#Target suggestions
1331 messages · Page 2 of 2 (latest)
M6 +3°
M7 -0.14°
56° north latitude
The Coathanger cluster or NGC 6633 and IC 4756 field
And of course you have the Haplha regions around Sadr, the North American Nebula, IC 1396 and the veil (altough they are a bit dim)
I was trying to look at the dumbell nebula with my celestron astromaster 130eq but I couldn’t find it anywhere. I kept aligning it to where the nebula is supposed to be but I couldn’t see anything. Any ideas why? (I know it’s not really a suggestion)
Also my telescope is powerful enough to see the nebula it’s just I couldn’t find it in the sky
Can't be in a city, use a wide eyepiece, starhop
having better skills by practicing
if you dont live in a city another way for you to be able to find it is for your eyes to adapt to the dark so you basically have to be in the darkest for atleast 10 minutes without looking at any bright lights except red lights
Wait so it it visible to the naked eye?
Wait is star hoping using the nearby stars to find something (for eg: using the 2 bottom stars at the bottom of lyra to find the ring nebula)
you need a scope to see it
i could see it through my skywatcher 150p
My telescope (celestron astromaster 130eq) can see the ring nebula
Will it be able to see the dumbbell nebula?
@ionic flint
U probs can but it would be blurry if ur in the city unless u stack it and stuff then it might look a bit better
Here’s my try at ring nebula btw
I don’t have tracking though 😬
How long r ur exposures rn @ionic flint
5-10 seconds
No don't try 30 seconds
Shoot 5 seconds subs in raw mode and then you can either stack the pictures yourself and process them if you know how or send it in #1021002743080558642 or #1021002578588352572 for someone else to do it and show the potential of your gear
Wait so people can just edit my stuff for free if i need help?
Mountain top, B2 in Vermont zero moon - Celestron 8SE Starizona 0.63% reducer + ASI533MC pro
Any cool ideas?
NGC 6823
Dumbbell
The Iris Nebula is dim but good too, as with the Fireworks Galaxy
Dumbbell was actually the first thing I ever photographed through that setup!
I'll check out the other ones you mentioned
I'm thinking of doing the eagle and getting the pillars too
Since the weather is showing only 2 clear hours I think imma just take the brightest and go with the eagle
Nevermind we have 4 hours now
I would advise against Eagle since you'll be far north and it stays low
Hey im looking for suggestions for a target to shoot, im in newcastle, australia so 32.9283° S, 151.7817° E. I wouldn't mind a larger target as im using a asi294mc, 560mm 80ed. really good geq mount
Bortle 3-4 skies btw.
U kinda just doxxed urself
Not totally but kinda
its like saying "I live in [Insert major city with over half a million people]"
in a country known for having a very bloated city size
True
its a bit over 100 square miles or 270 square km's depending on your pronounciation of aluminium
but thanks anyway
Its alr just that the south and east coordinate could help people pinpoint your location within the city
Ohhh alr i didnt check
Hi. I feel difficult to starhop to Helix Nebula. Help pls
You could try this maybe?
or this easier route, depending on your bortle
I think this route is easier. Thanks a lot for helping out.
What should I image with micro 4/3 camera with 40-150mm f4.5-5.6 lens under b8 sky
Lagoon -Trifid region
The coathanger region
I forgot to mention untracked
Try constellations at 40mm, like Corona Borealis, Cygnus, Lyra, not sure if you can do also the galactic core
At this point I'm convinced I live under the worst possible conditions for astro
Cloud cover is over 9000
You could be in B9
Or live next to the Las Vegas sphere
Literally a mini sun
But I live in the fastest developing Malaysian Cities and cloud cover is always like a blanket
I can't even see the moon
That's how bad it is
poarlis IFN
funny thing ive read that using a tracker for wide-ish field just add rotation
it seems the method is untracked
milky way
Through a telescope
I live in a b4, I reccommend Bode's galaxy
or the dumbbell nebula, or the whirlpool galaxy depending on your fl
114-1000??
Mhm
Nice
pinwheel untracked 10 mins
Bode's galaxy was 10 mins as well
and my dumbbell
so @scarlet rain I'd reccommend these fs
I need a new one but idk which
I cant get a custom setup
And its gotta be under £200
So it’s 114mm ap and 1000 fl?
I can get a custom but its gotta be under £200
Mhm
Great planetary scope tho dude
Why?
U do not wanna see
????
Can it not focus??
It might also be a brightness issue just turn the ISO down
Nah its just shit
Well, for untracked I'd say star clusters might be your best bet. Like M7, M6, M13, M15, M22, M3, M5, M4 etc.
How a about a 114/900 it's like the one you got but way better because it's not a bird Jones, it's pretty long tho
And about this I'd recommend some bright planetary nebula like ring or as the other guy said some clusters
turn down brightness
I have a high focal length scope with low aperture and am going to try saturn. Any small and bright targets i could do? (I did the alberio binary with it and found out that it can acttually capture stars with magnitude of 11.69). My equipment-
A 114\900 scope
Logitech C270 webcam (2MP)
Northern or south
Northern
I got 114/1000 canon 450d
Northern aswell
Planetary nebulas and globular clusters ig, though most objects apart from large nebulae and open clusters (like NA nebula or Pleiades) can fit comfortably inside 900mm fl
yall know what im gonna ask
but here are my limitations: the targets can only cover this part of the sky, it cant be a galaxy in ursa major and cant be a big nebula like say the north america nebula since i dont have a nb filter
Cave nebula
Why not do a neb w/o a narrowband. The neb will be harder to capture but whatever
What shoult i shoot with stock Canon eos 2000d and vintage 135mm f/2.8 and star tracker, northern hemisphere
Western veil
Thank you, how much exposure time should i get?
As much as u can
Okay
Your field should be wide enough to have the entire veil nebula in frame
I actually started out with the same exact scope you did, and it definitely isnt an issue with your telescope. I was able to get these images with it. Try stacking and lowering the exposure a lot, it makes a huge difference
I probably could've gotten even better but I upgraded from that one
Yh i aint been stacking or anything and ive been taking photos not videos
What should I image with a unmod Canon 550d, tamron 70-300lens and tracking device?
(Bortle 5-6)
56° north latitude
At waht should I look (galaxys or nebulas only) skywatcher 200/1200 bortle 5 and 43* north latitude
Ring nebula, dumbbell neb, bodes and cigar galaxy, also try out andromeda. M13 is pretty cool, and the double cluster in cassiopea
How did i forget the little dumbbell
All tryed unless borș and cigar
What should I shoot, 135mm of fl, septembre target (no filters needed)
Can anyone help me in starhopping to M16 and M17? I am using a 7*50 binoculars with a FOV of 7°
I also have binoculars with such a field of view, I pointed at them like that
It has a built in barlow/"corrector"
Oh nah that's worse than my 114/450 with no barlow
Anyone know any good galaxies maybe around the size of m51 whirlpool galaxy or larger?
M101, M31, M33, M81, C5 (if you want a challenge), C3, C7
Anyone know anyone knows some good galaxys that i can watch it from an 200/1200
cigar
c7
What should i image with 130PDS and ASI224MC? I have guiding so long exposure time is not the problem
M101, M31, M33, M81, C5 (if you want a challenge), C3, C7
Also i much prefer Nebulae than galaxies
M27, M57, M16, IC 1848, Melotte 15, NGC 281, NGC 7635, IC 1318
https://astronomy.tools/page/star_chart/
And any decent program can do you suggestions
Thx
Any suggestions for starting out with a seestar s50?
M31 m33 m27 m57 planets
planets with a seestar?
Yeah right?
Small aperture, not necessarily gonna get much out of it
Oh alr
Ok ty
Veil nebula, the Pleiades, Orion if you stay up late
I'd stay away from m57
What should I image with a powershitter 76Az or A mirror camera (Sony A3000- 18-55mm)
Alright
India
Alrightt
135mm untracked 26 lat no m42/31 bortle 7ish to 8 maybe
Rho Ophiuchi
How
idk
Are you good at processing?
not good but good enough that i can tell that there's nothing in this image
What does the autostretch look like
1min
btw this is stretched
Hmm
Same question
How many shots did u take? And exposure time?
lemme go check
sorry i took long
not less than 35min
AND HOW MANY SHOTS?
abt 1400-1800 with ofc not all the images are perfect i didnt stack them all
ah
can u tell me more about the settings
F2 ISO 1600 and 1.6sec
What should i shoot with 130PDS and asi224mc. I have guiding so i can do longer exposures and it must be nebula
shoot the dumbbell
Already did
800MM with 2600MM
any narrowband target?
already did elephant
veil back in july
Iris nebula is my favorite reflection nebula
Already imaged but imma do a reprocess later
Here, ya like it?
The only problem is that discord compressed it
here is my process of his data
I like the first one cause I like the super bright star illuminating the dust
samyang 135, nikon z50 crop sensor, tracking mount, nov start target, bortle 4 to 5
not modified btw
8se .63 reducer corrector ASI533mcpro in New Jersey, USA
Any deep sky recommendations? My FOV is almost exactly the size of a full moon.
Anyone know any good nebula in the sky right now northern hemisphere with lots of color variation? Anything like horsehead, or m42 specifically.
Pac-Man nebula is pretty good
If you get the blue parts
Oh and also the dumbbell nebula
helix i guess
California nebula
its got some nice blue-orange varitation
any very bright objects smaller than 0.4 degrees?
that would look decent with low int time
cats eye
ring nebula
dumbbell nebula
Ngc40
that's not bright rah
I would do ring or dumbbell but both are not visible from where I put my scope😿
It is tho, i see it with the eyepiece no problem
what
Yeah
what bortle
how do you see a mag 10 object in the eyepiece??
I can't even see m51
B4-5
im b7
Its litelary the the brightest distant galaxy visible
Makes sense
And its nothing more than a very faint blob in my scope
Zero detail just a small patch that you can barely tell is brighter than the rest of the sky
In my 130pds i see the galaxies coliding and a bit of the arms
Dang
M81 is brighter
at least from my experience
nuh uh
Well if you count a blob then yes
M51 has brighter detail hut m81 is brighter as a oval
any suggestions for a canon t4i with a rokinon 135m f2 and a star adventurer 2i
Bortle6-7
Veil supernova remnant
m81?
or is that not distant
It is distant
alright kids i need a target for my first tracked object
between 100-250mm w/ dslr unmodded APS-C
Carina
Lmc
Wait no smc
Dandadan is peak🔥🔥
Tru...
I added custom horison to nina and im trying to figure out how to read it now, that's a path of M45. what are the coloured rectangles? blue-white-gray-white-blue they don't align with sunset or sunrise. with the moon either what are they?
bru what kind of path is that
I don't understand, it comes up and comes down like anything on the sky
Bottle 6-7 with 135mm lens. What should I shoot?
Already completed targets are andromeda and NGC7000
wide field of orions belt? a lot of stuff going on there
b7 0.4deg fov, any bright targets that are good early in the night?
Idk, could you fit the veil nebula in ur fov?
Hell nah
Most galaxies are pretty small
I'd mostly look in NGC 4077 that single spot in the sky will fulfill your galaxy needs for years, tho I don't think you can see it during the winter
id like to image the IFN around pollaris but it's gonna be my first time taking on such faint targets, im in B7 can i get it or do i have to drive out, best i can do without driving 8h is B4 so that's always a possibility but id rather stay home
What should i image during full moon with 130PDS, eqm35, asi224mc and a guiding rig?
The full moon
Or M1
b7 26mm, I'd prefer smth that rises earlier than orion but I don't think there is anything, is there?
andromeda
?
for 26mm you could also add in the Cassiopeia side of the Milky Way
do you live far south or smth? Andromeda sets at 4:30am for me
no
it's just that west is obstructed for me
i see
how do i check if I can capture a target of given surface brightness from my skies? what i mean is how to compare the Bortle scale to surface brightnes/magnitude to see if the thing im trying to catch is even visible
Maybe compare with other things you or others have imaged, calculate average magnitude per unit of arc^2 using apparent magnitude and apparent angular size
or maybe thats not how apparent magnitude works im not too sure
i see the chat is dead but i need help
(my rig is in my name)
my fov is about 1.5deg
im gonna have a lot of clear next week and im gonna shoot the IC 405 but it goes behind the horisont on midnight so i have half of the night for something else but only thing i have left to shoot is around this area, i can't find any cool target in there i'd love a galaxy but there isn't any piticullary big there so i have to take something else
Maybe bodes galaxy & cigar galaxy
I did get 8h on them last time but it's just a bit to small to get any decent detail in there
M101, C3, C7, C12
Personally think C12 would look the nicest, large head-on spiral with an open cluster right next to it
also not a galaxy, but there's also Iris neb
They are all really small, below 25' across I'm looking for somethin in the range 50' and larger
(I didn't check the iris)
Iris is 18'
I always face this issue at this time, I have a lot of trees around and I can't really go anywhere else so I just have this slit of sky visible to me
k I just checked and Markarian's chain is inside that circle you've given above
I think that's basically your only option; the only other large DSO I can think of in that region is the Coma star cluster which on top of being far too large to fit in 1.5 degree fov, is an open cluster - real interesting /s
maybe i can do like a mosaic with all those nights, 4h per panel is that enough at f5?

