#š§ ļ½serious-chat
1 messages Ā· Page 73 of 1
It would not be a bullet but a banger that it will collapse on
what do you think I meant when I said it's own freedom. What does "freedom" represent in that context.
it's complex I have to say, It could be referred as their people's freedom, their spirit, or just a pretext for invading a nation like democratization of the middle east
they literally have law and other strict regulations not just you can do anything you want, that's limited freedom
if there is a degree of freedom, I would say USA is 70% and China is 50%, Taliban and North Korea is 10%
it's my stardard don't follow that
because they can't get benefit from fighting with Taliban
that's how capitalism works
they poured billions of money with tiny in return
for justice ? for freedom ? who the fuck will trust that shit
because it may threat US's national security, but it's not worth to pour billions of money for it
they need those money for israel and ukraine or for themselves š¤£
yes of course, USA's military are able to defeat any military power around the world
but it doesn't mean it worth to do that
are you shifting the topic ?
I'm just saying they do something they need rather than this one š¤£
well they can, but they won't do that
you have the button that could destroy the world, but it seems you didn't do that
Are you sure? When and where they successfully invade any country in the history? Vietnam? Afghanistan? Iraq?
it's different
Tragically they lost many battle invasions.
did you
wait I don't know how to respond you it's too ridiculous
if you think there is no war they have won
why they are the most powerful country in the world š¤£
They have equipments and full of lie.
actually the global order is established since the surrender of the Nazi Germany, fascist Italy and Japanese Empire
the UK, US and the Soviet Union established the global order
because they are biggest winner from this war
If there was no soviet unions. Usa nothing.
that is the pretext to defend their interest in your place
You can't win any war with mercenaries
You are laughing without knowledge dude as always
you can't even have 31 trillion debts
Roma empire was superpower too
only the most powerful nation has 31 trillion debts that means most country in the world will give money to them as debt
but you can't even have those debt
Ottoman empire was kicked ass by british
Poufff
LMAO
Magic they dissapeared
such a loser
my point is I'm stating the truth and what are you talking about ?
what is your point ?
you are trying to prove US is a loser and the great middle east will take over the world ?
š¤£
who is real loser I have to say
You too buddy
who is real loser
You are winner we are loser. Bye
you can't even defeat this small tiny Israel
š¤£
such a crap
I respect you if you respect the truth and think how to defeat them for yourself, for your people even your nation
but don't deny the truth or use some ridiculous idea to proof they are terrible or not
it's pointless, you can say they bombed civillians, conducting massacres, I know that and I admit they did
but don't think that would make them collapse or not, actually they are getting benefit from this
if I have a bomb and there is a reward like 1mil dollar for killing a people legally in the middle east, there is no doubt I'm gonna drop that
Yes laughing is a rule violation, if you break this rule again you will be severely judged.
hum really ?
oh
Just being respectful and knowledgeable will be enough @strong tinsel
yep like usually
@thorny steeple
who knows ,the days will talk
Hi everyone, I am finding english tutors for improving my speaking
help me
They do and it worked
We also want to do that but seems we donāt have a place to do
They got huge benefits for their people from almost every field
We also want to achieve that
US did that, Putin trying to do that, and we are watching them š
Hope there is a part of Middle East is under Chinese rule
Putin played the US
Well they need to maintain their hegemony in the Middle East
Israel is their puppet state in the Middle East but it seems it will change in the future
Who knows
They are still the most powerful nation ever and there is no Soviet Union in the world
Actually their NATO ally, Turkey recognizes Israel
Indeed but Russia is losing hegemony
Russia is reasserting their influence in the Middle East
Such as send militias in Syria against ISIS
Middle East is the world battlefield
Almost all superpowers spread influence there, they are the player
And such as Saudi or Iran, Turkey, they are the chess
Syria, Iraq, Palestine is chessboard
So we are great power where is our influence?
Iām gonna send a letter to Xi jinpingš¤£
Just kidding
Interesting
Damn
Last one killed me
hey, use preply, italki or cambly. they can help you š
Thank you so much
you're welcome
Everything is already built upon lies and fabrications. It wouldn't be right to expect the truth to follow.
I agree with your opinion.
With such perpectives, we will find the truth. I hope your way of thinking continues like this.
Agreed
While you're in the process of getting degrees, isn't learning things sort of par for the course of the whole process? In another words, unless you're given a degree for farting and picking your nose, how does one get degrees and not gain more knowledge?
maybe the knowledge you gain is irrelevant
not useful in the actual job
I'm not convinced by that, generally or even actually.
depends on the university, but sometimes what you study is not up-to-date, and that knowledge does not directly help you later
I suppose you could teach yourself and become sufficiently competent that way, thus rendering the degree someone redundant.
if you study C programming in computer science, then it kinda can help you later, but if you later try to work in Python, then you have to learn python yourself, the C knowledge will not be everything
But then how can you provide evidence that you have the skills needed for the job? Sure, you can pass a few tests and demonstrate your skills, but that doesn't account for things you haven't answered in the test or skills you haven't demonstrated.
You'll already have tons of knowledge about programming. You'll understand variables, general programming structure, how functions work, how loops work, how recursion works, etc. You'd learn the language syntax and what-not, but you'd have a huge head start.
this is a tricky question and i think you cant do this fully, in polish companies they usually do tech interview where theyve got questions to check if you are likely to know what they need, and they also require you to show portfolio of completed projects (well if you faked this then you wont pass the interview so)
yeah you will, but still thats not directly related, it is related indirectly but you might have passed that university and got the degree by luck and barely passing
I'd have to disagree that it's not directly related, because you learn all or most of those things as a direct result of the classes you had in order to get the degree.
well i teach myself programming on my own and both me and a computer science bachelor will know what loops or functions or other concepts are, the difference between us is i study everything specific to what i want to do, they studied a lot of general IT stuff
id say am better, but it is harder to prove i am
Yeah, I've had the same experience.
As a result, we miss a lot of stuff.
Whether that stuff is relevant or not, I suppose depends on the task at hand.
yeah
neither of those two is fully good, i guess this is why programmers do get hired with, and without, degrees
*these
If i were to think about this outside of IT tho, then hmm yeah degrees are very important
we can test the programmers or graphic designers, not accurately, but somewhat accurately, we cant test doctors or lawyers the same way
if i make a stupid bug then someone will probably notice this before we release the code to the production, but if a doctor fails, then the patient might die
or if a lawyer misinterprets the law, then their client might end up losing the case and being forced to pay huge money, u cant really reverse this as you could in code
Hi everyone, I'm Lucas, I'm from Brazil and soon I'll be going to Ireland to do an exchange, I hope to improve my English with you
That's great.
umar
Jonathan
helo
Hi
exactly
I would like to discuss about how open people are online. I watched essay on yt about second life. I never played in this game, but I am fascinating about how random people talking about private life. For example one woman told about her dying son, and other talking about trauma that have in school.
Anyone of you have a huge combination with someone random from internet? You are talking him how you feeling or something like that?
I have a complaint 474320885390639114 gets loud and swears
Yoo OSM how you been
I have a take on it
Can you share your opinion?
I think this kind of "connection" is a bit more related to the lack of judgment that being annonymous provides, as in: How much you take in from arial 12 characters is much different from what you can perceive from someone's voice tone, facial/body expressions. So in a sense the internet provides a place where you can hide from the consequences
you can have a new alias, pretend to be someone else etc
@shadow burrow made her major thesys about something similar if you want to chat a bitto
I can provide more context on my opinion a bit later :3
someone tell me the grammatically correct sentence
Seldom sense is found where words are in abundance
OR
Seldom is sense found where words are in abundance
Not too bad, but definitely not great, Mr. : lol
Ok I did miss talking with you!
#šļ½english-questions is the best place for grammar questions. 
yea im there
Wenn es mir richtig wieder einfƤllt, bist du Deutscher, und wir haben auf dem anderen Server mitgechattet, nicht wahr?
Calm down. Lord. Lol I misread what you said.
I don't know if you realise this, because maybe your first language uses completely different characters (e.g., Chinese), but you seem incredibly aggressive and āloudā right now, short of hurling insults at me. š
However,
... it's not true for everyone.
What I said seems to still apply to this, thus my question sort of still stands: how does one get a degree and not gain knowledge?
Whether or not the goal is knowledge, the result is knowledge. The only exception I can think of, is if someone somehow bought their degree or faked it, thereby learning nothing.
What does roting mean?
Definition (noun): memorization by repetition
Oh, OK. Well, in this case, you could certainly argue that they do learn something, even if there's a chance of some or potentially all of it being forgotten.
I can see that as a valid exception, though. Although unlikely, as I see it.
Frankly, one of the best ways to learn something is via repetition. I do it all the time, having taught myself many things. Without a single shred of doubt, I have learned.
I don't have a mic.
hey! š
how is it going everybody?
š Hi, Flare.
Not too bad. You?
life is going alright Alhamdulillah, thanks for asking. š¤
I know that was your point. However, knowledge is gained as a result, even if some of it is lost over time; even if all of it is lost. Hence my earlier example of German and myself having learned things partly via repetition. What is ātrueā knowledge vs knowledge?
Walikum Assalmu Warahmatulahi Wabarakatuhu. š¤
Goood. You're welcome.
It's fine. We can leave it.
no pain no gain
@thorny steeple
Have you tried hyprland before?
Debating in another language can be really difficult, I understand. There can be nuances and more complicated meanings that can make things tricky. I would have the same issues with some topics in German.
(The Linux window tiling manager)
Nope. I'm not on Wayland. Still X11.
I just switched this morning from BSPWM to Hyprland. I gotta admit, it's blazzingly fast and has some good aesthetic features such as smooth animations, rounded corners, blurry background etc... which are not natively supported on other Wayland-based WMs. My overall experience is decent, but it's too early to form a proper judgement.
Damn, that sounds awesome.
The only drawback I noticed is the limitation xdg portals poses, like sharing your entire screen for example. I understand that this limitation is made for security purposes, but it's pretty annoying though.
What are Portals? Not familiar with those. I'm a bit out of the loop.
I really like the sounds of Wayland's increased security.
Portals are ways for applications to access resources on your desktop. They are more secure (that's the whole purpose of their existence), but kind of annoying though and counter intutive. Some applications (like Discord) don't yet entirely support Wayland, so you'll most probably encounter some problems sharing your entire screen for example etc...
I also encountered some issues setting up the resolution on Wayland, it does not have a convenient tool like xrandr to add missing resolutions etc etc... I had to tweak the grub config to get it to work properly.
Ooh, I see. That's cool, but I can see the annoyance. Just another reason why I'll stick with X11 for the time being.
This sort of thing is one of the reasons I'm on X11.
Yes, depending on your situation and preferences, you might rather stick with X11 for the time being.
Even though Wayland is super fast, and is obviously more secure than X11, it's still under the development, and is not as mature. For me I like it.
Wayland is also evolving rapidly, and with popular Distros starting to support it more and more (such as Ubuntu), I expect it to be the default thing to be used in the future.
Yeah, I'll stick with it for as long as it's in the repositories, unless Wayland is for me ready. Even if I have to compile and build the damn packages myself.
I'm like that stubborn old man who refuses to use CDs, because records sound ābetterā.
BTW, I can't type graves on a German layout, it seems. š
Really annoying. Super important key.
ā² and ĀØ is the closest I can get.
ā²testā² <-- Discord's Markdown won't recognise it, of course.
You might be missing some incredible features though. š Hyprland looks super neat:
https://youtu.be/TZMfpNfRKUQ?si=gRzP5638UpTkFjyJ
I've been using a German layout for a few weeks now. It'd be painful going back to English.
Even if I'm missing features, I'm poop out of luck until it's ready for me.
I don't mind waiting. I just don't want to be forced into switching to the latest thing.
I can see why people got so up-in-arms over SystemD, although I love it. Having the rug pulled out from underneath you can be annoying.
I think it's ready. It just doesn't have as many features as X has yet, but there are some tweaks and tools that can make everything still works just like on X. Maybe you can give it a try sometime later and see if you like it. āØ
Nah. Not for me.
At least not yet.
It'd be a huge amount of faff to switch.
Maybe when I have to reinstall.
Alright, I'll let you know when I rice my desktop though if you'd like to. I like sharing those kind of things.
Also, if I learn about some other pros or cons, I'll be happy to share them if you like the idea.
Sounds good.
Oh also, I use Arch by the way. xD
Fair enough. I know it's popular.
Radium in cookies is good
glad i got opportunity to improve my english
@bleak osprey it wasn't always fighting the immoralists in the caliphate
yeah i know
In fact the reason the rashidun caliphate developed so much within 4 rulers was because how lawful they were and intelligence
They raised a pretty good fortune for a new state within a short time
eventually it got ruined
But you did hear how the last caliph got assassinated right?
yeah ali ra
Well not really just the ruling family changed
Welll but the caliphate's rule did continue
thatās caliphās hiers got killed by muslims
the leader was greedy
True but the Abbasids were one of the most successful ones in terms of science and arts
In fact algebra came from there, the first flight in humanity happened there, the first theoretical camera was also made there (just the concept)
agreed
But militarily the ottomans advanced the most
nowadays there are people who donāt believe that algebras and algorithms are founded by muslims because Muslims reject evolution theory
Well that's a theory
Human
first human, am i right?
everyone believes same
just like babies learning new things, through human history they learned things
pretty much that we are evolved
i suck at everything except mind games
sorry that i distracted from the context
my question is how did the first cell formed?
well that is already been proofed by science
no need to refer godsš¤£
if there is something doesn't exist or you just pretend they're exist because no vaild evidence or proofed by science, you can use god to explain it
but the difference is, athiest always think something doesn't exist is no existence
science = power, = money, = whatever you want
so you don't believe science, no one cares
I believe science because science make me powerful
a phone, a PC, a meal, a desk ......
they are invented by people
using science
even a nuclear weapons
science shiiii
LMAO everything has drawbacks but it provides more benefit to us
there are dozens of side affects of science
or exactly, it could generate money
if you control it, you have more power
you can destroy anyone you want
that's science
did I say that?
no you didn't say that but I don't care
and? Lol
because you are not talking to me even
you're the one who's trying to act like some badass as a kid and come here to talk about weird topics and you always deny them
Yes and Yes
LMAO anti-science kid
Don't care
holy crap that's the first time I know there is something anti-science
Ok kid shut up no one cares I gotta go keep your shit talks to yourself
I thought they are good if they trust god or something I don't care but they admit there is science
but, no they say no to science
really sick
better you shut up if you can't say anything
He's right though, How does saying a fact makes him anti-science kid.
When you're hurt, your body sends cleanup cells, builds new stuff, and has guards against germs. It's like a repair team. Eat well, rest, and stay active to help your body heal.
You think hes serious
mastermind ? prove it š¤£
what a mastermind
can I create a thing that call me I'm mastermind, I'm superior I created everything
Ayo
because you can't prove what did I do
holy crap that's really bs
I can you don't know that was created by me
Thats an illogical thing to say.
I literally created everything, can you prove that it's not created by me ?
XDDD
prove it it's not created by me then trust me as a god
really sick
so I can say anything control those people
Rather then calling him dumb prove it
to get huge benefit and more power
that is a tool for control those people
ass
if you read what did i said you won't say something like this
so I'm not responding you till you read something real
I said, there is an example and I perfectly proofed that can be worked
but what did you do ?
oppose me for no reason ?
oh damn
have a good time
last word god is bs, (I'm kidding don't judge me)
well no
it's good if you find your belief or trust god or something make your life better, but it's stupid to use that explain the world and denying science
science = power
your opinion is bs
wait it's not, my bad
a loser opinion I don't care
that's the most ridiculous thing I ever heard
I can laugh a whole day
I believe the Flying Spaghetti Monster created us all
Hey watch it @thorny steeple 
Respect
Only @thorny steeple

something I heard could change my act and opinion, so I'm gonna supplying like israel by buying more stocks
extremist is really terrible I need to say
<@&852814479569059840>
Hey there. How may i help you?
see what they said
is that out of rule ?
Ooooo man, thats a bold thing to say in front of us. Are you aware about the consequences if i may ask? 
Guess you've a misinformation about me. I dont come from that country FYI.
wait it's not the point
the point is did they violated the rule according to their speeches ?
I'm doin my business. Get some popcorn and enjoy the film.
Thanks for the offer. Unfortunately, not a big fan of lollipops dear.
Better.
And?
I see.
but something really wild they say ?
if I know that why don't I just say that wild thing 𤣠\
I think it's not
Guyz, how about we focus more on to build a peaceful paradise, free from blames and judgements for each other? 
chill
As long as we the authorities of the community are here, we make those dreams come true.
As i mentioned, its on us, so you enjoy the peace here, that we trynna establish.
i was asking to herlock shomes
Then, we butcher the sound systems that you'll use, still we wont feed you, work on yourself.'
And, buy the lollipops that you're beggin for.

i was practising english with him
Glad that you see yourself on the same page.
imo science is good for studying how nature works but if we go deeper itās pointless. it leads to disapproval of already existing knowledge
I haven't even imposed that i'm hungry or i wanna beg, ig you're viewin things in your subconscious mind
.
prove what?
personally I use science do something which some people can't do
it provides more power for me
more power = more money
You just became one so you see me on your boat, thats none of my issue
.
thatās your personal choice
well sorry but I'm confused can you furtherly explain it ?
Can't. My throat hurts.
I just need to pay the electricity bill so I can access the amazing internet ?
just like I buy a VPN in my state and I can access western world
it's a good deal
that's how capitalism works
Btw, i stepped in here, to make a liberal atmosphere for everyone to be equally respectful to each others' opinions. Seems like you've some difficulty in understanding. Don't you?
I mean the power is like the rule of power or just powerful weapons that make you superior so you can use your force to make someone do something
that is really superior
and the science provide it
Haven't you guyz just mentioned the moderators, to step in? What're you talkin about now?
so why don't I accept them and make myself more powerful more superior ?
why I'm gonna stay as a weaker ?
that point I agreed
Glad to know your perception on this regards. But, i also want you to watch your mouth before callin the staffs out in a regressive a way. A gentle reminder for you.
I'm doin my job and i did. No need to dig it up anymore. Matter closed š .
And, why's that?
they can't explain š¤£
Hmm, fair enough.
Now stop.
I'm bored.
of this convo.

Imma go now. Take care everyone. Lemme know if any other inconvenience bugs up later.
Thats a mystery. All that i can say it came outta scammin someone
.
šŖ
I'm watchin my words as a person and as a mod at the same time. I've not taken any harsh actions against you, i'm trynna make you realize kindly.
Nun, ich kann Deutsch und wir haben auf dem deutschen Server gechattet und ich lebe in Nordamerika, auch bekannt als USA
I was scrolling through word meaningsš
Well 117 is wrong indeed
Oh, yeah
Gay means happy lol
It isnāt usually used like that nowadays but that is one of the meanings
It's not science which is bs it's the scientists. Henri Becquerel, inventor of radioactivity wanted it to be used for medicine. Leonardo da Vinci designed the first tank but he never wanted his inventions to be bad. Graham Bell wanted to improve communication
It's us, not science
Yup
At the end it's a matter of how we use our knowledge not what we gain as knowledge
Itās quite quiet here
Well thanks to science, man-made rain exists in Dubai. Thanks to science we can treat many dangerous diseases like cholera, malaria, tuberculosis and now even the COVID-19. Thanks to science we can explore the outer atmosphere and have the potential to find new materials and who knows, they can be the future cure of cancer. Thanks to science we can perform advanced surgery and the risk of child birth decreased drastically. Thanks to science we can create many unique structures easier than before. The coffee you get is processed with machines possible from science. We study under light bulb which is another invention of science
Just like with every other thing there's bad and good to science
That is a lot of words lol
Ahaha no you can't. Real life isn't breaking bad and acquiring dangerous substances is rather hard without license
not personal
personally I live in a stable society why would I have to destroy someone else ?
but our government is doing it and it benefit us
Well science can try to explain nature always but "science" is a part of human subjects which revolves around explanation to nature and possible outcomes. But it's still not that well discovered. We don't really know what dark matter is yet. We don't know what's under the Atlantic ocean. We may but we don't yet
yes, just we don't know what is that but it exists
and it might be wrong
Just some old kiddos having fun with "adult" things
that's about interest
if they are doing something for my interest of course I'm gonna support them
and they literally doing for majority's interest
and I'm majority
Yep like the 4th dimension may not resolve around time. We don't know yet. But theoretically for now time is one of the elements
that's true
Science is a big topic so theoretically and logically it's good and of course it does exist just we still have a lot to discover
Who? Atheists? Well I can't say anything about them. I believe in god and science. Science revolves around nature and god created nature. Simple explanation for me
well that's not that bad but I think god is part of your belief, not representing the truth
Yes or else you could've deleted that message because we can destroy what we create
Just sometimes we don't
as I mentioned earlier, it's good to believe in god or something to make your life better, but it's stupid to use god to explain the physical world
actually in my scale, religion is used for control some people's mind and force them to believe something to moblize.
Uhhh we still aren't absolutely sure what happens inside a blackhole. Theories based on what we saw and calculated
Well how'll you explain the outer atmosphere's sudden change of gravity? Why does the pull change? Why such specific rules?
why would I explain something can't be explained for now ?
it's out of range
just waiting for technology boom and it will be explained
Uhhb suuure šš»
nature is a deity itself, nature is itself the biggest deity
Gotcha
It's already explained
Ever heard of newton's laws?
I don't know that, I'm not a scientist š¤£
Exactly
I can believe in science but it doesn't even mean I'm a scientist
actually I love science because I know what it is
what it actually work and how it changes the world
Sir Isaac was a Christian
And he came up with this important set of theories
So yeah
ĀÆ_(ć)_/ĀÆ
but I don't know what did god provide ? and why is it important ?
what did god provide to me
why would I trust them ?
BRO WHAT?
did they give me more money ?
did they give me more power ?
or lucky ?
no, it's not
they didn't provide anything to me
why would I trust them ?
Well rules are needed for an order or else everything breaks
I'm business man in heart I'm capitalist of course I don't trust them LOL
because it's not my interest
you gonna make me taking profit from it
like if I started propaganda for trusting gods, there must be someone paying for me
Well from my belief, I'm the soul controlling this body and god sent me to this amazing family and god arranged the circumstances so I can be here. So I am grateful
I can say I trust god at anytime if they give me enough money
but it was... explained by science ?
actually your conscious is based on your brain
But wouldn't that make you cheap? Because you're selling religion in god's name
is based on the material
Well, can you explain death any other way? Sudden stop of heart? Why?
death is not live
brain is like a controller of everything
wait not everything
but you can use it to think, to move, to use your hand use your arm
but without them you can do nothing
then you are dead
So while the soul isn't discovered yet, it's still not proved to be a lie so, why not? Plus it's a theory believed for thousands of years so it has some weight
why soul ?
It's simple thing because some people died and they are died
they can't stand up anymore
and they doesn't exist anymore
Brain can't control death, the brain is the cpu and without a power supply the body, let's say the computer in this case, cannot function
what ?
Why is your brain alive?
because of material, there is enough material made my brain alive
You should know from physics, energy cannot be destroyed or created
It only transforms
so you are saying god creates them ?
No what material? Where did that come from?
that's so deep but simply explain is they come from organic matter and it organizes to a complicated thing
Well there's a source of something. We came from the womb, our universe came from the big bang. Though energy is following the current law of nature now, maybe it was created long ago. We don't know but we can't deny
it was always exist and it's not the point
the point is why you pull over a god to force explain it ?
Well, how do you know it always existed but god didn't?
what is your intention to pull over a god to force explain it
what is that intention ?
I don't care because god can't affect me in any field
Not force explain it, just connecting to my beliefs
they can't affect me in any field, that is the point
Do you consider yourself an atheist or agnostic?
So where does the lightning come from?
if you trust god I respect you but you can't force me to accept it
Ok sure
But it seems you haven't studied the very science you believe in
from the sun ?
Heat waves to electricity? Really?
science is a big field we are talking like what is the science look like and what is it
Without use of energy?
I'm thinking how science changes the world
it's different
I'm not a scientist it's not my field to talking like that
and I don't think there is any god exist because it can't affect me
the point is they can't affect me
Then you should understand the basic laws of science. Rules of atoms and their behaviors, Quantum physics, nature of cell and origin of life, energy and matter
if I don't believe in science, the gun, the knife could force me change my thought
but the god can not
Well at least you should study the very belief you hold on otherwise you'll be considered illiterate no? I'm not forcing my belief but you can study science if you believe in it
Unless you believe in science fiction which I cannot help but call bs because it is just fiction
what's the debate ?
Does the gun move itself?
Science and religion I guess
oooh
Not exactly a debate
i'm for religion so
Well I believe both are connected
I am agnostic, I understand both points.
protestant ?
no
is that incorrect ?
It's the point because
it's not the point I think
ich denke dass
Maybe it affects you in a way you can't perceive.
Newton's first law
I think you can answer yes or no on this question, science can change me, god can change me ?
my answer it definitely no, they can't change me
You need to apply force to use the gun. Where does the force come from?
yeeeeeeeeeeep
they can't change me even in any field
He can kill you tho
science, isn't exact, based on mortgages
I won't, god will if he feels like it
whatttt!!?
best proof ever
But the god I believe in is merciful so he probably will give you a chance
really
hypothesis upon hypothesis, it becomes an act of faith to believe in it, doesn't it?
then kill me then don't give me chance you bs
Now tell science to kill you
Without suiciding
what a boring day, as always...
How about science?
why, do u want die ?
sush
I think he/she wants to reach the end of the line asap.
well did I need to proof the science ?
the phone the pc
the ac ? or nuclear weapons ?
hmmmmmm
of course they change me
"The question mark" is written adjacent to the end of the word.
and it was forced to change
you must accept that, that is the science
And the materials used to make them?
it was forced
Because don't say they came from space dust
Because it was a theory
With less value than a religious book
God is a theory?
is that the point ? I'm not scientist, there is enough proof of they changed me
right
but the god can not change me
If you wanna consider him that
enough proof for that
So you're ignorant?
I wish the death of everyone who freely talks about and encourages the deaths of other people.
we can't proof he's real, or proof he isn't real
you are so if you say I'm ignorant because it's accusation
Uhh what?
so others will live.
an accusation will not work on me š¤£
God is a theory, theories do not have sufficient validity of truth like laws
if u want to be whange, if u believe it, maybe u'll change
so why ? š¤£
are you including yourself
exactly
i don't know u just told about š
I said it's good if you trust god to make your life better but it's stupid to use that explain the physical world
not everyone... who talks about people's death and suffering like a normal thing.
that's my point
Well I'm calling you ignorant because you can't weight equally. You're comparing god with science. The nature cannot prove god in your theory. You want god to kill you so why don't you ask science to do the same? Of course I am not insisting you should die I'm just asking about how you scale
I agree
ha yep it's not the same, i agree
don't pull over a god on me
Hmm, i dunno i want peace and want to everybody live.
that's really bullshit
Yep but you shouldn't call it stupid
fine
You can live with your theory. My point is that believing in god isn't stupid
End of debate
that's okay
Yep
@feral river do u know pascal's bet ?
idk
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pascal's_wager A big scientist
Pascal's wager is a philosophical argument advanced by Blaise Pascal (1623ā1662), seventeenth-century French mathematician, philosopher, physicist, and theologian. This argument posits that individuals essentially engage in a life-defining gamble regarding the belief in the existence of God.
Pascal contends that a rational person should adopt a ...
hummmm there is a lot of scientist and philosopher in the world
the consensus for most of them is science
"Indeed, if God doesn't exist, the believer and the non-believer lose almost nothing. On the other hand, if God does exist, the believer gains everything, i.e. paradise, while the non-believer goes to hell for eternity. It is therefore more advantageous to believe in God" just read it š¤£š¤£
yes
but, scientist can believe in god
hahahaha
"You wishing death of those who freely talks about death" aint you doing the same by wishing that
is that right ? XD
they can they are human why not
Mhm and I prefer to be safe
If god doesn't exist we lose objective morality.
yes š¦ but i believe he exist
good
It's like saying I will believe in fairies. Believing in fairies doesn't affect me, but if I don't believe in them, they die. According to Peter Pan
I dont think Such entity like GOD cares if you beleave in him or not
we have because if we lose that there will be hell to pay
Sorry for saying 'freely'; it would be more accurate to say whoever speaks as if this is normal and should be, is more appropriate.
Wht matters is how you live your life
not the same š
but the objective morality is not important
why?
jecomprendspasgrandchoseheureusementquemonamideeplestlĆ
like me, I always following them when I was in my home or some places
but i will not if I do something violates them and I take huge profit over them
I'm a capitalist
money and power decides what I'm going to do
'cause you're not required to believe in god, if u don't, god don't die
you forget about feelings
I have feelings
You can tell if someoneās ideologically possessed when they make everything attributable to one thing, like power.
and that is stronger than money
yes
but It was based on them
that's human
of course I'm gonna do something benefit my people
and also I'm gonna use any means to defend my people, even kill a lot of other people
if it's necessary
Are feelings part of science?
yeah
perhaps
of course I'm not gonna do something hell to pay š¤£
š¤£š¤£
if I killed a lot of people no benefit to me and my family why would I do that
and maybe I was under arrest š¤£
i need my spaceship before the earth explode
Psychology and philosophy
risk, profit, and cost
You know what else is connected to philosophy :>
this is the core of a capitalist
both are not sciences
maybe u love to do it š
IT IS FREAKING AWESOME š¤£
I'd like to watch some people shooting each other but I'm not gonna do that
hAAAAAAAAAAAA
weird
ahahahah the head isn't on the ground
wait its CS2 right now
Psychology is actually
Social science is one of the branches of science, devoted to the study of societies and the relationships among individuals within those societies. The term was formerly used to refer to the field of sociology, the original "science of society", established in the 18th century. In addition to sociology, it now encompasses a wide array of academi...
𤣠maybe they will add that in the future
gamer woman ?
I'm kidding
yeah
Psychology is not an exact science, nor can it ever be.
For your knowledge, science isn't just physics chemistry biology
Social science is a thing
@feral river so u believe in the asteroid's collision ? to creates univers ? like the scientist theory ?
I don't know there was a conflict I think
Uhm are you talking about the big bang theory?
Big bang has lots of foundation tho
yep, but, where come from the both entities ?
And religious books like the Quran does indicate the universe was created from the big bang
Uhm sorry?
yes there is a lot of point of vue
in the big bang theory, where come from the both entities ? like, whappend before ? it must has a beginnig at all ?
Even genesis too
yes š so we can't prove the theorys XDD
We will never know with certainty, unless there is a time machine.
The before part is more theoretical so
Space dust for now
okayy, and... before ?
I don't know exactly because I don't know that much about space science. Big bang is part of modern physics in my country so I had to know
And it wasn't asteroids
something does not emerge from nothing. So the theory indicates that there was a collision of matter that existed at that time.
wich country ?
Yeah
yes, logical in right, but where did the matter come from ahah
You mean "where did the matter come from?"
hmmmmmmm yes sorry for the lexical mistake i'm tired
I can't think of anything that isn't matter. So I can't imagine a space without matter, since space itself is matter, right?
Well don't ask me, cosmology isn't my field of expertise but I believe in god so, ask god

yess š so interresting !! but, maybee..... where did the space come from XDD
i think i'll stop here
XD
Well we are 3d creatures and though we might be able to imagine the 4th dimension we can't think in the fourth dimension and maybe if we can prove the dimensions more, we may find an explanation?
for those who believe in god. Did God or matter exist first?
you believe that god created the earth, with the big bang
i didn't understand it before
god, cause god don't need matter, he's god
God did and he created matter
How do you define God, on what plane does he exist, or what is he composed of?
i believe in the genesis
God isn't matter?
a god don't need matter ??? i don't know, and don't need to know, i have the faith š
i trust him
don't have blind faith
i have it, you have it too
I believe he's all powerful and doesn't require existing in our possible explanations. And he lives somewhere we can't reach. Something like after the universe or the multiverse
as only in the minds of believers?
and he'll make his come back ?
on the earth
Uh no I don't believe that rather I believe we'll visit him
Uhm no
I meant he doesn't have to exist near us. He has the power to do anything wirelessly
yes, but š i have a bad explain right ahah i try to say, JĆ©sus will come back on the earth, i believe it, and u ?
I'm not saying it should exist nearby, but where?
Yes but I believe as a guide not as god
without touching the earth right
Somewhere we haven't discovered yet
yep
Uhm I believe Jesus will come to earth not god
If you believe in God, why do you think there is only one?
yes
there may be more, like Zeus
Or else, we would've seen star wars in 8k?
there are 3, in one, trinity ?
XDD
3 Gods?
3 or 1?
both at the same time XD
@strong tinsel are you catholic or orthodox?
protestant, u ? catholic right ?
i hope good love sushi
let me search ahah
In your religion is there a devil?
It's another Abrahamic religion
ha oki i saw
Yes but he's not that powerful
yes i know it š
Shaytaan, similar to the name Satan
but not the same right ?
who is the devil? a son, brother of God?
But no demonic lords
Nowhere close
because I understand that both should be in the same dimension
Well we consider god to be all seeing so he doesn't have problem
yes, and he knows all
How do you know that, because a book says so?
And shaytaan was a believer of god until god asked him to respect Adam, but because he had arrogance (he was made with fire), he refused and disrespected Adam which angered god so god cursed him but shaytaan challenged him and god is letting him do his stuff now so shaytaan can know he was wrong
because the book isn't a simply book !!
don't have a literral reading
Well we consider those books to be holy
and if we are a lot who praying, how god can know that we need ?
They tell a story, like thousands of children's stories. What makes it different, that millions of people believe in it?
Because he has the ability to be multidimensional so time doesn't affect him
There are people today who believe that by sacrificing people, it will rain. People believe what they want to believe
Oh well I don't believe that
how do you know? That's what I want to know, how can you say that without proof?
You don't, but many people do. Just like you believe in God, and many people don't
In fact, such sacrifices are just murder and it's against god's plan and murder is considered as arrogance. It's as if you're trying to control the death of someone which you shouldn't be able to. So it's like shirk, the worst sin in my religion
it's not a story, no... it's a message, which great values !! read it, try, i'm reading the book at home ahah the alone to way to know, is to read, and search to understand
Did you know that... God also killed?
yes i know i believe it XD
Because the reason for god's existence seems rational to me so I do not mind it
Depending on the religion, in books God killed people for various reasons to cause fear
And this is how gays and lesbians are frowned upon today, because a book says that God killed them.
god doesn't sacrifice humans
Sodoma y Gomorra?
Uhh well we consider it as punishment of arrogance. Because they didn't believe in god and were against his prophets so god punished them. And death isn't permanent in my religion cause there's an afterlife. And God created us so he can destroy us. Just like how Samsung discards their bad products
If God is good, why is it better not to educate instead of kill? After all, "we are his children"
Ahaha no I don't believe in "we are his children"
Are we bugs for him?
And god did send the prophets to educate. But they refused and the believers were having doubts in this all powerful god. So he had to show that he isn't a lie
So why aren't everyone who doesn't believe in God dead now?
Because he sent his last prophet already. We now await the day of judgement
how do you know? Who said it? Or is it something you choose to believe?
Some of the signs were, the arab lands will turn green, truth will become lies and lies will become true, the Euphrates will dry, time will run faster, the believers will start getting away from the right path, drugs and addictions will spread
Though there are some signs left
But yeah we dead
Another was that the Constantinople (istanbul) would be conquered by Muslims
The Quran
Which we consider as the word of god and the last holy scripture
Why do you believe in the Quran and not the Bible?
We do but the original one. Gospel
but not everything is the same
Yeah which is why it is the last
Do you think that if you had not been born in the place where you were born or in your family, you would still strongly believe in that? Or you could say that your environment defines what you believe. For example, if you had been born in the tribes of Africa, you would not believe in that, but in other things.
imaging someone replied to this question "Hey how are you?" as "Hey, I'm gay" 
š that's what I'm saying lol
lol
Well my god destined me to be born here and even in another scenario I most likely would've studied the religions because I'm a curious guy and would've believed in it
šš
for context gay means happy here
Fr?
hmmmmm... right, like NOAH'S ARK š but it's not sacrifice ! God killed ppl cause they were veryyyy bad, they killed kids, woman, steal, a lot of baaaad thing !!! so god did it... but, he noticed that it's not a good way to do... and then the rainbow, alliance between humans and god, and he never killed ! a few moments later he comes on the earth, JĆ©sus ( i believe it ) ! from a stern god to a human loving one god š
Hi, if anyone f you has a billboard subscription would u pls message me I need for my research paper
You don't really use this adjective to describe one's feelings, but to describe a situation, an event etc.. Something in general and not someone.
"The film wasn't gay" means that the film doesn't procure the spectators any form of happiness.
"The party was not gay" - The party wasn't fun
Visiting the cemetery is never a gay activity.
I assure you, only the stuffiest of native English speakers would use gay in such a context, or someone who is perhaps elderly and/or somehow ignorant to what it primarily means now. Unfortunately, the word was almost entirely hijacked. I suppose you might get a few brave souls willing to go against the tide, but I think it's fair to say such people would be the minority, alongside the others.
It metamorphosed however you can still use it literary contexts. I do use gay, and lots of people still do. But you can't use it with everybody because not everybody knows it's used as a synonym for happy.
To each their own, I suppose.
I can see how it might be useful in creative writing, but the connotation for just about everyone is way to prominent.
Maybe if enough people use the word as it was originally intended, the connotation will wear off. š
It won't šš¤
Yeah, probably not.
There are many ways to express happiness.
There's joyful, gleeful, high-spirited, elated, joyous, full of glee, full of happiness, feeling happy, in a great mood, ecstatic, etc. Granted, these themselves have different implications, but they could be used to also denote varying levels of happiness.
I mean the word chiefly means "happy" and had been always used as to describe something happy until it then became a word to refer to the sexual orientation.
People would rather not teach their children that gay means happy only to use it in the pejorative way or they just feel ashamed to use it like that. However, I personally didn't forget the original meaning of that word thus I'll keep using it that way. I'd better educate the youth instead of trying to use other words because for some people it means something else, which is taboo.
I know most of them actually, but using gay could also be a way to wrestle with those who believe gay refers to the sexual orientation
As happy as a clam, on top of the world, in high spirits, effervescent, buoyant, jovial, joyful, merry, happy, mirthful, etc..
ELATED
Yep, loads of ways.
To what end?
You say that it had always been used to mean āhappyā, but you're speaking about many years ago. Apparently it started to become a thing in the 60s, following some sort of LGBTQ movement. That's a long time ago.
Don't get me wrong, I hope we do away with the current generally understood meaning of the word, but you said yourself that it won't happen, so why bother trying to educate the youth?
Should we start saying āawfulā in the context of inspiring awe? Or maybe we should start saying āniceā to mean foolish? There are many words that evolved in meaning over time. Where do we draw the line?
I said the second meaning of that word won't vanish, but I still can use it and educate people.
I suppose the difference with those words and gay, is that gay is still apparently occasionally used to mean happy, whereas the others aren't.
You know what differentiate words with several meanings? - Context. That's why you can use any word you want as their original meaning but you need a context of course. People still use gay as happy and a lot of words that are now used for something else are still used as their original meaning. In literary or daily conversations, everything's relative to context
The word gay became a word referring to the homosexuality in 1970s if I recall correctly so yeah before that it had been used for "happy" until the word became a word for "homosexual" and now the meaning is simply lingering on
Those meanings per different contexts work because those interpretations of the word are generally currently understood.
How did the topic get raised to begin with, BTW? Not between us, but before that. Did you say āgayā and people jumped on you for it?
No, a guy was saying that it would sound weird to use gay for happy
But he didn't really use it correctly
we wouldn't use it for a person directly
And that is because of the "new meaning"
Exactly.
we gen z find it funny that's it
Hi
I never said science was bad, it is just that people see science as it's their idol lol?? That kid keeps saying "I created everything" that kid can't even survive a week in an island but like I said science have dozens of side affects but also useful things. Covid needles. They caused people hearth diseases in my country and I'm not that fond of science
Yep well. If you check my messages, I did try explaining science but it seems like he believes in science blindly
Not that I can do anything about it
Wrong , the massive one did
anyone from UK here ?
Covid needles. They caused people hearth diseases in my country and I'm not that fond of science
No, it's not āscienceā that wronged your people, it's the misuse of it or the decisions of the people behind that which led to this happening.
The scientific method and our uses of it doesn't mean perfection, it's simply the best way we have so far discovered to reach a solid conclusion, and the evidence of the success speaks for itself.
Your complaint of science seems to me to be like blaming a gun for the actions of the person shooting it.
Science made by people
I don't see how that's relevant.
your opinion
No, it's not, I just don't see what you mean and how it pertains to anything I said.
Whether or not we made science, everything I said still stands.
Did you read the first sentence i've written
Yes. I was addressing your last statement, though:
They caused people hearth diseases in my country and I'm not that fond of science
I see what you're saying, but you have implied you think science is at least partly in some way bad, because you've said you're not fond of science. While you can not like something and still not think it's bad, I went with the implication.
That's my opinion, not gonna offend someone
It strikes me that, in order not to like something, one has to find something bad about it. For example, I don't like eating snails, because I think it's disgusting. That, for me, is the bad.
it's just that I know sometimes it can not be perfect for all the times
I'm not at all offended. It's just a discussion about something you said earlier.
On this we agree. Science is definitely not perfect.
Assuming, when you say āscienceā, you're referring to the scientific method that works as the foundation for the sciences.
Science is science, it comes and you canāt deny
Itās forcible
Thatās why I say science is important, science = power
Because it provides something like more advance stuff to make your life better
And it also provides more weapons more risk to humanity
But I donāt freaking care the humanity, Iām a pure businessman in heart, Iām a capitalist
All I need to do is become more and more powerful
And the more power you have the superior you are
Then you can conduct something to force someone do your job
Thatās perfect
But it seems there are already a lot of people doing like that ? So Iām not gonna lose this chance
When I was seeing those advance killing machines, I felt safety
Without them, we are nothing
And of course we are struggling to make more advance killing machines
And I support that
If we donāt have something otherās have, that is really unsafe and itās terrible
What advance killing machine are you talking about?
It could considered as a threat to our security and independence
Almost any field, guns, drones, bombs
Even biological weapons
we are producing more weapons mass destruction for our security
there is a lot of progress recently
You are against that progress?
Lol, so you are just scared
Idk ? Wym
You are scared that some other country doesn't make an advance machine than your country
More weapons we have more powerful we are
Weapons based on science
If we have enough power then we are no longer as a great power but a superpower like USA
That's part of engineering not science
I donāt know what you are talking about, but it based on physics and yeah thatās engineering
But also part of science
The more you have money,the more powerful you are
True but it will be more correct if it was more asset you have the more powerful you are
Asset is money
Asset is not only referring the money, but money is part of asset
Money is the only part of assets ig
Why are you so interested in weapons and power?
Because I see there is a lot of conflict exist and it actually changes everything
Itās an opportunity if we are powerful enough we can spread more influence on them
And the war is really scary, I donāt wanna live in a war zone
So I need become more powerful, which means getting more money
Ya war is indeed very scary
And we are becoming more powerful, well thatās not my matter but I care
you are from China right?
Yeah the PRC
China already has a strong military ig
I know what terrible thing you may referring like massive surveillance, concentration camp against minorities , suppress democratic process in Hong Kong
Not powerful enough
What more scary is you are just chilling and suddenly a bomb drops into your house
I have seen many such videos online
Yeah it happens on a non-power state
In gaza
Like Iraq, Syria
Or Palestine
So we have to become more powerful to avoid that
To make sure if you do something like that and you also will die
And about Gaza I have to say itās terrible for their people
Tbh , my home is in a remote area with very less population so there is very less chances that someone will attack here lol
LOL not strategic region
Unlike the Middle East, the corridor to Asia, the oil production region
Yup genocide is going over there and they can do nothing about that
This is war
Actually Iām buying Israel military industrial stocks, maybe like supplying them
Lol
Buy American military stocks ,there prices are increasing exponentially
Yeah I missed thatšš
Really sick
Since the start of Israel war
I thought Israel military industrial will increase after the war started so I bought some
So did you gain any profit?
Not much like 1000 USD only
That's very good, atleast for me
Well that is our salary for a month
Our average salary per month in this city is 1000 USD
@frail wolf
So I bought a iPhone 15š¤£š¤£š¤£š¤£

