#Ritchey–Chrétien enjoyers thread
1 messages · Page 14 of 1
Not a single bit of wind
A fully loaded WAVE 150i including the mount weight, sums up to 79lbs. The CF tripod is rated for 50lbs💀
yikes
Good job Discord. Your replay function works amazing
My cgem fully loaded up is almost 150 pounds lmao
jfc
youre not going to be able to get good numbers tonight lol
And yeah the Dec is prob bad pa
With the tripod you mean? I mean I got good numbers just could not keep them
well it was fine near the equator where you would typically see much worse dec performance
with the tripod yes
Fair fair
I’m not trying to get good data anyways skys are as doodoo as shooting through a wet rag
Made no sense
My collimation is bad aswell
I got some things to sort out
yes you do
BACK UP TO 1.00 WHYYY
Hiw good was your PA?
i think it is the exposure in part
minute
Tru 1s maybe?
Ok less than 1 arc minute
yeah if changing the guide exposure does literally nothing, its flexture
i dont see any other reason why that would be the case
Yeah no tried all 0.5-2s and they all as bad
yeaaaaaaaaaahhhhhh
that's your best friend flexture
thanks to the amazing carbon fiber scam tripod
RIP
Best friend is pushing it
Not my money 😁😁😁
All borrowed so at least its not my money
well you can kindly give it back to him and try the mount on an actual steel tripod 
You swear it's nothing settings wise?
im seeing PHD2 trying its best and something external is preventing it from reaching an equillibrium
i do not know what else it would be unless the mount itself is garbage
Yeah I mean I did get it down pretty good so I don't think its the mount its self
all of those spikes are accompanied by corrections
PHD2 is trying its hardest and it is all in vain
something not in your control is at fault
it could be periodic error i mean
I think my seeing is so bad I'm still not getting star trials 😭
but at the same time, periodic error that bad would be huge yikes
LMAO
Hopefully
now just for a sanity check...
am I sane or insane @tight lodge ?
i think im a mix of both of course but a third party review will validate or invalidate my suspicions 
Do you have any guide charts from when you had a tc40? Or is that longg gone
i think i still have all of my guide logs
@tight lodge look over our conclusion and give a report
I would like a second option for safety
Tbh, I can narrow the jerkiness of my guiding down to the tripod as well. Because if I guide at 0.5s or 1s, I get the same results.
uh oh no i dont have any of those logs anymore
and that's that
😔
lol...
So it is tripod?
im gonna give it an 80/20 split that it's the tripod and not something else personally
this is a pretty deep treasure trove of evidence at this point
Fair fair I just have no clue you know 🤷♂️ so I have to consult the Professionals
we're certainly not professionals but we've done enough farting around to get in trouble

lol well good enough to know what the celestial equator is
“ I say that jokingly as I had no clue”
That's why I didn't get the pier extension for the CF tripod. That would have made things even worse
Amazing streak of days to test
But imma have to find a way to install the WAVE150i on the HEQ-5 tripod.
But you did get it after?
Nope. I don't have the pier
And yes... that's 22lbs of CW
oh god i didnt even think about that

Oh I read your message as if it was vels
oh crap... 😭
that is definitely not going to go down well with that tripod
yeah
if i wasnt greedy for exposure time id probably call this thing done here...
It's perfectly balanced. I unlock the clutch and it's perfectly balanced. And I didn't even planned it🥹
Ok they are not the same
oh?
Your center bolt is 3/8 mine is m12 “metric”
i believe the one that normally gets used with the AVX is a 10mm rod
so M12 is even better because that means that hole is larger
should be even less sketchy to thread a rod up through
But it won’t fit into peir extension?
Might have to drag it into the store lol
the M12 bolt with your CGEM tripod wont thread into the pier extension because M12 is way too big
M10 is way too big
3/8" is smaller than both of them and it's the same thread as the adapter you have on the bottom of the PE200 right now
Wait so this won’t work?
it should work
Oh I’m so lost
you dont need to thread the rod INTO the tripod itself, the CGEM tripod
Oh
you are just supposed to interface it through, into the adapter on the bottom of the PE200, and you use the tripod spreader as the tensioner to hold the PE200 and tripod together
In this video I show another method for mounting the ZWO AM5 to a durable tripod (Celestron Advanced VX tripod, 2" stainless steel legs). In this video, I use the ZWO PE200 Pier Extension, which uses the standard M10 x 1.5 threads of the Celestron Advanced VX, and the 3/8"x16 TPI threads of the AM5 on top, instead of modifying the Advanced VX tr...
this is a visual and a verbal explanation if you want
Perfect thanks man
go to 4:25 in the video
the first part of the video is irrelevant to you
WAIT
NOPE
dont listen to him
whatever the hell he did does not work for anyone
😭
You know what's the thing to install the mount on?
that is fake news
Big ol concrete pier
Sorry I was just watching it. I was like huh? The whole video
oh wait
my tripod uses m12 threads too
im confused now

i think 10mm is the threads that work for the smaller of the 2 PE200 adapters
I show how to connect the PE200 to an eq6-r pro tripod not the way ZWO says it will connect.
this is the one i followed lmao
jesus
i still think something is wrong though
idk how or why he is using the smaller of the two pier extension adapters because that one is M10 and not 3/8"
ohhhhhh hang on
i think it's because 3/8" threads fit M10 threads but the connection is pretty unstable
that's why
that's right
i opted to use the larger one that you have installed at present because there is 0 play with a 3/8" rod but that does mean the PE200 does not sit flush with the top of the tripod
i personally would not trust the smaller adapter with payloads as heavy as ours but it's up to you if you want the PE200 to sit flush or not with the tripod
as far as i can tell, it does not matter, as long as the rod is threaded through the little adapter plate
Wait I’m so lost so I can’t do it right?
Wait so we have the same extension? And yours does not sit flush?
correct
you can do it.
your tripod uses an M12 rod like my "AVX" tripod does
Oh cool
M12 does not thread into either adapter that comes with the PE200 which is why you need a 3/8" x 16" rod
Ok so I need that rod. And mine will be just like yours?
yes, with the wing nuts and washers ofc
Mannnnn
how does it look undersampled 😭
NASA at home
Cropped?
genuinely
Makes you see the pixels more
i zoomed way in and then took a screenshot lmao
the Angel looks amazing too
But I have noticed that a sho palette makes it look fuzzy
Ok I’m a hour ahead
yeah
Can’t wait to see m81 and m51 later this year
Backyard hubble
I can't wait to image m33
backyard 
same
the rerun this year is going to go hard
even harder than the 47 hours i got last year
Doing it rn hehehe

Especially because the 585 eats Hα for breakfast

There's a catch in me imaging M33. The weather needs to cooperate 
yup
this scope is cheating...
what a 4k crop looks like on the 2x upsampled image
Uhhhh I think I stayed up too late
Why you say that?
The roosters are crowing and everything 😭
Still early o'clock
ngl i love that sound being out in the middle of nowhere
like when im in my bortle 3 site

it was the sound of roosters i remember hearing when i walked outside to look at the milky way core for the first time
it was no longer astro dark but i could still see the major star clouds in sagittarius up through Aquila

Man that's prob a key memory haba
yeah it is at this point
i just opened one of mine on accident and thought to myself "good god this guy's mount is doing what my AM5N did when it was broken"
and then i realized it was my log

oh there's 2 because one is a debug log and the other is the actual log
ahhh
that would be how i made that mistake

I guess your PA was pretty bad
that certainly wasnt helping you
That explains why the RA was going up and then suddenly dipping down
but yeah see how this is just one giant roller coaster?
it looks periodic to a degree
certainly looks like an oscillation
ouch
well the way to pa this mount is stilly
ok almost the same as am5s i think
so its not the mount? just user error?
good to know 😭
is that rc8?
not blurx'd
yes
wow big fov

Now I'm curious about mine
good
be horrified
Remind me in 6h
this part looks awesome
ill be asleep but sure
Then you will not be present for my public shaming


this is an hour and 6 minutes of lum from my garbo backyard btw
Its so silly how to pa the mount. You have to unscrew the plate then rescrew it when done. And that moves it a little and throws it off smh smh
Is that in M32
@harsh matrix little hour of data only got 16min of data on r g b channels
not good but still cool
errrrr
i kinda like

😩
Stop flex
Thanks
That's what you got in 1h?

Blurx loves drizzle 2x
yeah fr
Yep
Only 16min each channel
too short
they had the rods in their own little place on that isle though
it was near the end of the isle
Its 16
also the rod shouldnt have a screw head on it
These?
unless your hand is huge, i highly doubt that is 16
yes
god their's is a mess though
mine was neatly organized

there should be a 3/8" x 16" rod somewhere there
no needs to be 16" because 12" is too short
i was mistaken when i said foot long
they better not be sold out 

@harsh matrix Uhhhh lt serms they only have it in 72 inches 😭
They are gonna cut it for me
Thats good
3/8" thread though right?
That's good 😭
Thread the rod until the top of the rod is sticking about 3 quarters of an inch out of the bottom of the PE200
Once its there, tighten the top nut until the PE200 is snug and doesnt easily move
Then tighten the nut below the tripod spreader until it is tight and there is no play
It might help to take the plastic cuff thing off the leg of the tripod 
@harsh matrix So I have it right tho?
Wait how come It still spins
Its hard to spin it but still
I added a nut
You could give the spreader a strong tug to see if you can get it to snap to a more level position
I find that it likes to droop down like that if you aren't careful
I had to use channel locks and a lot of force to make it not spin...
Thats why a fluted knob is preferable
But you can't go buy fluted knobs on a whim, you have to order them online. 
You need enough leverage on the nut to pull the rod so tight that the pier can't move but its virtually impossible unless you add another nut up top or use channel locks
I wasn't level when tightening it
Like I just did?
You see my vid
Ye
Ok I will grab my channel locks and try
Use em on the nuts of course
Not on the rod or the tripod itself
Haha I know
@harsh matrix Well I think I got it good enough I can’t get the plate to sit flat though
Weird
Looks like the rod could be going up into the pier sideways like the pier was not centered
Well, doesn’t it have to be center for it to even screw on?
Not really
3/8" threads are quite a bit smaller than 12 mm threads so its possible to get some lateral play in the rod as well as the pier when installing the whole thing
Don't think so
ok yeah though so i mena i ot it alot better than the last pic
its wtv
Good or bad idea @harsh matrix
You know it’s so light I feel it might tip so this lowers the center of gravity a good bit and makes it a brick
Bad idea?
No
Wait the spreader looks level now
I think they cut that rod to be more like 20 or 24 inches 
Not a big deal, just makes tearing it down a lot more annoying
no i measured it
how much was i suppose to scew it in
All the way through and then some
Are any of the threads poking up through the bottom of the pier extension?
Also idk how yours feels light
My tripod + pier extension alone weigh close to 20 pounds if I had to guess
like the whole setup is light lol
thats light
idk im used to 150 cgem setup
look at my video lol
but yes
@harsh matrix did you ever have any trouble with remote desktop keps dissconnecting
like im right next to my house and it cant go 3 minutes
and i have a really good wifi adapter
Yes
Its just not a very reliable connection
It’s pissing me off I can’t do this every night
So I ran a ethernet cord 👍
Problem solved
I hope
I do it every night
I dont know of a better solution 
Ngl asiair has it down
Other than directly connecting to the Hotspot generated by the mini PC
Oh I know maybe a Nina app or somthing
Yeah no it’s silly and like I said… asiair got it down
I can connect to it from my front yard if it is in the back
I think its down to the hardware they use to broadcast the signal on the air
PC's tend to have really crappy network range unless they are purpose built for it.

That is the only downside
Silly
You could probably get a beefy network extender and plug it into one of the USB ports on the mini PC and then you're down a USB port which is not cool.
I already do that
@harsh matrix Now that I switched tripods you think I’m gonna have to change some settings
Possibly since the oscillations could have tricked PPEC into thinking they were periodic error and not something external
You already need to change the period for PPEC to what I said last night if you havent already
I did
It was only off by 2s haha
It says my RA osc is 0.60?
It’s red so that’s probably bad
Uhhh
Looks like it is correcting way too much now
PPEC probably needs to reset or be reset
Like fully reset
And you can probably drop the reactive weight by a lot
Yeah
Ok
You can do that by swapping off of that to something else
Letting it run for a sec
And then switching it back to PPEC
Ok
It should retain the period length etc.
Over correcting means that its freaking out over nothing basically
Its correcting more than is necessary to keep the stars still
You can increase the min mo too to drop the frequency of the RA corrections if needed.
Increasing exposure time can help smooth out the graph too
Cause rn thats exhibiting normal harmonic behavior lol
No I’m telling you when I put it too 1s it can’t get back up
Its super twitchy meaning nothing is holding it back now
Same for 1.5 and 2
Oh really?
Yeah I have no clue why
Could still be the periodic error screwing with the software
If you have already reset PPEC, id drop the predictive weight back down to 50 for a bit as well
Ok done
I guess the Juwei is one of the ones you need 0.5s exposures for lol
Thats not unusual for harmonics
Why do you think?
My AM5N acts like a normal German equatorial
The torque of the drives
These things produce a butt load of torque which can cause the twitchy guide response like in the picture above.
They're almost too powerful for their own good and PHD2 has no clue what its doing with them 
Considering PHD2 was designed for use with GEM mounts.
Is there any better guide software than phd2?
I dunno
Supposedly metaguide is crazy good but I have no idea if that works with Nina or not and I dont really want to change what is working for me.
Yeah fair
Dude it’s like for the first minute is going great getting lower than it starts to over correcting
Yuppers
Now is when you need to find the middle ground
How
It needs to be correcting near constantly but not over doing it like it is.
It stays in 70
Dropping the reactive weight and tweaking the predictive weight until something works.

Ok
There's not really a one and done rule to this
Fortunately twitchiness is a good thing because it means that the stability of the tripod is not a problem now.
Dec is chilling right?
Yep at 35
Haven’t even moved from 35 lol
Uh oh dude
Like it goes fine for awhile then starts over correcting then going back down
But no big dips
May be time to increase the predictive weight then
Screw it im trying meta guide
I dont have a clue how to use it for guiding so you're on your own.
META GUIDE USES VIDEO
I will just try it’s fineeee
@harsh matrix I gave up nvm

@harsh matrix You imaging tonight?
no im clouded out
Ahh ok
Look at my settings and let Me know if anything looks weird
looks fine to me
have you changed the reactive weight at all?
that's still the same as i saw last
BRUH
i told you to play with that a while ago
lower that by quite a bit and leave it, see what it does
How much
Ok
@harsh matrix Didnt help
Wait
Honestly idk why my dec is higher now
It was staying strong at 0.34 now its at 0.35
brother
it's going to vary throughout the night
a difference of 0.01 isnt the end of the world
then drop it to 20
I MEANT 0.50 MY BAD
sometimes having the hysteresis too high can cause that
too low a minmo will cause the dec to do more than it has to
the aggression is probably too high too imo
increase the reactive weight to 30 now
possibly
Wait one sec for that blip to leave
increase the predictive to 70 too
i dont really know what that means tbh
Ok
Bubble
that's a much better looking graph holy
It’s chilling at 0.50 to 0.60
I think that is the limit of this mount
Remember last night 😭 I mean this looks so much better
Clouds just ruined my time 😔
hell yeah
any deviations now are probably due to passing clouds, high clouds, or seeing now
which is a much better place to be in
i told you the tripod was THAT BAD
I agree it is soooooo bad out rn
My guide chart looked like a wave
Well thanks for telling me I would have no clue without you saying somthing
Other event of tonight
@harsh matrix How do I get the guide log history?
documents folder on your PC
PHD2logs or something
Aye, thanks
Giggdy
Time to get disappointed. Imma just have a smoke before 
Chilling at 0.50-.65 seeing is limiting me I'm positive
Why disappointed
Because I will see how the tripod behaves like a noodle
Ohhh ok
Got it on my cgem tripod and its just fine
First sub 🙏
Yeah stars are hella soft but circles ✅
Its funny how we both come to vel for info and options haha
Probably not so funny for him XD
Aye well I mean he's smart 🤷♂️ why learn it if he can tell you 😂
could be quite a bit better
t be honest yes\
i need to mess around with PHD2
i can send you the log file if you want to dissapoint me even more XD
i'm a master of PA 
Oh yeah
I hope these settings apply to different nights
Have you had that problem?
Like if I were to tear down my setup and setup somewhere else will it work the same?
Yeah
The only thing you may have to do is recalibrate your guiding if rotation changed or something and thats it.
Ok yeah sounds about right
@harsh matrix Should I stay out for first meridian flip?
I wanna go to sleep 😔

holy
when is the flip supposed to happen?
40 minutes
fudge
i doubt that, unless you got the settings in NINA and onstep already configured, it will do it successfully
yeah
Never messed with onstep stuff
not worth it
@harsh matrix Am I supposed to have flip guiding after meridian flip?
I feel like I heard that somewhere for harmonic moumts
possibly
you're going to have to wait and see though because i dont know if the juwei needs the dec and ra inputs reversed after the meridian or not
Let me look it up
Yep you do
I knew where it was 😭
@harsh matrix To get the pe200 to sit flat have you thought of taking the adapter plate off then putting a nut inside of it? It would be just as if threads were there
Nah I didnt consider it tbh
do you think it wound be better? or kinda a if its not broke dont fix it kinda thing
@harsh matrix Since my guide period was 420 I should wait that long for it too chill out?
It’s about 7 minutes
Id say thats a pretty safe bet yeah
Cause once you start a session, PPEC will almost always be lost until it detects the beginning of another loop
Ok and like man it’s doing bad tonight
Do you have to recalibrate a couple times for it to be good?
Did you change anything between tonight and last night?
Only adding a little weight on my mini pc I put a WiFi thing but I have recalibrated it’s not even 1/4ca pound
Did you leave it outside all night and all day?
It’s just sitting at 0.60-0.70
Yeah but I had a cover over it
Did you check PA?
Yeah it’s good
Thats not really bad...
Oh
That could be seeing.
True
A little blurX never hurt
Up to 0.80 now

See
Sometimes you gotta let it settle down, can take longer than other times
Especially if that was around 30 degrees of altitude when you started
Yeah I guess I’m shooting through a lot of atmosphere
when i shot trifid, it was so low the entire time that my guiding was averaging around 0.8" RMS
and the seeing was so bad that it didnt even matter

@frosty shard the Pelican Nebula may make a great infrared target
i have the Cygnus wall on my list. Y'all stay away from it
I see I see 
Hey fellas, RC6 owner here (still noob). Am I getting a good fwhm, is there a need/room to chase finer collimation?
Guiding was as good as it gets for my gear (cg4 mount 30mm 120mm scope) in between 0.4-0.8
@harsh matrix Yayy new rc user
120mm scope on a rc?
How do people get away with this 😭
Yep)
Hard to tell collimation with asiair not gonna lie. Just unfocus your stars and send a photo that will give a good judgement on how good your collimation is
Atleast I hope
I’m pretty sure that’s seeing and your gear dependent
It can flux depending on seeing
Is that the HFR or FWHM?
The value in arc seconds should be the FWHM
Can't really see the star shapes but the FWHM is good.
only if it would have been clear. Check out this seeing
stars look good imo
whew, tnx
I've been through the obligatory collimation ordeal with that thing, and came out victorious)
my hangover brain cannot understand this chart at the moment, i'll come back to this)
i forgot the header XD
lolol
True
Sadly, Tom ain't telling me the truth
I think im going to swap back to the 533 shortly to get some NIR data on the Trifid neb
Cause it looks really cool in NIR

Isn't Trifid completely transparent in NIR?
Yeah was abt to say
Also, i gotta ask you something. i want to replace my blue filter with a Calcium K filter. so i get NIR, G, UV. What are you thinking? good or bad idea XD
not really
it's not until the micron level
between about 700 nm and 1000 nm it looks very interesting
another 100 or so stars appear too
Still waiting on clear weather so i can start my first NIR project
@frosty shard did you see this photo from a club member i put in BB last night?
Whoa
Dude was using a 20" ASA w/ a QHY 600M from the exact same location I shot it from
ASA?
Yeah I dont know exactly what kind of scope it is but think of it sort of like a CDK
I think he clipped the background to black too
I haven't been paying close attention to the server but I'm just about to fly home from JuliaCon
why do i feel like i can pull a sharper image than that?
Because I pulled a sharper image than that 💀
And i tried way less hard with much cheaper gear

I was gonna say like it doesn’t look that great or sharp 😭
This is when I still had a color cam on a full moon night 30mins 😭
@vapid patio this is a pretty typical start to a session for me
So freaking out initially is not really going to help you.
Concurring here, this is also what my guiding looks like at first
I've thought about making high quality name badges for when I do sidewalk astronomy
I'd make it like Hi, I'm Brandon. Don't touch my telescope
No, people not touching my telescope is the problem!
I tell people explicitly that they can come and have a look through it and they just don't
Not because they're not interested
But because they don't want to break my telescope
I'm glad I live in a place where people are too cautious rather than disrespectful, but it is an annoyance sometimes
Ok yeah fair fair
Also, never freak out about guiding. The RMS is average over time. You telescope can actually guide quite perfectly and show you arcseconds of RMS error.
Huh
How
Oh also @harsh matrix Is it ok to collimate on a not great seeing night?
Or only on like perfect nights
that is really up to you to decide if you can tell what adjustments do or do not need to be made
And you use meta guide?
i use metaguide on bad nights because it can give you an averaged idea of your focused star and the associated coma
it can work around the seeing
an un focused star and live view in sharpcap
I actually do something slightly different: collimating on windy nights
Since I don't need a guider to collimate
to get immediate feedback about what my adjustments do to no only the star i want to use on axis but the rest of the field
You can loop exps in Nina? Same thing?
doing it in nina would induce a delay on everything, and slewing your on axis star back to center after an adjustment would be a royal pain
yeah you can for sure
you dont need the subscription service to use live view fortunately
that's supported natively with the drivers of the camera you have i believe, or should be
what model of the 585 mono did you get again?
im drawing a blank
yeah ZWO supports the live view without doing anything special
I think this turned out okay
Ok sick
And also I wanted to ask if I got a 8” newt would it have the same resolving power as a 8” rc?
I don’t want all the fl that comes with the rc design with my tiny sensor
So a newt would let me get a bigger scope but same ish fl
Yup it's all down to aperture
And newts are alooooot cheaper
It would but keeping it nearly as sharp will be a pain imo
But if you think you are up to the challenge, you are welcome to try
Fair rc do hold collimation forever “so I’ve heard”
I’m thinking awhile in the future
I haven’t even really used my rc the more I think about it 😭
Got my guiding and flexture down
All I need is a good collimation and I'm good to go
Yeah with a Newt you'll need a coma corrector to take advantage of wider fields
And I have no idea how well those work in the NIR, if you want to image in that band
I wouldn't trust them for UV
Yuppers
I havent had to make any serious collimation adjustments since May 
The last bit of collimation I did was 2 weeks ago, and it was turning one screw on the secondary mirror about an eighth of a turn
And that only happened because of the difference between my apertura reducer and the Apex-L
That wasn't even due to the scope moving on its own
Yeah Ive reduced and before that it hasn't been collimated in over a year 🥴
Holy cow
I looked at my subs and my stars are kinda triangles
What does that tell you 
Same sort of thing my RC6 did regularly
That tells me there may be some combination of collimation error, possible reducer aberrations, and astigmatism induced by the weight on your focuser being transmitted into the primary mirror.
I havent had triangular stars since going to the RC8 though
I mean I doubt reducer its a good one I think
Bingo
You dont
You have to live with it unless you upgrade to a bigger RC
It may or may not be, its not guaranteed to be the reducer that is at fault
Wow that's a big design flaw
I guess because of how its mounted on the primary mirror
Well fist step is collimation we will see then
yes
it's manageable and not a huge deal at the end of the day, but it is incredibly annoying
As long as its sharp i don't care about the stars bluX can fix star sharp
Does it affect actual sharpness?
yes
and yes
but seeing will arguably be a bigger problem
i cant actually sample the 0.719"/px my sampling rate is because of it (I think) but if i were to fix it, i may be able to reach that potential
Wow rcs are a bigger pain than I thought
there's also the possibility that the mirrors arent within the wavefront error necessary to be capable of that kind of resolution since these are budget RC's made at a cheap price in China
Budget? Mine maybe
this particular point goes for the truss tubes too
Damn
they certainly can be
these closed tube ones were a design disaster
I might still get a newt smh
this is why there are folks out there (like me) who want more producers to enter the market, to give GSO a run for their money
i still like my results from the RC's more than what ive been able to get out of newts and fracs though
Yeah they are great
plus i get the reach i want, and/or the focal ratio i want without the field sharpness being a royal pain to sort out
Fair
in general, the central obstruction i believe is a bigger issue for the RC6's than the coupled primary and focuser thing
it's not until the 8 or the 10" when it becomes a serious issue
the CO on my 6 was by far the more annoying thing to deal with
central obstruction
it's 57% of the total aperture on the 6
that's why the 6 is so darn slow
DAMN
That's like a 3.5 inch refractor

still a 6"
Oh ok just slow I guess
Not a big deal after reduced
correct
F/5.7 for me
Zaaaamm
Lets compare to my 2hr with 533 and crappy narrowband filters
Wait this is super compressed
Send me your png I wanna compare in pix
Good thing we had the same pixel size so it’s a good comparison
true
skill issue of horrific proportions
my blue filter offset wasnt set accurately enough for my seeing here at home so i effectively induced chromatic aberration on my data
that's awful 
Filter offset of CA and despair
Yeah if all the stars are consistently comatic in the same direction, it's a collimation issue
ok yeah all the same way
Yeah your optical axis is off to the right
If you think about moving the stars to the right not the left that is the sort of adjustment you need to make to the secondary mirror to correct that.
To correct coma, you want to move the stars in the opposite direction of where they look "most focused" aka the centroid of the stars.
Ok yeah so I need to move it left
no
down to the right
not the left
the stars look like arrows pointing up to the left
makes you think you need to "move" them up to that direction but actually that will dig you into a deep hole
bruh im tired and im mixing up these directions
gotta move the stars in the opposite direction of where the comatic shape is pointing
So down and right?
Noted
that particular part is a very small adjustment
the rightward motion is what you will adjust most
And I have to do it in sharpcap?
you can do it whatever way that you want but i prefer sharpcap
you can use nina to center a very bright star, say Vega, go to sharpcap, use the reticle feature to pull up one of the x reticles, after every adjustment return the star to where they meet (in the dead center of the X and this is quite important), and you want to be collimating roughly 100 to 300 steps out of focus
going too far into focus and too far out are both useful for different reasons
what you are looking for is still sort of a less pronounced version of the comatic shape
there is something called the poisson dot that shows up in the middle of the shadow of the secondary mirror
Yeah the little circle in a unfocused star
that will always be in the same place as the centroid of the star, and when the secondary is out of collimation, that poisson dot will not be centered
it will be offset
you need to correct it in whatever direction will resolve the misplacement (as a little hint for you in this case down to the right, and the dot will be biased mostly to the left but also up a tad)
This is more or less what you should expect to see once you're in collimation
Aka a defocused star field.
Btw sometimes in sharpcap it helps a lot to lower the gain as much as possible and use 100 to 150 ms exposures to average out the seeing.
To fast an exposure can make it a royal pain to tell wtf is going on.
Also you can see the nice donut of death in that third picture 
YOUR GUIDING
Yes
No
IC 4665 (Summer Beehive) is a good starfield for collimation (in Ophiuchus)
No I mean its still great guiding
How far back does it look?

You mean focus wise?
Like how far back does your phd2 look back and tell you your rms
The entire session in that case
Oh I never knew that
But the entire session wasnt exactly all that long there
Ah
Holy
Funny how close our settings are

The things that light pollution hides from us is insane
Wow you looked back 🤣
Hm?
Just such an old post
It was an accident I guess
My screen started at the top..
Didn't realize how far it was till I scrolled instead of tapping to zoom down here
Garbage process, I barely have any S-II data and I overcooked the deconvolution, but here
I was gonna image NGC 7331 but then I saw cirrus overhead and lightning strikes so I made like a banana and split
Beat the rain easily though, so no water problems
I have no idea why it looks washed out on some applications but not others
probably some sort of color management thing Windows is screwing up, but I'm not sure which of the applications is accurate and which ones aren't
Also depends on how its saving the color space, some programs handle color data differently
Does this work better...
Not really...
These don't look any different...
Left is the Display P3 gamut I use for my processing, right is "converted" to sRGB but I don't see a difference
The one on the right appears to be a hair brighter.
jfc
Vel, I have a question about your RC
You're using an OAG to guide, right?
When the OAG goes out of focus, the stars seen by the guidecam split as well?
dOeS tHiS lOoK dIfFeReNt
They do
Hmm I can't tell. I'm actually colorblind 
Oh, so it's not just my newtonian
Yeah
it looks like that on all of my scopes, including my redcat
it's because an OAG is typically located at the very edge of the image circle of your telescope
the star looks sliced off because what you are seeing is effectively light cutoff, or an extreme form of vignetting manifesting itself in the shape of the stars themselves according to your guide camera
Also, I had this dumb idea to sync the offset in focus between the OAG an maincam by moving the OAG behind the EFW, Between the main cam and EFW basically
Wait really?
Do you know what kind
I'm just messing with you mate😂
Well something like 1 in 20 men have some type of red/green color blindness
So HSO and SHO could be confused with each other
people who can't see colour , can they resolve more? I mean they seeing in mono
I was playing around with a software that allows me to see different color spectrums and such.
They don't see in mono
Ik 
Also, I simulated what it would look like if you could only see the Hydrogen spectrum
Color blind people can sometimes see past camouflage more easily
Thats cool
Whooptie challenged me to beat the sharpness of his Pelican nebula
so tonight, with some of the best seeing ive see forecasted in a while, i shot SHO, 10 minute subs, all night long on this thing
zoomed in about 50% here, no blurx, just nuked the noise
The seeing tomorrow is going to be even better 
Noot gang 
You know what's even worse? I have better seeing than Vel
processed it super lazily and boomer style
Man when you get a rc your really going to be cooking
Boomer style??

yeah
like id call this project done and move on now if i was a boomer
that's how carelessly i processed it
Ahhh okay
Oversaturated HOO is boomer style
Ahhh so me 😅
I'm not saying that is you, but you get my point. I can give you an example
Ohhhhh
Yeah, this is boomer style

With some actual care this could be a fire process
I call this palette HaHaHa, because that's all i had to work with. so i decided to go all the way in and make it an example to what i shouldn't do
coma
because rcs are pissing me off
oh thats it
and they require coma correctors
but thats it/ no like flexture? or weird collimation
collimating the secondary on an f/5 or faster newt is a nightmare
if the focuser is crap, it has to be replaced
the focuser alone can be the source of tons of problems
like flexture, sometimes they need to be collimated so you can even collimate the newt
the primary mirror cells can often be equipped with inadequate springs resulting in frequent loss of collimation
by frequent, literally multiple times a night to every day
they leak light through the back of the primary mirror unless the rear is sealed off by some miracle
most newtonians are sold with inadequate spider veins as well, which means you cant collimate the secondary well, and their frail build can mean that they are easy to twist, resulting in ugly star spikes and more diffraction
stray light becomes a nightmare on a newt, especially because most newts, with the exception of very high end custom built ones from europe, do not come with light baffling
most of these problems go away with a high end custom build newt like an ONTC from Europe but those will cost you out the nose and are not worth it for the average person
on the lower end, anything in your range will require heavy modification for them not to be a nightmare to use
with a newt, you must pick your poison because there is no middle ground.

