#š§ ļ½serious-chat
1 messages Ā· Page 62 of 1
Yeah, my sentences are subjective but I think conditions can taken into consideration at a better level for every human. So, as a sample, we can't make slaughtering for we want this situation. You can make available hard rules on judgment, or maybe in front of the judge. Briefly, there are 2 levels, the first one is lifestyle, and the second one is judgment. An ideology can't start on a hard level, it should be in a better condition for humans. Judgment can decide plus the worst conditions
And I'm saying serious things for the first time, if I make mistakes forgive me
You are welcome to speculate as you please.
so this time do you want me to reply or notļ¼
i am just encouraging you to be an ostrich.
ENCOURAGE
Don't mistake me
yeah Iām chinese I just paid 100 RMB to get my passport with no requirements
and I traveled Japan, Singapore in the past
of course you have to get the visa which means you have to follow the target countryās visa requirements and freely traveling
politically Iām a member of the CCP, Communist Party of China, but I didnāt feel anything like suppress our activities , use strong measures to control in any scales except the politics
honest to say I know what is happening in Xinjiang, Tibet and Hongkong but if you are part of majority
you will be fine, except participating politics you have freedom to do anything you want in your life.
no minority were respected in Chinese government
90% of Chinese people are Han Chinese, of course Iām, the government work for us
no talk about politics, no act against government and policies, no spreading hates and divide our nation in verbal in anywhere
you will as free as america does
well you canāt hold guns š¤£
government are struggling improve our economy and society even some terrible thing they did like invade other state, suppress minorities
thatās why most people like them rather than take down them like soviet union
https://www.youtube.com/shorts/Cl8gt0Om7UE?feature=share I hope it will be helpful for you
The US dollar is what most of the world uses for trade, but that's changing.
Check out my new channel with Sam Ellis - Search Party: https://youtube.com/@Search-Party
Get access to behind-the-scenes vlogs, my scripts, and extended interviews over at https://www.patreon.com/johnnyharris
I made a poster about maps - check it out: https://store....
I think not all the humans think they have to struggle to do something better for all humans
and there is no one, even one government, really works for human
they may do something "work for human" to justify their achievement, to extent and preserve their interest
That won't stop if they withdrew from middle east
no doubt US is the most powerful country, and the US dollar is the most powerful weapon for the US
That's why I support those country that can make US weaker and stop act like an owner of the world I hope many countries use that currency and this "plan" will be succesfully
weak them financially and politically, nice idea
Exactly
Year and year Nobody fckn care Usa and its dogs

who are the dogs ?
Heyo
it doesn't matter whether it's superior or not, I don't adhere to the whole international law, I'm just quoting this one statement, which is well aligned with common sense. I don't appeal to authority or anything like that.
if you're intentionally massacring innocent civilians while using unproven excuse that among them are the enemies, then you lack basic human characteristics, which then makes you inhuman.
(I'm not referring to you, I'm talking about whoever does that)
so when humans like myself condemn these acts, and label them as terror and evil, we are right.
What you shouldn't want is to weaken the U.S it's more so to have other great powers; Similar to Europe in the past
I don't quite understand what you're saying here, but generally I don't care about the international law, the opponent disagreed with me saying Israel has not committed war crimes, that's why I quoted the international law which is the one that defines war crimes, so the argument is basically as follows:
premise: the term war crime is generally defined in the context of the international law.
premise: the international law labels countries that attack hospitals and schools as war criminals.
conclusion: whoever attacks these facilities is then labelled war criminal, which remotely means they've committed war crimes.
How convenient
Well breaking into another country and killing children, adults is also one
are you sure Israel has not committed any war crimes? just a basically phosphorus bomb and 8000+ children and babies. Does it have to use nuclear bombs and kill 1 million children for it to be a war crime?
Am I misunderstanding what you're saying? I didn't fully understand it because I didn't read it before.
If so, sorry.
Just a simple explanation, they are not war criminals, they are humanity's biggest parasites and viruses.
France, England, America, China and Russia
There will be no peace unless the world is freed from their dictates.
it continues not to happen As long as these false systems exist
There are two main reasons for all wars, control(power) and resources.
The funny thing is that we kill each other for very primitive and simple resources.
First of all, these old people need to die. They are very confused and brainwashed with nonsense.
No
at least we have to minimize it instead of accepting
Just wanna see what will change and hope them in good way
Only 50 years didn't have a war etc. in human history I mean yeah you're right
I think you should make propaganda as much as you can. Especially to young people.
We need to somehow explain that war and killing are bad and peace is a very good thing.
imagine you are living in palastine with your loved ones.
and most of them already killed
Today palastine
tomorrow your country or city
Adapt yourself against to war machines.
ok ok dude
next please
I dont like to talk with sheeps
wait are you sheep?
so sorry I rather to talk with humans
what are you talking about guys
a different matter


is there anyone who speaks fluent englisch pls dm me

can indians understand indian accent?

Why do you need to be privately messaged? If you need help with English, just ask a question here or in #šļ½english-questions .
hello guys, im getting boared giv some idea what should i do right now
is that the correct form?
yeah that a good idea
Did you go to the disco yesterday? (Use modal verbs where possible. If a model verb cant be used with a certain tense use its subsitute)
hi guys
āDid you go to the disco yesterday?ā
This is correct.
ok and can you say (Imagine, some people in GB may stay at a pub for 3 nights bc there was so much snow they couldnt go home.
Since he bought the new car he couldnt sleep)
Hey guys
How can i find a girlfriend?
It's not clear to me what it is you're asking if you can say, but I'll guess.
āSince he bought the new car__,__ he couldn__'t sleep.__ā
The grammar here, after the changes I made (underlined), is correct, provided the context is correct. However, I'm not sure how the above statement relates to the other text between the parentheses.
bro bro
What's your name?
If you pretend like a girl, you can find it very easily.
Creepy.
i don't pretend a girl
I just have an anime girl profile picture r
bro bro you didn't tell me your name
Of course I didn't.
So tell me
Don't be creepy and weird.
OK.
Can't you tell me your name?
I'm blocking you now.
Why
i thought you were a good guyš
don't mind me
I just asked his nameā¹ļø
didn't i?
they absolutely have committed war crimes and countless of atrocities in the land that they've stolen, that's what I was arguing about basically.
I wouldn't consider my own land another country, especially when the occupier puts me and my people in an open air prison.
Okay sorry, you are the opposite of my claim.
yes, it was my opponent who claimed that Israel has not committed war crimes when it bombed hospitals and schools filled with patients, children, and all types of innocent civilians, so I was just casually refuting their argument.
Hi guys! I would be happy if you suggest any advice regarding enhancing vocabulary (specifically frequent used) because I'm having problems in my speaking and listening. Sorry for sudden off topic)
ask chatgpt for new words lol
I think mostly yes.
But there's kinda difference between North Indian English accent and South Indian English accent. (Mostly because north Indians speak different languages like Hindi/Hindi related ones, while South Indians speak other languages which are totally different from Hindi and other North Indian languages, so even the Indian English accent varies within Indian itself.)
Bruh
Do you know how many languages are spoken in India?
Lol
I ask for definitions or usages of new words that I come across from chatgpt
What will happen if i don't study?
I'm not sure but I think 24 official languages are there in India.
I don't find it easy to learn just flat list of words
What won't you study?
Unofficially there are way more languages.
hmm maybe watch some more sophisticated youtube videos like university lectures
Oh it's okay don't study.
don't i die?
good idea I'll try
thanks
yw
Oh! Lol, damn I got it now.
It only applies to me, it doesn't apply for anyone else, so you're pretty safe.
š
Good evening everyone
winner defines everything
you canāt even say what is justice if you canāt live š¤£
thatās why I said itās pointless to condemn, it aint solve anything
pay their bills if you are supplying them š¤£
A famous word from ancient china āē½ŖåØå½ä»£ļ¼ååØåē§ā which means Sin in the present, merit in the future
if they seized new territory, expanded their interest, that was a huge advantage on everything
to achieve that, they have to do something notorious to maximum their interest
you dont ask twice if they have already refuses once.
@feral river i dont know but why you sound like someone from "one piece".
idk what you mean actually
nvm
š¤£
Sounds like an average user from bilibili which is full of Chinese kids
No, I just said you look like a Bilibili user, but nothing else about racism. Maybe is kind of offensive to people who use that. It's my fault. I should not judge people by stereotypes. Even if a kid he or she can be my teacher. Just like a word from ancient China "ę éæę å°ļ¼éä¹ęåļ¼åøä¹ęåä¹"
could you please describe what kind of person can defines as a bilibili user
oh let me see
a loser in real life ?
really ?š¤£
make sense
wait wait wait make sense now
but not for me Iām not watching that shit
While it is not me saying that. Everyone can use that.
It's still a good platform for English learners in China who don't know how to cross the Great Firewall
I donāt like Bilibili just because there is full of nonsense, extremism in the user community, and they continue to spread some incredible views even by harrassment
but because itās like they are protected because⦠political true or controlled by officials idk what if it is like this, but I guess it
maybe, the freaking wall also sick
what's so laughable?
Good morning
Power =/= Justice
you could either use power to oppress innocents for your own personal interests, or to establish justice and maintain law and order.
Morning. š¤
Hii š
Hi
I'm bored
Hi
hi
What's up?
ok
yo watcup?
im good
establish justice and maintain law and order is for maintain and expand your interest.
It doesn't cause conflict
more guns, money, resources and territory = more power
power is used for establish justice and maintain law for its own people and expand your interest in any way you want because no one could stop you if you are the most powerful entity
for yourself
not for the fucking international community
establish democratic rule in middle east ?
an awesome pretext š¤£
Hello beings of the highest light
The light is always low here
What do you think about pineapple on pizza??
My first ever pizza had pineapple on it (I was 5). So I might be biased
But it's yummy. Not even the worst pizza I had. Chocolate and syrup on pizza is another thing though
pinapple on pizza is fire but if you put mushrooms on pizza than uff
mushroom is good no matter where it is. Especially on pizza. But it could depend on the mushroom type I guess. I only ever ate brown mushroom on pizza
It's OK, but I prefer pizza without pineapple.

White people=miserable homeless
They fear power
I once tossed a white guy caused him to have spine problem
WTF
You=whatever orangutan you have for your profile
This is me
That's kinda the point I'm making
you mean you have strength more than whites?
Yes
I tossed him
And he had spine problem
I don't want to say more
I was teen,I saw a opium war movie few days back and I met a white guy walking on street in northern china
sorry i didnāt notice that you already shared your age
And hate growing and I picked him up and tossed him hit garbage can
His spine had problem
you didnāt got a filed for doing that?

Are you trolling or did this happen for real?
Fight for what? It doesn't make any sense.
Their racism
You attacked a random person first, maybe there's more context. I don't get it.
he was fighting for his race 
(tossed a innocent white out of nowhere in no time)
If that's the whole story I think it's just nationalist people finding excuses to bully other races
i get excited when i meet foreigners
existence is reasonable.
you say you're standing against racism, yet your actions were racially motivated to harm someone based on stereotypes.
racism is existing in anywhere, it's not that strange
are you from indonesia?
in modern times only
really ?
that's very incorrect
it's quite the opposite, i would say that in a global scale, racial tensions are way lower in this current era than ever before.
I agree. Racism wasn't a problem 200 years ago. But people gradually know that racism is not good, so racism topics get more reports on the news.
some places only
it's not going work in anywhere
some places thinks racism is not good
especially western nations and alliances
are you being serious ? "racism wasn't a problem 200 years ago", the US abolished slavery only 158 years ago. Racism and racial tensions were high back then.
people donāt use to segregate themselves based on culture and religion before
because there is a lot of conflict happening in their state because some racist is inciting, trying to spread hate among the country
Shanghai has too many white people,When in chaos times,I want to cull them
but some places NOT doing like that, and most people are majority of the society
I mean people don't care about the racist problem 200 years ago.
@dense agate sorry my mistake now i remember slavery of africans and other events
Don't know,i live in north
I'm not going to do that XD, I think they are paying our bills
I live in north too
are you also being serious ? are you telling me back in the past, let's say the medieval ages for example people never segregated themselves or went into wars because of differences in culture in religion ??
which province are you live in
#š§ ļ½serious-chat message
massacres, coup attempts etc.,
holy crap
I'm from Jinan City
the capital of shandong province
more white rich, more income and economy boost
I bet they can't do anything, if there is, our military forces is ready to them
it's not that they didn't care, it's that societies adopted certain view points that argues that there are inferior races, but people did care about race, the slaves and the enslavers themselves cared about it, it's just that the way races were seeing back then caused many to be oppressed. And when a more tolerating change was coming some societies found themselves divided i.e: The American Civil War.
well one would assume people would be serious here, but what you said is very untrue, it's an objective reality.
do you know what is the difference between most black and indian people in civil war ?
not only race, their literacy, their lifestyle, their political view
i think saying that ordinary white foreigners residing in china are plotting against the country is a vague conspiracy.
I think they are not going to do that
it's suicide
are you talking about native indians or hindi ?
Maybe I should say people care more about racist topics than 200 years ago. It's this OK?
sorry I don't know what is hindi, but I'm refering the native american people
some people thinks racist based on race
it's not
based on their activities, literacy, their own culture and views
The sentence I said feels like an IELTS writing exam
I passed that shit I'm not going to make a perfect sentence NEVER in my life 𤣠š¤£
first i just want to say it's not your fault for not being able to pin point a more precise expression, with how trending this topic nowadays people can get confused. But for me i would say that there are a lot of people nowadays who are calling for equality of outcome rather that equal opportunities and rights.
They promote what they call "positive actions" to give -what some see as advantageous- better chances to minorities, a good example of this is back when American universities would give racial minorities higher chances of acceptance.
Racism is discriminating based on race.
I think only a genius journalist can get 9 in writing.
here you are talking about about discrimination in general, it can be about anything.
It's the origin of the racism
racism is a part of general discrimination
it's not that special
racism is just one form of discrimination, just as sexism is discrimination based on sex/gender
They do manage to get on the news top headlines, but people still not change.
or colour
and people nowadays make dark humour jokes about it
Indeed
Frfr
thats kinds depressing.
noo pinapple
no again
pineapple is so goooooood on pizza
personal perference.
no comment
have you ever tired it
that's a different topic, humor and jokes are just words and means of expression, they don't oppress
you're going to get yourself banned from Italy
What are you talking about? humans are very tribal; in almost all ages people segregated based on religion, culture and ethnicity. The only difference is in modern times the concept of nation state came into being; a nation united based on ethnicity rather than under a king's banner.
Though he is lauded for his genius in developing the theory of evolution, Charles Darwin knew that one day his theory would fall. That day may have finally come. Watch the full episode: https://cs-link.gaia.com/3VPVs0Q
About Gaia:
Gaia offers the largest resource of consciousness expanding videos. Answer life's deeper questions and go beyond th...
but even now with mass migration; people still self segregate themselves based on culture and ethnicity.
it's natural
ahh isee
the reason why racisam wasnt a problem 200 years ago was, because it was that type of culture, in that era, "everyone slaved everyone."
Yeah, that's what I mean.
what's yall yallin about
answering
your argument is built on top of a false statement, making yours no more correct than his.
i think what you both mean is it wasn't as big of a deal, since it was common and widely accepted.
how is my arguamant based on false statement
Any book suggestions for this topic?
Between 1772 and 1833. British Parliament recorded the volume of slavery in India.
your argument further confirms YZ's statement, that slavery wasn't a problem 200 years ago. or at least you phrased it in such way that approved his statement
.
.
.
and these are the reasons why i argue that what he said is incorrect.
Italians already banned from my life
Food is food
Italians have not been a threat for a minute
not all food is eatiable or certenly you wouldnt like to eat it.
Hey guys, I am currently searching for a speaking partner to increase my TOEFL scores. I currently have 21, and I need 25. Any volunteer can DM me.
But. Food is the eatable 
Edible*
(general chat)
you said that it would bring pleasure, but how do you know that it can bring pleasure and after that I will begin to appreciate it even more? why do you think this should satisfy me?
"satisfy discontent," why should I do this? why should I waste my time on this?
You have shown me a very rigorous perspective of thinking.š
I think it depends on a lot of factors, I'm not sure it can really satisfy
To be honest with you, I cannot provide an answer to your question. My viewpoint might just be a sigh and consolation from an individual when they witness others expressing dissatisfaction with reality. Perhaps my words are full of loopholes.
Yes, I completely agree with this point.
but I like that at the end you clarified what exactly makes a person appreciate it, perhaps this is so
https://youtube.com/shorts/JF8gm0qgIDQ?si=Yy1GeuI_PvGap0WF Real Jews already left "isnotreal" not to be part of zionshits God bless them
#israel #palestine #israelpalestineconflict #judaism
Each person's life is intertwined with "discontent" and "loss", but it is precisely because of the thirst-like satisfaction of "discontentment" that one can experience the most joyful happiness after being satisfied. It is through "loss" that people cherish and yearn for beautiful emotions such as love and friendship even more.
"That's what these guys are talking about"
I get that people see things differently. Some might say you don't need to be unhappy to be happy later, and losing something isn't necessary to appreciate love and friendship. It's just different ways of looking at life.
Hey all!
In words such as
Baker
Bakery
To bake
Bakes
I suppose the "common root" is bake
Do that "common root" have a name?
I don't think that's always the case
hello
for more information - #šļ½english-questions
Thank you
why you thinks that?
e.g. I was glad to know that a person who showed a destructive character would be punished or executed. I don't want me and my family to be threatened.
I would not cherish it
I don't think it's right to generalize about "losses" and the cherish of it
but the clarification at the end was clear
humm
I'm sorry to have caused misunderstanding among my friends. What I want to say is that in life, "discontent" and "loss" are unavoidable. When you don't get what you want, try not to get too discouraged. Cherish what you have now.
this is common in here, dont worry
there is an alternative perspective that suggests that fostering a society focused on rehabilitation and understanding could potentially lead to long-term positive change.
no worries. Everything is fine
indeedš
you can always share ideas
I don't know how reliable it is
"unity" may not always lead to peace and prosperity
there maybe flaws inside
if you are going to take something to a big scale it is bound to have flaws in it
its still better then just cutting their head off.
but still
maybe
not always i say
this can also happen within this system. There will always be those who want to subjugate power and control others
we can put rules in place and improve the technology to stop them.
this requires detailed consideration.
For example, when we talk about the death penalty, what matters is who is behind it.
If we talk about rules, then ; How reliable is it? How can this regulate popular sentiment?
laws and police are everywhere, humans can't be left without leash without them spreading chaos
can this satisfy everyone?
nope.
yes, that's what they do
just announce one day in the whole world where everything is permissible and there are no laws and enjoy the show
chaos whould erupt
laws and polics are the gate keeper of chaos
not just those but mainly yes
if the main gates are open there is no need to use the side one.
(:
side to some main to others we aren't all the same when it comes to this
thats is true.
I believe that all laws, all moral codes, even all the stories told to us by neighbors, teachers, and elders, they all revolve around one common purpose: "the survival and development of the human species."
even this laws and regulations can be missused, morally correct or wrong, touches some more than others, but there's no alternative in this time and age they are the main gatekeepers of doom like you mentioned
shouldnt they do something about, things that can become a hinderence to that objective
Yes, but I believe that the issue of human consciousness is something that scientists have not fully comprehended yet
Sometimes entertainment appears to take priority compared to those you mentioned
I have read quite a few philosophy books and "Sapiens: A Brief History of Humankind," so I think it's really quite complex.
If there were no deaths, and no reduction in job positions, maybe?
When discussing such issues, from my personal perspective, it is easy to bring in too many biases and preconceived thoughts
it's always welcome it completes what you were saying since it doesn't go against it don't you think?
yeah, right
one pov is always limited
right
The powerful "laws" have constructed this universe, including the Milky Way and the Solar System, and we are living within these laws. It is difficult for us to use our own power to search for the fundamental laws of this world like what we see on television. Therefore, my current perspective is that since someone has designed this game for us, instead of searching for the basic codes, we should familiarize ourselves with the rules of the game in this brief life and perform our lives well on this stage
Of course, I really enjoy exploring the beauty of the universe, I love rockets, starry skies, and astronomy
up up down down left right left right
the cheat code of life
š
punda
can i get any tips on how to debate witha strong and rich vocabularylike you guys
wud really love it
All laws came to be because it is self-evident to us that natural rights exist; and that there is a right and wrong
I do not disagree that that keeping peace and creating a stable society isn't also a factor; for example someone mentioned if it was solely based on that smoking and drinking ought to be outlawed.
Dueling is a good example for it. It was outlawed not on moral basis, but practicality. Officers kept getting themselves killed.
It's a bit of both.
Friend, you speak very well. If there were no death and the potential for suffering for everyone, and one could freely indulge in smoking, drinking, and use their strength in any way they like to eliminate anything that makes them uncomfortable, as well as indulge in various things that make their brain ecstatic, there probably wouldn't be any man who wouldn't love it, right?
Of course, this is only based on societal considerations. Different people have different beliefs.
bruh proceeds to ignore
I need a linguistics expert.
look
We may have different beliefs for sure but there is an objective morality imparted in us. Unless we have crossed the boundaries expressed by our consciousness.
For example if you kill an innocent man no one will agree that what you did was good if he is reasonable.
And it becomes obvious for the community that you are a danger.
Now each states have it's functioning Law for organisation
Also for each action the fruit that you manifest establish if what you did is wrong. For example if you drink with moderation and never loose soberness it is clear that you are responsible while drinking. So there is not point saying that you are doing something wrong.
Poison is determined by quantity someone said
But this principle does not apply for everything
For example you may compliment other women without second thoughts but your wife does not like it. So if you continue you can destroy your home actually out of stubbornness.
First of all, I respect every opinion you have, my friend. However, the issue you mentioned is still an age-old problem, which is the failure to transcend the framework of "human" as a species. When you mention a "pure person," you actually define them as someone who has never harmed others within human society. But it doesn't mean they haven't caused harm to other living beings, including bacteria, viruses, and beyond just animals and plants.
If we cannot transcend this framework, it will be difficult for us to discuss this profound topic together, and it may lead to misunderstandings. I should clarify in advance that I have a comprehensive understanding of social laws, and I always abide by them.
I mentioned a pure person. Where ?
" innocent man "
Innocent and pure are not the same thing
If someone accuse you of having stole his bike and kill you for that. And later we find out you did nothing you were actually innocent and shouldn't having been killed.
There is nothing about being pure here.
And personally I do not believe in "pure person" at least not in the sense of someone who never did something wrong.
I believe the real issue is that while we all abide by the law, it may not be productive to spend too much time discussing everyone's individual values. The relevance to the complex issue of "human consciousness" might not be significant, right? The formation of individual values is influenced by factors such as family, friends, environment, and society. However, "human consciousness" is a complex issue that even scientists find difficult to fully understand, involving psychology, biochemistry, neuroscience, and more.
Friend, you make a good point, but we are no longer discussing the same topic.
Anyway I guess you are not ready to talk about certain topics.
Also it is evident "observable" science will not be able to explain what is not observable.
But let's not walk in denial
Cya
Consider me simply a passionate enthusiast of psychology; I mean no harm
If, friend, you feel uncomfortable, I'll try my best to reduce such comments in the future
science is not only about observation. observation is a crucial aspect of it, but it's only one piece of the puzzle.
very important aspects of science also include logic, reasoning, and deduction, for instance, archaeology is a field that relies heavily on analysis and interpretation of artifacts, this requires logic, reasoning, and deduction.
also, in nearly all fields of science, there is an aspect of interpretation that relies on deduction in order to formulate theories, that's the reason we have theories in the first place.
oh wait, sorry, I misunderstood your statement.
you were more specific, I think what you were saying is that, there are certain observations in science that don't necessarily explain non-observable things.
while I agree, but it's not always the case, this aspect might be so insignificant compared to the whole concept of science.
More like science focused on understanding the observable nature is not suited to explain self-evident invisible entities.
Like it is not by observing a cell that you will discern the source of life.
š
yes, you're right, there are certain things that we know based on their effects, such as dark energy in cosmology.
it's worth mentioning that dark energy is a hypothetical form of energy though.
Yeah I would have not used the term "know" because it remains a mystery.
If possible, I'll try to clarify my points using knowledge derived from evolutionary psychology in the future. From animals to modern humans, otherwise, I fear I might be misunderstood as a dangerous individual again
true, we don't exactly know the nature of such energy, it's unobservable, kind of invisible form of energy, we could only deduce its existence based on its effect.
Tbh I was just responding to your last sentence... I am not aware of all the convo before me.
are you replying to me or to @0_0LY?
Last reply OOLY
aha, I see.
But it seems you are interested in science @thorny steeple
I do love many fields of science.
although I'm not so knowledgeable or anything like that, but certain things catch my attention.
I guess so
I mean, I'm not an expert, so I might make mistakes or misunderstand things, but I've been able to prove some specialists wrong though, you'd be surprised that some scientists do intentionally spread disinformation, that's why I think it's important to have critical thinking when reading scientific literature, and differentiate between the results and the conclusions, some people draw very different conclusion than what the results suggest.
I believe most scientific principles serve to explain the majority of phenomena, much like how '1+2' in mathematics requires numerous proofs. The progress of science invariably relies on a strong, imaginative leap combined with mathematical knowledge as its foundation
Perhaps for humanity, this world is simply a combination of powerful imagination and rational explanations
From my personal perspective of dialectical thinking, understanding what is 'true' and what is 'wrong' might only grant the most fundamental right to speak after comprehending the universe
Science is not able to make truth claims. Anyway.
I don't exactly understand what you mean, but I believe science is meant to explain the nature around us and help us advance, and therefore it should not rely on imaginary leaps or anything like that, but rather, logical deduction based on observable phenomena.
Anyway, we're still enjoying it, aren't we?^_^
I mean certainly but I am kind of disoriented to use it as the main metric for discerning what is right from wrong.
Especially when the knowledge of science may be mostly used for harm
My statement comes from a previously mentioned Einstein interview, where he stated that, compared to statistics and observation, physics requires more imagination
yes, not every scientific piece of information is absolutely reliable. although there are certainly objective facts in science, some other things are surrounded with ambiguity and uncertainty which should be taken with a grain of salt.
oh, I get your point now, I agree.
imagination might be the most important tool to formulate scientific models and to understand nature etc...
I need to go sleep for a while. Wishing both of you continued enjoyable conversation
The simple fact that something is humanely interpreted is enough to be critical. In most case layman have only access to the most supported scientific opinion, the consensus. But even if this consensus is accepted at 90% it can be subject to a shift of paragdim with technology advancement and research.
how do you get the stream/media role?
And if we gather a panel of scientists to define what is Truth they will not be able to be of one mind.
you have the role can you let me know how you got it?
Idk what u are talking about sir
nvm then
I get your point. there is an important distinction to be made here though, human subjectivity is no proof of truth, subjectivity and objectivity are different, but they can align.
for instance, we all know 1 + 1 = 2, it's an objective fact, although I might suddenly start saying 1 + 1 = 8, it would be then my subjective opinion, I'm not forced to say 1 + 1 = 2, but when I say 1 + 1 = 8, it doesn't turn into reality, and therefore becomes an objective fact, 1 + 1 = 2 will remain true whether I accept it or not, so subjectivity may or may not align with objectivity, that doesn't affect the objective truth.
what I mean is that, yes, mere interpretations that are just put forth are no proof, the evidence that lead to this specific interpretation is what makes the interpretation valid though.
hi
Hi
do you care about them?
About who
I donāt really care about either but I have sympathy for the innocent civilians
I think both sides lie and make up things
I don't care about them eaither
And I think it is dumb for Palestinian supporters to deny things Hamas did when they video themselves doing things
And they bring up āwell the hostages said nice thingsā
Are we forgetting that itās a war where they are probably scared about either family hostages or what happens if they say the truth
The only country that i care about it
Is england
I kind of want someone here who disagrees with me
But one person got muted
For being immature about the topic
I donāt like when people bring emotion into debates
Lol
I think for many Palestinian supporters they are a lot more emotional
Over logic
In how they debate like the one person who was happy to just talk whatever when it was in general but when the time came for a real conversation they didnāt want to
bro which city do you live?
i almost know all the important citis in england
what?
Itās a county
a state?
Idk if itās similar
A county is an area of towns and cities with a sort of council to make it easier for the main government to manage
Thereās 48 in England
Almost as same as usš
did you count the wales?
its in uk
As britiand you don't even know how your govrmemt works?
damn
Ahh
I donāt know everything
Do you like your kings?
i forget his name
Charg?
Yes Iām a monarchist
because i like them
Believe or not im from none of them
i have to search this in dictionary
England went from š“ó §ó ¢ó „ó ®ó §ó æ- š“ when I tried to put it in my discord name
idk man
Its simple
See
i see
Itās just black but I put the england flag
Ohh
š
š“
Works with uk flag tho
That's okay now
Weird
Yeah
Define truth first
Definition 1 (noun): the quality of being near to the true value
Definition 2 (noun): United States abolitionist and feminist who was freed from slavery and became a leading advocate of the abolition of slavery and for the rights of women (1797-1883)
Definition 3 (noun): a true statement
Other definitions can be found here
1 + 1 = 2 in a certain domain of definition
Definition 1 (adverb): as acknowledged
Definition 2 (verb): make level, square, balanced, or concentric
Definition 3 (adjective): accurately fitted; level
Other definitions can be found here
Funny "near the true value"
It is actually a more than centuries debate among philosophers and theologians to define truth since the beginning
Boss move
if you mean what I think, which is that we could define "2" differently, then I would agree.
but that's irrelevant though, my statement is based on the assumption that we both define 2 the same way.
by the way, I believe that all communications between us, humans, are based on our experience of the world, i.e., you can't explain the concept of color and light for someone who've never experienced them (this is an actual medical condition, typically when someone is born blind, that they don't see anything, even dark and black), it would be impossible to do so, most of what we aim to convey rely on other if not the same experience we have and are mutual.
Boss move
No let's say in binary, 2 does not exist.
sorry, I don't follow.
1+1 in binary is 10. I guess you have already seen sequence of number like this 1011010100101 that people used to program in the past.
Use today
I mean the computer still understand like this but I have never seen someone program like this. We compile now but I am not knowledgeable on system program.
well, it's not technically 1 + 1, it's 1 and then 1. the binary system is all about electricity being turned on and off, when 1 it's "on", when 0 it's "off".
in other words, 1 presents the presence of electricity, and 0 represents the absence of electricity.
Actually it is a fact that 1+1 does not equal 2 in all mathematical system.
by the way, I'm a software engineer.
Thanks for that
we don't need it to work in all mathematical systems, as "+" might represent different things, we only need it to be hold true in arithmetic and algebra.
but how do they transform that into information like images or audio?
I don't think information is the right word here
it might boil down to how we define addition, but in most cases, we all define it the same way, so the default standpoint is the arithmetic one, unless we change the context.
apart from that, it holds true for reality, which is the most important.
this is a very diverse and complex topic honestly. xD
I see
one sec.
well it was worth a shot
Want to support me?
Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/H3Vtux
A short explanation of binary.
Upon reviewing the finished video I realized I made a mistake in some of my vocabulary. A byte can represent a number up to 255 but it can actually represent 256 different VALUES, as 0 is a value in and of itself. Rerecording and reanimating would be a p...
thx ill watch it in a bit
here is another video that might explain it a bit better.
https://youtu.be/wgbV6DLVezo?si=VEhmfXJdBrlTy53a
Check out our Patreon page: https://www.patreon.com/teded
View full lesson: https://ed.ted.com/lessons/how-exactly-does-binary-code-work-jose-americo-n-l-f-freitas
Imagine trying to use words to describe every scene in a film, every note in a song, or every street in your town. Now imagine trying to do it using only the numbers 1 and 0. Every ...
Hum
I don't think you'll find a lot of people from there
most of us are foreigners trying to learn english
I want to try!
Are u from there ?
Guys i need gamer friend for improve my english and hangout,talk etc..
Just chat with people! There are lots of people who're up for a chat about games.
What sort of games do you play?
BTW, you could say āto help me improveā, āfor improvingā, or āin order to help me improveā (before āmy Englishā).
Also, remember to capitalize proper nouns, like English. It's not a huge deal, but it's worth getting it right anyway, IMO.
And I is capitalized when it's the pronoun.
I don't play many games now, but every now and then I'll get hooked on something.
Hey, I have severe depression and want to talk and chill, we can talk about whatever you want to, DM me I'm playing stw on Fortnite if you want to join
I don't mind any level of English so if you want to practice talking about more unusual stuff and just talking in general text me
I also speak Spanish fluently so I can help beginners with talking
Just ping me
hello guys
Hello
Ok
thanks
chicken nuggets
Anyone here with a degree in english?
From a doctor's perspective, I can understand your words. In a way, your viewpoint also confirms why the simplest things can be the most difficult to explain. It's like the cosmic conundrum of 'why does existence exist,' a question that is akin to going from 0 to 1
you can use binary code for cheating on the class š¤£
just knock your table, 1 0 equals A
11 0 B, 111 0 C, 1111 0 D, 101 pass
1011 previous question
yeah I used it before for cheating
Your teacher will ask if you've got Parkinson's because you knocked the table 459 times during the 30 minute exam
So clever! Why didn't I think of such a brilliant solutionš¤£
Such a cunning perspectiveš¤£
Most helpful native in EngHub
Hello beings of the highest light
guys, what do you think the world would be like if it were one single country? i would like both optimistic and pessimistic opinions
it would be impossible in practice just because of the vast differences in climate, language, religion, culture, etc.
I'm looking forward to it
In that case, there's no need for a visa, and you can travel around the world
Then we can develop tourism projects in the Arctic and Antarctic, engage in deep-sea sightseeing, without allocating extensive taxes towards military endeavors
Then cities and districts will probably become the new "countries" 
It is nice to imagine a world where humans all speak the same language and can travel anywhere without complicated visa procedures, but human nature won't allow it. I don't mind there existing only 1 language either. Actually, I thought that was what sign language is supposed to be, and was super disappointed when I found out each country has its own sign language. It makes sense when you think about it, but I still think it's a missed opportunity
that would be a boring world.
As boring as a superpowered warlock, conquerer of dungeons and kingdoms, could feel about the everyday life of a salaryman. Maybe he just wants a break from all the magic and excitement. Simple is not always so bad
simple is not always good
But it can be
If the resources used for war were redirected into the construction of the world, there would be fewer people starving and falling ill. Everyone could avoid doing things in their daily lives that they don't want to do as much. I believe the world would become more beautiful
thats an extermaly quixotic idea
This is a false question. One country doesn't equate to using the same language. There can be several common languages, and then there can be numerous regional minority languages
a world where everyone specks the same language, would be a dull world because different lanaguage makes things more exciting.
different Languages also brings a specal way of talking that relects the culture where it comes from.
:The world is already diverse enough and exicting.
:A world wherw eveyone specks the same language would be dull and less exciting.
it wasnt a question.
The tax required for current military equipment is just too high, with annual increases and a vast number of soldiers. I feel this is an enormous drain on human resources
That's just what you imagine it to be
because the fact is, there is no world with only one language, so how can you say for sure it'd be dull
I see, but I think the question of why does existence exist is erroneous though.
if we agree on one definition, which is that existence is the state of being real in an objective sense, then you can't apply existence on existence itself, it's like saying is water wet? or is thunder shocked?
that's what I think.
you mean Morse code, not the binary system.
𤣠,correct!
imagin eating a curry with only salt.
That'd be plain. But it's not the same comparison yeah
i think its a good comparison.
curry represnts the "world"
slat represents the "language".
curry with multiple spice is what makes it intresting, the same goes with the world too
a world with only one language, do you think it would be fun when you go forgin country for travel and meet new people. but the speck the same old langauge.
meeting new people learing about their culture, language how they inteect in their own language, is what makes us as humans speical, thats also adds some taste in this tasteless world.
In my country there are many languages beside the official country language
it's not binary but I see why they mixed it up with that since each letter can be percieved as a 4 numbers binary code
yeah, true
why do you think so?
again, true
i think the main problem of world being together would be that not everyone has same opinions, there would be civil wars and protests, which we clearly have seen through history
and it would not be hard to just have one government, establish a federation like state, it would be easy
It is a human being nature its hard to find people to accept others opinions even if they say that
yep
I live in a country which ill mention it with name X we are at civil war for over than 15 years
And everyone think that they are on the right side and can't accept others
i have stated my reasons
alright, i'll take a look
At the end of any war we "the normal people" are collateral damages
that's a problem of world being one nation
civil wars
but stay strong brother
fair enough
Thanks alot, but after 15 years its normal and part of our lives
i can understand
How to stay strong ?
SAY A PRAYER⦠Your help will give me the strength to fight this health battle.
#Prayer #prayforme #illness #CaughtInProvidence #staystrong #hospital #danafarber
We are truly sad with what happened to him
he was a nice judge
seen him in yt shorts
U trolling me or what?
GOT U!!!!
if you are a network security engineer and you have to do a online test
you can use a trojan to monitor your screen
and an another person looking at your screen which is on their computer
and search answers or chatgpt etc.
then use that code to transfer the answers.
it's like hack your own computer to help you cheating
I'm doing that before because I'm
help my friend to pass their exam
š
This approach is very imaginative, and you've done an incredible job of implementing it
yeah that actually works, but not for all the exams
most important exam in here are not online exam
I'm a freaking cheater, I know
and I don't care, I think need to pass this shit
me too
However, during the pandemic, this approach should be quite useful
it works, well sometimes you will encounter some technical issues
that was expected
so plan B
using a perfect camera to monitor his screen, google it
and transfer
you can even built a new language system for this
better for struggling to study, for me
Your idea is very innovative, but from a technical perspective, it's a bit beyond my realm of knowledgeš¤£
š¤£
It's my realm, I guess, our job is finding bugs and hack into the system
there is no flawless system exist.
Sounds very exciting, interesting, and challenging
Ehhh if you say so
what if we are so small that there are some aliens soo bigger than us such that they cannot see, like, we are like atoms to them?
tell me if this theory is not correct
Unfalsifiable
Hii
hmm
Oh dang it, no I am not
Is there anyone American or British or at least has English as a main language
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=97NCKoDni40
Please watch this video
Hey everyone. Looking for native speaker i can talk to. I am from Ukraine, 19y.o
anyone has any opinions
what if we are so small that there are some aliens soo bigger than us such that they cannot see, like, we are like atoms to them?
We should constantly push our own limits
Then pray they donāt find earthšš @static hare

@stiff palm
Is Charge III a good king for uk?
asf?
It means āas fuckā
Yeah
Why can't i see him a much in the news?
Idk
and as fuck means?
Iām not sure it just means like āvery oldā old asf-very old
don't you have a prisident in uk?
Prime minister
huh?
Which country are you from again?
What does he do?
They are the one who runs the country
Iran
how about the loyal family though?
Barely anything anymore
huh
so they doesn't rule?
Because of the revolution of 1688 it furthered the constitutional monarchy, restricted by laws
Even if the monarchy wanted to restore power itād be impossible pretty much
Not really
damn
I miss that
Its bad to hear that
Yeah
Itās a very important part of my history and culture and Itās better than our shit governments
Personally thatās why I like it
monarchy is a good representation of how outdated britain is
Not always bad
If the monarch is a good one
In my opinion people need strict rule and authority and our country was better off when it was in that situation
Compared to how it is now
like the loyal family of iran

iran was a much better when it had monarch
maybe right but still, i think the biggest mistake the UK has ever made in modern history is resigning from european union
Yes
The reason it failed is because the government failed us
It wasnāt executed properly
you mean, leaving the union wasnt executed properly?
Why did they do this?
No idea
Have you delayed your schedule in the past? And have you surmounted this situation? If so, I want to know how you managed to do it
People yeah are really nice
Iām not sure really for more freedoms etc
compare yo us
And follow their own rules and shit and not following the eu
More freedom for whom?
The country to do what it wants
As Nigel farage said āwe love Europe we just hate the European Unionā
what does it want?
they successfully decreased the number of european migrants (legal ones), who were willing to come there to work, oftentimes for lower wage than british so they were beneficial i think
I donāt just mean immigration
Iām not an expert but there were other factors
The rough summary is they sought greater control over its laws borders and immigration by leaving the European Union through Brexit. Additionally there were economic considerations including the desire for more flexibility in trade agreements and regulatory autonomy.
I donāt really know why it failed probably because of the government poorly executing it
I mean itās pretty telling when rishi sunak thinks it had many benefits
And even Nigel farage said it failed
So if it wasnāt the conservative government who implemented it and a different one it couldāve worked
"Arguably, now we're back in control, we're regulating our own businesses even more than they were as EU members. Brexit has failed," Farage told the BBC, adding that takeover regulation and corporation tax were driving businesses away. "We've mismanaged this totally."
This is what Nigel farage said about it
Asked if the prime minister had sympathy with the concerns of businesses who said they were struggling to deal with government bureaucracy, Sunak's spokesman said the prime minister wanted to "ensure that the UK remains a business-friendly country to invest in".
And thatās what sunak said
He always just gives vague dumb answers and never solves anything pathetic leader
Ik lol
haha
Literally look at most of the people on the internet supporting Palestine. Itās the people who are LGBT or who support it. People who are LGBT are used to being discriminated, do you really think they would stand by and let it happen to others?
And yes, these people know Palestinians hate LGBT. Theyāre not stupid, they just donāt want to see others discriminated against
@sonic terrace
+99
They are really human. That's it.
What is the source?
but its really really realy rare to see discrimination outside, unless its on social media when its pronouns videos(that is quite weird), people don't really care about lgbt outside, i think most of the friends i had was from lgbt but they all had some sort of hateful behavior around me, even tough i was being respectful with them
I assume that you mean Palestinians hate LGBT 'cause they are Muslims, but it's not outright, we hate the sin not the sinner. from an Islamic standpoint, if someone is attracted to the same-sex, we don't automatically start to hate them, 'cause you can't control who you're attracted to, so the mere feeling is not a sin, but rather the action.
Yah, but the issue is there is still people trying to repeal gay marriage, shouting slurs, and hate crimes. This stuff happens in real life, itās not as common as it was a decade ago or as common as it is online, but it is still around. And there are still plenty of countries where you would be killed for being gay.
I apologize, I should have been more specific in my wording, I meant that as a more general term. I have nothing against Muslims and understand the religious viewpoint. I just donāt like when people use their religion to justify hate crimes toward people of differing religions or non-religionous people when the people they are being bigoted toward should not be held to the doctorine of a religion they donāt follow.
all of that is more related about culture like with Muslims, here's something interesting i know most of lgbt people don't do nothing against people, but some people had really bad experience with some hateful person that was lgbt, and i really understand that is a problem, but hear me out why the lgbts can't love and respect peoples opinion and just stay away of them, i love everyone but i had several bad experiences with someone that was from lgbt, i only have one lgbt friend and he is the most quite person who respects everybody and i accept him as my brother, why people from lgbt can't be like him?
no worries, no need to apologize, and of course Allah doesn't command or aim to impose the religion of Islam on other people, in fact, the absolute opposite is stated in Quran and Sunnah in multiple places, such as "There shall be no compulsion in [acceptance of] the religion. The right course has become distinct from the wrong. So whoever disbelieves in į¹ÄghÅ«t1 and believes in AllÄh has grasped the most trustworthy handhold with no break in it. And AllÄh is Hearing and Knowing." [Quran 2:256]. š¤
Yes I donāt like extremists either, Iām very sorry you have had bad experiences. Just like every group there are good and bad people with in it, and sometimes when people are attacked with hate they retaliate and hate others, though this is not a good thing to do and never justified. Iām very sorry about your experiences, just know that there is always bad and good in groups and I agree that everyone should be respectful of each other. I did not mean to offend you in any of my arguments, I was only attempting to show you my opinions. I am sorry if it seems I got to passionate about anything, and I do not have any ill will toward you.
I didnāt know that. Thank you for educating me and having this conversation. It was a good and constructive one and I thank you for that š¤
thank you, as a Christian i totally respect you and your believe i don't have nothing against LGBT people, i actually changed my mind a bit with our talk, i think we should talk more some time i really enjoyed to get challenged
Yes, I had a great conversation with you as well! Thank you so much for discussing with me, I would love to talk to you whenever you feel like it. š¤
them anytime them hahha i love to talk about certain serious topics
@sonic terrace
I agree, Linux is in a whole different dimension compared to Windows. š¤ š
I mean it's way way better.
I've been using Linux for about 5 years now, never regretted my decision switching from Windows, and I usually encourage anyone to give Linux a shot, it's really worth it, even for basic computer users.
Assalam Alaikum akhi
I don't disagree with what you're saying, we hate the sin and not the sinner
But i believe that this whole thing the pride community are doing or saying is aimed to normalizing them in other countries
Why else would they say 'oh hi i support you (I'm A member of the LGBTQ btw !)'
@compact forge and sorry mate for my late reply, my internet connection was bad
Bingo. Something we 100% agree on. š I've been using Linux exclusively for many years and feel as you do about it.
Linux brosš¤
nice!
It makes you wonder.. why are they offering help as a pride community?
Anyways I'm not meaning to be ungrateful (If this is true) what I'm saying is that you can see something weird with this.
yes, I agree, and by that they aim to impose their belief on us. I think that just like there are some religious people might try to impose their belief on others, some LGBT people also do so, it even happens in some public schools in Canada and the US and the UK as far as I know.
they aren't supporing to normalize it they do bc they are humans, any human would stand to violence against civilians
it's wrong to try to read in people's heart, only god knows what lies there
How are they imposing their 'beliefs' on you? It's just their sexual orientation. I'm not imposing my straightness onto you. I'm simply straight. Lol
Maybe I'm missing context, I'll grant you.
Lol, we agree on a lot of things actually, and I really respect you as a person. š¤
agreed imposing is too much of a word I'd say influencing is more accurate
I appreciate that.
Yeah, but influence? C'mon... be reasonable, guys. You're NOT gonna suddenly go out and <intimate act> some dude because you saw a gay couple. Lol
I hate it when I forget to type not. Lol
"ŁŲ§ ŲŖŲ²Ų± ŁŲ§Ų²Ų±Ų© ŁŲ²Ų± Ų£Ų®Ų±Ł" Namely that no bearer of burdens can bear the burden of another
I didn't claim that, but everyone is influencing everyone thought exchanging
I mean they are imposing the belief that the action homosexuality is normal and should not be considered a sin, well we strongly believe it's a sin, why can't they simply respect people's belief. š¤·āāļø
You can't change other people and their actions, but you can change how you respond to them. Ask yourself what sort of person you want to be.
not in muslim nations tho
Absolutely , i know a little kid living in Sweden who was asked if he wanted to change his gender
Since that community says that they just want to be equal..
Is this a question you can ask a child about? Isn't that considered pushing an ideology into a child's brain?
Homosexuality is common, even in the animal world. Is a dog a dirty sinner because it tries to shag some guy's leg? I feel like y'all have no leg to stand on here. This sounds daft, frankly.
Homosexuality goes against science and biology, each sex organ is made to suit the opposite one and there are 2 genders
And yet, it still happens everywhere. This is the reality, guys. Bugger all you can do about, if you'll excuse the pun.
This is how some people live their lives. You live your lives how you like.
I don't wanna go on about the sickness that are origanally from those acts since they aren't "confirmed"
yes, especially when in the same country the age of consent is 15, why would they ask little children about their sexual orientation if they are below the age where they can consciously be aware of their decision, that's an important question to ask.
There's absolutely no scientific reason for Homosexuality
And if you're saying it's normal in the animal worlds then you're describing them as 'animals'
Animals can drink dirty water from the ground, could a human do that too?
That does a little strange, but might be out of context, or misrepresenting the case. Some kids might know what they do and don't like but won't feel comfortable being open about it. Awareness of these things allows them to be open, or at least gives them some opportunity and people to talk to about it in a (hopefully) safe environment.
the animal world is not a very good place to take morality lessons from honestly.
I don't wanna live like an animal myself ngl
We are all animals.
People drink dirty water all the time. š
I hope i read than wrong lol
Nah.
it's the atheistic evolutionist view of humans.
Why should we have special status just because we're more advanced?
Lol
My point is, we can't use animals as an excuse for homosexuality
Why not?
there is more important question to ask, where do you get your morality from?
Hey you do you, we believe in a relegion and we don't want any homosexual sex in our society, if you don't accept it do tell me
It's a great point you're dismissing because... ?
This seems like a red herring. Why is this relevant?
Well bring the smartest animal ever
Can he build Bridges with metal? Can he solve equations? Can he ride a car? Can he MAKE a car ?
Can he speak multiple languages?
No
you're making a morality-based argument, so we need to establish a common ground first.
any homosexual is like the type of guy who uses screw driver to hammer a nail
Alr guys i really liked discussing with y'all
But my eyes are hurting and i need some rest fellas
See you tomorrow maybe?
type of kids who smashes the triangle blocks in the circular holes you get me
Do you realise this sort of attitude is what leads to a lot of suffering, even suicide? It doesn't seem very compassionate or empathetic. Isn't the whole point of your religion to make you a better person for having followed your god?
I really want to be discussing but I'm too tired rn lol
Yes, we can. You didn't answer my question, you just indirectly restated the opposite of my question.
yes, I agree that homosexuality is rationally abnormal.
Why is it abnormal?
everything is a creation , a creature
But not all of them are animals
how can you type "follow" and then say all of that? if i don't follow god should I follow you instead?
Like here we're putting ourselves on another argument!
It's quite literally normal, by definition.
I don't want anyone to 'follow' me. I'm not sure where that came from.
you answered yourself mate.
More advanced => more status
this is wholesome
Hi
toleration has its places, I don't tolerate sinning ty
Perhaps it depends how you define an animal. I suppose you see an animal as less-than; inferior.
that's a different question, could you first answer my question about your source of morality? I'm happy to answer yours though, but after we reach a conclusion on the first discussion.
Then don't sin. Problem solved. If someone else wants to do something different, that's up to them and not you.
You're not the lord of all of mankind.
You do you, basically.
Respectfully , but if we were animals we could've not been able to chat right now...
that applies on every muslim so your saying all muslims should do that, therefore you go back to the first thing I said thx
Technically seen we animals
They're pushing their ideologies on kindergarten children, what's the excuse for that?
I can't believe a whole group of people have come together to decide what other people should do with their own lives in their own bedroom between two consenting adults. This seems like madness, to me.
What Ideologie you mean
I wanna make sure you understand the atheistic evolutionist view of the world, it views us humans as very advanced animals, in the sense that we share a common ancestor with animals, that's why it's logical for @OSM that we are animals, yet we can chat and have intellectual discussions etc etc...
if you understand it like this then you missed what we are saying
saying smthing is sin isn't deciding for people is beliving it's punishible by god
and any sin also can be unhealthy or bad for humans
which is why it's prohibited
I am aware of that , and that doesn't make any sense for many reasons..
Like , if me and that animal had the same ancestor, why would i become more advanced than him?
Lol Sorry, I can't deal with this. This is just too nonsensical and silly to me, and I kinda feel like y'all need a 'reality check'. In order to remain even slightly charitable, I have to disengage. š
cool you incriminated us of smth that we didn't do and then you take yr leave šš¾
I hope you can understand that we didn't mean that that's all I'm seeking through this
Even though we both met
god bless
I dont understand why people think lgbtq is abnormal
walikom a salam
I agree, evolution is not "well established" theory as many people think, and I strongly consider it a myth.
it has many holes to be established as truth
š¤
every movement got a bit of reason to it which is why people follow it, but sometimes they do take it to the extreme
feminist can be right or toxic, muslim can be right or toxic ... yada yada
every freedom got a radius that if you trespass it you end up stepping on other people's freedom
my apologies if any of my questions or claims have been nonsensical to you, perhaps if we could continue (with patience) our discussion you'd find them more rational than they might appear at first glance.
I love science, rationality, and logic, I don't like people rushing to assume that my arguments are nonsensical, irrational, or illogical.
when having a discussion, I hope all parties become a bit more empathetic so that they don't provoke each other, or 'cause them discomfort, the discussion wouldn't yield anything positive if we don't become a bit empathetic towards each other.
Alikum Assalmu Warahamtulahi Wabarakatuhu. š¤
@thorny steeple
I truly like you and respect you as a person, despite our differences and disagreements, here is a flower for you my friend. š·
and I hope one day you understand the religion of Islam the right way, and perhaps become a Muslim yourself, not by anyone imposing the religion on you or anything, but by your own will.
Hello flare
Hi! š
my day is going great Alhamdulillah, can't complain, although I've got a lot on my plate, between college and work, sometimes the tasks get out of hands honestly, but generally, Alhamdulillah.
how about you my friend?
Also me,studying will make me unconscious
I have finished my h.w
But i still have to study geographic
Tomorrow at school i will study it
ah, I can relate. here is one tip I can share with you, try to ask questions about everything in the subject, perhaps teaching it to yourself could motivate you to do so, and don't forget to use your imagination so that you can picture concepts in your mind, this personally consolidates my understanding of subject, it works like a charm.
all the best my friend. š¤ š¤
Oh,thank you for this tip,i will use it from now on.
You can also try to study(if you have an exam)the hardest thing or lesson first
It is my tip if u dont know it
I see, thank you very much for this tip! āØ
I have been sick for the past 3 days. Does anyone know a good way to finish the schoolwork I missed?
you already know the answer to that question.
?
Are you able to ask your teacher to give you some more time so you can finish the work?
Good idea. Thank you! š
Clickbaiters have no shame
I want to discuss something where one person is speaking seriously while the other wants to have fun. These two paths are divergent, and if followed persistently, they will grow further apart. That's why, in my opinion, we should show care and empathy to both sides and not solely focus on fun. What I mean is, when one person is serious and the other seeks amusement, the one inclined towards humor should seek a partner who shares that inclination.
Chickens for KFC
Why doesn't the serious guy try to have more fun 
That's a good point lol.
Both of them have to adjust if they want to have a conversation together.
yea, its not really gone any further
Because he is a phò
And doesnt like phį»
those two are correlated because if you feed phỠto a phò then she will just melt and burn, it destroys the evil
man ended the debate
professional debaters please debate about SOMETHING i just wanna see how yall debate
cucumbers aint green, they are pink
what if green is just the name we use to describe cucumber real color could be pink
big brain
unfalsifiable
š.š

What native speakers think about Accesent of Slavoj Zizek?
Oh, he seems to have a lisp or something.
We can determine the color of things by the frequency of light, so it is as falsifiable as that allows. Assuming we all agree on what āgreenā means.
Has he got strong slavic accesent? Can you understand hım?
I'm not all that familiar with those accents, but it definitely seemed strong. The main thing I noticed was the lisp, unfortunately. I understood him, based on the short clip I saw.
İ suppose Zizek is a evidence of that if we had to make a choice between fluency and accesent we mjst choice fluency
Provided that accent didn't too badly interfere with the listener's ability to understand the speaker, I would agree.
If the point of language is to allow one to communicate, then it's a problem when one's accent is to the detriment of communication.
I agree
granted
I am finding a patner to improve my speaking English.
Anyone can help me?
@peak girder I mean, take logos for example. It involves building logical arguments. But on the other hand, ethos and pathos, both entail several conclusions that are themselves logically fallacious, don't you see, like the argumentum ad verecundiam for the former (which I was talking about) and the argumenta ad misericordiam and ad hominem in case of the second. Also, people are prone to the argumentum ad populum too, and in most cases the veracity of an argument or a fact is measured based on this. These are all informal fallacies, yet, indeed, they are the driving forces of dialectics. Another case where the human brain disagrees with logic, isn't it?
I'll ping you when i get in a debate
Maybe your screen color settings are different
I do agree although it has been proven that using techniques like ethos and pathos enable you to bring your point in a way that makes you (the debator), more likeable and since the human brain cannot compute information without bias like a computer, I believe both are relevant
Because you can be right
Hello ! How would you translate "I'm sure you're buzzing for your exams to be over" ?
I'm having trouble to understand "buzzing"
But if you are annoying/moralising, not many will be on your side
Exited
Thanks a lot !
lets talk

