#Phone Astrophotography
1 messages · Page 20 of 1
Oh okay I thought I was wrong
If U know any good used telescope or mount, tag me 😺
I might not go with used myself but will go if someone experienced person says
i'm not to familiar with used so I cant really help much there
Oh okay np
usually a lot of used scopes are hobby killers so I wouldn't go out looking unless you know exactly what you're looking for
Yeah I also don't feel to use my money for crap on this hobby
I am also confused with the price of mount and it's accessories
I made that mistake early on, now I have a crap telescope collecting dust in my room
Some have only mount, other with package and ahhhh I am soo confused
yea you're gonna have to look closely at what they ship
thats why I just shopped on amazon for my first tracker
Can U help me know what with the mount and it's accessories
Like what mount contains
I know just about mount that tracks
Also about the weight that helps to keep out telescope to be stable
Like aliphatic, s22 ultra 10x lens
hey i want to ask something so i got 600 hundred + raw images and i wanted to stack them at siril
but i got no space left, so can i stack them separately?
So U take pics from default 1x zoom and then after stacking, U cut it?
200 image into 1 fit files etc
Or did U zoom in ?
No it's 10x zoom
Ohh
Because the s22 ultra has a 10x optical zoom lens
That's why it's blurry
Nice
Try 5 x or lower, I think that would be better than 10x
Still it's a phenomenal photo 🫡
I imagine i could improve it a lot if I had a star tracker aswell
Unfortunately I'm limited to 4s exposures
Don't regret, you are doing good,U can always expand your budget in future
a3 with a71
This is a picture I took of Saturn with my phone using lucky imaging, how can I improve it?
More data,and make sure you're recording in raw format. There's apps that allow you to do that
I think one is called pro video
On iPhone ?
it's a set 10x telephoto
that's the native resolution for that camera
it might be blurry due to the regular camera app having super invasive post processing
the 10x can actually get some sharp images if you know how to use it well
I just wished they upgraded the sensor instead of switching to a 5x on the S24 ultra
I also think that image is stretched a crazy amount to reveal more data
oh hey you can see a bit of M33 too
It is awesome 🥸
how did you stack it?
@lofty trench Motioncam app
With autostakkert
try Astrosurface. it looks like there are some stacking artifacts
Ok thx
Yeah it gets dim day by day
Venus, McKinney TX, 10-20-2024
2 hours subs of milky way
idk why the nebula wont pop
i mean the color of the nebula
Got a nice image of the comet from bortle 9 10s 70mm focal lenght plus some cropp and untracked 19.5m intergration (dont mind the color noise all samsung phones suffer from it)
For comparison single sub
Yes, I stretched quite a bit. I shoot raw with pro mode, but the 4s subs are so noisy they literally fail to stack in sequator. So I denoise them all with lightroom then stack the jpgs because that's the only way that seems to work. So that's probably why it's blurry
^
Wdym
It looks like it did
Do you mean like the nebula inside the mw like lagoon not being pink?
Yeahh sorta
What equipment??
#1020657687291252797 message
phone and tripod
from bortle 7
Is it stacked???
How many pictures did you take??? I think I’ll go out tonight and try again
Bortle 3-4 ish 😊
Perks of living in the middle off the forest with the nearest city being like 30 km away
Very lucky
Redmi's are one of the best and underrated phones in the market
Can anyone help me to stack this photos?
30 of them
This are total 30 photos 800 iso 4.50ish zoom and 10 second exposure
If U can guide me, that would be more helpful
just give them to deepskystacker
Ol
Put them in deep sky stacker we cant stack png for u
Wait thats phone photography
Nvm
I did
The stacking In dss and got a kind of white photo, I made it worse but I was following the astrobackyard tutorial
👽💀
Can u send a pic ?
Dss didn't work for me when I first tried it so I did siril and it worked
If you wanna try siril tho you need to add the script that only uses lights
Osc preprocessing without dbf
Then do this but don't delete the two lines
Add the path of the preprocessing script that was just downloaded instead as a 3rd ljne
I don't know how
andromeda
I explained how below that message
Most of the things U said didn't make sense please try to explain in more detail🥲
Instead of deleting the two lines like the image says just put the path of the script on another line
So you keep the other scripts
Program files -> Siril -> scripts
drop this off there
manually removing the lines is stupid. just download the script
you still need to add it to the scripts area tho
yea i gave the directory
Ayy thanks
My best attempt for the Comet on my Samsung Galaxy note 20
I'm not really good at post-processing so I may have messed something up somewhere
Bortle 7, oppo reno 3
Telescope celestron powerseeker 80 EQ
With svbony 40mm 48 degree plossl eyepiece
I need kinda wide eyepiece, so more subs time.
Damnn
I'm surprised b7 phone ap came out like thst
Every 5 yo with a telescope be like
Helo gajs i buy my telescope first todaj :))) it wery ekspenciv
And i bot best cemra in maj budget
And the best eyepic so i can magnifaj to 9000 time
I had a kid like this in my neighborhood
He was so funny lol
its prob plasitc lens too
coated multiple times in dust
Let me check
Idk
It just says like
BEST CAMERA ASTROPHOTOGRAPHY FOR PROFESSIONAL USE
Yea it also says dropship lol
I think you can see dropship in the pic
for professional use
i wanna see someone use it with a planewave scope
itd be interesting to see what would happen if you paired a planewave with a camthat costs like 20000x less
Welcome to New Creation Tamil
Our Channel include of Guiding Videos:
1.DIY Projects
2.Awesome Ideas
3.Tips
You are inter with New Creation Tamil you can enjoy and learn about. Homemade Science project videos and more. Let watch and enjoy with New creation Tamil.
Thanking you. very much for watching , supporting and comment our videos.
Searc...
Bro why is it ok for the price
like???
I mean for 10 bucks
why do they advertise it as 10x
is it meant for a specific telescope?
does it make the fov 10x smaller than if it was just the sensor?
It's because of the small sensor that it cropped the target by 10x im guessing
but it has a lens
They arent smart enough to put it for something like that
“Lens”
Its maybe just see trought plastic
make sure you can send it back
absolutely no idea lmao
The trilangium galaxy lol
Also why does the camera look like its made out of cardboard
it prob is
A single 8s exposure of M37 with considerable noise reduction applied because the clouds rolled in within 30s of getting it in frame 😭
If you couldn't tell, it's that blurry blob
Caldwell 85 isn't photographed very often, neat
not fantastic looking, sure. But it's cool to see lesser-shot targets here in any case.
nice composition with your Orion shot, though
Yeahhh, my balcony only view south to west, so i had to pick at least 1 to photograph, and i chose caldwell 85, wanted to experiment, but suprisingly well, id call it decent result
Haha its only rotated, actually it has alot of noise, had to brutally denoise it
Since i dont take calibration frame.
Ah well, that's ok! I can tell it's denoised a lot, but we all gotta start somewhere I suppose.
What setup did you use to take those, if I may ask?
phone, bortle 7 and i think around 15 mins int time
Oh yeah, i use cheap telescope, i got 2 now, orion st80
400mm telescope with aperture 80mm, with plossl eyepiece vixen 32mm 52 degree.
Phone:
Oppo reno 3
what phone
s20+
what would be some good beginner deep sky objects that I can stack and are relatively easy to capture?
milkyway
andromeda
orion
phone camera doesn't really have enough focal lenfth
Andromeda galaxy in the top right corner and Triangulum Galaxy in the bottom left corner, 30s exposure with iPhone 16 pro in b3-4
Hi @brisk glen do you know there is a App called AstroShader? You can use this app for even longer exposure. The app also do multiple images and Stack the images by it self.
I also capture the andromeda galaxy and I use the app for it. It was a total exposure of 7min
I use my IPhone 12 Pro Max 2,5 telephoto Zoom in B6 skys
Ooo I’ll try that!
Bruh god dang it I really took 30 30s exposures before, seems to me I’ll have to go out again lol
Comet Atlas from 10 days ago that i've just got around to stacking. S22 Ultra 10x lens, 48x 4s
My first ever attempt on Orion Nebula! I took this with an iPhone 16 pro in B3-4 first photo is 30s exposure, the second is 10s exposure. Really happy how this turned out!
Bro Try this setting on AstroShader and you have a 5min exposure time picture
You can also use you 5x Telephoto camera
After the images ends you can save the data with Tiff
And you can send me the Raw data and I can process for you now
And very important is bad for having trees on the picture
can the comet still be imaged ?
yes
also would I need a telescope or will I be able to image it normally with my 50mm equivalent phone lens ?
shit I'm too late, finally skies cleared here
yes
I'll make an attempt today then , imx 890 is enough right ?
idk
guess we'll find out
I’ll try again tonight if I have good weather!
Ok, good luck
Oh wow Are you using iPhone?
def not😂
This is a similar framing from an iPhone15. The newer sensors (since iPhone14) are creeping up
It's nothing phone 1, not even close to an iPhone,
The settings were 800 iso , 18 sec exposure and 108 light frames
Total integration time was 30 min 30ish second
Woah you also caught the Triangulum Galaxy!
yes, tho i need to learn more about editing, i jsut randomly autostrech and yeah that was all some saturation but it didnt did much
How r u guys taking this on a phone? I just got my first phone and I’m wondering if I can do this too
In general you want as long exposures as the phone will let you - to capture the most light.
The other settings (ISO, white balance, etc) you may need to play with. Then shooting a whole load of images and stacking them will bring out more faint detail.
If you lookup Shayne Mostyn or AstroBackyard they have some good guides for phone astrophotography. As well the astrobiscuit videos of course
Stacking
1 hour integration orion with phone and 6" untracked dob
Nahh what
What app do you use and how much magnification?
i used a 6" untraacked dob
I don't think you understand
i ddont
Ok how many times did you zoom in
And question 2 is which app did you use on your phone
ohhhhhh
astroshader and 20mm eyepiece with 1200mm focal lenght
Would there be a difference using astroshader and pro mode on your phone?
u can stack and process a bit with astroshader
Did you just say you could stack in astroshader
I need to get myself an iphone this second
You're messing with me right?
From b9?
This is a little off topic but what does the Orion neb look like visually for you
in b4 or 9?
B9
REALLY faint smudge and stars
This is what it looks like for me
Everybody on the server was flabbergasted
Bc it is so so bad
I need one a half hour for a B4 we cooked
If the light pollution map would update for 2024 than I probably would need more.
Maybe There are now b10 areas
Always has been, they're just getting bigger.
tokyo:
why are iphone pics so poop even with a tracker
its just a skill issuee, i get nice pics wwithout one
4 min exposure with Google Pixel 7 Pro with the 116.2mm equivalent lens, barely edited. I'd say the 17€ amazon tripod I bought recently was worth it
send proof
@opaque tundra
i took that with iiphone 14 pro
Nah I meant like wide field with just the phone alone
i thought you and frogonthemoon were the same person and you were talking to yourself bc i thought the pfps were the same
I can't wait to get tracking, will ask for what I'm missing for onstep this christmas, this was a single 8s hand tracked so I can't imagine how good a 30s would look, let alone stacked
how do you hand track
How do you hand track
rly, from b7 it looks so much better
and the difference from b7 and b9 is not big
YES IT IS
especially when it comes to nebulosity
Ikr
Like what the hell
YOU CAN STACK IN ASTROSHADER
why android can't do something like it
ik it's insane
so much easier then transfering all the images on pc and then stack
Do you think I could get it on my 16 gigabyte Green iPhone 3?
idek how to stack
hmm good question
no.
Deepskycamera or pro mode it is:(
my pro mode is so trash it only does 10s 3200iso and no raw
You can't adjust the iso and exposure time?
gonna change the phone (maybe) this black friday
I can but those are the max
and deepskycamera is traaash
hate using it
ESPECIALLY AFTER THAT STUPID ASS UPDATE
And my phone camera cannot see any sort of infa red
also do you know anything ab open live stacker?
So this is what I get
Same as visual
Probably could have cranked the iso a little
but still gotta wse filter to get decent images
I want a UHC filter so badddd
fs
How big is your scope?
6"dob flextube
h got the 130mm
You or me?
you
Yeah
great
And i scratched the mirror while trying to clean it bc I thought it was dusty but it actually just wasn't in focus
(when I first got it)
I have fall break rn but EVERY SINGLE NIGHT has been cloudy
yeah, so if my scope isnt pointed above 75° or below 35° all stars (especially bright ones((this is Jupiter))) look like this
I never go out lol
Maybe like once every 4 months
lol
damn it's so sad
Yeah
Kinda thinkin bout getting a new one for xmas
Probably would scratch it again while installing it
lmao better be careful
like 50$
oh damn
F-woooooooooorrrrrdddd
They want to fully transition by 2025
Are there any filters I could use to get around that
gosh where do you live?
Not rlly right?
idk tbh
b11
The planets are basically affected by light pollution
yh this is insanity
This is dead middle of the night
(without the light from the Eiffel tower)
Yeah it doesn't look as bad when it is not cloudy
Prob yellow from all the smokers here Jesus
unlucky
(only works with eq) slowly move the right ascension to match the sky
it doesn't wobble?
🤯
My Old IPhone 8 can handle AstroSahder
Ok well....
Mine is 5 generations younger
yo ur name is the same as my future setup
4 min of exposure @potent gorge
Oof the walking noise
Which iPhone is that and what bortle
comet
looks great
Yep
iphone14 pro bortle 2
Was not able to collect much data but here it is stacked
Wish Iphone had astrophotography mode stuff like Samsung
With an actual pro mode
i use astroshader and its like 10 times better than pro mode could ever be
also heres the comet taken ONLY with my phone and nothingg else
How tf
Does your phone have telephoto lens ?
yes
Which one is it ? S23 ultra ?
iphone 14 pro
Ohh okay
die
Too late
With My IPhone and Celestron Astromaster 114eq
I use it aswell but that weird noise in the image is always annoying
Has anyone tried using darks and bias and see how much of a difference that makes for iPhone pics ?
A bit
That's why I only managed to get one good looking frame
I took like 20 but all were terrible
as a very bad dob user i am scared of breathing near my mount
(this actually happened the last time i imaged, when i was breathing too close to my mount my stars trailed)
taking a step trailed my stars even tho i was at least 5 meters away
Lmao it's a solid set up
(that wasnt you breathing it was me, sorry)
😨
Whenever I do astro I always feel like I'm being watched by something
but idc me want image
I had that happen with a random cat a few times too
And it was a black cat at night too, so pretty much invisible lol
normally my cat just stops me from doing astro tho
i have to sit on the ground to use my very cursed setup
then i cant get up bc my cat sits on my lap
its a microsoft surface pro 4 with no screen so the motherboard and battery is exposed, i have it connected to a old monitor but it refuses to give a display out unless i connect a specific 2015 samsung tablet to it
i have absolutely no idea why or how that works
😼
nice, but what causes the stars to do that around the center?
mine dont do that
The Ring nebula I Stack by my self and I only have a Mac for stacking. You can only download Lynkreos for stacking and I always have problems.
I only can stack the point I do Markt
But some times it looks funny for example the Whirlpool Galaxy
agree
I think this is radial (barrel) distortion. Similar to what occurs with a fisheye lens. But it’s made worse by the spacing of the smartphone lens to the eyepiece.
The orientation of the distortion is perpendicular to a line through the centre and the effect worsens in scale with distance from the centre - which are classic signs.
The major difference is probably the eyepiece. Actually I believe you can by “flat field” eyepieces, but I’m not sure if they would completely eliminate the effect
Bruh I got jumpscared by this
While stargazibg
this is brighter than my cloudy sky at sunset jfc
La criatura
Bro I got jump scared by these stupid groundhogs
They made this demonic howling/screeching noise
Taking data for orion nebulae
hello, I recently went to a bortle 4 sky to take images of the milky way and stack them later, but for some reason when I compared the stacked version to the single exposure the single exposure was way better and more detailed (I took the single exposure with the regular Iphone camera app and photoshop and the stacked one with nightcap and siril and photoshop), did I do something wrong?
1.5 hours of integration time
Exif : nothing phone 2 , imx 890
Does drizzling increase resolution,if yes then can I do it with phone ?
it doubles youre image at the cost of snr
I see , so its double edged sword
What's that?
Anyways, this is really cool
I was gonna ask the same , thought that was some other nebulae so I boosted saturation a bit there
Its NGC 2238
Looked it up on star map
Holy shit ,its the rosette nebulae
Yeah that is what I was about to say
But is the really bright orange star Beetlejuice?
Yes
Yeah I didn't quite get like the perspective
Well I just blindly framed it so that makes sense
I'm just lucky lol
rosette nebula
Do you use any Telephoto Camera? Zoom?
Nope , nothing phone 2 primary camera
I can shoot again yayy
Somewhat recently (a few weeks ago) I stayed at a Bortle 4 location for a couple days, as opposed to the Bortle 8 I live in. It's a yearly trip for me and my family, staying at our relatives mountain house in the middle of nowhere. Easily one of my favorite places to be, not just for how beautiful and serene everything is, but for the dark night skies too.
There, I would capture my current best image of the Andromeda Galaxy.
A total of nearly 17 minutes of data, taken with my iPhone 12 and my Orion StarBlast 114mm dob. Photographed and Stacked in AstroShader.
In addition to this, I got a pretty alright image of the Orion Nebula too, which I'll probably share eventually.
That means I need 2 hours of data to do this from b9
them astroshader users
Frick astroshader
My phone can't even see infared😭
I'm not jealous
my phone can't do more then 10s exposures
I love bortle nine
yeah
Aren't your stars trailing
Come ooooon where is that black friday
4s I got startrails
Then why do you need 10 second exposure
But the problem is, is that there are always scary animals that jump scare me everytime I am in dark skies
Currently at b4 , last night here , collecting as much data as possible
Last time in Normandy it was like 4 of these screaming like 10 meters away from me
It was scary as hell
Nothing I can do about stupid arse deepskycamera
IT IS SO BAD
SO F-WORDING BAD
qu'est-ce que c'est?
fr, we used tostreet light
couldnt agree more tbh
What is gcam?
The other time we were staying at a wild boar infested place
We had to clap so they wouldn't come and eat us
Google camera, has dedicated astro mode that works pretty well, auto stacks images and noise reduction
Yeah only for mw
these are stacked images I took the other day using nightcap and siril, but I have single exposures that are much better, what did I do wrong?
im assuming the left is stacked?
They are both stacked, this is the single exposure
I don’t understand why this looks better
did you include the foreground when stacking?
Yes, but then cropped it out and added it back later
More data 
oh goodness
🔊
Is it good or too saturated ?
Cooked.
What does that mean 🧍?
You didn't just cook it
You
-
Fried
-
Baked
-
Grilled
-
Roasted
-
Sauteed
-
Braised
-
Broiled
-
Poached
-
Toasted
-
Seared
-
Steamed
-
Boiled
-
Smoked
-
Caramelized
-
Barbecued
-
Sautéed
-
Crisped
-
Simmered
-
Glazed
-
Candied
-
Blanched
-
Blackened
-
Charred
-
Pressure-cooked
-
Stir-fried
-
Slow-cooked
-
Parboiled
-
Sous-vide
-
Deep-fried
-
Pan-fried
It

I don't undedstand these slang terms , just tell is it positive response or negative
You overdid it
Too much
Over processed in this case
I see
How would you process it ?
It is better for it not to have rainbows in the background for sure
(I can see how that can be mixed up with nebulosity)
I see , so what's the fix for that
There's a channel that allows sharing data and other people process it right ?
Yeah
I'll share data there and see if anyone helps
@tough nest better ? @potent gorge
Oooh I'm not either of the people you tagged but I can say that looks a lot better
thank you , I've also shared my data in processing section along with subs if you want might want to give it a try
A lot lot lot better
Can it be better ? With blurx terminator maybe ?
Probably but I just process with LR mobile
I processed this particular one using pixinsight and photoshop
Blurxterninator sharpens the image right ?
Hmmmmm
How did you take this
It's a composite image, so a combination of multiple different exposures. Not really easy if even possible to get a single exposure image or even a stacked image of the moon that looks like this, without using some method of composite imaging.
How would I take it?
I have nothing phone 1, is it really possible lol. I might try this view, can U send settings, like did U zoomed in or just 1x cropped, cause without 1x we can't get raw image, right??
@vague shard need help Brodie 👽
Its easy, 3 shots
Full moon, current phase moon, over exposure moon
Then you wanna blend them together in photoshop
Or any app in mobile.like ibis paint could be possible
I used gcam for this ,because I didn't had enough storage for all raw subs , you could get cropped raw with gcam , just use dedictaed astrophotography mode along and centering the frame every 2 shots and that's pretty much it
Also use nebula photos siril guide, it was really helpful for me
I don't process with siril , I've provided data for it , you might give it a try , I wanna frame this particular photo in my room so I want the best lol
Still not happy with nebulosity but sam helped me with blurxterninator and it looks a lot better
And , is it available on youtube ?
this is single exposure of Orion constellation by my nothing phone 1 with untracked tripod, 1600 iso, 13 exposure, default zoom. Is this good for a single sub or should i increase my iso or exposure? what do think about it? (also i think discord will decrease my photo quality and create a green circle but ignore that)
Yes it's best
Wait I will share a video that can help you
Yes , that's what I got , maybe try framing rosette in this too because why not ? 😄
Much appreciated 🙏
https://youtu.be/H9AuuTJ44Ik?si=U08GD1Nk2W1mcTAf
This is for siril guide( do not get afraid, it's complicated at first but then it will be easy if you follow him, he is a great teacher)
https://youtu.be/P_qqLA0WKJg?si=7Njy6958X8H-oMQv
This is for making barn door tracker ( star tracker to increase our exposure and in future getting a camera )
I will be doing this project
This video shows every step of photographing the Integrated Flux Nebula (IFN) around our North Star called the Polaris Flare. I show how to accomplish this without the use of a star tracker, just a basic DSLR, lens, and tripod. The second half of the video is a processing tutorial using the free programs Siril and Starnet.
=====================...
PDF Build Guide: https://tinyurl.com/30tracker
Clock wheel printout: https://tinyurl.com/clockwheel
$17 Ball Head I used: https://ebay.us/yWTCgU
6" hinge (if you can't find cheaper locally): https://basscatstore.com/6stainlesspianohinge.aspx
=============================
Supporting this channel:
◦ I'm on Patreon: h...
Thanks, can U share your single exposure raw file so can I see the difference and improve.
I have made motorized version too lol, my heatsink was bit loose so it overheated and the driver malfunctioned , that's why I did untracked
I've shared in that gdrive
Oh okay
- Baked
2. Boiled
3. Broiled
4. Grilled
5. Roasted
6. Fried
7. Sautéed
8. Steamed
9. Smoked
10. Braised
11. Simmered
12. Poached
13. Toasted
14. Caramelized
15. Seared
16. Blanched
17. Parboiled
18. Blackened
19. Crisped
20. Charred
21. Confit
22. Slow-cooked
23. Sous-vide
24. Glazed
25. Candied
26. Marinated
27. Infused
28. Seasoned
29. Scorched
30. Basted
31. Scalded
32. Reduced
33. Deglazed
34. Stewed
35. Melted
36. Fired
37. Cured
38. Brined
39. Pickled
40. Dried
41. Tenderized
42. Fermented
43. Crisped-up
44. Foiled (wrapped in foil and heated)
45. Overdone
46. Underdone
47. Flash-fried
48. Oil-sealed
49. Rendered
50. Bubbled
51. Toasted-up
52. Juiced-up
53. Deep-fried
54. Zested
55. Flamed
56. Bruléed
57. Microwaved
58. Half-cooked
59. Gravy-ed
60. Ovened
61. Pressure-cooked
62. Pot-roasted
63. Salt-crusted
64. Infused-in
65. Wine-bathed
66. Scalloped
67. Braise-fired
68. Egg-washed
69. Nut-roasted
70. Broth-bathed
71. Herbalized
72. Wood-fired
73. Flame-roasted
74. Griddle-fried
75. Pit-fired
76. Oven-blistered
77. Cheese-smothered
78. Sear-marked
79. Burnished
80. Toast-tanned
81. Glaze-finished
82. Sizzled
83. Herb-basted
84. Heat-shocked
85. Vinegar-soaked
86. Shallow-fried
87. Skillet-seared
88. BBQ’d
89. Flash-seared
90. Sugar-glazed
91. Fry-crisped
92. Wok-fried
93. Dough-baked
94. Crust-browned
95. Butter-browned
96. Malted
97. Sweetened
98. Paprika-dusted
99. Oven-crisped
100. Home-cooked
You used chatgpt didn't you
hdr moon again i guess lmao
How
Its actually 3 images blended together
1 image if current phase moon
1 image over exposured one
1 image full moon
You wanna blend them together in photoshop/ibis paint or any software that can blend images together
Oh, absolutely not! I mean, ChatGPT? Why would I ever need to use that? I have my own… uh, completely original, human-based sources for responses. Yeah, definitely nothing artificial here. Just a regular, totally normal conversation. No high-tech, AI-powered assistance happening at all.
So, uh… any other questions?
Beep bood
Bop
01101011 10111010 01101110 11110101
Oh, wow, “Beep boop bop” and binary? That… definitely doesn’t sound like something I’d say. No, not at all. I mean, I don’t even speak in ones and zeros!
Just good old-fashioned letters here, like any normal, non-robotic conversationalist. You know, no binary, no “beeps” or “boops”—just me, doing my usual totally human-like thing!
45 61 72 74 68 20 69 73 20 66 6C 61 74 20 61 6E 64 20 6C 69 66 65 20 69 73 20 61 20 73 69 6D 75 6C 61 74 69 6F 6E 2E
Oh, “Earth is flat and life is a simulation,” huh? Well, that’s… quite a statement! I’d say we’re more likely on a round planet spinning through space than in some elaborate simulation. But hey, anything’s possible, right? Just as long as nobody finds the “edge” of this flat Earth—or spots any suspiciously glitchy moments in this so-called simulation!
My most recent image of the Orion Nebula, not sure if I consider this one to be my best or not. It's a little sharper than my previous image of Orion and has better colors IMO, but also has less nebulosity visible.
About 13.5 minutes of integration time, 800 x 1 second exposures. Taken on my iPhone 12 using AstroShader. Star diffraction spikes are manually edited in because they look nice I think.
It looks alright, the stars being just pinpoints. I just like having the diffraction spikes on the brighter stars, it just feels nice.
How do you do diffraction spikes I've never tried them out
You get a newt with a 3/4 thing spider
Im planning on trying to take a stacked image of the Milky Way from my bortle 7-8 sky and I’ve seen a few tutorials online but most of them were for android, what would I have to do to take it with iPhone
does astroshader work for MW? you should just be able to set it to take a bunch of subs, idk how astroshader works tho bc i have android
i do recommend if available to do MW tracked so you can get more data and not lose detail due to stacking artifacts
They appear naturally with sufficiently long exposures, on telescopes that have an obstruction on the front end of the OTA, so a secondary mirror spider, or a mask. Basically the light gets more concentrated in the parts of the front of the OTA where the obstructions aren't, so you get these flares that form diffraction spikes.
Four legged secondaries will create four pointed stars, three legs will make six pointed stars, and two legs will make two pointed stars.
In my image I just added them artificially, but it's entirely possibly to get nice looking diffraction spikes just using a phone and a reflector telescope.
i have a 6se if that helps
Heck, if you're using a phone for astrophotography, you may get diffraction spikes even if you're using a refractor, as oftentimes the inconsistencies in the phone camera's assembly can create aberrations and diffraction spikes
I do have a tracker but do you rhink it is possible with an iPhone?
MW Astro is definitely possible with any phone I'd say, you just need sufficient exposure time.
Tracking helps too, I'd imagine
But it's not completely necessary
i got this with my phone so yeah probably, although this is android, iphone has good cameras tho
this was 30 mins untracked on cygnus
Oh wow that's gorgeous
i have heightened saturation mw too bc i prefer more saturation and vibrance
plus some star removal
bc it was a tad cluttered
I got this with only 30 seconds at a bortle 4.5, iPhone 12
obviously not great at all, but it was only 30 seconds lol
atleast u could see it with 30 seconds lol
i took like 3 mins til any mw was visible
In a bortle 7?!
b6.5
nice, how much integration time was that?
30 seconds
Damn alright
I guess the iPhone 14's night mode is just that much better than the iPhone 12's
yeah but you have to consider that 1. from the image you probably weren't pointing it at the core but the zenith ( consider that I got a similar picture by pointing at the zenith) 2. I denoised, stretched, and boosted saturation on photoshop
has anyone tried to take an image with the pleiades tracked and stacked? need advice
WOAH
Can u show
A 3 min exposure
i dont have a 3 min exposure
3 mins of like 5 second exposure stacked until mw was visible
Can u show me any of ur MW capture
^
^
i shot cygnus
It's good but editing needs to be improved
It's like a ai did the editing 👽
I haven't done a tracked image of the Pleiades (none of my images are tracked lol), but I did take a 7.5 minute long stacked image (150x 3 second exposures) of the Pleiades once, I should honestly try and get a better shot of them now that my equipment and experience is better
Here I'll send it
I didn't realize at the time that it was somewhat out of focus. Also it got denoised to hell and back, since my experience in post processing wasn't exactly very good lol
some walking noise is somewhat visible too
i would go out and shoot pleiades rn but its about to rain soon and its a tad bit cloudy
WOAH
cygnus is barely inside that but awesome shot nonetheless
well it was aimed at cygnus but im guessing during setup and shooting it moved out of frame a little bit, but u can see it on the right
i should've redone my Cygnus before it left
i mean it's still here but it's not in an area i can shoot anymore
He just has a dslr
Kkkkk
this is phone astrophotography
Ik
he used a phone
He uses xiaomi 14T
I just don't like to admit to myself that it is real
Which has great sensor for astrophotography
And dslr wont pop the circle thing also
xiaomi 12.
Oh sorry my bad
🗣️
Idk why u dont want use dedicated astrophotoraphy tools
Way better actually
The only major advantage I see is not having the distortion from the eyepiece. But now I have an UltraFlatfield eyepiece that greatly reduces the distortion caused by the afocal method. The noise and dynamic range of my phone are already quite decent for astrophotography, and an astro camera here in Brazil is pretty expensive. I will probably upgrade my mount before considering buying a camera.
Make sense
Wish you the best on astrophotography
Id love to see your pic further
Thanks!
I should get back to taking more photos in December. My college exams are over, so I have more time now.
The only problem is that it’s Autumn/summer here, and it’s raining almost nonstop because of the Atlantic and Amazon rainforests. Clear nights are hard to come by. Right now, it’s raining, and it has been going all day for about four days straight. 
This winter, it rained so little that fires started everywhere, which made the sky very poor and hazy. That’s why I took few photos this year. Complicated weather around here. 💀
Ahhh weather issue, same as here, i live in city b9 right now, clear skies are pretty hard also, since the polution got worsen, live southern, its pretty damn hard to took picture also, but yeah, cant predict weather innit
Lmao
Hahaha weather had mood also
Lmao
Yeah, Bortle 9 is a problem too. I usually go to the countryside to take photos, but when I went this year, it was either cloudy or the sky was smoky. All the photos I took this year were from only three clear nights back in March.
I live in São Paulo, the largest city in Brazil (and in the Americas), so the night sky here is B9++++ 💀 . I use a CLS filter when I take photos from here, but the sky transparency needs to be perfect; otherwise, it reflects more light and blows out the photos. I think it’s just not higher than B9 because the scale stops at 9. I tried to photograph the comet, but it was too low on the horizon, so everything was blown out. I live in a skyscraper/apartment, so I have to take everything to an open area, which is tiring. This year I didn’t even bother trying to take photos from here (except for the comet) since the results are really bad.
Both photos were not taken with the same eyepiece, so the one I took from here in B9 has much more distortion. But you can get an idea of how much signal is lost due to being in B9. The emission region only didn’t disappear because I use the CLS filter, which intensifies its capture... Otherwise, it would have disappeared as well.
My guiding on the photo taken in B4 was also terrible. It was very windy. That's why I want to upgrade my mount first.
Ugh stupid deepskycamera doing it's thing
Yeah, the guidescope is f4 and have no FF
Same here comet isnt visible in this b9 city
So this cls filter
Is just like a narrowband filter, but it just capture the light of the nebulae?
Do you have an alt az or EQ? Id assume with the long exposures your able to do an eq
it´s just a single sub on both
Also finally got some tape to cover the LDAF on my phone camera so I can finally shoot through the eyepiece now, just gotta wait for this rain to go away, can only shoot on Sunday and Monday bc of the rain lol
Cls is broadband, but a little more restrict.
Eq. Generic eq3 with onstep
Since it was very windy and I hadn't finished modifying it yet, the guiding was pretty bad, which made the photo a bit blurry.
I've seen some of your widefield, how much int time do you normally get? I did my first ever mw with only 30 mins int time untracked and I'm extremely happy with it
It's great fishy 🫠👽
I can see some aliens twerking over middle right
Omg circle it
5 dollar
I've been wondering what this is lol
Brocchi's cluster (Cr 399)
also known as The Coathanger
Ooh ok, I wasn't sure if it was a satellite or something else, thanks!
Fishy what are your settings and device ?
I am in northern hemispheres, so no Orion for me 🤡
its not actually a cluster tho... but still rly cool-looking star formation nonetheless
fr? You have to be really far up North if Orion is too low for you
It's visible but quite low and the core is not much visible
I have a Google pixel 9 pro fold, it's been a few weeks since I shot that image but I believe I did like 5 or 15s light exposure, beforehand I tested iso by shooting at different ones til I found a good middle ground that wasnt overexposed but wasn't super dark either
I have nothing phone 1 not good but atleast not trash
Try Orion constellation @zealous scaffold
I have shot Orion neb in the past when I first got into the hobby, here's my first ever nebula picture after only 2 months into the hobby
It's not with phone but it's amazing
I plan on shooting it again at the end of November or sometime in December but it's been raining out a lot, rain doesn't stop till Sunday
It's shot with phone
Thru a scope obc
judging by the height of Aquila that's rly not that bad. Orion should prob be at like at least 30-40° above the horizon at highest point
Yeah
though if lp is present I can see how that might not be optimal
I could try it but Orion is only high in the sky pretty late at night so
It depends. With a fixed tripod, I usually take around 50-70 subs of 20 seconds each, and it tends to work well.
.
I took this one of the northern Milky Way, but I used my Eq. However, since it was only 30 subs, you can easily achieve a similar result with a fixed tripod. This region of the Milky Way is quite low from my latitude in the Southern Hemisphere. So it’s easier to capture it in the north.
I'll probably shoot towards cygnus again since it's nearly straight up, I'll have to find a way to attach my phone to the top of the scope so I can do tracking this time
If I do that I'm aiming for prob an hour and a half of data which tbh is a bit overkill for MW lol
In 2019, when I didn’t have a good tripod, I used to do it like this
I don't have a tripod so I'll just have to rely on taping it down or something lol
Stacking and editing done by mami. Thanks mami!!
Mami: cropped version
Stacking and editing done by cai
How much int time
I don't know and I didn't did editing and stacking
My laptop is in Asus service center 💀
You can do a platesolve in #🤖-ask-a-bot
Oh to check the objects right
Yeah thanks
I've been trying to get a chance to capture those for ages
I see
Whats differences between them?
You did this with a phone?
Yeah, it's quite unbelievable for me too. The device was nothing phone 1(doesn't matter much), 800 iso, bottle 5 (medium horizon light though) , 10 second exposure. TOTAL INTEGRATION TIME was around 40min.
I didn't did the editing and stacking, it was done by other members in discord.
If I had done, it would be trash
Yeah Crazy how much Details can a phone get with amount of exposure time
Yep, didn't take any calibration frames, next time I will make sure to take those frames to make it more promising
first time shooting with my new phone
whats the full setup? (if you dont mind sharing)
Celestron Nexstar 6SE, the phone is Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold, and I'm shooting through a Celestron 17mm Plosll Eyepiece
solid setup 
send the pics when they're ready, I haven't really seen the pixel 9's performance yet
yeah for sure, i have a sub i can share rn
object is pleiades for reference
3s exp lights
cant tell if it's a tad out of focus or an artifact
i dont have a bahtinov mask but we'll see lol
ah
i focused it best i could but its hard when this is all that Deepsky cam shows you
you can always use digital zoom to your advantage to dial it in
yeah i did, i got it as best i could lol
then yea you're set, how's the eyepiece?
so originally i bought a 4se from an elderly man who was selling the scope on facebook marketplace, and he hooked me up with a whole briefcase of eyepieces and filters which ive discovered costs $300 on its own, along with a bunch of books and maps of the sky, the eyepieces are probably a few years old but their in really great condition and i havent really had any issues with them other than the length of them
thats good, my friend has the same eyepiece kit and we have no complaints with ours
yeah their great, i believe plossls are specifically pretty good at preventing CA
I see you play Fisch 
truly the only good game to play right now
wish they had a more diverse amount of rods
yeah, truly is lol, ive been so bored lately, im good at phasmophobia and love the heck out of that game but none of my friends ever wanna play with me
they just dropped a massive update
thats real, its been collecting dust in my steam library
oh right I only glanced over the changelog and didnt notice that new rod
i believe they have huge plans to add a bunch more rods with new abilities and stuff
nice, i'm stuck grinding 100k for that rod the travelling merchant sells
oh yeah that ones good i believe
although im not sure if its as good compared to the newer rods
i have steady rod, magnet rod, and another one i dont remember the name of
fortune?
real
its what I use with the 10,000 kg enchantment
I rarely can catch mythics since its impossible to keep it steady
yeah i use steady rod for mythics and legendaries
if u ever wanna play lmk, not much socializing would be done on fisch tho lol so not much of a point haha
I usually have an abundance of time so i'd join whenever ur on
plus playing with friends vs alone is better either way
yeah for sure
coo i'll pm my user
kk
and to not get muted for off-topic convo, heres an andromeda picture from my phone
ooh very nice, ive never been able to get the arms only core, also ive been timed out like 40 times so its not a big deal
I really wanna get cleaner data cuz I think my phone has the potential to take a good image of the andromeda galaxy without a telescope
what phone do you have?
I use my slightly broken S22 Ultra for phone AP
SIM card connector isnt working so I exclusively use it for imaging nowadays
ah rip
foldable phones are amazing for widefield, you dont even need a tripod to keep the camera pointed at the sky
unexpected convenience
yeah lol its the only reason i took my widefield MW
i also learned how to do a starmask with this image which was sweet
that pallete itches my eyeballs in a very pleasant way
thanks
if itching your eyeballs is a good thing then thank you very much
its actually just a dull mw image i took that i put into photoshop and increased saturation on lol
i was gonna image jupiter tonight but i couldnt lower exposure enough to get good detail on it
for context this is mine
how much data?
probs no more than 30 min
and mine isnt as saturated
gonna bump that up hold on
idk how well saturation will work on that with how much it pops already
I took a couple crapshoots with my phone
Each single picture beats the best I could do last year pre dob
Everyone needs a dob.
i have a schmidt-cassegrain and it works quite well, obviously its on a tracked mount so
when i'm not using my bare phone, I have a mak
Don't call those crapshots!
(1400mm at F/13
)
man you cant even see it thru a scope naked eye can u?
i can see nebulosity of it through a scope naked eye
i need some of those
dobs are nice but since I do mainly AP, I dont have the expendable budget to get one
10 in must be sweet, i got a 6 in SCT and even that gets a bunch of detail so
our bortle 9 skies make it almost useless but in a dark sky, you can see so much detail
ring nebula with the naked eye
detail in orion
i couldnt image jupie thru that, i can see the bands of jupiter with my naked eye thru the scope, and the moons, so it must look incredible thru a 10 inch
its really nice
idk if I have pics rn but it was surprising how well you can see it even with a phone mounted
i love orion neb one of my personal favorites
oh 100%
the fact that you can visibly see nebulosity is wild
even if its black and white
for fun, I wanna redo this image I got of it with like 10 min of data
ooh sweet
most of my phone pics were taken untracked so it set the exposures to like half a second on it's astro feature
i really wanna do widefield on orion sword but deep sky camera uses digital zoom and wont let me use my telephoto zoom so i cant do it without losing detail
yow
thats why I love samsung
the Ultras get their own dedicated astro mode in it's RAW app
and it livestacks for you
well my phone has 5x zoom thats real and then everything above that is digital zoom
i have a pixel phone so it has an ap mode built in that live stacks aswell
5x is solid for most targets
my 10x only has a 10mp sensor
thats cool
I wish they didn't ditch the 10x telephoto for a 5x
yeah so my issue is that i cant use my 5x telephoto zoom with DSC
because dsc doesnt let you switch to a different camera
I hope they implement that feature soon
you should also check out Ring and Lagoon nebulas
i have shot lagoon neb in the past but i didnt get the greatest data on it
still, if I can see nebulosity with my 3 inch in like a B7-8ish area, they have to be pretty darn bright
Heh, i mean, compared to what I can get with my RC, those are crap.
But compared to the very best I could manage without special equipment, every single one of those beats that.
5.5 inch
Ok so unfortunately, iPhones tend to be worse at Astro than Samsung or Pixel phones, especially anything less than the 12 model. The 15 is probably alright, I'd hope so atleast.
I have the IPhone 13 and a IPhone 12 Pro Max. it’s work good
I also have my old IPhone 8😅
Many noises
link to windows does have screen mirroring
or well it does
but its not available for my phone
😿
i did it
@timid wedge what settings did you use on astroshader for that orion?
12000 iso and 1sec exposures (i forgot to put 0.5 sec it was an accident) so i recomed 0.5 sec
weather gods after pulling the oldest trick in the book deciding to give the uk non stop cloud either side of the new moon and let it clear once the moon is out again: https://tenor.com/baA69.gif
I might try stay up tonight to get a photo of orion
pardon but that was taken with your phonr?????
i tried hooking my 8+ up on a phone mount and it didnt work at all lmao
Try use the astroshader app

