https://drive.google.com/file/d/1pzox5fI-zP3OodXvHIuEQO14kHlEzoQJ/view?usp=sharing
zip file, 2 tif files inside. One narrowband 1 visible.
Google Docs
35 messages · Page 1 of 1 (latest)
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1pzox5fI-zP3OodXvHIuEQO14kHlEzoQJ/view?usp=sharing
zip file, 2 tif files inside. One narrowband 1 visible.
probably means full spectrum of visible light, aka no filter or uv ir cut
ohhh
is there any reason for me to use that over the narroband version?
rgb stars esp since double cluster is in frame
Just lovely! btw that's narrow.
@quaint fox @void cape visible is without the l-enhance and stepped down to f/4 for sharper stars.
Nice Data
Here is my processing version on the Narrow Data
I like it overall, but I think there's a gradient. I can't tell if the background is real Ha or if it's noise, do you know? I didn't notice that it when processing if it is. If it is really dim Ha then great job with that. I also like the stars. I would like to know what your steps were.
Yes there is a gradient due to me I couldn't fix it
Right now I'm not home and I'm gonna go to bed after returning but my steps are sticking to the simple stuff
I have a plan on how I want an image to look like and I stick to that
Next time I want to try what @tulip dawn told me in here
bit of a shame how the data turned out, it definitely has more potential, but there were flat issues is the broadband and the narrowband had lots of gradients too
but 46 hours is nice nonetheless
PN HDW 2
caught my eye too
Neat
Mannnn
Yup, Bortle 7, moonlight, and dslr will do that 😭
what did you do for the stars? I like them.
that's fair enough then
i used the RGB stars. starx, then histogram stretch, SCNR green, curves saturation, then screen onto the finished starless
pix?
yeah, i also do a bit of sliders in Ps at the end