#Orion Nebula (Phone AP)
113 messages · Page 1 of 1 (latest)
might be the BEST orion image ive ever seen taken on phone
im just confused why u included the integration time for you calibration frames, and not your lights!
so i was told to do a 5s exposure image but i didnt know the difference between lights, flats, and darks
so i was just like "yeah flats seems about right"
then someone told me i was supposed to do lights, so
ill reshoot with lights after i shoot andromeda tmr
its kinda crazy because i started doing this hobby on dec 25th with a hobby killer and built my way up to a celestron nexstar 6se
im extremely happy that hobby killer didnt ruin the experience for me
ill stop ranting now though, thanks a lot, it means a lot to be told that its one of the best you've seen with a phone
I thought darks and lights needed the same time?
yeah but how many subs? what total integration
usually u would write something like:
50*120s lights
calibrated with darks, flats, dark flats,
or something like that
because people dont really care what your calibration settings are
they are generally more interested in the total integration time (total time your sensor is open)
yeah thats all good, light is by far the MOST important one
because they are the actual target you are shooting
after lights, i would prioritise flats --> darks --> biases
flats are taken using an evenly lit display/light panel, such as a laptop. its important to use a diffuser (piece of paper will work) between your telescope and the light panel, or the pixels could cause diffraction artifacts, which will ruin your image. the importance of flats are to remove vignetting and dust
darks are taken with a lens cap on, using the same exposure time and ISO as your lights. what darks do is basically "cancel out" the noise imposed by your camera sensor, which can be especially high in longer exposures
if you ever see little bright coloured pixels spotted around your image, those are "hot pixels" or "dead pixels", and are basically singular pixels which dont work in your camera (at least not well)
what darks do is basically subtract them out, which improves your image
finally, you can take "bias frames" which are there to improve your flats.
Flats need bias to calibrate correctly. Darks just calibrate out fixed pattern noise, like hot pixels or amp glow. They actually increase noise.
when you take an image, your camera has something called an "offset value" which essentially raises the black level of your image with a pedestal of noise
the noise often favours some lines of your sensor, so by taking those they prevent your flats causing line artifacts to the lights
oh thanks, didnt know they increased noise. surely not by much though, and they reduce walking noise which id say is a win
also stuff like amp glow can be mitigated
Walking noise is the weirdest stuff. What everyone calls walking noise isn’t actually walking noise
isnt it just FPN that follows your frame with bad guiding/tracking, then looks trailed after your images align?
obviously not some noise that decided to take an evening walk
Everyone says it’s from not dithering, which isn’t entirely true. Dithering in one direction will make it significantly worse than not dithering at all
i mean dithering randomly will make it so the FPN doesn't follow a line, so its impossible to notice
Yeah
ofc if you dither in one direction, it kind of makes guiding useless
surely nobody dithers in one direction🤯
Not dithering at all but guiding is better than dithering in one axis
Lazy SWSA users and untracked people do
i dont dither with swsa 😭
(i dont have a guidestuff for it)
but if you do enough separate nights, then the changing nights will be a dithering effect
so your separate sets of walking noise will average out
(guys pls dont learn from me this is horrendous practice)
good morning, this got a lot of messages while i was asleep
shooting andromeda later tonight (if weather plays nice), will definitely share results afterwards
haha yes LMC correcting my knowledge of calibration frames
anyways read the top if you're interested, u should learn the different types of image frames
do you think you could sum it up? i dont wanna get lost in the back and forth banter and think one thing is better than the other when its not lol
ok
lights: your target images
flats: take with light panel, corrects for dust and vignetting (same aperture and iso as lights)
darks: taken with lens cap, same shutter speed and iso as lights, corrects for certain types of dynamic noise and FPN
bias: taken with lens cap, very short shutter speed, but same iso as flats, corrects the "bias signal" in your flats, so they minimse inducing noise into lights during division
is there any source i could use that says how many lights, flats, darks, and biases to take for certain objects
just google it
but basically
flats, biases, darks: take 20-30 each
lights: as many as possiblr
basically with lights, the more you take, the more of an image u can make
gotcha
yeah one downside of phone is having to upload all the images to google drive
theres also something called "integration time" which is basically the total amount of "shutter open" time your lights add up to
so lets say each light is 60 seconds, and you take 30
then your total integration time is 0.5h
oh so just all the time added up, gotcha
as a beginner, i would recommend aiming for at least 1-2 hours of integration time
except for targets like orion's core
because they are very bright
its easy to minimise the noise using less integration time
i did a similar image, only 8 minutes of integration time
so, andromeda is in the western sky, and its supposed to vanish beneath my house within like 2 hours so i wont have much time to image it, how much integration time do you think i should do for that
oh wow its really good!
haha thanks, its just demonstrating how the brighter it is, less integration time required
yeah gotcha
but theres almost no other target i would do such a short time on
i dont believe i can do more than like 15 second long exposures on one object since im using an alt-az
or else the photo will probably come out blurry due to the object moving slightly
ah ok yeah
thats an advantage in resolution, your images will be sharper
well i plan on shooting andromeda for like 40 mins then shooting orion again
hmm andromeda might need more than 40 minutes but see how it goes
i mean like 40 mins of lights
idk what exposure time is best for andromeda with an alt-az
but 400 10 sec exposures should give me about an hour of integration time with lights
yeah sounds good
im not sure haha, im a southerner
so not used to shooting andromeda
i tried once in china but meh
its not bad imo
its a little noisy tho
gotta clear my google drive since i have a 15 gb cap on it
this is my best andromeda
super excited to see what i can get
lemme recap
x400 10s exp lights
x30 10s exp darks
x30 10s exp flats
x30 10s exp biases
all at ISO 1600
for andromeda
what's the red
its the laser detect auto focus on my phone
theres no way to disable it so i have to cover it with tape
problem is i only have blue masking tape so it still leaks into the sensor a bit
ive reduced it the best i can, i really gotta get some electrical tape
reduced to this, best i could get it to
@coarse flame nice work, welcome to nerd
yooo thank you
WOO
