#🧠|serious-chat
1 messages · Page 20 of 1
chrisrtianity is just another trendy religion
consciousness just means being aware; and responding to your experiences of which you are able to precieve.
I apologize if I offend you in any way, but it's the truth that it was created recently
yeah terrible in the dictonary of human beings.
But perfect in the dictonary of universe.
later than other religions
you never read about consciousness do you?
i am not chiristan ?
even if we take Islam
i am not muslim
yeah it doesn't and i am not offended. 😂
I am addressing the religions that have the idea of a creator
You said right to life is scaled based on "consciousness"
Then you said "consciousness" is decided by the probality of us becoming jesus and or thinking about religion and or a creator.
Animals as far as i'm aware will never go that far; in that case, they are not "consciousness" acording to you; Which would mean you are now contradicating all arguments you've laid out, no?
they are conscious but not as conscious as of Jesus.
Okay, so what is consciousness? Is it being aware? to be able to reason? What does this word mean to you
and no i am not contradiciting any of my statement.
maybe read again.
You have done so many times
being aware is the work of our 5 senses.
Sid, man can you like give me an answer; like a defintion of the word you keep using "consciousness". You keep changing and backpedaling
you may think i am contradicting
because you never read about philiosphy i am talking about.
it all started on creator and cosnciousness.
i can give you book?
@loud sonnet do you accept this definition?
Somewhat yes.
is still lacking the complete defination.
which is?
would you like to watch a video over it?
I'm not going ahead; till you lay out a proper defination.
Not really
No, sid we are not reading an entire book or watching entire videos; to define a single word.
:)
well, i can't define it in single word or line
Then, I shall end this here.
not IN a single word
it will be a paragraph.
you can't define something IN a single word
Go ahead.
define A single word.
I'll wait.
alright
I will type it and then mention you and john
and then we can talk/argue further.
why there is new delhi but no old delhi?
or new zeland but no old zeland
or new york but no old york?
There is also old delhi
where
near new delhi
@loud sonnet Do you believe that consciousness is the awareness of possibility of becoming like Jesus? Or is it the awareness of the possibility of the creator existing? Are atheists conscious? Animals can't talk, how do we know if they don't believe in a higher being?
bcs old stereotype is bad for them lmao
i will include the answer of all these question in the paragraph.
You reading all the chat?
i havent
oh okie
im not interested in conscusioness
what the duck
yeah its so mainstream even my brother know what is conscusioness
nobody really knows that it is
we just have this arbitrary definition
exactly thats why its not interesting not much to argue about conscusion
.

hi, happy saturday.
Happy to u too
i'd like to discuss about the job opportunties.
because i'd lost my job recently,
and i'd like to start coding...
Do you really like it?
hi guys
yep, i think i have some talent..
i am also interested in other online job opportunties...
but i am not sure, what can i do
Cool, how old r u
30
i performed some engineering work in telekom branch,
and if i am serious, i think i am not late to start new work...
especially in another industry or field that i am less experienced...
You can always start to learn coding, if you're passionate you will find it easier
thanks. and you can say that again,
No problem
all the best, bro
at the last position, i got some heady taste in gis working and programming, while i participated in telecom operation support system updates
and i believed this is my next choice
now i am jobless, and i 've to decide new way around my career
and how do you think about the online job opportunities?
how do you think about the online job opportunities?
no clue man
and have you got fulltime or parttime job now?
student
i majored in telekom engineering in the college, and i received some additional courses for data visualization and programming.
shall i know about your major?
There are many possibilities, if you learn to code you can work as freelancer
correct, i've searched some freelancing platforms
but especially software dev jobs are turf and full of candidates.
i've checked upwork, peopleperhour, freelancer, but got same result: noth
how can i chew and overcome it?
You may want to let you know by showing your work on github first, anyway I don't work as freelancer so don't know how that works in details, but I'm planning to try that also
thanks, correct. my repo is full of piece codes and incomplete programs, for years.
also i've been attaching some course lessons for it, but i am not sure how much it can help me to get programming jobs...
Work on that
What do you mean
because the online jobs are too complicated, but the lessons i got are about the basic concepts, still...
You must study more then, but I suggest you to work on personal projects along with studying that's how you improve drastically 😊
thanks.
You're welcome, if you need other help you can message me
Hello
Can anyone tell me how should I improve my speaking from intermediate to advance (ENGLISH)
can someone help translate a 20 second youtube video?
What language
Listen and speak more
I can't get the environment to speak more
U know any platform online which can help me with it
can anyone speak english well and tell me what is being said in the video? 20 seconds on youtube, video in english bro
You can join discord vocal channels
Great idea💡
Thanks for help✓
@devout shale english
@mortal dove ok
can i write priv bro? @devout shale
Yup
i wrote bro @devout shale
There is an old York. It’s in England.
There's Zealand or Zeeland, near Denmark.
And New Delhi was called Delhi centuries ago.
Sure. Give me the link.
Here or priv? @lavish finch
can you tell me what words are spoken there?
It’s mostly a list of gamer names. Like rollcall. He’s mentioning the people who are playing the game.
Swag, KT, tomato, Smileyface etc
There is sad news or send nu**s? This hear very similar and i'm not sure @lavish finch
Hello
Hello
hello
Hello
Hello
Hi everyone
Hi
Alright
Do you know how to identify a simple, compound or complex sentence?
That's the main problem
i got some notes tho
Send it here
Okay
Do you know what finite and non-finite verbs are?
Yup yup
@tranquil delta
Definitions I don't remember exactly
Yes I do
So the first thing you do is look for the finite verb(s)
Okay
If there's only 1 finite verb, it's a simple sentence
Okay
If there are more than 1 finite verb, it's either a compound or a complex sentence
Now to distinguish between a compound or complex sentence, you need to know about a set of conjunctions/connecting phrases.
Yes I know that
Clauses right?
For a compound sentence, you need to look for a coordinating conjunction.
Common coordinating conjunctions:
FANBOYS- For, And, Neither..nor, But, Either...or, Yet, So
Conjunctive adverbs also join the clauses in a compound sentence:
nevertheless, however, meanwhile, subsequently, etc.
Now that's... a mediocre nickname, in comparison to all the Greek names you kept.
For a complex sentence, you need a subordinating conjunction.
Common subordinatibg conjunctions:
If, Since, Because, As, that, unless, though/although, before, after, once, so that, such that, etc.
Relative pronouns like who, where, what, etc., also connect subordinate clauses.
Phrases like 'as soon as', as long as, in contrast to, etc., connect two subordinate clauses.
I usually pick a name suitable to my pfp
@tranquil delta
..
Thank you so much brother
It’s like
Simple, complex, compound are the only rules that I find complicated
And just didnt practice as much
Well
That's why I'm weak in this topix
Converting to a simple sentence is the hardest
Topic*
That's such an irony isn't it
Complex sentences are very easy to convert into... But converting to a simple sentence ain't that simple

I was wondering
Weren’t you ssc 2022
Irony to it’s highest 😂
Hi everyone
Russia even tho no one ask me
Where is it?
What?
i think he/she is asking for more specific answer like example PART OF ASIA, KOREA , BUSAN something like this
I don't know
ohhhh i seee canary Island from spain 🇪🇸 
Yes,it is.Territory of Spain.Near Africa.
good place but really hot weather ,wildfire
Yes, this summer, very hot,also have a big fire in Tenerife Island...
oooh so sad to hear that 
Lol yes I asked about location
maybe he/she didnt understand the question, definitely not a english person but hes trying

That is important,my english is not perfect,but I try so hard.
youre doing great 👏 dont worry youll get better soon 
Thank you so much.

an* English person 🙂
thanks for correcting me im asian, so im trying g to learn more about my mistakes

articles are very difficult
Just say they bro it’s easier
ohh coooll thankssssss
Np
its makes alot easier 
Ikrrr
The secret,practice every day.
Practice all time...
well help each other 
Lesgooooo
Yessir
It's fine
Hello
Follow us: https://twitter.com/psychchannel
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/PsychChannel
ORIGINAL WEEKLY VIDEO CONTENT COMING YOUR WAY SOON! SUBSCRIBE AND FOLLOW US
A professor discusses the path to become a clinical psychologist with her student.
**Do not copy and reupload this video as your own. Copyright violators will be reported. If...

Angelline
Olá James!
Good morning...
hi
Hello
Am new here
Welcome to the server.
Cool
Please introduce yourself.
Where are you from?
Washington Dc
Hello!
Excellent. Here to discuss something REAL serious?
Hello to you too
What will be the topic of the day?
Let @fair turret decide that.
For example, Oxford University is older than the Aztec Empire.
Anyone a supporter of empiricism?
Uuum yeah
What do you know of empiricism?
you asking me? huh?
Empiricism is a philosophical approach that emphasizes the importance of sensory experience and observation as the foundation of knowledge. According to empiricists, such as John Locke, George Berkeley, and David Hume, knowledge is primarily derived from direct experiences, like what we see, hear, touch, and feel. They believe that our senses are the main sources of information and that our understanding of the world is built upon these sensory perceptions.
Empiricists contrast with rationalists, who argue that reason and innate ideas are more significant in acquiring knowledge. Empiricism played a crucial role in shaping the development of modern science, as it promotes the idea that hypotheses and theories should be tested against real-world observations and experiments. This approach aims to ensure that our understanding of the world is grounded in concrete evidence rather than speculation or mere abstract reasoning.
Exactly. There's my person.
or
bro gave the chatgpt answer
It's the serious chat, so you gotta use your brain here.
So it would seem.
Empiricism is the belief that we gain knowledge by using our senses to interact with the world. This means that we understand things better when we can see, touch, or hear them. In science, this approach is significant because it urges us to verify ideas through actual experiences and observations.
lol
I'd say, empiricism is the philosophical view that stresses upon the adage "seeing is believing".
So, do you experience it? Or precieve it?
But what if i do not see but i believe?
We sense it. Experiencing and perceiving, both come under sensing. The proverb too, has this connotation.
Your thought may be a meme, or you'd have pursued deductive rationalism.
You said seeing is believing, right?
For Example,<> I have never seen Jesus Christ but i believe in Him.
Do you believe in right and wrong? good and bad?
That's a meme.
Everyone has different opinions, and I also have one.
Of course. The thought of God can be considered a huge meme.
So, what you are saying is there isn't an objective right or wrong; Just opinions.
So what is your opinion on that?
Yes. Logic doesn't partialize.
Rape isn't inherently wrong in your world view; neither is mass genocide.
No.
It wouldn't be objectivly wrong, right?
But the thought of rape being wrong has taken the form of a meme.
what
Since, you seem to disagree.
I'll ask you a simple question.
Do you think a man raping a women is objectivly wrong? Or is there nothing inherntly wrong with it?
"A man is indulging in coitus with a woman against her will."
This is a logical statement.
I asked you a question; the question was do you think it's objectivly wrong or not, it's a yes or no question
Whether it's wrong or right, that depends entirely on opinion.
No, opinions are opinions.
I'm not asking for what you prefer or do not prefer.
I'm asking you if you believe it's objectivly wrong or not.
If you do not believe in objective morality; That would imply you beleive a man taking a women by force is neither right or wrong.
In my personal opinion, it's wrong.
Which means you believe it's not objectivly wrong... You don't think the man has violated any natural laws nor rights; given there are none.
You simply do not prefer it; or like for such acts to happen.
But you do not find anything inherntly wrong with it, either.
would this be a correct observation of your stance on morality?
says who?
The majority of people in the world.
But it's logically and biologically neutral.
What authority does humans have to dictate right and wrong? why should anyone go with the majority?
I'm just stating.
That the majority considers raping morally wrong.
You stated raping is morally wrong; Why is it wrong? Because most human beings says it's wrong.
Now i ask you; Who has said morality is decided by majority of humans? Who dictated that?
Morality isn't decided by the majority.
If your beleif is just that there is no morality; and it's just opinions of what people prefer and not prefer for men to do
then say it as it is
In your world view there is no morality; You are simply using a word you don't subscribe to
Many, many, opinions have collectively taken the form of morality.
Define morality
cause you statements do not make any sense
let's first establish what these words mean to you; then we'll go further
Morality, simply put, is a collection of popular opinions on (mainly) culture that dictates what is right and what is wrong.
We'll discuss later. I haven't much time left.
So, essentially a faulty right and wrong; It's just preferences and privilege.
Is the majority of the entire globe? or cultures? or nations?
If the majority in india says women are not allowed to work; and if they do so it's bad.
and the entire world collectively says if you do not allow women to work it's bad
Who is right? or wrong? Or is no one right or wrong?
This entire framework of morality makes no sense; You do not believe in actual morality.
You are saying morality is based on consensus when that differs so much; moreover, that simply remains your opinion which we share with the likes of men like hitler.
You are redefining words in a strange way to present your world view in a fancy way.
If you believe there is no objective morality; that nothing is actually right or wrong; no good and bad. Just what we dictate for society to function, say it as it is; instead of being so contradictory.
I am actually saying it as it is.
Morality differs according to culture, societal status, worldview, socioeconomic development.
No, you are not.
In one sentence you said objective morality does not exist; Then said raping is morally wrong; and morality is decided by the majority; when asked who dictated morality ought to be decided by the majority, you had no answer.
So, then it is not morality.
It is simply privilege.
People do not have rights; they have privileges'.
for me right and wrong are just rules we force on others so we can blame others without looking selfish
or in another way, rules so that the society can continue working, things who are "wrong" does not benefit society
and when we realize it is actually beneficial for society we change the social norms so that that thing is "right"
(not rly good at expressing things hope you understand what i mean)
So it would seem.
You say it as it is; and I respect you for that.
I personally believe human beings have certain natural rights; which dictates right and wrong. Good and bad.
for me a society is formed because as gregarious animals, we tend to group together, so i somehow agree, because i see "society" a part of "human's nature"
Let me sum it up: Objective morality does not exist. Morality is subjective and differs from population to population (even person to person, based on cultures). In my opinion, raping is wrong. You asked for it.
Tf is this....
What you take it for.
Would you like to join a thoughtful discussion?
Taking the time to read and consider what others have written
And then helping the discussion deepen by adding your own relevant ideas
Because what we have here is a good thoughtful discussion.
I would like to add from reading a business communication textbook that morality, ethics, and the law are not on the same page.
Things you do can be not ethical but moral to the people such as sharing secrets wit your friends.
Maybe the person did something wrong with someone else?
So people deserve to know.
Indeed, morality and the law are different
What we really need is to be on the same page or come to a consensus about our values.
What traditions are good? Christmas was and still is a celebrated holiday even though it started off supposedly as a pagan holiday.
What about Martin Luther King Jr. Day? That guy was revolutionary in the way he spoke to people. He was born in Atlanta, GA. He represented his community really well and that influence and his March on Washington and his writing inspired a lot of people to follow him in his footsteps.
It's a federal holiday for a reason man. That guy sacrificed his rights and freedom (akin to Nelson Mandela's actions against apartheid). And as the vanguard of the Civil Rights Movement, he was the face of his community. That was how the Civil Rights Movement gained some steam.

Think of Attack on Titan man.
We haven't seen the ending yet b/c we aren't ready until we see peace.
True peace.
Also there should be episodes being released on a schedule again to be honest, it'd make me happy to write about it and discuss it with people.
What I want people to do when making adaptations is to stay faithful to the source material and know their audience's background.
And also the fandom should stop making themselves look bad.
Quit while you’re ahead
yea lol
I can spoil you what happen at the ending tho
nope
why is rap3 wrong, in your opinion? i agree, just asking for clarification.
It breaches the bodily autonomy of the victim, which is one of the most basic and important rights that anyone has.
so isnt that, by definition, an example of objective morality?
Bodily autonomy?
rap3 is wrong
Subjective it is.
so if someone rap3d a female member of your family, you would have no recourse against them because in their worldview, they subjectively dont see it as wrong
Everything I'm talking about right now is according to my personal opinion.
That would inevitably result in a debate and an argumentum ad populum.
so if enough people say rap3 isnt wrong, then it isnt? what about human trafficking? what about child rap3? what about slavery? what about murder? what about stealing?
Well I think rape is wrong or not depends on what the victim feels about it, and rape every victim feels it's very bad so it's bad, it never depends on what the majority says
So this topic is still incomplete?
you should be able to look around and see that this is not the case around the world. and one can try to maintain a consistent position in subjectivity, but when it hits you and someone comes to your home and claims it as their own, you arent just going to walk away. you will make an appeal outside of your subjectivity to defend your objective ownership of your home.
That's a fallacy, but it may be so, according to Goebbels. Popular opinion can change morality.
murder has and will always be wrong
@pallid surge Hi man, before i start explaning further, I want to ask why you want to know the defination and all other stuff?
Is it to prove me wrong, or is it to understand more about Vedant and philiosphy of ancient India?
or is it just to pass the time?
please define your 'wrong'
its not my wrong
then whose is it?
Good evening!
right and wrong exist outside of us. thats objective morality, friend.
and how would you prove this statement?
if I claim that objective morality does not exist
Following
Would you like to elaborate on what objective ownership is?
its not for me to prove anymore than gravity. it just is.
am i right that you are a materialistic naturalist?
what is this term?
It’s the term you used
where?
You spoke of objective ownership
i said objective morality...
Here
ah
“You will… defend your objective ownership of your home”
so, as far as I'm concerned, you declare that something is the way it is and expect it to be true? I don't associate myself with any philosophical beliefs, as of now
the truth outside of my words and the intruders words that my home is mine
we all have presuppositions, friend
Try not to push on people
ive not pushed anything
talk about our presuppositions please, by all means
yet realising that we do and trying to base them instead of asserting it as a fact are two different things
Try talking to the whole group
its all apart of having a conversation like this
I want both of you to try talking to the whole group
when two people debate, they talk to each other in earshot of those in the audience, who are free to insert comments/questions
If you don’t mind
I would naturally do that if I knew how to
Are you willing to try something slightly different?
Talking to the audience in earshot of the person who disagrees with you.
im not a preacher
And looking for the people who agree with you
I’m not asking you to preach or be a preacher
It's amazing that I, started all this with just a question on empiricism, to familiarize a guy with the serious chat.
See how much you can accomplish when you’re serious nocturnal?
with respect, i cant say that im too interested in talking to these people that agree with me... thats kinda echo chamberish
With all due respect, it’s exactly not an echo chamber, you just don’t know it yet.
Also, with respect, responsibility and power to moderate this channel has been vested in me by the powers that be.
and along with that I have a desire to support conversations which are constructive
We can discuss what a constructive conversation is and you’re welcome to disagree with me
The reason it’s not an echo chamber…
moderate doesnt mean dictate
Is because people are welcome to disagree just not at the same time as another is presenting their views.
well to some extent moderate requires me to dictate.
Requires may be the wrong word. I see the value in establishing boundaries.
I'm the carrier of seemingly controversial opinions.
We’ll get to you soon enough, nocturnal.
cool. well, enjoy doing that.
sorry folks, we cant have a normal discussion. James is dictator of the channel and its his way or the highway.
i'll take the highway. ✌️
I am proposing very specific guidelines for the discussion of topics in which people disagree. I can see that you’re not willing to join with me on the guidelines I am using. That’s fine.
It’s true that I’m not allowing a normal discussion, if by normal discussion you mean pushing on people to talk.
My guidelines are specifically designed to facilitate discussions between disagreeing parties so as not to create an echo chamber.
Echo chambers are created by eliminating the opposing subgroup or faction in a discussion.
There are a number of ways to do that.
One is to silence the opponent.
Back to you.
Could you tell me what I said?
Hi
You are saying that it's ok for CmdrViper not to follow the guidelines you are proposing.
You do step in if someone pushes someone else to talk.
No
I'm saying that I plan to intervene when the debate begins to move in a direction that I consider to be problematic.
And one thing I see as problematic is pushing on other participants.
Attempting to apply pressure directly to a specific person to speak or change their mind.
I'm saying that it's fine to disagree, and to disagree by appealing to the group as a whole, not to someone with an opposing view.
You are setting boundaries for this channel if you see the debate being conducted in an unhealthy way.
following
It's ok to disagree and seek agreement within all participants.
It's not ok to put pressure on an individual who has an opposing opinion.
I'm not prohibiting all direct interaction between people of differing viewpoints. But I'm watching those very carefully and when possible, putting some space between them so that the views can rise to the surface and personal issues can be put aside.
I'm planning to be here for another 30min.
In cases where you'd like to put pressure on a specific person, I'm inviting you to instead put pressure onto me or to appeal to the channel collectively.
Otherwise it's more likely to move away from the topic and towards personal animus.
I agree with James.
Having debate means sharing and exchanging the knowledge
rather then asking other person illogical questions and showing dominance.
People here debate to feed their ego (that they know better and you are the dumb or your values and views on life are inferior)
having disagreement is totally different from insulting someone else point of view on things.
Thank you for your summary, Neli.
I support this kind of debate and am glad that James is maintaining this boundary.
I find that for me the biggest problem with keeping such a boundary in a debate on a topic I care for is the feelings that come up.
(leaving)
The feelings that come up are likely not an issue.
More likely its the reaction to the feelings that creates difficulties.
When people disagree, it's natural to have some feeling, frustration or curiosity or whatever.
murderous hatred
easy cowboy
it can go to extremes for me
The more extreme, the less likely it has to do with the surrounding context.
You can ask yourself how it is that you're managing to make something so big out of something so small.
Disagreements come in all sizes.
If you're finding that your first response to any disagreement is murder, 99% of that reaction is whatever history you are carrying in.
Tell me what I said
You are saying that extreme emotions in a disagreement are not because of what just happened but because of experiencing disagreement over a long period of time?
No
You used the term murderous
that's not an emotion or a feeling
it's a frame or idea
one with a very specific charge
wanting to eliminate another opinion
yes, eliminating the opinion via eliminating the person who defends it
No
the opinion will still exist
No
Do you notice that you have stopped trying to tell me what I said
and have instead starting pushing on me?
I agree that I have stopped trying to summarize what you said.
When did you notice that?
I don't perceive myself as pushing on you.
here
Let's wrap this up for the time being
I found it hard to grasp the concept of "murderous hatred" not being a feeling. I got frustrated with trying to understand a new idea.
ok
I don't see a reason to qualify our emotions with charged adjectives like "murderous"
if we're talking about the feeling and not the idea
Bye, good talking with all of you.
“In Kali-yuga, wealth alone will be considered the sign of a man’s good birth, proper behavior and fine qualities. And law and justice will be applied only on the basis of one’s power. Men and women will live together merely because of superficial attraction, and success in business will depend on deceit. Womanliness and manliness will be judged according to one’s expertise in sex, and a man will be known as a brāhmaṇa just by his wearing a thread. A person’s spiritual position will be ascertained merely according to external symbols, and on that same basis people will change from one spiritual order to the next. A person’s propriety will be seriously questioned if he does not earn a good living. And one who is very clever at juggling words will be considered a learned scholar."
how is all?
I agree, they are hypocrites.
Hi everyone
Hi klaus
Hi
Hi
Eisan, I'd like to understand what you wrote.
everyone plays by their own rules
and the weak will lose this game
we and this earth are insignificant
no different from animals
those who push will be ignored
What's the game?
Life? This conversation?
You also express a concern for honesty
We are very different of other animals,more intelligent,but more bad...
Humans have a unique intelligence, just as many animals do.
More intelligent or less intelligent requires a more specific definition of intelligence.
Likewise, good and bad are distinct from intelligence. It's possible to be intelligent and bad, or unintelligent and good.
(leaving)
No.
Hi Nocturnal
I don't quite understand you again, Eisan.
Intelligence has nothing to do with what, exactly?
I think the ability to plan may be relevant in distinguishing the different kinds of intelligence present in different species.
But I don't quite follow the wagon analogy. What is meant to be separated from what?
I'd think that eisan compares thoughts to train wagons.
Thoughts of animals would be not connected through logical reasoning.
Since Eisan is not here to tell us, would you like to share your own thoughts?
I'm also curious about what eisan wants to tell us.
I see you're typing for about 5 min Neli
Eisan, the way I understand the first paragraph, "Exert pressure?...", is that you are talking about life in general.
If someone has an opposing opinion, in particular someone without power they won't be able to find support. A majority of people struggles to understand the perspective of a minority. And others just want to get rid of the uncomfortable opinions.
Yes. And I am also leaving soon.
Approaching my limit of 10pm for sleeping time.
ok
I enjoy reading the conversations here
Do you know what you enjoy about it?
I like the new concepts I learn.
Morality as a collection of opinions
Distinct from moral
Thinking about what happens in the world
The quality of conversations in this channel has been very high.
In my opinion, at least.
The kinds of conversations I'd like to be a part of.
Same
Covering a range of topics and including a range of participants
getting fairly deep and sophisticated at times
even without me being here
Yes indeed
I noticed that I usually prefer reading conversations with you participating. And I don't mind you being absent here.
I enjoy being here
Bye James
Bye, I'll leave too.
to answer you this:
What reality are you talking about? What does "superintelligent" mean? You said there was nothing you could do about it, but then how do you explain your behavior? ask yourself what am I doing? focus on being crushed, crushed you will be Your Will is that intensely powerful
I know that you're referring to the principle of mentalism
so what is it that you're trying to convey
I've understood that what you're saying is humans live in this deplorable state (like any other animal) because they don't realize their true power
I don't know if I got you wrong
I don't think is only endowed to us per se, because I believe that there must be superior beings that also have a "supermind" superior than ours
is it because they want and is their conscious will , or is it because they're deceived to do so
and in their blindness they simply comply
By entities who feed from chaos and misery
Hello friend! Word of advice from a beginner Colombian English speaker: Native speakers never use the word "whom" outside of a formal academic setting! Cheers!
To me conscious means to act in an analytical reflective way in accordance to ones beliefs, beliefs that also had to be previously questioned by oneself
What am I doing? Dying like everyone else, spending my days in insignificant ways
Haaaaa! Caught teaching magic for kids! 🤣
Jk
When you confront me with that question, I have to give you the reason, I'm like everyone else
Like any other human, who spends his days chasing the wind, waiting to die like a dog

I don't know what it is that I want to say, you confront me with questions and I give you answers of why I think that we are not like any other animal, yet I can not explain why we choose to act like them, instead of exercising our will
which I know to be extremely powerful
because when you say why I have to point inwards
Ok so what can be done
We do not "choose" to act like them, we are bound to our instincts. Your argument is flawed from the start because there is no "us" and "them", we ARE them.
I knew it will end like this 😭
I disagree with you, I don't believe that we are mere animals of instinct
There is no disagreeing with that, it is a fact
no, is just that I knew you wouldn't give me an answer, it's always like that, "go search the answer"
you're seeing this through a materialist prism, I don't share your view
Are you Orthodox?
I can't say so, I have flaws in my reasoning because I'm not perfect, I don't exalt man for being subjective we are just another link in the chain, it just so happens that we have the ability of abstract thinking, which to me is already a differential factor
See you, thank you too
Science says that reality depends on our perception of things
So, what is truly real?
I've read in internet that the way we see things influence on our mood and our position in life but I consider this more phycological than anything else
(on the internet — let me know if you mind corrections)
Yes, I do. Thank you!!
Yes you do?
"Yes I mind corrections" = I mind that you're correcting me, don't correct me. "No I don't mind corrections" = You can totally correct me!
Does it?
The second option. "No I don't mind corrections" = You can totally correct me!"
Some people yeah
Perception is often deceptive
Yes, that is what he was just saying
Which is exactly why scientific minded people interogate what they perceive
And that's a tangent
A tangent from what?
Idk. We should probably clear up space for the non-native people here or there's no point to the server
Alright, fine
Yes, but is there something that no depends on our perception? Mathematics, maybe?
You believe something is stopping the non native speakers from participating?
If we get into an argument, yeah it's just us two idiots yapping back and forth
And nobody else cares about it
Speak for yourself
But I think most non natives would like to talk to native speakers here.
Rather than that they remain silent.
That's what they say, overwhelmingly
Really? I'm surprised you know, talking over them so much
I am an expert
But since you asked, he was talking about "what is real," and then he turned it to "everything outside of us is not real because it's different for everyone" and the part where you jumped in said that scientific-minded people have minds that continuously assess what they're looking at to make sure it fits in the reality that they're studying. They're two different topics altogether
In which the latter has a reality that everyone agrees upon, and one makes sure that what they have fits in that
And the former is about how reality is extremely personal and there is no shared reality, or, shared experience of reality
So you do think it was a tangent after all
Yes... I wouldn't have said so if I didn't
Well, I asked and you said you didn't know what the topic was.
I backed down on it because, look, we're two idiots arguing with each other and nobody else has been entertained by it
I'm not arguing
If you were such an expert you'd know that "idk" is one way of backing down and moving forward
I'm genuinely interested in what you're talking about.
And I agree that I am being a pain
I wouldn't engage in this manner in all the channels in this server, but this is one channel it works.
Hard agree
Discussions tend to be highly sophisticated, including both natives and learners.
what are you arguing about
I asked about what is real
The noun of "to perceive"
"Our perception of reality" = What reality looks, feels, tastes, etc. like to us
What confuses you about it
In its best moments, yes
Where we get to be our most pretentious without being slapped
I mean, science says the reality of oneself depends on the perceptions you have, so you've got a reality different from others
You'll get there! Keep at it :)
Doesn't that concern you?
Why?
It's worked so far
"Thanks bud" sounds aggressive
Because of the "bud"
Blahboo, mind if I ask you some questions?
Sure, but I may not answer all of them depending on how much info I feel they reveal
Still kinda the same thing
Sure, let's give it a try.
You're a native speaker. Did you join this server out of curiosity? A desire to teach English?
No
I have tutored English for a long time for free as a hobby
Great. To esl students?
As far as I'm aware
You don't know if your students were esl?
Okay, there's a slight difference between the two. "Thanks buddy" can be friendly, but it can also be patronizing. "Thanks bud" can be friendly, but it can also be both patronizing and aggressive. It really depends on the tone of voice
I'm fine with sharing this information because it's been done in other parts of the internet. I've never met anyone irl
Oh, you've been tutoring online. I see.
I'm telling you because I know what you mean, I just don't want someone else to draw the wrong conclusion if they don't
What's a long time?
Why does it matter to you?
You don't want to say, no problem.
I don't think I could track it easily anyway
I'm really just genuinely curious. I work with English teachers, new, old, native, non native.
I like supporting English teachers.
Always an important job!
I teach here as a volunteer. But I also teach English full time.

I started teaching English in 2002 in China.
China, there is a country I'd like to meet one day!
Angelline, I heard that you like the bad boys, honey. Is that true?
Wut
Inside joke, sorry
It's better than I ever even knew... they said that the world is built for two... 😹
Lyric from a song she was just singing.
Brand new album 'Lust for Life' out now. Listen: https://lana.lnk.to/LFLaID
Lana Del Rey - Video Games (Official Music Video)
Sign up for updates: http://smarturl.it/LanaDelRey.News
Follow Lana Del Rey:
http://www.instagram.com/lanadelrey
http://www.facebook.com/lanadelrey
http://www.twitter.com/lanadelrey
http://lanadelrey.tumblr.com
http://...
Thanks for being there listening!! 🥰
Yesn't
You look like Martin Wallström
Even before Skype. I was using a program called "You See Me"
CU-SeeMe is an Internet videoconferencing client. CU-SeeMe can make point to point video calls without a server or make multi-point calls through server software first called a "reflector" and later called a "conference server" or Multipoint Control Unit (MCU). Later commercial versions of CU-SeeMe could also make point-to-point or multi-point c...
I liked MSN
It was similar to Discord?
OMG Very 2000's aesthetics, LOL
My childhood
Is Discord futuristic enough for you?

Gather round the computer, children, let grandpa tell you a story...
😂
At that time, youtube was just people making videos of themselves talking.
Yeah I remember this time.
Like I would post a video of myself saying "I like philosophy and blah blah blah."
And someone would post a video response
And the chains would go on forever
They got rid of that feature
I don't have children
I remember in 2011 I was very afraid to do a channel.
There were a lot of haters, lol
Today is more chill, I guess.
personal much?
What?
I think there were fewer haters then.
yes
The animus on the internet now is just brutal.
Again, it's only philisophical in its best moments
Now we're making it nostalgic.
Somethign about perception of reality oooo-oo-oooo-oooo
Is anything of this real?
The difference between being and seeming is an age old philosophic distinction.
No
Are you succeeding?
Why? 🤔
What's philosophical about saying you want it to be "non"?
Well, I don't get it. But maybe someone else does.
We lose you @thorny steeple ?
ok, that's clearer
You're a nihilist. You don't believe in nothin'.

I dunno, you're the nihilist
Hay is for horses.
מתחכם
There wasn't a single word that worked well in English so I relied on something else
Blah has moved to general. Shall we join him there?

I am
her
I didn't say that I didn't know the word in English. I said that English didn't properly express what I wanted to express, and another language did
America
Angelline, where'd you go?
I'll take a nap! I'll remember to type leaving nxt time, lol
You ask me to explain nicely
I would love that
Ok
I will call it a night. Have a good night everyone.
Good night everyoneee
The word חכם means "smart." To מתחכם means to pretend you're smarter than you are (and in Hebrew, the present tense can also be the person doing it. For example, עובד, "he works," can also be "a worker"). I could've used "pretentious," but I felt that this didn't fit well enough. Someone can be exactly as smart as they say they are and still be pretentioius
He said "Hay is for horses," which means, "Don't say hey because it's 'too colloquial'" or whatever, so I called him someone who pretends to be smarter than he is
You've taken it, I assume?
Don't call me uncle, cause that's rude.
And this is not what I meant.
Then I misunderstood
Also, I'm very smart.
I don't doubt it
Do you learning Hebrew?@crisp lake
But when I translated the word, google gave me "joking" not "smart". And I was joking.
Now I'm leaving.
You can find a more thorough breakdown of the word here: https://www.pealim.com/search/?q=מתחכם
It was just a response to one sentence. Don't take it too hard
Yeah!
(also, Are you learning Hebrew)
Sorry, my grammar is bruh nevermind.
Can I ask you something
Do you think the origin of the word alpha comes from Hebrew or ancient Greek?
No idea, I'm not an etymologist, sorry
I'm asking this cause ancient greek and Hebrew very impressed eachother ig
Thanks for answer.
But this might be helpful: https://www.etymonline.com/word/alpha#etymonline_v_26140
Pinging you since you may have stopped looking
Aw, cute!
Aleph*
Make sense
But again, no language exists in a vacuum, Phonecian also played a hand as well
That's mean, the name come from Anatolia probably
What's mean
Today I learned that referencing the Phonecians is considered mean.
It was sarcasm
leilif has a point.
Just one minute. I didn't know the considered means
Let
Considered means take into account right?
yes
My friend said that it had a different meaning in the sentence you used. i didn't understand what it means . is this a pattern?
I mean, not really, I think it just becomes adjective-like instead
considered means like you have taken it into account and thought abt it
So, instead of someone considering something, it is considered by someone
consider means you will think abt it and considering means your are thinking about it
"This is considered rude" can be reordered to say "People consider this to be rude"
@thorny steeple Does that clarify or is there something else about it?
It's okay, thanks for information 
"It's okay" or you understand it?
I'm just trying to understand this sentence
Today I learned that referencing the Phonecians is considered mean.*
What's your native language?
Turkish
I put it into a translator and got "Bugün öğrendim ki, Fonecilere atıfta bulunmak kaba olarak kabul edilir."
Maybe that will clarify something?
Oh, it says there, it is considered rude to refer to the Phoenicians*
But in your first sentence don't have "rude" word 
It expresses the same thing, it just rearranges the word order (which is Turkish's whole big thing)
I see I see thanks for answer
Ah okay, the problem was "the mean" word. Okay okay. The pattern is this one
Yeah I'm clearly understand rn
Cause I remember the be mean, meaning

F. It's almost 5:30 am and bruh
My brain is giving error
Btw where are you from
Cause I didn't sleep
Beautiful country
Same here, I have insomnia
And it's getting worse
I don't think so, cause I think it will be okay when I enter any job
I hope so
How old are you
Make sense, I'm 28.
I have kids and waiting my mother's entire
Thank you so much Dave 
😏
Wagwan mandem
Pretty sure it comes from the ancient Greek.
Speaking of the Phoenicians, they are some of the first Greeks to use written language around 1000 BC.
Using symbols taken from Egyptian hieroglyphics.
Phoenicians were Greeks?
I was reading a book today, and I’m pretty sure it referred to them as Greeks, but I see now they were not.
Ohhh , thank you so much. i think it comes from greek and it is fascinating to me that such an old word lives on in many languages until today.
Yep, kinda, actually they are Mediterranean-anatolian
Phoenicians are hypothesised to have been from North Africa and/or Anatolia, near modern-day Lebanon. Tyre used to be their trade capital.
You're a mom and people asks why don't you work, omg! Isn't it work enough?! 😅
My mom is a high school teacher, though!
But you're big kid already.
She had already become a teacher before I was born.
And my father an officer.
Hi
Hello, sir
A joke, lol
I'm married with @cursive bobcat now.
And I was supposed to be sleeping
Instead I'm cooking.
You have insomnia, don't you
What's the subject here?
like me
leaving, my dinner is ready
alright
though 3am seems a bit late for dinner
I'm doing what normal people do at 2am
I'm having a midnight snack
a little mozerella cheese, some sliced salami
a wedge of lime
you know, like normal people
I want to have some
*Mozzarella
Is that all you have to say for yourself, Nocturnal?
Nearly.
hello everyone, I am new here
hi
how are you
hi im a new too
i would like to talk with someone in English because i want to speak english better
is anyone interested?
Where are you from?
im from italy
nevermind them
ohhh not long ago i travel in italy
it's so hot in italy
hi
hi
i want to speak english
then speak english
ok but how should i shart fist step of every day
Do you read English?
ok
do you mean how should i start learning english more very day?
I usually read some English novels
then yeah you should read some books they help build vocabulary
ok bro
or you could just watch youtube in english
ok
or make anything you use alot in english which could help
ok
wher are u from
im indian but was born in america
ok
what about you?
i am from india maharastra
oh man im there right now for vacation
but i cant speak english thas way i found this server
where
near mumbai
i am from shegaon vidharbh
you seem pretty good to me right now
i have no clue where that is but nice
what is your real name
Tu,ith,Kay,karu,rahila
hahaha

wgho are u
who are u
I'm nerd
ok
Bro, it's vidharbh's Marathi accent
yes
Is there synonyms for (as it has) I need precise word
🧐
uh can you use it in a sentance
depending on the context it would be a diffrent word
yup
"All writing is a campaign against cliche. Not just cliches of the pen but cliches of the mind and cliches of the heart." ― Martin Amis
You are from there too?
Yes, It's not my mother language but I live in that state
Oh okay,
?define compact
Definition 1 (adjective): briefly giving the gist of something
Definition 2 (noun): a signed written agreement between two or more parties (nations) to perform some action
Definition 3 (noun): a small cosmetics case with a mirror; to be carried in a woman's purse
Other definitions can be found here
No animal can think as we do
Mate at this point your Socratic Questioning is just you in denial and it's becoming annoying, can animals do reflexive thinking can an animal use language to reflect about itself or distant objects can they do extensive contemplation of thoughts
I won't debate anymore because as I said excessive Socratic Questioning doesn't bring anything to our discussion, and is just pointlessly running in circles, have a good one.
Is not that I'm using terms I can not explain is that you want me to explain everything I say deviating from the main argument, do I really need to explain why animals don't think like humans? I am the one wasting my time having to explain to you such basic concepts
Play nice
No personal attacks
Try not to push on others to do work or talk.
Invite others but don’t force them.
Academics make do.
hi
Except humans are animals, so we think like animals.
When we get hungry or thirsty we seek food & water. When we are faced with danger our "fight or flight" instinct takes over. We have an innate drive defend our territory, our resources, and our young. When humans are old enough the instinct to seek a mate practically takes over the brain.
Our behaviors are mirrored throughout the animal kingdom. Even what you believe to be our most complex behaviors can be seen in creatures such as Birds, Elephants, Primates, Porpoises, etc... Did you know that some groups of chimpanzees have religions? And that they wage war on each other? Many species of primate and porpoise have developed communication through language, and a cool fact is that some monkeys have learned to lie to one another to get what they want (which is VERY complex behavior). Cats and Dogs even have dreams & nightmares.
Yes, we are different. Every species differs from each other in many ways, but that does not make them more or less animal. An ant is still an animal in the same way a cat or a fish is, and these species could not be more different from one another.
What is your english level

