#Blurx request pleasee
1 messages · Page 1 of 1 (latest)
wdym?
ty!
you're welcome
Uh what part don't you understand?
oh can i give you stack without DBE and SPCC?
@granite bloom
it seems to be darker
Just share the linear image. BXT works far worse on stretched images
yeah ill just DBE and CC and send it if thasts ok/
sure
Doesn't appear to be linear. It was already pre-stretched.
It looked heavily edited that's why the stars didn't turn out so well
It's best to just share the raw stack without any further processing to ensure the best results
If you don't wanna do DBE and CC all over again, I'm happy to do that for you too
so no DBE or colour cali?
yh
Here's the raw stack. 450fl and 2.9micron
ty
Still doesn't look like a RAW stack... What did you stack this with? And did you stack RAW files at all?
its old data i found it maybe it has been messed with
This is what the typical Linear image looks like. Yours appears to be pre-stretched
Yeah idk whats already been done.
Just give me a few mins to try find it
@granite bloom Found it
Perfect, that works
@subtle token here's the blurx'ed file again
works way better now that you've shared the RAW stack
why the heck does it look so good omg
It's an advanced gradient removal technique, but I applied a soft MSGR because I didn't have the best data to work with to create a proper background model
Oh I see, is that on pix?
Yes, but theoretically it could be done using SiriL as well in case you don't have pix
Ah whats the process called