#🧠|serious-chat
1 messages · Page 44 of 1
This video went viral! an Israeli hostage old women telling the truth about Hamas after she was released, she also testified that they treated them with dignity and care, are there still some scams trying to depict Hamas as a terrorist group!?
in contrast, this is the lowest violence the Israeli armed forces and government deal with Palestinians, they arrested a three year old Palestinian child!!
it's not even half of the violence and blood shedding you'll find in the videos recording the massacres they committed against the Palestinians, unfortunately I can't post these kinds of videos here as they will violate Discord SFW content.
it's funny how Israel is trying so desperately to look innocent and make the Palestinians and Hamas look terrorists.
Could you explain how the voice channel works ? for example, I'm seeing that some channels are english level labeled, and what about the other channels for example, Super Shy VC, or The Lounge
just different names
Same purpose
If you're shy. Join shy vc lol
How they actually treated the old lady:
Lounge is like a general vc
VS how the western media is claiming she was treated.
I'm kinda shy, guess I'll try it first kkkkkk, I'm also not used to use discord
Sure. Give it a whirl
what she actually said was "When we arrived in Gaza, they first told us they believed in the Quran & would NOT harm us, they fed us well, were kind, a doctor visited us regularly, everything was provided for us".
thank you so much vivek!
that's the difference between how Israel is treating its hostages and how Hamas is treating them.
(on the left is Hamas treating its hostages with dignity and care, and on the right is Israel treating its hostages as.... well it's obvious)
Let me simply tell you this tho. Voice channels are better than texts
to make sure what I posted above will not be lost and everybody will be able to see them, I'll re-post them again.
This video went viral! an Israeli hostage old women telling the truth about Hamas after she was released, she also testified that they treated them with dignity and care, are there still some scams trying to depict Hamas as a terrorist group!?
in contrast, this is the lowest violence the Israeli armed forces and government deal with Palestinians, they arrested a three year old Palestinian child!!
it's not even half of the violence and blood shedding you'll find in the videos recording the massacres they committed against the Palestinians, unfortunately I can't post these kinds of videos here as they will violate Discord SFW content.
it's funny how Israel is trying so desperately to look innocent and make the Palestinians and Hamas look terrorists.
How they actually treated the old lady:
VS how the western media is claiming she was treated.
what she actually said was "When we arrived in Gaza, they first told us they believed in the Quran & would NOT harm us, they fed us well, were kind, a doctor visited us regularly, everything was provided for us".
that's the difference between how Israel is treating its hostages and how Hamas is treating them.
(on the left is Hamas treating its hostages with dignity and care, and on the right is Israel treating its hostages as.... well it's obvious)
the western media is lying, they don't have a single evidence for what they're saying, on the other hand however, Hamas and Palestinians have tones of evidence destroying Israel and showing how much of a terrorist state it is!
I honestly can't even believe how is there still some people who have the audacity to be pro-Israel!
I'm convinced CNN is from an alternate universe 
so uhm can anyone here do me a favour? i have a speaking assessment tomorrow and need a 1 minute speech on the topic "fear" it would be greatly appreciated if anyone fluent in english wrote me like a 130 word passage
Fear, the ancient sentinel of human existence, weaves its intricate web within the depths of the human psyche. It is a primal force, both a warning and a captor, guiding our steps through the labyrinth of uncertainty. In the face of fear, hearts race, and minds tremble, revealing our vulnerability as sentient beings. Fear manifests in myriad forms – the fear of the unknown, of failure, of loss, or of rejection. It shackles our ambitions, obscures our dreams, and paralyzes our actions. Yet, in the shadows of fear lies an opportunity for resilience and growth. Confronting fear grants us the chance to unearth courage, to challenge our limits, and to emerge stronger. It is a transformative force, compelling us to face the darkest corners of our souls, teaching us that within the grip of fear, there resides an unyielding strength, waiting to be discovered by those brave enough to venture into its depths.

Gpt for the win xD
@thorny steeple bro the ppl here r brain washed
I gave them all the evidence but they keep being silent and claiming hamas for couples ppl died by self defense
And they focused in personal issues like the way i was talking and that shii
I think anyone keep silent in this thing mean he accept it
No one can name himself a human
Look at this fool btw he thinks Muslims kill anyone dont have their opinion
FREE PALASTINE❤️🇵🇸❤️
We need more than this word

I agree, that's why I assert there is no neutral side, if you don't talk about the issue at all, then you're inherently pro-Israel, 'cause you're not even offended as a human being by the massacres and mass atrocities they are committing.
What can I do?😔
ladies and gentlemen, this is officially called good-evil conflict, neither Palestine-Israel conflict nor Hamas-Israel conflict, it is 100% good-evil conflict, or good vs pure evil.
it's clear to the blind.
Its time to protest against government first
Then against the Zionism
Some Times we need war to make peace 💀
crystal clear.
that's actually pretty true, in order to preserve peace, you need to fight and declare war against those who intend to violate it.
But our governments r scared of a country dont have any relation of it
The next protest we need to call for war
Well I agree with u
But with my young age I can just pray for them✨️
At least u doin something 
Yep
it's clear that countries leaders in the west don't represent the people there whatsoever, it has been made clear what side is the good, and therefore people can't be fooled by the frauds and the corrupt media there, they are finally aware of what's happening.
since this channel is for the serious talk then let's talk serious and truly
We talked and now its dead chat
the chat might be dead but you have to remember people like me who are always keeping an eye out here
Should genetically modified organisms (GMOs) be widely adopted in agriculture?" What are your thoughts on this issue?
all the photos you see in the is not from Israel its from GAZA the last part of philistine ( the country that Israel occupy )
and its not a war the war must be between tow powers
but the people in GAZA doesn't even have an army or a weapon to defend their self
the photos and videos above is a small preview of the massacre that Israel did and still doing it to the innocent people on GAZA
spread and share this footage
and don't listen to the media
You're saying modified organisms like for example, modify a plant to become resistent to a plague or deasese?
It basically depends on the demand. If there's a high demand of something in the market, then using it would be a good option, just to make sure some sort of shortages don't happen, but it wouldn't be wise to use them on a large scale, because it could cause a price rise
The question of whether genetically modified organisms (GMOs) should be widely adopted in agriculture is a complex and debated topic. Many experts argue that GMOs can help address issues such as food security, crop yield improvement, and resistance to pests and diseases. My question how can they also be engineered to have enhanced nutritional value.
I think it's valid since it doesn't make us any harm. It's an interesting topic, I remender it was something that was used to be debated here in early 2000
Good job bro the world need to see the real story
Indeed, GMOs have been a topic of extensive debate for several decades, and public opinion has varied widely. Advances in technology and scientific understanding continue to shape the conversation around their safety and benefits. It's essential for society to stay informed and engaged in these discussions to make well-informed decisions about their use in agriculture and other fields.
the media in Europe and America is highly misleading people so we have to spread the truth
I hate the way people suddenly turns infinitely stupid when the topic is related to politics, as if they were personally involved with it
He talked fact
But thats illegal becuz this is kinda hate speech
As much as i try to evade poltics , these images and video truly breaks my heart 💔 .
be damned israel be damned
Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine spokesman Ghassan Kanafani interviewed by Richard Carleton, Beirut 1970.
Full clip here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Veoy32G7trY
The conflict was fought between the Palestine Liberation Organisation under the leadership of Yasser Arafat, and the Jordanian Armed Forces under the leadership of K...
Can someone give me context of the conflict?
Oh boy
this conflict legit starts from the beginning of written history
too long tbh to explain
Spread love
yesss
The Gospel according to St. Luke, Chapter 2, read in Old English (Anglo-Saxon) by Joshua Tyra. This is a late 10th- or early 11th-century translation, traditionally called the Wessex or West Saxon Gospels, in an 11th-century manuscript known as the Bath Old English Gospels (CCCC MS 140). Special thanks to the Master and Fellows of Corpus Christi...
@ornate siren
Thanks, about time I got rid of Beowulf.

gm
I'm angryyyyy
Give us the bare facts
She wants to find Vivek
That sounds like a mind read.
It isn't #💭|general message
I see

wow, The last time he told me "your application for mod has been accepted" but I'm still not a mod. 😁
I'm still angry 😂
no pat pat
ow wait it's not patpat
he punched my head

We often hear that Israel and Palestine is a complicated issue. It's actually not, and here's why.
We take it back to the beginning and find out how Israel got it wrong from the very start.
If you enjoy OnePath content, please consider supporting us to grow! ►https://onepathnetwork.com/dollar-a-day/?&utm_source=youtube&utm_medium=description
...
there you go.
bro what tf-
no it's not the F, it's reality.
for what?
it's based for sure, based on lies. xD
like a thief, it stoles, like a bully it chooses the weakest, and like a cowered it hides behind stronger guys, such as the US.
like a fraud, it spreads lies, and like a terrorist (as it is), it murders and spread terror against unarmed innocent civilians including children and commit massacres and mass atrocities against a small group of innocent souls for decades, it is really based, based on evil for sure.
pure evil.
but honestly, supporting them, is a whole another level of evil.
when muslim fight other muslim this happens
I think the native americans should recover the whole continent and kick out all the people there
that's also based
it hasn't, their great great great great parents lived there for just sometime, it has always been a Palestinian land.
until it got stolen*
If israel want to recover its land bc it was there thousands of years ago why not native americans?
'cause they didn't just steal it, they took it by force, this is the definition of a robbery.
you're advocating any original people to try to recover their lands therefore you advocate for a mass war
LMAO
So you abondon your initial point, you are adressing a new one ig?
meaning that your first poin don't stand, is that correct?
are you going to kick me from this chat like you kick palestinians from their lands? Oo
@formal scaffold @thorny steeple @latent ledge@vocal rapids
here is an example of why you can't talk sense out of these people, the only language they understand is violence, I hope now you understand why Hamas was formed 20 years after the occupation of their land, they finally realized what language they understand.
?
agreed
based on what it's not theirs?
bruh, it's too late, Israel is collapsing, and soon it will cease to exist. xD
on what grounds?
it's hard for me to understand what you're talking about.
Okey let's suppose you are correct, and even so where were you before all this years when israel didn't chill?
they were taking lands, where were u and the other? they only critisize the opressed with less money?
it hasn't lost in the first place.
there is no war, the ongoing violence that is being committed against Palestinians is nothing but a crime, it's not in any way a war.
if you support colonialiste with this kind of poor arguments i think you are better off to stay in Danermark
how is it not assault mr judge the girl was hitting back her agressor she should go to jail too
you can label it as diffrent for you, it's not diffrent for me
it's weird how you guys interpret reality, it's probably your cognitive dissonance, Palestine is taking back its land, and Israel is trying to preserve its occupation, a war is to be declared between two armies, not between an army and unarmed civilians.
anyways, I don't have time for this nonsensical argument of yours, I better head to college now before I miss the lecture.
true meaning of cognitive dissonance, please seek help, you need it.
stop the CAP
even if it's not CAP saying that his bio is unbiased without trying to confirme if he's serious too puts you on the spot
it pisses any human off, but of course you may identify as an inhuman, in that case there is no point in arguing with you, it's a waste of time and energy.
Nah, you are funny
Weird kink you got
Just to let you know, if i was born there watching my people die for years while nobody helps us, I'd probably wreck havoc on earth, while still abiding by the rules of wars and human morals bc I'm better than my oppressors
yes you were funny to me agreed
means that pressure makes diamond
you havest what you plant, you planted violence you'll harvest violence period.
Some people just heard about palestine/israel history recently while I watched them kids die for years, funny how they come teaching u about it lol
we are typing 🙂
@formal scaffold
bruh! are you still arguing with him? 😂
I wouldn't love somebody who preach for colonialism xD
it's funny xD
maybe I'll learn a thing or two
indeed it's funny how his non-argument sounds. xD
the policy or practice of acquiring full or partial political control over another country, occupying it with settlers, and exploiting it economically.
i got another one for you
**Ethnic cleansing: **the mass expulsion or killing of members of one ethnic or religious group in an area by those of another.
that's what you are defending btw
now you should argue it with yrself whether it's good or bad, if you are too confused check the people you follow to build your own opinion
you said they should go out of palestine, that's in the definition
your unbiased brain should comprehend this
bro you missed the definition
**expulsion or killing **
yep and everytime israel go somewhere people should leave agreed
bc why do we want to fight a strong army? there's nothing called Unisef xD
that's ethnic cleansing and i don't support it if you do, you do you bruv
what's their country? they don't have one?
let's see how unbiased you are
if you say smth biased i'll leave 🙂
Have a nice day 👋🏾
قالت السياسية الفلسطينية، حنان عشراوي عبر لقاء تلفزيوني، إن الإعلام الغربي يطالب الضحايا بإدانة أنفسهم، وإن إسرائيل المحتلة للأراضي الفلسطينية تواصل انتهاكاتها في حق الشعب الفلسطيني بقتلها للمدنيين في قطاع غزة.
#الجزيرة
#فلسطينية
#فلسطين
#حرب_غزة
#غزة
#الاحتلال_الإسرائيلي
#الإعلام
#حماس
#حركة_حماس
#سرايا_القدس
#حركة_الجهاد_الإسلامي
========...
the content is english
Pleasing all people is a never ending quest, talks and topics can be either fun or boring depending on your taste, it's a chat for everyone if it doesn't align with your taste, just know that complaining it about won't change anything and will make people feel the same thing you feel when people criticize what you say here
Your predicate doesn't make any sense.
Without further information, you concluded . that if I said that I was referring to objects in the secondary world as noise?
I don't quite understand what "pleasing " has to do with it and why did you decide e that it a quest?
I wasn't concluding you, saying noise, reminded me of the noise in my head so I related to that, i don't get maybe you don't like the voices in my head
hmm
I'm really talking to my inner self.
Idk who am I talking to at this point, at least you know who you are talking to
Could you share with your idea of "criticism"?
What does this mean for you?
speak out yr mind without puting yrself in people's shoes
i guess
What if I said that criticism is the engine of progress?
(I'm not talking about the useless holiwar that is "covered" by criticism)
it is a tool that can be usefull
The critique of ideas improves and enables the development of new and more flexible ideas.
Prerequisite: Rely on communication rather than rhetoric.
I agree.
google exists.

Hi Big smile
heheheh hii

don't let them know your next move. xD
Bro can I ask you how to learn english because I tried many time but I don’t find any good result
U can ask ur big bro🥳
hello
I'm not very good at this, but you can ask here – #📚|english-questions
Hi
hello
Is there anyone in the chat who edited in the Аfter Еffect?
Heck, I don't quite understand how this works. This program is complex..
Hello guys
i'm Brazilian, trying to improve my english pronounce, i would like to talk to anybody on voice in order to do this, i can offer some knowledge in portuguese in case someone have interest in learning
That's what I call a pro move
Hi
let's play chess
Ok bro
D
whats today's serious topic
Are we still on the Palestine/Israel Conflict
I was thinking about this the other day. Please share your thoughts. A two state solution and Jerusalem, the Holy City, managed by the UN.
As we all know, Jerusalem is a very important city for 3 major religions and holds many holy sites.
Why can't the UN send Peacekeeping troops over in order to deescalate tensions
The freedom of religion is a necessity and should be granted. I hate to see Jews spitting at Christians, Christians burning the Koran and Muslims calling a ''Jihad'' on all ''infidels''.
What are your thoughts on this matter? 🤔
If it's a religious case, you don't see the Christians fighting for it even if Jesus was born and died on the Holy Land.
This is really complicated isn't it? Fighting for this plot of land for centuries.
#FreePalestine
F War.
Is Palestine free? How and where can I get it?
Try keeping yourself updated on ongoing events, this would help you avoid asking stupid questions. 
Dude calm down why did you take this seriously? 😂
Cuz I can't take families being massacred as a joke.
Apologies from my side.
I'm sorry dude I didn't know that I'll pray for the dead families so they can go to heaven.
Ameen 🫂💔
paslestine citizens are not bad ppls hamas have bad intentionss
to take over the country
by brutal force
Which religion you belong to?
Then my friend respect people's religious views
But praying makes the war go well
You can't know if there is a god or not because you didn't die and resurrected my friend but we believe wholeheartedly and we have a lot of evidence that there is
Does praying make it easier to kill people my friend what did you drink today? To be in this mindset, you should suggest it to me too
I think so too let's close this issue have a nice day
Oh sorry man I thought this was a chat channel used for jokes As you know I can't read or write I have a hard time reading that's just carelessness
Hm...
Everyone makes mistakes
Always some argument in #🧠|serious-chat
hmm
discussing not discussing
It's a never-ending cycle.
I detail dismantled this thread in the chat.
what does marcellus wallas looks like?
he is black
go on
bald
does he look like a
?
no
shot fires does he look like a
?
I did not hump him like a dog
xD
Tarantino is well damn good with the discussions in movies
heloooow
@lavish finch hello
Are you aware of these terms: perturbation , satellite , Mauveton ?
hello
hru
seriously stirring up a debate there
Great! u?
I'm learning a program like After Effect
It's difficult for me...
not perfect but oke
after effect?
oh yes
great
Do you understand it?
yep i know that
but yeah litte bit hard thing
i mean after effects
steeply! How long have you been studying this?
The thing is, I like to do editing
especially do short edits with anime characters
meybie not
oh It's not my field
I am a photographer
act
How did you learn this program? What did you do for the first time?
Can give any advice?
Which operating system must be to work in this program ?? Does it make sense to go with a minimum threshold?
idk, don't be hard on yourself, you get used to it as you use it..
like what? i mean computer things or like own ability
oh i think not i don't know about Rams but i just downloaded and installed
this much
I didn’t know Mauveton, a borrowed word from Russian.
16+
oh, does it make sense with less than 16gb?
16gb is minimum requirement
for After Effects
thanks
hi
np
Hi
Same

I say my brother What dog die and go to paradise I did the right thing? or say to him what animals dies and it s natural cycle And it s normal and this happens too.
@thorny steeple yeah I found this server
Sup yall
yikes
sure
Hard
All who are dead doesn't go anywhere except 6 feet under
😂😂😂😂
why muslims always put their religion first?
i have a lot of questions related to this.

because thats the goal of nearly every religion
eh?
hmmm
well, as im not that religious, thts why idk much abt these stuffs, so just wanted to know.
or i should say the side effect
religious people always think their religion is the best one
Not all of them most of them, bc relegion "din" means also way of life
agreed
tru
but as far as i have seen, the people who put their religion most of the time first , are the islamic people
if they don't they aren't believers in the first place
yes but many people dont just think that but want to impose their views on others
Monks and priests can be like that too but in terms of like normal people Muslims tend to practice more their relegion compared to other faiths
in my POV, every religion is perfect, so everyone is same for me.
we all do that subconciously to some levels
hmm... fair enough
it depends at what level, and anyway this doesnt mean thats right behavior
absolutely
I don't say what's true I say what I believe it's true
we all do
hello idk if i'm beginner or advanced
Idk what you mean by we, but there are people who think that what they say is plain truth not what's their belief of what's true, so it's like a general truth it's hard to draw the line between both, But i hope you can do that
yes i agree
there are a lot of religions in the world
i meant everyone says what one believes is the truth but no one can say they have the absolute truth because that's not objective. they can just be convinced it is the truth however it may seems obvious and objective to them.
and a lot of different movement in a religion
if that makes sense
personally I don't believe in god, i was Muslim and I leaved islam
i like to watch apostate prophet
religions aren't logic
religion isn't believe but is credulity
sorry belief*
@hot galleonmany people dont like logic, they prefer simplistic and reassuring answers to difficult and tough questions
and pretend they are logic answers
yes, because they don't have answer of the meaning of the life, and they are terrified about the death
they feel a justice in life and they think their god is the better vigilante
but there is nothing wrong in that if they keep that for themself and dont neglect others
Religion, philosophy and science study 3 different fields yet they collide sometimes
religion use philosophy and science it's not true for the opposite
science studies knowledge, relegion takes on dogma and philosophy searches curiosity
personally I have a problem with the reasoning of believer, because they reproach to unbeliever that the life is an chance for them.
Comment vas-tu kind sir
i think you inverted religion and philosophy
as I said they collide and interact
ca va tres bien et vous
et toi* si tu me permets de te tutoyer
yeah i did thanks
Ofccccc u can speak informally good sir
oh thanks !
because to explain a phenomenon like the complexity of the life you can't explain that by god, because, to explain the cause of the god by rationality it's probably more difficult than the complexity of life
Human brain doesn't comprehend god in the first place
im not religious but i like hindu philosophy
me too, but monotheist religions don't have philosophy lmao
For me To not believe in god , it's just refusing the image of god you have created in yr mind, people might say when you are under the same religion you are worshiping the same god just bc he has the same name, but I believe it's different for each person
I'm sure I heard about monotheistic philosophers
philosophy is like the bridge between religion and science
god for you it's like Einstein or Spinoza, right ?
False
Maybe that's your own Ig
no personally idk if god exist or not
nobody has a clear proof, that's why it's called a belief
i doubt
but there's no proof that denies his existance either
You are free to doubt or believe
yes
i defend the reasoning by science and rationality.
science has a methodology to study things how did it apply that on god?
there are scientific investigations on god, for example a scientific investigation for the effects of prays, but I agree with you science can't prove that god exist or not
philosophy is a better methodology to know if god exist or not
seems to me like it's anthing but relegion
as a religious person I love philosophy and science and i don't get why people will try to get rid of religion isntead of getting some wisdome of it even if u disagree with it
you can get wisdom and being a unbeliever
for example i love philosophy I want to have a job with philosophy
you can get wisdom everywhere, ignoring such a big school of study that has been there for centuries isn't that wise, when you are seeking to understand the world itself and god himself
except if u have a good reason for that
i have a good reason for that, i prefer to know that i don't know everything than i affirm that something exist without proof, it's my philosophy
the doubt for me is important
just to clear that out religion doesn't have proofs, they are signes as i said before that's why it's called a belief system, and I think philosophy does that in a similar way
believing in religion means that you believe in both the wisdom in it and the violence in it
Violence exist everywhere even in your profile picture
some people don't want to accept the latter. Or they just realized that it's all man made.
And? How does believing in more violence helps it?
I don't remember mentioning take religion to heart as a whole, I said take the wisdome in it, you are free to leave what doesn't align with your interest
there is a difference between belief and credulity, credulity is the absolute trust of a thing , personality or ideology
yeah that meant not fully believing in the religion. Fine by me
no one philosopher has credulity
but I agree, philosopher use believe
more than a fiction for example
fiction: something that is invented or untrue.
philosophers use logic
Which is not necessarily present in religion
in philosophy, something is justified because there is reason for it
in religion "god says so", which can or can not be logical
to watch a fiction u use your belief
when a fiction is bad that's mean you don't believe in this fiction
but you know that fiction isn't real
it's relative to the brain we have, call me crazy but our brain is very limited compared to the whole universe
that's why I believe in relegion bc it's mostly logical and true compared to anything else
any other imbiguity I blame it on my limited brain
i agree but by definiton philosophy is a belief
so you can justify anything however illogical it is because "relative to the brain"?
Yeah
killing people?
thus why I don't follow any illogical stuff as I said I follow what's majoratrily aligns with my brain
so you pick whatever suits you from your religion and abandon the rest?
therefore you can't deny relegion with mention one or two things that we can't comprehend
you gotta study it as a whole and quantify if it's makes sense to you more than anything else
then follow it or don't
I don't think you get me
I really don't. Do you propose fully believing in a religion or pick whatever you want and abandon the rest?
Killing is the worst thing ever if you are a human, while hundred animals and insects dies everyday it's all about perspective we don't accept death even if it's good for society or the whole envirement
I propose you do what you feel like doing
are you a vegan
so are you saying killing is sanctioned or not...? if god tells you in holy book to go stab someone is it good or not?
it's wrong to me, but for god's wisdome it's smth else
HEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY
so it's good if god wills it?
IM HERE TOOOOOOO
HEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY
I'm not vegan bro
No
thanks
if you would kill one person to save 50 will you do it?
no i won't but I know it's smth good to do
plus the depection of killing in relegion is quiet unjust and false in the media so
would you kill somebody if that's what god wanted you to do, even though there are no benefits of doing so except god's favor, and you do not have any grudges against them
this is hypothetical
god's has no favor
we don't do favors to god
well it depends on which way you look at it
🤦♂️
he order us to do what's good for us or the environment
if god wants you to do this, would you do it?
i am the God any objections?
who the fuck are you
that's an impossible hypothetic situation
we dont like you hiponix
watch ur language pls u will get banned
stay away from us
I'm following your logic, just yes or no
we like like
am i talking to you
who are you little toe
it's not that easy to make it a yes or no question I think I explained myself well
yes
i like hitler
bye
hiponix do you like hitler
yes you doo my pumpkin
No, it's a binary question. There's literally no answer except yes or no. Your logic goes: you can justify anything if it comes from god, so if that comes from god, it's okay
you and other you are you a robot
skuggi
are ypu robot to
yes, bc my god can't be unjust or does things that has no benefits
you have to reshape your question bc it won't make sense to me
you're unfairly limiting your scope of what god can or can't do. Then they're not omnipotent. Which makes them cannot be god.
👽
as I said earlier each person has his own god
if you were dead, would you go shopping or to see the football game?
... I don't think we understand each other here
If I'm dead I would stay dead 6ft under lol
exactly, my god can't make mistakes
if he was i wouldn't have been following him
this chat full or robots yes you are right
I'm back
welcome back
The problem of your reasoning is the credulity, even we are limited by our brain, we can't have a answer of all questions of the world by nothing justification.
I just explained that I don't accept smth until its majority is true, to say that gullible shows either ignorance or lack of understanding
Even science can be wrong and you still believe in it would you call following it credulity??
Following doctors, teachers, politicians, philosophers is credulity too then
No because scientists and philosophers accept to change their position if it proves their reasoning is false.
This is not credulity, philosophers and scientists don't absolutely trust about an ideology or a thing, in contrast to believers.
The majority can be wrong, Hitler was elected by a majority of people...
science can accept only being disproved by science and phylosophy doesn't accept being disproved by relegion and relegion can be disproved by relegion itself or even science
﴿خَلَقَ السَّمَاوَاتِ وَ الْأَرْضَ بِالْحَقِّ يُكَوِّرُ اللَّيْلَ عَلَى النَّهَارِ وَ يُكَوِّرُ النَّهَارَ عَلَى اللَّيْلِ وَ سَخَّرَ الشَّمْسَ وَ الْقَمَرَ كُلٌّ يَجْرِي لِأَجَلٍ مُسَمًّى أَلَا هو الْعَزِيزُ الْغَفَّارُ ﴾ which as against the flat earth belief at first so some muslims did try to interpret it as flat from other passaged where god mean by "earth" the ground used for agriculture and when earth was pronounced meteorite oval theologist used the roundness and shape of earth mentioned to not contradict science
if science did accept that many of theology description that'd have helped them get to the truth easier
Again what I said is when a book is majoritarily true I'd follow it if there's imbiguity that science and philosophy didn't answer or the answer didn't make sense
But science doesn't affirm when there is no proof, and it's rational for science to demand proof for a new position.
Science isn't credulity...
for your example here to be compared to mine first most people in germany shouldln't be fascist, votes shouldn't be rigged, and they are under no pressure to say their vote and there it can be close to be compared to my own thinking
bc proof is implemented in its methodology using the 5 senses human has
science can't study what you can't see hear smell touch or taste at the same time
relegion is actually specialised to talk about that topic
backed up by history, revelations, prophesies prooven to be right, science signes prooven to be right
What does "majoritarily true" mean ? That means the rest of this book is wrong ?
It means according to my brain i accept the majority is true, while the other part i don't accept, or that I ignore about
that's why to accept that book you need both your rational thinking and believe bc it can bypass your brain capacity
Another example: A majority of people believe of Islam and Christianism, but Islam and Christianism are in contradiction because this is not the same God and the same order.
So if Allah exists Christianism is wrong, and if Jesus Christ is true Islam is wrong.
And if Allah and Jesus don't exists other religions or beliefs are wrong.
Bruh what's its majority is "true"
Which religion do you believe?
Islam
God is omnipotent and omniscient if you don't accept all of the texts, that means you consider God isn't perfectly...
Islam talks about flat earth...
idk how you got into that conclusion
Because per definition, a perfect God is absolutely good and just.
So I have a question for you.Why you reject the rest of the texts ?
goodness and justice that doesn't align with your own
they were changed that's what I believe
There is a particular reason that you believe they were changed ?
Duh
I thought you were and ex-muslim
you know why
I am an ex-muslim, but a lot of Muslim think that Coran is not falsified
What's the part of the Coran that you reject ?
Mhm a lot of guys who follows apostle also provide weak proofs of it being changed also
I didn't say reject, I don't accept with my mind but I believe in
Okay I see
dm
what is it dm?
It means: a direct message (at discord)
dm with him?
"His entire head exploded, and his brain was out."
A Palestinian child recounted the moment Israel bombed an area in his neighborhood in the Nuseirat camp in Palestine's Gaza.
Subscribe: http://trt.world/subscribe
Livestream: http://trt.world/ytlive
Facebook: http://trt.world/facebook
Twitter: http://trt.world/twitter
Instagram: http://trt.wo...
you have to be messed up in the had to make a kid go throught this
No, you just have to be Israel, which is worse.
Israel Palestine Conflict Explained! The latest breaking news worldwide October 2023 "Israel is At War". What is Happening? This Israel Palestine war with Hamas in Gaza Strip is happening before our eyes. But what does last days Bible prophecy have to say about this? Let us pray for Israel.
► LIKE! 👍
► COMMENT! 💬
► SHARE! ➤
► SUBSCRIBE! 👉 ht...
Don't believe everything you see on the Internet.
Last time I checked, Gemma Louisey doesn't sound very Hebrew to me.
how can you be sure that you do not need to know? do humans know what they do not need to know? what are the reasons you are sure you do not need to know?
Hey
mashallah
Yo can someone help me out
FreePalestine
Hamas and Israel both are horrible
that's the difference between how Hamas treats its hostages (the left side), and how Israel treats its hostages (the right side).
here is the old israeli lady who's been released speaking out the truth about how Hamas treated them.
I wouldn't trust a video some terror organization released as a PR stunt
just like I didn't trust Israel saying hamas bombed that hospital
hamas and IDF both has done terroristic acts. There's no higher ground for either of them
@abstract cypress
but wouldn't you trust the woman herself after she has been released while she was having an interview INSIDE israel?
there is no coercion, no one coerced her to say anything.
she also said that she was beaten, bruised, and tied up in a motorcycle like some sack when they kidnapped her to Gaza. Attending to her needs isn't some noble deed. That's the very basic necessity
kidnapping her in itself is a war crime
VC?
Not now. It's 3am
Are you in Cali?
when did she say such thing?
I'm est
just watch the cnn video
there is no defending kidnapping people lol
My battery has almost run out of juice
charge it
bro, this video is miscaptioned.
Really? Are you Jewish?
I don't need to.
Because almost every news outlet captioned the same thing
So how do you know it's miscaptioned?
Unless you can speak hebrew, because she's talking in hebrew.
this means absolutely nothing
do you remember that lie spreaded widly in the western media about the 40 babies who've been beheaded? it went viral even though it didn't have a single evidence, and later they had to admit it's false news, be careful of where you take your information, most of them are just biased and don't have any problem spreading more lies.
it contradicts what she was saying about Hamas and the fact that she shacked that solider's hand when she was getting released, also I wouldn't deem the CNN as a reliable source, it's pretty much biased, and you can also take a look at the comments, here is another post on twitter claiming that the CNN is lying.
this is the woman talking about that motorcycle, she also said they treated us very gently and nicely.
this is another woman talking about how they treated her at the time this so called "war" started.
if they are the force that defends Palestinians and stands against a terrorist state like Israel, then I would be a pro-Hamas.
I know how the western media randomly accuses certain groups of being terrorists, regardless of what they do.
it doesn't make sense to blame them for the deaths of their own families! they attacked Israel, Israel should've attacked them back, but instead, they attack tones of innocent civilians, the footage are horrifying! they weren't in any way targeting Hamas!
Egypt
The Israeli government is not "western media". The "western media" debunks the 40 babies fake news. I take all arguments saying "western media" as nonsense because so far the vast majority of media outlets based in the West has demonstrated fair coverage of both Palestinian and Israeli casualties while inserting "x says ..." (x being either the Israeli government or Palestinian authorities) for each claim.
what is the proof of this?
https://youtu.be/YjyQG4CTHRc?feature=shared
https://youtu.be/dh1foCv1F7g?feature=shared
https://youtu.be/YlTU0KHPuT8?feature=shared
https://youtu.be/ClnrOhprBGY?feature=shared
not gonna trust a random tweet when the evidence contrary is overwhelming
kidnapping and killing innocent civillians is terrorism
if you deny hamas being terrorist, then another person has the right to deny israel doing terrorism and war crimes towards the palestinian people
here is what ISIS do:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ea3jaxb2o2Y
CNN's Brian Todd reports on a video that may show a North American member of ISIS committing a war crime.
this is how ISIS treat the people they capture.
this is how Hamas treats them.
and this.
This is how hamas treats them
defending terrorism is filthy and disgusting
there is literally 0 reason to kidnap a geriatric grandma
you know why some people don't like the pro palestinian movement in the west? because stupid people defend hamas's actions instead of defending the palestinians
hamas =/= palestinians just like israel =/= jews
what does "jihad" means to you?
Here
Hi Dave
I see you’re typing
Hi Flare
You’re also typing
Dave
Hi
You and Flare disagree, obviously
Nothing wrong with that
Could I possibly persuade you to speak to the people here who potentially agree with you?
Same question for you Flare
bro, Hamas was a resistance group formed against Israel 1987, it has nothing to do with Sinai, what are you talking about!
It’s a real question. No is an acceptable answer
Ok
That includes emojis, Dave
😁
Oh
Are you really leaving?
Or…
Not yet?
can't say no to you honestly mr. James, I hold you in high regard.
I'm sure you're so upset. xD
he's so upset that I don't have a problem with Hamas as a resistance group against Israel, I provided documented evidence of how Hamas treats its hostages, then they bring some random videos of Hamas armies fighting against Israel while some civilians are around.
Conversations are about thoughts and feelings
You got the thoughts
now try to access the feelings
your feelings
are you upset too?
I'm sad, angry, and frustrated.
clear
Are you willing to try something with me?
Would you try and see what happens if you shift your focus away from him being upset to you being sad angry and frustrated?
I don't outright support Hamas, maybe they are terrorists, maybe they aren't, but the only thing I know is that they are the only force that can stand against this terrorist state of Israel, and I don't simply accuse a group of terrorism solely for being an Islamic group.
okay.
I only have two thumbs
Dave you’re leaving
or no?
Wow
now became 15 min of extra time
see, he's going to try and respond to me, and then I'll have to respond, he's not leaving. xD
No
You do not have to respond
and I’m sure each response is painful
you don’t have to suffer like this
In conversational misery
conversational slavery
yeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee
Hamas is a terrorist group
Flare, notice
the impact without compulsion to reply
the impact on you
Some phrases are designed to elicit a reaction
they are provocative
Its hard to not answer something when its related to trauma and pain when someone like him see such a thing
Hard but possible
every "war" has its casualties, what they did was a quick maneuver to distract Israel with the rockets fired while they can hold people hostages in order to be able to exchange them with the Palestinian hostages, so you don't condemn Israel of holding Palestinians hostages over the years, but you do condemn Hamas of holding some hostages and treating them nicely and gently before eventually releasing them.
to allow others to be
I came across this... (Yeah I'm still reading a little about prophecy)
'But the one thing that I think of is that when I see the aggression of Russia or Magog, if you will, it’s a reminder that that’s what we’re going to see when Magog attacks Israel.' Mar 8, 2022 can give a link. And what hamas did was the same or even worse.
I guess he wants to prove he is right
you’re still debating Dave
exactly
Dave you are 30 min late on “leaving”
it shouldn't be cute, you need to be lectured about wars and strategic attacks, it was a big slap on Israel's face, a force that claims to be one of the strongest in the world.
show your true pro-Israel face Dave, don't worry we won't hurt you, it seems like you're so scared of such. xD
Holy cows, i wonder if they can go all night on that
Some go their whole lives like that
this is a space for exploring serious topics
not for pushing others to change their minds
if you want to push someone to change, push me.
I am less likely to take it just personally
Otherwise I ask you to speak to the whole channel, and seek understanding first
your own understanding
Of what others are saying
okay, I understand, won't waste more time with these folks.
Flare, I want you to tell me what you heard me say.
Try again
Without deleting your own comments
You’re doing great
you are working for everyone right now
Giving us a chance to learn how to have constructive dialogue
People's heroes are others's nightmares
See how hard it is to give up the desire to change how others think?
It's my job to block that.
People like to decide for themselves what they think.
You're welcome to think whatever you want here.
But not to pressure others to change.
And if you don't like that policy you are welcome to pressure me to change.
There's a story about the two sons of Adam, there was basically 4 of them 2 girls and 2 boys, and in the marriage age both of them had to make offerings so that they can pick one of the girls, and the older brother gave a bigger offering than the younger brother but it wasn't the finest he had, while the younger brother offered the best he had, when the oldest brother was mocking his brother's offering .....god accepted the youngest brother offering (burned it) and after that the older brother kept complaining while the youngest was willing to accept any outcome ( it's a close example to having dialogue i think)
yeah but anyone who calls hamas heroes is disgusting
Slowdown mode, 2 min.
It's natural to have strong feelings about the issues we care about.
I realize now, we keep shooting to have an impact, but it's not one person's effort it's both the writer's and the reader's effort to understand each other
Most likely, when we're trying to impact someone else we are missing a vital piece of the picture. We're often having the opposite impact we want to have. And the harder we push, the harder they resist.
It's a kind of trap.
Are you familiar with this toy?
The harder you pull, the tighter it becomes.
I forgot its name, can you tell me?
Slowmode, 5 sec
chinese finger trap
When I was a child it was called a "Chinese finger trap" but that name is probably not used anymore for reasons of political correctness.
It's a great metaphor for effective communication
Why you say played but can't say payed?
Because those are two completely different words
I know
Because it's irregular
You want to know why we have irregular verbs?
You say paid to refer to verb pay
Bruh ur pfp is leterlly a cracked
Fit girl????
yee
The answer is complicated
Haha legendary one
The channel has dropped the topic of engaging across differences.
You sure that's what you want?
I know it's challenging.
Damn this topic is always hot 🐔
This thing sounds really interising
Yes, it is!
speaking of frustration when you try to convey a message: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j5UftOxIQbc&list=LL&index=4
This might be a familiar situation for some.
The 12-year-old boy volunteered to help his younger sister with her math homework after seeing his mother become frustrated with the girl. Although he was gentle with her at first, the boy ended up having a tearful meltdown after his stubborn sister refused to follow his instructions.
====
Inform ...
I joined a conversation in another group yesterday, by text, where I am not a moderator, attempting to talk across differences.
I lasted an hour and then gave up.
The other person was spamming me
calling me names
and ordering me around
and I was curious how long I could stay engaged without giving up and without pushing them.
Everyone has a limit
Chatgpt spotted 
People resort to insult when they don't have arguments
I know, language is dynamic and not always consistent
In that case i play thier game
Way to get fun
The fun of calling people names is short lived.
Even for a professional name caller.
Shakespeare was a professional name caller.
Shrekspeare
I'm going to use some in the future thanks for the ref :3
When I hear anyone yelling down other people for their opinions, I see a desire to end conversation, not begin it. Even if I share the beliefs of the person yelling.
- Tho
A few more...
end of conversation and the beginning of fighting, I think it's bc either one of them want to take control
44 🙂
38
that man was a natural roaster, never saw so many of that even tought i'm brazilian we are just natural roasters. i wish that my 3rd grade high school teacher showed some more arts of Shakesper, i just readed one poem
Sounds like most poetic way to send someone to end himself, not like that barbarian way that is used nowadays.
it wasn't a total waste of time getting insulted around I noticed a pattern, usually they insult you with smth that hurts them so it's some sort of projection and the proof to that is that if you insult them the same insult they get triggered more, and also they insult your identity (Ideology, culture, background)
Control is an elusive treasure. The real challenge is to control oneself. Try controlling yourself and see how difficult it is. How can I possibly control another person when I cannot even control myself.
The allusion to control here is to talk more, dismiss the other person POV almost like a speech not a convo
so in order to manipulate a person's point of vision you need to do a speach that will break every single argument possible in one speach?
it comes from, I'm smarter therefore you talk less and listen more to me
i don't think i'm good at this, because most of the times i just pin a my point and convince this person with tones of arguments
Nah you are perfectly fine, I wish I can do that (sorry I misread you -_-)
the more you speak the more of your flaws appear
I think that's true.
So for the person interested in investigating their own flaws, it's a great resource.
you mean in stressful situations? could you explain?
Everyone has flaws
How do people around the world think the prices of apple products?
overpriced and not worth it until you get one.
here its like 4.000 dollar a brand new equivalent in our currency, its not worth at all
When I allow myself to look squarely at my flaws, only then do I create the possibility of improving them.
I only use Apple
oh i see, thank you Mr. Green
I have only used Apple for 35+ years.
Here, they are considered to be a little expensive
This is the computer I started out on in 1990. Apple classic.
browsing looked like this;
For example, the brand new iPhone 15 is from 5999 RMB
In comparison, the best Chinese android devices are about 6000 RMB
I used it to play the boardgame Risk that looked like this;
Looks like Canada has gone full nazi in this game...
Welcome. Use your words.
yes, I know this toy. you're right. debating usually only yields hatred.
Well there's difference between arguing and debating, but it's up to person where it will lead in the end.
Is it kind of fetish or something?
No, I just consider that its products are quite good
My first apple device is iPad Pro 9.7 inch generation 1
Then I bought a MacBook Pro…
That's good. I just too bored of electronic stuff, you know. Everything is the same to me until it works somehow.
Tbh I’m not a crazy fan of them
a debate mostly involves two parties who will do anything to win the argument, and the more they argue the more they stand firm on their positions, regardless of whether or not either of them is right.
humans' egos are sometimes so powerful.
some people want so bad to win a argument that they go for violence even
agreed.
If your goal is to win the argument, for me personally it's arguing not debating. Debate for me it to learn and acknowledge point of view of another person and if possible accept it not trying to convince them that they are wrong and i am right, but i might be wrong and get my definition of debate also wrong.
no you're wrong #@!$%#$, just kidding. xD
O dont think we can debate abt the colour of the grass
We can debate about if colour of the grass of your neighbour is greener.
why would you do that?
Fun fact:)
We dont have even grass

that's more of a funny fact. xD
your green isn't like my green 
your Green isn't like Mr. Green
my family name has green in it too btw
free Green card? haha
are planes faster, or trains stronger?
I'm higher 🚬
i don't know but involves tones of calculation
alright guys, here are some more trivia.
are oranges named after the color or vice versa?
Actually, first "orange" wasn't name for fruit but the tree, as orange tree, in arabic "omme d’orenge" or just "orenge" (the fruit from the orange tree), middle english speakers adopted that phrase for "orange" back in the 13th century AD.
Color "orange" became thing almost 200 years later.
Also i don't believe you really made me to make research about history of orange.
So for your question, orange as fruit was before color orange.
too late, you already fell for it, you made a whole research about whether or not orange is a color or a fruit. xD
Actually i wonder, what you think was first, chicken or egg? And justify that, as many people likes to say chicken and i like to argue it.
eggs are the products of chickens, so there must be an ancient chicken that laid the first egg, that's what I think.
yes it was a dinossaur
You made me happy that you have same type of thinking, but also sad as i was ready to argue with facts involving evolution.
I don't believe in evolution, I'm a creationist.
https://inews.co.uk/news/world/why-russia-painting-replica-bomber-jets-air-base-floor-2657461 I don't think it can work. You only need one real plane nearby.
at least they are not using tires as protection anymore
12441242145125 IQ. xD
I'm sure they are. There is no limits for mentals.

guys, probably only 1% of you will be able to answer this question correctly without googling it.
what is the geometric shape that is used for stop signs?
Octagon i guess?
yep, that's correct!
congrats! you're among the 1% of the people who know the answer of this question. 🎉 🥳
this percentage is not precise though. xD
here is another one, what is "cynophobia"?
don't google it!
hello beings of the upper light
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YNRrbm6poE0
hm, if it is dead then... by now I'm sure russia is magog (In interpretation of prophecy) and it's leader is gog, but if it's met its maker... then the king of the north is something different or it will appear in the far future.
Get Your Strike Gum Today 90mg of Caffeine in Every Piece! https://strikegum.com/
Get the essential National Security News FREE Right to your inbox with the Strategic SitRep https://www.strategicsitrep.com/subscribe
Become a Member for exclusive perks!
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCMYdyjyHjKMzltuatKxkudw/join
Channel Manager/General Inqui...
alright, I think nobody knows, so I'll just hand over the answer. 🤷♂️
cynophobia is the fear of dogs.
hey god! how are you doing? no peace on 🌍! fix this issue on earth 🙏
i slightly fear dogs
especially when the owners are neurotic and let aggressive dogs walk around with no leash
hm... 7 years. that person started war in Ukrane in 2014 and some forces made something like "peace". 7 years after, it attacked Ukraine.
But it's not about Israel itself. My be there was something like some kind of treaty in Israel 9 years ago... just a thought in the wind.
but actually there was something at that time https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2014_Gaza_War
The 2014 Gaza War, also known as Operation Protective Edge (Hebrew: מִבְצָע צוּק אֵיתָן, romanized: Miv'tza Tzuk Eitan, lit. 'Operation Strong Cliff'),
was a military operation launched by Israel on 8 July 2014 in the Gaza Strip, a Palestinian territory that has been governed by Hamas since 2007. Following the kidnapping and murder of three Isra...
“ Love is as incomplete without an ending as life is without death, isn't it?” - wiki Fri, Oct 27
first love is beautiful, right ? because it's incomplete
If you want to believe in that.
I'm not sure
cuz I've never been in a relationship before
i would like to listen to their comments who've been in a relationship before
so I've never experienced it
You can't compare ukraine with isreal, ukraine is literally on the same position as palestine rn
The difference between them that Ukraine has no real weapon but Israel has something to protect its people.
which is why ukraine is the one in defenseless position just like palestine
I'm sure If Ukraine had something they would bomb russian territory as well. that's called war. @abstract cypress
Russia has more booms
The important thing who wanted blood, who has started.
not for long. ATACMS will help them to "join" their hamas' friends.
Plus Ukraine will get the fighters. That will change the game.
I'm sure their propaganda will start scream like that pro-palestina's one. Who cares what they scream.
https://qph.cf2.quoracdn.net/main-qimg-8a6857b996bd3213525f1b024df392cd-pjlq for all terrorist's fans and admires.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4q0KES_YqLQ there were underground children and the tunnels made because hamas somehow knew that Israel will brutally attack, murder and kidnap woman and children. Of course hostages are in Tel Aviv in secret bunkers where Jews are hiding like rats, behind their own children and wives.
Video from inside Gaza shows the moment bombs land on the strip. It is thought to have been taken inside Gaza city, located in the north. It shows smoke from a bomb landing before the recording started. Followed by multiple new blasts as IDF fighters strike the same spot. A second blast then throws more smoke and debris into the air. Having hit ...
What ☠️
wow
downloaded*

how is life going?
I don't know, I didn't ask him
do we need men?
ohmgggg
She's so cuteeeey
ok
that's a boy

u weren't even here
if men didn't exist
as far as I know, many scientists are also religious, so they are no contradiction between believing in a god or a superpower and knowing science. this is a good article about can science and faith coexist, I recommend reading it
https://blogs.scientificamerican.com/cross-check/can-faith-and-science-coexist/
oh wait, he's an atheist then, it all makes sense now.
science and religion can coexist absolutely. The difference is science is objective and in science there doesn't exist the behavior of pushing your point of view.
Meanwhile in religion, which is subjective, it's a battle royale of ego and mania to prove whose story is the best and in process push your belief, even to the point of killing people
what he believes in is not related to the discussion dear Flare, I get what he means, there are many religions, so he will not care about such things, they are sciences he will only focus on science, idk why he is comparing science with faith, but I understood his point
for example, no scientist have ever killed religious people for slandering the evolutionary theory, because they simply don't care
meanwhile you can be killed for being atheist in many countries, particularly in the middle east
yeah, this happens, for me am religious but my version of "religious" is believing in how i see the god and the world, and not how some big established religion tells me it is like, and at the same time i believe in science and i do not denounce any of its achievements or claims in any area. also, if someone does not view the god, or this world, same as me, then i am trying to just respect that and tell them i am glad they have their own belief if it works for them
it's good if you don't try to force your religion upon others. The status quo however is that many religious people are not. This issue may be non-existent in the West where we've had enough of religious wars and accepted that everyone has their own opinion, but it's generally not present elsewhere.
Maybe in Latin America; I don't know if they're Western or not, but they do share Western values
what do you mean? all I'm saying is, now I know why he was saying certain things and why he holds certain views.
that's not the case for Islam, Allah (God) doesn't need people to believe in him, people always have the choice to whether or not they wanna acknowledge their belief, I'm saying acknowledge 'cause a belief is not something you choose.
It's a law that is not applied in all middle east except for Iran, even Saudi stopped that
it's an oxymoron when you say belief is not something you choose. Belief is inherently chosen
even then, they still did apply those laws. That made them infinitely worse than the other side
yep even athiest did back in the days
atheism does not tell people to kill people. Religion does
geography ?
that's delusional
atheism is literally the lack of belief in god. That meant not following a creed at all. If there's nothing to tell them, how can atheism tells people to kill?
even recently the US was practicing the lethal injection
oh wait, yes you're right, made a mistake there.
that's irrelevant to the topic
The US is a secular country
and? did the atheism told the US government to practice death sentence? Does the atheism have a holy book? Does the atheism have a god that tells people what and what not to do?
your statement is very illogical
a belief is absolutely something you choose, I mean being convinced of something but denying it, you still have that belief inside of you whether or not you admit it, that's what I meant though.
did christiany or any other relegion do? no therefore the law isn't relegious, therefore it's non relegious
fear of blue?
You're cofusing correlation with causation. atheism itself is null. That's like saying time tells you to kill people. It's illogical.
no, the fear of dogs.
so that doesn't apply to everyone because not everyone is convinced
tell me where in atheism did it tell you to kill people @formal scaffold
does atheism have a holy book in it that commands its adherents to kill? do you see the illogicality in your statement?
yes, that's what I meant basically, some people will be convinced and yet they'll deny their belief, it's kind of complicated, or perhaps I'm not using a proper term for it.
who says I did say that
back in the days everyone was practicing execution
That is a blue heeler
nowadays only Iran does which is practically a non arab country so what's your point?
It does not concern me because I am not convinced. But if people who are convinced does not believe, it means there's something wrong with their conviction, I'm not sure you can call them convinced
as far as i remember no Christian stand up for death sentence here in my country, but they still do a lot of things that goes against the Christianism
you're implying that atheism is what caused the US government to practice death sentence which is illogical and wrong
it's not from a relegion law, it's a goverment law, and who follow those laws first before their relgion's law? athiest
my point is whether Iran is the only country doing it or there's another, nevertheless, the religious side is worse because they implemented rulings based on their religion that cause harm to people who do not choose to believe in their thing. No matter if they still practice it or not.
Because compared to the other side, there is no such practice.
Then answer me
lethal injection isn't a religious law and it calls for killing
Gross, doesn't relate to the topic though
don't make it like it's only relegion that makes such law, then we can talk
you're not seeing the bigger image ig
where did I say it's only religion that made such laws?
communism, fascism, cults, &c. but not atheism, and certainly not science
saying the middle east practicing that law while it's just once country which is Iran is kinda disingenuous
I already said nevertheless if they practice it now or abandoned it it does not matter
please read
please read and have some comprehension
You are blaming only relegion for it while living goverment laws, if you included them than maybe
because it is in their religion
if someone is convinced of something does that mean he believes in it and vice versa?
Europe used to have them too, if that gives you any solace
and religion is used as the basis of such law
it existed way before that
according to your logic, if someone is convinced but did not believe, then their convidence is null because convidence = belief
way before what? Islam? And whatever laws came before it are based on Arabian paganism, Zoroastrianism, Ancient Egyptian religion, Judaism, and so forth
Nah, u can make some1 truly understand and accept something in order to convince. Without making a person to just believe u
do you disagree?
To be told and to comprehend or sense are different things. And I'm sure that, most people, especially who trying to make up "their versions of religion", can see only the tiny tip of the iceberg (if we talk about Judaism and Christianity of course). That's mind blowing thing.
was the hanging method mentioned in the relgious books??
no, I'm just making a conclusion of your logic. It does not work because being convinced is equated with belief
therefore if someone does not believe, it meant that they are not convinced
or when they tie you to a horse
killing is
pin every killing on relegion if that make u feel good but do provide evidence
relegion is very stric on the method used for execution outside that it's just a non relegious practice
It seems like too long to read and catch up. What is the topic you are all talking about rn?
if you get a problem with death sentence make it about that not about relegion

