#š§ ļ½serious-chat
1 messages Ā· Page 90 of 1
btw this chat is the best chat for debate about any topic, in others discord channels, there are a lot of toxic people
Yeah sorta
if you like the mountains there are the Alps to the East and the PyrenƩes to the South ! but there are also smaller mountain ranges like the Vosges in the North-East and the Massif Central in the centre/south 
all the places in "red" are mountains (big or small) :))
Which ones are the most forested? Or are they more or less the same?
Also if you write something controvisial, be prepared to get stomped by everyone because this chat get aggrasive too quickly.
yes
some people are ready to defend their beliefs with everything they have
Sorry
This is such a good and horrible thing.
My state have enormous mountains, thatās why we conducted the guerrilla welfare fight against aggression and opponents.
hi
hey
well ,its true that hindus are oppressed badly over the years in india. he just use that opportunity
- he did some good works too so people support him
he is not evil
he is polition what people he simply give
that's why he win
but opposition leaders some times disrespect hinduism for eg udaynidhi stalin opposition leader did blasphemy
the main reasion is not modi . modi win because of foolish opossition
not only hindu vs muslim,hindu vs christian too. well normal people don't want hate other relligion they just want .to save their right to faith.
This little deer looks so cute,as a fairy from snow 
He doesn't deserve as much credit as you're giving him
Surely, we aren't talking about the man who sanctioned the release of bilkis bano's perpetrators just before independence day, are we?
All humans live with the wrong assumptions.
Isn't that another way of looking at it?
i am not glorifying him
just saying that our opposition is foolish that's why he is there
i am not pro modi . but,where he did correct i support it. and where he did wrong i will oppose him
yaa i also don't like that
and i am not giving him any credit
pls read my text properly
Hi
Such nonsense, there is no point in even arguing, continue to believe, freedom for the Jews.
dead chat:...
https://open.spotify.com/album/3nz5MrS1sY1Wor1ce76CUp?si=gdUZSKzJSmKgLj3_OO6k9A
new yeat x Travis scott song!
lately I was thinking about pain and loneliness
I'd been thinking is it useful for me or not
does it make me stronger or not?
do we need to be lonely sometimes?
and therefore I started reading "Existential Psychotherapy" from "Ervin D. Yalom"
the book was talking about the main cause of our mental problems
it says all of our mental problems come from 4 things:
- Fear of death
- Fear of loneliness
- Fear of freedom
- Fear of emptiness
if anyone is interested in this subject it will be a pleasure to talk about it
They say that if you read classical philosophical works, then these problems will never exist.
in the output as I can see classical people do have these problems too
and yesterday people were not perfect for their mental health
Yes, but for centuries philosophers have been discussing these basic topics, drawing conclusions, building theories, and if you understand how it works, then psychotherapy will not be needed.
Yes I'm agreed with you, knowledge is the key of everything
but psychotherapy isn't something that we can delete it from our life
and in these many centuries the classical philosophers still couldn't find the purpose of life.
because the truth is that we can't never understand the purpose of living
and classical philosophers have been always searching for the answers that do not exist
psychotherapy or religions are ways to living with emptiness
Yes, I agree with you. Psychotherapy is a useful thing. Philosophers have not found a universal meaning of life, but by reading their reasoning on this topic, you can determine some vectors for yourself. A religious people should not have these problems at all, because religion clearly answers all these fears. This is precisely the advantage of religion over atheism.
interesting speech
yes I think in someway we're at the same point
I disagree atheism af, but the thing about religion is that stops people to think
and in the result make many extremists and crazy people and stuff
and there are a little religious people that are wise and listening to other thoughts
I think religions prepare an environment for them to not thinking
People don't like uncertanity and religon gives them comfort
I don't understand you. You say: thing about religion is that stops people to think. It turns out that religion interferes with a person. Like a fairy tale that distracts from the terrible reality.
or maybe a good delusion
@keen whale May I ask why did you get yourself a beginner role? You put out some very nice sentences š
Maybe, I don't see the point in hating on any religion though, even if you see it as delusional. As long as it's a peaceful belief.
My level English is Elementary maybe pre intermediate, I still study, and I write sometimes with translationš
Got it
It's probably a nice way to get to know more complex words and sentences
yes religions say the reality isn't terrible
most wars in history came from religious causes because they hate every people that aren't agreed with them
and even they don't listen to other ideas
Yes, I need it, because my English at the level of a 7 year old boy)))
Good point, but do you think that wars wouldn't happen without religion? I see it as an easy excuse to start one, but not the end goal in most cases
I don't hate any religion and there is no religion in my mind that was peaceful in history
I can give u unlimited examples
Because they are promised eternal life, what is this temporary life worth compared to eternal life.
It's always a struggle for power and resources
It is easier to be motivated to die for God than for anything else.
These are the best fighters
and religion has no nation, it is simply an ideal instrument.
yes I agree u. either religions were exist or not, people would fight with each other
but the point is that religions always increased the hate in people instead of love
for example a view that a christian has to a muslim
therefore view of a muslim to a christian
True
I find it disturbing how religions that come historically from the same ideas can have so much hate for each other
hey how the influence of globalization on traditional cultures
this is absolutely what am I talking about
when they think there is an eternal life they don't care what happens on the earth or to other people or ...
It seems to me that this is generally the property of a person to divide his own into strangers according to various criteria, be it a nation or a religion or a country or something else.
Ours and others
Eternal problem
True I believe in God
but I think it's better to improve knowledges in people instead faith that sometimes is synonym with delusion
only wise and knowledgeable persons are really peaceful either religious or not
Emotional intelligence also influences people's peacefulness. There are a lot of smart villains.
very good example
Moses, Jesus and Muhammad
all of them brought wisdom but nations combined it with race and feudal system
Yes, Christians have a lot of branches, just like Islam.
in philosophy being smart is so much different with being wise
because the real wise person knows hurting other people doesn't bring him any happiness and he knows how to spend his awareness to be perfect
absolutely because if catholic church was absolute right there will be no protestant or orthodex church
or if sunnah was right there will be no shia or other things in islam
because both of them sunnah and catholic their first priority is power not anything else
as we see now the LGBT flags on catholic churches
or Halloween and other western cultures in Saudi Arabia and beside the Macca
Yes, wisdom and intelligence are different things, but they are easy to confuse
In my country, the Russian church blesses rockets, which is completely contrary to religion in principle. I don't understand how people believe this. This is a paradox.
True and this paradox is so crazy
at least Russian government or churches are not pretending pure angels like US and NATO
I have question. What is the difference between religion and propaganda?
religion is a subgroup of propaganda š¤
Here and there people believe. It's interesting why people tend to believe?
thinking and searching is fearful for them
maybe also laziness
Are you saying that the source of laziness is a feeling of fear?
yes I think fear is father of every negative emotions
hmmm, I never thought about it, there's something in this
actually I never thought about it too
I found it out just right now š
And if you are tired and you donāt feel like doing something, itās not because of fear, right?
I agree, part of the reason you don't want to start something is because you're afraid, and it's easier to be lazy.
no it actually can be justified by fear
the cause you feel tired and you do nothing is that do something is fearful and scary
because you're not brave to kill your tired feelings
and actually fear can be justified by laziness too ā ļø
you're afraid because you're not in the mood to don't be afraid
you're lazy to do something about your braveness
complication of mind š
or maybe we name these feelings separately
and they're not actually separated
bro if I talk more I can defeat Plato š š
Plato is the foundation of everythingš
I donāt know, tiredness and laziness are two different things. After running a 100 km marathon, you feel tired, but youāre not lazy, right?
If you worked in a mine for 12 hours, and after that you donāt want to learn English, is that laziness?
I think all of them are comparative
for Mike Tyson practicing for 12 hours is nothing
but for me is death
the thing is that u can and that's the thing make heroes and differences
Mike Tyson is special. If you overwork, you can get stressed, and this worsens your health. There are athletes who can work all day long, such as Khabib, Tyson, but ordinary people begin to lose their immunity from such training.
Can overwork kill desire? Letās say you want to be an artist, but because of your hard work you kill this desire and burn out.
for me is too soon even think about killing my desires or extremely hard working
most people stuck in very very lower level
if u really get to that high level you'd been strong and wise enough to got that position therefore you can solve the problem by your own
yes he is special now but he wasn't before
he was same as I am
It was fearless of humans and quite friendly too
No, human just are friendly to animal that don't harm us or something that we don't know specifically.
The deer turned out friendly too
a chat that is serious
What is serious?
Grandma's heart condition
topics, "serious" means important stuff
That's warm, not serious
important stuff? that's important. not serious
whats warm? š
Radiation

I don't think we do know that is a friendly one, fight or flight is the another choice.
actually I strongly believe that human is exactly superior than most animals in the world, that's why we almost took over the earth and only human established rule and having civilization.
so for some animal like pets, I love them because they are cute and lovely they are friendly with human too, they serve our emotions.
and actually animal is important to humanity, till now and in the future.
Zs propaganda music
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OJoUumdxOhE
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uldNBiVgPB0
Christian music (I hope there is no need for comments)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nQWFzMvCfLE
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dKVujUXxKag
SHAMAN bei YouTube: www.youtube.com/channel/UCsTGeNxaCVc2Boqw-SZVmwg
ŠÆ Š Š£Š”Š”ŠŠŠ bei YouTube: www.youtube.com/watch?v=FAPwIEWzqJE
Telegram: t.me/Shaman_Channel
I am Russian
I breathe this air,
the sun in the sky is looking at me,
free wind is blowing over me,
it is just like me!
And I just want
to love and breathe -
and nothing else matters.
I...
SUPPORT THE CHANNEL:
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC19xLluI7dG093Gmw57BhHw/join
I love keeping up with the latest in Russian propaganda on this channel, and in today's video we're covering Russian propaganda music.We'll check out a new Russian singer named SHAMAN - this guy is super popular right now, getting millions of views from his "patri...
"What A Beautiful Name" from the album 'let there be light'' recorded live at āŖHillsong Conference in Sydney, 2016.
** Scriptural Inspiration Behind the Lyrics**
https://goo.gl/N5M5Qh
** Song Story From Brooke Ligertwood**
https://goo.gl/OqOJxU
Subscribe to our YouTube channel
https://worship.lnk.to/subscribe
Click to listen to Hillsong Wor...
"When I Say Jesus" is a soul-stirring cover song performed by Life.Church Worship, a respected contemporary Christian music ensemble. Originally penned by Sonny LeMaire, Billy Simon, and Dan Truman, this rendition by Life.Church Worship adds a fresh, heartfelt perspective to the beloved track. With its profound lyrics and emotive melody, the son...
Is there one interested in one on one English practice I'm from India law pursuing students.. I m beginner š I m not feel comfortable in Group chats š ||I m male||
I don't understand, why is this?
You need to go beyond comfort
I have to disagree with you. Mike Tyson beat up grown men at age 14, this is clearly not an ordinary boy.
Mike Tyson was built different, the gen were scared of him.
Hi
because he had been boxing from 13
and practicing 24/7
he couldn't beat any grown man without being trained and prepared
he wasn't different he has been living differently
Bro, at the age of 14 he weighed 90 kg, why do you think there are weight scales in sports? Why did the short one beat the tall ones? Do you think other boxers trained less? Why does some Nganu come out and knock down Fury, having been boxing for at least 2 years?
Why are there 13-year-old genius children, while others are standard? Do you think geniuses learn more?
hi everyone i wanna a girl who i can practice my English with
BBoth Texting and voice chat
hmmm unfortunately you're right š
I'm a girl
Hey elise did u watch the vid I sent u?? Did it respond to the last point of the post u sent me?
huh. mAAAn,,, really? Fine.
propaganda preparing people to do what a current regime wants - to make you cannon fodder, to make you toil for nothing or hate someone, to make you forever loyal slave etc Propaganda never starts with something that it really wants. "I'm Russian" could mean - everyone else does not deserve to live. Someone is "bad" could mean - we are going to be worse. And so on.
religion is about your relationship with the Living God and how to live in His Kingdom (His church (community)), After that it can help a person to understand how to live in the world.
Sometimes religion is used by politicians and sometimes Churches can influence certain political decisions.
Hallo! oh. I am very sorry, I think I've missed that. ((( I'll check it now.
I'll resend it
āŗ Subscribe Now: https://goo.gl/2tmfa8
āŗ Donate: https://www.gofundme.com/saveourchannel
āŗ Become A Patron: https://www.patreon.com/mercifulservant
If you like our content and would like to stay updated please subscribe and press the bell (next to the subscribe button) to receive updates and notifications!
MS Website: http://www.themercifulse...
The point was that holy quran was a copy of the bible/ old testament
I made a group of girls to practice English if u want
No promotion
In English hub
He's trolling u, he's the server owner lol
I'm not
:x
See that's how we stop illegal activities
hahaha ok
Smart of u

Read the rules of this server
Wait its still not time yett
Isn't it like 26 february?
oh I wasn't know this sorry @static pivot
Thank @formal scaffold
You should attend this server's classes, you'll find a lot of girls to talk to
I'm new in this server can u tell me how?
There is good propaganda, for example, promoting healthy eating, or playing sports. Propaganda is not always bad; sectarians also think that they believe in God, and then commit suicide in the name of God. And what's the difference? For me, it has the same effect on a personās mind.
I can be your valentines
Check The 2nd tab under the server guide "events"
Thanks
14

How do even know that stats
I didn't say believe, I used the word "relationship". Yes my friend you can use propaganda methodology for something good... Although I do not see such things and I don't think it is good by itself. (But I do see advises of different kind or warnings.) Some examples?
Promoting healthy eating, promoting sports, promoting family, promoting humanism, and so on. There is plenty of good propaganda, you just donāt see it, or you donāt understand that it is propaganda.
Because I'm admin
General chat
It's interesting to note that Rahul Gandhi, despite his shortcomings and his family's challenges, appears to maintain a more composed approach compared to Modi. He avoids using divisive slogans
or fostering animosity to build a personality cult
@formal scaffold Skuggi. hm. ... About water, expanding nature of the world and the sky you can read in the first chapter of Genesis. (I didn't read it yet, but I've watched enough videos.)
About other points of the video. Root of the mountains is a common idiom and I think it is present in most languages. Skin - If you want someone to suffer again you need his skin back. Actually if you'd asked me how to write about everlasting suffering in the unquenchable fire I would have written something about returning of the skin and other tissues.
I think there is no prejudice in my opinion now, but I do not see that those details can make any difference.
I am sorry. I respect your fillings. (and water is usually means a chaos in OT. Genesis tells about creation from water and from chaos at the same time)
What is F...?
I understand that discussion is impossible here
If it is - it used not for a good purposes. It can mean that a politician or party want to change demography and exploit it. Propaganda deceives people to use them at some point. And no - you can make people better by means of propaganda - You can change their behaviour by zombifying them.
Just like religion.
any arguments?
It's a book that existed 1400 years ago, discrediting the evidences using nowadays scienitific common sense, or idiomes that came after it doesn't disprove it sorry
hi
Iāve already given all the arguments, you just donāt see them, I donāt see the point in hitting the wall. Thank you for the dialogue, but convincing a believer is an almost impossible task.
Greeks made up atoms )
Was that about the universe expanding point?
I see, I see.
You don't see.
I mean they invented that theory
It depends on whether there was witness about the evidences. Or Media can control all over situation to take cover those evidences for those in power?
It was in Genesis.
so you guys are discussing about physics?
First of all , theories and claims are diffrent, secondly the precision of the information is lacking, u got a book that claims that the sun got its own orbit its diffrent than a 1000 person theorising random stuff until one of them approached the truth with no details
And sadly people who determine how it is and what it is are in those in power side.
Can't find it
Who can define such things? it is people who are bought by those in power.
We generally are devoted ourselves to our work for life, money, or belief.
I will find that, but it is more general view. something like "spread". I do not remember.
Let's say it exist it, that dodsn't mean it is plagiarised , all scientific signes or most should be prooved to be plagiarised to pull that conclusion since quran approve the original old books that were non corrupted
We never know unless as long as we completely understand the mechanism or not following theories written by historical people
Plus to plagiarise only the correct parts from ancient civilisations without copying the wrong misconceptions disproved the plagiarisme theory
not again about corrupted (( oh. Adding a couple of "modern" details do not make anything that was long long before corrupted.
What do you define the situation as corrupted?
It depends on people, right? That is why this issue never figure out I guess
It's not my opnion, if something come from god it shouldn't be changed by humans.
We are talking about wether the quran is a plagiat of old books
Does Muslim believe that old Jews' prophets are valid?
So it is aloe related in Islam
Ofc
Jew is a race islam isn't a race
Islam is anything coming from any prophet sent by god
Specifically who did write those theories in the books?
How their books can be corrupted then?
That's vital point
they are in power just because they have power, peopleās support is power, violence is power, science is also power. Once they do something like spreading fake news they will taking risk of losing one of those sources which means they are likely and they are exactly losing one of those power.
As long as we know who write them, we can pursue their achievement in detail to make sure whether that is scientifically correct.
It got changed throught time and even during prophethoods, part of of jews always were known for killing prophets and disobeying god, bc of the vanity of the name the chosen people of god
The changing of the amount will cause the changing of the nature. (Idk if itās the correct translation but itās āéåå¼čµ·č“Øåā)
A major incident was the calf that you'll find recorded in the old testament
why people with religion are enthusiastic believe in books related with it not doubt those accuracy?
The people who in power is unnecessary to do something will lose their power
So the power tend to make manipulation on their country as they wish sucn direction.
How many prophets wrote Quran?
Do we need to be logical to figure it out?
Thatās why I live in an authoritarian state and I know what is the current situation.
None
But it doesnāt mean that they promoted is neutral, most of them are exactly working for their rule and power
or as long as we're being indulged in our belief or religion is enough?
Muhamed pbuh couldn't read or write
What do you resolve precisely and recognize what it is is important
Islam is the only relegion to recognize christianity and judaisme prophets , jews deny the christ pbuh and christians deny mohamed pbuh
OK. My point actually was - OT was not a single book for a long time. There were a lot of prophets and a lot of copies and a lot of scriptures. What you said is an extreme conspiracy is russian style.
from my perspective, I can see among each those different religions are just playing around showing how magnificent our religion is.
Am I wrong? any opinions?
The thing is a book of god don't needs additions or corrections since god knows the future right? Quran has never went throught modifications nor correction even linguistically
It didn't need 300 years to be released like the bible
Which is why we believe "the bibile is partially wrong"
When it has happened to the OT?
Bc its partially human
How can believer perceive their religion's theories?
There are no theories. ))
to perceive on purpose as the founders of the religion wish?
There's no clear change in the OT that I can point out except for the mohamad'im part that they added into the aramaic and gave it a meaning
Muhamed'im meaning sir muhamed
Such conspiratorial work
Yes highly
go ahead
Idk how we ventured away from the fact that no book can pinpoint which part of the brain is responsible for lying back then
To the OT
It is difficult even for brain scientist
everything is easy - 99999999999999999999999 years of evolution
Yet it got mentioned 1400 years ago along with the brain part respondible for movement
Rather even they have no idea what is going on part of it.
They can tract brain activity in modern age using electro magnetic devises to track weak electric pulses
Its very common
But to do costs large sum of money I guess
Ofc
It is objective far from ordinary people like us
Yeah?? I don't see any corelation with the fact that it got discovred 1400 years ago
correlation?
are we doubting that info from brain reseaechers bc we don't own that device?
Relation
Ofc we don't know what is going on actually like something activity corresponds with specific part.
So you are skeptical about every science fact that you can't proove yourself
Being doubt is scientifically correct behavior I guess?
only if you have brains
your opinion looks like telling me such being optimistic is good way of researching the truth as religion.
There's no way you find the truth in relegion
Agree

You find enough knowledge to decide wether to live by it or not
Hell you can't find the truth anywhere
How about liberal arts?
Maybe a satisfying answer to you personally is what we seek
Liberal arts?
We are currently living scientific and economic-based world, right?
True
well, sure religion can help us in some way but to think about priority what is significant in our life, It reminds me of the knowledge about science, economy and things like liberal arts.
The majority of people I met hates the world we live in
I don't think so tho
I'm glad u don't
well, that also depend on people preferance
I won't force them to accept because It is impposible to make it
It all goes back to feelings, we do things to have a certein feeling in us, relegion can be a priority too if it can give u what you seek
Yes true, the necessity changes by circumstances back then.
arts subjects such as literature and history, as distinct from science and technology.
arts subjects to free people from modern suffer by avoiding following tedious rules or restrictions. (my definition)
Does it call for Freedom, or absolute freedom?
Hello People
Then what's your version of freedom?
Hello
How's your day?
ye this is the world that I want it to be looking such
sorry I made confusion "what's" with "that's". my eysight...
The world that I seek is the world well-balanced and furthermore well-established with rule of law consistently.
Well it's fine it happens
Interesting view
The world you seek is the world that should begin within you.
Once you change yourself only then you shall be able to make changes to the current world.
Indeed for change you want you must change and perseverance
What is even bro typing
I find it is arrogant thought since this human society is corresponding each other.
But I in some way agree with you that should begin within me but I interpret it as only in case that if I want to affect
the world at least and that's all so nothing more and nothing less because we are corresponding each other affecting this society.
No one can achieve by oneself. but I agree that someone must do on starting.
The path to Immortality!
Itās a curse that only the supreme one bound to have
Religion is a thing that controls you. I've been learning a lot of stuff about it for more than 2 years, Islam, Christianity, watching different movies and now I'm pretty convinced that there is "something", but this "something" is not what we imagine. Watch Zeitgeist, the first movie and the first part of the movie, it explains a lot of stuff about religion very well.
It doesn't work the way we think it works, I'm 99% sure.
And it can be a political tool
existence is reasonable, I guess there is someone clearly knows how religion works.
you may believe you are going to heaven and other will going to hell, that's your freedom.
and that can't affect me, but using religion to spreading influence is like another advertisement.
just like what if I say communism is the best because I'm from China ?
then continuing argue that, we trust marx, lenin, stalin, mao zedong and we can achieve a lot from trust them, and make everyone trust them too.
I guess that is ridiculous, I will consider that mind is heavily under indoctrination
I mean it already happened in the past
Marxism-Leninism loves some brainwashing
Religion is basically propaganda, but for some reason it fulfills people
yes but I mean it was the almost same thing, just that is outdated.
because that failed
for instance, what about trump ? Biden ? Xi jinping ? it's hard to give a define those people and they actually have a lot of believers.
but those are the same thing, the point is trust.
I don't think if you think absolutely trust one thing/people/religion and using it to explain everything for yourself is rational.
that's why I like to study how to do not trust one thing and not using one scale to explain something, explain something by other's prospect is important for learning how this world works and how to get the maximum benefit from the environment.
If you know the prospect of muslims, Chinese, the people in different places etc. and choose one which you like and be your best stance, I think you can get maximum benefit than another other people like you in everywhere.
that's why I don't trust anything besides, truth. and I like questioning, that's core of philosophy
religion is unfalsifiable, but science is falsifiable.
Why Stalin
he saved Soviet Union with war against Nazi Germany
we actually... have positive views on Stalin, because your next leader breaks up with China.
actually Stalin is a totalitarian leader, and he cause some crisis for his nation like great purge, ukraine famine etc.
but he expanded territory for Soviet Union, like an annexation of baltics, part of poland and germany's territory.
How is that good? Those people didn't want to be part of the Soviet Union
when he was in power, Soviet Union is the most powerful nation in the Europe, and they are the biggest winner of the WW2
that's because the next leader, next leader and next leader made too many mistakes
No lol they didn't like it already, he literally deported countless people from those countries for no good reason at all
He annexed part of my country and people didn't wish for that, that's why they fled
they always rejecting their history, denying stalin, denying the next leader of stalin (I know who it is but I can't spell it in english)
of course that's from your prospect, but the people of Russia actually benefit from the Soviet Union
The people in Russia aren't the people from the countries that got annexed, which is my entire point
yes
It didn't benefit many minorities in Russia as well
we also annexed Tibet, but they don't wanna be annexed ?
we don't care then. because we need maximum our benefit.
that's correct. they actually doesn't have any power and messed up their nation
it's not good but it make sense, because Japan staying in their small territory and they wanna expand for hundred of years.
if I was the Japanese leader, of course a war with China to expand territory is necessary.
that's the best for Japan
but actually... history proven that Japan started a long-term war with China is failure action.
if they signed the peace agreement with Kuomintang, they will have a lot of advantages and they are also the great power since the WW2 was end
@versed rain
but history can't be changed.
the point was your prospect, if your prospect was supporting China, you will condemn Japan because they started war and they massacred Chinese people, but if your prospect was supporting Japan, you will know how important for expanding Japanese territory to China mainland.
@versed rain to achieve power ,u have to have a lot of influence, and only riches enables u to do that.
Thats why they are called oligarchies.
what do you have to say
My prospect isn't about supporting a country over another, that's myopic. It isn't much to side with the people that want to build their own country and not be oppressed
Bro, if u want to upgrade your military power u should have money but if you have money that is not mean of you can be powerfull on military.
They're called oligarchy because the power is in the hands of few people, olygos is a Greek word that means few
but for aggressor that's best for oppress them
Monarchy is power in the hands of one, diarchy is two
Is any greek here?
don't you have any other options for maximum benefit for your own people ?
MONEY IS POWER MAN
IF U HAVE MONEY AND STILL DK HOW TO SPEND IT THEN YOU'RE DONE
I don't think there is another best option besides oppress them
No,brooo
If u are a civilian buisness man who's filthy rich. The money u have we'll give u political influence even military influence.
There is no tangible benefit in oppressing and occupying, people will be unhappy and perform worse, they will revolt and discriminate or hate the majority
U just explained what the word means.
they will and their territory is important, their resources is also important.
this depend on the country and how much do your country need your service or product
Yes, because it isn't about people being rich, it CAN be about them but it isn't always like that
if they don't need more resources, more power, more strength why they need occupying that place ?
They can trade those resources if they don't need them
hey guys, can u rate my essay pls? if there are any grammatical errors, pls tell me
The chart provides information about global sales of Mobile Phone Games, Online Games, Console Games and Handheld games since 2000 to 2006 in billions dollars every year.
The highest sales of handheld Games was in 2006 and nearby 18 billion dollars was gained, moreover sales of handheld games increased from 2000 to 2006 and rise by almost 10 billion dollars, when started with approximately 11 billion dollars in 2000. Then sales of console games in 2000 was on 6 billions, but sales slowly falled by 2 billions dollars to 2006 and reached 3 billion dollars of sale
Sales of mobile games in 2002, when mobile games was created firstly, was on about 1 billion dollars, but there is a sharp increase in a number of sales between 2002 to 2006, by almost 5 billion dollars. Also the number of sales of online games was almost equal to the number of sales of mobile games
I know, but it only can be achieved through cheer wealth.
Im just simplifying the concept
why ? trade needs money and other resources, but took over those region becomes yours and you will never need to depend on others.
I am from Turkiye. Why have Turkiye a big inflation? This answer is that: Turkiye have been spending too much money for military rank for 5 years. You can see whats upgrading. For this example arabs only lives with expencive cars with their oil but they have not any military. America exploits year by year.
self-dependence is kind of security.
id send the chart, but i cant so sry
No country is completely self dependent by now
No this is universal.
but no doubt they want to achieve
it's a damn good advantage to achieve self-dependence.
It can be achieved peacefully and it's more stable than any other option
but why ? peaceful achieving those stuff needs time and more money even patient.
that's right
It's why once the Soviet Union collapsed and all the other countries ran to join NATO or distanced themselves form Russia
a war to annex them is the best option when they are weak.
It doesn't need more money
annex them, you don't need to care anything except using force to occupying
that's easy, and it always happening
Hasn't happened in decades in the EU
You play too much hoi4
Mhm that's my pov
If you spend the money on the right thing you will get the best with it ...and about Arab countries I'd tell ya QATAR and SAUDI are the safest countries of the world also UAE
They have got the safest life for them self as Turkiye.
because they are dependent and they have modern military which means if you started war against other nation that will be hell to pay
but it doesn't mean that is not available in other places
and it happens, always happening in the past.
you will under economic sanction, even military interfere, which means you may lose.
Because America protects these countries for oil.
We see Afghanistan. Afghanistan reached freedom.
"falled" - Should be 'fell'.
"Created firstly" - "Was first created"
Overall your choice of a few words makes it hard to follow a coherent story. "Was gained, moreover"
.....overall I would have a couple questions on the computational order of the math used. Not that it's 'wrong'
There's no country in the world whether it's under control of any super power country (US, RUSSIA,CHINA)
Including today's Afghanistan
Hasn't happened in Latin America either
because of what ? you guess ?
United States of America
thanks bro
What do they have to do with Latin American countries and their conflicts, that would benefit USA
they have conflict is the best for USA.
They don't have conflicts, only Venezuela with Guyana does
Yeah, already EU makes everything for what America wants.
they have enormous internal issues, and they actually all NON-POWER
I cannot say anything about this.
they don't have crucial resources like Venezuela
They have internal issues but they aren't at war with each other lol
Russia is a regional power at best
because if you fight against each other, USA will using their best tool, UN to solve this problem for their maximum benefit.
It only recently surpassed Italy's economy
an unstable place which nearing any country is not a good signal for them.
Mhm told u
if you look at the history of GDP of the Soviet Union.
China & the US both use consent by force on both their friends & enemies. I see little value to plebs to support either.
you will know how powerful Soviet it is.
Yeah and Russia isn't the Soviet Union
If Russia has any regional importance today it's only thanks to the Soviet Union, which says a lot about their shitty economy
Russia doing the right thing
75 percent
I wasn't talking about Stalin did not do anything bad, and I know what he do is creating holocaust against minors.
but it's best for againsting them rather than let them independent.
of course those minors always wanna independent from Stalin but they failed.
Clearly not, since Russia has no friendly countries in its western borders besides Belarus
What is the mindset of the communists? Really disgusting. Why don't a person want democracy?
that's past leader's doing.
So being aggressive towards the Baltics, Poland and Ukraine didn't work out quite well
not Stalin bro
Who do you think occupied those places and started the deportations?
You're not even from any of those countries
I have one question, that deportation is for who ?
Minorities mostly
for minors ? for Ukraine ? for Poland ? who the hell any Soviet leader care them, they care is their great country, Soviet Union
Yeah and their great country isn't a thing anymore
yes
That's some genius planning on Stalin's side
but they do is for Soviet Union, they killing for Soviet Union, they deporting for Soviet Union, not minors
that's my point
Maybe if he let them develop on their own they would've joined willingly and be a long term benefit and contributors
well I guess maybe ?
We got an island that almost was part of Sweden just by protecting them rather than occupying them
And afterwards they voted to join our country
but for us, we are suppressing Tibetans and Uhygurs it worked properly, both region is more stable and more likely for living for majority of people in China.
Are you justifying ethnic cleansing
nope, but it actually works.
Of course it works, until it doesn't
yes, that's all enough
That's what Germany attempted with Poland and it kept losing millions in war assets and logistics because Polish partisans kept sabotaging them
One day it may end like Myanmar, where minorities ally with each other to fight the country's military
they are so extreme I believe if they give another way for polish people like naturalization process for loyal citizens, I think they will be more powerful.
And by that point there will be nothing the government can do except being more aggressive
Until it collapses or can't afford it anymore
but that freaking leader, is a extreme racist...
why you think their junta will collapse ?
what if junta took over again
Because they can't control the entire country already, minorities are capturing vast portions of land and the economy isn't regulated
but they have more power, more economic power and more powerful military
they are receiving aids from China
Seems like it isn't enough
I would say they can win or not, just depending their power.
if minors actually has more power and it succeed, that's a W
but if junta took back their territory and continuing suppress minors, that's a L
The only outcomes I can see are either their country getting Balkanised to hell or the military will step down and the leaders will try to democratise the country to avoid consequences
that's the outcomes you believed in.
but I believe the truth.
the truth is junta do have more power, and they are likely to win
Kinda like what happened in the ROC, they probably democratised the country because the dictator feared they would fail to hold back the revolts
I don't know, but will they continuing exist ?
Having more power doesn't always translate like that, especially in a country full of jungles like Myanmar. USA was undoubtedly more powerful than Vietnam, but wasn't that efficient
I don't know about that, maybe one day their regime will collaspe and the red flag of People's Republic of China will be placed over their presidential building.
They will not give up and they will fight China as well
yes that's true
they will ? idk, but if they will just kill all of them then. I guess that's the order from Beijing
isn't that a strange thing for Chinese nation, in history they massacre the city they took over.
and for most empires too.
It's a stupid outdated way of conducting politics, barely above animals in term of thoughts, in fact I'd say it's offensive to compare animals to countries that act like that
depends how many people gonna surrender.
if they all surrender, no one damages.
Even some ant species ally with each other and don't care about where the other ants are from
if they fight, all of fighters will be killed.
If ants can do that and humans cannot, they are undoubtedly better
unforunately, we are human
actually, it's a brief history for China/Russia/USA has no war with others.
we even have a famous book, called the art of war which released in 5th BC.
today's 21.
the stage of power for the world, is always active.
19th, British, Russia, Germany, France, Japan
?
20th, USA, Soviet Union, Germany, Japan, China, Italy, British
How did Russia and China annex each other's Siberian regions then?
well ? maybe it's my english problem ? I was saying those nations has a brief history which is having no wars with others.
which means most of time they exist is having war with others.
they fight in Siberian and Russia wins, so they deserve then
you probably don't know how territory important for nations ?
It's overrated
there are always been a L or W in a war and may it has W and W in a war, or L and L in a war.
you may curious, how W and W ?
No winners in a war amongst the populace
ē½ŖåØå½ä»£, ååØåē§ (The crime is in the present time, but the merit is in the future)
that's not the prospect for us.
for US, and for Russia
economy, resources, jobs, prosperity.
and power
Do you get richer and more powerful?
what if our land all have more oil ?
we will be the dubai then!
damn that's so damn good
Does the government give you a piece of Amur?
they don't but they generates for us
Do they give you the profits from the trades?
can you imagine a lot of stuff that instantly having it.
They have to increase spending to change the region
increase spending means jobs
enormous jobs
economy prosperity
our prosperity comes from large territory
They may invite some people to settle the place, but China has billions of people so it's unlikely that you'll be called, even if you are, you will have to settle a poorer region with less development
oh really ? I'm using iPhone 15 to talking with you ?
and my family having 2 cars ?
both are CCP members
why you think I can't get the benefit
The average person doesn't have relationships with the CCP
Besides I get it now, you're defending your political class
CCP member has 100mil
wait, I want to ask, why would I abandon that ?
Less than 10% of the population
I didn't say that
But I get why you're defending it
I was stating the truth, personally I will defending it but it does not cause conflict to know what is the truth
That's not the truth, it's an opinion
the truth is more territory = more benefit
the opinion of more territory != more benefit ?
what are the exceptions are you talking about or just you don't agree it in any forms ?
Germany has less territory than WW2 and before that time
because they lose ?
And it's much better today
what ?
And yet they're better off today
wait, I want to ask you one question
if Germany gives their capital to Russia, will German be good ?
Nope
if Germany has Russian's capital, will German be good ?
It's full of people that don't speak German, that don't have anything to do with Germany, whose city is completely detached from Germany
sell it back then
I don't get what you're trying to say
I was trying to say, if they have their capital, they can just sell it back to them
and they getting more benefit
that's over.
Both Germany and Russia would be better off without each other's capitals
I'm not denying anything because I don't get what you're trying to say even
how is like a stuff coming from your hand, and you say that is no beneficial to you ?
I'm confused
If they invade one another and then sell back the conquered territory it'll damage trade relationships
I was saying if there is a stuff, coming to your hand, you have right to choose this fate of the stuff
you are actually getting more benefit
there is no doubt
How does it end up there? I doubt people would willingly give me free stuff
are you denying that if you have more stuff which means you don't getting more benefit ?
For example there is Russian Karelia, if I was president of my country and Russia wanted to give Karelia back to us I'd reject the offer
More stuff isn't always better, it often needs maintenance
If my home was bigger I'd have to clean a lot more
but what if it don't needs maintenance
And spend more to keep it clean, and more time to clean it too
what if it don't needs maintenance
Most of the times it does
and you mean, the territory needs huge maintenance project
Russian Karelia is way behind Finland in living standard
which means more conflict will comes out, more money pouring in and may you will lose them
It would be pointless to accept Russian Karelia just because my country would get way bigger
I will say if you don't have that ability to maintenance, just don't do it.
but my leader have, and it gets better.
Russia have, USA have, China also have.
are you talking SARS ?
USA didn't improve Hawaii either
Yes
Russia hasn't improved anything, if anything the opposite happened
Russia annexed Finnish Karelia, look at living standards there vs Finland
have you ever heard of Shanghai ? Chongqing ? Beijing ? Guangzhou ? Shenzhen ?
those places are not SARs
and even my place, the capital of Shandong province, Jinan is not.
I actually travelled in almost all of those megacities
Absurd gap
and even I ever been Xinjiang, Urumuqi and Tibet, Lasa.
I even been North Korea, Japan, Singapore.
yes but what is the problem ?
You said those governments improve the places, they clearly do not
have you ever see that night of North Korea and South Korea from the map ?
um
Urumuqi ?
how do u even pronunce that š
ä¹é²ęØé½ = wu lu mu qi = Urumuqi
they just need to control why would they gonna improve ?
cool.
they controlled this area and exploit resources and feed their core places
It's inefficient
at least better than no
just like Henan contributed the most food in China but Henan is poor
and Seribia contributed the resources for Russia but Seribia is full of ice
it's so damn common
If they produce and they're still poor then China doesn't even aim for communism
yes
but they must produce
if they don't produce they will facing another big problem which is alive or dead.
We all angry if they complain about this thing because they must work and they can live
If they donāt work they donāt have money
Thatās how capitalism works
Why do you say this then, you're an hypocrite
But capitalism allowed some people taking huge profits without work
You're an hypocrite if first you say that you look up to communists but feel that poverty is justified
I said what if
And I was not promoting communism
This
If real communists take over your country it's over
I donāt know what you are arguing on which point, but basically I was saying that Stalin is good for Soviet Union, and occupying territories in our state is beneficial for majority and it properly worked
And how capitalism and occupation works
But it seems like you are questioning my stance
Because it isn't true
Idk how it is true when Germany developed better after WW2 with less territory
Which point is not true ?
That more territory is better and that governments make good use of it
Yes ?
But which point I was saying is not true ?
I will not repeat it again
i see that you guys are talking about the russian annexation of karelia
but lets talk about the brazilian annexation of bolivian Acre
hahahahahahahaha
Well, since it's latin america, things are better there than in bolivia
Are you actually from China? I'd love to meet the forbidden city
There are a few chinese people here where i live, some are very gentle, i'd like to approach and talk mandarin to someone however i lack knowledge of this beautiful language
LMAO this language is the hardest language in the world
i was learning russian, but mandarin is indeed very difficult, i can say hello only
something like niihaao
it's a tonal language isn't it?
Yes
i've said niihao to a chinese vendor, he blatantly ignored me
Thatās pretty bad
however the ones selling food here are gentle
maybe i've said it wrong and cussed on him?
Or he thought you said ciao
I hope i hadn't said that
I had foreigners say wrong things to me because they don't differentiate A from Ć or O from Ć
it's a very difficult language, but i think i would be connect more easily with the chinese community here
where are you from?
Finland
I guess, are they so many Chinese in Brazil ?
i am brazilian, so we can say ã
Is it similar
i like nightwhish hahahahaha, i'd love to go to finland someday
One question, can I freely travel in Brazil if I only speak English ?
yes, however, be careful here
š
it's important to know where you are going, don't go sneaking into a favela
or some dangerous neighborhood
Thatās the freaking apple input system
Just for Nightwish?
I hate IOS
go buy samsung
Way better
i am getting quite acquainted with european folk culture, i believe i can find a lot of it in finland
There is some, certainly more than in most other countries
there are a lot of chinese tourists here in my city, some of them don't even speak english
Genuine interest is more stable than dumb nationalism
Nationalism may have interest
i actually wanna leave brazil, i don't think things are going to get better here in public safety š¦
i mean, the country is HUGE and there are safe areas here
If 91% of people have same race, same culture, same nationality
I think nationalism is best
some i'd like to live, particularly in the south or center east, but the law here is too weak
Anyways bye guys Iām gonna sleep
i am from it and i am also doing a masters degree in AI, so i think it may be easier for me to leave soon
good nightš
Is there no improvement on the horizon?
Unfortunatelly, in questions of public safety, which is the most concerning issue here, no
the president said he would like to pardon lower crimes, and people who commit them shoudn't go to jail
in my country samsung is more useful cuz most pf apples services are boycotted
It'd be a good idea but that depends on what he intends about that
by lower crimes i mean robbing cellphones, stores, cars
If it's just personal drug use or more
and that is already a problem here, the law is too weak
if a person kills someone here, this person may spend only 12 years in jail (or less)
and the killer is also permitted to leave jail on holidays
everyone who have commited a felony is....
How
Our prison system is quite generous
for me that is the only problem of the country, but the one people care the less and the one that most afflicts society here
the law obliges
Criminals are paid if they work here
that's not allowed here š¦
Some are hired once they are released and the amount of criminals is usually low and stable
the prisonal system here is danmed
the police arrests and the justice releases
if someone takes your cellphone or your car, be assure that no justice will be done
home invasions happen often in big cities
it's very sad
Are guns allowed by law?
no
Are there many guns circling around?
If yes they may as well allow citizens to keep guns
only in the hand of criminals
Then they should make them legal for all
some parts of the cities aren't controlled by the state
criminals have huge amounts of territory in some cities here
i bet you've heard about rio de janeiro before
more than 50% of the city is controlled by criminals, literally
The periphery I guess?
How do they control it? Just economy-wise or is it also more physical with roadblocks and outposts
roadblocks, bribery, extorsion of merchants
Sorta like how southern Italy used to be
they also steal cargo
However the police and the military police eventually started actively resisting and fighting them until they had to move in the underground sectors
YES, you get it
but i believe it's more wild here than in italy
It is
But Italy hasn't been like that since the late 90s
And it was only the South
The mafia moved to the political and industrial side, it isn't an active war of violence anymore
not the whole country is like that, but the law is weak and permits that, our supreme court is permissible with criminals and forbade military operations in slums
It's an economic detriment, I would conduct an active war against those people
italy actually had a strong law, the north was rich
There is only one language those groups know and it's their own, you may as well arm your people and use it against them
exactly :(, howver that is far from happening here
Sorta, in the South they weren't always enforced, there were duels in town squares at times
no one, not even the right or the left cares about this problem
My friends told me about how people were killed in city centres and how gangs fought on the streets
they just talk about the economy, which is not a problem here
there is poverty, however some regions are really prosperous
that is why i gave up on brazil, sadly
They could recruit people and form a massive peasant army to fight those or at least resist them, and pay them
i was think about going to uruguay, or getting an it job in the US
I doubt criminals are the majority of the country, so they are going to lose against the military+many citizens
they are not, but they never go to jail
and Rio de janeiro has a LOT of criminals, it's in the culture there
I'm pro-action
My country never had many criminals though
Is he the one that wants to wage war against them?
exactly
el salvador is now the most safe country in the world
Yeah, they should arm the locals too, you're never too sure
Especially if they think about coming back
They could make a huge island for the worst criminals to work in, like Norway does
the main problem people care here is the economy
that would never be allowed here
And have it full of criminals from all over Latin America and guards from all over there too
It has to be a community project
the narcos are in the politics
It'd be especially easy for countries other than Brazil since they all speak the same language
politicians receive donations from narcos
we've impeached our president in 2016 here
That could be an issue in the future as well if they are forced to "leave" the public spheres
but only because the economy wasn't doing nice
They'll move to underground operations
there are some new voices appearing here, but they are too little to achieve power, brazilian people know that public safety is an issue, but people just seem to not care about it
i might move to a safer state and then move out of the country
How many states does Brasil have?
26 states and the federal district (which is actually a "very" safe place to live)
It isn't very safe to be a corrupt politician
If the status quo changes you may end up in a bad position
in finland i guess hahahahahaha
our last president was in jail
No, in general, if the status quo changes people may not be kind to you
he commited crimes even in other countries in latin america
Like Ukraine's previous president, I mean people were kind enough to him but he had to leave
presidents where obliged to leave power because of the actions of corrupt politicians of brazil
well i didn't know about that
Then you have politicians that get the short end of the stick like Mussolini and some of his party, they were imprisoned or executed
What's smarter is to step down or transfer power peacefully
Brazilians don't revolt ahahhaha, so it's not a problem for them here
I think that's what China's last emperor did
even though the country is violent, people are very peaceful
He turned into a propaganda setpiece with no real power and was spared
as long as the economy is doing fine, people don't care if corruption is happening
They are probably more bothered by mundane stuff
Which is fine, not everyone is a fighter
yeah i don't see a bright horizon here, i was actually learning russian, i had intentions to move there before the war
than the war started and i stopped learning, i spent 4 years learning it
now i am doing spanish, it's more easier to move to spain or portugal as a brazilian
Russia was more or less fine with IT before the war, not the best but there were opportunities
The best option in Europe is undoubtedly UK
Yeah, i even looked on belarus hahahaha, but it wasn't very appealing to me
There is a region in Finland where IT is also quite profitable, the one where I'm from
The UK is actually good, but you have to be really good in what you are doing to be accepted there
I think it's the same here, also because there are few people
And it's one of the least populated regions
usually brazilians go to portugal, because the language barrier is easier and them move to another country
actually, there are a lot of brazilians in ireland
i've got no beef with ireland
Indeed, I know one such that is half Brasilian and half Portuguese
Only Belarus and Moldova are kinda unsafe in Europe, the others have less safe areas that are around the capital but not all the times
And of course Ukraine because it's at war
Even Bosnia is safe despite having a separatist region way larger than Moldova's, and Moldova isn't unsafe because of separatists, it's just like that
do you know, that it's more safe to be a ukrainian soldier in ukraine, than a person living in brazil?
I guess so
hahahahaha it's strange but it's true
I know that homicide rates are extremely high in some countries, especially in Latin America
So it wouldn't surprise me
It's not like everyone might die here in a tourist zone or in the streets
but we definitely have no-go zones
It's like that in Sweden, and there are bombings too
and the problem in big cities
But it isn't that bad
i've heard about the no-go zones in sweden
and the military operation against crime
It's dangerous if you're caught in the crossfire or are part of those gangs
but swedes took that more seriously than brazil ever took
So it often isn't dangerous
i wouldn't move to finland just because of the language barrier hahahaha
You can learn Swedish and move to Finland
Swedish is easy, not as much as English but close enough
i've heard that german is actually very close to english
and it's not that difficult to move there
They're all Germanic languages, German is West Germanic like English is
Swedish is North Germanic, but it's very simple compared to German
i am learning spanish right now, but i might take a look into swedish... or even finnish... it depends where i can find more opportunity
since not a lot of people speak swedish or finnish i may not have too much people to compete with in my area
we actually have a region that speaks german here in brazil
and pomeranian
Finnish is too different
It's better to learn Swedish even if you wish to move to Finland
There is a region that is majority Swedish speaking, and another that is almost only Swedish speaking
hmmm i mean, i was learning russian before so i thought it may be a little similar to slavic languages, but i might take a look into swedish
don't they speak finnish in estonia?
or estonian is a language that has its roots in finnish heritage
i've heard something like that before
estonia is actually a very I.T friendly country, but it looks too depressive
Why are you all guys writing/making note in chat ????
I am talking to Isfrun about moving out of my country because of violence
and we've developed a line of thought about how some countries deal with violence
Every bit of learning is a little death. Every bit of new information challenges a previous conception, forcing it to dissolve into chaos before it can be reborn as something better. Sometimes such deaths virtually destroy us.
They speak Estonian
It's Finnic but it's quite different from Finnish, it separated thousands of years ago
All northern European countries are, ours is the same
depressive or it friendly? HAHAHAHA
People themselves are helpful here but they aren't very friendly
In Estonia they're neither helpful or friendly
oh sorry I.T friendly
Oh
I don't know about Estonia but I guess it must be, it is developing fast
It's one of the fastest growing economies on the continent
yeah skype is estonian, but the language barrier is too high
i actually would like to meet latvia
or letonia
It's why I think Finland is easier because of Swedish speaking areas, 5% of our people speak Swedish as first language
i am catholic, and one of these countries is pretty catholic in a gothic way
yeah lithuania, i called it letonia, my bad
I love gothic architecture, things here a pretty baroque like in portugal
oh i know a lithuanian singer called aleksandra spicberga
The churches in Estonia and Latvia are more similar to ours
our gothic churches are in the south of the country, but we only have neo gothic, mostly churches are like that:
We only have pointy churches, and I don't mean pointy like that but more like shaped like arrows
they are full of gold inside, that is my catedral
oh that architecture is amazing, we have one famous catedral here in Sao Paulo that is neogothic, but nothing like the vilnius catedral
i think portugal didn't like gothic architecture
Random naked man sitting in front of it
too modern that one
Or they modified it
we've got some modern ones too, but i don't fint it appealing
that is the catedral of brasilia our capital
pretty bleh
now that is the catedral of sao paulo, neo gothic:
We have "old" churches by Finnish standards but they never look flashy
It's more about not having the snow build up on top of them
i am going to leave right now because i need to finish (not finnish) a report, but thanks for the conversation, i might join later to do some accent improving on the chat
peace š
Bye, I'll see if I can get this PS Vita modded
Yes you can, but I think it really depends on where you want to go in Brazil
They're gorgeous interior and exterior
Why so serious?
@shadow kite You mind continuing the conversation?
Not specifically Christianity but yeah
I'm assuming you're from eastern europe is that right?
Also what does your bio say?
Yes, I am Greek
Christian Orthodox
Is that greek written there?
Correct.
It's just interesting to see religious people in today's day and age
I don't consider myself religious, I'm not a good representative of my religion
I just try to be as faithful as I can.
Specially since I'm from a Muslim majority country I don't get to interact with non Muslim religious people
Well I would say the same for myself
But I do take God seriously
I love the Lord and I will stay His faithful servant until my last breath.
Whatever it takes.
What about the greek population, is it a majority cristian country?
Also Christianity is considered a monotheistic religion right?
The predominant religion of Greece is Orthodoxy. Unfortunately, people have lost their faith in God.
Yes, a monotheistic, abrahamic religion.
Do you guys also follow the Torah, is Torah and the old Testament the same thing?
You can be religious without being erudite
What's erudite?
Torah is only the first 5 books of the OT
knowledgeable
Knowledgeable, well studied
well educated, beyond good
Sure
So what it can be well educated?
But I think following a religion or any philosophy for that matter should be a conscious and educated decision
It mostly takes love and humility
You can have all the knowledge in the world, but if you lack love you have nothing.
What does love mean to you in this context?
Religion is about trust, but philosophy is about questioning
Not necessarily
There are mysteries in religions as well
Religion is unfalsible which means you can always use any prospect of your religion to explain something.
@manic juniper are you also a Christian?
Patience, kindness, truth, protection, trust and hope.
good point
I'm not but I've read some of the Bible
Thatās why Iām not religious, because I donāt think absolute trust brings anything useful to me
I rather believe myself.
And sacrifice
And always be questioning about everything
You can question while being religious.
Are you a theist though?
Actually yes, it has religious philosophy and I know, but the core of religion is about trust
Fair enough
Sorta
It's about faith, love and hope.