#Ritchey–Chrétien enjoyers thread
1 messages · Page 12 of 1
I have no idea if i will have issues with this or not, doesnt seem like i will, but using it with my 7x2 filter wheel may be a pain lol

so next week the RC will be back in business?
Tomorrow fingers crossed
So I've just realized I've been using the NL-Bayes denoising in SIRIL incorrectly. You're supposed to apply it at the linear stage
Like with RC astro stuff. You apply NoiseX, BlurX and StarX right at the start of the processing
This hurts to spend money
Not even the best camera for the price
@harsh matrix Do you have any trouble doing star collimation with that software? Does the star ever disappear when you barely turn the mirror
Collimation is in my future and I’m not looking forward to it
No
You do need to keep the star as close to good focus as possible while you make adjustments though
Otherwise it can trick you into making unnecessary changes
Well I can tell you from experience that if this ever happens, your secondary is loose.
Do not ever touch the center screw btw
Ok noted
And it’s like veryyyy small turns?
Good to know
yeah
or i will do large turns and the star still stays in the frame
but large turns with metaguide will throw the software for a loop
so small turns for the adjustments you make in that software
Noted noted
still debating on 571 or 533 for the RC8 tonight
it might be clouded out though despite the forecast saying clear yesterday for tonight

Sketchy
just cant catch a break
Real
When my new guide camera gets here the rc is back in business
I gotta clean the mirrors today and throw it together goodish
Any tips for cleaning
And clean with what? Micro fiber?
if you dont already know what you are doing then look up a guide of some sort
no
people use cotton swabs or Cuiv did a big sketchy and uses his fingers
Good idea haha
Ok let me see rq
Thanks
Kimwipes are also a good option
You can get them off Amazon...I have relatively quick access to them since I work in chemistry
@harsh matrix You imaging tonight?

Clouds rolling in?
I might have a chance tomorrow, but idk what to image. Especially with full moon
yeah
forecast yesterday said clear today
now it does not looks so promising
Always when the new gear shows up
Verdict is im not shooting unless by some miracle it stays clear
Almost didnt reach focus with the apex
The weather is not great whatsoever but I think i can squeeze some testing out on the mount
Holy crap the field is so good after collimating it 😭
This is incredible
I feel like ive unlocked super powers

GUYS
@tight lodge 
5 minute Ha sub, with some wind, with the new Apex-L on my 571
full frame
gawd dang this scope is sexy
i love it way more now
How's the mount holding up?
like it never acted up
i have admittedly not had a good night of imaging
got 2 5 minute subs in and then clouds the rest of the time so far
it looks like theyre about to break up entirely but with the way the forecast looks, it will probably get bad again when i least expect it
so guiding has been relatively unreliable, however i havent seen any red flags
no bird stars like i would have been getting otherwise
Man I really want to get better M16 data. Reprocessed the old data and now I know why the diffraction spikes aren't aligned
(the collimation shifted due to the loose secondary)
you should reshoot that
💯
so far night isnt going great
dumb PHD2 over wrote my min mo's so my guiding has been worse than it otherwise should be simply because it felt like screwing me over 
Unfortunately we're getting smoked out again
fml
tasty as hell Sii sub
thats crazy
hell yeah
How does the Min Mo affect the guiding tho?
Also, what's the RMS range that you usually get. For me is between 0.5 and 0.8, with some beautiful rare exceptions of below 0.4
It can affect the frequency of corrections as well as the strength
I like to keep the corrections neat constant but low in strength since I always polar align with error below 30"
My AM5N has been averaging 0.3" to 0.4" consistently night after night.
I know my mount can do the same, is just that PHD2 kinda has a stroke most of the time
just realized i could get an RC and do PN hunting if i wanted to
possible..
Perfect spot then

i'd need to modify it a good bit tho since i'd want to use my heavy 2600 mono train
or a 585 if i really wanted to keep things a little lighter
Surprisingly, with the reducer/flattener, I did not see signs of the "mirror flop".
It would still be a good idea to get the focuser and primary decoupled, but its not as dire as I thought tbh
For sure
Lmao same here
I probably shouldn't be shooting at native focal length, but I can't be bothered to figure out backspacing
-Bin the sensor to match the seeing-
No

Yeeeesss

Nope

Yes
wip but im surprised at how dust free my scope is considering I havent used it in 2 years

Light leak?
Full moon
yea
i got a 15 minute sub yesterday. Ive never had that ever. but I opted for 8 minutes
that being said, the 585 would give me .3” sampling but the rayleigh limit would be ~.46 for an 8” scope
are they slightly oval?
They are burnt in. If you look at the image in linear, I bet those stars will still be there.
It’s like if you do too long of an exposure on flame nebula
For that target they show a little but they shouldt be like a full on burnt circle
Maybe just overstretched?
Oh then, yeah most likely. That’s what it is No big deal
i gotta relearn all this astrolingojargon
i promise i wont abandon my set up ever again.
@vapid patio why do you hate binning?
not sure
i think it just makes it worse quailty right?
no, if your seeing is super bad, binning can actually make a sharper image because you are less oversampled. then you can do a 2x drizzle and get back to where you started
Binning increases your SNR per pixel by trading off your total pixel count. In some circumstances it can be worth it (for instance, if shooting a large mosaic that you won't release at native resolution)
naah... if i manage to pull the cygnus mozaic, i'll release it at full rez XD
I mean if I do that 16 panel of the Andromeda Galaxy, yeah me too lmao
The cygnus will be a 900 panel mosaic 
I was actually thinking about how many panels I'd need to do an LMC mosaic
in my case is 225 panels
This is 576 panels
but in the case of cygnus, i will most likely not spend more than 30s per panel per filter
you can get away with 450 panels
oh yeah forgot bout drizzling
whats undersampled in your opinion
deneb is square
Wanna borrow my RC6 permanently for $500? 
i use a reducer on my rc6 with my 585
huh
lol
maybe, let me put some thought into it
Lmao
It's halfway a joke
I need a focuser for my RC8 and ive poached the one from my 6 for the time being.
i'd probably upgrade it anyway
I’ve seen RC6s for like 300 bucks on cloudy nights
5 is a little steep haha
I can't find such good deals here
Well its a carbonstar
I can't quite give it away
These go for more than your run of the mill steel tubes
Btw AM5N averaged 0.4" RMS despite clouds and guide exposures that were too fast for half the night. 
It has to be fixed now.
🔥
What were your guide exposures?
1 second for most of the night, which was too short
I reverted it to the usual 1.5 second guide exposures and then my guiding leveled out and the RMS fell 0.2" lol
It was averaging about 0.7" to 0.6" RMS on the low end until I realized the exposure was probably too short, and thats when I found my min mos were wrong too.
You use 1.5 s with an AM5N? Wow
I'm using 0.5 s
Perhaps I should bump mine up and see if that helps
Yes
Cause any shorter gives me horrendous guiding and trailed stars
Something i was dealing with for most of the night last night.
I know the usual recommendation for harmonic drive mounts is to keep guide exposures to 1 s and below but I haven't actually done much testing
But at the same time it's not like I have an idea of the periodic error and nonperiodic contributions in the Wave 150i
Thats something you will only figure out on your end through trial and error.
I intentionally didnt listen to the old advice because I could tell it wasnt working with my mount.
The periodic error is too tame and my polar alignment is consistently very very good.
I'm going out tonight, not to image but to bring some friends to check out Yanna Research Station, so I'm probably going to use the night to try different guiding settings
The smoke is actually a good thing in this case
Less thermal expansion too, which means less of a need to refocus
I also might have to check up on my collimation
Supposedly
True
Not a bad idea since tonight wont be usable with smoke
You have time to tweak it all night.
Mine lost collimation while it sat around unused, it took a small movement of the secondary to return it lmaoooo
The primary has not moved since I pulled it out of the scope
Beginning of June I believe.
Yeah I want to stress test it and see the effect on star SNRs and such
Measure HFR for sure.
I mean, I refocus every 30 minutes anyway anyways but yeah
If i used mine more in the native config I could have given you a ballpark number but I havent used it in that configuration at all really
me spit balling to the tech that worked on my mount
a board failure is pretty unusual and it implies some sort of gradual degradation of a component on the board made to hold electric charge
degradation of a component in an unusual way could let electricity arc to other components
or on the worse side of things, and what may have actually occurred, a capacitor which has degraded sufficiently may not hold the charge it was designed for, and may only hold a small fraction of what it was rated for, triggering amplified signals to be sent to the motor drive
I found that 1 second exposures are actually just as good as 0.5 second exposures with the Wave 150i, if not better! @tight lodge figured you'd want to know this
Guided at around 0.7" with the 0.5 s exposures, but around 0.6" with the 1 s exposures
The only reason I'm hesitant to say it definitely is better is because we had variable cloud cover during the session (mostly high cirrus)
Not enough to lose guide stars even at 0.5 s, but enough that it made the star SNRs vary a lot
Also, collimation looked fine, the issues seems to be tilt
These settings gave me the smallest RMS
However it is still inconsistent,
did you try 1.5s exposures?
I did, 1.5 is starting to get worse😅

yall keep making me glad i didnt go for the Wave 150i
But again... I think is some settings that I have wrong
Why you blame the mount?
you might be able to lower the dec aggression and up the min mo unless your PA isnt great regularly
i have yet to see or hear anyone beat the numbers i get lol
plus the clutch issues brandon has with his
It guided like this the whole session
I tested mine, I have no issues with the clutches. The tripod is the only thing that is not great
wtf
you can put aggression higher than 100?
On the RA only
still doesnt beat my record
which was like 0.33" or something
0.31"?
maybe 0.35"?
but does yours average ~0.35" +/- 0.05" repeatedly session after session?

That's something that I need to fine-tune in PHD2. Because when I got it, it was bad, now I'm around ~.5" on average, so I'm getting close 
heh
mine will average 0.45" at worst in a bad session lmao
it's normally chilling around that 0.35" magical number
Plus I haven't really changed too many settings in PHD2 since I got the mount. I mostly played with what's on the screen. No algorithms nothing
||80% of the settings I have no clue what they do
||
bruh
you gotta play around with the settings
you might be able to push that mount a lot harder
I know... but I don't know what some of the settings do
that's why you experiment 
That's why I blame myself before the mount. I know that the mount can do it
unless the wave has way more PE than the AM5N, it is worth putting on PPEC as the RA correction algorithm
Hysteresis is fine on the Dec and i think that's what it may already be on for you
another qualifier on that note is that the frequency of the PE will determine how useful PPEC can be.
if it's really big swings in very short amounts of time, PPEC probably wont be of much use, but if it's pretty gradual, it should be no problem
@frosty shard listen up 
Also I the guide speed... I've seen some stuff about reducing it to 0.5 instead of 0.75
Thats another thing you need to experiment with to figure out.
Yeah... only if the skies will cooperate with me
Also, I'd love to experiment with it, but considering that at the moment I have about 2h of astro twilight, I just risk it and image in this state😅
Can you select hysteresis for the Dec axis? I thought it was just resist switch, lowpass(2) and Z-filter?
Since I swapped the hand pins for M6x12 bolts I have had zero issues
I didn't try PPEC for RA but I definitely should, and I didn't try 1.5 sec exposures
Yeah

huh what
I thought that was intentional lmao
less reduction? 
The more backspacing you add, the more reduction you get
✅
I thought you did that because you wanted more than 0.67x reduction
to get 0.67 it is 80mm of spacing, i had tried originally to get more but could NOT reach focus so i just went to spec. but actually went to 70mm not 80
so im at 80 now all good ✅
Oh hang on
The way you worded that is what made me HUH
Because I thought the 0.67x reduction was 80mm but you said "It was 70mm not 80mm" so you made it sound like the proper reduction was less not more
Thats why.

@harsh matrix whoops haha my bad. but so yeah im not at 80mm of spacing and go from 1370 to 911mm
is it worth to push to 90mm and become f/5.6 and 854mm?
Are you still having issues with consistent guiding?
no let me explain. once we dialed in my settings the limiting factor was now my asi120mms ability to see stars "as now we are doing 0.5s exps" so i ordered a new guide cam "asi220mm all I can get right now" to give me good guiding
Got it.
Id say get your 220 first and try 80 mm back space
If by some unfortunate luck, you still have trouble getting guide stars, then go to 90 mm of back space
ok bet thanks
Have you increased the gain of your camera?
too much and the stars become noise
im barely scraping by 🙏
Pay to win brother
Exactly
So I bought a new guide camera
By any chance, was there a telescope attached to that camera
https://app.astrobin.com/i/p9cmwy?r=C
Revision 3 baybee
The edge of the honse is so sharp you could cut glass with it
Ok... I got a question for you Vel. How do you map a channel to orange or... purple?
it is fr
i used a combine images script made for JWST images to do it in Pixinsight
you could achieve the same outcome by manually mapping colors to each filter in photoshop or gimp though
i just have a massive skill issue and i cant get it to work out the way i want in either of those
RC8 shenanigans again
i added the last bit of data from the other night to my existing 50 minutes
the signal was a bit worse due to poor transparency and eventually clouds, but it didnt affect the existing data too badly
i did
only 20 minutes survived the night
the rest was garbage
same case for all channels though tbh
I do have some SII that I could share, but I doubt it's up to your expectations 
mine is pretty garbage lol
When I'll get home tonight, I will share the SII
Trashed all my Lagoon data 
No idea why the focus was so far off
Check out this CO modulation though
NOOOOOOOOOOOO
YEAAAAAHHHH BWOIIIII
that's some CO mod
Funny enough, that was the last sub I took before the Lagoon subs, and all of them were out of focus
Tonight was not good for imaging though, fog rolled in
so I didn't waste too much imaging time
I got some more data on the Crescent though, processing that right now
Alright this is not good
All my stars are elongated, and I think it's all due to guiding issues
I noticed, weirdly enough, my RA corrections were very sluggish and would not move the mount very much at all
By contrast Dec was totally fine
this looks like RA error too
uh oh
Yeah it lines up perfectly
Got any idea what might be going on?
I will note, it was not a good night for imaging due to fog, but I never lost guide stars at any point during the night or had PHD2 complain about guiding
But I did have the whole "guiding may be impaired" due to orthogonality error
Hmmmm
How far off was the RA and the Dec from being 90 degrees?
And did you have any cable snags?
11 to 15 degrees depending on the run
I didn't check for this actually
Okay that should be manageable under ideal circumstances

The other thing it could be is that maybe you didnt have the aggression on the RA high enough or didnt have the min mo low enough
Or the maximum pulse size you allowed was too short
Those could all be factors and all of them revolve around exposure time too
My minmo was 0.5, aggression was 80, and I was actually just using half second exposures. In the past I've used these settings without serious issues
You have the Xena-M right?
Yup
Drop that min mo way down
Do like 0.2 or lower
That is most likely why you are having issues
Do you have them both that low or just RA?
My RA is actually 0.16 rn
For min mo
The Dec is at 0.28
Wait wrong
Correction, that is right
The guiding assistant at one point told me to move minmo up to 1.5 which seemed very wrong
If the min mo settings you are using is from guiding assistant, dont listen to it
It's not good at giving you settings for a harmonic mount
It will get the job done but it will not yield results good enough for high focal length imaging
I bumped it up from the baseline 0.3 or whatever the default was because I assumed that it needed to be increased, but I'll move both down
Yeah if the RA and Dec responses are sluggish, you can adjust the min mo down to compensate
It's better to have constant small adjustments than few large adjustments with these harmonics
Thats how you get the most out of them
Since you have the Xena-M too, the min mo's need to be quite a bit smaller than if you had any other guide cameras since the pixels are huge
From my understanding, the min mo defines how many pixels, or how many fractions of a pixel the mount will be allowed to drift before PHD2 issues a correction
I found it weird that the RA was so sluggish, it was almost like it couldn't clear backlash but there just isn't any
It could be that the clutch came loose again but I sort of doubt it
You seem to keep that on a tight leash
I highly doubt it, since the mod I've never had any issues
Also that would show up in Dec most likely
the stock bolt for the RA clutch is very secure
Interesting...
So yeah I suspect dropping the min mos will help with that.
0.5 is extremely high
I dont get good images if my min mo on RA is above 0.2 
Yeah I'll just set RA to 0.2 and Dec to 0.25 and go from there
Cool
And if you think the RA is still responding too slow, and your RMS remains pretty high, you can drop the min mo further
I think ive gone as low as 0.13 on my AM5N
And like 0.08 on my EQM35
Maybe that'll need to be slightly larger to compensate for the fact that I'm not using the reducer, but if you're going that low I'm just gonna start at those numbers
The guiding actually seemed really good until I looked the subs; the only indication was the poor RA response
Actually I dont change the min mo between my scopes
The reason being is that performance remains the same
0.5" or less for most of the night
It's because its measuring in fractions of a pixel, and not in arc seconds

Weird
Oh god
What if its flexture?

I hope it's just a poor choice of settings, but what could be flexing...
Maybe I should check my OAG screws actually now that you say that
That
And check the guide camera itself to see if it came loose somehow
Maybe see if the focuser is threaded on tight too.
Focuser was definitely threaded on correctly, I check the configuration for flexure all the time, but I haven't checked on the OAG screws
Ight
Excellent call. The screws holding the prism in place did come loose
Oh fuq
not by very much but enough to notice
Lol well maybe that will fix it
Well I've got several things to test but hopefully that covers it all
Btw how long were those subs?
Bro, PHD2 has no clue that is guiding a harmonic mount
. Guiding assistant even freaks out that it can't measure backlash
180 s for everything
Were all of the subs equally elongated?
Or was it variable?
It seems to vary a little bit
But not enough that I ever had a sub with round stars
@harsh matrix ! Here's the SII data. It ain't the best, but it's better than nothing 😅
Could very well be flexture and/or bad settings

Is that a good sniff or a bad sniff?
We will see later tonight lol
It ain't much, but it's honest work😂
@vapid patio they're someone who came along to troll in Astronium
QQQ timed her out last night
No kicked her
ah i see i was talking to her last night a little odd...
And then QQQ gave me permission to ban if she came back within 24 hours
you should ban lowkey nothing good come from this tbh
Yeah she's resorted to weird half bait rage baiting spam
I just did
good
Thats why she's back here trying to bring drama here
I banned the friend too but QQQ unbanned him and put him on strict watch for arguing all of the time
I told QQQ he would keep doing that too and he didnt listen, next thing you know he's part of a huge argument yesterday, the same day he was unbanned.
💀
come on 😭
@harsh matrix how much should i sell my 5x2 filter wheel for/ im getting a 7x2
im thinking 250?
Start at 250 and drop it to 200 if it goes too long without any offers.
BET TOO EASY
sorry for caps
bruh
How so
Missed it whoops
BRUH

Honestly he just seems to be jealous that I have friends online and he doesnt
Thats what it started to lean towards.
So odd
And he was all up on you like chill 😭
Yeah
He seemed to hate me mostly for how I spoke 
Y'all were in a vc at one point?
Did someone say... Drama?
Sort of 
Discord drama is always fun
It's so unnecessarily stupid too 
Watching a bunch of grown-ups acting like the 12 it's kinda funny
These 2 were just kids though
So it wasnt any fun to watch
Just annoying to deal with.
Uuuhhh
I bet. A good advice... just don't give them attention, they'll get bored and leave
They're banned now because they just kept causing trouble for everyone else
Not just the mod team
@frosty shard those CO modulation rings might give you an insight of what could be weird about the optics. 
I don't think anything's wrong with my optics as far as I can tell?
Something has to create that notch in the rings
Someone took a stab at my data
https://www.cloudynights.com/topic/862495-process-my-data-thread/page-75#entry14230293
i get them too
some reason i didnt get them on my osc camera but show alot with my mono cam
@harsh matrix you like my new nickname?
Yes
The decoupler mod from Natemandoo on CN is 500 dollars for an anodized version, and 400 for bare aluminum.
@harsh matrix No way I just sold my efw for 260 😭 I bought it for 200 this hobby is profitable
Stupid PayPal took 5 bucks
What the
That person is probably dumb
Unless you got yours used
Now I’m gonna look for a seven position finally I’m a real astronomer
@harsh matrix HAHAHAHAHAAH LOOOK LOOK
225 😭
yoink a 7x2" instead
trust
it'll save you from upgrading in the future
or a 7x36mm
smthn
yep thats what im going for now
i already have my lrgbsho filters
He can get a 8x1.25" rn and then upgrade the roulette down the road too
Lots of options
But a 7x36mm makes the most sense
i have all 2" filters
Oh so you're sticking to 2"?
i mean why not
wish i got 36mm when i was building out my primary rig
would make 3nm filters so much cheaper 💔
plan to get a 571
W
Rip
Ig?
huh
I thought it was more
player one aslways has good prices
but stupid china wont talk with us so we STILL GET NO PLAYER ONE
The astigmatism in the primary due to flexture is showing real bad at 33 degrees altitude lol
Whatever guess I'm getting zwo one
I guess I need a decoupler 
Yeaaaaaah
0.48" RMS guiding and first Ha sub has blob stars
But at the start of the session before PA, the stars were out of focus and the primary was very obviously collimated well
The field looked excellent until I slewed to Eagle lol
Also the blobs were in the direction of what would be Dec error i believe, not RA
And the dec is chill
Now that M16 is near the meridian the stars look perfect 
This is why i dont rush to redo collimation when I see oddities
This stupid design flaw is why.
Crazy CO modulation 
Why?
The FWHM of the frame i looked at here was 2.25" iirc
So the almost complete lack of atmospheric blur emphasized the rings further
@harsh matrix i played with Pix's color mapper and I made red blob 
Lol
Power of Texas I guess
LOL
Tonight will be even better
The seeing is forecasted to be above average
Have fun
All my gear is getting here anyways
220mm and 7x2 filter wheel
rip
Open im browser
But uh, raw image, I just linear fit, applied the stf stretch, and did curves
Very bad BGE
West Veil Neb too
How long
35 minutes of Ha and 30 minutes of Oiii
Ok not much sick looks sharp
Looks better than 17 hours with my modded DSLR
Haha I would hope
You ever take a look at my data?
Exactly 
Yeah no worries if you ever wanna that be cool
How much are you planning?
Idk I'll see how much I have at the end of this M16 project
Ohhh yeah yeah
Im filling in the remainder of the night with the west veil
Idk how many times it'll go into my tree though so I might end up deleting half my frames each night
You are useing 571 on rc8? What reduction?
Yes
At 0.65x
F/5.12
Basically an f/5 8" newt without the coma 
Ahh man I feel you
A 65 reduction? Is that the recommended reduction?
Thats what the Apex-L is designed to function at
Reducers on rcs ngl are overpowered
Dang fancy
Yeah exactly lmao
This reducer doesnt have any glaring flaws
It's a reducer/flattener too so there is no field curvature
Mines only f/6 smh smh
Only the artifacts at the edges do to actual field errors from the scope.
Ik
Dang well that's fancy
Can't with my super small sensor even with reducer is no good
Gotta get bigger sensor first but Ima enjoy my 585 for a little
True ish
If you ever upgrade to 10” let me know 
How ish? Don't forget my mount
LOL
I may in a few years but id probably keep my 8" to have a "widefield" light bucket 
Especially if I get the decoupler mod
The difference
Decoupler?
Yeah to separate the focuser from the primary mirror to fix that astigmatism i was talking about last night
Not seeing it tonight though
You mean like an extension ring?
Nope
Interesting
Bipolar 
I found one you can 3-D print
The focuser is hooked directly to the collimation mechanism that controls the position of the primary mirror, so all weight on your focuser gets transmitted straight into the primary mirror, causing flexture, which presents as unfixable astigmatism.
Won't be rigid enough
Tbh
Needs to be solid aluminum or steel, something with no give
Depends on what material you use but yeah
Fair fair
Oh interesting does it only really happen when you’re pointing stright upish?
No
Happens most at extreme right ascension and declination angles
It was happening really bad last night with M16, at 30 degrees
Hmmm interesting
I’m guessing maybe the temperature plays a role?
No idea
Conditions are pretty much identical
Of what?
You said you’re imaging tonight
I am but I dont have any way to show tonight's progress on hand atm
Alright all good
I do have a raw version of last night's data right here though
Tonight's is like this but sharper, by quite a bit. Lol.
Wow that's sick well once you get that data all together maybe send over the master?
Oh also question. Do you dither?
Every loop of frames yes
Sure
After how many frames? Leta say your doing 300s
If im doing SHO, I dither every 3 frames
At 300s
If im doing just one 300s frame, every frame

Good to know good to know
Every single 180s frame of one filter is every 2
But I will dither once in an RGB cycle for 3 180s back to back, 1 for each filter.
what do you think of people who sink there camera as cool as it can go always to get no hot pixels
Ok yeah
I think they're crazy
I dont want to burn out the cooler
Will dither once for a full cycle of 1 R, G, and B frame.
Ok yeah same as sho. Pretty much every color image sorta
Yes
You will only see walking noise develop if you are not dithering for extended periods of time with mono
As long as you are dithering like once almost every 10 minutes you're good.
Cool thanks for the info I will change some settings around
Oh also I have a good question
Yeah?
Mr pickles says if your seeing is bad you should bin your sensor then drizzle it back?
My seeing is always bad so maybe it's a good idea?
I have no idea
Since you're shooting reduced, your sampling will be a bit more ideal.
It might be worth a shot though
Its around .80 ish
What's your FWHM in arc seconds normally?
.65 sorry
Might be dumb but I have to see it in pix right?
Yeah
Do an image analysis on it in Pix, take the FWHM in pixels and multiply it by your sampling
Image analysis is a script
Ok yeah yeah mb I don't know haven't gotten any real data with the sensor only star trailed images

I only have that crescent data 
You can check that data lol
But the trails right? It changes my stars fwhm? No? Maybe I have it all wrong
Oh the trails will yes
And I said that.. Only data I got
Well crap...
@vapid patio there you go
1.85 HFR
on Ha
i need to not be lazy one of these nights and actually redo the offsets or verify that they are correct just to be safe
curiously the astigmatism seems to have returned now but on the opposite side of the pier as last night
wack
https://www.astroshop.eu/Produktdownloads/53809_1_EN_Omegon_Ritchey_Chretien_Full_Tube_IM_REV_C.pdf
@harsh matrix Will this be a good choice?
Ngl... I'm kinda like this everytime I look at it
Wowowo
Yeah that looks good
Awesome... Now I have to get the perfect opportunity to get it. Maybe Elon Muskular will lend me some money
@harsh matrix is this going the right way?
on the left is totally different processing and on the right is the old process that i did a while ago
Id say the right side is a lot better yes
You are getting that look to it
right side?
. Right side i thought is the bad one XD
well... back to it i guess
O
The left is more accurate to the colors I go for when trying Euclid
But the luminance of the stars looks messed up
that's what i'm trying to do. both have some NIR data. not enough tho. It's all i have to work with unfortunately.
i'm not focused on the stars. i was too lazy to run StarX so i'm trying to just go for the colors
I should have said the luminance of the overall image looks off
It's out of wack
i decided to tone down the purple as well
Yup
Is this 2 or 3 channels and is it an STF?
2 channels, and no, it's not STF
Hmmmm
Maybe its the way you stretched it
Most likely
Already?
Yup. Seems like it can't handle the dew/condensation
The adhesives, that is
Honestly I could be doing a much better job drying off the tripod but I wouldn't expect the adhesives to just fall apart the way they have
Exactly
Is the tripod the carbon fiber one from skywatcher
Yup
Ideally I'd like a taller one that doesn't weigh too much more
Honestly I shouldn't have bought that tripod. I should have bought the Apertura one instead
On a related note, I'm starting to think the Dec clutch issue isn't a problem with the mount, but the stock pins
Because I haven't had any issues with Dec play after replacing them
part of me really wants to try shooting some of campbell's hydrogen star on the 24" cdk buuut our seeing is probably gonna give me the middle finger on that idea
if one of y'all wants to undertake it with good seeing & a small pixel scale do ping me with the results
if i tried doing it with my scope it'd be only 7 pixels across so 
Wait thoses colors are sick
What do you mix it with?
I had no idea M42 would have argon emissions
There was an attempt
could be much worse
gonna try to shoot that supernova tonight

Not the best data but I like how I got the colors to turn out
Hey we discovered this 

Well I need your help then
with supernova or just in general?
Yes... well, I think it's a supernova. It's just weird that it shows up in 2 very specific filters and others friends that imaged the area got similar results #1386583050703605933
caldwell 30 is upside down here but the dot offset from the nucleus is the supernova right?
Ye
Type Ia
Which are brighter than most core collapse supernovae
That's a bad dream, not a nightmare
Yep! Some white dwarf in C30 had a very bad day. This is before the supernova, our discovery image, and then our most recent image
Barely visible in the discovery image lol but that's why we have difference imaging
i can see it 
hell yeah
Are coma correcters even expensive
Some of them are.
But let me show you nightmare fuel
This is nightmare fuel

Scary
Oiii emission wouldn't make sense for a supernova, or most kinds of transient tbf. I think the Oiii IR leak is probably the best explanation but maybe something else funky going on there
The Oiii line that we image is a forbiden emission line, so you typically only see it in fairly low-density gas. Supernova interactions do produce narrow emission lines but usually hydrogen (by far the strongest) and He II
Those images do look very odd though
With the OIII IR leakage i uderstand, but then, whatever that is, it's also very bright in IR
Mira variables are very very red so that makes sense
Looking at V1360 Cyg it's maxmimum V-band magnitude is about mag 13 (and the light curve looks like a mira), but in the infrared I band it's mag 9, and going deeper to K band it's magnitude 4
so these things are much brighter in the IR
that would make sense why they pop out so bright
that means i got 3 bright Variable Mira stars in the Tulip Nebula
As long as they show some variability then that's quite likely, though there are other types of variable red stars with slight differences
well... i do not really have the tools to properly measure them
@frosty shard I may be able to grab an hour of M24 blue for you
Tomorrow or monday
I think i may run to the bortle 3 site
finally actually got a goodish result i like in this hoo for ngc7000
need to fix those stars rq
Holy sharpness. You've been cooking while you were quiet
...did you do a mosaic
I don't think "cooking" is sufficient to describe this
no
project aint even close to done yet 
OH SHOOT WTF
Another paper refutes this and says that they should be around for much longer
is the wide field from your RedCat?
no
uh oh
You do see the diffraction spikes right?
As well as the CO modulation?
I am insanely sleep deprived atm lol
Now I see it
Are you out in bortle -12 again?
Nah just rudely awakened this morning from an unexpected lightning strike and trying to prepare for a conference

hehe what can i say
@harsh matrix Its in Texas amazing deal
Oh balls, thats a steal
i know like maybe worth just going and reselling it on cn for alot more
First sub is crazy
@harsh matrix Are there any accessories to look for when getting my first RC?
I see lots of extension tubes and I have no idea if I need em or not
Not very
You don't need them
Should come with enough
@frosty shard just saw NGC 7331 and Stephan's Quintet.
With me dob
Did you spot the supernova?
Pretty sure i did
The core of the galaxy shouldn't look like a bright defined dot, but there's definitely a bright defined dot within the buldge.
Was going to shoot NGC 206 with the RC8 while im out here but I decided to shoot the Supernova since thats on a timer, and its brand new at present.
In so close to biting the bullet on the RC
I thought you already had an rc8
Nope
Hehe
I hope it has nothing to do with me sharing this
Naah.... not at all
But for real? I always wanted an RC, and seeing my data togheder with yours plus all these images that you keep popping around just acted like a catalyst to finally get one.

Deer Lick group and Stephan's Quintet. A single 3 minute lum sub.
See? Why you ask, "Am I responsible for you wanting an RC?"
Your phone has a lot of spherical aberration 
Got a lot more than that going on
This is why phone AP didnt work out 
There goes my plan for more ink
I can see the flex induced astigmatism clearly here
Fortunately the seeing is bad enough to mask it 
Bin the sensor to make sure nobody will notice 
See?
Try a single Bin 2x2 and see the difference. If the seeing is bad that might actually help you avoid oversampling

Im actually not convinced the seeing was bad enough to justify doing that
Maybe if I bring it here in the future and the stars are like 5 pixels wide when the scope is in focus, I will give it a go

yeah 
cause of hot nights here
the temps are higher here than back at home
damn
the camera isnt too happy here
what was your cooler at?
-5C
ah
i’ve been somehow managing -10°C, barely
my cooler is at around 95% most nights 
yikes
i cant do that here or at home
next summer i’ll probably give it a break and do -5°c though
temps stay too high at night and once the typical summer cycle hits, it will probably be even harder
1 3 minute sub per channel

on the bright side, if my flats dont end up working, i may not need them
i just have to calibrate the bias out and it will be usable data
ill need an MSGR ref for NGC 7331 to Stephan's Quintet, and Trifid
pretty sure NGC 7331 to Stephan's has MARS data now
not sure about Trifid
I think it has. The community submitted 
I hope so
I mean, Rho is covered, so Trifid should be as well
Ill be using MGC regardless of if my flats work or not as id like to preserve everything I captured.
Heheheheh I’m getting a Juwei 17
Have you seen those before @tight lodge
It’s a knock off am5
And I’m getting it and a tc40 tripod/extension for free 🤑🤑🤑
I heard about them from our lord Cuiv the lazy geek
yo how are people getting free tripods when I'm the one who actually needs one lmao
Sign me up for one. CF tripods suck
I'm debating whether or not I should get a heavier tripod
Steel tripods for life. Imma get the pier extension that can adapt to the HEQ5 tripod
I have to weigh in my unusual transporation needs with my rig
How long until you get your driving license?
so the dew shield around the secondary mirror is basically useless if you are in an incredibly humid environment
i walked outside to look at my gear this morning to find it completely drenched in dew
looked down the tube, the primary looked foggy, the secondary was completely soaked, and it looks like it dewed up so bad that the last 12 or so minutes of the night are useless, AT LEAST.
havent been able to look at the data yet, but i dont have high hopes for NGC 7331, may need to go back tomorrow
crap the meridian flip is what screwed up
well i only lost a few frames per channel
ill see what i get
WOW
my data is sharper than telescope live data, across the whole field anyway
sharpness is consistent
the field is flat
this RC is fantastic
I don’t think he made a video about one
I have rich Astro friend 😅
Probably after I graduate from grad school early next year. Well I have a license I just don't have a car
btw @frosty shard I looked at the trifid the last 2 nights
with the dob
looked a hell of a lot like this
Yes
The filter made it possible to make out the bands ever so slightly
which filter was it?
hawt
real
me when my flats work better than any calibration that telecope live does

Telescope live?
An online service that provides data in turn for payment.
Oh wait yeah yeah like you can rent a big scope
lol yeagh
my new mount gets here tomorrow

What you doing with the AVX?
Did you sell it?
avx? hahaha cgem
no i have a friend that is pretty much giving me a Juwei 17 tc40 tripod and pier extension so ready to go
pretty much a knock off am5
same performance, has a slower slew speed. but totally upgradable
O

Astro hax
That'll solve a lot of problems at once
I KNOW RIGHT
Now you gotta figure out how to tune the guiding
pretty normal?
It's nothing like guiding a GEM
The guiding assistant doesnt give you sufficient settings
AM5N
huh?
perfect then enlighten me
Basically very low min mo's and fairly low maximum pulse lengths are the name of the game
RA correction algorithm is PPEC and Dec is Hysteresis

Min mo's im talking are like 0.16 on the high end for RA, and 0.28 as a good starting point on the dec
oh ok light work
Maximum pulse length on RA for me is 350
my cgems is 0.08 lmao
Setting it higher makes PHD2 guide unnecessarily poorly
higher than 350?
Max pulse on Dec I have around 1000 ms, should probably lower it but its working where its at, dont want to touch it anymore
Yeah
For me at least
You're welcome to try something else
Idk anything about the period of the RA drive on the Juwei though
doesnt it show up on the backlash test where it says "pulse 500ms?"
So for the period length, that is a big ol' ? From me.
is there somewhere i can see it? like i can send a spec sheet
Its best you dont even bother with the guiding assistant lol
It will not be of any use to you.
yeah no for sure it kept messing up my cgem more and more slowly






