#Should i buy an svbony sv503 80ed for Astrophotography on a low budget?
602 messages ยท Page 1 of 1 (latest)
Whatโs the budget, what mount and camera do you own
Planning on buying a star Adventurer gti, with an zwo asi585mc color camera, budget ~โฌ2.000
The 80mm is too large then
Because of the weight, or the tracking capabilities of the star Adventurer gti?
Svbony has a 70 mm quadruplet that is similar to the Askar 71F.
So the 80mm is to heavy then?
Imo too much focal length, other than the weight
I wouldn't personally go over 60mm in diameter
Yea but the focal length is just what i was searching for. I already have a seestar s30, and wanted something that has more aputure, and more focal length, because the wide stuff (Andromeda, pleiades, North America Nebula...) are things I can already do with my seestar
Gotta change the mount then, sagti + medium-long focal and 585 isn't a great combination
Because of mount wobble, or the weight of the whole telescope rig on the sagti, or is the tracking just not superior enough on the sagti
The mount itself isn't amazing on its own, adding a heavy-ish scope won't help and using a sensor with small pixels will require more accurate guiding
And if i go for the svbony sv503 70ed, with an asi585mc color (or the air version with built in autoguiding) and a guiding system. Would that be perfect or still to heavy/zoomed in?
Still both too heavy and zoomed in
Imo at least
What would your pixel scale be with the 70mm?
What about a second hand Redcat 51
The pixelscale for the svbony 70ed, and asi585mc color is right around 1.42 arcsec/pixel
Redcat 51 is an option, but i want to capture small things, sinds i can already do widefield photography with my Seestar s30
Your mount will be the limiting factor for deeper images.
What do you mean by that? (Too much backlash, limiting weight capabilities)
Overall, as you go up in focal length you'll need a mount with higher payload capacity, better tracking, etc. You're better off investing in a higher capacity mount first before a longer focal length OTA
So 420mm with asi585mc color is too zoomed in then?
Rather than too zoomed in, it's too much for the sagti
I use an Askar 65PHQ + 585 on a GTi, but itโs really pushing the limits of the mount
I have my guide settings mostly figured out by now and it works well enough for me but you gotta know what youโre doing
Every mount is different too, even between the same kinds of mounts have very slight differences. Yours wonโt perform the exact same as anyone elseโs, at least thatโs unlikely
As in what works for your guiding wonโt be the exact same as someone else
But anyways yes getting a better mount with more payload is important to do before longer focal length
I had around the same budget and just bought my rig if your interested
Yeah of course! Show me what you got!
And how heavy is your rig?
Comes out to about 7.5lbs
Main scope, 585, guide scope and cam
I donโt have any sort of mini pc on there itโs just those
I got a SW 130PDS, EQ5 mount + OnStep goto Kit, Baader MPCC coma corrector and a Touptek [idk how to spell it] 585 cooled color cam
Pretty much exactly 1.8k
Oh no way that 80mm scope is going to be in the weight limit of the skywatcher star Adventurer gti
And is the GOTO kit precise?
Havent recieved it yet but alot of people on the server use it so i assume it is
Your setup sounds really cool, but I'm not really into Newtonians, the smallest size I can get from a good brand is 8 inches, and that's just too big for me. I plan on traveling with my setup, so a newton is probably not going to be it
Nope, bought everything new
Hm, got ya. But the EQ5 and OnStep is definately a good shout. Also refrain from ZWO where possible
Alright, il do a bit of research on that eq 5 mount. Thanks! Which brand was your eq5? Skywatcher?
yep, Skywatcher EQ5
Alright, the skywatcher gti also has a pack where you can get a telescope with te gti, i believe it's a skywatcher 60mm with a focal length of 400mm. Would that be an option?
depends what you wanna do with it and what telescope
The telescope is an skywatcher evolux 60/400
Wanna do deep sky imaging with high focal length, but since thats not really an option with the skywatcher star Adventurer gti i will probably do wider field, or look into that eq 5 mount
i got told that the Evolux series isnt amazing
I still think a shorter focal length less than 400mm would be a better choice if you go with the gti
So if you get a gti then go with a redcat or sqa55
But if you go with a larger mount like that eq5 then by all means go long
(EQ5 + Onstep is robably cheaper than the GTI btw)
And if i go for the eq5, can i probably put an 102mm refractor, or is that to large for this mount?
For me it's about the same price
How heavy is it?
The ota with tube rings is about 5.7 kilos or 12-13 pounds
But wit asiair mini and camera and accesoires it wil probably be right around 6 kilos
If the weight is fine, the 102ed is even better than the 80ed. Pop on my canon 200d apsc sensor and you have a relatively wide field
Pop on the main imaging sensor (asi585) and you got a nice zoomed in shot
I have a redcat 51 and I can take maximum 3m subexposures guided with excellent PA and a pixel scale of about 4" pp
So I completely agree with you
My mount is the weak point of my whole setup
Yes, but I was not planning on doing 3 minute subs, with an 62mm scope, i was planning on max 60,90sec
60mm will be fine
80mm getting problematic
I also opened mine up and realised that the worm gear inside is plastic
So imo the star adventurer GTI shouldn't be overloaded for imaging
I would imagine that the higher load you put on the more it will wear out
I'm doing imaging rn I'll show you pics of my guide graph
My rig combined is like 2.7kg
Pushing 3 I think with some new accessories i put on
Alot of periodic error as well
Maybe it's just my copy
I've seen people really overload their gti's with like 6 inch newts and stuff
So maybe they just got lucky with good copies
Imo something in 250-350mm fl will be good match
Preferably in the lower end
Of that range
Another wierd moment of periodic error
Have a look at the skywatcher eqal55i
Just looked rn and there's no stock anywhere
For nebulae that's the kind of exposure time you want to do
What? 3 mins or 60-90sec?
Looking at that graph, there are some hefty spikes
So does anyone know any EQ mount that can support at least 5-8kg (sagti can't cope this load) that is pretty cheap (like I don't wanna spend all of my 2000/2500โฌ budget on an am3)
Ragdoll 17 
The base model is 1300$ rn
Or my umi17 
Hahah what do you like so much about the ragdoll 17 opposed to lets say like an am5
big update guys
Changed the settings on phd2 Dec guiding algorithms to hysteresis and now I'm getting sub arcsecond
more expensive and less easy to use than OnStep
No big jump so far
So maybe the problem was me and not the mount
from the tutorials ive watched its easy
Depends what kind of mount ur putting it on
If you are planning on upgrading a non goto mount by adding smth like NEMA 17 motors and onstep
Then there are kits but I still wouldn't recommend it unless you have worked with building your own electronic systems before
Nahhh, OnStep is legit like 5 screws
What Abt stepper drivers
Huge pain in the bum getting the right drivers
And calibration for the motors
Idk I have no experience I can't be talking
With onstel specifically
Price mostly, better support, FRAM
its plug and Play
You don't really have to build anything tho
I've had a huge building a mount obsession for a long time
legit download ASCOM and use it with NINA
You r bringing me closer to it
https://www.terransindustry.com/collections/allproduct/products/skywatcher-eq5?variant=42553929826497
This is what i got myself
SPECIFICATIONS Automatic nightscape tracking platform: Motorized tracking platform perfect for capturing incredible detail of the Milky Way, eclipses and other astronomical objects. Automatically locates and tracks objects for you. Tracking Rates Sidereal, Solar and Lunar. Double motor drive provides regulated sidereal
Also for buying any eq goto mount, aren't the juwei 14 mounts litrelly like the cheapest on the market
This is super cheap as well
exactly, payed like 600 for this + and EQ5
So is the onstep upgrade kit (like the terran) easy to install like just pop in a few screws and you're done, or do you need to pry open the whole mount?
And does it work with asiair mini?
nope, legit just a few screws and thats it
no clue but why use an ASIAir anyways?
So I can control everything from my phone, and process it later on my computer
Also
When I'm on vacation I don't feel like bringing my laptop so il store all my subs on an drive or an sd card and process it later when I'm back home
Good news
Niceeeee
And if you pop in an onstep kit, do you need to calibrate it or something like that?
Or does it just work out of the box
just works from what ive seen. if you wait a week or 2 i can give you a first hand review
Thanks, I'll be happy to hear from you
there are plenty of users with that onstep kit here, it's pretty much plug and play
my mount works on the same platform
Nice to know
Imo getting an eq5 or similar and then upgrading it will give you much better raw performance than a swsa gti
Why not a cheap harmonic mount? There are some that are not much more expensive than the sa gti.
Juwei 17 for example
I don't like them because there's 0 support after purchase, but they're as valid as the others otherwise
maybe a bit less QC and less accurate strain wave gears but still fine
their juwei 14 is interesting, 800โฌ for am3 like payload
Yes but with mounts like am3 you get good customer support, and you can look things up online, bc so much people have a mount like an am3, but for those Chinese mounts you dont get those things
zwo customer support isn't that good, it's full of stories of people getting defective AM3/5 mounts who had to go through hell and back to get a replacement or that just got told to eat shit
it's kinda why I suggest mostly proxisky mounts, they're always there to help and have already replaced several stolen stuff or mounts at no cost for the buyer
Oh thats a shame on zwo. I thought their customer service was always top notch
They're very apple like in their customer service
ZWO is basically the apple of astro
Get a sv555 54mm ๐
Got a 585 aswell
Yo our rigs are practically the same
Why should i get an sv555? Or did you mean "got a sv555 54mm"?
The Problem is with ur Sensor
You Can only Shoot small stuff with the Scope you want
Yeah that's kinda the plan
Was planning on buying the star Adventurer gti or a skywatcher eq5 with onstep kit
If youre on a budget I wouldn't get ZWO in the first place
Are there any other cameras that work with asiair then?
If he can spend 2k he can get a proxisky ragdoll
Why do you want asiair?
Get stellavita
๐
So I can control everything from phone
StellaVita Not asiair
ToupTek Stellavita or you just get a minipc + cygnus app
Why stellavita
literally just an asiair but compatible with basically everything
- you actually get proper customer service
But does stellavita have a good reputation
Got StellaVita Myself
Itโs new
Ofc not
But it works
โฆ
if you are worried about the bad start it had
Im using it for a year almost
its no longer that bad
still a few issues but way better than the asiair in terms of budgetting
you could also just do minipc + nina
with the cygnus app
Nah I want a plug and play system
Then stellavita
I have basically two left hands
Nina is not plug n play
Thats just the mobile app
You still need a pc with everything on and configured right
Unlike on the sv
honestly it depends on what you want, if you really want plug and play then do SV
tbh in some areas the price of a 585MC pro is the price of the ToupTek ATR585M Kit (with everythin u need for mono)
I have a seestar now
Get the sv555
Why sv555
For a mount
the Uranus-C is better imo
Star adventurer gti
What kind of advice is that
the GTI is absolute ass
EQ5 + Onstep all the way
If he wants to spend that much money on a mount sure
Yeah but it's kinda bulky isn'it
โฆ.
The thing iwth the GTI is
it has a terrible payload and for 700 bucks its INSANELY bad
Used 400โฌ
Alright
Evenfor 400 you barely think you didnt get ripped off
Eq5 is about same price here in the Netherlands
If you want a non-bulky one go with the Juwei 14
Its a harmonic mount with the payload of an HEQ5
But is it solid
Yes
And doesnt weigh 17 kilos like the heq5
Alright but i dont wanna spend money on a thing from China that does t work (i know everything comes from China but you get the point)
tbh the HEQ5 aint that heavy. i carry it in and out of the house completely assembled with counterweights every time
I can assure you juwei mounts are very functional and VERY good.
Try to be mobile with the heq5
I live near b2 and in a b4
Thats why i bought the ragdoll 17 pro with their carbon tripod
So touptek camera, stellavita, and telescope
Link to juwei-14: https://s.click.aliexpress.com/e/_oni7dDu
Use code: IFPWN1KM
For an extra $100 off $779+ Spend. (Valid until 1st of August 2025)
For cashback: https://www.topcashback.co.uk/ref/arsenalsgooner
Subscribe to watch more Astronomical videos!
Thank you to my members for supporting the channel!
โจโจโจ
Right to repair
Steve Pecket...
Yeah watched that vid
Was very good
Aight thanks
Id recommend the Uranus-C Pro as a camera
Why
But the ac version right
Player-One Astronomy has goated customer service, the firmware is (argueably) better and the casing is INSANELY well made
Oooh looks fancy๐ค
costs 500 usd
id recommend an OAG if you are all for compact
P1 cams look insanely good
all of them are so sexy its insane
I'm sorry guys but what's oag
Off-Axis Guider
Its a ring you attach in the optical train with a prism which directs spare light (that misses your main camera sensor) into a guide camera
Normaly u use a guide scope for ur guider, but with a oag it uses ur main scope
With this you got a bigger aperature and more focal lenght
Yeyeyeye now I know
I would use oag till like 1200mm
I had heard of it
OAGs are to be used beyond 1200mm
Looks compact
Oh it is
Do that with 2000mm and find a star โฆ
Use a high sensitivity sensor which is fairly large
like the Xena-M
its a tiny sensor so yeah i get what you mean but
a guidescope at such long focal lengths isnt going to do you justice
Better then using this small sensor at 2000mm
thats the issue lmaoo
Its very worth it if you want a compact and simple setuop
Yeah but I want everything to kinda fit into a backpack (tripod can't fit ofc)
An OAG is the best option then
Ok but isn't eq5 to big than?
Oh so you dont want the Juwei 14?
Ye but no but ye cause eq5 has a reputation for being good
The EQ5 certainly wont fit in a backpack but neither will anything due to the tripod
Tripod ain't gonna fit in a backpack ofc
Juwei 14 also does 
Anyhow, the EQ5 is pretty heavy but not that heavy, you could indeed get a carrying case/bag for it though
Only time when I go anywhere is when I go on vacation, but in the back of the car also need to be space for luggage
So I want something good
Eq5
Juewei
You can do plenty withhh that lol
For everything?
Yeah
a bit over the top dont you think
But less is always better
20kg payload for a compact setup
Are u dutch?
Haha
Understandable
Yeah how you know
Very
(i dont know German that well)
Wraaaah
So given you want a refrac i am assuming you want to do widefield?
or is it just for the sake of being compact
Compact but nice enough to see details from m51 and small galaxys (like 500-600 mm fl
A 585 with sv555 is good then
What is fl on sv55
255mm focal length? 
I meant 500mm fl + 585
Also he wants to be mobile
not enough for small galaxies or m51
oh god
do NOT ever listen to chatgpt for astro advice
PLEASE do not
Okidoki
That's why I came here
You will have better detail with your seestar
Hmmmm seestar s30 is pretty wide
You could do an F/4 6'' Newton
Well you have to pick unfortunately.
either get someone extremely expensive for that focal range or a reflector
an F/4 6'' weighs 5.5kg for reference
And if I start widefield with star Adventurer gti for example with 60 mm refractor
And if i get the hang of it
oh for the love of god do not get a GTI
Then upgrade to something bigger
you can get anything but a GTI, its CRIMINAL
Why does everyone hates these
Alright thanks
Newton is best for imaging
F/4 is fast, compact and it has the most power for the price
hate?
Got f3.45 on my newton

Mmmm everyone doesn't like these
Quattro 150p modded with cnc spider and mirror ring
But I really don't want a newt
You will have to settle for a reflector for galatic imaging or well, a REALLY expensive refractor
And if I do widefield
refracs are made for widefield
300-400 fl
reflectors get expensive as shit when it comes to widefield
And pair it with a tiny sensor
also gets hella expensive toward that range
tbh focal length isnt what is going to limit you for detail on galaxies
its the lack of aperture
Svbony is cheap, refractors from skywatcher are cheap
For a reason
though i guess the evostar 71ed isnt that shabby
Yeah afaik the 71ed will be your best shot
But is star Adventurer gti THAT bad?
Bc I've never held a eq6 r pro in my hand for example
So gti seemed like a good product
I know but it was just an example
@hollow shadow is also in this server and has a gti and a 65mm refractor
If it cost like 300 bucks yeah it would be fine
But 700 bucks for a piece of shit which can barely hold a mini refractor? Yeah no
EQ6r is for heavy stuff
Yeah but it's portable
Mainly the most expensive of refractors an large reflectors
@coarse spoke explain your experience with it to him lol
The GTI ainโt something Iโd ever recommend to anyone in any case
But is gti that bad, cause I've seen some amazing pictures, and if you use guiding it shouldn't be bad?
Or
Does it
The GTI is certainly useable
But itโs such a hassle and for the price itโs justโฆ bad.
a
I come from a seestar, I don't know mounts that well
Do some research on the Juwei 14, if you donโt trust it thatโs fine but do not get the gti new
Well Iโm from a seestar s50 and got a big ahh 10โ goto dobson
juwei 14 and 17 are amazingly good
Would you say it's better than gti?
for sure
?
What about guiding
gtiโs do the job but now you get better for the same price
svbony 50mm and a touptek cam
People can get amazing stuff with it yes
but it isnt worth it
But you have to ask yourself, can you?
Can you replicate the pain and modifications the people made to it
Im stuck at 3k
Can you replicate the equipment used to make it functional
840โฌ Juwei 14 / Aliexpress
500โฌ Uranus C pro
350โฌ StellaVita
550โฌ SV555 54mm / svbony.eu
180โฌ FHD-OAG MINI
160โฌ Ceres 462M
40โฌ Juwei 14 to eq5 tripod adapter plate
180โฌ EQ5 tripod
3000โฌ
Also cw bar and weight +40โฌ
Thanks
Swap 555 with evostar 72ed
NICEEEEE
Astro its ur own thing now if you wanna switch
But i can say the sv555 is good
@cobalt marsh
You know it better then we do
Haha redcats are good too but if it doesnโt fit in the budget it just doesnโt fit
But is juwei 14 easy to use cause I have like two left hands if you know what I mean
Yes
I am not a diyer
Same as eq5 xd
You forgot something
Player One prices are in USD
Almost the same as euro
Convert them to Euro and you loose a couple hubdred
Nope
Import tax
I bought from them itโs included
Thats why it will be around 3000
The import tax is included
Ah
In the price
perfect setup
But this is a mix of euro and dollars
I alleays calc usd 1:1 to euro because of taxes in germany
All the player one stuff is 720 Euro
But @cobalt marsh can help you better then we do
And what are the pros with a cooled camera?
So take off another 120 bucks
Basically 0 thermal noise
The Svbony SV555 is not only good, but almost a competitor for the price. It's a full-fledged APO, meaning it's color-accurate and corrected up to full frame, and all for a price that you might get duplicates from the competition. There are countless comparisons; for example, it performs better than the significantly more expensive Redcat.
And you donโt have to reshoot calibration frames every night
And u dont need to redo darks
Yeah
@shy narwhal here u go, andreas is here and he can def help u
If youโre lazy a TEC camera is way better.
Thermoelectric Cooler
Sounds expensive
Can cool ur camera down to like -30 degrees
Itโs a 170 buck upcharge last I checked
Why would you ever want that
Less noise
Thermal Noise
The warmer your sensor the more noise you get
Alternatively, I would recommend an IMX533 camera instead of the IMX585. The SVBONY SV605C, for example, costs exactly the same but has a better sensor.
But beyond -15 itโs redundant
the 533 being better than the 585 is the most controversial topic OAT lmao
Thermal noise. This is stronger the warmer the sensor is. At or below 0ยฐC, it is virtually completely gone.
The SV605C is not compatible with the Stellavita
Only one single camera from svbony is for some reason
What's controversial about it? Larger sensor, more full-wave, depending on the camera, more bit depth. So, on paper alone, the 533 is better. But I have both, and I speak firsthand. Does Kodak say that the 585 is bad, especially at shorter focal lengths? Still, I'd prefer the 533, especially if the price is the same.
but it is... and yes tested.
It depends on your use for it
I personally enjoy the high sensitivity and its versatility in planets and DSO
ToupTek doesnโt state it is so I based it off that
He knows what he is saying
The SV605C also has less fullwell than the P1 models
I don't dispute that at all. The 585 is a jack of all trades. It can do everything, just nothing perfectly. And if it's exclusively deep sky, I would prefer the 533 (this is my personal opinion based on my experience).
And you must note that the price is just a little less than the P1 models in EUR (if you consider 80 bucks a "little")
Understandable
Take it from me, don't buy it
This is missing filters as well btw lol
The SV220 is very nice
It has planetary gearing with unfixable periodic error due to part of the gear being flat
I said some models. Many IMX585s only have 12-bit and 38k full-wave...
It can carry only a small load efficiently and it's overpriced
I don't even think I'd buy it for 350โฌ and I own one
Thats why the same sensor doesnt mean the same product
Id personally go with the Ares-C if a 533 sensor is wanted since 80 bucks is worth it for the extra full well, the accessories it comes with and the general P1 customer service and look
But ultimately its up to AstroCas
But there's nothing wrong If I go for an 585 sensor? I personally don't like a square sensor
I love my 585
The 585 and 533 are both INSANELY good sensors
It's just a small sensor, but if it doesn't bother you it's a great choice
You cant go wrong with either
Well, I went by price; he had an IMX585 listed for around โฌ500. So my alternative should also be in that price range...
Alright, so juwei 14, 585 sensor, something like an evostar 71
The list he put didnt account for the USD to EUR conversion
I say avoid the evostars, they're not really good fracs iirc
Given that shipping and import tax is included, the Uranus-C Pro costs 430 euro
A juwei 14 can handle a decent payload, you could get a 6 inch imaging newt for less than a Evo 71
Of course not, absolutely good camera, I just wanted to list alternatives
ive heard theyre pretty good for the price
So what refractor in the 70-80mm range do you recommend on a budget?
How much are they again?
Like 400 or something
but wait #1405477195379511297 message
These are dublets, right?
Could get a 6 inch for that
He doesnt want a newt
Portability and collimation
Collimation is pretty straight forward but I get the portability part
here are some things fenice shot with the evostar https://telescopius.com/profile/daniele_p?order=is_featured&page=1
The SVBony SV550 80mm APO would also be an inexpensive but very good alternative. A full-fledged triplet APO, including a flattener and rotator, is available for only โฌ570. Price-wise, it's unrivaled.
small example for a combination
840 - Juwei 14 (Aliexpress / Ebay)
684 - Uranus-C Pro + OAG + Filter Drawer Mini + OAG Mini + UV/IR Cut filter
300 - StellaVita (ToupTek Astro)
570 - SV555
137 - Ceres 462M
40 - Juwei 14 to EQ5 Tripod Adapter
180 - EQ5 Tripod
40 - CW Bar and Weight
82 - SV220 Duo-Narrowband Filter
2833โฌ
@shy narwhal
Everythhing you need
This is a GOATED setup
As an alternative to the 555, you could also go for the 550, since they're currently priced at about the same price. It depends on what you want. Otherwise, a great combination ๐๐ผ
Thanks yall
although, then I would add the Gemini EAF, 50-60โฌ at AliExpress, and you have direct autofocus
Oh right I forgot
If you want to round it off, you could add the automatic flat panel from Gemini. It costs โฌ135, but there are discounts for those over 18, so I think you'd get another โฌ25 off.
of course only if you want
Like this
Rather than a flatpanel i believe the powerbox is a better pick so its compacter
or both ๐๐
Lovely compact rig
What flats panel are you using? I don't recall Gemini making one that small and I've been looking for one small enough for my frac ๐
yes really compact, light, and a great quality
Is it a gemini though ? If so, what size
This is the Gemini 100mm flat panel. It fits perfectly on the SV555.
Very beautiful, I might get one for my askar
but on the e.g. sv550 80mm
It'll be oversized for my FMA180 Pro, but what can I do ๐
I know, I still have the 150 mm version, because I thought the 100mm is too small for the 550... but it just fit
that's how it was before ๐๐
In the end, of course, it's always better to be too big than too small. The main thing is that the flats are good. But too big (which was the case with me before) is also annoying, as you can constantly get stuck on the panel.
Mine will probably look simlar to that ๐ Just at a smaller scale
How many mm is the outer diameter of the dew cap? I also underestimated it with the 555, thinking it would be smaller.
Gonna Order myself the Same one ๐
is really great for the price.
Now I just need one more for the 150pds...
58mm, so even the 100mm one will be big lol
๐ OK, thats small ๐
I just see the dew cap is not really thicker than the telescope itself
yeah, 40mm of aperture and a 58mm dew shield
for comparison, sv555 54mm aperture, 94mm dew cap
What do you guys recommend for refractor for the juwei 14? Is a 80mm finally the good size?
the sv555 is probably the best for the price, the aperture will only help if you have good optics for it
Yeah but if I have an juwei 14 I could go higher in fl since my tracking will be better right?
Yes surely, but I would believe its smarter to upgrade FL later
Bc its easier right?
The setup you have is basically upgradeable in every category, its smarter to go with the most optimal option and see if you even end up needing more FL
Right