#What's missing from Siril?
1 messages Β· Page 6 of 1
which script is t
oh what is it
This belongs here
Real though
Its really not missing anything major
Siril + SAS is quite the free combo
Why isnt relinearization possible in Siril? 1) stretched stars 2) stretched nebula 3) after not working relinearization
@stark ermine
Use the star recombination tool
which script does this
lock left us hanging π
litterally edging us
Still, it does not work though the pixelmath code is correct(?!)
it would be greatly appreciated if you could actually tell us where it is
In the star entry of the processing menu
You know, you enter star recombination in the documentation and you'll have all information.
The clone stamp tool?
Just switched to Ubuntu on my main machine and I wonder if Siril is recommended to be installed as a flatpak or an AppImage
in flatpak the dark theme doesn't work
There is the script "patch inpainting Tool" which also provides clone stamping
Ok I got it to work with flatpak override. Still I wonder which one would be best. Linux packages are confusing lol
But now I can finally stack more than 2k mosaic subs in one go and blink debayered frames without lagging thats so awesome 
Would it be reasonable to perform some sort of gradient removal as part of mosaic stitching? I'm still trying to trace the source of the reverse vignetting in this data, but it made me think about solving how this problem may be similar to MSGR.
You can perform a background extraction on the whole sequence before
how do i get the use drizzle button
ive chaned all settings on that page but only wants to use interpolation
dont debayer and it will default to drizzle
i have artefacts arround the star after staking with Siril drizzle 2x ... what could be?
I installed Siril as a flatpak on Ubuntu; GraXpert (both script and standalone) had a problem that it wouldn't use the nvidia GPU during denoising and other tasks, and after installing some of the dependencies I installed 3.1.0 rc2 so that it would work with the installed dependencies, and the standalone program now uses the GPU correctly, but through the Siril Graxpert-AI script, it still doesn't use it. I heard its because flatpaks dont detect the GPU by default? Is there something I can do?
Don't debayer your images
Anyone getting this criptic message on beta4 while trying to run starnet++?
21:49:37: Siril cannot create TIFF file.
21:49:37: Error: unable to save working StarNet input file...
do you have storage?
Do you have Antivirus? Sometimes they don't want you to save in Tif
@stark ermine I get " Error initializing application: no display name and no $DISPLAY environment variable" with some py scripts such as AberrationRemover.py or DBXtract, I now use Ubuntu 25.10 with Wayland instead of Windows, Siril is installed as a Flatpak (could have something to do with that?).
you're running on Linux too right?
I ran on Kubuntu 25.10 with Wayland for a week or so. Siril ran fine but I built mine from source rather than using Flatpak
I've now reinstalled to 24.05 because 25.10 was too new for some stuff I wanted to install
For a few days I have been wondering what the best way to install Siril actually is for Linux. From what I searched it appears as the virtualization of the flatpak prevents it from using some system resources
Flatpak build is not compatible with Wayland (Wayland sucks)
What are your gripes with Wayland? I know it's becoming the default in more places...
Too many things...
So would you recommend AppImage or straight up building from source?
Also that would explain why hardware acceleration through the GraXpert script doesnt work while it does on the standalone
If you know how to compile then go ahead!!
Maybe your harward is not supported by onnx
Should I use the lock042/siril PPA?
Or straight from source?
lock042 ppa is the package I maintain
from sources you could have all the update as soon as you pull new sources
Ok so what changes is how early i receive the updates?
If I decide to build from source do I have to install the python3 venv package or does Siril just come with its own venv?
I am a beginner so I am just figuring out stuff thanks
It will come with it's own
But you need at least to install the python3-venv package
Ok thanks, also, building from source installs Siril system wide unless prefixed otherwise? Is system wide okay?
great then, built from source makes siril faster than flatpak too?
Ok succesfully installed from source, at first it gave me a " Warning: unable to install or update the Siril python module." but i reset the venv and now it says its up to date. Btw is it normal that by default no .ssf script is preinstalled?
Ok the display error has been solved but now the ttinker one remain
Is this still due to Wayland? Any way around it?
did you install python3-tk with apt?
No, thats necessary?
Ok I see, I am going to try
It fixed that error but now I am fighting with this one, i did some troubleshooting and nothing is wrong or missing from my system. For now I saw this happening with DBXtract and AberrationRemover, so probably scripts that want to use ttkthemes
dunno I never saw that error. Perhaps Google for it?
I tried, cant really seem to find anything relevant as this specific issue
Could be that I am on 25.10, with Python 1.13 that is very new
which script?
because now, many scripts don't use tkinter
oh this is an issue with your locale
what language do you use?
in your OS?
Italian
because there are some known issue with python and some locales I believe
So, I should try switching to english?
So, english, in the whole OS?
Chatgpt to troubleshoot has made me go through some loopholes verifying where the C locale came from but there appears to be nothing wrong, so could just be a matter of language?
https://gitlab.com/free-astro/siril-scripts/-/issues/37 : some old issues
Dell Latitude 7490 laptop, German keyboard, Windows 11 German latest update, Siril 1.4.0 Beta 3. When trying to run Graxpert-AI.py script I get an error "unknown locale: en-DE"....
Graxpert doesnt give me the issue
But yes it could happen with any script i guess, most work
stumbled upon an issue preprocessing some comet stuff, ran starnet on images registered on the comet that had drizzle applied (default settings), opening the sequence in siril that had starnet applied it looks incredibly clipped and stacking them only worsens it, opening the subs by just dragging them in is completely fine though
nvm, its just one of the images thats borked apparently 
one question about scnr, considering that's it clips data and essentialy ruins the image, why is it kept in? does it have some application that makes sense to use it?
People hate green I guess (their opinion is wrong)
There's a characteristic bicolor look for SHO that SCNR produces and I'm sure users would really like that to be available
but wouldn't that also clip the data?
SCNR? Of course
mh then it's only for people that don't really care about that
I'm as confused as you are about SCNR's popularity tbh
the popularity is easily explained Imo, it removes the green tint at the press of a button and most people are fine with that
I used it a lot when I first started
Manual color calibration also does that without destroying data
but it's not at the press of a button 
I guess SCNR comes in handy only when the green tint is extremely stubborn and doesn't go away with CC or curves, so as a last resort
Or when you have color gradients
On an unrelated note, I feel like TGV denoise would be a good addition to SIRIL. It has some mathematical properties that make it really suited to astrophotography (it assumes the image is piecewise continuous rather than piecewise constant, so staircasing artifacts are eliminated)
ive knew scnr destroying data for a bit but i dont see much of a difference in my images so i continue using it instead of white balance
Using it on starmask is good
Does the "Noise" weighting option in Siril help when you have subs for example, from moon nights and some from moonless nights, to stack them in a way that it gives the moon subs the necessary weight to not make them degrade the stack?
is there any extra info on what the main weighting methods do?
I find weighted FWHM to give me slightly better results; it weights the star FWHM by the number of detected stars, so frames taken under worse skyglow are still going to be weighted lower than those under better skies.
Good. I notice I get more noise with it though
I will add that I'm prioritizing sharpness over noise so that may affect my evaluation
I think I just noticed something weird, not a real issue but something that makes me curious. Previously I had Siril installed as a Flatpak and what I use to notice is that if I opened a sequence and started holding arrow down it would smoothly blink through every frame, without skipping one. Then I uninstalled that and decided to build from source, however I noticed that now this isnt possible anymore. If you hold arrow down on thr keyboard it doesnt really blink subs, it mostly skips through them as they try to load, but they dont, just like what happened for me on windows.
that mainly depends of the frame size and the memory used and available
Guess who got Siril 1.5 instead of 1.4 RC1 by pulling git 
Ok yeah building from source without specifying branch guess it does that
we're already in 1.5 damn
You should read the release note
Especially:
Important note for master branch users: Once the stable 1.4.0 version is released, development of Siril 1.5 will begin on the master branch. Users accustomed to using daily builds from master are advised to exercise caution during the early phases of version 1.5 development, as this period may be more unstable than usual. We recommend waiting a few weeks after the start of the 1.5 cycle before resuming daily use of the master branch.
To which branch should I switch? to do this i delete the _build directory and rebuild it from scratch?
Not even to remove build to rebuild cleanly? thats not needed to downgrade or change branch?
No. Just change the branch and compile again
great thanks
I notice that every time I compile btw preferences like the gaia catalogue location or installed py scripts reset and I have to set them again, thats normal?
No. I compile all the time with no issues
ok then i'll see if it happens again
I think I get a error opening scripts directory on the terminal
amma have to read the releas notes
Reverted back to 1.4.0 RC1, my Python scripts are succesfully loaded but the default .ssf scripts are absent. But like some other times i get these errors, should I create the directories myself if missing?:
Entering wrapping_idle for function 0x6110574554b0 scripts: Error opening directory β/tmp/.mount_sirilA6RHwe4/usr/share/siril/scriptsβ: No such file or directory scripts: Error opening directory β/home/mattitech/.siril/scriptsβ: No such file or directory scripts: Error opening directory β/home/mattitech/siril/scriptsβ: No such file or directory
remove all the lines in the siril prefrences, scripts tab
Done, now siril doesn't respond
had to kill it, now the same paths show and same error
Edit: the directory of the .ssf scripts for me is in the directory where I built Siril source, I just found out, not where Siril is looking for in the home directory, changed it, now it finds the scripts, just hope it saves that for next compilation
so random but the locale error with the py scripts doesn't happen anymore, very cool
Following up, has it ever happened again?
If it does, can you pls test with this version of Siril: https://gitlab.com/free-astro/siril/-/jobs/12025374158/artifacts/download
Do not restart the PC and use the memory settings/cpu number as usual. We need to check if the memory allocation (implemented only on some very specific parts) performs as expected with a memory in fragmented state, which is reset when you restart the PC. It should also fix the crash that occurs with drizzle
ive had my allocation set real low so not really, could try though
So to test, you would need to reinstate a memory ratio of 0.9 or smthg, as it was before this bug occurred
yeah, ill do it sometime tomorrow most likely
any idea what causes this error in the continuum subtraction python script?
What is the version of SIril you are using?
1.4.0 beta 3
well, update
mh I didn't know about newer updates, will do
beta4 and rc1
You must have disabled the automatic update check, because Siril would have told you otherwise.
I don't think I've ever touched that setting, Idk
updating now, I'll enable the update check if it's not already on
yeah it was disabled for some reason
do scripts need to be updated? the continuum subtraction one is giving me weird results
Somehow, when turning on show objects option I get this weird visualization. But only after the image has been platesolved on Siril through either the standard solver or astrometry.net, but not when the image is already is solved by astrometric stacking
This is on rc2 and also happened on rc1 and beta 4
This is a wcslib bug
I already reported it
You're on debian?
Downgrade wcslib will work
@merry perch
i forgor π
Scripts are automatically updated
After registering frames, the plot only shows up with the converted frames and not with the registered ones
Did I do something wrong?
Also the stack looks like this
known issue fixed in the bext version
here you just use a bad Bayer pattern
you should let Siril decide what pattern to choose
Ty
crazy that this has turned into tech support
always has been
I was thinking it might be nicer to have a SIRIL users' thread
Maybe What's missing from Siril is the friends we made along the way
Yeah I always meant to ask to rename the chat
And always forgotten
I mean I'm personally interested in SIRIL development so this thread (if it stays on topic) is useful to me at least
it could be just named "siril chat" or something like that
Any recommendations for building a patchwork mosaic in SIRIL? (Stitching together a bunch of images taken by other people - different palettes and processing styles)
Also @stark ermine how feasible would it be to interface a different programming language with SIRIL? I'd really like to work with some tools I'm writing in Julia in combination with SIRIL
Obviously there's the Python tooling but I'm also the author/maintainer of several Julia packages :)
make the python pkg launch the julia one 
I mean that is probably workable, but I'd prefer something less roundabout
Hello. I'm not sure we want to use something else. Siril is coded in C/C++ and we use python for scripts
THis is already very complicated to maintain something consistent on all platforms
I don't think that using another language would be easy and helpful
Yeah, I figured there's probably a large amount of developer effort involved
yes π
I'm working on some denoising code which I would love to have available in SIRIL (TGV denoising that assumes Poisson statistics). Tbh I would love to contribute to the SIRIL codebase but my skills in all of these languages are kinda limited (I was taught C from a chemist who did not know how to malloc, free, or implement a multidimensional array
)

I have flashbacks of the code we used for our research. It's not pretty
is that a block of variables that have had their names truncated to be impossible to read without knowing what they do
I am actually trying to implement the algorithm described in this issue in a Julia package, so perhaps this may be useful to Adrian
There are 9 separate variables for matrix components instead of just using 3D matrices available in GSL...
wait until you spot the 45 unironic goto statements

which line is that 
Just use Ctrl+F on "goto" and you'll find them
yea
ive found tham
also im on mobile rn 
i have seen something about double electrons or something and a periodic table
what is this about?
dft chemical pressure analysis 
tried with one dataset and it was fine, both current and maximum modes on drizzle, stacking with maximum was fine too, was using a ratio of 0.95 for memory
was a rather small dataset though, will try with the version of siril i had installed before as well
it didnt crash in the normal version 
Working on a new script
This is about HR diagram
Could someone with PixInsight use the script on one of their images (ideally a globular or open cluster), send me the image in a private message, and show me the result in PixInsight? That way I can compare
Would you find it useful/interesting to have an IRG cluster image? (I don't have PixInsight, but I do have some HR diagram data that my friend got for the RGB version)
Yes please
I would like to compare both results
Files are getting uploaded right now
π₯
Double Cluster has finished uploading
Which file was used to create this?
Uncalibrated RGB version
ok. What are the filter and sensor ? (needed for SPCC π )
IMX533 mono & Touptek RGB
thx
IR data was taken with an SVBONY 685 nm IR pass filter and it reuses the Touptek RG data
this is the result
With apparent magnitude
I think we're good π
I didn't even realize how many white dwarfs there could be
The Double Cluster data is CC0, I'm releasing it to the public domain
thx for your share
So, in the coming days, I think Siril will have the HR diagram script too
Actually do you mind if I share the diagram on my social media?
Please do, but the UI dialog all around may change a bit ^^
Wait I can share you only the plot if you want
when we getting something like mars in siril 
Thanks!
Is this thing really worth the effort? I've heard that the results aren't great.
If I use the same axis scale:
where the flippy this come from?
??
hertzsprung-russell diagram done with Siril
i didnt know siril could do that xD
I'm writing a script allowing that
nice!
Good news, the script is now available
HR diagram my fav diagram
Amazing. Sorry if its a stupid question but does this work simply by analyzing the stars' color and flux based on the image data or does it need an astrometric solution?
astrometric solution is also needed
it compares stars between gaia catalog too, in order to know the star distance which is important for absolute magnitude
where can i find this tool? :o
like all other scripts
I figured.. perhaps a hint on under what tab/folder it might be?
??
Scripts->get Scripts
it is easy to find
alr ty! assumed it came with the latest siril version
Im getting this error
21:31:32: Starte Script /home/lukas/siril/scripts/HertzsprungRussell.py
21:31:35: Error: failed to retrieve FITS keywords: Received keyword data size 1465 doesn't match expected size 1235
21:31:40: Error: failed to retrieve pixel data: Timeout while receiving data
21:31:40: Fatal error: 'NoneType' object has no attribute 'ndim'
21:31:40: Traceback (most recent call last):
21:31:40: File "/home/lukas/siril/scripts/HertzsprungRussell.py", line 1218, in main
21:31:40: window = HRDiagramDialog(siril)
21:31:40: File "/home/lukas/siril/scripts/HertzsprungRussell.py", line 823, in init
21:31:40: if fit.data.ndim != 3:
21:31:40: ^^^^^^^^^^^^^
21:31:40: AttributeError: 'NoneType' object has no attribute 'ndim'
21:31:40: Python Prozess (PID: 29330) mit Status 1 beendet
what is your version of Siril ?
flatpak?
no, fedora
reset the venv in siril preference please
where do I do that?
in the Siril preferences, Scripts tab
It worked, thank you for your help!
@stark ermine Is it still helpful to translate strings on weblate now near official release or am I late?
New version available π
Which cluster is this?
Probably not the best image for scientific study, but I take what I have ^^
It only works with linear data, right?
do it require ir cut?
Are you shooting mono with RGB filters? I think that should be sufficient
im osc

i dont even have a tracking mount yet, why would i invest in mono
Ohhh well I think you should be okay if you can use SPCC on your data
how you spcc data?
what even spcc
Spectrophotometric color calibration, it's in the SIRIL docs
oh
dont you require a filter for that or somethings
or am i just going crazy
Not necessarily
what if im doing rgbir?
do i just deal with not having spcc
I am honestly not sure in that case since I only shoot mono
what if im doing irir
is that same?
bc ill be stacking ir data as mono images
You may need to use some custom filter data depending on what's available in SIRIL, I'm not sure
oka
what colour is it?
green due to H-alpha being in the green image channel
thanks to @chilly root for pointing this out
Is that ai generated?
The tutorial seems to be done by a real person
Who does not know much about how to use SIRIL
Cool
So it's still slop
The thumbnail is absurd, that guy looked like Sainz at first
...you're goddamn right
@stark ermine under some circumstances it seems like the saturation stretch functionality in GHS can alter the hues of my image
Original (left) vs altered (right)
I mean it looks cool but that is not the intended effect lol
"Hey siri, start NINA and begin livestack B)"
Hey siril, clip the blacks
πΌ πΆπ΅ Just rush and push it all, clipping all the blacks πΆ
Should RGB equalization in the stacking tab be checked if I plan on color calibrating the image?
does not matter
you will apply a background extraction before color calibration
the bge apply a RGB equalization too
So whats it there for?
in order to make users happy with a image that is not like Shrek after stacking
no, not necessary. I always check the option
but if I forget, this is not a big deal
"What are you doing in me swamp?!"
downloading spcc catalogue i think
the window crashed when i clicked a button
so i guessed which place the download button was in
and something is downloading 
hum. I don't understand what you are saying
you mean, gaia local catalogue?
how did you download it?

i pressed the button to the right of the button that i pressed to download (that dissapeared bc interface crashed)
ok, you are using remote catalogue
which caused it to die
while Gaia is under maintenance now.
you should use local catalogue
we have built a catalogue for this case
thats what im downloading ._.
so, i open the offline dowloader
oh ok
input everything for it
then to the right of the download button theres like a visualise button or something
that crashed the ui
so i guessed where the button to download was
but it worked somehow
ok. No crash for me
Not a SIRIL feature, but I would love to see a gallery of user images on the siril.org website
Could be an idea
Yeah its not like only Pixinsight is allowed to flex
I see to many "Siril vs Pixinsight" comparisons where the Siril image was processed in 30 seconds and with zero familiariaty with the program and then a meticulous Pixinsight version
Its so bad many people think you have to get Pix for "nice colors"
my dog a siril supoorter btw
|
V
processed with Siril
of course you can have nice colors with Siril
great example
it looks like a garlic
We will work on it before the end of the year I think
when we getting an official siril discord server and not just a thread in ab 
I'd join
Though of course there are user forums: https://discuss.pixls.us/c/software/siril/34
<a href="https://www.siril.org/">Siril</a> is a free astronomical image processing software intended to process amateur astronomic images and videos.<br>
<strong>If you think there is a problem, just saying it does not work will not help us finding a solution. Please share what you were doing, your OS, Siril version and most importantly logs!</s...
Though I will say dark mode should be the default for the forum. It's not fun to get flashbanged when you're troubleshooting something in the dark
Once you set it as dark, it will stay dark.
New python script for an automatic stretch better than the statistical one π
This is the easiest way to have nice stretch and nice preserved colour
Can you apply this autostretch to the image?
This is the purpose to the script
Apply an autostretch to the image
and a better autostretch than others
Oh sorry I'm asking the wrong question
Because I thought this was using GHS as part of the preview functionality
Either way, I would like to consistently apply stretches to my images so I will give this a try
For instant results, pick "read-to-use" mode and don't turn Log D up too high or colours will be too saturated
Did you develop this script?
I press the button to compute it automatically :).
Not me
I tried that but it computed too high. Had to turn it down a little
oh ok, good to know
maybe you can reach the dev to tell that
siril
woaa
I'd like to test it more before I feed back. Perhaps it was just an oddity with my data
this is what I ended up with, with very little effort
Very nice picture π
CALL THE FIRE DEPARTMENT 
SIRIL 1.4.0 JUST DROPPED
Thanks @stark ermine and everyone on the Siril team for your work and listening to us all yap about what we want regardless of how contradictory it may be

car moon
@stark ermine how do i use siril for lucky processing?
bc i do lucky imagery
and i wanna be able to do rejection stacking well
and use a video file instead of indeviduals
Use SER
All other video formats are bad
And with SER you use Siril in the same way you use it with standard FITS
This is the power of sequence
woa
is it possible to add rejection stacking to a script?
because ive made 1.2x drizzle scripts and stuff
and bayer drizzle without dbf
but i haven figured out how to rejection stack

Discover the power of Sirilβs revolutionary Veralux Hypermetric Stretch tool! You will learn exactly how to use this brand-new script to dramatically enhance faint nebulosity, boost galaxy detail, and reveal hidden structure in your astrophotography images. Whether you're shooting with a DSLR, mirrorless camera, or dedicated astro camera, Vera...
woww
qlready bido
Of course it is. Usual scripts have already rejection.
huh

hey, stop screaming :(
is it updated on S.u.S.E repo?
i didnt get brown with my haii data
haii ?
hydrogen alpha + ir ir
its colour correctly to hwo it mean to be is what i mean
I think you need to make a tutorial on your process, I can never get anything really good but your images on telescopius are great
I wrote a book, currently translating it in English
do you like my igbi onion image
colors are ... funny
Oh nice, can't wait to read it then
https://siril.fr for the French version
Any eta on the English version?
infrared momen
@stark ermine can siril take 8 bit video ;-;
i didnt realise it defaulted to 8 bit and not 16
yea
fircapture has dementia and keeps forgetting some settings π
@stark ermine Why do I frequently get weird corners and vignetting when using linear fit clipping (default settings)?
Doesnt happen on mosaics though
That is from stacking. Probably there you only have a few subs toward the beginning or end of the session
It only happens with linear fit, if I use Winsorized sigma clipping it doesn't
these methods are quite differents
I never seen that however
probably due to a gradient in each sub
@stark ermine The new mosaic tool is incredible! it stitched HΞ± perfecly in a matter of seconds, though it's having problems with OIII and SII (mainly SII as you can see). I think the issues are caused at least partly by SNR differences when averaging in the overlap, instead of just overlaying them. Any ideas on how to proceed?
(viewing in pix because of the 32k pixel limit in siril)
Sure, you could apply a background extraction on each panel before
I already did
maybe not good enough Β―_(γ)_/Β―
but OIII is done with MGC so it really should be good
i did
about 1k
try the max (2k)
wait then i'm not sure i understand. I have 1k pixels of overlap between the frames?
oh wait feathering
oh, I was speaking about border feathering
i only did 56 lol... lemme try 500
not sure it if it helped that much
(starx takes 10 minutes to run so not starless this time)
SII btw
i think it's the stars, but i'll try
@stark ermine on a related note, I find the denoiser has some trouble with panel overlap (it smooths the overlaps excessively). I figure this could be mitigated when masking arrives in 1.6 (IIRC) but in the meantime do you have any tips to reduce the effect?
(This is worse when you have less integration, if the panels already have sufficient integration on their own it's less of a problem)
For your information, I've finished the translation of my book about Siril (https://siril.fr). It should be available in Q1 2026 in USA (even if customs duties are a pain in the ass) and of course in other countries. I hope you'll enjoy it. French users have responded very positively to the book's release. I hope it'll be the same for you.
Is it a guide and explanation of tools in Siril?
yes
cool il buy it once available in the US
hi everyone, ive been trying to install the SPCC catalog lately, but so far i keep getting an "installation error: failed to download file""
does anyone know what could be the cause?
also getting that
idk the fix tho
https://zenodo.org/records/14738271 : you can manually download the files
This is an extract of the Gaia DR3 catalog optimized for spectrophotometric color calibration. The catalog is indexed at HEALpix level 8 and selects up to the 127 brightest sources in each level 8 HEALpixel, though in many HEALpixels the number is limited by the Gaia sources that have xp_sampled records available. However this strategy ensures a...
i guess that by doing it manually, i have to download the entire catalog
I didnt know siril was made in my country
You're French?
Oui !
oh non
-
There is a new version of statistical stretch with more parameters exposed
-
I miss some option to do HDR on the highlights (SAS pro has some tools that are nice) and also some tool to add more contrast to the shadows.
-
Blumish tools (for comet stacking, to remove the residues from stars)
-
An option to cleanup all the p_, r_ files, symlinks, etc after the final stack image is generated. Cleaning manually is a bit tedious and leaves lots of crap in disk.
-
If it is about asking, possibility to have previews (to test time demanding processes like AI stuff on smaller regions) and even multiple files opened and processed/linked simultaneously.
-
Fix the random crashes when doing RGB combination. When you open a new image to assign to a channel, sometimes the entire app crashes en macosx.
Maybe some of these are impossible with the current architecture, and maybe some of them are there but I just missed.
There is a new version of statistical stretch with more parameters exposed
OK, but Veralux stretch is betterο»Ώ anyway
An option to cleanup all the p, r files, symlinks, etc after the final stack image is generated. Cleaning manually is a bit tedious and leaves lots of crap in disk.
https://siril.org/faq/#could-you-add-commands-to-delete-files-or-sequences
If it is about asking, possibility to have previews (to test time demanding processes like AI stuff on smaller regions) and even multiple files opened and processed/linked simultaneously.
-> Did you try ROI feature? and for the other point the multiwindow script
Fix the random crashes when doing RGB combination. When you open a new image to assign to a channel, sometimes the entire app crashes en macosx.
Fixed in the 1.4.1 coming next
I miss some option to do HDR on the highlights (SAS pro has some tools that are nice) and also some tool to add more contrast to the shadows.
Siril has a HDR multiscale script
There is a new version of statistical stretch with more parameters exposed
Updated. But I really think that VeraLux scripts are far better

Well in my experience veralux is not far better than statistical stretch. It just saturates too much the images and exacerbate any mis-color calibration possibly present in the image. I keep telling myself to give it a chance, and every single time I come back to statistical stretch because for me it simple works much better
Thanks for the tips and updates !
You really need to test the last VeraLux version
And, no, it does not saturate colors while MAS does it (with a slider)
VeraLux preserve color vector
if SPCC is well executed right before
Veralux stretch has been released in its 1.5.0 version
@stark ermine sorry for the ping. I can't remember exactly what I did to build siril from source on Ubuntu, but now I realized for all this time Siril has been installed in /usr/bin and not /usr/local/bin. Is this a bad thing for the system or is it supposed to be installed this way?
I need a little clarification on what you mean that you install it system wide
Okay. I was simply reading its bad practice to put your binaries with system ones, because I know that /usr/bin is where apt works. I have the _build directory still so I just uninstalled, wiped and reinstalled again using the /usr/local/bin prefix
Worked fine so this is where its at I think
Its so cool that with AR and CosmicClarity i dont need to beg others for blurx as much
whaaaahhhhh???
Yep. This is very good :). You cans spread information to other channels π
gah
im using the old oneeee
i may have to reprocess π
wonder if this one will leave those tiles in images too at times
nope it has been fixed
it also insnt adding stars in anymore
it just takes them away
(star had a 1 pixel seperation and it eated it)
this the before
then it cronch
went omnom
its no big deal tho tbh
makes sense why it ate it
ok. This is with the new model?
yus
I noticed a bit of a similar issue. I tested it on two images for now, on a specific horsehead image it does this, also while messing with some structure in the flame nebula, it happened in this image, I tested it in IC1805 and it was much better though. I am keeping the old model availabme just in case, and I reported it on github.
This has a lot of potential
I had to reduce strenght to solve it, and the author clearly said that if you do that you could count that as an issue. Thats why I reported
when I try to do the registration with distorsion modeling, I get super weird results:
Here this is the result of stacking with rejection
without that distorsion it works better, slight artifacts near stars, but better
check your registered sequence first
I always use distortion correction with no issue
not so sure. It looks more like it is not correctly aligning the stars
so probably there is something wring in your data
yes, and rejection do the artifacts
without distorsion correction it works fine, my data is ok. A bit of tilt/coma on the right side, but not dramatic.
I always keep this setting disabled because it never worked with any of my rigs. But now I wanted to do some mosaic and thought I rather get it sorted
looks like changing the windsored sigma clipping to another algorithm and plate solving manually the reference image helped
I can't say without data
ive found that i can mosaic just fine without it
That depends of your distortion

Have you checked the plate solve solution/distortion map? I had a similar result once and it was due to a lack of stars, but clearly this isn't the problem here
This is why I'm a glorious RitcheyβChrΓ©tien enjoyer. It's designed for minimal distortion
I think the key was to select an adecuate reference image and manually plate solve it.
what you mean by, manually plate solve it?
Select the image in the frame list, click on astrometry and trigger a plate solve. I thought it was doing it automatically, but this seems to make a difference
hum. To register with distortion you need to choose an image and apply astrometry yes
We are very pleased to announce the release of a brand-new star removal script in Siril, based on an original artificial intelligence model, generously developed by SyQon specifically for the Siril community.
Unlike many existing approaches that rely on encoderβdecoder architectures with successive resolution reduction and reconstruction stage...

betta than starne
?
looks it
Test it
well uuh
chomped quite a few galaxies and the core of cigar
and just left one strip undone π
not cookin

It is also removing galaxies bruh
Honestly though its about time something other than starnet comes in
I still need to test it
still the first version ig, let em cook
waiting for starnet v3 π
i think you missed a bit on the side
ion know why that happened π
Its coming?
id hope so, i remember seeing some talk of it some time ago
yes we try to understand this issue. Because I can't reproduce
but you should see that background is far better than starnet
Here are the known issues we are investigating about the new star removal script:
https://gitlab.com/free-astro/siril-scripts/-/issues/91
If you experienced other issues, please let us know.
When I ran it on M31 it removed M32 and a big chunk of M31s core
WHat if you change Tile?
Well, we will ask for images soon. It will help to improve the beta
om nom :3
Before and after
In the starmask you can see it even removed some of the structures in M31 (especially the core)
Yes, but check with starnet. It does the same. All starless algorithm remove a bit of signal, especially in galaxy core
Performs slightly better than starnet on large stars imo
I still didnt have time to test it myself
hey, you missed a bit on the side 
Thank you for pointing that out. I totally missed that 

Is there a way to set the console font? It's showing up as proportional for me rather than monospace
(I switched from Windows 11 to Arch Linux/KDE)
it should be forced to monospace
YOU USE ARCH NIW??
also, eww arch

I actually have been using it in other places but I switched my desktop over to it
isee
what made u finaly switch?
Not here at least
Microslop and its AI crap
isee
Broken updates and all
ohh yeaa they now release constant broken updates dont they!
like once a week or something right?
Worse: Windows kept attempting to reinstall 25H2 every time I booted my PC. While it was already on version 25H2
I found the fix: apparently I had to re-enable telemetry (!!!)
Apparently it had something to do with the Windows Insider program, but I never enrolled my desktop in it
I'm surprised you didn't flame me for using KDE tbh
What are you on, Gentoo?
im on opensuse, i did used to use my own distro i made from scratch
used it for like 3 years
before deciding it wasnt worth it anymore
π
wankers the lot of them
also, not flaming you for kde bc i know you used windows

just wait 3-4 months then i will
dont worry
I wanted to try hyprland but I heard it was not supported on Nvidia GPUs
If I was using GNOME you should flame me though
Already starting to customize SDDM
hyperland dev is a twat
hella transphobic and stuff
Ohhhh I didn't know that...good reason to avoid it then lol
I know some people out there are gonna say "it's just code! who cares?" but it does matter when you're trying to actually work with the people who write your code
yea
What WM/DE are you using?
usually i3wm
Not using Wayland?
I've just stuck to KDE because it's consistent, customizable, and Valve's really brought it into a renaissance
im not used to it no
so ive only recently switched
within last 3 months
Are you using i3 with Plasma or just KWin?
As far as Drizzle goes, what droplet model would you use between Square and Gaussian and why (considering potentially thousands of short seestar exposures)? I wasn't able to fully grasp the pros and cons of both from docs
Square is flux-preserving (important for photometric applications), but Gaussian might give you better star shapes. I haven't had the chance to do much testing, but the difference has been relatively small (at least when it comes to how good the stars look).
You can also use the Turbo kernel for speed if you're operating in EQ mode. It assumes that the rotation between frames is negligible, so it probably won't be a good idea if field rotation is significant.
So I assume square works better for SPCC in theory?
Eh, I'm not sure if it makes that big of a difference there. The flux preservation is more so about getting accurate magnitude measurements, so it's more important if you're monitoring star variability
For SPCC it's more so about the ratio of luminosity across bands
Ok thanks for clarifying
suqare dosen effect star shapes imo
Ok I tried Syqon starless
Very good
Compared to starnet I got mixed results. Like for example Starnet did a better job of removing the huge Alnitak, while Syqon left it more smudged. On the rest they are either on par, or in a specific instance Syqon gave me a cleaner image while starnet would leave a halo or two
Very promising
Also I like that its GPU accelerated, could be my default
yeah the gpu accel is nice
Calling all astrophotographers!
Weβre improving Starlessβ Zenith model and need your linear stacked images (16-bit or 32-bit, FITS or TIFF). Even low-quality files are welcomeβreal-world data helps us train better! Your files will be deleted immediately after processing, and every contribution makes a difference.
Upload your files here:
https://www.dropbox.com/request/IjgrGb7za64dG0r6Zetn
Thanks for supporting the community! Letβs push the limits of astrophotography together.
Don't be shy!!!
what if i upload all 500gb of stuff i have 
ive sent 3 fits
moderately bad data too so it could help 
(only one image is good)
Is there any way to specify that they are welcome to retain my data?
Starnet vs Syqon on a mono Cone image. Same process for both - star removal, Graxpert denoising
Which is which?
SyQon on the right?
yeh, Starnet left traces of the original stars
It removed a part of Hubbles Variable cloud tho
Is that the bright bit at the bottom?
jup
About to send the most unholy Seestar elongated star stacks known to men, the model will have fun
Stuff like this for the record
What do you need my name and email for
just write
mrooowwww
as name
and use tempmaol
Nvm. I trust you. You cant do that much with only my Mail Information
I think it's a good question. It would be nice to be able to submit anonymously
just in case you forget that you sent them π
I dont get how to stack my Images without Scripts. I always get a shitty result
Siril has plenty of tutorials and even a documentation :).
Soon, I will even publish a book in English π
Yes, I know. But all the tutorials are for older Siril versions and they somehow just donβt work. I always get a very very dark image in which all the background had been set to 0 (itβs black in histogram). Only a few stars a visible
Absolutely not, or you are watching unofficial tutorials
siril.org contains updated tutorials, but yes, they are not videos
I will try them thx
But in the tutorials it is all done via scripts. I want to do it manually
No, there is at least one tutorial explaining manually
Introduction #
In this tutorial, we will study the pre-processing process of an astro image taken with a digital camera (DSLR), but the processing of images from astronomical cameras is almost identical. Of course, Siril comes with scripts that perform this process automatically. However, in a number of cases, you will need to perform manual pro...
what is this?
the image after calibrating
without all the logs (ideally in English)... difficult to say
gonna need the english translation
Itβs the one I marked
I just see that Siri told me during calibration with darks that the images contain 99% negative pixels. But I have a dark library. That makes no sense
if youve 99% negative pixels that means your dark frames havent been applied properly
But I havenβt done anything wrong
And even the scripts are messing it up
that means theres an issue with your darks
your darks are fucke
its never user error 
So you have the issue. Your dark is not good for your light
calibration is pretty simple. This is just subtraction
If your dark has a higher level than your lights... well you will have pleinty of negative pixels
gwt outtt
My lights are with Gain 300 and Offset 50. My other darks have the same offset but Gain 100. Why did I got 99% black pixels too then? After stacking the image looked fine tho
Did you apply biases and darks at the same time?
I tried with and without
why are the gains different?
idk. Apparently I just gave Nina the wrong numbers
Worked now
What did you do differently?
new darks
great π
In the future it might be worth trying to just subtract a bias/bias level for troubleshooting
I seem to have noticed drizzle intermediate registration files have gotten heavier since 1.4? or is it just me? high res drizzle files are disabled
this is 2x drizzle for instance, the original file is 1080*1920, when registered it is turned into 24mb at 1x drizzle
just wanted to know if the specific file sizes are normal, I know drizzle takes more storage
the raw CFA frames are 4.2mb
that makes sense uea
sorta
wait
4.2*3 = 12.6
idk
makes some sorta sense
you've doubled the image resolution so it would be double the file size
4* the pickles tho
yeah but the image in total has 4x more pixels, like you doubled on each dimension
yeah how does it get to 99
1.5x drizzle woth 10k frames nearly totaled my drive
seemed abnormal
could it be that the cfa frames are 16 bits and then siril turns them to 32 bits
yea
ohhh
that will do it!
alright mistery solved ig, but why do i remember it being less. or maybe Im tripping
I never stacked 10 thousand frames all at once with drizzle
i think it didnt use to auto make 32 bit
yea i believe by default siril does 32bit files
hey that used to be similar for mee
would be about 700gb for 2x drizzle with 8k images
maybe its that now siril produces these too
drizztmp files
so i think it may have gotten more space hungry in the stable release
oggi
italian today
For your information, Starless model zenith is now in 1.1. I think it is now very good.
i will hav to check it out
Will there be any way to not also remove noise in the starless image? Its a bit jarring I'd rather have a traditional star only removal, which I have tried and is very good indeed
still get that wonky line thats not processed on the left side with the new model
thats due to the way it breaks the image into tiles
i think its bc the side doesnt fit the ratio
so it leaves it out
Read the message in the console. At the beginning you have a comment to solve it.
Answer from SyQon:
I understand that the result can feel βtoo cleanβ compared to a traditional star removal, but this is a paradigm shift rather than excessive denoising.
The model does not apply an explicit noise-reduction step nor adaptive filtering. Instead, it operates as a latent signal estimator, optimized to maximize the effective SNR of the diffuse component. In simple terms, it does not remove noise β it reconstructs the signal that the noise was masking.
From a statistical standpoint, the model approximates a solution of the form:
Ε(x) = E[S(x) | I(x)]
where S(x) is the true diffuse signal and I(x) is the observed image. In this framework, noise is not something to be βpreservedβ: it is a stochastic, spatially incoherent variable that is automatically rejected because it does not contribute to a stable solution. This is why the noise can disappear almost completely without introducing blur or structural loss.
The key difference compared to traditional denoising methods is that those operate through local trade-offs (smoothing versus detail), while here the SNR increase happens globally, by exploiting spatial and multiscale coherence of the real signal. If a structure is supported by its context, it is reinforced; if it is not, it is suppressed. There are no arbitrary thresholds and no βstrengthβ parameters.
It is also important to note that if noise is not present, the model has nothing to reject: in the absence of an incoherent stochastic component, the output converges almost exactly to the input. This is why it does not introduce new structures and does not artificially βenhanceβ already clean data.
In other words, the result is not βcleaner than realityβ, but closer to the underlying physical signal than the noisy observation. Getting used to this type of output means finally separating the concept of βvisible noiseβ from that of βuseful informationβ, and working with a starless background that more accurately represents the astronomical content.
If the goal is to preserve the original noise texture for aesthetic reasons or compatibility with traditional workflows, then a classical star-only removal remains the appropriate choice. This model, instead, is designed to directly produce the best possible compromise between physical fidelity and readability, without requiring a subsequent denoising step.
It's not denoise, it's pure statistical math of the signal
Interesting. If I were to pre-denoise it with Graxpert then, would it not find any high frequency noise to suppress?
Is this model made to work best on non-denoised images? Cause in my test with M45, no denoising, worked perfectly, with denoise it missed some big stars
I ran the comment but now SyQon apparently just disabled gpu acceleration by default
ngl i have a feeling that someone Is gonna upload starless files
The call is over
wha?
Would be great to have an Android port of siril !
Haha.
I'm sorry, but that's something that will probably never happen.
First because GTK won't run on Android
Second because Android platforms are not really dedicated to image processing
Lol, its actually manageable if you install a proot Linux distro on Termux and build from source. Honestly I chatgpt pasted my way through most of it but it worked
Some scripts may not work but I am surprised it runs at all
Thats the most Android running you'll ever do with Siril probably 
@stark ermine during registration siril is forcing me to debayer my data, is there any way to make it stop?
im at 850nm so my bayer matrix is completely transparent
so it doesnt need debayering
all its doing is damaging the data
Remove bayer information in all your fit headers. (Siril can do it)
can i do that to all subs at once?
Yes if you delete the keyword it'll do it to all subs of the sequence
how do you do it
Go to the FITS headers, select the keyword and delete using the minus button i think
It'll give a warning telling you it will be done to all the sequence
wher is fits headers π
Its in the Tools menu
a oki
yes
use the command line to apply it on all subs
Running or building SIRIL on Arch Linux currently fails due to the package llhttp, which should be downgraded to v9.2.1 for it to work again
breh
arch users am i right 
The worst human beings imaginable
-# I use arch btw
eeeew
use a real distro
boooo
ew
god no
ubuntu is the shittiest shit ever shat onto this planet
Hannah Montana Linux?
god yea, thats the linux distro of kings and queens
What is a real distro though
and why
it was a joke 
Some people take that way too seriously, I wasn't sure lol

seriousness is not something i do often 
windows:
I concede
this is not a direct dep of Siril
@stark ermine is there any way to use filters of the "wrong" color for SPCC?
I see that Sloan irg can be mapped to the RGB channels, but I'd like to select Touptek R and G for my green and blue image channels, and add in my SVBONY SV183 longpass IR (685 nm) filter for the red channel.
i think you can just individually select the wavelength + bandpass
Oh right I didn't even think about that
I was wondering, what is the Noise weighting option really about? Just give more weight to less noisy frames? So if I were stacking 10s and 20s exposures together, the 20s would get more weight?
When do you think I should use that over wFWHM
Don't stack different exposures together
Would it be better if I stacked them separately and then stacked the masters?
What's the difference between Zenith v1 and axiom v2 on syqon starless?
so axiom v2 is paid?
yep
is it betterer?
I don't know π


Is this with AberrationRemover
Cause I have that too
I tried to reset the venv in the settings, but it didnt work
Try to use the new GPU helper script
See if there is anything to install like CUDA
If you have nvidia
Fixed it for me
Does it matter if Zenith is good enough?
nah
So I've got some frame data taken at different gain levels (gain 200 is what I should be using, but I have some data I took at gain 100) and I want to combine the gain 100 and gain 200 stacks while normalizing the values to that of the gain 200 stack, since I plan to do some continuum subtraction with more gain 200 data and combine it with IR and luminance data that was only taken at gain 200.
What's the best way of combining this data together and normalizing the intensities to match that of the gain 200 data?
New cosmic clarity models from Frank with AI4
I tested it in SAS Pro and the results are truly impressive, so it would be amazing to have it interfaced within Siril. Instead of running on the cosmic clarity executables, the script would need to be modified to call SAS Pro.
you need to contact the script owner, which is Adrian
@stark ermine in the documentation for image normalization, what is meant by "scaled to achieve dispersion matching" in the methods that include scaling? Is it just multiplying the images after the background removal to match them more closely?
There's no background removal
Normalization tries to make images consistent between each others in order to use rejection algorithm
On a better way
With images having consistent statistics
I have the same question specifically. Additive I seem to understand it means that it simply adds or subtracts from the background brightness, while scaling? Does it try to match the signal?
kind of yes
*not background removal in the sense of using RBF/polynomial fitting, but adding/subtracting a constant to match overall brightness
that's what I meant by that
yep this is the additive part
@stark ermine what is considered a rejected sample when Winsorized sigma clipping is used?
Just the samples that are rejected in the sigma clipping step, or the Winsorized samples as well?
If you are interesting in understanding the code, you can have a look here: https://gitlab.com/free-astro/siril/-/blob/master/src/stacking/rejection_float.c?ref_type=heads
I wish there weren't as many magic numbers in the code, but from what I understand that's not on the SIRIL team
Where factors like 0.991 for the IKSS estimator come from, for instance. I see it in archives of the PixInsight ImageIntegration documentation
Combines images pixel-by-pixel for signal-to-noise ratio improvement and rejection of spurious image structures.
It's not clear how that factor is derived
That, and the factor of 1.134 in the Winsorized sigma clipping algorithm: "the constant 1.134 is derived from the normal distribution for a sigma factor of 1.5 (as recommended in Huber's work)" and there's no further explanation of how this value is derived
oh I found this: it's the cumulative probability of the data lying outside 1.5 sigma
So it should actually be 0.13361440253771617
0.13361440253771617 == 2 * (1 - (1/2 * (1 + erf(1.5 / sqrt(2))))) == 2 - (1 + erf(1.5 / sqrt(2)))
(well, you add 1 to that)
After doing some numerical integration, this constant should be 0.9909048195090278
yep all that stuff come from statistics
there are no magic numbers
Just the assumption you have enough data and that follow the normal distribution
In computer programming, a magic number or file signature is a numeric literal in source code that has a special, particular meaning that is less than clear to the reader. Also in computing, but not limited to programming, the term is used for a number that identifies a particular concept but without additional knowledge its meaning is less than...
Though some of these numbers aren't described very well in the source material
so I understand why that's the case
I'm trying to stretch sequences in SIRIL for a video and I'm getting some really weird results - the stretch applied does not match the preview at all
My image gets nuked
This occurs with both the histogram stretch and GHS options
What I expect (left) vs. what I get (right)
It also screws up the AutoStretch in the preview window unless I hit "clear sequence"
[brain@westerlund:~/astrophotography/projects/orion-2x2/2025-11-13/Orion Square Panel 3]$ diff pp_light_H_.seq pp_light_H_.seq.bak
3c3
< S 'pp_light_H_' 1 42 42 5 0 6 0 0 0
---
> S 'pp_light_H_' 1 42 42 5 -1 6 0 0 0
47d46
< M0-0 9048064 9048063 0.00123745 0.00116188 0.000381033 -999999 7.07254e-05 -999999 -999999 -999999 0 0.248801 1 8.70506e-05
Here's a diff of what happens to the sequence file after I try stretching the sequence with GHS
Opened an issue for it: https://gitlab.com/free-astro/siril/-/work_items/1934
@stark ermine I don't know if this is a user issue, but here I have a pretty large number of subs that fail 2 pass registration on this dataset, some cloudy frames fail ofc, but also several good subs were rejected as well. I already tried some things, such as changing the reference frame before starting the first pass of registration; tweaked settings in the dynamic psf dialogue and also ticked "relax psf checks". Its not a massive number of subs, but I see some useful data being left behind epsecially considering there are worse frames being registered just fine. This only started to happen once I added 4-5 extra hours on this dataset. if you need anything else for an educated guess about the issue, i can provide it. Thanks.
If images aren't aligned, there must be a good reason. I regularly have hours of data to stack and never get any rejects. So you have to look at the logs to figure out what's causing the problem. You can also try aligning the images using plate-solving.
Oh thats right i can use platesolving.
Well there is a batch of frames that is slightly shifted a bit compared to the others, but I thought there were enough stars to overlap
Also I was wondering. Since the astrometric registration works well on most datasets even with problematic overlaps, is there a reason not to always use it over global star alignment?
Users do want they want. There is no preferred choice
The one thing I don't know about (and @stark ermine would be able to clarify) is whether undistortion corrections are done with astrometric registration alone (as opposed to global star alignment w/ undistortion from images)
That would be interesting to know. Also, my real question was more if astrometric alignment is worth it 99% of the time over global star alignment
Cause I am starting to think that some times
Cause even without a mosaic I still run into occasions where subs taken close to each other still somewhat fail to register due to some reason, and mosaic registration usually fixes that
yes they are
The only time I've had issues with astrometric registration is when there are very few stars and the distortion coefficients have a high uncertainty (e.g. shooting the Helix in narrowband with my RC)
You can lower the distortion coefficient
I found this on the Astrobin forums...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MXDgMY8Tyqk
thats pretty sick
Yep... That could be a game changer
of course, no need to sort the files
you can have a big mess, you drag&drop altogether
and tat's fine
something ive been wanting since 2022
it's almost done on my side
I hope
only for FITS images
necessary to have right FITS keywords
Gyatt damn
If only siril could support multiple files open in one place, it'd totally replace pix for me
you can do it with the multiwindow script
For me the script feels a bit slow and doesnβt properly align the windows
And itβs not built in like pixinsight, where you can do a lot more manipulations, etc. (and they feel a lot easier and better to use).
Don't expect Siril to work like PixInsight
Of course, and I donβt use pixinsight
It would be very nice if multiple windows was a built in feature
Upon everything thats being added to Siril, i wonder (if its not against its core UI philosphy), if its going to be possible to pin favorite scripts somewhere easy to click instead of digging in the script menu every time
do old scripts stop working? i think this was originally a pix script
what do you mean?
old scripts always work
alright i did transfer checkbox and it was the one that reduces stars so still working
star checkbox just freezes
you can rise a ticket in our GitLab script repository
siril!
yes?
idk i was just saying siril 
is siril vibe coded
Siril has been around since 2005... and we took over its code in 2012.
way before chatGPT
siril is that old???
do you ensure no contributors use ai?
Not really. And it wouldn't be such a big deal either. AI can be useful. Why is that?
there was a huge convo about ai
AI is a hot topic.
ya
My idea would be that as long as nobody is straight up vibe coding its fine to use AI as a tool under supervision
AI is great for debugging
Sure is
Or repetitive tasks that is
The line for me is simply where the AI has to build the program for you
AI is ideal for being a partner in pair programming, where you know what you're doing but want assistance https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pair_programming
NO O
oop
my bad
did not mean to be in this chat or reply to you
before and after with SyQon starless ... Why is it applying wavelet transformation??
with starnet
syquon starless denoises images for some reason
well "denoises"
it is dumb
i dont use antthing from them due to this
Same, it's annoying
:(
in squares too lol
True lol
Well yes. My honest feedback, is that for example, star removal itself is great, i just cant bring myself to use any of their stuff simply because it insists on performing things that then have nothing to do with the original purpose of the tool
Love me some Unix philosophy: make one tool to do one task well, and then compose them