could someone run this image through his Pixinsight. The couod and kit lens is not the best combination for good stars but I'm positive that NoiseX or StarX can do smth.
here is the file: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1ABMDIQWRIMig2QLAnrMVxvPtdyDtal_t/view?usp=sharing (it has no color correction or backgroundextraction yet, just the raw stack)
#help with stars
1 messages · Page 1 of 1 (latest)
hey @worn holly i don't mean to annoy you and I hope I don't but ik you managed to really help my image in the past. The stars are basically the same as in the orion image. They my lens gets pinched optics in the cold and combined with CA it gets really bad. It would mean the world for me if you could run it through StarX and maybe NoiseX :D
Hi sure I’ll run it through for you in a bit
I think I still have access to the starX trial lol
that would be lovely
did it work?
sorry i haven't done it yet, planning on doing a bit of processing later so i'll run it through then if that's okay
sure no problem. I did not mean to pressure you
hey, I'll be offline in about an hour. It would be very cool if you could starx until than :D
I’ll do it now
yaaay
starX hasn't worked great unfortunately, due to the aberrations i think. noiseX worked really well though as far as i can tell, will send the links to the starless version and your stars in a second
i'll run through a full process of it to see if blurX can do anything to help
thank you so much
alr
I mean if you ignore the stars than the Data is not bad I think
yeah it's pretty good looking at it
thank you
lots of small galaxies in there so maybe a starless image would work best
there are a lot but Starnet thought some were stars
what lens are you using btw?
yeah it sometimes does that, might see if there's a way to tweak the settings
Sometimes Starnet and StarX perform differently so i might run both to see which preserves the galaxies the best
thanks for your work !
@worn holly I think starnet did not work
OR should I erase does away? there some in the galaxy too
you see?
did you alr do back extraction?
no just noise reduction and starX. the issue there is the coma from your lens, i'm not sure if there's any work around
since starX and starnet will be trained on round stars they sometimes will struggle with coma and star trails
i'm having a proper go at processing it now. unfortunately there is some issues with the coma that BlurX can't correct fully but it seems to have reduced it a bit - will see if starX works this time
my starnet removed the stars in the galaxy
oke!
it does not like background xD
i'm having similar issues lol, hoping to correct them
banding and removing green noise helped a bit
those are the same files
No problem 
so it's the stars one you need right?
Google Docs
were you getting dew?
alright good news starX has done a better job the second time around lol
a bit bit as soom as I did I stopped imaging for a bit
lets go
if any of the data was shot through the dew that might be causing some background issues. it doens't look too bad though
But I get pinched optics in the cold
are you using the lens on the fastest setting?
thats why I think a dew heater could help
it was stopped down to f/6.3
ah yeah if it's cold it's good to have them on, stops frost and stuff too
and what's the fastest it goes?
it was not. I don't have one 
f/5.2
hmm it might be worth stopping down a bit further but you've already gone quite far there
maybe try f8
As I said I should stop down more
that's what i got
and unlike last time i have saved the tif so i'll share that with you in a second
that looks awesome thank you so much again. I'll share my process once I'm finished
thanks for sharing the data!
@worn holly I think it turned out pretty good 
looks good! you've brought out some really nice detail in the galaxy there