#Single Sub Challenge
1 messages · Page 2 of 1
A simple screenshot from Nina tn - 300s Ha sub of IC 1805
i cant do 5minute broadband subs
might be at like f8
Weird
Maybe cuz u shoot open at f2.8? Idk
300sec sub of the cone nebula and the christmas tree cluster
180s exposure on cone from almost exactly 1yr ago i think with the 585
Woah
Thanks for the object idea
WTF HOWW?!?! WHAT BORTLE?? DAMN
I'm curious about what may have caused this intersection:
Satellite overlapping
Probably 3 or 2
Interesting how the trail splits and doesn't fully intersect.
Holy
That is wierd
Really big muon crossing over the satellite path maybe? Or possibly a fainter satellite crossing the path and fading out
Don’t think it’ll be a muon as that is large
Mewon
looks like a satellite trail
Dude it’s ass wdym
Definitely not ass compared to some MW images I've seen
On par with most single subs from phones
Dam those skies actually look fairly dark
they were
sadly they are a continental united states south so Im probably not coming back lol
No
300 sec on flaming star nebula
woah
60s sub. Obviously processed and heavily denoised but still pretty good performance from the 650D
Same sub. Unprocessed
what bortle and scope? I have a 600d and can only get that kind of result from a 3 minute exposure at f2.8
Bortle 5, But my dslr is full spectrum modified And it was with l-enhance filter. Scope is Evoguide 50ed with starizona flattener
ah ok i would assume the filter would be the main difference here
mine is also modified
does a mosaic of single subs count?
yes
bro thats perfect
What even is that
Carina 
already better than your stack from bortle 9 
Muehehehehe
5min sub
I HATE AMP GLOW ARRRRGHHH
at least i can pretend its from alnitak hehehe
lol thats actually a good excuse
I thought it was alnitak at first even lmao
its real clean in the stack though which is good
asdfghjkl;'
Honse 
single 1s sub with my new scope and camera
533 mono?
close! its a 571 from touptek. been really happy with it so far. here is a 300s sub. I blew out the core at only 200 gain
oops
you cropped it to a near exact 533 aspect ratio 
but the 571 is fire, cant wait till the day i order one myself
that is my goal for the end of the year
300s Ha channel 👀
got mine off aliexpress for the price of a zwo 533 so far is been a great camera
You did get the TEC cooled not fan cooled right?
Ngl you prolly should have gotten one from Nokk, but hey if it's the normal tec cooled one then it should be solid.
what bortle and scope?
that looks amazing for a 1s sub
they don't make a non tec cooled one of the 571 actually. its the regular tec version
its slightly weird as the temp probe seems to be miscalculating temp by around 10-15c higher than it actually is but that is not to big of a problem
did talk to nokk but theve raised their prices and I was only really willing to spend 1k and 2k lol
so far it seems to be completly original
B4-5 Quattro 10" @ F3 with Nexus
its a crazy setup
Touptek do
hmm well its not on their website, maybe its discontinued? or are you talking about touptek photonics regular stuff and not touptek astro?
canopus
interesting reflections
sirius and fireworks
you can call this a single sub right? this is just a screenshot of a single frame from a video
its noisy cause i had my exposure time set to 1 ms
yup
dont wanna be that "um ackutahly" guy but thats a cooled one, look at description
toupteks atr3/atr are cooled only iirc
“Fan cooled” not TEC cooled, very major difference
I have to be the um ascutally guy I'm sorry
I think the fan cooled part is a mistranslation anyways
G3C is fancooled and they look like this
My apologies, always thought fan cooled meant fan cooled too 
all good all good, sorry too but my soul woulda died if I did not become what I swore to destory. the um acuatalalasidhlly guy
No worries, I don’t mind those people aslong as they are correct lol
google translate was not locked in
300 sec of m78, poor seeing as per usual of this time of year
thats poor seeing?
An app that I use claims that there was poor seeing last night (not sure how accurate it is though)
Meteoblue? they are very inaccurate, if you have pix you can test your seeing using subs with your FWHM
What about clear sky chart
The seeing forecasts online are not necessarily the best. I've been outside in conditions rated poor and it was better than that, sometimes substantially so. The best way is to get outside and look.
Honestly if you look at the sky and see high alt stars (say above 45°) twinkling/shimmering, you're probably not going to have a good time of it.
I think @fair lion sent this link, and honestly I think it should be pinned in the AP chat.
Stars in my area never shimmer sometimes they do but just barely
Like you have to star for a solid minute or so to see something
Single 300s lum sub from Bortle 1
That's actually nuts wtf
Man, that's tasty
there's a reason why people do remote observatories
Awful long walk from me to the nearest clear sky, let alone B1
WHAT
the core doesnt even look that bad
how much of it is clipped?
Yeah but then i won't be able to spend time with the homies and do astro
linear
thats insane
ur HDR stack doesnt even need much int
like 2 mins would do just fine
well I have about 24h total integration now, I will see what I can do with that (I need more RGB tho and want to add Ha as well)
ngl if it were me i would just do LRGB
i feel like orion has enough reds in broadband
i really love a good LRGB orion
I think Ha addition can be great, especially since it's kind of refreshing from the usual pure broadband.
I went crazy with my addition
, something a little more subtle would be even nicer.
agreed, for yours i think you could tone it down, although it was really cool to see the Ha you got
I'm going to thumbs up this, all I could ever get out of my cell phone for Jupiter was a bright white spot. At least you got a hint of the bands.
Thanks
Wait this isn’t real right 💀
It is 🙂
holy
How tho, 120 sec
Doesn’t make sense
I have a hard time believing it but damn
600 not 120
Oh I was looking at another sequence mb
just fit autostretch or whatever it is, 10min narrowband sub on carina
Bortle?
2 after moon set
damn crazy shot dude
Thanks
if you can spot the comet you win
not super hard tbh, is that G3 or A3?
a3, just to make sure, where is it
slightly left, tail pointing left up, almost touching treeline
congrats
must be from a while back
before or after perihelion? i cant tell
yeah, october 12th
ah ok, so after
the sub is alright for the image it produced
Single 300" Ha sub
(Screenshot unfortunately)
Is that recent? The moon seem to be really close to that area at the moment
spaghetti looks kinda like velasnr
NOT MINE!!
180s sub taken in La Palma
Just thought I should share this because it's amazing how low light pollution affects your images
That is incredible
yep, I like how the south and north have twins for each target lol.
how is ur detail kinda mid for the single sub but like 10x better for the full one
does it really make that big of a difference?
osc subs arent like mono subs, so yes
how long is each sub and the total integration?
That raw sub wasn't full res
300 sec on the elephant trunk nebula
my new scope on jellyfish👀
180s with no cooling (it wasnt cooling for some reason...)
Single 300s Ha with my RASA 11. Uncalibrated and autostretched. Taken at -15C with my beloved 6nm Astronomik MaxFR Ha filter
oh and bortle 5
Holy moly
For a sec I thought it said unstretched lol
a single raw 300s sub in Ha
that's absolutely insane
only 60s at f4! that must be some incredibly dark skies
its normally low b2 but the moon really messing with it
is that marks image?
im not sure about "low" b2, the horizon lights from bendigo are getting pretty bright
ah yeah havent been in a while
Another 300 sec of the elephant trunk, but with no moon this time
bortle 36 be like
Single 12s sub on C/2024G3
god damn
southern hemisphere getting a NEOWISE
300 sec sub of the elephant trunk nebula (again lol), but this time just a uv/ir cut filter.
I dont see anything💀
in the middle there is a little red ish thing
Oh yeah i forgot to mention that im blind
yeah its extremely hard, this is just a screenshot from the asiair so compression is killing it lmao. Its a bit easier when looking at the raw file though
Yeah i know
just wanted to check off some messier objects so just did one sub each
300s on m81 and m82
55s Sub on m46.
Xiaomi 12 + 114/900mm (f8) newt. B4 with full moon
Ignore the vignette and the broken spike in the left corner. The phone adapter had broken, so I couldn't align the phone properly with the eyepiece that day 
Crazy what you are doing with a phone
why do 6 spikes change shape like this so easily i have the same issue
It's hard to explain, but it's because the misaligned phone on the eyepiece basically obstructs or fails to capture part of the mirror at the edge. So, it's basically like half of the mirror at the edge stopped existing, and with that half, one of the secondary's vanes. This ends up altering the spike's shape.
This doesn't happen as easily with a common 4-spike pattern because the secondary also has 4 vanes. So, when one vane is obstructed, there are still 3 others aligned. Even if one vane is missing, the spike remains the same shape. I'll try to find an image to illustrate this
Here... Do you notice that even with missing vanes, the spike's shape doesn't change? Only the intensity does? That's why.
I'm not sure if I explained it in the best way in English, but it's understandable 
When aligning the phone to the eyepiece, unfocus the star and check if all the vanes are visible in the secondary's reflection. If they are, move the phone until only two vanes are visible and take a photo...The spike will come out just like it did in my photo
That's why I got the tridaptor with 3-axis adjustment. It should arrive tomorrow.
It will solve this alignment problem.
that focal length is godly
excuse me how does an am5 hold a 12 inch 6500mm for 300 seconds
Ohh done this cluster before and I didn’t even know there was a pn there and sooner realized lol
No secondary mirror? so just the primary?
Single 5min sub
so it's 6500mm but f4?
Muhehehe
U steal my gif
300 sec horsehead with an unfortunate 67% illuminated moon
Woah nice
Can’t wait to image this soon again
300 sec exposure of flame and horsehead, this time without the moon
Woah
Big difference in contrast tbh
5mins on Chameleon
and 5mins on RHo
finnaly have something worth showing it aint much compared to you guys but im proud
5min ISO 1600
M81 na M82
Alrighty, a 900s Exposure of IC1805.
Wtffff this is a full image
Literally looks like it
☠️
900s is a very long time lol
It is but still, quite crazy for 900 sec
15 mins
180s
180s with a tad bit of streching
500s somehow with my overloaded eq5pro which has extreme backlash problems
God damn
(also EQ5 pro user) i recently found out that your best bet with guiding with severe Dec backlash is to give up and pollar align good enough so you can turn the Dec guiding off and forget about it, it does mean your target will slowly move away from your fov but if you are willing to check it every 2-3h to recentere it is absolutly fine
after pollaraligment with NINA 3PPA i was able to take 5min exposures with no trailing
Or you could just belt mod it
There are a few videos on how to do it unlike for the eqm35
most of the backlash i found was in the worm gear belt would only change the backlash on gears before the wormgear
Oh well in that case that needs tuning you need to adjust the separation between the gears
If its too tight your gears can become sticky due to increased friction if it's too loose you will have play on your gears and thus backlash
Holy
Nice
300 sec of half of the soul nebula
Zwo 585
Whats wrong with eqm35, when i got it my friend just put new grease and since then my average total rms is 0.50
Its a pain up my buttocks i can't get the stupid guiding working
The mount controller is weird when you press a key to slew sometimes it slews quite a bit after lifting your finger off the button
I'm guessing the uncooled version right
Yes. I don't bother with darks. Flats and dark flats only. My location is prettyso recently my sensor temperature has been good between 2 degrees and 0.5 degrees celcus..
I did some testing with and without darks on the horsehead last, year and didn't see much difference (although I know it did).
Youll benefits from a peltier mod
Yeah love that idea. Thought about it. Cheap enough and it's something I can do.
By the way get a double stage not a single stage double stage gets way colder than a single stage i have moded my own my camera and i get -13°C with sub optimal conditions
Also yes i do have the same camera as you the zwo asi585
@plucky heath I may have to pick your brains at some point if you don't mind.
Nah i don't mind
Weird, why just not use a laptop with N.IN.A and Green Swamp server for slewing... Also i managed to do 4 pull ups
Nina is a pain to work with and navigate its more complex and annoying than my school website
Also nice you work out
To me N.I.N.A was confusing at the start but from time to time its really easy to use, give it a chance
2 subs both in Ha at 180s each. Redcat 51, 1600MM pro, Baader 8nm CCD Ha filter
RedCat 51 
i forgot you got that white cat
Hell yeah! Whitecat is so nice
1x 600" sub each colour channel (RGB)
2 minutes something on owl neb, test of duoband
How is that 2 minutes
pay to win? maybe pay to lose im not sure how to interpret that
Like why is there no nebulosity and why is it so dimme for 2 minutes
Thats my 5s
wack, guess dslr+thin clouds+full moon caused that?
I shot through moon too
Dslr is sensitive enough to oiii
Thin clouds is your only excuse
Here's my 100 secs
Ever stop to think what DSLR he's using and light pollution he's in? Your 715 is way more sensitive than most DSLRs.
Focal ratio should also be considered
Fair enough.
There are many factors
You cant just say that there is only one case where thats acceptable
Speaking from experience with a uncooled modded DSLR, thats about accurate signal
its f4 lol
Ive seen film do better tbh the image looks extremely like it was taken on film
Are you using film
Considering he said DSLR i don't think it was film
Trust me, having used many DSLRs, some very old, some more recent, this isn't that surprising.
I thought you bought a cooled cam
hasn't arrived yet
What cam? Ares C? Hopefully gets here soon. You'll see the difference greatly
zwo 533
You using a 6" f4 newt?
yea, carbonstar 150
6 inch f4 newts are peak
yeah im suprised the 90d does that poorly apparently
dont remember 1st one but b7 or so
id say theres a good chance
(like 90%)
Lobster claw 10 minute exposure, carbonstar 150, asi533 mc pro, l-extreme
brudda
ur a b1
hes a b7
i get the moon is there but still
Tyking is B1?????
Wait. juust wait
Beatles reference
Lucky, for the last year i have gone up from low b4 to probably b5-6
jeez thats terrible
Finna go to court
Do it
Now it seems his sky is brighter damn
Do it
I'd imagine snow would raise the bortle quite alot
Full moon plus snow makes my location a nice b5/6
blinding from above and below
Imma do it fr
bruh. When it has a lot snow at my location night is day
Still better than my b9
m81 from pyramid lake, 60 seconds lightly processed
single 5 minute subs in NIR and Ha
Debayer
Damnn
How did u take images in NIR?
with a 685nm IR pass filter
Which camera?
Oh nice
Why soo aggressive lol?
People yapping
600 sec sub on m51, carbonstar 150, asi533mc, uv/ir cut
60s on m101
flying squid OIII 10 min sub (crop + star removal for visibility)
Am I the only one that thinks this nebula looks a little suspicious? Great photo btw lol
I had no idea that could show up in a single sub
How fast were your optics?
okay now THAT is crazy
I think he's F2
yup, f.2.2 RASA11, and i got someone who lives in B2 to watch over my scope
and it's supposed to be clear pretty much all week, so i'm super hyped for the result
Maybe when I convert my newt to f4 along with a Nexus reducer for f3.
i'm gonna get like 50-60 hours of OIII
That should be dope
I’ve done this on my Newt, works great
Ah that explains it
OOOOO
Left is raw and right is processed
Does my single 30 second at ISO 3200 count?
yeah as long as it's a single sub and not stacked
Dayum
i don't get it how is it that much different than my dslr, when i take even 300s exposures i get stars on a gray background, there is absolutly no signs of nebulocity untill i ghater hours of data and after heavy processing there finnaly something starts coming out. i have a recent image of 26h on IC 405 and i bet one of you could get more detail in 60s. i know you guys use astro camera, mono and whatnot but it can't be litteralry THOUSANDS of times more sensitive than a dslr
Bcs ur dslr isn't modified, it has an integrated Ha cut filter and Ir cut filter
it's modified, i took out the IR cut fiter
Lemme see a sub exposure
90s on IC405
you can just about start seeing it but there is hydrogen all over that frame
(also that's a calibrated light frame not strait form the camera)
i meant more because one of them was processed

sort of
Huh, weird. Maybe its beacuse the sensor is not as sensitive to those wavelengths i guess.
What sky conditions, scope, and exact camera are you using?
I see you have SW150/750 in your username but your sub has no diffraction spikes so I'm not sure
i use those curvy things to remove diffraction spikes, aside from that
B7 and Canon 450D
Ahh ok yea, I used a modified Canon 450D early on too so I have a good idea of how it should perform.
Lemme see if I have some subs from my b5/6 skies with the 450d
Yea I took a look at some subs of equally bright nebulae with no filter and yours looks about right tbh.
It's a DSLR from 2008... Something like a 2600mc or even my already old 1600mm cooled mono cam will blow it away in terms of sensitivity.
Something like the QHY minicam 8 (mono imx585) and included LRGBSHO filters is a very good value
899 USD iirc
i don't get that much clear nights so i'd rather go for a one shot color camera
Cheaper than buying the cam I have with necessary filter wheel and filter set even used.
Which was already considered a budget mono cam
How many per year on average?
oh god i don't know, but during winter i got like withrawl sympthoms after not seeing stars for 3 months
If you want to maximize data gathering you may want to look into a faster Newtonian/scope in general (or getting a starizona Nexus reducer) + monochrome camera. It might seem like OSC gets you an image quicker, but in the same about of integration time you spend on an osc cam, the mono cam will provide far greater results.
i didn't think of that
my canon 1200D (slightly better than the 450D) VS my 1600mm w/ Luminance filter cooled to -10 C
Both 120s subs in b5/6
that's a huge differnece
But the 1200D one is still Bayered, no?
huh
me wondering why my 17h projects look like someones 4h project
Mono is still much better. You will get a better image regardless of clear nights.
i would need filters witch are not very cheap either but than i remembered the Cuiv's video about a QHY minicam 8
small pixels mean i can do the highly zoomed in imaging that intrests me most but without a barlow that slows my scope down (and is aslo pretty crappy so it degrades my images) but at about 1000$ it's pretty pricy UNLESS the filter wheel is already packed with filters and i dont have to buy them. but i can't see any info on that anywhere, does anybody have the minicam 8 and could tell me if it has a full filter wheel?
It has different versions with different filters.
I’d get the Touptek package though. Only a bit more money and it supports standard filters.
It includes filters yes
it's perfect
red is my daily setup
yellow is the same but with a barlow
and green is my daily with mini cam 8
and just for fun if i ever want to torture myself with guiding in blue it's minicam with a barlow
i think i know what to make money towards
thanks guys
i'll see you all here in a year 😑 drives off towards the setting sun
Holy crap
10 minute sub
Is narrowband RHO worth it? Without broadband
No
ok I guessed so thx tho
damn the 1600 keeps up . but this is a bright target lol
very much bright
are u using 4.5nm or 3nm ha
5 nm
and its probably not to spec
so lets call it 6 nm
svbony 5nm?
yeah
Waiting to see some NB projects with your svboner 122mm triplet 
New mount soon ish
Ahh yea forgot your mountless atm
Mountless is the homeless equivalent of astrophotography 
full moon and only 180s. very nice

Tadpoles and Flaming star
600s on Crescent
Now thats just 😩
Just waiting for mine to arrive and my SHO filters to sell so i can get some LRGB filters
Are you still using the 1600mm? This single sub looks like my stacks 
nah the 1600mm could never (maybe with dark skies and 1800s sub
)
switched to a 2600mm
I'm excited to see what I'll be able to get with this, just waiting on the camera to arrive 😄
I was looking for amp glow
. Dream camera
10 minute sub from quattro 
bro i want a newt and a 2600 now
90-minute time-exposure.
why is there an arc
It is a light leak.
It is quite unfortunate, but I have fixed it now.
you lucky lucky man it's a shame your no longer rich after this investment
Someone change their mind about fracs?

fr lol
how much that cost in total?
2.7k usd (including the camera, which isnt shown as it hasnt arrived yet)
oh Jeeper
I assume camera is new at that price? likely a 294mm?
585mm
Oh wow, majority of that is the filters cost then 😅
yeah 
yeah
the sho filters were about $100 more than the camera xD
Antlia moment 
nice
I like it
yeah!
Mine will be similar, it should make for a decent computer or phone background image
yeah! we should move to astrophotography chat though
ye
let's move over there and contuine this talk shall we?
First image for me with the 585mm pro! This is a 180 second exposure using the antlia luminance filter
Congrats!
Rlly nice sub.
sharp stuff
bc osc camera
180s
autostretch 10 mins of Ha
damn
What bortle?
Good god bruh
3min Sub processed because I was bored
1 minute lightly processed sub no debayer
damn what bortle?
5
looks better than my 45min stack in b4 with my phone lol, ccant wait to use my astrocam
If you did this with a phone I am sure your results with an Astrocam will be absolutely stunning
Brightest DSO I have ever shot This is OII LINEAR. non linear shows a cool OIII ring around. damn this thing is bright
It even starts to get spikes on my 5" piggyback
Planetary nebula?
Cats eye?
You can see a little structure in the first Pic
NGC 6826 (blinking planetary?? maybe? dont remeber normal name)
seeing wasnt great last night, hopfully I can get more structure and be sharper tonght
Whats your equipment?
yep its the blinking planetary neb
just wizzed by it in stallarium a min ago by chance 
C8 + ASI1600 and I've added a 5" F4? F5? on top of the C8
I am going to try with some of these fun filters tonight
single 3 minute sub
Single 600s sub
100-minute time-exposure.
A 100 min sub whilst still having round stars is insane to me
Guiding is an amazing thing
Quick 5 minute Ha sub on a portion of the soul nebula
Saw a guy call that region the skateboard nebula or the skater nebula, can’t unsee it since
Fr, I cant either
Looks like a little skater on a half pipe
I tried imaging it with my 533mc with a full moon and a cheaper duelband filter in the past, it turned out trash for my liking 
well it’s gonna be different this time
Fr, I'm going to enjoy this new camera and filters alot
Which cam and filters? IMX 571 and Antlias?
Im using the 585mm and antlia
Beautiful
600 sec Ha on M51
300s luminance sub. m51
Single 600sec sub m13 nir to test my new guide cam
Single sub of M16 in H-alpha tonight (calibrated), 180 s
SHO image with just 9 minutes of data
Single 300s sub on Crescent Nebula 
5min Hα sub for shits n giggles went pretty well
Holy sheet
RIP
Well... I guess we might share the same room in hell
. Me for laughing and you for making it🤣
single 10 min sub in HA from bortle 6
he means the SNR difference given the integration time
i know
. i was just joking
but i think he sent them the other way around. the 5min has more SNR than the 10min. 
if you look at the cygnus wall you can see browis' has more detail
Better guiding?
i wouldnt say so, the RASA is a f/2.2 lightbucket. leroy's scope is f/4 i think
ahhh... now that makes sense. i thought they used the same telescopes
Yup, cause mine was also taken from Bortle 6
Actually the difference is quite noticeable
The 5 minute one has significantly less noise than the 10 minute one
3 minutes on Abell 2151 (Apertura CarbonStar RC8, Touptek ATR533M, Touptek luminance filter, Bortle 2-3 skies)
120 second sub of some ha fillaments in the eastern veil
Some single subs from recent imaging sessions.
Last 3 are 300s subs with R filter - first sub is 600s OIII
personal distance record achieved in one sub, I captured QSO J1605+1745 (11.5 billion light years lookback time)
single sub, the pastrami nebula, Ha (hungry always)
120s sub from samyang at f/2.8 with no filter and bortle 7, stretched to the max
i read that as 30 second oiii sub lmao
i was so confused
what object
.
thats one long ass sub
watch a plane fly through and cook your 1/12 subs 
Yep, that was mostly for shits n giggles, max I'd go is 15 min.
10 minute ha sub - bortle 1, 94% moon
180 sec sub ha of m27 through light cloud coverage
10 min OIII sub (full moon)
Processed Starless 300" Sub with the L-Ultimate Filter
sadr still there lol
but great image
Well, its halo
why so soft?
Are you just going to completely ignore the fact that the outer shell is showing like that in a single sub
signal is decent - just very very soft
He's simmply using a newt not a frac which lets him see some nice details after applying blurx
brother what
blurX shouldnt be used exclusivly to acheive details
it should NOT be relied on
If it works it works :)
are you sure it's soft, and not just overstretched?
something is wrong in his optical system, seems like a mix of guiding/collimation
prob a mix of both tbh
L mindset
His guiding is sub 0.5" and his collimation looks decent
tho stars are kinda weird
He's at 1000mm of fl and has 2.9 um pixels
so?
Oversampling?
that doesnt excuse the mis shapen atars and why its so damn soft
Its soft because hes oversampled and yes maybe his collimation is indeed bad but whatever
at .6"/pixel it should not be that soft
Yeah that telescope isn't collimated properly
You just have to look at the stars as nexy said
Deconvolution is to help correct the atmospheric distortions and/or any optical errors. And Deconvolution actually still has a much stronger/better effect on data that is near perfect, good seeing, spot on collimation. I would avoid relying on it for details and focus on getting better data (:
Bro what, I know it's out of colli, but it ain't as soft as your making out to be lmao. Looks close to 2". Very similar to my Ring.
look at those stars g dawg 🙏
Signal is pretty dam good
The shell was def less noticeable for me.
After bX and dsnr
A couple hours iirc
Big stars doesn’t mean details are absolutely cooked tho lol
Sampling has a big play
Usually goes hand in hand tho tbf
Ahh I mean look at Lyaphines data for the master processor comp, that was sharp asf but the stars are huge and really soft
Yea diff systems handle brighter stars differently
The stars closer in brightness to the target are more so what should be compared. Also, something like bad collimation is going to be more evident in pinpoint sources of light rather than diffused sources such as the target your shooting.
600s Ha sub on the f4 noooot
600s on the dragons of ara, lightly processed
Why is everybody flaming Tyking for his gear, let him be dawg. Judge me before him bcs i dont use a coma corrector😭
i have literally never talked to you in my life
You did
What are these blue splotches?
why nexy on his villain arc
Probs bcs his mount left him for a better owner
Compression lol, it's a screenshot from Google remote desktop.
bruh
Dam high clouds as soon as the sequence switched to Ha last night 
At least OIII was looking decent
Wdym? Its better than JWST
A sub of each channel now.
Oh, jwst subs would be very messy
Have you seen jwst stacks?
Full of artifacts
Ye
thats like my schools website
Compared to the school website, this one has raw data from most telescopes. HST, JWST, GAIA, Chandra
crazy
Same way you do with satellite trails
10 minute Ha sub with RedCat 51, Touptek ATR2600M, and EQM-35
Cygnus my beloved ❤️
holy
Gawd dayum
Can i perhaps get ur telescopes phone number? I had a crush on it for the last 5 seconds. But im serious its such a beauty isnt it
Actually that's an old screenshot lol, that was with my 8" f6 scope.
It's taken already 
At least i tried
Well thanks, you ain't so bad yourself
and which one? Name?
Astro-Tech AT8N
Bad design, I got it for a steal and a moonlight focuser included so I went for it.
But didn't realize how dumb the colli system was
The secondary mostly can't be rotated
The very fine rotation adjustments one might need to perform cannot be
My plan was to mod it and replace allat but the tube size is smaller than my CNC spider.
I have a fix for it but have yet to implement it.
some current projects with it
most 8" f4 mirrors out there are gonna be fine, it's the OTA and hardware that really make a difference at this price point.
800s OIII sub
300s R
This has become a @half maple only chat

Ill fill in for Ein, 180s sub Ha on NGC 6888
Jayy
600s Ha from bortle 2. no astrodark and not sharp because of mid guiding
We need a no astrodark gang around here😅
Amazing shot btw
Hello
8s 2x binned platesolving sub with no astrodark in duoband
5min sub on lagoon with the 533 and redcat-51
I dislike bortle 7
I know it's cheating but here's 6 minutes of the Lagoon (2 minutes per channel)
holyy
5min sub on Corona Australis with the same stuff
10min subs go hard
BRO
YOU MOFOFO

GIMME YO SKIES
i get ur mono and u get my skies ? 👉 👈
single 1200s sub on wacawacawacawaca
holy frigging guiding how the f
0.35" at a pixelscale of 4" per pixel 
||the unnecassarity||
why not tune it with a small rig so you can work up to support a bigger one?

M10 (120 s, NIR)
how come the halos? Is it a frac?
It's an RC8 but I'm pretty sure it's the filter
Honestly I don't mind them in my images
But I do want to find a better IR filter, 720+ nm
M20 rgb image (5 min per channel, so not truly a single sub but close enough
)
also not including the L and ha sub that I took
3 minutes on the Crescent Nebula
I will take my liberties too
mono is cheating 😭
20min sub on propeller nebula
Dark nebula in Lupi, 5mins with redcat and 533
im not sure if livestacks count as a single sub but here is a 3.5 minute one on M13
2 minute sub in duoband
duoband monochrome?
He has no mono filters yet
goofy lol
this wins never seen such a nicely done Sub in this whole channel this is what i was waiting for the whole time i just WANTED A footlong man
lightly processed single 600s Ha sub
2min R sub from a planewave i stole 👍
will steal it from u the first chance ill get :0
what in the dss ass stars
yeah it's goofy, but thankfully only a preview thing, and not in the raw files
CCD moment
I still have tilt 
slightly processed 3 minute sub on a random dark nebula
More signal than my 15hr
average 120s sub f4 bortle 7
single 180s exposure with Baader 36mm Ha filter and SBIG STF8300M ccd camera and f5 130PDS
Tilt in the big 25💔🥀
600s Ha
300s R
180s mono duoband (i dont have proper nb filters yet)
Looks like you have guiding issues or collimation🥀
guiding
eccentricity ranged from 0.59 to 0.38
balls
600s ha
Is this supposed to be arcseconds?
There's no way
no
have you ever measured it in pix using subframe selector
i consider anything below 0.48 to be good (the bigger the value the more trailing there is)
i mean i dont even know in what units this is
No I always use the fwhm eccentricity script included with pix
Specifically on the master light
It gives fwhm in pixels and you multiply that by your pixel scale.
It's a more meaningful measurement
but what exactly do you mean by that?
the results are pretty much identical
I just meant compared to the eccentricity value you were using. But yea in general fwhm means more to most people. It's more commonly used.
all 240s subs
Again, one sub (120 s) per channel (SHO), so if you want an image that qualifies just rip out the green channel lol
600s Ha
180s narrowband sub on the fireworks galaxy i took for fun
i will build a rig like yours from the ground up one day
120s extracted Ha from duoband
neat nebula in the Saddar region (idk what its name is or if it has one). 600s ha
600s sii
Not much in terms of Oiii
180s
3 min sub on NGC 7331
propeller
Ah that makes since
10min subs on veil are nice.
I would be inclined to agree
duoband detected
15s exposure on adromeda, roki 135 and old sbig-8050
Roki 135, ALP-T, IMX585, Red channel, 180s
slightly trailed 30s test sub on m31
Niceee, im a proud owner of the SBIG 8300M
canon dslr
120s
f/2.4
b1 is insane
the difference is crazy
Wuuuut
Wowzers
Cheater
Lion nebula but through thin clouds several weeks ago
I didn't come by b1 easily tho, 12 hour drive plus 4km canoeing camping gear plus full astro gear lol
Where?
What lens?
The one and only Rokinon 135mm 
In Canada north of Lake Superior
Whoa
Damn, gg. Damn you light pollution i swear im gonna rip every one of those street lights appart
I’m with you on that one 
I SWEAR THEY ARE BUILDING A NEW ROAD AND THEY ARE GOING TO PUT MORE LED LIGHTS, I SWEAR IM GOING TO TAKE MY 9MM AND SHOOT EVERY LIGHT. IF THEY PUT THOSE LIGHTS IM GOING FROM B4 to HIGH B5 its not good, also jk abt my 9mm but i have an airgun
We need this
FR
I love your energy 🤣
Tell the twats to use red LED lights instead and keep them pointed to the ground
We need monochrome street lighting like the good ol days
Much easier to block
As a youngin I ain’t too familiar but I agree w you 😂
Yeah I'm not from that time either, but that's the reason why most RGB filters have a gap between green and red
Blocks out the 589nm light sodium vapor lamps
10sec sub nir of vega
Nothin special, just a quick shot to check collimation
Which wasnt as far off as i thought
What in the world
i got this one a while ago too
im not sure, are the flares caused by the OTA or the sensor?
ohh i see
quite cool
so would the pattern look the same/similar with a refractor?
yea it does i have a photo from mine somewhere. its light bouncing inside the camera both inside the window and inside the microlenses on the sensor itself
But that also means it's purely an OSC thing right?
nah both mono and color can have these. The bayer matrix is typically applied first then microlenses ontop. Its also strangly not all microlens array cameras have such issues. ASI1600 has it and ASI2400 has it. 2400 gets it way worse in Ir and 1600 gets it about the same in all wavelengths if I remeber correctly.
Dang
Mono is not completely immune to problems then
mono is 100% not immune. I get way more real world problems with it then color. the price I pay for more light
Yeah that's facts. OSC is the easy way, but not the best
The 533, 571, etc have it too in the far ends of the spectrum.
But yea hella worse on older sensor tech
Or at least the ones you mentioned, not sure about ccd's.
I should test CCDs I got a 8300 and a 8050 laying around
8300 should be one with microlenses but I'll have to check the 8050
I've never actually seen it in 571 now that I think about it. I should really run some tests. Heres one deer lick galaxy sub at 1000nm+ and the curve of camera.
I'll do a star test next clear night. this got me curious
The K8300 is a good sensor, realy good at picking up faint details. Also i discovered that the optimal exposure time for those kind of sensors need to be 10-15min long
I only see significant microlensing on bright stars with my 533
Nothing special about it really, it's just way worse than new CMOS tech lol.
Cmos are better to a certain point, still mono ccd sensors are quite up to date with the performance it gives and the pixel size
The kaf 8300 for instance has 25k well depth and a QE of 50% so not really up to date.
CCD's can certainly produce good results in the right hands.
Def not comparable to new IMX starvis sensors
I wouldn't ever recommend someone going out of there way to purchase one...
I still think the 8300 is cool because it was, iirc, the beginning of affordable CCD cams for amateur AP.
Thx for the detailed info, i still manage to get good results with it
my 8050 is maybe a tad worse than my asi1600mm. sony starvis is wayyyy better than either. sad how CCDs are dying but I’m very happy with shooting at f10 and it actually being a sensible option with modern cmos
you’d be shocked at the difference between the old kodak ccds vs starvis 1 and the imx571
Yeah, this is my latest work with the 8300
Why a .dng?
I tried some other formats wait i got a PNG i think
Compression💔
I see a dust spot
I know, i cleaned the filters multiple times and the sensor glass... and its still there
Yeah i feel you i can't get rid of my
dust spots either everytime i clean a new one manages to pop up but they're usually on the camera window or if not they might be inside the camera housing You can see that the dust spot is very small and almost in focus meaning that its located right on top of your sensor
I cant even see the dust spot on the glass and somehow its there😭
No not on the glass
Below the glass
Inside the camera housing
Directly ontop of your bare sensor
180s in full moon
300 sec sub ha
Dope
Ill be damned
You cloud try and open it to get rid of it but uhh use a blower if you are going to do that also be fast
scrape it off easy solution
since when did you get mini nerd
Since like a few months ago
600s SII and Ha subs
goated
300 sec sub Blue on IC 63
5min on Ha, new setup
did Sii and Oiii as well, so this is a total of 15mins. the mono equivalent of a single sub?
gonna run a little 3h sequence on it tonight
Holy denoise
haha yeah mb, single sub S and O aren't enough to process without some deepsnr
raw subs for each
It's gonna look awesome
yeah, lookin forward to it
12x the data of this hot mess
also im breaking it 2:5:5 ratio cuz Ha is so much stronger
It's the cats paw nebula right?
what gear?
poseidon-m pro, edgehd 8" at f/7, eq6r pro
Ah okay
You know it's white enough when you flip the bit back to black
I just did a big S curve to see what was in the image
Didn't really care if that clipped the cores
I've collected around 10hrs in broadband and 14hrs in duo narrowband so hopefully the results looks good
Weird, wouldn't have expected that to happen from just an S curve
It was a big one
Just one point towards the white point dragged to the top and one point dragged to the bottom
Also did a background extraction and colour calibration
But for one shot on a DSLR it looking great imo
Does anyone here have an idea on how I could mix the broadband and narrowband together since I haven't done that before
Funnily enough my old DSLR actually used to do this when it was clipping XD didnt clip like standard cameras and go pure white, but instead a pink or blue and almost look duller than anything else lol
Timelapse with my last m27 subs...
Subs of 30s at the beginning and 55s at the end (On the first night I captured with 30s by mistake. I only noticed at the end of the night
)
114mm F8 + Xiaomi 12
Bortle 4 + lots of red lights that my friends wouldn’t turn off 
The jumps are just my manual dithering.
Raw 6.9 millisec exposure of Mars in late April. Best frame from the best video.
idk why but that's the first thing that i imagined after seeing this
(that's the first colour image of the earth)
600s Ha sub
Single 10min Halpha sub on tarantula with my new mono cam and filters
That mf bright
well its very easily naked eye visible 
Didn't know 
southern hemisphere superiority
Too bad I live in the northern
Yeah, he's right I'm a fraud sorry I've been keeping this a secret for to long
Huh
Everything northern hemisphere. You are right, thats makes sense
Fr, bortle 1 skies everywhere and op targets sounds too good to be true
lmc?
smc
honse (5 min)
honse (5 min)
honse (5 min)
honse (5 min)
I'm here to end this streak 
honse (5 min)
honse (5 min)
honse (5 min)
honse (5 min)
honse (5 min)
sharpest sub I have ever seen. FWHM of 1.7" with a 8" sct. 180s
Lol didn't work
I mean the streak technically ended 
honse (5 min)
Honse (5 min)


