#Ritchey–Chrétien enjoyers thread
1 messages · Page 10 of 1
You might also get screwed over by the Sahara in a few weeks' time
@vapid patio How's the data looking?
You want to add some Ha?
YES
really isnt a broadband target haha
I only have 5 minutes
damn
I'm home in about 15 minutes
ok bet
@harsh matrix WHAT WE THINK
oops
AND THEY SAID WE COULDNT DO IT
Dont mind the just started guiding hehe
Actually that's when the guiding is the worst
i guess im too good
heres the lrgb data if anyone wants to take a look and see if its ok
obv gonnah ave star trails btw
sharper
wayyy sharper
depends what kind of NB as well XD
You use Pix, Right?
yep
aye... imma send you the data in a minute
ok
i'm stuffing my face because i haven't ate anything today
. Amazing to be an adult🤣
There you go
hehehehehe
i will try my best
only hard part is image alignment but thats still not even that hard
the ha added so much signal i didnt even really have to denoise
@tight lodge not to shabby
It really got damn sharp😲
Do you need some OIII as well? 
YES
THATD BE SICK
Crap ton more signal
And the benefit of being narrowband
and both mono
@tight lodge whats the weather thing
I sent it somwhere and when i wanted to send you the data, the link got sent as well
But that's what i use for checking the weather before going out
ohh ok all good
oii data is a little rough
did you calabrate it>
haha ok
well not bad then
pain to edit for sure but aye looks great
could do a little more masking to get a cleaner background but eh
@frosty shard @harsh matrix do you guys want to throw in some data just for experimentation?
I would if I had more :( but when I do you got it
I do have my M11 data #1377449917919789138
I contributed with only 5 minutes
But it's probably not all that interesting
what did the longer term average look like
1.00 flat
looks pretty darn good
Well I also have my M16 data from earlier: #1371584077442056314 and I can send you a stack of H-alpha (about 1 hour I think)
I don't have any data on m16
i sent all my files in a google doc if you wanna check them over
this new vs old
Didn't you already posted them?
i do see some slight evidence of it, but i think you can do a bit better about it, WR136 is magenta
Here😂
oh did that aswell
dont have a good reference
wdym?
SPCC?
of a rgb image of the target
huh
Spectropohotometry Color Calibration
did you not color calibrate the image?
That reminds me, I need to get spectrophotometric data on my filters
its spectrophotometric color calibration
I corrected it
Optolong filters are already in the list
I'm using Touptek filters
But one professor at my university is also an astrophotographer and offered to measure my filters with his lab's spectrophotometer
Well that's lucky
Oh good idea I gotta do that
oh snap
id be curious how close to spec they are
i wonder if cuiv has done a review on them
not yet
He said he will test the LRGBSHO from touptek... but judging by his last video, he might have more important stuff to take care of🥲
huh I wonder if I can get the spectrophotometric data to him/if he would include that in the video
I mean, if you get a paper that proves the test, maybe that would help
I will be providing the data to the SIRIL project for its SPCC implementation
@tight lodge @harsh matrix What we think for some good Ha filters
Not ready for a SHO set and just want Ha
Maybe a oiii set
Why not a full SHO set? Cost?
I got the Svbony 5μm Hα filter
In technical terms I think a 5 μm bandpass is a big chungus 
Have you seen Baader?
I mean I don't think they meausre bandpasses in micrometers
svbony ha is nice and cheap but you will get halos which is pretty cringe for an H alpha filter
Yeah
I’ll look it up
From personal experience, the Hα doesn't have those horrific halos. It does have a faint halo around really bright stars, but nothing horrible
yeah theyre pretty tame
tbh theyre hard to identify with an RC for one specific reason
CO modulation

that actually covers them up
sadr halo in ha with the filter
on my redcat
of course my redcat is so darn sharp now that the star itself is tiny compared to the halo, but even then, the halo isnt bloating the star and it's relatively diffuse
after 3 hours and 40 minutes btw
so really not too bad
How did you make it sharper? Lol
sent it to WO for them to actually collimate the thing
Tf you can do that
Free?
i did it under warranty
on the premise that i got a defective unit
i had to fight tooth and nail for them to agree to fix it though
This is my Hα halo around Alnitak. I used an APS-C sensor and a telescope that was not properly colimated for some reason
yeah at least the halos are constrained and not wild
Wait... I'm dumb. That's the OIII
oops
Mighty power of DSLR
Was it actually broken or you just wanted it to be sharper lol
well, I mean they have a builtin UV/it filter
the left was the scope as is since i got it, right is after i sent it to them
you can see in the left example, the centroid (most focused point of light) is offset to the left
I removed both of my filters. LFP-1 and 2
no blurx ofc
Ouch wow
it was actually broken
that's center of the frame too
for both
there should be NO aberration there of any sort
there's some slight tilt in the right image but i can at least fix that
Hm ok
Yeah, no that’s pretty bad
the difference was even more obvious in subs and in the focus of the stars
Did they send you a new sharpness graph thing?
no
never got one of those with this scope
Remember. The reflectors are the kings
just a warranty card
top left corner was really bad
😭
btw 2x drizzling with the scope in that state just made everything blurrier
i got no resolution increase either
meanwhile, post collimation, 2x drizzle meant it was rivaling an SVX in resolution and sharpness

a 102 SVX
😢
Dang thats crazy
Man when I was building my rig I thought I'd just do astrophotography with a DSLR and call it a day. I am so glad I did not go that route.
(I thought with a DSLR it would be more cost effective if I wanted to do terrestrial photography)
But nah, astro comes first
Also I can check out DSLRs from my university library 
Same here and I realize they had that filter in front of it and it would be useless
Then I found the cheapest camera I could
I might still borrow one for lunar but otherwise I'm so glad I got a cooled mono camera
i put a white T-shirt over the aperture, point it at zenith, and take them in a room with consistent lighting
normally i let the ambient light coming from outside do the work
Ah ok i see
What kind of exposure times do you need?
I bought myself a tracing panel for $21 on Amazon and it's a godsend
@harsh matrix I feel like this is a you kind of question.
where do I put my dew heaters? Main mirror secondary mirror.?
I don’t have a heated do shield since Astro zap is not shipping to the US really
*Dew
I just tell the Nina flat wizard to do the work
I don't bother doing flats manually anymore because I messed them up too often in the past and the flat wizard makes it so easy
You can wrap a dew strap around the secondary mirror shield and route the cable away if you're creative about it.
The primary should not need a dew heater because its so far down the tube
OK, thanks
Will this do anything as it is on top of the Dow shield?
doubt it
Doubt it will do anything?
yeah
amazing
I use the flat wizard as well but I find I rarely need exposures longer than 2 seconds with my narrowband/IR filters
Lagoon in HaRGB
Don't you dare to clown my filters 
I had 35nm oiii 😭
Probably to cover Hβ as well
@harsh matrix I found a break through
Were I put my mini pc and wifi thing completely changed a sude if my scope when moving it
Now I have my mini pc on the bottom of my Losmandy plate
Hb?
Hydrogen beta?
Weird haha
Nerd
If I'm referring to the hydrogen atom, I don't write it H1 but I write it H¹

I dont think my phone can do that haha
I use a Samsung 
Fancy
I can do lots of things with this keyboard 
I can write fractions as single characters
Like if I want to say 1 and a half, I don't have to write it as 1 1/2, I can write it 1½
Nice
I WISH DANG
@vapid patio can you send an unprocessed stack or frame of what your field looks like with that reducer
Uhhh
Let me look in my screenshots
And/or @prime sequoia
Wait I should point out that μm is micrometers and nm is nanometers (1000x smaller)
I mean the CCD67x or whatever its called
I have been summoned
Yeah
You have the astrotech CCD67X reducer or whatever it is for your RC right?
Yes
The last image I worked on with it
28 hours
I have the gso reducer the .75x one
Do you have a concern?
Not really
I just want to see if it has more or less field curvature than my current reducer
ok will do oneeeeeee sec
I can't seem to get the corners with my reducer all that good and I'm pretty sure its not collimation at this point...
A bit concerning for a tiny sensor like my 533 tbh
dont mind my star trails
less star trails
figured out what was causing my balance issue
the mini pc on top and my wifi thing screwed it up somehow
now they have the same balance with the counter weights in the same place
I saw
the video or the fix?
Fix
Might just go ahead and get the Apex-L if I can justify the cost rn
same star trails lol
im not the best dude for this haha
oh ok yeah so it looks cleaner now tbh so win win
AND i am due for a collimation tbh
That is one expensive reducer holy crap
Well no i can see what's a star trail and what isn't
Speaking of holy crap. I might be able to pull the rig out tonight
ouch yeah
Yes but there's on for sale on CN thats not as expensive
the direction right?
I'm not going to buy it new if possible
seems pretty consistent no?
Starizona does reducers right at least
Yes and no
You're talking about the Apertura reducer right
I can see signs that the reducer is too far from the sensor, in a back focus sense
Though thats not something you should concern yourself with.
Since you're using it as intended
Yes
The top right and bottom left corners aren't all that great but the center, top left, and bottom right are all good which is weird
I feel like if it was tilt due to collimation, there'd be some sort of bias visible in the rest of the field, but there isn't as far as I can tell
Plus I'm getting that 571 soon, whenever it ships
, so i want good to great corners if possible regardless of sensor size.
I wonder if it's a combination of tilt and astigmatism
Having visible distortion in the corners on a 533 is not very nice.
heres a better all 4 corners
I'm wondering the same
There's definitely astigmatism
me?
I think even across the field, but its so incredibly minor that I'm having a VERY difficult time tuning it out completely.
No me
oh haha sorry
Looks like a combination of distortion due to the reducer and signs that its time to collimate imo.
oh also why do i have a extra spike?
yeah sadly a collimation is in my future
and reducer problem? im right on the money at a 0.66 reduction
Either a spider put a web across the aperture of your scope during the night, or you shot through a tree, powerline, or roof.
Yeah thats what I was saying, you're using it as intended.
That means they didnt intend for the reducer to have a perfect field.
Probably the same case for me imo
I have none of those 
rc are weird lol
maybe spider
OH I KNOW WHAT IT IS
OUCH
lets say my mirror has some... imperfections...
...what do you mean
Oh god the backlash issue is still there
To me it feels like the tripod
But for your sanity, I will try to measure the DEC backlash with a needle micrometer
Yeah, I think that's the issue. The only other thing I can think of is that I did drop the mount once (oops)
Not onto something hard. I dropped it on its storage box and dented it.

Guiding is at 0.6" atm though
That's good.
I actually set the tripod on concrete this time
Also I still recommend replacing the stock screws, the setup feels WAY more solid
Alright, before I take this thing down I've decided to run a backlash test on the opposite side of the meridian
And I've already noticed one thing
My polar alignment is much worse on the opposite of the meridian
And guess what
The backlash is way, way better
It's like 1/3 of the amount on the east side of the pier
Bingo.
There's your backlash
You could do a test. Remove the pier extension and try the guiding on a random patch on the sky
Oh my god, I think I found the problem. The pier extension was not secured

That screams disaster 
Actually I tightened it again and it doesn't feel any different, but that may not be sensitive enough
Finally, got a chance to add S-II
Screw JPEG, let's do lossless
I keep making things too dark
Needs more stretch
Needs more SII and OIII
it really needs cleaned'
No thats how sho looks before any cleaning
Same with the stars sometimes
I love my svx and I’m thinking on another scope with high FL to compliment it
For an RC, should one get it with a reducer ?
rc6
If you mean integration, yeah, it's just 30 minutes in either channel.
If you mean stretching, GREEEEEEEEEEEEEN
Make it so green that it reverses global warming 
Okay but I do like the tinting variations of S-II and O-III.
alright, now I'm starting to like this
With your seeing and a 533 i would
There you go
turns out my processing is better when I get sleep
@harsh matrix Can I collimate inside?
Could you send data?
I am a sho master
1:30hr of data
once I'm back at my home PC, yup
note that my O-III and S-II data are really not that good
Nah its fine trust its a crap ton of masking
#1380301565692481618 Have at it
Not really
And not to the level of accuracy necessary to correct the error you do have since its not very large
@frosty shard im assuming your mount is properly balanced in dec, but if it isnt, that will cause huge backlash issues for you
I think I need to get a counterweight for my OTA, I don't even know if I can just mount it on the saddle in a balanced fashion as-is
the Wave 150i has a pretty small saddle
so you havent actually loosened the clutch to check balance before?
Yeah I didn't want to screw with the screw lmao
getting a counterweight for the dec is a good idea for sure
ah
yeah that's probably the cause of your backlash right now
But now that I'm confident that I can tighten it properly with the new bolt, I can test and fix that
when i balanced the dec correctly with my RC8, the dec went from responsive but not quick, to very twitchy
oh and some backlash to virtually no backlash
I just need to figure out the best way to attach some weights
probably a Losmandy clamp of some kind
https://www.highpointscientific.com/adm-accessories-dual-series-dovetail-counterweight-dvcw this is what i grabbed
The ADM Accessories Dual Series Dovetail Counterweight ensures optimal balance for telescope setups, ensuring smooth operation during astronomy sessions and astrophotography. Compatible with dual series dovetail bars, it counteracts forces to prevent shaking. Versatile mounting options offer customization for various telescopes and accessories. ...
I got a 404
Did they ban AliExpress in USA?

This is what was in that link
wait something is up because it seems like the page loads and then it gives me a 404?
@frosty shard I measured the backlash for you😅
Both screws locked
One unlocked
Both unlocked
By "unlocked" do you mean just loose and not completely removed?
Loosened
So that's what, ±4 µm backlash when properly tightened? Nice
I think I just need a counterweight for my OTA
yeah, brobably the pier kinda leans in the same direction as the OTA
I'll check all those connections but I also think there's a decent imbalance in Dec
And one of the things you have to worry about with strain wave gearing is flex in the elastic spline
Which actually explains the shape of the backlash curve I'm seeing
so it was 4µm over 4cm off the center. so at 40cm is a backlash of 0.04mm
Well... more like a spline flex than components actually moving. so the flex will mean that it doesn't matter in the end that you have a harmonic mount. you still have to balance it for the best results
The flex makes the backlash graph look somewhat curved which is what I'm seeing in the PHD2 graphs
I figured that the whole 4µm results in about ±20 arcseconds of error
PHD2 measured about 40 arcseconds of backlash on one side of the pier and 15 on the other
damn... i never trust my math and somehow i got so close to actual values? 
Oh I missed that congratulations!
naaaahhhh
I calculated the backlash of the WAVE 150i
It even has any? That’s surprising
Is it bad? Or barely any
It's not technically backlash, I think it's flex in the spline judging from the shape of the backlash graph in PHD2
@tight lodge if you ever get the chance, I wonder what it'll look like if you replace the stock Dec bolts with M6x12 ones that need an Allen key to tighten
My saddle feels way more solid after that
Like 0.20?
yes
Ahh ok
Oh ok thats great
Wait 20 arcseconds or 0.20 arcseconds?
20 arcseconds. what Kit-Kat wrote was 0.20 arc minutes 😄 The PHD2 display XD
Ah
that's quite impressive ngl
How can i measure mine 😭
Gonna be 20arc hours
Well... you will need couple of measuring tools. Something that will help you with some trigonometry
What I used in that clip was a dial indicator mounted on the RA axis and used that as a reference
In my case I moved the dial indicator about 4cm away from the center of the DEC axis. Then I measured how much it moved an note it. Then you can multiply the values by let's say 10 to make calculations a bit easier and you do some trigonometry to find θ in arcseconds
Or you can let PHD2 do it for you😅
I think i like that option more 😭
Why didn't you?
i promissed brainandforce that i will measure "the backlash" in teh WAVE 150i
But how is manual better than phd2 doing it?
you can see what causes the backlash 😄
HOW
i mean backlash is just the space in between the gears when switching direction right?
Well, PHD will tell you that there's backlash, but it can't tell you what causes it.
and what did the manual test tell you it was?
Yes, but the WAVE 150i is a harmonic drive, so it has no gears
oh yeah
that told me the flexure in the flex spline. in the case of Brainandforce there might be too much flexure because of the unbalanced load
But, still i will mostly blame the tripo as well
spline
yeah, with my GTI it flexes like crazy, but i don't care as it's very wide
The flex spline is like the ticking heart of the harmonic drive, The red flexible gear, that's the flex spline
ohhh yes! of course caught me off guard
so yes, Harmonic drives have incredibly high torque and very high reduction, the reason why they don't have backlash is because of the way that the teeth mesh together.
very good design. plan to sell my cgem if I can't fix it, and I think I can with what I just fixed "big deal, I think" seems to have been hyper tuned as it has no friction "stick" with nothing on it, it just spins in circles.
if i can get it good I wont go any bigger lol
that's the type of mount you want a tad unbalanced. Basically you want to constantly preload the backlash
yep a little back heavy on dec and east heavy on ra if pointing per say at cygnus
That sounds about right
cant wait to try this
and gotta do some surgery and take a look at my gears
saw something questionable
What was it?
let me see if i can find a photo
i wondered why it always sounded like when it hit a point it wound hit somthing
its not lube its hard btw
this might have not been it but it def is worth looking at
that lube needs to go
wdym
if you take it apart, is good to replace the lube as well
yes I need to figure out what it uses
I'm scared 😭
just take it slowly
Looks horrifying
Like watching your family member get operated on during open heart surgery
Might be no more cgem for me
Why
its fine now all but a ticking sound
theres so much info that goes with what I said but short story I think its fine
cgem is all back together what a pain
redoing gear backlash and worm gear backlash is a painnnnnnnnnn
Yuppers
If you're not using a median filter on your guide cam – my god do it
I'm seeing more stars than if someone whacked me in the head wirh a baseball bat
what's a median filter?
In PHD2 guiding settings you can use a noise reduction method, and by default none is used. But switch over to the 3x3 median filter option
I have a dark library but the median filter eliminates dead pixels if you don't have one
And it massively boosts star SNR
My god it's dropped down to 0.32"...

Whats funny and kinda sad I think i like the framing of my redcat more 😭
I maybe wanna get a 130pds tbh
It’s around what fl i truly want. 600-800
Last night's data
hawt
Looks like I need to recollimate
Yeah
I don't think its a huge adjustment that needs to be made though
Looks pretty small
First mosaic
How can you tell?
There's a very subtle bias in the core to edge of the stars across the frame
Ah i see
How bad is mine then?
Don't know since you use BlurX
My data is only stretched
Ok
Will you even be able to tell since I have star trails lol
It would be very hard tbh
No worries Collimation is easy fix, mount no so much 😭🙏
Gotta pick a struggle
Did your tune up not work?
Also was the RA drive damaged in any way?
Wdym drive?
Gotta wait for a clear night
Sounds a lot better to be honest once I just did the worm gear mesh
Worm gear, the rest of the gear drive, etc.
Rip
Oh ok them no not at all it looked amazing for being from 2007 🥲
Okay thats good.
In that case, tuning the meshing for the gears may give you way better results if initial testing isnt as good as we hope it will be.
Yes, and now that I know how to do it it’s easy to do it on the fly
How much he asking for it?
180 USD
Sort of sounds like a steal imo
@tight lodge I think this is as good as I can get my SHO moon image
SCNR actually came in handy for making the yellow color more natural

For real it looks like mineral moon
I mean it is I just bumped up the saturation to accomplish that
The issue is getting all of the subs registered. You need a diffeomorphic image registration tool to properly align the frames
At least the collimation is off on only one panel
I'm going to fix that tonight
Alright kids it's collimation time
From 1 to 10, how illegal is that laser?
A big fat 0. It's certified at 4.6 mW
Idk if that counts when pointing it in the sky
As long as you don't hit a plane you're good here lol
what if the plane finds itself in the way? I heard that military aircrafts like to sent a gift back XD
That is something I have to be concerned about since I live near a medium sized airport
i have 1 medium and 2 GA airports around me XD
But a single laser strike isn't as big of a deal as deliberately tracking a plane to disrupt the pilot
Either way I keep my eye out all the time and just use it when aiming
that's true
@harsh matrix I think I found the cause of my focus issues: astigmatism
likely
I tried collimating by eye last night and it's abundantly clear that evaluating the Airy disks makes this much more obvious on-axis
I decided I'll pull out the imaging train to use the DSI method properly, but I'm also interested in writing my own supplement for those collimating by eye
Also you can see the CO modulation effects pretty easily
Interesting
Well tonight is clear around uhhh 1am
So tonight is am I screwed or is it going on cloudy nights
All ready to go wish me luck gang 🙏
Imagine getting to image 😭
Can you see the Milky Way in your backyard?
Truly, I’m not lol just wanna see if my mounts destroyed or not 🔥 🔥
I took this photo with my phone a couple days ago
To be fair, my phone can’t take a Milky Way photo to save its life
And it does some hideous denoise
Ans you can still tell what it is

You can even see the little star cluster
Yeah you can see M24 and M8 easy
Yeah so cant wait to do a milkyway night with my normal camera
Well I'm getting the rain over here so I can't fix collimation tonight
My phone has been saying "rain possible" all day and it has not done anything 
Too real like is it gonna or not 💔
Take your rig outside. You'll see that starts to rain immediately 
@harsh matrix Whats funny is i dont think its any better or any worse 😅
These thin clouds wont hop off
So far so good I can't lie 🤷♂️

not a bad thing tbf
It’s great if anything shows that I didn’t break anything
There's a old one
New one
HOLY
DONT MIND THE BIG STARS IN THE PHOTO ITS OLD FROM EARILER
wow that's awful guiding
Oh
Wow yeah compared to my old charts this is really baf
What should I do?
Also
come in guiding assistant it always looks a good bit better but compared to actual guiding it’s horrible
what is your min mo on RA and Dec?
One sec
I'm running a guiding assistant
@harsh matrix Its for Ra 0.39 and DEC 0.60
that might be guiding within the limits you have then
might be good to try cutting those in half at least
how long are your guide exposures?
depends
should be fine to drop it for sure
might be worth dropping guide exposure length too to see what kind of effect it has
What does chaseing look like?
you can counteract chasing by extending the guide exposure length
Up down up down up down I'm guessing
lots of adjustments going in the opposite direction constantly
right now it just looks like your mount isnt receiving enough guide pulses to counteract drift
What should I do for the minimum move?
And I have heard that backlash compensation can sometimes mess stuff up
try about half for both RA and Dec
id personally drop the RA min mo as low as 0.12 just to see what happens
half their current values on both, yes
It gets all choppy
send a picture
that's a significant improvement
from there honestly, id experiment with various combos of min mo and exposure times until you find something that gets the guiding as low as possible
predictive?
Oh yes sorry
doing small intervals of like 0.02 to the min mo at most
and doing 0.5s variations on exposure times
Idk if my guide cam can find stars that short tbh
i think the min mo sweep spot for my eqm 35 is 0.16 or 0.12 at 1 second guide exposures
it's either that or trailed stars
you wont have a problem in the galactic plane
Fair
you will if you try shooting galaxies far from the disc of the galaxy
I need a new guide cam tbh bigger more sensitive sensor
for sure
Atee we are in 0.76 now
Min move for ra is now 0.5
Wait whoops
@harsh matrix Holy
0.56 🙏
I think there was never anything wrong with my mount probably just with my guiding settings
probably
but a tune up is worth it every time imo
And back up to 0.76 😢
no big spikes
More like a idk what I'm doing up
it's going to vary, that's a given
No none at all
did you change something before it went back up?
Nope
And back down to .60
thank you a lot though
that's more than good enough for your sampling i think
I think so let me figure what is ideal
I think the reason it was so bad at first is because everything was a little bit Off because the mount had been rebuilt
it could have been
PPEC gets messed up and thrown off after a big change to the mount
so that will have to relearn as well
I redid mine
Also
My collimation is pretty bad looking at it now with normal stars
i mean the computer has to relearn the the period
riiiiip
so that's next on the chopping block
Doesn’t it relearn when you switch targets?
shouldnt
Yayy 🥲
i think it has to figure out where in the cycle it is
it will
That's next on the spending chain
What? Haha
My filters come in today technically so nothing fun till then
Can’t shoot with all this moon


Leave some detail for the rest of us
yes sirre
What filter is this
i have them too
Ah just standard narrowband
yeah they do well for the price
Ha halos drive me mad though
Its a hit and miss so I've heard
Whats not standard narrowband?
My AM5N does not
My EQM-35 does
Oh, for some reason, I thought you had an HEQ5
OK, well for that amount does it have wobble in the RA axis between the worm gear and the big one it spins around
Actually, it might be irrelevant just because it’s probably geared a whole lot different
They are not too bad tho. I mean if you look at Sadr or Alnitak, yeah... they do appear
And you use a fast scope 
Some of them are out of the box
Cheater
That too
Yes, because they are inside the EFW😂
i mea like the cases
makes the box stack look bigger 
badder 35nm???
Beginner mistake
yeah ouch i didn't even know they sold those
@tight lodge you see my dm?
my particular copy gets them on stars which are not very bright
like mag 7 stars
I did😅

WR-136 doesn't have halos
It was only one outside of the box
i realized that
Amogos, what should I attempt to image tonight?
well if you are going milkyway targets i say. 1. m16 standard. 2. lagoon core is so nice @harsh matrix knows. 3. north American wall is amazing. 4. elephant trunk is not bad.
Elephant trunk might be interesting. Lagoon and Eagle are right next to the moon
forgot its moon season 
dont forget though wizard is near. also bubble nebula and pacman all really amazing targets in narrowband
broadband not so much
Broadband under full moon?... no thanks XD
moons low and target is other side of the sky but yeah narrowband for the win
dont forget veil
i'm gonna wait a bit for veil, to be higher in the sky
fair
heck yeah
its sick in sho 
Everything in SHO is sick XD
but i'm gonna start with Ha. a bit backwards of how i normally image.
my EFW has this sequence LSHORGB
Honestly I've been loving shooting mono H-alpha, you get a cool image immediately
im going to get a late start on my summer projects 😭
I'll also do S-II when the moon phase is unfavorable and save O-III for when it's out of the way
Weather? Or other commitments
weather
Same and it's mostly Canada's fault for burning
So I figured out how to collimate my RC correctly: make someone else do it
A fellow RC owner in my area offered to let me use his Skywave license
I actually want to see if I can get it dialed in on my own if the weather permits, but still
@harsh matrix when you go to calibrate your guiding do you point where it wants you to or nah
if yes does it really make any differnce
yes
yes
ok i will try
I usally just point it where im going to imaging and ignore it
Rick Wayne (fewayne on Cloudy Nights), I'm going to his place on Saturday
Also @harsh matrix you might find this thread super informative: https://www.cloudynights.com/topic/840516-gso-rc8-mirror-details/?hl=ritchey#entry12907378
oh boy
my brain doesnt want to learn today so reading this may not sink in right now
Fair enough
My main interest is that I'm curious how much you could optimize the GSO design for visual without compromising it photographically
The main tweak being reduction of the secondary size without significantly compromising illumination for an APS-C sensor

redcat 
One thing to consider is that it seems your PA is off a bit
Unless you did that on purpose so the dec only goes in one direction
How could you tell from the graph?
And yes it was off on accident
I had done a bad drift alignment from the clouds
What about you?? Time to bring it out again 
Im bringing it out whenever I actually get my 571.
gonna be super wide feield
what targets you plan?
Sadr region
my eyes are firmly set on that right now
like you wanna get the whole thing?
I really want to shoot it in broadband 
butterfly neb maybe up through crescent neb yes
I swear I've seen the exact chart 😔
you should do this this winter @harsh matrix
im going to put my 2600 on my roki and run to the bortle 3 site and do that
gonna be 
b3 backyard 
yup
id do it on the redcat with the 2600 but the framing is too tight
roki is just as good tbh
i think
it's not
yeah i actually thought abt it for a sec
but it's better than every other option in that focal length range
fma180?
like a sextuplet or somthing crazy
ASKAR FMA180Pro 40mm aperture apochromatic telescope/camera lens
Uses three-element objective lens with two ED elements for superb color correction and image quality
Also includes built-in three-element focal reducer, thus resulting in a final focal length of 180mm at f/4.5 for wide-field astronomical imaging
Includes Vixen-style telescope ...
the FMA doesnt have as good of a field as the roki
fair but close
and on roki do you need special filters? as its so fast?
not for broadband but for narrowband, probably yeah
i dont think anything ill have right now will work on it in narrowband
i can of course ask people what they use and see what options i have
yeah
Declination keeps pushing in one direction. It isn’t bad from what I see being honest but it’s a sign Pa can be improved. In the perfect world, with perfect seeing and perfect PA your dec should even move at all or little
Yes I'm aware but good catch it was a quick setup and tear down after I rebuilt my mount
@frosty shard , this is my backlash measurements from last night 
Is this with a properly balanced Dec axis?
eyeball it 😄

Sharp dang
@harsh matrix https://app.astrobin.com/i/znttj7
more oversharpened sct images
Noooooooo 😭
crazy sharp
there's a lot more going on with that than just oversharpening
the oversharpening is blatant either way you cut it though
he said he did that stuff to make it look good on a print
that's fair
but also, i think he should make a not garbage looking version for AB lol
yea
I like the amount of effort he puts in though
ive been following him on IG almost since i started the hobby
he puts in a truck load of time into all of his projects
i just cant stand the way he processes 
sho
cause that region has a lot of Oiii
wait no hoo
i did sho it was nice but i struggled to get any sii
yeah, honestly, there’s not much sii
And if I’m doing a four panel mosaic having to manage three channels is a pain
Doing RGB you have 4 to manage
So uh. I almost dropped my secondary mirror into my primary
Don't ask me how I managed to screw up that bad
Or well. Unscrew up
But at the end of the night, we completely nailed the collimation. Perfect Airy disk through the eyepiece
Imagine using luminance unironically
if you don't use "Luminance" You might want to use some Ha as luminance
I remember some discussion about luminance decreasing contrast but I don't remember the details

That's the third different mount I've set my RC up on
Sometimes they do which put me in hell when I was supposed to get my Wave 150i
First one was my friend's CGEM before I had my mount

icky
That thing groans like it pulled a tendon and has some of the most ridiculous slewing decisions
I've seen it slew below the horizon as M9 was nearing the meridian
and then take a minute to finally get there
Honestly it's entertaining to watch
fr
the times i went to the bortle 3 place, i had a guy set up near me with one of the Orion Sirius EQG mounts (HEQ5) and it sounded like someone opened a portal to hell every time it slewed
it was the most uncomfortable sounding mount ive heard so far
My friend Philip with the CGEM has gone to dark sites with me and it's funny because I sometimes think "wow maybe my mount is a little louder than I remember" and then I hear the CGEM and the Wave 150i is completely inaudible in comparison
At full slew speed it's only slightly louder than the CGEM's tracking motor
And 7.5°/sec of slew speed 
Great for marathons
fr
@frosty shard this might be a bit too much for the CF tripod 
Yeahhhh
What’s funny is after retuning mine mine is really quiet
I might have to DM you about what you did so I can pass that on to my friend with the CGEM
It was very fun rebuilding it
And scary at the same time
So I also realized I may have screwed up the mirror spacing in my RC, so I gotta check that out next time
😭
how
I think I got some documentation mixed up in my head, and I thought the secondary mirror screws did not need to be tracked precisely for loosening/tightening. So when Skywave told us that the astigmatism required a serious mirror realignment, I inadvertently loosened the secondary mirror to the point that it started flopping around
oh no
I managed to get the mirror realigned and tightened again, but I need to check if there's any spherical aberration - I didn't check rigorously
Unfortunately it's cloudy tonight and I cannot test against an artificial star to fix spherical aberration
I think i found the source of my tilt lmfao
There's a rather large piece of electrical tape sandwiched between the OAG and the filter wheel

Why
I was using it to block light leaks i thought we're coming from the OAG, but actually it was probably the focuser

Accidentally pinned a corner by accident when I reinstalled the OAG last, didnt know I did that.
Also my blue filter worked its way loose, I'm super lucky i didnt have issues with flats 
And i dropped a screw on the AR glass...

There appears to be a scuff but I think its from my finger nail
Im going to clean it and hopefully it comes off, not the first time this has happened.
Yeah it was from my fingernail thank God, it came off immediately with a DSLR sensor cleaning kit
Ez
Guys, the end game has arrived. 
The RC is down for the time being as I don't have very many filters I can run on it right now, and especially not in the filter wheel
But we are getting first light with the 571 tonight, come hell or high water
@harsh matrix Busy day haha
Redcat?
Do you need another filter wheel?
Yes
Already got thay covered, but yes
Quattro
I assume you have a coma corrector?
(This is the RC thread, so I feel obliged to say: imagine having coma)
Yes ofc
I may swap over to the redcat after all.
The filter wheel is too big and collides with my mount on the quattro
Aw man
Get a good early start on the summer projects
Okay i really didnt want to, -1 hour of my day, but I swapped it all back to the AM5N for tonight, maybe tomorrow if the weather remains conducive.
Oh well atleast you got that working
Probably a better way to ahow how good the camera is anyway
I was planning on buying the oiii and sii filter and stupid svbony made the oiii 130 a couple hours ago so now i had to pay almost double
and i bought sii right before it could get raised 😭
Why you didn't get it in black?
Wasn't an option from who I bought it from
I tried

Yeah 
At least the filter wheel doesn't stick out anymore
You must get it in blue to be part of the RGB gamer scope collective.

Right I forgot. Rainbow month🤣
Atleast is not all red. He proves he's not a ZWO simp
Also true, 'tis the season.
I wish I could drag y'all over to see this optically perfect Airy disk I've managed to obtain
Matching intrafocal and extrafocal patterns, complete first ring around the center
Thankfully the spherical aberration correction was not ruined and my mirrors are exactly where they need to be
Also, I just realized that I verified that my primary mirror is perfectly secure with respect to altitude
Are the orion rcs good
@tight lodge svbony sucks
The oiii filter shot up to 130 everywhere
So i bought it on ebay for 130 with some coupons
Then today its back down to a shocking 77 dollars
Now i gotta return it
They come with an extra finderscope shoe, which I personally would find very convenient



💯
