This is data that I captured from my club's darksite. I've been trying to get a picture of Rho for 3 years now but it never really rises that high here. I'd like to be able to pull out more of the blue any tips on processing (I use GraXpert, SIRL and finish up in GIMP). The subs are 120 seconds, from an ASI 533 MC Pro and a UV/IR cut filter
#9.5 Hours OSC Rho Ophiuchi @ 135 MM - Bortle 2
102 messages Β· Page 1 of 1 (latest)
May I ask what your general process was? I like your rendition better :). I'm still working on improving my processing skills.
Crazy in a good or bad way? And what's your general process of you don't mind me asking? Your processing is much better than mine
Thank you for sharing, data looks pretty decent
Pixinsight: STF to check borders for stack artifacts, a little crop of the borders, Graxpert background extraction, scnr, Blurx, image solver and SPCC, starx, seti star stretch on stars, seti statistical stretch on starless, noise xterm on starless, curves for a bit of contrast and saturation, combine images script, create HDR image script, improve brilliance script, lab color boost script and a final touch on GIMP.
fr good lol this data is just amazing!
well i have some bases but i change it a lot due to diferent datas. but some of my bases are:
cropping,
bge,
spcc,
ghs,
starnet removal,
normal stretch,
cosmic clarity sharpen on details,
cosmic clarity denoise (full),
star reintegration and star stretch,
cosmic clarity sharpen (stars),
graxpert denoise,
final stretch and saturation
Ah yes. Star stretching
@left copper what's your FL & pixel size?
Got starnet
thanks for the data
need a better bge but looks great
Hell yeah, very nice data
@vale fjord im relatively new to Astrophotography, thanks for the nice input
your welcome
to a relative new astrophotographer this processing is stunning
135mm and 3.76um was what i used
it worked so i think its a imx 533 sensor
Yes. IMX533 (3.76um) and 135mm fl
omg how did i get it 100% right? lol
The title says 135mm which is the used focal length and the posts description says that a ASI 533mc pro camera was used. I own the very same camera so I know that the pixel size is 3.76um
i did not read the description
only the title
lol
the pixel size i just went like... 3.76 is great
Over time, however, you also become surprisingly good at simply guessing or estimating itπ
yeah fr i got 3 right in the past month lol
in one there was no info
it was 1500 3.76
i guesed 1500 3.6 cuz i could imagine it being visible that way in my telescope and camera
A square image will be 3.76 99.9% of the time
fr my camera has retangular images
But yeah, that's why we should always put FL and pixel size into the descriptionπ
how do I get more color?
@violet breach @vale fjord@haughty axle
either saturation or spcc if your in the start
what's spcc?
spectometric collor calibration
Siril has SPCC afaik
you do it after you plate solve the image but must be after bge and before stretch
yes it has
what's ghs?
generalized hiperbolic stretch
how do you do it?
I usually only play with the first 3
You should watch a tutorial about GHS. It's quite powerful
well you need to see i cant explain properly
get a tutorial it will be great
pls send one
I'll check in the morning
In this tutorial we'll explore the powerful transformation technique, Generalized Hyperbolic Stretch within Siril.
Generalized Hyperbolic Stretch is a technique that allows you to enhance the details and bring out the faint structures in your astrophotography images. It works by stretching the pixel values in a non-linear way, which enhances th...
oh
lol
same vid
lol
rn i'm processing Ashen's Dungeon datas
the tarantula one and i'll probably process other
Do you process with siril?
you should process these they are great for learning
Okay
Well because stretching with PixInsight really got quite easy with all the tools. I rarely use GHS anymore. I just use statistical stretch from seti astro and curves which already does it for me lol
Maybe some tweaks with masks
whe have statistical stretch in scripts too but i never quite used it
what is it?
lol
i wish siriL had masks and multi images processing too
I don't even know. I just adjust the parameters to my liking π
look at this ashen starless tarantula
Might try this later
you should this data dump is amazing
it has like 15 stunning images
or more idk
also has ashens pix icons in there
tx a lot, im absolutely not new in image processing, but pixinsight was horror at first π
lol i wish i had pix
but siriL is doing great with me now
i always thought i dont need it, than i started to learn and to love it π i only own the seestar S50 and S30, but im quite happy with it
i own a 127slt telescope and a sl3 camera so integration time and the images are not quite the best
pix would be great lol
my images are noisy as fudge
tried gracpert for denoising ?
I would not want to do Astrophotography without PixInsight since I bought it
lol
It's such a wonderful piece of software
yes it creates too many artefacts in my data
like some noise is so proiminent that it literaly become a new star lol
thats indeed very good data. had a quick look at it