#🧠|serious-chat
1 messages · Page 53 of 1
what?
causality surely has many useful implications for our survival
sorry , but I don't think you know what you're talking about.
That's not helpful
no need to make pointless statements, how about be relevant to my rebuttals
or just ask me to elaborate
What's the point of refutations if you're contradicting yourself at every ?
Slow down. What's the contradiction you see?
dude again, how about explaining what the contradiction is
I wrote earlier this, please be careful
No
Write me what I wrote?
Just copy paste it
Refer to it
so u explained the contradiction before i even made the contradiction?
Why then did you decide that I didn't do it if you can't provide evidence?
ok let's all just try to be relevant to the discussion, and proceed with an intention to actually get somewhere with this
I'm trying
You think I decided that, but I didn't. I'm asking for you to point me to it.
@craggy sphinx can you please explain to me, where the contradiction is, kindly?
.
Let me elaborate. No, don't just say you already explained it. Show us where you explained it.
i added a 'please'
anyone any servers about entrepreneurs i have to interview one for a assignment
so to ask that question you come to the english hub?
yes
jk ppl will help you out
yeah
The one that definitely exists somewhere in this chat.
I think I am about to get disillusioned.
the moment of truth is about to show itself
Yes of course
Earlier, if you remember, you argued about the meaninglessness of the moment before the inflationary period. Explaining this by the fact that the current data is not able to explain it and does not know it at all.
Also, for some reason, you tried to establish a causal connection, although this is wrong, since you yourself said that we do not know what happened before this period
ObserverA, please go to #📚|english-questions for help.
okay sir
it is a fact that current data and knowledge say nothing about the pre-inflationary period, and it is my belief that it is meaningless.
i assert the existence of causality only within the confines of the universe, and i also state that this has a temporal limit, which means that i don't think causality can be shown to be existent before inflation
How do you know what's going on outside the universe?
if you claim it's pointless
I think Assassin just said he can't know.
this is what i claim to NOT know
No problem, but then you should limit yourself to the definition of "cause and effect"
Explain to me the point before the inflationary period
I can't
neither can i
.
Try using words
so wat is it you're claiming that i 'know' of?
Then it is foolish to say that it is pointless
It's unknown. How's that?
that is my belief and clearly, if you wanna pounce at my beliefs with derision, then it means that you're not trying to refute my logic, but rather my intuition
Where did I laugh?
there are only few things I respect more than someone who learns and accepts a new idea once he verify it's true, you have my respect my friend. 🤍
what
You called it foolish.
Then you shouldn't assert it
yeah thanks for that discussion again
Where's the laughter?
The word was derision, not laughter.
no
there was a tinge of mockery in they way you went against my beliefs
idk if u laughed
Are you saying you're always right?
but that's fine honestly since it's not rlly helping the discussion to keep bringing that up
He has said no such thing.
Because you are not able to explain it, unfortunately
He doesn't need to explain his intuitions and beliefs.
The serious chat has become stern.
it's a belief man chill, i look forward to a refutation of my logical argument and not that belief
and it's a belief cuz nothing can really disprove it as of today
and nothing can prove it either
so yeah
lol nice one
Mr. James Green, I think you don't know what you're talking about
he ASSERTED it, not assumed it or intuition. He also used cause and effect, although this is incorrect.
Forgive him.
forgive me for being confident in my beliefs
i shall never assert my beliefs ever again
You are free to think that.
We all have many beliefs that we do not need to or cannot justify.
😂
You're trying to hide your mistake instead of telling me to explain it and avoid misunderstandings.
You weren't afraid to make a mistake, on the contrary, you claimed it.
It's not a mistake to have a belief that cannot be explained, it's human.
It's not about faith
We don't talk about faith
We are not robots, we are humans.
wat bro i literally get your point, and am acknowledging the fact i may have come off as being a bit too confident in a belief which is bad for a debate
again
ok now back to the debate ig
No, I realized that it was useless to continue.
alright, well it was nice having you, and ngl, your arguments were kinda good
You're beating a dead horse, eisan. Make your point about the topic, not personal attacks at Assassin.
Nice epiphany.
@violet dragon Good luck !
thanks
I don't think you understand what you're writing and what we've actually discussed.
I also noticed that you came at the end of our conversation.
You might be right.
Enough with the flattery.
it's good to end things with some appreciation
yes, the universe is defined as all the mass, energy and all the physical things we know, these are all governed by the laws of physics, and the concept of causality is fundamental in physics, so when we refer to the big bang as the beginning of the universe we refer to the beginning of all mass, energy and other physical things, the big bang states that all mass, energy, etc etc were in a very hot, very dense state called the singularity, I'm sure you're aware of that but it's important to mention for my following explanation, the singularity is characterized by infinite density and temperature, after that it exploded which caused the accelerating expansion of the universe, the problem here is what caused this explosion to occur, and how is the universe so fine-tuned, I don't usually differentiate between the teleological argument (or the argument of fine-tuning) and the Kalam cosmological argument, I think they are pretty much complementary.
but im selfish tho, cuz all i cared about was that i got something out of that whole thing
There's lots of things I don't understand.
yes , and the Cause Effect is conditionally taken after the beginning of this period, as is commonly believed in science.
and is it only your belief, a subjective experience, that allows you to deny other theories like the big bounce or sumn?
My understanding is that physicists claim causality must be understood as probability.
do you mean the series of cosmic cycles?
sure
Since science is not yet able to explain the state before, it is easy to speak after. It can be said that this is arbitrary
I don't think you know what you're talking about (see how easy that was?).
And I'm just kidding.
don't start fighting now
Simply stay true to who you are. It is acceptable to hold varying opinions and to harbor doubts about them. You will examine, you will watch, and you will pick up knowledge.
I honestly don't understand what you're saying is arbitrary, eisan.
Nor can I really understand what you mean by easy. We speak about what we know about, yes.
so we interpret the validity of all these arguments subjectively and differently, and experience is key to gaining a better understanding of reality than yesterday. does that put it well
How is that arbitrary?
Mr James Green, it doesn't quite fit in organically now🙃
Of course, we still don't understand a lot of things, and we don't have to understand everything. We are subjective and rational beings, we can make mistakes and this is normal
I can't stay much longer, but perhaps next time, I'd like to talk about the counterfactual.
and especially counterfactual definiteness.
Yes
But I don't believe in facts
When did I ever say you did?
Yes, there was no such thing
But I'm speaking for myself
I think the wiser you will become, the less you will speak and more you will do or experience.
Is it just me or does stories from video games(like The Last Of Us and God Of War) have one of the most compelling stories of all time some of which are better thank most of the books I have read or is it because of the visual that make the player emotionally attached to a character?
Please check before just changing the topic.
I'm not ready to change the topic.
You're an empiricist, right?
To be honest I do not know what that means, let me google it 😂
I'm a cartesian rationalist. There are such things as facts. And knowledge.
empiricists believe that knowledge is based in experience.
rationalists prioritize reason
as a source of knowledge
Kind of but not sure. I do not have any strong opinions. I am learning.
No worries
but up to now experience has helped me
Alright, I must be off.
I'm aware that it's an hypothesis, but to consider it a theory, one must examine it very well against physical laws, however, there are a number of problems when one attempts to prove it:
- the second law of thermodynamics, which states that entropy always increases over time, if there is a series of cosmic cycles, it would reach a state of maximum entropy, where it would be impossible for the big bang to occur.
- the problem of the first cycle, what does that mean? it means that this hypothesis assumes that there is a first cycle, otherwise we would fall into infinite regression, which is impossible, also if it's possible for the universe to magically pop into existence without a single cause, then it's possible that we are originally in the first cycle, therefore, there is no need to prostulate an infinite number of cycles afterwords.
- the lack of any observation evidence or anything that indicates its validity.
this hypothesis also kind of contradicts the Occam's razor principle, and there has not been tested by any scientific method, and it doesn't provide a causal explanation of the universe, also I personally believe it also assumes that somehow the big bang is conscious enough to explain the fine-tuning of the universe.
Yeah, you are a teacher.
The laws of the origin of energies are also
I bow down to thee, Master.
yep, one source of all energies.
alright. so you believe that the universe has a cause?
yes, I believe it has an ultimate uncaused cause.
but why believe that this cause is an omniscient god? even claiming that this cause was a 'god' is going a bit too far, i think.
what leads you there?
God is defined as the first ultimate uncaused cause, his attributes can easily be deduced by many phenomena in this universe, for example, the fine-tuning of the universe is an incredibly strong argument for the conscious design.
In philosophy, there is a principle called the the Principle of Agencies
This explains that behind every identifiable object there is an execution object that precedes it.
"Briefly" : prychna - investigative connection
Hello people, i want to ask you some questions related to canada as a country and i really hope to find somebody who could give me reliable answers. You can write me in DMs as well, it would be easier that way for both of us
yeah the fine-tuning argument does provide a convincing argument for the existence of some supernatural intelligent being, but it comes down to belief and interpretation. but y an omniscient one. im being specific as you yourself were once an agnostic.
notice here, I'm using the term God, not Allah, 'cause I believe Allah is the God with all the attributes stated in the religion of Islam, which is another topic, I'm just kind of making steps of what makes me believe in Allah.
Excuse me, can I ask you a few questions in Dms?
You can answer them when you're free
omniscience = all knowing, or knows everything.
if you already knows things in this universe, how come the ultimate cause which caused it to exist doesn't know the universe, while he's the one designed it?
how can this follow when the previous premise only states that there was a cause for the universe, which happened to fine-tune it for the survival of, say, us, a species. a good design doesn't really imply complete knowledge of the succession of every event in the universe.
which also explains all the imperfections and not to mention sufferings in the world.
ok maybe suffering is irrelevant here
good design requires conscious decisions, that's why it's so unlikely that the ultimate cause doesn't even know how did he design the universe, then how did he design it if he doesn't know how to design it?
it's reasonable to assume that the cause had great intelligence, and that it knew very well, how to design the universe. i agree with this. but omniscience is still a problem tho.
i don't see how it follows
I'm not sure what do you mean by imperfections?
to know "everything", means to know literally everything, it all comes down to how an ultimate uncaused cause caused everything to exist, or rather created it in the first place, that doesn't including knowing non-things.
I think reason and experience are both needed. If one overpriotizes something in particular, it will cause misery. My bliss lies in balancing and using them both when needed. But you can say experience catches my eye often, and sometimes I find wisdom gained through experience more captivating. Does it make me an empiricist?
well, fine-tuning suggests that life and similar events are fortunate enough to have certain conditions placed in the universe. which means that anything which can be thought of, that could make the world or the universe even better for survival or even existence, is a better or more finely-tuned universe.
otherwise, it wouldn't even matter how the universe 'existed', as long as it just exists.
so you're saying that omniscience is restricted to complete knowledge of only 'things'?
so what is it about imperfections?
yes, it's called "knowing everything", everything = every single thing that exists.
the point im trying to convey here is that if it's possible to imagine a better suitable universe, then it could be more finely tuned, and hence a better possibility than what 'god' has given us
hey! welcome to our community. ✨
imperfections, as in being relative to comfort or a better existence of our species.
one of his names is the know-er of the unknown
it's not 'perfect' enough for it to come from 'god' is essentially what im saying
damn this is new
to me at least
so u suggest that the 'succession of every single event' is not a thing, if im not wrong?
It also means being 100% sure of it
TO KNOW
yes, but the question why this is not the case is a question for God, I believe Allah already answered that question in Islam, paradise exists, the ultimate place for enjoyment and pleasure as well as survival, but the fine-tuning argument is more about accuracy though.
yes, that unknown for all of his creations, he knows everything, and we don't know the amount of things in truth, we refer to things as all of what is known and unknown to us.
well, you're supporting the argument by citing the claim of allah from the quran. it would be fair to call this some form of faith, would you agree
yes, right.
no, it's okay if you don't believe in Islam and still accepts that the universe is finely-tuned which indicates the existence of an intelligent creator, I'm just mentioning that if you follow a religion and you finally believe it's a revelation from God, then you'll come to know why God did certain things.
brb.
my question was more personal. since your response to my claim that 'a better universe or world could have existed' is grounded on the quran, it would be fair to call it faith, right? and yes, it's fair to say that if one believes in the fine-tuning argument, it doesn't rlly have to be that the designer was allah.
i dont mean to be nosy, hope u understand that im doing this cuz u used to hold a worldview that i do now
surely it's a faith, but only if we agree on the definition that it's a complete trust or confidence in someone or something, I have a complete trust and confidence in Islam, and I have the certainty Alhamdulillah.
take a look at my about me section in Discord.
nah it's fine, I really respect that you're asking and searching, I know some atheists who wouldn't do that, or they probably would like to stay atheists 'cause it's more pleasing to them.
i think im gonna end this interview lol with one more question - how would you distribute the reason for your conversion between logic/arguments and pure faith?
I studied comparative religion for a while. Of all the scriptures, the Quran is, in my opinion, the best in explaining the structure of the world and its functioning
My Opinion
"the structure of the world" I have designated as operative / active
But I still have questions about this religion
I'm not sure what do you mean by pure faith, but I'd like to say that faith is not the same as blind belief, you'll have to be logically convinced in order to have the faith and certainty (as a Muslim I really wish for you to gain the certainty and to eventually settle on the belief of Islam), does that answer your question?
was there something in your mind which transcended that point of reason or hard logic and which naturally drew you to islam? that is wat i mean
mutual, I also studied many religions, I genuinely don't even know why did I learn about Buddhism which I knew it has never claimed it's not a man-made religion. xD
I knew that if there is an ultimate creator who created the universe, he might already know that I have tones of questions that need to be answered, and I knew that he might actually sent down something to answer these questions, that's why I started searching for the right religion.
was a difficult endeavor, but it's absolutely worth it.
thank you Assassin, I feel the same, the moment I saw you having no problem accepting new ideas and searching for the truth, I really admired you. 🤍
sure, and sorry for this late response. 😅 😂 (to eisan)
lol it's fine
wait!
lol, I was replying to @eisan. xD
oh lol
sure, and sorry for this late response. 😅 😂
That was prettier than any conversation I've ever seen, It was a pleasure to read your argument
who, me?
thank you very much, it's just my story on believing in Islam, really. 😂
that's great, I know that the rapid growth of this religion is not the proof that it's the right religion, but the idea that many people embrace this religion is so comforting to me.
I mean there are many other proofs which I think are irrefutable, but I don't consider this one irrefutable or anything like that, given that Christianity was once the most practiced religion in the world.
It would be better if someone didn't confuse "causal effect" with "convention" 🙃
...??
I searched the video mutiple times to make sure the video is not miscaptioned or anything like that, all the videos I found had the same exact subtitles, and even in the actual source which is the in context channel, yet some people claim Israel is not an apartheid terrorist state.
https://youtu.be/MQ1TAOibLss?si=U0ar2OCScThGSC4m
Yosef Diamant and Amitzur Cohen. Amitzur was originally a member of the Lehi terrorist group whose members went on to form the IDF 🇮🇱
Two terrorists who find rape and ethnic cleansing horrendously hilarious.
Lehi sought an alliance with Nazi Germany against Britain.
Non
Hi everyone , this is my first time using discord , i 've read some of your conversations and i would like to join your next one , i am not great at english,so you may see that i have a lot of mistakes 😅🥲,by the way i am a palestinian
what do you get when you say those things
you saying those thing will have absolutely no effect on the currant situation
from what???? any way your name explain everything
if you really want to free isreal. donate money.
bro its you who wants to free isreal
are dumb or something
i was talking to you btw.
if you dont understand its not my fault.
may be if you study
then you will be able to understand
an average troller on discord
indeed
No one is going to do that
🤔
Anyways
You can't free something that was never trapped in the first place.
<@&852814479569059840>
free from what idiot? Israel is an occupation power, meaning that they literally live on the land that belongs to other people.
free it from what? its guilt? he'll need to expel most of its population in order to free it from its guilt.
Zionists are mostly idiots.
a live example of who actually support Israel, only racist psychopaths who have no shame mocking PALESTINIANS DEATH! that's filthy and disgusting.
.
Free my world. From all states existence.
My world is under occupations.
One day people arrived on a spaceship and there was written on the ship.
'There is no water left on Mars and we left all our hopes and homes behind, please do not break our hopes' was the biggest mistake we believed.
One word for Zionist
Marsonists
Their entire goal is to seize the promised earth and establish the Marsaan Empire. But if you say this, you also become an anti-marsist. Be carefull...
Serious chatt
number of children who were killed by İsreal in one month is bigger than number of chıldren who were killed by russia in two years
one of this countries experienced twelve thousand sanction,other country experienced zero sanction
because white blonde humans's lifes is more importanrt than arap's lifes
Positive Russian song with English subtitles, be carefully dark-humor 😆
https://youtu.be/X7Yyf8gl78k
Are we supposed to get angry during a serious conversation?
i dont mind little chaos
being angry means being serious
this is serious chat not sincere chat so yes, you can get angry here
I feel like the United States is too bad
not neccesery
if you sign up for bad you automatically get the opposite and vice-versa
what
there is sincere anger but I haven't come across anyone with a temper like that here.
who knows
not neccesery
it does matter
if it is necessary right now, it will not be tomorrow
why you speaking from both sides
Which caste do you belong to
By birth, by mind, or by heart?
because it does not matter what side I choose
Is this a privacy issue
Are you sure? Because I like to be
complete your sentences bro
do not write half sentences and expect us to understand the rest
maybe anger has become your center of speech, nothing wrong with that if you do not suffer from it.
suffering is inveitable
No one answered me
I do not expect anything from anyone here.
But when some people get angry, they can show their reactions in different ways rather than anger.
Then you introspect and scrutinize.
lie decated
beep beep
see if it is helping you or working against you
i can never tell a truth that you would believe nor a lie that you would not doubt.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nx_L9To_LZA This man and his style are an example
In a widely circulated interview with Piers Morgan, Egyptian comedian Bassem Youssef employed dark humor to highlight the enduring Israel-Palestine conflict and the challenges endured by Palestinians.
Full story: https://www.dawn.com/live/pakistan
Official Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/dawndotcom/
Official Twitter: https://twitter.com/da...
lie decated again
beep beep
lol
I am a sociopathic narcissist.
no one asked
But I'm a little bit
horrid?
My serious style is different.
I have seen it
god is the best programmer
I don't like to be anger.
Like those chinese warrior monks?
ofcourse
This is quite beautiful
😂and i follow all the religion
what
He is definitely not a white-bearded grandpa punishing people with a stick in his hand.
Yes I believe all.
who knows
I know
he could be
As a Chinese, I actually don't understand
Chinese Kung Fu has been abolished by the Chinese government
they had to do it, otherwise people would have abolished them.
no
Ju-Do
Weapons are more effective than martial arts
Kung fu is far better than engineering these days.
These martial arts were developed as offensive sports practiced when there was no weapon left in hand.
Right, kill more and more.
It was designed to defend not to destroy.
I'm Yuk dan at taekwondo.
I spent 25 years
COOL
many Kung Fu Master died in the 1950 Kung Fu competition, so government was banned from using murder tactics
🙏
Human beings are always going to make fuss.
Taekwondo and other martial arts are strongly aggressive and offensive sports for pros.
Kung Fu suffered a heavy blow
It is actually was not sport it became a sport
Every trend has an end.
I like Taoism.
My memory has linked Kung Fu with the way of Lao Tzu.
The philosophy of "Do" as I mentioned
The eternal way
You are a Chinese expert
always towards truth and goodness...
Taoism is more like a poetry, and Confucianism is more of a philosophy.
the inner science
The name Lao Tzu translates to "The old man". Nobody knew his real name and his parents at that time.
East was rich in culture.
China, India, and, Japan were the masters of producing inner scientists.
Japan has learned from China
The west has produced intellectual giants, but nobody was at the level of Chang Tzu, Lao Tzu, The Buddha, or Zen.
And China has from India.
Dhyan>Chan>Zen
The roots of meditation are in India, the branches and leaves are in China, and the fruits and flowers are in Japan.
I am talking about meditation not other things.
China was intrigued in Buddhism, not anymore.
Have you heard of Bodhidharma?
Hiuen Tsang came to India to translate the Sanskrit scriptures in Chinese.
make known to every family
sure
But Taoism has a greater impact
No doubt about it.
We have integrated Taoism, Confucianism, and Buddhism
So what you said is not wrong
Lao Tzu is one of those few masters who have tried to say the truth as accurately as it is humanly possible. He has made tremendous effort to bring the inexpressible to the world of expression, to bring the wordless experience within the confinement of small words.
Hence, Tao is the way of Lao.
He has all the reverence I could offer.
Buddha is from India
Now it has become Nepal.
Confucius is not on the level of Buddha and Tzu.
why
He was a great rationalist, but when he met Tzu, he was very disappointed with himself.
You have heard about it?
And Buddha's philosophy is polar opposite of Lao Tzu's.
that is why they attract each other.
but they operate from the same core, just the way of expressing it is different.
Sometimes it feels like Lao Tzu would petrify buddha.
Teaching has to be like that, but Tzu has great teachings.
Plato did not dare to cross Diogenes, and you are putting him with Laozi.
I will improve them, thanks.
no
I was talking about this time-period.
Oh I see
well
Indian people did not have the concept of linear time. They used to learn from mythology and epics.
I think there's a problem with your recording system
In India, time is was circular concept, just like seasons moving in a circle. The summer comes and then the summer will come again, and it has been and will always be so. The Eastern concept was nearer to truth than the Western, because every movement is in a circle. Earth moves in a circle, the sun moves in a circle, the stars move in a circle, life moves in a circle—every movement is circular. So time cannot be an exception; if time moves at all, it moves in a circle. They say the linear concept of time is absolutely wrong.
That’s why in the East we were never interested in history. We have been interested in myth, but never in history. The West introduced history into the world. That’s why Jesus became the center of history, the beginning of the calendar. We go on measuring time with “before Christ,” “after Christ.” Christ became the center of all history, the first historic person. Buddha is not historic, Krishna is not at all; you can never really be certain whether Krishna was ever born or not, whether the whole thing was just a story or a history. But the East was never worried about it. They say everything is a story, and it has been told many times and will be told again and again. There is no need to be concerned with facts, because facts are repetitive. It is better to be concerned with the theme, not with the facts. So you may not be able to understand many things.
They used to live in myth; myth means a repetitive theme, the essential is always there. In the West myth is meaningless. If you can prove that something is a myth it becomes meaningless. You have to prove that it is history, it has happened in time; you have to be exact about it.
China attaches great importance to history
I don't know whatever has happened in history, but history has definitely been written in a distorted manner.
If someone wants to talk about history, then tell me the history that lasts for 4 billion years?
Like gunpowder lol
History is written by winners, isn't it
im serious guys
بچه ها من سیروسم
what is the prove that what's written in history is true
there's no prove. it's only trusting the writers
Hii
Hi
Hiiiiii
Oh hey
introduce yourself
We arent claiming that history is coming to present one hundred percent clearly and true
crazy
But we are improving our methods and we know much things than yesterday
You can enter arhcieve lol
Myself Raju from India
which part of india do u live?
There are a lot of indians in here LoL
Are you learning English in your schools?
Introduce yourself?
no sorry
No, school comes to me to teach 🤣
what
👍
It's arabic..?
yeah
@thorny steeple how did you learn English?
i said i am serious
I am in english prepare class in university
اوہ ائی سی
what
Oh i c
Oh any see?
Can I know your English level?
I finished pre inter
And ı will start to intermediate
I guess it means B1
History is just new people making old mistakes.
hello beings of the highest light
incisive
People have never learned from history
I don't trust my memory let alone trusting others memories
hello
Hii everyone
There's ample evidence to show that our memory isn't reliable, such as false memories and suppressed memories due to trauma.
it's a terrorist state, I'm positive of it, they've made countless of lies, yet they still want people to believe them and not Hamas, as if they have been ever deemed the most credible source of information or something, Lol, it really seems like they are making lies and believing them.
Why are you worried about this?
You may have misunderstood. I'm not worried about it.
You've written it as if you're afraid of it and want to avoid it.
Nah.
It was in response to the other poster and was essentially providing an argument for his or her stance so as to affirm it.
It doesn't make any difference whether they are false or real
np
hello , how are you ?
Yes,isreal is a structural racist apartheid state
İt is a colonization project against local arab people
Not muslims,to arabs because christans araps are being assaulted by isreal
Because these are memories, whatever they are, you shouldn't focus on that.
You can only benefit from it, for example, understand what you did and why
Try not to make the same mistake again
What is a memory?
Memories are the decoding of memories into sensation
it's true, the US is absolutely an evil face covered with the mask of "human rights" and "free speech", racism, oppression, and many other bad features the US is well-known with, yet it always depicts itself as if it's the super hero that will save all humanity from evil.
well, even many Israeli civilians are incredibly racist, this video is only one example:
these kind of people make me sick.
im doing good, how about you
im great
perfect
What do you think about memories?
Yes also they are kidding with Palestinian's pain in tiktok lol
memorie is identity
what do you mean ?
guys, do "i'm watching a movie tonight " and "i'm going to watch a movie tonight " have the same meaning ?
hello
For more information - #📚|english-questions
thank you
Generally, whether or not memories are false or real is evidently critical in many if not most aspects of life, such as in law, education, and science. If the validity of memories weren't in question, it would likely result in chaos, because, among other things, education would collapse, leading to a further collapse of science and the many professions in the world. If it truly didn't matter, we wouldn't consider it a problem when one has false memories, suppressed memories, implanted memories, amnesia, etc.
Have you ever delved into any particular mythology, and if so, which one captures your interest the most?
Christianity, I suppose. It comes to mind a lot when discussing or debating religiosity and creationism. Beyond that, probably not.
Uhh, if u ask me it, I can say i am Turk and i suggest Turkish mythology.
Egyptian and Greek mythology
No.
I think Norse mythology is quite interesting, but I know nothing about it. Thor and what-not. I find the origin and reasoning for such belief more interesting than the belief itself, I think.
I don't think it would have led to chaos. As I said earlier, we are subjective beings, which means that we can be wrong
if there is a reason for that
Why would it not lead to chaos? Whether or not we're subjective beings is irrelevant to whether or not chaos would follow your assertion.
Now THIS topic is becoming hackneyed.
there are many things that have been falsified, and even those that are still unknown. Would we kill each other in order to be the first to know about it?
I'm not sure how that is related to the subject. It seems like a Red Herring. Whether or not things have been falsified is irrelevant to your assertion, unless I'm mistaken, at which point I'd like to know your reasoning.
"It doesn't make any difference whether they are false or real"
This is the assertion you made, against which I'm arguing, because I think it's illogical to assert that when, if it were true, it would surely follow that the world would be in chaos. I highly doubt, for example, that we'd be using these computers. I'm under the assumption that your definition of a memory is the standard accepted definition, thus I don't feel the need to ask you to define it or track down a definition. However, if you're defining a memory in a non-standard way, then it's a definitional issue which could affect my argument.
I didn't say it was true or not. You claim that this would lead to chaos, but why?
Give me a definition of memories
I don't think standardization has anything to do with it.
Hello everyone. Any new updates?
A standard definition of memory, in this context, is the storage of information, either long term or short term.
"I didn't say it was true or not." — You directly did, hence it being an assertion. If it wasn't your meaning or intention, then I appreciate that.
"I don't think standardization has anything to do with it." — When discussing something, it's important to be on the same page. We have definitions for words for a reason, after all.
Regardless, whether or not standardization of the the understanding of the word 'memory' matters is irrelevant to your assertion.
I explained why I think your assertion, if true, would likely lead to chaos. This is what I said:
"Generally, whether or not memories are false or real is evidently critical in many if not most aspects of life, such as in law, education, and science. If the validity of memories weren't in question, it would likely result in chaos, because, among other things, education would collapse, leading to a further collapse of science and the many professions in the world. If it truly didn't matter, we wouldn't consider it a problem when one has false memories, suppressed memories, implanted memories, amnesia, etc."
Where did I claim this?
I think you are confusing the definition of the words "assert" and "assume"
So, I said that it doesn't matter if it's a bad memory or a good one.
you also said that remembering is a way of storing Information. That is why I pointed out the possibility of alterations and the incorrectness of this
Can it always be true? Does this have to lead to chaos because this or that memory turned out to be wrong?
no
That's not a problem. It's okay when you're wrong.
I think the language barrier is too much. I shouldn't have questioned you so heavily. I would find it impossible to have this sort of discussion in my 2nd language.
sorry
I really don't see any reason for chaos
It's OK.
An assertion is basically a statement of something as though it were fact, usually without evidence. For example: "God is real." That's an assertion, because I've provided no evidence and I've stated it as fact. However, assuming something is to consider something a given. For example, I assume you're likely an English learner, because of the server we're in.
Regarding chaos, I do admit I worked under the assumption that the validity of memory would not be in question now, with us already at this point. But, your assertion actually more likely suggests that memory was never important, against which my argument would simply be that it would be highly improbable, if even possible, that we would be talking on Discord, with computers powered by electricity, all of which was provided by science, a study which relies on the validity of memory, such as during education.
"assert " means that you are sure of It. But I don't think so.
Maybe you didn't quite get my point.
I said it didn't matter if those memories were true or wrong. It's normal when you're unsure about something.
But this is not a reason for chaos. As I've said before, memories may have been distorted or completely incorrect. Notice that I've taken "memory" as an information unit, since that's your definition of it.
If you really think this would have led to chaos, then why don't you worry about what happened a few hundred years ago? You take it for granted, but you can't be sure of it because you have " witness knowledge"
"To assume" is not quite the same as to assert
I agree that I may have missed your point. I may have taken something you said out of context, and argued against it alone. I've explained why I thought there would be chaos, and gave a reason and explanation which didn't conclude chaos but still argued against your assertion. Regardless, I think at this point we're getting nowhere. I appreciate the discussion and apologise if I frustrated you.
““As far as chaos is concerned, I admit that I have been working on the assumption that the shape of memory will not be questioned now when we are already at that stage““ - That's what you wrote earlier. You're using an assertion, but at the same time, you're not completely sure about it, saying it's at least "now"
Given your definition of memories, I think you didn't quite correctly relate it to what you wrote
No worries
You can share your ideas
This is something that cannot be refuted, at least for now
I can hello the arguments I once made, but I guess you don't want to
for real! it's really inhumane barbaric ruthless act!
https://youtu.be/_mwcFEpAYkU?si=DTijicvx90YLqPwQ
that provocative girl who mocked the Palestinian mothers who lost their children under the rubble justified her acts by citing a video of literally a Lebanese short film that aims to show the brutal living in Gaza under the ongoing coward Israeli bombardment.
here is the video that proves it: https://www.instagram.com/p/CzaicF9OQBi/?hl=en
even AP news talked about it: https://apnews.com/article/fact-check-crisis-actor-israel-hamas-war-false-movie-set-975355588351
their shameless series of lies must come to an end, those folks were born frauds and barbarians!
An old Israeli song has resurfaced in one of the latest Israeli TikTok trends meant to make fun of Palestinians and their living conditions amid Israel's ongoing bombardment of Palestine's Gaza, which is suffering from a severe lack of water, food, fuel, electricity and medicine due to Israel's siege and air strikes. #Gaza #Palestine #Israel
...
We keep having to do the fact checking since m e t a doesn’t seem to care about showing the truth. Anyways, some of you need more critical thinking skills because why would confetti be in any staged war content 🤣
1170
can a man be feminist from your point of view?
If being a feminist means raising my voice for women's education, advocating for career opportunities, speaking out against rape, and supporting women's basic rights, then I am a feminist man and I endorse it.
However, I don't support endorsing vulgarity, demeaning men, making frivolous demands that have no merit. I don't support it when people misuse feminism, which results in women being deprived of their rights.
A good man always support women, who play a role in their lives, have a progressive mindset, and view themselves not as less to men.
Comparisons between men and women don't make sense as both have distinct qualities, and both are highly valued.
I've actually met some people who claim to be as such, but it's important first to understand that feminism has many types, I don't think any man would be a pro cultural feminism, it's hard to say that women are any superior than men.
cultural feminism: is the belief that women are in fact superior than men.
I agree, absolute equality is always unjust, people should actually be looking for equity and justice.
No gender can be considered superior to another based on being of a particular gender.
actually not,cultural feminism means womans have got female core in their inside and this core is making them different from males,this quality isnt meaning always superiority
agreed. 💯
There are matriarhcalist cultural feminist but there are cultural feminists who dont believe woman superiority too
and second group is in majority
but ı agree a man cannot be a cultural femınıst but ı guess he can be a lıberal or socıalıst femınıst as man
I got my info from Wikipedia, could be wrong though, idk. 🤷♂️
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cultural_feminism
Cultural feminism, the view that there is a "female nature" or "female essence", attempts to revalue and redefine attributes ascribed to femaleness. It is also used to describe theories that commend innate differences between women and men. Cultural feminism diverged from radical feminism, when some radical feminists rejected the previous femini...
I believe women have got one of the most important roles in society, which is to preserve the structure of families.
we cant identify womans according to family becuase we arent making this to mans
mans and womans are creating family and they are making children but we are mentioning only woman's duty in family
everybody mentioning about woman's mother task but nobody talking about man's father task
and this is patriarchaly
Agreed 💯 as a women I think nowadays these so called feminist just want to b free , nude, want high payed jobs with doin nothing
Their illogical protest are actually not helping the deserving women who are suffering from rapes, bullying, sexual harassment, education n all
ah, no, I disagree, I mentioned the women's role to preserve the structure of the family 'cause we're primarily talking about women, but men's duty in the structure of the family is also important, however, I believe that women have the duty to raise the children, as men are inherently built for working in full-time jobs, women inherently have the qualities necessary to raise the children, of course men also contribute in this endeavor, but it's the woman's primary duty though.
Agree and women should contribute in other fields too, they should lead countries, businesses etc
I don't buy that notion, it's important to understand that the feminine side of women is soft and emotional, decision-making requires high EQ (emotional intelligence), while I agree it's possible for some women to gain that, but in the expense of partially losing their feminine qualities, I think there are certain jobs that particularly require women, but these are very specific, men are the ones responsible for working in most of the areas and decision-making fields, and to provide for their families, they are more expected to step up and take leadership roles, even in the structure of the family, that doesn't in any way lower women's importance in life, however, women still have the most important role in the family, which is to raise the children, they are the only ones who give birth and have the merciful and passionate heart which are all required qualities to raise children, I'd say there are also some overlaps in the duties between men and women, so it's not strict though.
both genders are complementary.
both genders are equally valuable.
Did u actually type all of that@thorny steeple
I pretty much agree with what you said, until this:
"Comparisons between men and women don't make sense as both have distinct qualities, and both are highly valued."
It's occasionally very important to compare genders, such as in psychology, anthropology, biology, etc. I think it's benign to simply compare genders, but I think any sufficiently cognisant individual will recognise when it's no longer productive to make such comparisons.
Denying differences between genders is to deny reality. We can't necessarily solve problems or disagreements by pretending they don't exist. Claims like 'men and women are the same' or 'men and women are equal' may be overlooking (cherry-picking) facts in order to satisfy the person's ideology, which isn't reasonable. There are things men are generally better at (e.g., physical labor) and there are things that women are generally better at (e.g., childcare), per the advantages and disadvantages given to us from millions of years of evolution. However, it doesn't mean that there's no overlap, as has been proven time and time again.
It doesn't always have to be about us vs them; we can simply acknowledge, appreciate, and take advantage of our differences.
You've also implied that the simple act of comparing genders is to undermine the qualities and values of each, which isn't the case. It's a false dichotomy, since, at the very least, we can both compare and appreciate the qualities and values of each.
I agree with you, but i'd like to know your opinion about this: What would happen if a woman doesn't want to have children? What would be her role?, or in what kind of works do you think she could work at?
In my opinion, women can work wherever they want, obviously, you are not going to put a woman in a construction labor, but what about other careers, or jobs which don't require that physical effort?
Thank you for the feedback.
"What would happen if a woman doesn't want to have children? What would be her role?, or in what kind of works do you think she could work at?"
What do you mean? You're implying something must be done simply because a woman chooses not to have kids. Can she not simply make that choice and nothing come of it? She can work as whichever role she considers financially viable and for which she is sufficiently suitable.
"obviously, you are not going to put a woman in a construction labor"
I'd like to challenge this. To me, this is not at all obvious, as a sweeping statement. Remember what I said earlier, with which you agreed:
"However, it doesn't mean that there's no overlap, as has been proven time and time again."
Therefore, provided a woman is sufficiently suitable for physical labor, she is well within her right to work in such a field. Unfortunately, some cultures or societies might make such a choice difficult, which I suppose is where some sort of feminism comes in. Keep in mind, some women are very strong.
It's also worth adding that many women already choose not to have kids, affording them the freedom, time, and energy to pursue other things, such as their career, passions, and/or happiness by other means.
Hi I'm new here
How I know my level in English? I think that I'm A1 or A0 or -A XD, well A1
Memories are nothing but present moments stored in your brain.
human brain shapes the very core of who we are, preserving experiences and knowledge that contribute to our unique identity.
If, God forbid something were to happen to you, causing you to lose your memory, you would also lose your identity or who you were. You would then have to start from square one, recollecting all those experiences to shape a new identity. This new identity could be completely opposite to your original one, or it could be the same the possibilities are abundant.
What you are right now isn't solely because of what you did in the past, but rather because you remember those actions in the form of memories.
what do you guys think about the news about Taylor's show in Brazil
Hey! How you doing?
The people of Gaza do not have human rights
They showed the people of the world the hypocrisy of the United States
The performance of the Western world is also unsatisfactory
Human rights and democracy have become jokes
The United States is the biggest terrorist in this world
I disagree totally
The true terrorist is the groups fundamentalists
Indeed, what I said was incorrect
Its fine until you start to behave like a racist or like innaproriate behaviour so you see @open plover the guy @orchid totem he didnt say anything rude or offensive he said his point if you find something that is a mistake you can just correct him by telling your point of view and also remember this is a serious chat people are allowed to talk freely about their opinion until it get really really offensive or bad trash talks but until then its fine so please try to prove your points and make clear.
The United States has made an indelible "contribution" to security
Definitely.
Uh-oh, I believe there's restrictions on political debates because of the server's guidelines.
But why did he say such violent things such as "The people of Gaza do not have human rights" and/or "The United States is the biggest terrorist in this world"?
Can that be considered "good behavior"?
Isn't it
Its just his point of view if you see mistake you can prove him wrong
Is it good behavior for it to attack other countries recklessly?
He didnt curse you or trash talk you
Sure not
How many people have died in Gaza now
That doesn't sound like a gentlemanly comment🧜♀️
Who is the mastermind behind the obstruction of peace in Gaza
Sorry! It was a mistyping! It can happen to anybody
China?Russia? Brazil?
tell me
If the people of Gaza have human rights, they cannot establish their own country?
No, but I found that style of opinions somehow concerning
Did you said Brazil? If you Said Brazil then you invoked a Brazilian now
I think provoking ethnic confrontation and civil war is particularly terrifying
At least Brazil did not prevent peace
China and russia to do peace? Impossible

I think that only can do It is Brazil
I say about Gaza
Yes, about Gaza
At least China does not interfere in other countries' internal affairs
But Brazil defines Hamas as a terrorist organization
The opinion what if he tells you the same. So dont get this too much to your
You guys talking this. But you guys really dont know whats happening sitting in your place that is 1000s of miles away
Israel is more like a terrorist organization
China definitely interferes with the internal affairs of other countries.
You can talk but dont take too personaly
@open plover
I think the politics topic is useless
but I can't find the information.because i am Chinese
Do you live in China?
And also xxf go ease with your words
You're right.
It's an unfortunate violation of freedom of opinion and of expression.
But is true, Hamas is a terrorist organization
With the example of the Soviet Union, we must control our speech
Does kills all jewi... Isn't terrorist?
Why not define Israel as a terrorist organization
sure
I'm talking about double standards
I don't remember the Israel says to kills all palestines
Compared to Hamas, Israel is now killing children, bombing hospitals, schools, and churches
But what about behavior
And kills palestines withouth a attack by hamas
Cultural extinction and genocide
Why is Hamas arresting Palestinians in the West Bank without Hamas
Because the Israel doesn't have choices If the groups hamas hide in hospitals, schools and churches with civils
What is the exchange rate between Israelis and Palestinians to be considered a terrorist organization?
If Israel doesn't do It who will die is jews
Do terrorism
How many Palestinians can we kill to stop
all?
Israel can define everyone as Hamas
holy shit this is serious chat
There is a possibility of Hamas in all places in Gaza
Do you will to war in Gaza to check?
If Israel doesn't defend jews will dies
Are those who support Gaza going to fight
If Israel defends palestines dies
Who does the Israel defends your country?

Israel defends yourself or no will kills people
But how much to kill and what to stop?
Who does the Israel defends yourself?
Is this self-defense?
Is Impossible stop because more members will Join in hamas
This is genocide
The war is a Factory of New members of hamas
No, because a palestine see people dies and see the hamas like the only thing to do
Why did they choose Hamas
No, invade the all Gaza and Inspect all members of hamas and kill them
Because peace is hopeless, the land they lost will never return
no
Because Hamas is not only a group
Do you know why they don't agree to the establishment of Israel
Hamas that import food and others things to Gaza
At that time, they only accounted for 20% of the land, 50% of the territory, and 80% of the arable land
If you still have to defend Israel, you won
They will never return to their homeland. The territory is getting smaller and there is no hope for peace
They live in the largest concentration camp of the 21st century
What else can Israel do if it doesn't give them what they deserve?
If there is a better way, who will support Hamas?
In palestine there was jewish, Christians and Muslims but with more jewish in palestine the muslims doesn't liked It and started try kick out the jewish but the jewish created the state of Israel and the muslims started the Wars until lost a lot of Lands to Israel and created terrorism groups
no
The conditions for Israel are too generous
It's too unfair to the Palestinians
As long as the fundamental issue is not resolved, there will still be organizations similar to Hamas appearing
There are only two ways to give the Palestinian people what they deserve or to kill them and drive them out of Gaza
In every way, Israel has done something outrageous
israel belongs to greece
the original inhabitants were the ionian philistines. not the jews or the arabic palestinians
the philistines(greek) were defeated by the ancient jews
both palestine and by extension the palestinians were named after the philistines by the romans for political reasons
both israel and palenstine are land stealers and the greeks should have the land back
The Philistines (Hebrew: פְּלִשְׁתִּים, romanized: Pəlīštīm; Koine Greek (LXX): Φυλιστιείμ, romanized: Phulistieím) were an ancient people who lived on the south coast of Canaan during the Iron Age. The Philistines originated as an immigrant group from the Aegean that settled in Canaan circa 1175 BC, during the Late Bronze Age collapse. Over ti...
hello beings of the highest light
you have no idea what you're talking about.
nah, the indigenous people of this land are the Canaanites, the current Palestinians are the descendants of them, also Lebanese, Jordanians, Syrians are, to some extent, also descendants of Canaanites, there have been genetic studies conducted on the link between the present-day Palestinians, and the ancient Canaanites, all of which find "Palestinians share a strong genetic link to the ancient Canaanites", and one study on pubmed has been retracted, perhaps due to political oppositions like other incidents.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Canaan
The Canaanites inhabited the Levant region during the Bronze Age and established a
culture that became influential in the Near East and beyond. However, the Canaanites,
unlike most other ancient Near Easterners of this period, left few surviving textual
records and thus their origin and relationship to ancient and present-day populations
remain ...
The genetic profile of Palestinians has, for the first time, been studied by using human leukocyte antigen (HLA) gene variability and haplotypes. The comparison with other Mediterranean populations by using neighbor-joining dendrograms and correspondence analyses reveal that Palestinians are genetic …
Canaan (; Phoenician: 𐤊𐤍𐤏𐤍 – KNʿN; Hebrew: כְּנַעַן – Kənáʿan, in pausa כְּנָעַן – Kənāʿan; Biblical Greek: Χανααν – Khanaan; Arabic: كَنْعَانُ – Kan‘ān) was a Semitic-speaking civilization and region of the Southern Levant in the Ancient Near East during the late 2nd millennium BC. Canaan had significant geopolitical importance in the Late Bron...
I have seen no information that mentions Greece
But I am on the Chinese internet, so I cannot provide evidence
Because it's all in Chinese
I'm not denying the fact that many of the Jews there are also, to some extent, descendants of Canaanites, but Palestinians lived with Christians and Jews for a long time under the country of Palestine, not Israel, the current one is totally made up and many of the current Jews have entirely different ancestries.
historically, ancient Greece occupied the land.
exactly, Zionism was aiming to make a home land for all Jews, regardless of the ethnicity, they settled on establishing it on Palestine, even though they had other lands in mind.
They distorted the concept of resurrection
more accurately, they settled on stealing the Palestinian land.
it is inhuman to support Israel on what is currently doing to people in Gaza.
Israel is according to the UN's definition of terrorism, is a terrorist state.
The Internet Reflects Species Diversity
This guy doesn't answer my questions and just talks to himself
Auschwitz concentration camp is equipped with water and electricity supply
This is too ironic
wait, are you talking about me?
no
this guy
His viewpoint surprised me
yes people can say whatever they want, you have to demand proofs and evidence of what they claim.
otherwise, he'll just simply spread lies.
Do you have a video of Israel sending underage children to military courts
it is the only country in the world that does this
https://www.dci-palestine.org/children_in_israeli_detention
https://reliefweb.int/report/occupied-palestinian-territory/defenceless-impact-israeli-military-detention-palestinian-children
https://www.btselem.org/statistics/minors_in_custody
thank you
not videos, but who would record himself arresting a child and throwing him in the jail.
but we do have many videos of Israeli terro... I mean soldiers abusing children.
crazyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy
?
I'm wondering how you defined it
this
this
this
An organization likes to see its own people die
I don't think this is a normal person's idea
he is serious
oh
He supports Israel's attack on hospitals, churches, and schools
this sentence
This answer makes me feel uneasy
In my opinion, he is like this
only in my opinion
yes, they found the tunnels of Hams under Al-Shifa hospital... oh wait, it was the elevator's hoistway, it doesn't matter, they find a paper with names of the Hamas members anyway... oh wait! it was a normal Arabic-written calendar, they are so desperate that they only have to lie to support their claims.
They bombed ambulances
i am beginning to think israel are the bad guys.
thankfully my home country of colombia has never done bad
They said ambulances pick up people in the city
So they bombed it. I think this is not his job as an ambulance worker
many colombian say if he was still alive they would vote escobar for president
but idk. he was smart
Israel has never been a good person
They were always jokes, you took them seriously.
I can totally imagine New Yorkers having fights about their pizzas and property.
You think China hasn't made any contributions?
then Hamas should stop taking help from Iran and contact Saudi Arabia.
because the Chinese Government is only showing you what it wants you to see.
This is impossible
The wolf enters the tiger's mouth
Hamas is the wolf, Israel is the tiger.
Not as much contribution as the United States
Sooner or later it will, wait and watch.
maybe
Take it as a prophecy, lol.
If Israel's actions were not like terrorist organizations, then there would be no terrorist organizations in the world
Not only did the Chinese people see the world, but they also saw it
Yeah like China was very kind to Tibet 😂
If you want to defend them, you won
and xinjiang
i know
you will say concentration camp
At least they are kind enough to give you this information.
These are two kids having pillow fights.
And we are just commenting on it.
All this my land, your land nonsense is going to get them nowhere; they will fight, they will kill, and they will stop. It happened before and is happening now. History repeats.
no
This is what foreigners told me
lol
Every country is similar, but the United States has gone too far
Just pray for the people you like, if it works, it works, otherwise let it be.
India has more serious problems than China
India will take care of it, I am not India.
Like what
where are you from
caste system
industrialize
People are having issues managing their family life, personal life, business, and passion, and you are expecting them to run a country successfully or even ordinarily?
That bothers only a person whose ego is fragile. A really egoless person doesn't care.
?
Why, only to allow people to detonate bombs there?
Someone will care
just kidding
They will, do not worry.
Would you like to help as a neighbor?
Slow and steady wins the race.
What can I do for you
A person is not a whole country.
Just keep calm and watch.
You are from China, but China is not yours.
Sure
and if it is yours, then the whole world is, there are no divisions.
Remember Laozi and chill.
This is cosmos, not chaos.
but chaos is a part of it.
what cosmos are you talking about?
Hey!
hello
Lol, Israeli lies are being debunked by the western media now.
https://youtu.be/nQ-CxCEELmQ?si=enT9I2tBoKuu_zYQ
A viral video shows a suspicious testimony of a so-called 'nurse' working at Gaza's Al-Shifa hospital. In the video, the nurse claims that Hamas is stealing all of the hospital's food, fuel and medicine. We explain why this video is staged in this edition of Truth or Fake.
#gaza #israel #hamas
Read more about this story in our article: https:/...
😂😂😂 what is this joke know i thought these guys are teaming up
Egoless?
How is that supposed to be a goal?
Egolessness is itself an ego driven goal
No, I accept that I have an ego.
Everyone does
It’s useful to have an ego and to care about things.
The idea that I can exist without a self and that I’d be better off that way is like saying I’ll be happy when I’m dead. No I won’t, because I won’t be anything or anywhere. Happiness is for the living only.
Dunno how the cast system works now, but doesn't it deny multiple civil rights from the lower end, restrict marriage between people of different social standing and all that jazz? It's more serious than the people calling you subhuman if you weren't born in the right family which is pretty cruel on its own.
Yes, it’s cruel.
I get your point, but the way you perceive it is different from the way he is stating it. I am not against ego or egolessness; both are interdependent things. And as you said, ego is what you identify yourself with. If it is not there, you are not. I am only saying that with or without a caste system, bias and unjustness will remain. There are so many places in India where people are not educated, but they will treat you nicely and will not care about your caste. And there are also places where they are educated and rich but still have a cruel or biased mindset. You can force discipline from the outside, but inside, a person remains vengeful and rebellious.
And to be honest, people here do not care; if you give them equality, they will bring back bias because now they are too attached to it. Nobody wants a job; they want caste benefits, including the poor.
And the ones who want to do something do. They find their way; unfortunately, not everyone gets this experience, but there are so many of them who have contributed a lot. And the way foreigners portray it and the way people live here are different. The Indian Constitution was written by a man who was from a backward class.
The mind.
What does this have to do with cosmos?
It is somewhat like this: someone was born an innocent person. Now society has tormented the baby into believing it is trivial, incapable, and impotent. Now the baby has become so attached to it that even after growing up, he or she remains in that state. However, it is not like that anymore, and it is getting better. But I am pretty sure they will come up with new problems.
Social support and self-confidence are both needed. But I'm not sure if everyone is lucky enough to have them.
Spread love, peace and, the truth.
This question only for muslims,What do you think about French Revolution? What iş the value of French R. According to İslamic point of view
Yes, I agree
But I don’t see the connection between “mind” and “love” in this context. If you are talking about his consequences, then ok.
no direct connection
Do not see, feel it. Take a deep breath and relax. Smile.
I "take" this figuratively🙃
How is your cause and effect?
but I like what you say
or was it affect?
a consequence of the mind?
Take it whichever way you want but smile. It will give a boost to my ego.
I do not know, you were saying something about it a day before yesterday I guess.
It would be better if you stopped at the previous message
I was kidding, lol. (no I was not)
yes
yesterday I explained the causal connection
but it seems that someone confused the scope of “conditionally” and the beginning of this connection
I see. I do not know much about it, but does it keep you happy to know all this, or does it confuse you when you read a lot?
I don't know anything. I have no knowledge.
I have also explained this many times
You really are funny.
Moreover, I still have a lot to learn
The more you know, the less you know.
So are you a skeptic?
An observer?
too serious here to spread love and peace, hardly can take a deep breath,other topics?
just try to soften the ambience, not have a specific intention
I thought we would get into gats, glocks, and guns, lol.
I am chat control😎
Soften the serious milieu.
Why soften something that has already been softened?
I took it figuratively, but I like what you say.
This question only for muslims,What do you think about French Revolution? What iş the value of French R. According to İslamic point of view
Hiya
In India, it is very easy to break the law and get away with it. Everything you see is a fragment of truth and a facade. Smart criminals and people never get caught up in the law or society, and the innocent and naive become an audience for media and politics. All are tactics.
The least you could do is greet a person with a smile when you meet them. But if you do that to a girl, chances are she will call you a freak or a creep.
But then again, isn't it like that almost everywhere? Except the fact that they're somewhat open about the class system.
The racial issue has not been resolved yet
On the surface, they are, but then again, black and white, religion and dogmas always interfere.
That's what I was trying to be getting at
Exactly, it is not an Indian thing, it is human.
Also brits were the ones who brought it here, lol.
but you cannot blame them because it was always there in human minds.
What irritates me is the fact that this is only the tip of the iceberg.
facts
Isabel Wilkerson - Caste The Origins of Our discontents. on want-to-read list
100000000% true facts 😂
People are merely scratching the surface here.
ultimate facts, client's own facts or other facts ,not the focal point. To parry away all the irritation, i take only legal facts😆
Politics is a joke bro, all you can do is laugh.
seriously i was talking about some feeling about what's the facts or truth from my career's standpoint, i am a civil trail lawyer 😆
If you get to know them, let me know.
but it rules.
Sense of humor runs the world.
my sudden pang of involuntary ideological flow is off any meanings, but a Heineken not, it's about the beer time
how
Come to India and be with me, I will show you how.
its better if can tell me
india isnt the only countrie what about other countries
It is something to be experienced, it is better that way to be honest.
Canada?
thats sit
See you there.
you dont even know me
I know Justin Trudeau.
illerelevent to our conversation
All you care about is relevance, have a taste of life and relevance will come.
Maple syrup and pancakes will liberate you.
why whould u assume that??
The first part or the last one?
fitst
you assuming again
.
yep
yeah but if you like to chill, then canada is the deal.
CN Tower and cents of humor.
i can be chill antwhere however there are some excaptions
i dont need a perticulsr geographic location to br chill.
aye aye caption!
good
goods good
also, it would be better if you can point out the spelling misktakes.
Kaplan's logic reasoning textbook for Law School Admission Test, told me that when you saw a "if", should automatically try to pinpoint the missing assumptions
you have a mixture of milkshakes.
bruh what are you talking about?
explain.
i am considering the assumptions of your argument
no gain in explain, it is vain.
how can you be sure
good luck
I said you have a lot of spelling errors, but it is fine.
nope
It makes the text funny and interesting to read.
🍃
Let's rake it.
sure
yo
hello
what are u guys discussing abt
beers?
overage
nonsense
do u guys believe in god
the rage. accurate!
im atheist btw just thought it would be interesting conversation
no, why how what
Are you kidding me? I am god.
we had that disscuans many times
give me 10 gf right now
you lonley
Nice approach to life, good luck!
wrong god, and wrong guy. should ask Allah
European or Turkish?
allah isnt the only god
are yall from middle east
who knows
I am from everywhere. (India)
not kidding with Islam, i should stop
have u seen Ghajini
you do you
My whole life has become Ghajini.