#Ritchey–Chrétien enjoyers thread
1 messages · Page 39 of 1
I don’t care
I’m not going to spend 50 minutes finding the star after a small adjustment
its a callo thing
doesn't really matter what thing it is
it takes weeks or months of practice
you cant be good at it in one or two nights
an RC requires a lot of patience and if one doesn't have the patience, it probably isn't the right choice for them
my astrocam sadly cant focus this, but have a phone cam shot instead
And it's worth getting right once because GSO RCs hold their collimation pretty well once you dial it in
My baader diamond steeltrack just arrived.

My focuser was on darn tight and it was moving that much. 💀
Oh sick. Hope that marks the end of your donut saga
It might. Can't thread the reducer directly onto the drawtube. 
Since there are no click locks available for the steeltrack, im going to have to use the compression ring.
Luckily it's a click lock style compression ring instead of a thin piece of brass.
I feel a little more comfortable with that than a standard compression ring.
Uh oh
I dont have a coupler big enough to fit this thing either.
I cant attach the bracket
It's straight up incompatible with my Gemini.
RASA + Reducer
No reason to reduce if you're using the whole image circle already 
Wait so
Ive thought about this long and hard.
Should I just shoot at native and downsample to give the illusion of stronger SNR?

But what if you reduce it
how you reduce a rasa?
You use a reducing agent like sodium borohydride
or you microwave it
wdym "illusion"?
you don't
yes
put it in the oven obviously
it shrinks the primary mirror

there is no illusion?
what happened?
i called off sick once
bruh
u see
they only scheduled me one every other week
and i dont get sigups for their shitty credit card
why do you need a credit card
the real question is, what is not being said that led up to only being scheduled every other week? 
I feel like there's more to this than is being let on
that's why I didn't press it

kind of like that Krishna kid
i asked
im busy working a 40 hour+ a week internship to graduate.... thats unpaid. it also takes up most of my freetime
why the hell does a 533 have insane amouunts of vignetting with an RC6
wtf
are you using 1.25" filters?
ohhhhh
youre using the reducer
so it smushed the light cone down
i think it looks more exaggerated than it actually is
well its bad enough that my OAG is starved
because of the STF
i had to use 6 seconds to see more than 2 stars'
what guide camera are you using
120mm
the 120mm was fine at native
I highly doubt that
it had more stars
I could hardly make it work in galaxy season with my 6
that doesnt make any sense whatsoever
idk what to tell you. thats what happened
the RC6 has a small image circle but I dont believe it is that small
Ugh, there is nothing narrowband to shoot at the moment, and moon is rough on galaxies
get Ha in galaxies
Iam shooting a Coma cluster, they are way too small
462 is goated guide cam
What hfr do you normally get? And what fl and pixel size is that corresponding with?
Use your S-II filter if you do that
Not H-alpha
dont have it
the redshift of the Coma Cluster is too high for H-alpha filter to work, but it slots right into the S-II bandpass
shooting as is BB with moon, lets see what happens
it isnt that small, theres a reason the secondary is so big
Is this a US moment?
I’m not good at convincing people to sign up for their credit card and rewards program
lol
and called off sick once
so il probably be scheduled 1 day a month now so I’m still “working” there
atp look for another job so you can quit
I’m stuck in an internship that’s like 40 hours a week, and requires a ton of work outside of it: all unpaid.
So I literally don’t have time to work more than 1 day a week
are they the only place letting you work 1 day a week?
Well what job would hire somebody who can only work 1 day a week lol
macdonal 
I refuse to work in a job dealing with food
cashier:
That’s what I’m doing currently
other cashier at different place :
bruh why so much vignetting
reducer entered the chat:
(also the tube sticking into the light cone to protect agains off axis light will block it some)
its only a 533 :/
isnt the scope only made for apsc un reduced
so reduced its gunna be tiny
This is what I said yesterday lol
didn't see my bad 
It's not a bad thing that you reiterated
It reinforces what I said.

vel do you think a class cass will have the same issues with light leak and stuff you are having?
hard to say considering how much farther back a camera will be in that system
im contemplating converting the RC back to native so i can use my rotator
i want a 1x flattener but i dont know if i can make that work with a rotator
or the rotator I own
i could make it work if i had the M68 version 
truee
we will find out in time
i will also test a coma corrector bc afaik it doesnt work with one bc of the hyperbolic secondary
did you check your imaging train for reflective adapters?
Learning myself far outside the Window Here but i dont think my sct Had These issues (but ive only started Mono Back then so i really dont know)
guys, heres the jwst pallete on bubble 
What could be reflective? I don’t remember there being anything reflective
mainly the extention tubes connecting the scope and camera
basically the entire inside of the scope is reflective
what is that palette
idk tbh
i just straight up slapped all 6 channels together and called it a day
okay but this actually looks scrumptious
more int
its my megaproject for the next while
its also a combined 8 hours
buut in He and Ir its so dim that 30 mins of Ha drowns it out
I was about to say "are you sure that is 8hrs?"
the bulk is Ha and red
the rest of the channels are sad
just wait until i get the ariii and siii filter
the oi filter wont be bad
oi has good snr
no
The tilt plate costs $90. I do have one though
But it covers the Collimation screws on the primary mirror
So I can’t use it lmao
wadafrug
I'm in for the Ar III and OI but not the S III
whats wrong with siii 
weak
only slightly 
what do you think the spikes are?
First one is a literal double star btw
ik that one
And the brighter small ones won't be perfectly round because of the diffraction
Looks like a good image to me
have you tried doing a saturation stretch after the initial stretch?
yes
hmm
How did you color calibrate? Did you do any other color manipulation before stretching?
(I may not be super helpful here since I've only really shot mono)
led diffuse light (not a point source)
the moon is so dim through it only my cone cells detect
😭
(full vs with uhc filter)
absorbtion lines!!
@frosty shard couldn't get an EAF on the BDS soon enough
However
There's not an unbelievable amount of tilt anymore.
My baby is sharp corner to corner just about.
Will need to iron things out once I get the adapter to use my click lock with it
Like im sure the tilt isnt great because I had it pre adjusted for the other focuser
Aka, I adjusted sag and not real tilt, most likely.

Oh and guiding is much improved.
Even with the wind Im hitting a nice 0.5" on the opposite side of the meridian and in the north instead of the south.
Which, before, id be lucky to see below 0.65" ish when guiding away from the part of the sky I calibrated on.
Which all tells me that focuser was flopping around.
Shouldn't have been.
Seeing sub 0.5" rn wtf
That's with wind.
do planetary
@frosty shard do you remember that we made a thread about the WAVE150i so we can troubleshoot issues with the mount? Now the thread is dead because there are no issues with the mounts😭
@frosty shard it is finally over
We are officially in danger 😭
Finally managed to get some H-alpha on NGC 2403 (HaLIRG+B preview)
SICK!
alright this looks a little better
I really just need to back this up with more luminance
And here's HaLRGB
That's 11 hours exactly of HaLRGB and just over 15 hours when the IR data is added in
I just saw this message while digging and if you haven't already tried it: it's worth a shot. RC and refractor reducers are often interchangeable
Refractors and RCs are aplanatic designs so it's not like an SCT reducer which also tries to correct coma
If you have tried it I'd be interested in hearing the results
The fact that you have IR shouldn't make Ha green😭
No, but I tried a frac field flattener on a newtonian 
Skill issue, learn to embrace false color
There's a difference between false color and not calibrating your colors 😭
I have a flat field refractor (71f), so yea I’m curious how it’ll work: they both are naturally flat fielded
Il have to give it a try eventually
yummi :3
Technically it is still there
But as i found through patching the light leak with the decoupler, it is likely from the light leak around the drawtube. 💀
So ill get to finding some way to either mitigate it, redirect it, or eliminate it entirely.
The stock adapter with the baader is designed not to let that happen but the M 90 adapter lets it happen.
Other focusers have flanges on the end of the telescope side of the drawtube, this one doesnt have that either, so another option is to make one
The reason I believe it is the drawtube is because the profile of the way everything looked after flats was identical to the unpatched decoupler leak.
in any case, the baader is a keeper
light leaks arent any worse than the GSO focusers, but rigidity is far superior
feathertouches have worse leaks than the baader
(which I was going to buy for a while before I learned of some first hand experiences with them
)
...they are calibrated.
sounds like SDSS palette
Here's a blink between the HaLRGB and HaLIRG+B
i already fixed the light leak with the BDS drawtube lol
i made a part so precise that it does exactly what i needed it to do without letting any light by
to put this nail in the coffin, i designed another half that is currently printing that will go inside the decoupler to catch any high angle reflections before they can get anywhere in the optical train

judging by just how precisely made this first one was, i think the fitment will be exact
what a saga
Does anyone want to try some short integration processing practice :D. Heres some data I captured before main target was available. Its less then 1 hour 5 mintes total LRGBHa. Heres what I was able to pull out of the data. 1500mm focal length at 2.3um pixel size. This is drizzled data so original pixel size is 4.6um with bin2. https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/19EFy7UhxB8BXfEYmltIUshnnJE4KxdiN?usp=sharing
Heh 
Decided I didnt need the other half of the blocking mechanism for 2 reasons
1, it's already very thin and wouldnt do much, 2 the bit on the drawtube and it don't align perfectly for whatever reason but they do fit together like they should.
I pointed my phone camera up the side of the drawtube with this current flange and I saw nothing.
At any point of focus id normally operate at, all the way racked in, and nearly all the way racked out, I made that so precisely that it just does the trick on its own.
Hell yes.
@harsh matrix @frosty shard I got a galaxy season challenge for you. In 1h I only managed to get two fuzzy pixels. Yall can do better on the Cheshire cat? 
yall should all do it then combine data
Yeah. We should... but people are more focused on average mainstream targets
shoud i do cheshire :3c
mainstream is mid
I will as soon as it clears Up (and i got som blue on m101)
blaeu
Oui
Just don't do it in IR
It's hard enough in luminance
But it's a small region. Plus you might be just the right person😭
but ir is my pride and joy 
Yeah, but this is a very dim target and you want every single photon in the spectrum. Especially where your camera has the highest QE
sooo, no filter at all then 
i can do that
ohhh noooo the moon is up!
i guess i have to do infrared 
sooo, this is the cheshire?
got shit seeing but i will lucky image it at some point
@tight lodge even got the mouth
i got the eyes and nose in 30 mins before tracking got bad
the nose gets mixed in mine if you can see
you can see like 3 pixels of nose
oh yea lol
how much int has yours?
lemme calc
83 mins
niiice
i wanted to do more but scope too heavvy
if its over the zenit it goes downhill (literally lol)
i dont trust the stellavita with a meridian flip and i dont know how to force it
so im back at m101

m101 is fun
its a bird lol
i love how many are just peppered everywhere
ill just keep glazing over this one for now
🤤
Light leak
The answer is yes
I believe anyway
The signs of movement were gone but I had artifacts comparable to your image there
Thats because light was leaking around the drawtube of my new Baader Diamond Steeltrack
I found the main reason it manifests is because of light leaks in between the imaging train and secondary mirror
so you think this circle in mine is a light leak too?
So think focuser light leaks or decoupler light leaks
hmmmmm i wonder where
well probably the focuser
I doubt it would be the where the primary mirror is
It's not
That part is surprisingly sealed off
None of my testing has ever revealed a leak there thankfully
Yes
Gap between the focuser body and the outside of the drawtube
I made a little lip that I put on the scope side of the drawtube
Purpose built to avoid the mechanical parts, aka doesn't get caught on anything or stuck
Flocking the extension tube helped further dampen the leak
This is what i did to the focuser I was using
This got rid of the leak too
But you have to take care not to put flocking material between the gap and the drawtube where the gap is too narrow for the material to fit
would the light leak cause the flats not to fix the dust spot too though?
I deemed that particular solution to be unnecessary for my BDS just based on how well the little flange with the flocked extension tube was doing
I believe it can
Yes I noticed
With a leak as excessive as the one that comes from around the drawtube of a focuser, I believe it does allow dust to survive calibration
what did you use to make the lip thing
Because the light leak during flats wont match the light leak during imaging.
I 3D printed it.
oh, i dont have one 🙁
I thought so, so I was already thinking about alternatives.
Low hanging fruit can be cardboard or something.
Maybe stuff like what I used for my decoupler, crushable foam strips, high density.
Or flock the ever living hell out of the entire inside of it and pray
I have some foam strips from when i made my shroud for my heritage, so maybe thatll work
What flocking material did you use?
I got like 10 squares of stuff off of amazon
I dont remember the exact brand so give me a sec
is it a velvet? I thought flocking was like a paint
k
I got this stuff
The adhesive is surprisingly good, it's very dark, and it's only about a tenth of a mil thick
so it sticks in the draw tube well enough?
It's really good for this application
Yeah
Almost not easy to get off ngl
felt does not taste nice
btw
if you ever wanted to know
Is this all you flocked?
its also a nightmare to get off your tongue
you must not buy the flavored ones
clearly not
No
The inside and outside are flocked around the end
Another solution which might be easiest for you
Is to make some kind of opaque shroud
Put it over the back of the focuser body all the way up to your imaging train.
Make sure it's not too tight so you can change focuser, but not so loose that it might drag on or get caught in the focuser's mechanics
And flexible enough to change with focuser.
easy for callo. Thats impossible
I agree ngl
@digital nexus this might be your best bet ngl
Not really sure of what exactly to make it out of, but I did have one made out of fabric
It did well in most cases but I didnt implement it perfectly.
So your light leak was on the blue and not red right?
I’m looking at one of these, might work
@harsh matrix Darks look normal so don’t think it’s a light leak
Shine a light up the side of the drawtube while you take a dark.
Yep nothing
This is a 10 minute dark, with a light panel lighting up the bottom .
Wtf
hardy har brown drarf
Are you using a filter drawer
yea
which has no leaks. i used it with my 71f and tested for leaks before
Is the filter loose?
Maybe not even loose in the drawer, but in the frame.
You can figure out if you shake the filter sometimes
Though mine wasnt loose enough that shaking would reveal anything, I didnt find out it was loose until I cleaned it, and I felt the glass shifting.
dust is removed now. Pix didnt use darks/biases when stacking
but the vignetting ring is still there
Filter is good i just checked
apparently the vignetting ring could be IFN
I can still see dust
Nah
the bottom? oh its extremely faint
It's a misalignment
Top and bottom
Exact same places as the pix light stack
it looks like it lines up
It does somewhat but there's a dark ridge next to it.
That's indicative of a reflection of some kind
So if it is, what do i do about that
Im retaking my flats tmrw with a t-shirt, i just used a light panel last time. maybe thall fix the dust
Find the reason why it is moving between the flats and the lights.
In my case, the focuser was moving laterally.
Something it shouldn't be able to do.
Which is why I never considered it until I had to believe it.
whats moving?
That's up to you to find.
I can't really help you out since I don't have your scope with me.
It would be a good idea to check if the primary mirror is fixed tight, same for the secondary, and it would be good to check to see if you can move the focuser drawtube up and down or left and right.
i can wiggle the draw tube up and down, idk how to tighen it
Uhhhhhh
Is it a crayford?
Or rack and pinion?
Aka, does the bottom rail on the drawtube have teeth?
rack and pinion
i got that thick TS optics one with like 90mm of draw tube
You cant tighten a rack and pinion
I tried to tighten mine
It made 0 impact.
The drawtube was still deflecting by a horrifying amount.
Gimme a wider image😭
wait I'm eligible for Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year
(unfortunately you cannot vote unless you have 75+ edits on Wikimedia projects)
Globulars in NGC 2403
cool
yummy globbies
looks like i didnt tighten the screws enough after collimating yesterday
Noice how much Int ?
2,5 hours
Do you want to collect more ?
100%
next clear night ill do some final adjustments and then im ready to go
Goood
here is my little try only 12min int
lovely
Thanks!
that a single sub?
6×120
why did u leave the satelite trail in then
Ehhh idk
Wasn't anything serious
lets just say it adds to the viibe xxD
Hehe yee
yours looks very nice
You can already see a bunch of BG galaxies
urs has them too, theyre just not as pronounced, which could be due to urs being a sccreenshot
Yea
i see walking noise as well
Yea im Not Sure how that happened xd
Touptek messed up the new update?
Could be
I mean the StellaVita is now unable to save a sequence xD
Blink the unregistered subs. Maybe they were not dithered at all😭
Just did
Theyre dithered
Maybe it changed the number of pixels that it dithers?
I'll Check that next time
What ive Just noticed is that i should increase the setting time after a dither
Because the First sub after dithering Always has worse Star shapes than the one following up
Update: I missed three globulars
horay!
Hehe. At such low integration you either drop the sub or leave it in. With my bodes data, first night 5/11 subs were with sat trails. So, you either wait for more integration or leave it in.
So RC bros
Would you guys say that my RC6 is in working status
based on this 2.5 hour M81
Collimation needs tweaked slightly, that ring is just something il have to deal with in processing.
I’d say I’m like 95% there
other than the god awful denoise yea
I know I over did it
But it was 2.5 hours and I don’t like noise
DeepSNR kinda burnt it ik
noise is better
why
bc it looks more real
uhh
Want to process my data yourself?
Give it a shot
I believe you are starting to cook
starting huh
That's only 2.5 hours, give it a full night and you may pick up some IFN
2.5 hours under 80% moon too
Oh yeah you'll get a lot more out of that without the moon around
Too bad it’ll be cloudy til 2030
(clockwise from top right) yur collimstion needs some work
Primary or secondary
yes
well it’s pretty close eh?
i dont know
it just looks worse than mine has ever looked
There's definitely room for improvement, but I'd also check for tilt in your image train first
How
I cant use my tilt plate
is it a single sub?
anyways its difficult
as denoise isnt what i wanted to use (i used a bit)
i also did manual decon
no that’s 2.5 hours
Did you not stretch?
thats why i really didnt push it here
the noise is scary
better than 90% of M81s 💔
yeaaa
I think there may be focuser sag
Just based on what Callo said about the drawtube
It has play in it
Oh my god what the hell
That's way worse than mine
That focuser should be a lot sturdier than that.

Yea so what do I do
tigthen everything up lol
Tighten what
yk the screws on the other side
What screw
i think you tighten the 4 bolts on either side of the middle
i think those 2 side grubs are for the focus knob
but i dont see any central grub to tighten it
so im guessing its the 4 bolts in each corner
There’s supposed to be a screw here but it’s missing
lmoooo
It’s to lock the focuser so it doesn’t matter anyway
I don’t want it locked since I use an EAF
I tightened them
It’s not wiggly anymore

Anyway to test if it’s too tight?
go through all the steps on your eaf
Im guessing this is why it has these scratch marks
if the motor missteps you will know
just run it and find out
any signs of not being able to move the tube easy it will complain

Behind the denoise is blur 💀
Hahhaha. I told him before he started imaging to check collimation with a star because he used an ocal. He decided not to and now sees the wrath of collimation
I think it’s fine
Was good enough for a test run
Because I imaged I figured out other issues that I otherwise wouldn’t have. So now I can be mostly fixed up before next light in 25 years
Oh so you told him too
I'm glad I'm not the only one.

i think everyone did 
Pretty sure those arent supposed to be that tight
Unless it was already all marred up like that
💀
Yike
i didnt care enoujgh
i wanted to get data regardless
it got me close to collimation
so im thankful
i understand il need a star test
but i felt and still do beleive that collimation was good enougy for me to test
Oh yeah it's good enough for that
i wanted to get SOMETHING after 5 months of having it sit in my room
Btw the adapter I needed to change the output on my BDS from M 48 to M 56 x 0.75 so I can use my Click Lock is supposed to get here tomorrow, ish.

im hapy you finally usedit
That way I can ditch the stinky set screws with big compression ring again
Okayyyyyyyy
Fine
I guess that's a justifiable reason.

it was painful having it sit for 5 months unused
Oh sick, hope the weather cooperates
It won't
Its like 2 solid weeks of rain
2 maybe clear nights.

El Niño hit and it's joever
You know what thread we're in, right?

if i get a cc im starting my own thread 
You should
I still want to pick up a 4.5" CC just for kicks
yes
modify it into an f3.3 4.5" astrograph 
class cass sounds like fun maybe
He keeps asking me, and this chat the same questions. I'm trying to do a project with him but he keeps getting two inputs
Finally! Congrats)
LIKE HWAT
callo (the broken record)
RC enjoyers
i may attempt to build a Dall-Kirkham (maybe)
DIY stuff is great
yesss
odk?
nope
dk?
CDK
aa
not a planewave**
i wonder how bad a dk's spots look
thats average
its 3.2k euro
im sorry but thats horrific for the price tag if you consider the alternatives
the collimation stability isnt good enough to justify that price either
okay ehat
an rc has better stars than that
buh
what the hael is this
btw
im estimating 1.500 euro for the 10" corrected dall kirkham i plan to build for the optics
the optics being from a company that is said to be zambuto level
also...
someone once tested their cassegrain mirror from that company
and got a strehl of 0.999
!!
why not 1 fr 
not good enough!!!!
2
a perfect 5 star restaurant is odd
fr
@frosty shard nvm i cant use the clicklock with this current BDS M 48 adapter
the adapter isnt wide enough for the reducer to fit through
i can use it no problem if i were to use some short extensions in front of the OAG to shoot native instead
honestly there's so many compatibility issues when trying to use the reducer that im tempted to drop it altogether
this is getting really frustrating

GET OUT OF HERE WITH YOUR SPHERICAL OPTICS
Well...this is upsetting...
A CDK is an RC for the weak
And I, am weak
I gotta be a little hyperbolic about gatekeeping in here.
Id say it’s better to get a great CDK instead of a mid GSO RC
hi weak
extremely
hi weak im amy
a bunch of BDS adapters are on sale rn
im not sure if i should get anymore
AYO
wait
Also I’ll likely have a coupled Focuser so a ritchey chretien would make me cry
the clicklock made for the BDS is back in stock and on sale

i think ill get that and possibly return the adapters i got
get class cass and a 0.5x reducer + a coma
corrector
the M 54 adapter is back in stock too
i think i want to either get that or the M 68 adapter or get both, or just the m 54 idk yet
where are these 0.5x reducer ideas coming from
oh nvm about the BDS click lock darnit
there's no ETA on them and theyre on back order
maybe that means they expect some soon ish?
I'd say skill issue.
gso reducer 
I already knew this wasnt going to work but ordered the adapter anyway
Im so annoyed with myself 💀
do you think that focuser slop was the reason i had that ring?
doiget
4
5
2
ritch cretin
@frosty shard why does weiner filter denoise my image 😭
makes it sharper and acts as denoise
Not vel but id say so
Now that U secured it, wait for the next opportunity and u will see
I may not build a Dall-Kirkham but rather a Harmer-Wynn Cassegrain instead depending on the cost of the CDK I want to build
(Same concept as them CDK besides the primary mirror being parabolic rather than ellipsoidal)
@frosty shard BOO
I think it is most likely to be the case yes
Do i think it was the entire reason? Hard to say
will find out Tuesday night
IS THAT A CDK?
REEEEEEEEEEE
its a CCC :3
REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE(fraction)
reeeefracton
this is the sharpest ive got a scope
for such a large corrected field too!
you can use a 1.2 meter big sensor with it
Yeah but what's the spot size on-axis?
on axis is left and 567mm off axis on the right lol
80° fov
I mean how big is the spot in microns
ohh
20um
about average
average refractor spot
bruh.
buut what im showing isnt a refractor
do you wanna know what type of lens it uses it :3
I'm scared to find out
its a pinhole lens looool
pinholes spot size depends on size of hole
...I feel like I just got jebaited lmao

you can technically use as big as a sensor as you want
yummers
Man i really need to fix my mount
class cass corrector
A Dall-Kirkham can be corrected with just two elements 
classy can be corrected with 1 
i just wanted to reduce it a bit
m

im not out of bed yet 
my eepy ass can not cope in the morning
https://discord.com/channels/794642864218439681/1490097406199726251
it lurks above you
okkaayyy
yummers
Are you talking about Zen Ottiche?
yes
That's way better than I thought damn
just know
strehl ratios get a bit weird at that range
and it wasnt a professional measurement so
take it with a grain of salt
Btw here's the price list
Strehl is also not the best method to test them, you should send the mirror to Zygo tbh
hey guys, I am getting a tilt adapter soon. Can I adjust it in daytime or just when looking at the stars? And what is the best way to do it? When out of focus to see the shape better?
You can make a fake star field out of some small ball-bearings place it at a certain distance frome the aperture and defocus the telescope on it. You should get something like this. This is a tilt test with the Samyang 135mm open at f2
This is how I made mine
Thanks!
Alright my fellow RC enjoyers
The skies are gonna be clear, but the winds probably aren't gonna cooperate
I can still image but it'll have to be short exposures (probably like 30 seconds or less)
Perhaps I will try to hunt RR Lyrae variables in M3
dang
our official spring meme
newtonian users are the bottom one every month
so are RC enjoyers
Aperture never fails you
get a bigger sensor
then you can be the bottom one all the time with an RC
sadly most of the time I'm just a dissapointed clear outside user :/
We got tons of circumpolar milkyway tho


me af rn
i think we finally got some clear sky last night for like 2 or 3 hours
i didnt set up because i was expecting to be blue balled

Right? Like it's so frustrating to hear some complain
grr clouds
looks like i have a 4 hour clear window tonight
i may take that chance to test the RC again
I don't really expect any issues

i hope your issues are gon
oi how does that cute little sharpstar do?
Askar/Sharpstar same thing
I think they will be
Im going to test this first tonight I think

then I think im going to drop the reducer and instead do some resampling to get desirable SNR moving forward
both in an effort to avoid the vignetting, and to make way to use the rotator
Its a freakin' little light bucket. Closing on on collimation too, stars have been hard to come by with this weather. 28min and 50min captures
I can imagine collimation is a PITA at F/2.8 jesus
reds a lil overcooked there
nah thats fine imo
We'll ignore that, deal? deal.
Tuesday is supposed to be all clear, all night long, the real session
this is the scope u have right andro?
yep
whats your sensor width and height, could you also send a raw?
raw stack or sub?
raw stack and sub if thats okay
23.5mm x 15.7mm
can you do that thingy with my scope and reducer
;-;
does that diagram account for a corrector?
could you maybe recreate a zemax file for me
yup
to check for tolerances
fire, i do not have the specs of the corrector do i
how would i recreate it
when i have nothing to go off
check dms
when nothing is there:
also i thought you meant for the 0.75x
wut
here is the sub
do mine
I DONT HAVE THE SPECS
6" f/5 gso, starizona nexys
t h e s p e c s a r e n o t p u b l i c
no, its propriatary
idk what that means

specs are a secret
which means its too good
one doesnt exclude the other)
my decon is propriatary, which clearly means its too good
or include either!
I really need to get the second mount going, want to run two scopes. Itching to use my Sharpstar obviously, but RC + 585 as well(
I wanna do m106 witht hat combo
you would be able to make one of those cool zoom in videos
where it goes in and gets replaced by a sharper image
damn that collimation isnt bad
Thanks! Damn thing is sensitive
not bad
Having RC prepared me for this moment:)))
well technically horrible but since its F/2.8, 130mm and at APS-C, not bad (without context someone will be hurt by these stars, welcome to the fast telescope world
)
collimation seems better than 90% of the cases though so good job on that lol
you may have some backfocus issues though
too close or too far?
hard to say
I plan on spending up to another couple of hours tomorrow to narrow it down more
If it needs to be shorter, there is nothing I can do. I have OAG and filter drawer back to back, that's it. I do have those thin spacers that came with the camera to make it longer
actually
do some collimation narrowing like you said
then lets see, it might just be the funky star sizes it naturally has
Not to pat myself on the back, but I've seen a few F4 quattros with worse collimation than this
This is from yesterday, after I took out the secondary for cleaning and bench-collimated it from the scratch. No adjustments under the stars at all
I will be fine tuning from this
that's clever wtf
was that in or out of focus
Out of focus
This is the amount of aberration my phone camera has😂
Yup
Looks about right
hmmm

i need one
easy print
There you go
i dont have a printer :(
You can make it out of a plank of wood
i do like how we are in a world where priners are a common thing though
yea
i got a few of those luckily
im doing jupiter but it turns out this barlow im using has terrible spherical aberation
stock focuser?
No
what sensor size?
533
I’m moving from a 533 Color to 533 mono, so I know it can handle the sensor size
Even though it starts vignetting
gonna be fiiiinnneeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee
-# ?
what focuser you got?
the 400 buck one?
think so
will be ok
yup will be alright
then adjust it
I haven’t tested it to make sure the screws aren’t too tight
is that after you fixed it?
alright id test it first
granted that i get that it can be easier said than done
i cant even get longer than a few hours of clear rn
I have 4 days of clear skies
a whole night is a pipe dream
bweg
I didn’t plan on selling the cam so I was all excited lol
can i call you a dumbass?
I’m getting $700 for my 533 with a 3nm sv230
and uv ir cut filter
I’m shipping it Thursday so il have 1 more night with it
onions
@slate falcon @frosty shard I might have just found the key to making mosaics out of Hubble data 👀
I've always wondered just how effective drizzling was on Hubble's images since I didn't know what the native resolution looked like from Hubble, and here it is
that's insane
that sounds yummers
oh dam
Yeah I've been meaning to try using this for stacking. SIRIL's good, but I'd rather just drizzle everything at once
👀
so you knew about it but didnt tell us?
how dare you

I mean...I figured y'all already knew about it lol
im shoiting at zenith under neath the cone of a street light
NOPE
to hate me
trying to figure out how to install it
sooo either bortle 9 conditions or trails
Then again, I keep forgetting I'm on the more technical side of things than you are
looks like you have to do it through Python which I'm not familiar with so uh
I've been meaning to write my own implementation of this
this is going to be fun 
I was refreshing myself on C++ earlier and even that feels like another planet now
😭
im only know basic bich stuff like ray optics and other stuff :(
dumbass street light :(
i think i know the most about ray optics except for Ryan who comes first in this server
crazy to think about how unpopular ray optics are here tbh
I mean...is it because people here prefer wave optics?
If so, not crazy
If not, u rite
wave optics are evil though
ive done wave optics a bit
buut its not as fun
Waves are just rays but spherical
looks cooler though
ya
On that note actually


