#Astrophotography Fails
1746 messages ยท Page 2 of 2 (latest)
After imaging, I decided to do some solar. I had the filter on, everything was okay except, I left the guidescope cap on, with the guidecam slowly cooking at prime focus
๐ฅ
It looks fine now but Idk
You can grow
that 3d printed?
Just lost 4hrs of data cus my intervalometer wasn't plugged in right. Only got one pic

Am I the only one who checks the subs here and there?
Nice idea. I fell asleep tho since I had school the next day
Iโm always concerned something is going to go wrong 
This is the third time something has happened lol. The first time, sprinklers went on,second time, my intervalometer died, and today
Need to det an alarm at 1am so I can check lol
I recently just skipped an alarm when I was in a bortle 3 and lost half the night
All I wanted was to take a nap before Orion rose ๐
SAME
When I hear of people doing fails like this, im like "wtf how"
like
I am watching the data come out of my rig in real time, if theres a problem I will know
how the hell do you forget to focus 
That is honestly a mistake beyond what I will ever do
Hopefullu
yes
Well, what I did is see a point of light thinking it was a star when it was really just bright noise.
I'm currently imaging while inside my house... i'm afraid i'll get back to the last 10 subs being unusable 
noo
those stars
Oof
Help Autostakkert had a stronk
๐
what gear did you use
So much Dew+bad transparency+full moon+bortle 5 light pollution
Idk how this much got all over my computer
yea get some sort of plastic bin then make cutouts for usb/power cables
In the making of this photo, I accidentally left the guidescope and guidecam exposed to the Sun unfiltered for about 5 minutes
๐ฅ
Would make a good meal now
Does it function?
Yes
was the guide cam focused then
idk if it matter if it is focused or not
NEQ6, SVBONY 102ED, old Canon 1100D
That looks like it was captured in 1905 ๐๐๐
I remember this
what cause it was a motion light in the backyard went off multiple times i need to remember to turn it off
i am trying to see if i can make it look any better in post\
I gotta redo all of my data
๐
Take flats please!!!
I shouldve those are when they tried to fix the bad reflection and gave up i may have fixed my problem tho
Ok
Bro i burned my phone screen
How idiotic i am
I pointed my scope at the sun and for some reason i put my phone screen on the focuser, and there is now like a golden shit flake full of dead pixels on my screen
No
Do not ever do that again.
Trust me i wont
The new screen costs 80โฌ
Dman
Damn
DURRR
natural selection at this point
Yuh
Wtf
Why
Idk, smooth brain moment
WHY WOULD YOU POINT IT AT THE SUN
I SAID ITS A SMOOTH BRAIN MOMENT (brain.exe stopped responding)
No, you were doing something
that was intentional
I wasnt thinking when i did it
either you got possessed by a ghost or that was intentional
i think what you wanted to do
was photograph the sun
and you thought
if you take the eyepiece out
maybe the phone camera is ok
you were wrong..
Uhhh
Actually curiosity took over me
And i pointed the screen at the sun, thats why there is a golden flake on the screen (burned pixels)
omfg
buffoon
matija was right our generation is doomed
Orion XT12
it is over 6 feet tall and magnifies up to 720x
@thorny niche you're not that guy
Im his brotha
Nahhh its just that im very curious
no, seriously you're not that guy
well stop being curious
the sun is not a toy to be played with
Wouldnt that kill my imagination and creativity
good
For me it is
if it means you wont play with the sun its a sacrifice that must be made
ur gonna end up losing an eye or causing more damage to other things
if you don't stop now, it will literally be burned into your head that you shouldnt play with the sun
I know, a few times i forgot to put on my solar filter and i burned my eye
Hey, I pointed my guidecam at the sun unfiltered for 5min and am also dumb, you're not alone in that sense
oh my gosh
And? Is the guidecam alive
||what about M40||
Well, yes
Good
I dont understand
How are your eyes alive bro
Idk i got burned twice at my left eye and i got shot by airsoft in the right eye, idk but my vision is damned
I used to stare at the Sun unfiltered, but not through a telescope 
Yeah my eyes hurt
that's wild lol
thou truth
mhm mhm
Avrg protostar shenanigans
Science experiment on what a burnt camera sensor or eye smells like
the diss is crazy
If your eyes are on the sun bru I'm on you idc
Better than my first by quite a bit
The noise has turned into literal sound waves
True but i missed focus, alignment and i forgot to clean the sensor
Taken worse.
When the coma is bad enough on 1/3rd of your frame that StarXterminator doesn't recognize anything over there as a star 
At least you can see stuff in it. Better Orion and horse head than I've ever gotten, and you actually got Barnards loop, the witch head, the boogie man......
interesting.... that shouldnt happen
tried starnett?
I haven't yet, just decided to start shooting on that lens at f/4 instead of f/1.8. Just got back from my dark site now and we'll see how much difference there is in the data.
I haven't had nearly as much luck with starnet as I have with StarX. Too many artifacts left over (even with starnet ++ V2). Worth a shot though to see if I can fix future problems.
By the way, I believe thatโs astigmatism and not coma
Camera shifted at a wrong angle, stars are looking weird
Looks like when binoculars are out of focus lol
Could it be? Idk but i know that the camera shifted, also its hard to find perfect focus, i forgot how focused stars look like with refractors
Idk could just be movement
Idk probably
My best is about the same as this but with glare from dew. Hand tracked 200P lol
failed orion nebula at bortle 8 skies with 50mm lens 
Looks like a peen
yep
looks kinda cool tho
Dew make an entrance ?
Tre
Tre
Tre
Tre
Tre
Tre
Tre
Tre
Tre
Tre
The sun burns in space cuz thereโs no air up there 
Guys help, my C8 shrunk
It's just a lil guy
Little telescope are not always bad
one pannel is completly weird and clouds came so I could not finish
Ya I tried taking a long video of the whole moon yesterday, but always kept one area in the fov to make sure there was something to align to. It did not work. Autostakkert just has a stronk sometimes I think it's just something to just accept
autostakkert in shambles
nice
nice
Nice
Nice
nice
This is the way
Nice
Nice
Nice
Dither or die....
Peak Performance
Look at my HDR moon
This deserves APOD ๐ฅณ

honestly, would not be suprised if it got apod
"extreme processing to show the extreme faint halo around the moon"
amazing, you got the lunar sodium tail
8in newt gang !!!
Nice
yayy 8" newt gang!
But it's a dob of course
I shall not be stopped!!!
Master@old dragon ,show me rhe screenshot way!
I have a dob but I put tube rings on it
the word CRlNGE is blocked
unpoggeth
BRo crlnge is blocked ๐
ืื
A dob is just a Newt held differently.
Indeed, was clarifying I don't use it for imaging.
Hes just standing there MENACINGLY
76mm f/4, parabolic mirror... I wonder if you can reach prime focus? ๐ค
I think I need a new telescope now
Iโm stuck with one of them โbeginnerโ refractors you get at Walmart
Me here stuck with one of those pos telescopes as well.
Where can this be ordered?
Itโs called a SkyWatcher Infinity 76P
I saw it in a catalogue once. My brain wants this to be unexpectedly good just cause it would be funny
From what I can gather, itโs actually ok but itโs hard to collimate because of the plastic. The Heritage 76 has the same optics but also collimation screws.
I had a very similar artefact due to a fleck of something causing a spike on one of the baffles in my refractor. Careful removal with a small moistened paintbrush 0n a very long handle cured the issue. ๐
calibration frames pls
Oof
GOOD LORD WHAT THE HELL HAPPENED
Context dude not my image

I started imaging orion thinking that im saving it in fits format but i imaged it in a SER format
Uhhh how do i stack ser files in dss
But this is what i managed to get from those 10 mins in fits format
Idk if it work but you can load the ser files in PIPP and just turn if all the processes and let it save the images as tiffโs
Yeah i could do that
Why shoot in ser tho?
I think that the name of this forum gives you context, i was filming jupiter and i forgot to change the format
Ah, Ye
I just film in raw and let Pipp fox everything cuz Iโm untracked
And Pipp converts it to set for me
frost it was cold and humid
bruuuuuh
is that fungus?
nope frost it disappeared when i brought it inside
ice on a light pollution filter yes very thin
This is what happens when AstroShader gets confused and has a stroke, not really sure how it happens but it's kinda funny

an abysmal shot of the Flame Nebula, but a cool (I guess?) demonstration of what happens when technology doesn't know what to do anymore.
need flats but the heck going on
here's one of mine from a while ago. forgot to turn off the stabilizer on my dslr, and got this in almost all of my images
Man I have no idea
This entire dataset was out of focus. BlurX tried to patch it and barely worked.
still looks cool 
I'd see that as a win in my books, but this is coming from someone with almost no DS capabilities or experience lol
Nope the flat failed to remove the dust
THATS WILD LMAOAO
looks like a portal
One of my first work of art,
"Ignoring the effects of shooting under lp"
it's been a year and a half since i got my first newt and a year since i started playing arround astrophotography and just yesterday i've finally understood how to collimate 
tutorials suck
mount hit eqmod limit faster than it performet an auto meridian flip
2 hour session all in jpegs
and you paid the price for shooting in jpg
it's also a bit out of focus
No thatโs the Astro modification with a cheap lens. The lens wasnโt made to focus IR light
i see
why you dont stack tif files on each other
when you stack all the sub frames together
I've stacked TIFFs upon themselves before, isn't the worst thing. I think with DSLRs it's a lot worse though
Trouble is that the tiff file format is so general it could mean anything. Could be 8-bit colour, could be 16. The only thing is that itโs (probably) not lossy compressed, so certainly better than jpeg.
Main thing is stacking artefacts. You get a lot more of those
Looks like the pixel format is wrong or something. Itโs not necessarily tiff, just that tiff may not contain all the metadata a stacking program needs.
There wasn't any snow on the forecast
Looks like windblast
That just hurts
brought the telescope with camera attached inside to dry it, still hoping to make some flats ๐
That mirror gonna need cleaning
id say 9/10 times when someone asks how to clean a mirror it doesn't need cleaning and i bet that right now it is not that time
Oh crap. My frosted over OTA that didn't have anything on the optics is nothing compared to this.
I 1000% recommend getting a 15 dollar tarp. Never go off of weather apps, check radars and cloud satellite data. In unpredictable weather that's going right now, if it turns cloudy unexpectedly throw a tarp on and wait. It's better to lose one night to be safe rather than months worth trying to get it repaired
i was sleeping ๐
I mean check all of that before going to sleep. I stay up until 2 am sometimes, but most times I just check 12 hr and 24 hr radars
And like some people were saying, might have been a windblast knocking off some of the snow off of trees. Wind speeds would also be something to check during snow. These types of things happen to everyone eventually. I've been rained on before
What is dithering though?
i dont think dithering will fix the streaks a thin cloud i could not see passed in front of it
No that's walking noise. A high cloud would just make the signal weaker. Definitely drizzle
use drizzle? I did that i got the same results
Dither I mean my bad
Drove 7h to a Bortle 1.5 site and found my battery was discharged and sitting at 11.8V...
๐ญ
man I feel depressed now, I come here and people's fails are better than my best pictures 
yeah, I learned that I'm broke
bro dont leak the milky way collision
Dawg
I'm sorry but what has your computer been smoking to think this is right.
I'm gonna need you to hand it over
On what pot is your pc?
it got uncollimated some how
dont stick a heavy dslr on a small scope with a fork mount its so hard to aim and focus too
Ok unironically this is really awesome looking
old pic this is my worst one
lol it looks like a picture in negative ๐
Failed flats for Pons-Brooks 
I tried to comet stack it, but didn't add the comet in the best (reference) frame and thus DSS didn't comet stack.
Around 1.5 hour of exposure
Pretty sure it is because I didnโt take flats as I am beginner but i am not sure
Background extraction in Siril made the galaxy good but the background got destroyed
These look like reflections. Did you have a bright lightsource near your set-up?
It has to do also to where you were pointing. In this photo there appears to be an arc slightly brighter than the rest of the background.
diamond-plated stars
Also, if you have a lens hood or a dew shield use it to reduce stray light.
How in the hell does this even happen
who wants to process this 
Uhmmm, me i wanna
But tell me what object is that
Imma try and process it in siril and lightroom
Let me know what you get
Thx, i will after i will process it after school
how did it go?
went to a dark sky site, forgot tripod and shot in jpeg, balls
Yeah about that i couldn't process it yesterday beacuse I had to study.
oh jeez
Ouch.
my awesome horsehead
Seems alright
can someon help me edit?\
do a bp shift??
gradient removal, shift bp, deepsnr and starnet
on another episode of "bobjones is a moron" i found the raw's, i took raw's. i didnt scroll enough ๐
so now i only forgot the tripod
i dont have pixinsight lol
You can do most of those things on siril
Siril is free 
what are they called in siril, bc i am clueless at it
starnet is starnet lol
You gotta install it separately I think I don't use siril so idk
Gradient is just back around extraction
You gotta look up how to use it
This tutorial aims to showcase use of the new Starnet++ integration available since Siril 1.2.0. This tool meets the needs of users to be able to manipulate images from Starnet++ with Siril, including Pixel Math, the Star Recombination Tool and the Synthetic Star Tools.
New Siril Integration Starnet++ Process When to Remove Stars Starnet++ User ...
Starnet non++ is old news
my bad lol
Its 2 am so can't walk you through it
Back in 2020 I tried to get a view of Centaurus A and Omega Centauri that were lying low in the southern horizon.
I mounted the camera with a telephoto lens on a dovetail. This resulted in the lens hood being pressured against the dovetail and throwing right out of collimation ( I removed the hood after that).
A second fail is the donut which I have no idea why it is there. I have used the same camera-lens combination and it isn't there.
could you try and edit it?
I just woke up...
dang
is this better
I mean it looks kinda cool?
yes just missing a subject bg looks cool
also I have chrome logo stars on the next one
its hogging your ram
also this
Experience orbs frfr
yea just got my mob ginder set up
we gonna beat the enderdragon with this one๐ฏ
another good fail - forgot to turn off the superpixels in dss lol
oh my
perfect moonless night in a dark B3 site, got git with aurora borealis or some extreme skyglow 
started ~23:30 then ended about 4:20
tried to stack a few images with clouds in them, just to see comet pons brooks, and this is what siril gave me:
still kinda cool, but i dont even know how it got that
I also tried pons brooks, have no idea if I even got it. Clouds all over the place that night couldn't make up their minds as to what direction to move
hopefully you got it!
never posted this image here. star reflection caused big issues with dark site data lmao
i saw it in the subs but barely, but i assumed it was laptop and closed that almost fully. then walked away to have fun with night vision.
this would be some good msgr data for larger scope users if not for that crap lmao
Oh my
it almost looks kinda cool actually, apart from the fact that it's not supposed to be there at all
Bruhh the amp glow on this is crazy
flats should help ๐
Yeah i did that and it fixed itself
noice
nice horsehead!
try the crab nebula
with this magnification should look pretty nice
rejoining
M1 crab is like a galaxy 
They say that M1 is an easy galaxy to look at, like bruh i cant even see it when its clearly pointed towards it
Run starnet++ on Markarian's Chain. It didn't go very well...
M84, afuera! NGC 4473, afuera! NGC 4440, afuera!
Oh my
has a vibe
Reminds me of those radially blurred images that are really funny for absolutely no reason

Where did you stack
Siril
^ That was me calibrating my EQ platform against the dining room ceiling, stacked in Siril 
Bro use DSS
DeepSkyStacker
If you dont know how to use it there is plenty of tutorials on youtube
DSS is a straight forward as it gets
ok
Imo this isnโt a fail, everyone starts somewhere
Yeah beacuse DeepSkyStacker alignes all of the stars so its basicly a normal image without the spinning going on
check general plz. Thx
Aight
I think i got rid of the data a long time ago
before midnight maybe
Yeah but the date like today or tomorow?
today
my first mw๐คฉ

๐ฅ๐ฅบ๐ฅฐ๐ฑ
๐
Thats
worth
hof
complete fail of trying to reprocess my 12p/pons-brooks data.
i mean its not a "astrophotography" fail. more like processing fail
I think your sides are a little clipped in the wrong direction
I even caught the elusive vertical dust lanes
DAMN
Iโve had that happen too
Failed flats on comet Pons-Brooks.
Because it was a bit windy, I removed while photographing the lens hood to reduce motion blur.
So I decided to take the flats without the hood too, but, as you see that failed.
I used the flats with the lens hood on and the end result is much better.
Stretched to show better the background gradients.
mmm noisy
kwispy
I can smell the noise aromas
A week ago i travelled to a b3 sky abt 4hrs away with my cam and star tracker. When I got there, i set up everything but then aligned my tracker to the south for some reason. Then I took some images and saw that there was trailing. So, i thought my tracker was broken and decided to do untracked instead. it wasn't until I started stacking that I realised I wasn't supposed to align it to the south... ๐ญ Image is half decent tho for 1hr data with unmodded camera
Tracking in the opposite direction, now the 1000 rule lmao
Its not that bad tho, you can see the bernards loop and the dark loop around bettlegeuse
Faint signals of the witch head nebula
Advantages of a b3 sky ig
I need to figure out these stars, I think my collimation is off Iโll find out next clear sky
It may not look as bad as it is because of discord compression
Starnet++ decided to emulate its inner Miro
Oh
If I use a less extreme curve it looks like a new age painting. I think there is commercial potential in this one. 
Cirrus and internal reflections are the main driving forces behind this image.
My fail at pons brooks
Single sub of the Stair Clusterโจ
who wants some dorito stars 
yummy
I dont like doritos
finally processed some really bad old data i had, and turns out i somehow managed to frame orion and the rosette nebula really poorly
New Doritos flavor just dropped, Hydrogen & Nuclear Fusion
No not true Doritos. mine are better
zoom into the stars
Just did a histogram stretch to show circular banding ๐ฆ
is it bad flats?
i mean i have to hold a flashlight up to a white shirt so it is probs brighter in centre
nice doritios
Pretty sure bad Flats cant cause that, did you take darks and biases?
Mooned
If anyone is wondering how looks something shot through a wire fence look no further. The fence creates some fat diffraction spikes (the thinner are from the secondary spider).
What is this target called again?
M83, the Southern Pinwheel Galaxy
I have a nikon D5600 and I wanted a cannon 75mm-300mm lens. I thought I could put a shitty adaptor on the camera body and mount the lens on it. Turns out there is something known as flange distance and the lens and the camera are not compatible. So the adaptor needed to have a lens in it. the lens was shitty and it did this to my stars.
Focal flange distance = backfocus btw
ok thx
@quiet walrus had that issue
For the imaging was used an Olympus E-PL5 with SD cart for storage
Stacked in DSS
The star in the upper left part of the galaxy is actually a supernova, SN 2024ggi
did you dither?
I used an SW SA 2i, in which I do a manual dither every 20 minutes
doesn't look like walking noise but in ap everything is possible
ok then
I restacked the 113 best of them and the lines aren't present.
yea
good
Oh ywah
e
i am such an idiot
so i thought i was photographing the leo triplet and were framed up well
and then when i stacked it, i see this
HAMBURGER IS ON THE TOP RIGHT
I DIDNT FRAME IT RIGHT
REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE
guess where the leo triplet is
Turns out that if you use a wide-angle lens you can capture multiple streetlights at once
man i just stole your idea whoops
MIOA
GradientHDRComposition didnt work all that well
i heard yall like bad flats
thats what gradient correction is giving
graxpert it worse
you were probably using the hyperdrive when you were capturing this image (image looks good still)
lol
Same for me
i recorded in jpg not raw until the end of the session so only ended up getting 10x30s subs lol
















6200mm

It pooped a 6200

@icy onyx
Ohhhhh god that gives me so much anxiety just looking at it
so thats where camera's come from? i thought storks deliver them to front doors
Why did it do that ๐ญ
I'm so confused why did the camera spasm off the scope?
After watching that poor OTA drop the camera/filter setup a dozen times, I've arrived at the thought that the tripod leg got in the way.
pleiades untrack fail cuz I let it shift way too much each frame
I think it did
ALWAYS SET YOUR MOUNT LIMITS
A friendly reminder so this doesn't happen again ๐
Don't just blindly assume it won't crash
Cause that's how it will crash
Lol
DSS stacks based on the frame with the highest score. It turned out that was the first shot, a test shot to check the framing
How do you set your mount limit?
I do it within Nina
I'm driving right now and can't text if you want me to explain hop in vc

My asiair thinking that upside down is home even when I manually correct it ๐คฉ

Uhhhh not true
I've been using it fully automated
for me I mean
Still not sure what went wrong


Took 120 odd MW pictures yesterday morning, and thanks to the field curvature of my kit lens only 25 were correctly aligned together

Oh dear
Was that untracked?
Tracked
Dother
I know whats wrong with it
It aint got no gas in it
you can dither with out guy ding
If is was tracked why are the pixels moving? Would they not remain stationary relative to the target?
I think its called walking noise
I know but why didnt he
tried to shoot m27 at 250mm last night and only managed to collect 8 minutes of exposure. this is after denoising and gradient removal. i think this is my worst image yet xD
i'd use the data from last night when i try again tonight, but since i was wildly off target i cant do anything with it lmao
i might actually just go for doing it at 135mm, might get better results that way
definitely wont have as much detail in the nebula, but that wont really matter if i cant manage to get it in the image at 250mm lmao
this your first tracked image?
how did you not dither then
that it is lol
these pixels are hortter than my laptop while running wbpp
Veil nebula
May get salvaged a bit with better flats and starnet++ (star reduction)
and blurx
Guys I somehow missed one of the brightest objects in the sky right now, have to redo it nowโฆ
I lucky only got 1 hour of data before I realized and I have 2-3 more clear nights so I should be good
Oops
Manual dither fail
Literally same thing I did
This is hell
NGC 6823 - unmodified camera, faint target, quite some wind. What could have gone wrong....
barnards loop wuth unmodded is nice\
Heavy dither fail
What nebula is this?
What is the cause of this? Is it because you forgot to dither? I've had a similar looking photo before couldn't figure out why
I forgot to dither
I had been looking for the comet for several nights now and last night I saw it for the first time, even naked eye. I took several hundred photos of it and right before the comet set my memory card got full, so I absentmindedly formatted the card, erasing all the photos. ๐ญ
Nooo! 
Dither and flat fail
Can I remove these lines? I haven't used darks on the data yet would that fix it?
How do I get rid of it or is it possible
you dither while imaging
It's not tracked I can't exactly dither
you dont need to be tracked to dihter
you just need to make slight movements manually with your tripod
the field was moving all over the place lol. just chose two random images.
Dont ask
Yes.
what
NINA is free๐
Untracked
atleast your donuts look good lmao
How often do you reccomend dithering?
i know you aint asking me but i personally dither every 3 frames
I tried dithering every 10 or so subs and i still got walking noise
Every 20-30.
I get ~300 subs a night
oh
ik how to do tracked dithering, but what about old dslr sensor dithering
is untracked dithering just lightly knocking on the scope? 
Yes
i just slightly move my rig to the sides or up and down
look this was dithered every 10 subs. NOT A FAIL
so i should dither every 5 subs?
on my main i can dither every 15 subs and not get walking noise
well i take way longer exposures
ah, alr
15 subs for me is 1/5 of the night
mine too but my lazy ahh doesnt want to get out and set the scope up at the start of the night
i usually wait 3 hours lol
worst mistake you can make :(
all i gotta do is align the dome and open the shutter 
yeah you got a dome so for me its a lil harder
you dont have to pa as requently, your scope is already there setup etc.
yea
Just throwing out valuable imaging time :(
ya but i wake up at like 2 pm because of the winter break 
i want to spend some doing smth on my pc
at home
winter break is over ๐
not for me haha
atleast for me
it ends in 2 days ๐ญ
bru
man i hate school
20th?? its made in the 19th
Try 18th century system with 17th century tech.

Pleiades with a 50mm lens
Clouds literally came 5 mins after i started imaging
also out of focus
Starnet
Starnets done its job properly, you've just got a bad lens
are you using the ef 75-300 lens?
Tamron 70-300
not me last night trying to image and for 10-15 minutes baffled as to why my images all have massive vertical trails only to find out i hadn't secured my mount properly after aligning and then bumped it knocking the polar alignment out by like 2 / 3 degrees out
This is an a stacked output from DSS, I swear I put orion nebula images in there.
I think I managed to change the reference frame and then stack without recomputing the offsets....
Lovely lens
Not sure if I posted this before, but this is (supposedly) the carina region, from b9
