denoise test

[vivid parrot]

I couldnt send it in messages because the file size
The horse looks to be out of focus by a lot, and the rosette a little bit
The orion already had denoise to it, but it might look a little cleaner now
@edgy remnant

also the rosettes background is clipped

little too black

[edgy remnant]

Cant say im a fan tbh

Then again thats usually a good thing for AP since topaz doesnt mix well at all

Just gonna stick to my graxpert denoise

Though my curiosity has been scratched

[vivid parrot]

I dont think any software can bring out out of focus details though but eh

maybe blur x can

expensive though

[edgy remnant]

Honestly my data set for flame was poor after things started going wrong

[vivid parrot]

topaz is too only get rid of the noise, but if you want sharp contrasty images i think blurx will be good

there is a thread here in this processing channel where you can give the file for your data

theyll process it for you

[edgy remnant]

Yes I make use of it all the time

[stark quest]

Hey @vivid parrot aint it a deconv test?

cuz like

ur talking abt the focus of the images not how moisy they are

and the images seen to have passed trough some strong deconv

[vivid parrot]

no, it was a topaz denoise test on adams data.
I was just saying it was out of focus, and no amount of denoise software will bring back data that's out of focus not necessarily lost behind noise if thats what you mean by deconv

[stark quest]

ahh