#M63-Sunflower Galaxy
1 messages · Page 1 of 1 (latest)
Thx!
Turns out blur exterminator is a thing
You should stretch it way more that's what mine looks like at 30m exposure so you should have way more data
How fast is your scope? Mines f/5
F4
your scope has higher data acquisition then mine, so it would make sense that your scope can make an image that looks like mine in a shorter time. Im also reprocessing this target to see if I can do a better job.
I mean 1 fstop doesn't make a 2.5hr difference look the same
Yeah I know that but I thought you were exaggerating.
No. on 3hr of data you should have tidal waves of the galaxy visible in your image
is that what the wispy stuff is on the edges?
Yeah but a lot more than that
I probably had to strong of a mask. I am reprocessing it now.
I also prefer a darker background in my images in general.
Heres 9hr i forgot what f stop
Albeit in this image the tidal waves are a little under stretched
If I was processing that I would think the contrast is too low, how can you tell the tidal streams from the background noise? That looks like you used a mask and that's just where the mask ended.
Heres the starless version of my re-process so far.
There is no noise
Crank it up dont be shy
lmao crank WHAT
The stretch slider
I used masked stretch, I dont even touch sliders
Use the sliders
Sliders have been used in this image
Ok now use the clipping silder
But not too much keep an eye on the clipped background %
Ideally you want it 0 but if you want to do a little more thats fine
There you go
Now just click on the auto stretch cause i want to see how much data you have
Alright now go back to this one and use generalized hyperbolic stretching to stretch your galaxy without over blowing the core
And once you see the image looks good then go and use inverse generalized hyperbolic stretch on your star mask
Should bring out some of those background galaxies
this was hyperbolic stretching on the maximum stretched setting
Looking Better now for hyperbolic stretching you shouldn't go for the max instead you should aim for a balance between the dim stuff like the tidal waves and the bright stuff the core and repeat until it looks good
had a mask on
What is the mask for
protecting the galaxy while I clip the background
thats where I am at
More
but isnt that gonna blow out the background? am I missing something? trying to get rid of the glowing background no?
That would require you to go to the stretching settings and clip the background but this step is only for stretching the dim stuff on your target
more
Ok that might of been a little too much
Did you click apply
Or are just moving the slider further up
better?
Oh ok
A little bit less
Honestly this looks perfect
Gotcha, that was with the mask preventing the core from being murdered
My starmask hasnt been stretched
Oooo I should start using a mask then
I use masks all the time
Yeah that needs to be stretched
I forgot to put an "I" in that sentence
OHH you dont use masks, yeah they are seriously good. Especially colour masks because you can selectively increase the saturation on the nebulas without making the background rainbow city
What camera do you have
I use an ZWO ASI 662MC
Hows the starmask coming
I started over, it happens a lot
Why tho this looked good
Its sort of like when you think your in focus but then you think could there be better focus???
yk?
Yeah
But like in terms of detail its way better than mine
My scope is the orion spaceprobe 130st and the mount is an old skywatcher HEQ5 synscan. I think thats what its called.
The scope and camera is a pretty good pair though, 0.9 pixels/arcsecond
Very nice
I also dither and use drizzling
But the heq5 is a little bit overkill for that 5 inch
I know I am upgrading to an 8inch imaging newtonian in a couple of days
Ah how many times drizzle
x2
Oooo very very nice
found a used one for 450 bucks CAD canadian dollars
all that matters is the mirror, if its good I can do magical things with it
Yeah maybe do a restack cause drizzling does hurt your snr
What brand
Its custom
What brand mirror
I have no idea
one sec
literal steal
the guys on vacation rn though so I have to wait till he gets back
mirror could be sketch though
Nah this story sounds sketchy
I just dont want to buy a mirror that needs to be aluminized
Silver is a better option
Gold is good for ir
Silver is good for ir visible and uv
I heard silver is better, but they dont use it a lot anymore because it tarnishes overtime. Aluminum has less reflectivity but it lasts much longer. Im pretty sure.
Aluminum is good for a little bit of ir and mostly visible
Yeah but nothing a simple coating on top of silver right after applying the silver to fix the issue
Yeah I think that was the standard practice, but I really dont have a good understanding as to why most scopes made the switch, maybe its cheaper.
Its easier to coat with aluminum aperently
Ive seen it done, its really interesting. You need a big machine that creates a vacuum. Thats why I dont want a messed up mirror that needs it done because I dont have that machine nor do I know where to send it or how much it would cost.
I think thats better, stretched a bit more so it shows off my integration time.
Looks better than your first one