#M16

15 messages · Page 1 of 1 (latest)

craggy nebula
#

Equipment:
Esprit 120 w/ .77x reducer
ZWO 2600mm Pro
ZWO AM5
Antlia 3nm SHO Filters & V-Pro RGB Filters
EFW, EAF, OAG, AsiAir

Acquisition:
S: 89x300"
8x600"
H: 104x300"
6x600"
O: 117x300"
15x600"
R/G/B: 5x60"
31hrs total

For one of the first times of my images, this one is actually ok to zoom in on

#

And here's the comparison because I'm delusional

oak marsh
#

Oh wow, this is pretty good actually

#

love the colors, stars are nice and round too, even at the corners

craggy nebula
oak marsh
#

Whenever I use the word "actually" to accentuate my point, I mean it in an inflection sort of way, as to indicate surprise or shock, which can have positive or negative connotation depending on the context of the situation.

In this case, I meant it in a positive sense, as your image here has a lot more detail and quality than I first expected when clicking on your post.

#

And to answer your question, yes! A lot of things here look really good, the colors, star quality, definition and detail on the nebulosity, it all looks very nicely imaged and processed!

As far as criticism goes, some areas of the nebulosity have some saturation gradients that create odd coloration, i.e. greens where there shouldn't be green, purples where there shouldn't be purples, etc.

hot marsh
#

Holy jeepers of eagle neb this is crazy sharp

primal furnace
simple ether
craggy nebula
craggy nebula
rare axle
#

Wow just wow

#

I would make a million more compliments but I'm too lazy

bitter sand
#

Looks so good! The seeing must have been awesome! The pillars are well defined! Bravo!