#CENTAURUS A Ashen's Dungeon
1779 messages · Page 2 of 2 (latest)
Cheater
@tawny minnow gonna have to up ur game
I didn't even know that blue dust on the sides existed
Its in everyone else's processes too idk how i never noticed
starless
looks juiced
yuh
I'll probably forget by the time i can tho
Maybe i shouuuuld get more data.
Get like 20h then you’ll be good for this target.

Which scope do you use?
The trifid so sharp
1000mm F5 Skywatcher newt
ah, ok
that looks hella nice
i want to reprocess this cause i honestly dont like the colors i got
theres no going back
im too poor to get a permanent license
and i enjoy siril more
but this is just my first day
so what can i say
i started on siril, and i liked it a lot
but ive switched to pix for like 2y now, its probably THE best thing ive done to improve my astrophotography
really good investment considering the money
even though its expensive for software, the effect it has on your images is much more than anything else you can get for the price
Honestly youve done well
It’s not amazing but it works
You’ve done many things well there
❤️
what should i work on and what did i do good on?
work on colours (use SPCC for colours, select a neutral black region for dark reference)
work on stretch (i use GHS to stretch the dust and background apart, then use autostretch to finish the job
autostretch is incredibly simple but good, id recommend starting with that, then incorporating GHS to get a bit more dust separation
also, use less sharpening or denoise than you are here, some details look oversharpened and "wrinkly"
for example this area, looks like too much blurx, or topaz or something
part 2
my workflow is quite long, ashen wanted to know as well. usually i spend 1+ hour working on a dataset
😲
well this is one helluva sharp dataset
very nice
I used MGC to correct any gradients, idk if the correction is perfect, probably wasnt even necessary tbh
what coma corrector do you use? these stars are perfect corner to corner which is insane
nice data. Starnet ruined my stars
Did you remove the stars when the image was non linear
surely
Skywatcher f/5 coma corrector
Will come back with more comments and feedback soon everyone!
But the kind words have been very encouraging so, thanks :)
im not great at processing images but i gave it a go :)
bruh
im using the one that comes with the quattro and my corners are garbage, even on my 533
im sure it's just collimation skill issue but idk how much better i can get them
Could be collimation yeah
I’ve ALWAYS struggled with collimation. Only thing I’ve found that works is using a well collimated laser. Even then, its not perfect at all but i just try get it as good as possible. After the laser i just stick my cam in with a fisheye (all sky) lens on the front of it, and make sure the primary is collimated
The secondary i just use the laser
Primary is laser + all sky lens
Is ur backspacing done well?
afaik yes
i think i was at 55.5 mm with the system i was running at the time when i used my 533 and had issues
correction, 56.5 with the 533
and 55.5 with my 571
i quite literally cannot make it shorter with the 571 though unless i dont use an OAG, and that's pretty sketchy
why oag sketchy? you might get better guiding if setup properly
no oag is sketchy
cause people encounter differential flexture with the quattro constantly
Octavio was forever and just fixed it
oh yeah didnt read properly 😥
revive
New data?
New master processor when
True, soon probs
[CHECK PINS] Ashen's Dungeon
tm
temporary submission until i get more integration ill put it in the GD
WHAT THE ACTUAL FRIDGE
we got data better than JWST from Ashen before gta6 thats crazy lol
actual crazy data
i'm anxious for the final result
btw these new siriL aditions are crazy look at these tiny galaxies so cute
Yo wth that’s sick
Hell yeah brother, cant wait to post the full 20-30 hours hopefully.
this is how much for now???
yoo 30 hours?!
Wdym?
how many hours did you take already
It’s at 6.7 atm but I am entering a comp with this data so am gonna try get 30 hours over the next month.
nice man!
wish i had a good setup and sky lol i would take 100 hours per night
wha- yes. 
hehe
What comp?

Mac uni?
yea
11 hour helix dropping tn
Might drop a combined version with me and @lament trellis ‘s data if we can get it combined well
Combined should be well over 20h
I have 11.5
Same
Excuse me i did not
@fallow flame
Been a while since I jumped on one of these
Interesting colours but it’s balanced nicely
Bg is good too
Stats could use some colour
If anyone tries the helix data!!! Use this one not the one in the drive
I’ll upload it to the drive tomorrow
Very clean process beanbag
very very clean
And my latest edit of my trifid data
@final crescent

I spent like 4 hours editing helix and 1.5 on trifid :/
Kinda mad lol but I had to go
I’ve been working on extracting more dust
Statistics stretch with intermittent GHS stretched in the post linear phase is INSANE at pulling dim stuff out (with a light noisex applied after (deepsnr still applied in linear stage))
very grey
Yeah I ran out of time to edit unfortunately
^
Thanks man, been trying a couple of different techniques
@cinder bane finally get around to all of these. Heres the first of many.
@cinder bane I've also had a go at it
more of this one please 🙂
We're grinding the cosmos I see
Reaaaally nice bro! Good stuff
You are quite good at stretching
If you’d like critical feedback lmk
its your data. you can critique it however you like 👍 ....i might politely disagree, but i always love feedback. We never get better w/o it 😀
Imagination,when?
Lmao
This is good but looks a bit grainy, could do with a star and noise reduction + dust saturation
Nice
This is nice, maybe has too much red though? The stars and galaxy are all yellow
I’ll get more data on that one with my big scope when it comes up
This looks good but the globular cluster looks really crunchy and fcked up
Here’s how it should lol
You got a really nice amount of dust though, here’s mine for comparison
Nice!
Damn this one is really good too
Like really really good
@cinder bane thanks for taking the time to write some notes. I got lazy on tarantula last night and didn't go thru all my normal steps
some of the data is definitely better than others...where the data allows it you can get some really nice processes. Really the data is doing most of the work...its nicely done tbh.
Yeah definitely, some of the datasets are years old haha
The new ones cook 🔥
New data will drop tomorrow (if it’s bright enough)
Otherwise I’ll need another night to dedicate to it
mega data drop tomorrow
This single sub shows you how sharp it is
(If all goes well with imaging, I’m not at home to monitor it). It’s gonna be FIRE.
My image of it 3 YEARS ago
[NEW DATA!!!! CHECK PINS] Ashen's Dungeon
FULL HELIX DATASET AND NGC 6744 HAS BEEN UPLOADED
!!NGCC 6744 NOW UPLOADED!!
ashen sucking at galaxy proccessing saga continues
not much has changed 
This data is on the rougher side in terms of how the quality of my data in general goes
quality but rough bg + noise
its a good challenge
10:22pm
what hahah
I thought it was getting dawn 
You gotten a jet stream 😄
@lament trellis surely have a go at editing this
youll be shooting it soon (hopefully) anyway
Let’s be fr bro
what
Maybe tommorow
ur rig be getting better
Bro every time I upgrade something new comes in the way and my images look the same or worse
Like idk how you’ve gotten so sharp
That last galaxy image is pretty blurry for me
Is this a png?
how blurry?
yes
heres a SS
I can see the individual pixels on both
I saved it, it looks better on browser
May just be the lack of int
From what sqm/bortle do you shoot?
What scope is the 1000mm data coming from?
bortle 5-6 and this was broadband. Yes it is a very low amount of data and ill prove upon it soon.
just curiousity 🙂
data drop coming soon
It’s NGC 6744 but I’ve got a new version to upload
He will never do m42 
@cinder bane what filters did you use for the Horsehead?
Duo band
k
kinda blown out
Dude wth 😭
I know this is not #1337566901496320101 but how is it even possible to do that with this kind of data? 😭
Exactly 😭💀
Processed on windows 7 Gimp 1.0.0
bro if you are actually serious about that process I’m down to help you some time but damn maybe watch a tutorial or smth
There’s good free tools out there
yeah, probably after my HYE
Half Yearly Examination
"kinda"
also idk how I went from decent data to cheseballs
Bump
which one is this?
australis
this neb is beautifull but i might as well take some notes of how to learn propper processing again, i'm kinda bad at it again lol
this is nice!
do you happen to have a higher res version?
theres maybe some slight gradient in it
Thanks!
(this image is a BTICH to bg extract i know)
Noo I always exclude all files after processing since my pc Is more like a Potato than a actual pc lol
Yeah that's fr lol
Don't think so
There are too many messages to pass in these chat
I just can't find it lol
Oh dang that's good
thank you sir
It's pretty close to mine but I didn't get that much contrats
yeah def, yours is good just different
And ur denoise is better did u use noiseX?
hmmm, maybe deep snr not sure, it was a while ago
Hum ok
Deep Snr is good tbh I never used it tho
i think maybe some of the colours in mine came out better, for eg the bg galaxy
are you pix or siril?
Yeah true
mine vs ur bg galaxy
not trying to say one is better just giving pointers from what i would improve btw, dont want to seem like a dic hahaha
jeez dude you should be proud of that
Yeah ur colors and denoise went way better but it's a pretty close call for me
Hehehe I use siriL for over 5 years straight I got some experience
shiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiish
like look at this lol
Yeah my processings are all 100% free software
I never paid a buck
Yeah but tbf he entered the community this year
with more ccontrast i think this would be better than my own edit lol
Not yet since I'm literally 15 and in Brazil pix is literaly a month pay
SiriL isn't able to push more than that the bg would be like that
sorry i never got back to you on this, but this is nice! maybe the bg could use some work but its good! with a better bg and green reduction it would be very very solid
fair enough, you should bee very proud with what youve got damn lad
Some green removal and the auto bge siriL script I think this would be fine
Thanksss
maybe try out gimp or something for further tweaks, even photos app on iphone is good for black level and contrast as well as green/purple and yellow/blue balanccing
Yeah I tried gimp for a while but I try to keep it just for my bigger processing like my entries to mpc
I used it in some of my entries in the last one but didn't go too well loll
ahhh rip, well, i mean your skills are definitely there, you just dont have the tools. Not ur fault tho so id say ur doing pretty well. at ur age my processes were uh.....

the ol iphone shabang
Yeah I mean it's pretty hard ro be interested in this things my age imagine being good
Outch
wdym?
To be fair my images are worse
Nobody almost nobody my age likes this things
Atleast here in brazil
I'm just good at processing but not that much at taking those
ahh true
once you get a bit older and get more money to spend on it you will be cracked
Probably cuz I don't have a specialized camera neither a good mount
Yeah but I still need freedom too
Lol
I take pics at b9
But with time I'll get good at it
Well I need to go to school my man
Cya
👋
Ty it turned Out better than i thought
i forgot to Run Msgr at the start and then Just went with it thats why the bg is a bot weird xD
[CHECK PINS] Ashen's Dungeon
Currently doing a flame and horsehead mosaic. Get ready for your PC’s to BURN
my pc might burn with 10mb data i'll be ready for that
NEW FLAME DATA [CHECK PINS] Ashen's Dungeon
Have at it, only putting in the channel because i will upload the final mosaic to the drive at a later date
@serene wolf
I know that this was over a year ago, but is this pgc 54559?
gonna have fun
I think it was just a halo
I think your right, I didn't fully read the message, so I didn't realize it was from the image of the trifid nebulae
Internal reflection
Looks good
Alnitak is decently controlled but missing out on a lot of background dust and Ha in V901
And the internal reflection is still there
Could maybe turn down the glow of Alnitak a bit too
ah, how to take it out?
not yet i stop for a bit
i'm not crazy my man that was just to be more clear on the thingy
lol
Bahahaha
Clone stamp
NEW FLAME DATA IN CHAT Ashen's Dungeon
Need more people to process it 
lol i'mma do it rn
was really annoying since someone decided to put that star right there
didn't get any of the HA out 
yeah fr idk how to get this star out of explode mode
Range mask
btw my siriL crashed trying to starnet it lol
whats that...
Your dust looks good, however very high noise, the Ha is mustard colour, and Alnitak is much too bright
yeah im working on a reedit
Tool in pix and photoshop, not sure about Siril, allows you to select the brightest parts of the image, blur it and make it a mask
Then you apply the mask and destretch
aaah i might try it i have photoshop but not instalated lol
okkk
that was a really fun data after u said to me how to use range mask
but i still need to get better at it lol
did some green noise removal
Looking better!
You’re pulling looooots of dust
Contrast increase and removal of the internal reflection would go a looong way
Edit if your data in iPhone photos app
Looks much punchier
You genuinely pulled more outer flame dust than I did

kinda messed up the background near the star
Aight
fr
tkxxxx
thats very nice just gotta be more carefull with the bge as u can see at the star side
me fr rn felling like i can do anything
Who would win
3
6
badunkie
also @cinder bane how is the mosaic so far (i wanna compare horsies)
Wanna try something on the other side of the star (without the star being annoying
ur horsehead? 
i can
precisely
Mf soliciting in my thread 
Looks alright but definitely has a bit of a browny-green haze over it
@plain ermine it is possible to control the star a bit more
Ur V901 (ha/oiii nebula in the top left) looks very good
Create a range mask for the high end, bring down RGB curves
program?
#1019937457095065731 message so theres this
not uploading cos its planetary data and blurry but nonetheless if anyone wants to try it lol
It’s decent
Makes me realise I need to fix the white point on mine
Details may be a little fried
@cinder bane what do you say? Quick Ghs stretch with some curves
Maybe Alnitak is a bit to "glowy"
Removed that reflection with a siril script, now it looks a bit weird
Looks good but has artifacting, maybe needs to be upscaled or smth?
what artifacting specifically
There’s lines around it ykwim
See the diff?
Other than that it’s good, probs just needs an upscale
Imaging this again tonight with the new scope
5 second exposure
This is my result from the old data (500mm scope) (the data uploaded here)
@dense parcel
Yooooo
When new data come? in 2 secs may i say?

while theres no new data i'll do centaurus A again
the old one
I was sleeping 
yeah i was lazy with the stars
New data in 10 hours
YEEAH
NEW CENT A DATA COMIN SOON Ashen's DungeonWN TOOGO
NEW CENT A DATA COMIN SOON Ashen's Dungeon
bet

Yall better get fckn hyped it’s been so damn long that Ashens dungeon has seen new daytar
❤️
lowk
am going to keep refreshing with latest edit
CENTAURUS A Ashen's Dungeon
thats so cool
@arctic sigil continue here! thank you anyway. And yeah idk, my seeing was pretty good last night, came out well.
btw bro how do u like avoid getting a piece of the background along with the stars when ur generating a starmask?
yep 😊
it is difficult, theres always a tiny bit of galaxy that gets in there. But generally i denoise then remove stars and it helps a tonne
do u like upscale the image before? or like use smaller strides
idk why but like when i do it i almost get a piece of the background everytime lol
nah i keep at native resolution all the way
show me
ill pull up my stars image if i have it
starless
stars
they are stretched
wish I had blurx
very nice edit
Rate the stars
farkkkkkk hahah
yeah damn wtf they got some issues
are they that bad in the raw stack? thats weirdd
but yeah blurx would fix that so eez
eh yea just less saturation
CA?
yeahhh i do want a new CC
i mean fark, mines pretty expensive, like $400 bruh, and its also giving me internal reflection issues when pointed at very bright stars
its the skywatcher f5 one
i expected better from it, not bad but not great
It's cool data. Would be worth to get more and to see more of the outher regions.
yeah 100%
if nothing else comes up, ill image it until the sombrero galaxy is rising, then im switching to that
cos its my favv
@arctic sigil how are you going?
btw what do u keep the stellar and non stellar sharpening strenght for this one?
its denoising rn
def do decon before denoise
lemme check
i would recommend reducing nonstellar to 0.8 tbh
aight perfect
What are we thinking chat?
It’s nice, lots of dust, but maybe not saturated enough and low contrast, and there’s no star colours
Core is verging on being to bright to maybe?
Overall it’s very decent though
@buoyant magnet
The existing colours are well balanced
cranked up star sat a little cause saturating the galaxy itself is a little tricky or I'm not good enough with Siril+GIMP yet
omg bro i destroyed the starmask 💔
i was thinking abt prestretching it
now i cant undo
ripperoni
W
sidivis lowk goated at post processing
I think that's half of the hobby
I look at it here and it feels under saturated.... annoying
your bg is a little green
And green. Looks nothing like it does on my PC.
YEEEEEEEAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHHH
@cinder bane Man this data is crazy
u planing to get more int?
lil zoom in
i think i'mma cry
this is just magic level data
u gotta gimme this spell u used on your telescope
Hahaha thank you
Just gotta dial ur shiz in 🫡
This is a really nice edit though
I’d say it’s the best out of anyone else that has done it
yayy! i'll prob process again later i had so much fun processing this
Woah, yeah that’s not enough you can be way more aggressive with it
If you want to that is
well i did use cosmic clarity, and i think its a bit more agressive
with 0.2 i got a very good result
Ahhh yeah cosmic clarity will give different results
Do you have a less compressed version? The one sent seems compressed and not clear
I’m sure it is clearer than what I’m seeing
hmmm i dont
i did take the pgn out on siriL cuz of cosmic clarity and for obvious reasons i am better at siriL so i did some final touches
next time i'll do the final touches and the get the png on pix
yeah the image really is very clean and sharp when on my screen so definitely either discord compression or siriL's
reprocessing rn
could these 2 clumps be ejection jets from centaurus A? @cinder bane
tried hard to push these jets out
the galaxy looks wonderful to me and these jets just add so much, i love it
i really liked it but i didnt quite like the contrast in between the galaxy and the jets, but if it didnt exist the core would be blown ig
This dataset has just so much to show
like look at this tinyini galaxy
Too much clarity in the middle or weird masking but that dark ring in the middle should not exist I think xD
ik man its an artefact that i created to pull these jets
if not the core would be blown
i'm still improoving ig
@fallow flame have a look through these edits
Not ashen but i think they are when you compare to this one
you could see hints of them in my edit
Yeah these are defnetly the same jets, just bnot the ha one ig
hmm yeah fr but i really trid to get those out lol
I was doubting my BGE skills before seeing Limepies example lmao
lol
yeah u can easily wrongly get then out of the pic
but graxpert kinda saved me
sending to myself
this data lowkey ahhh
AD got me hard
ill do another process, if i can get it good, ill post it
@stiff vector
@stiff vector
@stiff vector
@stiff vector
@stiff vector
@stiff vector
@stiff vector
@stiff vector
@stiff vector
@stiff vector
@stiff vector
hi
wrong juju my bad
@glossy zephyr
@glossy zephyr
@glossy zephyr
@glossy zephyr
@glossy zephyr
@glossy zephyr
@glossy zephyr
@glossy zephyr
@glossy zephyr
@glossy zephyr
@glossy zephyr
@glossy zephyr
@glossy zephyr
@glossy zephyr
@glossy zephyr
@glossy zephyr
@glossy zephyr
@glossy zephyr
@glossy zephyr
@glossy zephyr
@glossy zephyr
um what?
badunkie?
why did you just spam this guy
oh nvm i see lol
Hows it going?
Oh lol
oh yeah thats mine i did that on my phone
hmm seens fair
Do you want it
It’s kinda bad but I’d be curious to see another process
Hahahahaha alright king one sec
Yayyy
the data is iffy
AD/CC issues i think
im gonna reprocess cos mine was reaaally bad but good luck lol
Whats that?
atmospheric dispersion and coma corrector issues
Still usable sorts but yeah
I’ll get more data, add the dust and use the stars from the new data
were the stars supossed to be bad?
Why would I make them bad on purpose 😂
Res is the same, sorta, might be a bit blurrier, but the stars have a red and blue fringe
ahh ok
Yeah well if ur saying that the data is bad cuz of that i may reconsider my life choices
Hmmm like crhomatic aberration every pixel and t shaped stars?
not joking abt the T shaped stars


Just now i see the red and blue
man this aint even noticeable
@cinder bane THIS DATA IS JUST TOO GOOOD
I think i might like ur datas man
Bahahahah I’m glad you think so 
Ahahhaha damn thank you! It means a lot.
Hey if there’s every anything you want imaged lmk, I’m happy to let you get data off the scope if you want
Nice edit
Very clean
It is mirrored tho I think, unless I accidentally mirrored mine lol
I preffer taking data my self but i'll let u know, i like how ur datas get out usually
Fair enough!
idk how this galaxy is oriented so i just got it the way i liked the most lol
Fr
thats pretty good
This is why I want a newt 
This is really nice
Stars are maybe a little funky but eh they were hard to deal with in the first place
It’s not bad
I prefer the stars one
Saturate the starless and you’ll be onto something
In general pretty good though
um they both are stars
the one that hasnt been reduced u knob
You’re the knob Brudda starless means no stars and stars means only stars so you are kinda just wrong
Stars not staring
@cinder bane no bx used because this data doesnt need it
the google drive link is up to date
This is updated frequently
It is edited
Also it wasn’t sent a couple of months ago, it was sent in 2024 
so it is or not?
yeah lol but some of them are in like late 2025
It was updated like 2 weeks ago…
wait wha
oh yeah... you are right 
i saw the 12 March and just skipped it

Awesome data. May I ask what your drizzle settings were?
Thanks!
1x drizzle, 1.5 varshape 0.8 dropshrink
Why?
because the present noise pattern is quite nice
Thanks! Nice
Very clean
Actually might be a bit noisey? It’s compressed so hard to tell
Ashen, do u have an Ha filter? cuz if u have i think u really should add some Ha to this data. It can give some incredible details, and mb even the Ha-Oiii Jets
Idk abt Oiii but i think Ha would be a great add for this data
that would do a difference i think
yeah but ha is needed
😭
bruh
🙂
lol fr man


