#Ritchey–Chrétien enjoyers thread
1 messages · Page 28 of 1
15 minutes of exposure with flats
normally something sticks out already
nothing exceptionally abnormal here
hell
imma dump the whole night into this sucker
why not
Oh nice with the new baffle?
What's the target?
i did away with a baffle extension
It's one of the Camelopardalis galaxies right
instead i opted to do an internal light cut off ring
i double baffled that too
it sits inside of the decoupler and about 75 mm in front of the drawtube of the focuser/in front of one of the other internal baffle rings i made to stop light leaks from the focuser
this is what i designed
this side faces the secondary mirror and away from the camera
this side faces the camera
it is friction fit, a very, very tight fit, and it was designed in such a way that it only ever covers up the inside of the baffle tube extension and prevents the light from the sky from reaching the camera directly
in theory, and by looking by eye, it appears to work
according to a real test, it appears to work in reality as well.
i painted it matte black without missing any spots so any light that reaches it from the secondary is immediately absorbed
whatever sky glow from around the secondary hits it gets absorbed also
none of that seems to make it to the camera

the ring the camera can see through essentially has a built in knife edge baffle to reduce as much surface area visible to the camera as possible to prevent the build up of a light ring that could potentially interfere with calibration
that appears to be working as well.
the walls were all printed with a very rough texture to further increase light absorption
oh, the aperture for the camera is 30.5 mm in diameter
with where the cut off ring is fit, the angular size of the aperture is such that it completely obscurs any vision of the baffle tube extension from the camera, and only allows light from the secondary mirror to reach the camera
there seems to be some sort of reflection in the flats after a DBE but nothing residual remains in the light frames just yet, i need to do some long integration testing now
that reflection is likely what i observed before, and may be unfixable 
since cutting down the size of the aperture on this ring will cut out view of the secondary and primary mirror, subsequently
ill do when get hom
dusty hand my beloved
The ones made for all of the closed tube RC's work for whatever aperture you have except the 10"
Perfect thanks
Could my horrible focuser mess up my collimation? Make it look different at different angles?
Yes
But normally only if you are using the compression rings to secure the camera in place
Do you do it a different way?
I got a baader click lock to replace the stock compression ring on the focuser i bought
It returns the camera to the exact same place every time, and does not interfere with collimation.
Preferably i would thread the camera directly onto the drawtube but I dont have a converter that would let me do that.
Fancy wow but like 100-150 dollars
Surprised it’s not a thing
It is a thing
Oh
Theyre just all out of stock on Agena
What’s it called
I didnt have a choice if I wanted to keep using my reducer.
The decoupler consumes too much back focus and id never get the camera to reach focus if I continued to thread the reducer directly onto the drawtube.
I see
M56 x 0.75 female to M48 x 0.75 male adapter.
Seems to be in stock
Might look into it maybe it will work for me
that is M48 female
needs to be male unless you are willing to use that adapter as some kind of coupler where you thread the reducer all the way through it and thread the camera onto the back of the reducer
I see
well @frosty shard 3 hours of lum later and no dust motes
i think its safe to say that i have fixed it
the bg is a little weird but we had >50% moon and the neighbor's porchlights were shining down my OTA at an awkward angle
RGB looks good
because there are always problems with gear
and those problems demand more spending

Because it has Astro in its name😂
true
the astro tax is a real thing
I have been very spotty about checking up here but once I return to Madison I'd like to have a closer look at how you fixed this
star
I know it's too early for most of you fellas. but
Happy New Year and clear skies!!
Happy new Year and clear skies!
hapy new yerr
That gives me an excuse to take off the imaging train one more time to photograph and document what I did behind the primary mirror and in front of the camera
Happy New Year all!
Tbh i think it would be better if the new year started at a certain location in earth orbit and not exactly at 0000 like that everyone can celebrate it at the same time
A ton of RC users out there will appreciate that
I was gonna follow up with "not me
"
But then I realized that this will certainly help people join the cult
and/or not ragequit with a used RC
@tight lodge ive been looking into the 130 pds 
does seem like a good next step tbh
would bring me within my mounts payload capacity
@harsh matrix should we write an unofficial owner's handbook for GSO RCs?
Nothing formal, just a Google doc filled with tips, fixes, etc. for issues we've come across and background information about these scopes
ya
It's a good telescope.
Ok... it has good mirrors😂
Only if you tell me how to collimate
The sharpcap way is holy
whats the sharpcap way
Veloren is the goat at collimation
It’s like Nina but with other tools it’s amazing for collocation
i know what sharpcap is idk how it helps collimation though
@harsh matrix I need reinforcements
How many of you guys use an OAG
is this too much vignetting for my guide cam with OAG?
helps give you live feedback of adjustments you make during star collimation
idk how many times weve been through this but ive already said this multiple times
i forget most of it cause i still havent used it
unfortunately
If you want to look up in chats between me and veloren, awhile ago he walked me through how to use sharp cap
is it for the DSI method
No, sharpcap
I found it quite easy
Once he walked me through it
Are you using the free sharpcap or pro
I only know about it cause Mazzif gave me his old mini pc, and he had Pro. It’s expired now so I keep getting “Your Pro License is Expired, Please Renew”
I said I’d have that as my name til I use it
I’ve had it 2.5 months, and haven’t used it
I just realized I forgot to respond to this, maybe?
I dont have a lot of time to dedicate to something like that atm.
I think something like that has the potential to be very useful and I think it has the potential to draw the ire of people who dont want anyone buying these scopes because they had a bad experience with one.
#Astrophotography #DeepSky #Galaxies #AmateurAstronomy #Telescope #NightSky #AstroImaging
How far into the universe can a 6-inch telescope see? In this video, I image a series of deep-sky galaxies, each one farther from Earth than the last, all captured during a single observing session (well… almost).
Starting with the nearest galaxies and ...
opa!
(he got nowher near enough int)
His guiding was fluctuating quite a Bit as Well O.o
looks like my graphs lol
and im on my mounts payload capacity
he must have said no to polar alignment
Oh daaaamn
Im having enough payload capacity left to theoretically Being able to have my Setup in the scope twice xd
Maybe
But going from 0.9 to 0.4 in the Same exposure is pretty crazy
To be clear it's not something formal, just a place to compile all the things we learn about setting up our RCs
At the very least it would be useful for us to refer back to
@harsh matrix I think MAS might be my new standard 
Too bad they don't support unlinked stretch yet
add in the other 25 mm tube for the rear of your RC
it should have come with 2 25 mm spacers and a 50 mm spacer
@frosty shard heart neb core, raw
2.32" FWHM
5 min subs
this is with noisex and blurx
need more daytar
yup
it's very very good
oh i didnt know i needed all 3
you shouldnt
oh
that's only if you cant reach focus where it's at
k il have to check it in daylight this week
camera back focus w/ spacers doesnt matter as long as you can put the camera on the focuser
I thought i lost the m63 adapter i needed
but it was on the scope the entire time 🙁
yea
oh
what mas?
you definitely could get spacers for that
massgrave?
it might be harder to reach focus with the OAG though
that website
so think im good now? i guess il just have to see huh
ohh wait. the OAG will change focus when i swap scopes 🙁
that will be annoying
yes
yes
MultiscaleAdaptiveStretch
that's what I did 
well focusing the oag wasnt that hard
guess il deal with it
although i prob will get another OAG, camera, filter drawer, and filter eventually
and then another mount 👀 dual rig time
Right now im trying to figure out how I can easily move my mini pc and imaging train from my Askar to RC6. So far i think im going to try and keep all the cables stationary, so theyll stay with the scope. Then I just unplug everything and can quickly replug on the new scope
im getting a shorter ethernet cable and i did clean it up slightly. but my cable managment looks like this for the most part
hopefully i cna just easily slide out my minipc stack
gonna need to buy an EAF for the RC6 soon
aisee
Rc6 where
where what
did you eat it
ir cut filter was crunchy
@frosty shard you like to get uncomfortably close to the targets that you image. How comes you haven't had a crack at NGC604? 
thats the bright nebula in triangulum right
i would like to see an up close of that
Yep
This is the best I got so far😅
you don't want to see mine
it's lacking integration, shot in full moon, my collimation slipped while shooting, and it was shot on a heritage 150p
take one look at it and you'll understand why imaging with that scope is hell
Mine lacks integration as well. It's a single sub
still better than what i got
How much you got?
oh, and i processed it at 5 am with my monitor in hdr mode
Mine is 23min. Single 1400s exposure
how tf
i threw away half the subs that night bc of ass guiding
Good guiding. The true power of OAG
i need one
so bad
Worth every penny
but i need other things so much more
i need a new camera, new mount, filters, focuser, ànd spider
and a oag on top all that
Ah... better OTA😂
i still have used my current ota a total of twice
and ive had it for 6 months
it's unbelievable how bad my clouds are
Bruh... in 2025 I think I got a max of 50h of imaging. Total... the whole damn year💀
you think that's bad?
i think I got under 20
Damn...💀
i will be honest there was 2 or 3 clear nights i didn't use
but for those i was either sick as hell and had no energy or it was like -20°
I'm locked to weekends only. So I miss most of the clear days during the week
Same
I have a single sub of the Triangulum core in H-alpha somewhere
leave some for the rest of us 
I never pass a clear night unless i am running on like 2hrs of sleep because i simply cannot afford to lose my precious clear skies especially during the winter months summer is a bit more forgiving as i have a lot more clear skies
i haven't had a winter clear sky yet
December (and Jan so far) has been the worst
yep
Does anybody have idea if its too much to be this out w the spacers of the camera?
if that's the correct amount you're fine
Yeah it is, just makes me worry about the flexture
hey uhhh whats goin on buddy?
How can i explain
Best cable management ever seen
Its just the dew heater cable that is so long my first idea when i got it was to wrap it up around the spacer but since well gravity exists i decided to block it w a bit of tape

I need to continue working on that again
how much integration?
2hrs 55 mins
let’s gooo
There’s threads
Yippee
But I guess I’ll use the clamp
@harsh matrix Is it normal that I can feel every groove on the rack
Or does a screw need to be tightened or loosened?
that's how mine is
i dont know if it's good or bad

If you can get good focus it’s normal then
Also
Is this little bit of play normal
yes
someone should hyperstar a classic cassegrain
just bc
also, a doublet lens can correct an rcts field curvature
you can combine a doublet with a miniscus for better effectiveness
That's normal (and it's why I keep a Crayford for visual)
The Crayford is smoother/more precise for manual focus
Use it as a prime focus f/3 or so Newt?
I guess you would need a coma corrector
ya
also, you could use any noot with a regular coma corrector and replacing the secondary to make it "look like a rasa"
but you would need f4 or f3 mirrrorrs
have you thought about NGC 1569
I have but it's smaller than IC 10

I didn't have a need for an ota dew heater. Just have one on my guide scope
Mine does not need one
Its not for my rc its for the guidescope on it
How do u balance out all that weight just on a side?
Wing it
Wdym
Believe me if i say that even a small thing as a finder shoe gives many many issues to me to balance out dec ord in 3rd axis, how the hell do u balance all that lmao
I’m not
It’s a harmonic so like I dont need perfect balanced
I see
you dont want perfect balance otherwise you get wobbly backlash
I picked up a celestron one from Amazon for like 20-30 bucks, cut my own hole for the top rail and stitched it together works great and a lot less expensive than aatrozap
the gears are not zero tolerance so there is some wiggle. if the balance is slightly off then they are at least always engaged
Ah okay i thought u had a worm gear mount
Yep it should be a bit east heavy
Does the thing work the same in dec too?
@frosty shard almost made the corrector for f4 noots
That spot size though, oof
it oerforms okay now, ive changed it a bit
it doesnt work for f5 noots tho
it makes them f7
i made it betterer
also, i said its a coma coreector, never said it makes it flat field too 
@frosty shard it’s weird like I will go in cloudynights and somehow find your post about somthing rc then I go on astrobin look at cool photos and find your photos like man your everywhere
... hopefully you only find one photo of mine on Astrobin
Why haha
I've only ever uploaded one photo there
New OAG acquired and installed. Weather looks like it got worse for tomorrow but I may pull the rig out to find the new focus point if it's not totally overcast
Yeah it’s that mosaic
What was wrong with the previous one
I had the Askar one, but it's inferior to a bolt-on one in terms of design, setup, and positioning of the camera with my filter wheel
Also one of the screws that holds the prism in place is gone
Also that prism is too small for my sensor
Looks like I'm actually gonna get a chance to shoot tonight, but I will be battling the wind
Atleast it’s not a zwo one
Trust me it’s a pain
Oh ok so it just got sketchy
Yeah I don't think it's a bad OAG overall but mine is not trusted since I can't find the screw for the prism and it moves around easily
The SVBONY one is a better value though, for sure
Though I got my Askar OAG for pretty cheap
Ok I see
What did you get in replacement
I have the SVBONY SV238 now.
No I'm going to test it tonight
Dang it comes with helical focuser
Yup and the adjustment for the prism is much better
Love that they also made it wider not longer
With the Askar you have to adjust the position of the helical focuser if you want to move the prism holder around
With the SVBONY you just pull the prism to the position you want it
And you only need to loosen/tighten one screw to do that
Ok cool weird for askar to do that
Zwo is like svbony
Yeah it made more sense with my setup; it's compatible with Touptek and ZWO filter wheels
@harsh matrix Do you use any backlash setting on the focuser
I wanted a bolt-on OAG, not a thread-on
Isn’t askar limited to there stuff
and the Askar uses compression screws which is annoying
Nah if anything the Askar is compatible with more equipment
Oh ok
Zwo does aswell it don’t lock it that that well so if I move my filter wheel with little pressure it slides
Imaging train is ready to go
Im new to this whole RC thing, but I think the focuser is supposed to be on the scope
I have two focusers
One for visual, one for imaging
By default the visual one is on the scope
so my imaging train includes the focuser as well
Tonight's data on the Perseus Cluster (3 hours LRGB)
No way. I actually got some of the H-alpha filaments in NGC 1275
You can see a faint red glow around NGC 1275
I'm not sure if I can use an H-alpha filter here though, becuase the galaxies have a significant redshift at 225 Mly
I know 3 nm filters are only good for galaxies with a redshift equivalent distance of 30 Mly
you have 3nm filters?
Mine are Touptek's which are 6.5 nm
okay good
you can maybe shoot that cluster in H-alpha
Too far away; H-alpha is at 668 nm for the cluster's redshift of 0.0179
What about using Sii
That's at 672.4 nm...questionable, but not a bad idea, especially if the filter is slightly blueshifted
I've had the silly idea of looking for bad H-alpha filters to see if one might suit this cluster
ones that have incorrect bandpasses

This might be a great excuse to do IRG though because the filaments will stand out more in green
my orion imag is irgi

Someone dumped 30 hours of H-alpha integration into NGC 1275, oof: https://www.cloudynights.com/forums/topic/656082-ngc-1275-abell-426-h-alpha-troubles/#comment-9257170
isnt there a baader 20nm wide bandpass ha filter
that still might be too narrow for this cluster
unless the filter is redshifted somewhat
just shoot in ir 😭
But that starts at 685 nm, and the emission is at about 668 nm
It's a real challenge
I will get IR on it though
Thats bigger than i expected it to be
1624 mm of focal length does wonders
I need to get a full dataset on it though
It does indeed
also @vapid patio the new setup granted me ~20 mm of extra backfocus to work with
can i have the stack pls
i wanna try work some magic
#1458718804484816948
oki :3
2032mm
juh
got only the nebula out of it
my tools i made do come in handy every so ofter 
I was hoping I could treat this as a throwaway test image, but now I'm gonna have to commit to another 6-7 hours of integration lmao
if i had like 8 hours of free time i could have done it to be smoother but i dont

-# (my internet dying
)
i see some nebula in the blu chanel too
I wonder how the (R+B)/2 - G chromaticity looks like
same
green has very minimal
already??
uh huh
Cloudiness Curse
I’ve had 3 clear nights since getting this thing 2 months ago
wait and pray
tried combining channels and it went badly 
if u look at the nebula it kinda got a pne shape
@tight lodge this is what the secondary and secondary holder look like from the focuser
I think its unnecessary but I've gone and flocked it too
This is printing right now
It goes inside of the telescope side of the CYCK focuser i have
The aperture is big enough for the coma corrector to poke through and not any larger
This should help alleviate all other possibility of stray light getting into the CC
Worst case scenario I get a 1x or Paracorr to push the point of focuser farther away which should ultimately solve the problem if this design works.
I need to make sure this doesn't restrict the view of the primary mirror in the coma corrector first, do test fits, and stuff before I call it.
dirt
why so dusty
that's more than a little bit
Agreed
ur secondary got flocked
Veloren is right that much is pretty much nothing it might maybe reduce contrast by 1% at worse
True
in reality they just want to give me crap for it but their mirrors are even worse than the ones on this quattro, and I can guarantee them that

if y'all really want to have squeaky clean mirrors, go ahead and be my guest
I'll be looking forward to the cries of anguish of you having to tear your scopes apart every day
Yeah every time i take apart my telescope i age by a full year lmao

Imagine how I feel after I've had my RC8 completely apart like 10 times in the last 4 months of 2025

Well. Shooting may be impacted for me. My apartment has flooded
what the hell
All my telescope equipment rolled out immediately so nothing of value was damaged
A little more dust can make your mirror behave more like a diffraction grating
Heya guys can anybody tell me a good focuser to get since im still stuck w the stock linear 2” gso one? No because i hear people say nah get the steelrack, get the moonlight, get the ts one, this that, im confused, so if some of you could tell me the best to get id be thankful
Probably a Feather Touch if you have a kidney to sell
Moonlites are good as well
Finally got to shoot something last night, first night since before Christmas. I was only given 4h by the weather gods
why?:) Its HSO
If it were sho id be sad BC this Looks Like u nuked the Green the ha would be into oblivion
Im Not too Sure how hso is supposed to Look but for my taste its still too little green
Did you scnr it?
nope, just starmask
I didn't spend too much time on processing, this will need more data anyways
Gotcha
From the colors, it Just looked so Simular to a nuked sho, thats why i asked
Nah its def too much i need something that is not over 400 bucks
Moonlite doesnt seem to be sold in italy tho, unless on used market, anything else otherwise?
The baader steeltrack isn't bad from what I know
I don't remember the price off the top of my head though
Just tried SHO (my S is synthetic btw) and green noise removal post stretch
Aaaaaah that might be it
I thought you had a real S signal
Around 350€
How are you making a synthetic S-II channel?
Nothing fancy, just DBXtract script in Siril
Oh so there is S-II data with an S-II/O-III dual narrowband filter?
I assumed it meant that the S-II data was estimated from other data
update: I may shoot tonight
btw, the zwo duoband filter has from ha to a bit into 685nm 
soo i may be able to get ha in that elliptical
I've been thinking about seeing if I can get some use out of a duoband with my mono cam
i think you would be able to
would defo make some intresting coloured images
Aside from the extended H-alpha band, you could use it as a "nebula luminance"
smart
i think using those quadband filters would be good lum
Yeah like the SV260
i think altair astro also does one
ill compare theur bands
actually the SV260 is excessively wide
this just shows those filters
geebus it is
idk why they dont have a nice chart
but thats the graph
quite thin
covers hbeta halpha oiii sii
they also sell a literal osc tri band
which is hella cool imo
@frosty shard use this as luminance 
luminance premium™
I wonder what that blue transmittance is for. Reflection nebulae?
um no, its for blu
bc its a literal rgb filter
for shooting rgb in light polluted areas
with osc cams
or to be used as lum
this quadband doesnt have the blue tho
i think this could be interesting for pne's
they sell a 7nm version too
and a 2nm version 😭
they also do a 7nm nuv filter
Around what wavelength? 365 nm?
395
also, my cnc spider is finally getting ordered this weekend i think 
i honestly may get this at some point
looks not bad
I totally forgot about my Pacman project whoops
@tight lodge finally getting around to the rest of that cone nebula/fox fur nebula data
i 2x drizzled it
oh this is totally raw minus a DBE
also finally getting around to experimenting with fixes
for it
unfortunately my printer was acting up yesterday and i didnt have a chance to attempt another print today
the prototype looks like it would work very well but i have one large problem with it, and that's that it is too long
i redesigned it to be shorter but i havent been able to print that one yet
I think this Quattro + 585 combo is sharper than my RC6 though
that has me extremely excited and motivated to fix this thing
Day 52 of owning an RC6 and being unable to use it
Do you want to do a collaboration? 
I can offer 6h of Hα and 6h of RGB (2h a pop)
Thats right, it is estimated from Ha/O3 dualband filter. I have sv220 7nm Ha-o3
Holy crap I saw the Milky Way in Auriga from home last night
we certainly could
i wanted to get broadband on this but that aint gonna happen atp
holy balls
eeeem
What files would you need? Masters or raw unstacked?
yummy
masters preferably
Imma send you the files on DM
how are you more cropped in than me
also my star spikes look ugly next to yours

i dont even know why mine are so subdivided
its gross
That's interesting.
cause theyre flocked
(the thicker the spikes the more subdevides there are)
ahhhhhhh
ight
we have the same spider afaik
buh
maybe the flocky increas the width
oh yeah for sure
it increases it by about half a mm or more
oof
i kinda prefer the more spiky spikes
It increases the width and reduces the formation of the spikes
you could use the RGB stars anyways
how much better is multi star guiding than single star guiding
ew 😭
A lot better because you are averaging the ammount that the seeing is affecting the guiding
a
ill test the diff
hopefully its not much with my guidescope
(phd refuses to remove the hot pixels)
it keeps failing to calibrate wtf maan
True
Significantly
Even just going from 3 to 6 stars can cut RMS by 50% quite often
Also, the 130PDS is getting optics quality tests

at least that middle bit is covered by a co
What's wrong with the middle?
stress lines from the donut
well, what looks to be stress lines
I think they are just side leflections
This can't be right💀
1/8 is insane 😭
You can see somewhere on the left, there's a hair on the mirror. It has the same effect
i notic
I call the test a failure
Although... It did detect the mirror being slightly pinched... which is weird
After I build the interferometer and I get a reliable test, that's when I will check it
oki
Right now this is how I tested it
also, are you going full spectra?
funnily enough that doesnt work properly 
I guess the picture above confirms that😂
ig
Yeah. Idk why I was overengineering a 3D printed design when I had to use a hair tie and an led strapped to the roki 135
Samyang 135
Just a match made in heaven🤤
I do have a big kitchen knife 
it also needs to be kiiinda flat
So no kitchen knife
I do have a machinist ruler
sharpen it so much it gets a 0 on those knife sharpness testers 
Razor blade is the standard
This sounds really fun
I bet I have the brains to do something like this.
I just dont have the time or motivation 
But interfermoetry is a very interesting subject to me. Maybe ill get around to it some day. 
Wait how do you do this again
see? everybody went quiet after I pointed out how ridiculous they sound 
@tight lodge you have over 100 mm more focal length than my quattro

your data does have better signal than mine
Day 53 of owning an RC6 and being unable to use it
this Oiii is probably not worth including lmao
heyyyyy how about this?

this is just an STF
found a pretty nice way to add in narrowband to RGB data I think
in the linear stage
this is SHRGB
i dont think my Oiii will contribute anything beyond noise
💀
and a big halo
stretched with MAS then curves
alright this looks beaut on my monitor, hopefully discord does it justice
i dont think it does it justice
those blacks look clipped even though they arent
not in pix
better
i dunno why discord is crunching the values
maybe it's an LCD thing
Looks fine on my phone, whatever.

@tight lodge 
first crop can work on a 1080p monitor, the other 2 are fit for a 2k monitor
I could never see the Christmas tree in the cluster until now either

i dont even want to publish my SHO image now

Dude! You did an amazing job at processing it
i got 6h of Ha. with all the calibration frames needed. (Except darks)
i lick my mirrors clean 
i dont wanna loose any tasty morsels
more data maby?
@tight lodge is your scooe f4.5 or are you running f5?
Around 650?
ya, im 675
150p with the skywatcher 0.9x cc
Wait how are your spikes so narrow
I had roughly the same lmao
this broadband is from Pickles and not mine
oh yeah you like eating mirrors too right?
ya
Still tho how is it so tight
How are you doing it?
that would be a question for him 
i know without flocking, these machined spiders are pretty darn thin
This one is just beautiful
#1326833769495269376 message
agreed
So literally just a diffused light and a camera
Yes... kinda.
How much data we got in total?
26 hours or so
Yeah well
Make my quattro work
Then ill think about it
I'd love to
I got another print to work
However, the result in the flats is not promising
All it seems to do is diffuse the reflection instead of getting rid of it.
I think it's because the secondary mirror is unevenly illuminating the inside of the coma corrector or something
Thats with a dew shield thats about a foot and a half long btw
I think I have a similar issue. The primary and secondary mirror are technically aligned, but the lightcone is not center on the secondary
Another idea is that maybe, the reflection comes from within the coma corrector. Yours is about 4 times longer than mine
It absolutely does
Thats the entire reason this issue exists at all.
Yes
That's it
I just watched it.
So what I assumed to be the problem is the problem.
I cant fix it and use this coma corrector because making it any taller will intercept the primary mirror light path
I have to get a new coma corrector.
It disappears without the coma corrector.
But at the point of focus with the coma corrector installed, the coma corrector is far enough forward to pick up light directly from the sky or flat panel and that's creating the reflection.
I moved the focuser backward while running loops and noticed the reflection completely vanished as soon as the coma corrector was far enough into the shroud I made
YUP
As soon as I racked the focuser far enough in, the reflection spontaneously reappeared.
So dew shield length has 0 affect, as I already concluded.
Something to block the light makes a minor difference but wont matter in practice.
The only way I truly fix this is a better coma corrector.

Shorter one. I will risk a Baader MPCC Mk III if I was you😅
I might just to get the ball rolling ngl
I hate having this scope sit around and do nothing
With the IMX585 you won't notice any issues with that CC
Assuming that you get one from a bad batch
i better not
It's a 150$ CC anyways 😂
theyre almost 300 USD
There's a non 0 probability that ypu will be the lucky one like me and get a hood one


better than the dang near 600 id be paying for a Paracorr
There's a shit one, and a good ine
im looking at the one on the left
by the way, what focuser do you have and where does your camera reach focus?
this is the cheapest option rn
Stock focuser. I can't really give you a value to where it is😅
This is the only one that gives you an idea😅
that should be sufficient i bet
possibly not for a sharpstar 1x or 0.95x though
The coma corrector is about that deep in the focuser 😅
do you guys know what today is?
day 54 without being able to use your RC?
ding ding ding. We have a winner
But! Tomorrow I’m testing my OAG; and then it’s RC6 time

I continuum subtracted them first, then linear fit each continuum narrowband image to the r channel of the broadband, and then did pixel math
i did a 70/30 split of H-alpha and Sii, and then linear fit the result to red, and did a 50/50 split of that
i linear fit the Sii to the H-alpha as well iirc
that way they all had the same "stretch" and I wasnt going to lose any data
So both SII and Hα are blended with R?
yes
That explains the strong contrast
Did the PDS just resolved those 2 stars slightly better? 
Possibly
My quattros stars are very weird
Im not a fan
It's not up to the mirror potential.
Also, if you want to post the cone nebula in Astrobiscuit or Astrobin, it's up to you.
You did an amazing job at processing the data.
I mean come on. You nailed the star colors as well
What a nice work !
I like how we can see the bluish tint on the cone
@harsh matrix is an anomaly… just be a Red Giant isn’t enough for him
I'm surprised that my cheap RGB filters managed to pick that up. But big credit to Vel for preserving that in the data
I agree
He got it right I have to admit😂
it looks almost 3d 
The one on the right is from HST just to make that clear 😂
is it possible for you to get 15 mins of data on tombaugh 4 and do a 2x drizzle?
ahhhh, makes a lot more sense now xD
If I have the chance, sure
Where's is it?
i got a decent shot of it
i managed to resolve a mini seperation and i wanna see how urs differs due to that 1 inch smoller
Is just outside of the frame isn't it?
yea 
Does this count?
thats a smol detail
How about this?
0_0
im suprised that wasnt too bright ngl
i love how they all combined to make a single spike
Most people can't even resolve them 
where is it 
It looks like gravitational lensing ngl
theres a gravitational lens in andromeda
its called the andromeda parachute
is that another mini open cluster?
Nope
Andromeda parachute is a different target
No clue
I want to image it
put the coords into nina
Aaahh. Please share a screenshot of upur framing
oki
if its only 6 pixels i have at least 12 pixels 
Lmao😂 😂
I guess is a matter of shooting blind
heres the only reference photo i can find
mayb this is ut
That's it, right?
yas
i may be able to seperate it into 2 blobs
maby ill be able to get it into all seperate with a barlow
Lucky imaging time
I'm at 0.38"/px without the corrector 🔥
planned on 
u shoud image it too!
I don't think o will try something that small until I get a 10"
makes sense
i feel you would get some insane shots with a 10"
Something that i can't get yet is the money for a 10" 

Relatable
Under a certain quality, there is not so much differences
rubo, my guiders field flattener is so good it reducer the shit out the scope 
the only issue is is that it reduces the shit out the scope 
nah it's the spider
all that flocking material on the spider drastically increases light scattering around the star itself
leading to an almost dewed up appearance to all of them all the time i think
I do
I want to post it everywhere

I did use MAS to do the main stretch
it's a bit cheeky ngl
makes it so easy to nail the contrast and control it later as well
you're on Astrobin, right?
maybe?
I don't know how I managed to do that
I don't know if I can replicate it either

I think you can ^^
@tight lodge I really don't like you
i am extremely tempted to rip the flocking material off of the vains on my quattro
😭
the only problem is that if i decide i dont like it, it's hard to go back
good luck
oh the main issue with the baader mpcc mk 3 is that it will perform much worse on an f/4 system

you 130PDS is good since it's f/5 but i have an f/4 scope
ha!ppens
At last, spending some time today observing Jupiter with 2x barlow and 9mm eyepice with RC6
Its awesome
I am😅
A gallery on AstroBin.
when i upload it i can tag you as a collaborator
Thank you. And again. Amazing job at processing it
Tonight's data was garbage
Under what bortle you shoot your Ha?
8
Mine was in b4. That's interesting how light pollution affects the SNR even in NB
Better Garbo Data than None at all
Is this good?
gah dayum
As awesome as it was observing Jupiter, I don't think I am ever switching my RC6 between deepsky astro and visual/planetary ever again. It was so out whack afterwards, pretty much wasted a good imaging night
imaging Jupiter through barlow was a fiasco on the top of that
Planetary is hard, needs its own setup
Best detailed Jupiter I was able to capture to date, which is sad
How was it out of whack? Even before adding the second focuser I never had any trouble switching between visual and imaging
(Actually now I would have some issues with the rotator and new OAG, but either way)
Complete rebalance in my case (I run on maxed out CG4), guiding was very wonky afterwards, switching extension rings, rings getting dead frozen in place:)
Oh, right, I guess that's something I don't need to worry about with a harmonic drive
Many frustrating things throuout the n8ght
(tbf balancing a harmonic drive is better but I can only go so far with the small saddle and no counterweights)
My cam doing 3-7 fps)
As for the extension rings I've lubricated all of mine with perfluorinated polyether lubricants (Tribosys 3204) and they come off without any trouble
Might as well dust off my 4" Mak, slap barlow and my old Canon on it, and have a separate train for this stuff
Smart
Tribosys 3203/3204 and Krytox 205g0 are lubricants I use with my mechanical keyboard switches and they are also very handy for the astronomer
Tbh, the visual part was fine. Star diagonal also helped with needed focus travel, it worked out great.
Yeah RCs are just fine with visual. Though you were looking at the planets I assume? That's its weakest point lol
Yeah, I was rrying to go for Jup, both visualy and picture
I did enjoy the visual view
Where it really shines is with DSOs, so if you ever are inclined to try visual with again, I would absolutely recommend going out and checking out the Virgo Cluster this galaxy season
You can pan around Virgo and Coma Berenices and just find galaxies wherever you look
I started off with 8" Dob, even with that, DSOs were rough in my B7 skies. I've seen some fuzzy galaxy cores, but that's about it (star clusters are great though of course).
Once you're in Bortle 3 or below, the difference is shocking. You can even see a few galaxies that don't even have NGC/IC designations
I have experienced Milky Way from B1.5-2
*Forgot to say to go out to a dark site to do that
just with my eyes, what a feeling that was
I remember looking at Markarian's chain in an Observatory
Yeah I saw it in my 8" RC last year
one of the things I wanna capture with my trusty DSLR and lens combo
although im not sure if its worth going for
@quartz meadow rate the minut long frame on my mount mmeant for visual
pinged wromg person
its overcorrected by darks
mb
@frosty shard i was meant to ping
pretty round but why are the stars so beeg?
overcorrection
honestly not bad
and its a superstrech thing
just needs more int really
its a simgle sub
ah okay, very good lol
i got some actual data
this was just a test
while i tune my mount
thats overcapacity
I had one more Jupiter video, also a blur-fest 🙁
Is it a matter of having a faster frame rate cam, and accumulating/culling more data?
i think ive done something never done before
i got my framing wrong before the flip
so now i have 2 equal sets of data
next to eachother
that i can mosaic
one of the first ever accidental mosaics

@frosty shard one of the panstarrs survey options is irg
We can't shoot the tarantula nebula in our own backyard?
No stressing. We can shoot it in a galaxy 3 million light years away

This looks like a mini trifid
How thick are your spider veins Mr Pickles
Uuuhm... idk. Something like 2mm thick
2 or 2.5 but no larger
yup
@tight lodge really good stats so far
I crossed my fingers for IOTD
@tight lodge How did you remove the flocking from your secondary spider? I tried peel it slowly but it wouldn't come off cleanly.
I spent 5h removing mine
So yeah... is a very slow process
If you have acetone, it would help a lot to dissolve the glue
Even better
@frosty shard micro RC
they have spherical mirrors
bc they meant for microscopes
Close enough is good enough
Guys I created propaganda
And yet no counter weight 😭
even better now
oh we are so going to get screwed
this is unreal
Counterweights are for people who needlessly weigh their scopes down 
There's a chance
But yeah it's non sense
That should get at least TP
Yup
there's still 0
well it was when i checked about 30 minutes ago
we finally have 1 vote at 63.16%
still easily one of my favorite images
i mean, i think i will be hard pressed to top this
or this
yo
A ray of hope?
Speaking of rays. I got them all😂
interferometer!!!!
Damn right
you got any stuff off it yet?
Nope. Apparently it's a lot harder to diverge a laser beam
Sooo I need a new diverger
good luck!
I hope this works
lil guy
This is the size of the beam splitter kinematic mount for reference 😂
like the same size
lil guys
Looks like I might get my autofocuser before the next clear night here, it's scheduled to be delivered on the 20th
Wait... you didn't had an EAF until now?
Nope. Good old Bahtinov mask and a delicate touch