#Ritchey–Chrétien enjoyers thread
47365 messages · Page 48 of 48 (latest)
like slight tube flex over the course of a night causing it
but because i have reinforced every single axis in the scope, i havent observed the issue on any nights beyond those around the full moon, in broadband
so a solid focuser + threaded connection, and avoiding the moon at all costs will go a long ways towards solving the issue entirely

making sure the primary mirror and secondary mirrors are tight is another good step
holy info
you cant get rid of it 100% i dont think, but you can get about 98% of the way there
due I have been working on this flaw of the RC's for like 8 months 
ive been hunting for the cause like a rabid dog hunts for food
lol, why I own a newt
found nothing until this random post on CN
oh no
this issue pertains to noots too
i saw it on my quattro
what if its a good newt
like good mirrors
part of what made me so desparate for answers
nope
im gonna have to deal with elatoing soon
somebody in this thread still observed the artifact in question on an OOUK noot
how do you stop it
cancer
on an oouk?
you must try to eliminate any and all sources of flexture in the system
i think it's much harder to do on a noot since the imaging train sticks off the tube at an angle
that puts unusual stress on the focuser
your focuser needs to be exceptional at worst
this focuser any good or naw https://antares.space/products/focusers/focuser-newtonian-2-rackpinion-micro-focus'
its r&p
this is the OP
I dont believe the OP states what noot it is other than a 12"
prolly a gso or smt
this was the OOUK
basically this is what is happening
you can correct it by using a phyiscal offset when applyuing the flat
that does cause other issues yes, but it does prove that the imaging train moving is the reason it shows up
imaging train or a mirror
most likely the imaging train though
I know people use this focuser but I don't have any idea if it is any good
normally noot people's goto is the Baader Diamond Steeltrack
im gonna have a decenly light imaging train ftr
Daaaaamn so flexture all along
I think its eliminated for me as far as it goes (apart from me Being dumb the other night and loosening the focuser accidently one night)
But very good to know im Not gonna lie
That Info will definetely be able to Help many people going forward
is the touptek in the room with us
gimme
I got a peak at the biggest RC as well last night
you're in La Palma ?
i want swir
gimi
ai
🗣️
qhy are that lazy huh :/
Then it's really stuck on.
The tube does like to hold on to it.
If they got the tolerqnce too tight, that will happen.
Yes it really is. It seems to be a very common problem with this telescope because the seller I've bought it from states in the description that it can be hard to remove the primary mirror cell. I hoped you had the same problem and found a fix but I guess I'm out of luck. 😅
You need to remove the clamps but first you gotta remove the mirror assembly from the tube its like 4 black screws at the bottom of the telescope
You gotta wiggle it like lift one side up then the other and repeat until it's off
i have to pry my cell of with the explorer 150p
then hammer it back in
I was going to say it probably needs to be pried out.
I'm sure thats healthy for the mirror
what do you think will happen to it
Well idk microstresses and
its a pyrex mirror
a friend dropped one and nothing happened to it
i stepped on mine and not a single chip or crack
Amy stop typing RIGHT NOW

I mean if you use a lead hammer i think it will be healthier
Dafuq
i hammer it in with a screwdriver 
yuh
Ig that works i though you went all out with a metal hammer lmao
time to make a pasta bake on my mirror
i would if i didnt care about the paint flaking
Could buy a lead hammer
nah
i should buy a dead blow 
Diesofcringe
Same
i totally dont want swir
😭
It is way too expensive
swir hater amy
I would get it in a heartbeat if money was no object
already found an affordable swir cam 
i dont think the tech is really that crazy hard to produce, it just doesnt have a killer application that would spark production at scale
lies
now i just need a mwir cam to match
its £4000
Wait but wouldn't you need to cool your entire telescope for MWIR
Since the walls of your scope would be a major source of radiation
Explain
Where can you even find infrared narrowband
i got a quote and they said a 3nm gernanium nb filter would be arround 10k depending on the wavelength

I think it will be easier to cool the telescope walls
i corrected my filters bandpass shift
The mirror itself wont be emitting infrared since it's a white body not a black body so that only leaves the walls
What am i looking at
Niii filter
What was the issue again like the cause of the bandpass shift
manufacturer error
How did you fix it
secret 
You bought a new one didn't you or maybe reduced your f stop
increasing f stop would have fixed it 
sadly i dont have an f1 scope
and no, i didnt buy a new one
Damn uhh no idea then
Observatories do it when their filters dont fit for distant galaxies
Still clueless
i physically tilted the filter 
Oh right forgot that also causes bandpass shift
if you have a fast system it creates issues tho sadly
Like what
gradient
its not a perfectly even shift across the whole filter
but at f4.5 theres no issue
Right
light is such an ah
There are no perfect solution you'll always have to lose something to gain something
exactly
unless you steal
Nope I'm talking about solutions to problems in general
no linux is completely free 
So is windows

If you don't mind the watermark
windows is not free, they collect your data as payment instead
They do that either way
yea so its not free
meanwhile my linux system is free of any trackers
You could technically remove all the bloat ware on windows
But with linux is a prime example of my previous statement
how?
You get software with no tracker and it's free but you lose window's compatibility
i gain compatability
How
i can use all windows apps and all Linux apps
Yeah but you cant use nina for example
You also cant run java
i can use nina
say that again but slower
Can you?
Idk
Then why is minecraft java only on windows
java has an almost 30% performance boost on linux
yk java is a WORA language right...
nina is old news, kstars is meta now
nina is runnable on linux natively
im just sad that I cant run nina
ah
Nina is the goat
Java has native Linux support
Right
i beat uupo stacking with installing arch
im apparently quicker at installing arch than someone is at stacking
idk if thats good or not
toured another big RC tonight
yup, though this is our last night
take it, they wont notice
my first good RC6 image
@frosty shard ive slightly loosened the primary mirror so we shall see what collimation says later.
Just a very quick edit… but we are getting somewhere. Now I just need a lot more Oiii data 😂
The astigmatism appears to be much better controlled now
Nice
how's the weather up there these days? I'm landing in 2 weeks
Pillars of Creation part 2?
not yet
the moon is chilling like right in front of M16 rn
i will be adding onto my existing data though
im hoping that by combining the different data, i dont make it completely unusable though
I honestly want to order a corrector now
just to make the most of the scope
you need a corrector with a RC ? is that because you're using a reducer?
correct
im not using a reducer and using APS-C on an 8" RC
if i had a 10" RC i probably wouldnt need a corrector or if i used my 533 on here instead, i also wouldnt need a corrector
but the 8" is in a weird spot where it does rather well at APS-C but it does leave a little bit for wanting
even a field flattener with a reducer wasn't perfect tbh
i think a flattener at native or 0.8x would be far better
i also just want something to be in front of the filters to catch dust
based
funky spider vanes
I am seeing some chromatic aberration in the one Ben linked some time ago
🤔
im seeing a lot with CA
now that could be from bad offsets
or it is from the corrector lacking any high dispersion glass
Which corrector
Stack with drizzle scale 2, pixfrac 1, rgb align, bin. Thank me later 
Ok more of a bandage solution but it works extremely well
Idk why im in the rc thread
Yikes very likely
has been really good this trip, summer is usually good weather other than maybe some calima
@frosty shard been sub 3.0 HFR all night tonight
regularly seeing below 2.5 as long as there isn't a sudden disturbance in the air

Fingers crossed 
Finally someone wo can compete with Tom in aperture 
big
it’s a cool telescope, they do a lot of exoplanet discoveries and characterisation, and very good IR/Optical spectroscopy
they also have an imager which can do like nanosecond readout
-# (this does spell something out btw, its not just random lines)
What you think of my logo?
very minimalist, very tech 
Very nice
Okay I'm actually tilted at your HFRs
But not your FWHMs
Because I've achieved similar with my IC 10 data
It's making me very curious about how kurtosis affects star profile measurements
I wasnt convinced the HFRs were all that good
I have already found some neat features in this region
some bok globules and some evaporating globules that will eventually manifest into well defined structure with enough data

DSNR is cheating holy
How much Int
Ahh not bad
I'm so excited for NB filters
But they are damn expensive
I had to save for months to get these
but it's looking like it will pay off
these ones arent producing halos
just know as long as you arent impatient and buy something else instead, it's worth the wait
that's even more true for dark skies
I only have the camera + lum and a filter holder that i used with my first astro cam
So I need EFW RGB+NB and Focuser
My Gemini is broken in the truest sense of the word
That will cost more than 1.2k
Yea
but they are the kinds of things that will last years with good care
I want good filters
Goood
If no accident happens then you could do it
yeah
Oh and I still have to upgrade my Planetery Setup
damn
That will also be expensive

Oh god this hobby is so bad
When it comes to the cost
yes it is
if kurtosis is the analysis of outliers, then I think mine should be worse by far
since I have an APS-C camera and the corners are not corrected
cropping to just the middle does always yield an even better FWHM and HFR
sometimes by not much, sometimes by a whole lot
Not the kurtosis of the FWHM/HFR values, the kurtosis of the star profiles in ADU
The normal distribution (black) is the most platykurtic (goes to zero most quickly) of the three
The Cauchy distribution is the most leptokurtic
The star profile of an obstructed aperture is more leptokurtic than that of a clear aperture
This is a good way of quantifying the difference in star profiles when the FWHM appears to be the same
i was literally today revising this for my statistics exam in 10 days lmfao
digitized it 
i really need to not write on lined paper 
hubble is an rc right?
Almost, then Perkin-Elmer screwed it up
what happened?
The primary mirror was perfectly shaped wrong
A bit more work and you got yourself a grind core band logo
No for real, the error on the mirror was so perfect that they literally made a tertiary mirror with the inverse error of the primary
how can an error be perfect?
This is a good example. See the big spike? Thats the mount periodic error. It's actually happening so consistent that you can predict exactly when is gonna happe so you can correct. That's what perfect error means. It means you can reliably correct it
ohhhh
makes sense
thanks
this is what a bad harmonic drive looks like in case you wanted to know 
this is known good
periodic error is like +/-4"
very good
its definitely harmonic!
I think my guitar makes a similar sinewave😂
this still gets more photons than ur rct
How's Arch? (totally not related)
it works
ive been practicing fry screaming a bit
But like, would you suggest it to someone that never used Linux? I've been wanting to switch for a while now
Peak
if you know how to read and how to problem solve you will be able to use it :D
i dont think im doing it right still :(
Read? That seems complicated
Just don't destroy your voice trying
thats waht im planning
it didnt hurt at all
so maybe im doing it right
i still got my vocal range
No idea, I'm not good at screaming tbh, I should practice
do you wanna hear what i can make
it sounds like a deranged parrot
Oooo, please do say more
mainly bc im too scared to go too loud
idk what to say tbh :(
Sure
ill dm like 1 audio recording
Arch is not a beginner distro unless you are big on the DIY mindset. Literally just like recommending an RC to a beginner – not a good idea for most, but for some dedicated beginners it can be fantastic.
If you want an easier first time experience, try CachyOS, which is pacman based so you can use much of the Arch Wiki for help.
First experience with linux was arch+i3 
Perfect shot in tonight's time lapse
By design. Slower they are, sharper they are
Their CO is already huge natively at F/8
Imagine that but faster. Absolute pain with collimation too,
And the native correction of the 2 mirrors substantially reduces
Making a CDK or HW just better for faster FR because they’re diffraction limited throughout the field without using complex surfaces
I see, I'll def look into CachyOS then
