#Ritchey–Chrétien enjoyers thread
1 messages · Page 21 of 1
it's awesome
super cool to be able to see this stuff from bortle 8/9 too
i dont have to travel nearly 100 miles just to see it
NGC 1333
woaaaaa
Aw hell yeah
And thats why we love IR
@high aspen here's an RC module made from the mirror module
A more compact design than the GSO version with a faster primary and smaller secondary
this should work
What are the artifacts on the right
reflections from alnitak
they were right on top of the horsehead the prior night
it is this filter
the other channels dont have it
the 8 vs the 6
Holy microlensing 
Its probably because its a refractor
Nope. It's because is IR
Like its worsen by the fact that its ir with a refractor
In a reflector it would probably be less
It's the Talbot effect. It doesn't matter the telescope. The pattern is generated in front of the sensor because if the repetitive pattern of the pixels, that pattern is then reflected by the filter back into the sensor
So its because of the filter not the wave lenght?
It's because of the wavelength in relation to the pixels
... well the micro lenses in front of each pixel
Is there a way to reduce the microlensing
Get a sensor that doesn't use micro lenses
Or get a sensor with micro lenses designed for NIR light
Which most likely cost you the down-payment for a house
isee
And what sensor has that
IMX 990
Not where i live here it wouldn't even be able to buy you a new car
I wish i had the money
me:
I did not experience any microlensing with the 585
i just get halos
which i dont get in visible light
I don't get anything weird
gahh
i think its an issue with the internal glas protecting the sensor
bc no filters has the same issue
its like hailation xD
Yeah, that's usually the cause. And because IR wavelengths are close tho the size of the pixels (harmonics) it's much easier to generate a Talbot effect which either because of the AR window or the Filters, gets reflected back on the sensor
yea
Peak
I feel like your spikes look too "clean" and tiny lol
That's what happens when you have the secondary mirror spider flocked
For reference, this is Vega😅
hmm I see
looke kool
I just want an APS-C Starvis 2 sensor please and thank you
also, you also getting the halos i get!!!!
also what uo with the ca
the OIII filter has halos
Coming this Spring
Mini m101 and friends
@frosty shard im thinking of making a greg inspired design using a parabolic primary and parabolic/spherical secondary
the secondary will be f8 and primary will be f5
ill design it and see what tweaks will need to be made
the reason ill have these constraints is to make it so i wont have to custom make a mirror
If you could do a little bit of refiguring, I wonder how hard it would be to make an aplanatic Gregorian using those mirrors as a base
i decided to use off the shelf mirror configuratons
and its scary
the f number
You could null out a Gregorian with a parabolic mirror and a spherical one, but I don't think that actually would get you anything meaningfully different from a Newtonian in terms of correction
Well maybe it would off-axis, idk
parabolic mirror is better
p vs s
its f67 😭
I wonder what you could do with three mirrors
I mean if you can use arbitrary conics you can of course build a TMA, but I wonder if you can at least null out spherical aberration
im defo getting a hold of the software now tho
which im quite happy about
also, i could make the secondaries light rays run parallel and use a focusing lens
which could reduce aberations
Bro 
Looks like cool software ngl
Optics are really cool and are becoming a potential field id like to go into. 
yea :D
Also, really very good for what it is.
i like to look at the aberrations of each design
This is just barely around 4 hours of data from bortle 8, but it goes nearly through zenith, which is close to 7. 
its cool how they change
This scope is very lovely to image these small galaxies with.
smol boi :3
I very much look forward to the return of the NCP Messiers
And probably a pain to figure out how to solve
I bet it really drives home the point that no design is flawless 
it do
the rc has an intresting one
its defo not as cool as class casses tho
also
whats so funny is that fracs are worst lol
Mersenne Telescope
i can use 2 concave parabolic mirrors for this!!
and that would be kinda cool
Thats why everyone here clowns on them except frac owners
Oooo that's a neat one
It keeps hitting me just how good this already is.
Galaxies used to take me 20 hours, minimum, to get anywhere close to this with the same amount of processing.
I got this in a quarter of the time. The potential is definitely much higher. 

Plus the lum is surprisingly clean beyond the artifacts that the reducer is producing, which i currently have no way of fixing.
I found people with the same scope, reducer, cam combo as me and all of them have the artifact too.
I think that's definitely the fault of the back end of the Apex-L being M42 and not M48, which is a massive design flaw imo.
It isnt a limitation of the scope itself which makes it so disappointing.
My quattro is the same way
Previous owner flocked the spider and the spikes are horribly underwhelming
Its nothing like my goofy ahhhh RC8 
wtf is going on in that last image
Dont ask 
Your RC8 does not have the insane diffraction spiked on M45😂
Check out mine
Yeah my RC has pretty well-flocked spider vanes
I was wondering how to reversibly de-flock them
that last image gave me a jumpscare
When I switch my imaging setup from my ZS61 to my RC6 does the focus point of my OAG change?
yeah
Darn
Bro what did you used to use
does blåhaj increas rct performance?
Yes.
does the effect double if you have 2?
It stacks but logarithmically to not make it too powerful
a oki
i got 2 blåhaj :3
I had a cursed dream where my RC spider was made of foam
nooo
are you okay
yipee
also, i found out something cursed
"cursed"
the primary is f5
lemme work out the secondary rq
the f/# is now f/3
central obstruction: all of it
its a 70% obstruction
its 2 hyperbolic mirros
just dont look at the coma 
oh gosh
the rc is supprisingly corrected until you go extremely micro
then you see the issues
like 0.4um graphs show the issues
they so difficult to correct
100um graphs show how decent they are off axis
oh well uh
no camera has pixels that small

in visible light anyway
i mean, yeah, this is what i observed when shooting without a flattener
you should model a CDK
corrected dall kirkham

Wait you saw coma without a flattener? Uhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh
you saw it in my images

Oh I just saw astigmatism. The stars were still very round
RCs actually do have some coma but only a tiny amount of it at 5th order
In a properly nulled RC it's effectively cancelled by the 3rd order term for any reasonable field
that's way beyond the 8 mm in Tea's simulation
so i am not surprised whatsoever to see it at the very edges of the sensor
Maybe you have some 5th order coma at that field size
this is likely around 5 to 7 mm out from the center of the sensor
it's much less already
it onsets quickly
Actually the best way to check is to plate solve and visualize the distortion correction, since coma distorts the field somewhat
actually you can see the transition really well here
That is a sign of 5th order behavior
3rd order coma increases linearly with distance from the field center
yeah the stars that are even relatively close to the edges are barely distorted
its only once you reach the extremes is when you actually see bonified distortions
oh that's 2x drizzled lol

the native aberration inspector is a little misleading lmao
That still looks like astigmatism is the limiting factor in your field, so pretty solid optics if you ask me
maybe 
better than i expected ngl

You can try to reduce the coma by tweaking the mirror spacing if you feel comfortable with that
it absolutely is the limiting factor lol
i dont really feel like risking it
ive got it collimated perfectly atm too
Yeah I think it's still very much acceptable
it's almost imperceptible with the reducer
also it is invisible if the seeing isnt good
all coma and astigmatism vanishes

bear in mind my sim is an f6 rct
The thing with Cassegrains is that there is a mirror spacing that nulls spherical aberration, and a mirror spacing that nulls coma. The RC is designed so that those distances are the same
So if the mirrors are incorrectly figured, nulling the coma perfectly may introduce spherical aberration
im guessing thats the reason that the secondaries are so big
yeah
But I'd null spherical aberration and accept some coma
bc im trying to get a small obstruction which means i have to push the mirror out
Nah it's for illuminating the entirety of a full-frame sensor
Make your primary f/2 and your secondary f/4
Then you should be able to get away with something like 40% CO
RCs can have very small central obstructions if they are designed that way from the outset
It's just that off-axis aberrations like coma aren't relevant to the planetary observers who never really go off-axis significantly
waiit a minut
I'm waiting
patience is the key
what would be the f ratio of the whole thing if you combine f2 and f4
Sorry, I should be more precise. Make an f/2 primary and use a magnification factor of 4 to get an f/8 system
ah, oki
the software has it so any extra mirror is shaped to make the system whatever f/# you put in
this is the best shape i can get :/
f8 150mm rct
not bad 
What are the conic constants for the mirrors?
ill check in a sec
hyperbolic is anything below -1 right?
Yup
Wait so the reason I was asking was because it looked like there was coma in the design, but now I think that's an artifact of the triangle shaped markers for red light
xD
im pretty sure it is astigmatism
Yeah for sure the star looks nice and oval
looky very oval
could be a bit of coma too tho
it looks liek these stas
Yeah I think that's where the 5th order contribution comes in
That looks nuts
A really nice start
You are definitely Sii deficient
Unsurprisingly
Best looking channel, always the noisiest 💀
I saw the subs and thought man this is gonna be a pain so whatever
What is sii in this photo
And the highest SNR channel always hated
so much so that they run SCNR at 1.00 and wonder why their narrowband suddenly sucks
This region is just
Puke color NB
SHH raw
Bi color?
💯
What if you shoot OIII for a lil spice on the flame nebula?
because i will probably crop flame out in the final
this
is why
if alnitak didnt exist
i would not have to do that
But what if you do 2 crops. SHO on Flame, and SHH on Honse
i am not going to have time to do that
my weather stops being good at the end of this week
and i dont know when it will improve
i will likely focus on flame this season but not now
i dont have time thanks to the weather
@tight lodge I can buy a mono 585 at a large discount right now
specifically 40% off
a zwo 585mm pro
shall i?
I'm still waiting for good weather
wrong
nah ive been hunting for one
that and the roki are the 2 main uses i have in mind for it
Hey! Samy 135 + 585 was my plan
and i planned to do it too
before you
i didnt even know you planned to do that ngl
Ah... well, I plan to get an OSC 585 and have it running along with the main rig. I'm not to keen to invest in another mono setup😂
i already have another mono setup so the choice was easy for me
Fair point. Although, maybe in the far future when I get the 571, I will be able to use the Uranus M with the Samy
This image just screams RC supremacy
fr
you should get a second panel with the flame in :3
getting more rn too
i want to
alnitak has been a bother though
this isnt an issue in the other channels, only NIR
nooo :(
im pretty sure it is the filter
also, this reflection was just about on top of the horsehead in the framing that included the flame
it was change framing or cut out the entire reason i pointed the scope here

no way to fix it either
2 panel panorama, split it into like 4 images for Instagram the same way I split my M24 panorama. Or 3 for the pins like for my Lagoon image
Ye
The Antlia one? Welp...
No this one is the svbony one
Ohhhhhhh
Well I should get the Antlia one then for the parfocality
If you want to split an image up for your pins, you'll want the panels to have a 3:4 aspect ratio btw
Makes everything easier
That CO modulation is insane wow
Y'all owe it to yourselves to take a deep look at this image
egg
blue flame 
I cannot stop panning through this image
Tbh I might set this as my new wallpaper for my MeLe
I could because it is going to be way better tomorrow and the night after

Uh
Piss
Maybe not
gooooood
The thing that surprises me most is the separation between alnitak and the small star on the left
You could park a bus there
Ive never gotten the separation that wide before
Actually screw it I'm setting it as the wallpaper for one of my virtual desktops on my main PC
It dethroned Blueseed's Chimera Complex
That is some serious honse
Flame and NGC2023 are the most underrated targets in this region
Hehehehe
That honestly looks nuts covering a whole screen

Oh you bet it is
I agree
It feels like one of those wallpapers I'd download from a cool wallpaper site in 2005 or something, except it's even cooler than that
I think once I get sufficient NIR data, that whole blanket of evaporating hydrogen is going to be like a multi layered blanket
Where it will have layers to it
It already does if you look closely
There's a thick red layer with a blue glow on top of it.
You know what? I'm sick of M31... I don't even like galaxies and I keep grinding on that dumb project. I'm doing the Honse with the next opportunity.
I can get a pretty sweet framing without Alnitak 
Not any time soon... but eventually 
Do it coward

You might be able to try sun - tues
Well... that's the issue. Sunday I maybe be able to image until 11pm. Tuesday? Not a chance
But... yesterday I shot this cloud nebula
Mans
Yeah... I have to be a responsible adult and other bs like that
woa
sad
Did u at least get to See some polar Lights? Xd
Nope
Oooof
Me neither tho xd
Yah... who needs em anyways 
I think i wouldve been more annoyed than Glad to See em as i was ttying to eliminate the tilt in my scope
woaaaa
Oh wait yeah no duh whoops
Well... atleast you got some clear skies 😂
Trueeee.. Not completely clear but good enough to Test things
Also thing that interests me..
How do u Guys set up dithering?
Im currently dithering every 2-3 frames by 3 Pixels but for some reason i am encountering Walking noise again..
do 5 o 7 pixels
Will try that
Just found it really weird as ive been doing 3 Pixels pretty much since i have a guidecam and could Dither but its just now acting up
What's your OAG pixelscale?
2 um
Damn... that's small
smol :3
Is that 3 pixels of guide cam scale or 3 pixels of main cam scale?
(Though I'm still marveling at my photometric stack that somehow lacked walking noise despite the total lack of dithering...)
I think its by Guide Cam scale
I talked to pickles about it
I think i have been dithering at 1.5pixels Main Cam scale all along
Oh yeah bump that up
Wait u have photometric Filters? O.o
Will do!
No just did it with Touptek G
See #1427782559726833684
Aaaah
You can monitor this star too if you want, it's pretty easy
Was about to say how Jealous i am of that 
I will get UBVRI filters in the future for sure
Probably after I defend
Same i guess
I Just need to justify another Filterwheel and im in
And a 585m maybe
Though after my flats saga, I was actually informed about something that can be an issue with UBVRI filters (or any that have partial transmission)
If the filter has partial transmission that's done with dielectric coatings, the coatings can reflect light back up at the secondary and cause flat artifacts
Oooh interesting
Tbh i have Not bothered to Take Flats with the RC yet
I probably have to get a Panel large enough to be able to do so
Bruh
Do sky flats
There's no excuse not to take flats
The final image will always be worse without flats, with no exceptions.
Im Always using Msgc to Deal with gradients tbh 🥲
That might be the go to
I’m swinging target to target seeing what I wanna full send on
So for now I think this is good enough
Gonna go to m31
I got a late start on all the fall targets
Weather in N.C. is unpredictable
A suitable tracing panel is $20 or less on Amazon
I got one for about $20
I take flats every night with mine, it's pretty simple with NINA
Speaking of full sending
I am trying to decide what integration I should aim for on the Orion Nebula ISHO project
Since I'm doing a 2×2 mosaic
It's gonna be a time sink
I was about to ask
Guess Theres No excuse Not to have one then i suppose
I can probably get away with very little IR and H-alpha? But on the other hand there's a ton of depth in H-alpha I don't want to miss
I am fully prepared to sink another 32 hours into this tbh (2 hours per channel per panel, 4 channels and 4 panels)
woaaa what is that
its shaped like a heart
it's the pentagon nebula
i feel lied to :(
Oh I thought you were joking because it actually is called the Heart Nebula

see #1436814074993184859
maybe ill have to image it in ir
bc that would be really funny
remote control people????
uh huh
Im not worried about my mount. It should be able to handle an RC6, frankly it could handle an RC10
(Another reason people are so insistent on using lasers is because they don't want to waste imaging time collimating under the stars, but needing to recollimate an RC is rare)
a bucket for your tears of joy
Not really
This is everything it comes with extra
TS Optics 2-1/2" rack and pinion focuser
Tri-Bahtinov mask with parial mask (for collimation)
top vixen rail
aperture mask
Astrozap flexible light/dew shield
GSO focuser tilter
I would find a good quality reducer as well
that can be later
I’m buying this primarily for the focal length
I’m currently using an Askar 71f, so 490mm
Real
How would planetary be with an rc6
You can do fun stuff like this with a RC6
Better or worse than my 6” dob
Surprisingly good lmao
This might be with my dob
Lemme check to make sure it isnt
Okay I think that one is with the dob but this one is with the RC6
This was a pretty mediocre night of seeing too 
I used a 2x barlow
i wanna taste it
You definitely want to be oversampled out the booty hole to do planetary with an RC6
Or in general

Oh wow
I assume my Ragdoll 17 Pro can handle an RC6 without a sweat?
shoukld do yea
Think id need a oag tho?
Yes
Easily
How big of a guide acope do you have at present?
30mm
And what guide camera?
sv305 pro
You will need a new guide scope at the bare minimum 
Might as well get an OAG
what if I don’t
Differential flexture will pay you an unkind visit.
idk that mean
I am not familiar with that lol
SVBONY planetary camera. Garbage I need a new one
Differential flexture results in a certain amount of trailing after a given period of time.

When I encountered it, I couldn't guide longer than 60 seconds without significant trailing
Your OTA and guide scope might not always point at the exact same place in the sky, and your guiding numbers will look good while your subs look like trailed garbage
should I negotiate this guy?
I think as-is it's a killer deal...if you feel up for it, sure, but even at that price I would not be complaining
You can certainly give your current guiding solution a try
Just dont expect miracles
Kitkat made a guide scope work okay for a little while but he eventually got tired of trailing subs and got an OAG
Aside from differential flexure, OAGs are more convenient IMO
If you want to swap your imaging train to a different OTA, your guiding solution comes with it too
I just can’t afford an oag if I buy it lol
what if i align the 2 
In the RC Facebook groups I do see some people using pretty small guide scopes so I don't think it's totally out of the question
i have a 40mm guidescope
if you dont guide ill find you
The ragdoll pro only has 10 arc seconds of PE
and its already aligned to what my main scope sees
The problem is that they can bend/twist at different rates if they not absolutely locked down
sabge
ive got it good enough to if i center a dso its centred on my main scope
Dont
damn he’s selling it for cheaper than the focuser
that good ig
Unless you want to stick to like 5 second subs (and even still throw out a good number of them) you will need to guide
I was joking
joining :3
I mean I actually have wanted to test this myself and see how feasible it is just for fun
death + destruction + rampage
Nah probably just an exploded hard drive from too much data
Can someone search 533mc pro and rc6 in Astrobin for me
It’s broken
I can’t log in
stick to 0.5s subs then
smh
I like those stars too
Some of them are cropped
I think all of them are reduced
17 hours on Stephan's Quintet, this was at native and slightly cropped
You mean this?
ouch]
i dont think ill reduce ngl
Is that your flat artifact (and if so is that from a Bessel filter)
That's what I get if I try to take Flats for the IR filter😂
What filter are you using?
Svbony
Soooo... to calibrate the IR, I used the Luminance flats
Actually ended up using the G flats. Because the L were not properly correcting
I think it has something to do with the fact that the flat pannel emits no IR💀
If you live somewhere with minimal or less light pollution than the inner city, that would be the most enjoyable course of action tbh.
I cant really do that and expect good results in my yard because of the light pollution
Here, aperture and speed reign supreme.
im b5.5ish
I can get really good results but it takes a lot of integration time, and not shooting at the fastest possible speed available to my scope means I am shooting myself in the foot.
It would take like twice as long to get similar results at native.
A 30 hour project with the reducer turns into a 60 hour project at native.
Thanks to that light pollution.
:D
Yeah every second in this thread just makes me like RCs even more lol
The difference in price between an 8" and a 10" is insane tho
diff 6" vs 8" too
you have to remember rc mirrors are not easy to figure either
There are two mysteries that I need to solve before I die:
- What did Anthony Hamilton say to Isack Hadjar after he crashed out of the 2025 Australian Grand Prix
- How the hell does GSO mass produce RC mirrors and sell them for that cheap
yea
they must have underpaid workers or something
Unfortunately...most likely
its not like any factory would ever do that riiggghhhtttt
Though I should also point out that China subsidizes its industrial sector a lot as well
isee
And they might have contracts with the Chinese government actually
To produce optics for military use
wouldnt be suprised
being an optics company you kinda have to take any offer you can get
tbh, any industry its like that
They'd have the incentive to develop the expertise to fabricate optics of that size and quality
yea
and have equipment to rigorously evaluate optical quality
Hubble has imaged NGC 891 
It's a steel tube right? Ask about rust
I’m assuming it’s steel, I don’t see any rust on the pic
Ugh GSO made one ugly scope
i hate that logo
I believe that calls for some fun with vinyl wrap
that is steel yes
alright third night of horsehead has stacked, lets see what i got
H-alpha is flawless
holy crap bro
i can see fine details that hubble resolved

that's raw
What do you have
I am using an RC8 with a monochrome 571 sensor and the Starizona Apex-L
I modified my RC though
how’d you modify it
now i almost never collimate it
the primary mirror and the focuser are coupled together on these small RC's
so I decoupled them
my RC6 did this though
a very high bar
right out the gate
It sounds like the RC6 I’m looking at has the primary mirror movable…?
Or collimatable
theyre all moveable yes
the problem is that moving the primary also moves the imaging train
and any weight on the focuser gets transmitted into the primary mirror
in my experience, a light OSC set up doesnt actually impact it to a noticable degree
it's not until you get a chonky mono camera with a 7x2" filter wheel like i got is when it becomes a problem
Il be using light OSC, OAG (eventually), 533mc pro, and filter drawer
yeah that's no problem for it in the stock configuration
i was able to get away with the chonky 571 + loaded filter wheel with the 2 coupled too
this was done while the focuser and primary were still coupled
I asked the guy if it has any rust and if he’s firm on price
and as you can see, no problems with sharpness
Holy yea I want
Nothing like my Askar 71f
so yeah it's not really something you should worry about
not on the RC6
i just wanted to eek a little more performance out of my scope and I am very, very pleased with the results after doing so
Yea looks like an RC6 would be a good second scope. RC6 for small and close up. 71f for more wide
Then if I get an SQA55 I got wide, medium, and long
yup
i got roki for super wide, redcat 51 for wide, quattro for medium, and RC to hold the close to very close up
The only negative I see right now with an RC6, Collimation, moving my camera/filter drawer from scope to scope
And moving my mini pc
Il have to rework my cable management to make it easier to move it
it's worse when you are running a mono set up and you cant get the filterwheel to cooperate with the focuser

Ugh another EAF to buy
oh and you have to refocus the OAG every time you change scopes
Why
not necessarily
I’d just keep the OAG in the rc6
oh yeah you can do that lmao
or did the OAG have to be right after the camera
i just keep the whole thing together because it is easier for me
I can keep my guide scope setup on my Askar, just move the guide camera
nah you want the order to be camera, filter, then OAG
never have the filter and OAG reversed or life sucks
then that works out great. Since i only need to move my filter drawer and camera
yeah
And the focus wouldn’t change since I’m just plopping my guide cam out
I have to do that with my current guide scope cause my guide cam will randomly fall out lol
@frosty shard my favorite part about this scope is that even once 5th degree coma kicks in, the scope remains uncompromising on sharpness from corner to corner 
it is truly chef's kiss
those clouds have the floofy hubble look to them
just barely
5th degree coma?

The SVBONY 30mm guide scope isn’t known for top tier built quality
well depends on where the focus point for the guide cam is on the RC6 + OAG
Coma as wavefront and ray aberration; explanation, illustrations and formulae.
you will have to find the right spot again
oh hmmm
btw with a 533 you shouldnt ever really see coma
if you do, collimation likely shifted
How precise does Collimation need to be
up to taste tbh
i try to keep mine perfect because im unwilling to compromise quality
and fortunately, once it is set, it stays
Do you have an example of bad Collimation sub vs good Collimation sub
plenty
Idk if it would be the same as newts
the funny thing is
even if collimation is quite a ways out, it still is a sharper scope than a newt with bad collimation

okay this is bad collimation
it was quite a ways off here
good
these are stacks where it is a lot easier to tell
pay attention to the small stars
they show miscollimation much better than big ones
this is that raw Horsehead from the RC6 lol
it seems like i was diffraction limited with the RC6 LOL
Diffraction Limited?
I think Il use the RC6 for primarily planetary
Until I can get guiding
Basically the limitation of resolution due to aperture size
A hard limit by light itself
looks good to me idk how you can tell
General sharpness and the fine detail that has been resolved.
This guy used a 533mc pro for planetary wtf
@harsh matrix is 300 seconds too long for M 31.
Yes
Thats what I used for the planetary images I posted for you above
Why not a planetary camera
It is unironically a very good pairing for planetary despite what dissenters say
Too broke to buy one 
I don’t see many images of planets on Astrobin
For lum it is i should say
You can try other filters at your discretion
Most people buy RC's to hunt galaxies, me included.
Not everyone likes planetary so not many attempt it
Also planetary heavily depends on seeing and a lot of people are not in places with good seeing.
So what’s the Collimation method thing
DSI?
I use a defocused star
I also dont really follow any of the guides online because a lot of them dont really know what theyre talking about
Often made by people who dont actually understand how to collimate these.
They add a whole bunch of extra steps that only make it harder to do.
I’m doing Ha rgb
For RGB would you say it is OK?
I don’t wanna cook my core but at the same time not trying to have 1 trillion subs
H-alpha 5 minutes is fine
RGB might be okay
But again, test it
Try a 300s green sub
If that blows out then go to 180s or something
180s works.
OK, I’ll stop it down to 180. No big deal.
I appreciate it
I’m very late to this target
Man Weather sucks
this is the truest thing that anybody has ever said that was true
very very much so
oh god i thought this was a hubble image
no
this is ESA's southern observatory

this is Hubble
dis mines
raw
adaptive optics is a dream
seriously
Hubble love
i really want to shoot this thing in broadband
i could get the same definition on the side facing us as the bigger scopes get
it would be a bit easier to gauge as well
@frosty shard what i find most interesting is that all of the little protostellar jets in this area around NGC 2023 show up much better in Sii than in H-alpha 
(H-alpha left, Sii right)
i wonder why
that h-alpha is not altered in any way 
neither is the sii
Man, that’s crazy
@harsh matrix @tight lodge when I tell Nina to slew it gives me a ascom error invalid argument but when I manual slew in Nina it works and when I tell it to park it works like man
It didn’t do a meridian flip it couldt tell it to move
I have reset everything it doesn’t work
My two goats I need help 🙏
Are you using the same stretch function for both?
If so, it might be that H-alpha is self-extinguishing
or that the temperature is too low to ionize hydrogen as effectively as sulfur (assuming that sulfur is easier to ionize, which I need to check)
It is easier
The H-alpha is the most aggressively stretched
I love my RC breh
this was so peak
Huh... only slightly more than a new RC8
Dear god
You better hope all that is figured correctly
It ain't. The model is not designed for SLM. Is designed for FDM printing. If I want to make it for SLM, I can make the walls as thin as 1.5mm and skeletonize almost everything inside the body
Including the mirrors?
What mirrors? 
It has no mirrors
Don't make me design an RC because I already have couple of projects on queue
What even is that
What is bro making
Bro is building a roki 135 Setup and is gonna hide it in this Epic tube
Why tho
Extra layer of protection, less likely to Things Break when bumping Intro Things, maybe better for Transport and ofc a Clean optics (im Just guessing)
ease of transportation
Ah
Not a weapon
Not yet*
Not this
Tbh looks like a speed camera with a LiDAR
It is inspired by a Javelin
The tube will be acting as the case as well. So when you want to shoot, ypu just remove the dust cap and chuck it on the mount. I will most likely try to design it to fit a monochrome setup using 1.25" filter wheel, but so far it is made to have an OSC imx585. The big lids give me access for servicing and swapping filters.
IC 4182 is a Magellanic spiral galaxy in the constellation Canes Venatici. The galaxy lies about 14 million light years away from Earth, which means, given its apparent dimensions, that IC 4182 is approximately 28,000 light years across. It was discovered by German astronomer Max Wolf on 21 March 1903.
IC 4182 is seen nearly face-on. It has a l...
This is a really interesting spring target...
Apparently it's one of the prototypes for the de Vaucouleurs SAm (unbarred Magellanic spiral) type
ooo
Another really interesting Magellanic spiral: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NGC_4395
NGC 4395 is a nearby low surface brightness spiral galaxy located about 14 million light-years (or 4.3 Mpc) from Earth in the constellation Canes Venatici. It was discovered by German-British astronomer William Herschel on 2 January 1786. The nucleus of NGC 4395 is active and the galaxy is classified as a Seyfert Type I known for its very low-ma...
i tried to shoot this one
then stopped because my am5n was going wacko mode
thats pretty
do you plan to revisit it?
Actually I realized I may miss a good chunk of galaxy season next year
If I go to Australia in the spring
That is very much the plan
:D
woaw
omg 😭
The target list is
- strip mosaic with the Tarantula Nebula
- some region of the Carina Nebula (I'm thinking about the Gabriela Mistral Nebula, which was one of the JWST first light images)
- one of the great southern galaxies (M83, Centaurus A, or NGC 6744)
Oh and NGC 3603/Statue of Liberty
I think NGC 3603 is the next brightest super star cluster candidate after the Tarantula
and the only one in the Milky Way that's feasible to image in the optical band

@harsh matrix Are the closed tube 8" RCs coupled?
All closed tube RC's are coupled
Including the 8's
@frosty shard i dunno about you but i have flat calibration issues in general
seems to be the absolute worst with luminance
like this appears to be a dust spot that didnt calibrate out
i dont know what else i can try or do to fix problems atp
We'll see, I'm packing in the scope rn
And uh
You might notice a problem
the dust motes not entirely clearing up is exclusive in lum
RGB is cleaner
why is it parked like that 
Battery died 💀
Thankfully this precarious situation is now a postcarious situation
uh oh
progress
definitely worried about the lum flats
the color is surprisingly clean by comparison
i dont know why lum refuses to work
Hubble humiliates my tiny scope 
How does back focus work for RCs
Without a reducer, just bring the system to focus and that's all
So like my petzval quad refractor
With one, you'll probably have to do the standard 55 mm backfocus, but it depends on the reducer
Yup
They were designed with the goal of being astrometrically accurate (no coma or distortion) while being easy to scale to large sizes for observatories
So il prob need an OAG
How much do those go for used
U can try and do it unguided but u will Not get the best results
I have a 30mm guide scope I can use
I found an OAG for $42
Go for it?
nah if I do that I can’t afford the rc

Il just do planetary until I can afford it
I know rc6 isn’t great for planetary but it’s better than my refractor
Nice
@dense quiver Am i going to need a new guide camera?
sv305 pro
imx 290 i think or 662 i keep hearng different things
Mono?
no
Id look for a mono one
i made cheeb :3
theres me too :c
It is what it is then. You'll have to see but I dont think you'll have too many issues
I’m going rock with my 30mm guide scope and see how it goes
It’ll be better than no guiding regardless
it will be a good experiment to see how well ill perform with a similar setup 
what’s your setup
i got a 40mm guidescope and an sv105 or whatever it is
i originally got the guidescope to help with visual
bc the 20mm one before wasnt good enough
Now what’s that DSI method for Collimation
wrong channel
why
oh
#💬-general-chat message
@digital nexus this
I shall invest into an RC8 as well in the future
though the question is, is the carbon fiber variant a necessity or does the "normal" one suffice?
Im rocking a non-carbon one and im more than satisfied with its performance
what about dew? like that's my main concern
and yes I'm aware that dew heaters exist, though the question lies in how prone they are to dew
Ive Had my secondary Fog Up one night when humidity was fairly high, but since i started to use a dew shield i had No issues with dew
yipee!
Im hearing that imaging near horizon can cause collimation issues? Since the focuser is attached to the primary?
If you live in a humid or coastal area, I've heard the GSO steel tubes can rust
whoever told me to design an cdk, you are evil
@frosty shard is the rc6 primary mirror coupled to the focuser?
do you have a video of this
I dont
yes
is that a problem? Someone told me it caused Collimation issues at/near horizon
Yeah it's annoying, but you can decouple it; it's up to you if it's worth it or not.
If the imaging train is decently light I don't think you'll need to decouple, you shouldn't be imaging near the horizon either way
I heard the decouple kit was more expensive than the scope
My imaging train will just be
Asi533mc pro - spacer - filter drawer - oag - unknown amount of spacers - RC6
this is the best i could do
its like 100* worse than planewave
a lil bit better now?
no
worse
much better
20 um smoller
planewaves are like 7um
mine are 20um
so
close 
16 um nows!!
v i o l e t h a l o
im so close to fit the airy disk
if you shoot nb you good lmao
Does Zemax have a solver for lens and mirror figures?
it has an optomiser which can perfectly correct stuff
but i dont really wana use it xD
i think nb is the way to go 
I want to write my own solvers actually
would be cool
With my RC8 I have not had noticeable collimation shifts with altitude
But I have heard that an improperly tightened primary can cause similar issues
look at this cool star :3
I had a loose secondary and that caused problems at meridian flips
If it’s coupled how can it be improperly tightened
The primary mirror uses a push-pull screw system
@frosty shard should I put my Askar 71f on top of the rc6
Also @digital nexus now that I remembered this:
- If your OTA plate solves to a slightly different focal length from what GSO specifies (±10 mm), don't bother adjusting it. If the previous owner didn't mess with the spacing, it's very likely correct as-is.
- I would recommend marking or noting your imaging train's focal point on your focuser for future reference in case you do need to adjust the spacing.
- In the event you do need to adjust the spacing, it's much easier than people make it out to be – I had to do it myself – the trick is to use an eyepiece
I have no experience putting anything larger than a finderscope on my RC, and that's for when I use it for visual
lol that’d be funny
You should have the headroom for it with your mount I think
Stacking them for visual?
I mean you could get an MSGR dataset for all your RC data
wise decision
I’m doing just fine with Siril, Grax, and SAS, so I’m not in a rush to get pix
Or downgrade your Askar to a guide scope 
Or downgrade your RC to a manual guide scope, stick an eyepiece in it, and hand guide like it's the 1930s
My Askar Rig is about 11 pounds. RC6 will be what 15 pounds?
That’s the max payload I can do WITHOUT CWs
So what’s all this? @frosty shard https://www.cloudynights.com/uploads/monthly_2025_10/IMG_84771.jpg.281f1362d0521605683b0f0ee96938e9.jpg
I know the spacers of course. idk the rest though
Tri-Bahtinov mask (top left), mirror mask (top right), some other mask (bottom left), a full set of focuser extension rings (bottom right)
Mirror mask?
This is what he said
Tri-Bahtinov mask with parial mask (for collimation)
aperture mask
GSO RCs can have imperfectly silvered mirror edges that cause extra diffraction
top right looks like a mirror mask
Like extra spikes? Or bad spikes
explosion
I don't care about that personally but some people are bothered by it
Got an example?
See TV Cassiopeiae on the lower right for an idea
Over the front of the aperture
IC 10? or TV Cassiopeiae?
The green stuff
It's an HaIRG image
Weird
hai image
I have an HaRGB version as well for those with greenphobia 
boriiing
Are you using GS Server?
Gs?
Green Swamp Server to control the mount
dont think humidity is going to be the problem so I guess i'm fine
ascom?
I don't know
@frosty shard The RC6 comes with a GSO Focuser Tilter
is that compatible with the other focuser?
The other focuser should have an adapter with it which would make it compatible, yes
Does it?
It is a feathertouch, right?
I don’t know

