#Polls 5.0
1 messages · Page 11 of 1
i think we should stop now 
same
nu
the joke is that theres no andromeda galaxy visible on my pic
it should be there
but no
he was talking about the whole thread being filled with people putting their name on it
@brisk copper @mint talon we can stop now. If I have to bring it up again, there will be timeouts
ohh
what do i image untracked
5
9
2
Northern Lagoon
What is the worst star?
18
18
1
Alnitak
669023392766361610
dancing_star
true
how
ok so?
why not put a tiny mask on it so it blocks the light from it

That's not how telescopes work. You can not just block part of the aperture and remove an object from the frame. There are coronagraphs but those focus mainly on the star observed. And as far as I'm aware of there are no consumer grade star coronagraphs. None that any of us can afford atleast.
damn
sorry i might be dumb
Just put a dot with a sharpie on the sensor
Well you can block the image instead of the aperture, but literally why bother lol
I try
Tbh ive not used davinci
10" rct 
except you only get higher angular resolution if the seeing allows it
I did not want to go into more specifics but lets assume the seeing can support it.
wish granted, rct is f40
browi does this often, best to ignore 
-# (they are salty about their bad section of atmosphere
)
in that case bottom option is so much better
I never said the faster telescope is not sampled to 10" diffraction limit.
Don't forget to who you just said that to
do you cable organize your setup
9
22
2
a little
is premier pro or davinci resolve better
5
6
1
davinci better
what is kvass
Ive made that when i tried to make pizza dough
I let it rise for 24hrs and it smelled like vodka
not quite 😭
unless it was a liquid
If you had to pick one (lets assume its a 10" telescope)
14
18
2
Slower telescope, small FOV, higher "resolution"
i dont have any of the bread you meant to use so im using store bought brown bread 
Oh, you will make it yourself?
It's cool
yea, i cant buy any near me
so i have to make myself xD
why did callo and hero put no 😭
@urban quiver @marble hearth explain thyself!!!
Niiiice, kvass is amazing thing
i think ill ferment for 3 days
then maybe add orange peel for orangey flaver
for 2 days
after straining out the bead
(ill do taste beforehand
i love democracy
yea na i would move on
I'd rather kill myself than do this shit again
this doesnt specify a scope, you dont need to use something with painfully high focal length
could do it without a scope
Isnt that alcoholic drink
I think you added a bit too much sugar and the smell was from ethanol aka alcohol same stuff in vodka
I think I let it rise for too long, I made it again but let it rise for 2hrs and it came out much better
A mix of both really
whatevers cheaper
apeteura has 3mm more apeture for 10 more bucks
Hmm.
A = π x r^2
r = 0.5d
plugging in.
For 200mm
r = 100mm
100mm ^2 = 10,000
10,000π = 31,415.9265mm
For 203mm
r = 101.5mm
101.5 ^2 = 10,302.25
10,302.25π = 32,365.4729mm
32,365.4729 - 31,415.9265 = 949.5464mm
Approximately 1m in area difference between the two sizes.
Hilariously, the 203mm is roughly 3% more area than the 200mm ... which somehow in my mind tracks. 🤷
Even more hilarious is that near-meter of difference in area is around a circumference of 628.3185mm. Seems like the overall "around" circumference would be adding somewhere between a half and a third of a mm all the way around, which is near-imperceptible to the human eye, and certainly most people.
@fallen obsidian, what I'm saying is, in the end, Grand is right. Between the two, get the OTA that has better quality optics.
That was my recreational math session for the night, thank you for the opportunity.
...a meter of area???
My guy that's 950 mm^2 or about 3cm by 3cm
barely
Option C: ioptron RC 8
I hate kvass :(
disliking kvass is a crime
My Lithuanian ancestors would not approve
Whoops I got cm and mm mixed up. Recreational math past midnight goof
Yeah that makes sense. Somewhere in my brain the mental image was disconnected from the numbers and the part responsible for catching the mm vs cm thing had gone to bed.
which one would you say has better optical quality
I'm familiar with Apertura as a decent brand, and that's where the votes are going.
I don't know about iOptron optics. I would hope that it's about the same. However, I know of the brand by the mount I have from them, not their OTA.
I did not know that iOptron makes telescopes 🫠
And if thy just started, it's a high possibility is just a rebranded GSO
Wait. iOptron or Omegon?
Those are GSOs
TS-Optics and Omegon have the same exact truss RCTs, closed tube RCT, and newtonians😂
The real question is: are they any good?
it currently tastes weird, may have also added too much sugar
can defo taste bread in it tho
They are ok for the price tbh, they are required to have a certain strehl value (I'm aware that strehl is really not the best method to assess the quality of a mirror, but still).
Eeeehmmmm... define high quality 
just get a newt, 99% of RC users dont have the seeing for it anyways..
Big fat f4 newtonian, reduce it. Perfect sampling with massive aperture 
It's more about the big corrected field without the need to use correctors, but yes newts are very good as well
Slap the Nexus on that and make it a fat F/3 beast 
no
you need a corrector
and im yet to see people buy 6200MMs for their 8" GSO RC
terrible reducer if you think of pure quality
With a Q250P unreduced, you can still beat an RC😂
So reducing it is optional. How much bad glass ypu want to add between the mirrors and the sensor. A Good CC and knowing when to shoot probably is the best mix
and a Q250P aint really a great newt either
its ok, and good for the price
Good price for aperture. I know that the construction is poor. But the optics are good
What newt/corrector pair would you suggest around the 10" size? Possibly without spending a kidney, let's say 3500€ range
probably the best bet
should i brew kvass
7
9
1
yes
did you just ask if we would rather be
near death
kinda where we are right now
frozen to death
nothing but death
forgetting the fact that i can bring a powerseeker with me
Thank you
I've tested my RC out of necessity (had to fix the mirror spacing) and it's probably around 1/10 wave or so
wavefront or surface level?
wavefront
at what aperture ?
8"
Yeah well to test that you would need like 0,3" seeing, and thats below the diffraction limit...
You don't need that. You can just test if the intrafocal and extrafocal diffraction patterns are identical with an eyepiece
I mean if you want a Ronchigram I can build a Ronchi eyepiece
I have a grating for it that I need to assemble
You don't need perfect seeing to evaluate the correction
Our eyes cannot see 0.1 λ
Yeah, they absolutely can.
Foucault's knife edge test is a bit more quantitative
I could do that as long as I don't need to disassemble the scope
You do unfortunately
Yeah I was gonna say if you want the absolute correction you would need both conics
Wait are you talking about peak to valley wavefront error or RMS wavefront error
What about a corrector? I've found multiple candidates but I'm curious to know which ones you believe are best; I doubt I'll go bigger than APS-C any time soon, so that's about the corrected field size I'd like
RMS
best to ask Orion UK themselves
@dreamy cloak Has a Ronchi eyepiece. He said it didn't help with anything
Nothing beats interferometry
If I could afford that
Perhaps I'll put together such a setup in the future
50/50 beam splitter. Good reference mirror, some tubes and a camera
I think you gen get them all for like 200$ from aliexpress
1/10 wave RMS is difficult to spot (though possible) but that's why I cited that number as an upper bound on the wavefront error
Oh, perhaps not out of the question
Wait... λ = ?
reference wavelength of light
usually 550 nm depending on the optics
it matters less with an all-reflecting setup
Mainly the Problem i was facing with Mine was that the lines were too close to each other i think
I assume the wavefront will be different at λ = 500nm compared to λ = 800nm
yeah it'll be better at 800 because it's just not as sensitive
Wavelengths are longer so small imperfections are not affecting the light
not possible, not visually
Yeah it is, seriously. Just try it.
It's actually easier to test visually
Because you're not averaging out seeing effects and can get a better idea of what the defocused patterns actually look like
No further comments from me, its pointless.
Hear me out. Conjugated infinite point source of light. I was working on such projects before I got scammed with some pinholes
This was the rough idea
I need to look into interferometric setups now
for reference, here is what 1/10 wave spherical aberration looks like when you're 1/2 wave defocused (top) and 1 wave defocused (bottom)
and that's with 47% obstruction, which actually makes it harder to spot
the one that i showed you, that's not interferometry. that's just a way to dim and reduce the size of a source of light so it appear more like a star. also it will make it into a diverging beam which will be collimated by another optical system before being sent into the tested telescope.
the trick for making this apparent is to smoothly move in and out of focus, because then the different radial focus zones of the mirror will become evident (you bring the outer part of the mirror to focus at one side, then the inner part on the other side).
It's not as apparent as 1/10 wave RMS astigmatism, coma, or trefoil, but it's feasible to do by eye with a high power eyepiece
Oh I figured, but still, it sounds fun
idk if it would actually work, but worth testing XD
its so easy to see visually
(notice diff)
its goated for planetary visual
(if seeing allows)
Europa the prettiest imo
Smeeglezorp?
5
10
2
Gleep glorp!
Which Newtonian Do I Get
3
3
1
Apertua 8" F/4
I wanna try phone ap but guided
That reads "I want to needlessly make things hard to do and capture no image"
yes
nothing would change
Bruh phone ap is like super easy
Sure your images won't look super good (unless you got a xiaomi) but still looks alright
Nah. Can't stack, can't get details on Mars, Jupiter's way too bright to get anything other than a huge dot, and you can't image the ice giants either. Lucky to get Saturn and the moon. Can't bring out details in any of the nebula because you can't stack, images are too compressed to work with.
Who said you cant stack images
Me, who tried phone AP
There is literally a app made so that the photos taken by your phone are saved as raw files and not jpeg
Then you didn't try it properly
What phone did yiu use
There is literally no setting on the phone that would let me get a decent image.
Samsung S17, iPhone SE, iPhone 11, iPhone 14
Oh and one of the Samsung J series phones.
One of the "lower" smartphones. Then the various Flagship phone versions.
So ...
🤷
But I could get decent stuff with a DSLR. And probably my new mirrorless. Definitely with the planetary cam I have now. 🙂
Yeah no those phones have terrible lens quality and not to mention Samsung phones are riddled with noise
But thats not to say you cant get a half decent image from them half decent considering they are phones
Like i said tho if you want good images you need a xiaomi
Maybe if Jupiter came through as something other than a bright blob of light they could do halfway decent. But it doesn't, so the notion falls flat right at that point.
Yeah but it's not made for planetary it doesn't have anywhere near enough focal lenght and a binoculars and you can take a picture of jupiter itself like here is saturns rings with that setup and my phone
yes decent image is hard
but u can stack bad images
i also use samsung phone
Which
much better than mine
your data is a lot better too it just needs better processing
any s24 is better
my image of the same region is sending but wifi ass
oh one sent
other one failed
ok there other one sent
why watermark
orr, maybe just enable shoot in raw on ur phone???
Not available in every phone
Sometimes it's soo bad that i go months and months without being able to do astro
Tom's answer is the last one. Even if it isn't, doesn't matter, he has something on his equip that disperses the clouds and settles the atmosphere when he's imaging.
Looking at your images I'm starting to think that my thought of how phone AP works is different than how what people actually do when they're saying "phone AP."
nasa turns off the weather machines when he starts imaging
My pfp was taken with my mom's phone haha
open
we need an even worse option for me and @marble hearth , which includes >90% humidity every day, if not straight up foggy :(
Hey at least your telescope gets a free shower
Don't underestimate phone ap
Naw
maybe if you removed the lens
Maybe if you done it right
No the sensor is asssss
and used the bare sensor for ap
plandt sebnsor
Especially if its samsung
like 1up pixled
The sensor is mid i can agree w that but you van get crazy results
Seriously their sensors are a crime against photography with the amount of noise they have
theres a reason they perma 4x binned lmao
yes its 50mp
but only about 12.5 is the actual num
Dude i took this through sh seeing in B5 30min
Mid budget phone aswell
Stars were mid icl but there is potential
You lot silent now😂
Like just look how much noise there is and this is in day time with proper exposure
Like its just absurd
I can agree w noise but it's easily fixable with calibrations
The noise can be hefty
Not this type of noise
Because its read noise
Is this raw?
Yup
Why would yiu take a day pic in raw
More flexibility and besides id rather look at a noisy image than one that looks ai generated
Fairs but post processing makes up for the noise
Because of the absurd amount of noise reduction samsung has to do to make their images look even remotely alright
Samsung is greedy when it comes to sensors your better off getting a xioami
Like i said the only good sensors are the ones made by sony xiaomi is the only good phone camera manufacturer
I can agree w that a lot
Because they use good lenses and good sensors made by sony
But most of the time it somewhat don't matter what phone you have you js need to know what your doing
....like tonight 😭
One problem with xioami is the fact that they are a Chinese company so by law they are required to share their data to the Chinese government why do you think they are banned in north America
So i wouldn't recommend using their phones on a day to day basis unless you root the phone
sony phones enter the chat:
i think best phone is pixel + graphene
Idk how good the lens quality is
Xiaomi js an example
what scope
I have a Canon mirrorless camera not a Sony. Can't complain about their sensors and lenses.
But that's a camera not a phone
Cannon sensors have all sorts of problems
Sensor size has no effect on quality of an image wasoever sensor architecture pixel size and processing hardware on the other hand absolutely do at least when it comes to astro with normal photography larger sensor have a deeper depth of field
So "not necessarily an ideal astro cam." But great for the purpose I bought it.
Then again, don't underestimate Canon ... the same sensor on a different camera got this image.
#1087219932900638720 message should i keep my promise?
8
9
2
no
phew
yessss
i dont even know my images are what normal ppl phone AP
Oh well then.
Do you even have a mirror to fry
I don't remember you having a scope
All the above
Black wires on black gear helps hide them 
How’s your weather usually (during winter)
8
22
1
Absolutely awful, every single day is cloudy
Oh yeah, good luck sorting those out.
I mean it's all sorted and works, just lots and lots of excess wire... I need shorter cables 😭
Zip ties don't sound like a bad idea now haha
I used wire velcro... 😩
Lighter, melt the cables, fuse the copper, issue fixed 
just buy custom lenght USB cables jeez
yes yesss 😭
The options are. Slow, acceptable and stupendesly slow 
Easy to choose
slow and small, average, big but slow
10” sct because it has the highest resell value and i could do whatever i want with the money
I'd go with the newtonian all the time😂
🟤 Brown astro-, and guide-cam
I forgot brown existedb
makes me want to shoot m106
RGB gamer scope gang
They forgot gold
would you continue astrophotography if you had to return to untracked phone ap?
11
21
2
noe
1231002251599020135
asiair
where none
Would you rather buy a…
14
22
2
8” Newtonian
your phone is not transparent
Best galilean moon
7
15
3
io
🌋
o
hell no
though, does that mean that I am stuck permanently at untracked phone ap or I can upgrade?
can buy whatever you want as long as the mount is untracked and the camera is a phone
can even go to the extreme and remove your phones lens to have a bare sensor
oh
i keep my answer of hell no
unless you have @somber belfry powers, it's shit
he doesn't have powers he has experience
it isn't shit
i have been summoned
just practice
i suppose
You're working with a generous allowance for "not that bad"
Fake News
Also the earth is a dodecahedron
earth is the 6th hidden platonic solid
what
yes
elaborate
no ❤️
If you do it with the same exposure time that cameras and process it the same way, it ends up similar. The rest is just a skill issue
Took this shot at the same time with friends, but everyone processed their own.
3 pics: one shot on a stock A7III, one on an astromodded 6D, and one on a phone.
Same total exposure time, but the cameras used 180s subs and the phone used 20s (fixed tripod).
Guess which is which

First one is the phone?
Depends on what you want to do
Threathen us that he's gonna buy something 😂
Probably end up not buying it like the other 7 times
mono + esprit 100 🔥
cant get both for 1200 bucks
What colors are on your rig? (select all that apply)
23
95
1
Black
⚫
3rd option:
going outside because of the cold
4th option: knowing when to go outside so you don't get soaked
(by rain)
Post-Processing
mainly because the richest astrophotographers ABSOLUTELY SUCK
like they are HORRENDOUS
couldnt process ORION properly at GUNPOINT
20k on the setup and 2 whole seconds processing
no
its like 40k on the setup, 4 days of processing refusing to learn how to do it properly
eh 2 seconds and 4 days r close enough
5th option. Understanding the weather patterns and knowing precisely that not every clear night is a good night
THIS takes real experience!!!
always used first imo
new prices stay, used deals can disappear at any time
real
you may remember this because I mentioned this before, but this is an M31 of a guy with a ~$40k rig
like this data is incredible
but bro
WHY IS IT BLUE/PURPLE AND ORANGE
people put more effort into getting the data instead of processing it
It's rainbow
fr 😭
You have no idea how many times I've seen people do this
Tbh these are the type of people who think spending a crap ton of money will immediately get them the best results
when a clear night is a damn miracle, even bad data is still data 😭
even nasa oversimplified their logo :( the meatball is so good
ball
Those nights are just for troubleshooting and experiments. That's what I do. If I predict correctly the seeing that I will get, I'm grinding sharp data all night long. But if the conditions are bad. I just experiment with targets and stuff like that
I personally feel like both are too iconic and I cannot decide. I do associate the worm with human spaceflight, and per NASA regulations the worm is also official in that context
(It was retired between 1992 and 2020)
can't relate
the meatball is a well designed and recognizable logo, while the worm gets rid of all identity and style
just letters, except the A's are missing the line through them is probably the most basic logo for anything ever
This isn’t fair because the s30 and pix rig is significantly cheaper lol
You gotta match the value
pretend you get a good used deal for the rig
I’m not pretending anything
with an S30, pix won't help 
You don't see the symbolism in it?
who would not take that used deal
But if it came down to it I’d rather pix and osc over mono and no pix. Any day.
Siril just lacks a lot of mono processing tools. And osc processing tools.
i suppose i don't. What symbolisom is there in red letters on a transparent background?
The A's were intentionally missing the bar so it resembles the tips of solid rocket boosters
copium
Apparently the reason the worm was dropped in 1992 was because a good number of employees hated it
I'm a sucker for a good use of negative space
how will dubious symbolism ever compete with this
tho i guess they were the first to oversimplify their logo ig
that's at least something
tbh I feel like the worm might be more popular than the meatball in the US at the moment
this despite the general dislike of oversimplified logos
In this era the US government actually invested in graphic design
(mid 70s)
Fr
I Feel Personally Attacked by This Relatable Content™
One of the main appeals is that it’s open source…. So no
wtf is siril
Uhh only the most popular free alternative to Pixinsight?
If siril will become payware, they just shit themselves in the foot. Because right away people will rather opt for the more expensive pixinsight
What should I buy when I finally have money
11
14
2
Mono Setup (new)
Should I flock my telescope or add baffles
12
12
1
Flock
Oh trust me, after months of clouds every clear night absolutely is a good night 
Meatball but I'm saying this while wearing a hoodie with the simpler logo on it
To compete with Pix it needs to stay free imo but if Pix wasn't an option I'd probably be willing to spend even 30/40$
if Siril wasn't free I'd be doing my processing in a Jupyter or Pluto.jl notebook.
yes, its literally foss
What is harder to master?
19
23
2
Post processing
NASA meatball or NASA worm?
15
21
1
Meatball
🧆
What would you rather have?
14
14
1
Full OSC Rig without pix
Any reflection off an anti-reflection coating is the coating not doing its job
We ask not of the effectiveness but of the visual appeal

buh
alright hot take: I'd pay more for SIRIL than for PixInsight because PixInsight doesn't respect standardized FITS data, like ROWORDER or WCS distortion polynomials
It is a pain to deal with XISF files when you want to combine people's data
I just want to build a multiscale mosaic out of people's data. But no. PixInsight doesn't use WCS, they use their own incompatible garbage
im gonna end the poll early because i worded it very badly and the proper way to word it doesnt work in a discord poll
id have to say smth like "how much do you think siril is worth" but premade options dont work for that
Should Siril be free?
16
16
1
yes
1232562185784524831
siril
SiO
dio?????
i love dio
"Holy Diver" is the 2nd track of Dio's debut album, Holy Diver (1983).
Ronnie James Dio -- lead vocals, synthesizers
Vivian Campbell -- guitar
Jimmy Bain -- bass, keyboards
Vinny Appice -- drums
RIP Ronnie James Dio
You Rock \m/
I claim no rights to this song. No copyright infringement intended.

Way too hot
But yeah, that's probably the only thing I don't quite like about Pix, it constantly cries about FITS being deprecated 😭, like shut up, NASA is still using it afaik
once my camera arrives, what should i image !? (650mm FL F/5 + IMX664 uncooled uv/ir cut)
7
15
2
Silver Sliver Galaxy
Which lens coating looks best? (aka as the coloured reflection off of lenses)
7
21
2
Purple
🟣
Where would you rather be? You can sent signals faster than lights and you can bring anything you want. land anywhere in the solar system.
8
13
4
far in the Oort cloud
Za warudo
10k and put it all on red
$20,000 worth of extenders and adapters
So, is a box of 20.000$ of junk, or 10.000$ cash. Gimme the cash please. I know exactly what to get
This is worse than the galaxy vs nebula one damn💔
im just going to have a thousand walmart scopes
200 powerseekers, please
20K worth of seestar
My rig has been snowed on before
Ig lucky I never have to deal with that
Last time my area even had sleet was 1984
once saw new year moon in snow
idk if it was snowing but there was snow on ground
Ban meowing once and for all
15
30

did it help cool your cam?
technically it should
since it has a heatsink
cool it and it cools the sensor directly
Camera sensor has reached sub zero temps once just from being outside (its a planetary camera)
When we went out to Chaquamegon-Nicolet for first light with my friend's 8" SCT, we had an unexpected clear air snowfall
No clouds, just snow dropping out of a clear sky
It was actually pretty transparent, though to be fair we were in Bortle 2 skies at the absolute max

Would you rather
21
22
2
$10,000 up front in cash
For more specifics, it gets shot by a .22 LR or it lands on flat concrete
does anyone have any better poll ideas cause i ran out ngl
my prime in polls is long gone we need to make 6.0 or something so everyone forgets about the earlier polls and repeats them again
Rather the rifle because of i can Control the Angle in which it IS Shot at i Just need to replace the Tube of the scope which i think is managable
Oh no you’re not the one that shoots it it’s just a random shot somewhere at your rig
you gotta kiss those lucky charms and hope it doesn’t hit something expensive
Same for the other one you can’t control how you drop it
Actually i remember some guy kept making those “would you drop your rig from _ cm for 500 dollars” i forgot who it was
You people are insane
I bet a reflector would be fine if shot by a .22. It would probably just go thru the tube
Low chance it would hit a mirror
it kind of has to get hit thats the point
I’m saying it would hit and go thru the tube
so you’d just have 2 holes in your tube so just patch it lol
Ohhh wait i thought you meant like through the holes the truss ones have
No like the side
Someone should buy a cheap newt and test it
If I get annoyed with my heritage il shoot it
i mean if you have a light telescope i dont think dropping it from a few meters is gonna hurt it that much aside from scratches
Never forget when the Harlan J. Smith telescope got shot
The Harlan J. Smith Telescope is a 107-inch (2.7 m) telescope located at the McDonald Observatory, in Texas, in the United States. This telescope is one of several research telescopes that are part of the University of Texas at Austin observatory perched on Mount Locke in the Davis Mountains of west Texas. The telescope was completed in 1968 wit...
To be fair; isn’t that a special crystal mirror?
I doubt our commercial grade mirrors would survive being shot
I think it's just dummy thicc glass
How did it drop the aperture?
By blacking out sections of the mirror
So the total area of the mirror decreased
🎏
The resolution is mostly determined by the linear aperture size, so that's not affected as much
no, but my scope has been snowed and hailed on
same lol
are ophiuroids cute
7
9
5
yea
Define more affordable rigs?
Do you mean like
1 full mono EAF, AM5
2 OSC AM3s
4 OSC GTIs?
I think my gear fits the 2 rigs for specific targets
I got the Askar for wide/medium FL, and RC6 for small and planets
one good dso and one good solar rig
Inexperience combined with ratchet trying to bring the RA motor tight to the mount.
I mean, this is a fair question. The notion of "affordability" in this hobby can be a bit of a challenge.
fat rct 
Mine has rusted due to water exposure...at least the screws have. Which I need to replace but it hasn't been damaged otherwise
honestly my rig is my phone
rifle will have 0% chance of survival
balcony might have 5%
Mine has a few scratches on the outside nothing on the optics with some minor humidity rust nothing that hurts its performance
can it be any rig ive ever had
my first rig was an abomination of random houeshold items and it fell apart
What did you do 😭
It was extremely cold, grease dried out, and it started binding
brass worm gear beats aluminum worm wheel
How cold
While doing astro have you ever seen snow
9
21
4
Never
sounds untasty
Hehe worm 🪱
Would you rather
15
17
1
Have your rig get shot at by a rifle
You know what? If you shoot my OTA sideways, it could survive even a .50 BMG. I just put some tape over the holes and resume to imaging
I think you’re really underestimating the damage of a .50 BMG bullet
My telescope is a sheet of metal. Even a .50BMG makes a clean in and out without much disturbance 😂
a bullet aint gunna do shit
a drop from a balcomloyny will
mf, its thin sheet metal, not a bottle of water
it will punch through and leave a hole about 2-3x the size of the bullet
genuinely more survivable than a drop
what if you left the scope in the raim
Has your rig ever been damaged before
12
20
2
A few scratches
Given a pretty high budget, what would you rather have?
13
23
2
2 or 3 rigs for specific targets
Crunchy peanut butter is the only acceptable thing
Peanut butter is literally the most revolting thing over ever laid eyes upon
i gotta drop down a bortle :(
like .5 of one
so it takes me about 3 hours for 1 hour of data
wow
goober :3
Also with nir you can get b4 level so yk
1.45hrs
I'd rather have 1 clear day every 3 months and put out a banger of an image rather than daily slop
Easily b9
what?
the daily slop would be combined into one omage
But bad seeing
Seeing is all it matters
U could also just drive for b1 anyway ?
Easy for you. I don't think there are any true b1 skies left in EU
Ig just to many people in a small area
The message didn't say you couldn't use filters and b9 plus filters looks just as good as b1 also you are forgetting that the moon cycle will sometimes line up with your 1 day that you have a clear sky making your b1 look just as bright as b6 or b7
Avg seeing isn't bad seeing you probably have avg seeing rn and your images don't look terrible now do they in terms of sharpness
"B9 plus filters looks just as good as b1"
Close enough
I'm talking about narrowband btw
I know
No, it's not. But if I have to choose between avg seeing and excellent seeing... it's obvious for which one I go
Not too Sure on that but i think la Palma is the only one left in the eu
Oh Well, just saw its 1-2 most of the time
Ok... continental EU 
Maybe Iceland
Or Greenland
But you don't have anything to image in those areas
Damn i always thought it was linear
idk tbh
they dont let you repair your celestron products yourself you gotta send them at their facilities so they can overpay you for it
I’ve realized that celestron wouldn’t be particularly successful if Meade was still up and in the game for proper competition lol
What happened to meade
Bankruptcy iirc
how though weren’t they good
Horrible decisions
Orion bought Meade when it became bankrupt and then they realized how deep in debt it is
Peanut butter
10
17
1
Yes
🥜
Covid MASSIVELY dropped them
Yeah and obviously I'm in B5 instead of B4, the difference is crazy
Just because it would be slightly better doesnt compensate for the fact that you would need to image 30 times longer than at a bortle 1
This is a would you rather question
That's your opinion
I want the most potential possible
Also every night is clear gives the huge advantage of always being able to troubleshoot
It would take me a year to get half arcsecond guiding in the b1 scenario
Would you rather
13
18
2
constant bortle 9 + average seeing, always clear daily
no because whatever caused there to be zero light pollution in the world is going to be much worse than having light pollution
eh ig you did say only one day so fast recovery
remember that time when LA got blackout and ppl called emergency cos they saw milky way?
i vote yes
would be funny asf
also is education illegal in usa
Why?
cuz 'merica
Valid or Invalid - Celestron in reality is quite a bad company, considering their overpriced and cheaply made products (powerseeker, astromaster, AVX; list goes on and on) with the exception of their RASA and SCT.
8
15
1
Valid
Just one?
Presume that whatever caused the zero light pollution was something that was controlled and not catastrophic
The good thing about light pollution, if you turn off the lights it goes away
Unlike air or water pollution
Yeah, if I forget to turn off my faucet and turn off the lights my water bill is still pretty high.
Do you wish we can have 1 day without light pollution.
21
21
1
yes
yes
assuming pixinsight includes blurx the choice is clear for me
What kind of guiding setup costs you 400€?
What kind of pixinsight costs 400€?
The German one. You have to pay tax on top of that 300
The VAT isnt 33.33% lol
also considering shipping, taxes and currency conversion a guidesetup with an OAG costs no less
pi is okayish but guiding is supeme
What should I get?
7
9
1
Guiding Setup
rc8
rc8
yes of course but this is to see what the frac community thinks of frac designs
Let me think... a newt.
As somewhat of an RC owner myself, coma correctors are cheating
depends what FL you want, nobody can answer that for you
id get the RC personally tho
ive heard rc's have internal reflection issues
My internal reflection issues were caused by a bad adapter that I flocked
sun
12" newtonian
Can it handle it tho? 😩
Me? Or my mount?
Could've sworn discord pointed to ts when I clicked on ur reply
whos voting for the bottom option bruh
i tried to make this as difficult as possible hopefully it’s better than the last one
Nah man this is too easy. You compared actual useful gear with an sct
I mean, I wish I had one more telescope that was smaller than my RC
I don't have room for a 16" RC at the moment but I could use a small refractor
Or I could use a second 8" RC 
bb filter that just uninstalls wobble and light pollution?
Basically yeah
Or like a realllllyyyyy long imaginary straw that fits ur fov perfectly and has 0 air inside it
i see
would yea
Atmosphere filter doesn't prevent clouds btw chat
DAMN YOU
I HATE YOU
ONE SOLVED PROBLEM PER ITEM GUYS
idk exterminating the earth sounds like it would solve every problem
Not in that way - just let's u image through the ground (but not clouds obv)
So like 24hr imaging sessions and no objects that never rise above horizon
(if weather and atmosphere allows ofc)
Would you rather have....
9
13
1
Super Sharp Triplet + Field Flattener (e.g. esprit)
What scope do I get for my 2025 ragdoll 17
8
15
2
High Quality 8" f/4
Would you rather
6
12
Do you wish you had a bigger or smaller telescope.
18
20
1
Bigger telescope
ageing isnt the issue
its that everyone else ages as you go there
supposing you go near light speed
you come back and everyone you know is gone
It travels near light speed
I told yall this would be difficult, perfect 50/50
can i take one person with me?
Which fictional item would you rather have?
18
21
3
Atmosphere filter (no wobble or light pollution)
Yes. You can
yooo
if i can decide when ill travel and i survive and thrive there
i say yes
if it happens the moment I vote, nah i say no
Also yes
ill pick yes, stay on earth until everyone i love dies
then i travel to avoid being accused of immortality
will return every thousand years or so

I envy everyone who doesn't live where i live sp ima go with the cloud gun
I wouldn’t count DeepSNR as free since it’s locked behind Pixinsight
deepsnr free?
Yes, but it only for pix
MS paint
Oiiiiiiiiiiiiiii
oh eh eh eh
additional info:
Redcat comes with Bahtinov Mask (and drip) and has an internal focuser, eliminating focuser tilt.
Hope D60 is F/4.66, Redcat is F/5
Other than that, they come with similar stuff. Hope D60 is new and barely shows reviews.
reduce the 130 pds
to f/3.7
na if at all then imma get a 130HNT
I'd quit the hobby if those were my options
fair enough
get a 150mm f/4 and reduce to f/3
Why what's wrong with them?
mm nah
1000$ for extremely tiny aperture, even a cheap Chinese 8" newt is outperforming both while being cheaper lol
agreed
1000 for a frac?? 😭 😭 Even I only paid 600 for 71mm
I paid 200 for 75mm
Fracs get expensive way too quickly when you increase the aperture (if you don't want a garbage piece of glass with more chromatic aberration than a rainbow)
No yeah ofc, it's worth to get a reflector for apertures over 80ish mm
spring/autumn equally
Autumn has the best weather for me
oouk sharper
Double ionized Oxygen 
10" newt
where is O-Eeeeeeeeeeee
I love long astro dark
Not O eye eye eye ?
No way u guys are saying O eee
I just say O3
thats ozone
No because it's a big 3
😰
Isn't that the same as oyyyyy 😭
atp idk
Aye aye to you too 🫡
Aye aye doesnt sound like eye eye
aye and eye are the same sound ?
Yes..?
Like "aye aye captain"
jot at all
Wtf are yall on abt 😭
Literally any text or caption of that sound in that context will have that spelling
I get how u can say aye as "ayy" but like aye as "eye" also makes perfectly good sense
nop it dont
the fk is that options
Probably depends on what english you are speaking
Either way, it's the worst language on earth and pronunciation makes zero sense
yes or no bruh
Crazy bias 🙏
because the yes answer is just wrong
Nuhuh
😭 🙏
its so silly i have my own personal dialect basically :3
Favourite FREE Astro Processing Software/Tools?
16
19
1
Siril
in aye theres a further emphasis on the A
exactly!
How do you pronounce Oiii in your head
9
19
2
Oh-three
agreed
Would you rather have...
7
9
1
Hope D60 (Quintuplet 60mm)
Best season to image in
6
19
Is Aye and Eye the same sound
10
16
2
No
✅
i aint drinking that battery acid bruh
i dont like energy drinks tbh
during my exam period I have them bc i need the energy/ caffeine but apart from that they suck shit
🚮
also that shits really bad for you
way too sweet imo
crime
Creatine plus protein powder
Do you wish you can travel to another star system without ageing
10
13
1
Yes
Water
Many of the good Red Bulls arent what they used to as Well Cuz they keep changing the recepy
I stick with the classic and known to not contain a chemical shitstorm.
Coffee.
peak
monster is the only nice tasting energy drink
???
its a sweet, sugary 500ml can of heart attack
they aren't sweet
well, the flavour i drink isnt
at least it doesnt taste of chemicals the war redbull does
redbull you can taste the caffeine and its horrible
dont get me onto the taste of chemicals on monster
(some monster flavours have the same issues but i dont drink those)
grapefruit isnt chemical flavoured
the grapefruit monster is good
in which???
all of the ones ive had
so you tasted a bitter soapy note?
the original is by far the worst tho
never had that, i dont know what nuclear waste you drank
yeah its kinda mid
yup
is that what caffeine tastes of
okay bro you dont even know how it tastes and you tell me you taste it 😭
bc thats all i could think that flavour is due to
ive had caffeine powder and it tastes similar
caffeine in pure form tastes like that yes, but in regular doses its a slight bitter.
thought so
never tasted that
weird, its really strong
You run dsnr without pixinsight how?
Same caffeine doesn't affect me 😭 HELP
apparently for people with adhd, caffeine doesnt work if someone is dehydrated at all
dont ask for a source i dont have one
"Common sense". One rehydrates with water. Caffeine is a diuretic.
Still doesn't affect me i could literally chug 3 cans of redbull and then go to sleep 2 hours later
Not just that, but it can just not work period
I can be as hydrated as a lake, caffeine will still have 0 effect on me
I just demolish a chocolate bar and temporarily acheive nuclear fusion
the crash comes but it just sets me back to normal
A gram of uranium usually does it for me
You know what's healthier and made me stop drinking energy drinks and caffeine in general?
6000 calories a day plus 30g of creatine. I switch to autopilot ngl 
me with phone astrophotography
I have a pint (0.56l) of strong filter coffee with breakfast and that just about touches the sides.
Can also go to sleep on the same drunk 30 mins before bedtime 
Now ask “How many good eyepieces
I would probably gain like 50lbs in one week with that diet
Benefits of having a physically demanding job
If you burn them fast enough, they don't stick
oh am I just always dehydrated cuz caffeine doesn't do anything
Favorite energy drink
15
23
10
I don't drink energy drinks
How many eyepieces do you own
13
27
2
1-3
Nah
Some people aren't affected
As far as option one, I will buy a new roki 135mm and return the old one as many times as necessary until i get a good copy
Also, my rig is sort of built around the lens (mainly being the astrodymium ring set) so that is a big factor as to why I want to have a good copy
Try the Samyang 135

I mean… if they don’t come from the same factory…
Then maybe the qc is better?
I use one. I got a really good copy for 230€
Samyang and rokinon are the same
As I’m sure you know
Yes I know
You judge. (Ignore the hot pixel worms. The dithering from the main rig did not transfer to the Samy)
What is it stopped down to?
Mine is nowhere near that good at 4.5
T2.2 fully open
My lens is not measured in f-stops (ratio between focal length and aperture) is measured in Transmission stops. Basically it counts for how much light actually makes it trough the optical system. That's honestly how telescopes should be measured as well. In T-stops and not f-stops
Ah
Is it a cine lens by any chance?
Yes it is
Ah
Not sure if I the Astrodymium rings will work with that
Though, I think they might
I know I need to buy a new part for my EAF
Well, do you have a 3D printer?
Unfortunately no
Don't ask why, but I have it modeled in fusion360. So I can give you a .stl file that you can 3D print and test it with your rings
But I can make things work lol
Oh nice!!!
That's quite early tho so it's not as polished as is right now
aaaand i made a mistake whatever i dont feel like fixing it
“past year” means this year second 500 is supposed to be 501 blah blah blah whatever
like 3000
dude thats like at least 8
Last year, a little over 1k, this year... almost 5000
Its gonna be 7.5k € when I get the esprit on Christmas
Needs to be higher 
Spent or the lost, because I also sold stuff
would be like 1000 without the ragdoll
Should I make thread in share your data with all my data (like ashen) ?
11
14
1
Yes
Done
How much money have you spent on telescope equipment in the past year?
14
21
6
$1000+
its not even a competition
nuclear is just incredibly dangerous to produce
eginearing
it’s actually one of the safest
alr bro who voted for fossil fuiels
just dont blow it up tbh
dont get me wrong - nuclear energy is really good but its just very dangerous
solars way more safer and pretty much infinite
well its a good thing we have a whole lotta engineers dedicated their careers to safety huh
Source: the chernobyl mini series
Solar takes too much space
nuclear is the only option
and it’s extremely safe
Solar actually sucks
I love when people talk about opinions in these topics
saying solar sucks is a fact not an opinion
Chill big man im on your side
nuclear is super safe now
unless im the operator.... idk how the core temperature reached 9999F😭 (everything exploded 5 seconds later)
i hadnt realised coolant pumps were off...
Governments just sell solar, wind, hydro and so on as "green, clean energies" to discourage people from supporting/investing in nuclear. Nuclear means free energy for everyone and the oil industries dislike that idea very very much 
How much money have you spent on your equipment in total ?
6
27
And dont even talk about nuclear fusion, it will literally get you killed 
fission
No, fusion
You dont know what nuclear fusion is?
no i know i just mixed up fusion and fission somehow....
Its alright
wait im not an idiot
i thought i went crazy for a sec
fewww
😭
I said nuclear fusion will get you killed because of the recent death of Nuno Loureiro, look him up
ohhhhh oops
depends
Science and studies have borne out that nuclear is the safest to produce, I believe by a long shot.
The problem is that when something goes sideways, it tends to be ... noticeable in a manner that is substantially harder to overlook than when something goes sideways with other forms of power. Oh and Yellow Journalism and Sensationalism need to be accounted, as well. There's a town in PA that is uninhabitable because a coal mine is burning below it. That disaster doesn't get the news that 3 Mile Island or Chernobyl or Fukishima had. And Chernobyl was the only one that arguably had a larger immediate and larger potential impact than the burning coal.