#M45 from B4
151 messages · Page 1 of 1 (latest)
Nice detail and excellent colors
Cleaaan
damn
diffraction spikes 😍
I really like the sharp diffraction spikes! Id love to get some like that myself. I am curious, how do you process your stars?
This time was a bit special. My RGB data did not have spikes so the spikes from Lum worked well. This way I do not get the ”rainbow” star spikes ( witch I do not mind btw).
Yeah I dont really like the colourful spikes as well.
But usually I just do the Seti Astro Script ”Star stretch”. Not always good and in that case a simple histogram stretch.
My secondary holder vanes are quite thin so I think they have a hard time showing up in my images.
interesting. Its hard for my to articulate what I mean but ill try my best. Your stars have a sort of even glow that mine lack. mine look like circles whereas you cant really tell where yours star. also the spikes are HUGE which mine never get like that. Ill see if I cant show you an example quickly
They need to be very precisely aligned to give good sharp spikes.
Yes, show me! 😊
yours versus mine
^
I know the background is noisey compared to yours. I think I add too much noise back in after I use deepsnr
noisy^
the only star ive ever done that even remotely looks good like yours is the extremely bright Alnitak
see how it looks like its a glowing radiance
I assume you mean during stacking. I use WBPP in pixinsight which is usually the best if I am not mistaken.
- I have a mono cam
- I have applied BXT
I have applied blurexterminator as well, I use a OSC though. is the difference really using a mono cam versus not?
I have never understood why you might want to add noise back? I simply lower the setting on DeepSNR, maybe 85-95% depending on the data to keep some noise.
THere is no DSNR in my image though
What scope do you have?
Its a custom built f/4 newt with 8 inches of aperture
Agena astro mirror
Cool! I have an 8 inch newt too.
And my collimation is a bit off. I can get a OSC image to compare. Hang on...
gotta love em!
I watched a video once of someone using deepsnr and he said to use pixel math to add some of the noise back into the image after using deepsnr at 100% I am unsure why he advised to do it like that though
I dont think picture perfect collimation is attainable unless you have scientific instruments or technical equipment that does it for you. Too much human error involved. I have to guess where my secondary should go because I dont have a center dot on my secondary. You can tell because my diffraction spikes in my alnitak picture are split slightly horizontally.
Try to do both ways and compare.
The horizontal split is due to the secondary In/out position is a bit off. Insert it a bit and recollimate. If the split is bigger = you went the wrong way 🙂
I have. The issue I have is with noise level in the image. Each image is different. I use pixel math to add noise back in and I do it by a certain percentage, usually 10%. If I have an image that is virtually no noise because its really well sampled then 10% proportionally isnt much, but if the image isnt sampled well then 10% is a lot more so I have to play with the values.
In this OSC of M45, the spikes are terrible because I do not have my spider vanes paralell...
THis is after BXT btw.
hmm what settings do you use in blurex for star sharpening?
I only sharpen stars 0.2. I dont like the tiny star thing.
I am gonna try this now. Do you do anything with the halos?
No, not unless I feel the need to because of the image.
Here is another one more recent, Bright star:
All OSC data.
Star not centered in halo because of collimation error.
this is very nice
I think it may be a sharpening error
I looked at your star again, I can see you used SCNR on the image - I only do that before adding stars back. I never use it on stars. It creates brownish hue to the spikes that I dont like.
I try to do this too but sometimes I get weird green halos around blue stars if I dont
THis is another bright star just next to M31. Notice the green in the rainbow. I have SCNR on the background, not star image.
heres a star thats been corrected and nothing else. I am going to sharpen it like how you do it
Yeah, that can happen. Then I simply apply a star mask on the image and only do SCNR on the rest, that will make a better correction of the green without killing the stars.
very smart
what would the star mask be? just the stars luminance? use that as the mask?
Yeah, star luminance 🙂
And yes, use as a mask. It will help to get that green tint that sometimes follow the star at the separation.
its hilarious because I think this fixed my issue
for comparison
its definitely better but Im still curious about the spikyness between the diffraction spikes
They are like rays
Do you have an mask over your mirror clips for the primary?
im not sure what a mask is but this image should help
thats my primary'
Ok, you do not.
That is part of the issue.
THe mirror clips that keep the mirror to the mirror cell will give you diffractions and more importantly dark shadows.
the black rubber bits?
THis is because the very outside edge of the mirror is not optically sound (usually) it has a slight curve.
Yes, precicely
so there would be no solution to make it more even?
I still dont understand how theres many dark shadows if theres only 3 mirror clips, maybe I should clean my mirror haha
If you have a 3D printer, you can print a circle that covers the clips and simplu use the same or longer screws to hold it in place.
I did the easier thing and used a black marker.
I have a 3d printer and that would take 2 seconds
I simply drew a black line on the mirror that goes as far inside as the clips.
Several you tube tutorials on this.
this should get rid of any small flecs that might be on the mirror edge as well
or at least hide them
Yes. It removes all that. Every telescope should come with one.
My stars improved drastically.
amazing! well now I have some stuff to do while I wait for my damn SCT focuser
thanks so much for the advice, Ive been racking my brain on this for a while.
I was like, what the heck am I doing wrong!
I have too, and still are 🙂
The diffraction spikes can look good, but they are flimsy and unreliable and very hard to get in the right position if you ever move them.
I got an old Meade 10" SCT that suffers from mirror tilt so I've been waiting on parts to correct it so I can start doing photography.
Nice!
sometimes mine get squigly and I have no idea how this happens, let me show you
Very nice galaxy/planetary scope!
for this image I 2x drizzled it so thats why the star looks weird, I also sharpened it too much.
but look at how the diffraction spike is wavy!
yes the focal length is 2500mm and I am very excited to get some crazy images
Yeah. It is field curvature and BXT trying to fix it.
I have a feeling DSNR also can be involved. I try to go backwards in the editing history to see where the problem occurs.
Sometimes it is enough to use DSNR before BXT or the opposite.
Ive noticed the AI can get carried away
That sounds alarming 😉
I always use blurex before deepsnr
I do deepsnr right before I stretch
denoise, star removal, then stretch individually]
Try the other way around if you encounter problems. Sometimes I get oversaturation from DSNR if I use it on linear data but not on stretched data...
so many new things! haha overtime I am learning that there is not one master workflow and you have to keep a bunch of things in mind while you process.
True! It keeps it interesting! 🙂
Yeah I love it so much. Literally addicting my entire family thinks I am crazy
but then I show them what I stay up all night for and they are like whatttt
I am working on an image for the competition. Its NGC 4236
IKR! Well, I usually say that at least I stay at home, guard the house at night and stay out of trouble 24/7 🙂
Awesome image!!
I also have 8 hours of narrowband to highlight the nebulae which I think is cool, I havnt combined them together yet though.
this is a crop of the nebulae
That always gives it a new dimension!
I think it will make for a very unique, uncommon image. Although I still am not entirely sure on how to combine the channels into a regular broadband image.
This was my first attempt but I feel like I didnt do it very well, they look like red blobs with no detail or anything.
Yes I am pretty pumped about it. How do you combine Ha data with broadband data?
Another great image! I would be happy with that. You might tune it down if you don’t like it, but there is not one way that works every time. Some times I simply use Ha as a mask and increase red in the curves tool, or increase saturation to show the Ha emissions in the main image.
Other times I have to go all the way and use continuum subtraction on Ha and then add it in one of the scripts.
Sometimes I add it in linear mode, sometimes after the stretch.
PI has a series of videos on the subject though.
I forgot they even made videos haha Alright, ill try some different things. I heard someone say that I should try using the Ha as the red channel and recombine the images back into an RBG image.
My take away on M81. Not unlike yours.
fair enough! that looks great! This actually reminds me of another annoyoing issue that I have had to deal with. How do you prevent star exterminator from taking the nebulae out of the galaxy! the only way Ive figured out how to do it is by using a mask over the galaxy and doing two separate star removals, one of the stars on the outside of the galaxy and one on the inside with all the nebulae. Ill then duplicate the galaxy one and use clone stamp to remove all the stars from one and have that be the nebulae image and remove the nebulae from the other image and have that be the star image. I then recombine the nebulae with the background and add the galaxy stars with the background stars and then I can start processing them.
If you do, you will loose the visible red spectrum.
At least combine red and Ha. (After matching brightness ) with the Max(Image1,Image2) pixel math command.
Thats what I was doing wrong before. I was trying to combine them together but the addition of signal from both of them would overpower everything else, so I was guessing which values would be good.
There is another way. I usually use the max command (just mentioned) on the rgb_stars and Ha_stars.
Of course you need to match the two star images before hand so only the nebulas are brighter then the RGB star image
That will move the nebula from the NB stars and place it in the broadband stars data so you can add them back.
so theres some pixel math that I am unaware of. Max command is what its called? is there a video on this?
I dont think I’ve seen a video on that but it simply compares the images listed between ( and ) and uses the brightest pixel from them. I always create a new Image. The formula is exactly the same as Avg, Med and Min (Average, Median an Minimal)
If your rgb_stars and Ha_stars images are named like that , you open Pixelmath and type
Max(rgb_stars,Ha_stars)
And create the image, voila, star image with nebulas to add back.
omg really thats super easy and not time consuming
haha
Yeah. Beats manual work 😅
should I stretch them first? when should I combine them in the work flow, that was another thing I was wondering. I combined them after they were stretched already
I think it works both ways.
Important to match their brightness before hand though. I usually put the two on top of each other and blink untill they are stretched equally bright (compare the stars as reference).
do you mean the process in pix called blink? like you flash between the two and adjust until you cant tell their flashing anymore?
I sometimes use the process Linear fit, sometimes the script DNAunlinear fit.
No, not the process. I use the switch image keyboard shortcut (ctrl+pgDown)
It switches between last and present image back and forth
gotcha, and what do you mean by linear fit? I use this at the start of my workflow to make the green stack go away. You just select one of the images and use it on the other? And this will match their brightness?
Yeah. So you stack them as separate r,g,b?
I always recombine in the WBPP script because it gives me fewer files to handle.
The green will go away when applying SPCC.
But I did notice that it might be problematic, so I sometimes use Background neutralization on the image first.
The color calibration tools only ”bend” the colors into submission, so the closer they are to begin with, the better result
I am off to grab some sleep now 😅. I will check in tomorrow.
sleep well
full image? those fine stars in the background of M31 are nuts
Curious to know what newt you are using there too
It is the TS ONTC 808.
damn