
One fir each ethinicity
Yes and one gets two votes lol
The Serbian one gets two votes
Crazy
Because of Republika Srpska and stupid western and Serbian treaties or something
I think it's the same for Georgia and Ukraine, not as much for Palestine just because it's way outside the continent but still, more than this should be done
Well Yugoslavia didnāt join the Soviet Union I thought
It didn't, they were in neutral to bad relations
Stalin didn't like Tito and wanted him assassinated
Yeah Tito has too many autonomy
Stalin's thought basically was: either you follow our version of socialism or we'll force you to
We thought USSR will annex them but they didnāt because of Tito
If I'm not mistaken Czechoslovakia too was socialist but independently from the USSR, like Yugoslavia, until there was a forced change of government
Poland was seeking socialism as well but it was long before all of that, before it was forced
The biggest problem of USSR, is ignoring interests for their own people and their allies
Always denying their history, denying Stalin, denying every leader denying communist party of SU
We've got some ukrainjas refugees migrating to brazil, there is a huge ukrainian community here
How are things going in finland?
What's Brazil like?
Invading its neighbours, poor economic decisions, extreme focus on military, in my opinion Stalin did damage to socialism's reputation comparable to USA propaganda
Making historical nihilism and make everything confuse
I bet there may be more people
Beautiful and wild
Thatās no doubt yes
Hostile or nah?
Wild because life is not easy, and you need to pay attention to what you are doing
I don't know, I think they're around 60k maybe
It depends, sone areas definitely
If you do the wrong things it's hostile
My family has applied too and they are supposed to come in few months
Along others from the same city
But sputh america was always a safe haven for migrants and refugees
I guess Russia is missing their red empire
Isnāt that place achieved economy prosperity?
Is your family ukrainian?
South america?
No, things are pretty turbulent here
I thought South America is poor
Crisis happen often
They're not but most of my mum's relatives moved there before the collapse of the USSR
I wonder if these nation states will be around in a few centuries
My mum for example was living in Moldova
Not poor, there is a lot of poverty here, but a lot of richness also
Well I mean most people
Oh you speak romanian?
Yes but I lack practice
Iām not going to immigrate any nation besides some places like Singapore, Dubai, Hawaii
It depends on the country, in venezuela yes, most people are poor, in argentina or brazil no, most people are middle income
I've learned Ukrainian and Romanian when I was little but the lack of practice made me rusty in it
Cool
Romanian actually is a romance language
So it sounds a lot like portuguese, that is nice
Sorta, weirdly
What are your thoughts about the reunification of romania and moldova?
I've seen that moldovans are not quite against it
It definitely should happen although it will be difficult and not profitable to Romania, at first
It could improve the life of moldovans
Now Romanians are, it shifts continually
However transnistria is a problem
When Moldovans were against it, Romanians were favourable, now it's the complete opposite
A Soviet places left in this world ?
It's another issue like Republika Srpska that should be solved with force
Better say a russian exclave in moldova hahahaha
Never heard of that one
I am going to sleep 10 pm here, good night y'all
It's a separatist state in Bosnia much like Transnistria
Let's get all countries annexed into the one.
Abolish the concept of country or border.
I'm not a communism or socialism or anarchism.
this is one of choices we take and that's all. Here is no such prejudiced perspective. Rest assured.
Thatās what we are doing
Unite our nation by any means necessary
Expand territories, assimilation projects
And actually our society is so stable, only few people attends crime and no political opponents no barriers to accessing any part of our state
Even some city became the economic center and being so prosperous like Tokyo, Singapore, etc.
Well but thatās what we did
read carfefully please..
I donāt think itās possible to annex every state
I'm interested in clinical ergophysiology and rehabilitation. But I can also become a trainer of the sport I do!
What sport do you do?
Ju-jitsu
Nice, you ever tried to mix it up?
I mainly do boxing but I find it boring to stick to just one style
that would be a correct statement
Teach me boi.
Nikita kruschev is the killer, not Stalin 
Every socialist event in the world, have their explanation, you just have to search about it, it's hard to find the real history of the socialists countries because U.S always intervence in these countries lifes, 90% of the data critizing the socialists countries comes from western media. I used to say the same things that you say, but when I studied the real history of these countries, I learned about them. 90% of the western media, say that North Korea is a "dictadorship", and I used to say the same thing, but when I studied the history of the country, I learned the truth.
Video about the North Korea defectors: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XkegD7V9E6g
Wait are you saying stalin didn't kill?
No
ok
Stalin killed the N4Z1 germans
and like a bunch of ukrainians
And countless Kazakhs and ethnic minorities from Russia
omg
the 1930s famine that occurred in Ukraine, the Caucasus which comprise Armenia, Georgia, and parts of Southern Russia, and also hit Kazakhstan just as badly. Of course, calling it a Holodomor implies that it was intentional. Literal meaning "death inflicted by starvation".
However, even Princeton professor and conservative Stephen Kotkin, perhaps America's leading expert on Stalin, as well as a vocal critic, explains on episode 184 of The American Interest podcast that although he thinks Stalin has blood on his hands for the famine, he doesn't consider the famine to be intentional. Note also that I'm not even using a communist historian as my source, e.g. someone like Grover Furr, but the anti-communist historian Stephen Kotkin.
"I'm an empirical person. Today, in our country, it's more important than ever to have facts and to line up your facts and to substantiate, to document. You can't just argue what you want to be true, you have to argue on the basis of evidence. What's the evidence we have on this question of the intentionality or not of the famine of 1931-33?
"We have an unbelievable number of documents showing Stalin committing intentional murder, with the Great Terror, as you alluded to earlier, and with other episodes. He preserved these documentsāhe would not try to clean up his image internallyāand these documents are very damning. There is no shortage of documentation when Stalin committed intentional murder.
"However, there is no documentation showing that he intended to starve Ukraine, or that he intended to starve the peasants.
"Ask yourself, why are there no documents showing intentional murder or genocide of these people when we have those documents for all the other episodes?
"...the intentionality question is completely undermined by the documents on the record." ā from the podcast The American Interest, Episode 184: Stephen Kotkin on Stalin. Richard Aldous speaks with Stephen Kotkin about his book, Stalin: Waiting for Hitler, 1929-1941.
Yeah but wether it was intenional or not he still killed people
Exactly lmao
Gotta love USSR apologists
fr
My point is that the meaning of "Holodomor" is the thesis that a famine that occurred in Ukraine in 1932 and 1933 was deliberately planned by the Soviets authorities to "kill its people on purpose". In western media documentations, sometimes they appear as "to dicipline the peasants", sometimes others like "extermination of ethnic Ukrainians due to Ukrainian nationalism" (they don't even decide what really happened).
This famine happened in USSR. But the thesis that "it was planned by the Soviet authorities to kill Ukrainians" is false. The real cause of the famine in USSR, was the climate crisis. At that time, in 1932 and 1933, the USSR suffered a very serious problem of drought, flood and plague. There were regions that flooded and there were regions that were affected by locusts and rust, which is a type of fungus that makes the leaves turn red. The main factor that caused the harvests to be bad in these years, was the climate disaster.
And then there is another factor that contributed to USSR famine: the factor of sabotage. For those who don't know, the USSR was collectivizing the countryside in an accelerated manner and received resistance from the rich peasants, the kulaks. So the Kulaks burned crops, they didn't harvest, they let the grains rot, killed the livestock to boycott the rural collectivization project. And this is something that has so much evidence, that even Robert Conquest has to admit. It took the Soviet Union 10 years to recover from the death of the herd.
no I'm pretty sure they kinda deliberately made the starving people not able to eat
They would shoot those who tried to hide food
it was kinda planned
You didn't read the text š
u editied it tho
It said wasn't at first
But, what's the problem with it?
because it was planned
These are just English mistakens
It was a planned kiling
Like maybe not at the beginging but it definitely was deliberate after the ukranians were begging for food only to not recieve it
Ok, so these are the fonts:
Book:
TOTTLE, Douglas. Fraud, Famine and Fascism: The Ukranian Genocide Myth from Hitler to Harvard. Toronto: Progress Books, 1988. 167 pg.
Additional bibliography:
CHIGRIN, Ivan; PRUDNIKOVA, Elena. ŠŠøŃŠ¾Š»Š¾Š³ŠøŃ Ā«Š³Š¾Š»Š¾Š“Š¾Š¼Š¾ŃŠ°Ā». ŠŠŠŠ ŠŠµŠ“иа ŠŃŃŠæŠæ, 2013. 530 pg.
DAVIES, R. W.; WHEATCROFT, Stephen G.. The Years of Hunger: Soviet Agriculture 1931-1933. The Industrialization of Soviet Russia 5. Palgrave Macmillan, 2004. 555 pg.
FURR, Grover. Blood Lies: The Evidence that Every Accusation against Joseph Stalin and the Soviet Union in Timothy Snyderās Bloodlands is False. Nova Iorque: Red Star Publishers, 2014.
TAUGER, Mark B. Natural Disaster and Human Actions in the Soviet Famine of 1931-1933. The Carl Beck Papers in Russian & East European Studies, nĀŗ 1506, 2011. 65 p.
TAUGER, Mark B.. The 1932 Harvest and the Famine of 1933. Slavic Review, 50(1), pp.70-89
I understand you, the Western media portrays that it was the Soviet authorities who intentionally killed the population. However, there are sources proving that this is a lie, and if it is well-explained and detailed, demonstrating that it is false, it is because it truly is.
funny how half of your sources are writen by russians but ok
Yeah, the people who really have lived in the country
This is true.
Even their leader, kruschev is a Ukrainian, and he gave crimea to Ukraine SSR.
kruschev was the man who made USSR colapse, so he was the problem of the country. Kruschev was bad.
Yes I have! It's very fun
Ohh nice! I like boxing but I prefer muay thai
Of coursee!

It's easier to blame it on an imaginary belief that school is garbage. Pay attention to the better teachers at school and they'll be your best mentors. I'm still in touch with the teachers and they'll help me even if I call them on a Sunday.
If the student himself is unwilling to make the extra efforts and relies entirely on the government, then it's obvious that he'll never end up self-reliant and self-sufficiency.
The system is designed to aid the needy who have no other way out and can't afford anything at all at obviously the most basic level, not the average man who can, should & must do the basics by himself.
School is an academic guide, not a life-guide. I see no reason to blame it for when children don't know things that the school doesn't feature, I suppose that it's clearly evident that the school can give you only a limited number of hours too
Hi
Palestineš
Hi
What do you think about the genocide carried out by China against East Turkestan?
Hi
any france ?
Bro go to french chat
Oh sorry man
np man , nice music taste btw ;)
yep
nice to meet u to
So what do u think about this
let me think
Tyt
Hii
yo wassup
Eh not bad what about you
i'm doing good
china and East Turkestan
Heās doing the opposite
Hes looking for someone rather then promoting
And why are you speaking on his behalf?
propaganda
watch Mr Jones
Why do you care,
Answer my question.
How is it possible that, of 1.5 millions people starved in Kazakhstan in 1933, 1.2 millions were Kazakhs and they became a minority in their own region for decades? Were Russians just lucky enough that they managed to avoid starving while other ethnic minorities were struck by an anti-communist curse?
Also this "lie" wasn't pushed by western media at first but by Ukraine itself, even when they had a pro-Russian government. How is that possible?
modi want him as opposition leader ,lol
he is doing well.
i appreaciate it
rahul gandhi improved a lot
but many good leaders in congress party like sachin pilet and shashi tharoor should get chance
@pearl rain The Shiites praise and sanctify Ali, and some of them also sanctify Hasan, and they say that they are better than the prophets and that we must follow them, but this is wrong, as God says in the Qurāan (ŁŁŲ§ Ų£ŁŁŁŁŁŁŲ§ Ų§ŁŁŁŲ°ŁŁŁŁ Ų¢Ł ŁŁŁŁŲ§ Ų£ŁŲ·ŁŁŲ¹ŁŁŲ§ Ų§ŁŁŁŁŁŁ ŁŁŲ£ŁŲ·ŁŁŲ¹ŁŁŲ§ Ų§ŁŲ±ŁŁŲ³ŁŁŁŁ) ( you who have believed, obey a ALLAH and obey the prophet) and they do the opposite of that.
uh actually racism and social oppression have always existed and continue to occur throughout history
chinese administration because they are socialist, they oppresse the people and gives little value to minorities
So?
Do you think the china is right?
nahhh
Have you never watched the videos of the persecution of Uyghur Turks?
Lemme show some videos
alr
the Shiites say that Aisha, the Prophets wife betrayed him and this is not true and they curse her?? ur parents do this if they didnt so they r muslims cuz the prophet muhhamed isnt a sunni or shiei thats all. and the Sunnah means that I follow the actions and sayings of the Prophet Muhammed is it clear?
fk i saw that.....
What do you think about this persecution by the Chinese?
they are committing genocide
They want uniformity and assimilation
Aren't they sending Han Chinese settlers in the region as well?
this is like balkan genocide
these people cannot find a place to live
they are being persecuted
it's an autonomous region ig
and no one knows or talking abt this where America and human rights organizations are??? M.ozil stripped of his citizenship and harassed for supporting them tf they only talking about 7 october... they exaggerate the event and falsify events and facts fk this world fk propaganda.
FAKE HUMAN RIGHTS FAKE FREEDOOM ALAYWS LIES
They don't talk much about it because it's difficult to investigate, akin to Covid when it was widespread in the world
Covid investigations in China were difficult and murky, pretty much anything there is unless you're directly allowed to from their central government
it's hard to argue this from just that perspective.
but it can be
difficult???? wut a joke

Do you have any idea about how strict their country's surveillance system is?
Why do you think these people can be persecuted in the first place? It's because of the same surveillance system
here we are
America's freedom only works for his benefits
Agreed lol the amount of shittalking about Shias is insane
if they want to stop this genocide at least they will try yk that hey rasict thats all dont try to hide the truth like that this is stupidity.
Religion disputes never lead to somewhere
Or they don't want to resist China's oppression lol
China is trying to hide it, and rightfully so. But even if the entire world knew, there is the issue that China is responsible for a lot of the world's economy and boycotting it (while ethical) isn't easy at all
Turks have been their enemies for centuries, that's why no one resists
hmmm u want me to send videos that shia cursing aisha?? and glorify ali and hasan like a gods or smth?
They must not be the majority, there are videos of Muslims eating pork but I don't believe they are the majority of the Muslims, no?
China?
Yes
Yes, Uyghurs used to have an empire too
ch!na and other countries
at that time, when they saw any Chinese princess, the Turks 
they dont evin help them humanitarian aid or trying to negotiate with China. they supported Ukraine? Yes, Russia is also a great economic power. Isnāt this a matter of racism and bias?
I had some Muslim friends, well, friends of any ethnicity really
im saying that they shouldn't be no shia or sunna in islam cuz thats pretty clear It is discrimination and if they do not do what I said previously then they are Muslims we follow allah and his prophet. no need to say im sunni or shiei
This is not our topic rn
R u Kurd or smthn pojadam?
It isn't as much racism as it is about consequences and how far they can get with humanitarian aid, for example there isn't much to be done about Armenia or Georgia because they're already too far for the EU, USA can only help Ukraine through the EU because it borders with Ukraine. Also it's about how much freedom people actually have, I'll give you another example:
Countries such as Norway, Spain, Ireland, Scotland and some others are sending humanitarian aid to Gaza, because it isn't THAT far. There is NO way they could do the same for Uyghur Turks given the distance and how much less free they are (free to express themselves I mean. Palestinians at least can access the internet freely and post, I doubt Uyghur Turks can, Ukrainians too can freely post about their country and the war)
Alp bu Åakanin sırası deÄil aq hemekdijsndkkd
those who curse aisha and they sanctify ali and hasan.
sfhbuasjyu
They are even more persecuted than Uyghurs are, the country where they're from (Myanmar) is full of sanctions as a consequence, it's also possible because most countries in the world don't depend from Myanmar (while they are dependent on China)
Countries such as China and USA can hardly be sanctioned or criticised for the sheer power they possess, it's a bad idea
being superpower effects*
Yes
Sanctioning Russia had its consequences for example, and Russia isn't even remotely as powerful as those two. So imagine the consequences of not depending on either USA or China
yep russia is not strong as America
Do you think Russia, China and USA are comparable?
GDP?
Damn
A military power !!?
A lot of that is a good legacy from the USSR, otherwise even their military would be much worse than it is now
omg look at u how cute ur do you have any idea what the uyghur Turks and the people of Gaza are experiencing now?ooh im sorry. All the journalists who went there to report the news died... Isnt this a double standard? why are news talking about this blocked on social media?When companies stopped advertising on Twitter because of Muskās promotion of freespeach??? isnt it clear or ur blind
??? really
Ryssia is heavily sanctioned Thats why it joined the BRICS.
Getting rid of the dollar and creating a different currency like the euro would render american sanctions usless.
? Are you insane or something, speak normally. I see news about Palestine everywhere, even in my country they're talking about the conflict, it isn't censored because it's widely acknowledged and studied, you can hardly do that in China (which was my whole point)
It was in BRICS before the sanctions, why do you think it's called BRICS, they are a founding member
Yeah thats wat i meant, but u get the point.
I mean the real press not the press that still defends Israel and says that they are defending themselves by killing innocent people. wake up lady
Okay you're stupid I get it. Do you realise there are western countries donating to Palestine and condemning Israel? Do you think we have pro-Israel propaganda and that everyone believes in it? Especially our country that was colonised for 600 years by foreign powers
https://yle.fi/news/18-172177
Look, they're positive news about Palestine, there is even a critique about our government suspending funding to Gaza
Guys keep civility, no insults
I'll be civil once he actually reads my messages instead of making up stuff and assumptions
Than ur not suited for debate, u might as well keep ur info for ur self if no one accepts them.
He isn't suited for debate if he can't read a simple message and is a bad faith debater
The question is: Did they do anything to stop the genocide? Everyone can speak. Even America has been saying that the genocide must be stopped for months, but the question is: Did it actually do anything to stop the war? No, it is still supporting it financially and militarily.
As for the help that you mentioned every time, did it even come in? No
Can we compare the amount of support and aid that Palestine and Israel received? No
Children and the elderly are dying of hunger. Did you know that there is a hospitalist who recently All patients died due to the lack of oxygen? Yes, THAY ALL DIED. Where is the aid?
The help hasn't come in because Israel is blockading it, but I already mentioned countries that are donating to it
https://reliefweb.int/report/occupied-palestinian-territory/norway-increases-support-un-agency-palestinian-refugees
Why don't you stop being biased towards western countries and lumping all of them together? We don't have the same values and interests, most of us don't support the US sanctions of Cuba for example
Who the fuck mentioned America? I'm not from there and I don't like it as well
The world cannot do anything for USA.
What country are you from? What is your country doing for example?
If your country has trade relations with USA and China then it already failed to
Did they change anything by opposing it? No
Sanctions towards Israel are being considered in the EU
yup we failed.
Do you think I like the current situation? No. Even I feel like we could do a lot more about Ukraine but it isn't our choice
I hope this happens but unfortunately it will not happen. Israel is America's spoiled child
The war in Gaza and the other countries in the Middle East also have consequences for the EU, it's why I think it's in our interests to stop them
why you think USA is doing for their freedom š¤£
We will see if they will stop the EU, but that depends also on EU vs USA. Will USA sanction us?
USA is doing for their own interest.
I know?
Our countries are doing it out of interests too, I'm still glad they're doing something for Ukraine still
not freaking freedom
what if Ukraine falls ?
Ukraine falls means Russia is likely to invade them in the future, national security issue
It will not, they'll accept a new border at most, or lose the Donbas without peace treaties but no further Russian offensive
Ukraine falls means USA is freaking useless as the leader of the west
Ukraine falls means more resources more dependent on their enemy, Russia
Russia can't do more than what's doing actually, I'm not confident Ukraine will definitely keep these borders because I'm realistic, but I know for sure that Russia will never get most of the country
Ukraine falls means force is everything, they can use force to occupy Ukraine why can't other nation use force to occupy their neibor ?
that's too much
I can see Russia taking the entire Donbas or, more realistically, ā to ā of it, and the rest of Ukraine staying independent and joining NATO right after the cease of hostilities
I see, but I think Russia is not going to win, conversely, they are going to lose
because United States and European Union
What about the borders? Do you think they'll change?
is more powerful.
Personally I don't think the EU and USA are doing enough
economically, and militarily
now u get me there is nothing we can do.... The strong devour the weak. I am not saying that you support what is happening there. but I deny what you said about the fact that USA is unable to intervene thats and if i misundertood u im soo sry my eng is not good you know 
they won't because they still have their own people
We're allowing Ukrainians to fight almost all on their own, only giving them more weapons but no real military support
they are facing another crisis since the war started
I guess we are not lacking of Ukrainians ?
their population is huge
I never said USA is unable to intervene, they are unable to intervene in China yes just as China would be unable to intervene in USA
EU and US just need to give them weapons and some techs to fight against Russia
so i get from that u dint You do not support usa policy
actually since the war started, our country (China) increased our trade with Russia
The Israel-Palestine conflict will be left as such, USA could solve it but:
- Realistically, USA gains nothing and only loses by helping Palestine.
- Israel is their mutual best friend, look at all UN votes, USA and Israel are ALWAYS aligned
and send weapons to North Korea, and North Korea send our weapons to Russia
we all know it.
that's a little about cold war thing
you might know Soviet Union supports Islam country in middle east
I believe Israel actively damages the EU, indirectly
Destabilization of the Middle East brought many refugees in Europe
well, no matter what, we don't care that much, but we do trade with both sides, Israel and Islamic nations
China recognized Israel.
Most countries do
Some are starting to recognise Palestine even in the EU, like Spain did
we see Palestine as a exile government, we can't even find palestine on the map
The current president of Spain is receiving huge backlash from other politicians, Spain doesn't recognise Kosovo either for national reasons, not because it's against Kosovo
it only says Israel when we see the Palestine region.
This situation will not change any significant thing about war
So Spain recognising Palestine is an issue to most
It will not but like I said earlier, they are discussing about sanctioning Israel. EU is the largest single market in the world, if Israel is sanctioned by us it'll be hit by a freighter train
Either Israel gets much worse economically or they may stop the war even
why would they sanction Israel
I think the most of the EU and US will not agree with this.
They are only discourse, İsreal will not see any irade blockate or anything, support of west based establhisment to israel is not even categorical it is ontological
we see Israel as US's 52th state. (I was kidding but 51th state was Japan𤣠)
Well the war there partially affects us too, we helped Kosovo despite it being an economically irrelevant country, Palestine is irrelevant like Kosovo
I can see the EU helping Palestine out of humanitarian reasons rather than economic reasons
but based on your western state most of your politicians and leader stand with Israel for sure.
US will angry if you sanction an US ally
Yes
that would be hell to pay if US takes action
About this, politics are divided on the issue, there are countries where they're less divided like Norway, Ireland, Scotland and Spain that are already donating to Palestine
I guess they can donate some aid like medicine, foods, another supplies
but how dare they can provide weapons to palestine ?!
They are aiming to that but there are blockades because Israel controls the borders
well basically GG but I heard Iran is secretly supporting Palestine but how did they do
Palestine doesn't have a proper military to my knowledge, they have resistance forces and Hamas, and Hamas is recognised as terrorist by most. Iran's government is anti-Israel, it doesn't care about who is right or wrong, to them arming Hamas is inherently good because it damages Israel
They are pretty open about it I think, there were Iranian drones in Ukraine as well. Iran is a chaotic player
a wild card that can complete upset the balance of power yeah
it's honestly haunting to see a documentary about the conflicts that happen between israel and it's neighbors a few years ago only for it to resurge and happen now
you see it and the very next day, tensions arise just like in the reports you viewed
It's best to have the IDF stand down before they launch any attacks.
İs this situation of EU that they are helping to Palestine? İ do not want to see termst that they do not help to Palestine
İsrael has killed more children than Russia killed in Ukraine but nobody cares including EU countriea
Helping is more feasible than sanctioning Israel, some countries already donated but no aid arrived because of blockades
Egypt is the culprit in that regard
Because it's not on our borders
I personally think Pakistan and Saudi Arabia are the biggest culprit
Did Middle East countries care about Ukraine? I guess not
No because they are not white and blonde
Ukraine is receiving help but less than Kosovo did during the Yugoslavian wars
Chechens are often blonde, same as Uyghur Turks yet no one is helping them
Why is that
Because they are not white and being white is a social consturction and it is not only relevant with colour of your ekin, if you are not european or american you can not be white
because ?
İf you want to a real thing about genocide in Palestine, put blockade to İsrael
because first, they are chinese, second they are uyghur
Because they are too far from us and there is no realistic way to help them
Even country that complain israel to supreme court is south africa
The countries that donated the most per capita to Ukraine are all countries familiar with Russian oppression
Why don't Arabs do the same with Palestine
I guess they stand no chance against Chinese administration
even my friend working in Xinjiang re-education camp
and he told me what is happening there
Europeans do nothing: it's our fault
Europeans do something: they should do more
Lol
Most of their neighbours don't even care but they expect us to do more, yes, we should, but it isn't out of racism
"wahn" , too much attachment to the worldly life, so much so that they disregard morals
Ukrainians are more blonde than Kosovars are, yet NATO bombed Belgrade to save Kosovo, it didn't bomb Moscow to save Ukraine
dare they do ?
if they bomb moscow, moscow will rebomb washington
by nuclear weapons
Some people here don't get that it's not easy or feasible
Serbia wasn't even a regional power, and compared to NATO it was insignificant
they don't have ability to defend themselves
simply to say, they aren't powerful enough
if they have mass destruction weapons, no one dare to strike on them
Sup
Topic?
@thorny steeple
Are morals a factor in geopolitics
alright, so, you said that Jesus and Muhammed were prophets, relying the words of a creator.
Nah
then, what if those prophets twist and alter the words of their creators?
same issue essentially. it all begins with one, not many.
What do consider a prophet to be?
A Prophet is actually a messenger of God. How can he alter the message?
Bro all politic are bulshet but we must choose bad for worst
Yes
a person who relays the message given to them from some higher power, a member of the religious order with the highest rank and can steer his/her entire faith
No there's no must? Why must we compromise?
nope
Who determination prophet send message of god
can you trust what Muhammed said? he was illiterate and required a scribe to write everything he saw by a vocal account.
Ok what you want to do
With respect, he was never illiterate
"Hahahha that is different between us you believe revelation from creator i believe the god dont be say anything to human ever" you Said
.
If that's so, that God would have been unjust. But he's not that's why he sent revelations and messengers
Jesus was born through immaculate conception, his teachings were pure, but could one of his students alter the message?
Him ļ·ŗ being illiterate is the testament that he didn't write anything by himself
And it's all about belief. A religion is a belief
He was until God chose him
He was
He is illiterate he dont know how to read and write research about it!
my bad. it's been a few years since I've read it, apologies for any mistakes š
Everything is a belief
my point is, Christianity, islam, Buddhism, Zionism, hinduism, Zoroastrianism, any sort of belief system in this world is a product of the collective consciousness of a civilization.
That is not convicing
Why do you think so?
Give reasons for not being convinced
when humanity was still living in mud huts, we required a glue to bond us together as a community, and to find a way to explain phenomena we couldn't explain
Christianity did play a major role in influencing Europe's development, as people became more literate
So do you believe in a creator or not?
They are not slave of god of who another people say!
I don't, if that answers your question
Creator is real but why you thing creator must to interfere life of human and another ?
if there was a creator, all cultures would have had their own prophet, and a uniting beacon in the form of a common creator
however, we don't.
Atheist?
Why shouldn't he?
Religions would become more similar over time instead of more differentiated
buddhism
Because God does not have human morals
but Buddhism isn't a real religion if you follow the definition of Christianity or islam
In what case?
Budhhist literally worship BUDHAA
What are human morals?
In the case they weren't created by humans
it's moreso the teachings which he gave us. we don't worship him/they directly.
The actual ignorance is not knowing you were created by someone and who He was. The Prophet knew it and after being chosen by God as His messenger, he could memories the whole book which he could then qoute anytime anywhere. A normal human being is not able to do that
They do not
Like Interference, extravagance, slavery, kindness, forgiveness, order
Buddha is an example, many Buddhists don't even believe in deities
Sooo shit
Think of Jesus, an example to follow, without any divine quality. That's Buddha
Are you saying that if religions were man made they would grow to be similar over time?
its these topics which are powder kegs of their own. we humans like to argue about things which are theoreticals so much, don't we?
I'm saying the opposite, they are man made so they grow different over time
Just like languages
I would say religion is about trust, it's important figure in geopolitical, and it's a political tool
Why's that?
me too, honestly. it always has been a glue to connect people at its core
A creator who is able to create such a universe we live in and such intelligent creation like us, logically speaking knows everything about his creations. No matter how you believe the universe came into existence, there must me a beginning and it is the creator, which means he created time and space, so obviously only the creator knows everything
People that don't live together eventually come to become different, they speak different languages, discover different things, believe in different things
we don't invent religions for fun
its definitely not only that
then I ask you this. would a creator condone mass genocides?
When you see the politican use bhuddaism for politic?
Myanmar
Good point
Any majority religion and ideology can be used as a political tool
Buddhist nationalism is a thing in Myanmar
They arent real bhuddaism because they kill rohingia moslim
I know, but it's still a thing
Like I said you can turn anything into a tool
that place is so, so estranged from asian politics in general I think they're on their own island. they tout that stuff but in reality it's all a sham
vibe check- everyone here feeling comfortable with this discussion so far?
Asia has some weird countries like North Korea, Turkmenistan and Myanmar
oh definitely lol, earth in general is weird
Yeah
when you erase all preconceptions of how a culture works, everything is weird.
The topic is not about creator that is about talking of god with human! That is not convinced god talk with human and say you must go to heaven!
Fr
Everything really is weird
we see things from the human perspective, which is flawed in and of itself
biases form from which we establish a worldview
Every evil that happening in this world is a result of individual acts. God gave us free will, and he gave us clear guidelines, every evil happening in this world is caused because of not following his path. And there's where the term "Hell" and "Heaven" comes in. Which means there is a consequence for every actions
send it over please, would love it
So you're saying that after a man was created he lost his connection with his creator? Like when children move out..?
can someone ping the mods to pin these these two lovelies?
in some field they were.
Why not? I dont have real reason we must to connection with creator!
is there a consequence for all those holocaust perpetrators who escaped assassionations in the afterlife?
Which
both are a tool to shape society
If you are someone who compares creator with human, you'll never find anything. Creator is a separate entity. He has no comparison with his creations.
they can pull the heartstrings better than any political ideology
Shape it into what?
when you trust god or you are gonna prove something, it comes to a conflict between belief and truth.
whatever you want, of course. it's leaders will mould it into whatever shape they desire, but only if the grains of the masses comply and compress š
I said religion is about trust.
Belief is truth
Ok you say another reason about is not convincing if god connect with humanš
Everything is a belief
logically speaking, we can't tell if a creator is there, as there are too many creators to verify, and each myth doesn't start with a creator intentionally making it
that's why I said it's about trust
because you trust belief is truth. it's the first statement
reality breaks down the moment you don't trust anything, yeah
it's unfalsible, which means you can't use anything against it.
Factors that convinced someone to believe something may be different but it is all a belief afterall
see
because your belief is first
think for a moment. what if someone wipes your mind clear of everything. all your memories gone- a truly unbiased, pure mind. then, they give you the picture of an atrocity, and the picture of something helping others in need. what do you think would be chosen in this scenario?
Ok les talk abt an artist or a poet. When he creates something he puts a lit bit of his unique characteristics into his creation. Just like that a human is able to forgive another human which is a characteristic of God. So there's a beautiful connection between a creator and his creation if you feel it
then again, did god plan for evolution?
I would say, one thing, your brain is material
memory is your function of your brain
if you lose that part of brain you have no memory
wipe the slate clean 
over.
He say we dont have thing of god and i answer
very succinct, yes.
so this statment is actually incorrect.
it's comparable it even has conflict
okay this has been cooking like a stew for quite some time
What's the conflict?
coffee break everyone, let's gather our thoughts and conclusions
Just had some tea
we don't want this to become dissonant from the original topic haha
aye bitter tea?
I think we should decide a topic and then stick to it
the conflict of science is about truth, it's falsible, but religion is about trust, it's unfalsible
that's my favorite
I think I don't need further explain to this
We're not able to have all of the properties that God has. We being humans can't forgive each and everyone very easily, right? But God can. So it's just a few drops that he pours into us not the whole of it
aw dang, not a lot of people enjoy bitter it seems
it's clear.
That's because they deal with separate questions
Not me
Bhuddaism that is try to be do it you must try to be god and have all goodnes thing in morals and dont believe that be human to go to magic place!
I think we really should short the fuse on this one
well I don't think if you can 100% faith with god and trust science at the same time.
but it's possible ? idk I don't trust god.
I think it's satisfactorily concluded
Most religious people trust in science and God at the same time and have no problems
whether God decided that we should go into the domain of space and reap it's rewards, it's unknown
just enjoy life š
maybe that's why religion exist till now.
if they don't trust science, they will know how science powerful is
and trust it by force.
What does that mean?
that's my core principle, enjoy life while you still can. you see war in Ukraine and Israel and you see the devastation wracked upon those lands
Well, I'm not trying to be a God. It's just about morals, we should at least have some conscious. This is why we are called humans and not animals
it means if they don't trust science, they will facing huge problem from technology evolution, and they may backward with other civilizations
I'd like to point you guys to Ontology if you want to discuss more
Humanity is not about allah and jesus that is about how you do with society
and being eliminated or conquered by other civilization
https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&opi=89978449&url=https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ontology%23:~:text%3DIn%2520metaphysics%252C%2520ontology%2520is%2520the,even%2520is%2520a%2520fundamental%2520level).&ved=2ahUKEwji8PDhwI-EAxV50jQHHa7_ASgQFnoECBUQBQ&usg=AOvVaw3Zm4sNSZKHWKDj9XWsWMMO
That's very interesting
In metaphysics, ontology is the philosophical study of being. It investigates what types of entities exist, how they are grouped into categories, and how they are related to one another on the most fundamental level (and whether there even is a fundamental level). Ontologists often try to determine what the categories or highest kinds are and ho...
Religion tells us how to behave in a society.. It tells us what are the rights that we possess and what duties we have to perform.
Hi shivam
Huzaifah you from
What does your name mean?
Islam jewish and cristian and the religion like this all are only say what you must do to the creator dont be sad from you to go to magic place!
Your neighbour
I guess ? in a religious society if you are irreligion you might be a strange
The one you don't like š¤£
Bangladesh
but it's not happening in secular.
Yes God connect with human, that's why he sent prophets. If that's not convincing you it's not my problem lol.
Pakistan
Which city
Karachi
My ancestors root from peshawar
Exactly.
Your last sentence is end of convince in your brainš
irreligious is the correct form of irreligion btw
Oh nice, mine from Hansot, it's a village near Surat, Gujrat
it find it interesting how some of us are so staunchly religious tbh
Haha what you mean "magic place" lol.
It's the real world, he created us in earth to test us this is just a temporary word
alright frn I think you can end the discussion now
You might get the answer when you die!!
it's been settled now
What a peculiar argument
ayeeeee that's... uhhhh... don't you think a little inappropriate?
š¬
Yup it's very interesting how different human thought process can be
Good
It is inappropriate I agree, but it's a fact as well don't you think? No matter if you're muslim, Hindu budhhist or atheist, you will realise after death
Well it's the ultimate answer
He was talking about the magic place (and I didn't understand his English btw it was actually confusing tho!!
we can however always use religious motifs in our creative works though. art, music, architecture, etc etc. these can all be influenced by the tides of religion and science equally and that's why I think the arts are a noble pursuit
Transmogrification!
to find meaning from our own works, like our own prophet dispelling the gospel
That is last place before nirvana if you fail in world you come again there
all I know is, we are made of atoms, quarks and nothing but matter
Yup art really is the most human thing
Are you an atheist btw?
does the Galaxy care about religion? probably not. it's got way cooler things than crazy lore on a muddy planet
That too we're not sure lol
buddhist, but I have a very reductive view of people
"human life is a cycle of suffering and rebirth" this was view of Budha because of his circumstances in life. Insted of him thinking something positive, he delves into his fears lol
No offence but did the galaxy tell you it doesn't care at all?
then why do other states if matter exist?
I can't, but does it really matter in the grand scheme of things when earth explodes a billion years later?
Can the galaxy care? I think humans are greater than most things
I was referring to the lowest common denominator
We don't know what that is yet na
It does. At least for humans! Otherwise you must've been a cow eating grass all day and enjoying all day long!! They don't have to use their brains
my philosophy may contrast you all, but I hold the opinion that, as a human, created by a creator or a god, we should contribute to life through art and other expressions of the self
I agree
to repay the debts, however the debtor might be, with gifts of the mind
You probably think every religion is the same. The thing is different religions was meant to people from different time period, all religions in the past are corrupted by its people. Inorder to understand if a religion is true or not, there is it's scriptures.
Does galaxy care about religion? No galaxy is not a living thing, we are the ultimate creation
I'm estatic you agree haha
that's a human way to think of it. humans, always at the center of the Galaxy, they say!
but the. you see black holes, and the cold indifference of the universe
it's like what society you are in and what habits you have to be, it's not just religion or irreligious
interesting š¤
but religion gives us hope in an otherwise uncaring world, basically
just like me, I'm a conservative natioalist communist when I was in my own country, China, but I'm much liberal when I was in Singapore and Japan, even I ever been dubai I need to know something about Islam even allah stuff.
What if we lecture the aliens
maybe, it's all because we are humans?
Maybe, maybe not. Galaxies are creation of God aswell. That doesn't change the fact that there's no creator or disprove his religion
š„°
it's about society effect, because if you don't do something like other people they will see you as a strange and it's hard to get along with them
they would probably laugh at us, seeing us as nothing but crazed apes lol
same logic on religion, habits, festivals etc....
to invent faster than light travel is near godlike
The need for hope seems to be uniquely human
I mean people who couldn't believe in God believing in aliens is crazy lol
you are definitely a strange if you were religious in China, and some people may hate you for some reason idk
but that's normal.
any technology advanced enough can be considered magic to an undeveloped civilization
what if god is an alien?
Just because something is grand or awe-inspiring doesn't mean it was created by a god
The universe is vast and complex, yes, but that doesn't mean it was designed by some divine being
Nah bro I think the best of humanity really are something extraordinary
well, religion is unfalsible.
Doesn't mean it's "not" a created by a God either
I guess you guys don't know what is unflasible mean ?
Yes because they might have never been to your country. If a muslim comes to china and ask you not give him pork you will find it strange.
What you mean "alien" lol
unfalsible which means you can't prove this is wrong
It's not. Did you even read my argument?
Hi
just like, I said I created this world, but all of you guys don't know, can you prove this is wrong ?
this is type of unfalsible.
i think some of us are just more devout than others
Yep, just because is grand or awe-inspiring doesn't mean in came from NOTHINGNESS all by itself
This claim is very much falsible
Ahahaha. Alien is a foreigner who's not among us. And God is not one us because he is not a human ofc.
Nobody said that
but, you said forgiveness is something god gave us, no?
what is truly "human", then?
We can't definitively prove that the universe wasn't created by a god. But neither can we prove that it was.
You said it doesn't have to be created by God, otherwise what
I would say how do you explain this ?
It's all a matter of faith, of belief
if I trust I was the god, and it's my belief, I use myself to explain everything which means it's unfalsible for sure.
If it wasn't, how did the universe came into existence?
We need evidence, we need reason, we need logic. We can't just close our eyes and pretend that everything will work out because we believe in a higher power
or whatever you believe lol. reality is our own brains perception of what happens outside the pink mushy interior
I said God pours a lil bit of drops which means we does not possess the amount of qualities he has
If claim that you created everything you would have to know about everything aswell
I don't need to have to know, all I need to trust.
Logically, nothing can comes into an existence out of nowhere
trust is all enough, you don't to prove why jesus exist.
all you need is trust, that's how religion works
Are we the mind or the body?
Are we the brain?
What even are we lol
Not everything about the religion is about truth, but yeah mostly
If you say you created me. Can you take away my soul and then bring me back to life for once? That's what a God can
if you trust me, of course I can
first is your trust me
true
Ok I trust you, now take my soul
you can't prove how jesus send you to the heaven but you may trust.
then why can't you just trust me and I will put you on the heaven ?
that's unfalsible works.
Yes and that doesn't mean that the universe had to be created by a god. It could have always existed, as I mentioned earlier.
true. this could all be a fabricated reality.
religion is based on trust.
Can you tell me what color my eyes are?
Which God we're talking about?
Since you created me you would know
the color of your eye is the color of your soul
The creator of everything
rather than clinging to dogma, to rigid beliefs, why not try exploring and questioning them?
at the end of the day, these are just human constructs-something we built half arsed and then left the philosophers to debate about to gain wisdom clout
š
what your soul looks like, your eye is what it was looks like
that's my satirical take
XD I created a religion
I don't know which God is creator of everything, please educate me
The only God, Allah
it's me, I created everything
Did you forget the fact that time exists? Which means there is a beginning? What you said can be applied to god since he created everything. How are you able to believe universe could have already existed Instead of God which makes atleast a bit more sence
I would believe you
you can find answer on me, you can pray, you can express your faith
is Allah the true God? does this mean one religion takes precedent over others because you follow it?
and I will send you to the heaven no matter what
A human creating another human!! lolllll. A chair creating another chair
Anyone wanna practice english
I was not just a human, I was a god's son
god told me I was his son when I was in dream
There's definitely going to be someone in the VCs
How
Yes I believe there's no God other than Allah
your way of understanding in very human. concepts of time and space are made up by humans.
what if I don't?
Owhh a God would have a son? It means he was not alone? He had a wife? And he had to do what a human has to do in order to have another God
So you believe in Allah? That means you believe in Muhammad (pbuh).
Can you please explain how he splitted the moon?
actually he has a great family.
That's none of my business then!!
isn't a family a human thing?
cuckoos lay eggs in other nests and let the birds be adopted
The Big Bang theory proposes that the universe began as a singularity, a point of infinite density and temperature, that exploded outward, giving rise to space and time. Now, of course you wouldn't have this basic knowledge because you don't want to see the truth
Who told you the Prophet spitted the moon?
okay I think this is rapidly going to create discourse one day
That means his whole family is God
islam is a very touchy topic and so is religion
What will?
anything controversial will. this especially
Dw, we argue about this same topic typically everyday
Arguments aren't necessarily bad
The concept of time itself is not a made up this but, the way we calculate might be. Everyone's understanding is human, since God gave human a special level of intelligence.
If time is just a concept, there wouldn't be any ongoing activities or movements. No time = NOTHINGNESS
It's interesting to know how others perceive things
frn is pretty staunch on his view of god created the universe, and everyone is digging the heels
Quran in sura al qamar 54 (1:2)
can you tell me of why this the case?
What does digging heels mean m
Why what the case?
Good morning!
Good Evening
Logically, the universe did not came into existence all by itself
without us, time would cease, in our sense, to exist. because we perceive time as a passage of the day. ever seen a white room?
that room is all white. you can't see anything but white. our sense of time is lost the moment there is no reference point
Is time really just our perception of it?
It is indeed very compelling to see how people just blindly accept dogma, doctrine, of ideas that have no basis in fact, no foundation in reason
it really is, fellow mushy pink slab person
it's a roundhouse kick! this time with generational indoctrination
What are the basis of fact and reason?
fact is something that is true, proven by evidence and with consensus
Apparently not the Qur'an
when it comes to something you can't explain by science, the power of trust is coming out which is religion occupying those fields.
What qualifies as evidence? Is it just consensus?
In that case, without us there would be the term "science" even though everything would be bound with science.
"Passage of the day" day and night is the result of movement of solar system, which we experience as night and day. For someone who can think clearly, the night and day is one proof for existence of God
But what about my single argument that I can provide by just saying - go read the Qur'an
I'm honestly too sleepy to argue with y'all, but it's been a good ride. have good night ššš¤š“
I read it, still I'm atheist
Where're from?
Relatable
Owh that. The Prophet PBUH invoked God's powers to prove he was His messenger. Some scientists believe that the linear rilles might have formed after large impact events, while others believe that the rilles were formed as a surface manifestation of deep-seated dike systems when the moon was still volcanically active
because you trust.