#Broadband M27
40 messages · Page 1 of 1 (latest)
not the Canon, read the description lmao
I really don’t like what you did with the stars
Way too many
It’s hard to see m27
Your stars also have weird shapes
All I just read was yapping about star count in a broadband image...
I need to keep it natural not deemphasize the amount of stars in there, keep it real you know.
Weird shapes, I know, there is soo much BlurX can fix, this image was taken with the old CC which didnt correct the edges, and it was extremely hard to focus with, amongst other issues in 2018..
Appreciate the input.
My lord most of you guys are so stuck up in this server it’s not even funny Lmfao!
I love reading it sometimes. Get a grip 
Fr. I've noticed in my short time here that there's a lot of trigger happy people that like to micromanage, which is worrying. Too many people that abuse the server emojis for petty things.
Aside from that, this image is pretty cool I think! The stars are a little overcrowding, yes, but I think it's unique and looks kinda neat! It goes to show the sheer amount of stars in our galaxy, I feel like a lot of nebula images can give the false sense of a very open nature of our galaxy, which of course I imagine is simply to make the nebula easier to see. But it's cool to have this perspective sometimes too!
Quite a few people in here for sure need a reality check. Trust me, we know. If some people put the same effort into helping instead they put the effort being an ass with a inflated ego.
And this goes for a lot of higher up people in here. People like to just talk shit to each other and act better.
Nerds, MEGA NERDS, mods, contest managers.
It's a shame, really. Space is supposed to bring people together, not pit them against each other.
I like how rich the starfield is, some of the cores may be a tad blown out but the general feel is neat. Detail on M27 is very nice. I see a lot of people reducing stars so much because they think they take away from the object... A rich starfield in broadband data can do so much for the image.
Lux and I have known each other for a long time. He knows what I am saying and what I mean by it
I've been sayin. got me laughin everytime
Bxt correct only really should help those alot, I've thrown it at my helios 55mm data and it does ridiculously good to it ,other than that, looks nice
It does correct for that when the stars are elongated, but stars that are not "usual" shapes dont work
it is an improvement but not as much as elongated stars usually are
pretty wild improvement imo
These are a few more it's done ,I had some more even more extreme ones but I don't have the ss of it
I like
Still did pretty well
yeah but clearly not enough if people are complaining about star shapes
@delicate mesa not as wild as this from someone in #🔭-astrophotography-chat message
Yea thats nuts 😂
Dayum
For anyone asking BlurX was used on this image AI4 on 50%
A lot of your photos have clipped stars 