#š§ ļ½serious-chat
1 messages Ā· Page 33 of 1
I will remove the timer when I am there and we are chatting.
But if you'll excuse me I'd like to return to the topic.
Okay I am sending u the paper also for you to see it and I am writing all the things at one place
You're interrupting.
Please have some consideration for people here engaged in discussion.
Thank you
While trying to reduce the intesity of our negative feelings, is it more advisable to strenghthen our control over them?
I think control is the wrong word.
We don't control our feelings. They are more like the weather.
I would definitely try to hide my anger, and rage in front of the person offending me. I'll definitely take it out when the right time comes.
I talk about making space for having feelings, of course a metaphor.
Different than avoiding or suppressing, making space for having feelings is the acknowledgement that we have the ability to have our feelings without acting on them compulsively.
Acting out rage has serious consequences.
So does hiding, as we must first hide our feelings from ourselves.
would you say the same for a positive emotion? and acting on it?
I wouldn't necessarily want the offender to assume that I'm getting mad, and take advantage of that. I'll try to remain calm, and not let him accomplish what he wishes. I'll strike back when I have enough to say about the man, and try to make him feel the same way I felt when he was going against me.
That's retaliation, eyesaek.
We want to make others feel what we feel. But it has very serious consequences.
As I'm sure you already know.
Truly it does, and I agree with you on that. However when things escalate too much, then there has to be some sort of retaliation.
No, there doesn't.
Well then how do we make them understand?
Why must there be retaliation? Why must they understand?
Because they are going against us, we must defend ourselves.
The more you attempt to force someone to understand through retaliation, the less likely they will understand.
If we don't, their point stands, and becomes the truth in the eyes of the people.
Maybe
Let's put retaliation aside, and let's talk about what can be done without being too violent against the offender.
Yes
Justice, make them have a taste of their own medecin?
I believe, anger can sometimes lead to more trouble. Let's say I was calm, but at some point my tolerance can run out, and I can eventually go against them in a much more offensive manner.
Because a human's tolerance depends on their age, and I'm not an adult yet, I'm just some guy maybe I have more to learn, and maturity comes slowly to tell me that anger is not the path I should choose. But right now is the time to make points, and statements that'll carve my future, and if I do someone would take them wrongly, and try to go against me.
In that moment, if I don't defend my actions then I'll be in deep trouble for them. They would certainly affect how the world would see me.
And I can't let the world think less of me because of some loud mouth.
I think that's where anger comes handy, instead of hiding the signs of anger, it's good to show them, to draw the limits of relationships between you and others
Have to say, your English is not beginner level, it's advanced.
serious-chatto hi
Hi
actually nobody cares, but you may get in trouble, I donāt believe that there is a god to surveillance what you actually did
if you did something wrong, you may got punished or beaten by others, then you know you canāt do that because itās an offensive action, itās no deal about gods, just you do it, you pay for it.
In search of truth, one that could explain what is happening. This would be the final determination of our divergence.
Arguments that not a single living soul has been able to refute so far:
-
Dissent ā The uncertainty demonstrated by the differences of opinions among philosophers and people in general.
-
Progress ad infinitum ā All proof rests on matters themselves in need of proof, and so on to infinity, i.e., the regress argument.
-
Relation ā All things are changed as their relations become changed, or, as we look upon them from different points of view.
-
Assumption ā The truth asserted is based on an unsupported assumption.
-
Circularity ā The truth asserted involves a circularity of proofs.
Therefore, I have concluded that: The journey of a fool is a search for truth. Agrippa teaches, criticize instead, share ideas. This is the only thing that can take us to a higher level with internal magnetic induction.
@ornate siren
I think this is not always the case. You will encounter someone who is more aggressive than you, and you will be forced to use this
It's like saying, "I am against physical action"
This is silly
It is also worth noting that the path is not organically with anger. The āpath of angerā is the kind of rumination that is forced upon you.
Why even say the path of anger? It `s naturally.
he didn't mention nor refer to god tho š he's speaking about what society thinks of him
I think the word "protect" is not entirely true in this case.
After all, as I said earlier, you will be forced to do this.
if he has society influence.
What do you know about this?
I'm not claiming that, just throwing a topic for those who are interested
Did I say what you claim?
you didn't I'm just clarifying for everyone here
the more influence you have, the more punishment you gained
(leaving)
but I do agree with that to some extent, modernity made alot of people disconnect from reality and life.
hello! guys i'm new to this server.... can anyone be my friend?
but it's to complex to give a clear answer
I'll cover this topic later.
I admit there is an actual power on public opinion, but pointless on a regular person. if you get trouble into it, you could just ignore/apologize/revenge, and you pay for it. if you get into a new community, no one knows what terrible thing you actually did. thatās my point.
What does it mean for a ācommonā person?
Do you mean assertive personality?
And you said that there is a certain power over society/public opinion, but letās call it āpowerā does not affect an ordinary person.
That is, it represents dependence in interests/opinions
#šļ½general for me

Now that's what I call method.
Yes.
Because I wasn't there, I cannot discuss that and all those comments on anger now.
Shit.
This is a natural phenomenon
But I don't think it's true to talk about the "path of anger."
Sorry
Instead of being sorry, you'd do well to delete that.
Emotions, sorry.
Explain.
Someone in the chat said that it is better not to choose the "path of anger"
I don't think path is the right word in this sense.
Anger is anger, regardless of the path following which it has come to be.
Ye, agree
A balance of negative and positive emotions is necessary.
Yes, like electrons that revolve around an atom.
And which are at different orbital levels, which also have spins.
+1/2 , -1/2
If there is no balance, then...
The fallacies of Rutherford's atomic model will be proven correct.
Electrons will fall into the nucleus.
Ou
It's much more complicated there
Agreed.
Do you want to shock you?
*yourself
The model of the atom in school books is incorrect.
The principles of human emotion and psychology are simple enough, but the crafts and cautels that can be devised by the mind based on those and their corollaries is way more complicated.
Intelligence is proportional to inscrutability.
Well.
I do not think that the so-called principles are simple in their structure.
What do you mean?
What I mean?
You know how complex the quantum world is. This is a different form. It is very different from MKT (molecular kinetic theory).
And the movement of electrons cannot be accurately determined, and the model presented in school textbooks is incorrect.
I don't doubt it. Many things presented in schools are incorrect.
It takes some time for general audiences to catch up with experts.
Of course, this is done so as not to burden the child's mind. But why not then remove misconceptions about certain phenomena?
This is a shock for the child
I don't think it's intentionally incorrect.
When he finds out that this is not true
Maybe
I apologize for not explaining what this means.
Spins are properties of electrons that determine their direction relative to the axis. It also depends on internal magnetic forces.
+1/2 , -1/2 - These are their up and down directions.
Human mind is SUPPOSED to follow logic. This logic correlates with human psychology while itself deviating a little from the classical principles, but still can be reduced to basic characteristics and ideals as can classical logic too. But does the mind do so?
But, it also depends on the orbital level.
But there must be a balance.
Compare the truth values of classical inclusive disjunctions and the inclusive disjunctions as considered by the human mind, and you'll understand.
Know that.
Agreed, but then... almost everything on physics and chemistry has been grossly simplified, approximated, and idealized in the basic academic fields. Uncertainty and abruptness reigns supreme in the real world. For example, take any high school problem on a pendulum undergoing simple harmonic motion that neglects air friction, the elasticity and the mass of the string, inter alia.
Or you can take ballistics
There are countless examples.
But it normal
If I may, the human mind is not "logical" in a strict sense.
For schoolchildren
"Decayed" is the term I like to use, as in "decayed metaphors".
Of course.
Obviously.
Do they teach astronomy in schools?
If it's obvious why would you say that the human mind is supposed to follow logic.
If so, then this is a disaster...
Humans were the first to delve into the principles of logic. I thought it could have been better had they extended their works to be universally applicable.
I don't know what I'm talking about.
My mind doesn't follow logic.
In a sense the reason philosophers needed to create or discover formal logic is because it's not obvious.
I imagine the mind as a big box with the rest of the elements inside.
I definitely agree
In a sense, yes.
One of my areas of interest in linguistics in graduate school was crossover between formal logic and logic in natural language.
They inherently knew about something, but didn't know what that is before they decided to look into things.
@lavish finch Me too. The first thing I was intrigued by was this.
Hi
Hi Jazzar
Iād like to discuss the philosophy of science.
How do we know what a science is?
there are some subjects which are commonly agreed to be sciences like physics chemistry and biology.
Are you real?
There are other subjects which are generally agreed not to be science like astrology.
Ehhh, you like talking about DJ Khalid?
Then there are some subjects in between which he seem to be investigating important topics and yet may still not be science like psychology economics or sociology.
Are mathematics science? Or are they something else?
Bro are you a bot?
To be honest, I wouldnāt talk about that topics.
And?
This question of what is determined to be a science or not is called demarcation.
This was the subject of Karl Popper in the 1920s.
And he was part of a group of people working on this question called logical positivists.
Popper also did interesting work in political science.
He wrote a book called the open society and its enemies.
Where he said that a good open society has a government that is open, receptive and responsive to criticism.
And also said thatās what makes someone a good scientist.
Poetry Corner starting in a few minutes below. A short illustrated talk about Robert Browning's 'My Last Duchess'.
Science is a language to understand universe we life in
OK, thatās a start
Well I appreciate the invitation to define our terms
Good philosophy work results in the creation of definitions but does not necessarily start with them.
So I join you in the aim of defining science.
then what are they start with?
Perhaps by asking questions.
philospher have the heaviest thought of their own surroundings
oh yea im agree
so what is your answer james?
It looks like weāre not ready to define science
We are but atleast you have your own thought maybe?
Have you heard the saying I donāt know how to tell you what it is but I know it when I see it?
It sounds like ancient proverb, never heard but I understand
I know that astrology is not science but Iām not sure I could tell you exactly why.
If we develop our philosophy of science we will be able to say why.
One characteristic to consider is called falsifiability.
Saying that itās not science is not the same as saying it has nothing interesting to say in its body of knowledge.
Ikr I dont know how to put the word on the canvas
its hard to explain but it is science
Thatās OK thatās what weāre working on together.
You consider astrology to be science. Is there any subject which you consider to be a pseudoscience? Fake science.
ok let me try to explain why astrology is science, according to my knowledge "probably wrong" they used astrology to predict season and wind direction in ancient times. there's an item called astrolabe to measure the constellation. even nowadays they still use astrology to see where is andromeda and some particular star to observe. But im agree if we are talking about zodiac forecast yeah it is bs
Are you talking about astrology or astronomy?
astrology
I think scientists today would use astronomy not astrology to determine where Andromeda is.
oooh they still used astrology tho if you use telecope and want to see andromeda from your home, you need to find pegasus constellation first
wait I think I get the wrong definition of astrology

No I dont believe stars constellation have any effect on human, astrology is bs
Astronomy and astrology are very similar sounding words. But they are very different.
astrology is about the zodiac
Astronomy is the study of space and the motion of planets
Yeah I just researched it back, because according to my knowledge like 5 min ago astrology is a branch of science that studying about star constellation
do you believe in zodiac james?
if yes we can't be good friend
Can i be part of this conversation with my weak English language?
James will say define weak
btw sure more people the better the convo
Poor ?
Its actually so hard to define 1 word
Yes youāre welcome to participate if you take the conversation seriously.
Im not that good in English actually.. but im trying to develop my English with useful kind of topics
First do you believe in zodiac?
thatās irrelevant
No in fact..
What it is relevant, astrology is about correlation between zodiac and human right?
Someoneās personal belief is irrelevant to their ability to participate in our conversation about what science is
This conversation is open to people both who believe in zodiac and who donāt
I donāt personally believe in zodiac but thatās not what weāre talking about.
Oh yeah sure I was going to ask why he doesnt believe or why if he believe
I understand and I think that might take us away from what we were talking about.
Astronomy is the study of the stars.
In my country, most of them are believe in such things like.
But in my view.. what people saying about future canāt be adopted easily.
Astrology is fortune telling using the movement of stars to predict the future
In India they belive very much in the movements of star for 'auspicious occasions'.
I wonder when is astrology first implemented in human culture
and what's the reason behind it
I think it is very old
Well, what else is there but the clear night sly to wonder at?
Yes itās very old. And before science the two were intertwined.
Indeed
Itās back to ancient times.. like Egyptian
I prefer reading my tea leaves
oh that's make sense now, Im actually writing a script for documentary video about sun god shamas it's a god from ancient babylonia society, they always take a look up to the sky for their own activity
Youāve probably heard of Stonehenge the druidic mono lithic site in England.
Druidic ? Really?
I donāt know how much truth there is to it but Iāve heard that the design of the circle corresponds to some astronomical positions.
Keefy is from the UK so he might be able to give us more accurate information.
It does and people meet at Stonhenge for the spring and winter equinox
summer not spring
And whatās the approximate date of creation? 5000 years ago?
I think but no druids involved - they came later. We dont really know what went on at Stonehenge - there are theories but I dont think anyone is truly sure
Probably
how they put huge rock on top another huge rock
4000 years ago and neolithic not monolithic
just wonder tho
Yes or suffer sciatica for the rest of your life
The stones came from Wales
The ones called sarcen stones
I wonder if someone goes there and accidentally pushed the rock and everthing destroyed
And they reckon they may have come by sea
Oh some were probably pinched by the locals much later to make a nice mantlepiece
you know over the fireplace
And the ground also shifted no doubt
When I was a boy you could go right up to the stones and touch them
but now they keep people away except for the solstice celebration
wow, thats destructive and probably some stonehenge ghost will follow you
haha maybe
The sun comes through the stone arches and hits a particular stone on solstice day
What is stonehenge used for in ancient society? is it like worshipping site?
or... its for predicting time or season using sunlight?
Yes you can do that with it
like sundial
or calendar
Ive always wondered why they dont pick up the stones and put them back where they belong but archeologists dont do that sort of thing
It is a magical sight as you come over a hill on the main A303 road
No idea what is A303 road sounds like plane brand to me
There are other henges in the area apart from this one (the most impressive) and barrows - burial mounds - as well
Wait.. what if it was ufo landing site?
Its the main road west from London linked with the A30
Oh I see
Oh no not ALIENS!
you can see the stonehenge from the road?
Yes
woah thats cool
who is jcb
No idea how they can put that huge rock on top of other rock
Stonehenge is a prehistoric monument on Salisbury Plain in Wiltshire, England, two miles (3 km) west of Amesbury. It consists of an outer ring of vertical sarsen standing stones, each around 13 feet (4.0 m) high, seven feet (2.1 m) wide, and weighing around 25 tons, topped by connecting horizontal lintel stones. Inside is a ring of smaller blues...
This will explain. Ive got to go. Bye bye!
With antigravity power, of course. š
If you are interested I have a presentation on 'Who are the English?' which shows the development of these isles from prehistoric times.
I believe they did to some extent. They restored the site and made some adjustments.
There was restoration yes
What's the big deal around this? It's a bunch of stones placed in some weird fashion
You can build a similar one in your backyard too
@covert raptor Well, personally I think I would use polystyrene blocks which are somewhat lighter - like on Star Trek series 1. I once knew a bloke who worked for Denham Studios. He made a complete cinema with tiered seating in his garage for showing home movies. It carves very easily apparently...
I can't agree. In Stonehenge there are gates to time travel. You cannot recreate sth like this in your backyard.
Oh really š
Good for you
@livid hawkYou are probably right
I got these strange vibes when I was there. People say the stones vibrate. I had the feeling that if I walked through one of the portals still standing I would end up in the future or the past...
Creepy innit?
But also it might be an ancient landing spot for UFOs. Maybe its transmitting signals to another galaxy? Or maybe its just a bunch of old stones?
Just some conspiracy theories, nothing empirical proven
Thats Hog Wild
Absolutely Bonkers
That's what I said.
There's nothing to protect, and I know what you've said earlier. It's completely unrelated to what I've stated. In terms of defending my actions however, I can't get angry, or at-least I can't visibly show my anger. I'll have to keep my calm in order to make points logically.
Elaborate on that.
When you're in deep stress, or deep paranoia, you're not able to make decisions logically. When you're calm, you are more capable to solving a problem.
Hello
This is pure eclecticism.
Once again, carefully read what you wrote.
Just because you can't interpret my messages doesn't mean I have to read my own messages.
"interpretation" is not appropriate here.
I go out of the way to make sure my points are clear, and fair.
It's completely appropriate, depends on the perspective.
The latter may turn against you.
Elaborate more on that.
@ornate siren hello
Also elaborate on what you said about physical action.
I explained this using your example, if you were careful.
So I told you to read your message again carefully.
I read my messages right when I send them then again read them when someone goes against them.
I understand myself clearly, if you want more explanation without forcing yours on me, I can give that to you.
Just have to ask for it.
The first, and foremost topic here is why violence, and anger can lead to multiple dire situations along with the fact that anger is not the correct path not about me not being able to read my own message, and understand myself. I clearly understand myself, you wants explanation? Ask for it.
Do you read after you've posted? Does this mean that you passed it through a dead consciousness?
What does it mean? This means that you are not serious about what you say. You should have thought this through before you wrote.
You're off the topic here.
I didn't support the topic.
Just saying, going against what I can, or can not do doesn't mean you can escape with your points being proven. Which you are yet to do.
It's your business.
You're clearly berating me for what? Not being able to understand my own words? It's rubbish. If you want to discuss on the main topic, sure go ahead.
I just clarified those points where it seems to me that you presented it incorrectly.
How so, that's what I've been asking you.
Like do you want an explanation, or not? You're changing multiple topics here.
No, don't attribute to me what I didn't say. This is a kind of provocation.
I rely on connection, not rhetoric.
Same can go for you, you're trying to berate my comprehension when it's completely stable.
Good luck!
You can't be 100% sure of this.
I didn't say that I was criticizing you.
I've made it clear.
Neither can you, but you're confident in yourself, literally overconfident.
You've told me, to go ahead, and read what I've said a day ago to which I've replied multiple times that I know what I've said yet you keep telling to do what you want me to. I've asked you multiple times if you want an explanation, yet you denied.
Buddy, I didn't mind you explaining this to me. This happened due to the fact that you wrote a response immediately to my message, and I had to respond to the soon-arriving one and miss previous.
As I said earlier, I rely on communication rather than RHETORIC.
Of course, I also had some omissions.
There may have been a misunderstanding.
Could you please explain yesterday's topic to me?
Definitely not a misunderstanding, I consider it ignorance, and I find it reasonable. Simply because~
A) You ignored my request to explain you stuff.
B) You did not elaborate on other things.
C) You've been trying to tell me that I must read my very own message that I've clearly read before. I always read my messages twice before sending them to check if they are logically correct, and gramatically correct. All I have seen from your side so far are assumptions yet when I gave my perspective you weren't willing take that were you?
I believe the conversation should end right here because talking upon this any further just leads to actual misunderstandings. Whether you call it victory, or not I retreive my hand from this conversation.
I will simply not reply to any of yours messages about this particular conversation anymore. To start fresh of course.
I'm afraid I'll have to correct you this time too.
I think you donāt quite understand the mechanics of how logic and logical constructions work. So does a subjective set of discrete data.
"Assumption" is all we can do.
We cannot confirm anything with 100% certainty.
Because we are subjective beings.
Good luck!
@ornate siren hey. did your weekend work out?
@craggy sphinx as I realized, you're russian. Tbh your english is pretty insane comparing to average ones
Well forget it, I'll get back into the conversation.
What do you mean by correcting? Are you certain you're correcting me properly, or not? Can you explain why are you correcting me?
Coming back to this, this literally does not make sense. I made it crystal clear that I have to defend my actions in order to save my reputation in front of the world. I can let the world to think less of me. I don't understand what you're trying to say with the word force, but okay.
Well the conversation was between me, and Mr. Green about how tolerance can eventually be broken by a few more sentences from the opponent. I've also said,
'I believe, anger can sometimes lead to more trouble. Let's say I was calm,'
only making an if situation where we both are imagining what could potentially happen. I've made it extremely comprehendible that tolerance is simply not the greater force in anything, and sometimes you can improve it, but can never keep it together all the time. You'll eventually lose it to a person, and go all out on them. I do not understand what point you're trying to berate here because all of them literally agree to whatever you've said. If you wish to correct someone? Correct yourself.
Now you've still not elaborated what you meant here.
I'm learning, just like everyone else here.
I've used the word path to simply denote it as a weapon. Of course it's forced, and you can't control it at all, but you can choose it at times. You're in complete control of when to use it. You've got the ability to tolerate, and go off.
Exactly.
'Nobody cares,' seems a little wrong.
I can reason with you on that, it's mostly because people would care, they will keep that in mind if it's something serious. The internet is sort of like a weapon, in some ways it's good, and in some bad. It's been used a weapon, and as a tool. Cyber threat, cyber attacks, predators lurking around, and a lot of other bizarre things. These threats are never forgotten by the people of the internet. If someone does something slightly weird, people will remember them, but for how long? I'm not sure of that.
Yes it's self evident. I've just noted that
Peace is a period between wars, nobody changes my mind about this
Np is a slang word for ... ?
Means no.
No
Yeah that.
Thanks a lot
What is this?
May I know why you took this particular position?
Of course, starting from the analysis of our history, always that happens to evolution of technology or society the war was there.
Do you understand my point of view?
What I could properly make out is that, we're really not at peace, we are just in a truce.
There's really no true peace, a nation wouldn't go to war, but would threaten, and make it difficult for you in every way?
war is needed as a tool, but the most of countries don't still in war everytime, I think that's is inevitable, however war was there
Piece is just a shot period between wars
And an impossible dream, a goal that never can reach
no, that's not enough. I call this indiscriminate referencing.
war has both positive and negative consequences. Positive from a scientific point of view. Is this transition worth the lives of many people?
but I agree that this development has to do with the outbreak or its manifest beginning.
but these are not all aspects.
Damn, I missed a lot.
Yeah, in a sense.
How are you?
Any crazy topic to talk about?
do you remember the content you watched on tiktok or sth yesterday?
because you care, you care what did you with yourself, not other people unless you involved them into your case and you actually get them in trouble.
you are worried about public opinion/cyber threat or sth just because you are not powerful enough, mentally and physically.
if you get in trouble, donāt give a shit, thatās my opinion.
or just let him permanently silent. (mute/ignore)
Anger/Anxiety/Mad solves nothing, you are mentally consuming yourself.
Oh I dont care with what people say about me if its not constructive
Am I mentally strong then?
Fine. Continue with the topic.
A] I don't have TikTok, and it's banned in my country.
B] What is Sth?
B] Something
it's normal, there is a lot of people really feel unrest about others opinion.
it's hard to define you are mentally strong or not, but you can define it by yourself.
pretty good ! and you ?
I say you are not mentally strong because you are affected and feel uncomfortable by public opinion, and even if it actually can't affect you in aspect of way, you should not care about them, and be confident in the future.
if there is really someone who keeps annoy/insulting you, maybe that is your enemy, I don't recommend that you insult them back or make threats, but legally taking actions to against them is plausible.
Hello. I don't think that's always the case. You are dependent on society and communication with others can be a positive effect. What does that mean? For example, if you work in a field and you want to develop a project, then you will be forced to contact and listen to others. This will help you understand whether you are doing everything right or not.
Of course, this is not always the case. It has its drawbacks.
But what is ideal then?

Yes, we are dependent on society, but society is a big field that almost includes everything, It's a tiny influence on society for you, even if you did something terrible on this field, you are free to leave and seek a new field to contribute/working, unless you have strong influence on society like you are a politician/influencer/CEOs/Billionaires that would be hell to pay.
I don't think that after any serious violation you can just walk away.
make an example, In my opinion, why can't I LOL
well if it is a really serious violation like law violations
Ok, go out now and kill the man on the street.
You can hide, but not for long.
that's too terrible š , you have no chance to face the power of a nation.
I'm talking about private
Please stay on topic.
?
I'm sorry but I don't understand what you mean by private, could you provide some details for me ?
Is that means you can kill a person privately and no one knows ?
I don't think that really works.
No, have a good day
People idealize too much being "mentally strong" or some shit like that
It's better to go to your own rhythm rather than overcomplicating your own life
Yes.
Ok, ok
You said you could avoid this.
What strength?
can anyone provide me some ideas and writeups based on the topic "the influence of technology on society"?
Use ChatGPT...
š
I'm always up for discussions and dialectics in this channel I mean, but haven't got time for detailed paragraphs.
can u give me some ideas
I'll exaggerate it
you can if you have nukes
Sorry, but there's ChatGPT for you. I'm not really that much of a helping hand in these matters.
While they burn my reputation down? Absolutely not. I'm not uncomfortable due to public opinion, I do not care about public opinion that much, but when it comes to defending something which I've clearly not done, I will not resist.
You're talking from a perspective where I've actually done something wrong, but you've not considered understanding the perspective of having done nothing.
- Base your points on the benefit of it, mix them up with the side-effects.
- Describe their threat towards the mind.
- Describe their threat towards the well-being of a person.
It's just about making good, and bad points.
Insult it, but also embrace it.
Describe how it has turned humanity against itself, nuclear weapons, and other such stuff. Describe how humanity has formed newer bonds with the help of the internet, such as Discord, Instagram, Team Speak, and other such chat platforms that let you interact.
Let's talk
Reject modernity š©
Embrace masculinity āļø
About what?
Don't really have the knack for it...
Me too. My little self is responsible for this.
Ever saw the movie I was streaming?
that's how human works. we are all selfish, due to different aspects and opinions, also benefits, there must to be a war against each other, but unlike nuclear power/biological/chemical weapons, most of them are extremely mass destructive weapons. there is no benefit for everyone and yourself to use it, but not for deterrent. they are power, but when we all have this power, we have to consider who will be the real next victims, is that you ? or the target? same logic on other field.
I haven't watched it, but I've seen short footage on tik tok.
Don't get ahead of yourself.
Why are you streaming movies?
that's true, but you can't have a nuke.
How do you know?
Felt like it...
How can you be 100% sure of this?
I'm not sure about this, but It's no threat on me.
you can have a nuke or not, It's not my shit.
Why then ask if I have it?
What the hell are you talking about?
What case?
same
this case
I said that no one can be sure that I do not have a nuclear bomb.
She may be
Or not
Or ye
Who is ''she''? š
Anyways, that's what she said.
So better not rely on it too much.
Oh my little prankster
Ludmila. No homo.

Hello, what about the wave-particle duality theories?
what about it?
Are you saying that quantum physics is wrong?
Specifically mechanics
Well?
Would it be possible for a supercomputer to simulate all the supposed alternative realities that the superposition of particles create? Assuming this theory would be valid
Don't think so.
that would be impossiple to generate all of the infinite
Stay tuned for quantum supercomputers.
You meant to say quantum meter.
How do you imagine this?
Yeah, dunno much about it in depth
There's nothing wrong with that.
Forget about this critical baloney and watch Oggy And The Cockroaches.
I just was wondering how insane the amount of decisions our brains process everyday, if anyone was to be conscious about this they would probably go insane
BYE ALL
Ou yes
Oggy
?
Our brains are unique and very complex. Our anatomy is unique.
Have you used anything?
nobody can be concious about infity it'd take you an infinite amount of time to reach that (never reach that)
What is infinity?
don't you know?
I've no idea what you're talking about, it's become so vague.
What is infinity?
No but I can, if anything = you
( It's a joke )
What the hell are you doing?
Lol, ahahah
Gay or something?
something
Indeed, still fascinates me to this day that at some point we were creating the concept of airplanes and not so long after we were heading to the moon. Science and the brain's cognitive capabilities can make wonderful things, but some wrong beliefs can make such disasters as well, like denying other people's curiosity and consequentially making them less capable of expressing their thoughts
This is bad?
Good.
Incongruity is bad.
we learn by mimicing mostly, we got the idea of aeroplanes from birds and flying bugs, still our anatomy is complex and our brain is gifted, but not that capable.
Yes, this is fantastic. Even a small drop of water gives incredible sensations. The world is unique. His device is unique.
People strive for improvement, this makes it possible to understand how everything functions.
This thought always leaves me curious as well, what haven't we missed because we do not know if it's even possible

Ok
Something
Then stop with this shit.
that's why we imagine aliens to be a mixture of humans with some animal / bug, cause our imaginations is limited to what we absorbed and seen so far
I'll think about
But I watch the James Webb telescope every day. This is incredible..
I hope it's worth its price.
Then our science will probably reach a certain point and stagnate because advancement in technology hasn't shown much of a development, then i guess people will value more creativity and science than now days
Creativity has declined in value.
No, that will never happen.
Then it's more sad than it already is, i mean is it bad? For advancement overall? :/
I hope that as well
I agree, will never happen
I'm logging off. Hope y'all will have something great to discuss tomorrow. Bye.
(leaving)
Why will science not stagnate (stop)?Because every idea is the basis of something. This gives reasons. It's an endless cycle. We will never stop asking questions.
while chasing the advanced we sometimes forget the obvious
And every reason will require a question
Each question will require an answer, etc.
Good night

Even the most proven and seemingly complete model will require new alternatives.
What do you think this depends on?
Idk
This is the best thing that happened to humanity.
Yes, i agree about that, we're never going to stop asking questions, but i believe this cause there are various questions without answers, and some even being from generations ago, i supposed there would be a point where everything is so advanced there's no more to discover. This might be just me not realizing the scale of things science has discovered and its limits of doing so xD
I thought about this once, it's a good topic.
But I answered this question for myself.
Let me give you arguments that so far not a single living soul has been able to refute.
-
Dissent ā The uncertainty demonstrated by the differences of opinions among philosophers and people in general.
-
Progress ad infinitum ā All proof rests on matters themselves in need of proof, and so on to infinity, i.e., the regress argument.
-
Relation ā All things are changed as their relations become changed, or, as we look upon them from different points of view.
-
Assumption ā The truth asserted is based on an unsupported assumption.
-
Circularity ā The truth asserted involves a circularity of proofs
I was missing you all crazies from serious chatss ā¤ļø
That's a really good and well thought argument xD, i think that would be hard to refute even if i was discussing it in my main language, still have to learn a lot about English. Even though i still wonder if there would be a point where the divergence in people's thoughts would cease, not like- not existing anymore, but just converging, similar to how we, even tho having different backgrounds and lives, have so much in similar with each other's lives, like some behaviors of kids that tend to be similar even though they are from different countrys. Still a solid point though
See who's back š
Yeah, that's why I'm hoping for James Webb
Thanks. Not bad. Just wandering in discord before my class starts. You?
I hope you remember me
Well š
Have you changed your name?
I need to talk with you laterr āØ
Sure
No, my old account - @thorny steeple turned off. I wrote to discord support and they answered that it happened by accident.
Let me guess. Is it Sufficient?
Oh ok
Yeee
Luckily we can always create a new account
Thank you for supporting the topic
Thanks to all those who participated in this.
(leaving)
@devout shale late happy bday for youu ā¤ļø
byebyeee suffi ā¤ļø
Not the best thing actually. It's better than the predecessor, Hubble, you'd say.
best thing that happened to humanity is the discovery of antibiotics
I wonder how many lives has been and still are saved by just that
I guess so. We wouldn't imagine building telescopes if we were all dying, our focus will be on that.
I think the antibiotics era is gradually coming to an end because of advanced bacteria or super bugs
there are many things that we ignore the value of, like the organizations that works for peace, thinkers who spent their life to improve communication between people and nations ... etc
I am still here š¤£
The only message to get pinned for some reason
we need more pinned msgs Ig
True. The space research is stunted again because of the geopolitical tensions like the Russia situation.
Fucking politics
Well bro, I said that because it sounded epic
there's a Turkish saying that goes like this: "sonunu düÅünen kahraman olmaz" meaning: "He who thinks of the end cannot be a hero", some people are out there doing so much for humanity yet they aren't properly appretiated, like teachers for instance, Most of them aren't waiting for a reward or a prize they are doing it for a basic salary and hope for future generations.
Yes, I can also add that we have a lot of scientists in Russia who are deprived of housing and means of supporting life.
yes you can add that šš¾
leaving for now))
Well not all teachers teach well so there's that.
There's a reason why people are looking to the internet for educational content, and its rise in popularity
That's why I said most of them, I know an English teacher who despite not having an assistant for sign language (which is the case for all other classes maybe they didn't have enough), He learned sign language in a short laps of time so he can communicate with his student and it's not even mentioned in his contract and he's not even paid for the extra effort.
What happens to him when he walked away.
I know it sucks but at least he has a job. Many people don't have one. With the mass layoffs and stuff, people who remain have to work harder with the already less labor force.
Balduino IV, cool guy, I was your friend,we'd fight together
Hello i have a question how can i develop develop myself in critical thinking when i analyse literature works plz???
What should i do to think critically
Why ur like my shadowš¤£šš
because i love you
Yes answer plz
š
?
Yes. However, you need a strong foundation in literary theory. Have you took a course in literary theory? You need to stick to one literary theory. You also need to formulate a strong thesis statement. Have you took a course in academic writing? Critical thinking and analysis is usually taught in academic writing courses. I'm a university student in English literature and that's where we studied these skills.
Yes me too this year
That's why i'm lost
š¶
I wanna improve myself in literature
Can i add u plz
š
when ur gonna give me attention
Without literary theory and academic writing it's going be pretty challenging to write a strong essay. What you need to remember is that you need to provide TEXTUAL EVIDENCE, quote your text to show how it supports your argument. If your essay has no thesis statement, you will get an F. So make sure your essay clearly states your argument at the begining, in the introduction paragraph like this: "In this essay, I claim that [your argument]." and then provide the textual evidence and explain how it supports your claim. Remember to split your essay into logical paragraphs that each focuses on a particular theme or what one might call a "sub-claim."
How about you try to use a dating app instead?
hbu try to use a brain
i m trying to help here
Yes i studu literay theory the last year and i'm gonna study it this year that's why i'm asking we saw some glimpses abt academic writing and yeah in every essay teachers ask us to write in academic way
Do you know how to formulate a thesis statement?
I knew in the past but i forget honestly that's why i have to refresh my memory
Totally agree
hey bisky dont support him
A thesis statement is your argument about the story. It needs to be clearly stated in the introduction paragraph, or your professor will fail you.
I don't support u coz he or she is right this called serious chat we are talking abt Ʃducation!!
i m trying to help you
you breaking my heart
Ahh yeah i remember now he said to us that without it ur essay is useless
Then answer here and stop talking abt attention and love stuff
i m doing it already
you need to focus
Your thesis statement needs to be structured like that: "In this essay, I claim that [your argument]." in ONE SENTENCE in your introduction (first) paragraph.
And how can i improve myself in writing good essays
Yes
first you gotta listen me
Go ahead we r listening
?
You need to use transition devices, professors love those. For example: "Therefore, ..." "However, ..." "In addition, ..." "Nonetheless, ..." etc. Each transition device indicates what the sentence is doing in terms of logic, so the logic of your argumentation becomes clear to the professor.
or did you watch someone while writing essay
Yes Linking words
like ur teacher is writing and you ask them and listen their story while writing
I wrote some examples but i want to improve my writing
but a good teacher
š§
Bro ur not an english student ur talking nonsenseš
if u want to learn by yourself you should write then read what you wrote then think about it and edit
Yes ik
You also should provide textual evidence to support your close reading of the story. If you don't provide textual evidence, the professor will also fail you. It's like making a claim without any evidence.
bro u dont know who i am
But i need someone to evaluate me and my geachers r not always free
write the same essay until you like it
Yes ofc without them ur essay is not relevant
this will improve your critical thnkng and writing skills because you will criticize yourself and write again and again
And whenever u provide textuel Ʃvidence the teacher will increase ur mark
Yes that's true
U have a point samsam
i always have a point for who understands me
No
also you should learn philosophy to understand how people thinks and how to reach the truth
Remember to provide an MLA citation for the story itself at the end of your essay (your bibliography), and also provide an MLA in-text citation next to each quote (the page number in the story enclosed in parentheses after each quote), or your professor will chastise you for plagiarism, and in some extreme cases bring you to a disciplinary committee.
how will you create textual evidence ?
Yes indeed my prƩvious teacher warns us for that
have you thought about this any?
But what's MLA i forget
Textual evidence are quotes from the story. She does not create it, she quotes it from the story they studied in class.
so you dont produce anything lmao
useless essay
Yes exactly u quote them from the work to show ur relevant in ur essay
She produces an original argument and supports it by textual evidence from the story. That's the whole point of an essay.
you should come with a new idea in essay
š§
why would i need to create an argument
essays for to bring a new idea and make improvements
I have another question adding to the literary works i mean the books that the teacher asks us to read what else can i read to understand deeply those works and start writing in academic way i mean sth that adds value to me
You will need to write a conclusion paragraph at the end of your essay, reiterating your thesis statement (not a copy-paste, but an exact paraphrase), and then very shortly remind the reader how you supported this argument throughout the essay, without quotations. The conclusion paragraph does not present new evidence or previous evidence! It only summarizes your essay.
š
Ofc!
It's called an argumentative essay
!!!
U will provide arguments to dƩfend ur idea
Bro
how much can you support an idea
You can reference supporting arguments from other scholars in your essay. You MUST provide citations and proper MLA attribution for those scholars in your biliography and also in your essay with in-text citations. Otherwise, this is first-grade plagiarism and they will likely put you on probabation for this. So, as long as you are aware of that and are careful to provide correct MLA citations, then you can search for interesting essays about your story on JSTOR. You could type the name of the story and something related to your argument in the search bar on JSTOR and read those essays. Again, don't forget to give full credit, or the professor will take you to a disciplinary hearing, which will remain in your academic record.
š«
it really doesnt matter after some time
lets make a brain storm
i say this cube is red
support me
write a short essay something
Go sleep bro
come on people
i m teaching you right now
you should be able to support this the most basic idea at least
Generally speaking, in academic writing you have to cite anything that you learn or discover from other scholars or people. It doesn't matter how "unacademic" the source is, even YouTube videos, podcasts, blog posts, fashion magazine articles, social media posts, Reddit conversations, TikTok videos, everything must be cited, or it's pure plagiarism. The requirement to cite scholarly essays is not exceptional in that sense.
We won't waste our time on ur futile topic
I will ask my teacher he will teach me
your funeral
i will teach to other one
@spring furnace
btw does your teacher has a student thst written an essay which is really good and read by many people
used by many people
this is what will you be in future
If she will copy someone else's work or argument, then she'll get an instant failing grade in this course, and the university will put her on probation or possibly permanently dismiss her from the department or the entire university. This also includes the use of AI like ChatGPT.
i meant that how many people her teacher taught to write an essay
Yes totally right
how many her teacher's student wrote an essay that used in a lot of academical people
because she choose to follow only her teacher
Bro u have a lot of mistakes in english
so?
š¤£
It's very odd that your profile states that you are a native English speaker, yet your writing defies convetional English grammar.
okay too much ignorance
you guys write an useless essay without mistakes and i write an essay that help people but with mistakes
How will u show me to write an essay and u make Ć lot of mistakes in english esp spelling and somtimes ur sentences r ambiguous and can't be understoodš§
People like you always value the wrong things
This is called "irony" in poetry analysis.
š§
you even cant support the most basic idea
š
support that : this cube is red
show me what u got
Ur native and beginner at the same time
An oxymoron, as the Greeks used to say.
why trying to attack me by my profile?
just write an essay to support that idea lmao
Your profile should communicate to strangers who you are. She merely states what you communicate to everyone in the public space of Discord.
By thatš§
yep that s what you got
and you should defnetly improve your essay skills
but i dont see any potential in you
Gn bro if i follow u for sure i will fait in my examš
They will kick me out from university
Fail*
just ask your teacher to write you an essay to support "this cube is red"
and watch them how to do it
And i won't be able to attend his class anymore
they can write a long essay to support it
šššš
you will be the best student of him
Don't put people down, especially not those who you hope to date.
anyway
I'm not interested even to date him
waste of effort
š
no potential
Go sleep bro
write 100000 essays without value
focus on mistakes
dont try anything new
good luck with that
Are you from the same class or something?
you will waste alot of time writing useless essays
Who idk this samsam he is stalking me inthis english hub
dont worry about me
I don't understand how can someone develop so much passion for a person on the internet.
@spring furnace good luck to u too you couldn't write an essay
Me too
what a shame you guys study on this but not able to do the most basic one
I'm an outstanding honors student in my English department, I belong to one of the leading and most demanding universities in Israel. All my grade are A/A+ and my average grade throughout my BA is 93. I'm a fourth-year student. Teach me if you can.
nah i was just messing up with her
it is fun
she is cute
biscuit
So I told you from the beginning. Why don't you try to use a dating app instead?
This is just harassing people online.
ok support me and you will learn a lot
this cube is red
write an essay to support this
Yes totally agree soon i will do to him a report
š
I can't help but to giggle.
Me too
that s a bigger shame i thought you are studying in highschool or something
No bro we r university students ur the one who is from high school ig
So teach me sir, I'm sure that you can prove your own argument, no?
i guess israeli people is not good at writing an essay if their outstanding honor student like this
i can create strong arguments
I can do this, I can do that... Show, not tell.
Ofc from ur pic that ur putting in ur profileš
if i do, will you accept that you dont know nothing?
wow pfp shows that fr
I can't accept that which is not true, you want me to parrot?
but i will show you how it is done while you re the outstanding honor student
OK, magician.
if i show you this as a not that student that means you dont know nothing
will you accept that you dont know nothing?
Show us mr brillant
but it will be hard for you because your ignorant proud wont let you
Bro stop
stop what?
Samsam go to general chat
why?
ThIs is for seeious chat
i m deadly serious
Serious chat not for joking
i m not joking
Why not? Tell us a joke.
@opal star Have you decided what you want to study in college?
š§ru Stealing my words
well i am actually studying in college
No not yet he still thinking why the cube is redš
which is your brain not able to think about that
Philosophyš¤
@opal star , I think a BA in Women's Studies could help you, honestly. They teach a lot about the hardships of women in society, and also about harassment on the internet.
huh?
Bro leave me alone ur stalking me everywhere and whenver i asked Ć question i saw u stop stalking me !
no
i love you
Are you serious? Oh well, you are. That's the serious chat.
š
i will stalk
Bro read my bio
š§š
hehe biscuit still hiding huh
How can you love someone you never met in your life? You are infatuated and desperate for intimacy. I don't understand why are you harassing someone the internet instead of trying to date someone you could realistically have a relationship with?
because she s so cute
look how mad is she
she went to report me
She does not give you consent.
what does consent means
In fact, she actively rejects you.
what does reject means
It means ur disgusting
I don't love u
U r stalking me
not a common feeling
Look for another prey
biscuit
U need to be reported
Consent is agreement, is when someone expresses interest. Ask her, "Hey, do you want to go out with me maybe?" Then, she can give you consent and say "Yes, sure!" Or, she can reject you and say, "No, thanks." It's not the end of the world if someone rejects you. You can date someone else, you don't need to keep nagging. If you did this in America, Europe, or Israel in real life, you'd be reported and sued for sexual harassment.
btw why you cant write short answers
is it because that your teachers force you to do that all the time
and you became like this
No, it's because I'm trying to educate you so you don't get into trouble in real life.
No coz ur brain won't swallow the information
ahh you re cute too
And also because most young men are not even aware of what women experience.
am i a man?
No ur Ć tree
why i dont know about this
š
Strictly speaking, I don't know if you are a man or not. However, women don't usually harass other women online and tell them "I love you" and stalk them.
why?
i am a woman and lesbian
just my love language is weird
i have never wanted to harass someone
š¤®
biscut is not well
Oh really, are you?
I'm out
call 911
And i will report u
by?
You are told that you are harassnig, so you ought to stop. You are given clear statement of rejection like a red traffic light.
okay okay
where are you from btw
what is your name
Israel
@spring furnace
Lol, are you interrogating me? I don't owe you any information about myself.
I will report him
no just trying to know you
Or her
To stalk me too?
why?
i never stalked anyone
And i will do Ć report for harassing me
This person is psycho
you insult me a lot btw
They are very unlikely to be a woman. Lesbians are very sensitive and respectful, because they suffer the same amount of this type of harassment from other heterosexual men.
if you check i didnt do anything actually
Idk who is him or her but he is cringe and is stalking me
Eventually you'll learn that it's not OK and you will remember this incident in the future.
Don't waste ur time on him or her he or she is insane and disgusting š¤®š¤®š¤®
Are you an attention seeker or something?
Bye i will leave this conversation i came to ask and i start being stalked by lgbt
what
Goodbye
Your mind is detached from reality. What do you expect a woman on the internet to do with you? Let's say a random woman on the internet that you stalked so far finally agreed to your "love." How are you both going to date then? How are you going to have a relationship if she's on the other half of the world?
by plane
bro
He's not LGBT in any chance. Lesbian women don't act like that.
2023
Idk who is he but he will be reported for sure he is crazy
It's not the point. The point is that a woman on the internet is a foreigner to you. She has her family in another place and yours is elsewhere, her culture is different than yours, you don't have same citizenship, you don't have same native language, and so on and so forth.
oh
you thought i love her as the one?
i love her as friends
my bad
Sigh
congratulations your first short answer
@spring furnace why you chose english literature ? is it your hobby or you want to be a writer something?
I'm very good at it from an academic perspective. That's main reason why. I can also be a very good technical writer as I'm already a Wikipedia editor.
woow about what
I also once corrected Encyclopedia Britannica. They were flat-out wrong about something and it was a major factual error, so I presented the evidence and they correct it. WITHOUT GIVING ME CREDIT.
It's very niche. I'm typically writing comprehensive Hebrew article about historic programming languages like Ada, Modula-2, APL, etc.
What types computers you study?